Noasaurines form an enigmatic group of small-bodied predatory theropod dinosaurs known from the Late Cretaceous of Gondwana. They are relatively rare, with notable records in Argentina and Madagascar, and possible remains reported for Brazil, India, and continental Africa. In south-central Brazil, the deposits of the Bauru Basin have yielded a rich tetrapod fauna, which is concentrated in the Bauru Group. The mainly aeolian deposits of the Caiuá Group, on the contrary, bear a scarce fossil record composed only of lizards, turtles, and pterosaurs. Here, we describe the first dinosaur of the Caiuá Group, which also represents the best-preserved theropod of the entire Bauru Basin known to date. The recovered skeletal parts (vertebrae, girdles, limbs, and scarce cranial elements) show that the new taxon was just over 1 m long, with a unique anatomy among theropods. The shafts of its metatarsals II and IV are very lateromedially compressed, as are the blade-like ungual phalanges of the respective digits. This implies that the new taxon could have been functionally monodactyl, with a main central weight-bearing digit, flanked by neighbouring elements positioned very close to digit III or even held free of the ground. Such anatomical adaptation is formerly unrecorded among archosaurs, but has been previously inferred from footprints of the same stratigraphic unit that yielded the new dinosaur. A phylogenetic analysis nests the new taxon within the Noasaurinae clade, which is unresolved because of the multiple alternative positions that Noasaurus leali can acquire in the optimal trees. The exclusion of the latter form results in positioning the new dinosaur as the sister-taxon of the Argentinean Velocisaurus unicus.
Noasaurinae represents an enigmatic group of small-bodied predatory theropod dinosaurs best known from the iconic Masiakasaurus knopfleri, from the latest Cretaceous (Maastrichtian) of Madagascar1,2,3. Yet, the clade also minimally includes two other Late Cretaceous taxa from Argentina4, the name-bearing Noasaurus leali5,6, as well as Velocisaurus unicus7,8. In the most recent phylogenetic revision of the group4, Noasaurinae was found as sister to the Middle-Late Jurassic Elaphrosaurinae, together forming Noasauridae among the abelisauroid theropods. Other taxa possibly related to Noasaurinae includes a set of Cretaceous theropods from Gondwana, i.e.: Laevisuchus indicus2,8,9,10,11,12,13 and an unnamed form from India14, the Moroccan Deltadromeus agilis11,15,16, the Malagasy Dahalokely tokana10,17, an unnamed form from Niger18, and the Argentinean Ligabueino andesi17 and Austrocheirus isasii17, as well as the peri-Gondwanan Genusaurus sisteronis from France10,11,12. Yet, in part due to the scarce remains attributable to some of them, the relationships among these taxa and core-noasaurines are controversial and, at least for G. sisteronis and Da. tokana, there is more recent and substantial evidence4,17,18,19 suggesting that they do not belong to the Noasaurinae lineage, whereas De. agilis may instead represent a tetanuran theropod20.
The Bauru Basin was a sag basin developed in the south-central part of the South American Platform21, positioned in paleolatitudes corresponding to the “Southern Hot Arid Belt”22. Its deposits, i.e. the Bauru Supersequence23, lie upon the Valanginian-Aptian Serra Geral basalt flows24 and include the Caiuá and Bauru groups, which were respectively deposited in more aeolian and fluvial settings21,25. For some authors21, those stratigraphic units were chronocorrelated, respectively representing an inner desert and its surrounding alluvial environments. A more classical view26, endorsed by other researchers25,27, suggests that the Cauiá Group is older, representing a desert phase soon replaced by the more humid conditions recorded in the Bauru Group.
The fossil content of the Bauru Basin is mainly concentrated in the Bauru Group, which records a plethora of vertebrates, including dinosaurs, crocodilians, turtles, lizards, anurans, birds, and mammals28,29,30. As a whole, the fauna of the Bauru Group indicates a Coniacian to Maastrichtian age27, as corroborated by a recent radioisotopic dating31. Fossils are much rarer in the Caiuá Group, hampering the determination of its biostratigraphic correlations. These include an incomplete turtle shell from the Santo Anastácio Formation at Rubinéia-SP32, as well as the much richer fauna of Cruzeiro do Oeste-PR, which includes the new dinosaur described here. The Cruzeiro do Oeste fauna was first recognized by Manzig & Weinschütz33 and so far includes exceptionally preserved tapejarid pterosaurs, i.e. Caiuajara dobruskii34, and an acrodont lizard, i.e. Gueragama sulamericana35.
Dinosaurs are so far unknown from Caiuá Group deposits, whereas those from the Bauru Group include several titanosaur sauropods, as well as very fragmentary theropod remains36,37, including mostly abelisaurids36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44, but also megaraptorids45,46, unenlagiids47, noasaurids48, and improbably carcharodontosaurids49. Here, we describe the first dinosaur remains from the Caiuá Group, which also represent, to date, the most completely known theropod for the entire Bauru Basin. Moreover, the nesting of the new dinosaur within Noasaurinae improves our understanding of the anatomy of the group and of the evolution of some key anatomical features among abelisauroid theropods.
The Caiuá Group represents a Cretaceous quartz-sandstone sedimentary sequence21 deposited under arid conditions over most of the northern portions of the Serra Geral basalt flow. It has been assigned an Aptian-Albian age, based on its close association to those Valanginian-Aptian24 basalts and on the occurrence of tapejarid pterosaurs25. Nonetheless, the scarce record of pterosaurs in general casts doubts upon their utility for such correlations. On the other hand, a younger (Late Cretaceous) age can be suggested based on its inferred depositional synchronicity21 with rocks of the recently dated (as Coniacian to Campanian) Adamantina Formation31. According to some stratigraphic schemes, the Caiuá Group is composed of three coeval units: the Rio Paraná, Goio Erê, and Santo Anastácio formations. Previous accounts34,35 assign the fossil-bearing deposits of Cruzeiro do Oeste to the Goio Erê Formation, but the site is located in an area more commonly mapped as covered by sediments of the Rio Paraná Formation50. This assignment is confirmed here, based on a recent in loco revaluation of the stratigraphic relations and sedimentary structures present in the area.
In the studied area (Fig. 1), outcrops occur at hill tops and are composed of texturally and compositionally supermature, fine and very fine sandstones. These are reddish brown, with purple lamination. Three lithofacies (Fig. 2) could be identified: (1) the basalmost (Df) is composed of large cross-stratified sandstones, dipping SW (10° at the base, 25° at the top) and formed in the frontal face (lee side) of aeolian dunes, with an abrupt transition (cuneiform at the top) to the second lithofacies; (2) the second (Di) lithofacies is composed of massive reddish brown sandstones, with poorly defined plane-parallel bedding and faint centimetric ripple marks, deposited in wet interdunes, with the rich fossiliferous levels that yielded the specimen described herein, abruptly contacting the uppermost lihofacies; (3) the third (Df) lithofacies includes tangential cross stratification, dipping 15° NW, also corresponding to the frontal face of the dune. Although the depositional conditions of the Rio Paraná Formation can be described as primarily aeolian, representing a desert environment, the fossils and facies of the locality where the new dinosaur was found indicate the presence of enduring water bodies, most likely formed in interdune settings.
Material and Methods
The phylogenetic relationships of the new species was analysed using the dataset compiled by Rauhut and Carrano4, which is specially focused on noasaurid interrelationships. We added two extra characters and modified some scorings of the original version of this data matrix (see Supporting Information). As per the original study4, we deactivated two terminal entries (Spinostropheus gautieri and USNM 8415) and included the new dinosaur. In a second run of the analysis, we deactivated De. agilis, because this species probably represents a tetanuran theropod rather than a ceratosaur20. Thus, that second run was carried out based on 31 taxa and 220 characters (see Supporting Information).
The data matrix was analysed under equally weighted maximum parsimony using TNT v.1.551,52. A heuristic search of 1,000 replications of Wagner trees followed by TBR branch-swapping algorithm (holding 10 trees per replication) was performed. The best trees obtained were subjected to a final round of TBR branch swapping. Zero-length branches in any of the recovered most parsimonious trees were collapsed. Only two characters (33 and 165) were set as ordered (=additive) in the original study4, but we considered characters 33, 103, 104, 117, 138, 154, and 165 as additive due to their character-states representing nested sets of homologies.
Branch support was quantified using decay indices (Bremer support values53) and a bootstrap resampling analysis, using 1,000 pseudoreplicates and reporting both absolute and GC (that is, the difference between the frequencies of recovery in pseudoreplicates of the clade in question and the most frequently recovered contradictory clade) frequencies51. The minimum number of additional steps necessary to generate alternative, suboptimal tree topologies was calculated by constraining the position of terminal taxa in different parts of the tree and rerunning the analysis.
Branches or terminals that were topologically unstable through the recovered most parsimonious trees, producing polytomies in the strict consensus tree, were identified using the iterPCR protocol54. The iterPCR is based on an iterative evaluation of the agreement of triplets through the population of optimal trees54.
Theropoda Marsh 1881 sensu Gauthier55
Ceratosauria Marsh, 1884 sensu Holtz and Padian56
Abelisauroidea (Bonaparte and Novas, 1985) sensu Wilson et al.15
Noasauridae Bonaparte & Powell, 1980 sensu Wilson et al.15
Noasaurinae (Bonaparte & Powell, 1980) sensu Rauhut and Carrano4
The generic name derives from the words “vesper” (Latin for evening/west) and “sauros” (Greek for lizard/saurian), in reference to the name of the town, i.e. Cruzeiro do Oeste (=“Western Cross”), where the fossils were found. The specific epithet refers to the Paraná state, of which Ves. paranaensis represents the first non-avian dinosaur record.
MPCO.V (Museu de Paleontologia de Cruzeiro do Oeste, Cruzeiro do Oeste, Brazil) 0065d, postcranial remains possibly belonging to a same individual including three trunk (MPCO.V 0065d10a-c), three sacral (MPCO.V 0065d6-8), and three tail (MPCO.V 0065d4-5,9) vertebrae, partial left ilium (MPCO.V 0065d11) and ischium (MPCO.V 0065d2), and partial articulated right pes (MPCO.V 0065d1). The assignment of those different skeletal parts to the same individual is tentative and based on the absence of duplicated elements, their close association, and matching phylogenetic signal. Numerous isolated pterosaur bones (MPCO.V 0065p) were also found, mixed with the dinosaur remains, in the same block of sediment.
MPCO.V 0063b, left frontal; MPCO.V 0020c, tooth; MPCO.V 0067, axis; MPCO.V 0017, 0034, 0035, 0048, postaxial neck vertebrae; MPCO.V 0010, 0040, 0062a-b, 0066, trunk vertebrae; MPCO.V 0064a, sacral vertebrae; MPCO.V 0020, 0024, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0029, 0052, 0061, tail vertebrae; MPCO.V 0011, partial right scapulocoracoid; MPCO.V 0013, partial left scapulocoracoid; MPCO.V 0006 f, left scapular fragment; MPCO.V 0006d, left humerus; MPCO.V 0006j, left radius; MPCO.V 0064b, partial articulated right hand; MPCO.V 0042, partial right pubis; MPCO.V 0014, partial left ischium; MPCO.V 0018, right tibial shaft; MPCO.V 0057b, left metatarsal I; MPCO.V 0016, third distal tarsal and partial metatarsals II and III from the left side; MPCO.V 0055, MPCO.V 0063a, two partial right metatarsals II; MPCO.V 0044, 0059, two phalanges 2 of digit III; MPCO.V 0049, 0054, two phalanges 1 of digit III; MPCO.V 0056a-b, articulated right phalanges 1–2 of digit IV; MPCO.V 0060, right phalanx 1 of digit IV; MPCO.V 0057a, left phalanx 2 of digit IV; MPCO.V 0006k, articulated left phalanges 2–3 of digit IV; MPCO.V 0022, 0036a, two pedal ungual phalanges. These elements and the holotype were found in a mixed assemblage of dinosaur and pterosaur bones, over an area of about 500 square meters, with almost no evidence of closer association between parts. They are tentatively assigned to Ves. paranaensis based on their matching size and phylogenetic signal.
Type-locality and horizon
Dark red sandstones of the likely early Late Cretaceous Rio Paraná Formation21,50, exposed at the overbanks of a secondary road (53° 03′ 53″W, 26° 45′ 34″S) about 2 km north of Cruzeiro do Oeste, Paraná, Brazil (Fig. 1).
Distinguished from all other core-noasaurines (i.e. N. leali, Mas. knopfleri, and Vel. unicus) by the following unique combination of traits (unless explicitly mentioned, such differences are relative only to Mas. knopfleri) found in the holotype: ischiadic peduncle of the ilium not significantly projected ventrally relative to the pubic peduncle; ischium with no obturator notch; metatarsal II with an extremely lateromedially compressed shaft (≠ from Vel. unicus, Mas. knopfleri, and N. leali); distal articulation of metatarsal II with a shallower ventral sulcus and a lateromedialy broader medial flange (≠ from Mas. knopfleri and N. leali); lateromedially compressed metatarsal IV (≠ from Mas. knopfleri; = to Vel. unicus); pedal ungual of the fourth digit with a proximal end dorsoventrally taller than the distal end of phalanx IV-1 (≠ from Vel. unicus). In addition, other potential unique traits found in the referred material include (differences also relative only to Mas. knopfleri if not explicitly mentioned): frontal lacking a well-rimed upper temporal fossa; cranial margin of the axial diapophysis not separated from the lateral surface of the neural arch; axial epipophysis projecting distinctly beyond the postzygapophyseal facet; no cranial or caudal peduncular fossae in cranial post-axial neck vertebrae; mid-cervical vertebrae with prezygoepipophyseal lamina not cranially extensive (≠ from N. leali; = to Mas. knopfleri); mid-cervical vertebrae with epipophysis shorter than the length of the postzygapophyseal facet (≠ from N. leali; = to Mas. knopfleri); scapula blade not narrowing at its dorsal two-thirds; coracoid with a drop-shaped groove on the caudal portion of its lateral surface and a nearly straight caudal margin; humeral head more than twice (lateromedially) longer than (craniocaudally) broad in proximal view; humerus with convex distal condyles; pubis with an ambiens tuberosity on the dorsal surface of its proximal body; medial surface of the pubis with a semi-lunate depression caudal to the obturator foramen.
Based on the proportions of its holotype remains (MPCO.V 0065d), Ves. paranaensis was a small theropod, with an estimated body length of 1.0 to 1.5 meters. This is comparable in size to N. leali5 and the small individual (FMNH PR 2485) of Mas. knopfleri3, but larger than the known specimens of Vel. unicus6, and smaller than the adult of Limusaurus inextricabilis57. In order to estimate the body mass of Ves. paranaensis based on the equation of Campione et al.58, we employed the Benson et al.59 equation to infer femoral shaft circumference based on the tibial shaft circumference (46.18 mm in MPCO.V 0018). The resulting body mass estimate was 11.28 kg, similar to that of the ornithischians Jeholosaurus shangyuanensis and Gasparinisaura cincosaltensis.
An isolated left frontal (MPCO.V 0063b; Fig. 3a,b) is the single identified skull element recovered for Ves. paranaensis. It lacks its rostral third and the caudal margin is also incomplete. The bone is dorsoventrally flattened and slight arched upwards. It has a straight medial margin for the articulation with the antimere and a concave lateral margin, forming the large orbital rim, which is serrated at its central part. Although it resembles the frontal of Mas. knopfleri3 in general aspects, it is not a slender of an element, but nearly twice as broad (lateromedially) at its caudal margin than at its minimal breadth. The dorsal surface of the bone bears a finger-like depression at its caudolateral corner for the articulation of the postorbital. Medial to that, the bone lacks a well-rimmed upper temporal fossa similar to that of Mas. knopfleri3. Instead, a bulbous area (“db” in Fig. 3a) is present craniomedial to the postorbital articulation, directly in the position occupied by the cerebral hemisphere fossa within the internal surface of the bone of Mas. knopfleri3. That part of the ventral surface is covered by sediment in the frontal of Ves. paranaensis, but its lateral portion bears a marked orbital fossa, which maintains a similar lateromedial breadth along its preserved length and has a sharp ridge forming its medial margin.
A single mostly complete tooth crown (MPCO.V 0020c) was recovered from the sample (Fig. 3c–g; see Supporting Information). It was not preserved in direct association with the holotype, but mixed with other specimens, including pterosaur material. It is short: 5 mm tall (apicobasally) and 4 mm maximally broad mesiodistally. The apex is worn down, apparently as the result of wearing during the life of the animal, resulting in a general rounded labial/lingual profile. The mesial margin is markedly convex in labial/lingual view, whereas the distal margin is straight to slightly convex. This results in a nearly straight crown long axis, subtly curved backwards. The mesial and distal carinae are well-marked, but the crown is not strongly flattened labiolingually, being more than 3 mm broad on that axis near its base. In mesial/distal views, the crown has a subtly concave lingual and a convex labial margin, resulting in a lingually curved crown. In apical view, the carinae divide the crown in equally convex lingual and labial surfaces, but the latter is slightly more extensive. The carinae are oriented somewhat lingually, so that a subtle concavity is seen flanking them on the lingual surface, resulting in a “D-shaped” cross section of the crown60. The distal serration extends until the base of the crown, whereas that of the mesial carina finishes about 1 mm apical to it. The denticles are of similar size and development in both carinae, with 5–6 elements per millimetre, tending to be smaller closer to the base. The tooth lacks enamel wrinkles61,62 and extensive interdenticular sulci60,62,63,64.
If found isolated within a sample of multiple Cretaceous theropod taxa, the affinities of MPCO.V 0020c would probably be somewhat ambiguous, but here we suggest that it belongs to the same noasaurid taxon as the other skeletal remains under description. As such, it contrasts to the highly modified rostral teeth of Mas. knopfleri2, or isolated Masiakasaurus-like teeth from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil65. However, when compared with other theropods (including abelisauroids12,60,66,67,68), the combination of a “D-shaped” cross section and both carinae located in the lingual part of the tooth, indicates that it belongs to the same part of the jaw, i.e. premaxilla or rostral portion of the dentary. This hampers comparisons with the more elongated and distally curved maxillary teeth of N. leali and the more blade-like “distal teeth”66 of Mas. knopfleri. As these come from different (more caudal) portions of the tooth series, the identified differences are more likely related to tooth position than to taxonomy. Accordingly, we infer that MPCO.V 0020c belongs to the rostral part of the jaw of a noasaurid that did not share the extreme dental modifications seen in Mas. knopfleri1. It is, instead, more like the supposedly plesiomorphic rostral teeth seen in other abelisauroids66,67.
The cervical part of the axial skeleton of Ves. paranaensis is represented by an axial neural arch and several isolated postaxial elements. The latter include two disarticulated centra, three disarticulated neural arches, and two elements with those parts articulated, from the cranial (3rd to 6th positions) portion of the neck, as well as one rather complete caudal (8th or 9th position) cervical vertebra.
The axial neural arch (MPCO.V 0067; Fig. 4a) lacks its cranial margin and is best preserved on its right side. Its ventral margin, which articulated to the centrum, is sigmoid in lateral view, concave cranially and convex caudally. The articular facet for the atlantal postzygapophysis is located at the craniodorsal corner of the neural arch and does not project laterally to form a pedicel-like postzygapophysis. It instead faces caudolaterally and, although its cranial third is missing, was likely ovoid in shape (craniocaudally oriented long axis in lateral view). Below that, the strongly ventrally bent diapophysis trends cranially. Although lacking its cranial edge, the diapophysis was likely subtriangular in (dorsolateral) profile, because its caudal margin is cranioventrally to caudodorsally oriented. This differs from the axial diapophysis of Mas. knopfleri3, which has a concave caudal margin and a cranial margin more caudally positioned relative to the prezygapophyseal facet. In fact, as far as it is possible to infer, the cranial margin of the axial diapophysis of Ves. paranaensis is flush with the cranial margin of the neural arch and not separated from its lateral surface by a deep notch as in Mas. knopfleri3. The surface of the infradiapophyseal fossa is perforated by two expansive pneumatic apertures; one more medially, cranially, and ventrally positioned, and another more laterally, caudally, and dorsally placed. These are separated by an oblique (craniodorsally to caudoventrally oriented) lamina and at least the latter aperture seems to invade the neural arch. Above and lateral to that opening, a raised portion of the neural arch extends as a ridge from the caudal margin of the diapophysis towards the caudoventral corner of the neural arch, probably representing an incipient version of the caudal centrodiapophyseal lamina and forming the caudodorsal boundary of the infradiapophyseal fossa. The neural arch is depressed between that incipient lamina and the postzygapophysis, but no pneumatic fossa is observable. A similar arrangement of laminae and fossae is seen below the postzygodiapophyseal lamina of Mas. knopfleri3. The ovoid postzygapophyseal facet of Ves. paranaensis is laterally expanded, caudoventrally oriented, and lateromedially concave for its entire craniocaudal extension. The dorsal surface of the postzygapophysis possesses a dorsoventrally flattened epipophysis, which expands well caudal to the facet, resembling the condition in Li. inextricabilis (Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology, Beijing, China; IVPP V15923). In contrast, the axial epipophysis of Mas. knopfleri is much less projected caudally3. As a whole, the postzygapophysis expands caudodorsally at an angle of about 40° to the horizontal plane and the caudal margin of the neural arch below that is markedly concave in lateral view. The dorsal margin of the neural spine is sigmoid in lateral view, with a lateromedially expanded caudal portion. Its base extends from the cranial margin of the neural arch to surpass its caudal edge, forming a projection with a cranioventrally to caudodorsally oriented caudal margin, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri3. The caudal aperture of the neural canal is sub-rectangular, and slightly deeper than broad.
The best-preserved cranial postaxial neck vertebra, MPCO.V 0035 (Fig. 4b–g; see Supporting Information), has an hourglass-shaped centrum in ventral view, with cranial and caudal ends lateromedially expanded to about half the centrum length and a ca. 30% narrower central portion. The cranial end is somewhat broader lateromedially at its ventral part, due to the presence of the parapophyses, which expand cranioventrally from the cranioventral corner of the centrum. Yet, the articulation surfaces of the parapophyses are equally broad lateromedially. The ventral surface of the centrum is smooth, with no marked midline keel or groove, as is typical of Noasauridae4. A marked elliptical depression (“cvd” in Fig. 4d), with a lateromedial long axis, is present immediately caudal to the ventral margin of the cranial articulation facet, between the parapophyses. A pair of subtle grooves (“lvg” in Fig. 4d) extends craniolaterally from the midline of the caudal portion of the ventral surface of the centrum, entering its lateral surface and extending cranially in the direction of, but not reaching, a foramen located dorsal to the parapophyses. Between the caudal part of these grooves, a longitudinally elongated rugose area extends a short distance over the midline of the ventral surface of the centrum. The centrum is “parallelogram-shaped” in lateral view, although the cranial and caudal articular surfaces are not parallel, with the former facing much more ventrally than the latter faces dorsally, as also occurs in the cranial postaxial cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and an indeterminate noasaurid69 from the same unit (Lecho Formation) as N. leali. Furthermore, the cranial articular surface is dorsally displaced relative to the caudal, with the ventral margin of the centrum being subtly sigmoidal in lateral view: concave cranially and caudally concave. The caudal articulation is deeply excavated and has a sub-oval caudal outline, being slightly flattened dorsally and lateromedially broader than dorsoventrally deep. The cranial articular surface is nearly twice broader than deep and subtly concave at its centre, as is the case in Mas. knopfleri3. It has a pentagonal shape, with a dorsal base and ventrally converging lateroventral margins, the lateral portions of which are flanked by the parapophyses. Both lateral surfaces of the centrum bear a large ovoid pneumatic foramen dorsal to the parapohysis, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri3. This pneumatic foramen is absent, although a shallow blind fossa is present, in the cranial postaxial cervical vertebra of the indeterminate noasaurid from the Lecho Formation (Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales “Bernardino Rivadavia”, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MACN-Pv 662). In Ves. paranaensis, a broad ridge extends caudally from above the foramen to contact a larger, non-perforating depression (“ld” in Fig. 4c) in the caudal part of the centum, which bears a small nutrient foramen at its cranial margin. This is also seen in Mas. knopfleri3 and fits the position of the caudal pleurocoel of early theropods70. Another pneumatic foramen perforates the centrum at its mid-length, above the broad ridge and right below the neurocentral suture. The suture is partially closed at its cranial and, especially, caudal portions. Its remaining middle portion is composed of two nearly straight lines that converge dorsally to a summit below the diapophysis.
Each diapophysis expands lateroventrally from the lateral surface of the neural arch between the zygapophyses, tapering towards an area dorsal to the parapophysis. As the latter is located at the cranial part of the centrum, the diapophysis is subtriangular in dorsolateral profile, trending cranially at its lateral tip. Its dorsal surface is dorsolaterally arching and is slightly depressed at its centre. The position of the dia- and parapophysis suggests that the capitulum and tuberculum rib articulations were in close proximity. Each diapophysis is connected to the pre- and postzygapophyses by well-developed pre- and postzygodiapophyseal laminae. It is also connected to the craniodorsal corner of the centrum by the cranial centrodiapophyseal lamina, which corresponds to a mainly vertical pillar of bone. That centrodiapophyseal lamina is absent in the indeterminate noasaurid of the Lecho Formation (MACN-Pv 662). In addition, the caudal centrodiapophyseal lamina of MPCO.V 0035 extends craniodorsally from the caudodorsal corner of the centrum to intercept the middle part of the postzygodiapophyseal lamina. As seen in the best-preserved left side, the set of laminae radiating from the diapophysis defines the neural arch fossae. The infraprezygapophyseal fossa is set below the prezygodiapophyseal and cranial to the cranial centrodiapophyseal laminae. It faces mainly cranioventrally and is perforated by a pneumatic foramen that leads medially with a caudodorsal cant. The infradiapophyseal fossa is set between the centrodiapophyseal laminae and medial to the distal portion of the zygodiapophyseal laminae. It is perforated by three extensive pneumatic openings leading dorsally through the pedicel. The infrapostzygapophyseal fossa is set between the prezygodiapophyseal and the cranial centrodiapophyseal laminae and, unlike the fourth neck vertebra of Mas. knopfleri3, it is not perforated by any pneumatic structure. Both cranial and caudal openings of the neural canal are rounded and similar in size, i.e. about 2/3 the breath of the articular facets.
The prezygapophyses are incomplete, but expand craniolaterally from the neural arch at an angle of 20° in dorsal view. The postzygapophyses form slightly higher angles to the sagittal line in the same view. Their articular facets are transversely concave along their craniocaudal length. They face mainly ventrally, slightly caudally, and slightly laterally on their medial portions. The epipophysis is a constrained blunt ridge above each postzygapophysis and, unlike in Mas. knopfleri3, does not project caudal to the articular facet. The prezygoepipophyseal lamina corresponds to a subtle ridge on the dorsolateral edge of the neural arch. Most of the likely dorsoventrally short neural spine is missing, but its preserved base indicates that it extended over the caudal half of the neural arch. Cranial to that, the roof of the neural canal is exposed between the spinoprezygapophyseal laminae, forming a deep (deeper than lateromedially broad at its cranial end) fossa (“dcrf” in Fig. 4e), which continues caudally as the prespinal fossa on the cranial surface of the neural spine, as also occurs in the cranial postaxial cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and the indeterminate noasaurid of the Lecho Formation69. In dorsal view, the fossa takes the form of a craniocaudally elongated half-ellipse, that occupies nearly 1/3 of the craniocaudal length of the neural arch. In that same view, a subtriangular fossa (“dcf” in Fig. 4e) expands lateromedially towards its caudal end exposing the caudal part of the roof of the neural canal. The fossa is also subtriangular in caudal view, broader at the base, where two lateral furrows extend cranially into the neural arch, as also seen in Mas. knopfleri3 and the indeterminate noasaurid of the Lecho Formation69, with ventral diverticula extending into the pedicle. The flat surface between them is continuous to the postspinal fossa on the caudal surface of the neural spine.
MPCO.V 0048 (Fig. 4h–j) preserves only the centrum and the cranial half of the left neural arch. It matches the previously described vertebra in various aspects, but is 25% longer and its articulations are dorsoventrally deeper, although not significantly broader lateromedially. Other differences include cranial and caudal articulations set more perpendicularly relative to the long axis of the centrum in lateral view and subparallel to one another, resembling the condition in the mid-cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and La. indicus9. Yet, the cranial articulation is still slightly offset dorsally relative to the caudal. It is shallowly concave overall and has a hexagonal shape in cranial view, with a broader dorsal margin and ventrolateral margins that converge to a short ventral margin between the parapophyses. The cranial articular surface is approximately as tall as broad, contrasting with the transversely broader cranial articulations of the middle-cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and La. indicus9. The centrum is also more lateromedially compressed at its centre and its ventral surface is more concave in lateral view, bearing a subtle longitudinal ridge on its caudal portion flanked by a pair of equally subtle longitudinal fossae. Also, as in MPCO.V 0035, a lateromedially elongated depression is seen on the cranial margin of the ventral surface, slightly cranial to the parapophyses. MPCO.V 0048 is almost certainly from a more caudal part of the neck than MPCO.V 0035; respectively deriving from around the 5th–6th and 3rd–4th positions, when compared to Mas. knopfleri3. The lateral surface of the centrum of MPCO.V 0048 is excavated by a caudally tapering, subtriangular depression (“crd” in Fig. 4i) at its cranial third, dorsal to the parapophyses. It bears a more deeply excavated fossa on its cranial portion and a perforating foramen at its caudal tip. This fossa is at the same position as the cranial pneumatic foramina of the mid-cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and La. indicus9. As in Mas. knopfleri2, N. leali (Fundación “Miguel Lillo”, San Miguel de Tucumán, Argentina; PVL 4061), and La. indicus9, but unlike MPCO.V 0035, a shallow ovoid peduncular fossa (=laminopeduncular foramen71) is seen laterodorsal to the cranial opening of the neural canal. This also suggests a more caudal position for this vertebra, as the peduncular fossa gets better developed in middle neck vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2.
MPCO.V 0034a-d represents a set of two disarticulated neural arches and centra (Fig. 4k–p; see Supporting Information), which match in size and possibly correspond to parts of the same two elements. One of the centra is elongate (MPCO.V 0034c; Fig. 4o), ventrally concave, with offset and non-parallel articulations, probably positioned around the 4–5th neck vertebrae. The other seems to represent a more caudal element (MPCO.V 0034d; Fig. 4p). It differs from the previous one in having more parallel articulations, less laterally projected parapophyses, a less concave ventral margin with a longitudinal midline ridge, and a maximal lateromedial compression displaced towards its cranial half. Both centra have two clear pneumatic openings on each of their lateral surfaces, with the one caudodorsal to the parapophyses being much larger. This resembles the condition in La. indicus9, and a caudal cervical vertebra of Mas. knopfleri2, in which the caudal aperture is, however, as large as the cranial. Indeed, the caudal of such foramina has been considered a ceratosaur synapomorphy4, but it is also present in non-averostran neotheropods (e.g. Dilophosaurus wetherilli: University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley, USA; UCMP 37302). As with MPCO.V 0048, MPCO.V 0034c is three times craniocaudally longer than its maximum dorsoventral depth, a character considered synapomorphic for the mid-cervical vertebrae of Noasauridae4.
Compared to MPCO.V 0035, the best-preserved neural arch of MPCO.V 0034 (MPCO.V 0034a; Fig. 4k–m) has a caudal centrodiapophyseal lamina reaching its cranial summit closer to the diapophysis, which is less ventrally pendant. As such, it resembles the mid-cervical elements of Mas. knopfleri2, as well as the only known cervical vertebra of N. leali5. It was detached from its centrum along the neurocentral suture, which is composed of two nearly straight lines that converge dorsally below the caudal margin of the diapophysis. The zygodiapophyseal laminae are as developed as those of MPCO.V 0035, but the cranial centrodiapophyseal lamina is less pillar-like and more horizontally oriented. Both infrazygapophyseal fossae are well developed and perforated by a large pneumatic opening leading to the centre of the neural arch, with a small subsidiary foramen in the case of the right infrapostzygapophyseal fossa. Likewise, two large openings perforate the dorsal surface of the infradiapophyseal fossa. There is no recognisable peduncular fossa, contrasting with those seen in Mas. knopfleri2, N. leali (PVL 4061), and La. indicus2,9. In dorsal view, the neural arch of MPCO.V 0034a is elongated (nearly twice longer that maximally broad), waisted at its middle part, and bears equally laterally projected zygapophyses. As such, it more resembles the mid-neck vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2 than those described for both N. leali5 and La. indicus2,9. Yet, given the non-elevated prezygapophyses, it probably still comes from the cranial half of the neck, around the 4–5th positions, although more caudally positioned than MPCO.V 0035. The dorsal surface of its diapophysis is markedly depressed and medially bounded by a ridge that extends caudally from the caudolateral corner of the prezygapophyses. This ridge forms the angled dorsolateral margin of the cranial half of the neural arch, as is typical of abelisauroids4. The ridge faints caudal to the diapophysis, merging towards the postzygodiapophyseal lamina. Although this ridge is surely homologous to the prezygoepipophyseal lamina, it does not reach the epipophysis, as it does in the mid-cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri3 and the available cervical vertebrae of N. leali5 and La. indicus2,9, leaning instead towards the lateral margin of the postzygapophiseal facet. In dorsal view, the prezygapophyses expand craniolaterally at an angle of ca. 20° to the sagittal line, whereas the postzygapophyses form a slightly smaller angle. The ovoid prezygapophyseal facets face mostly dorsally, with minor cranial and medial windings, resembling the condition in N. leali5 and the 4th cervical vertebra of Mas. knopfleri3. In contrast, this differs from the larger and more strongly angled prezygapophyses of La. indicus2,9. The postzygapophyseal facets nearly mirror the prezygapophyseal arrangement, facing mostly ventrally, but also slightly caudally and laterally. Each postzygapophysis is covered by a plate-like epipophysis that extends caudal to the articular facet for about half of its craniocaudal length, contrasting with the proportionally longer and more dorsally projected epipophyses of N. leali (PVL 4061). The well-developed and tapering cranial projection observed on the prezygoepipophyseal lamina of N. leali6 is not present in any of the available cervical vertebrae of Ves. paranaensis, Mas. knopfleri3, and La. indicus2,9. The neural spine expands only slightly dorsally, occupying only about 1/5 the craniocaudal length of the neural arch, in a position that probably corresponds to the cranial part of the centrum, as is typical of noasaurines2,4. It is cranially bordered by the fossa located between the spinoprezygapophyseal laminae, but does not reach the corresponding caudal fossa, which is broader and more “V-shaped” in dorsal view. The second neural arch of MPCO.V 0034 (MPCO.V 0034b; Fig. 4n), is more fragmentary and lacks its cranial half. It matches the above described arch in most details, although the postzygapophysis expands caudally with a more marked dorsal inflection, around 30° to the horizontal plane, suggesting a more caudal position in the neck. The epipophyses are narrower lateromedially, with a more oblique long axis when viewed caudally. They extend cranially as a dorsal ridge, not observed in MPCO.V 0034a, but it is unclear if it connected to the prezygapophysis. As typical of noasaurids4, the epipophyses are not dorsally expanded, but do not approach the caudally sharply pointed morphology seen in the mid-cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2 and N. leali6.
MPCO.V 0017 corresponds to a caudal neck vertebra (Fig. 5a–e; see Supporting Information), around 8–9th positions if compared to the presacral series of Mas. knopfleri2,3. The centrum is elongate, nearly 2.5 times longer than deep. In lateral view, the ventral surface is concave, and the articular facets are parallel to one another and positioned at the same dorsoventral plane. There is no marked groove or keel on the ventral surface of the centrum, although a subtle ridge is present within its cranial half, being broader cranially and flanked by an equally subtle pair of elongate depressions. Both articulations are shallowly concave and about 1.5 broader than deep. Their cranial and caudal outlines are, respectively, subrectangular and crescent-shaped (concave dorsally and convex along the rest of its margins). The parapophyses are located at the cranioventral corners of the centrum, which has depressed lateral surfaces. Together with the flattened ventral surface, this results in a subrectangular vertebral body in cross section, with angled lateroventral edges. Better evidenced on the left side, a pair of pneumatic apertures pierce each side of the centrum at its cranio- and caudodorsal corners, resembling the condition of the caudal cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2. The neurocentral junction is still recognisable as a pair of nearly straight suture lines that converge dorsally towards the middle of the vertebra.
The neural arch is marked by the presence of robust diapophyses, both of which have broken lateral ends. The broken surfaces of the diapophyses expose the highly pneumatic internal structure of the neural arch, which is composed of large chambers separated by trabeculae. As preserved, each expands laterally, with no meaningful caudal or ventral inflections, but with a minor cranial inflection, and its caudal margin is positioned at the mid-length of the centrum. Each diapophysis is surrounded by the typical saurischian laminae and fossae complex. The well-developed postzygodiapophyseal and caudal centrodiapophyseal laminae surround a deep infrapostzygapophyseal fossa. This opens caudolaterally and is perforated by a main/central pneumatic aperture that leads medially with a craniodorsal inflection towards the neural arch. Inside the fossa, smaller blind pockets are positioned both dorsal and ventral to the aperture. As best seen in the left side, the shallower infradiapophyseal fossa is perforated by cranial, dorsal, and caudal foramina, the former of which is significantly larger, leading craniomedially into the neural arch. A similar pattern, but not identical in terms of size and position of the apertures, is seen on the right side. Unlike its caudal counterpart, which reaches the caudodorsal corner of the centrum, the cranial end of the cranial centrodiapophyseal lamina is more dorsally positioned. Indeed, it does not reach the craniodorsal corner of the centrum, but intercepts the cranial margin of the neural arch somewhat dorsal to that. A very similar pattern was described for a caudal cervical vertebra of Mas. knopfleri2. Consistent with the minor cranial projection of the prezygapophyses, the prezygodiapophyseal lamina is relatively short. As a result, the infraprezygapophyseal fossa, formed between the two previously mentioned laminae is dorsally displaced and relatively small. It is medially bordered by the dorsal half of the pedicle (=centroprezygapophyseal lamina2) and, although not well preserved in either side, it appears to have hosted a deep pneumatic furrow penetrating caudomedially into the neural arch, as described for Mas. knopfleri2. There is no peduncular fossa, as is the case in the caudal cervical vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2.
Both cranial and caudal apertures of the neural canal are ovoid, ca. 1.5 times broader than deep, and much smaller than the respective centrum articulation. The neural arch is rather craniocaudally extensive at its base, its ventral articulation spreading over about 80% the craniocaudal length of the centrum, narrowing along that axis as it expands dorsally towards the zygapophyses. Although positioned nearly at the same dorsoventral level, the zygapophyses are structured very differently from one another, as is the dorsal surface of the neural arch between them and the neural spine. The prezygapophyses do not expand cranial to the cranial margin of the centrum, as occurs in Mas. knopfleri2. In fact, their articular facet is not much more than a cranial expansion of the margin of the bone that extends craniolaterally (forming an angle of 45° to the sagittal line in dorsal view) between the cranial ends of the neural spine and the diapophysis. The prezygapophyseal facet is ovoid, with a craniocaudal long axis. It is oriented dorsomedially (forming an angle of about 45° to the vertical/horizontal axis in cranial view), but also slightly caudally. The dorsal surface of the neural arch caudomedial to the prezygapophyses is strongly depressed. It then rises both medially and caudally to form the nearly vertical lateral surfaces of the neural spine. The area flanking the neural spine is excavated by a deep dorsoventrally elongated pneumatic pocket (“df1” in Fig. 5e), the ventral portion of which perforates towards the roof of the neural canal, as seen in Mas. knopfleri2. Another pneumatic aperture (“df2” in Fig. 5e), is positioned caudolateral to the prezygapophyseal facet, perforating caudomedioventrally the dorsal surface of the diapophysis. In cranial view, bordered laterally by the above-mentioned pocket and depressed surface, it is possible to see that, in contrast to more cranial neck vertebrae, the neural spine is dorsoventrally extensive, corresponding to half the depth of the neural arch, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri2. Its cranial surface is excavated by a shallow and (following the shape of the spine) dorsoventrally elongated prespinal fossa. This is likely related to the attachment of the interspinous ligament, which may also account for the lateromedial compression of the craniodorsal portion of the spine. In lateral view, the neural spine is caudodorsally oriented and its cranial margin forms an angle of about 75° to the horizontal. This is also the case of its caudal margin, which is excavated by an equally elongated, but slightly deeper postspinal fossa, which is also possibly related to the attachment of the interspinous ligament. The distal end of the neural spine has two transverse clefts that define a central prominence. The presence of a single transverse cleft is present in the caudal cervical and cranial dorsal vertebrae of Mas. knopfleri2 and Majungasaurus crenatissimus71. As occurs in the above-mentioned species, the distal end of the neural spine of Ves. paranaensis is lateromedially constricted in dorsal view at the level of the transverse clefts. The base of the neural spine occupies only the cranial half of the roof of the neural canal, with its dorsal margin located caudal to the mid-length of the centrum. In dorsal view, the roof of the neural canal has mirroring cranial and caudal margins, so that the latter is caudolaterally oriented at an angle of about 45° to the sagittal line. As a consequence, only about 50% of the neural canal is roofed at the midline. All those medial elements of the caudal portion of the neural arch are laterally covered by the strongly caudodorsally expanded postzygapophyses and associated laminae, which extend well beyond the level of the caudal margin of the centrum. As such, the caudal margin of the neural arch, including the part formed by the postzygapophyseal extension above the roof of the neural canal, is markedly concave in lateral view, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri2. The oval postzygapophyseal articular facets have a craniocaudal long axis and face caudolaterally, forming a 45° angle to the horizontal/vertical planes. The dorsal surface of each postzygapophysis is covered by a strong ridge, which is probably homologous to the spinopostzygapophyseal lamina72. As such, there is no prezygoepipophyseal lamina. The ridge extends craniomedially, reaching the caudal margin of the neural spine at its dorsal tip. The surface lateral to that is elevated relative to more cranial areas. Ventromedial to the ridge, a vertical wall forms the medial surface of the postzygapophysis above the roof of the neural canal. This is delimited cranially by the caudal margin of the neural spine and ventrally by the roof of the neural canal caudal to the spine. This wall is, however, nearly entirely excavated by a pneumatic opening (“dcpo” in Fig. 5c) leading cranially to several chambers that fill the space between the postzygodiapophyseal lamina and the concealed lateral surface of the neural spine, also penetrating the pedicle (ventrally) and the diapophysis (laterally). In caudal view, two ridges extend ventrally from the postzygapophyseal facet. The more lateral (“lr” in Fig. 5c) reaches the dorsolateral corner of the centrum, its ventral half representing the caudal margin of the lateral wall (pedicle) of the neural canal. The medial ridge corresponds to the intrapostzygapophsyeal lamina. It extends halfway down and turns medially to continue as the caudal margin the roof of the neural canal and meet its counterpart. A subtle depression is formed between the two ridges, which is not pneumatically perforated as in Mas. knopfleri2.
The trunk series of Ves. paranaensis is represented only by one isolated partial neural arch (MPCO.V 0066; Fig. 5f–h) and some isolated centra (e.g. MPCO.V 0010, 0040, 0062a-b), including three preserved in the holotypic block (MPCO.V 0065d10a-c; Fig. 5i–m). The centra are all very simple elements, ventrally concave in lateral view, lateromedially constricted at their mid-length, and lacking midline ridges or a groove on their ventral surface. They are usually more than 1.5 times longer than deep, as is typical of Noasauridae4, with the cranial and caudal articulations both concave and somewhat deeper than broad. These traits compare well with those of the middle-caudal trunk vertebra of Mas. knopfleri3, a referral also bolstered by the absence of parapophyseal facets in the centra, which comparatively indicates positions caudal to the 4th trunk element. A longitudinally elongated depression is present on their lateral surface, cranially deeper in some elements, but the pneumatic apertures seen in the neck vertebrae, and in some cranial trunk vertebra of Mas. knopfleri3, are lacking. The alternative referral of these centra to the proximal part of the tail, with Mas. knopfleri3 bearing very similar vertebrae in this region to the caudal part of the trunk, is tentatively dismissed given the absence of evident haemal arch facets and the somewhat more gracile morphology of the lateral and ventral margins of the articulation facets4. It is worth noting, however, that the lateromedial constriction of some centra better fits the expected morphology of tail vertebrae.
The partial neural arch MPCO.V 0066 compares better to those of the middle part of the trunk series of Mas. knopfleri3. Only the central part of the right neural arch is preserved, lacking the roof of the neural canal, postzygapophysis, and neural spine. The diapophysis is dorsolaterally and slightly caudally directed, and positioned on the caudal half of the neural arch. In ventral/dorsal views, the diapophysis becomes craniocaudally narrower as it expands laterally to end in a straight margin for the capitular articulation. Although incomplete, the parapophysis is positioned well above the neurocentral junction on the cranial margin of the neural arch, somewhat below the level of the diapophysis. A sharp cranial centroparapophyseal lamina extends ventrally from the parapophysis to reach the cranioventral corner of the neural arch. The caudal centroparapophyseal lamina described for Mas. knopfleri3 cannot be observed, although a ridge extends caudoventrally from the parapophysis. The cranial centroparapophyseal lamina laterally hides a very deep infraprezygapophyseal fossa, which is clearly visible in cranial view, lateral to the prezygapophysis. The prezygapophysis extends further cranially than the ventral margin of the neural arch and is connected to the parapophysis by the prezygoparapophyseal lamina, which covers the infraprezygapophyseal fossa. The articular face is small, ovoid, and faces dorsally. The parapophysis is connected to the diapophysis by the paradiapophyseal lamina, which roofs the infradiapophyseal fossa. The caudal margin of this fossa is formed by a strong caudal centrodiapophyseal lamina, which buttresses the diapophysis as a vertical pillar, its ventral portion bowing caudally towards the caudoventral corner of the neural arch. A poorly preserved infrapostzygapophyseal fossa excavates the caudal surface of the caudal centrodiapophyseal lamina, dorsolateral to the preserved part of the neural arch pedicle. It is not clear if the fossa possessed pneumatic apertures.
Sacral vertebrae are represented by three isolated centra (MPCO.V 0065d6-8) from the holotypic block, as well as by an articulated series of three centra (MPCO.V 0064a; Fig. 6a) exposed in ventral view within the same block as the partial hand. The articulated sacral centra are completely co-ossified to one another, as indicated by the longitudinal striations on the lateromedially expanded portions of the series. This indicates that the cranialmost vertebra of the series (“sv1” in Fig. 6a) lacks its cranial margin and that only the cranial portion of the caudalmost element (“sv3” in Fig. 6a) was preserved. As seen in Mas. knopfleri2 and other neotheropods, sacral ribs are shared by adjacent centra in MPCO.V 0064a. The craniocaudal length of the most completely preserved centrum is more than twice its transverse width at mid-length. All elements have a concave ventral margin in lateral view and a transversely rounded, smooth ventral surface, with no midline groove or ridge. Based on the relative position of the portion of ilium preserved alongside the vertebrae and in comparison to Mas. knopfleri2, these most probably correspond to sacral vertebrae 1−3. Also, with respect to the more complete holotypic ilium, there would be space for three extra sacral elements medial to the iliac postacetabular ala. Accordingly, a six-vertebrae sacrum, as seen in Mas. knopfleri2 and generally typical of ceratosaurs4, seems likely for Ves. paranaensis.
The three isolated elements of the holotypic sacral vertebrae (Fig. 6b–e) are preserved disarticulated among the ilium, ischium, and foot. This indicates that the centra were not co-ossified at the time of death, which is consistent with their smaller size (about 30%) compared to those of MPCO.V 0064a. Likewise, as only the centra are preserved, the neurocentral junction was probably also not fully closed. The centra are all about twice longer than lateromedially broad at their mid-length, but expand laterally at both the cranial and caudal margins. The cranial margin is typically the broader of the two, being almost the length of the centrum in two of the elements, and reaching that length in one of them. These lateral expansions are related to the rib articulations, which are always shared between consecutive centra. As such, their craniolateral corners are flattened, forming craniolaterally facing articular facets for the ribs. The centra are dorsoventrally low, with their articulation facets lower than half of their craniocaudal lengths. Accordingly, the facets are also about twice broader (lateromedially) than deep. Most of these are flat and crescent-shaped in outline, concave dorsally and convex along the other margins. The lateral surface of the centra are depressed, but lack pneumatic apertures. Their ventral surfaces are concave in lateral view and lack a midline ridge or groove. Similar to Mas. knopfleri4, the preserved sacral vertebrate indicate that Ves. paranaensis did not possess the transversely compressed, rod-like middle sacral centra see in other ceratosaurs.
Caudal vertebrae in the Ves. paranaensis assemblage include three disarticulated elements from the holotype (MPCO.V 0065d4-5, 0065d9), as well as several isolated or clustered bones (MPCO.V 0020, 0024, 0025, 0026, 0027, 0029, 0052, 0061). Their centra are all amphicoelous and more than twice (often three times) longer than dorsoventrally deep. There is no evidence of vertebral pneumatization and the neural arches lack laminae. Compared to Mas. knopfleri2,3, this indicates that the preserved vertebrae belong to the middle and distal portions of the tail. There is no sign of the neurocentral junction in any of the tail vertebrae. The best-preserved holotypic element (MPCO.V 0065d5; Fig. 6i) is very similar to the figured mid-caudal vertebra of Mas. knopfleri2. The centrum is nearly three times longer than deep at its proximal and distal articulations. Its ventral margin is concave in lateral view and the distal facet for the chevron articulation is more marked than the proximal. The neural arch corresponds to more than half the dorsoventral depth of the vertebra at its mid-length. The dorsoventrally flattened transverse process expands laterally with a slight ventral cant. Although distally broken, its preserved base shows that the process was slightly caudally oriented and placed above the caudal half of the centrum. The prezygapophysis is proximodorsally oriented at an angle of about 40° to the horizontal axis and surpasses the proximal margin of the centrum. Compared to the prezygapophyses, the postzygapophyses are less dorsally oriented, but are dorsally arched. Their articular facets face medially and slightly dorsally. The ridge that connects the dorsal margins of the zygapophyses is more marked towards the postzygapophysis, nearly disappearing along the middle of the neural arch. No vestige of a distinct epipophysis is present. The neural spine extends over nearly the entire midline of the neural arch, corresponding to a faint ridge along its proximal part and expanding dorsally within its distal third. It does not display the marked dorsal rise seen in the corresponding vertebrae of Maj. crenatissimus71, resembling more the condition in Mas. knopfleri2. The two other tail vertebrae of the holotype, especially the more fragmentary MPCO.V 0065d9 (Fig. 6f–h), are very similar to the aforementioned. In the latter vertebra, it is possible to identify a subtle double-keel on the ventral surface of the centrum (area that is covered with matrix in the previously described vertebra). MPCO.V 0065d4, in contrast, has a less elongated centrum (two times longer than deep) and a more proximally extensive transverse process, likely representing a more proximal element. Its postzygapophyses are less dorsally arched compared to MPCO.V 0065d5. Its facet is ovoid and lateroventrally facing. The centrum and the aperture of the neural canal are circular in proximal view, but the latter is twice smaller.
All the other caudal vertebrae referred to Ves. paranaensis (Fig. 6j–r) come from more distal portions of the tail compared to those of the holotype. They are generally more elongate and their centra have a strong midline groove in the ventral surface, laterally flanked by a double ventral keel, as in Mas. knopfleri2. The neural spine and transverse processes take the form of distally displaced inconspicuous ridges, more marked in more proximal elements. The chevron articulation facets are subtle and some centra have striations surrounding the proximo- and distoventral corners. The more proximal of these elements (Fig. 6j,n–r) have less elongate centra (about three times longer than deep), with more strongly concave ventral margins in lateral view. They are also less lateromedially compressed, with proximal/distal articulations typically broader lateromedially than dorsoventrally deep. The neural arches also lack a mid-length constriction and bear marked ridges (“dlr” in Fig. 6n,p) extending along their dorsolateral edges between the zygapophyses. The better preserved prezygapophyses extend proximal to the proximal margin of the centrum for a distance corresponding to 15% the centrum length, whereas the articular facet of the only complete postzygapophysis forms a 30° angle to the vertical plane. More distal tail centra (Figs k–m) are more elongated, nearly four times longer than deep, as well as being more lateromedially compressed. This is seen in the proximal/distal articulations, which are dorsoventrally deeper than lateromedially broad in some elements. The neural arch is also lateromedially constricted between the zygapophyses. The only completely preserved prezygapophysis extends proximal to the proximal margin of the centrum for a distance corresponding to 20% the centrum length.
A pair of right and left scapulocoracoids (respectively MPCO.V 0011, Fig. 7a–c, and MPCO.V 0013) of approximately the same size are preserved. However, given some minor anatomical differences, these probably come from different individuals. Both lack the distal portion of the scapular blade, the cranial margin of the acromial area, and the cranial half of the coracoid. Additionally, the glenoid area of a slightly smaller left scapulocoracoid (MPCO.V 0006f, Fig. 7d), probably represents a younger individual. The latter was found near a left humerus (MPCO.V 0006d), with which it probably articulated, given that the humeral head and the glenoid have matching size/shape. The larger left scapula and coracoid show a complete fusion between the two bones, whereas traces of the suture line are still observable in the right pectoral bones. Both scapula and coracoid bow laterally in cranial/caudal views, as does the overall scapulocoracoid, fitting the outer curvature of the ribcage. Yet, a slight medial deflection occurs at near the junction of the two bones.
MPCO.V 0013 bears preglenoid ridge and fossa73 that are much better developed than in the other two specimens. When the former is aligned to the horizontal, the scapular blade expands caudodistally from the scapular body at an angle of ca. 45°, as also is the case in MPCO.V 0011. In both specimens, the cranial margin of the scapular blade is incomplete in the ventral fourth of its preserved length. Distal to that, the cranial and caudal margins of the blade are almost parallel, so that its craniocaudal breadth right above its incomplete cranioventral margin is only about 15% higher than at its most distally preserved portion. Accordingly, the craniocaudal narrowing of the blade seen in Li. inextricabilis57 and Mas. knopfleri3, as well as the caudal angle formed at the distal portion of the blade in those taxa, is not present in Ves. paranaensis. However, as seen in Mas. knopfleri3, a subtly concave surface (“lcs” in Fig. 7a) is present above the preglenoid ridge, displaced somewhat cranially along the lateral surface of the blade and directly caudal to its incomplete cranial margin. Caudal to that, the scapular blade thickens lateromedially. In MPCO.V 0013, the caudal margin of the blade above the glenoid is transversely rounded. In contrast, the other scapulae possess a ridge (“scr” in Fig. 7b) extending dorsomedially from the dorsolateral corner of the glenoid, so that the caudal margin of the blade is sharper at that point. Lateral to the ridge and distal to the glenoid, a supraglenoid pit is present in all specimens, probably representing the attachment of the scapular head of M. triceps74. The supraglenoid pit is aligned directly caudal to the preglenoid ridge. In MPCO.V 0011, a stout ridge (“sr” in Fig. 7a) extends cranially from the dorsolateral corner of the glenoid, along the lateral surface of the scapula. It forms a rugose ventrolateral edge for the supraglenoid pit, also delimiting the distal margin of a dorsoventrally elongated depression (“pgd” in Fig. 7a) positioned cranial to the lateral margin of the glenoid, a subtler version of which is seen in MPCO.V 0013. The scapular glenoid of all specimens has everted, lip-like borders, which are particularly marked in the distal and lateral margins, especially so in the case the two larger specimens. The strong distal lip produces a caudoventrally facing articular surface, which is excavated by a fossa, especially more ventrally. Its caudal outline is similar among the specimens (dorsoventrally deeper than lateromedially broad in MPCO.V 0013 and 0006F, and as deep as broad in MPCO.V 00011), being slightly concave at the coracoid suture, convex both distally and medially, and sigmoid laterally; i.e. convex distally and concave ventrally. The latter convexity is, however, more marked/angled in MPCO.V 0011, as a result of bearing the stout ridge mentioned above. The ventral margin of the scapular glenoid is also more markedly concave in that specimen, with the medial portion of the scapula-coracoid suture expanding caudally, to almost conceal the coracoid contribution to the glenoid in medial view. In fact, as in Mas. knopfleri3, the ventral margin of the scapular glenoid in all specimens of Ves. paranaensis is more caudally expanded at its medial portion, resulting in a somewhat laterally facing articulation.
The lateral margins of the glenoid formed by the scapula and coracoid meet at an angle slightly higher than 90° in lateral view. Traceable on the lateral surface of MPCO.V 0011 only, the scapula-coracoid suture extends cranially from that junction as a nearly straight line, forming an angle somewhat over 90° to the scapular part of the glenoid. The suture is less clear on the medial side, but appears to mirror its lateral expression more cranially, whereas the caudal part arches ventrally to intersect the glenoid at its ventral tip, as apparently also seen in Ceratosaurus dentisulcatus73. A ventrally arched striated area is also seen in the medial surface of MPCO.V 0013. In general, the medial outline of the glenoid of Ves. paranaensis is more rounded than the lateral, which angles at the junction of the bones.
The incomplete cranial and ventral margins of the best-preserved coracoid preclude an estimation of its general shape. Based on the available evidence, however, it seems to fit the “high and short” condition considered synapomorphic of Noasauridae4. The coracoidal part of the glenoid has an ovoid outline and bears lip-like caudal and lateral margins. The articular surface is mostly flat, occupying the lateroventral third of the entire glenoid. It faces almost strictly dorsally, with subtle caudal and lateral orientations. It is clear from MPCO.V 0011 that the coracoid foramen is set well below the scapula-coracoid suture, extending caudodorsally as it perforates inwards. It is larger and further from the scapula compared to those of Mas. knopfleri3 and Li. inextricabilis57. The equivalent area in MPCO.V 0013 is fractured, and thus it is not possible to confirm if it housed such a perforation. The caudal margin of the coracoid extends ventrally as a nearly straight line, forming an angle slightly above 90° with the scapular suture (as seen in lateral view of MPCO.V 0011). This differs from the U-shaped notch considered synapomorphic of Noasauridae4, as present in Mas. knopfleri3, Li. inextricabilis57, and E. bambergi4. Indeed, the coracoid tuber (=posteroventral process) is present as a subtle caudal inflection within the ventral half of the caudal margin of the coracoid, where the bone tapers (lateromedially) distally, and does not project as caudally as those of other members of the group (e.g. Mas. knopfleri3; E. bambergi4; Li. inextricabilis57). The coracoid displays its maximal non-glenoidal thickness dorsal to the coracoid tuber through to the ventral margin of the glenoid, whereas the remainder of the bone is more laminar, being medially depressed and laterally convex. A peculiar, drop-shaped groove (“ctg” in Fig. 7a) extends along the lateral surface of the coracoid. Paralleling the caudal margin of the coracoid tuber, but cranially displaced from it, the groove has a more expanded, rounded craniodorsal portion, from which it tapers caudoventrally. The whole structure possibly represents a modified version of the subglenoid ridge seen in Maj. crenatissimus75, with its craniodorsal part representing the biceps tubercle76. Indeed, as already mentioned, that part of the bone is particularly expanded laterally, with the ventrally tapering surface medial to the groove representing the subglenoid fossa75. Such a groove is, to our knowledge, unknown in any related dinosaur and potentially represents an autapomorphy of Ves. paranaensis.
A left humerus (MPCO.V 0006d; Fig. 6e–j) and a significantly shorter long bone (MPCO.V 0006j; Fig. 6k–p), approximately half the length of the humerus, were found associated with the scapulocoracoid fragment MPCO.V 0006f. Based on the proportions seen in Li. inextricabilis (IVPP V15923), the second long bone fits the size expected for an antebrachial element associated with the humerus and is here interpreted as a left radius. A partial right hand (MPCO.V 0064b; Fig. 6q–r), with some articulated phalanges in very close association, has also been recovered from the sample. Taken together, the forelimb elements of Ves. paranaensis are not stout as those of abelisaurids13,75.
The humerus is a nearly straight bone, slightly bent caudally and medially within its proximal third. This differs from the laterally arching element of Mas. knopfleri3, and is more similar to the condition seen in Li. inextricabilis57. The proximal and distal ends are not expanded craniocaudally relative to the midline breadth of the shaft, but are lateromedially expanded to about 2.5 (proximal articulation) and 2.0 (distal articulation) times the minimal transverse width of the shaft. These expansions occur along the same plane, so that the long axes of both articulations are nearly aligned. This results in the non-twisted humeral shaft, typical of noasaurids4. However, the proximal expansion is somewhat rotated (ca. 15° clock-wise) in relation to the distal, as seen in proximal view. The humeral head has a rounded cranial/caudal profile, with an elliptical proximal outline that is slightly flattened caudally. This differs from both the more globular humeral head of abelisaurids4,75,77 and the less than two times wider than long humeral head of Mas. knopfleri2 and El. bambergi4. As in Mas. knopfleri2, the perimeter of the head is depressed and formed of more spongy bone, possibly representing the attachment of the acrocoracohumeral ligament77. The proximal expansion of the head is slightly medially displaced, leaving a lateral space proximal to the greater tubercle2,3,4,73. The greater tubercle expands craniolaterally as a rounded element, forming an angle of about 40° to the long axis of the head. It is distally placed and positioned at about the same level as the internal tuberosity, a condition considered synapomorphic for abelisauroids77. As in most noasaurids2,4,57, the internal tuberosity is highly reduced compared to that of other abelisauroids4,75,78. It corresponds to the pinched medial margin of the bone, as seen in proximal view. In cranial/caudal views, it forms a weak medial inflection on the proximalmost portion of the medial margin of the bone.
The deltopectoral crest starts as a faint ridge immediately distal to the greater tubercle. It expands distally, along the lateral margin of the humerus, reaching the middle of its proximodistal length and forming a 90° angle relative to the long axis of the distal condyles. In general form, the deltopectoral crest is a lateromedially compressed lamina that, in cranial view, arches laterally at its mid-length. This arched portion is also the most cranially projected (i.e. the apex of the deltopectoral crest), whereupon the crest corresponds to about 1/3 of the craniocaudal width of the humeral shaft. At this point, the crest has a slightly flattened cranial margin, merging smoothly into the shaft both proximally and distally. Similarly unexpanded deltopectoral crests are typical of abelisauroids4. The cranial surface of the humerus is smoothly depressed medial to the deltopectoral crest for the insertion of M. coracobrachialis76. Likewise, the lateral surface of the crest is also depressed proximal to its point of maximal inflection, probably for the insertion of M. deltoideous scapularis74. Caudal to that, a straight, rugose ridge extends from the lateral margin of the greater tubercle distally along the caudolateral corner of the bone, possibly representing the insertion area of M. latissimus dorsi75. Its proximal end is in the same position as the caudolateral tubercle of E. bambergi, considered to be an abelisauroid synapomorphy4. Vespersaurus paranaensis also lacks the medially broad caudal tuberosity reported in a Late Cretaceous Argentine abelisauroid77. A small foramen is visible on the craniomedial corner of the shaft, immediately opposite to the distal end of the deltopectoral crest, as also seen in Mas. knopfleri3.
The distal part of the humerus expands smoothly both laterally and medially. This gives rise to convex (in cranial/caudal views), but not prominent, radial and ulnar condyles. Accordingly, as also occurs in Eo. mefi13, the proximodistal flattening of the condyles, typical of ceratosaurs3,4, is absent in Ves. paranaensis. The distal condyles are separated caudally, distally, and cranially by a continuous shallow depression. This is most prominent on the cranial surface, where it forms a low, but well delimited semi-circular brachial fossa, which is absent in El. bambergi (Museum für Naturkunde, Berlin, Germany; MB R 4960) and Mas. knopfleri3. Medial to this fossa, a longitudinal ridge (“entr” in Fig. 7g) extends along the entepicondyle, fading proximally along the humeral shaft. The ectepicondyle, on the other hand, is laterally smooth, lacking any marked structure. The ulnar condyle is more craniocaudally expanded than the radial condyle, bearing a more rounded distal outline.
The associated left radius (MPCO.V 0006j) of Ves. paranaensis is a slender bone, almost ten times longer than minimally broad at mid-shaft. This differs from the stouter element of abelisaurids75,78 and even other ceratosaurs13,79, approaching instead the condition of Li. inextricabilis57. The radius represents ca. 47% of the length of the humerus, resembling the ratio present in Eo. mefi (49%13) and Li. inextricabilis (53%, IVPP V15923). The radius is slightly arched both medially and caudally, although this morphology is enhanced by its expanded proximal and distal articulations and by the longitudinally concave cranial and lateral margins. On the contrary, the caudal and medial margins are nearly straight. The proximal outline is eye-shaped, with the long axis almost twice broader than the short axis, and the caudal portion more proximally expanded. The distal articulation has an ovoid outline, with the medial margin representing the distal articulation of the ulna. Accordingly, the medial surface of the radius is covered by longitudinal striations immediately proximal to its distal articulation and its distal half is traversed by a strong longitudinal ridge (“drr” in Fig. 7l,o), which marks the caudal margin of the ulnar articulation. The articulation facets for the ulna at the distal and proximal portions of the radius are not in the same plane. As such, the radius is twisted (about 25°) along its shaft, although its “in life” position relative to the orthogonal planes is difficult to confidently infer. In any case, the part of the distal articulation opposite to the ulnar facet is more distally expanded, as also seen in various other theropods80,81.
Three digits are preserved in the recovered right hand (MPCO.V 0064b; Fig. 7q–r). The ungual phalanx and its proximally articulating element were preserved for both medialmost digits, whereas three bones were preserved in the lateralmost digit, including what is interpreted to be the terminal phalanx (see below). As no averostran theropod82,83 is known to possess more than two bones forming the fourth manual digit, we interpret the preserved digits as I−III. As such, regardless of its poor preservation, the presence of a biconcave proximal ginglymoid articulation indicates that the penultimate element preserved in digit I is a phalanx, not a metacarpal as in deeply-nested abelisaurids75. Its proximal articulation is much more expanded, both lateromedially and on the extensor-flexor axis, than the distal articulation, and bears a subtle extensor tuber. This expansion is more marked towards the flexor side, as seen in isolated noasaurid manual phalanges3,84. The bone is also only about 1.5 times longer than broad at its proximal end, departing from the plesiomorphically more elongated first phalanx of digit I seen in non-abelisauroid taxa, such as Di. wetherilli70, but apparently also in Eo. mefi13. Further comparisons to noasaurids and abelisaurids are hampered by the highly modified manus of the latter group75 and the lack of well-preserved hands in the former. The medial condyle of the distal articulation of the first phalanx is broken away, although it can be inferred that the whole articulation was flattened on the extensor-flexor axis. The bone is shorter than its associated ungual, which bears a well-defined extensor tuber, and both dorsal and ventral “blood grooves” in its medial surface (the former also seen in the exposed portion of the lateral surface), as occurs in the preserved manual ungual of Mas. knopfleri2. The ungual is not lateromedially flattened at its proximal portion, which tapper in all dimensions. It bears a distinctive, but minor ventral curvature, as reported for Mas. knopfleri2, and is also slightly curved medially.
The ungual and its previous phalanx are preserved in manual digit two. These are respectively exposed mainly in lateral and dorsal views, precluding assessment of many details. The non-ungual phalanx is only slightly longer than lateromedially broad at its proximal end, which is also only slightly broader than the distal end and bears a subtle extensor tuber. The distal articulation forms a symmetric ginglymus, with rounded condyles separated by a shallow extensor fossa, and a collateral pit is seen on the lateral side (the medial surface is covered by sediment). Although uncommon among averostrans, a non-elongated penultimate phalanx was also reported for Li. inextricabilis57. As in that taxon, the ungual of the second digit is longer than the preceding phalanx. Its biconcave proximal articulation is broader lateromedially than dorsoventrally deep. The bone is less recurved than that of the first digit, not nearly approaching the curvature of the possible second or third manual ungual of N. leali84. It bears a clear, low extensor tuber and a single (ventral) “blood” groove, related to the sheath cover, extending along the ventral margin of its lateral surface. This configuration suggests that Ves. paranaensis bore the generally stout/broad non-terminal phalanges of abelisauroids4 at least in digits I and II.
The more proximal element preserved in digit III has a planar proximal surface, with a broader than deep subtriangular outline (deeper medially and laterally ponied). As such, it is interpreted as a metacarpal. The bone is twice longer than broad at mid-length, with the medial distal condyle slightly more expanded distally than the lateral. The first phalanx is not block-shaped as in most abelisauroids13,57, being longer than twice its midline breadth. The terminal phalanx has a subtriangular proximal outline and is distally pinched, but not recurved, differing markedly from the larger recurved digit III ungual of Li. inextricabilis57. As such, although it retains a relatively elongated first phalanx, digit III of Ves. paranaensis seems to present a reduction in the number of phalanges comparable only to that of carnotaurines75 among abelisauroids. Obviously, the incompleteness of the Ves. paranaensis hand and the scarcity of information for most abelisauroid hands, coupled with homology uncertainties, precludes the establishment of robust evolutionary patterns.
The holotypic left ilium MPCO.V 0065d11 (Fig. 8a–b) is partially preserved, lacking the entire preacetabular ala and the dorsal lamina, including the part that extended over the postacetabular ala. The latter ala is better preserved, but lacks most of its caudal margin, as well as the bone cover of the dorsal surface. It is strongly expanded lateromedially towards its caudal end, with a maximal breadth nearly twice that of the bone at the level of the acetabulum, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri3. This expansion is more marked towards the lateral than the medial side, so that the medial margins of the postacetabular ala and the iliac body form a low angle (about 165°) in ventral view. The ventral surface of the ala is entirely occupied by a deep funnel-shaped brevis fossa. This is bound medially by the sub-vertical ventral margin of the ala (=“medial brevis shelf”3) and laterally by a well-developed brevis shelf sensu stricto. As in Mas. knopfleri3, the brevis shelf extends ventrally, especially at its caudal end, as to almost entirely overhang and obscure the ventral margin of the ala (except for its cranioventral corner, just caudodorsal to the ischiadic peduncle) in lateral view. Although possibly exaggerated by compressive deformation, such a morphology seems to represent a further development, seen in both noasaurines3 and G. sisteronis85, from the typical condition present in other abelisauroids4,86,87,88. In any case, the lateral expansion of the postacetabular ala/brevis shelf has been considered a noasaurid synapomorphy4. In Ves. paranaensis, the caudal end of the brevis shelf gives rise to two cranially extending ridges. The more lateral of these (“lr” in Fig. 8a) forms a dorsal arch that nearly parallels the horizontal plane and is continuous to the supraacetabular crest. Such a connection between the brevis shelf and the supraacetabular crest via a strong ridge is typical of some early neotheropods and ceratosaurs3,79. The more medial ridge (“mc” in Fig. 8a) is much subtler, extending caudomedially and slightly ventrally from the brevis shelf, forming a craniolaterally bowing arch that delimits the craniolateral boundary of the brevis fossa. The caudolateral portion of the dorsal surface of the brevis shelf is covered by longitudinal scars, possibly representing the origin of the flexor tibialis musculature.
The iliac body is mostly preserved, including the supraacetabular crest, acetabular wall, as well as the pubic and ischiadic peduncles, although the distalmost end of the pubic peduncle is damaged. The acetabulum is fully open, with vestiges of its medial wall only at the craniodorsal corner. The supraacetabular crest is well-developed and ventrally overhanging, so that the dorsal margin of the acetabular opening is hidden in lateral view, resembling the condition in Mas. knopfleri3. The dorsal/ventral outline of the supraacetabular crest of Ves. paranaensis is subtriangular, with its rounded lateral terminus positioned within the caudal half of the acetabulum, as in Mas. knopfleri3, where it represents about half the lateromedial breadth of the bone. In contrast, the same profile is subrectangular in El. bambergi (MB R 4960). From the point of maximal lateral expansion, the caudal continuation of the crest becomes abruptly less laterally projected, forming the caudodorsal corner of the acetabulum and bifurcates into two lower ridges. The most conspicuous of these ridges extends caudally to join the brevis shelf, whereas a much subtler ventral extension forms the medial margin of the caudal surface of the acetabulum. Cranial to the point of maximal lateral projection, the supracetabular crest continues as a laterally expansive and ventrally overhanging flange. It bows dorsally, following the craniodorsal contour of the acetabulum, and extends along the pubic peduncle, where it merges smoothly to its lateral surface. The acetabular roof is also exposed in ventral view in another specimen of Ves. paranaensis (MPCO.V 0064a), along with a partial sacral series. The exposed portion of this ilium matches the previously described bone in all details, demonstrating that the lateromedial breadth of the acetabulum is greater than half the space between the iliac pair when they are in articulation.
Unlike Mas. knopfleri3 and various abelisaurids13, Ves. paranaensis does not have an ischial peduncle that, relative to the pubic peduncle, projects significantly ventrally. However, as is typical of abelisauroids12, the distal articulation of both peduncles display the “peg” morphology whereby they would have locked into their respective sockets on the proximal pubis and ischium. Although its cranial surface is broken, it is possible to infer that the pubic peduncle had a subtriangular ventral outline, with lateral, craniomedial, and caudal margins. The latter forms the base of the cranial surface of the acetabulum, between the caudomedial and caudolateral corners, with the “peg” located at the craniomedial portion of the articulation. The former of those corners is continuous with a ridge that extends caudodorsally, forming the sharp medial margin of the cranial surface of the acetabulum. The caudolateral of those corners is caudoventral to the cranioventral tip of the supraacetabular crest, which does not reach the articulation facet itself. The better preserved ischiadic peduncle is also subtriangular in distal outline, with a pointed lateral corner and a convex medial margin. The “peg” is positioned in the centre of the articulation, displaced towards its medial side and surrounded by portions of the articulation that are not as ventrally extensive. This mirrors the ischial “socket”, which is also slightly displaced medially on its articular surface.
The preserved medial surface of the ilium is mostly flat, with shallow depressed areas above the peduncles and a more medially expanded area dorsal to the acetabular aperture. An ovoid depression dorsal to the ischiadic peduncle and below an oblique shelf that extends along the postacetabular ala possibly represents the fourth sacral rib articulation, as is seen in Mas. knopfleri3. Likewise, another oblique shelf that follows the dorsal contour of the pubic peduncle probably represents the dorsal margin of the more craniocaudally extensive articulation of the second sacral rib.
The isolated right pubis MPCO.V 0042 (Fig. 8c–f) preserves most of the body and about the proximal three-fourths of the shaft. The body is dorsoventrally expanded and lateromedially compressed. Moving dorsally to ventrally in lateral view, its proximal articulation includes a sigmoid (convex at the dorsal third and concave ventral to that) iliac articulation, the acetabular margin, and the ischiadic articulation, the latter two of which are straight and form an angle of 120° to one another. These elements are enhanced in medial view, in which two markedly convex margins meet at a nearly right angle, directly medial to a deep excavation on the articular surface. The dorsal of these convex margins represents the dorsal two-thirds of the iliac articulation, whereas the lower encompasses the lower part of that articulation, as well as the acetabular margin and the ischiadic articulation. In proximal view, the iliac articulation arches laterally around the deep medial excavation, dorsal to which the articular facet is dorsoventrally convex. This morphology matches the “peg-and-socket”12 arrangement seen in Mas. knopfleri2, which also bears a deep, medially displaced socket for the iliac articulation. The entire proximal articulation area of the pubis is, however, more lateromedial compressed in Ves. paranaensis than in Mas. knopfleri2.
The dorsal margin of the pubic body of Ves. paranaensis is marked by a subtle angular expansion. This, along with a depressed area positioned proximoventrally from it, on the lateral surface of the bone, represents the origin of M. ambiens89. This contrasts with the origin of this muscle in Mas. knopfleri2, which is mostly represented by the depressed area on the lateral surface of the bone. The obturator plate is incomplete ventrodistally, but it is possible to infer a rounded profile and the presence of single a suboval obturator foramen, as occurs in Mas. knopfleri2, but not in Li. inextricabilis, which possesses two apertures in the obturator plate57. In medial view, the proximal and dorsal margins of the foramen in Ves. paranaensis are flanked by a semi-lunate depression (“sld” in Fig. 8e), which extends proximally to form deep pocket within the pobic body. In contrast, that surface bears a proximodistally elongated groove in Mas. knopfleri3. The obturator plate extends distally as a ridge (“or” in Fig. 8e) along the ventral portion of the medial surface of the shaft. Dorsal to that ridge, the proximal part of the shaft bears a subtle longitudinal groove, which extends as a shallow fossa on the medial surface of the pubic body, dorsal to the obturator plate. More distally along the shaft, that medial ridge is more expanded, forming the laminar medial contact of the pubic pair, i.e. “pubic apron”2. As a result, the pubic shaft has a “crescent-shaped” cross section (with a ventromedially facing concavity) at its more distally preserved portion, composed of a dorsoventrally deeper lateral rod-like body and a more dorsoventrally flattened portion extending medially from its dorsal portion. In general, the preserved portion of the pubic shaft is relatively straight, in both lateral/medial and dorsal-ventral views.
The partial left ischia MPCO.V 0065d2 and MPCO.V 0014 (Fig. 7g–l) resemble one another in most details. Both lack the distal half of the shaft as well as the ventral margin of the obturator flange and the proximal margin of the pubic peduncle. Their proximal bodies are composed of well-developed iliac and pubic peduncles, separated by a deeply incised acetabular margin that bows slightly laterally in proximal view. The pubic peduncle is longer, but not as dorsoventrally deep as the iliac peduncle. The latter is also much more lateromedially expanded than both the pubic peduncle and the more laminar portion of the bone that extends ventrally from it. The proximal ends of both peduncles have rugose and striated outer margins, indicating the presence of ligamentous attachments. As seen in MPCO.V 0014, the proximal surface of the iliac articulation has a rounded outline and is deeply excavated along its entire surface, forming the socket of the “peg-and-socket” articulation typical of abelisauroids12. The margins around the socket are mostly eroded in MPCO.V 0014, but MPCO.V 0065d2 shows that they expand proximally, especially at the dorsal and ventral parts of the articulation, which acquires a concave lateral profile. The most conspicuous feature of the iliac peduncle is the rugose origin point of M. flexor tibialis internus3,89,90, situated laterally on its dorsodistal portion. This is better developed than that of Mas. knopfleri3, forming a projection. The tip of that projection forms a low angle between the straight dorsal margin of the iliac peduncle and the concave margin of the bone distal to that. As such, the proximal portion of the iliac peduncle has a slight ventral lean (relative to the long axis of the bone in lateral view), as is also manifested by the dorsal margin of the ischial acetabulum. Indeed, as in Mas. knopfleri3, this does not follow the rounded contour of the rest of its margin, but is also ventrally leaned. The ventral margin of the pubic peduncle extends distally to form a low obturator flange. As is typical of noasaurids, that flange lacks a distal notch separating it from the ischial shaft. However, a subtle distal incision is present (Fig. 8g) and the flange does not smoothly merge with the shaft as in Li. inextricabilis57 and E. bambergi4. Likewise, a secondary notch, as seen in Mas. knopfleri3, is also lacking. The medial surface of the ischial body is mostly concave, with a ridge (“mr” in Fig. 8i) flanking the ventral half of the acetabular margin. In ventral/dorsal views, the preserved part of the ischium is sigmoid, arching laterally at its proximal portion and medially along the proximal part of the shaft. The latter also arches slightly ventrally in lateral view. Immediately distal to the obturator flange, the ischial shaft has a dorsoventrally elongated cross section. Yet, as it extends distally, the ventral portion of the shaft twists medially, so that the cross section becomes lateromedially elongated, although a laminar medial flange is lacking. Instead, the symphyseal medial articulation to the antimere is deep and striated, marking the distal half of the persevered part of the shaft. The symphyseal articulation occupies the entire dorsoventral depth of the shaft more distally, but tapers to its ventral margin as it extends proximally. The cross section of the most distally preserved part of the shaft is ovoid, with a lateromedial long axis.
A single right tibial shaft (MPCO.V 0018; Fig. 9a), lacking both extremities was preserved in the sample. It is caudally bowing in lateral/medal views, and sigmoid in cranial/caudal views, with a slight medial bowing proximally and a lateral deflection more distally. The mid-shaft cross-section is ovoid, with a craniomedially to caudolaterally oriented long axis and a flattened craniolateral margin. More proximally, however, due to the cranial expansion of the cnemial crest, the tibial cross section is subtriangular. Its most conspicuous feature is the sharp fibular crest, which extends along the lateral surface of the proximal part of the shaft, turning slightly caudally at its distal end. Contrasting with Mas. knopfleri3, the crest does not extend distally to form a marked fibular flange. The fibular crest forms the boundary between the lateral fossa3,8, cranially, and another depression located on the caudolateral surface of the bone. The latter is caudally bounded by a fainter ridge, with a nutrient foramen piercing the tibial shaft just distal to that depression, as also seen in Mas. knopfleri3. The lateral fossa3,8 is well developed and the distal end of the cnemial crest expands slightly laterally along its cranial border. Cranial and lateral longitudinal intermuscular lines extend distally from the cnemial and fibular crests respectively.
A left third distal tarsal (Fig. 9o–s) is the only tarsal element known for Ves. paranaensis and was preserved along with the articulated proximal portions of metatarsals II−III (MPCO.V 0016). It covers the caudolateral half of the proximal articular surface of metatarsal III and is partially co-ossified to it, as occurs in the relatively advanced ontogenetic stages of several early neotheropod and coelophysoid species91,92. Overall, the proximal surface of the tarsal is convex, with its proximal apex placed near its medial margin, close to the articulation for metatarsal II. From that point, the proximal surface descends more abruptly towards its medial edge, forming a longer and more gently sloping surface towards its lateral margin. The proximodistal width of the bone at its apex is about the same as its minimal breadth as seen in proximal view. In the same view, the tarsal is caudomedially to craniolaterally elongated, being twice as long along that axis than on the opposite one.
The metatarsus of Ves. paranaensis is known based on a complete metatarsal I, which is articulated to the distal portions of metatarsals II−IV of the holotypic right foot (MPCO.V 0065d1; Fig. 10), an isolated left metatarsal I (MPCO.V 0057b; Fig. 9b–f), an isolated right metatarsal II lacking its distal part (MPCO.V 0063a; Fig. 9g–i), the isolated distal end of another right metatarsal II (MPCO.V 0055; Fig. 9j–n), and the articulated proximal parts of left metatarsals II−III (MPCO.V 0016; Fig. 9o–s). The holotypic metatarsal set (MPCO.V 0065d1) was originally more complete, but the more proximal portions were lost prior to the current description. Nonetheless, older photographs of these elements exist (see Supporting Information), and these help to elaborate some of the pedal anatomical traits of Ves. paranaensis. Compared to Vel. unicus7 and based on the length of the phalanges and the lateromedial breadth of the distal end of the third metatarsal, we estimate that slightly more than one third of the metatarsus is currently preserved in the holotype, but that at least three quarters were originally preserved.
Metatarsal I is a small bone, 18 mm long in the holotype (Fig. 10d), with a partial left isolated element (Fig. 9b–f) measuring 13 mm long as preserved. As seen in the holotype, the bone was appressed to the medial surface of the distal portion of metatarsal II, its distal end positioned four centimetres proximally from that of its laterally neighbouring metatarsal. The lateral margin of the bone is flattened, matching the overall lateromedial compression of its wedge-shaped shaft. Its enlarged distal portion forms well-developed condyles, the lateral of which is more distally and craniocaudally expanded than the medial, with a predominant cranial projection. It bears a deep collateral ligament pit, the caudal margin of which is formed by a curved ridge that extends proximally to form the craniolateral corner of the shaft. The medial condyle is craiocaudally depressed and the surface housing its shallow collateral pit faces craniomedially. The caudal margin of that condyle forms the pointed medialmost extension of the distal articulation. The metatarsal has a subtriangular distal outline, with a flattened caudal margin. This margin is caudolaterally oriented in the articulated pes of the holotype, so that the digit extends somehow behind the rest of the foot.
Based on photographs of the holotype when it was more complete (see Supporting Information), the shaft of metatarsal II is strongly compressed lateromedially. Its midshaft transverse breadth was less than one fifth that of metatarsal III, a condition confirmed by MPCO.V 0016 (Fig. 9p–s). In that specimen, the proximal part of the metatarsal II shaft has a cross section slightly less than three times broader craniocaudally than lateromedially. Poor preservation hampers a more precise estimate of this ratio in the more distal parts of the shaft. On the contrary, the best preserved MPCO.V 0063a (Fig. 9g–i) has a laminar shaft that is lateromedially narrower than one fifth of its craniocaudal width. The lateral surface of its shaft is longitudinally traversed by a broad/shallow groove, imparting a subtle craniocaudal concavity. This indicates a closely appressed articulation with metatarsal III. The cranial part of the shaft is lateromedially broader, with a transversely rounded cranial margin, whereas the caudal part is more strictly laminar (Fig. 9g), tapering to a sharp margin. Estimated from the craniocaudal length of its proximal articulation and based on closely related taxa4,7, MPCO.V 0063a preserves roughly the proximal three-quarters of the bone, indicating that metatarsal II is lateromedially flattened along most of its shaft, as confirmed by the compression of the proximal-most preserved portions of the bone in both MPCO.V 0065d1 and 0055. Vel. unicus8, Mas. knopfleri2, and N. leali5 share generally similar shaft proportions of the metatarsal II. Indeed, a lateromedial compression of metatarsal II was considered synapomorphic for the clade formed of Elaphrosaurinae + Noasaurinae4, although this trait is clearly more marked in core-noasaurines than in El. bambergi4,12 or Li. inextricabilis (IVPP V15923). However, the metatarsal II of Ves. paranaensis is even more laminar than those of all other noasaurines.
The proximal articulation of metatarsal II (Fig. 9i,o) expands strongly craniocaudally and especially lateromedially from its shaft. Although the articulation with metatarsal III is not clear in the proximal view of MPCO.V 0016, it is well marked both cranially and caudally (arrows in Fig. 9o). It is, therefore, possible to infer an ovoid proximal outline, that was slightly elongated craniocaudally. The articular face has a slight proximal expansion within its caudal half, although the surface is subtly concave overall. The proximal articulation of the bone is positioned somewhat displaced cranially with respect to the lateral surface of metatarsal III, as is also seen in El. bambergi4. In medial view, it is clear that the proximal expansion is particularly marked towards its cranial surface, whereas its medial surface is marked by longitudinal striations. The caudal margin merges more subtly into the shaft, although it bears a caudally angled projection (“cp” in Fig. 9s). The proximal outline of MPCO.V 0063a is also ovoid, one third craniocaudally longer than lateromedially broad. Its medial margin is rounded, whereas the lateral is flattened for articulation with metatarsal III, with a subtle lateral inflection point. The “reduction of the proximal end of metatarsal II” has thus far been the only unambiguous synapomorphy proposed for Noasaurinae4. Indeed, compared to that of metatarsal III, the proximal end of metatarsal II of Ves. paranaensis is reduced relative to that of El. bambergi4 and Li. inextricabilis (IVPP V15923), resembling the conditions in Mas. knopfleri2 and Vel. unicus7,8. Furthermore, based on comparisons to its distal articulation, the proximal end of metatarsal II seems even less expanded in N. leali5 than in the above taxa.
The distal end of metatarsal II (Figs 9k–n, 10a,d) is well expanded lateromedially from the laminar shaft, the distal part of which has a crescentic cross section; i.e. rounded medially and subtly concave laterally. As a result, the bone has sharp cranio- and caudolateral corners, an indication of its close contact to metatarsal III. The former corner has a craniolateral inflection also seen in Mas. knopfleri2, medial and distal to which the cranial surface of the bone is flattened, with a very subtle “hyperextension” depression2. Both collateral ligament pits are well-developed, but the lateral is significantly deeper. The distal outline is slightly craniocaudally deeper than lateromedially broad, with a caudal sulcus that is shallower than those of Mas. knopfleri2 and N. leali (PVL 4061), excavating about 30% of the distal depth of the bone. The medial flange is narrower than the lateral, but this discrepancy is less marked than in N. leali (PVL 4061) and Mas. knopfleri2. The caudal surface of the lateral flange is flattened, with a lateral expansion projecting below the collateral pit.
Metatarsal III (Figs 9o–s, 10a,d) is by far the most robust of the metatarsals, and likely the main weight-bearing metapodial element. Its proximal outline (Fig. 9o) is hourglass-shaped, well excavated both medially and laterally to accommodate the proximal ends of metatarsals II and IV, respectively. These excavations indicate that the proximal articulation of metatarsal II was significantly more pronounced than that of metatarsal IV. In proximal view, between the articulations for metatarsal II and IV, the cranial margin of metatarsal III is rounded, whereas the caudal margin is more pointed. The cranial part of the articular facet bears a broad transverse groove, forming a craniocaudally concave surface. Caudomedial to that, the facet is covered by the third distal tarsal. In lateral/medial views, following the pattern seen in metatarsal II, the proximal end of metatarsal III expands more abruptly towards the cranial side, whereas the caudal margin bears a caudal bulge, also seen in Vel. unicus7,8 and Mas. knopfleri3.
Breakages in the shaft of both metatarsals III of MPCO.V 0016 and 0065d1 reveal an ovoid cross-section for the former (with a lateromedial long axis) and a more rounded, but medially (towards metatarsal II) flattened, cross-section for the latter. The distal end of the bone (Fig. 10a) is kinked medially relative to the long axis of the shaft proximal to that, as also seen in other abelisauroids86. The cranial surface of this kinked portion bears a well delimited, drop-shaped “hyperextension” depression. This depression is bound laterally by a marked crest (“mc” in Fig. 10a), that is cranially expanded in its proximal portion, and distally by a very proximally extensive (much more than in the neighbouring metatarsals), semilunate phalangeal articulation. A subtler border marks the medial boundary of that depression. The distal outline of metatarsal III was subrectangular, slightly deeper than broad, with both collateral pits present and moderately deep. Further details of the distal end of metatarsal III are obscured by the articulation to the other metatarsals and the proximal phalanx of the pedal digit.
Old photographs of the holotype reveal that the shaft of metatarsal IV was strongly compressed lateromedially, about four times broader craniocaudally than lateromedially at midshaft. This differs from the uncompressed metatarsal of Mas. knopfleri2, as well as from the rod-like element of Vel. unicus8. However, the bone expands lateromedially as it extends distally; its shaft bearing an ovoid cross section at its current most proximally preserved portion (c. 6 mm broad lateromedially and 8 mm craniocaudally), with a flattened medial margin. Unlike in Mas. knopfleri2, this indicates a close adherence to metatarsal III continuing to the distal end of the bone. Such a morphology is seen in Vel. unicus7,8, albeit without the lateromedial compression of the shaft seen in Ves. paranaensis. The distal articulation of metatarsal IV is deeper craniocaudally than lateromedially broad, but is also lateromedially compressed at its cranial half. This is about 80% the breadth of the caudal margin, which displays a slight concavity between the distal condyles. This results in an asymmetric articulation, wherein the cranial surface faces craniolaterally, the lateral collateral pit faces slightly cranially and is caudally positioned on the lateral surface of the bone, a condition very similar to that of Mas. knopfleri2. In fact, the lateral surface of the distal end of the bone is excavated by two pits, caudoproximally and craniodistally placed and separated by an oblique ridge.
Based on its holotype (Fig. 10), the phalangeal formula of Ves. paranaensis for digits I−IV is 2-3-4-5, all of which bear an ungual terminal phalanx. Phalanx 1 of the first digit is elongated, nearly four times its distal breadth. The distal articulation is as dorsoventrally deep as lateromedially broad, whereas the proximal articulation is slightly deeper, with the shaft narrowing to a minimal breadth of about half of the dorsoventral depth. The ventral margin of the proximal portion bears a longitudinal ridge slightly displaced laterally. The distal condyles are raised higher towards the dorsal side, with a depressed area separating them ventrally. This represents a moderately developed flexor pit, whereas the collateral pit is well-developed on the lateral surface (the opposite being covered by sediment). The ungual is shorter than the preceding phalanx and, although narrowing towards its pointed proximal portion, is not trenchant. Its lateral surface bears an eye-shaped depression at its proximodorsal corner, which extends distally (“dlg” in Fig. 10d) following the contour of the dorsal margin of the bone. The distal part of this groove approaches a sigmoid (ventrally arching at its proximal part and dorsally arching at the distal part) groove extending along the lateral surface of the ungual. This set of grooves correspond to the “Y-shaped” system of lateral vascular grooves typical of abelisauroid theropods93. On the lateral surface, the area ventral to the lower groove is lateroventrally facing and aligned with the ventral surface of the previous phalanx. Therefore, although laterally exposed, this surface corresponds to the ventral surface of the ungual of theropods in general. This bears a proximal flexor pit (“fp” in Fig. 10d) and another groove extending distally from it. Indeed, because the margin separating the original (as generally seen in theropods) lateral and ventral surfaces of the ungual is dorsally positioned, the actual ventral margin of the ungual corresponds to the margin separating its original ventral surface from the medial surface of the bone. This margin is laminar, nearly straight in lateral/medial views, and bears a small proximal concavity.
The first phalanx is the longest of digit II. Its shaft is lateromedially compressed, and the distal articulation is deeper dorsoventrally than lateromedially broad. The extensor pit is also lateromedially compressed and the medial collateral pit is rounded and shallow. It bears a subtle extensor tuber at its proximal articulation, as also seen in the second phalanx. Its distal articulation with the latter is lateromedially compressed with a very subtle extensor pit and a broad and deep lateral collateral pit. The lateral distal condyle is raised dorsally relative to the medial, reflecting the anatomy of the ungual, as also seen (to a lesser degree) in digit I. Following that rise, the lateroventral corner of the proximal articulation of the ungual is also positioned more dorsally. As a result, the original (in the above sense) ventral surface of the bone is lateroventrally facing and its original medioventral margin functions as the laminar ventral margin of the ungual (“vm” in Fig. 10d). The original ventral surface of the ungual is traversed by a shallow longitudinal groove and its proximal portion bears a marked flexor pit. A pair of longitudinal grooves excavates the lateral surface of the ungual. The ventral groove (“vlg” in Fig. 10d) extends dorsodistally from the proximoventral portion of the bone to meet its dorsal counterpart, which follows the contour of the dorsal margin of the ungual at its proximal end, whereupon they extend distally as a subtler, conjoined groove that also follows the dorsal contour of the bone. The ungual is strongly flattened lateromedially and slightly longer than the second phalanx.
Phalanx 1 of digit III is the longest in the foot. Both its shaft and distal articulation are lateromedially compressed. The distal end has well-developed extensor and collateral pits, being also depressed ventrally between the condyles. The second phalanx is nearly as long as the first and similar to that in most morphological aspects, although it bears an extensor tuber, which is lacking in the preceding element. The ventral surface is flat and lateromedially expanded in the proximal portion of the bone, resulting in a subtriangular surface in plantar view. The shorter third phalanx has a better developed extensor tuber at the proximal articulation, a well-developed lateral collateral pit (the medial is covered by sediment), but no extensor pit. Only a longitudinal groove separates the distal condyles dorsally. In contrast to the condition in the second digit, the medial condyle is displaced dorsally relative to the lateral. The ungual is intermediate in length between phalanges 2 and 3, and slightly shorter than that of the second digit. It is less dorsoventrally expanded at its proximal portion and lateromedially compressed than the unguals of the adjacent digits. Its lateral surface is traversed by well-developed dorsal and ventral longitudinal grooves, which follow the contour of the respective margins of the bone. As such, the ungual of digit III lacks the ventral surface modifications seen in the other digits. In fact, the proximal end of the ventral longitudinal groove extends onto the ventral surface of the bone, where it is waisted in ventral view. A clear flexor pit excavates the ventral surface of the bone proximal to that, and its ventral margin is expanded lateromedially more proximally.
Phalanx 1 of digit IV is shorter than those of digits II and III and subequal to phalanx 3 of the previous digit, as seen in Vel. unicus8. It is much deeper dorsoventrally at its proximal than at its distal articulation. The former has well developed extensor and flexor tubera, the latter of which is rugose and ventrally flat. The distal end bears a faint lateral collateral pit. The shorter second phalanx resembles the former, but is not so dorsoventrally expanded at its proximal articulation. Both bear shallow extensor pits. Morphologically similar to the previous one, phalanx 3 is more compact, only slightly proximodistally longer than dorsoventrally deep. On the contrary, phalanx 4 is deeper than long and has a deeper and larger lateral collateral pit. The large ungual is the longest phalanx of the digit. In contrast, phalanx 1 is proportionally longer than the ungual in the fourth pedal digit of Vel. unicus (Museo de la Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Neuquén, Argentina; MUCPv 41).
As with the other phalanges of the holotype of Ves. paranaensis (Fig. 10), only the lateral surfaces of the unguals are exposed. None of them are strongly recurved, bearing a straight to subtly concave ventral margin. Except for the third ungual, they are distinctly more lateromedially compressed than the ungual reported for Mas. knopfleri2 and those of Vel. unicus (MUCPv 41). Ungual of digit II is relatively the deepest, with the dorsoventral depth of the proximal margin about two-thirds of the entire length of the bone. It has the “Y-shaped” system of lateral vascular grooves typical of abelisauroid theropods93, including noasaurines2,6. The surface between those dorsal and ventral branches is convex, but not protruding as in some abelisaurid unguals93. The ungual of digit III is the broadest element in the pes lateromedially, but the shallowest dorsoventrally, with a sharper distal tip and the depth of the proximal margin less than half the proximodistal length of the bone. This is heightened by a proximally-projecting, well-developed extensor tuber, with the proximal and dorsal margins of the bone forming an angle of about 120° (that angle is about 90° in the ungual of the second digit). Unlike the condition in the former ungual, the pair of lateral grooves does not merge distally. Instead, the ventral one extends along the entirety of the ventral margin of the ungual, whereas the dorsal is restricted to the proximal half of the dorsal margin, as also seen in some abelisauroid unguals93. Flanking its proximal articulation, the lateral surface of that phalanx bears the proximal groove (“vg” in Fig. 10d) seen in Mas. knopfleri2. The ungual of the fourth digit is the largest of the pes. There is a deep, well-developed extensor tuber and the lateral grooves are not distally connected. It is much deeper than the previous ungual, roughly twice as long proximodistally than dorsoventrally deep at its proximal end. It is interesting to note that the pedal ungual of digit IV of Vel. unicus (MUCPv 41) bears a closer resemblance to the ungual of its digit III, rather than to that of the digit IV of Ves. paranaensis.
A series of non-ungual pedal phalanges were found isolated. A pair or articulated elements (MPCO.V 0056a-b) represent phalanges 1–2 of a right digit IV. The former (Fig. 11a–f) has a concave, “D-shaped” (slightly deeper than lateromedially broad) proximal articulation, medially flattened where it bordered metatarsal III. The bone is about twice longer than dorsoventrally deep and lateromedially broad at its articulations. The proximal end is slight deeper and narrower than the distal end. The proximal articulation has an extensive ventral process. This is more marked towards the medial side, medially bounding a flat and rugose flexor platform. This platform faces slightly laterally, its more ventrally projecting medial half bearing a depressed surface. The distal ginglymus is asymmetric, with a dorsoventrally deeper and lateromedial broader medial condyle. These are separated dorsally, distally, and ventrally by a well-developed intercondylar groove. Its dorsal branch is continuous to a deep extensor pit with smooth margins. Both collateral pits are also well developed. The shaft has a dorsoventrally convex lateral surface, whereas the medial is flatter. Matching the preceding element, the proximal articulation of the second phalanx (Fig. 10g–l) is asymmetric, with the deeper kidney-shaped medial facet expanding dorsal to the rounded lateral facet, from which it is separated by a sharp medially-arching ridge. The proximal outline is dorsoventrally elongated and broader ventrally than dorsally. Both the dorsal and ventral processes are elongated, the latter slightly further. The bone is about twice longer than lateromedially broad and 1.5 longer than dorsoventrally deep. Its ventral surface bears a marked proximal flexor pit. The distal articulation lacks the lateral condyle, but is not as dorsoventrally deep as the proximal articulation. It has well marked extensor and medial collateral pits, and intercondylar groove, leading proximally to a small extensor pit at the dorsal margin. Based on their resemblance to the former elements, two other phalanges of the sample are identified as a right phalanx 1 (MPCO.V 0060; Fig. 10m–r) and a left phalanx 2 (MPCO.V 0057a; Fig. 10s–x) of the fourth pedal digit. The former is deeper and more lateromedially compressed than that of the articulated pair. It is about 1.5 longer than dorsoventrally deep at its proximal articulation, which is 1.5 deeper than the distal articulation and almost twice deeper than lateromedially broad. That articulation is also lateromedially narrower than the distal and its breadth (lateromedial) is less than half the total length of the bone. It preserves a well-developed process (extensor tuber) at its dorsal portion and a flattened and rugose flexor platform at the ventral margin. A foramen is seen perforating the distal part of the dorsal surface of the bone. The left element shows that the medial distal condyle of the phalanx 2 of digit IV is dorsoventrally deeper, but less distally extensive than the lateral condyle. Those two condyles are also closer to one another at their dorsal part and more set apart ventrally. These pedal digit IV phalanges match the general morphology of those descried for other abelisauroids2,7,8. MPCO.V 0006k (Figs Fig. 11y-dd) corresponds to an articulated pair of phalanges 2 and 3 of a left digit IV. Their collateral pits are better developed on the medial side and the lateral distal condyles are somewhat more distally extensive. Both have well-developed extensor and flexor tubers, the latter ventrally flattened as a platform. The medial and lateral condyles are not parallel to one another in distal view.
Other isolated non-ungual phalanges within the sample are dorsoventrally depressed, more elongated, and have a symmetric distal ginglymus. As such, they probably represent digit III phalanges7, the two best preserved of which (MPCO.V 0049, 0054) are phalanges 1. MPCO.V 0049 (Fig. 12a–f) is about three times longer than dorsoventrally deep at the proximal articulation, which is nearly twice deeper, but only slightly lateromedially broader than the distal. Both articulations are broader than deep, especially the distal, resulting in an average breadth about 40% the length of the phalanx. They bear shallow, extensor (“D-shaped”) and collateral pits at the distal end, and a subtle intercondylar groove, slightly better developed ventrally than distally. A pair of ventral processes is well developed in the proximal margin, flanking a shallow flexor platform, which is rugose and slightly depressed. The bone is ventrally bent distal to the proximal margin of the extensor pit. Two other isolated phalanges (MPCO.V 0044, 0059) possibly represent the second element of digit III7. The best preserved MPCO.V 0059 (Fig. 12g–l) has a trapezoidal proximal outline, deeper than lateromedially broad. A dorsoventrally oriented and laterally arching crest divides the proximal surface in two concave areas, the lateral of which is more dorsoventrally expanded. The proximal articulation is deeper and dorsoventrally broader than the distal, and both are less than half the length of the phalanx. The proximal half of the bone bears well developed medio- and lateroventral corners, the medial of which is more expanded outwards, and both flank a rugose flexor platform. The distal end bears subtle extensor and lateral collateral pits, and a deep medial collateral pit. The intercondylar groove excavates the dorsal, distal, and ventral articular surfaces. The distal outline is deeper than broad, and the lateral condyle is further expanded ventrally than the medial.
In addition to those preserved in the holotype, two isolated pedal ungual phalanges in the sample of Ves. paranaensis deserve attention. The larger of which (MPCO.V 0022; Fig. 12m–q; see Supporting Information) better fits the proportions of the ungual of the fourth holotypic digit, therefore representing an element from the right side. Its proximal margin is deeper dorsoventrally than half the proximodistal length of the bone. It has a subtriangular proximal outline, with a large subtly convex lateral margin, a straight ventral margin that is the shortest and faces slightly medially, and a medial margin that is concave dorsally and straight ventrally. The dorsal and lateroventral corners formed by those margins extend distally creating the sharp dorsal and ventral margins of the ungual. Those sharp margins give the impression that the bone is extremely compressed lateromedially, but its proximal surface is broader than half its depth. That surface is divided in concave lateral and medial sides by a vertical ridge that extends dorsally from the middle of the ventral margin towards the extensor tuber. This expands proximally, so that the proximal margin of the bone is dorsally convex and ventrally concave in lateral/medial views. In fact, the medial surface is divided into ventral and dorsal parts, set apart by the distal extension of the medioventral corner of the proximal articulation. The dorsal part is dorsoventrally deeper, with the proximal half of its dorsal margin traversed by a groove (dorsal longitudinal groove) that approaches, but does not merges with, the dorsally arching longer ventral longitudinal groove. This starts at the distal tip of the bone, extends proximodorsally along its dorsal margin, and then turns ventrally, occupying about 80% of the length of the ventral margin of the ungual. These represent the abelisauroid “Y-shaped” system of lateral vascular grooves, which is also seen in lateral surface of the second ungual, therefore representing a trait of the “inner” side of the unguals adjacent to the third (main) digit. Clearly, a more typical “Y-shaped” system is seen when the longer ventral groove is more dorsally positioned and connects with the dorsal groove. The proximal subtriangular space between the dorsal and ventral grooves is not protruding, but is proximally bound by a subtle vertical groove (“vg” in Fig. 12m), as in Mas. knopfleri2. Finally, the slightly ventrally facing ventral part of the medial surface represents the distal extension of the ventral margin of the proximal surface, therefore representing the original ventral surface of the bone. Its proximal part is excavated by a “D-shaped” flexor pit, with a flat proximal margin and a rounded, rugose distal margin, as also typical of abelisaurid unguals6,93. The lateral surface of the ungual is traversed by dorsal and ventral longitudinal ridges, but these are mostly flanking the respective margins of the bone.
The other isolated ungual phalanx (MPCO.V 0036a; Fig. 12r–v, see Supporting Information) is much smaller, 9 mm of maximal length, and relatively stouter, i.e. less lateromedially compressed, with a proximal dorsoventral depth about 2/3 of the maximal length of the bone. Yet, it has all the typical features of a noasaurid pedal ungual, and seems to represent a left first digit element. Its proximal surface has a slightly concave medial margin and a strongly arched lateral margin, the maximal inflection point of which extends distally along the lateral surface, setting the lateral and ventral margins of the bone apart. The latter bears a flexor pit near the proximal articulation, and the former surface houses the two lateral longitudinal grooves. These are also well-marked on the medial surface of the phalanx, the ventral margin of which forms a sharp ventral keel.
Results of the phylogenetic analysis
The phylogenetic analysis including De. agilis recovered 17,400 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) of 444 steps, with a consistency index (CI) of 0. 5338 and a retention index (RI) of 0.7380. The optimal results were found in 545 of the 1,000 replications. The strict consensus (SCT) of those MPTs shows Ves. paranaensis nested within a highly polytomic Ceratosauria (see Supporting Information). The analysis with De. agilis deactivated recovered 6,612 most parsimonious trees (MPTs) of 438 steps, with a consistency index (CI) of 0. 5411 and a retention index (RI) of 0.7456. The optimal results were found in 893 of the 1,000 replications. The strict consensus (SCT) of those MPTs is congruent with the results of Rauhut and Carrano4, and also shows Ves. paranaensis nested within a highly polytomic Ceratosauria (see Supporting Information). The IterPCR protocol54 found that these unresolved relationships were mainly a result of the alternative positions acquired by Berberosaurus liassicus, La. indicus, and MNN tig6 in the recovered MPTs. After pruning these unstable taxa, the strict reduced consensus tree (SRCT) shows the clade formed by Ceratosaurus spp. + Genyodectes serus as sister to Abelisauroidea, which is composed of Abelisauridae and Noasauridae (see Supporting Information). The nesting of the new species within the latter clade is supported by the presence of middle-cervical vertebrae with postzygapophyses placed caudal to the neural arch pedicle and overhanging the centrum caudally (character 113:0->1), cranial cervical vertebrae with relatively poorly developed (not long and robust) epipophyses (character 115: 1->0/1), and centrum length/height ratio higher than 3 (character 117: 0->1/2). Within noasaurids, Ves. paranaensis is recovered as a Noasaurinae (Fig. 13) based on the presence of mid-sacral centra with equivalent transverse dimensions relative to other sacral elements (character 131: 1->0), ilium with pubic and ischial peduncles of subequal proximodistal lengths or with a longer ischial peduncle (character 183: 0->1), and metatarsal II with proximal articular surface two-thirds or less the width those of metatarsals III or IV (character 213: 0->1).
The branch supports for Noasauridae are relatively low, with a Bremer support of 2 and absolute and GC bootstrap frequencies of 44% and 34%, respectively. Such supports are similar for Noasaurinae, with a Bremer support of 2 and absolute and GC bootstrap frequencies of 40% and 37%, respectively. The lack of resolution within Noasaurinae results from alternative positions adopted by N. leali among the MPTs. When this species is pruned from an even more taxonomically restricted SRCT (see Supporting Information), M. knopfleri is positioned as sister to a clade composed of Ves. paranaensis and Vel. unicus (Fig. 13). In this tree, the Bremer support of Noasaurinae is 3 and the absolute and GC bootstrap frequencies are of 43% and 40%, respectively. The clade composed of Ves. paranaensis and Vel. unicus is based on a metatarsal IV with a lateromedially compressed shaft with respect to that of metatarsal III (character 220: 0->1). This clade is more poorly supported than Noasaurinae, with a minimal Bremer support and bootstrap frequencies of 37% and 32%, respectively.
Under topologically constrained searches, five additional steps are necessary to place Ves. paranaensis as sister to all other noasaurids, and eleven and six steps to force a sister-taxon relationship with E. bambergi and Li. inextricabilis, respectively. Beyond Noasauridae, nine extra steps place the new species within Abelisauridae (as sister to all other clade members) and 19 steps are required to force its position outside Abelisauroidea (when it is recovered as sister to that clade).
The position of Ves. paranaensis as a noasaurine abelisauroid is well-supported, but the relationships among noasaurines are unresolved when its four core species are included in the consensus tree. This seems to be mainly a result of the high amount of missing data present in two of the four known species of the clade (N. leali, 83.2%, and Vel. unicus, 91.4%). In fact, Ves. paranaensis (with 64,5% missing entries) represents the first noasaurine with multiple comparable characters with Mas. knopfleri, the best sampled species of the clade (24.5% missing entries). Indeed, for any resolution to be attained including all these four taxa, it is necessary to identify characters that can be scored (with variation on the states) for at least three of them. Yet, overlapping of skeletal parts among these taxa is minimal, including only metatarsal II for Vel. unicus, N. leali, and Ves. parananesis, that bone plus cervical vertebrae and manual phalanges for N. leali, Mas. knopfleri, and Ves. parananesis, and the tibia (very incomplete in the new species) plus foot for Vel. unicus, Ves. parananesis, and Mas. knopfleri. As such, the discovery of more complete noasaurine remains, especially for the Argentinean taxa, is necessary to substantially help unravel the relationships within the clade.
Implications for the understanding of Noasaurinae anatomy and evolution
Regardless of the uncertainties on the relations among noasaurines, the larger amount of characters sampled for Ves. parananesis, at least compared with Vel. unicus and N. leali, allows the revision of certain anatomical traits of the group. This is particularly the case for the manus and pes, better preserved in Ves. parananesis than in any other known noasaurine. The new species shares the generally reduced forearm and manus of abelisauroids. The radius is about half the length of the humerus, proportionally longer than those of carnotaurines75,78,94, but close to the condition seen in other abelisauroids such as Eo. mefi13 and Li. inextricabilis57. Metacarpal III is the only metacarpal preserved for Ves. parananesis. It is stouter than those of Eo. mefi13 and Li. inextricabilis57, and only slightly more elongated than that of Maj. crenatissimus75. In contrast, the non-terminal phalanges of all those abelisauroids (with the possible exception of the first digit I phalanx of Eo. mefi13) are blockier than those of the new species, although the digits of the latter are somewhat reduced compared to those of non-ceratosaur theropods, e.g. Di. wetherilli70. This is also the case for C. nasicornis79 and the isolated manual phalanges referred to N. leali84 and Mas. knopfleri3. Furthermore, the inferred reduction in the number of phalanges of digit III of Ves. parananesis, as well as the changes to its terminal element, is not seen in Li. inextricabilis57, but resembles the condition of carnotaurines75. Hence, the new species shares some modifications towards the reduction of distal forelimb elements seen only in highly nested abelisaurids, whilst retaining plesiomorphic features for Abelisauroidea. This confirms the mosaic pattern of forelimb reduction generally regarded as characteristic of that clade13,75.
The foot of Ves. parananesis has a rather uncommon morphology. The shafts of metatarsals II and IV are strongly lateromedially compressed, so that the central element (metatarsal III) would have endured most of the load during locomotion. Similar conditions are present in other noasaurines, but not to the extreme extent seen in the new species. Indeed, although flattened, the second metatarsal of N. leali5, Vel. unicus7, and Mas. knopfleri2 is not laminar to the same degree as in Ves. parananesis. In addition, the fourth metatarsal of Mas. knopfleri2 is not transversely compressed, unlike those of Vel. unicus7 and Ves. parananesis. As for the phalanges, the third ungual of Ves. parananesis resembles those recovered for Mas. knopfleri2, as well as the fourth ungual of Vel. unicus6, consistent with the condition expected for a weight-bearing phalanx. In contrast, those of digits II and IV are strongly compressed lateromedially. Their inner (facing the central digit) portions, including the condyle and ventral margin, are elevated dorsally relative to their outer parts. Therefore, the ventral margin of the outer portion forms a sharp ventral edge, atypical for a weight-bearing phalanx.
The anatomy of the unguals goes hand in hand with the subtle shortening of pedal digits II and IV of Ves. parananesis, especially when compared to the general condition of theropds57,70. In the articulated pes, they barely extend distally to reach the penultimate phalanx of digit III. A similar digit shortening is seen in Vel. unicus6, and was also reported for a still undescribed noasaurid from Niger18. These anatomical traits suggest that Ves. parananesis could have been a functionally monodactyl animal, with a single central weight-bearing digit, flanked by neighbouring elements that were positioned very close to digit III or perhaps even held free of the ground. As such, we seem to be facing an anatomical adaptation previously unrecorded among archosaurs, although previously hinted-at from footprints from the same geological unit that yielded Ves. parananesis (see below). Among vertebrates, monodactyl bipedalism is also seen in sthenurine kangaroos95, but these differ from Ves. paranaensis in being saltatorial animals. On the other hand, lateromedially flattened ungual phalanges are also seen in all pedal digits of Erlikosaurus andrewsi96, an animal that surely employed digits II-IV for weight-bearing. As such, this morphology alone cannot be used as the sole indication to infer that a digit has no function in locomotion. Moreover, the fact that the non-ungual phalanges of Ves. parananesis are similarly robust in the three central digits also cautions against the off-hand dismissal of a weight-bearing role for digits II and IV. Yet, even if this was the case, the unusual morphology of the unguals suggests they were surely employed in a function other than locomotion. In this context, it is interesting to note that the flexor tubercles of the proximal phalanges in the fourth digit of Ves. parananesis are significantly more expanded than those of the central (third) digit, as seen in the penultimate phalanx of the hypertensive second pedal digit of dromaeosaurids97. Yet, unlike the dromaeosaurid sickle-claw, the pedal unguals II and IV of Ves. parananesis are not strongly recurved, nor pointed, but have a straight, sharp ventral margin. As such, those elements probably functioned more as slicing/scratching devises (for whatever inferred behaviour) than as a perforating weapon. Also, their extensor tubers are much larger than in the dromaeosaurid ungual II, in a digit that has flexors tubers better developed in its proximal, rather than distal phalanges. Such an arrangement may relate to the contraction of the outer digits via the extension and flexion of their distal and proximal portions respectively, possibly facilitating (again) a monodactyl stance. Finally, the first phalanx of digits II and IV has asymmetrical flexor tubers, more expanded towards their inner side. This suggest that, during retraction, those digits were not only pulled backwards, but also inwards, so as to approach one another behind digit III. Clearly, a more detailed biomechanical study of the Ves. parananesis foot, which is beyond the scope of this initial contribution, is needed to fully explore its functional implications.
Dating to at least since the earliest Cretaceous, the Botucatu Desert represents one of the largest deserts in Earth’s history, covering an area of about 1.300.000 km2 in south-central Brazil and also occupying parts of Argentina, Uruguay, and Paraguay98,99. It was home to an assorted fauna, including mammals and dinosaurs, whose presence is inferred based on a huge collection of trackways100. Its sand-sheets were later covered by the Valanginian-Aptian Serra Geral basalt flows24, also one of the largest in Earth’s history, which covered most of the Paraná Basin. However, the arid conditions continued to prevail after the extrusions (Fig. 13), covering part of the northern half of the Serra Geral basalts in the form of the Caiuá Group101. Footprints of very similar morphology to those of the Botucatu Formation are also found in the Caiuá Group102, some known from sites near (Fig. 1) the type-locality of Ves. parananesis103, indicating the recurrence of a similar desert-dwelling fauna. Although difficult to substantiate, it is tempting to speculate whether some of those theropod footprints were produced by an animal similar to the new taxon. Indeed, Leonardi104 suggested that one such track, found in the same stratigraphic unit at a site about 50 km northwest of Cruzeiro do Oeste, was produced by a functionally monodactyl bipedal “coelurosaur”. This corresponds to three footprints, about 8 cm each in length (stride = 80 cm; nearly 180°pace angulation) and representing, following classical models105, a trotting bipedal theropod of less than half a meter hip-height. Despite all the uncertainties involved in the preservation of tracks in aeolian sandstones106, these footprints are broadly consistent with the length of the four phalanges of digit III of the holotype of Ves. parananesis. Comparable monodactyl footprints have also been recorded in the Botucatu Formation103,104 and resemble those from the Jurassic La Matilde Formation of Argentina107,108,109,110, i.e. Sarmientichnus scagliai, suggesting that similar dinosaurs may have roamed such arid settings in South America since earlier in the Mesozoic. In fact, it is noteworthy that the gap in the fossil record of noasaurids, from the Late Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous (Fig. 13), generally matches the inferred (even if rather uncertain) age of the Botucatu Formation, and could be explained by the colonisation of arid environments by the group, in which the preservation of body-fossils is not so common. Finally, by identifying a more suitable producer, this cast doubts on recent suggestions, from Chinese tracks111, that footprints such as S. scagliai are better assigned to a didactyl deinonychosaur.
Sampson, S. D., Carrano, M. T. & Forster, C. A. A bizarre predatory dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Nature 409, 504–506 (2001).
Carrano, M. T., Sampson, S. D. & Forster, C. A. The osteology of Masiakasaurus knopfleri, a small abelisauroid (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22, 510–534 (2002).
Carrano, M. T., Loewen, M. A. & Sertich, J. J. W. New materials of Masiakasaurus knopfleri Sampson, Carrano and Forster, 2001, and implications for the morphology of the Noasauridae. Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 95, 1–53 (2011).
Rauhut, O. W. M. & Carrano, M. T. The theropod dinosaur Elaphrosaurus bambergi Janensch, 1920, from the Late Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 178, 546–610 (2016).
Bonaparte, J. F. & Powell, J. E. A continental assemblage of tetrapods from the Upper Cretaceous beds of El Brete, northwestern Argentina (Sauropoda–Coelurosauria–Carnosauria–Aves). Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France, Nouvelle Série 139, 19–28 (1980).
Bonaparte, J. F. The Gondwanian theropod families Abelisauridae and Noasauridae. Historical Biology 5, 1–25 (1991).
Bonaparte, J. F. Los vertebrados fósiles de la Formación Río Colorado, de la Ciudad de Neuquén y cercanías, Cretácico Superior, Argentina. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ e Instituto Nacional de Investigación de las Ciencias Naturales, Paleontología 4, 17–123 (1991).
Egli, F. B., Agnolín, F. L., & Novas, F. A new specimen of Velocisaurus unicus (Theropoda, Abelisauroidea) from the Paso Córdoba locality (Santonian), Río Negro, Argentina. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, e1119156 (2016).
Novas, F. E., Agnolín, F. L. & Bandyopadhyay, S. Cretaceous theropods from India: a review of specimens described by Huene and Matley (1933). Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales ‘Bernardino Rivadavia’ 6, 67–103 (2004).
Farke, A. A. & Sertich, J. J. W. An abelisauroid theropod dinosaur from the Turonian of Madagascar. PloS One 8, e62047 (2013).
Wang, S. et al. Extreme Ontogenetic Changes in a Ceratosaurian Theropod. Cell Biology 27, 1–5 (2017).
Carrano, M. T. & Sampson, S. D. The phylogeny of Ceratosauria (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 6, 183–236 (2008).
Pol, D. & Rauhut, W. M. A Middle Jurassic abelisaurid from Patagonia and the early diversification of theropod dinosaurs. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279, 3170–3175 (2012).
Wilson, J. A. In: Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology, Program and Abstracts. Small theropod dinosaurs from the latest Cretaceous of India. 194. (2012).
Wilson, J. A. et al. A new abelisaurid (Dinosauria, Theropoda) from the Lameta Formation (Cretaceous, Maastrichtian) of India. Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan 31, 1–42 (2003).
Sereno, P. C. et al. Predatory dinosaurs from the Sahara and Late Cretaceous faunal differentiation. Science 272, 986–991 (1996).
Tortosa, T. et al. A new abelisaurid dinosaur from the Late Cretaceous of southern France: palaeo-biogeographical implications. Annales de Palaeontologie 100, 63–86 (2014).
Sereno, P. C., Wilson, J. A. & Conrad, J. L. New dinosaurs link southern landmasses in the Mid-Cretaceous. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 271, 1325–1330 (2004).
Filippi, L. S., Méndez, A. H., Juarez Valieri, R. D. & Garrido, A. C. A new brachyrostran with hypertrophied axial structures reveals an unexpected of latest Cretaceous abelisaurids. Cretaceous Research 61, 209e219 (2016).
Apesteguía, S., Smith, N. D., Juárez Valieri, R. & Makovicky, P. J. An Unusual New Theropod with a Didactyl Manus from the Upper Cretaceous of Patagonia, Argentina. PloS One 11, e0157793 (2016).
Fernandes, L. A. & Ribeiro, C. M. M. Evolution and palaeoenvironment of the Bauru Basin (upper Cretaceous, Brazil). Journal of South American Earth Sciences 61, 71–90 (2015).
Chumakov, N. M. Climatic zones in the middle of the Cretaceous Period. Stratigraphy and Geological Correlations 3, 3–14 (1995).
Milani, E. J., Melo, J. H. G., Souza, P. A., Fernandes, L. A. & França, A. B. Bacia do Paraná. Boletim de Geociências da Petrobrás 15, 265–287 (2007).
Bruckmann, M., Hartmann, L. A., Tassinari, C. C. G., Sato, K., & Baggio, S. B. The duration of magmatism in the Serra Geral Group, Parana volcanic province. in Metallogeny and Crustal Evolution of the Serra Geral Group 507–518 (IGeo, Gráfica da UFRGS, 2014).
Batezelli, A. Continental systems tracts of the Brazilian Cretaceous Bauru Basin and their relationship with the tectonic and climatic evolution of South America. Basin Research 27, 1–25 (2015).
Soares, P. C., Landim, P. M. B., Fulfaro, V. J. & Sobreiro Neto, A. F. Ensaio de caracterização estratigráfica do Cretáceo no Estado de São Paulo: Grupo Bauru. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 10, 177–185 (1980).
Menegazzo, M. C., Catuneanu, O. & Chang, H. K. The South American retroarc foreland system: The development of the Bauru Basin in the back-bulge province. Marine and Petroleum Geology 73, 131–156 (2016).
Godoy, P. L., Montefeltro, F. C., Norell, M. A. & Langer, M. C. An additional baurusuchid from the Cretaceous of Brazil with evidence of interspecific predation among Crocodyliformes. PloS One 9, e97138 (2014).
Candeiro, C. R. A., Martinelli, A. G., Avilla, L. S. & Rich, T. Tetrapods from the Upper Cretaceous (Turonian Maastrichtian) Bauru Group of Brazil: a reappraisal. Cretaceous Research 27, 923–946 (2006).
Martinelli, A. G. & Teixeira, V. P. A. The Late Cretaceous vertebrate record from the Bauru Group at the Triângulo Mineiro, southeastern Brazil. Boletin Geologico y Minero 126, 129–158 (2015).
Castro, M. C. et al. A Late Cretaceous mammal from Brazil and the first radioisotopic age for the Bauru Group. Royal Society Open Science 5, 180482 (2018).
Menegazzo, M. C., Bertini, R. J. & Manzini, F. F. A new turtle from the Upper Cretaceous Bauru Group of Brazil, updated phylogeny and implications for age of the Santo Anastácio Formation. Journal of South American Earth Sciences 58, 18–32 (2015).
Manzig, P. C., & Weinschütz, L. C. Museus e Fósseis da Região Sul do Brasil: Uma Experiência Visual com a Paleontologia. Curitiba. Ed. Germânica (2012).
Manzig, P. C. et al. Discovery of a rare pterosaur bone bed in a Cretaceous desert with insights on ontogeny and behaviour of flying reptiles. Plos One 9, e100005 (2014).
Simões, T. R., Wilner, E., Caldwell, M. W., Weinschütz, L. C. & Kellner, A. W. A. A stem acrodontan lizard in the Cretaceous of Brazil revises early lizard evolution in Gondwana. Nature Communications 6, 8149 (2015).
Bittencourt, J. S. & Langer, M. C. Mesozoic dinosaurs from Brazil and their biogeographic implications. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 83, 23–60 (2011).
Brusatte, S. L., Candeiro, C. R. A. & Simbras, F. M. The last dinosaurs of Brazil: The Bauru Group and its implications for the end-Cretaceous mass extinction. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências 89, 1465–1485 (2017).
Bertini, R. J. In: Boletim do 4o Simposio sobre o Cretáceo do Brasil. Evidence of Abelisauridae (Carnosauria: Saurischia) from the Late Cretaceous of the Paraná Basin. 267 (1996).
Novas, F. E., Carvalho, I. S., Ribeiro, L. C. B. & Méndez, A. H. First abelisaurid bone remains from the Maastrichtian Marilia Formation, Bauru basin, Brazil. Cretaceous Research 29, 625–635 (2008).
Machado, E. B., Campos, D. D. A., Calvo, J. O. & Kellner, A. W. A. A new Abelisauroid from the Upper Cretaceous of Brazil. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Geológicas 30, 446–452 (2013).
Mendez, A. H., Novas, F. E. & Iori, F. V. New record of abelisauroid theropods from the Bauru Group (Upper Cretaceous), São Paulo State, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Paleontologia 17, 23–32 (2014).
Brum, A. S., Machado, E. B., Campos, D. A. & Kellner, A. W. A. Morphology and internal structure of two new abelisaurid remains (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Adamantina Formation (Turonian–Maastrichtian), Bauru Group, Paraná Basin, Brazil. Cretaceous Research 60, 287–296 (2016).
Delcourt, R. & Iori, F. V. A new Abelisauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from São José do Rio Preto Formation, Upper Cretaceous of Brazil and comments on the Bauru Group fauna. Historical Biology, 1–8 (2018).
Machado, E. B., Campos, D. A. & Kellner, A. W. A. On a theropod scapula (Upper Cretaceous) from the Marília Formation, Bauru Group, Brazil. Paläeontologische Zeitschrift 82, 308–313 (2008).
Méndez, A. H., Novas, F. E. & Iori, F. V. First record of Megaraptora (Theropoda, Neovenatoridae) from Brazil. Comptes Rendus Palevol 11, 251–256 (2012).
Martinelli, A. G. et al. Insight on the theropod fauna from the Uberaba Formation (Bauru Group), Minas Gerais state: new megaraptoran specimen from the Late Cretaceous of Brazil. Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia 119, 205–214 (2013).
Candeiro, C. R. A., Cau, A., Fanti, F., Nava, W. R. & Novas, F. E. First evidence of an unenlagiid (Dinosauria, Theropoda, Maniraptora) from the Bauru Group, Brazil. Cretaceous Research 37, 223–226 (2012).
Brum, A. S., Machado, E. B., Campos, D. A. & Kellner, A. W. A. Description of uncommon pneumatic structures of a noasaurid (Theropoda, Dinosauria) cervical vertebra from the Bauru Group (Upper Cretaceous), Brazil. Cretaceous Research 85, 193–206 (2018).
Delcourt, R. & Grillo, O. N. Reassessment of a fragmentary maxilla attributed to Carcharodontosauridae from Presidente Prudente Formation, Brazil. Cretaceous Research 84, 515–524 (2018).
Fernandes, L. A. Mapa litoestratigráfico da parte oriental da Bacia Bauru (PR, SP, MG), escala 1: 1.000. 000. Boletim Paranaense de Geociências 55, 53–66 (2004).
Goloboff, P. A., James, S. F. & Nixon, K. C. TNT, a free program for phylogenetic analysis. Cladistics 24, 774–786 (2008).
Goloboff, P. A. & Catalano, S. A. TNT version 1.5, including a full implementation of phylogenetic morphometrics. Cladistics 32, 221–238 (2016).
Bremer, K. Branch support and tree stability. Cladistics 10, 295–304 (1994).
Pol, D. & Escapa, H. Unstable taxa in cladistic analysis: identification and the assessment of relevant characters. Cladistics 25, 515–527 (2009).
Gauthier, J. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8, 1–55 (1986).
Holtz, T. R. & Padian, K. Definition and diagnosis of Theropoda and related taxa. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology suppl. 15(5), 35A (1995).
Xu, X. et al. A Jurassic ceratosaur from China helps clarify avian digital homologies. Nature 459, 940–944 (2009).
Campione, N. E., Evans, D. C., Brown, C. M. & Carrano, M. T. Body mass estimation in non‐avian bipeds using a theoretical conversion to quadruped stylopodial proportions. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 5, 913–923 (2014).
Benson, R. B., Hunt, G., Carrano, M. T. & Campione, N. Cope’s rule and the adaptive landscape of dinosaur body size evolution. Palaeontology 61, 13–48 (2018).
Hendrickx, C. & Mateus, O. Abelisauridae (Dinosauria: Theropoda) from the Late Jurassic of Portugal and dentition-based phylogeny as a contribution for the identification of isolated theropod teeth. Zootaxa 3759, 1–74 (2014).
Brusatte, S. L., Benson, J. B., Carr, T. D., Williamson, T. E. & Sereno, P. C. The systematic utility of theropod enamel wrinkles. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27, 1052–1056 (2007).
Benson, R. B. J. An assessment of variability in theropod dinosaur remains from the Bathonian (Middle Jurassic) of Stonesfield and New Park Quarry, UK and taxonomic implications for Megalosaurus bucklandii and Iliosuchus incognitus. Palaeontology 52(4), 857–877 (2009).
Currie, P. J., Rigby, J. K., Sloan, R. E., & Carpenter, K. Theropod teeth from the Judith river formation of southern Alberta, Canada. in Dinosaur systematics: approaches and perspectives 107–125 (Cambridge University Press, 1990).
Rauhut, O. W. M. & Kriwet, J. Teeth of a big theropod dinosaur from Porto das Barcas (Portugal). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen E13, 179–185 (1994).
Lindoso, R. M., Medeiros, M. A., de Souza Carvalho, I. & da Silva Marinho, T. Masiakasaurus-like theropod teeth from the Alcântara Formation, São Luís Basin (Cenomanian), northeastern Brazil. Cretaceous Research 36, 119–124 (2012).
Smith, J. B. Dental morphology and variation in Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27(S2), 103–126 (2007).
Richter, U., Mudroch, A. & Buckley, L. G. Isolated theropod teeth from the Kem Kem beds (early Cenomanian) near Taouz, Morocco. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 87, 291–309 (2013).
Longrich, N. Small theropod teeth from the Lance Formation of Wyoming, USA. in Vertebrate microfossil assemblages: their role in paleoecology and paleobiogeography 135–158 (Indiana University Press, 2008).
Agnolin, F. L. & Martinelli, A. G. Did oviraptorosaurs (dinosauria; theropoda) inhabit Argentina? Cretaceous Research 28, 785–790 (2007).
Welles, S. P. Dilophosaurus wetherilli (Dinosauria, Theropoda). Osteology and comparisons. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 185, 85–180 (1984).
O’Connor, P. M. The postcranial axial skeleton of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27(S2), 127–163 (2007).
Wilson, J. A. A nomenclature for vertebral laminae in sauropods and other saurischian dinosaurs. Journal of vertebrate Paleontology 19, 639–653 (1999).
Madsen, J. H. & Welles, S. P. Ceratosaurus (Dinosauria, Theropoda): a revised osteology. Miscellaneous Publication, Utah Geological Survey 00-2, 1–80 (2000).
Langer, M. C., França, M. A. & Gabriel, S. The pectoral girdle and forelimb anatomy of the stem-sauropodomorph Saturnalia tupiniquim (Upper Triassic, Brazil). Special Papers in. Palaeontology 77, 113–137 (2007).
Burch, S. H. & Carrano, M. T. An articulated pectoral girdle and forelimb of the abelisaurid theropod Majungasaurus crenatissimus from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 32, 1–16 (2012).
Jasinoski, S. C., Russell, A. P. & Currie, P. J. An integrative phylogenetic and extrapolatory approach to the reconstruction of dromaeosaur (Theropoda: Eumaniraptora) shoulder musculature. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 146, 301–344 (2007).
Novas, F., Ezcurra, M. D. & Agnolin, F. Humerus of a basal abelisauroid theropod from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Revista del Museo Argentino de Ciencias Naturales nueva serie 8, 63–68 (2006).
Bonaparte, J. F., Novas, F. E. & Coria, R. A. Carnotaurus sastrei Bonaparte, the horned, lightly built carnosaur from the Middle Cretaceous of Patagonia. Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County Contributions in Science 416, 1–41 (1990).
Gilmore, C. W. Osteology of the carnivorous Dinosauria in the United States National museum: with special reference to the genera Antrodemus (Allosaurus) and Ceratosaurus. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 110, 1–154 (1920).
Madsen, J. H. Jr Allosaurus fragilis: a revised osteology. Utah Geological and Mining Survey Bulletin 109, 1–163 (1976).
Currie, P. J. & Carpenter, K. A new specimen of Acrocanthosaurus atokensis (Theropoda, Dinosauria) from the Lower Cretaceous Antlers Formation (Lower Cretaceous, Aptian) of Oklahoma, USA. Geodiversitas 22, 207–246 (2000).
Tykoski, R. Osteology, ontogeny, and relationships of the coelophysoid theropods. Ph. D. thesis, The University of Texas, Austin, USA (2005).
Barta, D. E., Nesbitt, S. J. & Norell, M. A. The evolution of the manus of early theropod dinosaurs is characterized by high inter‐and intraspecific variation. Journal of Anatomy 232, 80–104 (2018).
Agnolin, F. L. & Chiarelli, P. The position of the claws in Noasauridae (Dinosauria: Abelisauroidea) and its implications for abelisauroid manus evolution. Paläontologische Zeitschrift 84, 293–300 (2010).
Accarie, H. et al. Découverte d’un dinosaure théropode nouveau (Genusaurus sisteronis ng, n. sp.) dans l’Albien marin de Sisteron (Alpes de Haute-Provence, France) et extension au Crétacé inférieur de la lignée cératosaurienne. Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des. Sciences. Série 2. Sciences de la Terre et des Planètes 320, 327–334 (1995).
Carrano, M. T. The appendicular skeleton of Majungasaurus crenatissimus (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Madagascar. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 27(S2), 163–179 (2007).
Sereno, P. C. & Brusatte, S. L. Basal abelisaurid and carcharodontosaurid theropods from the Lower Cretaceous Elrhaz Formation of Niger. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 53, 15–46 (2008).
Canale, J. I., Cerda, I., Novas, F. E. & Haluza, A. Small-sized abelisaurid (Theropoda: Ceratosauria) remains from the Upper Cretaceous of northwest Patagonia, Argentina. Cretaceous Research 62, 18–28 (2016).
Carrano, M. T. & Hutchinson, J. R. Pelvic and hindlimb musculature of Tyrannosaurus rex (Dinosauria: Theropoda). Journal of Morphology 253, 207–228 (2002).
Hutchinson, J. R. The evolution of pelvic osteology and soft tissues on the line to extant birds (Neornithes). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 131, 123–168 (2001).
Rowe, T. A new species of the theropod dinosaur Syntarsus from the Early Jurassic Kayenta Formation of Arizona. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 9, 125–136 (1989).
Tykoski, R. S., & Rowe T. Ceratosauria. in The Dinosauria, 2nd Edition 47–70 (University of California Press, 2004).
Novas, F. E. & Bandyopadhyay, S. Abelisaurid pedal unguals from the Late Cretaceous of India. Publicación Especial de la Asociación Paleontológica Argentina 7, 145–149 (2001).
Coria, R. A., Chiappe, L. M. & Dingus, L. A new close relative of Carnotaurus sastrei Bonaparte 1985 (Theropoda: Abelisauridae) from the Late Cretaceous of Patagonia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 22, 460–465 (2002).
Wells, R. T. & Tedford, R. H. Sthenurus (Macropodidae: Marsupialia) from the Pleistocene of Lake Callabonna, South Australia. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 225, 1–111 (1995).
Barsbold, R. & Perle, A. Segnosauria, a new infraorder of carnivorous dinosaurs. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 25, 187–195 (1980).
Ostrom, J. H. Osteology of Deinonychus antirrhopus, an unusual theropod from the Lower Cretaceous of Montana. Bulletin if the Peabody Museum of Natural History 30, 1–165 (1969).
Assine, M. L., Piranha, J. M. & Carneiro, C. D. R. In: Mantesso–Neto, V., Bartorelli, A., Carneiro, C. D. R. & Brito–Neves, B. B. Os paleodesertos Pirambóia e Botucatu. in Geologia do Continente Sul-Americano: evolução da obra de Fernando Flávio Marques de Almeida 77–92 (Beca, 2004).
Volkheimer, W. Esporas y granos de polen del Jurásico de Neuquén (República Argentina). II. Asociaciones microflorísticas, aspectos paleoecológicos y paleoclima. Ameghiniana 6, 127–145 (1969).
Leonardi, G. & Sarjeant, W. A. S. Footprints representing a new mesozoic vertebrate fauna from Brazil. Modern. Geology 10, 73–84 (1986).
Fernades, L. A. & Coimbra, A. M. O Grupo Caiuá (KS): revisão estratigráfica e contexto deposicional. Revista Brasileira de Geociências 24, 164–176 (1994).
Fernandes, L. A. et al Rastros de dinossauros e de mamíferos em rochas do deserto neocretáceo Caiuá. in Sítios Geológicos e Paleontológicos do Brasil, 3–12 (ET Queiroz, 2008).
Leonardi, G. Two new ichnofaunas (vertebrates and invertebrates) in the eolian cretaceous sandstone of the Caiuá Formation in Northwest Paraná. in Atas do I Simpósio de Geologia Regional, São Paulo 112–128 (Sociedade Brasileira de Geologia, 1977).
Leonardi, G. Annotated Atlas of South America Tetrapod Footprints (Devonian to Holocene) with an appendix on México and Central America. (CPRM, 1994).
Alexander, R. M. Estimates of speeds of dinosaurs. Nature 261, 129–130 (1976).
D’Orazi Porchetti, S., Bertini, R. J. & Langer, M. C. Proposal for Ichnotaxonomic Allocation of Therapsid Footprints from the Botucatu Formation (Brazil). Ichnos 25, 192–207 (2017).
Leonardi, G. & Oliveira, F. H. L. A revision of the Triassic and Jurassic tetrapod footprints of Argentina and a new approach on the age and meaning of the Botucatu Formation footprints (Brazil). Revista Brasileira de Geociências 20, 216–229 (1990).
Novas, F. E. The age of dinosaurs in South America. (Indiana University Press, 2009).
Casamiquela, R. M. Estudios Ichnologicos. Colegio Industrial Pio IX, Buenos Aires. 229 pp (1964).
De Valais, S. Revision of dinosaur ichnotaxa from the la Matilde Formation (Middle Jurassic), Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. Ameghiniana 48, 28–42 (2010).
Xing, L. et al. Tetrapod track assemblages from Lower Cretaceous desert facies in the Ordos Basin, Shaanxi Province, China, and their implications for Mesozoic paleoecology. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology (2018).
We are indebted to the Cruzeiro do Oeste-PR municipal administration, particularly the mayor Maria Helena Bertocco and the ex-mayor Valter P. da Rocha, as well as to Mauro L. Baesso, Julio C. Damasceno, Lúcio T. Mota, Suzana Volkmer (all at UEM), Josina Melo, Dislene Freitas, the Dobruski family (especially João D. Dubruski), the Cruzeiro do Oeste chamber of councillors, and the Universidade Paranaense (UNIPAR) for their support in various aspects of this research. Átila A. S. da Rosa, Giuseppe Leonardi, Jonathas S. Bittencourt, and Simone D’Orazi-Porchetti provided valuable help in their areas of expertise. Blair W. McPhee exhaustively revised the English language of our MS and Pedro L. Godoy helped estimating the body mass of the new dinosaur. Thanks also to the Sanches family, owners of the fossil site, and to Agencia Nacional de Mineração, particularly Felipe B. Chaves, for the intuitional support. M.C.L. was funded by the FAPESP grant #2014/03825-3.
The authors declare no competing interests.
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.