Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance

An Author Correction to this article was published on 14 February 2020

This article has been updated

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) are known to increase plant tolerance to several abiotic stresses, specifically those from dry and salty environments. In this study, we examined the endophyte bacterial community of five plant species growing in the Thar desert of Pakistan. Among a total of 368 culturable isolates, 58 Bacillus strains were identified from which the 16 most divergent strains were characterized for salt and heat stress resilience as well as antimicrobial and plant growth-promoting (PGP) activities. When the 16 Bacillus strains were tested on the non-host plant Arabidopsis thaliana, B. cereus PK6-15, B. subtilis PK5-26 and B. circulans PK3-109 significantly enhanced plant growth under salt stress conditions, doubling fresh weight levels when compared to uninoculated plants. B. circulans PK3-15 and PK3-109 did not promote plant growth under normal conditions, but increased plant fresh weight by more than 50% when compared to uninoculated plants under salt stress conditions, suggesting that these salt tolerant Bacillus strains exhibit PGP traits only in the presence of salt. Our data indicate that the collection of 58 plant endophytic Bacillus strains represents an important genomic resource to decipher plant growth promotion at the molecular level.

Introduction

Plants are largely considered to be meta-organisms due to their dependence on plant-specific growth-promoting bacterial communities1,2. This dependence is associated with bacteria that can: 1/increase plant nutrient uptake by nitrogen fixation, phosphate and zinc solubilization and siderophore production, 2/produce phytohormones e.g. indole-acetic acid (IAA), salicylic acid (SA), and abscisic acid (ABA), 3/suppress biotic stressors by production of antimicrobial compounds against plant pathogenic bacteria or fungus, and 4/confer plant tolerance to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity and extreme temperatures3,4,5,6,7,8. These characteristics led to several attempts to identify plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) that can improve crop growth and yield9,10,11,12. One possibility is to use biofertilizers to replace or reduce the use of chemical fertilizers that require non-sustainable petroleum sources. Based on Mahdi et al.13, the demand for chemical fertilizers will exceed the supply by more than 7 million tons by 2020. This shortage of fossil fuels used to produce chemical fertilizers is expected to increase the price of chemical fertilizers and consequently limit crop production worldwide and more so in developing countries. Moreover, chemical fertilizers negatively impact the agro-ecosystem and the environment as nitrogen fertilizers are made from ammonia and their continuous application results in pollution of water through leaching and emission of ammonia gas14. Also, phosphate fertilizers, that are imperative to crop production, have limited efficacy as up to 80% of the applied phosphorous precipitates in the soil14,15. Conversely, using PGPB as a biofertilizers, improve the availability of phosphorous and nutrient supplies to crops, improve soil structure and promotes a healthy, fertile soil9,10,11,12.

As sessile organisms, plants are exposed to different abiotic stresses that frequently co-occur such as high temperatures, drought and salinity16,17,18 and exerts devastating effect on crop production16,17. In this regard, at present, 20% of total cultivated and 33% of irrigated agricultural lands are affected by salt stress18 and more than 50% of arable land is expected to be affected by both drought and salinity by 205019,20. Both of these stresses have been shown to affect the water potential and turgor of plants, thereby resulting in a reduction of plant growth21,22.

Interestingly, abiotic stresses such as drought and high temperatures also influence the spread of pathogens and insects23,24,25. Thus, products that curb the loss of crops caused by pathogens and diseases are of great interest. In this regard, several studies focused on siderophore producing bacteria as an ecological solution to help plants to tolerate both biotic and abiotic stresses. For example, pyoverdine siderophores produced by Pseudomonads control wilt disease in potato caused by Fusarium oxysporum26, the inhibition of plant growth caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis27, as well as the suppression of maize root diseases caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, F. moniliforme and F. graminearum28. Ruiz et al.29 also demonstrated that the plant disease suppressing Pseudomonas protegens strain survives in a toxic environment created by the metal chelating mycotoxin Fusaric acid (produced by Fusarium strains) by producing metal scavenging siderophores including pyoverdine and pyochelin. Butaite et al.30 recently demonstrated that non-producers of siderophores, with the appropriate siderophore-receptors, can exploit foreign siderophores, while siderophore-producers that generate exclusive siderophore types render iron acquisition inaccessible to competing strains that lack the appropriate receptor.

Several studies tried to identify appropriate biofertilizers focusing on bacteria belonging to Bacillus31,32,33, Azospirillum34, Pseudomonas34, Rhizobium34, Ralstonia35, Burkholderia35, and Klebsiella35 genera that can alleviate these stresses for several crops such as rice36,37, maize38,39, tomato40 and wheat41. Not all PGPB can be commercialized as their resilience to different environmental stresses are low. In contrast, PGPB belonging to the Bacillus and Pseudomonas genera are suitable biofertilizers, as they can survive in diverse biotic and abiotic environments42,43,44,45,46. Moreover, Bacillus-based biofertilizers display high resilience to diverse environmental stresses due to their spore-forming ability. They also produce metabolites that confer to Bacillus strains better biofertilizer qualities than the non-spore forming Pseudomonas strains47. Some examples of Bacillus-based biofertilizers include Alinit48, Kodiak (Bacillus subtilis GB03)49, Quantum-400 (B. subtilis GB03), Rhizovital (B. amyloliquefaciens FZB42)50,51, and YIB (Bacillus spp.)52. Currently, none of these commercialized biofertilizers confers tolerance to crops against salt stress, or salt and drought stress simultaneously. These factors highlight the urgency for developing biofertilizers that can confer crop resilience to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses. In addition, very few studies focused on the identification of desert plant endophytic Bacillus that can alleviate salt stress as biofertilizers.

In the present study, we examined the endophytic bacterial community in plants growing in the Thar desert of Pakistan. We screened Bacillus endophytes for their ability to: 1/support plant growth, 2/fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate, 3/provide protection against biotic stresses, and 4/confer tolerance to salt stress. This search for potential Bacillus biofertilizers was performed as part of the DARWIN21 project (www.darwin21.org).

Results and Discussion

Isolation and characterization of root endophytes from diverse desert plant species

We collected our samples from the Thar Desert region in Pakistan. Table S1 describes the characteristics of the sampling site and chemical properties of the soil. Briefly, the sampling site had sandy nutrient-poor soil with less than 5% water content and a pH of 7.31. The physicochemical properties and weather conditions were very comparable with different desert regions in the Arabic peninsula53.

Bacteria were isolated from a total of five plant species: 1/two Zygophyllum simplex, 2/three Panicum antidotale, 3/two Tribulus terrestris and 4/one Euphorbium officinarum and Lasiurus scindicus plants. From surface-sterilized roots, a total of 368 bacterial endophytes were isolated from the five plant species (Table S2). Based on 16S rRNA gene sequences, a taxonomic affiliation of the bacterial isolates was assigned to 141 of the 368 isolates with 99% 16S rRNA gene sequence identity, however the rest of the isolates (227 isolates) were excluded from the current analysis due to redundancy of the identification on the genius/species level or low sequence identity in database. These 141 strains belong to four major phyla: Firmicutes (42 strains; 8 genera), Actinobacteria (51 isolates; 17 genera), Proteobacteria (43 strains; 24 genera) and Bacteroidetes (5 strains; 3 genera) (Fig. 1). Using only few plant individuals (1–3 plants) per species may skew the bacterial diversity as there is no guarantee that the plants used in this study reflect the general bacterial diversity found in the plant species at that location and larger sample sizes might affect this distribution (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
figure1

Un-rooted phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequence showing the diversity of bacteria isolated from all plants, at both the phylum and genus level. The numbers in parentheses represent the total count of unique isolates at each level.

Figure 2
figure2

Bar graph showing the distribution and diversity of bacteria cultivated from each plant at genus level. Genera represented by one isolate are not shown.

Most of the endophyte strains analyzed in the present work showed a dominance of Bacillus of the five plant species from the Thar Desert: 17% of the 141 characterized strains belonged to Bacillus (Firmicutes) as the dominant taxon, followed by the Actinobacteria genus Microbacterium (12%). Moreover, only Bacillus endophytes were isolated from all plant types (Fig. 2). Interestingly, a recent report by Eida et al.53, showed a similar pattern, as Bacillus was found to be one of the most dominant genera in a number of desert plants. Bacillus was representing a 33% of the total bacteria isolated from E. granulata, 22% from T. terrestris, 5% in P. turgidum and 9% in Z. simplex.53.

It is interesting to note that Koberl et al.54 showed that bacteria isolated from Adleya desert soil in Egypt were similarly dominated by Actinobacteria and Proteobacteria, but the Firmicutes numbers were less than half that of Actinobacteria. Marasco et al.55 further reported that bacteria isolated from the endosphere, rhizosphere, and root-surrounding soil from desert farmed Capsicum annum L. plants (growing in the desert region in Egypt, near El-Tawheed) were primarily Proteobacteria and Firmicutes, while non-cultivated arid soil harbored more Actinobacteria (genus Cellulosimicrobium) and Firmicutes (genus Bacillus) than Proteobacteria. This result was corroborated by Dai et al.56 in part, who reported the dominance of Proteobacteria and Firmicutes endophytes in Carragana microphylla growing in a plantation in the desert-region of Ningxia Hui, China. Several other studies similarly reported the dominance of Firmicutes as endophytes in plants growing in desert or arid saline land57,58,59. Taken together, the results from our study and the other endorhizosphere studies suggest that Firmicutes (especially the genus Bacillus) counts become relatively more abundant with host interaction.

As Bacillus diversity at the species level was more pronounced than that for Microbacterium, we focused our search for PGPB on the 58 isolates belonging to the Bacillus genus. The 16S rRNA gene sequences of the 58 isolates were used to construct a phylogenetic tree (Fig. 3), which categorized the strains into 8 clusters. Strains from each cluster were selected and tested for their ability to grow in liquid media. Some strains were unable to grow in liquid media, thus only 16 strains were selected for further screening for plant growth-promoting (PGP) effects.

Figure 3
figure3

Phylogenetic tree showing the relationship of the 58 newly isolated Bacillus strains, based on their 16S rRNA gene sequences. The strains used in this screen are marked with an asterisk (*). P. typhae [LN867175] was used as an out-group for the phylogenetic tree. Bacillus type strains used to construct the tree, include B. subtilis [KY206830], B. subtilis [NR_104873], B. badius [KT382256], B. circulans [KR055041], B. endophyticus [AF295302.1], B. megaterium [CP018874], B. cereus [CP023245], B. licheniformis [AY052767], B. mojavensis [NR_112725], B. axarquiensis [DQ993671.1], B. halotolerans [NR_115063], B. tequilensis [NR_104919], and Staphylococcus gallinarum [DQ350835]. Branches with support less than 50% were collapsed. Bootstrap values are shown in the tree branches.

Identification of potential Bacillus PGPB

Screening of Bacillus strains for common PGP traits

The capacity to fix nitrogen, solubilize phosphate or produce indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) are key traits of PGPB10,11,12. Zinc can also be a limiting factor in plant growth that can be improved by PGPB34,35. We therefore screened the 16 Bacillus strains for their ability to solubilize phosphorous (P) and zinc oxide (ZnO) or produce (IAA), and ammonia (Table 1). Among these, only B. subtilis PK5-26 and B. cereus PK6-15 could solubilize P and ZnO, respectively. Also, B. badius PK3-68 and the B. circulans strains PK3-15, PK3-138 and PK3-109 were the only bacteria capable of producing IAA. However, most of the strains (13 out of 16) were capable of producing ammonia. B. subtilis PK5-26, B. cereus PK6-15 and B. badius PK3-68, that exhibited some of the other PGP traits (such as solubilizing P and ZnO, and production of IAA), were amongst the strains capable of producing ammonia. Such PGP traits have been reported for other B. cereus60,61, B. subtilis31,32,33 and B. circulans62 strains, but, to our knowledge, our study is the first to report a B. badius strain with PGP traits. Studies related to zinc solubilizing bacteria (ZSB) are less common63, even though this trait has been shown to positively facilitate plant growth. Nonetheless, the search for ZSB is on the rise, and a zinc-solubilizing Bacillus strain recovered from soybean rhizosphere soil significantly increased the Zn content in soybean seeds when compared with uninoculated controls64.

Table 1 Bacillus strains screened for plant growth promotion traits. In this table, potential biocontrol agents against, 1/Pseudomonas syringae DC3000 are indicated by *, 2/Botrytis cinerea is indicated by √, and 3/Alternaria brassicicola is indicated by ∞.

Screening of Bacillus strains for siderophore production

Several studies reported siderophore functions in scavenging of iron from the host or environment65, as well as in the biological control of pathogens, as several siderophores exhibit antimicrobial activity66,67. Thus, we also screened the 16 Bacillus strains for siderophore production (Table 1). Only the B. subtilis strains PK3-9, PK1-2, PK1-3 and PK5-26 and B. tequilensis PK5-16 exhibited siderophore production. The siderophores produced by these and most other Bacillus strains have generally not been screened for their antimicrobial effects. However, B. subtilis CAS15 was shown to produce the siderophore bacillibactin which significantly reduces the incidence of Fusarium wilt disease in pepper31. Since iron supplementation reduced this biocontrol effect, these results suggest that bacillibactin may be responsible for the biocontrol effect31. Beyond this study, the reports by Butaite et al. (2017) and others26,27,28,29,30 (mentioned in the “Background” section) suggest that iron scavenging and antimicrobial functions of siderophores are both shaping microbiome diversity and community dynamics. Thus, siderophore producing strains such as the B. subtilis strains PK3-9, PK1-2, PK1-3 and PK5-26 identified in this study, may be essential components of a biofertilizer consortium.

Screening for antimicrobial effects against selected known plant pathogens

Al-Amoudi et al.68,69 reported that Firmicutes, and specifically strains from the genus Bacillus, are better targets for antimicrobial bioprospecting than Actinobacteria due to the selection pressure in environments exposed to high salinity and hydrocarbon contamination. For that reason, we further verified if these 16 Bacillus strains have antimicrobial effects that might confer disease resistance to plants. Despite the fact that only five strains showed siderophore production (the small sample size could affect this result), it is still possible that these Bacillus strains have antimicrobial activity via other mechanisms45,70,71,72. All strains were screened against the bacterial pathogen P. syringae that causes bacterial speck disease73, and the fungal pathogens Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola that cause grey mould74 and rot disease75, respectively. Most strains showed a potential as biocontrol agent except for B. subtilis PK1-2, PK5-26 and PK5-68. Specifically, 12 of the 16 strains exhibited antimicrobial effects against A. brassicicola. However, only B. circulans PK3-109 exhibited antimicrobial effects against P. syringae, while B. cereus PK6-15 and B. circulans PK3-109 exhibited antimicrobial effects against B. cinerea. Thus, only B. subtilis PK3-9 exhibits siderophore production and antimicrobial effects against A. brassicicola. Moreover, B. circulans PK3-109 and B. cereus PK6-15 were the only strains that exhibit antimicrobial effects against two of the plant pathogens used in this screening process. Also, B. subtilis PK1-3, PK5-52 and PK3-9, B. tequilensis PK3-2 and B. circulans PK3-15 and PK3-138 displayed the most effective clearing of A. brassicicola. However, this finding is not surprising as B. subtilis isolate B776 and B. subtilis OTPB177 were reported to have antimicrobial effects against A. brassicicola. Here too, it should be noted that the PGP traits are only representative of the 16 strains tested in this study, and do not necessarily reflect the capabilities of the other Bacillus strains isolated in this study.

Bacillus strain tolerance towards abiotic stresses

The selected 16 strains were also evaluated for their resilience against low (0.5 M NaCl), mild (1 M NaCl), high (1.5 M NaCl) and severe (2 M NaCl) salt stress conditions (see Table 2). All 16 strains grew well on Luria-Bertani (LB) media and LB media + 0.5 M NaCl. However, B. tequilensis PK5-16 only grew under low salt stress conditions (0.5 M NaCl), while all other strains could grow under high salt stress conditions (1.5 M NaCl). B. subtilis PK5-26, B. tequilensis PK3-2 and B. circulans PK5-39, were the only isolates able to grow under severe salt stress conditions (2 M NaCl). With the exception of B. tequilensis PK5-16, these results suggest that most of the bacteria are halophiles, growing best in media containing 0.5–2.5 M NaCl78,79. This characteristic feature makes these bacteria ideal candidates for growing plants in saline areas or upon saline irrigation. The next step is of course to test whether these bacteria can also interact beneficially with crop plants in greenhouse experiments and finally in open agriculture.

Table 2 Bacillus strain resilience against abiotic stresses. Bacillus strains were evaluated for their resilience to heat at multiple temperatures including 28 °C, 37 °C, 42 °C and 50 °C, as well as for their resilience to salinity and at various salt concentrations including 0.5% NaCl, 1% NaCl, 1.5% NaCl, and 2% NaCl at 28 °C.

Since the strains were isolated from the Thar desert, where large temperature differences occur between night and day, the 16 strains were also screened for their thermotolerance (Table 2). All strains grew at 28 °C, 37 °C and 42 °C on LB media. The majority of strains were also able to grow at 50 °C, except B. badius PK3-68, B. circulans PK3-15 and PK3-109 and B. cereus PK6-15. These data suggest that most of the strains may be simple/moderate thermophiles, as they were able to grow under heat stress conditions up to 50 °C.

We shortlisted Bacillus strains for further assessment of their ability to confer salt-resilience to model plants. For strain selection, we picked strains that are characterized with one or more PGP traits and with disease suppression capabilities. Bacillus strains with PGP traits and no antimicrobial activity were also included. The shortlisted strains were B. cereus PK6-15, B. badius PK3-68, B. circulans PK3-15, PK3-138, PK3-109, B. subtilis PK3-9, PK1-2, PK1-3, PK5-26 and B. circulans PK5-39.

Testing Bacillus strains for their ability to enhance Arabidopsis salt stress tolerance

To test the PGP potential of the Bacillus strains on plants, we inoculated Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings with strains showing positive PGP traits and disease suppression capabilities. In Table S3, we list the strains based on their ability to increase the fresh weight of A. thaliana compared to uninoculated control plants under salt stress conditions (100 mM NaCl). Bacteria were categorized as plant growth-promoting bacteria (+)PGPB and/or salt tolerance plant growth-promoting bacteria (+)ST-PGPB if they confer a statistically significant fresh weight increase to A. thaliana when compared to the uninoculated control in the absence of NaCl and in the presence of NaCl, respectively. A p value of ≤0.05 was used to determine the statistical significance and is indicated with an asterisk in Table S3. B. subtilis PK5-26, B. cereus PK6-15, and B. circulans PK3-109 (not shown in Fig. 4) significantly enhanced plant growth despite salt stress. When compared to uninoculated control plants, these strains doubled the fresh weight of A. thaliana under salt stress conditions (Fig. 4, Table S3). B. subtilis PK5-26 slightly increased plant growth under non-salt stress conditions as well as under salt stress conditions. However, B. circulans PK5-39 and PK3-138 did not increase the growth of A. thaliana under non-salt or salt stress conditions despite their ability to produce ammonia and IAA, respectively. This result indicates that strains displaying PGP traits in vitro may not necessarily function as PGPB in planta. Interestingly, B. circulans PK3-15 and PK3-109, B. cereus PK6-15 and B. subtilis PK3-9 did not display growth under non-salt conditions, but increased the fresh weight of A. thaliana by more than 50% when compared to the uninoculated control plants under salt stress conditions. These results suggest that the presence of NaCl may be a trigger for these bacteria to induce factors that facilitate the growth of A. thaliana under salt stress conditions.

Figure 4
figure4

Screening assay of A. thaliana inoculated with (A) Bacillus cereus PK6_15 and (B) Bacillus subtilis PK5_26 in non-salt (1/2 MS, 12 days) and in salt (1/2 MS + 100 mM NaCl, 15 days) conditions. The total fresh weight of Arabidopsis is presented as the mean of three biological experiments. Asterisks indicate statistical differences compared to the control samples under the same conditions based on Mann-Whitney U Test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). Abbreviations: ½ MS: ½ strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt macronutrient solution for plant medium; ½ MS + 100 mM NaCl: ½ strength Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salt macronutrient solution with 100 mM NaCl salt added for plant stress medium; Col: Arabidopsis thaliana Columbia strain (Control).

