Alkali fusion using sodium carbonate for extraction of vanadium and tungsten for the preparation of synthetic sodium titanate from spent SCR catalyst

Article metrics

  • 2767 Accesses


Alkali fusion method to extract vanadium and tungsten from spent SCR catalyst and to simultaneously prepare synthetic sodium titanate for the purpose of preparation of feedstock for TiO2 manufacturing by hydrometallurgical processing was investigated. Based on the Na2O-TiO2 phase diagram and experimentally obtained results, appropriate alkali-fusion temperature and molar ratio (MOx/Na2O + MOx) were determined to prepare soluble vanadium, tungsten salts, and sodium titanate. As results, the extraction efficiency of vanadium and tungsten was >99% and sodium titanate as feedstock for making TiO2 was obtained under the following alkali fusion conditions: Temperature, 950 °C; reaction time, 20 min; molar ratio, 0.5. When the molar ratio (MOx/Na2O + MOx) was less than 0.5, complete liquidized product (eutectic melt of the feedstock and Na2CO3) was obtained at the given conditions. This method, compared to conventional alkali roasting, is advantageous for rapid synthesis of water-soluble compounds for leaching of vanadium and tungsten, and for use as feedstock for the preparation of TiO2 by hydrometallurgical route.


Since the global demand for V2O5-WO3/TiO2 (herein SCR) catalysts has been increasing due to the interest in nitrogen oxide (NOx) control, spent SCR catalysts have been contributing to the generation of a significant amount of solid waste1,R1. In particular, the demand for SCR catalysts in stationary applications, such as thermoelectric power plants, incinerators, and marine systems is known to be significant2,R2. SCR catalysts for stationary applications usually consist of 70–80 mass% of TiO2 (anatase) as a supporting oxide. Vanadium as a catalytic agent and various promoters such as W, Si, and Ca are also used3,R2. Despite the main catalytic reaction of vanadium for denitrification in a SCR catalyst, a high content (7–10 mass% as WO3,) of tungsten is usually chosen over the content of vanadium (0.5–1.5 mass% as V2O5) due to an improvement in chemical durability of the catalysts.

Owing to stringent regulations for NOx emissions and increasing global demands of SCR catalysts, studies on the recycling of spent SCR catalysts have reported their high potential as a new secondary source4,5,6,7,8. Direct leaching of metal in spent SCR catalysts using acid or alkaline agent has revealed as inadequate for effective extraction of vanadium and tungsten7. This seems to be due to the characteristics related to the formation of vanadium and tungsten of SCR catalyst. Despite the high-energy consumption process, alkali roasting process is good economic and technical option for metal reclamation from various feedstock due to its simple operation, high yield, and dissolution of insoluble metals9. The alkali roasting process is known to be the most practical process to dissolve valuable metals from various feedstock10,11,12. Choi et al.5 proposed a soda roasting and water leaching process to dissolve vanadium and tungsten. According to their results, vanadium and tungsten from spent SCR catalyst were dissolved with increasing Na2CO3 addition amount and roasting temperature. However, due to the formation of insoluble calcium compounds of vanadium and tungsten (calcium vanadate and CaWO4) in the roasting process, the dissolution efficiency of vanadium and tungsten in water leaching was insufficient within the investigated conditions. In addition, for the completion of an alkali fusion reaction, it took hours in general. Another disadvantage of the previous research was the wasting of TiO2 as a residue. Spent SCR catalyst typically contains a considerable amount (70–80 mass%) of TiO2 as a supporting oxide. Considering the complexity of upgrading titanium ore or slag for titanium processingR3,13, the recycling of TiO2 using spent SCR catalysts is worthwhile and attractive for producing pigment-graded TiO2. Among the various feedstock for producing TiO2, sodium titanate (NaTiOx) as a promising feedstock has been reported for preparation of iron-free TiO2 by a hydrometallurgical route14,15,16. This newly developed process is known to considerably reduce energy consumption compared to the conventional processes of TiO2 manufacturing.

This paper addresses the synthesis by alkali fusion of vanadium, tungsten, and titanium with their eutectic melt of spent SCR catalyst and Na2CO3. For the homogeneity and rapid synthesis of vanadium, tungsten, and titanium, the present work mainly focuses on the optimum synthesis temperature and the Na2CO3 addition amount for the eutectic system of Na2O-MOx (M = Ti, Si, and W in the feedstock). From our study, it is expected that energy saving and more highly efficient alkali fusion process for high yield of vanadium and tungsten is possible. In addition, the preparation of sodium titanate as feedstock for the hydrometallurgical production of TiO2 is developed simultaneously.

Results and Discussion

TG and DTA results of the feedstock, Na2CO3 and their mixed samples

The faded lines in Fig. 2 represent the TG-DTA results of the feedstock (solid line) and Na2CO3 (dashed line) as background. For the TGA and DTA results of Na2CO3 in Fig. 2(a,b), the typical thermal behavior of pure Na2CO3 is shown17,18. For the feedstock in the TG analysis, about 8% of weight loss was appeared throughout the temperature range, and this result might be explained by the thermal decomposition of unknown matters in the feedstock and it is open for discussion.

Figure 1

Schematic process flow chart of this study.

Figure 2

TGA, (a), and DTA, (b), curves for various mole fraction (MOx/MOx + Na2O, M = Ti, Si, and W) of feedstock and Na2CO3.

Figure 3

Actual appearances of samples after the alkali-fusion reaction depending on a molar ratio (MOx/Na2O + MOx, M = Ti, Si, W in the feedstock); (a) 0.3, (b) 0.4, (c) 0.5, (d) 0.6, (e) 0.7 for 20 min at 950 °C.

Figure 4

XRD patterns of alkali-fused samples depending on molar ratio (MOx/Na2O + MOx); (a) 0.7, (b) 0.6, (c) 0.5, (d) 0.4, (e) 0.3.

Figure 5

Standard Gibbs energy of formation for some selected vanadium compounds.

Figure 6

Extraction efficiency of vanadium and tungsten depending on molar ratio in an alkali fusion reaction (Leaching condition: solvent, water; particle size distribution, > 106 μm; temperature, ambient temperature; S/L(W/V), 0.1; time, 2 h).

A noticeable result in the TG and DTA analysis of the feedstock is the endothermic peak in accordance with a decrease of residual weight in the range between 700 and 850 °C. According to a previous study5, transformations were initiated with metals including tungsten and titanium into equilibrium form and rutile, respectively, in that temperature range. This endothermic heat flow could be assumed to be enthalpy relaxation of amorphous materials (VOx and WOx on TiO2 surface) due to the increase of density and decrease of free volume19. On the other hand, decrease of residual weight at 700–900 °C was found. Considering the structure of vanadium and tungsten on the TiO2 surface in a SCR catalyst and behavior of phase transformation of supporting oxide (TiO2, anatase)3, it assumed that decomposition of hydroxyl radicals, which is absorbed in manufacturing of SCR catalysts on the surface of TiO2, occur in accordance with phase transformation of anatase into rutile20.

Since various metal oxides existed in the feedstock, establishment of eutectic system in this study is challenging. However, based on the Na2O-TiO2 eutectic system, the eutectic melting point can be roughly derived because the main composition is TiO2 in the feedstock. According to the Na2O-TiO2 phase diagram21, various sodium titanate compounds can form including Na2TiO3, Na4TiO4, Na8Ti5O14, and Na2Ti3O7, depending on the molar ratio (TiO2/Na2O + TiO2). In addition, the eutectic melting point for the Na2O-TiO2 system can be decreased with the decrease of molar ratio in the investigated experimental conditions (molar ratio, 0.3–0.7). On the other hand, considering the Na2O-SiO222, the eutectic melting point using spent SCR catalyst and the Na2CO3 system can be affected. In particular, based on the Na2O-SiO2 binary phase diagram, eutectic melts of two phases is relatively high compared to titanium or tungsten at an identical molar ratio. Since silicon in the feedstock is another main component apart from titanium, the eutectic melting point of the feedstock and the Na2CO3 can be increased.

The TGA results for various samples depending on molar ratio showed similar decreasing tendencies of weight, and two noticeable decreases of weight loss were found. One is evaporation of volatile matter (possibly appearing with residual water) in the feedstock at the initial stage. Another is the remarkable decrease at around the melting point of Na2CO3. In general, the decomposition of pure Na2CO3 at its melting point is not significant17,18. In order to increase the decomposition rate of Na2CO3, the temperature should be increased far beyond the melting point of Na2CO317,18. Thus, when the temperature increases, possible reactions in alkali fusion between Na2CO3 and MOx can be expressed as follows:


where M indicates metals (Ti, Si, W, V, etc.) in the feedstock.

Based on the TGA results in Fig. 2, the decrease of the residual weight of the samples is negligible (<1%) up to the melting point of Na2CO3. This means that alkali fusion reaction rarely proceeded, or slow below the melting point of Na2CO3. However, from the melting point of Na2CO3, the residual weight of the samples significantly decreased with sharp endothermic peaks (Fig. 2(b)) for all conditions. Thus, the decomposition of Na2CO3 was promoted by the alkali fusion reaction with MOx (M = Ti, Si, W, etc.) in the feedstock and the equilibrium reaction in Eq. 2 is considered to be the main reaction in the alkali fusion process. In addition, alkali-fusion reaction showed significantly fast kinetics when the reaction underwent with solid-liquid reaction.

On the other hand, when the molar ratio was 0.3 and 0.4, Na2CO3 the decrease of residual weight appeared to be saturated. This means that the alkali-fusion reaction was completed. However, when molar ratio is more than 0.5, alkali fusion reaction was in process from the TGA results with continuous exothermic heat flow. Based on the TG-DTA results in Fig. 2 and the phase diagram of Na2O-TiO2, the alkali fusion temperature for attaining complete melt was considered to be above 950 °C.

Figure 3 shows the actual appearance of samples after alkali fusion reaction at 950 °C for 20 min depending on the molar ratio of Na2CO3 and the feedstock. According to the images, sample (a), (b), and (c) are found to be completely melted and liquidized by the given conditions and the molar ratio of Na2CO3 and the feedstock. Sample (d) was partially liquidized with remarkable volume reduction. However, sample (e) showed a simply agglomerated form without noticeable changes, and was easy to crush and grind. In summary, based on the observations, in order to make eutectic melts with the feedstock and Na2CO3 for fast synthesis, 0.5 molar ratio appeared to be most suitable for the given alkali fusion conditions.

XRD patterns and their variation of fused samples

Figure 4 shows the XRD patterns for the alkali-fused samples. A noticeable result is that the non-melted sample, (a), shows the various sodium titanate compounds in accordance with unreacted TiO2. Based on the dissolution efficiency results, the XRD patterns of the partially melted sample, (b), appear to show that titanium and tungsten were completely alkali-fused. The fully melted samples, (a), (b), and (c), were shown with Na8Ti5O14 phase, and this phase can be appeared when a molar ratio from 0.525 to 0.725 is based on the Na2O-TiO2 binary phase diagram. This chemical formula was maintained despite the increase of Na2CO3 amount. Moreover, even when the molar ratio was 0.3, the chemical formation of sodium titanate remained unchanged. It seemed that Na2TiO3 was polymerized into Na8Ti5O14 and Na2O23. However, this metastable phase of sodium titanate can be utilized for follow-up process (acid leaching).

At the low molar ratio (0.6 and 0.7), sodium metatitanate (Na2Ti3O7) appeared. Although Na2Ti3O7 is soluble in acid solution, it is even when finely ground, and it only very slowly dissolves24. Thus, Na2Ti3O7 is not adequate for feedstock for the preparation of TiO2 by hydrometallurgical route. Further, when the molar ratio was 0.7, unreacted TiO2 was found. Considering the hydrometallurgical processing including acid leaching and hydrolysis of the feedstock, the molar ratio of the feedstock and Na2CO3 should be higher ratio of Na2CO3 ( < 0.5) for the appropriate synthesis of TiO2 and liquidation (eutectic melt).

Tungsten in the feedstock was characterized by Na2WO4 (and its hydrated form) by XRD analysis. It can be observed that the peak intensity of Na2WO4 was developed in accordance with a decrease of molar ratio. This compound easily dissolves in water with high solubility. Silicon, one of the main components in the feedstock, was not observed including its alkali-fused compounds. In addition, vanadium, one of the target materials, was not present.

Based on the XRD results of each of the alkali-fused samples, when the molar ratio of the feedstock and Na2CO3 was 0.5 or less, water-soluble Na2WO4, in accordance with acid-soluble sodium titanate, could instantly be obtained by making their eutectic melts. Considering the conventional process (alkali roasting), homogeneous synthetic products can be obtained with less reaction time. This also leads to energy-saving alkali-fusion process.

Leaching efficiency of vanadium and tungsten in alkali-fused samples

In the previous report7, one reason for the low leaching efficiency of vanadium and tungsten in alkali-roasted feedstock by water leaching is the formation of insoluble compounds including calcium tungstate and calcium vanadates in the alkali roasting of spent SCR catalyst. Detrimental effect of insoluble formation for extracting vanadium was significant. These formations originated from the heterogeneous alkali roasting reactions (side reaction including insoluble calcium-vanadium compounds) and low activity of Na2CO3. In particular, the leaching efficiency of vanadium was remarkably low compared to tungsten because of high driving force of the calcium compound formations (Fig. 5). In addition, it appeared that a degree of calcium vanadate formation in alkali roasting was determined by the amount of CaO in the feedstock regardless of the Na2CO3 addition amount according to a previous report5. However, based on the Na2O-CaO-V2O5 ternary phase diagram25, soluble sodium vanadate species are possibly formed due to sufficient Na2CO2 (Na2O) activity and negligible CaO content in the mixture.

In contrast, the activity of Na2CO3 in the mixture is relatively sufficient in our investigation. Also, when the molar ratio was 0.5 or less, the residual weight in the TGA results was continuous. Thus, the activity of CO32− in the leaching solution assumed to be high. When the [CO32−] existed in aqueous solution (alkaline area, pH < 14), calcium vanadate can be dissolved as below equilibrium reaction:


Based on the TG-DTA results, when the molar ratio was below 0.5, the decrease of residual weight was not completed. This means that free Na2CO3 existed in the alkali-fused sample. Thus, in the water leaching of the alkali-fused samples, existence of [CO32−] is possible in the leaching solution. This condition is favorable for a dissolution of calcium vanadate.

On the other hand, when the molar ratio was 0.5 or below, the pH of the solution after water leaching of the alkali-fused samples appeared to be highly alkaline. According to the measured pH value (calibration between pH 4.01 and 12.46, R = 99.998), high alkalinity may have originated from the following equilibrium reaction in the water leaching:


This leaching environment is also favorable for dissolving insoluble calcium vanadate. Thus, even if low activity of CO32− is in the solution, the leaching condition for the dissolution of calcium vanadate compounds is fulfilled due to the high alkalinity (pH > 14). However, the specified leaching mechanism and equilibrium formation of vanadium in alkali fusion process is open for discussion.

Figure 6 shows the results of leaching efficiency of each alkali-fused sample in water. Based on the results, the leaching efficiency of vanadium and tungsten was saturated to >99% at ≥0.5 molar ratio or less. Dissolved titanium in water leaching was below 2 mg·L−1 for all conditions. Compared to previously reported alkali roasting and other conventional processes, the alkali fusion method attained remarkably high extraction efficiency of vanadium and tungsten with shortened reaction time. The influence of the molar ratio on the leaching efficiency of vanadium was remarkable. With less Na2CO3 addition (molar ratio = 0.6, 0.7), a significant decrease of leaching efficiency of vanadium appeared. Based on the solubility of calcium vanadate in high-alkaline solution (pH > 14) and the measured pH of the water leaching solution, the dissolution of calcium vanadate appeared to relate to the the pH of leaching solution (high alkalinity).


Sample preparation and chemicals

The feedstock (spent SCR catalyst) used in this study was supplied by Samcheonpo thermoelectric power plant, South Korea. Attached dust, ash, and poisons in the feedstock were firstly removed. Then the feedstock was pulverized by jaw crushing and mill grinding. The particle size distribution of the pulverized feedstock was determined (mainly ranging from 1 to 100 μm) by particle size distribution analysis (Mastersizer2000, Malvern Instruments, USA). Pulverized feedstock was dried at 80 °C in an oven over 24 h to remove residual moisture. Apart from the aforementioned process, further pre-treatment was not conducted. Table 1 shows the chemical composition of spent SCR catalyst as feedstock. Na2CO3 (99.8%, Kanto Chemicals, Japan) was used as an alkali agent for the alkali fusion reactions.

Table 1 Chemical analysis of feedstock (Spent SCR catalyst composition).

Experimental conditions and analysis

The mixing ratio varied between 0.3–0.6 (mole fraction ratio = MOx/Na2O + MOx, M = Ti, Si, and W) to determine the eutectic melting point of the mixture (pulverized feedstock and Na2CO3). The alkali fusion time was fixed at 20 min for all mixed samples. Process flows, which is a sequence with pulverization, alkali fusion, and water leaching, of this study is shown in Fig. 1. Simultaneous thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and differential thermal analysis (DTA) for the various mixtures were carried out using a DTG-60H (Shimadzu, Japan) analyzer from ambient to 1100 °C in air. The heating rate was 10 °C min−1. In order to investigate the leaching efficiency of vanadium, tungsten and titanium in each fused feedstock, water leaching was conducted under the following conditions: Temp., ambient temperature; S/L (V/W) ratio, 0.2; time, 2 h; particle size distribution, ≥70 mesh (<210 μm).

Phase characterization of the fused samples and residues was carried out using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD, X’pert MPD, Phillips, USA). pH measurement was done using Orion Versa Star (Thermo Scientific, USA).


In order to develop the process of extraction of vanadium and tungsten in accordance with a preparation of synthetic sodium titanate from spent SCR catalyst, the alkali fusion method was investigated in our study and our conclusions are presented here. The alkali fusion method using spent SCR catalyst and Na2CO3 was newly developed for the extraction of vanadium and tungsten in accordance with the preparation of sodium titanate as feedstock for the production of TiO2 by hydrometallurgical route. Based on the TG-DTA results, alkali-fusion conditions for the eutectic melt of spent SCR catalyst and Na2CO3 were established under the following conditions: Molar ratio, 0.5; temperature 950 °C; time, 20 min. Under these conditions, the extraction efficiency of vanadium and tungsten from spent SCR catalyst was >99% (Ti, >2 mg·L−1). In addition, sodium titanate was obtained for the preparation of TiO2 by hydrometallurgical processing. This investigated method can be considered as an alternative process for the efficient and energy-saving extraction process of vanadium and tungsten as well as simultaneously for the preparation of sodium titanate as a TiO2 source, with shortened reaction time and homogeneous reactions.


  1. 1.

    Yan, Q. et al. A comprehensive review on selective catalytic reduction catalysts for NOx emission abatement from municipal solid waste incineration. Environ. Prog. Sus. Energy. 35(4), 1061–1069 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Alemany, L. J. et al. Characterization and composition of commercial V2O5-WO3-TiO2 SCR. catalysts. Appl. Catal. B. 10, 299–311 (1996).

  3. 3.

    Reddy, B. M., Ganesh, I. & Reddy, P. Study of Disperstion and Thermal Stability of V2O5/TiO2-SiO2 Catalysts by XPS and Other Techniques. J. Phys. Chem. B. 101, 1769–1774 (1997).

  4. 4.

    Choi, I. H., Moon, G., Lee, J. Y. & Jyothi, R. K. Spent V2O5-WO3/TiO2 catalyst processing for valuable metals by soda roasting-water leaching. Hydrometallurgy. 178, 137–145 (2018).

  5. 5.

    Choi, I. H., Kim, H. R., Moon, G., Jyothi, R. K. & Lee, J. Y. Hydrometallurgical processing of spent selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalyst for recovery of tungsten. Hydrometallurgy. 175, 292–299 (2018).

  6. 6.

    Wu, W.-C., Tsai, T.-Y. & Shen, Y. H. Tungsten Recovery from Spent SCR Catalyst Using Alkaline Leaching and Ion Exchange. Minerals. 6(107), 1–10 (2016).

  7. 7.

    Choi, I. H., Moon, G., Lee, J. Y. & Jyothi, R. K. Extraction of tungsten and vanadium from spent selective catalytic reduction catalyst for stationary application by pressure leaching. J. Clean. Prod. 197, 163–169 (2018).

  8. 8.

    Kim, J. W., Lee, W. G., Hwang, I. S., Lee, J. Y. & Han, C. Recovery of tungsten from spent selective catalytic reduction catalysts by pressure leaching. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 28, 73–77 (2015).

  9. 9.

    Marafi, M. & Stanislaus, A. Spent hydroprocessing catalyst management: A review Part II. Advances in metal recovery and safe disposal method. Resour. Conserv. Recy. 53, 1–26 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Li, Z. & Cheng, C. Y. A literature review of the recovery of molybdenum and vanadium from spent hydrodesulphurisation catalysts. Hydrometallurgy. 98, 1–9 (2009).

  11. 11.

    Li, D., Guo, X., Xu, Z., Tian, Q. & Feng, Q. Leaching behavior of metals from copper anode slime using an alkali fusion-leaching process. Hydrometallurgy. 157, 9–12 (2015).

  12. 12.

    Dong, H., Jiang, T., Guo, Y., Chen, J. & Fan, X. Upgrading a Ti-slag by a roast-leach process. Hydrometallurgy. 113-114, 119–121 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Kang, J. & Okabe, T. Upgrading Titanium Ore Through Selective Chlorination Using Calcium Chloride. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 44B, 516–527 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Middlemas, S., Zak Fang, Z. & Fan, P. A new method for production of titanium dioxide pigment. Hydrometallurgy. 131–132, 107–113 (2013).

  15. 15.

    Zhang, Y., Qi, T. & Yi, Z. A novel preparation of titanium dioxide from titanium slag. Hydrometallurgy. 96, 52–56 (2009).

  16. 16.

    Wang, D. et al. Novel Process for Titanium Dioixde Production from Titanium Slag: NaOH-KOH Binary Molten Salt Roasting and Water Leaching. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 52, 15756–15762 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Kim, J.-W. & Lee, H.-G. Thermal and Carbothermic Decomposition of Na2CO3 and Li2CO3. Metall. Mater. Trans. B. 32B, 17–24 (2001).

  18. 18.

    Newkirk, A. E. & Aliferis, I. Drying and Decomposition of Sodium Carbonate. Anal. Chem. 30, 982–984 (1958).

  19. 19.

    Inoue, A. & Chen, H. S. Enthalpy relaxation behavior of (Fe, Co, Ni)75Si10B15 amorphous alloys upon low temperature annealing. J. Mater. Sci. 19, 3953–3966 (1984).

  20. 20.

    Kakuma, Y., Nosaka, A. Y. & Nosaka, Y. Differences in TiO2 photocatalytic mechanism between rutile and anatase studied by the detection of active oxygen and surface species in water. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17, 18691–18698 (2015).

  21. 21.

    FToxid - Oxide Phase Diagrams based on data from FToxid - FACT oxide databases at,

  22. 22.

    Wu, P., Eriksson, G. & Pelton, D. Optimization of the Thermodynamic Properties and Phase Diagrams of the Na2O-SiO2 and K2O-SiO2 Systems. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76(8), 2059–2064 (1993).

  23. 23.

    Manhique, A. J., Focke, W. W. & Madivate, C. Titania recovery from low-grade titanoferrous minerals. Hydrometallurgy. 109, 230–236 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Palmer, W. G. In Experimental Inorganic Chemistry 253 (The Syndics of the Cambridge University Press, 1970).

  25. 25.

    Slobodin, B. V. & Surat, L. L. Subsolidus Phase Relations in the Systems M2 +O-M2+O-V2O5 (M+ = Li, Na, K, Rb, Cs; M2+ = Mg. Ca). Inorg. Mater. 40(2), 232–238 (2004).

Download references


This study was supported by the R&D Center for Valuable Recycling(Global-Top R&D Program) of the Ministry of Environment.(Project No.: 2019002230001)as well as the authorities of Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources (KIGAM) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT, and Future Planning of Korea.

Author information

The author Dr. In-Hyeok Choi did all experiments, analyzed the data and written the manuscript. The other author Ms. Gyeonghye Moon did all samples analysis and technical support. The other authors such as Dr. Jin-Young Lee and Dr. Rajesh Kumar Jyothi were supervised the experiments and given proper advices and monitored the experiments; finally edited the manuscript.

Correspondence to Jin-Young Lee or Rajesh Kumar Jyothi.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, I., Moon, G., Lee, J. et al. Alkali fusion using sodium carbonate for extraction of vanadium and tungsten for the preparation of synthetic sodium titanate from spent SCR catalyst. Sci Rep 9, 12316 (2019) doi:10.1038/s41598-019-48767-0

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.