Abstract
In this case study, the mycelium growth of Sclerospora graminicola in the infected tissues of pearl millet and the process of sporulation and liberation of sporangia and zoospores were observed using four different microscopic techniques. The cotton blue-stained samples observed under light microscope revealed the formation of zoospores with germ tubes, appressoria and initiation of haustorium into the host cells, while the environmental scanning electron microscopy showed the rapid emergence of sporangiophores with dispersed sporangia around the stomata. For fluorescence microscopy, the infected leaf samples were stained with Fluorescent Brightener 28 and Calcofluor White, which react with β-glucans present in the mycelial walls, sporangiophores and sporangia. Calcoflour White was found to be the most suitable for studying the structural morphology of the pathogen. Therefore, samples observed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) were pre-treated with Calcofluor White, as well as with Syto-13 that can stain the cell nuclei. Among the four microscopic techniques, CLSM is ideal for observing live host-pathogen interaction and studying the developmental processes of the pathogen in the host tissues. The use of different microscopic bioimaging techniques to study pathogenesis will enhance our understanding of the morphological features and development of the infectious propagules in the host.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Many oomycete plant pathogens cause a considerable loss in food crops, including cereals, legumes, oil seeds, vegetables, and fruit crops1. The oomycetes are a diverse class of fungus-like eukaryotic microorganisms that share common morphological features with the true fungi1. Cellulose is a major cell wall component in oomycetes, whereas chitin is a major cell wall component of true fungi2,3. However, oomycetes often possess chitin synthases that are activated during the morphogenesis of young hyphae and mycelia4. The hyphal and mycelial structures of oomycetes are diploid during their vegetative growth stage, whereas most fungi are haploid (e.g., ascomycetes) or dikaryotic (e.g., basidiomycetes), even though exceptions exist5. The cells of the oomycetes can be morphologically distinguished from true fungi as their mitochondrial cristae are tubular, whereas the cells of true fungi are flattened4.
Pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R.Br.] is a vital cereal crop mainly cultivated in the arid and semi-arid regions of the world, as it is tolerant to drought and high temperatures6. Downy mildew disease, caused by Sclerospora graminicola (Sacc.) J. Schröt, is one of the major diseases of pearl millet, causing approximately 10–80% of the annual grain yield loss7,8. Thines et al.9 recognized 20 genera of downy mildews of which eight belong to cereal downy mildews. Among these eight, S. graminicola is an obligate biotrophic pathogen9. The primary inoculum of S. graminicola is oospores that are capable of surviving in diseased plant residues and soil9. Sporangia/zoospores are secondary sources of inoculum, originating from the infected leaves of host plants, and becoming air-borne which can spread to new susceptible hosts9.
Fourteen grass species are recognized as hosts of S. graminicola strains with high host specificity observed among the pathogens10,11. The pathogens invade the hosts systemically, and infected leaves normally show yellowing or chlorosis along the veins of the leaves12 (Fig. 1). When the pathogen colonizes the inflorescence (panicle), the floral organs turn into leaf-like structures, and this abnormal development is termed phyllody13. Phyllody is the reason why the disease is referred to as ‘witch’s broom’, ‘crazy top’ or ‘green ear disease’14. These symptoms are common among the many host crop species, including pearl millet, infected by downy mildew pathogens belonging to the genera Peronosclerospora, Sclerospora and Sclerophthora13,15.
Bioimaging plays an important role in studies of fungal biology and plant pathology by allowing per se elucidation of cellular structures in living cells16. Recent advanced in fluorescence laser microscopic techniques, such as multiphoton microscopy and confocal microscopy, are new emerging areas for cellular exploration17. In addition, the applications of genetically encoded molecular markers, such as Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP)18, Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) and in situ hybridization along with the various microscopic techniques have shown a great potential for investigating host-pathogen interactions19. Furthermore, Erukhimovitch et al.20 used Fourier Transform InfraRed (FT-IR) microscopy for early and rapid detection of Colletotrichum coccodes, the cause of black dot disease of potato (Solanum tuberosum). Bioimaging offers possibilities for gaining insights into host-pathogen interactions, which cannot be availed by using conventional techniques. Research in plant pathology is greatly influenced by newer advancements in techniques and imaging devices that can be used in combination with newer fluorescence techniques.
