Phase stability and electronic structure of iridium metal at the megabar range


The 5d transition metals have attracted specific interest for high-pressure studies due to their extraordinary stability and intriguing electronic properties. In particular, iridium metal has been proposed to exhibit a recently discovered pressure-induced electronic transition, the so-called core-level crossing transition at the lowest pressure among all the 5d transition metals. Here, we report an experimental structural characterization of iridium by x-ray probes sensitive to both long- and short-range order in matter. Synchrotron-based powder x-ray diffraction results highlight a large stability range (up to 1.4 Mbar) of the low-pressure phase. The compressibility behaviour was characterized by an accurate determination of the pressure-volume equation of state, with a bulk modulus of 339(3) GPa and its derivative of 5.3(1). X-ray absorption spectroscopy, which probes the local structure and the empty density of electronic states above the Fermi level, was also utilized. The remarkable agreement observed between experimental and calculated spectra validates the reliability of theoretical predictions of the pressure dependence of the electronic structure of iridium in the studied interval of compressions.


Iridium (Ir), with electronic structure [Kr]4d105s25p64f145d76s2, is one of the most incompressible 5d transition metals with face-centered cubic (fcc) structure. It is the second densest elemental metal having an ambient pressure density of 22.65 g/cc at T = 0 K and 22.56 g/cc at T = 293.15 K, and a shear modulus, Go = 210 GPa, comparable to that of osmium, Go = 220 GPa, at ambient conditions1. On top of that, Ir has an extremely high thermal stability, being able to preserve mechanical stability at temperatures above 2000 °C and it is not easily susceptible to corrosion. These properties make Ir useful for many technological applications; for instance, as a high-pressure gasket or as a pressure calibrant in high temperature and high-pressure (HP) diamond-anvil cell (DAC) experiments. On the other hand, Ir is used for the construction of thermocouples and encapsulators of nuclear-powered electrical generators in space technology2. Furthermore, Ir is being currently used to synthesize Ir-based double perovskite compounds and iridium-based transition metal oxides or iridates, and its application fields stand from high-temperature superconductivity3, magnetoresistance4, to multiferroicity5. Whereby, its use in numerous applications make the study of Ir metal of great interest from a fundamental standpoint.

The study of the 5d metals under pressure have attracted the attention of the scientific community since the beginning of the 21st century because of the relevance of their behaviour under extreme conditions for improving the knowledge of planet interiors6. In this sense, the debate on the structural stability of iridium under pressure has taken years. In 2000, Cerenius et al.7 reported the formation of a complex superlattice in iridium above 59 GPa in a high-pressure energy-dispersive x-ray diffraction (XRD) experiment. The structure of such a superlattice corresponded to a 14-layer hexagonal closed packed structure with lattice parameters a = 2.60 Å and c = 29.68 Å. In subsequent experimental-theoretical studies, such a phase transition was not predicted8,9. More recent studies have shown that 5d metals undergo pressure-induced peculiarities in their electronic structure. L. Dubrovinsky et al.10 have reported a new type of electronic transition, the so-called core-level crossing (CLC) transition in osmium (Os) metal at around 440 GPa. This pressure-induced transition has been associated with interactions between the core electrons that affect the pressure evolution of the lattice parameter ratio c/a in Os at 440 GPa. In a methodical theoretical of the CLC transition reported the prediction of a generality of the effect in 5d transition metals11, revealing a CLC transition for Ir at a reasonable low-pressure of 80 GPa. Such a prediction makes Ir a great candidate for the study of its pressure-induced evolution of the electronic structure, in which the 5p and 4 f core electrons at the CLC transition could affect the valence electrons due to the nonlocal nature of the electron interactions. Unfortunately, the effect of the CLC transition on the valence states is expected to be extremely weak and an observation of its influence on structural, thermal, electronic and transport properties of the metals might represent a true challenge10. Consequently, it is crucial to perform an exhaustive characterization of the stability and the electronic structure of compressed Ir metal at the megabar range.

In this work, we clarify the structural stability, accurately determine the P-V equation of state (EoS) in the pressure range up to 1.4 Mbar, and report the high-pressure phase of Ir through a detailed quasi-hydrostatic XRD and x-ray absorption (XAS) study in which the effect of the pressure on the electronic structure of the Ir is explored. In hexagonal-closed-packed (hcp) metals, such as Os10, the CLC can be detected by XRD through changes in the c/a ratio; this is not the case of Ir, with fcc structure. Furthermore, the crossing of the 4f and 5p orbitals in the core could affect the 5d electrons due to the nonlocal potential interaction, an interaction expected to be very weak. Thus, in order to explore the occurrence of a CLC in Ir we have carefully explored any change of compressibility or in the local structure. Despite of the weak effect searched, the occurrence of the CLC in Ir could lead to an energy shift, a broadening of the band, or a change of intensity of the white-line (WL) in the x-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES). Thus, besides obtaining careful information of the local structure of Ir, we attempt to use XAS to obtain information about the electronic and thermal effect of the CLC in this metal.

Results and Discussion

X-ray diffraction

Ir metal crystallizes in the space group Fm \(\bar{3}\,\)m, an fcc structure, with lattice parameter at ambient pressure of 3.837(1) Å. The fcc structure was used in the Rietveld refinements up to 1.4 Mbar, showing no evidence of phase transition or structural distortion, in contrast with the results obtained by Cerenius and Dubrovinsky7. Fig. 1 shows the refinements to three different diffraction patterns at 0, 70 and 140 GPa, where the reflections of the superlattice exhibited by Cerenius and Dubrovinsky are not observed. Here, it is important to underline that our experiments were carried out in quasi-hydrostatic conditions, so that the appearance of the mentioned reflections in the XRD patterns measured by Cerenius and Dubrovinsky could be due to the non-hydrostaticity of the PTM (magnesium oxide, MgO) used12. Indeed, L. Burakovski et al.9 had already concluded theoretically that such phase transition was caused by the lack of hydrostaticity during the experiment. Therefore, it is clear that no phase transition and no structural distortion are observed in our diffraction data.

Figure 1

Rietveld refinements of diffraction patterns at 0, 70 and 137 GPa. Black empty circle line corresponds to the measured XRD pattern, black (red) solid line shows the refinement (residual) and the blue ticks are the position of Bragg peaks of Ir.

The pressure-volume (P-V) curve (Fig. 2) shows a smooth volume decrease. Often, electronic transitions affect the structure of materials resulting into changes in the compressibility and local environment of the atoms13. However, we do not see any clear discontinuity in the P-V curve. We fit our experimental data to third order BM EoS, which is very similar to that obtained from previous ab initio calculations up to 900 GPa by L. Burakovski et al.9 (Table 1). The order of the EoS has been determined by the positive linear slope exhibited by the F-f (Eulerian strain-normalized pressure) plot of the theoretically simulated volume vs pressure curve, not shown here. The ab initio calculations and our quasi-hydrostatic experiments agree very well, which demonstrates that this is the most appropriate EoS order for the compressed Ir metal. Moreover, an extrapolation to 650 GPa totally agrees with shock-wave experiments (Fig. 2)14. Although, it is well known that dynamic high-pressure experiments involve a temperature increase under compression, in the case of Ir the effect of temperature can be neglected.

Figure 2

Experimental pressure-volume curve obtained by our XRD experiments (black points) and shock-waves data (ref.14) (orange squares). The 3rd order EoS are represented by solid lines: red line for our data, blue line for the values calculated by quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) (ref.9) and green line for the data obtained by Cerenius and Dubrovinsky (ref.7).

Table 1 Ambient volume V0, bulk modulus B0, first derivative of bulk modulus B0′, maximum pressure reached, Pmax, pressure transmitting medium (PTM) and calibrants.

Note that the third-order BM EoS from Cerenius and Dubrovinsky underestimates the bulk modulus, B0 = 306(23) GPa, and overestimates its derivative, B0′ = 6.8(1.5) (Table 1). In fact, an extrapolation to very high pressure, above 600 GPa, does not reproduce the experimental results from shock-waves experiment (Fig. 2).

X-ray absorption spectroscopy and ab initio calculations

X-ray absorption (XAS) measurements were collected at the Ir L3 absorption edge (11.215 KeV) and are shown for three selected pressures in Fig. 3. These spectra can be decomposed into three main contributions: (i) a sharp, atomic-like “white-line” that can be assigned to the 2p3/2 → 5d electronic transition, (ii) a step-like edge associated with 2p3/2  → continuum electronic excitations, and (iii) smaller oscillations (fine structure) that result from the photoelectron backscattering from neighboring atoms. The EXAFS signal weighted in k3 and the modulus of its Fourier transform (FT) at pressures of 0, 45 and 90 GPa are presented in Fig. 4a. The EXAFS signals exhibit a worthy quality up to k = 13.4 Å−1. The FT of the k3χ(k) weighted EXAFS signals were calculated in the interval k = 4–13.4 Å−1 using a Hanning window, as represented in Fig. 4b,c. The FEFF-8 code15 was employed for the structural analysis. The modulus and imaginary part of the FT (black symbols) are shown in Fig. 4c at 0, 45 and 90 GPa. The best-fittings (red and blue solid lines) are also represented in such a figure. First and second neighbouring shells have been included in the analysis, which was performed using the Artemis code in R-space, between 1.8 and 4 Å−1. The nearest- and second-neighbour distances were modelled following one single-peak average distribution, fixing the coordination numbers to the theoretical values. As a consequence, there were only four fitting parameters: the Debye-Waller (DW) factor (σ2) for both average distance distributions, the deviance from the average distance (ΔR), the amplitude reduction factor (S02), and the edge-energy difference between experiment and theory (ΔE0). S02 was determined at ambient conditions and the obtained value of 1.0(2) was considered to be pressure independent. A similar procedure was used for ΔE0 getting a value of 8(2) eV.

Figure 3

Experimental (simulated) x-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) spectra at ambient pressure, at 45 GPa and 90 GPa in black line, red line and blue line, respectively. The Lorenztian + arctang fit of the WL (experimental spectrum at room pressure) is represented in the inset. Red dash line is the total fit of the WL, the blue line corresponds to the arctangent fit function and the clear green line is the lorenztian fit function.

Figure 4

(a) k3χ(k) EXAFS signals and (b) Fourier Transform at the Ir L3-edge at 0 GPa (black curve), at 45 GPa (red curve) and at 90 GPa (blue curve). (c) The Fourier transformed k3χ(k) EXAFS signals at 0 GPa, at 45 GPa and at 90 GPa are represented in black squares. The finest fits of the modulus and imaginary parts are shown in red and blue line, respectively.

The first more intense peak in the EXAFS Fourier transform is associated with the first shell around Ir atoms while the second corresponds to the second shell. The starting modelization assumed for the fitting of the FT signals, in the full pressure range studied, includes the nearest-neighbor Ir-Ir distances of the dodecahedra and the second-neighbor Ir-Ir distances of a hexagonal environment, both associated to an fcc structure with a stacking sequence of layers ABC. The first and the second-neighbor distances have a smooth evolution under pressure without remarkable changes that could be associated to any electronic transition (Fig. 5(a,b)).

Figure 5

(a) Pressure evolution of the nearest-neighbor distances and (b) second-neighbor distances. The Debye-Waller (DW) factors that correspond to the first and second shell are represented in the insets.

No significant changes are observed, within the error bars, in the pressure evolution of the DW factors corresponding to the first and the second shell (insets of the Fig. 5(a,b)). The DW factors corresponding to the first-neighbor distances maintain a constant value around 0.0035 Å2. The DW factor for the second shell is around 0.007 at ambient pressure and it remains around this value as pressure increases. The DW factor includes a thermal contribution due to the local vibrational dynamics and a structural contribution linked to the local structural distortions. In relation to the structural contribution, the first shell around the Ir atoms is almost regular and the higher value of the DW factor of the second shell could reflect a more distorted environment. Now, considering only the thermal part of the DW factor, we can try to understand whether this is a signature of the occurrence of the CLC since the electronic transitions, while not affecting explicitly lattice parameters, are expected to cause anomalies in the behavior of the vibrational and transport properties.

Within the framework of the harmonic approximation for a cluster with N atoms, using Bose-Einstein statistics and considering only single scattering paths, the DW factor depends on the phonon frequencies as follows16:

$${\sigma }_{j}^{2}(T)=\,\frac{{\rm{\hbar }}}{2{\mu }_{j}}\,{\int }_{0}^{{\omega }_{max}}\frac{d\omega }{\omega }\,{\rho }_{j}(\omega )coth(\frac{\beta {\rm{\hbar }}\omega }{2})\,$$

where μj is an effective reduced mass for scattering path j that guarantees normalized initial conditions. The parameter \(\beta =1/{k}_{B}T\), \({\rho }_{j}(\omega )\) is a projected density of vibrational modes. It weights the contribution of every mode to the specific vibrational motion along the bond direction. In addition, \({\omega }_{max}\gtrsim z\,\sqrt{{k}_{1}/{\mu }_{1}}\) is the maximum frequency of the lattice motion. It depends on the coordination number, z, the central first-neighbor force constant, \({k}_{1}\), and \({\mu }_{1}\) is the half of the mass of the iridium atom16. The short wavelength modes are those that dominate the vibration of the first and second neighbor atoms since vibrational energies involved are typically between 300 and 3000 cm−1. However, from the similarity of the effect of CLC and more well studied electronic topological transition (ETT) on the pressure dependence of c/a axial ratio in hcp Os10, it is expected that the former would imply an anomalous behavior in the long wavelength phonon modes, which has been discussed in detail by Glazyrin et al.17.

Therefore, we conclude that the DW factors are unlikely to bear a signature of the effect of the CLC transition, which is also evident if we pay attention to the stability of these values in the insets of the Fig. 5(a,b).

The most striking feature of Ir L3 edge XANES is the prominent white-line (WL) observed. The integrated intensity (or area) of the white-line peak is correlated with the local density of unoccupied final states in the system18. The intrinsic width of the 5d band of the compound is the parameter that mainly determines the linewidth. However, it is also influenced by broadening mechanisms which include core-hole lifetime effects, final-state lifetime effects, and obviously instrumental resolution18,19. These observations are consistent with conclusions from a systematic work of Ir L3 lineshapes in a series of Ir-based oxides20. Another consideration to take into account is the strong spin-orbit coupling (SOC) effect in the Ir metal and also in different iridates such as Sr2IrO4, Na2IrO3 and Y2Ir2O7. J. P. Clancy et al.21 have reported the spin-orbit expectation value \(\langle {\rm{L}}\,\cdot \,{\rm{S}}\rangle \) of these materials, which are −1, −3.1, −2.7 and −2.8 expressed in units of \({{\rm{\hbar }}}^{2}\), respectively. Therefore, the SOC energies are comparable to the crystal field and the Coulomb electronic interaction in these systems, and therefore it plays an important role on the electronic ground state, as will be discussed below.

The integrated intensity of the white-line at the L3 edge and its linewidth are obtained through an arctangent + Lorentzian fit function as can be seen in the ambient condition experimental XAS spectrum in the inset of the Fig. 3. The pressure evolution of these values, in all the pressure range studied is shown in Fig. 6(a,b). There are no dramatic changes neither on the integrated intensity of the WL nor on its linewidth along the whole pressure range. The intensity of WL decreases slightly as the pressure increases and the linewidth keeps almost constant. These experimental results have been compared with those calculated from first principles. The simulated XANES spectra can be seen in Fig. 3 and it reproduces very well the experimental ones. Both experimental and theoretical integrated intensity and linewidth have the same trend under pressure as shown in Fig. 6(a,b). Moreover, the experimental and theoretical WL peak position has been represented in Fig. 6c and no anomalies are observed.

Figure 6

(a) Integrated intensity of WL of the XAS spectra collected at Ir L3 edge under pressure is represented, (b) the pressure evolution of the linewidth of the WL is plotted and (c) the variation of WL peak position under pressure is shown. Red points correspond to experimental data and black points correspond to simulated data using WIEN2k code.

Neither theoretical nor experimental results bear observable signatures of the CLC. In order to give an explanation of why the CLC effect is not appreciable in the XANES of Ir L3 edge, let us consider all the energies involved in the process. The full Hamiltonian of a system is:


The first term \({\hat{{\rm{H}}}}_{0}\) takes into acount the kinetic energy, \(\hat{{\rm{T}}}\), and the interaction potential, \(\hat{{\rm{V}}}\). Within the Phillips-Kleinman pseudopotential approximation, the interaction potential can be divided in two contributions \(\hat{{\rm{V}}}=V+{\hat{{\rm{V}}}}^{R}\) being V an effective potential that operates on the electron and \({\hat{{\rm{V}}}}^{R}\) the non-local operator that acts on the smooth part of valence orbitals in this way:

$${\hat{{\rm{V}}}}^{R}\,{\tilde{\psi }}_{i}^{v}(\overrightarrow{r})=\,\sum _{j}({\varepsilon }_{i}^{v}-{\varepsilon }_{i}^{c})({\psi }_{j}^{c}|{\tilde{\psi }}_{i}^{v}){\psi }_{j}^{c}(\overrightarrow{r})$$

However, this potential, \(\hat{{\rm{V}}}\), is weak.

The second term corresponds to the spin-orbit interaction obtained from the Dirac equation and it is written as

$${\hat{{\rm{H}}}}_{{\rm{SO}}}=\xi (r)({\rm{L}}\cdot {\rm{S}})$$

where \(\xi (r)=\,-\,\frac{e\,{{\rm{\hbar }}}^{2}}{2{m}^{2}{c}^{2}}\frac{1}{r}\,\,\frac{dU(r)}{dr}\), with a potential \(U(r)\) for the electron that is spherically symmetric. As mentioned above, the SOC in Ir metal is strong and leads to important effects at the Ir L3 edge WL.

The last term, the crystal field (CF) potential, describes the interaction of the electrons of central atom with these of ligands. It strongly depends on the symmetry of the crystal structure. In general, such a contribution to the electron potential energy is given by

$${V}_{CF}(\overrightarrow{r})=\sum _{i=1}^{N}\frac{Z\,{e}^{2}}{\overrightarrow{{R}_{i}}-\overrightarrow{r}}$$

where \(\overrightarrow{{R}_{i}}\) is the position vector of the i-th point charge, \(\overrightarrow{r}\,\,\)is the electron coordinate and the summation includes all the point charges. In the 5d transition metals, the crystal field values are high, between 1 and 5 eV, hence the CF effect is also significant at the Ir L3 edge WL.

Therefore, and according to the theory, the effect of CLC cannot be strong in the XANES of the Ir since the non-local potential, which acts on the valence electrons, and is modified due to substantial reconstruction of inner 5p and 4f states at the transition, is very weak compared with the strong SOC and CF effect in Ir. On the other hand, the excellent agreement achieved between experimental and calculated spectra supports the accuracy of theoretical predictions of the behavior of the electronic structure of Ir under compression in the studied interval of compressions.


X-ray diffraction

The HP-XRD experiments were carried out at ID15B beamline of the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF, Grenoble, France). A monochromatic x-ray beam (E = 30 keV, λ = 0.4111 Å) was focused on the sample using two sets (one horizontal and one vertical) of compound refractive lenses22 to a beam size of 7 × 7 µm2. The XRD patterns have been collected using a MAR555 amorphous Se flat panel detector located at 400 mm from the position of the sample. Ir powder and a small amount of copper (Cu) powder, to be used as a standard pressure23, were placed in the pressure chamber of a membrane-driven DAC, mounting Boehler-Almax-design diamonds (culet diameter: 150 μm). The pressure chamber (50 μm in diameter) was laser drilled in a Re gasket, which were previously indented to 15 μm. The PTM selected was He to ensure the best possible hydrostatic conditions during the measurements. At each pressure, two images were collected, one in the position of the sample and another one in the position of the Cu powder. In each acquisition the ω-axis of the DAC was rotated between −3° and +3° in a single step with 1 second exposure time. The patters were integrated using DIOPTAS software24 and the pressure was calculated using the equation of state proposed by Dewaele et al. for the Cu powder. Data analysis was conducted by GSASII software25. The integrated x-ray diffraction patterns were fitted by Rietveld refinement method, but the lack of free coordinates of the atomic position allowed to determine the lattice parameters. These structural data have been fitted to a Birch-Murnaghan equation of state26 (BM EoS) using the software EosFit727.

X-ray absorption

The experiment has been performed at the BM23 beamline28 of the ESRF armed with a double crystal Si(111) monochromator and Kirkpatrick−Baez mirrors with a Pt coating to concentrate the x-ray beam to 4 × 4 μm2. The mirrors were fixed to an angle of 5 mrad to eliminate high order harmonics. XAS was measured in transmission mode at Ir L3-edge (11.215 KeV) until 90 GPa using a membrane-type pressure cell (DAC) equipped with 150 μm culet nanopolycrystaline diamond anvils29. The pressure transmitting medium (PTM) was helium (He) and we determined the pressure through the luminescence of a ruby placed in the cell.

The Extended X-ray Absorption Fine Structure (EXAFS) signal was extracted in a conventional way using the Demeter package30. In addition, the X-ray Absorption Near Edge Structure (XANES) was studied by carrying out simulations of XANES spectra in the framework of Density Functional Theory (DFT) using the WIEN2k software package31. Here, the Generalized Gradient Approximation exchange-correlation function PBE according to Perdew et al.32 was utilized. WIEN2k is based on the highly accurate all-electron Full-Potential Linearized Augmented Plane-Wave (FPLAPW) method. In this case, the Augmented Plane-Wave plus local orbital (APW + lo) basis set was used and spin-orbit coupling was included. To account for final state effects in the Ir L3 XANES spectra, a core-hole was inserted at the 2p3/2 orbital for a single atom. To avoid artificial interactions between core-ionized sites due to periodic boundary conditions, supercells of 108 Ir atoms were chosen for the calculations. By promoting a single electron to the valence band, the charge neutrality of the supercells was preserved. Lattice parameters were selected as corresponding to experimental values for the different pressures. While a single k-point was sufficient for the self-consistent DFT supercell calculations, an extra step with an 8 × 8 × 8 k-point mesh was done before obtaining the XANES spectra using the XSPEC package within WIEN2k. Finally, a 1.5 eV full width at half maximum Lorentzian broadening was applied for comparison with experiment.


Ir metal has been studied by two complementary techniques, XRD and XAS, as well as by theoretical DFT calculations in order to characterize its high-pressure structure and electronic properties. Ir metal remains in the fcc structure in the full pressure range studied. We characterized its pressure-volume EoS up to 1.4 Mbar using a third order BM EoS, giving rise to an experimental bulk modulus at ambient pressure of 339(3) GPa and its derivative of 5.3(1). Experimental characterization of its structure confirms the large stability of the low-pressure phase. The exhaustive analysis of the local structure and the electronic structure associated to the 2p → 5d transition, revealed the decrease of the first and second-neighbor distances while DW factors remain almost constant under compression. Moreover, the pressure dependence of the integrated intensities, the width and the peak position of the WL does not present remarkable changes. Here, we have demonstrated the difficulty to detect the effect of the CLC transition in the Ir metal through both experimental techniques. Nevertheless, we observe a nice agreement between experimental and theoretically calculated structural and electronic results. This feature supports the reliability of the theoretically predicted CLC transition in Ir at 80 GPa, which implies that additional experimental paths are needed to unambiguously verify its presence.


  1. 1.

    Cynn, H., Klepeis, J. E., Yoo, C.-S. & Young, D. A. Osmium has the Lowest Experimentally Determined Compressibility. Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 135701–135704 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Döhring, T. et al. Prototyping iridium coated mirrors for x-ray astronomy. Proc. SPIE 10235, 1023504–1023511 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Bednorz, J. G. & Müller, K. A. Possible high Tc superconductivity in the Ba−La−Cu−O system. Z. Phys. B: Condens. Matter 64, 189–193 (1986).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Tokura, Y. & Nagaosa, N. Orbital Physics in Transition-Metal Oxides. Science 288, 462–468 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kobayashi, K.-I., Kimura, T., Sawada, H., Terakura, K. & Tokura, Y. Room-temperature magnetoresistance in an oxide material with an ordered double-perovskite structure. Nature (London) 395, 677–680 (1998).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Hrubiak, R., Meng, Y. & Shen, G. Microstructures define melting of molybdenum at high pressures. Nature Commun. 8, 14562–14571 (2017).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Cerenius, Y. & Dubrovinsky, L. Compressibility measurements on iridium. J. Alloys Compd. 306, 26–29 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Grussendorff, S., Chetty, N. & Dreysse, H. Theoretical studies of iridium under pressure. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 15, 4127–4134 (2003).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Burakovsky, L. et al. Ab initio phase diagram of iridium. Phys. Rev. B 94, 094112–094120 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Dubrovinsky, L. et al. The most incompressible metal osmium at static pressures above 750 gigapascals. Nature 525, 226–229 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tal, A. A. et al. Pressure-induced crossing of the core levels in 5d metals. Phys. Rev. B 93, 205150–205156 (2016).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Merkel, S. et al. Deformation of polycrystalline MgO at pressures of the lower mantle. J Geophys Res. 107, 2271–2287 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Greenberg, E. et al. Pressure-Induced Site-Selective Mott Insulator-Metal Transition in Fe2O3. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031059–031071 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Nemoshkalenko, V. V., Mil’man, V. Y., Zhalko-Titarenko, A. V., Antonov, V. N. & Shitikov, Y. L. Pis’ma Zh. Eksp Teor. Fiz 47, 295–297 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Rehr, J. J. & Albers, R. C. Theoretical approaches to x-ray absorption fine structure. Rev. Mod. Phys. 72, 621–654 (2000).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Poiarkova, A. V. & Rehr, J. J. Multiple-scattering x-ray-absorption fine-structure Debye-Waller factor calculations. Phys. Rev. B 59, 948–957 (1998).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Glazyrin, K. et al. Importance of correlation effects in hcp iron revealed by a pressure-induced electronic topological transition. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 117206–117210 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sham, T. K. L-edge x-ray-absorption systematics of the noble metals Rh, Pd, and Ag and the main-group metals In and Sn: A study of the unoccupied density of states in 4d elements. Phys. Rev. B 31, 1888–1902 (1985).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Leapman, R. D., Grunes, L. A. & Fejes, P. L. Study of the L23 edges in the 3d transition metals and their oxides by electron-energy-loss spectroscopy with comparisons to theory. Phys. Rev. B 26, 614–635 (1982).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Choy, J.-H., Kim, D.-K., Hwang, S.-H., Demazeau, G. & Jung, D.-Y. the Ir-O Bond Covalency in Ionic Iridium Perovskites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 117, 8557–8566 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Clancy, J. P. et al. Spin-orbit coupling in iridium-based 5d compounds probed by x-ray absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 86, 195131- (2012).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Snigirev, A., Kohn, V., Snigireva, I. & Lengeler, B. A compound refractive lens for focusing high-energy X-rays. Nature 384, 49–51 (1996).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Dewaele, A., Loubeyre, P. & Mezouar, M. Equations of state of six metals above 94 GPa. Phys. Rev. B 70, 094112–094119 (2004).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Prescher, C. & Prakapenka, V. B. DIOPTAS: a program for reduction of twodimensional X-ray diffraction data and data exploration. High Pressure Res. 35, 223–230 (2015).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Toby, B. H. & Von Dreele, R. B. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all-purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Cryst. 46(2), 544–549 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Birch, F. Finite strain isotherm and velocities for single‐crystal and polycrystalline NaCl at high pressures and 300 K. J. Geophys. Res. 83, 1257–1268 (1978).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Angel, R. J., González-Platas, J. & Alvaro, M. EosFit7c and a Fortran module (library) for equation of state calculations. Z. Kristallogr. 229, 405–419 (2014).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Mathon, O. et al. The time-resolved and extreme conditions XAS (TEXAS) facility at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility: the general-purpose EXAFS bending-magnet beamline BM23. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 1548–1554 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ohfuji, H. et al. "Natural occurrence of pure nano-polycrystalline diamond from impact crater". Scientific Reports. 5: 14702.s, L. D., 2000. J. Alloys Compd. 306, 26–29 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Ravel, B. & Newville, M. ATHENA, ARTEMIS, HEPHAESTUS: data analysis for X-ray absorption spectroscopy using IFEFFIT. J. Synchrotron Radiat. 12, 537–577 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Blaha, P., Schwarz, K., Madsen, G. K. H., Kvasnicka, D. & Luitz, J. WIEN2K, An Augmented Plane Wave + Local Orbitals Program for Calculating Crystal Properties. Karlheinz Schwarz, Techn. Universität, Wien, Austria. (2001).

  32. 32.

    Perdew, J. P., Burke, S. & Ernzerhof, M. Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors thank the financial support of the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, the Spanish Research Agency (AEI), the European Fund for Regional Development (FEDER) under Grant No. MAT2016-75586-C4-1/2-P and the Generalitat Valenciana under Grant Prometeo/2018/123 (EFIMAT). V. M. acknowledges the “Juan de la Cierva” fellowship (FJCI-2016-27921) and J.A.S. acknowledges the “Ramón y Cajal” fellowship program (RYC-2015-17482) and Spanish Mineco Project FIS2017-83295-P. We acknowledge the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility for provision of official research beamtimes, the Swedish Government Strategic Research Area in Materials Science on Functional Materials at Linköping University (Faculty Grant SFO-Mat-LiU No 2009 00971), Knut and Alice Wallenbergs Foundation Project Strong Field Physics and New States of Matter CoTXS (2014–2019). The interpretation of theoretical results was supported by the Ministry of Science and High Education of the Russian Federation in the framework of Increase Competitiveness Program of NUST “MISIS” (No. K2-2019-001) implemented by a governmental decree dated 16 March 2013, No 211.

Author information




V.M., J.A.S., F.C. and G.G. performed the XRD measurements under pressure at ID15B beamline in the ESRF and they were analyzed by J.A.S., V.M. and D.E. The XAS measurements were carried out by V.M., J.A.S., C.P. and V.C. at BM23 beamline in the ESRF with nanodiamonds provided by T. I. The XAS results were analyzed by V.M., V.C. and S.P. The ab initio calculations were realized by W.O., I.A. and H.J.M.J. The understanding of the results and the writing of the article were performed by V.M., I.A., J.A.S., V.C., S.P. and D.E.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. Monteseguro.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Monteseguro, V., Sans, J.A., Cuartero, V. et al. Phase stability and electronic structure of iridium metal at the megabar range. Sci Rep 9, 8940 (2019).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing