Abstract
Increasing precipitation has been predicted to occur in the karst areas in southwestern regions of China. However, it is little known how various plants respond to increasing precipitation in this region. Here we determined the impacts of water addition on leaf metabolites of grasses (Cymbopogon distans and Arundinella sitosa) and shrubs (Carissa spinarum and Bauhinia brachycarpa) in this area. Four levels of water additions (CK, T1, T2 and T3 indicating 0%, +20%, +40% and +60% relative to the current monthly precipitation, respectively) were designed. Sphingolipids substantially increased in the leaves of all four species with increasing water supply which suggests that these plants adopted biochemical strategy to tolerate the wet stress. However, both shrubs showed decreases in valine and threonine (amino acids), threonate, succinate and ascorbic acid (organic acids), galactose and rhamnose (sugars) and epicatchin and oleamides (secondary metabolites) with increasing water supply. Both grasses increased in the total metabolites at T1, but the total metabolites in A. sitosa significantly decreased at T2 and T3 while remains unchanged in C. distans. Tri-carboxylic acid cycle and amino acid metabolism in shrubs and shikimate pathway in grasses were strongly affected with water supply. Overall, shrubs and grasses respond differentially to variation in water addition in terms of metabolomics, which is helpful in understanding how plants respond to climate change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Drought and soil erosion are the major causes of desertification, which lead to extensive degradation of land and decline of vegetation in karst area. Less water retention capacity of karst is characterized by an extremely slow soil formation from underlying limestone in this region1,2,3. Therefore, drought is one of the most important factor in limiting the growth, photosynthesis and distribution of plants in the karst habitats of southwestern China1,4. It has been reported that drought stress not only reduces stem elongation, root propagation and leaf size but also disturbs plant-water relations and reduces water-use efficiency in plants5,6. As a result, the aboveground biomass of forest and vegetation in tropical and subtropical zones of the karst areas is approximately equal to that of temperate zone7. Moreover, majority of the plant species growing in karst have adapted to the conditions of arid climate in long-term evolution. Hence, increasing water supply may cause an oxidative stress in plant species growing in karst area8. Due to decrease in the number of rain days/annum, an increase in annual precipitation has been observed in southwest China for the last decade9,10. However, the karst habitat supports plant species in adaptation but the plants responses to increasing water remains mysterious.
Metabolomics contributes significantly in expanding our knowledge on metabolic changes and biochemical composition of plant species growing in diverse environmental conditions11,12. Eco-metabolomics deals with metabolome and metabolic remodeling, which are down and up-regulated due to environmental stresses. Furthermore, Eco-metabolomics evaluates the effects of the plant–environment interactions using advanced techniques such as GC-MS and LCMS coupled with advanced bio-informatics tools12,13. Additionally, eco-metabolomics approach is progressively being utilized to observe the modification in a specific genotype due to changes in global environment, especially the drought stress14,15,16. Differential responses of grasses and shrubs to climatic variability, particularly increasing precipitation inconsistency, have been reported mainly on their average productivity. It has been estimated that precipitation variability significantly reduces the primary production of an ecosystem17.
Water is an important factor for proper functioning and restoration of ecosystems in desert and grassland regions17,18. Changes in the hydrological systems not only effect the rate of diffusion of plant nutrients but also alter the vegetation pattern19,20. Moreover, changes in the components of hydrological systems, such as rainfall, impact significantly on the current water gradient of habitat and plant communities21,22. Other components include surface water23,24, ground water25,26 and soil moisture27,28. Over a long period of drought, decrease in nutrient uptake is accounted by partial transfer of ions to the root system29. Therefore, field manipulative experiments of irrigation are the best way to explore the relationships between water availability and ecosystem functioning17,30. In addition, maximum benefits may be attained by adopting suitable irrigation and planting techniques under water stress condition31.
In southwestern China, major part of the plant community in karst areas is dominated by drought-resistant dwarf shrubs and grasses. These species have distinct water relations with variable water conditions and have physiological and biochemical adaptations to survive in the arid climate of karst for long time. However, increasing precipitation may cause a wet stress in these species, particularly growing in the karst region8. In addition, the response of different plant species to increasing precipitation in the arid climate of karst area in terms of metabolomics is still unresolved. The main contribution of this work is (i) to determine whether plants respond differently to watering treatments in karst areas of Yunnan province, SW China (ii) to examine the impacts of water addition on the leaf metabolites of four plants species.
Results
Metabolic responses of plants to water additions
Results given in Fig. 1 revealed that the overall leaf metabolism was significantly affected by water addition with significant difference at p < 0.05. The PCA results obtained from the data for four plant species indicate significant differences in leaf metabolites, which is mainly depending on the levels of watering treatments. PCA of metabolomics variables of shrubs exhibited that samples had different values along the PC2-axis. However, significant changes were observed between CK and water treated samples along the PC1-axis at p < 0.0001 (Fig. 1a,b). Post hoc analysis of the PCA scores exposed that overall leaf metabolism of C. spinarum varied significantly between CK and T3 along the first PC (explaining 57.9% of the variation, p < 0.0001). Data of metabolomics variables, given in Fig. 1a, (PC1) showed that water treated samples had higher concentrations of amino acids (compounds associated with protein biosynthesis), secondary metabolites and sugar alcohol while the CK samples had higher concentrations of sugars, organic acids and osmolytes. PCA of metabolomics variables of B. brachycarpa (Fig. 1b) depicted significant changes between CK and T3 which were separated along the PC1 axis explaining 68.5% of the variation (p < 0.01). These results were confirmed by Post hoc analysis. PC1 loadings of metabolomics variables showed that CK samples had higher concentrations of organic acids i.e., intermediates of TCA cycle and amino acids while water treated samples had higher concentrations of fatty acids and osmolytes (Fig. 1b).
In contrast, the PCA of metabolomics variables of grasses exhibited that CK and water treated samples were separated along the PC2-axis (Fig. 1c,d). PCA explaining 87.3% of the variation with metabolomics variables of C. distans showed that CK and water treated samples differed along the PC2-axis (Fig. 1c). Post hoc analysis of the PC2 scores specified that overall leaf metabolism of C. distans varied considerably between CK and T3 (p < 0.01). Loadings of metabolomics variables in PC2 disclosed that water treated samples had higher concentrations of fatty acids and sugars related compounds while CK group had higher concentrations of amino acids, osmolytes and organic acids, like the intermediates in Shikimate pathway (Fig. 1c). Likewise, PCA of metabolomics variables of A. sitosa indicated comparable responses to water addition which exposed that CK and T3 were separated along the PC2-axis (explaining 6.4% of the variation, p < 0.01). PC2 and PC3 elucidated 10% of the variance in the PCA conducted with the leaf samples of A. sitosa. PC1 was discounted for the differences of watering samples and results were confirmed by Post hoc analysis. PC2 loadings of metabolomics variables indicate that water treated samples had lower concentrations of amino acids (Fig. 1d).
Metabolic regulations during watering treatments
The GC/MS chromatogram given in Fig. S1 indicates that more than 450 peaks were resolved from the polar extract of each plant species. Comparatively, more metabolites were identified in the leaves of grass species (181 metabolites) than shrubs (152 metabolites). In C. distans and A. sitosa leaves, there were 141 and 136 metabolites, respectively while 108 and 110 metabolites were found in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves (Tables S1–S4). The numbers of unique and common leaf metabolites that increased or decreased during watering treatment are presented in Venn diagrams (Fig. 2a–d).
Regulation of the significant leaf metabolites among the four treatment groups i.e. CK, T1, T2 and T3 (cutoff of 2-fold log2, p < 0.05) was compared. This analysis revealed that five metabolites in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves each, 20 in C. distans leaves and one in A. sitosa leaves were consistently up-regulated at T1, T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). Compared to CK, the down-regulated metabolites in the leaves of both shrubs were significantly higher at T3 (p < 0.05). The down-regulated metabolites in A. sitosa leaves were found much higher than C. distans leaves at T2 and T3, while only one metabolite in C. distans leaves was consistently down-regulated at T2 and T3 (Fig. 2c,d). The percentage of total number of down-regulated metabolites in the leaves of both shrubs was higher than up-regulated metabolites (Fig. 3a,c,e,g), whereas the percentage of down-regulated metabolites was 11.1% in C. spinarum leaves at T2 and 22.2% in B. brachycarpa leaves at T3 (Fig. 3a,c). Comparatively, the percentage of up-regulated metabolites in both C. distans and A. sitosa leaves was 53.1% and 12.8%, respectively at T1 (Fig. 3e,g). However, the percentage of down-regulated metabolites in A. sitosa leaves was 58.3% in T2 and 46.2% at T3 compared to CK (Fig. 3g).
It was noted that total relative content of metabolites decreased in the leaves of both shrubs with water additions (Fig. 3b,d). Compared to CK, the total content of organic acids in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves was decreased by 1.20 and 0.71 folds at T2, and 0.93 and 0.92 folds at T3 (p < 0.05), respectively. Conversely, in C. distans and A. sitosa leaves, amino acids, organic acid, carbohydrates, sugar alcohols and other metabolites contents increased at T1, but were lower than CK at T2 and T3 in A. sitosa (Fig. 3f,h). For instance, the total relative content of amino acids, organic acids, carbohydrates and sugar alcohols, and other metabolites in C. distans leaves increased by 1.55, 1.79, 1.55 and 1.71 folds, respectively, at T1 compared to CK. Whereas, compared to CK, the total content of amino acids, carbohydrates, organic acids, and sugar alcohols, and other metabolites in A. sitosa leaves increased by 0.82, 0.65, 0.59 and 0.70 folds at T1, but dropped up to 1.85, 2.12, 1.88 and 1.75 folds, respectively.
Variation in different metabolites due to water addition
It was observed that water additions had significant effects on the amino acid content in the leaves of both shrubs and grasses (Fig. 4a–d). Compared to CK, threonine and valine content was decreased significantly at T1, T2 and T3 in the leaves of both shrubs (Fig. 4a,b). However, the content of GABA and homoserine increased considerably at T1, T2 and T3 in C. spinarum leaves (p < 0.05). Compared to the CK, the relative content of alanine and serine increased by 3.55 and 1.32 folds, respectively, in C. spinarum leaves at T3 (p < 0.05) (Table 1). However, other amino acids did not show any significant change after water addition. In B. brachycarpa leaves, a decline was noted in the content of amino acids, except GABA and isoleucine at T1, T2 and T3 (Table 2). As shown in Table 3, water addition led to an increase in the relative content of eight amino acids in C. distans leaves, such as GABA, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, serine, methionine, phenylalanine and tyrosine at T1 (p < 0.05). Compared to CK, the relative content of glutamic acid in A. sitosa leaves (Table 4) increased by 1.07 fold at T1 (p < 0.05), but at T2 and T3, the relative content of cystathionine, oxoproline, methionine, phenylalanine and leucine decreased significantly (p < 0.05).
Total organic acids in the leaves of both shrubs decreased significantly with increasing water addition (p < 0.05). Individual organic acids contributing in the variations of total organic acids between two plant types were key metabolites in the tri-carboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and fatty acid synthesis. In C. spinarum leaves, caffeic acid, citric acid, elaidic acid, linoelaidic acid, malic acid, oleic acid, palmitic acid and sinapinic acid content was decreased (p < 0.05) in water treated samples (Table 1). Likewise, in B. brachycarpa leaves, a significant decrease was noted in acrylic acid, ascorbic acid, butyric acid, threonic acid, galacturonic acid, glycolic acid, lignoceric acid, oxalic acid, palmitic acid and pyruvic acid content at T1, T2 and T3 (p < 0.05) (Table 2). Compared to CK, the total organic acid content in the leaves of both grasses increased at T1. In C. distans leaves, the content of stearic acid, N-acetyl neuraminic acid, niacin, palmitic acid, malic acid, glycolic acid, α-linolenic acid, linoleic acid and itaconic acid increased considerably at T1, T2 and T3 (Fig. 4c). At T1, the relative content of gluconic acid, malonic acid, stearic acid, glyceric acid and propanoic acid in A. sitosa leaves was (p < 0.05) higher than CK (Fig. 4d). At both T2 and T3, the relative content of fumaric acid, propanoic acid, 5-O-feruloylquinic acid, glucuronic acid and niacin in A. sitosa leaves was relatively lower than CK (p < 0.05). Compared to the CK, a significant decrease (p < 0.05), in the content of quinic acid in C. distans and A. sitosa leaves was 0.73 and 2.01 folds at T2 and 1.21 and 1.49 folds at T3 respectively (Tables 3 and 4).
A total of 18 mono- and di-saccharides were identified in both shrubs (Tables 1 and 2). Compared to CK, a significant decrease was observed in galactose and rhamnose contents in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves at T1, T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). In B. brachycarpa leaves, total sugar content except maltose decreased at T1, T2 and T3, (Fig. 4b). For example, decrease in the relative content of turanose and glucose was 1.33 and 1.71 folds, 1.80 and 2.58 folds, 3.19 and 2.14 folds at T1, T2 and T3, respectively, as compared to CK (Table 2). Likewise, in C. spinarum leaves, lactose, mannose, galactose, maltose, tagatose and rhamnose reduced at T2 and T3 (Fig. 4a). In C. distans leaves (Fig. 4b), altrose, arabinose, fructose, glucose, β-gentiobiose, melibiose, rhamnose, erythrulose, ribose and turanose contents were higher at T1 as compared to CK; whereas, only β-gentiobiose was higher at T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). The relative content of β-D-glucopyranose in A. sitosa leaves improved up to 0.78 fold at T1 (p < 0.01). As shown in Table 4, total nine metabolites of sugar group were decreased significantly in A. sitosa leaves at T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). Such as, decrease in the relative content of turanose and trehalose was 2.08 and 1.82 folds at T3 as compared to CK.
Two important sugar alcohols: mannitol and myo-inositol were identified in the leaves of both shrubs (Table 1 and Table 2). Mannitol and pinitol exhibited a decreasing trend at T1 and T2 in the leaves of C. spinarum (p < 0.05). In addition, the relative content of myo-inositol in C. spinarum leaves increased by 0.11, 0.23 and 0.74 folds at T1, T2 and T3, respectively, as compared to CK (Table 1). Decrease in the sugar alcohol content of B. brachycarpa leaves was mainly attributed to decrease in the level of threitol and myo-inositol at T1, T2 and T3 (Fig. 4b). A total of 15 sugar alcohols were identified in grasses under different levels of watering treatment. It was noted that total relative content of sugar alcohols enhanced in C. distans leaves as a consequence of increase in the relative content of ethylene glycol, glycerol and aribitol at T1 (Fig. 4c). At T2 and T3, the relative content of mannitol, ribitol, theritol and arabitol was increased significantly compared to the CK (p < 0.05). In A. sitosa leaves, the relative content of arabitol increased by 0.77 fold at T2 and 0.92 fold at T3 as compared to CK (p < 0.05), whereas, other sugar alcohols did not show any significant change in response to water addition in A. sitosa (Table 4).
Likewise, different treatments of water also depicted noteworthy effects on the secondary metabolites in the leaves of shrubs and grasses (Fig. 4a–d). Compared to CK, a significant decline was observed for phloroglucinol, epicatechin, oleamide and 5-p-coumaroylquinic acid contents in C. spinarum leaves at T1, T2 and T3, respectively (p < 0.05), while an increasing trend was noted in the relative content of cadaverine, cerulenin, ethanolamine, 5-methyluridine and methyl galactoside at T3 (p < 0.05). In case of B. brachycarpa leaves, the relative content of α-tocopherol, oleamide, cerulenin, catechine, epicatechin and methyl galactoside decreased considerably at T1, T2 and T3 (p < 0.05), while bisabolene content was higher than CK (p < 0.05). Furthermore, the relative content of 2-deoxyadenosine, β-sitosterol, campesterol, magnolol, oleamide and stigmasterol increased significantly in C. distans leaves at T1 (Table 3); however no major changes were observed at T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). Compared to CK, the relative content of borneol and methyleugenol in C. distans leaves was increased by 4.03 fold and 1.38 fold at T2 and 3.71 fold and 1.63 fold at T3, respectively (Table 3). In A. sitosa leaves, the relative content of guanosine, oleamide, 5-methyluridine and stigmastanol was decreased considerably compared to CK at T2 and T3 (p < 0.05) (Fig. 4d).
Effect of watering treatments on the lipid composition
Like other metabolites, watering treatment depicted significant effects on the content of lipids and fatty acids in the leaves of both shrubs and grasses. As shown in Table 1, decrease in the content of total fatty acid in C. spinarum leaves was mainly due the decline in palmitic acid (C16:0), oleic acid (C18:1), elaidic acid (18:1T) and linoelaidic acid (C18:2T), at T1, T2 and T3 (p < 0.05). Fatty acids (FAs) are the building blocks of lipids and our results revealed that total relative lipid content of C. spinarum leaves was increased by 0.30 fold at T1, 0.41 fold at T2 and 0.26 fold at T3 (Fig. 5a). This enhancement was mainly due to increase in glycolipids (GL), sphingolipids (SP), sterol (ST), Phosphatidylcholine (PC), Phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), Phosphatidylglycerol (PG), Phosphatidylserine (PS) and neutral lipids (NL) after watering treatments (p < 0.05). In contrast, the relative content of palmitic acid (C16:0), linoleic acid (C18:2) and α-linolenic acid (C18:3) in B. brachycarpa leaves increased significantly at T1 (p < 0.05). However, lignoceric acid (C24:0) was decreased by 3.98, 2.38 and 2.81 folds at T1, T2 and T3, respectively (Table 2). Whereas, the total lipid content in B. brachycarpa leaves was decreased by 0.11 fold at T2 as compared to CK. In C. distans leaves, the relative content of palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), linoleic acid (C18:2), alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3) was improved by 1.59, 1.34, 1.52 and 1.07 folds at T2, and 1.55, 0.88, 1.47 and 1.50 folds at T3, respectively (Table 3). And only the lipid class SP of C. distans leaves was increased after water addition (Fig. 6a). In A. sitosa leaves, decline in the content of fatty acids was attributed to the decrease in myristic acid (C14:0), palmitic acid (C16:0), stearic acid (C18:0), linoleic acid (C18:2), alpha-linolenic acid (C18:3) and lignoceric acid (C24:0) at T2 and T3 (Table 4). The total lipid content was significantly increased by 0.30 fold at T2 and T3 each (Fig. 6b). The significant increase in the total lipid content in A. sitosa leaves was attributed to an increase in SP, PA, PI and PS with water addition (p < 0.05).
Effects of water additions on metabolic pathways
Metabolic profiling showed that water had considerably altered the metabolic pathways of the tri-carboxylic acid cycle of respiration, glycolysis, sugar metabolism, fatty acid synthesis, lipid metabolism, shikimic acid pathway and amino acid metabolism in the leaves of plant species under investigation. As demonstrated in Fig. 7a,b, TCA cycle was affected in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves by succinic acid, malic acid and citric acid, which were substantially decreased with the addition of water (p < 0.05). Additionally, watering treatment has also affected the amino acid metabolism by decreasing the valine and threonine contents in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves. Whereas, in grasses, watering treatment has strongly affected the shikimate pathway by decreasing the content of quinic acid and shikimic acid (Fig. 8a,b).
Discussions
Lipids constitute a major group of naturally occurring bio-molecules with various biological functions. Lipids are not only the structural components of cell membrane and cell wall (e.g., waxes and cutin), but also a rich source of energy that releases during the lipid metabolism32. They act as activators in many biochemical processes including cytoskeletal rearrangements, signal transduction, and membrane trafficking taking place in plant species33. And these processes are vital for cell survival, growth and differentiation, and for plant responses to environmental stresses32. In this study, we deliberate the role of leaf metabolites in plant species of karst areas under different levels of watering treatment.
Sphingolipids are essential components of plant cells and contribute significantly in the growth and development in plants34. It has been reported that sphingolipids are directly involved in different aspects of plant development and in response of plant species to environment changes including biotic or abiotic stimuli35. In general, lipid content increases with increasing water and decreases in drought stress. For instance, about 24% and 31% reduction in total lipids and phospholipids in plasma membranes isolated from sunflower seedlings grown under water stress has been reported by Navari‐Izzo, et al.36. Likewise, it has been reported that water deficit caused a significant decline in the total lipid content of leaf, which rapidly increased after rehydration, showing recovery in lipid biosynthetic activities37. A similar trend was observed during the present investigation, whereby a significant increase in sphingolipids content was noted in the leaves of all four plant species with different treatments of water (Figs 5 and 6). According to Xu, et al.38 waterlogging causes decrease in linoleic acid (C18:2), while increase in linolenic acid (C18:3), which indicates that waterlogging might affect the production of metabolites involved in lipid biosynthesis. This advocates that additional water enhances lipid biosynthesis in the leaves of in situ plant species of karst areas. Firstly, during the biosynthesis of sphingolipids, sphingoid backbone is produced by the condensation of serine and palmitoyl-CoA in the presence of heterodimeric enzyme serine palmitoyltransferase (SPT) as presented in Fig. 9. This SPT enzyme is capable of generating ROS by high level of sphingoid bases39. Moreover, in plants lacking ORM1 or ORM2 (negative regulators of de novo sphingolipid synthesis), the profile of sphingolipids enhanced the production of ROS on cell wall to strengthen the plant defense mechanism against the changes in environment40. Secondly, flooding causes decline in the availability of oxygen for plants, which affects vital cellular and physiological processes41. Recently, sphingolipid profiling has been explained as a protective strategy adopted by plants under hypoxia conditions to improve tolerance to environmental stresses. A consistent increase in ceramide and hydroxyl-ceramide levels was observed in Arabidopsis under hypoxia conditions42. The production of sphingolipids with long fatty acyl moieties in Arabidopsis is an adoptive strategy for hypoxic tolerance43. However, sphingolipid signaling under wet conditions is still unresolved. Therefore, it can be concluded that increasing precipitation could be a wet stress on drought-adapted-karst plants, and the compositions of extant plant communities could be changed with the invasion of water-loving plants.
Our results also showed that the overall leaf metabolism was significantly affected by water addition (p < 0.05). In both shrubs, total relative contents of amino acids, organic acids, carbohydrates and other secondary metabolites were decreased consistently. However, increase in the total relative contents of metabolites in the leaves of both grasses was observed at T1; but at T2 and T3, total metabolites were decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in A. sitosa leaves, while no changes were observed in C. distans at the same treatments.
Amino acids function as osmolytes for regulating water content in the cells and hereafter for water-dependent processes like nutrient transport, stomatal movements and response to environmental stresses44. Both shrubs and grasses showed diverse metabolic behaviors in the changes of amino acid. In the present study, decrease in the content of valine and threonine in the leaves of both shrubs was observed, which was probably associated either with the inhibition of protein degradation or enhanced protein biosynthesis because plant growth was enhanced clearly with water addition45 and inhibited with prolonged drought stress46. A study conducted by Sun, et al.45 reported that isoleucine, threonine and valine were accumulated during drought and decreased after re-watering. Furthermore, changes in valine, threonine and isoleucine may be related to gluconeogenesis and relative transmission products as these amino acids are associated with pyruvate metabolism46,47.
Majority of the grasses are sensitive to a wide range of abiotic stresses. In the present study, an unexpected increase in the level of amino acids at T1 was observed in the leaves of both grasses, which showed their sensitivity to water. This confirms that variability in the gene pool of grasses appears to be relatively small and may provide rare chances for major steps required to tolerate such changes48. Likewise, some abiotic stresses, i.e. heat stress, cold acclimation, water stress, salt stress and soil nutrient deficiency, increased protein degradation and led to accumulation of NH4+ in the plant tissues49. The accumulation of glutamic acid in the leaves of both grasses at T1 might reflect adaptive response to generate more GABA for wet stress. Glutamic acid and GABA, which can transform from each other directly serve as nitrogen resource50,51. Furthermore, glutamic acid is also involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis52,53.
Sugar acts as an important osmolyte to stabilize membrane integrity and cell turgidity in plants54. Sugar activates expression of stress-linked genes55,56, and also functions as energy source in plants to tolerate the environmental stress56. Plants use sugar for growth in making cell wall fibers as energy to make other metabolites in addition to essential nutrient. Soluble sugar contributes in plant metabolism and structural growth at cellular and organ levels57. Our study revealed a significant decrease (p < 0.05) in the total sugar content of C. spinarum, B. brachycarpa and A. sitosa leaves at T2 (0.53, 0.90 and 1.88 folds) and T3 (0.32, 0.87 and 1.48 folds), respectively. These findings coincide with Sun, et al.45, who reported a significant increase in the sugar content in drought affected plants but decrease in recovering plants during the watering treatments. Additionally, galactose and rhamnose contents were also decreased in the leaves of both shrubs, and this decrease reflects changes in the structural organization of the cell wall58. In contrast, the sugar content such as glucose, fructose and maltose was increased in C. distans leaves at T1. It is evident that the waterlogging-tolerant plant species have more carbohydrates than the sensitive species. However, up-regulated sugar transporters, enhanced phloem loading, and more soluble sugar segregation are the important mechanisms behind the waterlog tolerance59.
In plants, organic acids are involved to maintain the pH level, energy metabolism and osmotic potential under various environmental stresses60. In C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves, a significant decline was observed in the content of organic acid after watering treatments: 1.20 and 0.71 folds at T2 and 0.93 and 0.92 folds at T3, respectively, as compared to the CK (p < 0.05). López-Bucio, et al.61 reported a dramatic increase in the biosynthesis, accumulation and transportation of organic acids under water-stressed conditions. In this context, our results showed decreased levels of TCA metabolites such as succinic acid and malic acid in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves under well-water conditions. This confirms the hypothesis of Vanlerberghe62, that mitochondrial respiratory pathway such as the TCA cycle is very sensitive to abiotic stress. Waterlogging or flooding affects the activity of many enzymes i.e. aconitase, pyruvate dehydrogenase, NAD+-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenase, NAD+-dependent malate dehydrogenase, 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase, and NAD+-dependent malic enzyme, linked with TCA cycle which results in the inhibition of mitochondrial respiration63.
A significant decrease in the content of ascorbic acid in C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa leaves (1.60 and 1.63 folds at T2) was noted as compared to CK (Tables 1 and 2) which reflects down-regulation of the antioxidant system, amylase, and the seed germination rate64. These findings are comparable to Bartoli, et al.65 who reported 35% decrease in the ascorbic acid content of wheat leaves after exposure to water. Likewise, up to 30.1% decrease has been reported in the ascorbic acid of tomato plants grown under waterlogged treatment66. Additionally, Murshed, et al.67 reported that water stressed Solanum lycopersicon showed a consistent increase in the ascorbic acid content affecting the transcript levels of various antioxidant enzymes. However, ascorbic acid in leaf tissues is necessary for the regulation of the catalytic activity of ascorbate peroxidas, dehydroascorbate reductase, mono-dehydroascorbate reductase and glutathione reductase, resulting to the removal of H2O2 related molecules with the maintenance and regulation of the ascorbic acid pool68.
Our results clearly showed that quinic acid decreased significantly in the leaves of both grasses with water addition. These findings confirm that drought-treated plant species had higher concentrations of quinic acid14,69. Quinic acid is a key metabolite of the Shikimate pathway. This is an important pathway in the production of aromatic amino acids i.e. phenylalanine and tyrosine70, which are the precursors of flavonoids71. Phenolic compounds involved in altering the kinetics of peroxidation and their antioxidant function causes high reactivity as H-atom or electron donors72.
Organic alcohols including sugar alcohols or polyols i.e., glycol, glycerol, mannitol, myoinositol and sorbitol are often found to accumulate in many species under water-stress conditions73. Sugar alcohols frequently occur in many important crop plants functioning as primary photosynthetic products and playing major roles in translocation and storage74. A sugar alcohol, myo-inositol was differentially regulated in the leaves of both species under well-water conditions. Accumulation of myo-inositol in response to drought treatments has been reported in drought sensitive Glycine max75, Zea mays45 and Pinus pinaster76. Myo-inositol is the key metabolite and acts as a precursor of several other metabolites such as phosphatidylinositol, myo-inositol polyphosphate and a number of compatible solutes including pinitol, galactinol, raffinose-family oligosaccharides, and cell-wall polysaccharides77. In grasses, arabitol was found to be up-regulated with the increase of water supply. Watkinson78 reported that the accumulation of arabitol content in fungi played a significant role in osmotic adaptation.
Primary metabolites are involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites such as phenolics, terpenoids, steroids and alkaloids79. Though, secondary metabolites are not essentially involved in the optimal growth and developmental processes in plants; but their production decreases the palatability of the plant tissues80. In the present study, cadavarine content was increased up to 1.16, 1.16 and 1.23 folds at T1, T2 and T3, respectively, in C. spinarum leaves (Table 1). This cadaverine compound produces as lysine catabolite and is involved in plant growth and development, cell signaling, stress response, and insect defense81. The α-bisabolene and β-bisabolene was accumulated in B. brachycarpa leaves during the course of water periods. Bisabolenes are present in the essential oils of a wide variety of plants but their biological role is yet unclear. The content of borneol in C. distans leaves was increased by 2.73, 4.03 and 3.71 folds at T1, T2 and T3, respectively (Table 3). Borneol is a component of camphor oil and used as a remedy for several ailments82. β-amyrin was accumulated in A. sitosa leaves at T1. The main function of β-amyrin is still unknown in plants, but this molecule serves as an intermediate in the synthesis of more complex tri-terpene glycosides associated with plant defense mechanism83.
Based on our results, watering treatments had significant effects on leaf metabolism: a significant decrease in the content of leaf metabolites in both shrubs with increasing precipitation from CK to T3, and in contrast, both of the grass species had higher leaf metabolites at T1. Firstly, the opposite responses of grasses and shrubs to variation in water supply could be associated with contrasting root distributions and competitive interactions84. Deep rooted shrubs could use stored water in deep soil layers85,86, whereas grasses have relatively shallow roots and use soil water located in upper layers of the soil87. Therefore, variations in the available resources may result in the competitive balance between the two different types of plants85. Secondly, it could also be due to the different growing pattern of grasses and shrubs in a year cycle due to variations in soil moisture content. In this study, both warm-season grasses and broadleaf shrubs initiate new growth in drought season with warming temperatures. During this period, shrubs may grow faster than grasses due to changes in soil moisture content under well-water conditions. Because, the growing point in shrubs is located at the tip of the shoots while grasses has growing point at the base88. However, the optimum air temperature may help to break bud dormancy in all the tea varieties89. He concluded that air temperature is the best treatment for breaking dormancy, enhance growth and ultimate yields of tea. In our study, the daily air temperature increased and reached a peak between 8:00 and 16:00 (Fig. S2). In Poaceae, species exhibiting summer dormancy include wild grasses such as Poa bulbosa90 and Dactylis glomerata91. These species exhibit a complete dormancy since they cease growth completely and their meristems are subjected endogenously induced dehydration even under summer irrigation92.
In conclusion, increasing precipitation in the karst areas of southwest China affects the leaf metabolism of plant species in this region. Based on consistent increase in the sphingolipids content in both grasses and shrubs, increasing soil moisture could be a wet-stress on these species due to their adaptation for drought conditions. Moreover, plant species under investigation have differentially responded to moisture variation in terms of metabolomics. Our results suggest that the growth of plant species might be compressed and the compositions of plant communities could be altered with changing climate in future. It can be concluded that increasing precipitation could be a wet stress on drought-adapted-karst plants, and the compositions of plant communities could be altered with the invasion of water-loving plants.
Materials and Methods
Description of Study area
This research is a part of the ongoing experiment I at Ecological Research Station in Jianshui County (23°59′N, 102°53′E), southeastern Yunnan, southwestern China (Fig. S3). A pot experiment was conducted in a natural grass and shrub mixed community which is located at the Karst Ecosystem Research Station. Climate of study area falls into typical subtropical monsoon type with two distinct seasons: the warm-wet season (about 85% of annual rainfall, June to October) and the dry-cool season (about 15% of annual precipitation, November to May). The long term mean annual precipitation (1981–2010) is 135 mm, with rainfall from April to May accounting for about 17.6% (http://data.cma.cn/en/?r=data/weatherBk). Mean annual air temperature of the study area is 19.8 °C, and mean annual precipitation is 805 mm with the lowest annual precipitation of 475 mm and the highest of 1017 mm), while average annual evaporation capacity is 2297 mm. The sunshine or radiation duration is one of the key driving forces that impact the planet's ecosystem, climate change and human activities93. The data from a nearby meteorological stations showed that annual average precipitation days (≥0.1 mm) are 25 during the study period. The annual average sunshine duration is 426.5 hours. The present study was done at the end of dry season, so it is likely that sunshine duration in this season was greater than wet season in all treatment plots.
In karst ecosystems, the lime soil formed from a carbonate rocks and the mean pH of the top soil is 6.29 (1 M KCL). In the study area, vegetation and soil are under serious degradation due to human disturbances which causes carbonate-rocks in the barren land. The zonal vegetation is subtropical evergreen broadleaf forests with dominant flora including Carrisa spinarum, Bauhinia brachycarpa, Osteomeles anthyllidifolia, Myrsine africana, Dodonaea viscosa, Arundinella sitosa, Cymbopogon distans, Barleria cristata, Elsholtzia ciliate and Pinus yunnanensis94. In the degraded areas, drought-resistant grasses and shrubs are dominant plants, e.g., perennial grasses, C. distans and A. sitosa, and two deciduous shrubs, C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa.
Experimental design and data collection
The field experiment was based on precipitation manipulating design which consist of a randomized complete block (RCBD) with five blocks. Rainfall amounts were manipulated with appropriate methods described by Zhang, et al.95, who used the apparatus to monitoring the impact of rain redistribution on vegetation and soil traits. Totally, there were 20 plots, each 3 × 3 m in size, with five replications. Each block included four treatments of water addition, CK, T1, T2 and T3, indicating 0%, +20%, +40% and +60% relative to the monthly mean precipitation, respectively (Fig. S4). The irrigation system was installed from the beginning of April month. For each month, the monthly mean precipitation was calculated based on the climate data of 2010–2017 (Fig. S5). The natural precipitation was 143 mm at the end of dry season (from early April to late May) in 2017 (Fig. S6). Watering treatments of +20%, +40% and +60% were established by addition of rainfall and their actual manipulated precipitations were 172 mm, 200 mm and 228 mm, respectively. The plots in the control treatment (CK) received ambient levels of precipitation. In each month, the amount of irrigated water was sprayed three times to the relevant plots in the morning of every 10th day. The soil water content (SWC%) and soil pH was measured at the end of irrigation treatments (Fig. S7). The SWC% showed significant variations among precipitation treatments.
In this study, two dominant grass species (C. distans and A. sitosa) and two shrub species (C. spinarum and B. brachycarpa), each growing in all plots, were selected as study plants (Fig. S8). Plant leaves were sampled at the end of irrigation treatments in May (the drought season). During the sampling time, the daily air temperature increased and reached a peak between 8:00 and 16:00 (Fig. S2). The composite samples of 5 plants of each targeted species were collected from each plot. The live, green leaves were picked at the middle part of canopy from four targeted species. Leaf samples were put into liquid nitrogen tank, and transported to the laboratory with the dry-ice-box method.
Soil water content and pH measurement
Soil pH was determined with 1:5 soil: 1 M KCl solution using a digital pH Meter (FE20/EL20; Mettler Toledo, Shanghai, China). Oven-drying method was used to measure the soil water content (SWC%). Soil samples were dried in oven at 105 °C for 48 h and SWC% was calculated as:
where W1 is the weight of the container plus wet soil, W2 indicates the weight of the container plus dry soil and W3 indicates weight of the container.
Metabolite extraction and derivation
Fresh leaf samples were collected from each plot, then immediately shifted to dry ice box and stored in laboratory at −80 °C for further studies. Metabolites profiling was achieved using Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS, Agilent, USA) and liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS). Different metabolites were extracted following the method as explained by Wu et al.96 and Du et al.97 with slight modifications. Two sets of 50-mL centrifuge tubes were tagged: set A for GC-MS analysis and set B for LC-MS analysis. Frozen leaves were lyophilized and ground to a fine powder using a ball-mill. Each tube of set A: received 100 mg of the powdered sample, whereas, 0.5 mL methanol-chloroform (3:1) and 16.6 μL 2-chloro-phenylalanine solution (3.0 mg/mL water) were added to each tube as an internal standard. This mixture was grinded at 60.0 HZ for 80 s and centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. Next, 0.2 mL of mixture from each tube of set A was transferred to the corresponding tube of set B. Then 0.3 mL polar phase (aqueous and organic) of set A was collected independently into 1.5 mL HPLC vials and dried for 4 h in a bench top centrifugal concentrator (Labconco Corporation, Kansas City, MI). After drying the polar phase, methoximation and trimethyl silylation was carried out by incubating the dried fraction at 37 °C for 1.5 h with 80.0 μL methoximine hydrochloride (15 mg/mL in pyridine). Then, the dried fraction was incubated with 80.0 μL TMCS (BSTFA: TMCS = 99: 1) at 70 °C for 1.0 h.
Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis
The derivatization of samples was carried out with a PerkinElmer gas chromatograph and Turbo Mass-Autosystem XLmass spectrometer (PerkinElmer lnc, Waltham, MS). Accurately measured 1 μL aliquot of each sample was injected into a DB-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm) (Agilent JW Scientific, Folsom, CA). After 5 min, the GC oven temperature was adjusted at 80 °C; and after injection for 2 min, the oven temperature was raised up to 280 °C at 5 °C/min, and finally persisted at 280 °C for 27 min. The injector temperature was set at 280 °C and for the ion source at 200 °C. Helium was used as the carrier gas at a constant rate of 1.0 mL/min. Measurements were achieved with electron impact ionization (70 eV) in a full scan mode (m/z 30–550). The levels of each metabolite were identified using LECO Chroma TOF 4.3X coupled with NIST 12 library (National Institute of Standards and Technology, PerkinElmer lnc., Waltham, USA).
UPLC-QTOF-MS/MS analysis
UPLC was performed with a Waters ACQUITY UPLC –I class system and VION IMS QTOF MASS spectrometer (Waters Corp., MA, USA) equipped with a binary pump, vacuum degasser, auto-sampler, and a column oven. Temperature of the column was maintained at 45 °C and separation was achieved on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC BEH C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm, 1.7 µm, waters). The mobile phase consisted of water and acetonitrile, both containing 0.1% (v/v) formic acid and used as mobile phases A and B, respectively. The linear gradients for UPLC-HPLC chromatographic conditions transplantation was 5% ~100% B in 15 min. The flow rate was 0.4 mL/min. The sample injection volume was 0.1~1 µL. The analysis time was 20 min.
Mass spectrometry analysis was performed on a VION IMS QTQF MASS spectrometer (Waters Corp., MA, USA) equipped with LockSpray ion source and was operated in positive and negative electrospray ionization (ESI) mode. Two independent scans with different collision energies were acquired during the running cycle: a low energy scan (CE, 4 eV) and a high energy (CE, 15–40 eV) for fragmentation. The functions settings were set at a scan time of 0.25 s and scan range 50 to 1000 amu. Argon (≥99.999%) was used as collision-induced dissociation (CID) gas. The capillary voltage and cone voltage were set at 2000 V and 40 V, respectively. The source temperature was 115 °C. The desolvation gas flow was set to 900L/h at temperature of 450 °C. Nitrogen (>99.5%) was employed as desolvation and cone gas. For lock mass correction, a 250 ng/mL standard solution of leucine-enkephalin in acetonitrile/water/formic acid (50:49.9:0.1, v/v/v) was continuously infused (5 μL/min) through the reference probe and scanned every 30 s. All data was examined using an accurate mass screening workflow within UNIFI informatics platform from Waters Corporation.
Data analysis
GC-MS and HPLC-MS data was analyzed by Agilent's Mass Profiler Professional Software (MPP). MPP was used to exploit the high information content of MS data and determine the relationships among four watering treatment groups. We used a univariate analysis (one-way ANOVA) to test the significant differences and fold changes of the metabolites among four levels of watering treatments. As the multivariate methods take all the variables into consideration, we performed the multivariate ordination principal component analysis (PCA) to detect patterns of sample ordination in the metabolomic variables. The PC scores of the cases were subjected to one-way ANOVAs to determine the statistical differences among groups. The heat map was generated based on normalized log response value of the metabolite levels, showing significant metabolites selected by an analysis of variance (ANOVA) test using a significance level of p ≤ 0.05. The samples were arranged according to their watering treatments levels i.e. CK, T1, T2 and T3. The fold change of significant leaf metabolites among four groups CK, T1, T2 and T3 (cutoff of 2-fold log2, p < 0.05) was calculated. The pathway analysis was performed using Agilent's Mass Profiler Professional Software (MPP) for the identified significant metabolites using Arabidopsis thaliana pathway libraries. The wiki pathways (https://www.wikipathways.org) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes pathway database (http://www.genome.ad.jp/kegg/pathway.html) were also used for the metabolites.
For statistical analysis, we used SAS version 9.1 to perform ANOVAs and determine the effect of watering treatments and error associated with the experiment with five replications and four treatments as random effects. To identify significant differences among treatments, a mean comparison was carried out by using Duncan's multiple range with least significant difference (p < 0.05) test where error mean square was used to estimate the standard error (±SE) of differences between means. All graphical data analyses were performed using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA), SPSS 19.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), Sigma Plot 10.0 (Systat software, Inc., 2006) and PAST 3.2098.
Data Availability
All analyzed data are included in this article and its Supplementary Information files.
References
Liu, C. Biogeochemical processes and cycling of nutrients in the earth’s surface: cycling of nutrients in soil–plant systems of karstic environments, Southwest China. 618 (Science Press, Beijing, China, 2009).
Liu, C., Wei, Y., Liu, Y. & Guo, K. Biomass of canopy and shrub layers of karst forests in Puding, Guizhou, China. J. Plant Ecol. 33, 698–705 (2009).
Zhu, S. Q. Ecological research on karst forest. Vol. 2 (Guizhou Science and Technology Press, Guiyang, China, 1997).
Liu, C. et al. Comparative ecophysiological responses to drought of two shrub and four tree species from karst habitats of southwestern China. Trees 25, 537–549 (2011).
Boutraa, T., Akhkha, A., Al-Shoaibi, A. A. & Alhejeli, A. M. Effect of water stress on growth and water use efficiency (WUE) of some wheat cultivars (Triticum durum) grown in Saudi Arabia. J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 3, 39–48 (2010).
Yongrsquo, L., Quanwen, D., Zhiguo, C. & Deyong, Z. Effect of drought on water use efficiency, agronomic traits and yield of spring wheat landraces and modern varieties in Northwest China. Afr. J. Agri. Res. 5, 1598–1608 (2010).
Wenhua, L. & Jianhua, C. Karst Ecosystem: An Ecosystem on Carbonate Rocks. J. Resour. Ecol. 6, 197–198 (2015).
Loreti, E., van Veen, H. & Perata, P. Plant responses to flooding stress. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 33, 64–71 (2016).
Piao, S. et al. The impacts of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 467, 43 (2010).
Qin, N. et al. Impacts of climate change on regional hydrological regimes of the Wujiang River watershed in the Karst area, Southwest China. Geoenviron.Disasters 2, 10 (2015).
Penuelas, J. & Sardans, J. Ecological metabolomics. Chem. Ecol. 25, 305–309 (2009).
Sardans, J., Penuelas, J. & Rivas-Ubach, A. Ecological metabolomics: overview of current developments and future challenges. Chemoecology 21, 191–225 (2011).
Dunn, W. B. & Ellis, D. I. Metabolomics: current analytical platforms and methodologies. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 24, 285–294 (2005).
Gargallo Garriga, A. et al. Warming differentially influences the effects of drought on stoichiometry and metabolomics in shoots and roots. New Phytol. 207, 591–603 (2015).
Gargallo Garriga, A. et al. Opposite metabolic responses of shoots and roots to drought. Sci. Rep. 4, 6829 (2014).
Rivas‐Ubach, A. et al. Drought enhances folivory by shifting foliar metabolomes in Q uercus ilex trees. New Phytol. 202, 874–885 (2014).
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Automated rainfall manipulation system: a reliable and inexpensive tool for ecologists. Ecosphere 4, 1–10 (2013).
Zhou, W.-l et al. Plant diversity and its maintenance in Populus euphratica riparian forests in the Ejina Oasis, China. For. Stud. China. 12, 55–61 (2010).
Yang, T., Chen, X., Xu, C.-Y. & Zhang, Z.-C. Spatio-temporal changes of hydrological processes and underlying driving forces in Guizhou region, Southwest China. Stoch. Env. Res. Risk A. 23, 1071 (2009).
Zhao, W., Chang, X. & He, Z. Responses of distribution pattern of desert riparian forests to hydrologic process in Ejina oasis. Sci. China Ser. D: Earth Sci. 47, 21–31 (2004).
Devoto, M., Medan, D., Roig Alsina, A. & Montaldo, N. H. Patterns of species turnover in plant‐pollinator communities along a precipitation gradient in Patagonia (Argentina). Austral Ecol. 34, 848–857 (2009).
Jain, A., Sudheer, K. & Srinivasulu, S. Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrol. Process. 18, 571–581 (2004).
Winter, T. C. Ground water and surface water: a single resource. Vol. 1139 (Diane Publishing Inc., 1998).
Zenner, E. K. et al. Riparian vegetation response to gradients in residual basal area with harvesting treatment and distance to stream. For. Ecol. Manage. 283, 66–76 (2012).
Chen, Y. et al. Ground-water level affects plant species diversity along the lower reaches of the Tarim river, Western China. J. Arid Environ. 66, 231–246 (2006).
Chen, Y. et al. Physiological response of natural plants to the change of groundwater level in the lower reaches of Tarim River, Xinjiang. Prog. Nat. Sci. 14, 975–983 (2004).
Denmead, O. T. & Shaw, R. H. Availability of Soil Water to Plants as Affected by Soil Moisture Content and Meteorological Conditions 1. Agron. J. 54, 385–390 (1962).
Sinclair, T. & Ludlow, M. Influence of soil water supply on the plant water balance of four tropical grain legumes. Funct. Plant Biol. 13, 329–341 (1986).
Marschner, H. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. 889 (Academic Press, London, 1986).
Sala, O. E., Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. & Howarth, R. W. Introduction. Methods in ecosystem science: progress, tradeoffs, and limitations in Methods in ecosystem science (ed. Sala, O. E., Jackson, R. B., Mooney, H. A. & Howarth, R. W.) 1–3 (Springer, 2000).
Sharma, S., Dixit, R. & Tripathi, H. Water management in potato (Solanum tuberosum). Indian J. Agron. 38, 68–73 (1993).
Welti, R. et al. Plant lipidomics: discerning biological function by profiling plant complex lipids using mass spectrometry. Front. Biosci. 12, 2494–506 (2007).
Wang, X. Lipid signaling. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 7, 329–336 (2004).
Chen, M. et al. The essential nature of sphingolipids in plants as revealed by the functional identification and characterization of the Arabidopsis LCB1 subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase. Plant Cell. 18, 3576–3593 (2006).
Michaelson, L. V., Napier, J. A., Molino, D. & Faure, J.-D. Plant sphingolipids: Their importance in cellular organization and adaption. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids. 1861, 1329–1335 (2016).
Navari‐Izzo, F., Quartacci, M. F., Melfi, D. & Izzo, R. Lipid composition of plasma membranes isolated from sunflower seedlings grown under water‐stress. Physiol. Plant. 87, 508–514 (1993).
Gigon, A. et al. Effect of drought stress on lipid metabolism in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana (ecotype Columbia). Ann. Bot. 94, 345–351 (2004).
Xu, M. et al. The effect of waterlogging on yield and seed quality at the early flowering stage in Brassica napus L. Field Crops Res. 180, 238–245 (2015).
Rojas, C. M., Senthil-Kumar, M., Tzin, V. & Mysore, K. Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Front. Plant Sci. 5, 17 (2014).
Li, J. et al. Orosomucoid proteins interact with the small subunit of serine palmitoyltransferase and contribute to sphingolipid homeostasis and stress responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell. 28, 3038–3051 (2016).
Ali, U., Li, H., Wang, X. & Guo, L. Emerging roles of sphingolipid signaling in plant response to biotic and abiotic stresses. Mol. Plant. 11, 1328–1343 (2018).
Xie, L. et al. Unsaturation of very-long-chain ceramides protects plant from hypoxia-induced damages by modulating ethylene signaling in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 11, e1005143 (2015).
Xie, L. et al. Arabidopsis acyl‐C o A‐binding protein ACBP 3 participates in plant response to hypoxia by modulating very‐long‐chain fatty acid metabolism. Plant J. 81, 53–67 (2015).
Rai, V. Role of amino acids in plant responses to stresses. Biol. Plant. 45, 481–487 (2002).
Sun, C. et al. Metabolic and growth responses of maize to successive drought and re-watering cycles. Agric. Water Manage. 172, 62–73 (2016).
Zhang, J. et al. Dynamic metabonomic responses of tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) plants to salt stress. J. Proteome Res. 10, 1904–1914 (2011).
Guo, R. et al. Metabolic responses to drought stress in the tissues of drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive wheat genotype seedlings. AoB Plants 10, ply016 (2018).
Tester, M. & Bacic, A. Abiotic stress tolerance in grasses. From model plants to crop plants in Plant Physiol. Vol. 137 (American Society of Plant Biologists, 2005).
Li, B. et al. Ammonium stress in Arabidopsis: signaling, genetic loci, and physiological targets. Trends Plant Sci. 19, 107–114 (2014).
Shelp, B. J., Bown, A. W. & McLean, M. D. Metabolism and functions of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Trends Plant Sci. 4, 446–452 (1999).
Bouche, N. & Fromm, H. GABA in plants: just a metabolite? Trends Plant Sci. 9, 110–115 (2004).
Burg, M. B. & Ferraris, J. D. Intracellular organic osmolytes: function and regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 283, 7309–7313 (2008).
Beale, S. I., Gough, S. P. & Granick, S. Biosynthesis of delta-aminolevulinic acid from the intact carbon skeleton of glutamic acid in greening barley. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 72, 2719–2723 (1975).
Seki, M., Umezawa, T., Urano, K. & Shinozaki, K. Regulatory metabolic networks in drought stress responses. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 10, 296–302 (2007).
Xue, G.-P., McIntyre, C. L., Glassop, D. & Shorter, R. Use of expression analysis to dissect alterations in carbohydrate metabolism in wheat leaves during drought stress. Plant Mol. Biol. 67, 197–214 (2008).
Sheen, J., Zhou, L. & Jang, J.-C. Sugars as signaling molecules. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2, 410–418 (1999).
Couée, I., Sulmon, C., Gouesbet, G. & El Amrani, A. Involvement of soluble sugars in reactive oxygen species balance and responses to oxidative stress in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 57, 449–459 (2006).
Le Gall, H. et al. Cell wall metabolism in response to abiotic stress. Plants 4, 112–166 (2015).
Ferner, E., Rennenberg, H. & Kreuzwieser, J. Effect of flooding on C metabolism of flood-tolerant (Quercus robur) and non-tolerant (Fagus sylvatica) tree species. Tree Physiol. 32, 135–145 (2012).
Jones, D. L. Organic acids in the rhizosphere–a critical review. Plant Soil 205, 25–44 (1998).
López-Bucio, J. & Nieto-Jacobo, M. A. F. Ramı́Rez-Rodrı́Guez, V. & Herrera-Estrella, L. Organic acid metabolism in plants: from adaptive physiology to transgenic varieties for cultivation in extreme soils. Plant Sci. 160, 1–13 (2000).
Vanlerberghe, G. Alternative Oxidase: A Mitochondrial Respiratory Pathway to Maintain Metabolic and Signaling Homeostasis during Abiotic and Biotic Stress in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 14, 6805–6847 (2013).
Rocha, M. et al. Glycolysis and the tricarboxylic acid cycle are linked by alanine aminotransferase during hypoxia induced by waterlogging of Lotus japonicus. Plant Physiol. 152, 1501–1513 (2010).
Pavet, V. et al. Ascorbic acid deficiency activates cell death and disease resistance responses in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 139, 1291–1303 (2005).
Bartoli, C. G. et al. Drought and watering-dependent oxidative stress: effect on antioxidant content in Triticum aestivum L. leaves. J. Exp. Bot. 50, 375–383 (1999).
Rasheed, R. et al. Glycine betaine counteracts the inhibitory effects of waterlogging on growth, photosynthetic pigments, oxidative defence system, nutrient composition, and fruit quality in tomato. J. Hortic. Sci. Biotechol. 93, 385–391 (2018).
Murshed, R., Lopez-Lauri, F. & Sallanon, H. Effect of water stress on antioxidant systems and oxidative parameters in fruits of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L, cv. Micro-tom). Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plants 19, 363–378 (2013).
Noctor, G. & Foyer, C. H. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 49, 249–279 (1998).
Rivas-Ubach, A. et al. Strong relationship between elemental stoichiometry and metabolome in plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, 4181–4186 (2012).
Herrmann, K. M. & Weaver, L. M. The shikimate pathway. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 50, 473–503 (1999).
Tzin, V. & Galili, G. New insights into the shikimate and aromatic amino acids biosynthesis pathways in plants. Mol. Plant 3, 956–972 (2010).
Rice-Evans, C., Miller, N. & Paganga, G. Antioxidant properties of phenolic compounds. Trends Plant Sci. 2, 152–159 (1997).
Merewitz, E. Chemical priming-induced drought stress tolerance in plants in Drought Stress Tolerance in Plants Vol. 1 (ed. Mohammad, A. H. et al.) 77–103 (Springer, 2016).
Perata, P. & Alpi, A. Ethanol-induced injuries to carrot cells: the role of acetaldehyde. Plant Physiol. 95, 748–752 (1991).
Silvente, S., Sobolev, A. P. & Lara, M. Metabolite adjustments in drought tolerant and sensitive soybean genotypes in response to water stress. PLoS One 7, e38554 (2012).
de Miguel, M. et al. Organ-specific metabolic responses to drought in Pinus pinaster Ait. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 102, 17–26 (2016).
Valluru, R. & Van den Ende, W. Myo-inositol and beyond–emerging networks under stress. Plant Sci. 181, 387–400 (2011).
Watkinson, S. C. Physiology and Adaptation in The Fungi (Third Edition) (eds Sarah, C. W., Lynne, B. & Nicholas, P. M.) 141–187 (Elsevier, 2015).
Hartmann, T. Diversity and variability of plant secondary metabolism: a mechanistic view in Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Insect-Plant Relationships. 177–188 (Springer, 1996).
Boege, K. & Marquis, R. J. Facing herbivory as you grow up: the ontogeny of resistance in plants. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20, 441–448 (2005).
Tomar, P. C., Lakra, N. & Mishra, S. Cadaverine: a lysine catabolite involved in plant growth and development. Plant Signal. Behav. 8, e25850 (2013).
Bakkali, F., Averbeck, S., Averbeck, D. & Idaomar, M. Biological effects of essential oils–a review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 46, 446–475 (2008).
Thimmappa, R. et al. Triterpene biosynthesis in plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 65, 225–257 (2014).
Gherardi, L. A. & Sala, O. E. Enhanced precipitation variability decreases grass-and increases shrub-productivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 12735–12740 (2015).
Weltzin, J. F. & McPherson, G. R. Implications of precipitation redistribution for shifts in temperate savanna ecotones. Ecology 81, 1902–1913 (2000).
Sala, O., Lauenroth, W. & Parton, W. Long‐term soil water dynamics in the shortgrass steppe. Ecology 73, 1175–1181 (1992).
Jackson, R. et al. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 108, 389–411 (1996).
Schacht, W., Sandall, L. & Fick, W. Perennial Plant Response to Defoliation - An Overview. (Department of Agronomy and Horticulture, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, USA, 2005).
Shah, S. A. et al. Effect of Temperature in Breaking Bud Dormancy in Tea. Am.-Eurasian J. Agric. Environ. Sci. 16, 903–909 (2016).
Volaire, F., Conéjero, G. & Lelièvre, F. Drought survival and dehydration tolerance in Dactylis glomerata and Poa bulbosa. Funct. Plant Biol. 28, 743–754 (2001).
Volaire, F. Drought survival, summer dormancy and dehydrin accumulation in contrasting cultivars of Dactylis glomerata. Physiol. Plant. 116, 42–51 (2002).
Volaire, F. & Norton, M. Summer dormancy in perennial temperate grasses. Ann. Bot. 98, 927–933 (2006).
Li, Z. Study on climate change in Southwestern China. (Springer, 2014).
Pang, D. et al. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Two Typical Plantations in the Karst Ecosystem of Southwestern China. Forests 9, 56 (2018).
Zhang, R. et al. Effect of manipulated precipitation during the growing season on soil respiration in the desert-grasslands in Inner Mongolia, China. Catena 176, 73–80 (2019).
Wu, D. et al. Ionomic responses and correlations between elements and metabolites under salt stress in wild and cultivated barley. Plant Cell Physiol. 54, 1976–1988 (2013).
Du, H. et al. Differential metabolic responses of perennial grass Cynodon transvaalensis × Cynodon dactylon (C4) and Poa Pratensis (C3) to heat stress. Physiol. Plant. 141, 251 (2011).
Hammer, Ø., Harper, D. & Ryan, P. Paleontological statistics software: package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 1, 9 (2001).
Acknowledgements
This work was financially supported by the National Key R and D Programme of China (2016YFC0502501). The chemical analyses were carried out at the Analytical and Testing Centre of Shanghai Jiao Tong University. We thank Kehou Chen, Huimin Tao, and numerous station workers and interns for their outstanding help during the field work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
C.L. designed the study; M.U., N.S. and C.L. collected field samples and data; W.Y., M.U., C.L., J.W., J.Y., J.Z., and H.D. analyzed the data; M.U and C.L. wrote the manuscript; A.M.A. and C.L. review the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Umair, M., Sun, N., Du, H. et al. Differential metabolic responses of shrubs and grasses to water additions in arid karst region, southwestern China. Sci Rep 9, 9613 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46083-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46083-1
This article is cited by
-
Contrasting effects of experiencing temporally heterogeneous light availability versus homogenous shading on plant subsequent responses to light conditions
BMC Plant Biology (2023)
-
Responses of plants to temporally heterogeneous water conditions in species from different ranges of habitats
Tropical Ecology (2023)
-
Plant adaptability in karst regions
Journal of Plant Research (2021)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.