Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Tempo and mode of allopatric divergence in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus dariensis in the Isthmus of Panama


Spatial isolation is one of the main drivers of allopatric speciation, but the extent to which spatially-segregated populations accumulate genetic differences relevant to speciation is not always clear. We used data from ultraconserved elements (UCEs) and whole mitochondrial genomes (i.e., mitogenomes) to explore genetic variation among allopatric populations of the weakly electric fish Sternopygus dariensis across the Isthmus of Panama. We found strong genetic divergence between eastern and western populations of S. dariensis. Over 77% of the UCE loci examined were differentially fixed between populations, and these loci appear to be distributed across the species’ genome. Population divergence occurred within the last 1.1 million years, perhaps due to global glaciation oscillations during the Pleistocene. Our results are consistent with a pattern of genetic differentiation under strict geographic isolation, and suggest the presence of incipient allopatric species within S. dariensis. Genetic divergence in S. dariensis likely occurred in situ, long after the closure of the Isthmus of Panama. Our study highlights the contribution of spatial isolation and vicariance to promoting rapid diversification in Neotropical freshwater fishes. The study of spatially-segregated populations within the Isthmus of Panama could reveal how genetic differences accumulate as allopatric speciation proceeds.


The closure of the Isthmus of Panama is one of the main drivers of Neotropical diversification. On the one hand, the rise of the Isthmus resulted in immediate reduction in gene flow between marine organisms on the two sides of the Isthmus1,2,3,4. On the other, the exposure of the land bridge facilitated dispersal and colonization in both terrestrial5 and freshwater organisms6,7. In addition, global events such as the Pleistocene glaciations8 have facilitated the expansion and contraction of local populations via changes in sea level9,10,11. Together, these events have defined the current spatial structure of the Isthmian populations6,12,13,14, with implications for allopatric divergence across isolated populations.

Accordingly, spatial isolation of populations along and across the Isthmus of Panama is expected to facilitate the accumulation of genetic differences leading to the formation of new species15,16,17,18,19. However, the extent to which spatially segregated populations accumulate genetic differences relevant to allopatric divergence is not always clear. In addition, if divergence occurs, its historical context might be difficult to define, given the dynamic nature of the rise of the Isthmus of Panama. For instance, allopatric divergence might proceed randomly across the range of segregated populations, or it might be driven by multiple dispersal and colonization events6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21. Furthermore, divergence of seemingly isolated populations might be influenced by selective (i.e., local adaptation) and random processes (i.e., drift) that are difficult to disentangle if relying on low numbers of molecular markers22. Here, we explore these issues by quantifying genetic variation at both nuclear loci linked to ultraconserved elements (UCEs23,24; and whole mitochondrial genomes across geographically segregated populations of the weakly electric fish, Sternopygus dariensis, in the Isthmus of Panama.

Sternopygus dariensis (Meek & Hildebrand, 1916) is a geographically unique species within the Blue-green knifefish (S. aequilabiatus; Humboldt, 1805) species complex. Similar to other Neotropical electric fishes25, this Sternopygus complex originated in South America, but it has since colonized the Isthmus of Panama. Although it has not been resolved whether S. aequilabiatus and S. dariensis are allospecies or distinct species, here we consider S. dariensis as an independent species following Hulen et al.26 and Albert27. However, our inferences do not change if we consider S. dariensis as synonym of S. aequilabiatus as suggested by Maldonado et al.28. Sternopygus dariensis is narrowly distributed from the Pacific slope of Colombia to the Tabasará River in western Panama26, which represents the effective range limit of the species. As with other weakly electric fishes, S. dariensis has an elongate eel-shaped body and the ability to produce electric organ discharges (EOD) used for electrolocation and communication29,30. Interestingly, despite evidence for genetic variation in other species of the genus Sternopygus31,32 no population-level analysis has been performed within the Isthmus of Panama. Thus, quantifying genetic variation across Isthmian populations of S. dariensis will help inform the tempo and mode of allopatric divergence in Neotropical freshwater fishes.

By integrating available data from mitogenomes as well as UCEs, we examine i) the historical factors driving allopatric divergence across spatially segregated populations, and ii) the genetic consequences of allopatric divergence in the weakly electric fish S. dariensis across the Isthmus of Panama.


Ultraconserved elements (UCEs)

We recovered 150 UCE loci (32 were invariant) that had an average length of 861 bp shared across individuals of S. dariensis. The 118 variant loci contained 285 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), ranging from 1 to 8 SNPs per locus. The complete dataset including the outgroup Eigenmannia humboldtii had 98 enriched UCE loci with a total alignment length of 85 028 bp. UCE raw read data are available on NCBI SRA SRP071703 (BioProject PRJNA480353, see Table 1 for BioSample numbers). Overall, our RAxML phylogeny analysis using 98 UCEs showed high bootstrap support (100%) for one western and one eastern clade, comprising samples from San Pablo, Santa María, and Tumaganti, and samples from Chucunaque, respectively (Fig. 1C).

Table 1 Sample information for S. dariensis and other Gymnotiformes included in the present study.
Figure 1

Phylogenetic reconstruction of allopatric populations of S. dariensis based on UCE data. The figure shows sampling sites (A), population structure with K = 2 representing the highest posterior probabilities as implemented in STRUCTURE and CLUMPPAK, for 118 SNPs (B), and maximum likelihood tree inferred by RAxML, for 98 UCEs sequences. Numbers at the nodes are bootstrap values (C).

Similar results were obtained with the Bayesian clustering analyses (based on the 118 SNPs), which revealed high posterior probability for two well-defined independent clusters (K = 2), as identified by maximum ΔK value (Fig. 1B). These two clusters corresponded to western (Santa María, San Pablo and Tumaganti), and eastern (Chucunaque) Panama, respectively.

When examining genetic divergence between clades, we identified a total of 91 (77%) UCE loci containing 150 fixed SNPs. All UCE loci were successfully mapped to the available genomic scaffolds of the electric eel (Electrophorus electricus), and 83 loci (containing 129 fixed SNPs) were mapped to the channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) genome (Fig. 2; Supplementary Table S1). These 129 fixed SNPs were located in 22 of the 29 channel catfish chromosomes, and ranged from 1 to 18 SNPs per chromosome, with chromosome 6 showing the highest number of fixed SNPs (Fig. 2). In addition, 21 fixed SNPs did not map to any of the known channel catfish chromosomes. Across the complete data matrix (285 SNPs), only seven chromosomes (5, 16, 17, 21, 26, 28 and 29) did not show fixed SNPs (Fig. 2). The distribution of fixed SNPs across the electric eel scaffolds was widespread and appeared to show similar positions with respect to their location on the channel catfish chromosomes (Supplementary Table S1). In addition, the frequency distribution of FST estimates between clades was highly skewed toward large values (Mean = 0.65, Median = 1.0, Skewness = −0.62; Fig. 2). Finally, our analysis of outlier loci using BayeScan 2.133 failed to detect loci under directional selection (Mean q-val = 0.90). By contrast, the PCAdapt analysis identified 12 potential outlier loci associated with differences between the two lineages, at FDR of 0.05 (Fig. S1). These SNPs occurred over 11 separate chromosomes of the channel catfish genome.

Figure 2

Chromosomal position of SNPs linked to UCEs in S. dariensis. Pink bars show highly differentiated SNPs between eastern and western populations within the Isthmus of Panama. Blue bars show non-differentiated SNPs. Chromosome mapping was done using the channel catfish reference genome. Chromosome “0” indicates a set of SNPs that did not map to any of the known chromosomes. The upper right inset shows the frequency distribution of FST values between eastern and western populations across the entire SNP dataset.


We recovered a total of 9 complete mitogenomes: 8 from the present study (GenBank accession nos. MH605309-MH605315 and MK530706) and one assembled previously (MH39959034) (Table 1). We also were able to retrieve a partial mitogenome from 1 individual from Tumaganti (GenBank accession no. MK530707). Both maximum likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses based on a concatenated dataset of 12 protein-coding genes (PCGs) derived from whole mitogenomes yielded a monophyletic relationship among samples of S. dariensis collected in Panama (Fig. 3). In agreement with the UCE results, we detected two highly supported (BS, 100%; PP, 1.0) phylogenetic clades within S. dariensis (Fig. 1C). One clade comprised samples from the three western populations (San Pablo, Santa María and Tumaganti rivers), and the other encompassed samples from the eastern population of the Chucunaque River (Fig. 3). Furthermore, the most western populations of S. dariensis, San Pablo and Santa María and Tumaganti, showed similar genetic distances among them (~0.18%), but the greatest genetic distance (2.83%, SE = 0.25%) from the eastern population of the Chucunaque River (Table 2). Across species, we found high levels of genetic divergence between S. dariensis and its most closely related species, S. arenatus (6.6%, SE = 0.91%) (Table 3).

Figure 3

Phylogenetic relationships among S. dariensis based on RAxML and MrBayes. The phylogeny represents the best-scoring maximum likelihood tree based on 12 PCGs. Branch lengths are mean estimates. Numbers at the nodes are posterior probabilities and bootstrap values. The scale bar indicates relative branch lengths.

Table 2 Pairwise uncorrected p-distances between populations of Sternopygus dariensis based on 12 PCGs.
Table 3 Pairwise uncorrected p-distances between Sternopygus species based on cox1 gene.

TCS35 haplotype networks were characterized by two centrally shared haplotypes, corresponding to the eastern and western populations, which were separated by up to 13 mutational events. In addition, there were three peripheral haplotypes. The most common haplotype was shared by the western populations (Santa María and San Pablo) and represented up to 45% of all sampled individuals. The second-most common haplotype was unique to the eastern population (Chucunaque River; Supplementary Fig. S2). These results suggest the presence of two distinct genetic groups spanning the four geographical locations sampled.

Time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA)

Mitochondrial-based dating of TMRCA placed the first split within Sternopygidae around 13.6 Ma (95% HPD: 10–28.4 Ma; Fig. 4), separating members of Eigenmanninae and Sternopygus. Two clades separated 6.3 Ma (95% HPD: 2.58–12.28 Ma) were identified within Sternopygus, the first one including S. arenatus and S. dariensis; the second clade included S. macrurus and S. xingu. The split within the first clade (S. arenatus and S. dariensis) occurred during the Pliocene period, approximately 3.4 Ma (95% HPD: 1.2–6.7 Ma), while divergence between western and eastern clades of S. dariensis took place in the Pleistocene, approximately 1.1 Ma (95% HPD: 0.5–2.6 Ma).

Figure 4

Divergence time estimates among Sternopygus species. Results are based on 2217 bp of concatenated cox1, cytb and 16S with posterior probabilities from Bayesian Inference (BI) shown in grey, reconstructed using BEAST. Nodes are individually numbered, with gray bars indicating 95% confidence intervals on divergence time estimates (in My before present). Calibrated node is indicated with a black circle. Asterisks indicate that confidence interval bars are truncated.


Allopatric divergence most often occurs when populations accumulate random genetic differences as a byproduct of spatial isolation19,36,37. However, the extent to which spatially segregated populations show progress towards allopatric divergence is not always obvious. Here, we explore this issue by using a panel of over 285 UCE, SNPs and complete mitogenome sequences in the weakly electric fish S. dariensis in the context of the biogeographic history of the Isthmus of Panama.

Overall, our analysis of population structure based on UCEs revealed two divergent clusters (without evidence for admixture) that corresponded to eastern (i.e., Chucunaque/Tuira) and western populations (Santa María, San Pablo and Tumaganti; Fig. 1B). Indeed, over 77% of UCE loci, distributed across 22 of 29 chromosomes of the channel catfish and across available scaffolds of the electric eel, contained SNPs differentially fixed between these two genetic clades (Fig. 2). In addition, the frequency distribution of FST estimates across the entire dataset was highly skewed toward large values (Fig. 2). Thus, our results are consistent with a pattern of genetic differentiation under strict geographic isolation (i.e., a model of allopatric divergence38) and suggest that S. dariensis is composed of two genetic lineages, likely representing incipient allopatric species.

Tempo and mode of allopatric divergence in S. dariensis

Allopatric divergence in primary freshwater fishes, including weakly electric fishes, in the context of Lower Mesoamerica is often associated with multiple colonization events during the dynamic formation of the Isthmus of Panama6,12. However, we showed that substantial progress towards allopatric speciation could also occur in situ following the closure of the Isthmus. This was supported by our phylogenetic analysis, which indicated that the Isthmian populations of S. dariensis constitute a monophyletic group (Fig. 3), likely derived from the South American S. arenatus over 3 Ma ago (Fig. 4). Thus, allopatric divergence in S. dariensis is likely the result of a single colonization event, followed by segregation of populations via colonization and dispersal. In addition, our analyses of mitogenome sequences revealed that divergence between eastern and western populations of S. dariensis is substantial (2.8%; Table 2) when compared to divergence across established Sternopygus species (6.6% between S. dariensis and S. arenatus; Table 3). This suggests an early geographic split in the mitochondrial genome between these populations, which occurred ~1.1 Ma (Fig. 4).

The historical context of this divergence is consistent with a scenario of early divergence between populations from Tuira/Chucunaque and Tumaganti watersheds, followed by more recent dispersal from Tumaganti to the western watersheds (Santa María and San Pablo). This scenario could explain the low genetic variation across the three western populations (i.e., Tumaganti, Santa María and San Pablo), possibly due to a strong bottleneck (or founder effect) or a limited time for the accumulation of genetic differences39,40,41. This expansion and contraction of populations was likely facilitated by changes in sea level during the Pleistocene glaciation oscillations42. For instance, during periods of low sea level, large portions of the eastern Pacific seabed remained exposed43,44,45, likely facilitating the exchange of freshwater fishes between eastern and western watersheds39,44,46. By contrast, during periods of high sea level, riverine populations likely became spatially isolated due to the intrusion of seawater39,47,48. It is important to notice that analyses of behavioral and genetic incompatibility may be necessary to confirm if these allopatric populations represent reproductively isolated populations/species within S. dariensis. For example, previous studies on electric fishes have highlighted the role of the temporal (shape) properties of the EODs in maintaining prezygotic isolation and speciation49,50. Cytogenetic analyses have also been used to test for genetic incompatibility Gymnotiformes51,52. Overall, however, our findings indicate that substantial genetic divergence has accumulated within the Isthmus of Panama. This also suggests that the diversity of Sternopygus species might have been underestimated, possibly due to the existence of cryptic species across the Isthmian range of the genus.

Exploring the genetic consequences of allopatric divergence in S. dariensis

An expected consequence of allopatric divergence is the accumulation of genetic differences across large portions of the species’ genome due to random drift38,53,54. However, allopatric divergence may also be affected by adaptive processes (e.g., local adaptation55,56), which might lead to genomic islands of divergence57,58. Distinguishing between these possibilities requires a large number of genetic markers that can be mapped across the genome59,60. Although our analysis only included a few individuals per population and a reduced representation of the species’ genome (285 SNPs), the high number of fixed loci between populations, and the broad distribution of these loci across the majority of the species’ chromosomes, is consistent with a model of strict allopatric divergence38,53. In addition, the low number of loci under selection also points towards the role of non-adaptive processes as the predominant driver of divergence in S. dariensis. For instance, Picq et al.6 found sizeable evidence of the role of drift in EOD evolution. However, further work is needed to disentangle the contribution of both factors to in situ divergence in S. dariensis post-colonization of the Isthmus of Panama. This work could benefit from inclusion of additional sampling sites, and a larger number of individuals to examine genetic structure across the entire range of the species. In addition, future work should explore the geographic origins of S. dariensis in South America and its pattern of colonization of the Isthmus of Panama.

In summary, our results suggest that allopatric divergence in S. dariensis progressed in situ post-colonization of the Isthmus of Panama, and that genetic divergence is likely to occur widely across the species’ genome. Thus, our findings support the pattern of genetic differentiation expected under the classical model of allopatric divergence. Although reproductive isolation between allopatric populations is difficult to determine in nature, we suggest that integrating UCEs and mitogenome data is a useful approach to assess the evolution of genetic incompatibilities between geographically isolated populations. Our findings also underscore the role of vicariance and spatial isolation in promoting diversification in weakly electric fishes. Although more work is needed to disentangle the demographic and phylogeographic history of S. dariensis across its range, the study of spatially segregated populations within the context of the Isthmus of Panama could provide further insights into the accumulation of genetic differences that drive allopatric diversification in freshwater fishes.


Taxon sampling and ethical statement

Fish were first detected using a wire electrode connected to a mini-amplifier (Radioshack, Fort Worth, TX), and then collected using a dip-net. Fish were then euthanized with an overdose of eugenol (C10H12O2) derived from clove oil. Twelve specimens of Sternopygus dariensis were collected from four sites in the Republic of Panama (Fig. 1A): San Pablo River (SP: 8°11ʹ24ʺ N, −81°15ʹ0ʺ W), Santa María River (SM: 8°13ʹ50ʺ N, −80°58ʹ12ʺ W), Tumaganti River (TU: 9°13ʹ12ʺ N, −78°52ʹ47ʺ W) and Quebrada La Hoya stream, which flows into the Chucunaque River (PB: 8°15ʹ0ʺ N–77°43ʹ11ʺ W). Two individuals of Eigenmannia humboldtii were also sampled and used as outgroups in the phylogenetic analysis.

UCE library preparation and sequencing

We extracted DNA from frozen-preserved tissues following the Qiagen DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA.) protocol. We quantified all DNA extracts with a Qubit Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Inc.), assessed each extract for quality by electrophoresis, and then sheared extracts by sonication to a target size of 600 bp on a Covaris S220 instrument (Covaris, Woburn, Massachusetts, USA). Approximately, 500 ng of genomic DNA was used to prepare twelve 300 bp paired-end libraries, following the protocol Kapa Kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), and the UCE protocol described in Faircloth et al.61, available online from We enriched libraries for UCE targets using Arbor Biosciences UCE Capture Kits (myBaits UCE Actinopterygians 0.5Kv1) designed to target 500 highly conserved loci across fishes. We determined the size of enriched and purified pools with a Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Inc.), and quantified enriched libraries by qPCR (Kapa Biosystems) prior to sequencing. Genomic libraries were multiplexed before sequencing 300 bp from both ends on the Illumina MiSeq platform at Naos Molecular Laboratory of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute (STRI), in Panama City, Panama.

UCEs bioinformatics

Raw sequence data were converted to FASTQ before demultiplexing, trimming and cleaning using Illumiprocessor62, which works with Trimmomatic63. We then followed the standard PHYLUCE64 pipeline ( for processing target-enriched UCEs data. Trinity version r2013-02-2565,66 was used to assemble reads using the script We then used the match_ script to map assembled contigs to the UCE probes, which allowed us to assemble contigs representing enriched UCE loci from each species. We created two FASTA datasets: the first containing both the ingroup and outgroup taxa, and the second with only the ingroup, to increase the number of shared loci. We then followed the PHYLUCE pipeline to produce MAFFT67 alignments across all loci from both datasets. We removed locus names from each alignment, and created a complete dataset, with each locus containing data for all the individuals. Alignments of the first dataset (containing both ingroup and outgroup) were concatenated in PHYLIP format for subsequent analyses of phylogenetic structure (see below).

We chose the sample with the most UCE contigs recovered within the ingroup as reference sequence to call SNPs. We mapped reads (per individual) to this reference using the program BWA68. We converted SAM files to Binary Alignment Map (BAM) files format using the SAMtools69, and Picard ( to identify and remove PCR duplicates. We added read groups for each individual using Picard, and merged the BAM files across individuals with the SAMtools. We used the Genome Analysis Toolkit (GATK; McKenna et al.70 to identify and realign indels, to call and annotate SNPs and indels, and to mask SNP calls around indels, following the population genomics pipeline for UCEs developed by Faircloth and Harvey ( This included restricting data to high-quality SNPs (Q30), and read-back phasing in GATK. At the end of the pipeline we created a Variant Call File (VCF) with nuclear SNPs. Finally, we used Python scripts from the seqcap_pop pipeline to convert the phased VCF into an input file for subsequent population analyses.

UCE analyses

To quantify phylogenetic structure across species (i.e., the first dataset), we performed unpartitioned concatenated maximum-likelihood (ML) analyses, using RAxML 8.0.1971. Support for the best ML topology was assessed by performing 1000 nonparametric bootstraps in CIPRES Science Gateway72. For this analysis we used the GTR GAMMA site-rate substitution model for the best ML tree obtained from CIPRES Science Gateway72, using JModelTest 273.

To estimate population structure across S. dariensis populations, we used a Bayesian clustering algorithm as implemented in STRUCTURE 2.3.474. One random SNP from each locus was selected using the script ( to create STRUCTURE input file, to minimize linkage disequilibrium. The number of subpopulations (ΔK) was determined using the ad-hoc statistical method, based on the rate of change in the log probability of data between successive K values. Ten independent runs for K values ranging from 1 to 4 were performed with a burn-in length of 50,000, followed by 500,000 interactions. Best K results were analyzed on Structure Harvester75 and Clumpak76.

To further examine divergence across S. dariensis populations, we quantified the proportion of SNPs that were differentially fixed (FST)77 between the two major clades recovered from the STRUCTURE analysis (see results). These analyses were performed in the R package adegenet version 3.2.278,79, and was performed on the 285 SNPs data set using the script ( To determine the genomic distribution of differentiated SNPs, we mapped each fixed SNP (UCE locus) to the available scaffolds of the electric eel, Electrophorus electricus80 genome using BLAST on SequenceServer ( implemented in EFISH genomics ( We also mapped the fixed SNPs to the channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus81 chromosomes, using the NCBI Genome Workbench version 2.12.8. In cases in which we obtained multiple hits, we retained the hits with >90% sequence identity and the highest query coverage. Finally, to examine the pattern of genetic divergence between clades, we estimated the frequency distribution, including skewness, of FST values across the entire SNP dataset.

Outlier analyses

We quantified outlier loci with two methods: BayeScan 233 and PCAdapt82. BayeScan uses differences in allele frequencies between populations, and estimates the probability that each locus is subject to selection using a Bayesian method. BayeScan was run under default settings. In PCAdapt, population structure is defined with PCA, and outliers are detected with respect to their contribution to population structure. Cattell’s graphical rule was used to choose the number of principal components (K) that identify potential SNPs under selection. Outliers were selected by performing the q-value procedure at a false discovery rate (FDR) of 0.05 using the R package qvalue83. PCAdapt was run assuming three genetic clusters after graphical evaluation of the eigenvalues according to Luu et al.82. To account for population structure, we retained the first two PC axes that explained most variation. For both analyses, the input file was created using the previously generated VCF file, and it was converted to other formats, as needed, using PGD Spider84 for BayeScan and Plink v1.985 for PCAdapt.

Recovery of mitogenomes

We identified mitogenomes from UCEs off-target reads by following the same methodology described in Aguilar et al.34. The complete sequences of mitogenomes were annotated in Geneious version 11.1.486 using the complete mitochondrial genome sequence of S. dariensis (GenBank accession no. MH399590) as a reference.

Phylogenetic analyses of complete mitochondrial genomes

In order to compare mitochondrial gene sequences, we extracted the protein coding genes (nad6 and stop codons excluded). We aligned them using Multiple Alignment using Fast Fourier Transform (MAFFT)87 in Geneious version 11.1.486. Sternopygus arenatus88 and Eigenmannia sp. mitogenomes89 were used as outgroup (Table 1). We manually checked the alignments to correct for annotation errors based on consensus, and removed positions with long gaps, as well as regions with uncertain alignment, ambiguous portions and stop codons. A General Time Reversible (GTR) model, with a proportion of invariable sites (I) and heterogeneity of substitution rates among sites using gamma distribution (G), was selected as the preferred model of nucleotide sequence evolution by jModelTest2 on XSEDE73, performed in the CIPRES Science Gateway72, with corrected Akaike information criterion (AIC). Maximum likelihood (ML) analyses were performed using RAxML. The resulting tree topology was evaluated by a rapid bootstrap analysis with 1000 replicates. Bayesian inference (BI) analyses were performed in MrBayes on XSEDE version 3.2.6 on CIPRES Science Gateway72. We ran two independent runs of 2,000,000 generations for each of the four chains. Each chain was sampled every 2000 generations with a burn-in of 25%. Trees inferred prior to stationarity were discarded as burn-in, and the remaining trees were constructed using a 50% majority-rule consensus tree with posterior probabilities.

We also assessed the evolutionary distance (uncorrected p-distance) among S. dariensis populations across all of the genes (concatenated) using uncorrected p-distances among unique haplotypes with MEGA version 790. In addition, we calculated pairwise distance across Sternopygus species (S. dariensis, S. arenatus, S. xingu and S. macrurus), using the cox1 gene. Standard error estimates were obtained by a 1000 bootstrap replicates under a maximum likelihood model91. Phylogenetic relationships between haplotypes were determined by constructing a Templeton, Crandall and Sing (TCS) haplotype network35 based on cox1 sequences in PopArt 1.7 (Population Analysis with Reticulate Trees92). One previously published cox1 (645 bp) sequence6 from Tuira River from Eastern Panama, was aligned independently to the newly generated mitogenomes.

Time to the most recent common ancestor

We estimated divergence time among populations and species using BEAST2 on XSEDE v2.4.893 on the CIPRES Science Gateway72 under a relaxed molecular clock with uncorrelated lognormal distribution of rates, to allow for lineage-specific rate variation, and using a Yule speciation model as tree prior. Sequences of cox1, cytb and 16S were concatenated on a 2217 bp alignment. Nucleotides were first grouped into four different partitions: the 1st, 2nd, and 3rd codon positions respectively for cox1 and cytb; and the 16S. Nucleotide substitution models were estimated for each partition using the Bayesian Information Criterion in Partition Finder94. The best-fit models for the three genes were TVM + I + G (for the 16S region, and the 1st and 2nd codon positions), and the TRN + G (for the 3rd codon position of the coding genes). Bayesian posterior distributions of evolutionary rates were estimated using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) procedure. Four independent MCMC chains were run for 4 × 107 generations and were sampled every 1,000 generations, after discarding the first 20% as burn-in. We used TRACER version 1.695 to test for convergence of the chains to the stationary distribution, which was determined by an effective size (ESS) of over 20095. The four independent runs were combined using LogCombiner v1.8, and the dates of divergence along with their 95% confidence intervals (HPD) were estimated using Tracer v1.6. The resulting phylogeny and the 95% HPD for the dates of divergence for the major clades were visualized using FigTree v1.496.

To calibrate the molecular clock, we used a fossil of Humboldtichthys kirschbaumi dated to c. 10 Ma, which shares morphological characters (i.e., opercle) with extant Sternopygus species97. The fossil age was placed on the stem node of the genus Sternopygus, using an uniform prior distribution with a maximum age equal to the maximum tree root height, following Picq et al.6. We used the three sequences (cox1, cytb and 16S) to include all Sternopygus species available in Genbank and four genera of Gymnotiformes as outgroups (Supplementary Table S2).

Ethics statement

Sampling permit was obtained from the Panamanian Ministry of Environment (Permit number SE/A-100-14). This research was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the Instituto de Investigaciones Científicas y Servicios de Alta Tecnología (INDICASAT AIP), and all methods were performed according to the guidelines and regulations of the approved protocol (IACUC-16-001).


  1. 1.

    Lessios, H. A. The great American schism: divergence of marine organisms after the rise of the Central American Isthmus. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 39, 63–91 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Miura, O., Torchin, M. E. & Bermingham, E. Molecular phylogenetics reveals differential divergence of coastal snails separated by the Isthmus of Panama. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 56, 40–48 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Galván-Quesada, S. et al. Molecular phylogeny and biogeography of the amphidromous fish genus Dormitator Gill 1861 (Teleostei: Eleotridae). PLoS One 11, e0153538 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    O’Dea, A. et al. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Sci Adv 2, e1600883 (2016).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Woodburne, M. O. The Great American Biotic Interchange: dispersals, tectonics, climate, sea level and holding pens. J. Mamm. Evol. 17, 245–264 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Picq, S., Alda, F., Krahe, R. & Bermingham, E. Miocene and Pliocene colonization of the Central American Isthmus by the weakly electric fish Brachyhypopomus occidentalis (Hypopomidae, Gymnotiformes). J. Biogeogr. 41, 1520–1532 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McMahan, C. D. et al. Pleistocene to holocene expansion of the black-belt cichlid in Central America, Vieja maculicauda (Teleostei: Cichlidae). PLoS One 12, e0178439 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Roberts, T. R. Ecology of fishes in the Amazon and Congo basins. Bull Mus Comp Zool, Vol 143, No 2, p 117–147, 1972. (1972).

  9. 9.

    Lambeck, K., Yokoyama, Y. & Purcell, T. Into and out of the Last Glacial Maximum: sea-level change during oxygen isotope stages 3 and 2. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 343–360 (2002).

  10. 10.

    Dias, M. S. et al. Global imprint of historical connectivity on freshwater fish biodiversity. Ecol. Lett. 17, 1130–1140 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Swartz, E. R., Chakona, A., Skelton, P. H. & Bloomer, P. The genetic legacy of lower sea levels: does the confluence of rivers during the last glacial maximum explain the contemporary distribution of a primary freshwater fish (Pseudobarbus burchelli, Cyprinidae) across isolated river systems? Hydrobiologia 726, 109–121 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Bermingham, E. & Martin, A. P. Comparative mtDNA phylogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes: testing shared history to infer the evolutionary landscape of lower Central America. Mol. Ecol. 7, 499–517 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Reeves, R. G. & Bermingham, E. Colonization, population expansion, and lineage turnover: phylogeography of Mesoamerican characiform fish. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 88, 235–255 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Ingley, S. J., Reina, R. G., Bermingham, E. & Johnson, J. B. Phylogenetic analyses provide insights into the historical biogeography and evolution of Brachyrhaphis fishes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 89, 104–114 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Faulks, L. K., Gilligan, D. M. & Beheregaray, L. B. Islands of water in a sea of dry land: hydrological regime predicts genetic diversity and dispersal in a widespread fish from Australia’s arid zone, the golden perch (Macquaria ambigua). Mol. Ecol. 19, 4723–4737 (2010).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Loxterman, J. L. & Keeley, E. R. Watershed boundaries and geographic isolation: patterns of diversification in cutthroat trout from western North America. BMC Evol. Biol. 12, 38 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hung, C.-M., Drovetski, S. V. & Zink, R. M. Recent allopatric divergence and niche evolution in a widespread Palearctic bird, the common rosefinch (Carpodacus erythrinus). Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66, 103–111 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Taugbøl, A., Junge, C., Quinn, T. P., Herland, A. & Vøllestad, L. A. Genetic and morphometric divergence in threespine stickleback in the Chignik catchment, Alaska. Ecol. Evol. 4, 144–156 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Mayr, E. Systematics and the origin of Species, from the Viewpoint of a Zoologist. (Harvard University Press, 1942).

  20. 20.

    Alda, F., Reina, R. G., Doadrio, I. & Bermingham, E. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Poecilia sphenops species complex (Actinopterygii, Poeciliidae) in Central America. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 66, 1011–1026 (2013).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Turchetto-Zolet, A. C., Pinheiro, F., Salgueiro, F. & Palma-Silva, C. Phylogeographical patterns shed light on evolutionary process in South America. Mol. Ecol. 22, 1193–1213 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Avise, J. Intraspecific Phylogeography: The mitochondrial-DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18, 489–522 (1987).

  23. 23.

    McCormack, J. E. et al. Ultraconserved elements are novel phylogenomic markers that resolve placental mammal phylogeny when combined with species-tree analysis. Genome Res. 22, 746–754 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Faircloth, B. C. et al. Ultraconserved elements anchor thousands of genetic markers spanning multiple evolutionary timescales. Syst. Biol. 61, 717–726 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Albert, J. S. & Crampton, W. G. R. Diversity and phylogeny of Neotropical electric fishes (Gymnotiformes). In Electroreception (eds Bullock, T. H., Hopkins, C. D., Popper, A. N. & Fay, R. R.) 360–409, (Springer New York, 2005).

  26. 26.

    Hulen, K. G., Crampton, W. G. R. & Albert, J. S. Phylogenetic systematics and historical biogeography of the Neotropical electric fish Sternopygus (Teleostei: Gymnotiformes). System. Biodivers. 3, 407–432 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Albert, J. S. Family Sternopygidae. Checklist of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Edipucrs, Porto Alegre 493–497 (2003).

  28. 28.

    Ocampo, J. A. M., Buckup, P. A., Gomes, J. A. & Lovejoy, N. R. Sternopygus species relationships, molecular and morphological evidence. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 6 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Moller, P. Electric fishes: history and behavior. 17, Chapman & Hall (1995).

  30. 30.

    Bullock, T. H., Fay, R. R., Hopkins, C. D. & Popper, A. N. Electroreception. Springer Handbook of Auditory Research. (Springer, 2005).

  31. 31.

    Rincón-Sandoval, M., Betancur-R, R. & Maldonado-Ocampo, J. A. Mitochondrial genomes of the South American electric knifefishes Eigenmannia humboldtii (Steindachner 1878), Eigenmannia limbata (Schreiner and Miranda Ribeiro 1903), Sternopygus aequilabiatus (Humboldt 1805) and Sternopygus macrurus (Bloch and Schneider 1801), (Gymnotiformes, Sternopygidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 3, 572–574 (2018).

  32. 32.

    Rincon-Sandoval, M., Betancur-R, R. & Maldonado-Ocampo, J. A. Comparative phylogeography of Trans-Andean freshwater fishes based on genome-wide nuclear and mitochondrial markers. Mol. Ecol. 28:1096–1115, (2019).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Foll, M. & Gaggiotti, O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics 180, 977–993 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Aguilar, C., Miller, M. J., Loaiza, J. R., Krahe, R. & De León, L. F. Mitogenomics of Central American weakly-electric fishes. Gene 686, 164–170, (2019).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Templeton, A. R., Crandall, K. A. & Sing, C. F. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data. III. Cladogram estimation. Genetics 132, 619–633 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Bush, G. L. Modes of animal speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 6, 339–364 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Kenney, A. M. & Sweigart, A. L. Reproductive isolation and introgression between sympatric Mimulus species. Mol. Ecol. 25, 2499–2517 (2016).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Feder, J. L., Flaxman, S. M., Egan, S. P., Comeault, A. A. & Nosil, P. Geographic mode of speciation and genomic divergence. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 44, 73–97 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Albert, J. S. & Reis, R. Historical biogeography of Neotropical freshwater fishes. (University of California Press, 2011).

  40. 40.

    Seehausen, O. & Wagner, C. E. Speciation in freshwater fishes. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 45, 621–651 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Souza, C. da S. de, Oliveira, C. & Pereira, L. H. G. Knodus moenkhausii (Characiformes: Characidae): one fish species, three hydrographic basins - a natural or anthropogenic phenomenon? DNA Barcodes 3 (2015).

  42. 42.

    Clark, P. U. et al. The Last Glacial Maximum. Science 325, 710–714 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Coates, A. G. et al. Closure of the Isthmus of Panama: The near-shore marine record of Costa Rica and western Panama. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 104, 814–828 (1992).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Coates, A. G. & Obando, J. A. The geologic evolution of the Central American Isthmus. Evolution and environment in tropical America 21–56 (1996).

  45. 45.

    Clark, P. U. & Mix, A. C. Ice sheets and sea level of the Last Glacial Maximum. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 1–7 (2002/1).

  46. 46.

    Schaefer, S. A. et al. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes. Phylogeny and classification of Neotropical fishes (1998).

  47. 47.

    Ochoa, L. E. et al. Genetic structure and historical diversification of catfish Brachyplatystoma platynemum (Siluriformes: Pimelodidae) in the Amazon basin with implications for its conservation. Ecol. Evol. 5, 2005–2020 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Mondin, L. A. et al. Genetic pattern and demographic history of Salminus brasiliensis: Population expansion in the Pantanal Region during the Pleistocene. Front. Genet. 9, 1 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Crampton, W. G. R., Lovejoy, N. R. & Waddell, J. C. Reproductive character displacement and signal ontogeny in a sympatric assemblage of electric fish. Evolution 65, 1650–1666 (2011).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Crampton, W. G. R., Rodríguez-Cattáneo, A., Lovejoy, N. R. & Caputi, A. A. Proximate and ultimate causes of signal diversity in the electric fish Gymnotus. J. Exp. Biol. 216, 2523–2541 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Milhomem, S. S. R. et al. Gymnotus capanema, a new species of electric knife fish (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae) from eastern Amazonia, with comments on an unusual karyotype. J. Fish Biol. 80, 802–815 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Machado, M. A. et al. Extensive karyotype reorganization in the fish Gymnotus arapaima (Gymnotiformes, Gymnotidae) highlighted by Zoo-FISH analysis. Front. Genet. 9, 8 (2018).

  53. 53.

    Wu, C.-I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14, 851–865 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Marques, L. A. & Renesto, E. Genetic variability and evidence of founder effect in Hemiodus orthonops (Characiformes: Hemiodontidae) from the upper Paraná River basin. Brazil. Acta Scientiarum. Biological Sciences 39, 53–58 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Westley, P. A. H., Ward, E. J. & Fleming, I. A. Fine-scale local adaptation in an invasive freshwater fish has evolved in contemporary time. Proc. Biol. Sci. 280, 20122327 (2013).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tiffin, P. & Ross-Ibarra, J. Advances and limits of using population genetics to understand local adaptation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 29, 673–680 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Feder, J. L., Egan, S. P. & Nosil, P. The genomics of speciation-with-gene-flow. Trends Genet. 28, 342–350 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Chaves, J. A. et al. Genomic variation at the tips of the adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches. Mol. Ecol. 25, 5282–5295 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Brown, R. P., Paterson, S. & Risse, J. Genomic signatures of historical allopatry and ecological divergence in an island lizard. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 3618–3626 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Kang, L. et al. Genomic signatures of speciation in sympatric and allopatric Hawaiian picture-winged Drosophila. Genome Biol. Evol. 8, 1482–1488 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Faircloth, B. C., Sorenson, L., Santini, F. & Alfaro, M. E. A Phylogenomic perspective on the radiation of ray-finned fishes based upon targeted sequencing of Ultraconserved Elements (UCEs). PLoS One 8, e65923 (2013).

  62. 62.

    Faircloth, B. C. Illumiprocessor: a trimmomatic wrapper for parallel adapter and quality trimming. doi: 10.6079 (2013).

  63. 63.

    Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M. & Usadel, B. Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data. Bioinformatics 30, 2114–2120 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Faircloth, B. C. PHYLUCE is a software package for the analysis of conserved genomic loci. Bioinformatics 32, 786–788 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Grabherr, M. G. et al. Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol. 29, 644–652 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Marçais, G. & Kingsford, C. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics 27, 764–770 (2011).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Katoh, K., Misawa, K., Kuma, K.-I. & Miyata, T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 30, 3059–3066 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Li, H. & Durbin, R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows–Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25, 1754–1760 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Li, H. et al. The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    McKenna, A. et al. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 20, 1297–1303 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Stamatakis, A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics 30, 1312–1313 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Miller, M. A., Pfeiffer, W. & Schwartz, T. Creating the CIPRES Science Gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In 2010 Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE) 1–8 (IEEE),

  73. 73.

    Darriba, D., Taboada, G. L., Doallo, R. & Posada, D. jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat. Methods 9, 772 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Pritchard, J. K., Wen, X. & Falush, D. Documentation for STRUCTURE software, version 2.3. University of Chicago, Chicago, IL. (2010).

  75. 75.

    Earl, D. A. & vonHoldt, B. M. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 4, 359–361 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Kopelman, N. M., Mayzel, J., Jakobsson, M., Rosenberg, N. A. & Mayrose, I. Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 15, 1179–1191 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Weir, B. S. & Cockerham, C. C. Estimating F‐statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution (1984).

  78. 78.

    R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL (2013).

  79. 79.

    Jombart, T. & Ahmed, I. Adegenet 1.3-1: ne w tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics 27, 3070–3071 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Gallant, J. R. et al. Genomic basis for the convergent evolution of electric organs. Science 344, 1522–1525 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Liu, Z. et al. The channel catfish genome sequence provides insights into the evolution of scale formation in teleosts. Nat. Commun. 7, 11757 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Luu, K., Bazin, E. & Blum, M. G. B. pcadapt: an R package to perform genome scans for selection based on principal component analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour. 17, 67–77 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Storey, J. D., Bass, A. J., Dabney, A. & Robinson, D. qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. R package version 2.6. 0. Available at github. com/jdstorey/qvalue. Accessed April 14, 2017 (2015).

  84. 84.

    Lischer, H. E. L. & Excoffier, L. PGDSpider: an automated data conversion tool for connecting population genetics and genomics programs. Bioinformatics 28, 298–299 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Purcell, S. et al. PLINK: A tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 81, 559–575 (2007).

  86. 86.

    Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Elbassiouny, A. A. et al. Mitochondrial genomes of the South American electric knifefishes (Order Gymnotiformes). Mitochondrial DNA Part B 1, 401–403 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Saitoh, K., Miya, M., Inoue, J. G., Ishiguro, N. B. & Nishida, M. Mitochondrial genomics of ostariophysan fishes: perspectives on phylogeny and biogeography. J. Mol. Evol. 56, 464–472 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Kumar, S., Stecher, G. & Tamura, K. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for Bigger Datasets. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 1870–1874 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Tamura, K., Nei, M. & Kumar, S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 11030–11035 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Leigh, J. W. & Bryant, D. popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol. Evol. 6, 1110–1116 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Drummond, A. J., Suchard, M. A., Xie, D. & Rambaut, A. Bayesian phylogenetics with BEAUti and the BEAST 1.7. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1969–1973 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Lanfear, R., Calcott, B., Ho, S. Y. W. & Guindon, S. Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 1695–1701 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. J. Tracer, version 1.5. (2007).

  96. 96.

    Rambaut, A. & Drummond, A. FigTree: Tree figure drawing tool, v1. 4.2. Institute of Evolutionary Biology, University of Edinburgh (2012).

  97. 97.

    Albert, J. S. & Fink, W. L. Phylogenetic relationships of fossil neotropical electric fishes (Osteichthyes: Gymnotiformes) from the upper Miocene of Bolivia. J. Vert. Paleontol. 27, 17–25 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors are thankful to Dr. Kristin Saltonstall and Marta Vargas from the Ecological and Evolutionary Genomics Laboratory at STRI for their support and technical assistance. This work was supported by funding from the Secretaría Nacional de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación (SENACYT, Panamá) in the form of grants (No. ITE12-002, FID16-116) to LFD. Additional support was provided by Instituto para la Formación y Aprovechamiento de los Recursos Humanos (IFARHU-SENACYT) in the form of a doctoral fellowship and SENACYT international internship to CA, and the University of Massachusetts Boston to LFD. CA and JRL were also supported by the Sistema Nacional de Investigación, (SNI), in the categories PhD Student and Researcher, respectively. We thank Carlos Arias for suggestions during data analysis, and the three anonymous reviewers for valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information




C.A. and L.F.D. conceived the study. L.F.D., M.J.M., J.R.L. and C.A. designed the research; L.F.D., R.K and R.G. conducted fieldwork; C.A. conducted the laboratory experiments and analyzed the data; C.A. and L.F.D. wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors read, revised and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis F. De León.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aguilar, C., Miller, M.J., Loaiza, J.R. et al. Tempo and mode of allopatric divergence in the weakly electric fish Sternopygus dariensis in the Isthmus of Panama. Sci Rep 9, 18828 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing