Abstract
Neutron grating interferometry (nGI) is a unique technique allowing to probe magnetic and nuclear properties of materials not accessible in standard neutron imaging. The signal-to-noise ratio of an nGI setup is strongly dependent on the achievable visibility. Hence, for analysis of weak signals or short measurement times a high visibility is desired. We developed a new Talbot-Lau interferometer using the third Talbot order with an unprecedented visibility (0.74) over a large field of view. Using the third Talbot order and the resulting decreased asymmetry allows to access a wide correlation length range. Moreover, we have used a novel technique for the production of the absorption gratings which provides nearly binary gratings even for thermal neutrons. The performance of the new interferometer is demonstrated by visualizing the local magnetic domain wall density in electrical steel sheets when influenced by residual stress induced by embossing. We demonstrate that it is possible to affect the density of the magnetic domain walls by embossing and therefore to engineer the guiding of magnetic fields in electrical steel sheets. The excellent performance of our new setup will also facilitate future studies of dynamic effects in electric steels and other systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Neutron radiography is a method allowing for non-destructive analysis of the inner structure of an object1. Because the neutron cross-sections show no systematic dependence on the atomic number, both light and heavy elements can be visualized. Moreover, the contrast between different materials can be varied by using isotopes. Therefore, neutron imaging has been established to be a very efficient technique in materials science, research in cultural heritage, archaeology, and engineering, where imaging with X-rays fails to produce sufficient contrast. Neutron imaging is, however, limited by the coarse spatial resolution imposed by the limitations in neutron flux and the spatial resolution of the neutron detectors. Currently, the achieved spatial resolution is in the low single μm range2,3,4,5,6,7. Paths towards resolving structures with higher resolution (e.g. water transport in fuel cells) are, for example, improving the detector resolution3,4,5,6 or in some cases using neutron grating interferometry (nGI)8,9 as a spatially resolved ultra-small-angle scattering technique. nGI simultaneously gathers spatially resolved information about the transmission- (TI), the differential phase contrast- (DPCI) and the scattering/dark-field (DFI) of a sample. Most notably, the contrast provided by the DFI10,11 is generated by ultra-small-angle neutron scattering (USANS) off structures on a length scale similar to the correlation length of the interferometer setup, which is typically in the range 0.1 μm to 10 μm. Such structures are caused by variations of the nuclear or magnetic scattering length density. nGI has been used for the analysis of material structures and the investigation of magnetic domains in ferromagnets12 and vortex lattice domains in superconductors13.
In recent years neutron grating interferometers deviating from the highly asymmetric Talbot-Lau geometry introduced by Pfeiffer et al.14 have been built. For Talbot-Lau types of interferometers higher Talbot orders have been used. This allows easier positioning of samples between G1 and G2, as well as tuning of the correlation length without changing the neutron wavelength8,15. Typically a visibility of 0.25 has been achieved. Also symmetric Talbot-Lau interferometers have been introduced16,17, which have typically a higher maximum phase sensitivity than an asymmetric setup. A visibility of 0.2 has been reported17. In contrast to the above considered variations of Talbot-Lau interferometers, the concept of purely phase-grating based neutron far-field interferometry was introduced. Interferometers with two18 or three19 phase-gratings were shown. Visibilities of 0.13 and 0.32 have been reached, respectively.
At the same time, nGI has started to transform from a qualitative tool sensitive to the presence of microstructures to a quantitative tool, also providing detailed information on the size and the orientation of microstructures inside a sample20,21,22,23,24. An advantage for a quantitative analysis of these parameters is a high contrast of the interference pattern generated by the nGI-setup to decrease the error accrued during the measurement. Hence, the contrast produced by the nGI, denoted as visibility, may be used as a figure of merit25.
Here we report on the design and the application of a newly designed neutron grating interferometer using Talbot-Lau interferometry, which has recently been implemented at the ANTARES imaging beamline at the Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ)26,27. A schematic view of the interferometer is shown in Fig. 1. The setup has been tuned towards a more symmetric geometry compared to our previous design22 and other similar existing nGI setups in asymmetric Talbot-Lau geometry28,29. The third Talbot order has been used to achieve this decreased asymmetry. The total length of the setup is approximately 8 m and the distance d between G1 and G2 has been significantly increased from ≈2 cm to ≈61 cm. This change of geometry allows to use a larger G2 period, enabling the fabrication of a highly absorbing binary G2-grating by using a newly developed technique of Gd powder deposition into an etched Si grating structure30. The improved quality of the G2-grating is the hallmark towards achieving a high visibility25.
The new interferometer reaches a visibility of \(V\approx 0.74\) at 4 Å over the whole field of view (FoV) of the detector system (71 mm × 76 mm) which is the highest V achieved on such a large FoV. At 5 Å a comparable visibility V ≃ 0.69 has been reported by Seki et al.31, however, due to the metallic glass imprinting process used for the fabrication of the G2-grating only small FoVs (10 mm × 10 mm) have been realized until now. Most gratings are currently produced by sputtering or evaporation of Gd under an inclined angle onto an etched Si line grating22,29,32 and a visibility V of ≈0.25 over a FoV of 64 mm × 64 mm is typically achieved. As a result of the highly improved visibility over a large FoV, experiments with samples exhibiting only small variations in scattering contrast or requiring short measurement times now become more accessible. In this work we demonstrate the capabilities of our novel nGI setup to study the magnetic domain structure of non grain-oriented electrical steel sheets33. Typically, highly performing electric motors are limited in rotational speed and efficiency by the cut-outs machined into their magnetic core, which are required to guide the magnetic flux34,35. We propose the novel approach of embossing the sheets to induce stress allowing to pin the magnetic domains using inverse magnetostriction36,37. Due to the pinning of the magnetic domains, the magnetic permeability of the material is decreased in the area of the applied stress. This allows to guide the magnetic flux without the introduction of cut-outs in the magnetic core. As a result of the improved mechanical stability higher rotational speeds may be used, thus increasing the efficiency. To analyze the effect of stress in the bulk of the material, the bulk magnetic domain structure has to be mapped. This is not possible with standard (surface sensitive) techniques such as magneto-optical Kerr effect (MOKE)38, as the surface magnetic domains may vary strongly with respect to the bulk magnetic domains. Using the new nGI-setup we investigate the pinning of the domain walls in the bulk material to quantify the effect of stress that is induced by embossing.
Results
Simulations of the visibility
To develop and optimize the new design of the nGI setup we implemented a wave-optical simulation software based on a Fresnel-propagator39 and numerical convolution calculations, which quantitatively describe the formation of the fringe contrast that is created by the three gratings G0, G1, and G225,40. We determined the visibility depending on the groove depth h1 of the silicon grating G1 and the wavelength λ. For the simulations, the duty cycles (fraction of transparent area) of the gratings G0 and G2 were set to 0.3 and 0.5, respectively. The results shown in Fig. 2(a) indicate spots of high visibility related to odd multiples of π-phase shifts. Around λ = 4 Å and h1 = 38 μm and 114 μm, pronounced maxima in V appear. The respective gratings, which shift the neutron waves by π and by 3π, respectively, are denoted in the following by G1,π, and G1,3π.
Because the phase shift of the neutron waves is proportional to λ, the gratings also offer a high visibility for other wavelengths. According to Fig. 2(b), grating G1,3π could be also used as π and 5π phase-shifting for wavelengths λ = 1.3 Å and λ = 6.7 Å, respectively. As expected from theory41,42, at even integers of fractional Talbot distances there is no intensity modulation over the entire groove depth range of G1.
Figure 2(b) shows the visibility vs. λ of the gratings G1,π (blue line) and the G1,3π (orange line) together with the spectrum of ANTARES in arbitrary units (green line). The graph illustrates the benefit of using G1,3π at neutron wavelengths in the sub-2 Å regime yielding a high visibility, as G1,3π acts in this regime as a π phase-shifting grating. G1,3π performs also excellently above 6 Å, i.e. much better than G1,π. In contrast, G1,π exhibits a broader visibility peak at 4 Å and is therefore better suited if a broad wavelength band is available. Considering the results of our simulations we decided to implement the option of exchanging the two phase gratings G1,π and G1,3π.
Due to the challenges involved in the fabrication of the gratings, their effective parameters deviate slightly from the design parameters. In particular the duty cycle has a significant influence on the performance of the gratings25,40. It is a challenging parameter to control. Therefore, the simulations described in the following, which are compared to experimental data, have been adapted to the effective design parameters, which are listed in Table 1.
Visibility of the setup
To benchmark the performance of the new nGI, we measured the wavelength dependence of the visibility of the nGI-setup using absorption gratings G0 with various duty cycles DC0 and phase shifting gratings inducing phase shifts of π and 3π (G1,π G1,3π), respectively. For a detailed technical description of the new interferometer setup see Sec. 4.3. Details of the experiment, such as the acquisition times, the wavelength ranges, and the resulting peak visibilities of the scans are listed in Table 2.
Figure 3(a) shows the visibility V of the new nGI-setup for 1.6 Å ≤ λ ≤ 6.0 Å and a fixed duty cycle DC0 = 0.28 using the gratings G1,π (blue markers) and G1,3π (red markers). V was obtained by averaging the data over the central area of 75% of the FoV (Fig. 4). The comparison of V with the performance of the previous setup (green markers) demonstrates a tremendous increase in V. The new setup exhibits also a reasonably large visibility at the secondary peaks. The higher visibility V = 0.35 (grating G1,π) at λ = 1.8 Å when compared with V = 0.14 at λ = 5.8 Å is a result of the deviation of the effective groove depth h1 = 41 μm of G1,π from the nominal design value \({h}_{1}^{nom}\mathrm{=38}\,{\rm{\mu }}{\rm{m}}\). The visibility of the phase grating G1,3π (red markers) shows a peak at λ = 3.75 Å with an amplitude of 0.60. The deviation of the peak position from the simulated value λ = 4.0 Å (see Fig. 2(b)) is a result of the deviation of the effective groove depth h1 = 123 μm from the design value \({h}_{1}^{nom}\mathrm{=114}\,{\rm{\mu }}{\rm{m}}\).
The agreement of the simulations and the data using the parameters of the nGI-setup from Table 2 shown in Fig. 3(a) by solid lines is very good. Note that the trapezoidal profile of the etched grooves results in a depth dependent width of the grooves. This effect has not been considered in the simulations. The peak wavelength and peak visibility of the secondary peaks cannot be fully assessed, as the maxima lie outside of the accessible wavelength range. In agreement with Fig. 2(b), a visibility of V ≈ 0.56 is reached close to λ = 1.6 Å.
Figure 3(b) shows the visibility at λ ≈ 4 Å of the new setup using G1,π and gratings G0 with four different duty cycles. As expected, V increases with decreasing DC0. A maximum visibility V ≈ 0.74 is obtained at λ = 4 Å using DC0 = 0.18. The corresponding visibility map is shown in Fig. 4. V is very homogeneous over the whole FoV having a standard deviation of 0.021 inside the marked area. Towards the edges of the FoV a slight decrease of V is observed. It is caused by inhomogeneities of the analyzer grating30 and the limitation of the beam size with a diaphragm to reduce the background. The measured and simulated peak visibilities for each measurement are given in Table 2 and agree well with each other. For comparison of the new with the previous setup, the DC0 = 0.38 of the new setup has been used as this is the most similar to the DC0 = 0.4 of the previous setup, resulting in a similar spatial coherence. In this case, the new setup reaches a visibility of 0.63 at a wavelength of 4.0 Å, while the maximum of the visibility of the old setup is 0.21 at a wavelength of 3.9 Å underlining the outstanding performance of the new gratings.
Variation of the correlation length
The placement of the sample in the space (60.9 cm) between G1 and G2 allows for a wide variation of the correlation length \(\xi =\lambda {L}_{sd}/{p}_{2}\) (see Sec. 4.2) of the setup, which enables a quantitative analysis of the microstructure within the sample20,22,24. Firstly, changing the position of the sample allows operation of the nGI at the design wavelength with constantly high visibility and therefore constantly good signal-to-noise ratio. A trade off of this mode of operation is the variation of the spatial resolution with the sample to detector distance. Assuming a minimum and maximum distance between sample and G2 of 2 cm and 50 mm, respectively, the new setup provides a range of correlation lengths of 0.602 μm ≤ ξ ≤ 15.038 μm, when operated at the design wavelength λ = 4 Å. Secondly, by adjusting λ between 1.6 Å and 6 Å and the sample position, the range increases to 0.241 μm ≤ ξ ≤ 26.165 μm. For comparison, the previous nGI setup was restricted to a range of 0.796 μm ≤ ξ ≤ 2.983 μm. Here the Talbot distance d was 19.9 mm, the G2 period was 4 μm and the wavelength range was 1.6 Å and 6 Å. The sample to G1 distance was kept at a fixed value of 2 cm. The sample was placed between G0 and G1.
Stress in electrical steel sheets
Taking advantage of the excellent performance of the new nGI setup, we have investigated the pinning of magnetic domains caused by localized stress in non grain-oriented electrical steel sheets containing 2.4 wt% Si. As a result of the pinning of the magnetic domains, the magnetic permeability changes locally. Hence the magnetic flux is deflected from the area influenced by stress, similar to the case of cut-outs introduced in the electrical steel sheets. For a sketch of the expected magnetic flux inside manufactured electrical steel sheets see Fig. 5(a). During the course of the experiment, DFI data from four different electrical steel samples has been acquired. Three samples have been embossed using either a spherical, a conical or a flat punch. The fourth sample was used as a reference and was not embossed. For details see Table 3. A schematic of the embossing process is presented in Fig. 5(b). A summary of the sample properties including the embossing process and the experimental details are given in Sec. 4.5 and Sec. 4.6, respectively.
Figure 6(a) shows normalized DFI maps of the embossed samples A, B, and C in a magnetic field Ha = 3330 Am−1. To visualize the influence of embossing, the DFI signals of the samples were normalized to the DFI of the reference sample by dividing the respective images pixel by pixel with the reference sample. Hence, a value S = 1 denotes no change in the scattering contrast of the embossed sample. Obviously, the three different punches generate different patterns. Figure 6(b) shows plots of radially averaged images of samples A–C, which were exposed to magnetic fields \({H}_{a}\mathrm{=780}\,{{\rm{Am}}}^{-1}\) (solid lines) and Ha = 11200 Am−1 (dashed lines). The radially averaged signal is denoted as \({S}_{ave}(r)\). First the results of the measurements at \({H}_{a}\mathrm{=780}\,{{\rm{Am}}}^{-1}\) are presented. Here, sample A exhibits a roughly linear increase of Save starting from 0.13 at r = 0 to 1 near r = 3 mm. For sample B, Save attains a value 0.26 at r = 0 in Ha = 780 Am−1. In contrast to sample A, however, a faster rise of the signal away from r = 0 is observed, reaching 1 at r = 2 mm. Moreover, the rise of Save is not linear, showing a dip at r = 1.5 mm. In sample C, Save exhibits a minimum near r = 1.45 mm. Save rises for r > 1.45 mm reaching saturation near r = 2.2 mm. For r < 1.45 mm we observe a slight rise of Save, indicating that the magnetic field cannot be blocked completely by the barrier formed by the stress, thus allowing the magnetic field to reach the center of the embossed area. For an increased applied magnetic field Ha = 11200 Am−1 the signal behaviour changes. Increasing Ha leads to a strong increase of Save in sample A, i.e. at the center, Save = 0.68. In contrast, the radius where Save = 1 is still r = 3 mm. In sample B, the dip, seen when applying Ha = 780 Am−1, disappears when Ha is increased. Note that Save is almost constant for r in the range of 0.75 mm to 1.5 mm. The saturation of Save is independent of Ha for samples A and B. In sample C increasing Ha causes an increase of Save which is, however, not as pronounced as for samples A and B. The differences in sample A and B can be attributed to the different shape of the punch and the embossing process: The deformation of sample A proceeds more gradually because a spherical punch is used. While in sample B the punch causes a secondary residual stress area in the range of 0.75 mm to 1.5 mm due to stronger deformation. The signal of sample C is also not completely circular but shows a deformation along the field direction. It is caused by the interplay between the circular embossing and the unidirectional magnetization direction. Overall, the saturation distance for all samples is largely independent of the applied magnetic field. This is expected, because the distance, where the signal stays constant, depends on the range of the stress and not on the applied magnetic field.
All samples show an increase of the normalized signal Save with increasing field indicating that the pinning of the magnetic domain walls due to stress is overcome by Ha. The minor deviation of Save from unity in the homogeneous area away from the embossing may be caused by small variations in the properties of the base material and differences in the magnetic coupling between the magnetic yoke and the sample.
The deformation introduced by embossing may also influence the grain structure of the electrical steel sheets, which will affect the evaluated nGI-signal. In previous tests it has been shown that the effect of the changed grain structure on the nGI signal is small compared to the effect of the changed magnetic domains due to residual stress43. There, an embossed electrical steel sheet has been compared to an embossed and subsequently annealed electrical steel sheet to reduce residual stress. In contrast to the non-annealed sample, the DFI contrast vanishes nearly completely in the annealed sample. The small remaining signal is probably caused by the aforementioned change of the nuclear scattering, or remaining residual stress changing the magnetic domains. It is not possible to completely differentiate between the two effects, as they are strongly connected.
Conclusion and Outlook
We have presented the specifications and performance of the upgraded neutron grating interferometer at the beamline ANTARES. The adapted geometry of the new nGI allows expanding the range of correlation lengths ξ by a factor of 30, i.e. two orders of magnitude in ξ can be covered. Moreover, the visibility could be increased by a factor of 3.5 over a large FoV of 71 × 76 mm2 reaching almost the theoretical limit. The design of the new setup provides high flexibility in choosing the optimum combination of flux and visibility for each experiment by choosing the appropriate duty cycle for the grating G0, i.e. the precision of the data can be optimized with respect to the measurement time. The uncertainty of the DFI signal follows a \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{I}}\) dependence for the neutron flux I and a \(\frac{1}{V}\) dependence for the visibility44. As an example, we can use a small duty cycle for experiments, where a high visibility is desired i.e. weakly scattering samples. In case of dynamic measurements a large DC0 may be chosen to have the necessary detector statistics. Finally, by replacing the phase grating G1,π by G1,3π, nGI experiments can be conducted with thermal neutrons (λ < 2 Å). Previously, experiments in this wavelength range have not been considered, as the lacking quality of the absorption gratings caused a low visibility, resulting in unreliable measurements.
In a first experiment, we have evaluated the influence of stress triggered by embossing on the local magnetic domain pinning and thus the magnetic permeability of electrical steel sheets using the new nGI. It is shown that embossing with a flat punch yields the most localized stress and hence the most localized decrease of magnetic permeability in the sample. This tailored influence on the magnetic domains allows to guide magnetic fields similarly as the currently used technique of introducing cut-outs. Furthermore, the flat punch provides also the strongest pinning of the magnetic domain walls at higher magnetic fields. Both features indicate that embossing with a flat punch is the best choice to guide magnetic fields in an electrical steel sheet.
In future experiments the effects of the orientation of highest sensitivity of the nGI with regard to (i) the rolling direction of the sample, (ii) the magnetization direction and, (iii) in the case of non radially symmetric punches, the embossing shape will be investigated. The high sensitivity and the wide range of correlation lengths available will allow us to systematically investigate the interplay between the magnetic domains and the resulting scattering signal thus giving us a handle to adjust the embossing process to produce electrical steel sheets with reduced losses. As a result electric motors with improved efficiency may be developed.
Furthermore, the better signal-to-noise ratio of the new nGI allows conducting experiments with shorter exposure times. Hence, experiments analyzing the response of the magnetic domains in an alternating magnetic field, which is used in electric machines, can be performed stroboscopically45. Also samples which could not be investigated so far can now be probed. As an example, the vortex lattice domains in superconductors are currently mainly studied in niobium because it exhibits a large scattering contrast between the vortex domains and the Meissner phase13. Now, the investigation of the flux line lattice may be extended to other systems such as high Tc-superconductors. Despite all of these upgrades the flexibility of the previous nGI-setup with respect to the installation of sample environment and the possibility to perform directional dark-field imaging are maintained.
Methods
Design and simulation of new interferometer
During the course of an nGI measurement the variation of the intensity vs. the grating position xgi is measured for every pixel (k,l) of the detector46:
where \({a}_{0}(k,l)\) denotes the mean value of the oscillation, \({a}_{1}(k,l)\) the amplitude, and \({\boldsymbol{\phi }}(k,l)\) the phase. xgi designates the position of the stepped grating perpendicular to the neutron beam and the lines of the grating46. The parameters a0, a1 and φ are determined by fitting the data using Eq. 1. Afterwards, the transmission- (TI), differential phase contrast- (DPCI), and the scattering/dark field image (DFI) are calculated22.
The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the DPCI and DFI strongly depends on the visibility \(V(k,l)=\frac{{a}_{1}(k,l)}{{a}_{0}(k,l)}\). Therefore, to maximize V the following conditions have to be adjusted with respect to each other: (i) the periodicity of the gratings p0, p1 and p2, (ii) their relative distances L and d in respective parallel alignment (Fig. 1), (iii) the neutron wavelength λ, (iv) temporal (bandwidth of the neutron wavelength) and spatial coherence of the neutron beam and (v) the quality of the gratings. (i) - (iii) can be considered to be parameters of the nGI-setup, which are chosen depending on the design of the imaging beamline in which the nGI is installed, as well as the manufacturing limits of the gratings. L denotes the distance between G0 and G1, while d denotes the distance between G1 and G2. The temporal and spatial coherence of the neutron beam (iv) are quantities, which are used to adjust the ratio between flux and visibility, while the absorption of G0 and G2 and the quality of the etching profile of G1 (v) define an upper limit of the achievable visibility. Ideally G0 and G2 have a binary transmission profile.
The Talbot-Lau interferometer has to adhere to conditions between the inter-grating distances, the grating periods and the wavelength of the neutrons: Firstly, the interference patterns created by each slit of G0 have to be projected onto the periodic profile of G2 according to the intercept theorem47:
Secondly, the periodicity of G2 has to match the periodicity of the interference pattern generated by G1, taking into account the magnification effect (M) of the conical beam48:
Here, \(\eta \mathrm{=1}\) and \(\eta \mathrm{=2}\) for a π/2− and a π-shifting phase grating, respectively. \(\eta \mathrm{=2}\) is used to account for the frequency doubling effect of the π-shifting phase grating. Thirdly, d has to be an odd fractional Talbot-distance to allow the observation of an intensity modulation48:
Here, n designates the fractional Talbot-order, which is an odd integer \((n\mathrm{=1,3,5,}\ldots )\). A deviation from these three relations leads to the appearance of Moirè fringes or/and to a decrease in visibility and should be avoided. The fractional Talbot-order n can be chosen according to the desired sensitivity range and G1-G2 distance. The new interferometer is designed to allow for the 3rd fractional Talbot-Distance to obtain an increased sensitivity and more space for the sample environment. In Table 1, the effective design parameters of the upgraded nGI are given. Compared to the previous setup, the asymmetry in the grating parameters has been reduced thus relaxing the fabrication requirements for the G2 grating.
Although the neutron beam at ANTARES is slightly conical, we performed all calculations for a parallel beam geometry with adapted geometrical parameters, as the results are invariant with respect to different magnification factors48. Using grating G0, a coherent wave front is created and propagated through the binary phase profile of G1 resulting in an intensity modulation according to the Talbot-effect. To exclude edge effects due to the finite size of the propagation matrix the simulation was performed with a kernel of 100 G1 periods and only the central intensity modulation was considered for further analysis. The propagation distance G1-G2 was made equal to the third fractional Talbot-distance induced by a π-grating for a wavelength of 4 Å. We treated G1 as a pure phase object neglecting the minor absorption by the silicon substrate for simplicity. Then the modulation was convoluted with the binary absorption profiles of G0 and G2 with the respective duty cycles resulting in an approximately sinusoidal intensity profile. We assumed that G0 and G2 are binary and fully attenuating gratings, according to previous analysis of their performance in the accessible wavelength range30. Since the simulation was sampled very precisely (10 pixel resolution) we extracted the visibility directly from the resulting intensity modulation by taking the difference between the minimum and maximum of the intensity oscillation. To account for the polychromaticity of the neutron spectrum when comparing to our experimental data we calculated and weighted the wavelength-dependent visibility spectrum with a Gaussian-shaped intensity distribution (FWHM as described in Sec. 4.4 below, 0.01 Å bins) as delivered by the neutron velocity selector49.
Correlation length ξ
The correlation length \(\xi \) is given by20
where \({L}_{{\rm{sd}}}^{{\rm{eff}}}\) is the effective sample-to-detector distance. Depending on the placement of the sample with respect to the gratings, \({L}_{{\rm{sd}}}^{{\rm{eff}}}\) is calculated as follows48
from the distance between sample and detector \({L}_{{\rm{sd}}}\). Hence, when placing the sample between G1 and G2, the correlation length of the nGI can be tuned by changing only the distance between the sample and G2 without having to change λ. Therefore, the nGI can always be operated at the design wavelength yielding the maximum visibility and SNR.
Technical realization
All gratings used silicon wafers as substrate material in which the necessary grating lines have been etched by deep reactive ion etching (DRIE). For G0 and G2 a new fabrication technique involving filling the grooves with Gd powder was used to optimize the quality of the gratings. Both the G0-gratings and the G2-gratings show a very good binary profile, over the whole area of the grating. Details about the fabrication, the technical data and the transmission performance are reported in30.
Four different source gratings with varying duty cycles \((D{C}_{0}s)\) have been produced. As the coherence length of the neutrons rises with decreasing \(D{C}_{0}\), a variation allows to optimize flux and visibility as desired for every measurement. The active area of the G0 gratings is 65 mm × 65 mm. The positioning system of G0 allows to i) rotate the grating around the beam axis (z-axis), ii) adjust the effective period by tilting around the y-axis, and iii) adjust the total length of the interferometer S and the distance between G0 and G1 by using a translation stage in z-direction in the coordinate system defined in Fig. 1.
Two different phase gratings G1, with a circular active area of 110 mm diameter, have been produced. At the design wavelength of 4.0 Å, the \({{\rm{G}}}_{1,{\rm{\pi }}}\) and \({{\rm{G}}}_{1,3{\rm{\pi }}}\) phase gratings cause a phase shift of \(\approx \pi \) and \(\approx 3\pi \), respectively. In Fig. 2(b) the performance of the two phase gratings as predicted by our simulations is presented. The positioning system also allows for i) a full rotation around the beam-axis, ii) an adjustment of the tilt around the x-axis, iii) a translation along the z-axis and iv) to perform the stepping scan perpendicular to the grating lines.
The analyzer grating G2 has a circular active area with a diameter of 110 mm. Evaluation of the transmission shows that the produced Gd filling has an effective thickness of 16 μm. Due to the small period of the analyzer grating, its fabrication is the most challenging. Previously used methods such as evaporation from the side29 or metallic glass filling31 have shown to either not provide an ideal binary grating25,30 or a limitation of the reproducible area \((\approx 1\,{{\rm{cm}}}^{2})\)31, respectively. Due to the increased distance d even bulky sample environments can now be placed between G1 and G2. In many cases this new geometry reduces the minimum distance between sample and detector, allowing for a better spatial resolution without the need to decrease the neutron flux by reducing the diameter of the pinhole.
Experimental procedure for the evaluation of the visibility V
We quantified the wavelength dependence of the visibility of the nGI using the four different DC0. For this evaluation, the \({{\rm{G}}}_{1,\pi }\) phase grating was used. The velocity selector installed at ANTARES has a minimum wavelength of 3 when aligned parallel to the direction of the neutron beam. To access wavelengths between 1.6 Å and 3.0 Å the selector was tilted by 5° which increases the wavelength spread from \(\frac{\varDelta \lambda }{\lambda }\mathrm{=10} \% \) to 20%. Additionally, the wavelength dependence of the visibility of the new setup has been acquired for the \({{\rm{G}}}_{1,3{\rm{\pi }}}\) phase grating using a \(D{C}_{0}\) of 0.28. The nGI was placed at the optimal distances given for the nGI in Table 1. As a reference, the wavelength dependence of the previous setup described in22 has been acquired. The field of view for all scans was 71 mm × 76 mm, which is a limitation of the employed detector. An L/D-ratio of 250 was used and the scintillator thickness of 100 μm resulted in a spatial resolution of approximately 100 μm.
Specimens
Electrical steel sheets of the identical grade of material have been thoroughly categorized in50, from which the values have been reproduced. The chemical composition of the samples is given in Table 4. The sheets were prepared at the Chair of Metal Forming and Casting of the Technical University of Munich as described in43. The initial geometry of the samples was chosen to be 90 mm × 15 mm × 350 μm. This allowed to simultaneously emboss the sample and blank locating holes, which were later used to align the samples during the erosion process. The long edge of the sample was parallel to the rolling direction. All embossings have a nominal depth of 200 μm. After embossing, the samples were eroded to a length of 60 mm. This length is imposed by the magnetic yoke33 used for the experiment. The width was arbitrarily chosen to be 10 mm. The thickness of 350 μm has been used to prevent saturation of the DFI-signal. For embossing and blanking, a Schuler stamping press CSP 100 with ServoDirect Technology was used. To recover the exact geometry of the embossing, the samples were scanned in 3 dimensions using a Keyence VK-X100 Series Shape Measurement Laser Microscope. The results are reproduced Table 3.
Experimental parameters for analyzing the stress in electrical steel sheets
The electrical steel sheets were placed in a magnetic yoke allowing to apply a maximum magnetic field \({H}_{a}\mathrm{=11200}\,{{\rm{Am}}}^{-1}\)33. The rolling direction of the sample, the magnetic field direction of the yoke and the sensitivity direction of the nGI were chosen to be parallel. A correlation length of 1.865 μm was used for the experiment. This correlation length is a result of the distance (62 mm) between sample and G2 and the chosen wavelength of 4.0 Å. At this wavelength and using \(D{C}_{0}\mathrm{=0.28}\) a visibility of 0.69 has been used.
For each magnetic field strength an nGI-scan was performed by moving G1 in ten equidistant steps over one half period, resulting in a movement of the interference pattern by one period at G2. At each of the ten steps three images with an exposure time of 10 s were taken, resulting in a total exposure time of 300 s for one scan. The effective pixel size of the detector system was set to 33 μm × 33 μm, resulting in a field of view of 71 mm × 76 mm. A LiF scintillation screen, with a thickness of 100 μm has been used in the detection system. The L/D ratio of the instrument was set to 250. These parameters resulted in a spatial resolution of approximately 100 μm.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anderson, I. S., McGreevy, R. L. & Hassina, Z. B. Neutron imaging and applications: A reference for the imaging community 2009. Tech. Rep., ISBN 978-0-387-78692-6.
Hussey, D. S., LaManna, J. M., Baltic, E. & Jacobson, D. L. Neutron imaging detector with 2 μm spatial resolution based on event reconstruction of neutron capture in gadolinium oxysulfide scintillators. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 866, 9–12 (2017).
Trtik, P. et al. Improving the spatial resolution of neutron imaging at paul scherrer institut–the neutron microscope project. Physics Procedia 69, 169–176 (2015).
Trtik, P. Neutron microtomography of voids in gold. MethodsX 4, 492–497 (2017).
Crha, J., Vila-Comamala, J., Lehmann, E., David, C. & Trtik, P. Light yield enhancement of 157-gadolinium oxysulfide scintillator screens for the high-resolution neutron imaging. MethodsX 6, 107–114 (2019).
Williams, S. et al. Detection system for microimaging with neutrons. Journal of Instrumentation 7, P02014 (2012).
Hussey, D. S., LaManna, J. M., Baltic, E. & Jacobson, D. L. Neutron imaging detector with scintillation light magnification and amplification. ECS Transactions 75, 245–250 (2016).
Harti, R. P. et al. Sub-pixel correlation length neutron imaging: Spatially resolved scattering information of microstructures on a macroscopic scale. Scientific Reports 7, 44588 (2017).
Brooks, A. J. et al. Porosity detection in electron beam-melted ti-6al-4v using high-resolution neutron imaging and grating-based interferometry. Progress in Additive Manufacturing 2, 125–132 (2017).
Strobl, M. et al. Neutron dark-field tomography. Physical review letters 101, 123902 (2008).
Grünzweig, C. et al. Bulk magnetic domain structures visualized by neutron dark-field imaging. Applied Physics Letters 93, 112504 (2008).
Grünzweig, C. et al. Neutron decoherence imaging for visualizing bulk magnetic domain structures. Physical review letters 101, 025504 (2008).
Reimann, T. et al. Visualizing the morphology of vortex lattice domains in a bulk type-ii superconductor. Nature communications 6, 8813 (2015).
Pfeiffer, F. et al. Neutron phase imaging and tomography. Physical Review Letters 96, 215505 (2006).
Harti, R. P. et al. Visualizing the heterogeneous breakdown of a fractal microstructure during compaction by neutron dark-field imaging. Scientific reports 8, 17845 (2018).
Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, D., Hussey, D. S. & Lee, S. W. Feasibility evaluation of a neutron grating interferometer with an analyzer grating based on a structured scintillator. Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 033701 (2018).
Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, D., Hussey, D. S. & Lee, S. W. Characterization of the phase sensitivity, visibility, and resolution in a symmetric neutron grating interferometer. Review of Scientific Instruments 90, 073704 (2019).
Pushin, D. A. et al. Far-field interference of a neutron white beam and the applications to noninvasive phase-contrast imaging. Physical Review A 95, 043637 (2017).
Sarenac, D. et al. Three phase-grating moiré neutron interferometer for large interferometer area applications. Physical review letters 120, 113201 (2018).
Strobl, M. General solution for quantitative dark-field contrast imaging with grating interferometers. Scientific reports 4, 7243 (2014).
Betz, B. et al. Quantification of the sensitivity range in neutron dark-field imaging. Review of Scientific Instruments 86, 123704 (2015).
Reimann, T. et al. The new neutron grating interferometer at the antares beamline: design, principles and applications. Journal of Applied Crystallography 49, 1488–1500 (2016).
Rauscher, P. et al. The influence of laser scribing on magnetic domain formation in grain oriented electrical steel visualized by directional neutron dark-field imaging. Scientific reports 6, 38307 (2016).
Strobl, M. et al. Wavelength-dispersive dark-field contrast: micrometre structure resolution in neutron imaging with gratings. Journal of Applied Crystallography 49, 569–573 (2016).
Harti, R. P. et al. Visibility simulation of realistic grating interferometers including grating geometries and energy spectra. Optics Express 25, 1019–1029 (2017).
Calzada, E., Gruenauer, F., Mühlbauer, M., Schillinger, B. & Schulz, M. New design for the antares-ii facility for neutron imaging at frm ii. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 605, 50–53 (2009).
Schulz, M. & Schillinger, B. Antares: Cold neutron radiography and tomography facility. Journal of large-scale research facilities JLSRF 1, 17 (2015).
Manke, I. et al. Three-dimensional imaging of magnetic domains. Nature communications 1, 125 (2010).
Grünzweig, C. et al. Design, fabrication, and characterization of diffraction gratings for neutron phase contrast imaging. Review of Scientific Instruments 79, 053703 (2008).
Gustschin, A., Neuwirth, T., Backs, A., Schulz, M. & Pfeiffer, F. Fabrication of gadolinium particle-based absorption gratings for neutron grating interferometry. Review of Scientific Instruments 89, 103702 (2018).
Seki, Y. et al. Development of multi-colored neutron talbot–lau interferometer with absorption grating fabricated by imprinting method of metallic glass. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 86, 044001 (2017).
Lee, S. W., Hussey, D. S., Jacobson, D. L., Sim, C. M. & Arif, M. Development of the grating phase neutron interferometer at a monochromatic beam line. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 605, 16–20 (2009).
Weiss, H. et al. Neutron grating interferometry investigation of punching-related local magnetic property deteriorations in electrical steels. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 474, 643–653, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.098 (2019).
Gerada, D. et al. High-speed electrical machines: Technologies, trends, and developments. IEEE transactions on industrial electronics 61, 2946–2959 (2013).
Van der Geest, M., Polinder, H., Ferreira, J. A. & Christmann, M. Power density limits and design trends of high-speed permanent magnet synchronous machines. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification 1, 266–276 (2015).
LoBue, M., Sasso, C., Basso, V., Fiorillo, F. & Bertotti, G. Power losses and magnetization process in fe–si non-oriented steels under tensile and compressive stress. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 215-216, 124–126, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00092-5 (2000).
Moses, A., Ntatsis, A., Kochmann, T. & Schneider, J. Magnetostriction in non-oriented electrical steels: general trends. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 215-216, 669–672, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-8853(00)00254-7 (2000).
LL.D., J. K. Xxiv. on reflection of polarized light from the equatorial surface of a magnet. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 5, 161–177, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786447808639407 (1878).
Hipp, A. et al. Energy-resolved visibility analysis of grating interferometers operated at polychromatic x-ray sources. Opt. Express 22, 30394–30409, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.030394 (2014).
Chabior, M. et al. Signal-to-noise ratio in x ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer. Journal of applied physics 110, 053105 (2011).
Talbot, H. F. Lxxvi. facts relating to optical science. no. iv. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science 9, 401–407 (1836).
Guigay, J.-P. et al. The partial talbot effect and its use in measuring the coherence of synchrotron x-rays. Journal of synchrotron radiation 11, 476–482 (2004).
Vogt, S. et al. Extent of embossing-related residual stress on the magnetic properties evaluated using neutron grating interferometry and single sheet test. Production Engineering 13, 211–217 (2019).
Harti, R., Strobl, M., Morgano, M., Valsecchi, J. & Grünzweig, C. Statistical uncertainty in the dark-field and transmission signal of grating interferometry. Review of Scientific Instruments 88, 103704 (2017).
Harti, R. P. et al. Dynamic volume magnetic domain wall imaging in grain oriented electrical steel at power frequencies with accumulative high-frame rate neutron dark-field imaging. Scientific reports 8, 15754 (2018).
Pfeiffer, F. et al. Hard-x-ray dark-field imaging using a grating interferometer. Nature materials 7, 134 (2008).
Pfeiffer, F., Weitkamp, T., Bunk, O. & David, C. Phase retrieval and differential phase-contrast imaging with low-brilliance x-ray sources. Nature physics 2, 258 (2006).
Donath, T. et al. Inverse geometry for grating-based x-ray phase-contrast imaging. Journal of Applied Physics 106, 054703, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3208052 (2009).
Friedrich, H., Wagner, V. & Wille, P. A high-performance neutron velocity selector. Physica B: Condensed Matter 156, 547–549 (1989).
Weiss, H. et al. Influence of shear cutting parameters on the electromagnetic properties of non-oriented electrical steel sheets. Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic materials 421, 250–259 (2017).
Acknowledgements
This work is funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - HA 4395/22-1; SCHU 3227/2-1; VO 1487/31-1. Support by the BMBF grant (Project No. 05K16WO8, NeuRoFast) is gratefully acknowledged. The results of this work are based upon experiments performed at the ANTARES instrument at Heinz Maier-Leibnitz Zentrum (MLZ), Garching, Germany.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Experimental work, data analysis and manuscript preparation were performed by T. Neuwirth. A. Backs contributed to the experimental work and the data analysis. A. Gustschin manufactured the gratings and provided simulation data. S. Vogt produced the electrical steel samples evaluated and helped to interpret the results. F. Pfeiffer complemented the work with his knowledge concerning grating interferometry, as well as help with the preparation of the manuscript. P. Böni helped with interpretation of the data and preparation of the manuscript. M. Schulz aided in the experimental work, the data analysis and the preparation of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
We declare that there are no competing interests as defined by Nature Research, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Neuwirth, T., Backs, A., Gustschin, A. et al. A high visibility Talbot-Lau neutron grating interferometer to investigate stress-induced magnetic degradation in electrical steel. Sci Rep 10, 1764 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58504-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58504-7
This article is cited by
-
Multi-directional neutron dark-field imaging with single absorption grating
Scientific Reports (2023)
-
Investigations of Talbot and Talbot–Lau effects with various light sources
Applied Physics B (2023)
-
Analysis of a silicon comb structure using an inverse Talbot–Lau neutron grating interferometer
Scientific Reports (2022)
-
Towards spatially resolved magnetic small-angle scattering studies by polarized and polarization-analyzed neutron dark-field contrast imaging
Scientific Reports (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.