In the present investigation, mycelial structures and asexual reproduction of S. graminicola was examined for the first time in infected leaves using light, fluorescence, confocal, and environmental scanning electron microscopic techniques in combination with various stains. We aimed to test the suitability and simplicity of different microscopic techniques in identifying the developmental stages of the asexual structures of S. graminicola so that scientists can select the most appropriate approach(es) to obtain information on the host resistance and susceptibility mechanisms, such as papillae and callose formation, and molecular understanding of the host-pathogen interactions.
Results
S. graminicola oospore viability assay by light microscopy, and symptoms of S. graminicola-infected pearl millet
Prior to the seed coating, the viability of oospores used in the coating was tested by staining with 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride (TTC) and examined under light microscope. Results showed that not all the oospores were viable. Specifically, when being observed under a compound light microscope oospores stained in red were viable, whereas non-stained oospores were not viable (Fig. 1a). Pearl millet seeds coated with the pathogen oospores were germinated 48 h after sowing and showed the typical asexual symptoms of downy mildew like leaf chlorosis and stunted growth at day 20 after sowing under field conditions (Fig. 1b). The white cottony growth symptoms occurred on the lower surface of infected leaves after 20 days of sowing (Fig. 1c). The disease symptoms continued until the panicle stage after 56 days of sowing, resulting in malformation of the floral structure into leafy structure that represents the sexual stage of pathogen (Fig. 1d).
Light microscopy of pathogen structures in infected leaves
Infected leaves with asexual sporulation of S. graminicola exhibited intensive growth of the pathogen on the lower surface of the leaves. Such infected leaves subsequently showed the production of sporangiophore primordia, sporangiophores, sporangia and zoospores. Examination of infected lower leaf tissues from zoospores-infected seedlings stained with cotton blue under a compound light microscope revealed zoospore germination, as well as the initial stages of pathogen structures such as formation of germ tubes, appressoria and vesicles after 3 h of S. graminicola inoculation (Fig. 2a). After penetration, the induced hyphae were further developed into haustorial mother cells and other structures. The hyphae and haustoria penetrated the epidermal and mesophyll cells of the host within 2-days, and persistently colonized the pearl millet internal tissues following the challenge-inoculation with the pathogen (Fig. 2b).
Fluorescence microscopy of live pathogen structures
To observe the various features of S. graminicola developing after its penetration into the plant cells, the infected leaf samples were stained with Fluorescent Brightener 28 and Calcofluor White, which are known to react with β-glucans present in the mycelial walls, sporangiophores, and sporangia. Our results revealed that Calcoflour White was the most suitable for studying the structural morphology of the pathogen. As shown in the representative images of staining with Calcofluor White, this chemical enabled us to clearly distinguish the features that have cell wall like mycelia, sporangiophores emerging from a stoma, and sporangia scattering over the leaf surface (Fig. 3a) from the wall-less zoospores (Fig. 3b).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) of live pathogen structures
CLSM was used to study the asexual sporulation of S. graminicola in infected pearl millet leaves after staining with Syto-13 and Calcofluor White stains. Syto-13 only stained nucleic acids, making the multinucleate conditions of mycelia, sporangiophores and sporangia very clear (Fig. 4a–f). Sporangiophore primordia emerging through stomata in a Syto-13-stained infected leaf were observed in Fig. 4a–c, whereas a sporangiophore with sterigmata on which sporangia were developed could be noted in Fig. 4d, and a mature sporangiophore with fully grown sporangia could be seen in Fig. 4e. Additionally, Fig. 4f clearly showed a sporangiophore primordium with nuclei migrating to the growing tips of the aseptate structure after staining the infected pearl millet leaves with Syto-13.
Syto-13-staining of S. graminicola-infected pearl millet leaves indicated sporangiophores and sporangia released on the lower surface of infected leaves (Fig. 5a). Furthermore, sporangia, which released zoospores on the lower surface of the infected leaves during sporulation, were also stained and visualized with Syto-13. Each sporangium with 3–5 nuclei reacting with the stain Syto-13 showed liberated mononucleate zoospores (Fig. 5b). In addition, Syto-13 also induced staining in the cytoplasm of sporangia, but with less intensity, indicating that nucleic acids were present in the cytoplasm to some extent (Fig. 5b).
Calcofluor White bound to S. graminicola cell wall, resulting in yellow/orange fluorescence, when it was examined by the CLSM. Figure 6a showed a CLSM image of a S. graminicola sporangiophore on an infected pearl millet leaf, with the basal cell of the sporangiophore. Furthermore, Fig. 6b presented sporangia on an infected pearl millet leaf, where the position of the operculum (opening) for zoospore release could be noted.
Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) of live pathogen structures
The CLSM study was compared with another scanning technique, namely ESEM. In contrast to the conventional SEM, the ESEM allowed us to study fresh hydrated materials21. When infected pearl millet leaves were examined using ESEM, the leaf surface showed the emergence of sporangiophores (Fig. 7a), and subsequently the dispersed sporangia (Fig. 7b). ESEM was a quick and convenient method to examine the activity of S. graminicola structures on the infected leaf surface within 30 min without requiring any special staining or treatment prior to the microscopic observation22. A large number of sporangia deposited on the leaf surface were observed, and some were beginning to germinate (Fig. 7a,b). Many sporangia were deposited around the stomata, and the germ tubes of the sporangia often grew directly toward the stomata (Fig. 7b).
Discussion
In the present investigation, the downy mildew pathogen S. graminicola of pearl millet was examined by using light microscopy, fluorescence laser microscopy, CLSM, and ESEM. For light microscopy, lower surface of the infected leaf tissues was processed, and then examined to study the early morphological features of the infection structures like wall-less zoospores, germ tubes, appressoria, and haustoria of S. graminicola after 3 h of inoculation (Fig. 2). This was time consuming, but relevant to study the details of interal pathogen structures. However, for external structures, further studies were carried out to observe live specimens without any tissue preparation (Figs 3–7).
The availability of various microscopic methods is critical to advance our understanding of the morphological features of different plant pathogens, and serves the basis for understanding of the interactions between hosts and pathogens at cellular level. Oomycete plant pathogens are unique in their morphological, biochemical, cytological and histological structures. Oomycetes are multinucleate with cell wall consisting of β-1,3- and β-1,6-glucans21. Studies of the intimate association between hosts and pathogens at cellular level and elucidation of the roles of different host and pathogen genotypes can shed light on understanding of the nature of disease resistance and advance our understanding of the host-pathogen interactions23. In the present report, the use of different types of microscopy to study pathogenesis and morphological features has enhanced our understanding of the morphological features of the infective propagules of the S. graminicola pathogen. Previously, Weston & Weber24 described morphological features of the pathogen S. graminicola in detail by drawing the sporangiophores and sporangia based on the data observed with a normal light microscope. In a separate research, the histology-based light microscopic analysis of pearl millet-S. graminicola interaction was investigated by Sharada et al.25. The authors demonstrated that the observation of developmental processes of asexual structural features of the pathogen by microscope allowed them to identify and predict the response of pearl millet seedlings to downy mildew disease, which was in good correlation with the results of disease incidence obtained under field conditions. Furthermore, the same authors also observed less haustoria and more papillae in the highly resistant pearl millet lines, while the reverse tendency for the highly susceptible lines25. In literature, there appear to be no references that provide a clear photomicrograph using either light or fluorescence microscopy or CLSM or ESEM. Therefore, this report provides the first photographic details of the S. graminicola pathogen in relation with the host pearl millet.
The use of fluorescence microscopy in studying plant-pathogen interactions complements the application of bright-field microscopy17. In the present study, it was observed that the fluorescence stains Fluorescent Brightener 28 and Calcoflour White reacted with β-glucans of the mycelial cell wall, sporangiophores and sporangia, while the wall-less zoospores did not (Fig. 3b). In our observation, Calcoflour White stain enabled us to elucidate the asexual structural development of the pathogen better than the Fluorescent Brightener 28 stain; and thus, photographs were taken (Fig. 3). Hansen et al.26 studied Thanatephorus cucumeris (syn. Rhizoctonia solani) hyphal structures and performed cytological studies on the oomycete Pythium oligandrum. In the present study of the S. graminicola oomycete, the nuclear cytology is clear, with a large number of nuclei in the hyphae and in the asexual reproductive structures sporangiophores and sporangia. Monheit et al.27 studied fungal cytology using Calcofluor White 28, and the results revealed that detection of the fungal pathogen by the combination of light and fluorescence laser microscopy was very effective compared with that of light microscopy alone. In addition, a KOH-Aniline Blue technique for fluorescence staining of fungi in association with plant tissues was developed by Hood & Shew28. However, even though the technique provided documentation of plant-fungal interactions, characteristics of host colonization, fungal reproduction and detection of inoculum, this procedure required extensive preparation for tissue clearing, which is time-consuming and may disrupt delicate pathogen structures.
The potential of microscopic techniques as investigation tools in plant-pathogen interactions has increased, and there is an increasing demand for using the fluorescent probes to study the structure of living cells. In addition, fluoresent labelling of specific components in cells can be generated without any manipulation of experiment. The applications of such techniques in studying the plant-pathogen interactions by locating the infection structures involved in the cellular alteration, defensive secretory processes and signaling pathways in susceptible and resistant host cells have been well documented29,30.
In general, it is not so easy to capture good images of cellular components labelled with fluorescent probes in isolated flat cells, including fungal hyphae. Furthermore, it is a challenging task to obtain high-resolution quality images of cellular components at various depths in plant cells, especially in those inside the plant organs. For instance, in the case of leaf samples, it is normally possible to visualize fluorescing structures in the epidermal cells present along the side of the leaf closest to the target objective31,32,33. However, it is very difficult to get clear images of structures associated with the mesophyll cells. Chloroplasts and other organelles often autofluoresce, and this will result in overlap with the emission spectra of the fluorochrome marker proteins34. The use of multiphoton lasers with increased penetration and small excitation volume may allow us to address this problem35. Computer-aided fluorescent microscopy, which uses higher light reflection, delivers better contrast and resolution of the host tissues and of the pathogen than conventional fluorescence microscopy36. In addition, computer processing can generate three-dimentional images of different structures of S. graminicola by assembling stacks of two-dimentional images37.
Recently, various techniques have been improved by Minker et al.38 for semi-automated confocal imaging of fungal pathogens on plants. Techniques and methods were optimized for sample fixation, optical clearing, species-specific fluorescence staining and image processing with reference to pathogenesis in maize tissues by the fungal pathogens Exserohilum turcicum, Bipolaris maydis, and Cercospora zeae-maydis38,39. CLSM is a new advancement in light microscopy, which mostly explores the latest laser, imaging and computational technologies that enable biologists to vizualize a distinctive form of cell and/or subcellular components38. The blur-free images of thick specimens can also be obtained by using computer tools and fluorescent light reflection at various depths. It is mainly advantageous for examining thick specimens or host-pathogen interactions where the pathogen is fixed deeply within the host tissue36. In the present study, CLSM provided optical sectioning of thick specimens at high resolution images of infected leaf tissues at various depths. Safeeulla40 used Feulgen stain to detect the nuclei in the mycelia, sporangia and zoospores of S. graminicola in pearl millet. However, the staining procedure is laborious and time consuming, whereas using Syto-13 is a very simple and convenient approach when compared with Feulgen staining. Overall, the CLSM combined with Syto-13 staining provides excellent opportunities for studying the live host-pathogen interaction with minimum disturbance of cellular developmental processes. Future studies involving immuno-cytolocalization of functional proteins and metabolites in pearl millet infected with S. graminicola may further enhance our understanding of the host-pathogen interaction during pathogenesis.
The emerging sporangiophores and the dispersed sporangia were observed by ESEM (Fig. 7). The quick and convenient procedure of ESEM, which could produce results within 30 min without any previous preparations, helped in examining the activity of S. graminicola infection structures in infected pearl millet leaves (Fig. 7). The capacity to view the fixed samples with minimum preparations has made this technique more advantageous and unique. Specimens can be observed directly, without drying and coatings. Pressure variations in drying units have been known to spoil and alter delicate biological materials41,42. Moreover, it reduces the preparation time, and its ability to scan directly the biological specimens enables soft specimens to be viewed with less mechanical damage42. Only a few studies have used ESEM to produce images of S. graminicola43,44. A clear image of the sporulating structures of pathogen on the infected leaves will give a better idea about its development and role in the epidemiology of the disease development under field conditions.
Taken together, the fluorescence microscopy allows us to capture high-resolution quality images of cellular components at various depths in plant cells, especially in those inside the plant organs31,32,36. The ESEM helps in understanding the sporangial deposition on the young leaf surface for forecasting the disease epidemiology and development43. In case of CLSM, the host cell response to the disease and the pathogen developmental processes at the early stage during the host-path interaction can be visualized36,38.
The advances in image processing technology and the assimilation of cellular and molecular approaches with advanced microscopy techniques have revolutionized the studies of cytological research. In this avenue, the studies by Hardham & Blackman45 on the position of plant receptors involved in Phytophthora spp. detection, and mechanisms of basal defence were demonstrated. Drake et al.46 extended the application of state-of-the-art methodologies, such as Synchrotron Radiation X-ray Tomographic Microscopy (SRXTM), Secondary Ion Mass Spectrometry (SIMS) and Time-of-Flight (ToF) SIMS, to enable comprehensive newer way to characterize fungi.
With the advances in bioimaging and the use of genetically encoded marker molecules like GFP, much attention will be given in future towards studies of living cells and materials with reduced requirements of fixed materials. Bioimaging offers better possibilities for studying host-pathogen interactions, which cannot be availed by using conventional techniques. In future, plant pathology will be profoundly influenced by such innovative bioimaging techniques, as well as the availability of genetic approaches and tools that can be used in an integrative manner with newer fluorescence techniques.
Methods
Host and pathogen
The downy mildew susceptible pearl millet cultivar 7042S was obtained from International Crop Research Institute for Semi Arid Tropics, Hyderabad, India. The oospores of S. graminicola were collected from the downy mildew infected plot at the University of Mysore, India.
Oospore viability test
The presence of oospores in the seed samples was determined by the washing method, and the viability of the oospores was assessed by the 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride test (TTC) as described by Shetty et al.47.
Seed coating and generation of zoospores of S. graminicola
Seeds of the cultivar 7042S were sprinkled with sterile water, and the wetted seeds were coated manually with powdered oospores of S. graminicola for 30 min. The coated seeds were sown in the downy mildew infected plot at the University of Mysore. After eight days of sowing, germinated seedlings were observed for typical asexual disease symptoms in the form of chlorosis in the emerging leaves, stunted growth, white cottony growth on lower surface of leaves and necrosis on leaf tips. The symptomatic plants were regularly monitored up to the panicle stage (54–60-days of sowing) to evaluate the sexual stage of the pathogen. Such infected young leaves from 8-days old plants were harvested and kept for incubation in the evening and observed for sporulation during the early morning hours of the next day. Sporulation of the pathogen was also observed on the lower surface of infected leaves, including sporangiophore primordia as well as fully grown sporangiophores and sporangia. From such sporangia, 3–5 zoospores were liberated in water. The zoospore load was measured using a haemocytometer and adjusted to approximately 105 zoospores mL−1, which was then used as an inoculum source.
Plant treatment and tissue clearing for light microscopic studies
Twenty-five seeds of the cultivar 7042S were placed in six inch diameter Petri dishes lined with three layer of moistened blotting discs and incubated in growth chamber as explained above. The three-day old germinated seedlings were inoculated with S. graminicola by applying the asexual zoospore suspension (105 zoospores mL−1) into the leaf whorls48. The inoculated seedlings were transered to 12 inch diameter pots containing the soil mixture ‘Weibulls Enhetsjord’ (K Jord, W. Weibull AB, Landskrona, Sweden) with all the required nutrients. Seedlings were raised in a growth chamber with alternative cycles of 12 h/12 h light and darkness. Light source was provided by fluorescent tubes (Osram L 36 W/11- 860 Lumilux plus Eco Daylight, Osram GmbH, Augsburg, Germany, 200 µE m−2 s−1). The temperature and humidity in the growth chamber were programmed to 25 °C/50–60% in day and 20 °C/80–90% during night, respectively. The infected seedlings were then harvested at different time intervals, namely 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h after inoculation, and fixed in a mixture of acetic acid and alcohol (1:3, v/v). The fixed seedlings were then soaked in 3% (w/v) NaOH for 30 min at 60 °C, and were then rinsed thoroughly in running distilled water for 30 min to remove the traces of NaOH. Subsequently, the treated seedlings were dried at room temperature and transferred to warm cotton blue [0.2% (w/v)] for 2 h to ensure uniform staining25.
Light microscopy of live pathogen structures
Microscopic slides were prepared from live pathogen materials obtained from infected leaves harvested at different time intervals, namely 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, 48, and 96 h post-inoculation as previously described40,48. For light microscopy, the samples were stained using 0.2% cotton blue and were directly observed under a compound light microscope. The motile asexual sporangia releasing zoospores and penetration of pathogen propagules in the host tissues were directly observed using a Wild Leitz microscope (Wild MPS 46/52 Photoautomat, Switzerland).
Stain preparation
The stain solutions used were:
-
(a)
0.03% (w/v) Fluorescent Brightener 28 (F6258, Sigma) in 0.2% phosphate buffer (w/v, pH 8.0)49.
-
(b)
3 µLmL−1Syto-13 (Molecular Probes)26.
-
(c)
0.1% (w/v) Calcoflour White (Polysciences) in distilled water containing 4,4’-bis-[4-anilino-bis-diethyl-amino-triazin-2-xylanimo-2,2′-stilbene disulfonic acid]27.
Fluorescent Brightener 28 was applied for 30 min, whereas Calcoflour White was applied for 1 min and Syto-13 for 15 min. For fluorescent microscopic observation, samples were prepared using Fluorescent Brightener 28 and Calcofluor White. For CLSM studies, samples were stained with Syto-13 and with Calcofluor White.
Fluorescence microscopy of live pathogen structures
The infected leaves were harvested after 4 days of inoculation and were made to sporulate on Perspex plates as explained above and treated with each of the three stains for different durations. Microscopic slides were prepared with live asexual pathogen materials (sporangiophores, sporangia, and zoospores) obtained from infected leaves at 4th day post-inoculation. Sporangiophores, sporangia, and zoospores were observed using a fluorescence light microscope (Olympus BX60, Denmark). The filter used for Fluorescence Brightener 28 had excitation of 330–385 nm, dichroicmirror DM 400 nm and barrier filter >420 nm). Calcofluor White-stained samples was observed under UV light (excitation 365 nm and emission ∼440 nm, and DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) filter set was used).
Confocal laser scanning microscopy
The interaction between plant and pathogen was monitored by CLSM using infected leaves of 4 days post-inoculation. The asexual structures, including sporangiophores, sporangia and zoospores of S. graminicola, were prepared and treated with two stains as described above, and were then observed by CLSM following the previously described method26. A confocal laser scanning microscope (TCS4d, Leica Laser Technik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) was used for detecting the fluorescence signals from stained pathogen structures. The instrument was assembled with an argon/krypton laser. The filter used for Syto-13 had excitation wavelength of 488 nm, beam splitter of double dichroic 488 and 568 nm and barrier filter of 515–545 nm.
Environmental scanning electron microscopy
Infected leaves (4 days post-inoculation) showing asexual sporulation were directly observed using an environmental scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 200 ESEM, ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA) without any prior staining or treatment. A Peltier stage maintained the temperature at 4 °C with a water vapour pressure of about 0.813 kPa (6.1 Torr) and the relative humidity approximately 100%. Secondary electrons released from the specimen were amplified by water molecules and detected by a gaseous secondary electron detectormounted at the tip of the objective.
References
Kamoun, S. Molecular genetics of pathogenic oomycetes. Eukaryot Cell 2, 191–199 (2003).
Guerriero, G. et al. Chitin synthases from saprolegnia are involved in tip growth and represent a potential target for anti-oomycete drugs. PLoS Pathogen 6, 81–82 (2010).
Lévesque, C. A. et al. Genome sequence of the necrotrophic plant pathogen Pythium ultimum reveals original pathogenicity mechanisms and effector repertoire. Genome Biology 11, R73 (2010).
Fawke, S., Doumane, M. & Schornack, S. Oomycete interactions with plants: infection strategies and resistance principles. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 263–279 (2015).
Coelho, M.A., Bakkeren, G., Sun, S., Hood, M. E. & Giraud, T. Fungal sex: The basidiomycota. Microbiol. Spectr. 5 (2017).
Hu, Z. et al. Population genomics of pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.): Comparative analysis of global accessions and Senegalese landraces. BMC Genomics 16, 1048 (2015).
Hess, D. E., Ram, P. T. & Tom, H. C. Pearl Millet Downy Mildew: Problems and Control Strategies for a New Millennium, in: Sorghum and Millets Diseases. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 37–41 (2008).
Jogaiah, S., Sharathchandra, R. G., Niranjan Raj, S., Vedamurthy, A. B. & Shekar Shetty, H. Development of SCAR marker associated with downy mildew disease resistance in pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum L.). Molecular Biology Reports 41, 7815–7824 (2014).
Thines, M., Telle, S., Choi, Y.-J., Tan, Y. P. & Shivas, R. G. A new genus of graminicolous downy mildews from tropical Australia, with an updated key to the genera of downy mildews. IMA Fungus 6, 483–491 (2015).
Shetty, H. S. et al. Downy mildew of pearl millet and its management. All India Coordinated Research Project on Pearl Millet (ICAR), Jodhpur (2016).
Jogaiah, S., Anand Kumar, S., Thakur, R. P., Rao, V. P. & Shekar Shetty, H. Molecular characterization of Sclerospora graminicola, the incitant of pearl millet downy mildew revealed by ISSR markers. J. Phytopath. 157, 748–755 (2009).
Govind, S. R., Jogaiah, S., Abdelrahman, M., Shetty, H. S. & Tran, L.-S. P. Exogenous trehalose treatment enhances the activities of defense-related enzymes and triggers resistance against downy mildew disease of pearl millet. Front. Plant Sci. 7, 1593 (2016).
Das, I., Nagaraja, A. & Tonapi, V. Diseases of millets- a ready reckoner. Indian Institute Millets. Research 67, 81–89 (2016).
Kobayashi, M. et al. Genome analysis of the foxtail millet pathogen Sclerospora graminicola reveals the complex effector repertoire of graminicolous downy mildews. BMC genomics 18, 897 (2017).
William, F. & Grunwald, N. J. Introduction to oomycetes. The Plant Health Instructor, APS Press, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-I-2010-1207-01 (2010).
Eggeling, C. Advances in Bioimaging-challenges and potentials. J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 51, 040201 (2018).
Dunst, S. & Tomancak, P. Imaging flies by fluorescence microscopy: principles, technologies, and applications. Genetics 211, 15–34 (2019).
Schoina, C., Bouwmeester, K. & Govers, F. Infection of a tomato cell culture by Phytophthora infestans; a versatile tool to study Phytophthora-host interactions. Plant Methods 13, 88 (2017).
Li, A. Y. et al. The microscopic examination of phytophthora cinnamomi in plant tissues using fluorescent in situ hybridization. J. Phytopathol. 162, 747–757 (2014).
Erukhimovitch, V. et al. Early and rapid detection of potato’s fungal infection by fourier transform infrared microscopy. Applied Spectroscopy 61, 1052–1056 (2007).
Fry, W. E. & Niklaus, J. Grünwald. Introduction to oomycetes. The Plant Health Instructor, https://doi.org/10.1094/PHI-I-2010-1207-01 (2010).
El Abed, S., Ibnsouda, S.K., Latrache, H. & Hamadi F. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and environmental SEM: suitable tools for study of adhesion stage and biofilm formation. In: Kazmiruk V, editor. Scanning electron microscopy, Chapter 35. Croatia: InTech, 2012. ISBN 978-953-51-0092-8 (2012).
Botero, D., Alvarado, C., Bernal, A., Danies, G. & Restrepo, S. Network analyses in plant pathogens. Front. Microbiol. 9, 35 (2018).
Weston, W. H. & Weber, G. F. Downy mildew (Sclerospora graminicola) on everglade millet in Florida. Journal Agriculture Research 36, 935–963 (1928).
Sharada, M. S., Shetty, S. A. & Shekar Shetty, H. Infection processes of Sclerospora graminicola on Pennisetum glaucum lines resistant and susceptible to downy mildew. Mycological Research 99, 317–322 (1995).
Hansen, M., Thrane, C., Olsson, S., Sørensen, J. & Srensen, J. Confocal imaging of living fungal hyphae challenged with the fungal antagonist viscosinamide. Mycologia 92, 216–221 (2000).
Monheit, J. G., Brown, G., Kott, M. M., Schmidt, W. A. & Moore, D. G. Calcofluor white detection of fungi in cytopathology. American Journal Clinical Pathology 85, 222–225 (1986).
Hood, N. & Shew, H. D. Applications of KOH-aniline blue fluorescence in the study of plant-fungal interactions. Phytopathol. 86, 704–708 (1996).
Heath, M. C. Signal exchange between higher plants and rust fungi. Canadian Journal Botany 73, 616–623 (1995).
Heath, M. C., Nimchuk, Z. L. & Xu, H. Plant nuclear migrations as indicators of critical interactions between resistant or susceptible cowpea epidermal cells and invasion hyphae of the cowpea rust fungus. New Phytologist 135, 689–700 (1997).
Takemoto, D., Jones, D. A. & Hardham, A. R. GFP-tagging of cell components reveals the dynamics of subcellular re-organization in response to infection of Arabidopsis by oomycete pathogens. Plant J. 33, 775–792 (2003).
Koh, S., André, A., Edwards, H., Ehrhardt, D. & Somerville, S. Arabidopsis thaliana subcellular responses to compatible Erysiphe cichoracearum infections. Plant J. 44, 516–529 (2005).
Doehlemann, G. et al. Pep1, a secreted effector protein of Ustilago maydis, is required for successful invasion of plant cells. PLoS Pathogen 5, e1000290 (2009).
Godfrey, S. A. C. et al. Confocal imaging of Pseudomonas syringae pv. phaseolicola colony development in bean reveals reduced multiplication of strains containing the genomic island PPHGI-1. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interaction 23, 1294–1302 (2010).
Czymmek, K. J. et al. In vivo time-lapse documentation using confocal and multi-photon microscopy reveals the mechanisms of invasion into the Arabidopsis root vascular system by Fusarium oxysporum. Fungal Genetics. Biology 44, 1011–1023 (2007).
Hoppe, A. D., Seveau, S. & Swanson, J. A. Live cell fluorescence microscopy to study microbial pathogenesis. Cellular microbiology 11, 540–50 (2009).
Jesacher, A., Ritsch-Marte, M. & Piestun, R. Three-dimensional information from two-dimensional scans: a scanning microscope with postacquisition refocusing capability. Optica 2, 210 (2015).
Minker, K. R. et al. Semiautomated confocal imaging of fungal pathogenesis on plants: Microscopic analysis of macroscopic specimens. Microscopy Research Technology 81, 141–152 (2018).
Trese, A. T. & Loschke, D. C. High contrast resolution of the mycelia of pathogenic fungi in corn tissue after staining with Calcoflour and destaining with cellulose. Phytopath. 80, 196–200 (1990).
Safeeulla, K. M. Biology and control of the downy mildews of pearl millet, sorghum and finger millet. Wesley, Press Mysore (1976).
Kashi, A. M. et al. How to prepare biological samples and live tissues for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Galen Medical J. 3, 63–80 (2014).
Kirk, S. E., Skepper, J. N. & Donald, A. M. Application of environmental scanning electron microscopy to determine biological surface structure. Journal of Microscopy 233, 205–224 (2005).
Mauch-Mani, B., Schwinn, F. J. & Guggenheim, R. Early infection stages of the downy mildew fungi Sclerospora graminicola and Peronosclerospora sorghi in plants and cell cultures. Mycological Research 92, 445–452 (1989).
Michelmore, R. W., Pawar, M. N. & Williams, R. J. Heterothallism in Sclerospora graminicola. Genetics 72, 1368–1372 (1982).
Hardham, A. R. & Blackman, L. M. Molecular cytology of Phytophthora–plant interactions. Australasian Plant Pathology 39, 29–35 (2010).
Drake, H. et al. Anaerobic consortia of fungi and sulfate reducing bacteria in deep granite fractures. Nature Communication 8, 55 (2017).
Shetty, H. S., Khanzada, A. K., Mathur, S. B., Neergaard, H. & Copenhagen, P. Procedures for detecting seed-borne inoculum of Sclerospora graminicola in pearl millet (Pennisetum typhoides). Seed Science and Technology (Netherlands) (1978).
Sudisha, J. et al. Relative efficacy of strobilurin formulations in the control of downy mildew of sunflower. J. Pest Sci. 83, 461–470 (2010).
Hoch, H. C., Galvani, C. D., Szarowski, D. H. & Turner, J. N. Two new fluorescent dyes applicable for visualization of fungal cell walls. Mycologia 97, 580–588 (2005).
Acknowledgements
This research work has been carried out in the project Systemic Acquired Resistance funded by Danish International Development Agency under the Enhancement of Research Capacity Program (DANIDA-ENRECA). The authors also thank Dr Eigil de Neergaard, the Lead partner of this collaborative research project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceived and planned the experiments: H.S.S. and S.J. Performed the experiments: H.S.S., S.M.S. and A.R. Data analysis: H.S.S., M.H., H.J.L.J., S.J. and L.-S.P.T. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: H.S.S., M.H., H.J.L.J. and L.-S.P.T. Wrote the manuscript: H.S.S., S.J., L.-S.P.T. Prepared figures/graphs: S.J. and A.R. Revised the manuscript: H.S.S., S.J. and L.-S.P.T. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shetty, H.S., Suryanarayan, S.M., Jogaiah, S. et al. Bioimaging structural signatures of the oomycete pathogen Sclerospora graminicola in pearl millet using different microscopic techniques. Sci Rep 9, 15175 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51477-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51477-2
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.