Ag Nanoparticles/α-Ag2WO4 Composite Formed by Electron Beam and Femtosecond Irradiation as Potent Antifungal and Antitumor Agents


The ability to manipulate the structure and function of promising systems via external stimuli is emerging with the development of reconfigurable and programmable multifunctional materials. Increasing antifungal and antitumor activity requires novel, effective treatments to be diligently sought. In this work, the synthesis, characterization, and in vitro biological screening of pure α-Ag2WO4, irradiated with electrons and with non-focused and focused femtosecond laser beams are reported. We demonstrate, for the first time, that Ag nanoparticles/α-Ag2WO4 composite displays potent antifungal and antitumor activity. This composite had an extreme low inhibition concentration against Candida albicans, cause the modulation of α-Ag2WO4 perform the fungicidal activity more efficient. For tumor activity, it was found that the composite showed a high selectivity against the cancer cells (MB49), thus depleting the populations of cancer cells by necrosis and apoptosis, without the healthy cells (BALB/3T3) being affected.


Silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs), are considered one of the most important members of the noble metal NPs family. The ever-increasing research activity around them relies on their unique physical, chemical, and biological properties toward applications in catalysis for reduction, oxidation, and oxidative coupling reactions1,2,3, air and water purification systems4,5,6, development of consumer products (e.g., cosmetics, paints, laundry detergents, toys, accessories, and a variety of household applications)7,8, and fabrication of sensing devices9,10. Moreover, they exhibit diverse useful bioactivities for healthcare11,12,13, antiviral properties14,15, bactericidal behavior16,17, antifungal activity18, as high antimicrobial agent against yeasts, molds, Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria19,20,21,22,23, anti-cancer24,25,26, and anti-inflammatory effects27. Recently, Chernousova and Epple17 reviewed the state of research on the effects of Ag on bacteria, cells, and higher organisms, which has shown promising results. However, apart from its outstanding single-NP behavior, its hybridization with semiconductors is also leading to unprecedented behaviors and features that have now paved the way toward promising applications in many fields28,29,30.

The development and use of hybrid nanomaterials, composed by a noble metal–semiconductor, i.e., NPs of Ag, Au, or Pt deposited on a semiconductor surface, have led to advantageous features related to surface plasmon resonance effects, a Schottky contact additional active sites and/or presence of electronics traps31,32,33, that in the end are used to enhance localized heating in living systems, wich may find potential applications in thermal ablation therapies or drug delivery mechanisms34.

In this context, a highly attractive semiconductor for its photochemical activity is α-Ag2WO4. This is an n-type semiconductor with a band gap value of 3.1 eV (400 nm)34,35,36 which has been widely exploited in applications such as visible-light photocatalysis for the degradation of organic dyes and aromatic organic compounds37,38,39,40, as well as ozone and acetone gas sensing41,42. Ag NPs on the semiconductor’s surface could enhance the surface plasmon resonance effect, which might improve the separation rate of the photo-generated holes and electrons in the composite, leading to augmented photo-derived phenomena. Therefore, developing a metal–semiconductor junction of Ag/Ag2WO4 in a controllable way would represent a wise strategy that may have significant potential for the design of novel materials43.

The great potential for growing Ag NPs on the framework of semiconductors, induced by electron beam irradiation, is well known44,45,46. Recently, our research group demonstrated that the exposure to electron or femtosecond (fs) laser beams can give rise to many fascinating and unexpected phenomena, such as the formation and growth process of Ag NPs on α-Ag2WO4 crystals34,47,48,49,50,51,52 with a wide range of applications, including microbial53,54 and antifungal55 agents. Very recently, we demonstrated that the interaction between pulsed fs laser irradiation and α-Ag2WO4 revealed a new processing alternative for the formation of Ag NPs on α-Ag2WO4 with bactericidal properties36. From a medical point of view, the development of novel composites as antimicrobials is very attractive, owing to the worldwide crisis of bacterial resistance to conventional, narrow-target antibiotics.

Taking into consideration its afore mentioned biological relevance, the synthesis of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite by electron beam and fs irradiation was undertaken and a systematic study of its antifungal and antitumor activities was carried out in order to analyze the beneficial implications of the composite in two of the most important bio-medical applications (as an antitumor and antifungal agent) that directly impact the healthcare of human kind.


Structural analysis

Four samples were studied: pure α-Ag2WO4, a composite irradiated with electrons (Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E), a composite irradiated by a fs laser beam under non-focused conditions (Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF), and a composite irradiated by a fs laser beam under focused conditions (Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F).

Figure 1A shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples to evaluate the crystalline order/disorder at long distances. The samples present an orthorhombic structure with a space group of Pn2n and eight molecules per unit cell (Z = 8), according to the crystallographic data sheet n° 2489692 in the Inorganic Crystal Structure Database (ICSD). The lattice parameters are: a = 10.878 Å, b = 12.009 Å, and c = 5.89 Å. Figure 1B shows the most intense diffraction peak (231), which was shifted slightly to higher values of 2θ for all composites. This behavior is also observed for the (002) and (400) peaks of Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:E composite, and the (002), (400) and (313) peaks of Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:F composite (Fig. 1C). Another phenomenon that occurs is the suppression of certain peaks in relation to the non-irradiated phase. For all composite, the (303) peak is not observed, whereas for the Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:F composite, the peak (301) does not appear (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1

(A) X-ray diffractograms of the α-Ag2WO4 samples before and after the different irradiations; (B) Approximation of the diffracted region between 28 and 34° and (C) Approximation of the diffracted region between 52 and 59°.

Micro-Raman spectroscopy analysis, as shown in Fig. 2, was performed to determine the short-range structural order/disorder effects, and is thus a structural complementary technique to XRD. α-Ag2WO4 belongs to the C2v symmetry group; its structure is composed by four different clusters associated with the local coordination of Ag: [AgO2], [AgO4], [AgO6], and [AgO7], and only one cluster of W: [WO6]. The active Raman modes are observed at 80, 104, 324, 668, 769, and 875 cm−1 (Fig. 2A). The modes located at lower wavelengths, 80 and 104 cm−1, can be associated to a transition A1g of the crystal lattice modes of Ag53,56 that do not undergo changes, even for samples irradiated by laser and electrons. The other modes correspond to movements of the [WO6] cluster, the values 875 cm−1 and 769 cm−1 are associated with the A2g and A1g vibrational modes of the symmetric and asymmetric stretching modes of O-W-O, respectively53,56,57. The B1g mode of 668 cm−1 was related to stretching modes of the W-O bond and the A2g mode at 324 cm−1 was attributed to cationic lattice vibrations57. It is observed that both Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF composites do not present significant changes, whereas for the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite, the defined peaks at 668 and 769 cm−1 disappear, thus presenting a higher structural disorder at short-range than the other composites (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2

Micro-Raman spectra of α-Ag2WO4 samples before and after the different irradiations with the respective regions in the sample (I–iv); (B) Comparison between relative positions of experimental Raman-active modes for the samples.

Figure 3 presents images of the samples obtained by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM). In the α-Ag2WO4 sample (Fig. 3A), the formation of Ag NPs was not observed because the system was not disturbed by any external energy source. For Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composite (Fig. 3B), it is possible to observe the delocalized formation of Ag NPs, as reported by Longo et al.34. Figure 3C,D display the images of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite, respectively. In the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF composite, there is a small number of Ag NPs attached to the semiconductor’s surface (similar to Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composite) and a slight sinterization of α-Ag2WO4 microrods, whereas the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite presents many spherical Ag NPs with a larger particle size than in α-Ag2WO4:NF, probably due to an enhancement of the sinterization process experienced by α-Ag2WO4 microrods, as was observed by Andrés et al.34.

Figure 3

FE-SEM images for (A) α-Ag2WO4; (B) α-Ag2WO4:E (C) α-Ag2WO4:NF; (D) α-Ag2WO4:F.

All materials have a normal size distribution, and the obtained sizes of width and length for the samples are of 0.31 ± 0.02 μm and 2.76 ± 0.88 μm, 0.33 ± 0.03 μm and 2.83 ± 0.62 μm, 0.33 ± 0.11 μm and 2.32 ± 1.2 μm, 0.36 ± 0.13 μm and 2.54 ± 0.95 μm for Ag2WO4, Ag2WO4:E, Ag2WO4:NF and Ag2WO4:F respectively. The increase in the error of the samples irradiated with the laser in femtoseconds, is due to the sinterization of some rods of α-Ag2WO4, as shown in the Fig. 3C,D.

Antifungal activity

The antifungal activity of the samples was evaluated against the biofilm formation of the Candida albicans ATCC 90028 reference strain. The minimum obtained inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum fungicidal concentration (MFC) values are presented in the Fig. 4A. The results obtained by counting colony forming units per mL (CFU.mL−1) show that the most effective samples were, in descending order: Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E, and α-Ag2WO4. The highest concentration used for the tests was 125.00 μg/mL and we observe that all irradiated materials have antifungal activity. Even at sub-inhibitory concentrations, the reduction in the number of viable fungal colonies is observed in relation to the control. A dose-dependent effect was observed.

Figure 4

Candida albicans (A) and FGH (B) growth as a function of different concentrations of samples.

Four concentrations of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composites were studied on a human gingival fibroblasts (FGH) cell line, because this exhibiting better fungicidal activity. After 24 h of incubation, the effects of these composites on cell viability, cell proliferation, and cell morphology were evaluated by the resazurin assay (Alamar Blue) quantitative fluorimetric assay (Fig. 4B), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) (Fig. 5), and SEM (Fig. 6), respectively. The studied concentrations were 31.25, 15.62, 7.81, and 3.90 μg/mL, respectively, because they are above the optimum range of fungicidal activity of the materials. The results show no statistically significant loss of cell viability for this concentrations compared to the control (CT), which shows a contrasting behavior with respect to cell death control treated with Triton-X 100 0.9% buffer (LB) (see Fig. 4B). The proliferation assay on CLSM by carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester and propidium iodide (PI) showed a homogeneous label of CFSE by HGF cells for the concentrations, whereas no important staining with PI was detected. This was very similar to the CT cells, and completely different from the pattern of the fluorescence cells treated with the cell death control (CAM), showing no influence of α-Ag2WO4:NF and α-Ag2WO4:F materials on HGF cell proliferation (see Figs 5 and 6). The cell morphology observed by SEM showed the presence of whole cells, with integrated shape and attached to the substrate, similar to the CT. Even at 31.25 µg/mL, the cells maintained their normal morphology, showing no signs of typical morphology death as observed for cells treated with LB (see Fig. 6).

Figure 5

Fluorescence staining of FGH cells after α-Ag2WO4 microcrystal incubation. (A) Control (without microcrystal); (B) 31.25 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (C) 15.62 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (D) 7.81 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (E) 3.90 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (F) Death control (CAM); (G) 31.25 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (H) 15.62 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (I) 7.81 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (J) 3.90 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F.

Figure 6

Scanning electron microscopy as a confirmation of biocompatibility α-Ag2WO4 effects on FGH cell morphology. (A) Control (without microcrystal); (B) 31.25 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (C) 15.62 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (D) 7.81 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (E) 3.90 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:NF; (F) Death control (LB); (G) 31.25 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (H) 15.62 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (I) 7.81 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F; (J) 3.90 μg/mL α-Ag2WO4:F.

In this study, we analyzed the viability of the MB49 and BALB/3T3 cells exposed for 24 h to different samples at concentrations of 1.0 (4.63 µg/mL), 2.5 (11.58 µg/mL), 5.0 (23.16 µg/mL), and 10.0 µmol/mL (46.31 µg/mL). MB49 is an induced bladder carcinoma derived from mouse, and BALB/3T3 is a representative of no tumorigenic cells evaluated by the resazurin assay (Alamar Blue) quantitative fluorimetric assay (Fig. 7). In relation to the major effect of the α-Ag2WO4, the BALB/3T3 cell culture presented 95% and 80% cell viability when exposed to concentrations of 4.63 and 11.58 µg/mL, respectively, whereas the MB49 cancer cells presented 50% and 10% of cell viability in comparison to the CT (Fig. 7A). In relation to the other concentration, the loss of viability was intense for both types of cells, mainly at a dose of 46.31 µg/m. For Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composite, the BALB/3T3 cell culture at 4.63, 11.58, and 23.16 µg/mL concentrations presented viability equivalent to the CT group, whereas the MB49 cell presented a significant reduction in the viability (20%, 80%, and 10%) (Fig. 7B). This increase in cell viability at the intermediate concentration of 11.58 μg/mL shows that this sample has a non-linear behavior against MB49 tumor cell exposure, thus presenting a minimum of inhibition different from the minimum concentration, obeying a gaussian behavior.

Figure 7

Viability assay of MB49 and BALB/3T3 cells on exposure to samples at concentrations 4.63; 11.58; 23.16; 46.31 µg/ml respectively, for 24 h. (A) Ag2WO4; (B) Ag2WO4:E; (C) Ag2WO4:NF; (D) Ag2WO4:F.

For Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF composite, the BALB/3T3 cell culture exposed to 4.63, 11.58, and 23.16 µg/mL concentrations of the composite presented viability equivalent to the CT in contrast with the MB49 culture that showed a significant reduction (16%, 32%, and 2%) at the same concentrations (Fig. 7C), with perfil of cancer activity very similar with Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF composite (gaussian behavior). For Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite, the BALB/3T3 cells exposed to 4.63 and 11.58 µg/mL of the sample presented viability greater than 95%, whereas the MB49 cell showed viabilities of 64% and 60%, respectively (Fig. 7D).

Figure 8 illustrates the kinetics of the production of the reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the period of 120 min by MB49 and BALB/3T3 exposed to the different samples at a concentration of 23.16 µg/mL (5 µmol/mL) in comparison with positive (1.0 mM of H2O2) and negative control. For the BALB/3T3 cells, the highest ROS production was reached with the exposure to Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F followed by Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF, α-Ag2WO4, and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E (Fig. 7A). For the MB49 cell line, in the same way, the highest production of ROS was similar to the obtained with BALB/3T3 cells (α-Ag2WO4:F, α-Ag2WO4:NF, α-Ag2WO4, and α-Ag2WO4:E) (Fig. 8B). In comparison with CT, all materials presented a continuously higher production of ROS during the two hours of measurement. The ROS production pattern over time was equivalent for both cell lines (Fig. 8A,B). The level of ROS of the BALB/3T3 cells did not have a linear relationship with the different level of cytotoxicity of the materials (Fig. 7). To the MB49, the toxicity was high, independent of the level of ROS measured.

Figure 8

Intracellular detection production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by BALB/3T3 (A) and MB49 (B) cells by exposing the samples of Ag2WO4:F; Ag2WO4:NF; Ag2WO4; Ag2WO4:E, respectively up to 120 min. Comparison of mean of ROS production by cells exposed to samples (C).

By analyzing the specific type of death caused by each sample for both cell lines through the acridine orange (AO) and ethidium bromide (EB) assay, it is possible to observe a difference in resistance of the BALB/3T3 and MB49 lines in relation to the type of sample. The fluorescence images (Fig. 9) show that the BALB/3T3 cell (healthy cell) exposed at a concentration of 23.16 µg/mL of α-Ag2WO4, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F, α- Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:NF, or Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E maintained its membranes (AO−/EB−). On the contrary, MB49 exposed to α-Ag2WO4, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F, and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF presented signals of apoptosis (Fig. 9G,H: AO+/EB−), late apoptosis (Fig. 9K,L: AO+/EB+) and necrosis (Fig. 9O,P: AO−/EB+), respectively. The cells exposed to Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E totally lost the integrity of the membranes and it was possible to observe only the presence of cellular debris (Fig. 9O,P).

Figure 9

Cell death assay (apoptosis and necrosis). AO/EB: Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide. (A) control cells BALB/3T3 absent from apoptosis; (B) control cells BALB/3T3 absent from necrosis; (C) control cells MB49 absent from apoptosis; (D) control cells MB49 absent from necrosis; (E) Ag2WO4 cells BALB/3T3 absence amount of apoptosis death; (F) Ag2WO4 cells BALB/3T3 absence of necrotic death; (G) Ag2WO4 cells MB49 large amount of apoptosis death; (H) Ag2WO4 cells MB49 absence of necrotic death; (I) Ag2WO4:F cells BALB/3T3 absence amount of apoptosis death; (J) Ag2WO4:F cells BALB/3T3 absence of necrotic death; (K) Ag2WO4:F cells MB49 large amount of apoptosis death; (L) Ag2WO4:F cells MB49 large amount of necrotic death; (M)) Ag2WO4:NF cells BALB/3T3 absence of apoptosis death; (N) Ag2WO4:NF cells BALB/3T3 absence of necrotic death; (O) Ag2WO4:NF cells MB49 absence of apoptosis death; (P) Ag2WO4:NF cells MB49 large amount of necrotic death; (Q) Ag2WO4:E cells BALB/3T3 absence of apoptosis death; (R) Ag2WO4:E cells BALB/3T3 absence of necrotic death; (S) Ag2WO4:E cell debris (cellular debris) MB49; (T) Ag2WO4:E cell debris (cellular debris).

In order to evaluate the ROS production of the composites, tests of photocatalytic activity (Fig. 10) were performed with the addition of appropriate reactive species scavengers. For these tests, benzoquinone (BQ) was used to capture superoxide radicals \(({O^{\prime} }_{2})\) and tert-butyl alcohol (TBA) was used to capture hydroxyl radicals (OH*), because these species are directly linked to the oxidative stress of these cells and their subsequent death. α-Ag2WO4 presents a low efficiency in the photocatalysis (~48%) and when the TBA is added, this value reduces, indicating an action by the radical OH* in the oxidative processes. The same was done by adding BQ to Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite, but the photocatalytic activity remained constant, showing that the \({O^{\prime} }_{2}\) moiety is not generated by α-Ag2WO4. For Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composites, an increase in the dye degradation is observed, owing to the structural modifications of both samples. When TBA is added to the process, a reduction of the photocatalytic efficiency occurs, and once the BQ is added, the efficiency becomes constant, that is, the oxidative process occurs through the OH* radical as well as in the α-Ag2WO4. Finally, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite was the only that showed a contribution to the radical \({O^{\prime} }_{2}\), apart from the contribution of OH*, thus causing an increase in its photocatalytic efficiency among all the materials.

Figure 10

Influence of various scavengers onto the photodegradation of RhB.


In the XRD patterns (Fig. 1), we observe a right-shift of some peaks in the composites, including the main peak (231), as well as the suppression of certain diffraction peaks (Fig. 1B,C). This change can be associated with the electron beam irradiation and fs laser irradiation that provokes a decrease in the interplanar distances of this plane with a concomitant small reduction in the volume of the unit cell, indicating that the effect of different irradiations changes certain orientations of the clusters forming the material, increasing the long-range disorder. It is not possible to observe Ag in the XRD spectrum, because the growth phenomena of these Ag NPs are delocalized and superficial in α-Ag2WO4.

Another factor related to structural order/disorder effects at long-range can be found by analyzing the full width at half maximum of the most intense peak of the XRD patterns, related to the (231) plane. An increment in the FWHM of this peak in the non-irradiated material with respect to the others is observed as 0.34°, 0.40°, 0.43°, and 0.57° related to α-Ag2WO4, α-Ag2WO4:E, α-Ag2WO4:NF, and α-Ag2WO4:F, respectively. These values indicate that when the material is irradiated with the focused fs laser, the structural disorder is much higher than it is for irradiation with the non-focused fs laser and electron beam.

The micro-Raman spectroscopy analysis shows structural disorder associated with the vibrational modes of [WO6] clusters (Fig. 2). The formation of Ag NPs during the irradiation (fs laser and electron beam) provokes distortions in the [WO6] clusters. According to Longo et al.34, when the α-Ag2WO4 is irradiated with electron beam in a SEM, Ag nanofilamentos grow in the surface of the material, thereby forming a Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite (Fig. 3B). This happens because [AgO2] and [AgO4] clusters accept the incoming electron density and the reduction of Ag cation occurs with a concomitant Ag formation process. When the material is irradiated with a fs laser, spherical Ag NPs grow on the surface of α-Ag2WO4, yielding a Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite (Fig. 3C,D). Fs laser irradiation strips the equilibrium system, causing the segregation of these Ag NPs36.

As mentioned above, α-Ag2WO4 without any irradiation is an n-type semiconductor, it has positive charge holes in its structure, which combined with the effect of the Ag present on the material have a high oxidizing power. Under electron beam irradiation, α-Ag2WO4 semiconductor becomes n/p due to the formation of Ag vacancies within the material. On the contrary, when α-Ag2WO4 is subject to fs radiation, the structural disorder of the sample is increased because the fs laser beam is concentrated in localized regions of the material’s surface, promoting an increment in the segregation process of Ag NPs out of α-Ag2WO4 semiconductor; then, a new semiconductor with a larger p character is formed, owing to a higher density of Ag vacancies.

When α-Ag2WO4 was irradiated with electron beam and fs laser in non-focused mode, nucleation and formation of Ag NPs was observed, transforming α-Ag2WO4 into Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite, acting as a n/p semiconductor type. In the α-Ag2WO4: NF sample, not only the plasmonic effect is potentiated but there is selectivity and only the cancer cells are affected under the effects of the new tungsten clusters. This is probably due to the highly unregulated energy rate of tumor cells, since they exhibit aberrant growth rates relative to normal cells, which require high levels of ATP for the production of carbohydrates, proteins, lipids and nucleic acids58,59.

The antimicrobial activity of α-Ag2WO4 composites has been previously described36,53,54,55. Comparing the antimicrobial activity of α-Ag2WO4 and α- Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:E composite, a fourfold improvement in the activity against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 33591 (MRSA) bacteria was observed. In previous works36, the antimicrobial action of the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite against the MRSA bacteria exhibited a 32-fold greater efficacy than the non-irradiated material, where the nucleation of metallic Ag NPs can be associated to a surface plasmonic effect, with a subsequent enhancement of their antimicrobial activity. In the present study, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite exhibits the best antifungal activity, showing a larger number of defects and metallic Ag NPs on the material surface, which is believed to be the reason for the enhanced surface plasmonic effect leading to a bactericidal improvement (Fig. 4A). The biofilms treated with this sample presented a smaller area of coverage, smaller number of cells, and morphologically altered cells, in comparison with the other biofilms.

The known antimicrobial potential of α-Ag2WO4 is a notable feature of this material54 and its antifungal potential was shown in this work. The development of technologies that provide modifications of different characteristics with respect to their morphological structure as well as highly controlled physicochemical activities and surface area, increases its capacity of application and its therapeutic use60. Ag NPs is extremely poisonous against planktonic cells and biofilms of different species, at exceptionally low concentrations, compared to different commercial antimicrobials61. Apart from its capacity to participate in oxidative reactions, Ag NPs damages and inhibits Fe–S-containing dehydratases at bactericide concentrations, leading to microbial death62.

Previously, Ag NPs have been reported to have effective antitumor effects at low concentrations, as they cause irreversible DNA damage63. However, their genotoxic and cytotoxic effects provoked some instability in its use. The combination of Ag NPs with other materials, such as tungsten (W) has led to its reduced toxicity according to different studies54,55. As eukaryotic and bacterial cells possess distinct transport metalloproteins, some metal compounds discriminate between bacterial targets and eukaryotic cells64. In this way, the material is toxic to Candida albicans cells, and at the same concentration does not cause damage FGH cells (Figs 4B, 5 and 6).

In this study, the viability and cytotoxicity of MB49 tumor and BALB/3T3 non-tumor cells exposed to the samples irradiated by different energy sources has been analyzed (Fig. 7). Our results show that the samples had effective abilities to cause the death of MB49 relative to normal BALB/3T3 cells, depending on the concentration (Fig. 7). The order of antitumor activity when the cells was exposed to a more effective concentrations (23.16 μg/mL) of the composites is: Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF > Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E > Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F > α-Ag2WO4. This is due to the formation of Ag NPs on the surface of the semiconductor and the generation of internal defects in the material, which cause a threshold between Ag toxicity and its antitumor activity. It was also observed that the material that was better for the antifungal activity, Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite, showed no selectivity between tumor and non-tumor cells in relation to the others, because the number of Ag NPs on its surface exceeded its toxicity threshold58.

The samples are considered triggering elements for the cell death pathway. Oxidative stress induced by the samples linked to the intrinsic (mitochondrial effects) or extrinsic apoptotic network (cytoplasmic effect) is currently the most accepted description65, and many in vitro studies have identified a significant increase in ROS as a toxicity factor66,67,68, regulating the expression of apoptotic proteins (Figs 8 and 9). The signals that are produced in response to these stimuli increase the permeabilization of the mitochondria, interrupting the synthesis of ATP and releasing the pro-apoptotic molecules, which triggers the production of the protein complex, culminating with the final events of the cell death itself  65,69.

In the case of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composites, the excited electrons from Ag NPs can be transferred to the conduction band (CB) of α-Ag2WO4 semiconductor and then further transferred to the noble metal particles owing to the Fermi-level equilibration. Under visible-light irradiation, the processes of the photo-induced charge separation and transfer at the interface of the metal Ag NPs and α-Ag2WO4 semiconductor can be divided into the following steps: (i) the visible light is harvested by the metal Ag, and then a hot electron transfer from Ag to α-Ag2WO4 takes place; (ii) the local electric field in the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite can promote electron–hole pair separation under visible-light irradiation. The other Ag particles on the α-Ag2WO4 surface act as an efficient photocatalyst and trap the photoexcited electrons that come from the CB of α-Ag2WO4. The promotion effects on the separation of the photogenerated electron−hole pairs on α-Ag2WO4 by Ag can be achieved. Overall, the synergistic effect, enhanced visible-light absorption, and efficient electron–hole separation play an important role in enhancing the activity of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite.

In the photocatalytic activity of both α -Ag2WO4 and Ag/α -Ag2WO4, Liu et al. proposed a mechanism involving three steps: (i) Light absorption and photoelectron excitation, i.e., the electrons are excited from the CB to the valence band (VB) and the photogenerated holes appear in the VB. (ii) Formation of the free radical. The photoelectrons at the CB at the surface of the semiconductor would react with the surrounding substances, such as O2 molecule and generate \({O^{\prime} }_{2}\) radical, which could turn into other ROS including \(H{O}_{2}^{\ast }\), or H2O2 by successive photochemical processes. On the contrary, the photogenerated holes in the VB can yield OH* by combining with OH (iii) The last step corresponds to radical oxidizing rearrangements involving ROS; it must be pointed out that neither α-Ag2WO4 nor Ag/α-Ag2WO4 could produce electron spin resonance (ESR) signals without light irradiation. However, after visible-light irradiation, the presence of radical OH* is detected by ESR, where the ESR signals of the Ag/α-Ag2WO4 nanocomposites was almost 1.5 bigger than that of α-Ag2WO4, exhibiting a better photosensitive ability to produce OH* under visible-light irradiation.

Avalos et al.70 measured the production of ROS induced by distinct sizes of Ag NPs in HepG2 and HL-60 tumor cells. The results showed that the higher ROS production can be attributed to an increment in the surface area of the NPs. In the work of Hussain et al.71 it was also demonstrated that for TiO2 NPs, the ROS modulation was proportional to the reactivity of the small area of the NPs. Depending of the magnitude of ROS production, the samples presented a different level of toxicity.

The Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite has a major capacity to produce ROS (Fig. 9), which causes this material to have the best antifungal activity, as confirmed by assay (Fig. 4A). However, with respect to the antitumor activity, the high degree of cytotoxicity affects the tumor cell MB49 and non-tumor cell BALB/3T3 in the same way, indistinctly producing cell death at concentration of 23.16 µg/mL. On the contrary, the number of Ag NPs formed on the surface of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composites is capable of producing a selective cytotoxic effect on tumor cells. This characteristic is probably related to the resistance to ROS action.

Thus, these electrons and holes ultimately produce ROS. As a function of the aerobic metabolism and oxidation of substrates, normal cells continuously produce ROS and the low level of intracellular ROS generated during the physiological activities acts as a factor in the differentiation, progression, arrest of growth, apoptosis, and immune response. However, when ROS are accumulated in a high quantity, the cells get into an oxidative stress state that induces a plethora of dysfunctional alterations in macromolecules such as DNA and lipids, among others that can lead to the cellular death. In order to counterbalance the excess of ROS production, the cells possess an efficient system formed by antioxidant enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase, and catalase that protect the cell from oxidative stress72.

In the normal process, the redox state may contribute to tumor progression, increasing the expression of genes related to ROS metabolism, such as the enzyme SOD73,74. However, with exposure to materials, the induction of genotoxicity through DNA breakdown may occur. In this case, the production of ROS is an important factor. Materials have the potential to lead to cell death by the induction of autophagic dysfunction produced by mechanisms that lead to the overload or inhibition of lysosomal activity, interference of organelles trafficking by the cytoskeleton, and the breakdown of lysosomal stability (oxidative stress, alkalinization, osmotic edema, and membrane rupture). Finally, the materials induce the formation of the protein complex known as inflammassome that mediates the production of the IL-1β pyrogenic mediator, which stimulates the development of acute inflammatory process.

Here, we can assume that non-tumor cells could present some mechanism beyond tumor cells that allow survival when exposed to oxidative stress. This selectivity is associated with the basic mechanism that undergoes interference by the samples with the cells’ ability to compensate for the changes caused75. This is in contrast to the tumoral cells, in which the ROS act as secondary messengers in intracellular cascades, inducing and maintaining malignant phenotype. The DNA damage, mutations, and altered gene expression are involved in carcinogenesis76.

A large body of research about the microbial53,54 and antifungal55 activity of α-Ag2WO4 material has been presented by our research group, and very recently, we demonstrated that when the material is irradiated by pulsed fs laser, its bactericidal properties are enhanced36. The present study demonstrates, for first time, the antifungal and antitumor activity of Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4 composite formed by electron beam and fs irradiation. However, it is important to remark that the mode through which these composites exert their biological actions has not as yet been fully elucidated. There is compelling evidence that ROS species are responsible for the antifungal and antitumor effects.

It is important to note that the elucidation of the mechanisms of action as well as the molecular changes caused in the cells is out of the aims of present work. Excellent reports on antifungal and potential tumoricidal NPs, particularly for realistic physiological situations, have been published in the literature. The ongoing works are based on different studies in which the production of ROS is the main mechanism of action of Ag containing materials for the elimination of neoplastic cells63,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84. Tough, the researchers have widely explored the antibacterial efficacy of Ag NPs but their mode of action is still not clear85,86. Possible mechanisms contributing to the biological effects include both the direct damage to cell membranes by Ag NPs and the Ag NPs-mediated generation of ROS. He et al. point out that Ag NPs enhance a powerful oxidant through a reaction with H2O2, and the oxidizing species did not include the free OH*. It is well known that free OH* is highly reactive and can damage virtually all types of macromolecules, especially the nucleic acid and lipids. This evidence indicates that the lack of significant generation of OH* but large amount of other ROS species by the laser generated Ag NPs in our experiment suggest that the molecular mechanisms underlying the antifungal and antitumor effect might be dependent on the method used for the NP production and the target microbial species. It would be interesting in a future study to compare the behavior between the specific ROS species induced by electron beam and fs laser irradiation. This would further clarify the specific properties of the generated Ag NPs/α Ag2WO4 composite.


The development and use of hybrid nanomaterials, composed by noble metal nanoparticles–semiconductor composites, are playing increasingly important roles and becoming useful multifunctional materials toward the development of advanced intelligent devices with novel, multiple, and versatile bioactivities.

In the current work, we deployed our investigations in this regard by constructing an interesting composite system formed by Ag NPs and α-Ag2WO4 fabricated by electron beam and fs laser irradiation on α-Ag2WO4, and its remarkable higher performance in antifungal and antitumor activity were demonstrated.

The synergistic effect of the plasmonic Ag nanoparticles on the α- Ag2WO4 semiconductor enhances the antifungal and antitumor efficiency. For the antitumor activity, the best results were achieved by the α-Ag2WO4:NF and α-Ag2WO4:E materials, which showed greater selectivity and efficacy against the action of MB49 tumor cells and greater cell viability of healthy BALB/3T3 cells. In the case of the antifungal activity, the synergism between the bacteriostatic effect of W and the higher oxidizing power of Ag NPs makes the α-Ag2WO4:F the best fungicide agent, with a minimum concentration of 3.90 µg/mL.

The irradiation of solids with energetic species, such as electrons or photons, normally gives rise to formation of atomic defects in the target and spoils the material properties. However, in spite of the damage, irradiation may overall have a beneficial effect on the target. This application motivated further studies of defect production under irradiation, because each implanted atom creates many lattice defects in the sample, imparting to the material new properties to be explored.

Experimental Section


The synthesis method, based on the aqueous coprecipitation method, of α- Ag2WO4 was previously reported by Longo et al.36.

Electron irradiation

To irradiate the material with electrons to obtain Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:E composite, the α-Ag2WO4 sample was placed in a field emission gun scanning electron microscope (SEM-FEG) using a Supra 35-VP (Carl Zeiss, Germany) with an acceleration voltage of 15 kV for 5 min.

Fs irradiation

α-Ag2WO4 pellets were irradiated with a Ti:sapphire laser (Femtopower Compact Pro, Femto Lasers) using 30 fs full width at half maximum (FWHM) pulses at the central wavelength of 800 nm, and a repetition rate of 1 kHz. To get more precise pulse compression at the sample, a programmable acousto-optic filter (DAZZLER, Faslite) was used. A laser beam of 6 mm diameter and mean power of 200 mW was focused onto the surface of a pellet target of α- Ag2WO4 with a 75 mm lens. To obtain the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composite, the α- Ag2WO4 pellet was placed at the bottom of a quartz cuvette attached to a two-dimensional motion-controlled stage moving in a raster scanning at a constant speed of 0.45 mm/s in the focus plane perpendicular to the laser beam. At the focal position, the spot size was approximately 21 µm with a fluence of approximately 60 J/cm2. For the Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:NF composite, the position of the pellet was moved 8 mm closer to the convex lens to obtain a focal spot of approximately 84 µm and a fluence of approximately 3.6 J/cm2. The large difference in the fluence over the two samples is the key parameter for the structural differences between them as, reported in38.


The microcrystalline powders were characterized using XRD with a D/Max-2500PC diffractometer (Rigaku, Japan) involving CuK α radiation (λ = 1.54056 Å) in the 10–70° 2θ range at a scan rate of 0.01° min−1. Micro-Raman spectroscopy was carried out using an iHR550 spectrometer (Horiba Jobin-Yvon, Japan) coupled to a charge-coupled device (CCD) detector and an argon-ion laser (MellesGriot, USA) operating at 633 nm with a maximum power of 200 mW. The spectra were measured in the 50–1000 cm−1 range. The SEM images were analyzed using field emission gun scanning electron microscopy (FEG-SEM) on an FEI instrument (Model Inspect F50) operating at 5 kV.

Antifungal study

The culture of Candida albicans ATCC 90028 was kept frozen at −80 °C. Before the tests, the cells were thawed and streaked onto Sabouraud dextrose agar supplemented with 0.05 g/L chloramphenicol (SDA, Acumedia Manufacturers Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA). The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, and then five colonies were transferred to yeast nitrogen base culture medium supplemented with 100 mM glucose (YNB) and incubated for 16 h to prepare the pre-inoculum. Sequentially, the pre-inoculum was diluted 1:10 in fresh YNB and incubated for an additional 8 h until the cells had the mid-log phase of growth. The cells were standardized at a concentration of 107 by a spectrophotometer and incubated for 90 min for the initial cell adhesion phase at 37 °C. Then, the non-adhered cells were removed through two washes with phosphate-buffered saline solution (PBS, pH 7.2), and incubated for 24 h with the samples two-fold diluted in YNB for the biofilm formation phase.

After the growth of the biofilm in contact with the particles, 10-fold dilutions were prepared of each well and 10 µL aliquots of these were inoculated in duplicate SDA. The plates were incubated for 24 h at 37 °C, the colony forming units per milliliter (CFU/mL) were calculated and log10-transformed.

Biocompatibility of antifungal Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:F composites

For biocompatibility assays, human gingival fibroblasts (FGH cell line from Rio de Janeiro Cell Bank Code 0089) were used as a model in monolayer cultures. The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium Low Glucose (DMEM, Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) medium, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), 100 IU/mL penicillin, 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA), and 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA) in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2 at 37 °C. After reaching 90% confluence, the cells were washed with PBS, recovered using trypsin, and re suspended in fresh medium prior to further analyses. The assessment of α- Ag NPs/Ag2WO4:NF and Ag NPs/α-Ag2WO4:F composites on cell viability were evaluated by the resazurin assay (Alamar Blue quantitative fluorimetric assay). FGH cells were seeded at 8 × 103 cells/well directly into the 96-well polystyrene black plate (TPP Tissue Culture Plates, USA) for monolayer cell culture. The cells were incubated at 37 °C under 5% CO2 for 24 h. Next, the medium was removed and 200 μL of the fresh medium containing the composites was added at 3.90, 7,81, 15.62, and 31.25 µg/mL. In sequence, 10% of resazurin assay-Alamar Blue (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was added into each well and the fluorescence signals were measured using a Fluoroskan (Fluoroskan Ascent FL; Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA) at an excitation wavelength at 544 nm and an emission wavelength at 590 nm, after 24-h incubation. The experiment was performed in triplicate and with three independent biological repetitions. To confirm the impact of the concentrations of the samples on gingival fibroblasts behavior we investigated the proliferation/cell death staining by labeling the cells with CellTracerTMCFSE (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR,USA) and propidium iodide - PI 20 µM (Invitrogen, Eugene, OR,USA) after 24 h of incubation with materials. This assay was performed by CLSM using a Carl Zeiss LSM 800 microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany). The green fluorescence of CFSE and the red one of PI were employed by laser excitation at 488 nm and 561 nm, respectively. Images were acquired through 20X dry (Plan NeoFluar NA). Finally, the cell morphology was investigated by SEM using a JEOL JSM-6610LV microscope (Ref JEOL). First, 5 × 104 cells were plated on sterile cover glass discs on a 24-well plate (TPP Tissue Culture, Switzerland) and maintained at 37 °C under 5% CO2 conditions. After 24 h the medium was removed and materials were added at concentrations 3.90, 7,81, 15.62, and 31.25 µg/mL for 24 h. After this period, the samples were prepared for SEM analyses. A fixation step was performed by sample incubation in a solution of 2.5% glutaraldehyde (pH 7.4) at room temperature for 1 h. The PBS-washed discs were then subjected to a standard procedure for dehydrating of specimens: 70% and 90% ethanol for 1 h per step, ending with five changes within 30 minutes of 100% ethanol. Prior to visualization, the discs were placed under vacuum to protect the dry samples from moisture, and after storage for seven days, the discs were sputter-coated with gold. The experiment was performed in duplicate for each experimental and control group, which were: CT: cells in standard culture conditions, cell death controls for Alamar Blue and SEM: Triton-X 100 0.9% buffer (LB) or 10 µM of Camptothecin for 8 h (CAM) for CLSM.

Cell viability MB49 and BALB/3T3 on α-Ag2WO4 samples exposure

To investigate the in vitro toxicity of the samples, the test was carried out with the cell lines MB49 (tumor cell) and BALB/3T3 (non-tumor cell). Both cell lines were plated on 2 96-well culture plates (Corning Incorporated, NY, USA) to a concentration of 1.105 cell/well in DMEM medium (SIGMA-ALDRICH, USA) in the presence of L-glutamine (2 mmol L−1) and penicillin/streptomycin (100 U mL−1) with the addition of fetal bovine serum (10% SFB) and kept overnight. The cells were exposed to α-Ag2WO4 samples irradiated by different sources at the following concentrations: 4.63, 11.58, 23.16 and 46.31 µM and a negative control. After the 24 h exposure, the supernatant containing the nanomaterials was collected and the resulting cells were washed with PBS (1X) buffer and the cell viability test was performed by the resazurin assay-Alamar Blue (SIGMA-ALDRICH, USA), was added into each well and the fluorescence signals were measured using a Fluoroskan (Fluoroskan Ascent FL; Thermo Scientific; Waltham, MA, USA), according to the instructions provided by the supplier. The readings were taken using a spectrophotometer with absorbance in the range 570–600 nm. The experiment was performed in triplicate.

Reactive oxygen species generation assay

The MB49 and BALB/3T3 cells were plated under the same conditions described in item 1, and exposed to the materials at the concentration that presented the best results in the cell viability assay. For the measurement of the production of ROS, kinetics (ROS production/time) were performed for 105 min (every 15 min) using 100 μm 2′,7′-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (DCF-DA, SIGMA-ALDRICH, USA). The measurement of the ROS production was performed using a Spectra Max i3 (Molecular Devices) with 485–530 nm excitation.

Cytotoxicity assay: apoptosis and necrosis

The MB49 and BALB/3T3 cells were plated in black plate 96-well (Corning Incorporated, NY, USA) under the same conditions described above, and exposed to the materials at the concentration that showed the best results in the previous assay. After the 24 h exposure, the cells were washed with PBS buffer (1X) and subjected to the apoptosis and necrosis assay using acridine orange/ethidium bromide (AO/EB), according to the instructions provided by the supplier. The total count of apoptotic and necrotic cells, as well as the analysis of cellular morphology, was performed on the ImageXpress Micro (Molecular Device) with 515–560 nm excitation filter and 590 nm barrier filter.

Scavengers tests

The scavengers test was performed from the degradation of rhodamine B (RhB) (Aldrich 95%) under ultraviolet light. We dispersed the samples (50 mg) in a RhB solution (50 mL 1 × 10−5 mol L−1) in a beaker placed in an ultrasonic bath (Branson, model 1510; frequency 42 kHz) for 10 min. This solution was maintained in the dark, under stirring for 30 min to allow the adsorption–desorption process. After this process, the initial aliquot was withdrawn. Next, these solutions were illuminated by four visible lamps (Philips TL-D, 15 W) in a photocatalytic system maintained at 20 °C in a thermostatic bath under stirring. The final aliquot was withdrawn after 60 min. This process was repeated for all the samples. The aliquots were centrifuged to obtain the liquid phase alone. Variations in the absorption band maximum at λ = 553 nm (RhB) were measured by performing UV-Vis absorption spectroscopy measurements of the solution on a V-660 spectrophotometer (JASCO). To analyze the action of the radicals OH* and \({O^{\prime} }_{2}\), we performed tests by adding appropriate reactive species scavengers such as 0.067 g of BQ (Alfa Aesar) and 0.0589 mL tert-butyl alcohol (TBA), respectively.

Data presentation and statistical analyses

Data were represented by the mean and standard error of the mean. The data followed the normal distribution; according to the Shapiro-Wilk test, differences between groups were determined using the ANOVA and Newman–Keuls tests for multiple comparisons. The nominal variables were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. The software used for analyses was GraphPad Prism version 5.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego,CA, USA). The tests were considered statistically significant when the p-value was less than 0.05.


  1. 1.

    Dong, Z. et al. Silver nanoparticles immobilized on fibrous nano-silica as highly efficient and recyclable heterogeneous catalyst for reduction of 4-nitrophenol and 2-nitroaniline. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 158, 129–135 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Yang, G.-W., Gao, G.-Y., Wang, C., Xu, C.-L. & Li, H.-L. Controllable deposition of Ag nanoparticles on carbon nanotubes as a catalyst for hydrazine oxidation. Carbon 46, 747–752 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Xia, Y., Xiong, Y., Lim, B. & Skrabalak, S. E. Shape‐controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: Simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angewandte Chemie International Edition 48, 60–103 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Pradhan, N., Pal, A. & Pal, T. Catalytic reduction of aromatic nitro compounds by coinage metal nanoparticles. Langmuir 17, 1800–1802 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Saha, S., Pal, A., Kundu, S., Basu, S. & Pal, T. Photochemical green synthesis of calcium-alginate-stabilized Ag and Au nanoparticles and their catalytic application to 4-nitrophenol reduction. Langmuir 26, 2885–2893 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Signori, A. M. et al. Formation of catalytic silver nanoparticles supported on branched polyethyleneimine derivatives. Langmuir 26, 17772–17779 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Li, Q. et al. Antimicrobial nanomaterials for water disinfection and microbial control: potential applications and implications. Water research 42, 4591–4602 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Tolaymat, T. M. et al. An evidence-based environmental perspective of manufactured silver nanoparticle in syntheses and applications: a systematic review and critical appraisal of peer-reviewed scientific papers. Science of the Total Environment 408, 999–1006 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mitrano, D. M. et al. Presence of nanoparticles in wash water from conventional silver and nano-silver textiles. ACS nano 8, 7208–7219 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Varner, K., El-Badawy, A., Feldhake, D. & Venkatapathy, R. State-of-the-science review: everything nanosilver and more. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. (EPA/600/R-10/084, 2010).

  11. 11.

    Rai, M., Yadav, A. & Gade, A. Silver nanoparticles as a new generation of antimicrobials. Biotechnology advances 27, 76–83 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Nowack, B., Krug, H. F. & Height, M. 120 years of nanosilver history: implications for policy makers. Environmental Science & Technology 45, 1177–1183 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Seil, J. T. & Webster, T. J. Antimicrobial applications of nanotechnology: methods and literature. International journal of nanomedicine 7, 2767 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Xiang, D. et al. Inhibition of A/Human/Hubei/3/2005 (H3N2) influenza virus infection by silver nanoparticles in vitro and in vivo. International journal of nanomedicine 8, 4103 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Maillard, J.-Y. & Hartemann, P. Silver as an antimicrobial: facts and gaps in knowledge. Critical reviews in microbiology 39, 373–383 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Morones, J. R. et al. The bactericidal effect of silver nanoparticles. Nanotechnology 16, 2346 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Chernousova, S. & Epple, M. Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 52, 1636–1653 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Kvitek, L. et al. Initial study on the toxicity of silver nanoparticles (NPs) against Paramecium caudatum. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 113, 4296–4300 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Kim, J. S. et al. Antimicrobial effects of silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 3, 95–101 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Wodka, D. et al. Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide modified by silver nanoparticles. ACS applied materials & interfaces 2, 1945–1953 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Panáček, A. et al. Antifungal activity of silver nanoparticles against Candida spp. Biomaterials 30, 6333–6340 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Xiu, Z.-M., Zhang, Q.-B., Puppala, H. L., Colvin, V. L. & Alvarez, P. J. Negligible particle-specific antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles. Nano letters 12, 4271–4275 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Martinez-Gutierrez, F. et al. Synthesis, characterization, and evaluation of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effect of silver and titanium nanoparticles. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine 6, 681–688 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Bhat, R. et al. Photo-bio-synthesis of irregular shaped functionalized gold nanoparticles using edible mushroom Pleurotus florida and its anticancer evaluation. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology 125, 63–69 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Dipankar, C. & Murugan, S. The green synthesis, characterization and evaluation of the biological activities of silver nanoparticles synthesized from Iresine herbstii leaf aqueous extracts. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces 98, 112–119 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jeyaraj, M. et al. Biogenic silver nanoparticles for cancer treatment: an experimental report. Colloids and surfaces B: Biointerfaces 106, 86–92 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Pugazhendhi, S., Kirubha, E., Palanisamy, P. & Gopalakrishnan, R. Synthesis and characterization of silver nanoparticles from Alpinia calcarata by Green approach and its applications in bactericidal and nonlinear optics. Applied Surface Science 357, 1801–1808 (2015).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Wang, H. et al. Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chemical Society Reviews 43, 5234–5244 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mehdi, A., Reye, C. & Corriu, R. From molecular chemistry to hybrid nanomaterials. Design and functionalization. Chemical Society Reviews 40, 563–574 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Emeline, A., Kuznetsov, V., Ryabchuk, V. & Serpone, N. On the way to the creation of next generation photoactive materials. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 19, 3666–3675 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang, Y. et al. Surface-plasmon-driven hot electron photochemistry. Chemical reviews 118, 2927–2954 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Knight, M. W., Sobhani, H., Nordlander, P. & Halas, N. J. Photodetection with active optical antennas. Science 332, 702–704 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Clavero, C. Plasmon-induced hot-electron generation at nanoparticle/metal-oxide interfaces for photovoltaic and photocatalytic devices. Nature Photonics 8, 95 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Andrés, J. et al. Structural and electronic analysis of the atomic scale nucleation of Ag on α-Ag2WO4 induced by electron irradiation. Scientific reports 4, srep05391 (2014).

    Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cavalcante, L. et al. Cluster coordination and photoluminescence properties of α-Ag2WO4 microcrystals. Inorganic chemistry 51, 10675–10687 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Assis, M. et al. Towards the scale-up of the formation of nanoparticles on α-Ag2WO4 with bactericidal properties by femtosecond laser irradiation. Scientific reports 8, 1884 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Zhang, X.-Y., Wang, J.-D., Liu, J.-K., Yang, X.-H. & Lu, Y. Construction of silver tungstate multilevel sphere clusters by controlling the energy distribution on the crystal surface. CrystEngComm 17, 1129–1138 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chen, H. & Xu, Y. Photoactivity and stability of Ag2WO4 for organic degradation in aqueous suspensions. Applied Surface Science 319, 319–323 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Lin, Z. et al. Electronic reconstruction of α-Ag2WO4 nanorods for visible-light photocatalysis. ACS nano 9, 7256–7265 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Zhang, R. et al. Facile hydrothermal synthesis and photocatalytic activity of rod-like nanosized silver tungstate. Micro & Nano Letters 7, 1285–1288 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Da Silva, L. F. et al. A novel ozone gas sensor based on one-dimensional (1D) α-Ag2WO4 nanostructures. Nanoscale 6, 4058–4062 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Da Silva, L. F. et al. Acetone gas sensor based on α-Ag2WO4 nanorods obtained via a microwave-assisted hydrothermal route. Journal of Alloys and Compounds 683, 186–190 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Linic, S., Christopher, P. & Ingram, D. B. Plasmonic-metal nanostructures for efficient conversion of solar to chemical energy. Nature materials 10, 911 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Shi, G. et al. Electron beam induced growth of silver nanoparticles. Scanning 35, 69–74 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Mansourian, A., Paknejad, S. A., Zayats, A. V. & Mannan, S. H. Stereoscopic Nanoscale-Precision Growth of Free-Standing Silver Nanorods by Electron Beam Irradiation. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 120, 20310–20314 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Li, K. & Zhang, F.-S. A novel approach for preparing silver nanoparticles under electron beam irradiation. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12, 1423–1428 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Longo, E. et al. Direct in situ observation of the electron-driven synthesis of Ag filaments on α-Ag2WO4 crystals. Scientific reports 3, 1676 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    da Silva Pereira, W. et al. Elucidating the real-time Ag nanoparticle growth on α-Ag2WO4 during electron beam irradiation: experimental evidence and theoretical insights. Physical chemistry chemical physics 17, 5352–5359 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    San-Miguel, M. A. et al. In situ growth of Ag nanoparticles on α-Ag2WO4 under electron irradiation: probing the physical principles. Nanotechnology 27, 225703 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Longo, E., Avansi, W. Jr., Bettini, J., Andrés, J. & Gracia, L. In situ Transmission Electron Microscopy observation of Ag nanocrystal evolution by surfactant free electron-driven synthesis. Scientific reports 6, 21498 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Faccin, G. M., San-Miguel, M. A., Andrés, J., Longo, E. & da Silva, E. Z. Computational Modeling for the Ag Nanoparticle Coalescence Process: A Case of Surface Plasmon Resonance. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 121, 7030–7036 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Andrés, J. et al. Formation of Ag nanoparticles under electron beam irradiation: Atomistic origins from first‐principles calculations. International Journal of Quantum Chemistry (2017).

  53. 53.

    Longo, Vr. M. et al. Potentiated electron transference in α-Ag2WO4 microcrystals with Ag nanofilaments as microbial agent. J. Phys. Chem. A 118, 5769–5778 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Foggi, C. C. et al. Tuning the morphology, optical and antimicrobial properties of α-Ag2WO4 microcrystals by using different solvents. Crystal Growth & Design (2017).

  55. 55.

    Foggi, C. C. et al. Synthesis and evaluation of α-Ag2WO4 as novel antifungal agent. Chemical Physics Letters 674, 125–129 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Turkovič, A., Fox, D. L., Scott, J. F., Geller, S. & Ruse, G. F. High temperature Raman spectroscopy of silver tetratungstate, Ag8W4O16. Materials Research Bulletin 12, 189–195 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Pereira, P. et al. ZnWO4 nanocrystals: synthesis, morphology, photoluminescence and photocatalytic properties. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics (2018).

  58. 58.

    Johnston, H. J. et al. A review of the in vivo and in vitro toxicity of silver and gold particulates: particle attributes and biological mechanisms responsible for the observed toxicity. Critical reviews in toxicology 40, 328–346 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Tung, J. C. et al. Tumor mechanics and metabolic dysfunction. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 79, 269–280 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    De Stefano, D., Carnuccio, R. & Maiuri, M. C. Nanomaterials toxicity and cell death modalities. Journal of drug delivery 2012 (2012).

  61. 61.

    Harrison, J. J., Ceri, H., Stremick, C. A. & Turner, R. J. Biofilm susceptibility to metal toxicity. Environmental Microbiology 6, 1220–1227 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Xu, F. F. & Imlay, J. A. Silver (I), mercury (II), cadmium (II), and zinc (II) target exposed enzymic iron-sulfur clusters when they toxify Escherichia coli. Applied and environmental microbiology 78, 3614–3621 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wei, L. et al. Silver nanoparticles: synthesis, properties, and therapeutic applications. Drug Discovery Today 20, 595–601 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Lemire, J. A., Harrison, J. J. & Turner, R. J. Antimicrobial activity of metals: mechanisms, molecular targets and applications. Nature Reviews Microbiology 11, 371 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Sarkar, A., Das, J., Manna, P. & Sil, P. C. Nano-copper induces oxidative stress and apoptosis in kidney via both extrinsic and intrinsic pathways. Toxicology 290, 208–217 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Nel, A., Xia, T., Mädler, L. & Li, N. Toxic potential of materials at the nanolevel. science 311, 622–627 (2006).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Shvedova, A. A., Kagan, V. E. & Fadeel, B. Close encounters of the small kind: adverse effects of man-made materials interfacing with the nano-cosmos of biological systems. Annual review of pharmacology and toxicology 50, 63–88 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Orrenius, S., Nicotera, P. & Zhivotovsky, B. Cell death mechanisms and their implications in toxicology. Toxicological Sciences 119, 3–19 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Manna, P., Ghosh, M., Ghosh, J., Das, J. & Sil, P. C. Contribution of nano-copper particles to in vivo liver dysfunction and cellular damage: Role of IκBα/NF-κB, MAPKs and mitochondrial signal. Nanotoxicology 6, 1–21 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Avalos, A., Haza, A. I., Mateo, D. & Morales, P. Cytotoxicity and ROS production of manufactured silver nanoparticles of different sizes in hepatoma and leukemia cells. Journal of applied toxicology 34, 413–423 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hussain, S. et al. Oxidative stress and proinflammatory effects of carbon black and titanium dioxide nanoparticles: role of particle surface area and internalized amount. Toxicology 260, 142–149 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Matés, J. M., Pérez-Gómez, C. & De Castro, I. N. Antioxidant enzymes and human diseases. Clinical biochemistry 32, 595–603 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Hempel, N., Ye, H., Abessi, B., Mian, B. & Melendez, J. A. Altered redox status accompanies progression to metastatic human bladder cancer. Free Radical Biology and Medicine 46, 42–50 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Kim, Y. S., Gupta Vallur, P., Phaëton, R., Mythreye, K. & Hempel, N. Insights into the Dichotomous Regulation of SOD2 in Cancer. Antioxidants 6, 86 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Bendale, Y., Bendale, V. & Paul, S. Evaluation of cytotoxic activity of platinum nanoparticles against normal and cancer cells and its anticancer potential through induction of apoptosis. Integrative medicine research 6, 141–148 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Valko, M., Rhodes, C., Moncol, J., Izakovic, M. & Mazur, M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chemico-biological interactions 160, 1–40 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Arora, S., Jain, J., Rajwade, J. & Paknikar, K. Cellular responses induced by silver nanoparticles: in vitro studies. Toxicology letters 179, 93–100 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Gaillet, S. & Rouanet, J.-M. Silver nanoparticles: their potential toxic effects after oral exposure and underlying mechanisms–a review. Food and Chemical Toxicology 77, 58–63 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Dai, X. et al. Functional silver nanoparticle as a benign antimicrobial agent that eradicates antibiotic-resistant bacteria and promotes wound healing. ACS applied materials & interfaces 8, 25798–25807 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Huma, Z.-e et al. Cationic Silver Nanoclusters as Potent Antimicrobials against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. ACS omega 3, 16721–16727 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Rizzello, L. & Pompa, P. P. Nanosilver-based antibacterial drugs and devices: mechanisms, methodological drawbacks, and guidelines. Chemical Society Reviews 43, 1501–1518 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Le Ouay, B. & Stellacci, F. Antibacterial activity of silver nanoparticles: a surface science insight. Nano today 10, 339–354 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Wang, L.-S., Gupta, A. & Rotello, V. M. Nanomaterials for the treatment of bacterial biofilms. ACS infectious diseases 2, 3–4 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Huh, A. J. & Kwon, Y. J. “Nanoantibiotics”: a new paradigm for treating infectious diseases using nanomaterials in the antibiotics resistant era. Journal of controlled release 156, 128–145 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Jeeva, K., Thiyagarajan, M., Elangovan, V., Geetha, N. & Venkatachalam, P. Caesalpinia coriaria leaf extracts mediated biosynthesis of metallic silver nanoparticles and their antibacterial activity against clinically isolated pathogens. Industrial Crops and Products 52, 714–720 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Khatoon, N., Ahmad, R. & Sardar, M. Robust and fluorescent silver nanoparticles using Artemisia annua: biosynthesis, characterization and antibacterial activity. Biochemical engineering journal 102, 91–97 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


All authors acknowledge to the Servei Central d’Instrumentació Científica for the use of the femtosecond laser facility; CAPES, FAPESP (2013/07296-2; 2013/26671-9; 2017/12594-3), CNPq (166281/2017-4) and Enio Longo for the support given in the realization and creation of the images. H.B-M and E.C. thank the Universidad Jaume I (Project UJI-B2016-38) and Ministerio de Economia, Industria y Competitividad (Project MAT2016-80410-P) for financial support. G.M.V thank Generalitat Valenciana for Prometeo/2016/079 and Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad project FIS2016-75618-R. R. T-.M. acknowledge the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic and the European Union for the funds Hybrid Materials for Hierarchical Structures (HyHi, Reg. No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_019/0000843) and the “National Programme for Sustainability I” LO 1201.

Author information




Authors M.A., T.R., C.C.F., A.M.K., G.M.-V., E.C., H.B.-M., R.T.-M., M.O., C.E.V., P.A.B., E.R.C. and R.C.B. contributed equally to perform the required experiments, analyze the data and write the paper. M.A. prepared the figures. E.L. and J.A. conceived the project and contributed to analyze the data and write the paper. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Longo.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Assis, M., Robeldo, T., Foggi, C.C. et al. Ag Nanoparticles/α-Ag2WO4 Composite Formed by Electron Beam and Femtosecond Irradiation as Potent Antifungal and Antitumor Agents. Sci Rep 9, 9927 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing