Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36965-1, published online 24 January 2019
This Article contains errors introduced during its publication, where the wrong fonts were used to distinguish between two models.
In the HTML version, in the Results section under subheading ‘Folding step’,
“In this way the whole folding processes, \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\) respectively, can be defined as following”:
should read:
“In this way the whole folding processes, \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\) respectively, can be defined as following”:
In the same section of the HTML version, ‘Theorem 1’,
“If \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}={\mathscr{{H}}}({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna})\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}={\mathscr{{H}}}({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p})\) then \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\) are strongly bisimilar (\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\, \sim \,{{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\))”.
should read:
“If \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna})\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{p})\) then \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\) are strongly bisimilar (\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\, \sim \,{{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\))”.
In the PDF version, in the Results section under subheading ‘Higher abstraction level model’,
“The application of \({\mathcal H}\) to the models described in the previous section results in a new representation of the folding processes of RNAs and proteins, indicated by the symbols \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\) respectively (see Section 2 of the Supplementary Information for a complete description)”.
should read:
“The application of \({\mathcal H}\) to the models described in the previous section results in a new representation of the folding processes of RNAs and proteins, indicated by the symbols \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\) respectively (see Section 2 of the Supplementary Information for a complete description)”.
In the same section of the PDF version, ‘Theorem 1’,
“If \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna})\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{p})\) then \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\) are strongly bisimilar (\({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\, \sim \,{ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\))”.
should read:
“If \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna})\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}= {\mathcal H} ({ {\mathcal F} }_{p})\) then \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\) are strongly bisimilar (\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\, \sim \,{{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\))”.
In the proof for Theorem 1,
“A winning strategy of the defender starts from the pair of states (\({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}^{s},{ {\mathcal F} }_{p}^{s}\)) of the relative LTSs, transliterated (RNAFS, PFS) as in Fig. 3”.
should read:
“A winning strategy of the defender starts from the pair of states (\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}^{s},{{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}^{s}\)) of the relative LTSs, transliterated (RNAFS, PFS) as in Fig. 3”.
In the same section of the PDF version,
“The \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\) folding processes, likewise \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\), are defined as
\({\mathcal F}_{rna}\mathop{=}\limits^{\rm{def}}({\mathcal F}_{rna}^{s}|\Delta {G}_{{\mathcal{F}}^{s}})\backslash \{ndg,\,pdg,\,zdg\};\)
\({\mathcal F}_{p}\mathop{=}\limits^{\rm{def}}({\mathcal F}_{p}^{s}|\Delta {G}_{{\mathcal{F}}^{s}})\backslash \{ndg,\,pdg,\,zdg\};\)
where
\(\Delta {G}_{{{\mathcal{{F}}}}^{s}}\mathop{=}\limits^{{\rm{def}}}\overline{pdg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathcal{{F}}}}^{s}}+\overline{ndg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathcal{{F}}}}^{s}}+\overline{zdg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathcal{{F}}}}^{s}}\)”
should read:
“The \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\) folding processes, likewise \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\), are defined as
\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\mathop{=}\limits^{{\rm{def}}}({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}^{s}|\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}})\backslash \{ndg,\,pdg,\,zdg\};\)
\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\mathop{=}\limits^{{\rm{def}}}({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}^{s}|\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}})\backslash \{ndg,\,pdg,\,zdg\};\)
where
\(\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}}\mathop{=}\limits^{{\rm{def}}}\overline{pdg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}}+\overline{ndg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}}+\overline{zdg}.\,\Delta {G}_{{{\mathscr{{F}}}}^{s}}\)”
And,
“Such proof can also be obtained with the aid of an automated tool; in Fig. 4 we show the results of the bisimulation game performed with CAAL on the processes \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}\) and \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}\), transliterated RNAFOLDING and PFOLDING respectively”.
should read:
“Such proof can also be obtained with the aid of an automated tool; in Fig. 4 we show the results of the bisimulation game performed with CAAL on the processes \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}\) and \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}\), transliterated RNAFOLDING and PFOLDING respectively”.
In the legend of Table 1 in the PDF version,
“Winning strategy of the defender in the strong bisimulation game that compares the pair of processes (\({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}^{s},{ {\mathcal F} }_{p}^{s}\)), transliterated (RNAFS, PFS). The results of this play proves that RNAFS ~ PFS, i.e. that the two processes are strongly bisimilar”.
should read:
“Winning strategy of the defender in the strong bisimulation game that compares the pair of processes (\({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}^{s},{{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}^{s}\)), transliterated (RNAFS, PFS). The results of this play proves that RNAFS ~ PFS, i.e. that the two processes are strongly bisimilar”.
Finally, in the legend of Figure 3 in the PDF version,
“Labelled Transition Systems of (a) the redefined \({ {\mathcal F} }_{rna}^{s}\) process, transliterated RNAFS, and of (b) the redefined \({ {\mathcal F} }_{p}^{s}\), process, transliterated PFS, generated with the CAAL web-based tool (Concurrency Workbench, Alborg Edition)”.
should read:
“Labelled Transition Systems of (a) the redefined \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{rna}^{s}\) process, transliterated RNAFS, and of (b) the redefined \({{\mathscr{{F}}}}_{p}^{s}\), process, transliterated PFS, generated with the CAAL web-based tool (Concurrency Workbench, Alborg Edition)”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Maestri, S., Merelli, E. Publisher Correction: Process calculi may reveal the equivalence lying at the heart of RNA and proteins. Sci Rep 9, 16651 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51082-3
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-51082-3
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.