Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Determination of the Faraday rotation perpendicular to the optical axis in uniaxial CeF3 crystal by using the Generalized-High Accuracy Universal Polarimeter


Many single crystals have been developed and commercialized for optical isolators. However, optical isolator materials have been limited to isotropic crystals or to the isotropic direction (optic axis) of anisotropic crystals. This study investigates the wavelength dependences of linear birefringence, linear dichroism, Faraday rotation and magnetic-circular dichroism in a single crystal rare-earth fluoride, namely CeF3. Measurements were made in the direction parallel and perpendicular to the optic axis under an applied magnetic field. The magnetic field was generated by Nd-Fe-B magnets installed in the generalized-high accuracy universal polarimeter (G-HAUP). The first application of G-HAUP to a magneto-optical material is presented. In the CeF3 crystal, the Verdet constants along directions parallel and perpendicular to the optic axis were positive over the measured wavelength region (300–680 nm), and their magnitudes were nearly equal. The success in the accurate measurement on Faraday rotation along anisotropic directions has opened the way to study on optical isolators along the direction other than optic axis.


Avoiding parasitic oscillations and frequency instabilities in amplifier systems is imperative in optical communication support for advanced information technology and Internet society. Frequency instabilities, which decrease the quality, stability and lifetime of a laser light source, have received much attention1,2. Optical isolators are based on the Faraday rotation (FR), which is a non-reciprocal magneto-optical rotation of polarization of light. FR is explained using the imaginary and anti-symmetrical part of the dielectric tensor induced by an applied magnetic field H3 in a medium. FR is generally expressed as an odd function of H4 but for sufficiently weak H the FR angle can be approximately designated by the following equation5,6:

$$\theta =VHL,$$

where V and L are the Verdet constant and the sample thickness, respectively.

Numerous single crystals have been developed and a few have been commercialized for optical isolators7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14. However, the materials of optical isolators have been limited to isotropic crystals or to the isotropic direction, (i.e., along the optic axis) of anisotropic crystals. Optically anisotropic crystals are disadvantaged by linear birefringence (LB) and linear dichroism (LD), since a light beam splits into two orthogonally linear-polarized components with different refractive indices and absorption coefficients, respectively. The differences can be two to four orders of magnitude higher than the refractive-index difference between the right and left circularly-polarized light components in circular birefringence15,16. In other words, FR in anisotropic crystals cannot be accurately measured by conventional optical apparatuses such as polarimeters and circular dichroism (CD) spectrophotometers, except along special directions such as the optic axis. Therefore, optically anisotropic directions in anisotropic crystals have been almost ignored in the magneto-optical research field.

Nevertheless, the influence of LB on FR in an anisotropic medium has attracted some interest. Chauvin measured the Verdet constants of calcite along directions slightly inclined from the optic axis, but no dependence of these constants on the light propagation direction was observed17. Ramaseshan derived an approximate negative correlation between FR and LB, and verified it in experiments on strained glasses and plastics18. It should be noted that FR has been ambiguously defined in some previous reports18,19. When linearly-polarized light enters an optically anisotropic medium along an external magnetic field, it splits into two orthogonal elliptically-polarized rays of opposite senses, traveling at different velocities. When emitted from the surface of the medium, these two vibrations superimpose to produce an elliptically-polarized light whose major axis is rotated (except in special cases) from the plane of the linearly-polarized incident light. This rotation angle, called the apparent rotation in some reports, was defined as the FR in Ramaseshan. We considered that the definition of apparent rotation is not equal to that of Faraday angle. As the superimposed polarized light become elliptical and the major axis rotates when the LB and LD exist, it is difficult to estimate whether or how FR contributes to the rotation. Later, Tabor et al. analyzed light propagation through a medium exhibiting both FR and LB from an electro-magnetic perspective, and suggested ways of measuring these physical quantities20. They measured the visible and infrared FR and LB in single crystals of rare-earth orthoferrites using transmission techniques. They also recognized the difficulties of applying a material with LB to optical devices based on FR21.

The subject material selected Faraday rotator in the present study CeF3 single crystal, is characterized by its wide transparency range (300 nm to 2500 nm) and an outstanding Verdet constant, besides of being uniaxial22,23,24. Cerium is usually found as a trivalent ion Ce3+ in condensed matter. The electronic configuration of Ce3+ is 1s22s22p6 … 4d10 4f15s25p6. Electronic transitions from 4f to 5d confer the magneto-optical properties observable in the UV-Vis-IR region1. In a previous report23, the refractive indices of the ordinary and extraordinary light rays in single crystal CeF3 at 633 nm were determined as 1.616 and 1.609, respectively. Therefore the LB is 0.007, comparable to that of the α-quartz crystal along its a axis. Even at this low order of LB magnitude (10−3), the OR of the crystal cannot be accurately measured by conventional optical apparatuses25. Previously, we developed a novel optical apparatus called the generalized-high accuracy universal polarimeter (G-HAUP), which simultaneously measures the wavelength dependences of the OR, CD, LB, and LD in an anisotropic medium (Fig. 1(a))26,27. When a sample is subjected to a magnetic field applied parallel/anti-parallel to the light propagation direction, the G-HAUP can measure its FR and Magnetic-CD (MCD). In this study, we measured the wavelength dependences of the FR, MCD and optical anisotropy in CeF3 single crystal along the optic axis (c axis) and perpendicular to the optic axis (a axis) with the G-HAUP. A magnetic field parallel/anti-parallel to the light propagation was generated by Nd-Fe-B (NIB) magnets introduced for that purpose (Fig. 1(b)).

Figure 1

(a) Optical configuration of the G-HAUP apparatus. The axes of polarizer (P) and analyzer (A) are set in the crossed-Nicols configuration. θ′ and Υ′ are the azimuthal angles of P from the extinction position and A from the crossed-Nicols configuration for the extinction position of P, respectively. (b) Photograph of the NIB magnet to apply the magnetic field parallel or anti-parallel to the light propagation direction. The mounted sample on the plate with a pinhole of diameter ~0.5 mm is sandwiched between two identical ring NIB permanent magnets. The black line represents the scale bar (1 cm).


We prepared a 307-μm thick (001) plate of single-crystal CeF3 by polishing. In structure, the CeF3 crystal belongs to the uniaxial and optically inactive crystal point group D3d (Table S1). Therefore, when the magnetic field is applied parallel to the light propagation direction, FR occurs only along the c axis. Although FR along the optic axis is easily measured by conventional optical apparatuses, we here implemented the rotating analyzer mode of G-HAUP28. To apply the magnetic field parallel or anti-parallel to the light propagation direction, we mounted the sample on a pinhole plate, and sandwiched it between two ring NIB permanent magnets. The magnetic field in the middle of the magnets was homogeneous, with a value of ~0.5 T parallel to the longitudinal direction29. The wavelength dependences of the Verdet constant along the c axis at 25 °C are plotted as black rhombuses in Fig. 2(c). The Verdet constants along the c axis were positive over the observed wavelength region, indicating that the right-handed circularly-polarized light propagates faster than its left-handed counterpart.

Figure 2

Wavelength dependences of the LB (a), LD (b), Verdet constant (c) and MCD (d) in single-crystal CeF3 at 25 °C. The black, blue and red rhombuses represent the data along the c axis, the a axis without a magnetic field and the a axis under an applied magnetic field, respectively. We eliminated the anomalous behaviors of Verdet constant and MCD due to the unstable and low-sensitivity regions in the G-HAUP measurements. The Verdet constant spectra were fitted to a simple Drude oscillator. The error bars represent the standard deviations. The error range for a axis Verdet constant in (c) is 0.32–1.40 deg/mm · T.

We then prepared a 58.0-μm thick (100) plate sample of single-crystal CeF3 by polishing. The optical characters, i.e., the directions of the fast and slow light rays, were determined under a polarizing microscope (DMLP, Leica, Hesse, Germany) with a Ehringhaus compensator. Before measuring the magneto-optical properties, we determined the wavelength dependences of the LB, LD, OR and CD along the a axis in the absence of the magnetic field at 25 °C (blue rhombuses in Fig. 2). For these measurements, the G-HAUP was operated in extended mode26,27. (The measurement principles of the G-HAUP and the data analysis of the G-HAUP measurements are described in the Supplementary Information). The LB along this axis was of the same order of magnitude as the LB of α-quartz crystal (Fig. 2(a)). However, the LDs were almost zero over the wavelength region (Fig. 2(b)). This result is consistent with the UV-Vis spectrum, which exhibits no significant absorption above 282 nm. As shown in Fig. S2(c,d), the OR and CD values were also close to zero, consistent with the clack of optical activity for this crystal structure.

Then, the wavelength dependences of the LB, LD, FR, and MCD along the a axis under a magnetic field parallel to the light propagation direction at 25 °C were measured in the extended mode of G-HAUP (red rhombuses in Fig. 2). In general, reversing the magnetic field direction inverted the signs of FR and MCD. Therefore, in order to obtain accurate spectra, we applied the magnetic field anti-parallel to the light propagation direction, re-measured the wavelength dependences, and averaged the absolute magnitudes of both sets of measurements. The values of LB and LD hardly changed with and without the magnetic field (Fig. 2(a,b)). The Verdet constants along the a axis were positive throughout the wavelength region (Fig. 2(c)).


As it is well known, the light propagation in an anisotropic crystal can be described by the Maxwell equations and by a material equation describing the macroscopic properties of the material. In general, optical phenomena are little affected by the magnetic permeability tensor μij(ω, k), so we can equate μij(ω, k) to the magnetic permeability in a vacuum. Furthermore, the dielectric permeability tensor εij(ω, k) needs to take into account the magnetization M induced by the magnetic field as:

$${\varepsilon }_{ij}(\omega ,{\bf{k}})={\varepsilon }_{ij}^{0}(\omega ,{\bf{k}})+\sum _{k}\,{f}_{ijk}{{\bf{M}}}_{k}+\sum _{k}\,\sum _{l}\,{f}_{ijkl}{{\bf{M}}}_{k}{{\bf{M}}}_{l},$$

where \({\varepsilon }_{ij}^{0}(\omega ,{\bf{k}})\) is the dielectric tensor without the applied magnetic field, and fijk and fijkl are the third- and fourth-rank axial tensors, respectively30. Eremenko and Kharchenko analyzed the relationships between the symmetries and optical properties of nonmagnetic materials. They demonstrated FR and MCD under an applied magnetic field along the light propagation direction, and magnetic LB and magnetic LD under an applied field perpendicular to the light propagation direction31. In this study, the wavelength dependences of FR in single-crystal CeF3 were successfully measured by the G-HAUP along both the c and a axes under an applied magnetic field. As the LB and LD values were almost identical in the presence and absence of the magnetic field (Fig. 2(a,b)), we concluded that no magnetic field was applied perpendicular to the light propagation direction.

Spin-orbital coupling splits the ground state of the 4f configuration of Ce3+ ions into several multiplets, which are further split by the crystal field. Under a magnetic field, the degenerate levels split into sublevels by violation of the time-reversal symmetry (Zeeman splitting). According to previous reports, the FR of CeF3 arises from the occupation probabilities of these sublevels. Each sublevels are excited by left or right-circularly-polarized light, respectively32,33. The FR of paramagnetic lanthanide ions is quantified by the Verdet constant

$$V=\frac{\pi {\nu }^{2}\chi }{2{\mu }_{B}ch}\sum _{ij}\,\frac{{C}_{ij}}{{\nu }_{ij}^{2}-{\nu }^{2}},$$

where v is the frequency of the incident light, and vij and Cij denote the frequency and probability of transitions between the electronic states i and j, respectively, χ is the magnetic susceptibility, g is the Landé factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, c is the velocity of light and h is the Planck constant.

According to Eq. (3), the magnitude of V at an arbitrary frequency v depends on the magnetic susceptibility χ and the transition probabilities Cij. In this study, the Verdet constants were positive along the c and a axes at all wavelengths in the measured range, and their magnitudes along both axes were nearly equal (Fig. 2(c)). To investigate these results, Fig. 3 plots the magnetic field dependences of the magnetic susceptibilities of single-crystal CeF3 along the c and a axes at 27 °C. The magnetic susceptibilities, measured with the SQUID instrument (VSM SQUID, Quantum Design, California, USA), were nearly identical along both axes. In addition, the Verdet constants along each the axes, respectively were fitted to a simple oscillator equation, such that

$$V=\frac{A}{{\lambda }^{2}-{\lambda }_{0}^{2}},$$

where A is a constant appropriate to the absorption wavelength λ0. The fitted A and λ0 values were 5.3516 × 105 and 239.23 nm along the c axis and 5.3553 × 105 and 245.42 nm along the a axis, respectively, and the coefficient of determination, R2, obtained by the fitting procedures were 0.999 and 0.986, respectively. The values of A and λ0 along the a axis are almost as large as the values along the c axis. In the measured wavelength region, 4f–5d electronic transitions are associated with the optical and magneto-optical properties of single-crystal CeF3. Therefore, we may reasonably consider that the anisotropy of the summed 4f–5d transition probabilities C4f−5d is zero.

Figure 3

Magnetic susceptibilities of single-crystal CeF3 along both the c axis (black) and a axis (red) at 27 °C.


The wavelength dependences of LB, LD, FR and MCD were investigated along the a and c axes of single crystal CeF3 under an applied magnetic field. These measurements were successfully collected by the G-HAUP equipped with NIB magnets. Before this study, the G-HAUP had never been applied to a magneto-optical material. The Verdet constants along the c and a axes were positive and nearly equal in magnitude in the measured wavelength region. The results suggest that a novel optical device, based on FR along axes other than the optic axis may be fabricated. When linearly-polarized light enters an optically anisotropic medium, it divides into two orthogonally linearly-polarized components with different refractive indices and absorption coefficients. Therefore, to fabricate an apparently optically isotropic device, we can set two single crystals of the same-thickness under a polarizing microscope, to compensate for the LB and LD. Although, the optical device consists of two optically anisotropic crystals, it should exhibit only FR. As a next step, we should produce and test the performance of such optical isolator. Furthermore, if the FR of an anisotropic crystal is higher in the perpendicular direction than in the parallel direction to the optic axis, it is possible to fabricate a novel optical isolator that operates under much lower magnetic fields. This in turn enables the use of significantly smaller magnets, which favors both miniaturization and cost-down.


Single-crystal growth

Single crystals of CeF3 were grown by the modified Czochralski technique are described elsewhere22,23,34 and were provided by Prof. Dr. Kiyoshi Shimamura (National Institute for Materials Science, Japan).

Introduction of NIB magnets to the G-HAUP

In the G-HAUP optical system, the sample was mounted on a Cu plate pinhole (diameter ~0.5 mm) to improve the signal-to-noise ratio of the transmitted light intensity. To apply the magnetic field parallel or anti-parallel to the light propagation direction, we sandwiched the mounted sample between two identical ring NIB permanent magnets (Fig. 1(b)). The outer diameter, inner diameter and length of each magnet were 9 mm, 3 mm, and 5.5 mm, respectively. The middle of the magnet exhibited an homogeneous magnetic field of ~0.5T parallel to the longitudinal direction29.

G-HAUP measurements

G-HAUP employs a simple optical configuration that contains only two optical elements: polarizer (P) and analyzer (A) (Fig. 1(a)). The axes of the P and A are set in the crossed-Nichols configuration, and light travels through the P, the sample (S), and the A successively. The G-HAUP is operated by measuring the transmitted light intensity as a function of rotations of the P and A at discrete azimuthal orientations, from which LB, LD, OR (ORP or FR) and CD can be extracted from the functional dependence of the intensity. Systematic errors; parasitic ellipticities p and q originating from imperfection of the P and A, respectively, and a small error angle δΥ attributed to the deviation from the correct crossed-Nicols configuration, are considered into the measuring theory of the G-HAUP and can be removed through the post-experimental procedures to obtain the accurate values of OR and CD. Measurement principle of the G-HAUP is only applied for crystal in anisotropic direction. In the case where measurement of Verdet constant in isotropic direction, Verdet constant is easily measured by conventional optical apparatuses such as polarimeter, but here it was measured by just rotating the analyzer of the G-HAUP.

In this study, we decided to follow the sign convention that is mainly accepted in the field of chemistry. The observer views from the detector looking towards the light source. When the plane of a polarization rotates clockwise, i.e., θ > 0, it is said to be dextrorotatory, whereas when the plane of a polarization rotates counterclockwise, i.e., θ < 0, it is said to be levorotatory.

We prepared two types of samples, (001) and (100) plates of single-crystal CeF3. The sample surfaces were polished by polishing machines (Nano factor, Tokyo, Japan and Metaserv 2000, Buehler, Illinoi, USA) with a diamond slurry (abrasive grain diameter 3.0 μm) and colloidal silica (32.5 nm), yielding thin samples with smooth flat surfaces.

Magnetic susceptibility measurements

The applied magnetic field dependences of the magnetic susceptibilities of single-crystal CeF3 along the c and a axes at 27 °C were measured with SQUID (VSM SQUID, Quantum Design, California, USA).


  1. 1.

    Shinagawa, K. Faraday and Kerr Effects in Ferromagnets. Magneto-Optics, Springer 137 (2000).

  2. 2.

    Weber, M. J. Faraday Rotator Materials For Laser Systems. Proc. SPIE 681, 75 (1987).

  3. 3.

    Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. Electrodynamics of continuous media. Pergamon Press Oxford (1960).

  4. 4.

    Shen, Y. R. The principles of nonlinear optics. John Wiley & Sons (1984).

  5. 5.

    Yariv, A. & Yeh, P. Optical waves in crystals: propagation and control of laser radiation. Wiley Class. Libr. (2003).

  6. 6.

    Hecht, E. Opics (5th Edition). Pearson (2002).

  7. 7.

    Rubinstein, C. B., Uitert, L. G. V. & Grodkiewicz, W. H. Magneto-Optical Properties of Rare Earth (III) Aluminum Garnets. J. Appl. Phys. 35, 3069–3070 (1964).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Linares, R. C. Growth of Garnet Laser Crystals. Solid State Commun 2, 229–231 (1964).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Geho, M., Sekijima, T. & Fujii, T. Growth of terbium aluminum garnet (Tb Al O ; TAG) single crystals by the hybrid laser floating zone machine. J. Cryst. Growth 267, 188–193 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Shimamura, K. et al. Growth of {Tb3}[Sc2−x Lux](Al3)O12 Single Crystals for Visible-Infrared Optical Isolators. Cryst. Growth & Des 10, 3466–3470 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Villora, E. G. et al. Faraday rotator properties of {Tb3}[Sc1.95 Lu0.05](Al3)O12, a highly transparent terbium-garnet for visible-infrared optical isolators. Appl. Phys. Lett. 99, 011111–011113 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Koralewski, M. Dispersion of the Faraday rotation in KDP-type crystals by pulse high magnetic field. Phys. Status Solidi A 65, K49 (1981).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Dexter, J. L., Landry, J., Cooper, D. G. & Reintjes, J. Ultraviolet optical isolators utilizing KDP-isomorphs. Opt. Commun. 80, 115 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Vasyliev, V., Molina, P., Nakamura, M., Víllora, E. G. & Shimamura, K. Magneto-optical properties of Tb0.81Ca0.19F2.81 and Tb0.76Sr0.24F2.76 single crystals. Opt. Mater 33, 1710 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Nye, J. F. Physical Properties of Crystals: Their Representation by Tensors and Matrices. Clarendon Press (1985).

  16. 16.

    Shindo, Y., Nishiro, M. & Maeda, S. Problems of CD Spectrometers (V): Can We Measure CD and LD Simultaneously? Comments on Differential Polarization. Microscopy (CD and Linear Dichroism) Biopolym 30, 405–413 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chauvin, M. On the magnetic rotatory power in crystal-line bodies. C.R. Acad. Sci., Paris 102, 972 (1886).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Ramaseshan, S. Faraday effect and birefringence-I. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 34, 32–40 (1951).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Oh, E., Bartholomew, D. U., Ramdas, A. K., Furdyna, J. K. & Debska, U. Birefringence and Faraday effect in Cd1−xMnxSe. Phys. Rev. B 42, 5201–5211 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Tabor, W. J. & Chen, F. S. Electromagnetic Propagation through Materials Possessing Both Faraday Rotation and Birefringence: Experiments with Ytterbium Orthoferrite. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 2760–2765 (1969).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Tabor, W. J., Anderson, A. W. & Uitert, L. G. V. Visible and Infrared Faraday Rotation and Birefringence of Single-Crystal Rare-Earth Orthoferrites. J. Appl. Phys. 41, 3018–3021 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Molina, P., Vasyliev, V., Víllora, E. G. & Shimamura, K. CeF and PrF as UV-Visible Faraday rotators. Opt. Exp 19, 11786–11791 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Vasyliev, V. et al. UV-visible Faraday rotators based on rare-earth fluoride single crystals: LiREF4 (RE = Tb, Dy, Ho, Er and Yb), PrF3 and CeF3. Opt. Exp 20, 14460–14470 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Guo, F. et al. Czochralski growth, magnetic properties and Faraday characteristics of CeAlO3 crystals. Cryst 9, 245 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kobayashi, J., Asahi, T., Takahashi, S. & Glazer, A. M. Evaluation of the systematic errors of polarimetric measurements: application to measurements of the gyration tensors of α-quartz by the HAUP. J. Appl. Cryst. 21, 479–484 (1988).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Kobayashi, J. et al. Optical properties of superconducting Bi Sr CaCu O. Phys. Rev. B 53, 11784–11795 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Tanaka, M., Nakamura, N., Koshima, H. & Asahi, T. An application of the advanced high-accuracy universal polarimeter to the chiroptical measurement of an intercalated compound K Nb O with high anisotropy. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys 45, 175303–175310 (2012).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Ishikawa, K. et al. Absolute chirality of the γ-polymorph of glycine: correlation of the absolute structure with the optical rotation. Chem. Comm 48, 6031–6033 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Víllora, E. G., Shimamura, K. & Plaza, G. R. Ultraviolet-visible optical isolators based on CeF3 Faraday rotator. J. Appl. Phys. 117, 233101–233104 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Dillon, J. F. Jr., Remeika, J. P. & Staton, C. R. Linear magnetic birefringence in cubic magnetic crystals. J. Appl. Phys. 40, 1510–1511 (1969).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Eremenko, V. V. & Kharchenko, N. F. Magneto-optics of antiferromagnets. Phys. Reports 155, 379–401 (1987).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Xu, Y. & Duan, M. Theory of Faraday rotation and susceptibility of rare-earth trifluorides. Phys. Rev. B 46, 11636–11641 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Duan, M. & Xu, Y. A theoretical investigation on the magneto-optical effect of CeF and NdF. J. Mag. Mag. Mater 115, 1–8 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shimamura, K., Vıllora, E. G., Nakakita, S., Nikl, M. & Ichinose, N. Growth and scintillation characteristics of CeF, PrF and NdF single crystals. J. Cryst. Growth 264, 208–215 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank Prof. Dr. Kiyoshi Shimamura for growing the single crystals of CeF3. We thank Prof. Dr. Bart Kahr (New York University, USA), Prof. Dr. Takuro Katsufuji (Waseda University, Japan) and Dr. Hirohiko Murakami (ULVAC Company, Japan) for their fruitful discussions and comments. This study was financially supported by the Program for Leading Graduate Program in Science and Engineering, Waseda University, from the Ministry of Education, Sports, Culture Science and Technology, Japan, as well as the Grant for Special Research Projects B, Waseda University. This study is a research projects “Energy-Next” and “Nano-energy” of Waseda Research Institute for Science and Engineering, Waseda University.

Author information




K.N. and T.A. designed the research. K.N. performed the experiments. K.N. and T.A. analyzed the data. K.N. and T.A. wrote the manuscript. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Toru Asahi.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nakagawa, K., Asahi, T. Determination of the Faraday rotation perpendicular to the optical axis in uniaxial CeF3 crystal by using the Generalized-High Accuracy Universal Polarimeter. Sci Rep 9, 18453 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing