Yeast screening system reveals the inhibitory mechanism of cancer cell proliferation by benzyl isothiocyanate through down-regulation of Mis12

Abstract

Benzyl isothiocyanate (BITC) is a naturally-occurring isothiocyanate derived from cruciferous vegetables. BITC has been reported to inhibit the proliferation of various cancer cells, which is believed to be important for the inhibition of tumorigenesis. However, the detailed mechanisms of action remain unclear. In this study, we employed a budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model organism for screening. Twelve genes including MTW1 were identified as the overexpression suppressors for the antiproliferative effect of BITC using the genome-wide multi-copy plasmid collection for S. cerevisiae. Overexpression of the kinetochore protein Mtw1 counteracts the antiproliferative effect of BITC in yeast. The inhibitory effect of BITC on the proliferation of human colon cancer HCT-116 cells was consistently suppressed by the overexpression of Mis12, a human orthologue of Mtw1, and enhanced by the knockdown of Mis12. We also found that BITC increased the phosphorylated and ubiquitinated Mis12 level with consequent reduction of Mis12, suggesting that BITC degrades Mis12 through an ubiquitin-proteasome system. Furthermore, cell cycle analysis showed that the change in the Mis12 level affected the cell cycle distribution and the sensitivity to the BITC-induced apoptosis. These results provide evidence that BITC suppresses cell proliferation through the post-transcriptional regulation of the kinetochore protein Mis12.

Introduction

Naturally-occurring isothiocyanates (ITCs), such as benzyl ITC (BITC), phenethyl ITC (PEITC) and sulforaphane (SFN) derived from cruciferous vegetables, have been demonstrated to block the tumor formation initiated by chemicals in experimental animals, and the dietary consumption of ITCs has been shown to strongly correlate with the reduced risk of various cancers in humans1,2,3,4. The antiproliferative effect of ITCs through the induction of cell cycle arrest and apoptosis is believed to be one of the important determinants for the inhibition of tumorigenesis. For example, BITC induces cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase by a p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-dependent pathway in human leukemia Jurkat cells5 and by an extracellular signaling-regulated kinase-dependent pathway in human pancreatic cancer Capan-2 cells6. Also BITC induces apoptosis by the mitochondrial death pathway in rat liver epithelial RL34 cells7 and by a c-Jun-N-terminal kinase-dependent pathway in Jurkat cells. However, the detailed molecular mechanism involved in the antiproliferative effect of ITCs remains to be clarified.

The identification of molecular targets of ITCs conferring their antiproliferative ability contributes to the understanding of the molecular basis of ITCs8. As electrophiles, ITCs can covalently bind to cellular nucleophilic amino acids, such as Cys and Lys. Mi et al. found a correlation between the covalent binding to the cellular proteins and antiproliferative effect of ITCs9. Consistent with this report, the direct binding of ITCs to several proteins, such as tubulin10, macrophage migration inhibitory factor11 and DNA topoisomerase II alpha12, are likely to be associated with the antiproliferative ability of ITCs. Proteomics analysis by 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis has recently been used to screen the binding targets of ITCs and identified 30 proteins as the binding targets of ITCs in vitro13. However, the binding targets of ITCs identified by proteomics include several proteins abundantly existing in the cells, such as actin, tubulin and vimentin14. The low binding specificity of ITCs makes it difficult to find the molecular targets specifically contributing to the antiproliferative effect of ITCs. Therefore, the paradigm shift of the screening system is needed in terms of the requirement of the targets for the ITC-induced phenotype.

Budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a eukaryotic model organism which has been frequently used in scientific studies due to its easy and cheap cultivation, short generation time and the ease of the application of molecular techniques for its genetic manipulation15,16, and widely employed for the identification of drug targets and mechanism of action studies17. The yeast screening system would be especially useful for the identification of target molecules contributing to the antiproliferation by ITCs, because ITCs exert an antiproliferative effect in yeast as well as in human cancer cells18, and antiproliferative agents often target the components of cell division and DNA repair machineries which are highly conserved between humans and yeast. One of the approaches to identify small-molecule targets is a multi-copy suppression screening for genes that provide resistance to a drug on overexpression. This screening is based on the principle that cells overexpressing a small-molecule target should tolerate the higher levels of the drug19. In addition, the yeast genome has been entirely sequenced and includes about 6000 open reading frames (ORFs)20,21. Based on the genome, we previously developed pRS423ks, a genome-wide multi-copy plasmid collection of S. cerevisiae22. Briefly, each gene with its native regulatory elements (promoter and terminator) is cloned to a 2-micron-based plasmid vector. Plasmid vectors derived from a 2-micron circle, which is a naturally-observed selfish DNA in S. cerevisiae, have copy numbers of 10 to 40 per cell23. Although the promoter swapping using the strong promoter, such as GAL1, causes an absolute gene overexpression, pRS423ks causes a relative gene overexpression from the native level. We then tried to identify the molecular targets for the antiproliferative effect of BITC by the introduction of the plasmid collection to the wild-type yeast strain and the following examination of individual transformants for resistance to BITC.

To investigate the mechanisms of antiproliferation by BITC in human cancer cells, we conducted a genome-wide overexpression screening in yeast and applied the results obtained from the yeast to human cancer cells. By the screening, 12 genes, including MTW1 encoding an essential component of the MIND kinetochore complex, were identified as overexpression suppressors of antiproliferation by BITC in yeast. We found that the down-regulation of Mis12, a human orthologue of Mtw1, plays an important role in the antiproliferation by BITC in human colon cancer HCT-116 cells. Our data indicated that the proteasome-dependent decrease in Mis12 induces G2/M delay and enhances the BITC-induced apoptosis, which contributes to the suppression of cancer cell proliferation by BITC.

Results

BITC dose-dependently suppresses yeast cell growth

To determine the concentration of BITC for the yeast screening, we examined the effect of BITC on the yeast cell growth by calculating the maximum growth rate in the yeast BY4741 strain. As shown in Fig. 1, the maximum growth rate decreased with the increasing concentrations of BITC, which suggests that BITC dose-dependently suppresses the proliferation of yeast. Since the treatment of BITC at a too low or too high concentration makes it difficult to detect the recovery of the maximum growth rate by overexpressing genes, we decided to use 100 μM BITC for the screening.

Figure 1
figure1

BITC inhibits cell growth in yeast. Yeast BY4741 cells were incubated in the YPD medium with different concentrations of BITC in a 96 well-plate. The time-lapse change in absorbance at 595 nm was measured using a microplate reader. Based on these data, the maximum growth rate was calculated. The values represent means ± SEM of three separate experiments (*P < 0.05 compared with control; Student’s t-test).

Overexpression of 12 genes contributes to BITC resistance in yeast

The scheme of yeast screening by BITC is shown in Fig. 2. First is a BITC treatment step: transformants of BY4741 cells with 8 groups of pRS423ks, a genome-wide multi-copy plasmid collection of yeast22 (about 750 ORFs/group), were treated with 100 μM BITC at 30 °C for 3 days in YPD liquid medium. Second is a colony formation step; a cell suspension from each well was spotted and cultivated on synthetic complete without the His (SC-His) agar plate at 30 °C for 3 days. Third is a major gene searching step; inserted DNA in the plasmid was amplified by colony PCR, digested by restriction enzyme and separated by gel electrophoresis to find the same patterns of the inserted DNA. The plasmid DNA of a sample with the same frequently seen (more than 2 times) band patterns was selected and isolated. Fourth is a DNA sequencing step; 15 gene candidates were identified by DNA sequencing using the isolated plasmids and primers. To validate the screening, pRS423ks plasmids with the sequences of the 15 identified genes were cloned by Escherichia coli and introduced to yeast again, then the transformants were subjected to a spot assay. As shown in Fig. 3, overexpression of the 12 genes (ATP10, BAP2, COX23, MTW1, RCM1, RRT5, RTS3, STP1, UBP7, YDR262W, YGR017W and YML100W-A), but not overexpression of 3 genes (SQT1, TAT1 and YOL019W), significantly weakened the antiproliferative effect of BITC compared to the control group (empty vector), suggesting that the overexpression of these 12 genes contributes to the BITC resistance in yeast (Table 1).

Figure 2
figure2

Scheme of screening for overexpression suppressors of antiproliferation by BITC in yeast. Transformants of BY4741 cells with pRS423ks were treated with 100 μM BITC for 3 days in YPD medium. Yeasts from each well were cultured on an SC-His agar plate. Formed colonies were subjected to colony PCR to amplify the inserted DNA into the plasmid. The PCR products were digested with restriction enzymes and separated by gel electrophoresis. Only the plasmid DNA of the samples with a major band fragmentation pattern was subjected to DNA sequencing.

Figure 3
figure3

Validation of screening by spot assay. BY4741 cells were transformed with pRS423ks with ORF of each of the 15 genes identified by screening and empty vector (control). The transformants were treated with the indicated concentrations of BITC for 30 min in YPD medium. The cell suspensions were spotted on a YPD agar plate. The number of colonies was counted to determine the cell viability. The values represent means ± SEM of three separate experiments (*P < 0.05 compared between overexpression (OE) group of each gene and control at the same concentrations of BITC; Student’s t-test).

Table 1 Overexpression suppresser genes of antiproliferation by BITC in yeast.

Change in Mis12 level affects the sensitivity to BITC in human cancer cells

We focused on MTW1 among the 12 identified genes because the function and structure of yeast Mtw1 are highly conserved in the human orthologue of Mtw1, Mis12. Mis12, an essential component of the Mis12 kinetochore complex in humans, is required for the appropriate chromosome segregation during mitosis24. In human colon cancer HCT-116 cells, we examined the effects of the overexpression and knockdown of Mis12 on the antiproliferation by BITC. The Mis12 protein level in HCT-116 cells stably overexpressing Mis12 (Mis12 OE cells) was about 1.7 times higher than that in the vector control (Fig. 4A). The Mis12 overexpression itself didn’t affect the cell proliferation (Fig. 4B). As shown in Fig. 4C, the antiproliferative effect of BITC in Mis12 OE cells was significantly attenuated compared to the vector control, which is consistent with the result from the yeast in Fig. 3. The transfection of HCT-116 cells with 30 nM Mis12-specific siRNA depleted the Mis12 protein level by 16% compared to control (Fig. 4D). Mis12 knockdown alone weakly, but significantly, suppressed the cell proliferation (Fig. 4E). As shown in Fig. 4F, BITC itself dose-dependently suppressed cell proliferation in the control siRNA-treated group, whereas the Mis12 knockdown enhanced the antiproliferative effect of BITC. These results suggested that the expression level of Mis12 in human as well as Mtw1 in yeast affects the antiproliferative effect of BITC.

Figure 4
figure4

Change in Mis12 protein level affects the sensitivity of cells to the antiproliferative effect of BITC. The Mis12 protein level was determined by a Western blot analysis. Actin was used as a loading control. The viability was determined by a trypan blue dye exclusion assay. (A) Mis12 protein level in HCT-116 cells stably expressing HA-Mis12 (Mis12 OE cells) was determined. pQCXIP (vector) was used as the control. (B) Mis12 OE and control cells (2 × 106) were cultured for 24 h and the viability was determined. (C) Mis12 OE and control cells (2 × 106) were treated with BITC for 24 h and the cell viability was determined. (D&E) HCT-116 cells were transfected with the control siRNA or Mis12-specific siRNA. The Mis12 protein level (D) and viability (E) were then determined. (F) HCT-116 cells were transfected with the control siRNA or Mis12-specific siRNA. After the treatment with BITC for 24 h, the cell viability was determined. The values represent means ± SEM of three separate experiments (*P < 0.05 compared between the indicated groups; Student’s t-test).

BITC induces proteasome-dependent decrease of Mis12 in HCT-116 cells

We examined the effect of BITC on the protein expression of Mtw1 in yeast and Mis12 in HCT-116 cells. For detection of the Mtw1 protein expression, we used the yeast strain whose MTW1 sequence on the genome is replaced with the MTW1-TAP sequence by homogeneous recombination. Western blot analysis using the anti-TAP-tag and anti-Mis12 antibodies showed that BITC significantly decreased the Mtw1-TAP level in yeast (Fig. 5A) and the Mis12 level not only in HCT-116 cells, but also in immortalized non-tumorigenic human epidermal (HaCaT) cells (Fig. 5B,C). In addition, the anti-cancer agent paclitaxel decreased the Mis12 level and cell viability in HCT-116 cells (Fig. 5J,K). The decrease of Mis12 was observed 1 h after the BITC treatment and continued for 24 h after treatment (Fig. 5D). A previous study indicated that Mis12 appears to localize on DNA throughout the cell cycle24. Immunofluorescence data showed that BITC didn’t affect the subcellular localization of Mis12 on DNA but significantly decreased the Mis12 fluorescent signal (Fig. 5E). Although the results in mitotic phase were shown as the representative pictures in Fig. 5E, we also confirmed that the fluorescent foci of Mis12 were observed on DNA in interphase (data not shown). Furthermore, we observed the misaligned chromosome in the BITC-treated HCT-116 cells (Fig. 5F). This finding is consistent with a previous report showing that the siRNA-mediated down-regulation of Mis12 induces misalignment of the chromosomes in HeLa cells25.

Figure 5
figure5

BITC decreases Mis12 protein expression in a proteasome-dependent manner. The Mtw1/Mis12 protein level was determined by a Western blot analysis. Total protein staining or actin was used as the loading control. (A) BY4741 cells expressing the Mtw1-TAP were treated with BITC for 24 h and Mtw1-TAP protein level was determined. (B) HCT-116 cells were treated with BITC for 24 h and the Mis12 protein level was determined. (C) HaCaT cells were treated with BITC for 24 h and the Mis12 protein level was determined. (D) HCT-116 cells were treated with 20 μM BITC for the indicated hours and the Mis12 protein level was determined. (E) HCT-116 cells stably expressing HA-Mis12 were treated with 20 μM BITC for 1 h. The signals of HA-Mis12 (green) and DNA (blue) were detected by immunofluorescence. The signal intensity of HA-Mis12 at each kinetochore was measured relative to an adjacent background signal. Bar, 10 µm. Fluorescence intensity was quantified using Image J software. (F) HCT-116 cells were treated with 20 μM BITC for 1 h. The signals of the microtubules (green) and DNA (blue) were detected by immunofluorescence. Bar, 10 µm. (G) HCT-116 cells were treated with BITC for 24 h and the Mis12 mRNA level was determined by RT-PCR. (H) HCT-116 cells were treated with 10 μM MG132 and/or 20 μM BITC for 24 h, and the Mis12 protein level was determined. (I) HCT-116 cells stably expressing HA-Mis12 were treated with 10 μM MG132 and/or 20 μM BITC for 30 min. The whole cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with the HA antibody and visualized by a Western blot analysis with ubiquitin, phosphoserine/threonine/tyrosine or HA-tag antibody. (J) HCT-116 cells were treated with 100 nM paclitaxel for 24 h and subjected to Western blot analysis to detect Mis12 signal. Actin was used as a loading control. (K) HCT-116 cells were treated with 100 nM paclitaxel for 24 h and subjected to MTT assay to measure cell viability. The values represent means ± SEM of three separate experiments (*P < 0.05 compared with control; Student’s t-test).

Next, to check whether or not the decrease of the Mis12 protein level by BITC is regulated by the transcriptional level, we investigated the effect of BITC on the mRNA expression of MIS12. As shown in Fig. 5G, BITC showed no significant effect on the MIS12 mRNA expression in HCT-116 cells. We next examined the effect of proteasome inhibitor, MG132, on the BITC-decreased Mis12 protein level. The co-incubation with MG132 impaired the BITC-decreased expression of the Mis12 protein (Fig. 5H). Since some phosphorylated proteins could be recognized as the substrates of the E3 ubiquitin ligase and degraded through an ubiquitin-proteasome pathway, we performed an immunoprecipitation assay to examine the post-transcriptional modification of Mis12. As expected, BITC drastically increased the phosphorylated Mis12 and tended to induce the ubiquitination of Mis12 (Fig. 5I). These results suggested that BITC degrades the Mis12 protein, possibly through the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway without affecting its gene expression or subcellular localization.

Down-regulation of Mis12 increases G2/M cell population and enhances BITC-induced apoptosis in HCT-116 cells

The BITC-induced chromosome misalignment may cause delay in mitosis. Consistently, BITC delays the cell cycle progression at G2/M phase and induces G2/M phase-specific apoptotic cell death in human leukemia Jurkat cells. Thus, we hypothesized that the decrease in Mis12 enhances the BITC-induced apoptosis by increasing the G2/M cell population in HCT-116 cells. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of the overexpression or knockdown of Mis12 on cell cycle regulation by BITC. In the vector group, BITC increased the G2/M and Sub-G1 cell population (Fig. 6A,B), the latter of which is characterized as the apoptotic cells26. On the other hand, the Mis12 overexpression cancelled the BITC-increased G2/M cell population and partly, but significantly, attenuated the BITC-increased Sub-G1 cell population. Compared with the control siRNA-transfected group, Mis12 knockdown alone increased the G2/M cell population, but not the sub-G1 cell population (Fig. 6C,D). Moreover, the increase in the sub-G1 cell population by BITC was enhanced by the Mis12 knockdown. These data suggested that BITC increases the G2/M cell population, possibly by reducing the Mis12 level and thus sensitizing the cells to the BITC-induced apoptosis.

Figure 6
figure6

Change in Mis12 protein level affects the sensitivity of cells to BITC-induced apoptosis. (A,B) Cells in the Mis12 OE and vector group were treated with BITC for 24 h and subjected to a cell cycle distribution analysis using Tali™ image-based cytometer. The representative histogram is shown in (A). The G2/M and Sub-G1 cell populations were statistically analyzed in (B). (C,D) HCT-116 cells were transfected with the control siRNA or Mis12-specific siRNA. After the treatment with BITC for 24 h, the cell cycle distribution was analyzed as (A). The representative histogram is shown in (C). The G2/M and Sub-G1 cell populations were statistically analyzed in (D). The values represent means ± SEM of three separate experiments. Data were analyzed by a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by multiple comparisons among the means (Tukey’s HSD) using XLSTAT software (Addinsoft, Paris, France). Different letters above the bars indicate significant differences among the treatments for each compound (P < 0.05).

Discussion

In the present study, we originally developed the yeast screening system as a reliable and convenient tool to identify overexpression suppressors for the antiproliferative effect of BITC. As shown in Table 1, the 12 identified genes in yeast includes ATP synthase (ATP10), amino acid transport system (BAP2 and STP1), cytochrome c oxidase Cu chaperon (COX23), kinetochore complex (MTW1), deubiquitinating enzymes (DUBs) (UBP7), ribosomal RNA (rRNA) methyltransferase (RCM1) and protein phosphatase type 2A (PP2A) complex (RTS3). According to the Saccharomyces genome database, Bap2, Cox23, Mtw1, Ubp7 and Rcm1 are recognized as the human homologs of SLC7A5-10, CHCHD7, Mis12, USP2, 8, 21 and NSUN5, respectively. Because the structure is highly similar between homologs and the overexpression of each gene increases the resistance against BITC, they might play a pivotal role in the BITC-induced antiproliferation in both the yeast and human cells. Among the identified 12 factors, ATP synthase, cytochrome c oxidase Cu chaperon and DUB have already been identified as the direct binding targets for PEITC, an aromatic ITC analogue of BITC, by an in vitro proteomics study using the human cancer cell lysate13. The existence of such common hits between our screening and previous proteomics analysis further confirmed the usefulness of our yeast screening system and also implies that the down-regulation or dysfunction of these proteins by the direct binding of BITC contributes to its antiproliferative effect. For example, the collapse of the mitochondrial electron transport system through the direct binding of BITC to ATP synthase or cytochrome c oxidase Cu chaperon might induce apoptosis. This idea is supported by the finding that the mitochondrial death pathway is involved in BITC-induced apoptosis7.

Our screening system identified other types of factors contributing to the BITC resistance such as the components of the amino acid transport system (Bap2 and Stp1). Bap2 is the branched-amino acid transporter that mediates the uptake of leucine, isoleucine and valine to the cells27. Stp1 regulates the transcription of amino acid transporters including Bap228,29. The increased expression of the L-type amino acid transporters (LATs), the major transporters that regulate uptake of leucine to cells, is the hallmark of many kinds of human cancers30. There is now strong evidence that leucine enhances the mammalian target of the rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling which modulates protein synthesis to regulate cell growth, proliferation and cellular differentiation31. Furthermore, we have recently reported that an mTOR inhibitor, NVP-BEZ235, potentiated the BITC-induced apoptosis induction in human colorectal cancer cells32. Thus, the inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway through the down-regulation of the LATs might contribute to the antiproliferative effect of BITC in human cells. Similarly, the attenuation of the antiproliferative effect of BITC by overexpressing the rRNA methyltransferase might be attributed to the facilitation of protein synthesis because methylation of the rRNA regulates ribosome maturation33.

In this study, we identified a kinetochore protein Mtw1, a well-conserved orthologue of human Mis12, as one of the overexpression suppressors for the antiproliferative effect of BITC using the yeast screening system. Our data showed that the antiproliferative effect of BITC was not only inhibited by the Mis12 overexpression in HCT-116 cells, but also enhanced by the Mis12 knockdown (Fig. 4C,F). The Mis12 knockdown alone induced G2/M delay but not apoptosis in HCT-116 cells and synergistically enhanced the antiproliferative effect of BITC accompanied with acceleration of the BITC-induced apoptosis (Figs 4F and 6). These observations suggested that the accumulation of the G2/M cell population is involved in the increased sensitivity to the BITC-induced apoptosis. This idea is supported by the report showing that BITC induces the G2/M phase-specific apoptosis in human leukemia Jurkat cells5. PP2A, a factor identified by our screening, is a family of serine/threonine protein phosphatases that regulates many cellular processes including cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, protein synthesis, cell morphology and development34,35. Down-regulation of the PP2A-B55 complex accelerates entry into mitosis and inhibits exit from mitosis. The inactivation of PP2A induces apoptosis in many cancer cells36. Based on these findings, the overexpression of the PP2A component might weaken the antiproliferative effect of BITC by inhibiting the BITC-induced M delay and apoptosis. However, PP2A regulates cell growth both positively and negatively due to the formation of a multitude of different PP2A holoenzyme complexes37. Thus, the individual role in each of the PP2A complexes in the antiproliferative effect of BITC needs to be clarified.

We also found that BITC enhanced Mis12 phosphorylation and tended to induce Mis12 ubiquitination (Fig. 5I) and decreased Mis12 in a proteasome-dependent manner (Fig. 5H), suggesting that the post-transcriptional regulation of Mis12 plays a key role in the antiproliferative effect of BITC. Although previous research indicated that Mis12 is phosphorylated at Ser190 or Thr192, and Ser213 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe possibly by Gsk3 kinase24, the mechanism stabilizing kinetochore attachment of Mis12 is still unknown. The phosphorylation sites of human Mis12 and their effect on the stability should be elucidated in the future researches. We identified UBP7 encoding DUB, a large group of proteases that cleave ubiquitin from proteins and other molecules including ubiquitin-specific proteases (USPs) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolases (UCHs). Since dysregulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome system has been suggested to play an important role in the pathogenesis of many human diseases including cancer38, DUBs are promising targets for cancer treatment through the interference with the ubiquitin regulation machinery39. For example, the knockdown of USP7 actually exerts an antiproliferative effect through induction of cell cycle arrest in HCT-116 cells40. Since proteomics analysis also identified DUB as a direct target of the ITC compound13, the DUB dysfunction through the direct binding of BITC might contribute to the Mis12 degradation by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. In fact, a very recent study revealed that BITC and PEITC inhibit the activity of USP9x and UCH37, possibly through the direct modification to the Cys residue in the catalytic domain of the DUBs41, supporting our hypothesis. However, there is another possibility that the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of Mis12 is followed by the BITC-induced cell cycle delay. Therefore, the further studies on the upstream signaling of Mis12 phosphorylation are required. Since the ITCs-bound proteins are also degraded in a proteasome-dependent manner, the direct modification of the target proteins by BITC is another possible mechanism of the Mis12 down-regulation. A recent study revealed that the subunits of the multi-protein complex including the MIND kinetochore complex composed of Mtw1, Dsn1, Nsl1 and Nnf1 were subjected to tuning toward the fine proportion at the protein level by the ubiquitin-proteasome system in yeast42. We preliminary found that BITC drastically decreased the protein level of the human Dsnl in HCT-116 cells (data not shown). These results suggest that Mis12 affects the stability of the subunits of the human Mis12 complex other than Mis12 and becomes the promising target of the anti-cancer agent.

The human Mis12 kinetochore complex, a heterotetramer composed of Mis12, Dsn1, Nsl1and Nnf1, connects the centromere region on the chromosome to the mitotic spindle microtubule and is essential for the kinetochore assembly and proper chromosome segregation24,25. Mis12 depletion induces the high frequency of misaligned metaphase chromosomes and lagging chromosomes in anaphase, followed by the frequent appearance of micronuclei in the interphase. These mitotic and interphase abnormalities should cause chromosome missegregation and aneuploidy, an aberrant number of chromosomes24,43. Consistent with these reports, we observed chromosome misalignment induced by BITC (Fig. 5F). This result indicated that BITC induces aneuploidy through the down-regulation of Mis12. Targeting the components involved in the mitotic regulation is a major strategy of cancer therapy, whereas the induction of delay in mitosis causes not only the cell death but also aneuploidy44. Recent study revealed that paclitaxel, a first-line anti-cancer agent inhibiting the depolymerization of spindle microtubules, induces aneuploidy to suppress proliferation in a clinically relevant concentration range in breast cancer45. Paclitaxel as well as BITC decreased the protein level of Mis12 at the concentration where it suppresses cell proliferation in HCT-116 cells (Fig. 5J,K). These findings suggest that the induction of aneuploidy is an effective strategy for cancer therapy, while aneuploidy has ever been recognized to be a hallmark of cancer development. Some researchers argue that aneuploidy is simply a by-product of tumorigenesis46, while others argue that aneuploidy is the driving force of tumorigenesis47. This confusion may be due to various factors including the heterogenic nature of cancers and the individual genetic alteration in humans48. Since BITC decreased the protein level of Mis12 in non-tumorigenic HaCaT cells as well as in tumorigenic HCT-116 cells (Fig. 5B,C), it is very important to examine whether or not the down-regulation of Mis12 by BITC causes carcinogenesis in various cell types including normal cells. Although the agents targeting the components of kinetochore complex including Ndc80 and Nuf2 have been shown to have anti-cancer effects49,50,51, this is the first report, to the best of our knowledge, to show the mechanism to suppress cancer cell proliferation through the degradation of Mis12. This finding is expected to contribute to the development of the new anti-cancer drug targeting Mis12 as well as other kinetochore complex members.

Here, we proposed the regulating role of Mis12 in the BITC-induced suppression of proliferation in HCT-116 cells due to G2/M delay and apoptosis in Fig. 7. However, the other study implies that the cell cycle inhibition by ITCs is caused through the disruption of spindle structure by the ITC binding to tubulin10. Furthermore, the decrease of Mis12 level by paclitaxel, which is known to cause the spindle disruption up to the dose, suggests the probability that the spindle disruption leads to the downregulation of Mis12. Thus, it is also possible that the disruption of spindle structure by BITC is followed by cell cycle inhibition and Mis12 degradation. Even though the Mis12 overexpression canceled the cell cycle inhibition by BITC (Fig. 6B), the excess Mis12 may impair the disruption of spindle structure to interfere with the BITC binding to tubulin. Future studies should be directed to clarify the detailed mechanism of the down-regulation of Mis12 level by BITC. Our yeast screening system requires a lower cost, shorter time and simpler operations compared to the human cell screening system. We also revealed the commonality between the molecules identified by our screening and possible binding targets of BITC previously reported13, suggesting the high utility of our screening system. Although we did not provide evidence that BITC targets Mis12 directly or indirectly, future efforts will be concerned with chemical detection of the BITC-modified Mis12 by mass spectrometry or by immunoprecipitation using the antibody recognizing the Lys adduct of BITC52. Furthermore, because inhibition of the DUB activity by BITC is the most plausible indirect pathway, it should be clarified whether the DUB modification by BITC contributes to the proteasome-dependent Mis12 degradation.

Figure 7
figure7

Proposed model of antiproliferation by BITC. BITC has been shown to induce G2/M arrest and apoptosis in various cancer cells. BITC possibly decreases Mis12 protein level by inducing the phosphorylation, ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of it. The reduced-Mis12 level causes G2/M delay, but not apoptosis and enhances the apoptosis induction by BITC. Thus, the down-regulation of Mis12 contributes to the antiproliferative effect of BITC by inducing G2/M delay and sensitizing cells to the BITC-induced apoptosis.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and antibodies

BITC was purchased from LKT Laboratories, Inc. (St Paul, MN). Antibodies against Mis12 (#98368, 1:200), ubiquitin (#sc-8017, 1:200) and actin (#sc-8432, 1:200), and horseradish peroxidase-linked anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgGs, Mis12-specific siRNA, control siRNA, siRNA transfection medium, siRNA transfection reagent and Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose Immunoprecipitation reagents were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Antibody against phosphoserine/threonine/tyrosine (#ab15556, 1:1000) was purchased from abcam (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Peroxidase anti-peroxidase soluble complex (PAP) antibody (#P3039, 1:1000), propidium iodide (PI) and RNase A were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Antibody against HA-Tag (#3724, 1:1000) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, Inc. (Beverly, MA). Alexa Fluor-linked anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgGs, McCoy’s 5A, penicillin/streptomycin, trypan blue stain, FastDigest EcoRI, FastDigest HindIII, Pierce® BCA Protein Assay Kit and Trizol® reagent were purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Waltham, MA). Fatal bovine serum (FBS) was purchased from Nichirei Corporation (Tokyo, Japan). Immobilon-P membrane was purchased from Merck Millipore (Billerica, MA). Taq polymerase and PrimeScriptTM RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time) were purchased from Takara Bio Inc. (Shiga, Japan). Paclitaxel was purchased from Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). All other chemicals were purchased from Nakalai Tesque Inc. (Kyoto, Japan).

Yeast strain, growth conditions and yeast transformation

S. cerevisiae strain BY4741 (MATa his3Δ1 leu2Δ0 met15Δ0 ura3Δ0)53 was used for yeast screening system. S. cerevisiae MTW1-TAP strain obtained from Funakoshi Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) was used for Western blot analysis. Yeast cultivation and transformation were performed as previously described54. SC-His was used for the selection of yeast transformed with plasmid.

Generation of gene overexpression library of yeast

To generate the gene overexpression library of S. cerevisiae, BY4741 strain was transformed with pRS423ks and plated on minimal media lacking His. Because BY4741 strain harbors inactivated his3 genes, it cannot grow on His-lacking medium. However, the genomic DNA of the yeast strain from which the library was constructed has the functional HIS3 genes. Thus, the presence of a plasmid in the library that contains HIS3 genes in BY4741 strain will restore growth to a transformant on medium lacking His.

Measurement of maximum growth rate

Yeast growth was measured by monitoring OD595 every 30 min at 30 °C using a microplate reader (Model 680XR, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Maximum growth rate was calculated as described previously54.

Screening for overexpression suppressors of antiproliferation by BITC in yeast

The entire scheme of yeast screening system is described as follows. A genome-wide multi-copy plasmid library of S. cerevisiae cloned into pRS423ks22 was divided to 8 groups for convenience and introduced into BY4741 cells. The 8 groups of transformants were cultivated in SC-His medium until mid-log phase, seeded to 96 well-plate and cultured in YPD liquid medium with 100 μM BITC for 3 days at 30 °C. The cell suspension in each well was plated onto SC-His agar plate and incubated for 3 days at 30 °C. Relatively big colonies were picked up and subjected to colony PCR using primers 5′-AAGATCAACACTGCCAAAGCG-3′ and 5′-AGCCATATCAATACGGCGAACATC-3′ to amplify DNA sequence of gene inserted in plasmid. PCR product was digested with EcoRI and HindIII for 1 h at 37 °C and separated by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. Plasmid DNA from colony with the same band pattern frequently seen here (more than 2 times) was isolated by Yeast DNA miniprep as previously described54. Escherichia coli XL1-Blue Electroporation Competent Cell (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) was transformed with the isolated yeast DNA by electroporation and plated on ampicillin-containing LB plate. Plasmid DNA was isolated by E. coli DNA miniprep as previously described54. DNA sequence of insert in the plasmid was determined by the service of Macrogen japan (Tokyo, Japan) using primers 5′-CGGCCGCTCTAGAACTAGTGGATCC-3′ and 5′-ATTGGGTACCGGGCCCCCCCTCGAG-3′. To re-evaluate the suppressor activity of the identified candidate gene, suppressor plasmid was transfected to yeast again and performed spot assay.

Spot assay

Yeast cells were cultured in YPD liquid medium with BITC (100, 500 and 1000 µM) or 0.1% DMSO for 30 min. The cell suspension was diluted 1, 100 and 500 times with YPD liquid medium and the diluent of cell suspension (10 μl) was spotted onto YPD agar plate. After 2 days cultivation, the number of colonies was counted.

Human cell line and cell culture

Human colon cancer cell line HCT-116 was obtained from the American Type Culture collection (ATCC) (Manassas, VA). HCT-116 cells were maintained in McCoy’s 5A medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 1% penicillin/streptomycin. Immortalized non-tumorigenic human epidermal cell line HaCaT was kindly provided by Shiseido Research Center (Yokohama, Japan). HaCaT cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS and 0.5% penicillin/streptomycin. Cells were grown at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 95% and 5% CO2.

Western blot analysis

The experiments for yeast cells55 and for human cells56 were performed as previously described. Briefly, whole cell lysates were subjected to SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membrane and the chemiluminescent picture was taken after immunoblotting using antibodies. Densitometric analysis of the bands was carried out using the Image J Software Program.

RNA interference

Cells were cultured in 6-well plates (2 × 105 cells per well) in normal growth medium without antibiotic and transfected with siRNA. Predesigned siRNA targeting Mis12 or nonspecific control siRNA were transfected to the cells according to the manufacturer’s instructions using siRNA transfection medium and siRNA transfection reagent. After the incubation for appropriate time, cells were assayed using the appropriate protocol.

Trypan blue dye exclusion assay

Trypan blue dye exclusion assay was carried out for quantitative analysis of cell viability. Cell suspensions were mixed with 0.4% Trypan blue stain. Viable cells (cells that excluded blue dye) were counted using a hemocytometer (Bürker-Türk) under a light microscope.

MTT assay

MTT assay was carried out for quantitative analysis of cell viability as previously described56. Briefly, cells were treated with MTT solution and the absorbance was measured at 570 nm after 2 h-incubation at 37 °C.

RT-PCR

Cells were washed with ice-cold phosphate buffered saline (PBS) (−). Total cellular RNA was isolated using Trizol reagent according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. RNA was quantified by measuring absorbance at 260 nm. Total RNA (0.5 μg) was reverse transcribed using PrimeScriptTM RT Master Mix (Perfect Real Time). PCR amplification was then performed with Taq polymerase and specific primers. Primers used in PCR amplification are as follows: MIS12, 5′-CAGGCCGTTGAACAGGTTAT-3′ and 5′-TCAGCTGCAAAAACAGTTGC-3′ (160 bp); and β-ACTIN, 5′-GTCACCCACACTGTGCCCATCTA-3′ and 5′-GCAATGCCAGGGTACATGGTGGT-3′ (455 bp). The PCR products were then subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis (3%), stained with ethidium bromide and photographed. Densitometric analysis of the bands was carried out using the Image J Software Program.

Plasmid and stable cell line

Plasmid to express Mis12 was kindly provided by Drs. Mitsuhiro Yanagida and Takeshi Hayashi (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan). Mis12 cDNA fused with HA-tag sequence at N-terminal was produced by PCR and subcloned into pQCXIP (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). HCT-116 cells stably expressing HA-Mis12 were established as previously described57.

Immunoprecipitation assay

Cells were washed with ice-cold PBS (−), lysed in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 0.25% Sodium deoxycholate and 1 mM EDTA) containing protease inhibitor cocktail and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail, and left on ice for 15 min. After sonication, lysates were centrifuged and the supernatant was used as whole cell lysates. Whole cell lysates (800 μg protein) were incubated with HA antibody for 24 h at 4 °C. Then, 20 μl Protein A/G PLUS-Agarose Immunoprecipitation reagents were added and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 4 °C. Beads were washed with lysis buffer three times. Immunoprecipitated proteins were subjected to Western blot analysis.

Cell cycle analysis

After treatment, the culture supernatant was collected, and the cells were detached by trypsin treatment. The detached cells were suspended in the collected culture supernatant. After the centrifugation at 1,500 rpm for 5 min at 4 °C, cells were stained with PI solution (20 μg/ml PI, 0.1% Triton X-100, 0.2 μg/ml RNase A in PBS (−)) for 30 min under dark condition at room temperature. Stained cells were analyzed by a Tali™ Image Based Cytometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).

Immunofluorescence microscopy

Cells on coverslips were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) in PBS for 15 min, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 5 min at room temperature. The cells were blocked with 4% bovine serum albumin (BSA) in PBS for 15 min, and then incubated for 15 min with primary antibodies diluted in 4% BSA in PBS. The cells were washed three times with PBS, and incubated for 15 min with secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa fluorophors. After washing the cells, the coverslips were mounted on microscope slides and imaged using a IX71 fluorescent microscope equipped with a 60 × objectives (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Image data were processed and quantified using Image J software. The signal intensity of HA-Mis12 was determined by measuring the integrated fluorescence intensity within a 3 × 3 pixel square positioned over a single HA-Mis12 signal and subtracting the background intensity of a 3 × 3 pixel square positioned in a corresponding background. A minimum of 3 cells and 10 kinetochore foci per cell were measured for each condition each experiment (each replicated a minimum of three times).

References

  1. 1.

    Tse, G. & Eslick, G. D. Cruciferous Vegetables and Risk of Colorectal Neoplasms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Nutr Cancer 66, 128–139 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Fowke, J. H. et al. Urinary Isothiocyanate Levels, Brassica, and Human Breast Cancer. Cancer Res 63, 3980–3986 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Zhao, B. et al. Dietary Isothiocyanates, Glutathione S-transferase -M1, -T1 Polymorphisms and Lung Cancer Risk Among Chinese Women in Singapore. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10, 1063–1067 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hecht, S. S. Inhibition of Carcinogenesis by Isothiocyanates. Drug Metab Rev 32, 395–411 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Miyoshi, N., Uchida, K., Osawa, T. & Nakamura, Y. A Link Between Benzyl Isothiocyanate-Induced Cell Cycle Arrest and Apoptosis: Involvement of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases in the Bcl-2 Phosphorylation. Cancer Res 64, 2134–2142 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Sahu, R. P., Zhang, R., Batra, S., Shi, Y. & Srivastava, S. K. Benzyl Isothiocyanate-Mediated Generation of Reactive Oxygen Species Causes Cell Cycle Arrest and Induces Apoptosis Via Activation of MAPK in Human Pancreatic Cancer Cells. Carcinogenesis 30, 1744–1753 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Nakamura, Y. et al. Involvement of the Mitochondrial Death Pathway in Chemopreventive Benzyl Isothiocyanate-Induced Apoptosis. J. Biol Chem 277, 8492–8499 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Nakamura, T., Abe-Kanoh, N. & Nakamura, Y. Physiological Relevance of Covalent Protein Modification by Dietary Isothiocyanates. J. Clin Biochem Nutr 62, 11–19 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Mi, L. et al. The Role of Protein Binding in Induction of Apoptosis by Phenethyl Isothiocyanate and Sulforaphane in Human Non-Small Lung Cancer Cells. Cancer Res 67, 6409–6416 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Mi, L. et al. Covalent Binding to Tubulin by Isothiocyanates. A Mechanism of Cell Growth Arrest and Apoptosis. J. Biol Chem 283, 22136–22146 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Brown, K. K. et al. Direct Modification of the Proinflammatory Cytokine Macrophage Migration Inhibitory Factor by Dietary Isothiocyanates. J. Biol Chem 284, 32425–32433 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Lin, R. K. et al. Dietary Isothiocyanate-Induced Apoptosis Via Thiol Modification of DNA Topoisomerase IIalpha. J. Biol Chem 286, 33591–33600 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Mi, L. et al. Identification of Potential Protein Targets of Isothiocyanates by Proteomics. Chem Res Toxicol 24, 1735–1743 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Lenstra, J. A. & Bloemendal, H. The Major Proteins From HeLa Cells. Identification and Intracellular Localization. Eur J Biochem 130, 419–426 (1983).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Bjornsti, M. A. Cancer Therapeutics in Yeast. Cancer Cell 2, 267–273 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Forsburg, S. L. The Art and Design of Genetic Screens: Yeast. Nat Rev Genet 2, 659–668 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hartwell, L. H., Szankasi, P., Roberts, C. J., Murray, A. W. & Friend, S. H. Integrating Genetic Approaches Into the Discovery of Anticancer Drugs. Science 278, 1064–1068 (1997).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Mochida, K., Gomyoda, M., Fujita, T. & Yamagata, K. Toxicity of Allyl Isothiocyanate and Cinnamic Aldehyde Assessed Using Cultured Human KB Cells and Yeast, Saccharomyces Cervisiae. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 40, 339–342 (1988).

  19. 19.

    Luesch, H. et al. A Genome-Wide Overexpression Screen in Yeast for Small-Molecule Target Identification. Chem Biol 12, 55–63 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Goffeau, A. et al. Life with 6000 Genes. Science 274(546), 563–567 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Winzeler, E. A. et al. Functional Characterization of the S. Cerevisiae Genome by Gene Deletion and Parallel Analysis. Science 285, 901–906 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Makanae, K., Kintaka, R., Makino, T., Kitano, H. & Moriya, H. Identification of Dosage-Sensitive Genes in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Using the Genetic Tug-Of-War Method. Genome Res 23, 300–311 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Schneider, J. C. & Guarente, L. Vectors for Expression of Cloned Genes in Yeast: Regulation, Overproduction, and Underproduction. Methods Enzymol 194, 373–388 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Goshima, G., Kiyomitsu, T., Yoda, K. & Yanagida, M. Human Centromere Chromatin Protein hMis12, Essential for Equal Segregation, is Independent of CENP-A Loading Pathway. J. Cell Biol 160, 25–39 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Kline, S. L., Cheeseman, I. M., Hori, T., Fukagawa, T. & Desai, A. The Human Mis12 Complex is Required for Kinetochore Assembly and Proper Chromosome Segregation. J. Cell Biol 173, 9–17 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ormerod, M. G., Collins, M. K., Rodriguez-Tarduchy, G. & Robertson, D. Apoptosis in Interleukin-3-Dependent Haemopoietic Cells. Quantification by Two Flow Cytometric Methods. J. Immunol Methods 153, 57–65 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Grauslund, M., Didion, T., Kielland-Brandt, M. C. & Andersen, H. A. BAP2, a Gene Encoding a Permease for Branched-Chain Amino Acids in Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1269, 275–280 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Nielsen, P. S. et al. Transcriptional Regulation of the Saccharomyces Cerevisiae Amino Acid Permease Gene BAP2. Mol Gen Genet 264, 613–622 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Ljungdahl, P. O. Amino-Acid-Induced Signalling Via the SPS-sensing Pathway in Yeast. Biochem Soc Trans 37, 242–247 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Wang, Q. & Holst, J. L-Type Amino Acid Transport and Cancer: Targeting the mTORC1 Pathway to Inhibit. Neoplasia. Am. J. Cancer Res. 5, 1281–1294 (2015).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Laplante, M. & Sabatini, D. M. MTOR Signaling in Growth Control and Disease. Cell 149, 274–293 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Liu, X. et al. Inhibition of Phosphatidylinositide 3-Kinase Ameliorates Antiproliferation by Benzyl Isothiocyanate in Human Colon Cancer Cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 491, 209–216 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Grummt, I. The Effects of Histidine Starvation On the Methylation of Ribosomal RNA. Eur J Biochem 79, 133–141 (1977).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Janssens, V. & Goris, J. Protein Phosphatase 2A: A Highly Regulated Family of Serine/Threonine Phosphatases Implicated in Cell Growth and Signalling. Biochem J. 353, 417–439 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Virshup, D. M. Protein Phosphatase 2A: A Panoply of Enzymes. Curr Opin Cell Biol 12, 180–185 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Kiely, M. & Kiely, P. A. PP2A: The Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing? Cancers (Basel) 7, (648–669 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Schonthal, A. H. Role of Serine/Threonine Protein Phosphatase 2A in Cancer. Cancer Lett 170, 1–13 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Hoeller, D., Hecker, C. M. & Dikic, I. Ubiquitin and Ubiquitin-Like Proteins in Cancer Pathogenesis. Nat Rev Cancer 6, 776–788 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Pal, A., Young, M. A. & Donato, N. J. Emerging Potential of Therapeutic Targeting of Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases in the Treatment of Cancer. Cancer Res 74, 4955–4966 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Colland, F. Ubiquitin and Cancer: From Molecular Targets and Mechanisms to the Clinic–AACR Special Conference. IDrugs 9, 179–181 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Lawson, A. P. et al. Naturally Occurring Isothiocyanates Exert Anticancer Effects by Inhibiting Deubiquitinating Enzymes. Cancer Res 75, 5130–5142 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Ishikawa, K., Makanae, K., Iwasaki, S., Ingolia, N. T. & Moriya, H. Post-Translational Dosage Compensation Buffers Genetic Perturbations to Stoichiometry of Protein Complexes. Plos Genet. 13, e1006554 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Sen, S. Aneuploidy and Cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 12, 82–88 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Sudakin, V. & Yen, T. J. Targeting Mitosis for Anti-Cancer Therapy. Biodrugs 21, 225–233 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Zasadil, L. M. et al., Cytotoxicity of Paclitaxel in Breast Cancer Is due to Chromosome Missegregation on Multipolar Spindles. Science Translational Medicine 6(229), 229ra43-229ra43 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Zimonjic, D., Brooks, M. W., Popescu, N., Weinberg, R. A. & Hahn, W. C. Derivation of Human Tumor Cells in Vitro without Widespread Genomic Instability. Cancer Res 61, 8838–8844 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Duesberg, P., Rausch, C., Rasnick, D. & Hehlmann, R. Genetic Instability of Cancer Cells is Proportional to their Degree of Aneuploidy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95, 13692–13697 (1998).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Wood, L. D. et al. The Genomic Landscapes of Human Breast and Colorectal Cancers. Science 318, 1108–1113 (2007).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Wu, G. et al. Small Molecule Targeting the Hec1/Nek2 Mitotic Pathway Suppresses Tumor Cell Growth in Culture and in Animal. Cancer Res 68, 8393–8399 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Kaneko, N. et al. SiRNA-mediated Knockdown Against CDCA1 and KNTC2, Both Frequently Overexpressed in Colorectal and Gastric Cancers, Suppresses Cell Proliferation and Induces Apoptosis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 390, 1235–1240 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Hu, P., Chen, X., Sun, J., Bie, P. & Zhang, L. D. SiRNA-mediated Knockdown Against NUF2 Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer Proliferation in Vitro and in Vivo. Biosci Rep 35, e170 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Nakamura, T., Kitamoto, N., Osawa, T. & Kato, Y. Immunochemical Detection of Food-Derived Isothiocyanate as a Lysine Conjugate. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 74, 536–540 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Brachmann, C. B. et al. Designer Deletion Strains Derived From Saccharomyces Cerevisiae S288C: A Useful Set of Strains and Plasmids for PCR-mediated Gene Disruption and Other Applications. Yeast 14, 115–132 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Amberg, D. C. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual/. In: Burke D., Strathern J. N., Burke D., eds 2005 ed. ed. Cold Spring Harbor, N. Y.: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 2005.

  55. 55.

    Makanae, K., Kintaka, R., Ishikawa, K. & Moriya, H. Small Toxic Protein Encoded On Chromosome VII of Saccharomyces Cerevisiae. Plos One 10, e120678 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Abe, N., Hou, D. X., Munemasa, S., Murata, Y. & Nakamura, Y. Nuclear factor-kappaB Sensitizes to Benzyl Isothiocyanate-Induced Antiproliferation in P53-Deficient Colorectal Cancer Cells. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1534 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Koreishi, M., Yu, S., Oda, M., Honjo, Y. & Satoh, A. CK2 Phosphorylates Sec. 31 and Regulates ER-To-Golgi Trafficking. Plos One 8, e54382 (2013).

    CAS  Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The plasmid to express Mis12 was kindly provided by Drs. Mitsuhiro Yanagida and Takeshi Hayashi (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan). This study was supported by MEXT KAKENHI Grant Number 25292073 (Y.N.) and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25·46 (N.A.K.). Some part of this paper has been taken from the PhD thesis of the first author N.A.K. (Abe, N. Identification of plausible targets for antiproliferation by benzyl isothiocyanate in colorectal cancer cells. PhD thesis, The Graduate School of Environmental and Life Science, Okayama University, Japan, 1-95 (2016)), which has been open just before the acceptance of this paper.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

N.A.K., A.C., H.M. and Y.N. desinged the research. N.A.K. and N.K. performed the experiments. T.M., S.M., Y.M., A.S., A.C., H.M. and Y.N. assisted with the experiments and contributed to the discussions. N.A.K. and Y.N. conceived the experiments and drafted the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshimasa Nakamura.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abe-Kanoh, N., Kunisue, N., Myojin, T. et al. Yeast screening system reveals the inhibitory mechanism of cancer cell proliferation by benzyl isothiocyanate through down-regulation of Mis12. Sci Rep 9, 8866 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45248-2

Download citation

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.