Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Complete inclusion of bioactive molecules and particles in polydimethylsiloxane: a straightforward process under mild conditions


By applying a slow curing process, we show that biomolecules can be incorporated via a simple process as liquid stable phases inside a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix. The process is carried out under mild conditions with regards to temperature, pH and relative humidity, and is thus suitable for application to biological entities. Fluorescence and enzymatic activity measurements show that the biochemical properties of the proteins and enzyme tested are preserved, without loss due to adsorption at the liquid-polymer interface. Protected from external stimuli by the PDMS matrix, these soft liquid composite materials are new tools of interest for robotics, microfluidics, diagnostics and chemical microreactors.


Liquids and elastomeric materials are key components in microfluidic and diagnostic devices. Conveyed in open structures such as microchannels1, deposited as refillable reservoirs2, or conductive metallic lines3, liquids can add novel functionalities to materials. For instance, in closed structures such as droplets, liquids reinforce the mechanical properties of elastomeric composite material4. Our work reports a novel inclusion process and addresses how it affects the molecules contained in the droplets, in particular bioactive molecules or particles embedded in a polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) matrix.

The introduction of compartments, channels and cages in materials is a challenging, yet desired step towards the manufacture of complex lab-on-a-chip architectures, metamaterials5, flexible sensors6, stretchable electronics3, soft composites7, mobile structures8, and soft robots9. Compartmentalization of biomolecules and/or reactions benefit from the confinement in an isolated and thus contamination-free environment. When coupled to a high-throughput manufacturing strategy, this allows access to a large number of samples, each with different reaction conditions10. For instance, this has been used for screening and for crystallization studies, where nanoliter-scale droplets have been superficially deposited on a PDMS chip to imprint nanowells11. A similar approach has been applied to single protein counting12 and single-cell analyses13,14.

Droplets are complex systems characterized by a high internal mobility of the component molecules15 and ‘active’ droplets able to self-divide, self-replicate, or migrate along chemical gradients can be assembled by tailoring their composition and surface tension15. Single size-controlled droplets provide microreactors for chemical reactions in a partially isolated environment, which is of high interest for microfluidic devices16,17,18, or the analysis of reactions in confined spaces19. The inclusion of a liquid or gel phase in a polymeric material allows modification of the mechanical properties of the material and the generation of soft liquid composites (SLC) with novel properties and functionalities, e.g. for diagnostics20,21,22, production of plasmonic devices23, stretchable electronics3, soft conductive three-dimensional sponges24, and polymer-encapsulated liquid droplets25.

Regardless of its high hydrophobicity (water contact angle of 110°26), PDMS is a versatile elastomeric polymer, easy to manipulate, with a very good contour accuracy (<10 nm), chemical inertness, thermal stability, and homogeneity even after the generation of microstructures27,28. Applications range from electronics to biomedical devices, mechanobiology and microfluidics. PDMS has been applied to the development of patches for the release of therapeutic molecules triggered by a mechanical stress29, e.g. stretching, pressure. PDMS is often used in the prototyping of microfluidic devices but the small dimensions of the channels and the high hydrophobicity of the material makes it prone to biofouling, thus requiring passivation methods30,31,32,33,34,35,36.

Current approaches to the production of microcompartments for liquids in elastomeric materials require laborious two-to-many step processes involving the deposition of multiple layers, the design of masks or moulds, lithography or replica molding37. In addition to increasing time and cost, multiple steps increase the risk of fabrication errors and possible contamination.

Here, we report a straightforward method for the inclusion of biomolecules as liquid droplets in PDMS films to generate SLC materials. In comparison to previously reported approaches, droplets are fully included in the PDMS matrix, and the formation and storage of biomolecules in aqueous droplets is achieved without surfactants or detergents that might compromise their bioactivity. Ensuring the stability of fluorophores and of catalytic entities is a requirement when testing how synthetic devices affect biological entities. Therefore, we firstly optimized the inclusion method by using dyes and then demonstrated its functionality by investigating three fluorescent proteins and the biotechnologically-relevant catalyst laccase. Additionally, we show that functional materials such as magnetic nanoparticles in liquid droplets can also be included in PDMS films and their spatial distribution can be controlled via external stimuli.

Materials and Methods

PDMS sample preparation and droplet formation

The Sylgard 184 silicone elastomer kit including the polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) monomer and curing agent was purchased from Dow Corning. For PDMS fabrication the base and curing agent are mixed with 10:1 ratio by weight and poured into a mold. The PDMS is cured for at least 48 h at room temperature. Paramagnetic particles were purchased from Polyscience (Cat. #18879).

Fluorescent biomolecules production

The α-subunit of C-phycocyanin (CPC, UniProt ID: Q54715) from Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 was overexpressed and purified by IMAC essentially as described in1. The His-tagged version of GFPuv was recombinantly expressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) as described in2. The mCherry-coding gene was cloned from the plasmid pET-mCherry LIC cloning vector (Addgene, ID: 29769) to give plasmid pEM09. In detail, the mCherry-encoding gene was PCR amplified with oligonucleotides pr044fw 5′-GTT TAA CTT TAA GAA GGA GAT ATA CAT AAT GGC CAT CAT CAA GGA GTT CAT GC-3′ and pr045rev 5′-TTG TCG ACG GAG CTC GAA TTT TAC TAG TGA TGA TGA TGA TGA TGC TTG TAC AGC TCG TCC ATG CCG-3′, and cloned into the EcoRI/NdeI linearized pET22b vector by isothermal assembly (50 °C, 40 min). Plasmid pEM09 was transformed into chemocompetent E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells and one ampicillin-resistant colony was picked and used for expression as in2. CPC, GFP and mCherry were all expressed with a hexa-histidine tag and purified by nickel-affinity chromatography using an Äkta Purifier system and Histrap columns (GE Healthcare) as in2.

Protein analytics and quantification

Spectrophotometric UV-Vis analyses were done with a 96-well plate reader using a 200 μl sample at 22 °C. Fluorescence intensity measurements were performed using black half-area multiwell-plates with a 100 μl sample and with λex = 609 nm and λem = 400–700 nm. CPC concentration was determined from the absorbance at 620 nm using an extinction coefficient ε1%620 = 70. mCherry was quantified using an extinction coefficient ε = 35870 M−1 cm−1 at 280 nm, as calculated with the software Protparam3. GFPuv concentration was determined using Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific) and an extinction coefficient ε = 27000 M−1 cm−1 at 280 nm and a calculated molecular mass of 27862 g mol−1. Protein structures were visualized and analyzed with PyMol (The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System, Version 1.5 Schrödinger, LLC.).

Enzymatic activity

Laccase from Trametes versicolor (product nr. 38429) and chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Buchs, Switzerland). Upon removal from the material, laccase activity was measured using 2 mM ABTS as substrate in McIlvaine buffer (pH 4) at room temperature, in transparent polystyrene 96-well microplates. The reaction was followed with a microplate reader BioTek Synergy Mx spectrophotometer at 420 nm at 22 °C, and enzymatic activity was calculated with a molar extinction coefficient of 36000 M−1 cm−1 for oxidized ABTS. The total assay volume was 200 μl.


Images for intensity analysis were taken with a LS Reloaded Microarray Scanner (Tecan, Switzerland) equipped with three lasers at 635 nm, 532 nm, and 488 nm. Images were also acquired with a Leica DM6000 microscope fitted with a digital camera (Leica DM6000, Wetzlar, Germany) and equipped with a GFP (λex = 450–490 nm, λem = 525–550 nm) and N2.1 filter (λex = 515–560 nm, λem ≥ 590 nm).

Results and Discussion

The initial hypothesis was that PDMS in its viscous state would be suitable for the inclusion of liquid droplets, which could introduce additional functionalities to the material. Two main issues had however to be faced. First, the high viscosity of unpolymerized PDMS prevents the spontaneous complete penetration of water-only liquid droplets, as their density is too low. Secondly, droplets with higher density dispensed at the surface of the unpolymerized PDMS slowly migrated towards the bottom and adhered to the mould used for casting, leading to a loss of integrity. To solve the first technical issue, the density of the liquid droplet was tuned to promote its complete incorporation in the PDMS matrix. Preliminary screening experiments identified glycerol as the optimal compound. Characterized by a higher density than PDMS (dglycerol = 1.26 g/cm³ and dPDMS = 0.97 g/cm3 at 20 °C), glycerol is able to stabilize the tertiary structure of biomolecules, it is used as cryoprotectant, inhibitor of aggregation, and is an inert component in enzymatic, biological, and chemical reactions38. Moreover, PDMS and glycerol were selected for their incompressibility and immiscibility. Therefore, glycerol was added at a concentration of 50% to all aqueous samples prior to deposition in PDMS. These droplets were then introduced within the PDMS matrix as shown in Fig. 1. To ensure the integrity of the droplet within the material, first a basal layer of PDMS (0.5–1 mm thick) was poured into the mould and cured under mild conditions (Fig. 1, step 1), e.g. room temperature (22 °C) for 48 h. Once cured, a second unpolymerized PDMS layer was dispensed to reach an approximate 5:1 vol/vol ratio with the basal layer (Fig. 1, step 2). During the degassing phase, air bubbles were let to spontaneously migrate to the surface and, when no longer visible, droplets of the chosen biomolecule-containing solutions were dispensed on the surface of the viscous PDMS using a micropipette and let to settle (Fig. 1, step 3). The time between the mixing phase (monomer and curing agent) and the disappearance of the air bubbles corresponds to 30 min. As soon as the monomer and the curing agent were mixed, the polymerization process started. Nevertheless, the deposition of the droplets could be realized during an experimentally defined window of time of 4 hours where the PDMS remains in a viscous state due to the slow polymerization condition (room temperature) and before its complete polymerization.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the process leading to the inclusion of an aqueous solution containing a biomolecule in its active form in PDMS. After pouring a thin basal layer of liquid PDMS that is then cured, a subsequent thicker layer is added on top. Then the biomolecule-rich solution is deposited in µl-sized droplets and the PDMS is let to cure under mild condition, to be characterized subsequently by in situ spectrophotometry or ex situ using biochemical methods.

As an illustration of the final composite, Fig. 2 shows the generation of aqueous dye-loaded inclusions into the PDMS matrix. The aqueous solution containing the blue-violet dye in distilled water was mixed with glycerol (50% volume of the droplet solution) to generate the droplets included into the PDMS matrix. Figure 2a,b illustrate the top view of the PDMS film with blue-violet droplets having a unique size. The droplets’ volume was 10 µl and the droplets were deposited on a hexagonal lattice, demonstrating control over the localization of each droplet. Figure 2c,d indicate that the droplets were not on the surface of the PDMS matrix but were included inside the PDMS matrix as illustrated in Fig. 2d where a side view of the PDMS matrix is shown.

Figure 2

Soft liquid composite samples made with inclusions of various dye-loaded droplets: (a) Top view of the blue-violet dye-loaded droplet inclusions forming a hexagonal network; (b) Zoomed view of the hexagonal network; (c) 60° and (d) 90° side views of the sample illustrating the complete inclusion of the blue-violet liquid droplets into the PDMS matrix; (e) Top view of inclusions made using droplets of 5, 10, 15 and 20 µl; (f) Zoomed view of the soft liquid composite sample illustrating the different droplets; (g) 90° side view of the sample illustrating the penetration of the blue-violet liquid droplets into the PDMS matrix. (h) Top view of the sample made with different dye-loaded droplets forming a cubic network; (i) Zoomed view of the cubic network; (j) 90° side view of the sample illustrating the penetration of the different dye-loaded droplets into the PDMS matrix.

In the next example (Figs. 2e,f,g, and SI1), droplets of different volumes were included in the PDMS to demonstrate control over their size. The volumes used were 5, 10, 15 and 20 µl. Figure 2e,f,g clearly indicate the possibility to control the volume and thus the size of the generated inclusions into the PDMS matrix allowing to tune both the material and the droplets/microreactors.

As a last illustration of the developed method, in Fig. 2h,i,j, the introduction of aqueous droplets using different dyes was investigated. A cubic network was used to deposit the droplets. The droplets contained the same volume (10 µl) but were made of mixtures of different dyes in distilled water and 50 v/v % glycerol. Figure 2h,i display the top views of the sample. In particular, Fig. 2i shows a zoomed view of the cubic network. In Fig. 2j, we show the 90° side view illustrating the droplets into the PDMS matrix. In Fig. SI2, additional illustrations indicate the change of colour in function of the view angles due to the superposition of the different dye-loaded droplets demonstrating that the material could be used to manipulate incoming light and potentially as a signal transducer.

After demonstrating control over the droplet distribution and size (Figs. 2 and 3) fluorescent proteins were used to investigate the effect of the inclusion process on biomolecules (Fig. 3a). Fluorescent proteins CPC, GFP, and mCherry were selected because of their different structural and fluorescent properties. Since the fluorescence of a protein is dependent on the interaction of the chromophore with its molecular environment, including the protein matrix39, it can be perturbed by the interaction with a material surface40,41. It is thus interesting to investigate if the inclusion of fluorescent proteins solutions in a PDMS matrix affects their properties42. All fluorescent proteins used are characterized by good solubility levels and their molecular surface show well distributed hydrophobic regions that, however, could lead to interactions with the PDMS surface (Fig. SI3). Although the adsorption of proteins to surfaces is a spontaneous process hard to prevent, and their interaction with PDMS surfaces in aqueous solutions was reported to lead to extensive adsorption forming layers of up to 4 nm in thickness with a density of ~3 mg/m2 in less than one hour, droplets containing the fluorescent proteins were homogeneous. The colour was not concentrated at the PDMS interface nor at the bottom of the droplets, which could happen in case of aggregation. Therefore, this suggests that the addition of the glycerol inhibits the adsorption of the proteins to the surface and minimizes their interactions with one another (Fig. 3a). Upon inclusion and by controlling the direction of the white-light illumination, the characteristic fluorescence of the proteins became visible (Figs. 4a and SI4). Under lateral illumination, the included droplets of GFP and CPC appeared green and red to the eye, respectively, as these conditions reduced the amount of reflected white light observed under top illumination. CPC, GFP and mCherry proteins within droplets retained their characteristic light absorption and fluorescence properties (Fig. 4b) once included, i.e. with absorbance/fluorescence maxima at 620/640 nm, 395/509 nm, and 587/610 nm, respectively43,44. In addition to being measured in situ with a fluorimeter, fluorescence intensity was quantified using a microarray scanner (Fig. 4c) and the linear correlation between concentration and emitted fluorescence of GFP was not affected by the inclusion process (Fig. 4c) in a 0–2 mg/ml range. These results show that PDMS could be used as an optical waveguide45 (Fig. 4a), due to the intrinsic smoothness of the polymerized PDMS-liquid interface that minimizes light scattering and reflection. This might be of interest for static optofluidic applications, e.g. liquid lenses and mirrors.

Figure 3

Inclusion of biomolecules containing droplets in a controlled spatial arrangement. (a) Zoomed view of inclusions of GFP in PDMS as droplets in liquid form. Deposited as 6 droplets of 10 µl volume, aqueous solutions containing GFP can be stored in PDMS as well-defined spherical droplets. (b) Droplets can be freely arranged in patterns and arrays without leading to fusion while preserving their fluorescent properties (FL).

Figure 4

Characterization of fluorescent proteins, enzymes, and nanoparticles included as droplets in PDMS. (a) Fluorescence of the included biomolecules was visible upon lateral illumination. (b) In situ measurements of the absorbance (continuous line) and fluorescence (dashed line) emission spectra of GFP (green), mCherry (blue), CPC (red) and included as droplets in PDMS. (c) Linear concentration-dependent fluorescence emission of GFP as droplets in PDMS. In the inset, a photographic image and a false colouring based on fluorescence of the material. (d) Concentration-dependent activity of laccase included in PDMS (empty dots) and of the control solution (filled dots). (e) Migration of nanoparticle aggregates in aqueous solution as droplets when exposed to an external magnetic field (magnet on the left) and visualized by optical microscopy over time (droplet volume: 10 µl, = 2.7 mm, total time = 30 s).

The enzyme laccase has proven to be particularly valuable in biocatalysis, food engineering, and sensing devices46, it would therefore be interesting to be able to screen its properties in the presence of different solutes in a controlled environment. Like the fluorescent proteins used above, laccase is also a highly soluble protein that, additionally, is glycosylated at multiple sites, which contribute to its stabilization47. The interaction of proteins, applied in dry powder form, through hydrophobic and moulding interactions with unpolymerized PDMS has been shown not to compromise the functionality of the protein48. To test this observation with the newly developed inclusion method, solutions of laccase with concentrations ranging from 0 to 3.2 mg/ml were included as droplets in PDMS. Enzymatic activity was measured after two days and compared to an identical untreated control enzyme solution. To reliably perform a one-to-one comparison of residual activity between the control solution and the one stored as inclusions, we simply extracted the inclusion solution using a micropipette. The laccase solution included in PDMS retained its activity and was not influenced by the inclusion process, i.e. the residual activity measured from the included enzymatic solution was comparable to the untreated solutions (Fig. 4d). The highest level of protein adsorption is usually registered at conditions of pH values close to the isoelectric point (pI) of the protein49. Since the laccase solution was prepared in 50% glycerol with the addition of 100 mM of potassium phosphate giving a pH of 7.5, a condition far from the pI of the protein, it is not surprising that the inclusion of laccase (pI = 3.535) within PDMS did not lead to a loss of enzymatic activity (Fig. 4d). In addition, the high concentration of amphiphilic glycerol present in the droplet will also favour the retention of the biomolecules in the liquid phase, as glycerol can shield the interaction between the hydrophobic PDMS surface and the hydrophobic regions of the proteins.

The possibility of completely embedding liquid droplets in a material paves the way for the development of microreactors and sensing droplets, e.g. containing traceable elements whose behavior can be influenced by external triggers. By including solutions containing superparamagnetic nanoparticles, the localization and orientation of these particles could reveal the presence of externally applied magnetic fields, e.g. a magnet influenced their movement. Similarly, nanoparticle movement could be actively induced to swirl the solution within the droplet (Fig. 4e) and clearly indicates that a liquid phase is maintained in the inclusions introduced in the PDMS matrix. These observations suggest applications of included nanoparticles as stirrers for microliter volumes and/or as drivers of the motion of droplets on surfaces50,51,52,53.


We report a method for the complete inclusion of aqueous droplets containing dyes, biomolecules or nanoparticles in PDMS under mild conditions that do not alter their biochemical properties or mobility, respectively. This new tool allows to create liquid phases into a polymeric matrix, a process that will be useful for the development of functional materials from photonic crystals, batteries, biosensors, storage devices, microreactors to transdermal drug delivery systems which are under investigation in forthcoming works54.

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


  1. 1.

    Song, H., Tice, J. D. & Ismagilov, R. F. A Microfluidic System for Controlling Reaction Networks in Time. Angewandte Chemie 115, 792–796 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Bongsoo, K. et al. A Strain-Regulated, Refillable Elastic Patch for Controlled Release. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 3, 1500803 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Larmagnac, A., Eggenberger, S., Janossy, H. & Vörös, J. Stretchable electronics based on Ag-PDMS composites. Sci. Rep. 4, 7254 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Style, R. W. et al. Stiffening solids with liquid inclusions. Nat Phys 11, 82–87 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kim, H. K., Lee, D. & Lim, S. Wideband-Switchable Metamaterial Absorber Using Injected Liquid Metal. Scientific Reports 6, 31823 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Khan, S., Tinku, S., Lorenzelli, L. & Dahiya, R. S. Flexible Tactile Sensors Using Screen-Printed P(VDF-TrFE) and MWCNT/PDMS Composites. IEEE Sensors Journal 15, 3146–3155 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Sadasivuni, K. K. et al. In Cellulose/PDMS hybrid material for actuating lens. 9434, 94340K–94340K-6 (2015).

  8. 8.

    Wang, W., Rodrigue, H. & Ahn, S. Deployable Soft Composite Structures. Scientific Reports 6, 20869 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Martinez, R. V. et al. Robotic Tentacles with Three-Dimensional Mobility Based on Flexible Elastomers. Adv Mater 25, 205–212 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Iino, R., Matsumoto, Y., Nishino, K., Yamaguchi, A. & Noji, H. Design of a large-scale femtoliter droplet array for single-cell analysis of drug-tolerant and drug-resistant bacteria. Frontiers in Microbiology 4 (2013).

  11. 11.

    Zhu, Y. et al. Nanoliter-Scale Protein Crystallization and Screening with a Microfluidic Droplet Robot. Scientific Reports 4, 5046 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Walt, D. R. Protein measurements in microwells. Lab Chip 14, 3195–3200 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Bose, S. et al. Scalable microfluidics for single cell RNA printing and sequencing. Genome Biol. 16, 120 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Klein, A. M. et al. Droplet barcoding for single-cell transcriptomics applied to embryonic stem cells. Cell 161, 1187–1201 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Lach, S., Yoon, S. M. & Grzybowski, B. A. Tactic, reactive, and functional droplets outside of equilibrium. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45, 4766–4796 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Boukellal, H., Selimovic, S., Jia, Y., Cristobal, G. & Fraden, S. Simple, robust storage of drops and fluids in a microfluidic device. Lab Chip 9, 331–338 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stone, H. A., Stroock, A. D. & Ajdari, A. Engineering Flows in Small Devices. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 36, 381–411 (2004).

    ADS  MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Song, H., Chen, D. L. & Ismagilov, R. F. Reactions in Droplets in Microfluidic Channels. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45, 7336–7356 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Loste, E., Park, R. J., Warren, J. & Meldrum, F. C. Precipitation of Calcium Carbonate in Confinement. Advanced Functional Materials 14(12), 1211–1220 (2004).

  20. 20.

    Kobayashi, T. & Konishi, S. Microfluidic chip with serially connected filters for improvement of collection efficiency in blood plasma separation. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 2012161(1), 1176–1183 (2012).

  21. 21.

    Jin, B., Esteva-Font, C. & Verkman, A. S. Droplet-based microfluidic platform for measurement of rapid erythrocyte water transport. Lab Chip 15, 3380–3390 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Taylor, N. et al. Biophysical characterization of organelle-based RNA/protein liquid phases using microfluidics. Soft Matter 12, 9142–9150 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Wang, J., Liu, S. & Nahata, A. Reconfigurable plasmonic devices using liquid metals. Opt. Express 20, 12119–12126 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Liang, S. et al. Liquid metal sponges for mechanically durable, all-soft, electrical conductors. J. Mater. Chem. C 5, 1586–1590 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chipara, A. C. et al. Structural Reinforcement through Liquid Encapsulation. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4, 1600781 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Lawton, R. A., Price, C. R., Runge, A. F., Doherty III, W. J. & Saavedra, S. S. Air plasma treatment of submicron thick PDMS polymer films: effect of oxidation time and storage conditions. Colloids Surf. Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 253, 213–215 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Schneider, F., Draheim, J., Kamberger, R. & Wallrabe, U. Process and material properties of polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) for Optical MEMS. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 151, 95–99 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mata, A., Fleischman, A. J. & Roy, S. Characterization of Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) Properties for Biomedical Micro/Nanosystems. Biomed. Microdevices 7, 281–293 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Morteza, A., Sahar, S., Nelson, B. J. & Metin, S. Recent Advances in Wearable Transdermal Delivery Systems. Adv Mater 30, 1704530 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wu, D., Zhao, B., Dai, Z., Qin, J. & Lin, B. Grafting epoxy-modified hydrophilic polymers onto poly(dimethylsiloxane) microfluidic chip to resist nonspecific protein adsorption. Lab Chip 6, 942–947 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Roach, L. S., Song, H. & Ismagilov, R. F. Controlling Nonspecific Protein Adsorption in a Plug-Based Microfluidic System by Controlling Interfacial Chemistry Using Fluorous-Phase Surfactants. Anal. Chem. 77, 785–796 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Faccio, G. From Protein Features to Sensing Surfaces. Sensors 18 (2018).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Liu, Y., Zhang, L., Wu, W., Zhao, M. & Wang, W. Restraining non-specific adsorption of protein using Parylene C-caulked polydimethylsiloxane. Biomicrofluidics 10, 024126 (2016).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Chandradoss, S. D. et al. Surface Passivation for Single-molecule Protein Studies. Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE 50549 (2014).

  35. 35.

    Keir, B. et al. Simple surface treatments to modify protein adsorption and cell attachment properties within a poly(dimethylsiloxane) micro-bioreactor. Surf. Interface Anal. 38, 198–201 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Herrmann, M., Roy, E., Veres, T. & Tabrizian, M. Microfluidic ELISA on non-passivated PDMS chip using magnetic bead transfer inside dual networks of channels. Lab Chip 7, 1546–1552 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    McDonald, J. C. & Whitesides, G. M. Poly(dimethylsiloxane) as a Material for Fabricating Microfluidic Devices. Acc. Chem. Res. 35, 491–499 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Vagenende, V., Yap, M. G. S. & Trout, B. L. Mechanisms of Protein Stabilization and Prevention of Protein Aggregation by Glycerol. Biochemistry (N. Y.) 48, 11084–11096 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Stepanenko, O. V., Stepanenko, O. V., Kuznetsova, I. M., Verkhusha, V. V. & Turoverov, K. K. Beta-Barrel Scaffold of Fluorescent Proteins: Folding, Stability and Role in Chromophore Formation. International review of cell and molecular biology 302, 221–278 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Quiquampoix, H. A stepwise approach to the understanding of extracellular enzyme activity in soil. I. Effect of electrostatic interactions on the conformation of a beta-D-glucosidase adsorbed on different mineral surfaces. Biochimie, Jun–Jul, 69(6–7), 753–63 (1987).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Baugh, L. & Vogel, V. Structural changes of fibronectin adsorbed to model surfaces probed by fluorescence resonance energy transfer. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. A Jun 1, 69(3), 525–34 (2004).

  42. 42.

    Chumbimuni-Torres, K. et al. Adsorption of proteins to thin-films of PDMS and its effect on the adhesion of human endothelial cells. RSC Adv. 1, 706–714 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Faccio, G., Kämpf, M. M., Piatti, C., Thöny-Meyer, L. & Richter, M. Tyrosinase-catalyzed site-specific immobilization of engineered C- phycocyanin to surface. Scientific Reports 4, 5370 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Faccio, G., Senkalla, S., Thöny-Meyer, L. & Richter, M. Enzymatic multi-functionalization of microparticles under aqueous neutral conditions. RSC Adv. 5, 22319–22325 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Cai, Z., Qiu, W., Shao, G. & Wang, W. A new fabrication method for all-PDMS waveguides. Sensors and Actuators A: Physical 204, 44–47 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Rodríguez Couto, S. & Toca Herrera, J. L. Industrial and biotechnological applications of laccases: A review. Biotechnol. Adv. 24, 500–513 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Norde, W. My voyage of discovery to proteins in flatland …and beyond. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 61, 1–9 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Piscitelli, A., Pezzella, C., Giardina, P., Faraco, V. & Sannia, G. Heterologous laccase production and its role in industrial applications. Bioengineered Bugs 1, 252–262 (2010).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Baldrian, P. Fungal laccases - occurrence and properties. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 30, 215–242 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Heyries, K. A., Marquette, C. A. & Blum, L. J. Straightforward Protein Immobilization on Sylgard 184 PDMS Microarray Surface. Langmuir 23, 4523–4527 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    van Reenen, A., de Jong, A. M., den Toonder Jaap, M. J. & Prins, M. W. J. Integrated lab-on-chip biosensing systems based on magnetic particle actuation - a comprehensive review. Lab Chip 14, 1966–1986 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Chong, W. H. et al. Stirring in Suspension: Nanometer-Sized Magnetic Stir Bars. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52, 8570–8573 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Long, Z., Shetty, A. M., Solomon, M. J. & Larson, R. G. Fundamentals of magnet-actuated droplet manipulation on an open hydrophobic surface. Lab Chip 9, 1567–1575 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Innocenti Malini, R. et al. Crosslinking dextran electrospun nanofibers via borate chemistry: Proof of concept for wound patches. European Polymer Journal 110, 276–282 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information




A.C. contributed to the assembly and characterization of the composite, E.M. contributed to the cloning and characterization of the mCherry protein. E.Z.E. contributed to the protein sample preparation. G.F. and F.S. conceived the study with support from R.I.M., K.M.W. and R.M.R., supervised the experimental work and wrote the manuscript with input from all authors. The 3D illustration was realized by R.I.M.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Greta Faccio or Fabrizio Spano.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

Parts of this work were implemented in a European Patent Application (EP17197227.6; 50617EP).

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Faccio, G., Cont, A., Mailand, E. et al. Complete inclusion of bioactive molecules and particles in polydimethylsiloxane: a straightforward process under mild conditions. Sci Rep 9, 17575 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing