Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46146-3, published online 12 July 2019

This Article contains an error in the legend of Figure 2 and Figure 3.

The legend of Figure 2:

Pairwise difference plots for Alpha diversity metrics. Treatment group is represented on the x-axis and pairwise change between pre and post measurements are demonstrated on the y-axis. The asterisk denotes significance (p = 0.05). (A) Pairwise difference comparison in observed OTUs (Alpha diversity). (B) Pairwise difference comparison of community richness using Shannon indices (Beta diversity).”

should read:

Figure 2. Pairwise difference plots for Alpha diversity metrics. Treatment group is represented on the x-axis and pairwise change between pre and post measurements are demonstrated on the y-axis. The asterisk denotes significance (p = 0.05). (A) Pairwise difference comparison in observed OTUs between micronutrient and placebo group. (B) Observed OTUs for each time point of the micronutrient and placebo groups.”

Additionally, the legend of Figure 3:

“Pairwise difference plots for Alpha and Beta diversity metrics. Treatment group is represented on the x-axis and pairwise change between pre and post measurements are demonstrated on the y-axis. The asterisk denotes significance (adjp = 0.05). (A) Pairwise difference comparison in observed OTUs (Alpha diversity). (B) Pairwise difference comparison of community richness using Shannon indices (Beta diversity).”

should read:

Figure 3. Pairwise difference plots for Beta diversity metrics. Treatment group is represented on the x-axis and pairwise change between pre and post measurements are demonstrated on the y-axis. The asterisk denotes significance (adjp = 0.05). (A) Pairwise difference comparison in Shannon indices between micronutrient and placebo group. (B) Comparison of community richness using Shannon indices for each time point of the micronutrient and placebo groups.”