At present, the nature of the growth stimulating bacterial factors is unknown. However, a recent study described the desert plant Indigofera argentea endophyte Enterobacter sp. SA187, to produce 2-keto-4-methylthiobutyric acid (KMBA) to facilitate salt stress tolerance via stimulating the ethylene signaling pathway in Arabidopsis80. Moreover, SA187 was reported to increase the yield of the forage crop alfalfa when submitted to saline irrigations80, providing a proof of concept for the potential use of desert microbes in enhancing the growth of crop plants.

Also, plants adopt different mechanisms to cope with the stress of toxic ions81. In Eida et al.82, we demonstrate that five phylogenetically diverse bacteria isolated from the rhizosphere of three different desert plants induced salinity stress tolerance in A. thaliana through similar tissue-specific Na+ and K+ distribution patterns and transcriptional regulation of ion transporters. Currently, we do not know by which mechanisms the isolated Bacillus strains render Arabidopsis salt tolerance and further studies at the transcriptome and metabolome level are necessary to define their mode of action.

Concluding Remarks

Like similar studies, the results on the characterization and activity of the described Bacillus isolates of this study are limited by the choice of the plants, sample size and the culture-dependent approach. Nonetheless, this is the first work to identify a zinc-solubilizing B. cereus and to report the ability of multiple Bacillus strains to promote/increase plant growth under salt stress conditions. Interestingly, several Bacillus strains only showed an increase in plant growth in the presence of salt but not in the absence of salt stress. These results suggest that salt stress might trigger the production of plant factors that ultimately stimulate yet unknown bacterial factors to allow plant growth under salt stress conditions. Overall, in this work, we identified several Bacillus strains that promote plant growth under ambient and/or salt stress conditions. This work further provides the basis for a genetic evaluation of PGP traits in the context of optimizing agriculture of crops under conditions of saline water irrigation. The combination of PGP traits together with the capability of the selected Bacillus strains to enhance plant tolerance to salt stress makes them good candidates for sustainable agriculture. To reach this aim, further evaluation of the PGPR quality of the selected Bacillus strains with a variety of crops will be necessary under different culture conditions, including field tests on different soils and saline irrigation. From the variety of the isolated Bacillus strains, we hope that some will turn out to protect crops under various abiotic challenges and ensure crop productivity and yield for future generations.

Materials and Methods

Study site description

Samples were collected from the Thar desert region in Pakistan (24°45′00.4″69°56′00.8″E) at an altitude of 28 m. The selected location is characterized by low humidity, high evaporation rates, high temperature and limited rainfall. The criteria of plant species collected was based on the plants being indigenous species, perennials woody shrubs/sub-shrubs for easy access to the whole root system and are growing in different desert region including the Arabian Peninsula. Samples consisted of three plant individuals (PK3, PK3b, PK9) from P. antidotale, two plant individuals (PK5, PK7) from T. terrestris, two plant individuals (PK1, PK6) from Z. simplex, and one plant individual from both E. officinarum (PK4) and L. scindicus (PK8), collected in Zip plastic bags and kept at 4 °C (Bahauddin Zakariya University, Institute of Pure and Applied Biology, Multan, Pakistan) before shipment to Saudi Arabia.

Soil analysis

Three soil samples were collected from a site (24°45′00.4″N69°56′00.8″E) devoid of vegetation but in close proximity (approximately 2 m away from the vegetation) to the plant samples site. Each soil sample was collected up to 20 cm of depth and placed in sterile tubes that were stored at 4 °C prior to processing. Triplicates of one gram of soil from each sample were used for soil analysis by drying thoroughly followed by nitric acid (1 M) digestion as described in Alzubaidy et al.83. Element measurement was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma Optical Emission Spectrometry (Varian 720-ES ICP OES, Australia). Elements measured include P, K, Ca, Cu, Mn, Pb, Na, Ni and S. The instrument settings were: power (KW) 1.2, plasma flow (L/min) 1.65, auxiliary flow 1.5, nebulizer flow (L/min) 0.7, sample uptake delay (L/sec) 70, pump rate (rpm) 15 and rinse time (sec) 35. Carbon and Nitrogen were measured using Flash 2000 (Thermo Scientific) according to83. pH was measured using the 5 Star pH Portable Meter (Thermo Scientific, USA). All the samples were measure as three replicated with three to four technical measurement for each replicate. Three biological replicates were measured for all samples.

Isolation and cultivation of endophytes

As mentioned above, the samples consisted of three plant individuals (PK3, PK3b, PK9) from P. antidotale, two plant individuals (PK5, PK7) from T. terrestris, two plant individuals (PK1, PK6) from Z. simplex, and one plant individual from both E. officinarum (PK4) and L. scindicus (PK8). Briefly, nine surface sterilized root systems from the nine plant individuals were used for the extraction of endophytic bacteria. The bacterial endophytes were isolated using the standard cultivation-based technique. The root systems from the nine plant individuals were surface sterilized by dipping in 70% ethanol for 30 s, then 2% sodium hypochlorite for 5 minutes, followed by washing with sterilized distilled water. The sterilized roots were then macerated with 0.8% saline solution and subjected to serial dilution (10−2–10−5). Each dilution was spread in duplicate on the different media (TSA, Tryptone-Yeast (TY), R2A, LB, and R2A with 1.5% NaCl) plates. In addition, 1.5% NaCl was added to R2A was used as a fifth media to enable the isolation of endophytes that can grow in high salt concentrations. Not all colonies growing on the media plates were selected for isolation. Based on colony morphology characteristic e.g. form, elevation, margin, surface, opacity and pigmentation, only bacterial colonies were hand-picked and further purified. Single colonies were isolated from 10-4 and 10-5 dilution, in total 368 colonies were isolated; 118 from TSA, 37 from TY, 80 from R2A, 52 from LB, and 81 from R2A + 1.5% NaCl.

Taxonomical identification

Isolated strains were identified through the sequencing of their 16S rRNA genes. Bacterial DNA was extracted using GenElute™ Bacterial Genomic DNA Kits, following manufacturer’s instructions. PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes was performed using the extracted genomic DNA as the template and the universal primers 27F (5′-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3′) and 1492R (5′-TACGGYTACCTTGTTAGCACTT-3′). Thermocycler conditions started with initial denaturation at 95 °C for 1 min, followed by 30 cycles at 95 °C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 °C for 45 seconds and extension at 72 °C for 1.5 minutes, and a final polymerization extension at 72 °C for 5 minutes. PCR amplification was verified by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and those showing positive signal, were purified using EXOSAP IT (Invitrogen) then sent for Sanger sequencing at Bioscience Core Laboratory, King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST).

Phylogenetic analyses

In order to study the evolutionary history and taxonomical relationships among isolated Bacillus species, the 16S rRNA gene sequences for 58 newly isolated strains were compared with those in the GenBank database using NCBI BlastN. P. typhae [LN867175] was used as an out-group for the phylogenetic tree. Bacillus type strains used to construct the tree, include B. subtilis [KY206830], B. subtilis [NR_104873], B. badius [KT382256], B. circulans [KR055041], B. endophyticus [AF295302.1], B. megaterium [CP018874], B. cereus [CP023245], B. licheniformis [AY052767], B. mojavensis [NR_112725], B. axarquiensis [DQ993671.1], B. halotolerans [NR_115063], B. tequilensis [NR_104919], and Staphylococcus gallinarum [DQ350835]. The T-Coffee multiple sequence aligner version 1184 was used to align the 16S rRNA sequences using the parameter ‘t_coffee -mode rcoffee’. Subsequently, to identify conserved blocks from the multiple sequence alignment (MSA), the Gblocks 0.91b85 was applied onto the MSA by using the minimum sequence for flank position at 85%, maximum contig nonconserved position at 8, and minimum block length at 10. Next, we employ PhyML version 2012041286, a widely used phylogeny tool based on maximum-likelihood principle. For building the phylogeny, the bootstrap was set to SH-like branch supports, HKY8587 was used as the nucleotide-based model and parameter optimization was implemented for the tree topology, branch length and rate parameters. Finally the Newick output from PhyML was used as input for the tree-drawing tool, TreeDyn 198.388 where all branches with branch support values smaller than 50% were collapsed.

Literature search

A literature search was conducted using PubMed49 and PubMed Central49 to determine the number of articles that have assessed plant growth promotion through phosphate solubilization, zinc solubilization and indole-3-acetic acid production (see Table 3).

Table 3 A literature search was conducted for studies focused on plant growth promotion through PGP traits such as production of indole-3-acetic acid, phosphate-solubilization, zinc-solubilization.

Screening the Bacillus strains for PGP traits

For all biochemical assays, Bacillus isolate suspensions were adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 1.0 at 600 nm, and 30 μl of suspension was used to inoculate all media plates, unless otherwise stated. Also, all assays were performed in triplicate. In cases where the Bacillus isolates produced high amounts of exopolysaccharides in LB broth, strains were alternatively grown in those media from which they were originally isolated from (either TSA, TY, R2A, or R2A + salt).

Solubilization of phosphate and zinc oxide

Isolates were tested for their ability to solubilize phosphate (P) using the Pikovskaya et al.89 protocol. Briefly, bacteria were grown on Pikovskya’s (PVK) Agar (M520, Himedia) plates at 28 °C for 48 hours. Plates were observed for zone of clearance around the bacterial inoculum to identify bacteria capable of solubilizing P.

Similarly, modified PVK Agar90 was used to screen isolates for their ability to solubilize zinc oxide (ZnO). Here too, plates were observed for zone of clearance around the bacterial inoculum to identify bacteria capable of solubilizing ZnO.

Production of indole acetic acid (IAA), ammonia (NH3) and siderophores

Production of IAA was assessed using the Brick et al.91 protocol. Briefly, bacteria were grown in LBTD4 medium in L-Tryptophan (2.5 mM) for 48 hours. Fully grown cultures were centrifuged at 10000 x g for 30 min. Subsequently, 1 ml of the supernatant was mixed with two drops of orthophosphoric acid and 2 ml of the Salkowski reagent, then incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Development of pink color indicates IAA production.

NH3 production was assessed using the Cappuccino and Sherman (1996)92 protocol. Briefly, 50 μl of bacterial suspension was inoculated in 5 ml of peptone broth and incubated at 28 °C for 48–72 hours. Subsequently, 250 μl Nessler’s reagent was added to each tube. Development of brown- orange color was used as an indicator of ammonia production.

Siderophore production was detected qualitatively using the Blue Agar CAS assay as described by Louden et al.93. Formation of an orange-yellowish zone of clearance was used as an indicator of siderophore production.

Antimicrobial activity

Antimicrobial activity against plant pathogens (including P. syringae DC3000 and two pathogenic fungal strains Botrytis cinerea and Alternaria brassicicola) were detected using dual culture assay. Briefly, the fungal strains were grown at 24 °C for 20–25 days on Potato Dextrose Agar (PDA) plate. Fungal disks were made using the back side of sterile 200μl pipette tips, and placed on new plates in one side and the selected Bacillus isolates were streaked at one corner in other side. The plates were incubated at 28 °C and checked at 24 h, 48 h and 72 h for formation of cleared zone as an indicator of a potential biocontrol agent. For the antibacterial assay, P. syringae DC3000 and Bacillus isolates suspensions were grown at 28 °C, 200 rpm, overnight on LB broth adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 1.0 at 600 nm. The spread plate technique was used to inoculate LB agar plates with 100 μl aliquots of each individual DC3000 culture, and then sterile disks were soaked with the Bacillus suspension and added to each inoculated plate. Formation of a zone of clearance was used as an indicator of a potential biocontrol agent.

Screening Bacillus strains for their tolerance against abiotic stresses

Isolates were screened for their resilience against heat and salt stress. In brief, the Bacillus isolate suspensions were grown in LB broth and adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 1.0 at 600 nm, before being used to prepare serial dilutions (10−1–10−5). An aliquot of 30 µL of each dilution suspension and the non-diluted suspension was used to inoculate each LB plate used in the salt and heat stress tests. Bacillus isolates inoculated on LB agar plates were incubated at multiple temperatures 28 °C (control temperature), 37 °C, 42 °C and 50 °C) and incubated for 48 hours. These Bacillus isolates suspensions were also inoculated on LB agar plates containing various salt concentrations (0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, and 2% NaCl) that were incubated at 28 °C.

Assessing the Bacillus strains on plant growth promotion

The effect of inoculating Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 with each of the shortlisted strains (B. subtilis (PK5-26), B. cereus (PK6-15), B. badius (PK3-68), B. circulans (PK3-15; PK3-138; PK3-109), B. subtilis (PK3-9; PK1-2; PK1-3) and B. circulans (PK5-39)) was evaluated. For this assessment, bacterial cultures were grown overnight in LB broth at 28 °C at 220 rpm. Culture concentrations were then adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 0.2, 0.02 and 0.01 at 600 nm for each bacterial strain. Bacterial cultures were then pelleted and washed with 1⁄2 MS media to remove all bacterial media from the bacterial suspension. A final inoculum of 10 μl of washed bacterial suspension was inoculated to each of the 5-days-old seedlings. The control used for this method was non-inoculated seedlings.

Seeds of Arabidopsis thaliana Col-0 were surface sterilized, stratified on half-strength Murashige and Skoog Basal Salt Mixture pH 5.8, 0.9% agar (½MS) (Murashige and Skoog, 1962) without sucrose media for 2 days and then germinated for an additional 5 days at 22 °C, long day photoperiod (16 h light/8 h dark), 70 Lux. Germinated seedlings were then transferred to fresh ½MS and ½MS + 100 mM NaCl and inoculated with 10 µl of individual shortlisted strains (suspended in ½MS media adjusted to an optical density (OD) of 1.0 at 600 nm). Inoculated seedlings were incubated at 22 °C, 16 h light/8 h dark, 70 Lux, for a total of 15 days post-inoculation. At least three independent experiments corresponding to 36 plant seedlings were used for each strain analyzed. To clarify, six seedlings per plate = one technical replicate. In total, three technical replicates were analyzed per treatment (18 seedlings for non-salt conditions and 18 seedlings for salt stress conditions). On day 9, lateral root density was calculated using the standard calculation: The average number of lateral roots/cm of root length from 36 plants. Fresh weight was measured for plants growing in ½ MS on day 12 and for those growing in ½MS + 100 mM NaCl on day 15. The experiment was done in 3 biological replicates of 36 plants each for each treatment. Here it should be noted that since, roots of plants grown on non-salt media already reached the bottom of the plates after 12 days, we harvested the plants at this time point. In contrast, plants grown under salt stress is slow growing and hence were harvested at 15 days. It should be noted that we only compared salt to salt and non-salt to non-salt treated Bacillus-inoculated plants to each other.

Statistical differences were determined using the Mann-Whitney U Test (https://www.socscistatistics.com/tests/mannwhitney/Default2.aspx). For the comparison between non-salt controls and samples, and salt stressed controls and samples, the means were used. A p value of ≤0.05 was considered as statistically significant (indicated with asterisks in Fig. 4). Note that in this study we opted for the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test.

Data availability

All data used in this study have been included in this article and its Supplementary Files. The obtained 16S rRNA gene sequences were deposited in NCBI database and were assigned accession numbers MG988210 to MG988268.

Change history

  • 14 February 2020

    An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Vryzas, Z. The Plant as Metaorganism and Research on Next-Generation Systemic Pesticides - Prospects and Challenges. Front Microbiol 7, 1968, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01968 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Koberl, M., Schmidt, R., Ramadan, E. M., Bauer, R. & Berg, G. The microbiome of medicinal plants: diversity and importance for plant growth, quality and health. Front Microbiol 4, 400, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2013.00400 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Lakshmanan, V. & Bais, H. P. Factors other than root secreted malic acid that contributes toward Bacillus subtilis FB17 colonization on Arabidopsis roots. Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, 657–668 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Kumar, A. S. & Bais, H. P. Wired to the roots: impact of root-beneficial microbe interactions on aboveground plant physiology and protection. Plant Signaling & Behavior 7, 1598–1604 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Zamioudis, C. & Pieterse, C. M. Modulation of host immunity by beneficial microbes. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 25, 139–150 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Barnawal, D. et al. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria enhances wheat salt and drought stress tolerance by altering endogenous phytohormone levels and TaCTR1/TaDREB2 expression. Physiologia Plantarum (2017).

  7. 7.

    Nehra, V., Saharan, B. S. & Choudhary, M. Evaluation of Brevibacillus brevis as a potential plant growth promoting rhizobacteria for cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) crop. Springerplus 5, 948, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-016-2584-8 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    de Zelicourt, A., Al-Yousif, M. & Hirt, H. Rhizosphere microbes as essential partners for plant stress tolerance. Molecular Plant 6, 242–245 (2013).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Vurukonda, S. S., Vardharajula, S., Shrivastava, M. & Sk, Z. A. Enhancement of drought stress tolerance in crops by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiol Res 184, 13–24, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2015.12.003 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Etesami, H. & Maheshwari, D. K. Use of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPRs) with multiple plant growth promoting traits in stress agriculture: Action mechanisms and future prospects. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 156, 225–246, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.03.013 (2018).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nadeem, S. M., Ahmad, M., Zahir, Z. A., Javaid, A. & Ashraf, M. The role of mycorrhizae and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) in improving crop productivity under stressful environments. Biotechnol Adv 32, 429–448, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.12.005 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Vejan, P., Abdullah, R., Khadiran, T., Ismail, S. & Nasrulhaq Boyce, A. Role of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria in Agricultural Sustainability-A Review. Molecules 21, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21050573 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mahdi, S. S. et al. Bio-fertilizers in organic agriculture. Journal of Phytology (2010).

  14. 14.

    Lamb, J. A., Fernandez, F. G. & Kaiser, D. E. Understanding nitrogen in soils. University of Minnesota Extension,(Revised), 1–5 (2014).

  15. 15.

    Qureshi, M. et al. Role of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) in enhancing P availability and promoting cotton growth. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences 22, 204–210 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mittler, R. Abiotic stress, the field environment and stress combination. Trends in Plant Science 11, 15–19 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Prasad, P., Pisipati, S., Momčilović, I. & Ristic, Z. Independent and combined effects of high temperature and drought stress during grain filling on plant yield and chloroplast ef‐tu expression in spring wheat. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 197, 430–441 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tanji, K. K. Nature and extent of agricultural salinity. ASCE, NEW YORK, NY,(USA), 1990. 1–17 (1990).

  19. 19.

    Jamil, A., Riaz, S., Ashraf, M. & Foolad, M. Gene expression profiling of plants under salt stress. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 30, 435–458 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Jarvis, A., Lane, A. & Hijmans, R. J. The effect of climate change on crop wild relatives. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 126, 13–23 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Negrao, S., Schmockel, S. M. & Tester, M. Evaluating physiological responses of plants to salinity stress. Ann Bot 119, 1–11, https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcw191 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Farooq, M., Hussain, M., Wahid, A., Siddique, K. & Aroca, R. Plant responses to drought stress: from morphological to molecular features (2012).

  23. 23.

    Coakley, S. M., Scherm, H. & Chakraborty, S. Climate change and plant disease management. Annual Review of Phytopathology 37, 399–426 (1999).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Seherm, H. & Coakley, S. M. Plant pathogens in a changing world. Australasian Plant Pathology 32, 157–165 (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Duveiller, E., Singh, R. P. & Nicol, J. M. The challenges of maintaining wheat productivity: pests, diseases, and potential epidemics. Euphytica 157, 417–430 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Schippers, B., Bakker, A. W. & Bakker, P. A. Interactions of deleterious and beneficial rhizosphere microorganisms and the effect of cropping practices. Annual review of Phytopathology 25, 339–358 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Voisard, C., Keel, C., Haas, D. & Dèfago, G. Cyanide production by Pseudomonas fluorescens helps suppress black root rot of tobacco under gnotobiotic conditions. The EMBO Journal 8, 351 (1989).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Pal, K., Tilak, K., Saxcna, A., Dey, R. & Singh, C. Suppression of maize root diseases caused by Macrophomina phaseolina, Fusarium moniliforme and Fusarium graminearum by plant growth promoting rhizobacteria. Microbiological Research 156, 209–223 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ruiz, J. A., Bernar, E. M. & Jung, K. Production of siderophores increases resistance to fusaric acid in Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5. PloS one 10, e0117040 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Butaitė, E., Baumgartner, M., Wyder, S. & Kümmerli, R. Siderophore cheating and cheating resistance shape competition for iron in soil and freshwater Pseudomonas communities. Nature Communications 8, 414 (2017).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Yu, X., Ai, C., Xin, L. & Zhou, G. The siderophore-producing bacterium, Bacillus subtilis CAS15, has a biocontrol effect on Fusarium wilt and promotes the growth of pepper. European Journal of Soil Biology 47, 138–145 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Gaind, S. & Gaur, A. Thermotolerant phosphate solubilizing microorganisms and their interaction with mung bean. Plant and soil 133, 141–149 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Zaidi, S., Usmani, S., Singh, B. R. & Musarrat, J. Significance of Bacillus subtilis strain SJ-101 as a bioinoculant for concurrent plant growth promotion and nickel accumulation in Brassica juncea. Chemosphere 64, 991–997 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Naz, I., Ahmad, H., Khokhar, S. N., Khan, K. & Shah, A. H. Impact of zinc solubilizing bacteria on zinc contents of wheat. Am. Euras. J. Agric. Environ. Sci 16, 449–454 (2016).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Gontia-Mishra, I., Sapre, S. & Tiwari, S. Zinc solubilizing bacteria from the rhizosphere of rice as prospective modulator of zinc biofortification in rice. Rhizosphere 3, 185–190 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Cassan, F. et al. Cadaverine production by Azospirillum brasilense and its possible role in plant growth promotion and osmotic stress mitigation. european journal of soil biology 45, 12–19 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Bhambure, A. B., Mahajan, G. R. & Kerkar, S. Salt Tolerant Bacterial Inoculants as Promoters of Rice Growth and Microbial Activity in Coastal Saline Soil. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India Section B: Biological Sciences, 1–8 (2017).

  38. 38.

    Ansary, M. H. et al. Effect of Pseudomonas fluorescent on proline and phytohormonal status of maize (Zea mays L.) under water deficit stress. Annals of Biological Research 3, 1054–1062 (2012).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Nadeem, S. M., Zahir, Z. A., Naveed, M. & Arshad, M. Rhizobacteria containing ACC-deaminase confer salt tolerance in maize grown on salt-affected fields. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 55, 1302–1309 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mayak, S., Tirosh, T. & Glick, B. R. Plant growth-promoting bacteria that confer resistance to water stress in tomatoes and peppers. Plant Science 166, 525–530 (2004).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Timmusk, S. et al. Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PloS One 9, e96086 (2014).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Nadeem, S. M. et al. Synergistic use of biochar, compost and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria for enhancing cucumber growth under water deficit conditions. J Sci Food Agric 97, 5139–5145, https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.8393 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Lim, J. H. & Kim, S. D. Induction of Drought Stress Resistance by Multi-Functional PGPR Bacillus licheniformis K11 in Pepper. Plant Pathol J 29, 201–208, https://doi.org/10.5423/PPJ.SI.02.2013.0021 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Rolli, E. et al. Improved plant resistance to drought is promoted by the root‐associated microbiome as a water stress‐dependent trait. Environmental microbiology 17, 316–331 (2015).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Myresiotis, C. K., Vryzas, Z. & Papadopoulou-Mourkidou, E. Enhanced root uptake of acibenzolar-S-methyl (ASM) by tomato plants inoculated with selected Bacillus plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR). Applied soil ecology 77, 26–33 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chowdhury, S. P., Hartmann, A., Gao, X. & Borriss, R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42 - a review. Front Microbiol 6, 780, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00780 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Haas, D. & Defago, G. Biological control of soil-borne pathogens by fluorescent pseudomonads. Nat Rev Microbiol 3, 307–319 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Kilian, M. et al. FZB24® Bacillus subtilis–mode of action of a microbial agent enhancing plant vitality. Pflanzenschutz-Nachrichten Bayer 1, 1 (2000).

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Brannen, P. & Kenney, D. Kodiak®—a successful biological-control product for suppression of soil-borne plant pathogens of cotton. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology 19, 169–171 (1997).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bisutti, I., Pelz, J., Büttner, C. & Stephan, D. Field assessment on the influence of RhizoVital® 42 fl. and Trichostar® on strawberries in the presence of soil-borne diseases. Crop Protection 96, 195–203 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Bákonyi, N. et al. Comparison of effects of different biofertilisers on early development of cucumber and wheat seedlings. Zbornik Radova 44, 16–20 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Piao, C., Tang, W. & Chen, Y. Study on the biological activity of yield-increasing bacteria. Chin J Microecol 4, 55–62 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Eida, A. A. et al. Desert plant bacteria reveal host influence and beneficial plant growth properties. PloS one 13, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208223 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Köberl, M., Müller, H., Ramadan, E. M. & Berg, G. Desert farming benefits from microbial potential in arid soils and promotes diversity and plant health. PLoS One 6, e24452 (2011).

    ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Marasco, R. et al. Are drought-resistance promoting bacteria cross-compatible with different plant models? Plant Signaling & Behavior 8, e26741 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Dai, J., Liu, X. & Wang, Y. Diversity of endophytic bacteria in Caragana microphylla grown in the desert grassland of the Ningxia Hui autonomous region of China. Genetics and Molecular Research 13, 2349–2358 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    El-Deeb, B., Fayez, K. & Gherbawy, Y. Isolation and characterization of endophytic bacteria from Plectranthus tenuiflorus medicinal plant in Saudi Arabia desert and their antimicrobial activities. Journal of Plant Interactions 8, 56–64 (2013).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Zhao, S. et al. Isolation of Endophytic Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria Associated with the Halophyte Salicornia europaea and Evaluation of their Promoting Activity Under Salt Stress. Current Microbiology 73, 574–581 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Li, Y., Cheng, C. & An, D. Characterisation of endophytic bacteria from a desert plant Lepidium perfoliatum L. Plant Protection Science 53 (2017).

  60. 60.

    Vessey, J. K. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant and Soil 255, 571–586 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Joo, G.-J., Kim, Y.-M., Lee, I.-J., Song, K.-S. & Rhee, I.-K. Growth promotion of red pepper plug seedlings and the production of gibberellins by Bacillus cereus, Bacillus macroides and Bacillus pumilus. Biotechnology letters 26, 487–491 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Mehta, P., Walia, A., Kulshrestha, S., Chauhan, A. & Shirkot, C. K. Efficiency of plant growth‐promoting P‐solubilizing Bacillus circulans CB7 for enhancement of tomato growth under net house conditions. Journal of Basic Microbiology 55, 33–44 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Sayers, E. W. et al. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 47, D23–D28, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1069 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Sharma, S. K., Sharma, M. P., Ramesh, A. & Joshi, O. P. Characterization of zinc-solubilizing Bacillus isolates and their potential to influence zinc assimilation in soybean seeds. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 22, 352–359 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Cornelis, P. Iron uptake and metabolism in pseudomonads. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 86, 1637–1645 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Takehana, Y. et al. Fradiamine A, a new siderophore from the deep-sea actinomycete Streptomyces fradiae MM456M-mF7. The Journal of Antibiotics (2017).

  67. 67.

    Ong, K. S. et al. Burkholderia paludis sp. nov., an antibiotic-siderophore producing novel Burkholderia cepacia complex species, isolated from Malaysian tropical peat swamp soil. Frontiers in Microbiology 7 (2016).

  68. 68.

    Al-Amoudi, S. et al. Metagenomics as a preliminary screen for antimicrobial bioprospecting. Gene 594, 248–258 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Al-Amoudi, S. et al. Bioprospecting Red Sea coastal ecosystems for culturable microorganisms and their antimicrobial potential. Marine Drugs 14, 165 (2016).

    PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Almoneafy, A. A. et al. Tomato plant growth promotion and antibacterial related-mechanisms of four rhizobacterial Bacillus strains against Ralstonia solanacearum. Symbiosis 63, 59–70 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Chowdhury, S. P., Hartmann, A., Gao, X. & Borriss, R. Biocontrol mechanism by root-associated Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB42–a review. Frontiers in microbiology 6, 780 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Monteiro, L., Mariano, R. D. L. R. & Souto-Maior, A. M. Antagonism of Bacillus spp. against Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 23–29 (2005).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hirano, S. S. & Upper, C. D. Bacteria in the Leaf Ecosystem with Emphasis on Pseudomonas syringae—a Pathogen, Ice Nucleus, and Epiphyte. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews 64, 624–653 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Williamson, B., Tudzynski, B., Tudzynski, P. & van Kan, J. A. Botrytis cinerea: the cause of grey mould disease. Molecular Plant Pathology 8, 561–580 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Logrieco, A., Moretti, A. & Solfrizzo, M. Alternaria toxins and plant diseases: an overview of origin, occurrence and risks. World Mycotoxin. Journal 2, 129–140 (2009).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Moustafa, H., Abo-Zaid, G., Abd-Elsalam, H. & Hafez, E. Antagonistic and inhibitory effect of Bacillus subtilis against certain plant pathogenic fungi, I. Biotechnology 8, 53–61 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Chowdappa, P., Kumar, S. M., Lakshmi, M. J. & Upreti, K. Growth stimulation and induction of systemic resistance in tomato against early and late blight by Bacillus subtilis OTPB1 or Trichoderma harzianum OTPB3. Biological Control 65, 109–117 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Oren, A. Microbial life at high salt concentrations: phylogenetic and metabolic diversity. Saline systems 4, 2 (2008).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    den Besten, H. M., Mols, M., Moezelaar, R., Zwietering, M. H. & Abee, T. Phenotypic and transcriptomic analyses of mildly and severely salt-stressed Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579 cells. Applied and Environmental microbiology 75, 4111–4119 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    de Zélicourt, A. et al. Ethylene induced plant stress tolerance by Enterobacter sp. SA187 is mediated by 2‐keto‐4‐methylthiobutyric acid production. PLoS genetics 14, e1007273 (2018).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Munns, R. & Tester, M. Mechanisms of salinity tolerance. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 59, 651–681 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Eida, A. A. et al. Phylogenetically diverse endophytic bacteria from desert plants induce transcriptional changes of tissue-specific ion transporters and salinity stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci 280, 228–240, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.12.002 (2019).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Alzubaidy, H. et al. Rhizosphere microbiome metagenomics of gray mangroves (Avicennia marina) in the Red Sea. Gene 576, 626–636, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2015.10.032 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Notredame, C., Higgins, D. G. & Heringa, J. T-Coffee: A novel method for fast and accurate multiple sequence alignment. Journal of Molecular Biology 302, 205–217, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2000.4042 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Castresana, J. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17, 540–552 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Guindon, S., Delsuc, F., Dufayard, J. F. & Gascuel, O. Estimating maximum likelihood phylogenies with PhyML. Methods Mol Biol 537, 113–137, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_6 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Hasegawa, M., Kishino, H. & Yano, T. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22, 160–174 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Chevenet, F., Brun, C., Banuls, A. L., Jacq, B. & Christen, R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC Bioinformatics 7, 439, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-439 (2006).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Pikovskaya, R. Mobilization of phosphorus in soil in connection with vital activity of some microbial species. Mikrobiologiya 17, 362–370 (1948).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Bapiri, A., Asgharzadeh, A., Mujallali, H., Khavazi, K. & Pazira, E. Evaluation of Zinc solubilization potential by different strains of Fluorescent Pseudomonads. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management 16 (2012).

  91. 91.

    Brick, J. M., Bostock, R. M. & Silverstone, S. E. Rapid in situ assay for indoleacetic acid production by bacteria immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane. Applied and environmental Microbiology 57, 535–538 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Cappuccino, J. G. & Sherman, N. Microbiology: a laboratory manual (1996).

  93. 93.

    Louden, B. C., Haarmann, D. & Lynne, A. M. Use of blue agar CAS assay for siderophore detection. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 12, 51 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to acknowledge the experimental support from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Bioscience Core Laboratory. This work has been supported by the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) Base Research Fund (BAS/1/1062-01-01) to H.H. and (BAS/1/1606-01-01) to V.B.B., as well as KAUST Office of Sponsored Research (OSR) under Awards No URF/1/2302-01-01 and FCC/1/1976-02-01.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

M.M.S. and H.H. conceived the overall study. K.H.S., S.S. and H.H. collected the plant samples. M.E., A.B., V.B.B., M.M.S. and R.R. wrote the manuscript. A.B., C.A.B. and F.L. performed the isolation and 16S identification of all Pakistan collection. A.B. and R.J. performed the seedling-inoculation assay. A.B. and S.A. performed the screening for antimicrobial effects. R.R. performed the Bacillus phylogenetic tree. H.A. performed the soil analysis

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heribert Hirt.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

V.B.B. is on the Editorial Board of Scientific Reports. A.B., M.E., F.F.L., C.A.B., R.J., S.A., R.R., H.A., K.H.S., S.S., H.H. and M.M.S. declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bokhari, A., Essack, M., Lafi, F.F. et al. Bioprospecting desert plant Bacillus endophytic strains for their potential to enhance plant stress tolerance. Sci Rep 9, 18154 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54685-y

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing