Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Current-induced shuttlecock-like movement of non-axisymmetric chiral skyrmions


Current-induced motion of non-axisymmetric skyrmions within tilted ferromagnetic phases of polar helimagnets with the easy plane anisotropy is studied by micromagnetic simulations. Such non-axisymmetric skyrmions consist of a circular core and a crescent-shaped domain-wall region formed with respect to the tilted surrounding state. Current-driven motion of non-axisymmetric skyrmions exhibits two distinct time regimes: initially the skyrmions rotate towards the current flow direction and subsequently move along the current with the skyrmionic crescent first. According to the Thiele equation, the asymmetric distribution of the topological charge and the dissipative force tensor play an important role for giving the different velocities for the circular and the crescent-shaped constituent parts of the skyrmion what underlies such a shuttlecock-like movement. Moreover, the current-velocity relation depends on the angle of the tilted ferromagnetic phase what makes in particular the transverse velocity of skyrmions sensitive to their field-driven configurational transformation. We also argue the possibility of magnetic racetrack waveguides based on complex interplay of robust asymmetric skyrmions with multiple twisted edge states.


Magnetic chiral skyrmions are topological excitations with particle-like properties that have complex non-coplanar spin structure1,2,3,4,5. Skyrmions were recently discovered in bulk non-centrosymmetric helimagnets6,7,8,9,10 and in nanostructures with confined geometries over larger temperature regions11,12,13. According to general arguments by Hobart and Derrick14, however, any multidimensional localized states are unstable in many physical field models: particle-like inhomogeneous states may arise only as dynamic excitations, but static configurations are unstable and collapse into topological singularities14. Consequently, non-linear field equations produce only one-dimensional soliton-like solutions. Chiral Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions (DMI)15 represent a distinct stabilization mechanism working against the constraints of the Hobart-Derrick theorem14 and thus protects chiral skyrmions from radial instability1,16. As a result, non-centrosymmetric magnets constitute a particular class of materials where skyrmions can exist and thus are of special interest in fundamental physics and mathematics17,18. Nanometer size of chiral skyrmions, their topological stability and manipulation by electric currents19,20,21 enabled a new burgeoning field of research in non-volatile memory and logic devices22,23. In particular, in the skyrmion racetrack23,24,25 – a probable model for future information technology – the flow of information is encoded in the moving metastable skyrmionic bits26.

The customary approach to enhance the functionality of the skyrmion-based racetrack memory is the mechanical patterning of underlying nanosamples. As an example, suggested devices may feature a regular arrangement of notches to divide the track into a sequence of parking lots for the skyrmions26,27. An additional nanostrip on top of the racetrack may create an energy barrier along the middle and thus forms two channels for a skyrmion movement24. This enables the information storage in the lane number of each skyrmion. Moreover by adding stripes with high magnetic crystalline anisotropy at the edges, one confines the skyrmions inside and prevents their escape from the nanotrack28. One should also mention elaborate schemes that include, e.g., Y-shaped junctions22,23,29. By these, the skyrmions can be selectively driven into different nanotracks and form complementary data representation. Moreover, spin logic gates such as the “AND” and “OR” operations based on manipulations of skyrmions can be designed22,23,29.

An alternative approach to enhance the functionality of the skyrmion-based racetrack memory is to utilize the unique properties of non-axisymmetric isolated skyrmions (NISs) that in particular may emerge within tilted ferromagnetic (TFM) phases of polar magnets with the easy-plane anisotropy30 (Fig. 1(a), right). TFM state represents a homogeneously magnetized state with a ferromagnetic moment tilting away from the polar axis due to the competition between the easy-plane anisotropy and the field. As compared with the ordinary axisymmetric isolated skyrmions (AISs) within the field-saturated state16 (left side of Fig. 1(a,b)), NIS may acquire both polarities in their cores (although the vorticity bears the same sign) and thus are subject to the skyrmion Hall effect with opposite shift directions (and hence naturally form two channels, Fig. 1(d,e)). Based on the opposite sign of the topological charge, one may call two types of NISs – skyrmions (Fig. 1(d)) and anti-skyrmions (Fig. 1(e)), and consider them as binary data bits for possible practical applications. Note that skyrmions and antiskyrmions with the same polarity but the opposite vorticity were recently investigated in frustrated magnets with competing exchange interactions31,32,33.

Figure 1

(a) Schematic of the current-induced motion of isolated skyrmions in polar magnets. Magnetic field is applied along z-axis and either saturates the surrounding state (left) or due to the competition with the easy-plane anisotropy leads to the angular phase (right). Skyrmions implanted into these homogeneous states have either axisymmetric (b) or non-axisymmetric (c) shapes. On the contrary to the saturated state that hosts skyrmions only with the negative polarity (b), the angular phase accommodates both types of NIS with the magnetization in their cores both along and opposite to the field (d,e). Note the opposite orientation of the crescent with respect to the cores with opposite polarity. The color plots indicate z-component of the magnetization in AIS (b) and NIS with positive (d) and negative (e) polarities. Black arrows are projections of the magnetization on to the xy plane. The spin polarized current comprises angle θ with x- axis while NIS-dipoles q – angle φ as shown in (c).

In the present paper, we explore the current-induced dynamics of introduced non-axisymmetric skyrmions. We show that depending on the direction of the spin-polarized current (SPC) with respect to the skyrmion orientation, NIS undergoes a rotation towards the SPC with its subsequent current-aligned movement. The velocity of NIS is effectively regulated by the field magnitude (and thus by the tilt angle of the surrounding angular phase). We also underline prospects of using NISs in racetrack memory devices. Anisotropic skyrmion-skyrmion interaction that depends on their mutual orientation30 alongside with the three types of edge states naturally formed at the lateral edges of a racetrack, make NISs effective candidates to be employed in nanoelectronic devices of the next generation in which nanopatterning is boiled down to a minimum.

Micromagnetic Model

The equilibrium solutions for NIS are derived within the standard discrete model of a polar helimagnet9,10,30 where the total energy is given by:

$$\begin{array}{rcl}w & = & J\,\sum _{ < i,j > }\,({{\bf{M}}}_{i}\cdot {{\bf{M}}}_{j})-\sum _{i}\,{\bf{H}}\cdot {{\bf{M}}}_{i}-K{M}_{z}^{2}\\ & & -\,D\,\sum _{i}\,({{\bf{M}}}_{i}\times {{\bf{M}}}_{i+\hat{x}}\cdot \hat{y}-{{\bf{M}}}_{i}\times {{\bf{M}}}_{i+\hat{y}}\cdot \hat{x}\mathrm{)}.\end{array}$$

Mi is the unit vector in the direction of the magnetization at the site i of a two-dimensional square lattice and <i, j> denote pairs of nearest-neighbor spins. \(\hat{x}\) and \(\hat{y}\) are unit vectors along x and y directions, respectively. The first term describes the ferromagnetic nearest-neighbor exchange with J < 0, the second term is the Zeeman interaction with the magnetic field parallel to the z axis, and the third term is the easy-plane anisotropy with K < 0. Throughout the paper, we use the value of K that enables only TFM formation, i.e. we omit the regions of the H − K phase diagram that host modulated skyrmion lattice (SkL), spiral and elliptical cone phases34 (Fig. 2). Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI) stabilizes NISs with the Néel type of the magnetization rotation. The DMI constant D = Jtan(2π/p) defines the characteristic size of skyrmions with the period of modulated structures p. In the following simulations, D is set to 0.5J. Within model (1), AISs exist as metastable excitations of the saturated state for H > Hcr = 2K (Fig. 1(b)), while NISs (Fig. 1(c)) are present for lower fields. We use K = −2.6D2/J to consider metastable NISs, and hence Hcr = 5.2D2/J (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Magnetic phase diagram of the solutions for model (1) with the easy-plane anisotropy. Filled areas designate the regions of thermodynamical stability of corresponding phases: blue shading - cycloidal spiral, green shading - elliptical cone, white shading - polarized ferromagnetic state, yellow shading - hexagonal skyrmion lattice, orange shading - tilted ferromagnetic state. Thick black lines indicate the first-order phase transitions between corresponding phases, thin black lines - the second-order phase transitions.

AIS are characterized by azimuthal (θ) and polar (ψ) angles of the spins according to \(\theta =\theta (\rho ),\,\psi =\varphi \). Here the boundary conditions are θ(0) = π, θ(∞) = 0, while φ and ρ are cylindrical coordinates of the spatial variable (Fig. 1(a), left). On the other hand, NISs are confined by the following in-plane boundary conditions: θ(0) = π, θ(∞) = θTFM = arccos(H/2K). These boundary conditions violate the rotational symmetry, forcing the skyrmions to develop an asymmetric shape (Fig. 1(a), right).

The complete phase diagram (Fig. 2) of states of the model (1) has been reproduced from refs. 30,34 and includes stability regions of modulated phases and regions of metastable skyrmions. The phase diagram also allows to generalize the processes of skyrmion lattice formation. Along the line a − b the skyrmion lattice appears as a result of condensation of isolated skyrmions (building blocks of the hexagonal skyrmion lattice), as found for axisymmetric skyrmions in the easy-axis case1,4,16. Along the line c − d, hexagonal skyrmion lattice may appear as a result of local cutting of the cycloid (in this sense, two merons may be considered as nuclei of the skyrmion lattice. Along the first-order phase transition line a − d, however, none of the aforementioned mechanisms is appropriate. Presumably, domains of the skyrmion lattice and the elliptical cone state coexist with non-trivial domain boundary between them.

Figure 3 exhibits the magnetic structure of all the states from the phase diagram in Fig. 1. The states in Fig. 2 include in particular skyrmion chains, disordered glassy states of NISs, as well as square arrangements of AISs. We, however, state that additional minimization with respect to the size of considered numerical grids preserves only the phases from the phase diagram in Fig. 2. All other phases are the result of imposed confinement and thus could be realized in nanostructures with confined geometries.

Figure 3

Magnetic structure of solutions on the plane (magnetic field)– (easy-plane anisotropy). Such an alternative phase diagram could be rather applied to magnetic nanostructures with confined geometries (see text for details).

In the present manuscript, however, we consider only metastable NISs surrounded by the TFM state (orange shaded region in Fig. 2) what is required for racetrack memory devices. We avoid regions of the phase diagram where skyrmions form skyrmion lattices or undergo elliptical instability, as well as the regions of one-dimensional spiral states.

The current-driven dynamics of NISs and AISs was simulated using Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation35,36:

$$\frac{d{{\bf{M}}}_{i}}{dt}=-\,\gamma {{\bf{M}}}_{i}\times {{\bf{H}}}_{{\rm{eff}}}+\frac{\alpha }{{M}_{{\rm{s}}}}{{\bf{M}}}_{i}\times \frac{d{{\bf{M}}}_{i}}{dt}+\tau +{\tau }_{\beta }.$$

Here γ is the gyromagnetic ratio and α = 0.01 is the Gilbert damping constant. This value of α is common and widely used in skyrmionics. The value of the same order, α = 0.04 or even smaller α = 0.004, have been used to theoretically study spin-wave modes and their intense excitations activated by microwave magnetic fields in the SkL phases of insulating magnets37. α = 0.04 is a typical value for the ferromagnetic metal and the dilute magnetic semiconductors38. α = 0.01 was used to address the dynamics of skyrmions in frustrated magnets31,33. Since the velocity of AISs is inversely proportional to α and the SPC-velocity characteristics in the SkL phase remain universal, independent on α, nonadiabatic effect β and impurities38, the substantial room for improvement of skyrmion velocity is provided, because many magnetic materials show α much smaller than that for cobalt26, α = 0.3.

Heff is a local effective magnetic field, which at the site i is given by Heff = −∂w/∂Mi. The spin transfer torque (STT) consists of the adiabatic part, τ = A(j)Mi, and the non-adiabatic term, τβ = Mi × (j)Mi, where A = JgμB/2eMs is the coefficient proportional to the SPC density. The SPC j comprises an angle θ with x-axis (Fig. 1(c)). An orientation of NIS is characterized by an angle φ between a vector, which connects centers of the circular core and the crescent (skyrmion dipole q), and x-axis (Fig. 1(c)).

Current-Induced Motion (A Shuttlecock-Like Movement)

To systematically investigate the current-driven dynamics of NISs, we applied the SPC with different angles with respect to the skyrmion dipole initially oriented with \(\varphi =0\) (Fig. 4(a)). It was found that after an initial rotation towards the SPC, NIS-dipoles are always current-aligned with \(\varphi =\theta \) (Fig. 4(a)). A relatively small increment of the SPC angle θ allowed to exclude local minima of the skyrmion orientation with respect to the SPC. In particular, a NIS motion with its core along the SPC was excluded (although in a numerical experiment of Fig. 4(a) such a movement opposite to the SPC appeared to be feasible).

Figure 4

(a) Current-induced rotation of NISs. Independently on the angle θ, the NIS-dipoles acquire the same orientation angle φ, i.e. become co-aligned with the SPC direction. Such a forced rotation is explained by the STT energy (b) that is minimized only for the current-aligned movement.

Rotation of NIS towards the SPC direction

Figure 4(a) shows the time dependence of the dipole angle \(\varphi \) for different SPC directions θ. As expected, more time is needed to orient NIS along the SPC with increasing angle θ. The skyrmion rotation originates from the non-axisymmetric internal structure. By applying the charge current, the magnetization structure is modulated by the spin transfer torque. This modulation changes the total energy of the magnetic system. The energy gain due to the spin transfer torque ESTT can be expressed as \({E}^{{\rm{STT}}}={\int }_{{\rm{sk}}}\,d{\bf{r}}{{\bf{M}}}_{i}\cdot {{\bf{H}}}_{{\rm{eff}}}\). Figure 4(b) shows the ESTT as a function of θ featuring minima only along the SPC. We use the magnetic configuration of t = 10−13s after the current is applied. The minima, however, become shallow with the increasing magnetic field and completely disappear for H > Hcr with the onset of the field-saturated state.

Translational movement of NISs

The current-induced translational motion of NIS is well understood in terms of the Thiele equation39

$${\bf{G}}\times ({\bf{j}}-{\bf{v}})+\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}(\beta {\bf{j}}-\alpha {\bf{v}})=\nabla V,$$

where v is the velocity of the skyrmion and V is the pinning potential. The gyromagnetic coupling vector G = (0, 0, Gz) equals the topological charge

$${G}_{z}=\frac{1}{4\pi }\int \,d{\bf{r}}\frac{1}{{M}_{{\rm{s}}}^{3}}{\bf{M}}\cdot ({\partial }_{x}{\bf{M}}\times {\partial }_{y}{\bf{M}})\mathrm{}.$$

\(\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}\) is the dissipative force tensor:

$${\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}}_{ij}=\frac{1}{2\pi }\int \,d{\bf{r}}\frac{1}{{M}_{{\rm{s}}}^{2}}{\partial }_{i}{\bf{M}}\cdot {\partial }_{i}{\bf{M}}\,(i,j=x,y).$$

which is not symmetric for NISs \(({\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}}_{xx}\ne {\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}}_{yy})\), even the off-diagonal element has a finite value \(({\boldsymbol{\mathscr{D}}}_{xy}\ne \mathrm{0)}\). Thus, when the charge current j is applied, the skyrmion feels both the longitudinal and the Magnus forces38.

For θ = 0, the longitudinal (vx) and the transverse (vy) components of the velocity are represented as

$${v}_{x}=\frac{{G}_{z}^{2}+{D}_{xx}{D}_{yy}\alpha \beta +\xi \beta {D}_{yx}}{{G}_{z}^{2}+{D}_{xx}{D}_{yy}{\alpha }^{2}+\xi \alpha {D}_{xy}}j,$$
$${v}_{y}=\frac{(\alpha -\beta ){D}_{xx}{G}_{z}}{\xi \{{G}_{z}^{2}+{D}_{xx}{D}_{yy}{\alpha }^{2}-\xi \alpha {D}_{xy}\}}j\mathrm{}.$$

where ξ = Gz − αDxy.

We plot the spatial configuration of the dissipative force tensor in Fig. 5(b–d). With a sufficiently large value of dxxdyy = (∂xMxM)(∂yMyM) (plotted in Fig. 5(b)), vx = β/α, which is the same as for AISs38 and is consistent with the universal j − vx relation independent of β (Fig. 6(a)). The transverse velocity, on the contrary, is proportional to dxx (Fig. 5(c)) and is strongly field-dependent (Fig. 6(b)), since the field affects the spin configuration of NISs, which also may be reflected in the skyrmion Hall angle of the NIS. One can also see that dxxdyy of the crescent part is larger than that of the circular part (Fig. 5(a,b)). This asymmetry of dxxdyy underlies the faster velocity of the crescent resulting in the rotational motion and is the reason why we dubbed such a motion “a current-induced shuttlecock-like movement”. We neglect the effect of the off-diagonal element of the dissipative force tensor dxy = ∂xMyM, since it is much smaller than dxx and has opposite sign for upper and lower parts of NISs (Fig. 5(d)).

Figure 5

Color plots of the Mz component and the dissipative force tensor dxxdyy (b), dxx (c) and dxy (d) as defined by Eq. (5). The depicted distributions account for a rotational movement of NIS as well as for the translational dynamics in Fig. 6 (see text for details).

Figure 6

Longitudinal vx (a) and transversal vy (b) velocities of the current-induced motion of NISs for several values of the applied magnetic field and therefore for different TFM states. Whereas vx is clearly field-independent what complies with the Thiele Eq. (3), vy strongly depends on the skyrmion internal structure (see text for details).

Edge States

The practical use of NISs in racetracks hinges on their interaction with edge states. For racetracks with the field-saturated magnetization, the edge states manifest themselves as remnants of the helical spiral and repulse AISs40. For racetracks with the TFM state, however, three different types of edge states can arise (in Fig. 7 the edge states are marked with capital letters A, B, and C).

Figure 7

(a–c) Edge states in a nanostripe with the easy-plane anisotropy. An applied magnetic field induces consecutive phase transitions A-B-C (see text for details). (d) The total energy of the magnetic system (insets) in which the NIS is set on the racetrack. The position of the NIS is defined as the center of the circular vortex part. The total energy becomes larger when the NIS comes near to the edges that assures the propagation of the NISs in the quasi-one dimensional racetrack waveguide.

Transitions between edge states

The type A edge state with collinear in-plane spin components (azimuthal angle of the magnetization is ψ = π/2) is induced for lower values of the applied magnetic field. z-component of the magnetization acquires opposite signs at the opposite edges which leads to an asymmetric NIS-edge interaction potential (Fig. 7(d)). With increasing magnetic field, the A-type edge state undergoes the first-order transition into the type B edge state with the rotating magnetization across the racetrack width L. Once mz reaches unit value in the racetrack middle, the B-type edge state by the second-order transition transforms into the type C edge state with ψ = π/2 (Fig. 7(c)).

Orientational confinement of NISs

Three different types of edge states formed at the lateral boundaries of the racetrack also impose an orientational confinement on non-axisymmetric skyrmions. The A-type state implies perpendicular orientation of a skyrmion dipole q with respect to the racetrack edges (white arrow in Fig. 7(a) and magnetic configurations with NISs located near both stripe edges, Fig. 7(d)). At the same time due to the asymmetry of the magnetization distribution within the opposite edges, a NIS will be located closer to one edge than to the other (Fig. 7(d)). The SPCjx, by inducing the skyrmion rotation, may also initiate a transition A-B between edge states in spite of the B-type state is a metastable solution. The B-type state, on the contrary, may accommodate NISs with q||x. Thus, a moving NIS due to the skyrmion Hall effect will shift the whole stripe with the maximal Mz-component (marked by the dashed lines in Fig. 7(b)) towards one of the edges. The C-type edge state allows two opposite NIS orientations degeneracy of which could be removed by the SPC jx (Fig. 7(c)). In the present calculations, we avoid such extreme regimes under the larger current densities when (i) the skyrmions overcome the repulsive potential barrier from edge states what leads to skyrmion annihilation; (ii) the skyrmions are strongly deformed or even decay into magnons.

We also show that NISs rotate the surrounding homogeneous state, which otherwise is insensitive to SPC. Thus, NISs could be utilized as tumblers in nanostructures that rotate the surrounding oblique phases. In Supplementary Video, the current is applied perpendicular to the NIS-dipoles. After NISs have been rotated along the current, the current is switched off (j = 0 for t > 35 ns). This leads to the repulsive interaction between NISs30.

The considered effect is based on the anisotropic NIS-NIS interaction potential30: NISs attract each other being oriented head-to-head (initial configuration in Supplementary Video) and repulse being oriented side-to-side (the configuration after t = 35 ns). Thus, we stress that the SPC may disassemble the coupled pair of NISs or vice versa couples remote skyrmions into skyrmion chains. Recently, the chains of NISs were observed in chiral LC by the group of Ivan Smalyukh41,42,43.


In conclusion, we examined the current-induced dynamics of non-axisymmetric skyrmions that exist within TFM states of bulk polar helimagnets with the easy plane anisotropy. In particular, uniaxial anisotropy of easy-axis and easy-plane type is attributed to the bulk polar magnetic semiconductors GaV4S89 and GaV4Se810 (the C3v symmetry), respectively. Since the value of this effective anisotropy in these lacunar spinels is temperature-dependent, these material family establishes an ideal ground for the thorough study of anisotropic effects on modulated magnetic states10. The results obtained within the model (1) are also valid for thin films with interface induced DMI44,45.

We considered a shuttlecock-like movement of NISs that consists in their rotation to coalign with the SPC. We succeeded in modifying the current-velocity relation by the field-driven control of the angle in a surrounding homogeneous state. In ref. 29, conversion between skyrmions with axisymmetric and non-axisymmetric shape was achieved in a setup where the left input and right output wide regions with different material parameters are connected by a narrow nanowire. We remark that in ref. 29, the non-axisymmetric skyrmions are called bimerons. Such a terminology is also widely used to describe NISs in frustrated magnets46,47. Since frustrated magnets endow isolated skyrmions with the additional degrees of freedom - vorticity and helicity, easy-plane anisotropy forces AIS to transform into a bound pair of energetically equivalent merons with opposite vorticities, each carrying topological charge 1/2. In ref. 46, a meron cluster with a square lattice of vortices and antivortices was realized. Real-space observations of a two-dimensional square lattice of merons and antimerons emerging from a helical state was also reported in a thin plate of the chiral-lattice magnet Co 8 Zn 9 Mn 3, which exhibits in-plane magnetic anisotropy48. In polar helimagnets, the pattern of DMI vectors stabilizes only one of the formed merons leading to a crescent-shaped deformation of the other meron. Nevertheless, such a bimeron preserves its summary topological charge 1. The NIS-NIS interaction, however, has an anisotropic character and can be either attractive or repulsive depending on the relative orientation of the NIS pair. Thus, instead of square arrangement of merons46,48, chiral NIS develop disordered metastable meron spin textures49.

We also speculate that a NIS placed into the racetrack memory with three different types of the edge states not only undergoes an orientational confinement, but can also be used as a current-activated tumbler between edge states. Our results are not only relevant to the application of magnetic skyrmions in memory technology but also elucidate the fundamental properties of skyrmions and the edge states formed in the TFM states of polar helimagnets10,50.


  1. 1.

    Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. Thermodynamically stable magnetic vortex states in magnetic crystals. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 138, 255–269 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bogdanov, A. & Hubert, A. The stability of vortex-like structures in uniaxial ferromagnets. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 195, 182–192 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bogdanov, A. N. & Yablonskii, D. A. Thermodynamically stable “vortices” in magnetically ordered crystals. The mixed state of magnets. Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 95, 178–182 (1989) [Sov. Phys. JETP 68, 101–103 (1989)].

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Nagaosa, N. & Tokura, Y. Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 899–911 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rößler, U. K., Leonov, A. A. & Bogdanov, A. N. Chiral Skyrmionic matter in noncentrosymmetric magnets. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 303, 012105 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Mühlbauer, S. et al. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet. Science 323, 915–919 (2009).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Real-space observation of a two-dimensional skyrmion crystal. Nature (London) 465, 901–904 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Wilhelm, H. et al. Precursor Phenomena at the Magnetic Ordering of the Cubic Helimagnet FeGe. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 127203 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Kezsmarki, I. et al. Néel-type skyrmion lattice with confined orientation in the polar magnetic semiconductor GaV4S8. Nat. Mater. 14, 1116–1122 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bordács, S. et al. Equilibrium Skyrmion Lattice Ground State in a Polar Easy-plane Magnet. Sci. Rep. 7, 7584 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Near room-temperature formation of a skyrmion crystal in thin films of the helimagnet FeGe. Nat. Mater. 10, 106–109 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Du, H. et al. Electrical probing of field-driven cascading quantized transitions of skyrmion cluster states in MnSi nanowires. Nat. Commun. 6, 7637 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Liang, D., DeGrave, J. P., Stolt, M. J., Tokura, Y. & Jin, S. Current-driven dynamics of skyrmions stabilized in MnSi nanowires revealed by topological Hall effect. Nat. Commun. 6, 8217 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Rajaraman, R. Solitons and Instantons: An Introduction to Solitons and Instantons in Quantum Field Theory. (North- Holland, Amsterdam, 1982).

  15. 15.

    Dzyaloshinskii, I. E. Theory of Helicoidal Structures in Antiferromagnets. I. Nonmetals. Sov. Phys. JETP 19, 960–971 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Leonov, A. O. et al. The properties of isolated chiral skyrmions in thin magnetic films. New J. of Phys. 18, 065003 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Rößler, U. K., Bogdanov, A. N. & Peiderer, C. Spontaneous skyrmion ground states in magnetic metals. Nature (London) 442, 797–801 (2006).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Melcher, C. Chiral skyrmions in the plane. Proc. R. Soc. A 470, 20140394 (2014).

    ADS  MathSciNet  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schulz, T. et al. Emergent electrodynamics of skyrmions in a chiral magnet. Nat. Phys. 8, 301–304 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jonietz, F. et al. Spin Transfer Torques in MnSi at Ultralow Current Densities. Science 330, 1648–1651 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Hsu, P.-J. et al. Electric-field-driven switching of individual magnetic skyrmions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 123–126 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Sampaio, J., Cros, V., Rohart, S., Thiaville, A. & Fert, A. Nucleation, stability and currentinduced motion of isolated magnetic skyrmions in nanostructures. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 839–844 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Tomasello, R. et al. A strategy for the design of skyrmion racetrack memories. Sci. Rep. 4, 6784 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Müller, J. Magnetic skyrmions on a two-lane racetrack. New J. Phys. 19, 025002 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Wang, K. et al. Voltage Controlled Magnetic Skyrmion Motion for Racetrack Memory. Sci. Rep. 6, 23164 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Fert, A., Cros, V. & Sampaio, J. Skyrmions on the track. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8, 152–156 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Fook, H. T., Liang, G. W. & Siang, L. W. Gateable Skyrmion Transport via Field-induced Potential Barrier Modulation. Sci. Rep. 6, 21099 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Lai, P. et al. An Improved Racetrack Structure for Transporting a Skyrmion. Sci. Rep. 7, 45330 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Zhang, X., Ezawa, M. & Zhou, Y. Magnetic skyrmion logic gates: conversion, duplication and merging of skyrmions. Sci. Rep. 5, 9400 (2015).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Leonov, A. O. & Kezsmarki, I. Asymmetric isolated skyrmions in polar magnets with easyplane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 96, 014423 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Leonov, A. O. & Mostovoy, M. Edge states and skyrmion dynamics in nanostripes of frustrated magnets. Nat. Commun. 8, 14394 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Leonov, A. O. & Mostovoy, M. Multiply periodic states and isolated skyrmions in an anisotropic frustrated magnet. Nat. Commun. 6, 8275 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zhang, X. et al. Skyrmion dynamics in a frustrated ferromagnetic _lm and current-induced helicity locking-unlocking transition. Nat. Commun. 8, 1717 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Rowland, J., Banerjee, S. & Randeria, M. Skyrmions in chiral magnets with Rashba and Dresselhaus spin-orbit coupling. Phys. Rev. B 93, 020404 (2016).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. On the theory of the dispersion of magnetic permeability in ferromagnetic bodies. Phys. Z. Sowjetunion 8, 153–164 (1935).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Gilbert, T. L. A Lagrangian formulation of the gyromagnetic equation of the magnetic _eld. Physical Review 100, 1243 (1955).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Mochizuki, M. Spin-Wave Modes and Their Intense Excitation Effects in Skyrmion Crystals. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 017601 (2012).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Iwasaki, J., Mochizuki, M. & Nagaosa, N. Universal current-velocity relation of skyrmion motion in chiral magnets. Nat. Commun. 4, 1463 (2013).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Thiele, A. A. Steady-State Motion of Magnetic Domains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 230–233 (1973).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhang, X. et al. Skyrmion-skyrmion and skyrmion-edge repulsions in skyrmion-based racetrack memory. Sci. Rep. 5, 7643 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Ackerman, P. J., Boyle, T. & Smalyukh, I. I. Squirming motion of baby skyrmions in nematic uids. Nat. Commun. 8, 673 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ackerman, P. J., Lagemaat, J. V. D. & Smalyukh, I. I. Self-assembly and electrostriction of arrays and chains of hop_on particles in chiral liquid crystals. Nat. Commun. 6, 6012 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sohn, H. R. O. et al. Dynamics of topological solitons, knotted streamlines, and transport of cargo in liquid crystals. Phys. Rev. E 97, 052701 (2018).

    ADS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Romming, N. et al. Writing and deleting single magnetic skyrmions. Science 341, 636–639 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Woo, S. et al. Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current-driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets. Nat. Mater. 15, 501–506 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Kharkov, Y. A., Sushkov, O. P. & Mostovoy, M. Bound States of Skyrmions and Merons near the Lifshitz Point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 207201 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Göbel, B., Mook, A., Henk, J., Mertig, I. & Tretiakov, O. A. Magnetic bimerons as skyrmion analogues in in-plane magnets. arxiv:1811.07068.

  48. 48.

    Yu, X. Z. et al. Transformation between meron and skyrmion topological spin textures in a chiral magnet. Nature 564, 95–98 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Lin, S.-Z., Saxena, A. & Batista, C. D. Skyrmion fractionalization and merons in chiral magnets with easy-plane anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B 91, 224407 (2015).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Ezawa, Z. F. & Tsitsishvili, G. Skyrmion and bimeron excitations in bilayer quantum Hall systems. Physica E 42, 1069–1072 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are grateful to Istvan Kezsmarki, Katia Pappas, Ivan Smalyukh, and Maxim Mostovoy for useful discussions. This work was funded by JSPS Core-to-Core Program, Advanced Research Networks (Japan), JSPS Grant-in-Aid for Research Activity Start-up 17H06889, Grant-in-Aid for Scientic Research (A) 17H01052 from MEXT, Japan and CREST, JST. A.O.L. thanks Ulrike Nitzsche for technical assistance.

Author information




R.M., A.O.L. and J.-I.O. performed the calculations. A.O.L. and J.-I.O. wrote the manuscript; A.O.L., K.I. and J.-I.O. planned the project.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Andrey O. Leonov, Katsuya Inoue or Jun-ichiro Ohe.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Murooka, R., Leonov, A.O., Inoue, K. et al. Current-induced shuttlecock-like movement of non-axisymmetric chiral skyrmions. Sci Rep 10, 396 (2020).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing