Article | Open | Published:

Arsenic accumulation in lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes and risk associated with the consumption of grains

Abstract

Arsenic (As) is a toxic metalloid. As phyto-toxicity is manifested by its accumulation in different tissue types and subsequent growth inhibition in plants. Despite the vital role of leguminous crops in providing proteins to human diets, a little is known about the As accumulation in lentil. In this study, the rate of As uptake and transport from soil to root, shoot and grain of lentil as well as associated risks with the consumption of As contaminated food were examined. Biomass accumulation of lentil genotypes pardina, red chief and precoz drastically decreased when treated with As at 6 mg kg−1 concentration in comparison to 0 and 3 mg kg−1 As. Quantification of As concentrations following different treatment periods showed that As accumulation in roots and shoots of 0, 3 and 6 mg kg−1 As-treated lentil genotypes was statistically different. Arsenic content in grains of red chief genotype was found significantly lower than pardina and precoz. Moreover, As transport significantly increased in roots and shoots compared to the grains. Due to the high concentrations of As in biomass of lentil genotypes, animal as well as human health risk might be associated with the consumption of the As contaminated legume crops.

Introduction

Arsenic (As) is a carcinogenic metalloid released into the environment from both natural and anthropogenic sources. The transfer of As in soil-plant systems represents one of the principal pathways for human exposure to As1. In particular, As contamination in food crops through irrigation water poses a serious threat to food safety. A recent cohort study showed that daily consumption of 500 g cooked rice containing As content above 200 µg/kg can result in genotoxic effects on human2. The scale of this environmental poisoning has been expanding year after year, and is greater than any other hazards. The impact of As poisoning is thought beyond the catastrophe relating to the accidents at Bhopal, India, in 1984, and Chernobyl, Ukraine, in 19863. Although the first As-poisoned (arsenicosis) patient was seen in 1983 in West Bengal, India, it came into consideration quite lately and the cause was confirmed in 1993 in Chapai Nawabganj, Bangladesh4. So far, As contamination has affected 59 out of 64 districts of Bangladesh, where As levels have been found above the nationally accepted limit (50 ppb). It is estimated that about 35 to 77 million inhabitants of Bangladesh are at risk through the contamination of As in water and food crops5. At global scale, more than 100 million people have been estimated to be chronically exposed to As from drinking water. Obviously, the situation is devastating in Bangladesh, India and Pakistan6,7,8. This toxic element (As) is found naturally in all soils throughout the world9,10. It is also released into an environment due to human and natural activities. Ground water, mineral ore, geothermal processes and pesticides are the main source of As11. Arsenic was detected in food crops grown in As-contaminated soil and/or irrigated with As-contaminated ground water12. Contamination of groundwater by As in the Deltaic region, particularly in the Gangetic alluvium of Bangladesh and part of West Bengal, has become one of the world’s most important natural catastrophes13. Since many decades, As contaminated groundwater is being used for drinking as well as irrigation, leading to the contamination of food chain14. Accumulating evidence suggests that As in rice, lentil and other food sources could contribute to about 30% of the total As ingestion15.

Lentil is one of the most ancient cultivated legume crops16. Bangladesh, Canada, China, India, Iran, Nepal, Syria, Turkey, and USA are the major lentil growing countries in the world17. The total cultivated area in the world is around 4.6 million hectares producing 4.2 million tons of lentil with an average yield of 1.095ton ha−118. Lentils provide protein and fiber, as well as many vitamins and minerals, such as iron, zinc, folate, and magnesium. In addition, the phytochemicals, saponins, and tannins found in lentil possess antioxidant and anti-carcinogenic properties, indicating that lentils may have significant anti-cancer effects19.

Among all lentil growing regions, many of lentil growing countries are highly contaminated by As. Specifically, west Bengal and Bangladesh combined rank the second largest As contaminated region in the world. About 8% of the area in the United States of America is As affected11. Despite this, the As element is not-essential and generally toxic to many food crops including lentil crops. Lentil roots are typically the first tissue to be exposed to As, where the metalloid inhibits root extension and proliferation. This metal translocated to the shoot and grain and it can be rigorously constrained of physiological growth by slowing or arresting growth and biomass accumulation, as well as compromising plant reproductive capacity20. Osmotic as well as oxidative stress increases in food crops due to the accumulation of As in biomass. Moreover, lipid peroxidation, electrolyte leakage, H2O2 accumulation, root oxidizability and the activities of antioxidant enzymes change drastically in response to As stress21. Arsenic-stressed plants show reduced growth and pigment content. Particularly, total chlorophyll, catalase and ascorbic acid content drastically reduced in food crops due to the imposition of excess metals (As)22.

High concentrations of As interfere with critical metabolic processes, which may lead to the death of lentil plants23,24,25,26. Arsenic ingestion can lead to serious diseases, including cancers27,28,29. However, this metalloid As is universal in the environment due to geological and human activities. Arsenic in the soil is taken up by plants, accumulated in the edible parts (such as lentil grains) and is further expended by humans and other organisms higher in the food chain29. Currently, millions of people, especially in South and South-east Asia, are at risk for exposure to food that is contaminated with As30. Excessive consumption of As from food crops leads to As accumulation in tissues and inhibits cellular enzyme activities. Inhalation, ingestion and skin contact are the primary routes of human exposure to the As. Chronic As ingestion is known to cause skin cancer, and there is substantial evidence that it increases risk for cancers of the bladder, lung, kidney, liver, colon, and prostate. Recent studies have also shown that As is associated with a number of non-neoplastic diseases, including cardiac disease, cerebrovascular disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus and diseases of the arteries, arterioles, and capillaries31. Individuals with chronic Hepatitis B infection, protein deficiency or malnutrition may be more sensitive to the effects of As32.

Reduction of As concentrations in soils and food crops is significantly important for ensuring sustainable crop production as well as food safety. In this regard, phytoremediation of As with lentil crops depends on in-depth understanding of As transport in lentil plants. In the present study, we hypothesized that As uptake, transport and accumulation might differ among different genotypes of lentils such as precoz, red chief and pardina, which might also show differential impacts on nutritional quality and associated health risk with the consumption of As- contaminated grains. In this assessment, we conducted a research on As uptake in root, shoot and grains of lentil crops and the association of risk with the consumption of As-contaminated lentil.

Results

Dry weight of root, shoot and pod

Dry weights of pardina roots were found 0.333, 0.389 and 0.264 g in 0, 3 and 6 mg kg−1 As treated pots, respectively at week 6. Similarly, dry weights of red chief roots were found 0.349, 0.497 and 0.301 g at 0, 3 and 6 mg kg−1 As treated pots, respectively. Chronologically, average dry weights of root, shoot and pod were found lower in 6 mg kg−1 As treated lentil cultivars at week 6, 10 and 13. On the other hand, average dry weight of red chief root, shoot and pod at 0, 3 and 6 mg kg−1 As treated condition were found significantly higher than other lentil genotypes at week 6, 10 and 13 (Figs 1a3b). Treatment and lentil varieties both showed significant differences on the dry weight of root at week 6. Similarly, treatments and varieties both were found significantly different on the effect of dry weight of lentil shoot at week 6, 10 and 13. In week 10, treatment and varietal effects on the dry weight of pod were found statistically different. On the other hand, only treatment effect was found significantly different on the pod dry weight at week 13 (Table 1).

Figure 1
figure1

Effect of As uptake on the dry weight (Mean ± SEM) of lentil roots at (a) week 6; (b) week 10; and (c) week 13. Arsenic treatments indicate concentration of As in peat moss; A, control, 0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A3, 3.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A6, 6.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss. Means denoted by different letters under the same As level indicate significant difference at 0.1% level of significance.

Figure 2
figure2

Effect of As uptake on the dry weight (Mean ± SEM) of lentil shoots at (a) week 6; (b) week 10; and (c) week 13. Arsenic treatments indicate concentration of As in peat moss; A, control, 0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A3, 3.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A6, 6.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss. Means denoted by different letters under the same As level indicate significant difference at 0.1% level of significance.

Figure 3
figure3

Effect of As uptake on the dry weight (Mean ± SEM) of lentil pods at (a) week 10; (b) week 13. Arsenic treatments indicate concentration of As in peat moss; A, control, 0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A3, 3.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss; A6, 6.0 mg As kg−1 peat moss. Means denoted by different letters under the same As level indicate significant difference at 0.1% level of significance.

Table 1 Significance test on the dry weight of lentil root, shoot and pod at different As treated lentil plant at week, 6, 10 and 13.

Arsenic accumulation in root

Treatment, interaction result of variety and treatment on As uptake in root of lentil genotypes were found significantly different at week 6 and 10. On the other hand, only treatment effect on As accumulation in root was found significantly different at week 13 (Table 2). Arsenic accumulation in root was found significantly higher at A6 (6 mg kg−1) treated pardina, red chief and precoz lentil genotypes than control (0 mg kg−1) and A3 (3 mg kg−1) during week 6, 10 and 13. Based on the treatment period, accumulation of As in root of control, A3 and A6 treated lentil genotypes were found statistically different. For instance, As uptake in root of pardina, red chief and precoz lentil genotypes at week 6 was found significantly higher than week 10 and 13 (Table 3). However, As uptake was found at similar rate during week 6 and 10 in root of these lentil genotypes. In week 13, As uptake in red chief genotype was lower than precoz and pardina (Table 3). Arsenic uptake in roots in A6 treated lentil genotypes was more than other As treatments.

Table 2 Significance test for the accumulation of As in root, shoot and grain of lentil genotypes according to the variety and treatment at week 6, 10 and 13.
Table 3 Arsenic accumulation (mg kg−1) in root, shoot and grain in Pardina, Red Chief and Precoz lentil varieties after 6, 10 and 13 weeks of growth.

Arsenic accumulation in shoot

Treatment effect on As accumulation in shoot of lentil genotypes was found statistically significant during week 6, 10 and 13 according to significance test. On the other hand, varieties were found statistically different for As uptake in shoot at week 6 rather than week 10 and 13 (Table 2). Arsenic accumulation in the shoot was found higher at A6 treated pardina, precoz and red chief lentil genotypes during week 6, 10 and 13 (Table 3). On the other hand, accumulation of As at week 6 and 13 in the shoot of the pardina, and red chief genotype was found significantly different between A6 and control, and A6 and A3 treated lentil genotypes. According to week, accumulation of As in shoot of control, A3 and A6 treated lentil genotype was found statistically different. Red chief was found significantly different at week 13 for uptake of As in its shoot from week 6 and 10. Arsenic accumulation in shoots of pardina, red chief and precoz genotypes were found statistically insignificant at week 6 and 10 (Table 3). Arsenic uptake in shoot with A6 treated lentil genotypes was more than other As treatments (Table 3).

Arsenic accumulation in grain

Treatment and varietal effects on As accumulation in grains of lentil genotypes were found statistically significant during week 10 and 13 (Table 2). Arsenic accumulation in grains was found statistically insignificant between control, A3 and A6 treated pardina and precoz lentil genotype during week 10 and 13. At week 10 and 13, As accumulation in grains of red chief genotype was found statistically different between the control and A6 treatment. According to week, accumulation of As in grain between control, and A6 treated lentil genotypes was found statistically dissimilar. This uptake in the grains was found statistically insignificant between A3 and A6 treatment. Arsenic uptake in grains of red chief was found significantly lower than pardina and precoz at week 13. Arsenic uptake in grains showed insignificant difference between pardina and precoz (Table 3). Arsenic accumulation in grains was found lower than root and shoot during week 10 and 13. Arsenic in grains increased by 20% and 40% in red chief and precoz with 6 mg As kg−1 peat moss as compared to 3 mg As kg−1 peat moss after 13 week of growth. Arsenic in grain was found 17% higher by the treatment of 6 mg As kg−1 peat moss in comparison to 3 mg As kg−1 peat moss after week 13. Red chief genotype was found low As accumulator in contrast to pardina and precoz (Table 3).

Discussion

Arsenic (As) is a lethal metalloid. Its accumulation in plant tissues and associated health risk with the consumption of As contaminated grains are matters of huge public concern. Among food crops, rice as well as lentil is also grown in As contaminated areas in Bangladesh and other contaminated areas in the world. Arsenic is translocated from soil to root shoot and grains of lentil and other food crops33. As a result, As reduces the biomass accumulation of lentil genotypes. Lentil seedlings showed normal growth in As free pots. The seedling growth was negatively affected by increasing the rate of As concentration in pardina, red chief and precoz genotypes. Similarly34, conducted research on As toxicity in food crops. They found a high concentration of As decreased the plant growth and development by inducing phyto-toxicity. Due to the As toxicity, germination, plant height, number of roots and shoot growth were negatively affected which might eventually lead to the death of food crops35,36,37,38,39. The transportation and accumulation of As in plants followed the order, roots > shoots > grains40,41. Arsenic contamination in growing media (0.2 mg kg−1) causes negative effects on food crops42,43. Similarly, 0.6 mg kg−1 As in soil affected soybean growth44. Likewise, biomass of 3 mg kg−1 and 6 mg kg−1 As-treated pardina, red chief and precoz lentil genotypes significantly decreased compared to the control plants grown in As free medium (Figs 1a3b).

Arsenic is one of the most toxic elements for the reduction of biomass production in food crops. In this experiment, dry weight of lentil genotypes was found lower in As treated lentil crops than As free crops (Figs 1a3b). It is in agreement with the previous studies as As contamination could reduce dry weight of root and shoot in maize and sunflower plants45. Similarly, tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum) plants grown under different levels of As show As toxicity. Arsenic exposure resulted in a drastic decrease in plant growth parameters (e.g., maximum decrease of 76.8% in leaf fresh weight) and fruit yield in tomato crops (maximum reduction of 79.6%)46. Upon translocation of As can rigorously constrain plant growth by slowing or arresting expansion and biomass production as well as compromising plant reproductive capacity through losses in fertility, yield, and fruit production20.

Consequently, As accumulation significantly increased in the root of lentil genotypes from soil solutions. Pardina, red chief and precoz, varieties were shown to have significant uptake of As in their roots (Table 3). The results are in agreement with a study on chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), a major supplementary food in many areas throughout the world47. On the other hand, in mangrove plants such as, (Aegiceras corniculatum L.), seedlings grown in As contaminated soils, showed increased As concentrations in roots stems and leaves with increasing treatment concentrations of As, but the As accumulation rates in the roots were found 74.54–89.26% of the total As accumulation in the plants48. A similar range of As in the roots (14.5–27.4 mg kg−1) was found in maize (Zea mays)49.

Notably, arsenic can be translocated from the roots to the shoots of plants. In the present study, As concentration significantly increased in the shoot of lentil genotypes (Tables 2 and 3). Similarly, As is transported significantly to the shoot, which impairs the growth, and biomass accumulation in rice plants26,50. In general, As accumulation in the plant increases with the increasing As concentrations in soils. Nonetheless, terrestrial plants such as legume crops show a higher concentration of As in shoot to root compared with emergent plants51.

Arsenic can be accumulated in grains of lentil crops, but this is not a level that is significant for all genotypes (Table 3). In this context, precoz genotype uptakes a significant level of As compared to pardina and red chief cultivars (Table 3). As well as lentil genotypes, As can be accumulated in the edible grains of Phaseolus vulgaris. It is also found that increasing the concentration of As in plants decreases the plant growth as well in the lentil plants52,53. Research was also conducted on As uptake in several pulse crops such as pea which showed the highest As uptake (1.30 mg kg−1)54. Arsenic in selected paddy soils of China causes toxicity to bean, lentil, oats and other food crops55,56.

Extreme uptake of this metalloid may cause physiological changes in food crops, producing a wide range of detrimental effects, such as suppression of photosynthesis and pigment synthesis, oxidative stress, and other metabolic disturbances57. This metal (As) induces oxidative damage in lentil and other food crops due to its excessive uptake in their biomass. Oxidative stress is associated with the increasing levels of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and osmolytes in As stress condition58. Although the accumulation of As in roots, shoots were found higher than grains in lentil (Table 3), this element can be transferred to human and animal bodies through the food chains59. In human beings, inorganic As species arsenate (AsV) and arsenite (AsIII) are strongly cytotoxic and may lead to As-induced skin hyperkeratosis and cancer60,61. In Southern Asia, groundwater contaminated with As is used for the irrigation in food crops8,62. Lentil grown on As contaminated soil contains considerable amounts of As in shoots tissues and grains63. Persistence of this As within soil and its toxicity to plants, animals and human are of grave concern. Long-term exposure to low concentrations of As can lead to skin, bladder, lung, and prostate cancer. Non-cancer effects of ingesting As at low levels include cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, and anemia64,65.

It is well understood that As is a threat for the development of lentil crops in As contaminated regions in the world. For this reason, good agricultural practices are significantly important to get an optimum yield in this food crop66. The optimum water and N doses both are important components as recognized good agricultural practices for attaining higher yield, which may enhance grain yield under abiotic stress66. As well, optimum temperature and radiation both are important indicator for the increasing of biomass67. Good agricultural practices such as optimum temperature, water use efficiency, radiation, and nutrient availability are all affected due to As stress in soils. On the other hand, drought, salinity, lead (Pb), Cd, Cu, Cr and As stress in food crops disrupt the photosynthesis and its associated metabolic activities57. This type of stress severely decreases the photosynthesis, water use efficiency, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll contents, and antioxidant defense mechanism in crops68,69. Likewise, oxidative damage and osmotic stress increase in food crops due to As toxicity70,71. In this situation, mycorrhyzal association might mitigate different abiotic stresses and minimize metal toxicity as well as associated health hazards72,73,74,75. Mycorrhizal fungi colonized with the root cortex and extended the network of its hyphae into the surrounding environment. These external hyphae can contribute to improving plant nutrients for increasing the biomass growth as well as can alleviate heavy metal toxicity by modulating the metal acquisition in plants from contaminated soils76. In addition, agronomic and civil engineering methods such as, judicious use of water, management of soil and plant-nutrients might be recommended in As prone crop growing areas to mitigate the building up of As in human food chain and thus minimizing the negative impact on the environment77. Chitosan (CH) and biochar (BC) can be used to reduce mobility and bioavailability of heavy metals and to facilitate plant growth by improving the antioxidant system78,79. It is to be noted that biomass of lentil should be toxin free to the end users. If biomass becomes affected in the As contaminated region, the associated risk with the consumption of As contaminated food would definitely increase. In this circumstance, reduction of As transportation from soil to food crops towards the human food chain is significantly important for a sustainable global environment.

Conclusion

Lentil is an important leguminous crop that provides protein to human diets. Arsenic accumulated in tissues of lentil genotypes and its reallocated to grains enhance health risk with the consumption of contaminated tissue. In this study, we found that concentration of As transport significantly increased from soils to root and shoot tissues and grains in lentil genotypes. Due to such high As transport, biomass of the crops was negatively affected in their entire life cycle. As a result, root and shoot mass of lentil genotypes was found significantly affected. Pardina, red chief and precoz lentil genotypes responded remarkably in terms of As uptake from soils to their root, shoot and grains. Arsenic in grains was increased 17% by the treatment of 6 mg As kg−1 peat moss in comparison to 3 mg As kg−1 peat moss after 13 week of growth. Thus, the toxic metalloid (As) might transfer to the human body through the consumption of grains, thereby increasing health risks. Therefore, development of As mitigation technologies that could improve plant growth by restricting As transport to plant tissue is urgently needed to expand lentil production in the As contaminated regions throughout the world as well as the reduction of health risk with the consumption of this food crop.

Methods

Peat Moss and Pot

Peat moss was collected from the local market in the USA. This growing media was brought to the greenhouse in the Department of Crop and Soil Sciences at Washington State University (WSU) for the growing of different lentil genotypes. The sizes of pots were 275–300 ml volume. All pots were made of toxin free plastic.

Lentil genotypes and nutrient added from fertilizers

Precoz, red chief, and pardina lentil genotypes were collected from ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas) for this pot experiment. Slow released mixed fertilizer (Osmocote plus) was purchased from the local market in the USA. The ratios of N P K 15: 9: 12 were found in this slow released fertilizer. Out of the 15% total Nitrogen (N), 8.4 and 6.6% were added to its fertilizer from the source of ammoniacal and nitrate nitrogen, respectively. On the other hand, available phosphate (P2O5), soluble potash (K2O), total magnesium (Mg), sulfur (S), boron (B), cupper (Cu), total iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), molybdenum (Mo), and zinc (Zn) at 9, 12, 1.3, 5.9, 0.02, 0.05, 0.46, 0.06, 0.02 and 0.05% were added from this slow released fertilizer in this pot experiment, respectively.

Sowing of lentil seeds

Precoz, red chief, and pardina seeds were sown in the pots on 13th March, 2014. Seven to 8 seeds from each variety were spread at 2–3 cm depth in peat moss in each pot. After the emergence of the lentil seeds, only 5 seedlings were kept in each pot for further sampling during different stages of lentil plant. Recommended doses (2 g pot−1) of slow released fertilizers were applied during seedling and flowering stages of lentil plants.

Preparation and application of arsenic diluted solution in lentil plants

Sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate (Na2HAsO4.7H2O) was used as the source of As. Deionized water was used for the preparation of As diluted solutions. Arsenic solutions were applied from seedling to mature stages at intervals of about every 7 days. About 0.012494 g sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate was added to 1liter water for the preparation of 3 mg L−1 concentrated As solution. On the other hand, 0.02498 g of sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate was taken for the preparation of 6 mg L−1 concentrate As dilute solution. These diluted solutions were kept in bottles with proper labeling and preserved in a refrigerator for further application in the pot experiment.

Treatments and replications in pot experiment

Arsenic free peat moss was used as the growing media in this pot experiment. Three treatments were followed such as, control (A) = 0 mg As kg−1 peat moss, A3 = 3 mg As kg−1 peat moss and A6 = 6 mg As kg−1 peat moss. Three varieties of lentils, precoz, red chief and pardina were selected for this pot experiment. Three replications with three lentil varieties were followed at week 6, 10 and 13 sampling point and the total number of pots was 81 for this experiment.

Collection of plant sample at week 6, 10 and 13

Precoz, red chief and pardina seedlings were collected from each of the treatment at week 6, 10 and 13. Three pots including seedlings of each genotypes were removed from each treated tray randomly at week 6. After collection of seedlings, roots were washed with distilled water. Then water was removed from the washed roots using tissue paper. Roots were separated from the shoot of each collected lentil seedlings using scissors. All root and shoot samples were kept separately inside an envelope with proper labeling on each sample. After that, all root and shoot samples were kept in a drying oven for 72 hours at 55–65 °C. Similarly, root, shoot and pod samples of lentil genotypes from each of the treated pots were collected at week 10 and 13 also.

Dry weight, grinding and sieving of plant samples

Dried samples were brought into the Laboratory of Crop and Soil Sciences at WSU. Dry weight of root, shoot and pod were taken separately. Meanwhile, grains were separated from pod of lentil manually by hand with gloves. Hand gloves were changed during the separation of grain for each sample. Then the samples were ground separately by a coffee grinder using liquid nitrogen. The grinder was cleaned between the samples with ethyl alcohol (C2H5OH) and tissue papers. These ground root, shoot and grain samples were sieved with 250 µ mesh. Then all samples were kept in envelopes with proper labeling.

Digestion of samples

Lentil roots, shoots and grains (seeds) were digested separately following heating block digestion procedure80. Of the plant samples, 0.1 g ground root, shoot and grains samples were put into clean digestion vessels and 5 ml concentrate HNO3 was added to it. The mixture was allowed to stand overnight under a fume hood. On the following day, this vessel was digested in a digestion block for 1 hour at 120 °C. This content cooled and 3 ml HClO4 was added to it. Again, samples were put into the heating block for 3–4 hours at 140 °C. Generally, heating stopped whenever white dense fume of HClO4 was emitted into air. Then cooled samples were diluted to 25 ml with de-ionized water and filtered using Whatman 42 filter paper. Finally, samples were stored in polyethylene bottles. Prior to samples digestion, all glassware was washed with 2% HNO3 followed by rinsing with de-ionized water and drying.

Analysis of total arsenic

Digested samples were analyzed for the determination of total arsenic in the lentil root, shoot, and grains. The total arsenic in root and shoot tissue and reallocation to grains of the lentil plants was analyzed by flow injection hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry (FI-HG-AAS, Perkin Elmer A Analyst 400-USA) using external calibration81. The optimum HCl concentration was 10% v/v and 0.4% NaBH4 which produced the maximum sensitivity. For each sample of the digested lentil’s root, shoot, and grains, three replicates were taken and the mean values obtained based on the calculation of those three replicates. Standard Reference Materials (SRM) from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), USA was analyzed using the same procedures from the start of the experiment, during and at the end of the measurements to ensure continued consistency and accuracy. Method detection limit (MDL) for As was 0.02 µg/l or ppb (parts per billion).

Statistical analysis

The experiment was carried out following Completely Randomized Design (CRD). Level of significance was analyzed between average dry weight of root, shoot and pod at different As levels in lentil genotypes using software R. Accordingly, the significance test for the comparison of As uptake in root, shoot and grains of lentil plants was performed using software R as well.

Data Availability

Data supporting the findings of the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request. All data analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. 1.

    Li, J., Dong, F., Lu, Y., Yan, Q. & Shim, H. Mechanisms Controlling Arsenic Uptake in Rice Grown in Mining Impacted Regions in South China. PLoS ONE 9, e108300, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108300 (2014).

  2. 2.

    Banerjee, M. et al. High arsenic in rice is associated with elevated genotoxic effects in humans. Sci Rep 3 (2013).

  3. 3.

    Pearce. F. Bangladesh’s arsenic poisoning: who is to blame? (2002).

  4. 4.

    Islam, M. S. & Islam, F. Arsenic contamination in groundwater in Bangladesh: An Environmental and Social Disaster, https://www.iwapublishing.com/news/arsenic-contamination-groundwater-bangladesh-environmental-and-social-disaster (2019).

  5. 5.

    International Atomic Energy Agency [IAEA]. Arsenic contamination of groundwater in Bangladesh, International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna (2002).

  6. 6.

    Smith, A. H., Lingas, E. O. & Rahman, M. Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull. World Health Organ. 78, 1093–1103 (2000).

  7. 7.

    Uddin, S. J. et al. Determination of the binding site of arsenic on bovine serum albumin using warfarin (site-I specific probe) and diazepam (site-II specific probe). J Biol Sci. 4, 609–612 (2004).

  8. 8.

    Atta, R. et al. Arsenic and heavy metal contaminations in the tube well water of Punjab, Pakistan and risk assessment: A case study. Ecol. Eng. 95, 90–100 (2016).

  9. 9.

    Cullen, W. R. & Reimer, K. J. Arsenic speciation in the environment. Chem. Rev. 89, 713–764 (1989).

  10. 10.

    Smedley, P. L. & Kinniburgh, D. G. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl. Geochem. 17, 517–56810 (2002).

  11. 11.

    [ATSDR] Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry. Environmental Health and Medicine Education, https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ (2016).

  12. 12.

    Chung, J. Y., Yu, S. D. & Hong, Y. S. Environmental Source of Arsenic Exposure. J Prev Med Public Health 47, 253–257 (2014).

  13. 13.

    Huq, S. M. I., Joardar, J. C., Parvin, S., Correll, R. & Naidu., R. Arsenic Contamination in Food-chain: Transfer of Arsenic into Food Materials through Groundwater Irrigation. J Health Popul Nutr. 24, 305–16 (2006).

  14. 14.

    Das, D. K., Sur, P. & Das, K. Mobilisation of arsenic in soils and in rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants affected by organic matter and zinc application in irrigation water contaminated with arsenic. Plant Soil Environ. 54, 30–37 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Huq, S. M. I., Abdullah, M. B. & Joardar, J. C. Bioremediation of arsenic toxicity by algae in rice culture. Land Contam. Reclam. 15, 327–333 (2007).

  16. 16.

    Alihan, C. & Shtaya, M. J. Y. Lentil: Origin, Cultivation Techniques, Utilization and Advances in Transformation. Agric Sci. 1, 55–62 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Ahlawat, I. P. S. Agronomy – rabi crops, Lentil. Division of Agronomy, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi – 110 012 Agronomy (2012).

  18. 18.

    FAO. Faostat,Fao Statistical Database, http://www.fao.org (2010).

  19. 19.

    Mudryj, A. N., Yu, N. & Aukema, H. M. Nutritional and health benefits of pulses. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 39, 1197–204 (2014).

  20. 20.

    Garg, N. & Singla, P. Arsenic toxicity in crop plants: physiological effects and tolerance mechanisms. Environ. Chem. Lett. 9, 303–321 (2011).

  21. 21.

    Singh, H. P., Batish, D. R., Kohli, R. K. & Arora, K. Arsenic-induced root growth inhibition in mung bean (Phaseolus aureus Roxb.) is due to oxidative stress resulting from enhanced lipid peroxidation. Plant Growth Regul. 53, 65–73 (2007).

  22. 22.

    Srivastava, S. & Sharma, Y. Impact of arsenic toxicity on black gram and its amelioration using phosphate. ISRN Toxicol. 8 (2013).

  23. 23.

    Patrick, M. F. & Weihua, C. Arsenic Toxicity:The Effects on Plant Metabolism. Front Physiol. 3, 182 (2012).

  24. 24.

    Carey, A. M. et al. Grain unloading of arsenic species in rice. Plant Physiol. 152, 309–319 (2010).

  25. 25.

    Song, W. Y. et al. A rice ABC transporter, OsABCC1, reduces arsenic accumulation in the grain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 15699–15704 (2014b).

  26. 26.

    Roje, S. et al. Lentil Selection and Management to Reduce Dietary Intake of Arsenic, http://csanr.wsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/99CarpenterBoggs.pdf (2012).

  27. 27.

    Martinez, V. D., Vucic, E. A., Becker-Santos, D. D., Gil, L. & Lam, W. L. Arsenic exposure and the induction of human cancers. J. Toxicol. 431287 (2011).

  28. 28.

    Bundschuh, J. et al. Arsenic in the human food chain: the Latin American perspective. Sci. Total Environ. 429, 92–06 (2012).

  29. 29.

    Alam, M. Z., Ali, M. P., Al-Harbi, N. A. & Choudhury, T. R. Contamination status of arsenic, lead, and cadmium of different wetland waters. Toxicol Environ Chem. 93, 10 (2011).

  30. 30.

    Verbruggen, N., Hermans, C. & Schat, H. Mechanisms to cope with arsenic or cadmium excess in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 12, 364–372 (2009).

  31. 31.

    Engel and Smith. Arsenic in drinking water and mortality from vascular disease: an ecologic analysis in 30 countries in the United States. Arch Environ Health 49(5), 418–427 (2004).

  32. 32.

    World Health Organization [WHO]. Arsenic in Drinking Water, Fact Sheet No. 210 (1999).

  33. 33.

    Hafiz, F. B. et al. Arsenic uptake, accumulation and toxicity in rice plants: Possible remedies for its detoxification: A review. Environ Sci. Pollut. Res., https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8462-2 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Marin, A. R., Pezeshki, S. R., Masscheleyn, P. H. & Choi, H. S. Effect of dimethylarsinic acid on growth, tissue arsenic and photosynthesis of rice plants. J Plant Nutr. 16, 865–80 (1993).

  35. 35.

    Bhattacharya, S. et al. Effects of Arsenic toxicity on germination, Seedling growth and Peroxidase activity in Cicer arietinum. Int J. Agric Food Sci. 2, 131–137 (2012).

  36. 36.

    Abedin, M. J. & Meharg, A. A. Relative toxicity of arsenite and arsenate on germination and early seedling growth of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Plant Soil 243, 57–66 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Kang, L. J., Li, X. D., Liu, J. H. & Zhang, X. Y. The effect of arsenic on the growth of rice and residues in a loam paddy soil. J Jilin Agric Univ. 18, 58–61 (1996).

  38. 38.

    Rahman, M. A., Rahman, M. M., Miah, M. A. M. & Khaled, H. M. Influence of soil arsenic concentrations in rice (Oryza sativa L.). Sub-trop. Agric. Res. & Dev. 2, 24–31 (2004).

  39. 39.

    Cox, M. S., Bell, P. F. & Kovar, J. L. Different tolerance of canola to arsenic when grown hydroponically or in soil. J Plant Nutr. 19, 1599–1610 (1996).

  40. 40.

    Lee, J. T. & Yu, W. C. Evaluation of legume growth in arsenic-polluted acidic soils with various pH values. J. Water Sustain. 2, 13–23 (2012).

  41. 41.

    Shaibur, M. R. & Kawai, S. Effect of Arsenic on Visible Symptom and Arsenic Concentration in Hydroponic Japanese Mustard Spinach. Environ Exp Bot. 67, 65–70 (2009).

  42. 42.

    Heikens, A., Panaullah, G. M. & Meharg, A. A. Arsenic behaviour from groundwater and soil to crops: Impacts on agriculture and food safety. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 189, 43–87 (2007).

  43. 43.

    Pineda-Chacon, G. & Alarcon-Herrera, M. T. Arsenic uptake and distribution in Cucumis melo and Citrullus lanatus plants. Environ Prog Sustain Energy 35, 750–757 (2016).

  44. 44.

    Bustingorri, C. & Lavado, R. S. Soybean as affected by high concentrations of arsenic and fluoride in irrigation water in controlled conditions. Agric. Water Manag. 144, 134–139 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Várallyay, S., Bódi, E., Garousi, F., Veres, S. & Kovács, B. Effect of arsenic on dry weight and relative chlorophyll content in greening maize and sunflower tissues. J Microbiol Biotech Food Sci. 4, 167–169 (2015).

  46. 46.

    Carbonell Barrachina, A., Burlo Carbonell, F. & Mataix Beneyto, J. Arsenic uptake, distribution, and accumulation in tomato plants: Effect of arsenite on plant growth and yield. J Plant Nutr. 18, 1237–1250 (2008).

  47. 47.

    Gupta, D. K. et al. Arsenic accumulation in root and shoot vis-a-visits effects on growth and level of phytochelatins in seedlings of Cicer arietinum L. J Environ Biol. 29, 281–286 (2008).

  48. 48.

    Wu, G. R., Hong, H. L. & Yan, C. L. Arsenic Accumulation and Translocation in Mangrove (Aegiceras corniculatum L.) Grown in Arsenic Contaminated Soils. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 12, 7244–7253 (2015).

  49. 49.

    Neidhardt, H., Kramar, U., Tang, X., Guo, H. & Norra, S. Arsenic accumulation in the roots of Helianthus annuus and Zea mays by irrigation with arsenic-rich groundwater: Insights from synchrotron X-ray fluorescence imaging. Chemie der. Erde - Geochem. 75, 261–270 (2015).

  50. 50.

    Dixit, G. et al. Reduced arsenic accumulation in rice (Oryza sativa L.) shoot involves sulfur mediated improved thiol metabolism, antioxidant system and altered arsenic transporters. Plant Physiol Biochem. 99, 86–96 (2016).

  51. 51.

    Bergqvist, C. Arsenic accumulation in various plant types. Stockholm University, Sweden, http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:455728/FULLTEXT02 (2011).

  52. 52.

    Aracil, P. et al. Total arsenic accumulation in edible pods and seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris. J Environ Sci Health 36, 849–61 (2001).

  53. 53.

    Finnegan, P. M. & Chen, W. Arsenic Toxicity: The Effects on Plant Metabolism. Front Physiol. 3, 182 (2012).

  54. 54.

    Santra, S. C. et al. Arsenic in Food chain and Community Health Risk: A Study in Gangetic West Bengal. Procedia Environ Sci. 18, 2–13 (2013).

  55. 55.

    Das, I., Ghosh, K., Das, D. K. & Sanyal, S. K. Assessment of arsenic toxicity in rice plants in areas of West Bengal. Chemical Speci Bioavailab. 25, 201–208 (2013).

  56. 56.

    Xie, M. & Huang, Y. C. Control of arsenic toxicity in rice plants grown on an arsenic-polluted paddy soil. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant. Anal 29, 2471 (1998).

  57. 57.

    Song, Y. et al. Proteomic analysis of copper stress responses in the roots of two rice (Oryza sativa L.) varieties differing in Cu tolerance. Plant Soil 366, 647–658 (2012).

  58. 58.

    Shakeel, A et al. Osmoregulation and antioxidant production in maize under combined cadmium and arsenic stress. Environ Sci Pollut Res, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6382-1(2015).

  59. 59.

    Tu, C. & Ma, L. Q. Effects of arsenate and phosphate on their accumulation by an arsenic-hyperaccumulator Pteris vittata L. Plant Soil 249, 373–382 (2003).

  60. 60.

    Ghosh, S., Banerjee, S. & Sil, P. C. The beneficial role of curcumin on inflammation, diabetes and neurodegenerative disease: A recent update. Food Chem Toxicol 83, 111–124, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2015.05.022 (2015).

  61. 61.

    Islam, L. N. Immuno-toxic Effects of Arsenic Exposure. In:Handbook of Arsenic Toxicol. pp 493–519, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-418688-0.00021-6 (2015).

  62. 62.

    Garnier, J. M. et al. Temporal variations in arsenic uptake by rice plants in Bangladesh: The role of iron plaque in paddy fields irrigated with groundwater. Sci Total Environ 408, 4185–4193, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.019 (2010).

  63. 63.

    Meharg, A. A. et al. Geographical variation in total and inorganic arsenic content of polished (white) rice. Environ Sci Technol. 43, 1612–1617, https://doi.org/10.1021/es802612a (2009).

  64. 64.

    Zhang, W., Cai, Y., Tu, C. & Ma, L. Q. Arsenic speciation and distribution in an arsenic hyper accumulating plant. Sci Total Environ 300, 167–177 (2002).

  65. 65.

    Le, X. C., Yalcin, S. & Ma, M. Speciation of submicrogram per liter levels of arsenic in water: on-site species separation integrated with sample collection. Environ Sci Technol. 34, 2342–2347 (2000).

  66. 66.

    Hafiz, M. H. et al. The effect of nutrients shortage on plant’s efficiency to capture solar radiations under semi-arid environments. Environ Sci Pollut Res, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7206-z (2016).

  67. 67.

    Nanyan, D. et al. Influence of temperature and solar radiation on grain yield and quality in irrigated rice system. Europ. J. Agronomy 64, 37–46 (2015).

  68. 68.

    Saud, S. et al. Silicate application increases the photosynthesis and its associated metabolic activities in Kentucky bluegrass under drought stress and post-drought recovery. Environ Sci Pollut Res, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6957-x (2016).

  69. 69.

    Saud, S. et al. Silicon application increases drought tolerance of Kentucky bluegrass by improving plant water relations and morph physiological functions. Sci. World J., https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/368694 (2014).

  70. 70.

    Abbas, G. et al. & Natasha. Arsenic uptake, toxicity, detoxification, and speciation in plants: physiological, biochemical, and molecular aspects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 15, E59 (2018).

  71. 71.

    Swarnakar, A. Induction of oxidative stress and osmolyte accumulation in response to sodium arsenate toxicity in mungbean seedlings and its amelioration. Res. J. Chem. Environ. Sci. 2, 61–67 (2014).

  72. 72.

    Alam, M. Z., McGee, R., Hoque, M. A., Ahammed, G. J. & Carpenter-Boggs, L. Effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi, Selenium and Biochar on Photosynthetic Pigments and Antioxidant Enzyme Activity Under Arsenic Stress in Mung Bean (Vigna radiata). Front. Physiol. 10, 193, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2019.00193 (2019).

  73. 73.

    Chen, S. et al. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) increase growth and secondary metabolism in cucumber subjected to low temperature stress. Sci. Hortic. 160, 222–229 (2013).

  74. 74.

    Shi, Y. Z. et al. Mycorrhizal relationship in lupines: a review. Legume Res. 40, 965–973 (2017).

  75. 75.

    Alam, M. Z., Hoque, M. A., Ahammed, G. J. & Carpenter-Boggs, L. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi reduce arsenic uptake and improve plant growth in Lens culinaris. PLoS ONE 14, e0211441, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211441 (2019).

  76. 76.

    Ferrol, N., Tamayo, E. & Vargas, P. The heavy metal paradox in arbuscular mycorrhizas: from mechanisms to biotechnological applications. J Exp Bot. 67, 6253–6265 (2017).

  77. 77.

    Bakhat, H. F. et al. Arsenic uptake, accumulation and toxicity in rice plants: Possible remedies for its detoxification: A review. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 24, 9142–9158 (2017).

  78. 78.

    Turan, V. et al. Promoting the productivity and quality of brinjal aligned with heavy metals immobilization in a wastewater irrigated heavy metal polluted soil with biochar and chitosan. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 161, 409–419 (2018).

  79. 79.

    Turan, V., Ramzani, P. M. A., Ali, Q., Irum, A. & Khan, W. U. D. Alleviation of nickel toxicity and an improvement in zinc bioavailability in sunflower seed with chitosan and biochar application in pH adjusted nickel contaminated soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci. 64, 1053–1067 (2017).

  80. 80.

    Rahman, M. A., Hasegawa, H., Rahman, M. M., Rahman, M. A. & Miah, M. A. M. Accumulation of arsenic in tissues of rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) and its distribution in fraction of rice grain. Chemosphere 69, 942–948 (2007).

  81. 81.

    Welsch, E. P., Crock, J. G. & Sanzolone, R. Trace level determination of arsenic and selenium using continuous flow hydride generation atomic absorption spectrophotometry (HG-AAS). In: Arbogast, B. F. (ed.) quality assurance manual for the branch of geochemistry. Open File Rep. 90-0668. US Geological Survey, Reston, V. A. P38–45 (1990).

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to the laboratory of Crop and Soil Sciences at Washington State University (WSU), Laboratory of Environmental Science at BSMRAU and Biological Research Division at Soil and Environment Section of BCSIR. Authors are especially grateful to the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), Bangabandhu Science and Technology Fellowship Trust and BSMRAU for their valuable funding. This research was accomplished as a part of collaborative PhD program between Washington State University and Bangladesh Agricultural University.

Author information

M.Z.A. and L.C.B. conceived and designed the research. M.Z.A. performed the experiments, analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. R.M. and L.C.B. discussed the data and provided constructive suggestions. G.J.A. revised and proofread the manuscript. M.A.H. supervised the study. All authors revised and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Mohammad Zahangeer Alam.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.