Introduction

Compared with traditional materials, nanomaterials have received considerable attention due to their unique physical and chemical properties1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Magnetic nanomaterials have wide applications in the fabrication of optical and electronic devices, since their remarkable magnetic properties can improve the performance of those devices, for examples in power generation, conditioning, conversion, transportation, and other energy-use sectors of the economy8,9,10,11,12,13. Nanometer-sized FeCo alloys have been paid enough attention by many researchers recently since they possess much better soft magnetism such as low Hc (coercivity), high μ (permeability), hig h Tc (Curie temperature), high Ms (saturation magnetization) and high tensile strength14,15,16,17. Due to the formation of the ordered B2 state18, near equiatomic FeCo alloys exhibit very good soft magnetic properties, while they are extremely brittle at room temperature19, on the other hand, the coercivity of FeCo alloy films prepared by a conventional sputtering method is quite high, which is naturally not applicable for high frequency application20. So a suitable non-magnetic matrix and a strong (200) FeCo texture are vital on improving FeCo soft magnetism and further applications. Our teams have devoted some years to investigating how to improve (200) FeCo texture growth21 by choosing different metals as seedlayer or underlayer (Cu22, Co23 and Al24) and doping elements (Al25, Cu, Pt and Pd) into FeCo crystal lattice and also by choosing various preparing methods. Sol-gel technique is not only commonly easy-control to achieve uniform-doping among raw materials but also combines a superior advantage of low-cost.

In this work we chose Pt metal as doping element in view of the tiny structural difference between fcc-Pt, fcc-Al, fcc-Cu and bcc-FeCo, for the purpose to investigate the influence of deferent elements on FeCo grains’ preferred orientation.

Experiments

Cobalt nitrate (Co(NO3)2·6H2O), platinum nitrate (Pt(NO3)2) and iron nitrate (Fe(NO3)3·9H2O) were dissolved into absolute ethyl alcohol under continuously magnetic stirring, then some mixed solution of glycol and ethyl orthosilicate were dropwise-added into as-prepared initial solution, then some nitrate was added to get transparent sol. The sol was ultrasonic vibrated for 1 hour and aged at room temperature for 24 hours, then spin-coated onto silicon substrates, as-prepared films were annealed in hydrogen for 1 hour to obtain FeCoPt/SiO2 thin films. The Pt doping content was set as 0, 0.5, 1, 3 and 5 wt% in FeCo/SiO2 composite films, the corresponding films were marked as a, b, c, d and e, respectively.

A Rigaku D/max 2500/PC X-ray diffraction was chosen to investigate the structures of the samples, and radiation is Cu Kα. Lake Shore M-7407 vibrating sample magnetometer was chosen to study the magnetic properties of the specimens, the films were measured at room temperature. A JSM-7800F field emission scanning electron microscope was used to observe the surface topography of film samples.

Results and Discussion

XRD patterns of FeCoPt/SiO2 sample films were shown in Fig. 1. There were only two diffracting peaks which can be indexed to (110) and (200) planes of bcc structure FeCo alloy. No diffracting peak corresponds to silicon dioxide. This indicates that silicon dioxide is amorphous. The diffracting peaks corresponding to metal platinum could not be detected also, which is due to the replacement of Fe or Co sites by Pt elements, since Pt is doped into FeCo alloy crystal lattices. As seen in Fig. 1, the intensity of (200) peak for the sample b is higher than that of (110) peak. This indicates that the film tends to present (200) preferred orientation after being doped with only small amount Pt element (0.5 wt %). But this preferred orientation trends becomes less obvious with the increasing of Pt doping, since the peak intensity of FeCo (200) becomes small gradually when the Pt doping content increases.

Figure 1
figure 1

XRD patterns of the samples with various Pt doping content.

We calculated the integrated intensity ratio of diffraction peaks (200) to (110), which is noted as I(200)/I(110). In Fig. 2, we presents the relation between the I(200)/I(110) and Pt doping content. It displays that the value of I(200)/I(110) reduces when Pt doping content increases. The maximum value of I(200)/I(110) appears when Pt doping is 0.5 wt%. This indicates that a strong (200) texture of FeCo arises on the smallest Pt doping. Samples with Pt doping follow the same trend as Al element both as doping and underlayer24,25. It is obvious that both metal Al and Pt can promote FeCo (200) preferred orientation, but this promotion was reduced when more Al or Pt were doped into or deposited. While for samples underlayered with Cu and Co22,23, they present a different trend. For example, the more is the thickness of Co, the higher is the value of I(200)/I(110), which means more Co content is benefit for improving FeCo (200) preferred orientation. This various doping effect is dominantly derived from their structural and crystal difference between those metals. It is due to the similar atomic radius and crystal cell volume values between Al and Pt, so they can result in similar effects among FeCo grains. The corresponding parameters are listed in Table 1.

Figure 2
figure 2

Dependence of the I(200)/I(110) versus various Pt doping content.

Table 1 Element parameters of Fe, Al, Cu and Pt metals.

For Pt element, it has similar atomic radius and crystal cell volume with Al element, so they play similar role in doping into FeCo alloys’ crystal lattices, thus cause similar relative lattice strain between FeCo grains, resulting in similar relative lattice deformation (d-d0)/d0 values, which is dominant in promoting preferred orientation in (200) planes or (110) planes26. It is also noted that the more element doping whether Al or Pt are introduced, the more relative lattice strain are formed, so appropriate choosing of doping element and doping content is important in promoting (200) texture in FeCo thin films. For the samples underlayered with Cu or Co, they display different changing trend due to their structural and crystal difference from Al and Pt.

The magnetic hysteresis loops of the FeCoPt/SiO2 sample films are shown in Fig. 3, and it shows that all samples films display very typical soft magnetism. Corresponding magnetic data of Pt, Al, Cu and Co metals were listed in Table 2.

Figure 3
figure 3

The hysteresis loops of the samples with various Pt doping content.

Table 2 Magnetic data of Pt, Al, Cu and Co metals.

Figure 4 illustrates the graphs of the values of the coercivity Hc of the films. As shown in Fig. 4, all the Hc (out-of-plane) is higher than Hc (in-plane), this shows that an out-of-plane magnetic anisotropy is dominating for all sample films. It can be shown from previous XRD results, there exists the smallest strain between FeCoPt/SiO2 film so presenting a strong (200) texture when Pt doping content is less than 1 wt%, this leads to expressing the best soft magnetic property with less coercivity Hc values. So Pt is appropriate to be chosen as doping element for improving FeCo (200) texture growth as Al element.

Figure 4
figure 4

Dependence of coercivity Hc of the samples versus Pt doping content.

This kind of similar atomic and crystal structure between Pt and Al elements produce similar relative lattice strain between FeCo grains when they act with FeCo particles whether as doping elements into FeCo crystal lattice or as underlayers being deposited under FeCo layers, so they play similar role in promoting (200) texture in FeCo thin films, which is also the key factor in governing their magnetic properties. For samples underlayered with Co or Co element, whether the values of coercivity in-plane and out-of-plane, or the changing trends follow the different ways, originating from their structural and crystal difference with Al and Pt elements.

Figure 5 shows the SEM images of sample film. The thickness of the sample film is calculated as 110 nm by Nano Measure software and the grains’ growth is homogeneous.

Figure 5
figure 5

SEM images of sample.

Conclusions

Pt metal is proved to be a good doping element as Al is introduced into FeCo alloys to promote (200) preferred orientation. It is due to similar atomic radius and crystal cell volume of Pt and Al that the change of structural and magnetic properties of FeCoPt/SiO2 thin films follows the similar trends with the increasing of Pt doping content.