Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Silicon-Nanographite Aerogel-Based Anodes for High Performance Lithium Ion Batteries



To increase the energy storage density of lithium-ion batteries, silicon anodes have been explored due to their high capacity. One of the main challenges for silicon anodes are large volume variations during the lithiation processes. Recently, several high-performance schemes have been demonstrated with increased life cycles utilizing nanomaterials such as nanoparticles, nanowires, and thin films. However, a method that allows the large-scale production of silicon anodes remains to be demonstrated. Herein, we address this question by suggesting new scalable nanomaterial-based anodes. Si nanoparticles were grown on nanographite flakes by aerogel fabrication route from Si powder and nanographite mixture using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA). This silicon-nanographite aerogel electrode has stable specific capacity even at high current rates and exhibit good cyclic stability. The specific capacity is 455 mAh g−1 for 200th cycles with a coulombic efficiency of 97% at a current density 100 mA g−1.


Rechargeable lithium-ion batteries are popular devices for energy storage due to their high energy density, excellent environmental compatibility, long life cycles, and low self-discharge rates. Lithium-ion batteries are widely used in mobile applications, electric vehicles, and other devices1,2,3,4. However, there is an ever-increasing demand to develop lithium-ion batteries with lower weight, larger capacity, and longer cycle life. Traditional lithium-ion batteries use graphite as anode material, which has a maximum theoretical capacity of 372 mAh g−1 and poor capacity retention at a high current density5,6,7,8,9. Silicon has attracted considerable attention as one of the most promising anode materials due to its high specific capacity (~4200 mAh g−1 for the Li22Si5 phase and ~3579 mAh g−1 for the Li15Si4 phase), which is approximately 10~12 times greater than traditional graphite anodes. Silicon (Si) also has a low discharging potential (0~0.4 V vs Li/Li+) compared to other anode materials. Furthermore, Si is abundant, inexpensive, and environmentally friendly, making it an attractive anode material for lithium-ion batteries10,11,12.

Despite these advantages, Si-based lithium-ion batteries suffer from large volume expansion during the lithiation process, poor electrical conductivity, and short life cycles10,11,12,13. In the fully lithiated state of Si, i.e. the Li22Si5 phase, drastic structural changes appear (an approximate 400% volume expansion)14,15. This volume expansion leads to pulverization of the Si particles causing rapid degradation of the electrical connectivity of the electrode16. Furthermore, when Si expands and contracts, the solid-electrolyte interphase (SEI) film on the outer surface of the electrode breaks up in a cyclic manner, resulting in the continual formation of new insulating SEI film and eventually poor electrical conductivity17.

Over the past decade, great attention has been paid to improving the performance of Si-based anode materials by preparing amorphous structures, porous architectures, nanometer scale particle size, and sandwiched designs, among other methods7,11,12,13,14. One effective way to overcome the limitations of Si-based anode materials is preparing Si/carbon composites by coating carbon layers on the Si or incorporating Si into the carbon matrix18,19. However, most of the aforementioned methods involves complex processes and require expensive equipment, resulting in expensive synthesis and greater overall costs, thus limiting the practical application of Si in lithium-ion batteries.

In the present work, Si nanoparticles were grown on nanographite flakes by aerogel fabrication route from Si powder and nanographite using polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) by a simple, cost-efficient, and scalable method, which does not require expensive equipments for the synthesis. PVA is a synthetic water-soluble polymer with good biodegradability, and biocompatibility, and is nontoxic and environmental friendly20. Nanographite, in turn, is used as an additive to enhance the electrical conductivity of the aerogels by connecting Si particles onto and between the nanometer thick flakes. In this study, we show that electrodes prepared based on this structure show high specific capacity and cycling stability, thus being a potentially cost-effective method for Si-based anodes.

Experimental Procedure

Materials and methods

PVA (Average molecular weight: 9000–10000) and sodium alginate were purchased from Sigma Aldrich. Nanographite (NG) was produced using a large-scale tube shear process that allows the high volume and low-cost production of nanographite-based devices according to routes described before21,22,23, without further modification. NG is a mixture of graphene, multilayer graphene, and graphite nano platelets. The platelets are less than 100 nm thick. Si powder, with particle size ~1 μm, was obtained from VestaSi Europe AB.

In a typical procedure, 0.25 g of Si was dispersed in PVA solution (2 wt%) under vigorous stirring for 30 min using Ultra-Turrax T25 with an S 25 N-10 G shear head at 10 k rpm. PVA is used as dispersant for this purpose because it is a synthetic water-soluble polymer, effective in film forming, emulsifying, and has an adhesive quality with high mechanical strength and forms a gels like structure when dissolved in water20. Then, 0.5 g of exfoliated nanographite was added to the suspension and stirred for 30 min to form a Si/NG suspension. The suspension was stirred during heating at 90 °C using a magnetic stirrer at 1200 rpm to form Si-nanographite hydrogels. The hydrogels were washed several times with distilled water. The hydrogels were then freeze dried at −30 °C for 24 h and finally heated in a tube furnace at 800 °C for 2 h in a nitrogen atmosphere to form the Si-nanographite aerogels (SNGA). Freeze drying of the hydrogel was carried out to create micropores. Micropores are formed in the hydrogel due to the reduced entropic effect and subsequently improved heat transfer during freezing. Specifically, freeze drying is used as it is a simple and clean process without the need of any porogens and organic solvents24.

Material characterization

Structural characterization was conducted using X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D2 phaser) with Cu-Kα (λ = 1.54184 Å) radiation in the 2θ range 10° to 80° with the step width 0.01°. Raman spectra of the samples were obtained using a Raman microscope (Horiba XploRA PLUS, laser excitation at 532 nm) in a frequency range of 50–3000 cm−1. The microstructure of the SNGA and surface morphology of the electrodes was investigated using a field emission scanning electron microscope at 2 kV (FESEM; MAIA3, TESCAN) and a transmission electron microscope at 300 kV (Tecnai F30). Thermogravimetric analysis of SNGA and Silicon was performed using the instrument Mettler Toledo TGA-1 in order to calculate the weight percentage of silicon in the SNGA structure. The sample was heated to 850 °C in nitrogen atmosphere at 20 °C/min rate, followed by a 10 min isotherm at 400 °C. Afterwards, the measurement was changed to oxygen atmosphere and heated from 400 to 1100 °C at 20 °C/min heating rate.

Electrochemical measurement

The SNGA, nanographite, and sodium alginate (as a binder) were mixed at a weight ratio of 60:30:10 using Ultra-Turrax T25 with an S 25 N-10 G shear head at 10 k rpm for 1 h. Sodium alginate was selected as a binder due to its rich content of carboxylic groups, high Young’s modulus, and electrochemical stability, which significantly enhances the columbic efficiency, specific capacity, and cycle stability25,26. The mixture of SNGA, NG and binder was deposited on copper foil (1 mg cm−2) to prepare the electrodes (label: SNGA/NG). Two reference electrodes were prepared by mixing i) nanographite and sodium alginate binder (weight ratio 90:10) labeled as NG and ii) silicon, nanographite and sodium alginate (weight ratio 21:69:10) labeled as SNG. The half cells of these electrodes were assembled in a glove box filled with highly pure argon gas (H2O < 0.1 ppm and O2 < 0.1 ppm). Lithium metal foil was used as reference and counter electrode. The electrolyte used was LP40, that is, 1 M LiPF6 in a mixture of ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) in a 1:1 weight ratio. Celgard 2325 was used as a separator.

Cyclic voltammetry (CV) tests were performed between 0.01 and 2.0 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 using a VersaSTAT 4 Potentiostat. Galvanostatic charge-discharge tests of the cells were performed using a LabVIEW-based PXI system in a voltage range between 0 and 1.5 V at various current densities. The capacities and current densities were calculated based on the weight of the active materials (total weight of SNGA + NG in case of SNGA/NG electrode, weight of NG in case of NG electrode and total weight of Si + NG in case of SNG electrode) without binder. All of the electrochemical measurements were conducted at room temperature.

Results and Discussion

Materials analysis

TGA measurement of the SNGA and Silicon was performed by heating/cooling in nitrogen atmosphere 30-850-400 °C with at the rate of 20 °C/min. followed by 10 min. isotherm at 400 °C and is shown in Fig. 1. Thereafter, a switch to oxygen atmosphere was made, followed by heating from 400 to 1100 °C with the 20 °C/min. heating rate. TGA measurement of the silicon was carried out to determine the exact percentage of the silicon in the aerogel composite. TGA measurement of silicon shows small gain in weight indicating oxidation of silicon with the formation of SiOx. From the TGA curve of the SNGA sample, it is observed that the there is no appreciable weight loss in the nitrogen atmosphere. In the oxygen atmosphere, there is a weight loss of 64% started at 400 °C and ends at 800 °C, corresponds to combustion of graphite27. Based on this result, the content of silicon in the SNGA structure is calculated to be 34.65%. The SNGA, nanographite, and sodium alginate binder were mixed at a weight ratio of 60:30:10 to prepare the electrode. Hence, percentage of silicon is 20.79% in the final electrode.

Figure 1

TGA curve of the silicon and SNGA.

The XRD patterns of Si, NG, and SNGA are shown in Fig. 2a. For Si, five diffraction peaks are observed at 28.3°, 47.0°, 55.8°, 68.4°, and 75.5°. These diffraction peaks are related to Bragg’s reflections from the (111), (220), (311), (400), and (331) planes of the Si phase (JCPDS no. 27-1402), respectively. For NG, a diffraction peak is observed at 26.1 that corresponds to the (002) plane of graphite28. The significant reduction of the characteristic peak of silicon and nanographite observed in the XRD pattern of SNGA may be due to the presence of amorphous substances covering the structure. The thickness and uniformity of amorphous substances blocks the X-rays from reaching the crystalline silicon particles and nanographite flakes suppressing their peaks in corresponding XRD pattern29.

Figure 2

(a) XRD pattern and (b) Raman spectra of Si, NG, and SNGA.

Raman spectroscopy was carried out to study the structural aspects of Si, NG and SNGA samples. Figure 2b shows the Raman spectra of Si, NG, and SNGA. Both Si and SNGA shows the peak centered at 523 cm−1 which corresponds to crystalline Si30. Thus, it is clear that there is no phase change of Si during the aerogel preparation process. The peaks observed at 1346, 1579, and 2720 cm−1 of the samples NG and SNGA are related to graphite. These peaks correspond to the D, G, and 2D bands, respectively31. Similarly, there is no change in graphite phase.

SEM images of the SNGA structure are shown in the Fig. 3a–c revealing the presence of nanoparticles on the nanographite flakes. To further analyze these nanoparticles; TEM images of the SNGA structure were taken. Figure 3d shows the TEM image of the SNGA. TEM analysis further reveals, in SNGA structure the nanoparticles covering the nanographite flakes are of silicon/silica; Both SEM EDS and TEM EDS shows presence of silicon and oxygen, however in SEM EDS oxygen is at higher ratio indicating silicon to be of SiOx form (See supplementary information). The selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern shown in Fig. 3e exhibits the rings made up of discrete spots. The rings corresponds to reflections with d spacing 0.346 nm, 0.213 nm, 0.1924 nm, 0.121 nm and 0.105 nm. The reflections with d spacing 0.346 nm, 0.213 nm, 0.121 nm and 0.105 nm corresponds to (002), (100), (110) and (201) planes of graphite respectively while the reflection with d spacing 0.1924 nm is due to (220) plane of silicon implying presence of nanographite and silicon. One likely mechanism describing the formation of particles can be understood by a silane route. PVA undergoes pyrolysis at about 230 °C, decomposes rapidly and further reacts with silicon in nitrogen atmosphere forming a gaseous silane (SiH4). The silane gas diffuses over the graphite flakes and further undergoes thermal degradation due to high temperatures forming the silicon nanoparticles over the nanographite flakes (as seen in the SEM and TEM image)32,33. However, after aerogel preparation process, part of the silicon nanoparticles undergo oxidation when air comes inside the tube furnace forming SiOx. Further, the NG aerogel was prepared by the same procedure described above. These structures does not show presence of any nanoparticles on the nanographite flakes (see supplementary information Fig. 4). From SEM image, the estimated amount of silicon nanoparticles in the SNGA structure is around 10.37(2) weight %. (see supplementary information for details). Hence, the amount of silicon nanoparticles in the SNGA/NG electrode is 6.2(2) weight %. Therefore, in the SNGA/NG electrode out of 20.79 silicon, 6.2 is nanosized silicon and remaining 14.59 is silicon microparticles.

Figure 3

SEM images (ac), TEM image (d) and corresponding SAED pattern (e) of SNGA.

Figure 4

SEM images (a,b) of the NG and (c,d) SNGA/NG electrodes at different magnifications.

Electrode analysis

SEM images of the NG and SNGA/NG electrodes at 20 μm and 100 μm are shown in Fig. 4a–d, respectively. From Fig. 4a,b, the NG electrode contains nanographite flakes of different sizes that are stacked over each other. A few pores are observed in these structures, which are formed due to the stacking of nanographite flakes of different sizes. However, Fig. 4c,d demonstrate that the SNGA/NG electrode that contains Si-nanographite aerogels with nanographite shows a large number of small and large pores with relatively smaller nanographite flakes.

The charging/discharging mechanism of the SNGA/NG electrode (as an anode) for lithium-ion batteries was investigated using CV. The CV measurements were performed on half cells in a voltage range between 0.01 to 2.0 V at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 for five cycles as shown in Fig. 5a. A cathodic peak is observed from 0.78 to 0.46 V in the first scan, which is attributed to the formation of a thin SEI layer. This peak disappeared in the successive cycles, indicating the formation of an SEI in the first cycle. Another cathodic peak is observed in the first cycle at 0.01 V, which is characteristic of lithiation of crystalline and amorphous Si. This splits into two peaks at 0.16 and 0.01 V in the second cycle and becomes sharper in the further cycles34. These peaks belong to the lithiation of Si and formation of a Li-Si alloy. In the first cycle, one anodic peak at 0.29 V is characteristic of amorphous Si and splits into two peaks at 0.29 and 0.49 V in the second cycle and becomes sharper in the further cycles. These peaks correspond to the phase transition from Li-Si alloy to Si. After the first cycle, the intensities of the cathodic and anodic peaks increases, indicating improvement in the Li insertion and extraction kinetics.

Figure 5

(a) Cyclic voltammograms of the SNGA/NG electrode at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. (b) Typical charge-discharge profiles of the SNGA/NG electrode at the 1st (0.09 C), 5th (0.09 C), 25th (0.27 C), 50th (0.45 C), 100th (0.9 C), and 200th (0.09 C) cycles. (c) Specific capacities of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes at a current density of 100 mA g−1 (equivalent to 0.09 C). (d) Coulombic efficiency vs cycle number of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes. (e) Rate performance of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes at different current densities 0.1 A g−1 (0.09 C), 0.3 A g−1 (0.18 C), 0.5 A g−1 (0.45 C), and 1 A g−1(0.9 C).

To study the electrochemical performance of the SNGA/NG electrode, galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements were conducted at a current density of 100 mA g−1 (equivalent to 0.09 C) in a voltage range of 0 to 1.5 V. Galvanostatic charge-discharge measurements of the NG and SNG electrodes were also conducted at the same current density and voltage range for comparison. The typical charge-discharge profiles of the SNGA/NG electrode at the 1st, 5th, 25th, 50th, 100th, and 200th cycles is shown in Fig. 5b. The current density in the 1st, 5th, 25th cycles was 0.1 A g−1 and that of the 50th, 100th, and 200th cycles was 0.3 A g−1 (0.27 C), 1 A g−1 (0.9 C), and 0.1 A g−1, respectively. The first discharge shows two slopes between 0.78–0.46 V and 0.16–0.01 V, which can be correlated with the cathodic peaks observed at the same position in the discharge of the first cycle in CV. This is largely responsible for the electrode’s capacity. The slope between 0.78 and 0.46 V (corresponding to the formation of the stable SEI layer) disappears in subsequent cycles while a slope between 0.16 and 0.01 V is present in the discharge of subsequent cycles. From the charge-discharge profiles of the SNGA/NG electrode, the plateaus between 0.16–0.01 V are present up to 200 cycles, indicating that lithiation-delithiation occurs in the Si particles without pulverization and disintegration from the current collector.

Figure 5c,d shows the cycling performance and corresponding coulombic efficiency of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes at a current density of 100 mA g−1. In the first cycle, the SNGA/NG electrode has a discharge capacity of 1050 mAh g−1 and a charge capacity of 1072.2 mAh g−1 with a coulombic efficiency of 97.9%, while the NG electrode has a discharge capacity of 325.8 mAh g−1 and a charging capacity of 318.7 mAh g−1 with a coulombic efficiency of 102.2% and the SNG electrode has a discharge capacity of 890.7 mAh g−1 and a charging capacity of 870.6 mAh g−1 with a coulombic efficiency of 102.3%. In the second cycle, the discharge capacity decreases to 944.4 mAh g−1, 319.8 mAh g−1 and 577.4 mAh g−1 for SNGA/NG, NG and SNG, respectively. Finally, in the 30th cycle, the discharge capacity decreases to 603.1 mAh g−1, 310 mAh g−1 and 293.7 mAh g−1 for SNGA/NG, NG and SNG, respectively. The specific capacity of the SNGA/NG electrode is higher than the NG and SNG electrodes in all the cycles. The electrodes SNGA/NG and SNG has the same percentage of silicon but there is a significant difference in their capacities and capacity retention.

The charge-discharge studies of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes were conducted at different current densities of 0.1 A g−1 (0.09 C), 0.3 A g−1 (0.27 C), 0.5 A g−1 (0.45 C), and 1 A g−1 (0.9 C) and the corresponding results are provided in Fig. 5e. The specific capacities of the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes in the 25th cycle are 622.5 mAh g−1, 310.2 mAh g−1 and 304.8 mAh g−1 respectively, at a current density of 0.1 A g−1. After increasing the applied current density to 0.3 A g−1 (after 25 cycles), the capacity falls by 17% in the SNGA/NG electrode, 7% in the NG electrode and 41% in the SNG electrode, remaining almost constant afterwards. When the applied current density increases to 0.5 A g−1 (after 50 cycles), there is a decrease in the specific capacity of 13%, 7% and 30% in the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes, respectively, remaining constant thereafter. Whereas at higher applied current densities (1 A g−1), there is a 22%, 20% and 49% decrease in the specific capacity in the SNGA/NG, NG and SNG electrodes, respectively, which remains constant. At 100th cycles, the capacity of the SNGA/NG electrode is significantly larger than that of the NG and SNG electrodes. Further, cyclic stability measurements were conducted on the SNGA/NG electrode at an applied current density of 1 A g−1 up to 189 cycles and continued up to 200 cycles at 0.1 A g−1. The corresponding results are shown in Fig. 5e. When the applied current density decreased to 0.1 A g−1 (after 189 cycles), 74% specific capacity is recovered and stable capacity is delivered for the SNGA/NG electrode. This indicates that Si continues to contribute to the specific capacity of the electrode up to 200 cycles.

The specific capacity of the SNGA/ NG electrode for the first cycle is 1050 mAh g−1 (that is almost equivalent to the theoretical capacity 1084 mAh g−1 calculated based on the weight of the silicon and nanographite) which decreases to 603.1 mAh g−1 after 30 cycles measured at the current density of 0.1 A g−1. The capacity retention of SNGA/NG electrode is 57% for the 30th cycle. Comparing it with previous studies of pristine silicon, milled silicon and heat treated silicon that show capacity retention of 33%, 32% and 52% respectively for 30th cycle measured at the current density of 0.1 A g−135. Further for 100th cycle, the capacity retention for SNGA/NG is 52% while for pristine silicon, milled silicon and heat treated silicon the capacity retention is 17%,31% and 19% respectively35.

Jiang et al.29 have synthesized Si nanoparticles (size ~10 nm) via acid-etching Al-Si alloy powder and further prepared the Si/GO paper followed by thermal reduction at 700 °C. The electrochemical study reveals, the said electrode has capacity fade of 47% from initial capacity (3200 mAh g−1 to 1500 mAh g−1 for 3rd cycle). The capacity was calculated based on the weight of active silicon particles only. Based on these calculations, the SNGA/NG electrode, has capacity of 2365 mAh g−1 after 100 cycles which is 58% higher than this report29. Lyu et al. has prepared silicon based gel in which Si core is covered with phytic acid shell layers through a facile high-energy ball milling method. The capacity was calculated based on the weight of active silicon particles. The gel based electrode has the capacity of 1300 mAh g−1 at 0.42 A g−1 while SNGA/NG electrode has shown the capacity of 1915 mAh g−1 at 0.5 A g−1 after 50th cycle. which is 47% higher than gel electrode36.

In comparison with the above results, SNGA/NG electrode prepared using micron sized silicon particles have shown much better specific capacity and capacity retention. SNGA is prepared by simple, scalable, and cost-efficient method as compared with the methods explained above. The specific energy of SNGA/NG electrode was found to be 787 Wh kg–1 for the first cycle and for 200th cycle, the energy density was 341.25 Wh kg−1 which is significantly higher than commercial automotive batteries based on the Si anodes37.

From Fig. 5c, it is observed that for 30th cycle, the specific capacity of SNGA/NG and NG electrode is 603.1 mAh g−1 and 310 mAh g−1 respectively. Considering the weight percentage of nanographite in the SNGA/NG electrode, it contributes 238.7 mAh g−1 in the total specific capacity of electrode while the expected contribution from nanosilicon in specific capacity is 364.4 mAh g−1 implying the weight of nanosilicon in SNGA/NG electrode to be 10.41% (indicated in Table 1). The actual weight of nanosilicon is 6.2% while the expected value of 10.41% falls within upper bound of geometric standard deviation in weight of nanosilicon i.e. 12.4% (see supplementary information for details). However, the decaying of capacity curve indicates this effect to come from the fracturing of the microparticles in the powder.

Table 1 Comparision of specific capacities based on expected and actual weight percentage of nanosilicon and nanographite.

Analyzing further for 200th cycle, the specific capacity of SNGA electrode is 455 mAh g−1, the expected contribution from nanosilicon in specific capacity is 218 mAh g−1, which corresponds to 6.2% of weight percent of nanosilicon in the final electrode. The theoretical value of the weight percentage of nanosilicon (6.2%) matches closely with the actual calculated value of 6.2%. This implies that the specific capacity is mainly due to silicon nanoparticles.


A simple, scalable, and cost-efficient method for the fabrication of silicon nanoparticles attached to the nanographite flakes was studied and reported. The presence of silicon/silica nanoparticles attached to the nanographite flakes was confirmed from the SEM and TEM studies. The electrochemical measurements proves stable specific capacity even at high current rates and good cyclic stability for aerogel-based electrodes. The electrodes show a specific capacity of 455 mAh g−1 for 200th cycles with a coulombic efficiency of 97% at a current density of 100 mA g−1. This performance is fully explained by the contribution of nanosilicon in the electrode. This electrode is made from a scalable and low-cost aerogel method. Electrode performance for 200th cycle i.e. 455 mAh g−1 corresponds to 341 Wh kg−1 which is higher value than currently reported best value of 260 Wh kg−1 in literature37. Measured nanosilicon weight was 6.2% and matches closely to the expected weight calculated from electrochemical performance of 6.2%.


  1. 1.

    M. Armand, J. M. T. Building better batteries. Nature 451, 652–657 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tarascon, J. M. & Armand, M. B. Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature 414, 359–367 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T. & Yushin, G. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater. Today 18, 252–264 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhu, Y. et al. Liquid-Solid-Solution Assembly of Nanocomposite as a High-Performance Lithium-Ion Battery Anode. Electrochim. Acta 215, 247 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Winter, M., Besenhard, J. O., Spahr, M. E. & Novák, P. Insertion electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Adv. Mater. 10, 725–763 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Ji, J. et al. Advanced Graphene-Based Binder-Free Electrodes for High-Performance Energy Storage. Adv. Mater. 27, 5264–5279 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Xiao, W. S. & Yu Xin Zhang, D. L. Diatoms silica an emerging biomaterial for energy conversion and storage. J. Mat. Chem. A 0, 1–3 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ji, J. et al. Graphene-Encapsulated Si on Ultrathin-Graphite Foam as Anode for High Capacity Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 25, 4673–4677 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ji, J. et al. In Situ Activation of Nitrogen-Doped Graphene Anchored on Graphite Foam for a High-Capacity Anode. ACS Nano 9, 8609–8616 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Zhang, W.-J. A review of the electrochemical performance of alloy anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 196, 13–24 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ge, M., Fang, X., Rong, J. & Zhou, C. Review of porous silicon preparation and its application for lithium-ion battery anodes. Nanotechnology 24, 422001 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Su, X. et al. Silicon-Based Nanomaterials for Lithium-Ion. Batteries: A Review. Adv. Energy Mater. 4, 1300882 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Zhang, Q. et al. T. Z. and M. L. Harnessing the concurrent reaction dynamics in active Si and Ge to achieve high performance of lithium-ion batteries. Energy Environ. Sci. 11, 669 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zhang, L. et al. Si-containing precursors for Si-based anode materials of Li-ion batteries: A review. Energy Storage Mater. 4, 92–102 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Yang, J. et al. Amorphous TiO 2 Shells: A Vital Elastic Buffering Layer on Silicon Nanoparticles for High-Performance and Safe Lithium Storage. Adv. Mater. 1700523, 1–7 (2017).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Ma, D., Cao, Z. & Hu, A. Si-based anode materials for li-ion batteries: A mini review. Nano-Micro Lett. 6, 347–358 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu, N. et al. A yolk-shell design for stabilized and scalable Li-ion battery alloy anodes. Nano Lett. 12, 3315–3321 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shelke, M. V. et al. Facile Synthesis of 3D Anode Assembly with Si Nanoparticles Sealed in Highly Pure Few Layer Graphene Deposited on Porous Current Collector for Long Life Li-Ion Battery. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4 (2017).

  19. 19.

    Kim, N., Chae, S., Ma, J., Ko, M. & Cho, J. Fast-charging high-energy lithium-ion batteries via implantation of amorphous silicon nanolayer in edge-plane activated graphite anodes. Nat. Commun. 8, 1–10 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Meshram, J. V., Koli, V. B., Phadatare, M. R. & Pawar, S. H. Anti-microbial surfaces: An approach for deposition of ZnO nanoparticles on PVA-Gelatin composite film by screen printing technique. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 73, 257–266 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Blomquist, N. et al. Large-scale production of nanographite by tube-shear exfoliation in water. PLoS One 11, 1–11 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Blomquist, N. et al. Metal-free supercapacitor with aqueous electrolyte and low-cost carbon materials. Sci. Rep. 7, 39836 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Blomquist, N. et al. Effects of geometry on large-scale tube-shear exfoliation of graphite to multilayer graphene and nanographite in water. Sci. Rep. 9, 1–8 (2019).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Rich, M. H. et al. Water-Hydrogel Binding Affinity Modulates Freeze- Drying Induced Micropore Architecture and Skeletal Myotube Formation. Biomacromoleules 16, 2255–64 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Furquan, M., Raj, A., Vijayalakshmi, S. & Mitra, S. E ffi cient conversion of sand to nano-silicon and its energetic Si-C composite anode design for high volumetric capacity lithium-ion battery. J. Power Sources 382, 56–68 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ling, L. et al. Remarkable E ff ect of Sodium Alginate Aqueous Binder on Anatase TiO 2 as High-Performance Anode in Sodium Ion. Batteries. (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Birol, H. et al. Fabrication of LTCC Micro-fluidic Devices Using Sacrificial Carbon Layers Fabrication of LTCC Micro-fluidic Devices Using Sacrificial Carbon Layers (2005).

  28. 28.

    Sun, W., Hu, R., Zhang, M., Liu, J. & Zhu, M. Binding of carbon coated nano-silicon in graphene sheets by wet ball-milling and pyrolysis as high performance anodes for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 318, 113–120 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Jiang, H. et al. Free-Standing Si/Graphene Paper Using Si Nanoparticles Synthesized by Acid-Etching Al-Si Alloy Powder for High-Stability Li-Ion Battery Anodes. Electrochim. Acta 188, 777–784 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yun, Q. et al. Micron-sized Spherical Si/C Hybrids Assembled via Water/Oil System for High-Performance Lithium Ion Battery. Electrochim. Acta 211, 982–988 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Su, M. et al. Enhancement of the cyclability of a Si/Graphite@Graphene composite as anode for Lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 116, 230–236 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Li, X., He, Y., Talukdar, S. S. & Swihart, M. T. Preparation of silicon nanoparticles by photothermal arrosol synthesis followed by acid etching. Phase Transitions 77, 131–137 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kim, K., Woo, D., Park, J.-H., Doo, S.-G. & Kim, T. Formation of silicon nanaoparticles using SiH4 pyrolysis at atmospheric- and low- pressure. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 54, 1021–1026 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Li, X. et al. Mesoporous silicon sponge as an anti-pulverization structure for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. Nat. Commun. 5, 1–7 (2014).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Wang, D., Gao, M., Pan, H., Wang, J. & Liu, Y. High performance amorphous-Si @ SiO x/C composite anode materials for Li-ion batteries derived from ball-milling and in situ carbonization. J. Power Sources 256, 190–199 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Lyu, F. et al. A Low-cost and Novel Si-based Gel for Li-ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(12), 10699–10707 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schmuch, R., Wagner, R., Hörpel, G., Placke, T. & Winter, M. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nat. Energy 3, 267–278 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We acknowledge funding from the Swedish Energy Agency (grant number: 2014-001912), Swedish Energy Agency (project No. 40466-1), the EU Regional Fund, the KK Foundation, STINT (IB-2018 7535) and Vinnova (grant number: 2017-03616). Open access funding provided by Mid Sweden University.

Author information




M.P. and R.P. conceived the aerogel preparation method. M.P., R.P., N.B. and G.H. contributed to the experiments. S.F., M.P., R.P., N.B., J.M. and D.B. contributed materials and experimental tools. M.P., R.P., N.B., K.L., S.K.M.S. and M.H. performed the measurements. M.P., R.P., K.L., S.K.M.S. and J.Ö. analyzed and interpreted the results. M.P., R.P. and H.O. drafted the manuscript. All of the authors critically revised the manuscript and approved its publication.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manisha Phadatare or Rohan Patil.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Phadatare, M., Patil, R., Blomquist, N. et al. Silicon-Nanographite Aerogel-Based Anodes for High Performance Lithium Ion Batteries. Sci Rep 9, 14621 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing