Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Beneficial bile acid metabolism from Lactobacillus plantarum of food origin


Bile acid (BA) signatures are altered in many disease states. BA metabolism is an important microbial function to assist gut colonization and persistence, as well as microbial survival during gastro intestinal (GI) transit and it is an important criteria for potential probiotic bacteria. Microbes that express bile salt hydrolase (BSH), gateway BA modifying enzymes, are considered to have an advantage in the gut. This property is reported as selectively limited to gut-associated microbes. Food-associated microbes have the potential to confer health benefits to the human consumer. Here, we report that food associated Lactobacillus plantarum strains are capable of BA metabolism, they can withstand BA associated stress and propagate, a recognised important characteristic for GIT survival. Furthermore, we report that these food associated Lactobacillus plantarum strains have the selective ability to alter BA signatures in favour of receptor activation that would be beneficial to humans. Indeed, all of the strains examined showed a clear preference to alter human glycol-conjugated BAs, although clear strain-dependent modifications were also evident. This study demonstrates that BA metabolism by food-borne non-pathogenic bacteria is beneficial to both microbe and man and it identifies an evolutionary-conserved characteristic, previously considered unique to gut residents, among food-associated non-pathogenic isolates.


Food-associated microbes are proposed to interact with the human host and provide potential benefits to gut health1,2. However, it has proven difficult to determine if these benefits are related to the dietary components alone, a direct influence of foods upon the host microbiota, the microbes they feed or in tandem with effects elicited by the microbes that they carry, since few studies have examined the dissemination of microbes of food origin1,2,3. In order to survive GI transit and persist in the gut, resident and transient microbes must be equipped to endure dynamic physiological stresses. Following oral ingestion, bacteria encounter a number of human defence systems that are associated with secretions, among them bile. Bile is a digestive, gall bladder secretion, synthesized from cholesterol in the liver and recycled to it, in the terminal ileum4,5. Bile has a major role in the emulsification and solubilisation of lipids and it generates bile flow to facilitate hepatobiliary secretion of lipids, endogenous metabolites, and xenobiotics6. The major component of bile is bile acid (BA), representing >50% of the organic components, it acts as a digestive surfactant to present and emulsify dietary lipids and lipid-soluble vitamins for digestion and uptake7. Because of their detergent properties certain BA moieties, at high levels, have antibacterial and inflammatory properties including disruption of bacterial and host cell membranes, protein denaturation, iron and calcium chelation and they can cause oxidative damage to DNA7. Therefore, the ability of microbes to tolerate bile and BAs is recognised as important for their survival and for their persistence in the GI tract8.

In the liver, cholesterol is converted into primary BAs, chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and cholic acid (CA), then conjugated, as N-acyl amidates, mainly to amino acids taurine or glycine and self-assembled into fat presenting micelles in the small intestine9. The intestinal microbiota, particularly Lactobacilli spp. can use bile acids as environmental signals and, in certain cases, as nutrients and electron acceptors10. Importantly, intestinal bacteria have a major role in bile salt metabolism11,12 mainly through microbial bile salt hydrolase (BSH) enzymes that catalyse bile salts deconjugation by hydrolysis of the amide bond to release the glycine/taurine moiety from the steroid nucleus9,13,14. This function is recognised as the crucial gateway reaction in BA biotransformation9,14, regenerating primary free BA CA and CDCA, to facilitate microbial formation of secondary bile acid deoxycholic acid (DCA) from CA, lithocholic acid (LCA) and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) from CDCA as well as a range of intermediates (reviewed by Long et al., 2017). Many of these are now recognised as potent cell signalling molecules involved in regulating host lipid and cholesterol, glucose, and energy metabolism, drug metabolism, and the modulation of immune response15,16. These receptors include BA ligand-activated nuclear receptors, the farnesoid-X-receptor (FXR) in the liver and intestine which controls BA homeostasis, the vitamin D receptor (VDR) which has a number of different roles, as well as the energy homeostasis G protein-coupled bile acid receptor TGR516.

Amino acids released by deconjugation can be further utilized as carbon and nitrogen sources for bacterial sustenance and survival17. BSH enzymes may also promote cholesterol integration into bacterial membranes to alter membrane potential, fluidity and tensile strength18. This is proposed to effectively improve the viability of intestinal bacteria4 by enhancing bile salt tolerance and sensitivity to host defensins. It has been suggested that BSH enzymes might represent detergent shock proteins that enhance Lactobacilli GI survival19. In support of this, strong correlation between microbial habitat and BSH activity is reported8,20. Furthermore, intestinal bile salt deconjugation is essential for intestinal homeostasis by influencing the size and the composition of both the bile acid pool and the intestinal microbiota21.

BSH deconjugation activity is well represented among intestinal microbial genera10,22, it is predominantly characterized among gram-positive species Bifidobacterium23,24,25, Clostridium26,27, Enterococcus28,29, Listeria30, and Lactobacillus31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38, including Lb. plantarum species39,40,41,42,43. In addition, several investigators reported that bile tolerance is a strain-specific trait and tolerances of species cannot be generalized within a species or a genus15,16. Early reports assigned BSH activity to GI associated commensals, but not to environmental isolates8. They found that bsh coding sequences were present among all of the major phyla and that BSH enzyme activity differs between environments. Where examined in their study, all gut associated Lactobacillus strains were capable of both glyco and tauro deconjugation of bile acids. In contrast, Lactobacillus isolated from fermented milk show a preference for glyco conjugated bile acids, although some overlap for tauro deconjugation (specifically TDCA) was detected for a number of strains44.

BA metabolism, through BSH activity is an important EFSA criteria for probiotic strain selection45. It is taken as an indication of the strains potential to survive gastro-intestinal transit. More recently microbial BSH activity was shown to influence microbe-host dialogue, to functionally regulate host lipid metabolism, to alter cholesterol metabolism and potentially influence weight loss21.

The exact mechanism by which BA signatures impact weigh loss is currently unclear, therefore, regarding BSH enzymes, a generalized rule cannot be applied. The importance of bile acid metabolism has been studied only in gut-associated microbes4. In this work, food-borne Lb. plantarum isolated and characterized by the authors46,47 as well as known type strains, were examined and shown to vary in their ability to endure bile-associated stress in vitro. In addition, the specific ability of each strain to metabolize bile acid moieties was examined. Since bile acid derivatives are being recognized as therapeutic agents for treating human metabolic diseases19, this work suggests that the properties of food-associated microbes may also provide benefits to the host and it reinforces a role for food-based microbes as important targets for consideration and development in functional foods.


Potential for bacterial survival in GIT environment upon bile stress

Bile salt resistance and tolerance

The ability to grow in the presence of bile salts was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm during co-incubation with increasing concentrations of bile salts (0–3.6% w/v). At tested concentrations below 1.8%, microbial viability was unaltered (Fig. 1a and SI Figure S1a) for the majority of strains, however, significant reductions in viability were recorded with type strains Lb. plantarum ATCC14917, CF1 and LT99 isolated from pickled cabbage, sourdough, raw-milk cheeses respectively. The effect is more pronounced for these strains in the presence of 3.6% bovine bile where no viable growth is recorded for these 3 strains all of food origin (Fig. 1a). The remaining strains of food origin (olives, pickled cabbage, sourdough, raw-milk cheeses) could tolerate bile levels to the same extent as the human isolates WCFSI (from human saliva), IMC510, and IMC513 (human gut isolates). These data suggest a strong ability of food-borne Lb. plantarum strains to endure bile salt stress in concentrations higher than that found in the human gut to a similar extent to gut commensal Lb. plantarum representatives.

Figure 1

Food associated Lb. plantarum strains are resistant to bile salts. (a) The viability of Lb. plantarum strains was assessed on exposure to bile salts. Data are represented as mean values and bars indicate the standard deviation (SD) obtained from three replicates. Data were analysed by One-Way Anova followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post hoc test (0% vs 1.8% p < 0.05, 0% vs 3.6% p < 0.001). (b) Food associated Lb. plantarum strains are capable of anaerobic growth in the presence of bile. Lb. plantarum strains were assessed for growth under anaerobic conditions in the presence and absence of bile. Orange line indicates MRS broth alone, Green line indicates MRS broth supplemented with 0.5% porcine bile (0.5% w/v). Data are represented as the mean with standard deviation (SD) from the mean for three biological replicates.

Considering that bile salts form micelles with phospholipids (as they are found in whole bile) and, that they may have lower antibacterial activity than artificial solutions of pure bile salts48, we investigated bile tolerance by incubating all the strains in MRS broth with 0.5% w/v porcine bile (of gallbladder origin) and monitored bacterial growth hourly over 24 hours (Figs. 1b and SI Figure S1b). All of the strains tested display a high ability to grow and survive during exposure to bile, both under aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Under these conditions all three human isolates were reduced in growth over the term of the experiment in the presence of BA and they showed a doubling time (DT of ca. 240 mins). Similarly Lb. plantarum strains O5, O13, C9O4 (from table olives) and 21B (from sourdough) all showed reduced DT (270, 240, 240, and 300 mins respectively) in the presence of porcine gallbladder bile (Fig. 1b). These DTs were similar under aerobic conditions (Figure S1). These data suggest that those strains of slower growth may have the ability to metabolize bile acid, a function previously limited to gut associated commensal bacteria. Conversion to more hydrophobic moieties may reduce bacterial growth and this may be an advantage in the GIT. For this reason, the specific ability to metabolize BA was investigated for all of the Lb. plantarum strains irrespective of origin.

Bacterial alteration of bile acid profile: BSH deconjugation activity

Targeted metabolomics was applied to all 22 strains in order to determine their BA deconjugation ability or BSH activity in which, more than thirty bile acid moieties were assessed (Table S1). BAs derived from the in vitro co-incubation assay were extracted through a liquid-liquid extraction procedure (for details see Supplementary Information). Following the method developed by Joyce and coworkers21, the efficiency of BAs extraction was assessed by using 2 deuterated internal standards that ensure the correct BA identification and the high linearity of the calibration curves for each moiety allowed facilitated reliable quantification to ng level (Figure S2). UPLC chromatograms showed a clear ability of food-borne Lb. plantarum strains to alter bile acid profiles as shown in Fig. 2a, in which it is clear that some unconjugated bile acids are generated (green arrows). Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for all BAs (Fig. 2b) confirm that microbe-bile co-incubations showed altered BA moieties since these groups separated, and were distinct, from control reactions indicating that all of the strains have the ability to deconjugate bile salts, even though they are not directly isolated from the gut environment (Fig. 3). Relative to human gut and saliva associated strains some of the food isolated Lb. plantarum strains were equally efficient in their ability to generate free bile acids including secondary BAs DCA, LCA and UDCA albeit to different extents. Moreover, all of the strains show a clear glyco-specific deconjugation activity, while the levels of tauroconjugated bile acid is not significantly altered (Fig. 4). Interestingly when strains were examined for the presence of BSH alleles, the number of BSHs carried by these strains varied in number (from 1-4 BSHs) and in length (data not shown). Their level of activity does not appear dependent on the presence of a specific BSH allele.

Figure 2

Food associated Lb. plantarum strains show differential bile acid metabolism ability. (a) UPLC TMS chromatograms showing representative bile acid moiety alterations by food-borne Lb. plantarum strains designed by factor of changes (FC). FC was calculated by comparing treated with untreated sample mean values for each bile acid alteration. From the top: Untreated sample, Human Lb. plantarum WCFS1 treated sample, food-borne Lb. plantarum O13 treated sample; food-borne Lb. plantarum LAB49 treated sample. (b) Principal Component Analysis (PCA) analysis (generated using MassLynx Software V4.2 SCN943 (WATERS Corporation, USA)) representing untreated and Lb. plantarum treated bile acid adjustments as follows: Lb. plantarum strains grouped by different origin: reference/probiotics (blue), cheeses (yellow), sourdough (orange), table olives (green).

Figure 3

Alteration of bile acid profile by Lb. plantarum strains. Assessed by UPLC Q-TOF-MSE in co-incubation supernatants. Green bars show the basal level of bile acid in untreated porcine bile. (a) Free bile acids. (b) Total Tauro-conjugated bile acids (c) Total Glyco-conjugated bile acids. (d) Total levels of Primary bile acids (e) Total levels of Secondary bile acids. All data are represented as mean ± SD; Statistical analysis were performed by One-Way Anova followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post hoc test ($p < 0.05, #p < 0.01 and *p < 0.001).

Figure 4

BSH activity of Lb. plantarum strains. free, glycoconjugated and tauroconjugated forms of (a) Deoxycholic acid, (b) Chenodeoxycholic acid, (c) Ursodeoxycholic acid and (d) Lithocholic acid as representative bile acids moieties showing the high glyco-specific production of unconjugated bile acids compared to the basal level in untreated porcine bile (green bars). Data are presented as means ± SD. Statistical analysis were performed by One-Way Anova followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparisons post hoc test ($p < 0.05, #p < 0.01 and *p < 0.001).

The deconjugation strength of isolates to generate free BA is as follows: ATCC14917 ≥ C9S2 ≥ LT52 ≥ LT100 ≥ LAB62 ≥ LAB49 ≥ LAB40 ≥ C9O4 > IMC513 > O5 > LAB1 > LT21 > WCFS1 ≥ N14 ≥ CF1 ≥ LAB32 > Lab30. These data indicate that slower growth may not be due to the degree of deconjugation but rather to the levels of specific BAs generated. In this regard, the UPLC Q-TOF-MSE method detected a high production of some free bile acids, specifically DCA, CDCA, UDCA, and LCA, all of them generated from glyco-deconjugation activity (Fig. 5). Variation in bile acid deconjugation profiles indicate selective modifications in a strain-dependent manner. In particular, all strains clearly showed different abilities to generate levels of DCA, CDCA, UDCA, with IMC513 representing the most efficient strain among human associated strains (Fig. 4). Similar differences in BSH activity are reported also for food-associated strains of the same origin. Indeed, the two sourdough associated strains, 21B and CF1 showed distinct activity to generate different levels of DCA, CDCA and UDCA (Fig. 4). A similar effect was evident for raw-milk cheeses strains, where LAB30, LAB32 and LT99 displayed lower activity compared to all of the other strains with same origin, confirming no relationship between type of food and specific BSH activity. Nevertheless, it is important to underline the significant BSH activity and resultant liberation of free bile acids such as DCA, CDCA, UCDA and LCA, as a widespread property among all food-associated isolates in this study.

Figure 5

Bile salt hydrolase activity of bacteria strains from different origins. Heat plot indicates alterations to bile acid classes (a) and to individual BAs (b). Heatmaps were generated using RStudio software, version 1.2.1335 (


In order to survive in the human GI tract microorganisms must tolerate and survive numerous environmental insults including variations in pH, low oxygen levels, nutrient limitation and high osmolarity. In terms of bacterial survival in the gut environment, it is necessary to evaluate the ability of potential probiotic strains to endure bile acid-related stress49,50. Exposure to bile represents a serious challenge in the gut. Bile is a digestive fluid that emulsifies lipids but when highly hydrophobic and in large quantities it can affect also alter cell membranes, therefore bile tolerance is an important property for both microbial survival and GIT colonization4. Bile plays a fundamental role in host specific51 and non-specific52 defense mechanisms and the magnitude of this inhibitory effect is strongly influenced by BA concentration53. In the human GI tract, the mean bile concentration is believed to be 0.3% w/v, a concentration considered as critical and sufficient to screen for bile tolerance and resistance54. All of the food associated Lb. plantarum strains remained viable in the presence of 1.8% bile and only three strains (Lb. plantarum ATCC14917, CF1 and LT99) showed any inhibition of growth when exposed to 3.6% bile. The BA concentration in the gut is not static, but changes over time as well as regionally in the intestine. This is particularly evident after a meal, where bile salt concentrations can increase sharply up to ca. 15 mmol/L in the duodenum, in the ileum, the concentration falls below 4 mmol/L due to active ileal BA re-absorption51. Considering that BAs form micelles with phospholipids, cholesterol and fatty acids (whole bile) they have lower antibacterial activity than artificial solutions of pure BAs48 we also investigated bile tolerance by incubating all the strains with 0.5% w/v porcine bile (of gall-bladder origin). All of the strains were able to tolerate porcine bile, under both anaerobic and aerobic conditions and they showed similar growth in either presence or absence of bile (Figs. 1b and SI, Figure S1b).

These data support the adaptation ability of Lb. plantarum, a versatile lactic acid bacterium that occupies a range of environmental niches including dairy, meat and many vegetable fermentations as well as the human GI tract55. Lb. plantarum has one of the largest genomes (3.3 Mb) characterized among Lactobacilli, this may reflect its ecological flexibility for occupancy of several environmental niches56. The Lb. plantarum WCFS1 genome57 is predicted to contain four BSH related genes, annotated as bsh1 to bsh4, they are spread throughout the genome, and bsh1 appears solely responsible for the BA metabolism ability of Lb. plantarum strains.

Our data points towards the ability of all of the strains applied to this study, both food-borne and human isolates to survive one of the main gastro-intestinal stresses, and combined with our previous studies in an in vitro GI model46,47 we suggest that all of the strains should be viable on reaching the duodenum and in GI transit. Microbial bile tolerance is a recognized criteria for probiotic strain selection, and BSH activity is a desirable property when selecting a strain for use as a dietary adjunct10,13,58. In this regard, microbial BSH activity is the first step in bile salt biotransformation in the gut. BSH activity is considered a common feature of gut microorganisms that is distributed across the major phyla of bacteria in the gut as well as the gut Archea8. Moreover, this activity has been recognised as important in mediating a microbe-host dialogue that functionally regulates host lipid metabolism and plays a profound role in cholesterol metabolism16,59,60,61. Microbial BA modulation and metabolism has been shown to significantly impact on host physiology13, and they have been linked to alterations in blood cholesterol levels19,36,62,63 with the potential to regulate body weight and lipid metabolism in mice. This highlights microbial BA alterations as a novel strategy to influence weight gain in the host21,61.

To date, there is a scarcity in publications where BA metabolism by bacteria isolated from fermented foods has been examined. In the present study, we determine that food-borne Lb. plantarum strains can metabolize BAs, albeit to different extents and at levels that are similar to those reported from human isolates. Thus, the idea that BSH activity is strictly limited to intestinal resident or to tourist pathogenic strains should be reconsidered. This work highlights strain-specific variation in BAs deconjugation ability among the food isolates (Fig. 5) there is no strict correlation between food origin and BSH activity. Moreover, we demonstrate that the food associated isolates, from this study, are adapted for glyco-specific deconjugation activity, while the ability to act on tauro-conjugated bile salts is not significant (Fig. 3). BSH positive bacteria have different affinities and relative activity against conjugated substrates4. The preference to metabolize glycine- over taurine-conjugated BAs is also a feature of Lb. plantarum WCFS1. This specificity could represent an evolutionary preference for glycine-conjugated BAs, given their increased prevalence in the human GIT and their proposed higher toxicity in comparison to taurine-conjugated BA64. Although the precise mechanism by which BA amidates are selected by BSHs is uncharacterized, the differential affinity for a glyco- or tauro-conjugated BA specific substrates, suggests that BSH hydrolysis could be of importance for bacterial survival in vivo.

The Lb. plantarum food isolates, from this study, support accumulation of free bile acids DCA, CDCA, UCDA and LCA while maintaining tauro-conjugated BA as relatively untouched (Figs. 4 and 5). These free BAs are ligands to influence the activity of certain host receptors, expressed in many organs and tissues (liver, gallbladder and intestine) including the nuclear bile acid receptor farnesoid X receptor (FXR) and Vitamin D receptor (VDR) indicating the dual digestive and signaling role for BAs in the host16,59,60,65. These interactions with can influence energy metabolism, liver function and intestinal health, they can also improve insulin sensitivity and weight loss16,21,66. The FXR is preferentially stimulated by the specific free and secondary BAs that our strains facilitate to accumulate. FXR activity is considered protective against colorectal cancer suggesting that BA deconjugation may enhance the anti-cancer effects of FXR67. Activation of TGR5, by taurine conjugated secondary BAs: TDCA and TLCA, conjugates that remain intact in the presence of the Lb. plantarum isolates reported here, BA activated TGR5 can increase browning of white adipose tissue and induce thyroxine production to increase energy expenditure, thereby influencing diet-induced obesity68. BAs are also proposed to contribute to regulation of whole-body glucose and lipid metabolism and therefore body weight61. It has been universally recognized that bacterial modulation of the BA pool, especially by the modulation of FXR and TGR5 signaling, plays a fundamental role in regulating host homeostasis as well as lipid and cholesterol host metabolism9,61. In addition, it has been found that modulation of BA profiles is also related to the peripheral circadian clock, an interesting aspect that may be correlated to food intake and obesity69. Thus, microbial BSH activity could be considered a beneficial property that may find importance for novel preventive and therapeutic strategies for conditions associated with BA dysbiosis including cirrhosis, fatty liver disease, cholestasis, colorectal cancer, certain types of Helicobacter-associated cancer as well as obesity and related metabolic diseases.

In conclusion, this is one of the first studies to investigate a collection of Lb. plantarum strains, isolated from fermented foods for their ability to metabolize BAs, as an adaptation mechanism to persist in the gut environment. All of the food-borne Lb. plantarum strains examined here were shown to have BSH activity to a similar level to human isolates even though they are not gut-associated. Variation in BA deconjugation profiles indicated subtle selective modifications in a strain-dependent manner with a clear and significant ability to utilise glyco-conjugated BAs as specific substrates. BSH activity in all isolates led to the accumulation of free BAs such as DCA, CDCA, UCDA and LCA, all of these are recognized as BAs signalling molecules to contribute to regulation of whole-body glucose and lipid metabolism.

From a host perspective, this microbial activity can potentially lead to alterations in host metabolic processes, by modulating the BA pool and host receptor signalling. In addition, the experimental evidence reported in this study, suggests that we must reconsider the concept that BSH activity is an exclusive feature of gut-associated microbes alone. Overall, this work highlights the beneficial contribution of fermented foods through their microbial components (as Lb. plantarum species) to the BA metabolism and their potential to modulate host metabolic processes. Finally, this study highlights that food-borne microbes are equipped, somewhat, for gut survival. Considering that, microbes are commonly introduced with a foodstuff that may facilitate their propagation in the GI tract, our data indicate the importance of future studies to monitor and track food-associated non-pathogenic microorganisms through GI transit, in order to determine transient from stable colonization and interaction with the host as well as monitor their outgrowth and genetic adaptation to both food and the gut environments.


Bacterial strains

A collection of 22 strains of Lactobacillus plantarum belonging to our laboratory culture collection at the University of Teramo, were investigated in this study. All the strains were originally isolated from fermented foods as raw-milk cheeses (11 strains), table olives (5 strains) and sourdough (2 strains) with the exception of Lb. plantarum WCFS1 and ATCC14917 and two strains with documented probiotic activities, IMC 510, and IMC 513 (kindly provided by SYNBIOTECH, Camerino, Italy), included in the study as reference strains (Table 1). All the strains were previously characterized as Lb. plantarum species and tested for several properties including their potential ability to survive in GI transit46,47. They were routinely grown under microaerophilic conditions using de Man, Rogosa and Sharp (MRS) medium (Oxoid) at 37°.

Table 1 Lb. plantarum strains investigated in this study including their food of origin and source.

Bile salt resistance

A spectrophotometric assay was carried out in order to investigate microbial bile salts tolerance, by using a modified method described by Gilliland and coworkers51. Isolates were grown in MRS broth at 37 °C to obtain overnight cultures. Then 0.5 ml from serial dilutions were added to MRS broth to obtain an initial inoculum concentration of 103 CFU/ml and all strains were co-incubated in MRS broth at 37 °C for 24 hours with increasing concentrations of bile salts (OXOID) (0%, 0.30%, 0.60%, 1.8%, 3.6% w/v). After 24 hours of incubation, microbial growth was assessed turbidimetrically by measuring optical density at 600 nm (Fig. 1a).

Bile tolerance

Microbial bile tolerance was assessed for each strain by monitoring growth in presence of gallbladder porcine bile. All the strains were incubated in MRS broth with porcine gallbladder bile (0.5% w/v) both in aerobic and anaerobic conditions, and O.D. at 600 nm was taken every hour for 24 hours to follow bacterial growth (Figs. 1b and S1 Figure S1b).

Bile salt hydrolase deconjugation activity

The bacterial ability to deconjugate bile acids was investigated by performing a coincubation in vitro assay followed by Ultra Performance Liquid Chromatography coupled with an electrospray ionization Quadrupole Time-Of-Flight Mass Spectrometry operating in MSE mode (UPLC Q-TOF-MSE). Briefly, all Lb. plantarum strains were coincubated for 90 minutes in porcine gallbladder bile (0.5% w/v) and then a liquid-liquid extraction was carried out to recover all bile acids (Table S1). UPLC Q-TOF-MSE was performed to analyse the BAs profile according to Joyce and coworkers21. Lb. casei NCDO161 was used as a bsh negative control in the study (Figure S3). For experimentally details see SI Materials and Methods70,71.

Statistical analysis

Data from three biological replicates, reported as mean values with SD, were statistically analysed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student t test. Differences between strain means were tested for significance by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test using PRISM 7.0 (GRAPHPAD Software Inc., La Jolla, CA). Principal Component Analysis of microbial alteration of BAs profile were performed by using MassLynx Software V4.2 SCN943 (WATERS Corporation, USA).


  1. 1.

    David, L. A. et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nat. 505, 559–563, (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Marco, M. et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: microbiota and beyond. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 44, 94–102, (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Gobbetti, M., Di Cagno, R. & De Angelis, M. functional microorganisms for functional food quality. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 50, 716–727, (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Begley, M., Gahan, C. G. & Hill, C. The interaction between bacteria and bile. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29(4), 625–651, (2005).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Joyce, S. A. & Gahan, C. G. Bile acid modifications at the microbe-host interface: potential for nutraceutical and pharmaceutical interventions in host health. Annu. Rev. Food. Sci. Technol. 7, 313–333 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hofmann, A. F. Bile Acids: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. N. Physiol. Sci. 14, 24–29 (1999).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li, G. Intestinal Probiotics: Interactions with Bile Salts and Reduction of Cholesterol, 2011 International Conference on Environmental Science and Engineering (ICESE 2011). Procedia Environ. Sci. 12, 1180–1186 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Jones, B. V., Begley, M., Hill, C., Gahan, C. G. M. & Marchesi, J. N. Functional and comparative metagenomics analysis of bile salt hydrolase activity in the human gut microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 13580–13585 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Long, S. L., Gahan, C. G. M. & Joyce, S. A. Interactions between gut bacteria and bile in health and disease. Mol. Asp. Med. 5, 1–12, (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Urdaneta, V. & Casadesús, J. Interactions between Bacteria and Bile Salts in the Gastrointestinal and Hepatobiliary Tracts. Front. Med. 4, 163, (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ridlon, J. M., Kang, D.-J. & Hylemon, P. B. Bile salt biotransformations by human intestinal bacteria. J. Lipid. Res. 47, 241–59, (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nicholson, J. K. et al. Host-gut microbiota metabolic interactions. Sci. 108, 1262–1268, (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Begley, M., Hill, C. & Gahan, C. G. M. Bile salt hydrolase activity in probiotics. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72(3), 1729–1738, (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ridlon, J. M., Harris, S. C., Bhowmik, S., Kang, D. J. & Hylemon, P. B. Consequences of bile salt biotransformations by intestinal bacteria. Gut Microbes 7, 22–39, (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Li, T. & Chiang, J. Y. Bile acid signaling in metabolic disease and drug therapy. Pharmacol. Rev. 66(4), 948–983 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Chiang, J. Y. Bile acid metabolism and signaling. Compr. Physiol. 3(3), 1191–1212 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Van Eldere, J., Celis, P., De Pauw, G., Lesaffre, E. & Eyssen, H. Tauroconjugation of cholic acid stimulates 7a-dehydroxylation by fecal bacteria. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62, 656–661 (1996).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Gomez-Zavaglia, A., Kociubinski, G., Perez, P., Disalvo, E. & De Antonio, G. Effect of bile on the lipid composition and surface properties of bifidobacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 93, 794–799 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    De Smet, I., Van Hoorde, L., Vande Woestyne, M., Christiaens, H. & Verstraete, W. Significance of bile salt hydrolytic activities of lactobacilli. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 79(3), 292–301 (1995).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tanaka, H., Doesburg, K., Iwasaki, T. & Mierau, I. Screening of lactic acid bacteria for bile salt hydrolase activity. J. Dairy. Sci. 82, 2530–2535 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Joyce, S. A. et al. Regulation of host weight gain and lipid metabolism by bacterial bile acid modification in the gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111(20), 7421–7426 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Hylemon, P. B. Metabolism of bile acids in intestinal microflora New Compr. Biochem. 12, 331–343, (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Grill, J., Schneider, F., Crociani, J. & Ballongue, J. Purification and characterization of conjugated bile salt hydrolase from Bifidobacterium longum BB536. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61(7), 2577–2582 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Kim, G.B., Yi, S. H., & Lee, B. H. Purification and characterization of three different types of bile salt hydrolases from Bifidobacterium strains. J. Dairy Sci. 87(2), 258-266 (2004).

  25. 25.

    Tanaka, H., Hashiba, H., Kok, J., & Mierau, I. Bile salt hydrolase of Bifidobacterium longum-biochemical and genetic characterization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66(6), 2502-2512 (2000).

  26. 26.

    Kishinaka, M., Umeda, A. & Kuroki, S. High concentrations of conjugated bile acids inhibit bacterial growth of Clostridium perfringens and induce its extracellular cholylglycine hydrolase. Steroids 59, 485–489 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Masuda, N. Deconjugation of bile salts by Bacteroides and Clostridium. Microbiol. Immunol. 25, 1–11 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Franz, C. M. A. P., Specht, I., Haberer, P. & Holzapfel, W. H. Bile salt hydrolase activity of enterococci isolated from food: screening and quantitative determination. J. Food Prot. 64(5), 725–729 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Wijaya, A. et al. Cloning of the bile salt hydrolase (bsh) gene from Enterococcus faecium FAIR-E 345 and chromosomal location of bsh genes in food enterococci. J. Food. Prot. 67, 2772–2778, (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Begley, M. R., Sleator, D., Gahan, C. G. & Hill, C. Contribution of three bile-associated loci, bsh, pva, and btlB, to gastrointestinal persistence and bile tolerance of Listeria monocytogenes. Infect. Immun. 73, 894–904 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Bateup, J. M., McConnell, M. A., Jenkinson, H. F. & Tannock, G. W. Comparison of Lactobacillus strains with respect to bile salt hydrolase activity, colonization of the gastrointestinal tract, and growth rate of the murine host. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 61, 1147–1149 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Corzo, G. & Gilliland, S. E. Bile salt hydrolase activity of three strains of Lactobacillus acidophilus. J. Dairy. Sci. 82, 472–480 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dashkevicz, M. P. & Feighner, S. D. Development of a differential medium for bile salt hydrolase-active Lactobacillus spp. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55, 11–16 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Elkins, C. A., Moser, S. A. & Savage, D. C. Genes encoding bile salt hydrolases and conjugated bile salt transporters in Lactobacillus johnsonii 100-100 and other Lactobacillus species. Microbiology 147, 3404–3412 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    McAuliffe, O., Cano, R. J. & Klaenhammer, T. R. Genetic analysis of two bile salt hydrolase activities in Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4925–4929 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Pereira, D. I., McCartney, A. L. & Gibson, G. R. An in vitro study of the probiotic potential of a bile-salt-hydrolyzing Lactobacillus fermentum strain, and determination of its cholesterol-lowering properties. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 4743–4752 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Chae, J. P., Valeriano, V. D., Kim, G. B. & Kang, D. K. Molecular cloning, characterization and comparison of bile salt hydrolases from Lactobacillus johnsonii PF01. J. Appl. Microbiol. 114, 121–33, (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Jayashree, S., Pooja, S., Pushpanathan, M., Rajendhran, J. & Gunasekaran, P. Identification and characterization of bile salt hydrolase genes from the genome of Lactobacillus fermentum MTCC 8711. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 174, 855–66, (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Christiaens, H., Leer, R. J., Pouwels, P. H. & Verstraete, W. Cloning and Expression of a Conjugated Bile Acid Hydrolase Gene from Lactobacillus plantarum by Using a Direct Plate Assay. App. Environ. Microbiol. 58(12), 3792–3798 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    De Smet, I., Hoorde, L. V., Saeyer, N. D., Woestyne, M. V. & Verstraete, W. In vitro study of bile salt hydrolase (BSH) activity of BSH isogenic Lactobacillus plantarum 80 strains and estimation of cholesterol lowering through enhanced BSH activity. Microb. Ecol. Health Dis. 7, 315–329 (1994).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lambert, J. M., Bongers, R. S., de Vos, W. M. & Kleerebezem, M. Functional analysis of four bile salt hydrolase and penicillin acylase family members in Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74(15), 4719–4726 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ren, J., Sun, K., Wu, Z., Yao, J. & Guo, B. All 4 bile salt hydrolase proteins are responsible for the hydrolysis activity in Lactobacillus plantarum ST-III. J. Food Sci. 76, 622–628, (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Gu, X. C. et al. Cloning and analysis of bile salt hydrolase genes from Lactobacillus plantarum CGMCC No. 8198. Biotechnol. Lett. 36, 975–83, (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Reyes-Nava, L. A. et al. Use of bile acids as a selection strategy for Lactobacillus strains with probiotic potential. J. Food Nutr. Disor. 5, 1, (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Shewale, R. N., Sawale, P. D., Khedkar, C. D., & Singh, A. Selection criteria for probiotics: a review. Int J Prebiotics and Probiotics 9(1) (2014).

  46. 46.

    Prete, R. et al. Food-Associated Lactobacillus plantarum and Yeasts Inhibit the Genotoxic Effect of 4-Nitroquinoline-1-Oxide. Front. Microbiol. 8, 2349, (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Garcia-Gonzalez, N., Prete, R., Battista, N. & Corsetti, A. Adhesion Properties of Food-Associated Lactobacillus plantarum Strains on Human Intestinal Epithelial Cells and Modulation of IL-8 Release. Front. Microbiol. 9, 2392, (2018).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Sung, J. Y., Shaffer, E. A. & Costerton, J. V. Antibacterial activity of bile salts against common biliary pathogens. Digest. Dis. Sci. 38, 2104, (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Collins, J. K., Thornton, G. & Sullivan, G. O. Selection of probiotic strains for human applications. Int. Dairy. J. 8, 487–490 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Dunne, C. et al. Probiotics: from myth to reality. Demonstration of functionality in animal models of disease and in human clinical trials. Antonie van. Leeuwenhoek 76, 279–292 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Marteau, P., Minekus, M., Havenaar, R. & Huis Int Veld, J. H. J. Survival of lactic acid bacteria in a dynamic model of stomach and small intestine: validation and the effect of bile. J. Dairy. Sci. 80, 1031–1037 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Kalambaheti, T., Cooper, G. N. & Jackson, G. D. F. Role of bile in non-specific defence mechanisms of the gut. Gut. 35, 1047–1052 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Charteris, W. P., Phillip, H., Kelly, M., Morelli, L. & Collins, J. K. Antibiotic Susceptibility of Potentially Probiotic Lactobacillus Species. J. Food Prot. 6i 12, i636–i643 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Gilliland, S. E., Staley, T. E. & Bush, L. J. Importance of bile tolerance of Lact. acidophilus used as a dietary adjunct. J. Dairy. Sci. 67, 3045–3051 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    de Vries, M. C., Vaughan, E. E., Kleerebezen, M. & de Vos, W. M. Lactobacillus plantarum: survival, functional and potential probiotic properties in the human intestinal tract. Int. Dairy. J. 16, 1018–1028 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Kleerebezem, M. et al. Complete genome sequence of Lactobacillus plantarum WCFS1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100(4), 1990–1995 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Molenaar, D. et al. Exploring Lactobacillus plantarum genome diversity by using microarrays. J. Bacteriol. 187(17), 6119–6127 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Vinderola, C. G. & Reinheimer, J. A. Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative “in vitro” study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. Food Res. Int. 36, 895–904 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Thomas, C., Auwerx, J. & Schoonjans, K. Bile acids and the membrane bile acid receptor TGR5-connecting nutrition and metabolism. Thyroid. 18, 167–174 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Thomas, C. et al. TGR5-mediated bile acid sensing controls glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab. 10, 167–177 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Joyce, S. A., Shanahan, F., Hill, C. & Gahan, C. G. Bacterial bile salt hydrolase in host metabolism: potential for influencing gastrointestinal microbe-host crosstalk. Gut. Microbes 5(5), 669–674 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Nguyen, T. D. T., Kang, J. H. & Lee, M. S. Characterization of Lactobacillus plantarum PH04, a potential probiotic bacterium with cholesterol-lowering effects. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 113, 358–361 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Gorenjak, M. et al. Improvement of lipid profile by probiotic/protective cultures: study in a non-carcinogenic small intestinal cell model. N. Microbiol. 37, 51–64 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Pereira, D. I. & Gibson, G. R. Effects of consumption of probiotics and prebiotics on serum lipid levels in humans. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 37, 259–281 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Han, S., Li, T., Ellis, E., Strom, S. & Chiang, L. A Novel Bile Acid-Activated Vitamin D Receptor Signaling in Human Hepatocytes. Mol. Endocrinol. 24, 1151–1164, (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Ma, H. & Patti, M. E. Bile Acids. Obesity, Metab. Syndrome. Best. Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 28(4), 573–583, (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Xie, G. & Raufman, J. P. The farnesoid X receptor and colon cancer. J. Cancer Metastasis Treat. 2, 24–28, (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Watanabe, M. et al. Bile acids induce energy expenditure by promoting intracellular thyroid hormone activation. Nat. 439(7075), 484–489 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Govindarajan, K. et al. Unconjugated bile acids influence expression of circadian genes: a potential mechanism for microbe-host crosstalk. PLoS One 11(12), e0167319 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Grill, J. P., Cayuela, C., Antoine, J. M. & Schneider, F. Isolation and characterization of a Lactobacillus amylovorus mutant depleted in conjugated bile salt hydrolase activity: relation between activity and bile salt resistance. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89(4), 553–563 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Ren, J., Sun, K., Wu, Z., Yao, J. & Guo, B. All 4 Bile Salt Hydrolase Proteins Are Responsible for the Hydrolysis Activity in Lactobacillus plantarum ST‐III. J. Food Sci. 76(9), M622–M628, (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references


R.P. and A.C. were in part of Italian Ministry of University and Research (PRIN Project WZ2NJN_005, University of Teramo Unit), S.L.L. and S.A.J. are supported by SFI-EU JPI CABALA (Grant Number 16/ERA-HDHL/3358). S.L.L., A.L.G., C.G.C. and S.A.J. are supported by Science Foundation of Ireland Centres for Science, Engineering and Technology (CSET) programme (Grant Number SFI/12/RC/2273) to APC Microbiome Ireland. The authors gratefully acknowledge Synbiotec, Camerino, Italy for providing Lb. plantarum strains (IMC510 and IMC513).

Author information




S.A.J., R.P., S.L.L., .C.G.C.  and A.C. conceived the experiments, R.P., A.L.G. and S.L.L. conducted the experiments and discussed the data with S.A.J. and A.C. R.P., S.A.J. and A.C. drafted the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan A. Joyce.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Prete, R., Long, S.L., Gallardo, A.L. et al. Beneficial bile acid metabolism from Lactobacillus plantarum of food origin. Sci Rep 10, 1165 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing