# Direct observation of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase diffusional states by Single Particle Tracking and their remodeling by mutations and inhibition

## Abstract

Lipases are interfacially activated enzymes that catalyze the hydrolysis of ester bonds and constitute prime candidates for industrial and biotechnological applications ranging from detergent industry, to chiral organic synthesis. As a result, there is an incentive to understand the mechanisms underlying lipase activity at the molecular level, so as to be able to design new lipase variants with tailor-made functionalities. Our understanding of lipase function primarily relies on bulk assay averaging the behavior of a high number of enzymes masking structural dynamics and functional heterogeneities. Recent advances in single molecule techniques based on fluorogenic substrate analogues revealed the existence of lipase functional states, and furthermore so how they are remodeled by regulatory cues. Single particle studies of lipases on the other hand directly observed diffusional heterogeneities and suggested lipases to operate in two different modes. Here to decipher how mutations in the lid region controls Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (TLL) diffusion and function we employed a Single Particle Tracking (SPT) assay to directly observe the spatiotemporal localization of TLL and rationally designed mutants on native substrate surfaces. Parallel imaging of thousands of individual TLL enzymes and HMM analysis allowed us to observe and quantify the diffusion, abundance and microscopic transition rates between three linearly interconverting diffusional states for each lipase. We proposed a model that correlate diffusion with function that allowed us to predict that lipase regulation, via mutations in lid region or product inhibition, primarily operates via biasing transitions to the active states.

## Introduction

Lipases such as the one from Thermomyces lanuginosus (TLL) are degrading fat and the tight regulation of their activity is central for controlling a plethora of vital biological processes. Their use in a spectrum of industrial applications including detergent industry and chiral organic synthesis1,2,3,4,5, makes them an ideal target for design of tailor-made function to meet increasing industrial needs6,7. Lipases in general display very low activity for monomeric water-soluble substrates. This is because the active site of most lipases is covered by a lid, that upon interaction with a water-lipid interface, is displaced exposing the active site and activating the lipase8,9. Changes in lid structure has been shown to significantly alter lid dynamics and the function of lipases in general and TLL here10,11. A few different TLL variants have been constructed with variations in the residues 71–77. Lipase variant 2 (L2), contains lid like the one of ferulic acid esterase FAEA12, a lipase variant known to attain an open lid conformation in solution. L2 is thus hypothesized to have a more open conformation. This mutant has been shown to exhibit much lower activity than native10,13, albeit having a more open lid and therefore displaying an interfacially independent activity10,11. Additionally, recent MD simulation studies indicate L2 to have the least flexible lid conformation13 when compared to native. L3 variant on the other hand is rationally designed to have a hybrid lid, with structural origins from both native TLL and FAEA12. Interestingly, this mutant was later found to have a more dynamic lid than native TLL, activate more favorably under conditions mimicking interfacial activation (low polarity solvent)11 and, possibly as a corollary of these, attain a slightly higher activity under some conditions13.

Current understanding on activity regulation of lipase, and protein in general, primarily relies on crystallographic evidence and studies reporting the average activity of large ensembles of enzymes in solution, by measuring concentration changes over time. Reporting the averaging behavior of a large ensemble of biomolecules often masks protein dynamics and their inherent conformational sampling, all of which are expected to underlie regulation of protein biomolecular recognition and function14,15. Single molecule studies allow the direct observation of enzyme conformational sampling and the presence of multiple conformations within the average structure16,17,18,19,20,21. The existence of multiple protein conformations20 gives rise to activity fluctuations and the existence of multiple protein functional states, as we and others22,23,24,25 have shown by single molecule studies (referred to as dynamic disorder)23,25,26,27,28,29.

Current single molecule characterization of functional dynamics of proteins and their dependence on regulatory cues, primarily rely on fluorescent methods that report changes in fluorescent properties upon enzymatic reaction, and can be summarized in ones that involve fluorogenic substrates17,23,26,28,30,31,32, fluorogenic cofactors33 or FRET34 studies. Using fluorogenic substrates and parked beam setups offers studies at the fundamental limit of individual catalytic turnover albeit require sequential low throughput readout. Our recent studies on TLL based on this methodology revealed the existence of discrete functional states that were redistributed by allosteric regulation23. Single particle tracking methodologies, on the other hand, allow extraction of diffusional behaviors from individual molecules, yielding critical insights in protein function35,36. Such pivotal studies of lipases on native substrate layers provided the first insights on the interaction and diffusional properties of lipases with native substrates and proposed the existence of two diffusional states37. Deconvoluting docking interactions as well as the function on native substrates is instrumental for deciphering how mutation in the lid region affect the function of lipases.

Here we used a single particle tracking (SPT) assay to directly observe the temporal trajectories of hundreds of individual enzymes synchronously acting on their native substrates with high temporal resolution. We used the metabolic26,38 enzyme, TLL on trimyristin layers, which constitute its native substrate37,39. By deploying rationally designed variants with mutations in the lid region9,10, we sought to gain key insights on mechanistic details on how lid mutation govern TLL function37,39 as well as the link between mobility and function. Quantitative analysis of the kinetics, using HMM analysis, revealed each lipase to reversibly sample 3 linearly inter-converting diffusional states, an arrested, practically immobile one (D = 0.05 µm2/s), a state with diffusion slightly smaller compared to lipids (D = 0.1 µm2/s), (see Fig. S1 for quantification of D of lipid by SPT) as well as states with either diffusion coefficients similar to lipids or significantly faster than lipids (D = 0.3 µm2/s and D = 1 µm2/s respectively). Studies on lipase variants with mutations in the lid region, known to control function, allowed us to quantify how energetics and thermodynamics of sampling these states are regulated by mutations and additionally develop a linear model of diffusional states. The observed redistribution of conformational sampling by mutations and product presence, allowed us to provide correlations of sampling between diffusional states to the overall lipase function regulation.

## Results

We employed a SPT assay to directly observe the temporal displacement of individual TLL and its dependence on mutations in the lid region and product inhibition. Total Internal Reflection (TIRF) is widely used to record the spatial organization and lateral diffusion of membrane related proteins40,41,42. We ensured a specific directional labeling of lipases by employing single cysteine labeling (D137C) to TLL enzymes and reacting them with Alexa Fluor 488-maleimide. Labeled enzymes were subsequently added to the buffer solution atop a thin layer of the trimyristin substrate surface (Fig. 1A). TIRF imaging allowed the parallelized recording of thousands of TLL trajectories on a trimyristin surface with 97 ms temporal resolution (see Fig. 1B for overlay of >2000 traces, see Fig. S2 average imaging lifetime for each individual enzyme mutant). The high labeling efficiency of 83–86% ensured that the vast majority of enzymes was labeled. Exclusively analyzing data displaying single step bleaching (>95%) ensured single chromophore labeling, monomeric protein imaging and confirms the absence of protein aggregates (see Fig. S2 for individual bleaching steps, and labeling yield). Zooming in on the recorded tracks (Fig. 1C) revealed heterogeneous mobility behaviors, as both freely diffusing, static and molecules temporarily arrested were found.

### Lipase diffusion is correlated to function

Comparison of the data for the selected variants indicates TLL mean diffusion coefficient (D) to correlate with overall bulk activity (see Table 1 and Fig. 2C). Diffusion coefficients were calculated as described in Supplementary Methods M1, values below indicate empirical mean and standard error. The highly active, native and L3, variants display the highest average diffusion (D = 3.5 · 10−10 cm2/s and 4.7 · 10−10 cm2/s respectively). L2 variant, with reduced activity, was found to have D = 3.1 · 10−10 cm2/s. Although the distribution of diffusion coefficients are wide and overlapping, they are significantly different (verified by two-sided Welch’s test, see Supplementary Table S4) and thus elute a link between high mobility and high function, which to be confirmed requires a more quantitative analysis.

We expect the enzymes to undergo some form of Brownian motion, under the assumption that they will be moving as hard spherical particles43 embedded within the substrate surface and exposed to solvent drag. A key element of classical diffusion theory is that many models are asymptotically defined44 and thus require long trajectories to converge45,46. To compensate for the fact that SPT may yield primarily short trajectories and be of stochastic nature, we chose a different approach than the classical mean square displacement, which require long track to converge properly. Instead we used the same method as we published earlier42, by analyzing the probability density function for observed step lengths. Calculation of the hydrodynamic radius using Stokes-Einstein theory43,47 from particle diffusion coefficient (see Supplementary Method M5), results in radii practically identical for all variants, within error. Assuming spherical particles, we report radii ranging from 1.8 ± 0.6 nm for the slowest variant, to 1.2 ± 0.4 nm for the fastest (see Supplementary Table S5). The found hydrodynamic radii are in great agreement with earlier reported values48. The fact that the radii are identical within error for all variants provides limited insights on the potential effect of varying hydration layer43 among mutants to the observed diffusional behavior (see Supplementary Table S5). The agreement of the extracted sizes with earlier studies using orthogonal methods, may further validate the Brownian motion hypothesis.

Several control experiments ensured the validity of our readouts. Labeled and non-labeled enzymes displayed the same bulk behavior showing fluorophore labeling not to affect their function39 (see Fig. S3). Surfaces retained their structural integrity for the entire experimental time (see Fig. S4). Similarly, SPT measurements on trimyristin layer (with 5 ppm Atto-655 DOPE) revealed lipid diffusion to be constant and independent of lipase addition within the experimental time frame (<5 min, see Fig. S1). These data indicate that lipid hydration or lipase hydrolysis and myristic acid production do not significantly affect trimyristin layer properties within the experimental time frame.

### Effect of lid mutations on lipases diffusional properties

We next quantified how TLL docking and diffusional properties depend on lid mutations that we have recently showed to affect lid dynamics and function (see Fig. 2A,B)10,11,13. L2 contains ferulic acid esterase (FAEA) lid, while L3 had a hybrid lid composition of both FAEA and TLL character. Native and L3 variants display several large hydrophobic residues and a relatively high hydrophobic moment compared to L2 which has smaller hydrophobic residues. L2 is expected, and experimentally shown, to primarily sample the open lid configuration albeit display lower activity, where L3 and native on the other hand are found to have similar activities as native and slightly higher different lid dynamics10,11,13.

The L2 mutations in the lid region resulted in large increase of the normalized surface recruitment probability Pdock when compared to more active variants. We calculated this by finding the fraction of enzymes that remain docked for at least 2 frames, Pdock = Ndock/Ntotal, where Ndock is the number of lipase trajectories that last for at least two frames and Ntotal is the total number of particles detected (including Ndock and particles only observable for one frame). Normalization of docking event to the number of recorded traces, by dividing with the total number of particles, excluded potential bias due to varying enzyme concentration. While the method is a qualitative estimate of the true recruitment, some interesting observations were made. L3 and native have similar docking properties Pdock ~31% (see Table 1), as expected based on lid properties. L2 displays higher Pdock, 51%. This is surprising, as due to the absence of a hydrophobic wedge on the lid, one would expect a lower binding to the lipid surface49. The lack of hydrophobic wedge on L2, results in a shift of the lid equilibrium towards an open configuration11 as recently described9,50,51 causing consequently the increased capacity of L2 to hydrolyze substrates below the CMC10. This equilibrium shift consequently exposes a large hydrophobic patch of the protein to the water solvent10. One possible explanation is that this exposure may destabilize the soluble enzyme and lead to increased binding, shown here as an increased Pdock. The increased Pdock of L2 may indicate increased affinity of L2 for the substrate but verifying this falls out of the scope of this paper. The increased docking of L2 is interesting, as it has been hypothesized earlier, that the reduced activity of L2 was due to lower binding10,11,13. Our single particle approach points towards another mechanism, where we hypothesize it may be interlinked with the observed reduced mobility.

### Analysis of step length distributions reveals distinct diffusional behaviors redistributed by lid mutations

To investigate for the existence of multiple mobility behaviors, as hinted by visual inspection of the traces in Fig. 1C, the distribution of step lengths for each lipase variant was fit with respectively 1 to 4 gamma distributions and evaluated the optimum using BIC values (see Supplementary Table 1 for BIC values). The analysis revealed, that all mutants and conditions are best described by 3 underlying states with characteristic mobility, which was then applied in the following segmentation by HMM. This analysis of the step size24,52,53,54,55,56 (see Fig. 1D for idealized trace and Fig. S5 for more traces) yielded three clear distributions of step lengths, Fig. 2D, that correspond to three states with varying diffusion coefficients for each mutant and condition. Careful inspection of the distributions revealed, that while each enzyme appears to sample three populations, the summary of states sampled by all enzymes is four. The fidelity of the data treatment methodology was confirmed by simulated single molecule trajectories (see Fig. S6), using both step lengths and HMM analysis. The fact that 3 states pertain to all tested lipase variants (see Fig. 2D) and regulatory conditions indicates this to be a pervasive phenotype underlying their behavior.

We developed a model to account for TLL diffusional states where each of the diffusional state would correspond to a state with different activity, Fig. 2C. Each lipase variant reversibly samples 3 diffusional states en route to catalysis. Out of these states there is a slow and a practically immobile one (see Fig. S7 for irreversible immobilized particles), (with mean step sizes 0.1 µm and 0.05 µm respectively), and a diffusional state with higher mobility, the occupancy and diffusion coefficient of which varies depending on the lid mutation. The higher activity mutants (native and L3) spent 19% and 14% of their time (see also Fig. 3) in a fast-diffusional state (step size 0.6 µm), while the intermediate activity variant (L2) displays ~31% probability to sample an intermediate diffusional state (step sizes ~0.3 µm). The fast diffusional state is ~2x faster than lipid diffusion, (see Figs 2D, S1), in agreement with evidence on charged fatty acids produced during catalysis to propel the enzyme38. We attribute therefore the fast state to a highly active state, where hydrolysis and product productions appears to propel the enzyme. The fact that bulk activity measurements here and earlier10,11 display L3 and native to have similar activity and, furthermore so, higher than L2 further supports this hypothesis. The higher presence of anomalous diffusion parameter alpha >1 (see Fig. S8), indicating some form of active transport similar to the “ballistic” mode reported earlier38 for acetylcholinesterase and urease, further support the fast diffusional states to correlate with higher activity (see Fig. S8 for rest of data). The intermediate diffusion state, sampled by L2 on the other hand, has diffusion similar to that of phospholipid (see Table 1). This state, while active, would display very slow product formation not propelling the enzyme. This could originate from the less hydrophobic lid of L2 that could result in improper orientation of the enzyme on the lipid interface as suggested earlier13 or imperfect active site organization. The major difference between the intermediate activity variant L2 and the highly active variants (native and L3) is the sampling of the intermediate and the highly active states respectively, indicates a correlation of diffusion to activity; the higher the mean step length of the state, the higher the activity. The slow diffusional as well as the static state on the other hand seems to be inactive. The fact that across multiple experiments L3 rarely samples the static – attributed to practically inactive state – indicates a functional advantage compared to native variant.

### Mechanistic insights on state redistribution by thermodynamic and kinetic analysis

The single particle trajectories and the corresponding transition density plots (TDP’s, see Fig. S9) revealed a well-defined, linear pathway of sampling lipase diffusional states (Fig. 2E) where the tested lipases sequentially sample adjacent states, while transition between non-adjacent states seems prohibited. TDP’s allow visualization of state transitions, and thereby provides information on the sequence of the transitions. Analysis of the TDP’s allowed us to extract the dwell time and the microscopic transition rates for all pairs of transitions as we did recently20. Using a combination of k-means clustering and two dimensional gaussian mixture model (see Fig. S10 and Supplementary Note M2) allowed us to calculate the ΔG and energy barriers for all diffusional states sampling (see Table 2, Supplementary Tables 2 and 3) for well separated transitions (see Supplementary Method M2 for comments on separation and overlapping clusters). The highly active mutants (L3 and native) directly transit from the slow to the fast-diffusive state. Interestingly the native variant had a slightly lower energy barrier compared to L3 for accessing the highly diffusive state (70.35 and 71.7 KJ/mole respectively) and a lower energy barrier for returning to the intermediate sate (67.9 and 68.7 KJ/mole respectively). As expected, a clear difference is observed for lid mutants, also indicated by earlier studies using MD simulations13, where it is suggested that while the lid only tends to open when in lipid contact, variants may exhibit different orientations on the surface. While our data does indicate a significant difference between mutants, we cannot resolve the exact binding or interaction. Both native and L3 mutants have return rate (k−3) to the intermediate state that is significantly larger than (k3) for native and L3 (by ~2.65 and ~3.3 fold) rendering the sampling of the highly active state transient and short lived. Earlier coarse grained simulation studies13 showed L3 to have a highly dynamic lid which in agreement with the dynamic sampling of the highly active open state observe here.

L2 variant on the other hand displays alternative sampling pathway. It does not sample the fast diffusive state (see Figs 2D, S11) in agreement with its low activity measured here (Fig. 2C) and earlier10,11. It displays an apparent equilibrium constant of ~1.8 fold for transiting from static to slow state and ~1.4 for transiting to the slow from intermediate, resulting in the slow state be the most thermodynamically stable one. Earlier modeling and functional studies suggested L2 to display increased likelihood of sampling the open lid state, albeit to display low or no activity10,11. The 30% likelihood of sampling the intermediate states and the practically 0% likelihood of sampling the highly diffusing state fully agree with these measurements and further support intermediate state to correspond to an intermediate activity state and fast states to active state. The low activity of the L2 variant may is thus due to the prohibited sampling of the fast diffusing active state rather than decreased binding to trimyristin surface.

### Product inhibition diminishes the fast diffusional state

A basic assumption of our model is that diffusion states correlate with functional states. Under this assumption we would predict that inhibitory interaction of TLL would operate primarily via altering the fast states diffusion coefficient or /and redistribute the equilibrium of sampling that state. To test for this prediction we constructed trimyristin surfaces enriched by 2% mol:mol product (myristic acid) that is reducing lipase activity (see Fig. 2C light blue)57. Indeed activity assays in bulk confirmed product addition to reduce the overall activity of native and L3 variants (Fig. 2C). Our single particle readout revealed product addition to the native variant to primarily operate via prohibiting the transition to the highly active state and favoring the previously inaccessible transition to an intermediate diffusive state (see Fig. 3A). This could be state similar to the state sampled by the L2 or with a slight different orientation due to the negative charges originating from released product, also indicated by simulated data13. The relative rates and occupancies of sampling the slow and inactive states on the other hand, remained practically unaffected for native variant, albeit they are slightly reduced. Transition rates between the slow and intermediate states is significantly slower as compared to transition between slows and fast state for the non-inhibited enzyme. This indicates product inhibition to also reduce the dynamics of lipase conformational sampling between active and inactive states (see Table 2, Fig. S12 and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3). Inhibition of L3 variant displays overall similar redistribution towards the low diffusing states as for the native variant. Careful inspection of the histograms of step sizes show that inhibited L3 retains a minute sampling of the highly active state a phenotype that may explain the lower product inhibition observed by bulk measurements (see Fig. 2C,D). Interestingly product inhibition for L3 drastically increased the likelihood to sample the, otherwise rarely sampled, static state.

### Remodeling of energy landscape by mutations and regulatory cues

Relative free energies differences between all TLL states were calculated using the individual rates for all pairs of transition (see Supplementary Methods M2, Figs S9 and S10). The combination of free energies differences and activation energies for all pairs of transitions allowed us to visualize the free energy landscape for each mutant and how mutations and regulatory cues remodel it (Fig. 3, Table 2 and Fig. S12). Because the slow state is practically dominantly sampled, and its mean step length is similar, across all variants and conditions its energy can be approximated to be practically identical for all variants and conditions and could thus be taken as a reference point in our energy landscape. Figure 3B provides a full visualization of how the occupancy of each state is dependent on point mutations and regulatory cues. The inhibited L3 enzyme has decreased energy barriers by 1.5 KJ/mol to transit to the intermediate state as compare to the product inhibited native (72.06 ± 0.011 KJ/mol and 73.55 ± 0.07 KJ/mol respectively) and ~1KJ/mol to return to the slow (72.26 ± 0.10 KJ/mol and 73.38 ± 0.11 KJ/mol respectively). This results in a slight free energy stabilization, albeit reduced dynamic sampling of the intermediate state for the L3 inhibited as compare to native inhibited (see Fig. 3A, and Supplementary Tables 2 and 3. We note that the relatively poor separation of TDP clusters for native-inhibited may result in increased errors in extracting rates and energy barriers (see Supplementary Method M2). Mild product inhibition was found to originate by eliminating transition to the highly active state and favoring transition to the intermediate state.

## Discussion

The dynamic sampling of conformational states governs all aspects of protein behavior from folding to function. These conformational states are expected to correspond to distinct functional outcomes23,28 however their quantitative characterization is challenging because a large number of single molecules have to be recorded and may require native substrates. The dynamic exploration of conformational and functional states of lipases has been characterized by us and others at the single turnover level23,26,31,58, who also quantified their dependence on regulatory cues. Recent SPT studies relying exclusively on active lipases variants acting on trimyristin surfaces, observed the existence of diffusional heterogeneity and partial arrest, that was attributed to product propulsion and more than one binding conformations37. The parallelized and high temporal resolution imaging SPT using quantitative (TIRF) microscopy here combined with the mutant comparison revealed a new mechanistic layer on how lid mutations control lipase behavior on native substrates. The detailed statistical and HMM analysis allowed us to identify the existence, and abundance of four distinct underlying diffusional states that correlated to lipase function. We developed a linear model that correlated the diffusional states to functional and thus conformational states, which allowed us to predict that lipase product mediated inhibition operates via biased of conformational sampling and prohibiting transitions to the active states (see Fig. 3A). Quantitative analysis of the microscopic rates of all pairs of transitions allowed the complete thermodynamic and kinetic characterization of the conformational sampling and consequently mapping the multidimensional landscape of the lipase. Regulatory cues or mutations in the lid appear to remodel the landscape allowing previously practically inaccessible transition and/or inhibiting transition.

The direct observation is a significant new addition to insights on the diffusional properties of enzymes, which until recently was done by e.g. NMR59, electrophoresis60 or even sedimentation61. Assuming the diffusion follows Brownian motion, the stokes radius can be derived by following Stokes-Einstein theory, taking into account diffusion coefficient and solvent viscosity. The Stokes radius is informative on both the hydration level and the molecular weight and shape of the protein. Our measurements on diffusion coefficient and the extracted hydrodynamic radius are in great agreement with earlier gyroscopic radius studies48 and provide hydration levels similar to earlier published results for similar lipases47. The Stokes-Einstein relation may also provide info on lipid structure47 and future comparative measurements on additional lipids may shine light to this.

The single particle readout also allowed us to extend beyond the effect of mutations on average activity and deconvolute this effect on the surface recruitment probability as well as the likelihood of sampling the highly active states. L2 mutation, previously thought to have lower activity due to reduced binding, is found to have higher docking on trimyristin surfaces as compared to native enzyme albeit not to sample the highly diffusing states we attribute to function. The low average activity of the L2 variant may thus be due to the prohibited sampling of the fast diffusing active state rather than decreased binding. L3 variants shows limited sampling of the static state. Based on the assumption that the static state is not active, this may indicate L3 has an advantage of avoiding sampling the inactive immobile state. When inhibited by product L3 maintains a low (~1–2%) probability to maintain the highly diffusing state. The fact the L3s lid has decreased hydrophobic moment and consequently increased dynamics10, as compared to native, indicates the intricate role of lid mutations, and that deciphering their precise role is crucial for design of new variants.

Recent measurements on these variants in solution, measured the activity of water soluble, free lipase (below CMC) and primarily substrate-bound enzymes (above CMC)10. These studies reported L2 to be less active, but able to retain activity without being interfacially activated. L3 and native displayed similar tendencies, both highly dependent on interfacial activation and significantly higher activity as compared with L2 – similarly to our results. Our studies here are optimized to directly observe the enzyme when docked on the natural substrate interface, but general trends for both diffusion as well as activity are in good agreement with earlier published results.

Our data may indicate the presence of a feedback loop type of product mediated inhibitory mechanism. Lipase activity appears to be inhibited by excess product formation and presence in the trimyristin surface. Enzymes remaining in the same area would be downregulated by excess product preventing “over activity” in lipases on their natural substrates. The observed product mediated active transport of the enzyme (alpha values > 1) to new areas may on the other be an efficient way to optimize lipases functional outcome, not unlike the results recently published38, but here in a product mediated feedback loop. This chemical diaspora may allow lipases to overcome overcrowding limitations and product-inhibitions and consequently to sense areas where no product is present where they can continuously work, maximizing catalytic proficiency.

The adaptability and flexibility of the reported assay may cover a vast collection of novel mutants and new environmental cues, and easily extend to cover other membrane bound proteins. Furthermore the convenient sample preparation, allows the facile variations in lipid composition. By varying the lipid species (e.g. mixtures of trimyristin and triolein), substrate surfaces with phase separation or hydrophobic defects maybe introduced. These hydrophobic defects would act as binding sites for amphipathic helix insertion49,62 and lipase binding in general36,62,63, as we and other have shown. Varying lipid chain length may significantly alter the activated lipase activity, as it depends on triglyceride chain length64 and exhibits a preference for medium length substrates. Based on these and recent findings, we would expect similar or reduced binding on substrates that are in solid phase65, like tripalmitin. Similarly due to reduced activity towards tripalmitin, we would anticipate also a reduced mobility, albeit this remains to be experimentally validated.

Importantly, the presented methodology may allow in the future, simultaneous high throughput measurements of diffusion and enzymatic activity, using pre-fluorescent substrate analogues66 thus unifying structure/function measurements at the single molecule level. A better understanding of how mutations and environmental factors remodel the lipase landscape may prove vital in expanding our understanding enzymatic behavior and function and disentangle the molecular mechanistic details that underlie their regulation. Insights in enzymatic regulation of function and their direct relation to structure may provide the basis for future design of tailor-made enzymatic functions, where one design new mutations to address specific needs.

## Materials and Methods

### Materials

All used chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Denmark) unless otherwise stated. Alexa-488 mono-functional maleimide was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Denmark. Labeled phospholipids, 1,2-Dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-ATTO655 (DOPE-ATTO655) were purchased from ATTO-TEC GmbH, Siegen, Germany. 1,2-Di-O-lauryl-rac-glycero-3-(glutaric acid 6-methylresorufin ester) (lipidated resorufin) (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 195833-46-6), glyceryl trimyristate (trimyristin) (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 555-45-3), Trizma base (TRIS) (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 77-86-1), n-hexane (Sigma-Aldrich, CAS: 110-54-3), 96% ethanol (Alere, CAS: 64-17-5), microtiter plates (ThermoFisher, Cat. # 237107).

### Protein engineering

Protein engineering and purification was performed as described earlier10.

### Protein labeling

The free cysteine C137, located on the backside of the active side, was labeled specifically with Alexa Fluor 488 mono-functional maleimide as described by the manufacturer’s protocol (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and separated from free dye as earlier reported22. The labeled enzyme was flash frozen via liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C until use. All labeled lipase variant was prepared similarly.

### Lipase activity assay

Lipase activity was determined in 50 mM TRIS buffer at pH 7, 8 and 9. The bottom of microtiter plate wells were carefully coated with lipid using a 1:200 molar ratio of lipidated resorufin and trimyristin dissolved in hexane at a concentration of 20 µM and 4 mM, respectively. 100 uL of the hexane solution was carefully pipetted onto the bottom of each well and left to evaporate in a fume hood at a minimum of three hours in dark minimizing the bleaching of lipidated resorufin. A stock solution of 10 mM lipase substrate in 96% ethanol was used. Trimyristin was used in powder form. To run the assay, 200 uL of TRIS buffer with or without lipase at 51 nM was carefully loaded into the wells and the increase in fluorescence intensity in the solution above the lipid layer due to release of resorufin analog was measured every minute for one hour in a plate reader (Tecan Infinite M1000 PRO) with excitation at 530/10 nm, emission at 590/10 nm and gain at 100. The assay was run at 24 °C.

### Total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy

All single particle tracking (SPT) experiments were performed on using a Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscope (IX 83, Olympus), using two EMCCD cameras (ImagEM X2, Hamamatsu) and oil immersion 100x objective (UAPON 100XOTIRF, Olympus), resulting in a total pixel width of 160 nm. Alexa-488 and ATTO-655 fluorophores were excited using 488 nm and 640 nm solid state laser lines respectively (Cellsense, Olympus). Imaging of enzymes (Alexa-488) was done using 80 ms exposure time, 300 EM gain and a resulting framerate of 10.1 s−1. All experiments were done using the same experimental setup.

### Trimyristin substrate surface preparation

Trimyristin substrate surfaces were made using an in-house developed method, adapted from37. Trimyristin were dissolved in toluene to a concentration of 20 g/L (27.66 mM) and mixed with 5 ppm DOPE lipid attached Atto 655 organic fluorophore (DOPE-ATTO655, mol:mol). The lipid solution was spin coated Ø25 round microscopy glass slides at 5000 rpm for 60 s, followed by 1 s pause, follow by 60 s at 5000 rpm. The samples were placed in custom made teflon chambers, and then subjected to high vacuum for at least 5 hours before immediate use. For experiments with product incubation, 2% (mol:mol) myristic acid were added to the trimyristin/DOPE-ATTO655 solution prior to spin casting.

Prior to imaging, 59 µl 50 mM TRIS buffer were added to the chamber, followed by 1 µl labeled enzyme, resulting in a final concentration of ~0.5 nM protein. Solution were allowed to equilibrate for 1 min for image recording.

### Image analysis and single particle tracking (SPT)

Quantitative image analysis was done using a customized version of TrackPy67,68 together with in-house developed routines for detailed analysis. In order to test the validity of the software, we initially tested the tracking using simulated data (see Fig. S3). Here we created a video of randomly distributed gaussian intensity spots on a surface with similar noise as the experimental setup and allowed them to move following a single diffusion Brownian model. Inspection of the true step length distribution and the one from the tracking software revealed almost identical results. For experimental data only particles with 15 or more observed locations were used for further analysis. MSD was calculated as described in69 and36:

$${\rm{MSD}}({\rm{\tau }}={\rm{n}}\ast \Delta {\rm{t}})=\langle {{\rm{r}}}^{2}({\rm{\tau }})\rangle \ast \frac{1}{{\rm{N}}-{\rm{n}}}\ast \mathop{\sum }\limits_{{\rm{i}}=1}^{{\rm{N}}-{\rm{n}}}{({{\rm{x}}}_{{\rm{i}}+{\rm{n}}}-{{\rm{x}}}_{{\rm{i}}})}^{2}+{(({{\rm{y}}}_{{\rm{i}}+{\rm{n}}}-{{\rm{y}}}_{{\rm{i}}}))}^{2}$$

where ∆t is the frame interval, N is the number of total frames and xi and yi are coordinates at t = i. From the MSD, the instantaneous diffusion coefficient can be found together70 along with the anomalous diffusion parameter, alpha, found by fitting the first 15 time lags of the MSD by,

$${\rm{MSD}}=4\ast {\rm{D}}\ast {{\rm{t}}}^{{\rm{a}}}$$

For extraction of diffusion coefficients we deployed a method using a simple Brownian diffusion model to describe the data, as we and others have used previously42,71, where the probability to a given steplength r is given by,

$${\rm{p}}({\rm{r}},{\rm{t}},{\rm{D}})=\frac{{\rm{r}}}{2{\rm{Dt}}}\ast \exp (-\frac{{{\rm{r}}}^{2}}{4{\rm{Dt}}})$$

where r is the observed steplength, D is the diffusion coefficient (determined using the maximum likelihood approach, see Supplementary Methods M1 for detailed explanation) and t is the time between consecutive steps.

### Data analysis

All data analysis was done using custom made scripts in python. See Supplementary Methods for detailed information regarding Hidden Markov Model (HMM) analysis, Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), Transition Density Plots (TDP’s) and the resulting state lifetimes, rates and relative energies.

## References

1. 1.

Houde, A., Kademi, A. & Leblanc, D. Lipases and their industrial applications. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 118, 155–170, https://doi.org/10.1385/ABAB:118:1-3:155 (2004).

2. 2.

de Castro, M. S. & Sinisterra Gago, J. Lipase-catalyzed synthesis of chiral amides. A systematic study of the variables that control the synthesis. Tetrahedron 54, 2877–2892, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(98)83024-X (1998).

3. 3.

Kazlauskas, R. J. Enhancing catalytic promiscuity for biocatalysis. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 9, 195–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2005.02.008 (2005).

4. 4.

Bornscheuer, U. T. Methods to increase enantioselectivity of lipases and esterases. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 13, 543–547, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00350-6 (2002).

5. 5.

Hatzakis, N. S. & Smonou, I. Asymmetric transesterification of secondary alcohols catalyzed by feruloyl esterase from Humicola insolens. Bioorg. Chem. 33, 325–337, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2005.05.002 (2005).

6. 6.

Corici, L. et al. Large scale applications of immobilized enzymes call for sustainable and inexpensive solutions: rice husks as renewable alternatives to fossil-based organic resins. RSC Advances 6, 63256–63270, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA12065B (2016).

7. 7.

Pellis, A., Cantone, S., Ebert, C. & Gardossi, L. Evolving biocatalysis to meet bioeconomy challenges and opportunities. New Biotechnology 40, 154–169, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.07.005 (2018).

8. 8.

Schmid, R. D. & Verger, R. Lipases: Interfacial Enzymes with Attractive Applications.

9. 9.

Cajal, Y., Svendsen, A., Girona, V., Patkar, S. A. & Alsina, M. A. Interfacial Control of Lid Opening in Thermomyces lanuginosa Lipase. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 39, 413–423, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi991927i (2000).

10. 10.

Skjold-Jørgensen, J., Vind, J., Svendsen, A. & Bjerrum, M. J. Altering the Activation Mechanism in Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 53, 4152–4160, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi500233h (2014).

11. 11.

Skjold-Jørgensen, J. et al. The Enzymatic Activity of Lipases Correlates with Polarity-Induced Conformational Changes: A Trp-Induced Quenching Fluorescence Study. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 54, 4186–4196, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biochem.5b00328 (2015).

12. 12.

McAuley, K. E., Svendsen A Fau - Patkar, S. A., Patkar Sa Fau - Wilson, K. S. & Wilson, K. S. Structure of a feruloyl esterase from Aspergillus niger.

13. 13.

Willems, N., Lelimousin, M., Skjold-Jørgensen, J., Svendsen, A. & Sansom, M. S. P. The effect of mutations in the lid region of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase on interactions with triglyceride surfaces: A multi-scale simulation study. Chem. Phys. Lipids 211, 4–15, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2017.08.004 (2018).

14. 14.

Boehr, D. D., Nussinov, R. & Wright, P. E. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 789, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.232 (2009).

15. 15.

Henzler-Wildman, K. & Kern, D. Dynamic personalities of proteins. Nature 450, 964, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06522 (2007).

16. 16.

Peterman, E. J. G., Sosa, H. & Moerner, W. E. Single-Molecule Fluorescence Spectroscopy and Microscopy of Biomolecular Motors. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 55, 79–96, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.physchem.55.091602.094340 (2004).

17. 17.

Hatzakis, N. S. Single molecule insights on conformational selection and induced fit mechanism. Biophys. Chem. 186, 46–54, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpc.2013.11.003 (2014).

18. 18.

Zhao, Y. et al. Substrate-modulated gating dynamics in a Na+-coupled neurotransmitter transporter homologue. Nature 474, 109, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09971, https://www.nature.com/articles/nature09971#supplementary-information (2011).

19. 19.

Roy, R., Hohng, S. & Ha, T. A Practical Guide to Single Molecule FRET. Nat. Methods 5, 507–516, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1208 (2008).

20. 20.

Stella, S. et al. Conformational Activation Promotes CRISPR-Cas12a Catalysis and Resetting of the Endonuclease Activity. Cell 175, 1856–1871.e1821, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.10.045 (2018).

21. 21.

Bavishi, K. & Hatzakis, S. N. Shedding Light on Protein Folding, Structural and Functional Dynamics by Single Molecule Studies. Molecules 19, https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191219407 (2014).

22. 22.

Bavishi, K. et al. Direct observation of multiple conformational states in Cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase and their modulation by membrane environment and ionic strength. Sci Rep 8, 6817, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24922-x (2018).

23. 23.

Hatzakis, N. S. et al. Single Enzyme Studies Reveal the Existence of Discrete Functional States for Monomeric Enzymes and How They Are “Selected” upon Allosteric Regulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134, 9296–9302, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja3011429 (2012).

24. 24.

Thompson, C. D. K., Sharma, A. K., Frank, J., Gonzalez, R. L. Jr. & Chowdhury, D. Quantitative Connection between Ensemble Thermodynamics and Single-Molecule Kinetics: A Case Study Using Cryogenic Electron Microscopy and Single-Molecule Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer Investigations of the Ribosome. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 10888–10901, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp5128805 (2015).

25. 25.

English, B. P. et al. Ever-fluctuating single enzyme molecules: Michaelis-Menten equation revisited. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2, 168, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio0306-168 (2006).

26. 26.

Engelkamp, H. et al. Do enzymes sleep and work? Chem. Commun., 935–940, https://doi.org/10.1039/B516013H (2006).

27. 27.

Laursen, T. et al. Single Molecule Activity Measurements of Cytochrome P450 Oxidoreductase Reveal the Existence of Two Discrete Functional States. ACS Chem. Biol. 9, 630–634, https://doi.org/10.1021/cb400708v (2014).

28. 28.

Lu, H. P., Xun L Fau - Xie, X. S. & Xie, X. S. Single-molecule enzymatic dynamics.

29. 29.

Iversen, L. et al. Ras activation by SOS: Allosteric regulation by altered fluctuation dynamics. Science 345, 50 (2014).

30. 30.

Gorris, H. H., Rissin, D. M. & Walt, D. R. Stochastic inhibitor release and binding from single-enzyme molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104, 17680 (2007).

31. 31.

Flomenbom, O. et al. Stretched exponential decay and correlations in the catalytic activity of fluctuating single lipase molecules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 2368 (2005).

32. 32.

Hatzakis, N. S. et al. Synthesis and single enzyme activity of a clicked lipase–BSA hetero-dimer. Chem. Commun., 2012–2014, https://doi.org/10.1039/B516551B (2006).

33. 33.

Kuznetsova, S. et al. The enzyme mechanism of nitrite reductase studied at single-molecule level. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105, 3250–3255, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0707736105 (2008).

34. 34.

Zhang, Z. Q., Rajagopalan, P. T. R., Selzer, T., Benkovic, S. J. & Hammes, G. G. Single-molecule and transient kinetics investigation of the interaction of dihydrofolate reductase with NADPH and dihydrofolate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 2764–2769, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400091101 (2004).

35. 35.

Di Rienzo, C., Gratton, E., Beltram, F. & Cardarelli, F. Fast spatiotemporal correlation spectroscopy to determine protein lateral diffusion laws in live cell membranes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110, 12307, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222097110 (2013).

36. 36.

Rocha, S. et al. Linking Phospholipase Mobility to Activity by Single-Molecule Wide-Field Microscopy. ChemPhysChem 10, 151–161, https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800537 (2008).

37. 37.

Sonesson, A. W., Elofsson, U. M., Callisen, T. H. & Brismar, H. Tracking Single Lipase Molecules on a Trimyristin Substrate Surface Using Quantum Dots. Langmuir 23, 8352–8356, https://doi.org/10.1021/la700918r (2007).

38. 38.

Jee, A.-Y., Dutta, S., Cho, Y.-K., Tlusty, T. & Granick, S. Enzyme leaps fuel antichemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 115, 14, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1717844115 (2018).

39. 39.

Sonesson, A. W., Brismar, H., Callisen, T. H. & Elofsson, U. M. Mobility of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase on a Trimyristin Substrate Surface. Langmuir 23, 2706–2713, https://doi.org/10.1021/la062003g (2007).

40. 40.

Jaqaman, K. et al. Cytoskeletal Control of CD36 Diffusion Promotes Its Receptor and Signaling Function. Cell 146, 593–606, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.049 (2011).

41. 41.

Andrews, N. L. et al. Actin restricts FcɛRI diffusion and facilitates antigen-induced receptor immobilization. Nat. Cell Biol. 10, 955, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1755, https://www.nature.com/articles/ncb1755#supplementary-information (2008).

42. 42.

Lin, W.-C. et al. H-Ras forms dimers on membrane surfaces via a protein–protein interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 2996 (2014).

43. 43.

Einstein, A. Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen der Physik 322, 549–560, https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.19053220806 (1905).

44. 44.

Granik, N. et al. Single-Particle Diffusion Characterization by Deep Learning. Biophys. J. 117, 185–192, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2019.06.015 (2019).

45. 45.

Meroz, Y. & Sokolov, I. M. A toolbox for determining subdiffusive mechanisms. Physics Reports 573, 1–29, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2015.01.002 (2015).

46. 46.

Magdziarz, M., Weron, A., Burnecki, K. & Klafter, J. Fractional Brownian Motion Versus the Continuous-Time Random Walk: A Simple Test for Subdiffusive Dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 180602, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.180602 (2009).

47. 47.

Ferrario, V. & Pleiss, J. Simulation of protein diffusion: a sensitive probe of protein–solvent interactions. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 37, 1534–1544, https://doi.org/10.1080/07391102.2018.1461689 (2019).

48. 48.

Gonçalves, K. M. et al. Nanoencapsulated Lecitase Ultra and Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase, a Comparative Structural Study. Langmuir 32, 6746–6756, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b00826 (2016).

49. 49.

Hatzakis, N. S. et al. How curved membranes recruit amphipathic helices and protein anchoring motifs. Nat. Chem. Biol. 5, 835, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.213, https://www.nature.com/articles/nchembio.213#supplementary-information (2009).

50. 50.

Hedin, E. M. K. et al. Implications of Surface Charge and Curvature for the Binding Orientation of Thermomyces lanuginosus Lipase on Negatively Charged or Zwitterionic Phospholipid Vesicles As Studied by ESR Spectroscopy. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 44, 16658–16671, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi051478o (2005).

51. 51.

Hedin, E. M. K. et al. Interfacial Orientation of Thermomyces lanuginosa Lipase on Phospholipid Vesicles Investigated by Electron Spin Resonance Relaxation Spectroscopy. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 41, 14185–14196, https://doi.org/10.1021/bi020158r (2002).

52. 52.

Sgouralis, I. & Pressé, S. An Introduction to Infinite HMMs for Single-Molecule Data Analysis. Biophys. J. 112, 2021–2029, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2017.04.027 (2017).

53. 53.

Persson, F., Lindén, M., Unosson, C. & Elf, J. A Bayesian Approach to Single Particle Tracking Analysis. Biophys. J. 104, 177a, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.998 (2013).

54. 54.

Das, R., Cairo, C. W. & Coombs, D. A Hidden Markov Model for Single Particle Tracks Quantifies Dynamic Interactions between LFA-1 and the Actin. Cytoskeleton. PLoS Comp. Biol. 5, e1000556, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000556 (2009).

55. 55.

Persson, F., Lindén, M., Unoson, C. & Elf, J. Extracting intracellular diffusive states and transition rates from single-molecule tracking data. Nat. Methods 10, 265, https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2367, https://www.nature.com/articles/nmeth.2367#supplementary-information (2013).

56. 56.

McKinney, S. A., Joo, C. & Ha, T. Analysis of Single-Molecule FRET Trajectories Using Hidden Markov Modeling. Biophys. J. 91, 1941–1951, https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.106.082487 (2006).

57. 57.

Muth, M., Rothkötter, S., Paprosch, S., Schmid, R. P. & Schnitzlein, K. Competition of Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase with its hydrolysis products at the oil–water interface. Colloids Surf. B. Biointerfaces 149, 280–287, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.019 (2017).

58. 58.

Velonia, K. et al. Single-Enzyme Kinetics of CALB-Catalyzed Hydrolysis. Angew. Chem. 117, 566–570, https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.200460625 (2004).

59. 59.

Altieri, A. S., Hinton, D. P. & Byrd, R. A. Association of Biomolecular Systems via Pulsed Field Gradient NMR Self-Diffusion Measurements. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 7566–7567, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00133a039 (1995).

60. 60.

Rothe, G. M. & Purkhanbaba, H. Determination of molecular weights and Stokes’ radii of non-denatured proteins by polyacrylamide gradient gel electrophoresis. 2. Determination of the size of stable and labile molecular weight variants of enzymes from plant sources. Electrophoresis 3, 43–48, https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150030108 (1982).

61. 61.

Erickson, H. P. Size and Shape of Protein Molecules at the Nanometer Level Determined by Sedimentation, Gel Filtration, and Electron Microscopy. Biological Procedures Online 11, 32, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12575-009-9008-x (2009).

62. 62.

Larsen, J. B. et al. Membrane curvature enables N-Ras lipid anchor sorting to liquid-ordered membrane phases. Nat. Chem. Biol. 11, 192, https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.1733, https://www.nature.com/articles/nchembio.1733#supplementary-information (2015).

63. 63.

Gudmand, M. et al. Influence of Lipid Heterogeneity and Phase Behavior on Phospholipase A(2) Action at the Single Molecule Level. Biophys. J. 98, 1873–1882, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.035 (2010).

64. 64.

Xin, R. et al. A comparative study on kinetics and substrate specificities of Phospholipase A1 with Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 488, 149–154, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2016.10.058 (2017).

65. 65.

Kellens, M., Meeussen, W. & Reynaers, H. Crystallization and phase transition studies of tripalmitin. Chem. Phys. Lipids 55, 163–178, https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-3084(90)90077-5 (1990).

66. 66.

Basu, D., Manjur, J. & Jin, W. Determination of lipoprotein lipase activity using a novel fluorescent lipase assay. J. Lipid Res. 52, 826–832 (2011).

67. 67.

Houssais, M., Maldarelli, C. & Morris, J. F. Soil granular dynamics on-a-chip: fluidization inception under scrutiny. Lab. Chip 19, 1226–1235, https://doi.org/10.1039/C8LC01376D (2019).

68. 68.

Daniel B. A., Caswell, T., Keim, N. C. & van der Wel, C. M. trackpy: Trackpy v0.4.1 (Version v0.4.1), https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1226458, 2018).

69. 69.

Konopka, M. C. & Weisshaar, J. C. Heterogeneous Motion of Secretory Vesicles in the Actin Cortex of Live Cells:  3D Tracking to 5-nm Accuracy. J. Phys. Chem. A 108, 9814–9826, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp048162v (2004).

70. 70.

Dahan, M. et al. Diffusion Dynamics of Glycine Receptors Revealed by Single-Quantum Dot Tracking. Science 302, 442 (2003).

71. 71.

Di Rienzo, C., Piazza, V., Gratton, E., Beltram, F. & Cardarelli, F. Probing short-range protein Brownian motion in the cytoplasm of living cells. Nature Communications 5, 5891, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6891, https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms6891#supplementary-information (2014).

72. 72.

Gautier, R., Douguet D Fau - Antonny, B., Antonny B Fau - Drin, G. & Drin, G. HELIQUEST: a web server to screen sequences with specific alpha-helical properties.

## Acknowledgements

We Acknowledge Jesper Vind for assisting with molecular biology, and Werner W. Streicher for assisting with protein purification. Camilla Dyngbo Thorlaksen for figure design. This work was generously funded by the Villum foundation young investigator fellowship (grant 10099) and the Carlsberg foundation Distinguished Associate professor program (CF16-0797) for N.S.H.

## Author information

S.S.R.B. performed most microscopy measurements, wrote software, and treated most single molecule data with the help of S.C. and J.T. P.M.L. and A.S.K. recorded single molecule data. H.P. and J.T. wrote software and analyzed data. P.M.L. performed all bulk assays with the help of L.I., S.C. and A.S. All data were discussed and evaluated with inputs from all authors. N.S.H. designed and had the overall management and coordination of the project and wrote the manuscript with the help of S.S.R.B. and inputs from all authors.

Correspondence to Nikos S. Hatzakis.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions