Redox balance, metabolic fingerprint and physiological characterization in contrasting North East Indian rice for Aluminum stress tolerance


Aluminum (Al) toxicity is a serious problem for rice crop productivity in acidic soils worldwide. The present work was conducted to look out for the alteration in ROS homeostasis; metabolic fingerprint; and morphology in two contrasting Indica rice cultivars of North East India (NE India) to Al toxicity. Al stress led to excess accumulation of ROS (H2O2 and O2), and this in turn induced ROS mediated cellular damage, as indicated by lipid peroxidation both qualitatively as well as quantitatively. This excessive ROS production also led to significant reduction in chlorophyll content and stomatal conductance. This was followed by the loss of photosynthetic efficiency as detected by chlorophyll fluorescence. This excessive damage due to ROS prompted us to check the anti-oxidative machinery. Antioxidants, especially enzymes (SOD, APX, POX, GR, CAT, DHAR, MDHAR) are very important players in maintenance of ROS homeostasis. In tolerant variety Disang, higher activity of these enzymes and vice versa in sensitive variety, was observed in response to Al treatment. The non-enzymatic antioxidants (proline, ascorbate and glutathione) also showed similar trend. Though the tolerant variety showed strong anti-oxidative machinery, it was unable to completely nullify the stress experienced by the seedlings. Organic acids are also important players in detoxification of Al stress through efflux in the rhizosphere. In tolerant genotype, citrate exudate was found to be more when compared to sensitive genotypes on exposure to high dose of Al. This is supported by higher abundance of FRDL4, a citrate transporter. Not only FRDL4, other stakeholders for Al stress response like ART1 and ALS1 depicted prominent transcript abundance in the tolerant variety. In conclusion, through this study detailed physiological and metabolic characterisation of two contrasting Indica rice varieties Disang and Joymati, native to NE India for Al tolerance was performed for the very first time.


Aluminum (Al) is the third most abundant, and ubiquitously distributed metallic element in the earth crust1. The toxicity of Al depends on soil acidity. Acid soil comprises of approximately 30% of land area worldwide and 50% of world’s arable land has pH below 5. Rice (Oryza sativa L.) has been found out to be comparatively the most Al-tolerant, among cereal crops2. Though more tolerant, Al toxicity has its effect felt on rice too. Rice constitutes the food for half of the population worldwide, making it the world’s most important cereal crop. About 90% of total rice production is cultivated and consumed in Asia. Al phyto-toxicity causes speedy suppression of root elongation, and thus root relative elongation rate has functioned as a distinctive marker for degree of toxicity and tolerance in plants3. Al toxicity due to acidic soil, induces reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn triggers lipid peroxidation, limits ion transport capacity, affects membrane fluidity and causes protein oxidation etc. in plants4,5,6.

Determination of redox status is essential to predict the metabolic activities and the health of cells. Pyridine nucleotides such as NADH-NAD+ and NADPH-NADP+ are fundamental players in signalling through ROS molecules7. The balance between the oxidized and reduced forms, ie. NADH/ NAD+ ratio is an indicant of the redox status. ROS triggers deleterious reactions and plants have thus developed a complex antioxidant system to preclude the catastrophic consequences of ROS5. Excess ROS molecules oxidizes cellular macromolecules finally directing to cell death. H2O2 is a versatile molecule of the ROS network, generated in part by superoxide dismutase (SOD) from superoxide anion under stressful conditions8. One of the key role of H2O2 in Al stress signalling might be the possible involvement in lignin synthesis through peroxidase activity. H2O2 has got crucial function as an electron donor for coniferyl alcohol peroxidase, taking part in lignin formation. Lignin deposition leads to decreased cell elongation9. Hence plant cells possesses a defensive system composed of enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants that help to detoxify the ROS.

Though ROS molecules are unavoidable by-products of oxygenic photosynthesis, excess accumulation of the former leads to damage in photosynthetic apparatus10. Thus chlorophyll fluorescence is a powerful tool to obtain a full picture of plants to environmental cues11.

In order to isolate the affected cells from the healthy one’s plants resort to callose deposition in plasmodesmata. Callose is a β-1, 3-glucan, that is very rarely detected within plant cells and only known to be needed in a few very specific developmental procedures. Al-induced responses, leads to speedy accumulation of callose, which can be detected in plants within a few hours of exposure to Al. As its accumulation is so closely connected to Al stress, callose deposition has been a useful determinant for evaluating manifestations due to Al toxicity11.

Al-responsive genes play crucial role in fine tuning of stress response, be it nucleus localized transcription factors or functional genes whose products directly mediate in Al tolerance. ART1 (Aluminum Resistance Transcription Factor 1) caters to a vital role in Al stress response in rice. ART1 regulates genes that are crucial in eliciting response to Al toxicity12. Whereas, ALS1 (Aluminum Sensitive 1), a half-size ABC transporter, is involved in the vacuolar sequestration of Al and is localized in the tonoplast of root cells13. Since organic acids have a crucial role in Al detoxification, the genes encoding organic acid transporters are of utmost importance. Three citrate transporters has been reported in rice; OsFRDL1, OsFRDL2, OsFRDL4 which belongs to MATE (Multidrug And Toxic compound Extrusion) group. Out of the three, only OsFRDL4 has been accounted to be responsible for Al stress mediated citrate extrusion14.

Once being sensitized to Al toxicity, plants in its defence response secrete organic acids both in cytoplasm and rhizosphere. In the cytosol, these organic acids can form stable complexes with Al, thereby precluding the adherance of Al to cellular components. Whereas, organic acids in the rhizosphere also forms complexes with Al and prevents excess uptake of Al ions by the root apex cells. Hence, Al-stimulated synthesis of organic acid, has been widely examined in multiple studies15. This work was carried out to provide a differential insight into redox, metabolic and physiological fingerprint of two contrasting rice varieties of North East India to Al stress in acidic condition.


Plant growth under Al stress

Al stress dose on rice seedlings led to morphological changes and growth inhibition (Figs 1, S1). In stressed plants, root length reduced significantly, irrespective of cultivar. The cultivar Disang was the quickest growing with most eminent root biomass, whereas Joymati showed much reduction after 48 h (Fig. 1). On the contrary, shoot biomass production didn’t show significant reduction due to stress. After five days, treated plants showed more damage in shoot of Joymati variety when compared to Disang.

Figure 1

Effect of Al on root growth of rice seedlings (Al tolerant; Al sensitive) the seedling were grown for 6 day in nutrient solution After that treatment in solution containing 0, 100 µM AlCl3 in 0.5 mM CaCl2 at pH 4.5 for 48 h was exerted. (Bar represent the 1 cm).

Oxidative stress in rice on Al3+ toxicity

ROS accumulation

Higher accumulation of ROS was observed under stress condition as revealed by staining with H2DCFDA dye. As indicated by staining intensity, accumulation was more in Joymati in response to Al treatment and low pH when equated to Disang (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

Microscopic observation of total ROS accumulation in the root tip region was visualized by 2′,7′-dichloro dihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA) then observed under a fluorescence microscope. White bar indicates 100 μ. At least three biological replicates were performed. Representative images showing endogenous ROS production. Rice root were exposed to various Al treatments (0, 25, 50 and 100 µM) for 48 h.

Determination of superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide levels

Dose and time dependent superoxide (O2) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content under Al stress in both root (Fig. 3a) and shoot (Fig. 3b); was observed. The content of both ROS molecules was more in 100 µM of Al3+ in both root and shoot at 24 h and 48 h interval. Superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide significantly increased at higher dose of Al stress. Joymati accumulated more of these free radicals when compared to Disang (Fig. 3).

Figure 3

Effects of Al, on superoxide anion (O2−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content in the roots (a,c) and in the shoots (b,d) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0, 25, 50,100 µM AlCl3, containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Measurement of damage due to oxidative stress in rice on Al3+ excess

Stomatal conductance and photosynthetic pigments of Al stressed seedlings

The photosynthetic pigment content such as total chlorophyll (Fig. 4a) chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoid content (Fig. S2) on Al stress was determined. Stomatal conductance decrease at higher concentration of Al, in Joymati was more when compared to Disang (Fig. 4b) after 48 h.

Figure 4

Effects of Al, on the total chlorophyll content (a) and stomatal conductance (b) in the shoot of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to AlCl3, containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Chlorophyll fluorescence studies

The study of chlorophyll fluorescence parameters such as Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, Fo, Fm′, Fv′/Fm′, Y(II), qP, qN, qL, NPQ, Y(NO), Y(NPQ) and ETR was conducted. The chlorophyll degradation in both cultivars was progressively correlated with maximum quantum yield of PSII (Fv/Fm) as well as the optimum quantum yield of PSII (Y(II)), leading to growth reduction. The correlation among the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters are presented in Table S1. The Fm, Fv/Fm, Y(II), Fm′, ETR, qP, qL, Y(NO), Fv′/Fm′ showed negative correlations while Y(NPQ), NPQ, Fo′, qN, Fo showed positively co- related in both cultivars to Al stress treatment (Table S1).

Measurement of protein oxidation and lipoxygenase on Al stress

Protein carbonylation was assessed in both root and shoot under Al stress condition. The result revealed that the stressed plants had higher carbonylated proteins. The level of carbonyl bound protein content enhanced after 24 h and 48 h interval in both root and shoot (Fig. S3). Lipoxygenase (LOX) enzyme activity evaluated in root and shoot, was elevated in higher concentration of Al for both cultivars (Fig. S3). In shoot, LOX activity increased significantly in higher dose at 24 and 48 h interval.

Lipid peroxidation

MDA is typically used as a marker of levels of lipid peroxidation. Enhanced MDA content was observed in both varieties 24 and 48 h after Al treatment when equated with control irrespective of tissue samples. Joymati showed more lipid peroxidation in comparison to Disang in both root and shoot sample (Fig. 5). MDA is the ultimate produce of membrane lipid peroxidation and impacts membrane fluidity, induce protein degradation and confines the capability of ion transport, which at last leads to cell death.

Figure 5

Effects of Al on the MDA content in root (a) and shoot (b) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) containing 0, 25, 50,100 µM AlCl3 for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Callose and lignin accumulation in Al stressed seedlings

Callose accumulation was determined in the rice root both qualitatively (Fig. 6) and quantitatively (Fig. S4). Significant changes in the accumulation was observed in sensitive cultivars under higher concentration of the Al stress when equated to Disang. There was a significant enhancement in lignin content under stress condition for Joymati in comparison to Disang at both intervals (Fig. S4).

Figure 6

Microscopic observation of root tips exposed to Al stress. Callose accumulation in the root tip region was visualized by aniline blue then observed under a fluorescence microscope. White bar indicates 100 μ. At least three biological replicates were performed. Rice root were exposed to various Al treatments (0, 25, 50 and 100 µM) for 48 h.

Pot stress assay

The tolerance capability of both cultivars in soil under Al stress was ascertained. Though both varieties were significantly affected Joymati showed better tolerance phenotype to stress when compared to Disang (Fig. S5).

Al3+ stress response in rice seedlings

Estimation of soluble protein and SDS PAGE profiling

Total protein was quantified to check the effects of Al in root and shoot of rice sample. In response to diverse dose of Al the total protein content was found altered. Root showed increased total protein content with the increase in Al dose (Fig. S6) whereas shoot showed decrease in total protein content (Fig. S7). SDS PAGE profiling of stressed and unstressed plant protein showed increase in band intensity of some bands (Fig. S7).

Determination of Glutathione, Ascorbate and Proline content

Contents of non -enzymatic antioxidants such as glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid (AsA) and proline displayed an uptrend on Al treatment in Disang and Joymati cultivars. Both cultivars showed a significant enhancement in GSH accumulation when the seedlings were treated with Al. But the increase was significantly higher in Disang when compared to Joymati with the exception at 100 µM; root for both the cultivars and shoot for Disang, where there was a decrease (Fig. 7a,b). For AsA there was all throughout increase in concentration for both cultivars but the increase was profound in Disang. Proline is an osmoprotectant cum non-enzymatic antioxidant, whose content was observed to increase in root and shoot with respect to Al dose (Fig. 7c,d). Similar to GSH and AsA increase was more significant in Disang (Fig. 7e,f).

Figure 7

Effects of Al, on the Glutathione, Ascorbate and proline content in the roots (a,c,e) and in the shoot (b,d,f) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0, 25, 50 and 100 µM AlCl3, containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for 24 h and 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey multiple range test.

Organic Acid exudates measurement

Among malate and citrate, later was observed to be the major organic acid (OA) exudate on exposure to Al stress in Indica rice cultivars (Figs 8a, S8). In stress condition citrate content was observed to be more in tolerant variety when compared to sensitive (Fig. 8a).

Figure 8

Effects of Al, on organic acid and metabolite enzyme. Citrate exudation as affected by the Al (0 and 100 µM AlCl3) treatment in rice genotypes at 24 h and 48 h (a). The activity of the citrate synthase (b) succinate dehydrogenase (c) and malate dehydrogenase (d) and organic acid content in the roots of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0, 25, 50, 100 µM AlCl3, containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey multiple range test.

Organic acid synthesizing enzyme assay on Al stress exposure

Enzymes responsible for organic acid metabolism like, citrate synthase (CS), succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and malate dehydrogenase (MDH) were studied. CS activity was detected to undergo enhancement on exposure to stress in both cultivars (Fig. 8b). SDH activity increased in Disang throughout, while in Joymati, activity slightly increased after 24 h but decreased at 48 h interval (Fig. 8c). MDH activity increased in stress condition for both varieties. The increase for Disang was profound when compared to Joymati (Fig. 8d).

Measurement of NAD+-NADH and its ratio on Al stress

The content of NAD+ and NADH and its ratio in course of Al stress of 100 µM and untreated conditions was analyzed. The content was calculated from the standard graph of NAD+ and NADH. It was observed that the NAD+, NADH and its ratio increased under Al stress. The NAD+ content increased in stressed condition at 48 h in Disang while in Joymati it decreased in root sample. The shoot sample showed increased NAD+ content in both cultivars. NADH content also increased in Disang and Joymati varieties in root and shoot sample but the increase was profound in Disang. NADH and NAD+ ratio didn’t show significant difference within treatments for each cultivar, but in Joymati, significantly difference was observed in root sample (Fig. 9a–c).

Figure 9

NAD+, NADH content and its ratio of rice plants under Al stress. Absolute quantification of NAD+, NADH by microtiter plate reader coupled enzyme assay in different replication (a,b) and ratio of NADH-NAD+. (c) Results simply showed the difference between control and treated root tissue of rice plant after 48 h exposure of 0 and 100 µM Al concentration Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey multiple range test.

Analysis of metabolites through LC-MS

The HPLC chromatogram of both varieties were scored for change in each peak area, at 254 nm. The peaks with significant difference in area between the two varieties were processed for mass chromatography. From MS, stronger signals were selected for MS2 analysis. MS2 signals having m/z 195, m/z 243, m/z 275, m/z 290 and m/z 540 were searched for in the mass bank database12 and the compound Gluconic acid, Uridine, L-Saccharopine, Catechin were identified whereas one compound remains unknown (Table S2).

Isozyme study of antioxidants enzymes

To inquire into the consequences of Al stress on antioxidant isoenzymes, the native PAGE profile for antioxidant enzymes isoforms was performed. The patterns of iso-enzymes of superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), guaiacol peroxidase (POX), glutathione reductase (GR) and catalase (CAT) in root and shoot were analyzed. The content of iso-enzymes also showed alteration in response to different concentrations of Al. In root four SOD, four POX, one APX two GR and one CAT iso-enzyme were detected, in stress and control condition. When in stress, SOD and POX content was slightly in decline while GR, APX and CAT remain unchanged (Fig. S9). Whereas in shoot, three SOD, three POX, one APX two GR and two CAT iso-enzyme were detected. In stress condition, all isozymes showed uniformity except for SOD which showed decline at 25 and 50 µM (Fig. S9).

Activity of ROS scavenging enzyme

Al stress significantly increased the activities of SOD, CAT and POX in root and shoot tissue. In root, increase in SOD activity was detected as the dose of Al increased. In root, higher SOD activity was detected at Al dose of 100 µM after 24 h of exposure. After 48 h of stress, a gradual increase of SOD activity was detected as the dose of Al was enhanced (Fig. 10a). Similarly, in shoot, (Fig. 10b) significantly elevated SOD level was observed as compared to control. APX activity on Al stress exposure, was observed to get elevated significantly in both root and shoot tissues, (Fig. 10c,d) after 24 and 48 h. POX activity was also examined in both root and shoot. In both tissues, significant gradual increment of POX activity was noted with the increase of Al dose (Fig. 10e,f).

Figure 10

Effects of Al on the activity of SOD, APX and POX, in root (a,c,e) and shoot (b,d,f) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) containing 0, 25, 50, 100 µM AlCl3 for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Tukey multiple range test.

Under Al stress, significantly enhanced GR activity was observed in the rice. GR activity was found to enhance in a time and dose dependent way, in both root and shoot (Fig. 11a,b). The CAT activity in treated root was raised as compared to control and amidst all the doses it was more in 100 µM Al treated root (Fig. 11c,d). However, in shoot after 24, 48 h of treatment it was detected that the activity was in increasing order with the increase in Al concentration. Monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR) content also increased significantly after 24 and 48 h of stress (Fig. 12a,b). Dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR) activity as determined in response to Al stress, was observed to be elevated for treated samples in comparison to control check. In both tissue samples, gradual increase of DHAR activity was observed with increment of Al dose (Fig. 12c,d). Disang showed profound APX, GR, MDHAR and DHAR activity in comparison to Joymati under stressful condition.

Figure 11

Effects of Al on the activity of GR, CAT in root (a,c) and shoot (b,d) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) containing 0, 25, 50,100 µM AlCl3 for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Figure 12

Effects of Al on the activity of MDHAR, DHAR in root (a,c) and shoot (b,d) of the two rice varieties. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) containing 0, 25, 50,100 µM AlCl3 for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Transcript abundance of Al stress responsive stakeholders

Al induced gene expression studies were done in both Disang and Joymati cultivar. OsALS1didn’t show much difference (0.3 times) in expression in both the cultivars under Al stress; whereas, for OsART1 expression was negligible (Disang showed 21.3 times more expression) in the sensitive variety, Joymati. (Figs 13, 14). The semi-quantitative PCR was further supported by real-time PCR. OsFRDL4, the citrate transporter showed higher expression (by 1.6 times) in the tolerant cultivar Disang under the influence of Al stress (Fig. 14).

Figure 13

Al induced gene expression studies in Root (a) shoot (b) of Disang rice cultivar and Joymati rice cultivar under Al toxicity at 24 and 48 h intervals.

Figure 14

Relative expression (2−ΔΔCT) of Al induced genes in root. (a) OsART1, (b) OsALS1 and (c) OsFRDL4. Seedlings were exposed to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) containing 0, 100 µM AlCl3 for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Interaction of Al3+ with other stake holders during stress response

Impact of Al-Mn interaction on growth physiology

Al-Mn interaction assay was conducted and it was observed that the Mn toxicity caused more damage in Joymati variety when compared to Disang variety. The leads pointed that Al addition relieved the toxic effects of Mn on rice growth but not significantly (Fig. S10). The figures of the seedlings in various doses demonstrate the slight alleviation of Al on Mn toxicity (Fig. 14).

Impact of Al-GSH interaction on growth physiology

Al-GSH interaction study revealed that GSH has a crucial role to play in the amelioration and reduction of Al toxicity in both rice variety, especially in case of the sensitive variety Joymati where marked differences was observed. There was marked increase in root length when GSH was exogenously given, whereas no such observations were made on shoot length (Fig. S11). Similar trend was followed when observed for H2O2 content, which showed drastic reduction in root H2O2 content (Figs 15, S11).

Figure 15

Effects of Al-Mn interaction in rice plants. Effect of Al on rice under Mn toxicity in a long-term experiment. Toxicity symptoms of Mn toxicity and ameliorating effect of Al on rice (a) and H2O2 content measurement in root sample (b). Rice seedlings (6 days old) were grown in nutrient solution with 18, 500, 1000 µM Mn in the presence or absence of 100 µM Al for 5 day. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.


Rice is an important cereal consumed by a very large segment of world population. Though rice is comparatively tolerant to the threat of acid soil it’s production is highly constrained. A large portion of the soil of North East India is highly acidic, yet it has rich diversity of Indica rice varieties. Our long term goal is to identify any new knowledge that can be gathered through study of these varieties. The exhaustive screening and the toxicity of Al stress in combination with acid soil has been documented in our earlier report4. In the study, random 22 varieties of North East India were screened physiologically for Al stress tolerance along with two previously reported tolerant and sensitive varieties. The present report was carried out to show the differential redox, metabolic and physiological fingerprint of two contrasting cultivars native to NE India, Disang and Joymati (identified in the earlier report) under Al stress at acidic pH.

Root growth, the initial and potent marker for Al stress in acidic condition was significantly inhibited in the two varieties (Fig. 1). The phytotoxic symptoms detected were very much alike to those described earlier16,17. Shoot length and, root: shoot ratio showed significant changes under Al stress at low pH (Fig. S1). The extent of oxidative stress was estimated by determining ROS accumulation, H2O2 and O2 content. In Joymati, total ROS accumulation was higher on exposure to Al stress at low pH, when compared to Disang (Fig. 2). In maize and pea plant Al-induced ROS production caused excess cell rigidity5. Our histochemical observations corroborated with the quantitative studies4. ROS is generated due to cellular metabolic activities in plants, generally a homeostasis is maintained between the ROS generating and scavenging machinery but when in stress the homeostasis stands disturbed9. A significant increment of H2O2 and O2 upon Al treatment was observed when compared to control in plant tissues (Fig. 3a–d). Though, ROS works as signalling molecules to activate the response mechanism leading to tolerance, but on excess accumulation the entire machinery succumbs. The high amount of ROS causes stomata closure and decrease in photosynthetic rate resulting in hampered crop productivity18. As loss of ROS homeostasis have its direct effect on photosynthetic apparatus, different stakeholders were analysed to have clear picture of the consequence of Al stress on photosynthesis. Diminution in total chlorophyll content (Fig. 4a); the photosynthetic pigments viz., chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and carotenoids content in response to Al stress after 48 h (Fig. S2) was observed when exposed to higher dose of Al at low pH. Though the preliminary site of injury is root but the effect can be felt at the whole plant level18. Al stress also led to decrease in stomatal conductance, depending on dose (Fig. 4b). Aluminum induced decrease of stomatal conductance in Citrus limonia19, Cleoptara tangerine20, Sour pumelo21 and in rye22 has been reported previously. These decrease in pigment content and stomatal conductance poses a negative effect on the whole photosynthetic machinery.

Analysis of photosynthetic efficiency through florescence measurements depicted drastic decrease on exposure to Al. The correlation analysis was performed for all the chlorophyll fluorescence parameters (Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, Fo′, Fm′, Fv′/Fm′, Y(II), qP, qN, qL, NPQ, Y(NO), Y(NPQ) and ETR). The Fv/Fm values being a robust indicator, are generally very coherent within varieties and individual plants; as such, any modest decline is well detectable and signifies clearly that loss of viability in stress condition. Broadly, Fv/Fm, Fv′/Fm′, Y(II), and qP have been named photochemical quenching parameters, and NPQ is a nonphotochemical quenching functions23. The Non-Photochemical Quenching (NPQ) of chlorophyll fluorescence is the most effective photoprotective reaction in plants. The study observes that the NPQ, Y(NPQ) increased while Y(NO) decreased under Al stress condition (Table S1). For the very first time, photosynthetic efficiency of two contrasting varieties of rice to Al stress under acidic condition was studied.

Consequence of exuberant ROS induced oxidative damage was documented by measuring carbonyl content in both root and shoot. After Al stress imposed, an heightened level of protein carbonyl content was detected which is actually protein oxidation promoted by ROS (Fig. S3). Protein carbonyl content is proposed to be an indicant for oxidative damage24,25. LOX mediates membrane lipid peroxidation in presence of excess ROS which finally directs to membrane damage and cell death. LOX activity and MDA content was observed to increase in time and dose dependent way on exposure to Al stress at low pH (Fig. S3).

Plant in its attempt to restrict the damage due to environmental cues and isolate the affected cells resorts to callose deposition. Deposition and assemblage of callose reverberates physiological stress as well as the level of cumulative cell injury, particularly in the Al3+-sensitive cultivars16. Significant changes in callose accumulation was observed in sensitive cultivar under higher concentration of the Al stress while in Disang cultivar accumulation was less (Fig. 6). Similar response was observed earlier in the two Japonica cultivars of rice16, after 60 h exposure to 80 µM Al. Besides isolating the damaged cells plants also responds by providing structural rigidity through lignin deposition26. Heightened lignification under biotic and abiotic stress can assist as a roadblock restricting the entry of metals and pathogens into tissue. Previous studies also described that Al caused the assemblage of lignin in roots of Indica rice27 and wheat28.

GSH, AsA and proline are involved in physiological and stress related defence mechanisms in plants by providing redox homeostasis. Schutzendubel29 observed that ROS accumulation is favoured by lack of GSH content and results in disintegration of developmental processes. In this study, Disang showed more GSH accumulation than Joymati (Fig. 7a,b). GSH is needed in detoxification of oxidative stress caused by heavy metals in plants30. Increased GSH level was detected in pea root system in response to Al stress while in shoot it was reverse3. AsA interacts with enzyme activities and reduces cellular damage caused by ROS molecules through synergistic activity with other antioxidants9. Less accumulation of AsA content as equated to control for root was observed (Fig. 7c,d). The results also suggest the deposition of proline in response to Al stress in root and shoot (Fig. 7e,f). Proline deposition precludes membrane deformation; act as a hydroxyl radical scavenger, and an osmoprotectant31. Similar results were observed in rice32, maize33, and Borago officinalis34.

NADH-NAD+ content helps in having a clear view of the redox status of a cell when exposed to sub-optimal environments. The NADH-NAD+ content is being depicted for the first time in response to Al stress. Determination of NADH-NAD+ content revealed higher prevalence of NAD+ (oxidizing agent) in root and shoot sample of Disang when compared to Joymati depicting better redox status. Similar revelations were made in Arabidopsis treated with quinolinic acid35 and Atgpdhc1 mutant line36; in pea under water deficit37 and in tobacco nad7 mutant38. NADH content was also higher as compared to control. Whereas the NADH/NAD+ ratio was not significantly higher in root and shoot sample under Al stress in Disang (Fig. 9) similar to that of pea under light and CO2 stress39.

Antioxidative enzymes such as superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), and catalase (CAT) serves as important ROS-scavenging enzymes under Al toxicity40. Hence analysis of the isoforms is of utmost importance to have a glimpse of the overall machinery. As the analysis revealed four distinct bands for SOD in root and three band in shoot tissues, indicating that these SOD isoforms are expressed under Al stress (Fig. S9). Plants under Al stress showed variation in SOD isoform’s band intensity in 25 and 50 µM Al treatment in shoot. The root and shoot samples showed only one prominent APX isoenzyme band in response to different concentration of Al3+, and the band intensity slightly differs from that induced due to higher concentration of Al. Similar results were reported in rice earlier under Al stress40. GR isoforms in both root and shoot detected two isoform bands in both root and shoot tissue samples. CAT isoenzyme band pattern showed significantly increased band intensity in root. Between the cultivars, although distinct differences were not observed still in case of POX and APX increase in band intensity with Al dose in Disang and vice versa in Joymati can be noted.

SOD, APX, POX, GR, CAT, MDHAR, DHAR antioxidant enzymes activity were also analysed, for their activity as ROS scavengers. It was observed that under Al stress condition SOD activity increased in root and shoot (Figs 1012). SOD consists of different metalloenzymes viz., Cu-Zn SOD, MnSOD and FeSOD isoforms. SOD is involved in catalysing the reaction of dismutation of ROS molecules (O2 to H2O2 and O2). Enhanced SOD activity was reported in response to Al stress in Allium cepa24. Previous reports also support the findings regarding increased SOD activity in response to Al stress in soyabean, maize and barley6,41,42. The intensity of SOD isoforms found to be increased under stressful conditions, which indicates its involvement in defence mechanism against oxidative stress condition in cytosol, mitochondria and chloroplast43. The induced synthesis of toxic free radicals, in response to abiotic stress, such as O2 and H2O2 can be scavenged by APX, CAT, and POX antioxidant activity44 in plants. APX reduces H2O2 to H2O molecule by using ascorbic acid as an electron donor and this step is the initial step of ascorbate-glutathione cycle. APX activity was observed to be increased under Al stress in rice. Similar result was reported in rice under 160 µM Al stress40. It was suggested that APX has major role in scavenging H2O2 molecule under stress condition44. POX is another antioxidant enzyme involved in scavenging of ROS molecules and thus protect from oxidative injury3. By oxidizing phenolic compounds POX catalyses H2O2 degradation. In this study increased POX activity was observed in rice plants under Al stress in root-shoot tissues (Fig. 10e,f). Similar result were earlier observed in maize, pea and rice in response to Al stress3,6,40. Glutathione reductase is one of the key enzymes of the ascorbate -glutathione cycle that protects cells from oxidative damage and holds a high GSH/GSSG ratio encouraging cellular constancy and integrity7. We have also investigated GR activity, another enzyme of ascorbate-glutathione cycle, which also showed increased activity under Al stress in rice (Fig. 11a,b). We observed time dependent enhancement of GR activity under Al stress. Excessive ROS produced under stressed condition is finally scavenged by CAT activity. CAT activity in rice root samples treated with 40 µM Al was significantly enhanced in tolerant rice cultivar under Al stress44. The main purpose of MDHAR in Ascorbate glutathione cycle is to regulate the level of MDHA radical involved in non-enzymatic disproportionation and generation of DHA. MDHAR activity in treated samples increased in dose dependent fashion (Fig. 12). Higher MDHAR activity can regulate the MDHA content by reducing it into ASA by using NADPH45. DHAR contributes in ascorbate production by reducing itself with glutathione as reductant. Further ascorbate is utilized by APX to detoxify H2O2 to H2O. In this work, elevated DHAR activity was observed in treated root samples. DHAR activity was induced by Al after 24and 48 h of stress (Fig. 12c,d). DHAR activity has earlier been reported to increase at early stage of copper stress in Arabidopsis46.

Organic acid efflux due to Al stress in rice is somewhat controversial. Few reports suggest no significant role of organic acids towards aluminum tolerance31 whereas others report their active role47. In this case, when citrate exudation was studied, marked influence was observed on both sensitive and tolerant varieties in a time dependent fashion (Fig. 8a). The enhanced citrate exudation, observed on exposure to Al toxicity, leading to detoxification of Al by formation of OA–Al complexes and in the process preventing its uptake by root cells in the rhizosphere. The excess citrate exudation was confirmed by observance of increased abundance of OsFRDL4 transcripts (a MATE family citrate transporter, Fig. 14).

Organic acid metabolizing enzymes such as citrate synthase, malate dehydrogenase and succinate dehydrogenase were studied to compare their activities. Citrate synthase (CS) activity was found to increase under stress condition in both cultivars (Fig. 8b). Similar results were reported in rye48, Plantago almogravensis49 and soyabean50 on exposure to Al stress. CS is the rate limiting enzyme of TCA cycle and is responsible for formation of citrate, which is used in Al detoxification mechanism51. Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH, EC activity increased in Disang variety, while in Joymati, SDH activity increased slightly after 24 h (Fig. 8c). SDH is the only enzyme of the Krebs cycle that is bound to the inner mitochondrial membrane and acts in the transfer of electron from succinate to ubiquinone52. On drought stress, SDH was found to be upregulated in Ilex paraguariensis leaves53. In summer months, SDH activity of cauliflower was observed to be less54; similarly, in cowpea on Al stress it showed decreased activity40,55. SDH, frequently denoted to as complex II, has a dual activity; hence plays a substantial part in both the tricarboxylic acid cycle and the aerobic respiratory chain by catalyzing the oxidation of succinate to fumarate, and the reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol, respectively. Malate dehydrogenase (MDH) activity increased under stress condition in both the varieties; activity was more in Disang compared to Joymati (Fig. 8d). The enzyme MDH catalyses the reversible reduction of oxaloacetate to malate and is crucial in multiple metabolic pathway. It is taking part as a central enzyme in the citric acid cycle that catalyzes the oxidation of malate. MDH activity was reported to be significantly increased in triticale56, plantago species49, and Lupines albus root57. MDH activity was also reported high in tolerant rice variety under salt stress58. Increase MDH activity in the Halimione portulacoides leaves when exposed to salinity and in Casuarina equisetifolia under drought59 has been described. While its differential expression was observed during high and low temperature stresses60.

Pot stress assay revealed more damage and discoloration in sensitive variety (Fig. S5). Total protein content in root was observed to increase with time and concentration of Al3+ hinting towards Al induced protein synthesis in root (Fig. S6a). However, in shoot, total protein content declined under Al stress (Figs S6, S7). In contrast, Roshani et al. found increased protein activity after 15 day of Al stress in rice seedlings24. Similar result was reported in kidney bean61. This enhancement in protein content might be due to synthesis of stress responsive stakeholders. Heavy metal stress including Al stress, induces proteins of 20 different functional classes and most of these include antioxidant defence elements. Further the change in abundance of proteins also depends on stress dose and duration62,63.

OsART1 showed more expression in Disang compared to Joymati (Fig 13, 14). It plays a vital part in Al tolerance in rice by regulating the downstream genes responsible for both internal and external detoxifications of Al12. OsALS1 is a half ABC transporter localized in vacuolar membranes and is responsible for sequestration of chelated Al in vacuoles13. Vacuolar sequestration forms an important and integral tolerance mechanism in rice63. ALS1 expression also showed significant changes on exposure to Al. OsFRDL4 is responsible for citrate exudation in the rhizosphere and was found to be more abundant in the tolerant variety Disang. MATE group citrate transporter has earlier been reported to provide Al tolerance in many crops64,65.

Al-Mn interaction assay was also conducted and it was observed that Mn toxicity hampered Joymati variety more as compared to Disang. The study revealed that the Al alleviates Mn toxicity minutely in both doses (500, 1000 µM) of Mn with 100 µM Al (Fig. 15). In the absence of Al, Mn significantly decreases root length. However, addition of Al markedly attenuated this suppression (Fig. 14). The morphology of the seedlings under several treatments demonstrate the attenuating effects of Al on Mn toxicity66. Due to Al toxicity rice leaves were observed to show orange yellow interveinal chlorosis, leaf tip death, poor growth and stunted growth67.

Al-GSH interaction study revealed that the GSH has important role to play in the amelioration and reduction of Al toxicity in both rice varieties (Disang and Joymati). Root reduction was higher in Joymati as compared to Disang at higher concentration of Al (100 µM). This study thus revealed that the GSH is vital for Al detoxification (Fig. 16) in rice seedling44.

Figure 16

Effects of Al-GSH on rice under Al toxicity. GSH ameliorate the effect of Al on rice (a) and H2O2 content measurement in root sample (b). Rice seedlings (6 days old) were grown in nutrient solution with 0,100 µM Al and 1 mM GSH in the presence or absence of GSH for 48 h. Values are mean ± SE (n = 3) of three separate experiments. Means denoted by the same letter were not significantly different at P < 0.05 according to Duncan’s multiple range test.

Based on the experiments an Al stress response mechanism of both tolerant and sensitive cultivar, has been concluded upon (Fig. 17). Al enters into the cell via endocytosis, interacts with cellular macromolecules and in the process disrupts ROS homeostasis68. Also it activates transcription machinery to code mRNA for organic acid synthesis and antioxidant enzymes. After the synthesis of organic acids Al3+ forms a complex, OA:Al3+ and gets deposited into the vacuole. Organic acid molecules also effluxed from root system into the rhizosphere to prevent further intake of Al by root cells. ROS scavenging enzymes and TCA cycle organic acid metabolizing enzymes activity increase and gets involved in detoxification of ROS molecules, in tolerant variety. In sensitive varieties, Al enters into the cell and interacts with the cellular molecules, rapidly enhancing ROS production without a strong antioxidant system. Organic acid is also secreted out in less amount. Lipid peroxidation was more and necrosis also occur in sensitive genotypes, which was responsible for the morphological changes in this cultivar.

Figure 17

Mechanism of Al response in tolerant and sensitive Indica rice cultivars.

There are several reports on rice showing differential responses of contrasting varieties to Al stress2,28,44,69,70,71,72. This report characterized two contrasting varieties to Al stress that have been screened out from the numerous varieties of North East India which is a hotspot of indica rice diversity4. Citrate was the major organic acid synthesized in response to Al stress in rice of North East India. Also was reported for the very first time NADH-NAD+ status in response to Al stress in the contrasting rice varieties. Increased citrate exudation and better anti-oxidative defence was mainly responsible for better Al tolerance in Disang compared to Joymati.


Plant materials and growth condition

Rice genotypes Al Tolerant (Disang) and sensitive (Joymati) were selected from our previous study4. Adequate amount of viable rice seeds was taken and surface sterilized with 0.1% HgCl2 solution, for 3–5 minutes with continuous shaking. After this, HgCl2 solution was removed, rinsed with distilled water for 2–3 times. Seeds were then soaked in water for 12 h, in petri plates with moistened filter paper and germinated at 28 ± 2 °C for 3 days. After three days, the healthy germinated seedlings with similar height of root and shoots were shifted into Planton box (400 ml; Tarsons, India) holding Hoagland nutrient medium. Seedlings were grown for a period of 5 days in a growth chamber under white light with photon flux density of 220 μmol m−2 s−1 (PAR) with 14 h photoperiod at 28 ± 3 °C, day: night temperatures. The relative humidity was controlled at 65 ± 5%. After every two days the medium was changed for healthy growth. On the sixth day rice seedlings were pretreated with 500 µM CaCl2 (pH 4.5). The very next day of pre-treatment, solution was discarded and the plants were treated with Al in the form of aluminum chloride (AlCl3) supplemented with 500 µM CaCl2 in a dose dependent (0, 25, 50 and 100 µM) and time dependent (24, 48 h) manner with a constant pH of 4.5.

Oxidative stress in rice on Al3+ excess

ROS accumulation

ROS accumulation in root apex was labelled by using 2, 7-dichlorofluorescein diacetate (H2DCF-DA), a ROS-specific fluorescent probe, as described by Maffei et al.73. Briefly, root apex was incubated with 10 mM HEPES-NaOH buffer (pH 7.5) containing 10 μM H2DCF-DA for 30 min in dark. The root apexes were then washed with fresh buffer prior to detection using an epifluorescence microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan).

Superoxide radical and hydrogen peroxide estimation

O2 and H2O2 content was determined following the method of Elstner et al.74 and Sagisaka75 respectively.

Damage due to oxidative stress in rice on Al3+ excess

Photosynthetic pigments and stomatal conductance of Al stressed seedlings

For photosynthetic pigment, 100 mg of fresh leaf was taken into a test tube holding 5 ml of DMSO. The test tube was then allowed to stand in an oven at 60 °C for about 4 h to ease the extraction of the pigments. After 4 h, the samples were cooled to room temperature and; absorbance was read at 454, 645 and 665 nm on spectrophotometer76. For the study of stomatal conductance randomly selected 10–15 leaves of each treatment and control were examined using a porometer (AP4 cycling porometer, Delta-T Devices, Cambridge, UK). The measurements were scored from the abaxial surface of the leaf between 10.00 h and 14.00 h. The readings were accomplished during one-hour to avoid the diurnal pattern of variation of the leaves.

Chlorophyll Fluorescence

Chlorophyll fluorescence measurements were performed using Junior PAM chlorophyll fluorimeter (Walz, Germany). For assessment of dark and light-adapted parameters, The following parameters were derived from the final measurements obtained after the 15 min dark adaptation and light adaptaion Fo, Fm, Fv/Fm, and Fo′, Fm′, Fv′/Fm′, Y(II), qP, qN, qL, NPQ, Y(NO), Y(NPQ) and ETR. All parameters were computed as defined previously77. Six measurements were obtained for each parameter.

Measurement of protein carbonylation and lipoxygenase (LOX)

For determination of protein oxidation or carbonylation, the carbonyl content of 1.0 g plant sample was scored following Verbeke et al.78.

LOX activity was estimated from 1.0 g of tissue by estimation of linoleate hydro peroxidation activity spectrophotometrically at 25 °C by monitoring the enhancement in absorbance at 234, due to the transition of linoleate into corresponding hydroperoxide79. An extinction coefficient of 25 mM−1 cm−1 was used to convert absorbance value to nmol of conjugated dienes (hydroperoxy linoleic acid).

Lipid peroxidation determination

For lipid peroxidation, MDA was quantified following the protocol of Heath and Packer80.

Callose accumulation

Al3+-induced callose accumulation was appraised by an aniline blue staining procedure following the protocol stated by Kauss81 and quantification was done adopting the procedure of Kauss et al.82.

Lignin accumulation

For lignin quantification from root segments Syros et al.83 protocol was adopted.

Pot stress assay

The rice seeds were surface-sterilized in 1% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 5 min, washed exhaustively with deionized water, and then allowed to wet in deionized water overnight. The seeds were germinated in an incubator at 30 °C for 3d, and then transferred to soil pot. The nutrient solution was provided every week. After 45 days of growth, pre-treatment with 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for 1d was imparted, then; Al treatment (0, 100 µM) containing 0.5 mM CaCl2 with pH 4.5, was given at every 3d interval. After 15 days, the plants of both varieties were documented.

Defence response of stressed rice seedlings to Al3+ stress

Estimation of soluble protein

Samples were prepared by homogenising 200 mg leaf and root tissue in 1.5 ml pre-chilled phosphate buffer (0.1 M, pH 7.0) containing 50 mg insoluble PVP. These were then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm at 4 °C for 15 min. The pellets were disposed and protein in the supernatant was quantitated with Bradford’s reagent. Each sample was diluted five times with extraction buffer before estimation. To 0.1 ml of this diluted extract, 1.5 ml Bradford’s reagent was added. Mixed thoroughly and absorbance was measured at 595 nm after 5 min. Standard curve was prepared using graded doses of bovine serum albumin (1 mg/ml) solution and protein profiling by SDS PAGE.

Glutathione, Ascorbate and Proline content

Total glutathione and ascorbate contents were determined by the method Griffith84 and Oser85, absorbance was recorded at 660 and 412 nm respectively. Whereas, for proline content, Bates et al.86 method was adopted.

Organic acid (citrate) exudation and measurement

In an aseptic environment, fifteen seedlings were grown on a plastic mesh floating over control growth solution containing 1% sucrose at pH 5.6. At day 5 after the seedlings have grown, they were shifted to separate wells of a 6-well plate containing 4 ml of control or Al-containing (100 µM Al) media. Both organic acid collection media were made by adding 1% (w/v) sucrose to the control growth solution, and the pH was maintained at 4.5. Rotary shaker was used to gently shake (40 rpm) the seedlings at 25 °C in the dark. Media were collected at 24 h and 48 h after transfer, each medium was measured for citrate content by a NAD/NADH cycle coupled enzymatic method87.

Organic acid synthesizing enzymes

The citrate synthase (CS, EC activity was determined spectrophotometrically by measuring the reduction of acetyl coenzyme A with 5, 5-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzonic acid) at 412 nm for 3min88. Malate dehydrogenase activity (MDH, EC activity was assayed as described by Gupta et al.57. Succinate dehydrogenase activity (SDH, EC was determined by continuous recording of the reduction of DCPIP at 580 nm89.

Measurement of NAD+-NADH and its ratio on Al stress

The NAD+, NADH content were scored according to enzymatic reaction, for absorbance at 570 nm, content was calculated by using standards run concurrently with unknown29,90.

LC-MS sample preparation

Rice root sample (500 mg) were ground in 1.5 ml of deionized water. The mixture was then agitated in a water bath at 60 °C for 30 min and then centrifuged at 25 °C and 13,0000 rpm for 15 min. The supernatants were lyophilized and analyzed with UPLC-MS (Waters Xevo G2 Q TOF). Sample were injected into an ACQUITY bridged ethyl hybrid (BEH) C18 column (100 × 2.1 mm i.d., 1.7 µm, Waters). Column temperature was set at 35 °C. The mobile phase comprised of A (0.5% v/v formic acid in water) and B (100% CH3CN). The gradient for the mobile phase were as follows: 0 min, 99% A (held 5 min), 20 min, 40% A. the flow rate was 0.3 mL/min. UV detector wavelength was set at 254 nm. Data analyzed with Mass bank data base91.

Isozyme study of antioxidant enzymes

The extraction for the enzymes was done as suggested by Larkindale and Huang92. For superoxide dismutase (SOD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX), peroxidase (POX), glutathione reductase (GR) and catalase (CAT) isozyme study Rucinska et al.93, De Gara et al.94, Rao et al.95, Smith et al.96, Lee and Shin97 respectively; protocols were followed.

Antioxidant enzyme activity

After extraction of enzyme85, SOD (EC, activity was ascertained by measuring the suppression of photochemical reduction of NBT spectrophotometrically at 560 nm57.

For CAT (EC, activity estimation98, the alteration in absorbance was recorded at 240 nm. The enzyme activity was expressed as unit g−1 fresh weight.

For APX (EC assay99, the decrease in absorbance was documented at 290 nm at 15 s intervals for 2 min.

POX (EC, activity was quantitated by calculating the oxidation of guaiacol100. The absorbance change was noted at 15 s interval for 2 min at 470 nm.

For estimation of GR (EC activity96, change in absorbance at 412 nm was checked at 15 s interval upto 2 min.

MDHAR (EC, activity was assayed by documenting the oxidation of NADH at 340 nm101.

DHAR (EC, activity102 was recorded using an extinction coefficient of 14 mM−1cm−1 for ascorbate at 265 nm.

Organic acid transporter gene expression studies

To study the expression pattern of ART1, ALS1, FRDL4 and reference gene actin by semi-quantitative and quantitative real time PCR, seedlings of the two rice cultivars were treated with different aluminum doses (0 and 100 µM) for time periods of 24 h and 48 h. Whole roots and shoots tissue samples were excised and frozen in liquid nitrogen within 5 mins of harvest. Total RNA was extracted using the NucleoSpin RNA Plant (MACHEREY NAGEL). cDNA synthesis was done following manufacturer’s instructions using PrimeScriptTM first strand cDNA synthesis Kit (TAKARA Clontech). The primer sequences for semi-quantitative and quantitative real time PCR of OsART1 were Fw 5′- CAGTGCTTCTCGTGGGTCTT-3′, Rv 5′- CCTGTGCGTGAAGAACCACT-3′13; OsALS1 were Fw 5′-GGTCGTCAGTCTCTGCCTTGTC-3′, Rv 5′-CCTCCCCATCATTTTCATTTGT-3′103; OsFRDL4 were Fw 5′-CAGTGCTTCTCGTGGGTCTT-3′, Rv 5′-CCTGTGCGTGAAGAACCACT-3′104 and OsActin were Fw 5′-GACTCTGGTGATGGTGTCAGC-3′, Rv 5′- GGCTGGAAGAGGACCTCAGG -3′ respectively.

Interaction of Al3+ with other stakeholders during stress response

Impact of Al-Mn interaction on growth physiology

After 5 days of growth, the germinated seedlings were shifted to 0.5 mM CaCl2 (pH 4.5) for further 1 d. Finally, 6 d-old seedlings were used in experiments with various Al and Mn treatments. To discover a desirable Al dose for interaction studies, seedlings were allowed to grow in half strength Hoagland nutrient solution containing 0, 25, 50 or 100 µM Al for 24 h and 48 h. Based on the results of this prelim experiment, 100 µM Al was chosen for further experiments. Similarly, concentrations were chosen for Mn. For Al–Mn interaction study, 6-d-old seedlings were grown in Hoagland nutrient solution harbouring 500 or 1000 µM Mn in the presence or absence of 100 µM Al for 48 h, then rice plant growth, root length, shoot length, hydrogen peroxide were scored. Al and Mn were supplied in the form of AlCl3 and MnCl2, respectively. The initial pH for each solution was adjusted to 4.5.

Impact of Al-GSH interaction on growth physiology

For all Al–GSH interaction studies, ten seedlings were grown in nutrient solution. After CaCl2 treatment as described in previous section, in order to evaluate the role of GSH in attenuating Al toxicity, GSH (1 mg/L) was added at the start of Al treatment. Based on experiments performed, as described in previous section, 100 µM dose for Al stress whereas Mn dose of 1 mg/L was chosen after running a test on a range of concentrations. For the Al–Mn interaction studies, 6-d-old seedlings were grown in 0.5 mM CaCl2 solution containing 1 mg/L Mn in the presence or absence of 100 µM Al for 48 h, then rice growth, root length and H2O2 content were scored after 48 h.

Statistical analysis

Each experiment was repeated thrice and data presented are mean ± standard error (SE). The results went through one-way ANOVA. Tukey test was performed for comparison among the set of experiments. The data analysis was carried out using Microsoft Office Excel 2013, statistical software SPSS 20 and Origin Lab8.5.


  1. 1.

    Panda, S. K., Baluska, F. & Matsumoto, H. Aluminum stress signaling in plants. Plant Signaling & Behavior. 4, 592–597 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Famoso, A. N. et al. Development of a novel aluminum tolerance phenotyping platform used for comparisons of cereal aluminum tolerance and investigations into rice aluminum tolerance mechanisms. Plant Physiology. 153(4), 1678–1691 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Panda, S. K. & Matsumoto, H. Changes in antioxidant gene expression and induction of oxidative stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.) under Al stress. Biometals. 23, 753–762 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Awasthi, J. P. et al. Morpho-physiological analysis of tolerance to aluminum toxicity in rice varieties of North East India. Plos One 12(4), e0176357 (2017).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Yamamoto, Y., Kobayashi, Y. & Matsumoto, H. Lipid peroxidation is an early symptom triggered by aluminum, but notthe primary cause of elongation inhibition in pea roots. Plant Physiol. 125, 199–208 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Boscolo, P. R. S., Menossi, M. & Jorge, R. A. Aluminum-induced oxidative stress in maize. Phytochemistry. 62(2), 181–189 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Foyer, C. H. & Noctor, G. Oxidant and antioxidant signalling in plants: a re-evaluation of the concept of oxidative stress in a physiological context. Plant, Cell and Environment 28(8), 1056–1071 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Caverzan, A., Casassola, A., & Brammer, S. P. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant enzymes involved in plant tolerance to stress. In Abiotic and biotic stress in plants-Recent advances and future perspectives. InTech. (2016).

  9. 9.

    Byrt, C. S., Munns, R., Burton, R. A., Gilliham, M. & Wege, S. Root cell wall solutions for crop plants in saline soils. Plant science 269, 47–55 (2018).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Foyer, C. H. & Shigeoka, S. Understanding oxidative stress and antioxidant functions to enhance photosynthesis. Plant physiology 155(1), 93–100 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Ezaki, B., Gardner, R. C., Ezaki, Y. & Matsumoto, H. Expression of aluminum-induced genes in transgenic arabidopsis plants can ameliorate aluminum stress and/or oxidative stress. Plant Physiology. 122(3), 657–665 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Yamaji, N. et al. A zinc finger transcription factor ART1 regulates multiple genes implicated in aluminum tolerance in rice. Plant Cell. 21, 3339–3349 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Larsen, P. B., Cancel, J., Rounds, M. & Ochoa, V. Arabidopsis ALS1 encodes a root tip and stele localized half type ABC transporter required for root growth in an aluminum toxic environment. Planta 225(6), 1447 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Yokosho, K., Yamaji, N. & Ma, J. F. An Al‐inducible MATE gene is involved in external detoxification of Al in rice. The Plant Journal 68(6), 1061–1069 (2011).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Ma, J. F., Ryan, P. R. & Delhaize, E. Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends in plant science 6(6), 273–278 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Alvim, M. N., Ramos, F. T., Oliveira, D. C., Isaias, R. M. S. & França, M. G. C. Aluminium localization and toxicity symptoms related to root growth inhibition in rice (Oryza sativa L.) seedlings. J. Biosci. 37, 1079–1088 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Pandey, P., Srivastava, R. K. & Dubey, R. S. Salicylic acid alleviates aluminium toxicity in rice seedlings better than magnesium and calcium by reducing aluminium uptake, suppressing oxidative damage and increasing antioxidant defense. Ecotoxicol. 22, 656–670 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Aftab, T., Khan, M. M. A., Idress, M., Naeem, M. & Moinuddin Effectes of aluminum exposures on growth, phostosynthetic efficiency, lipid peroxidation, antioxidation, antioxidant enzymes and artemisinin content of Artemisia annua L. J Phytol. 2, 23–37 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Banhos, O. F. et al. Aluminum-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation in ‘Rangpur’lime is associated with low stomatal conductance rather than low photochemical performances. Scientia Horticulturae. 205, 133–140 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Chen, L.-S., QI, Y.-P. & Liu, X.-H. Aluminum-induced decrease in CO2 assimilation in citrus seedlings is unaccompanied by decreased activities of key enzymes involved in CO2 assimilation. Tree Physiol. 25, 317–324 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Jiang, H.-X. et al. Aluminum-induced effects on Photosystem II photochemistry in Citrus leaves assessed by the chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Tree Physiol. 28, 1863–1871 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Silva, S. et al. Aluminium long-term stress differently affects photosynthesis in rye genotypes. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 54, 105–112 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Maxwell, K., & Johnson, G.N. Chlorophyll fluorescence−a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany. 51(345), 659–68 pmid, 10938857, 10.1093/ jexbot/51.345.659. (2000).

  24. 24.

    Achary, V. M. M., Jena, S., Panda, K. K. & Panda, B. B. Aluminium induced oxidative stress and DNA damage in root cells of Allium cepa L. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety. 70(2), 300–310 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Fedorova, M., Bollineni, R. C. & Hoffmann, R. Protein carbonylation as a major hallmark of oxidative damage: update of analytical strategies. Mass spectrometry reviews 33(2), 79–97 (2014).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Ji, H. et al. The Arabidopsis RCC1 family protein TCF1 regulates freezing tolerance and cold acclimation through modulating lignin biosynthesis. PLoS genetics 11(9), e1005471 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wang, J. W. & Kao, C. H. Protective effect of ascorbic acid and glutathione on AlCl3-inhibited growth of rice roots. Biologia Plantarum. 51(3), 493–500 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hossain, A. K. M. Z., Koyama, H. & Hara, T. Growth and cell wall properties of two wheat cultivars differing in their sensitivity to aluminum stress. Journal of Plant Physiology. 163, 39–47 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Schutzendubel, A. et al. Cadmium-induced changes in antioxidative systems, hydrogen peroxide content, and differentiation in scots pine roots. Plant Physiol. 127, 887–898 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Hernández, L. E. et al. Contribution of glutathione to the control of cellular redox homeostasis under toxic metal and metalloid stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 66(10), 2901–2911 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Sharma, P. & Dubey, R. S. Modulation of nitrate reductase activity in rice seedlings under aluminium toxicity and water stress: role of osmolytes as enzyme protectant. J. Plant Physiol. 162(8), 854–862 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Ma, J. F. et al. Response of rice to Al stress and identification of quantitative trait loci for Al tolerance. Plant and Cell Physiology. 43(6), 652–659 (2002).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Giannakoula, A., Moustakas, M., Mylona, P., Papadakis, I. & Yupsanis, T. Aluminum tolerance in maize is correlated with increased levels of mineral nutrients, carbohydrates and proline and decreased levels of lipid peroxidation and Al accumulation. J. Plant Physiol. 165, 385–396 (2008).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Shahnaz, G., Shekoofeh, E., Kourosh, D. & Moohamadbagher, B. Interactive effects of silicon and aluminum on the malondialdehyde (MDA), proline, protein and phenolic compounds in Borago officinalis L. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research. 5(24), 5818–5827 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Pétriacq, P. et al. Inducible NAD overproduction in Arabidopsis alters metabolic pools and gene expression correlated with increased salicylate content and resistance to Pst‐AvrRpm1. The Plant Journal. 70(4), 650–665 (2012).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Shen, W. et al. Involvement of a Glycerol-3-Phosphate Dehydrogenase in Modulating the NADH/NAD1 Ratio Provides Evidence of a Mitochondrial Glycerol-3-Phosphate Shuttle in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell 18, 422–441 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Iturbe-Ormaetxe, I., Escuredo, P. R., Arrese-Igor, C. & Becana, M. Oxidative Damage in pea plants exposed to water deficit or paraquat. Plant Physiol. 116, 173–181 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dutilleul, C. et al. Mitochondria-driven changes in leaf NAD status exert a crucial influence on the control of nitrate assimilation and the integration of carbon and nitrogen metabolism. Plant Physiol. 139, 64–78 (2005).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Igamberdiev, A. U. & Gardestrom, P. Regulation of NAD- and NADP-dependent isocitrate dehydrogenases by reduction of levels of pyridine nucleotides in mitochondria and cytosol of pea leaves. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 1606, 117–125 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sharma, P. & Dubey, R. S. Involvement of oxidative stress and role of antioxidative defense system in growing rice seedlings exposed to toxic concentrations of aluminum. Plant Cell Reports. 26(11), 2027–2038 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cakmak, I. & Horst, W. J. Effect of aluminum on lipid peroxidation, superoxide dismutase, catalase, and peroxidase activities in root tips of soybean (Glycine max). Physiologia Plantarum 83, 463–468 (1991).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Tamás, L., Huttová, J. & Mistrík, I. Inhibition of Al-induced root elongation and enhancement of Al-induced peroxidase in Al sensitive and Al-resistant barley cultivars are positively correlated. Plant Soil. 250, 193–200 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ushimaru, T. & Kanematsu, S. Effect of hypoxia on the antioxidative enzymes in aerobically grown rice (Oryza sativa) seedlings. Physiologia. 107, 181–187 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Ma, B., Gao, L., Zhang, H., Cui, J. & Shen, Z. Aluminum-induced oxidative stress and changes in antioxidant defenses in the roots of rice varieties differing in Al tolerance. Plant Cell Rep. 31, 687–696 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Noctor, G. & Foyer, C. H. Ascorbate and glutathione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology. 49, 249–279 (1998).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Drążkiewicz, M., Skórzyńska-Polit, E. & Krupa, Z. Response of the ascorbate–glutathione cycle to excess copper in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.). Plant Science. 164(2), 195–202 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Xu, D. et al. Linking hydrogen-enhanced rice Aluminum tolerance with the reestablishment of GA/ABA balance and miRNA-modulated gene expression: A case study on germination. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 145, 303–312 (2017).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Li, X. F., Ma, J. F. & Matsumoto, H. Pattern of aluminum-induced secretion of organic acids differs between rye and wheat. Plant Physiol. 123, 1537–1544 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Martins, N., Gonçalves, S., Andrade, P. B., Valentão, P. & Romano, A. Changes on organic acid secretion and accumulation in Plantago almogravensis Franco and Plantago algarbiensis Samp. under aluminum stress. Plant science 198, 1–6 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Yang, Z. M., Nian, H., Sivaguru, M., Tanakamaru, S. & Matsumoto, H. Characterization of aluminium-induced citrate secretion in aluminium-tolerant soybean (Glycine max) plants. Physiol Plant. 113, 64–71 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Ma, J. F., Hiradate, S., Nomoto, K., Iwashita, T. & Matsumoto, H. Internal detoxification mechanism of Al in Hydrangea: Identification of Al form in the leaves. Plant Physiol. 113, 1033–39 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hatefi, Y. & Stempel, K. E. Resolution of complex I (DPNH-coenzyme Q reductase) of the mitochondrial electron transfer system. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 26(3), 301–308 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Acevedo, R. M. et al. A succinate dehydrogenase flavoprotein subunit-like transcript is upregulated in Ilex paraguariensis leaves in response to water deficit and abscisic acid. Plant physiology and biochemistry. 65, 48–54 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Singer, T. P., Oestreicher, G., Hogue, P., Contreiras, J. & Brandao, I. Regulation of Succinate Dehyrogenase in Higher Plants I. Some General Characteristics of the Membrane-bound Enzyme. Plant physiology. 52(6), 616–621 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Yu, L., Yan, J., Guo, S. & Zhu, W. Aluminum-induced secretion of organic acid by cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) roots. Scientia Horticulturae. 135, 52–58 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Hayes, J. E. & Ma, J. F. Al-induced efflux of organic acid anions is poorly associated with internal organic acid. J. Exp. Bot. 54, 1753–1759 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Gupta, A. S., Webb, R. P., Holaday, A. S. & Allen, R. D. Overexpression of superoxide dismutase protects plants from oxidative stress (induction of ascorbate peroxidase in superoxide dismutase-overexpressing plants). Plant Physiology. 103(4), 1067–1073 (1993).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Kumar, R. G., Shah, K. & Dubey, R. S. Salinity induced behavioral changes in malate dehydrogenase and glutamate dehydrogenase activities in rice seedlings of differing salt tolerance. Plant Science. 156(1), 23–34 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Sachezrodriguez, J., Martinezcarrasco, R. & Perez, P. Photosynthetic electron transport and carbon-reduction cycle enzyme activities under long term drought stress in Casuarina equisetifolia forest. Photosyn. Res. 52, 255–262 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Jorge, I. C., Mangolin, C. A. & Machado, M. F. Malate dehydrogenase isoenzymes in long term callus culture of Cereus peruvianus (Cactaceae) exposed to sugar and temperature stress. Biochem. Genet. 35, 155–164 (1997).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Roshani, M., Abbaspour, H. & Saeidi-Sar, S. Toxic effects of aluminium on the activity of antioxidant enzymes, protein content and electrophoretic pattern of polypeptides in different cultivars of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Trends in Plant Science. 4(3), 39–49 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Ovečka, M. & Takáč, T. Managing heavy metal toxicity stress in plants: biological and biotechnological tools. Biotechnology Advances 32(1), 73–86 (2014).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wang, X. et al. Comparative study of four rice cultivars with different levels of cadmium tolerance. Biologia 68(1), 74–81 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Magalhaes, J. V. et al. A gene in the multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) family confers aluminum tolerance in sorghum. Nature genetics 39(9), 1156 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Ryan, P. R., Raman, H., Gupta, S., Horst, W. J. & Delhaize, E. A second mechanism for aluminum resistance in wheat relies on the constitutive efflux of citrate from roots. Plant physiology 149(1), 340–351 (2009).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Wang, W. et al. Aluminium alleviates manganese toxicity to rice by decreasing root symplastic Mn uptake and reducing availability to shoots of Mn stored in roots. Annals of botany. 116(2), 237–246 (2015).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Dobermann, A., & Fairhurst, T. Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management. Los Banos, Philippines: Potash and Phosphate Institute, Potash and Phosphate Institute of Canada. & International Rice Research Institute. (2000).

  68. 68.

    Illéš, P. et al. Aluminium toxicity in plants: internalization of aluminium into cells of the transition zone in Arabidopsis root apices related to changes in plasma membrane potential, endosomal behaviour, and nitric oxide production. Journal of experimental botany 57(15), 4201–4213 (2006).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Bhoomika, K., Pyngrope, S. & Dubey, R. S. Differential responses of antioxidant enzymes to aluminum toxicity in two rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars with marked presence and elevated activity of Fe SOD and enhanced activities of Mn SOD and catalase in aluminum tolerant cultivar. Plant growth regulation. 71(3), 235–252 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Ribeiro, C., Cambraia, J., Peixoto, P. H. P. & Fonseca Júnior, É. M. D. Antioxidant system response induced by aluminum in two rice cultivars. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 24(2), 107–116 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Meriga, B., Reddy, B. K., Rao, K. R., Reddy, L. A. & Kishor, P. K. Aluminium-induced production of oxygen radicals, lipid peroxidation and DNA damage in seedlings of rice (Oryza sativa). Journal of plant physiology 161(1), 63–68 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    de Macêdo, C. E. C., Jan, V. V. S., Kinet, J. M. & Lutts, S. Effects of aluminium on root growth and apical root cells in rice (Oryza sativa L.) cultivars. Reliability of screening tests to detect Al resistance at the seedling stage. Acta physiologiae plantarum. 31(6), 1255–1262 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Maffei, M. E. et al. Effects of feeding Spodoptera littoralis on lima bean leaves. III. Membrane depolarization and involvement of hydrogen peroxide. Plant Physiology. 140(3), 1022–1035 (2006).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Elstner, E., Stoffer, C. & Heupel, A. Determination of superoxide free radical ion and hydrogen peroxide as products of photosynthetic oxygen reduction. Zeitschrift für Naturforschung C 30(1-2), 53–57 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Sagisaka, S. The occurrence of peroxide in a perennial plant Populas gelrica. Plant Physiol. 57, 308–309 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Wellburn, R. W. The spectral determination of chlorophyll ‘a’ and ‘b’ as well as total carotenoids using various solvent with spectrophotometer of different resolution. J. Plant Physiol. 144, 307–313 (1994).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Klughammer, C. & Schreiber, U. Complementary PS II quantum yields calculated from simple fluorescence parameters measured by PAM fluorometry and the saturation pulse method. PAM Application Notes 1, 27–35 (2008). PMID: 18430404.

  78. 78.

    Verbeke, P., Clark, B. F. C. & Rattan, S. I. S. Modulating cellular aging in vitro: hormetic effects of repeated mild heat stress on protein oxidation and glycation. Experimental gerontology. 35(6), 787–794 (2000).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Axelrod, B., Cheesbrough, T. M. & Laakso, S. Lipoxygenase from soybeans. Methods Enzymol. 71, 441–451 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Heath, R. L. & Packer, L. Photoperoxidation in isolated chloroplasts. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics. 125(1), 189–198 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Kauss, H. E. I. N. R. I. C. H. Callose and callose synthase. Molecular plant pathology. 2, 1–8 (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Kauss, H., Jeblick, W., & Domard, A. The degrees of polymerization and N-acetylation of chitosan determine its ability to elicit callose formation in suspension cells and protoplasts of Catharanthus roseus. Planta, 385–392 (1989).

  83. 83.

    Syros, T., Yupsanis, T., Zafiriadis, H. & Economou, A. Activity and isoforms of peroxidases, lignin and anatomy, during adventitious rooting in cuttings of Ebenus cretica L. Journal of Plant Physiology. 161(1), 69–77 (2004).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Griffith, O. W. Determination of glutathione and glutathione disulfide using glutathione reductase and 2-vinylpyridine. Analytical Biochemistry. 106(1), 207–212 (1980).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Oser, B. L. Hawks physiological chemistry. McGraw Hill. N. Y. USA. 702–705. (1979).

  86. 86.

    Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P. & Teare, I. D. Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and soil 39(1), 205–207 (1973).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Hampp, R., Goller, H. & Fullgraf, H. Determination of compartmented metabolite pools by a combination of rapid fractionation of oat mesophyll protoplasts and enzymic cycling. Plant Physiol. 75, 1017–1021 (1984).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Johnson, J. F., Allan, D. L. & Vance, C. P. Phosphorus stress-induced proteoid roots show altered metabolism in Lupinus albus. Plant Physiology. 104(2), 657–665 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Burke, J. J., Siedow, J. N. & Moreland, D. E. Succinate Dehydrogenase A Partial Purification from Mung Bean Hypocotyls and Soybean Cotyledons. Plant physiology 70(6), 1577–1581 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Queval, G. & Graham Noctor, G. A plate reader method for the measurement of NAD, NADP, glutathione, and ascorbate in tissue extracts: Application to redox profiling during Arabidopsis rosette development. Analytical Biochemistry. 363, 58–69 (2007).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Horai, H. et al. MassBank: a public repository for sharing mass spectral data for life sciences. Journal of mass spectrometry. 45(7), 703–714 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  ADS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Larkindale, J. & Huang, B. Effects of Abscisic Acid, Salicylic Acid, Ethylene and Hydrogen Peroxide in Thermotolerance and Recovery for Creeping Bentgrass. Plant Growth Regulation 47(1), 17–28 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Rucińska, R., Waplak, S. & Gwóźdź, E. A. Free radical formation and activity of antioxidant enzymes in lupin roots exposed to lead. Plant Physiol and Biochem. 37(3), 187–194 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    De Gara, L., de Pinto, M. C. & Arrigoni, O. Ascorbate synthesis and ascorbate peroxidase activity during the early stage of wheat germination. Physiol Plant. 100, 894–900 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Rao, M. V., Paliyath, G. & Ormrod, D. P. Ultraviolet-B-and ozone-induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant physiology 110(1), 125–136 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Smith, I. K., Vierheller, T. L. & Thorne, C. A. Assay of glutathione reductase in crude tissue homogenates using 5,5’-dithiobis (2-nitrobenzoic acid). Analytical Biochemistry. 175(2), 408–13 (1988).

    CAS  PubMed  Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Lee, M. Y. & Shin, H. W. Cadmium-induced changes in antioxidant enzymes from the marine alga Nannochloropsis oculata. Journal of Applied Phycology. 15(1), 13–19 (2003).

    MathSciNet  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Aebi, H. Catalase. In: Methods of Enzyme Analysis. (ed. Bergmeies, H.) Verlag Chemie Wenhein. 273–277 (1983).

  99. 99.

    Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant and Cell Physiology. 22(5), 867–880 (1981).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Rao, M. V., Paliyath, G. & Ormrod, D. P. Ultraviolet B and ozone induced biochemical changes in antioxidant enzymes of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol. 110(125), 136 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Hossain, M. A., Nakano, Y. & Asada, K. Monodehydroascorbate reduetase in spinaeh ehloroplasts and its partieipation in regeneration of ascorbate for scavenging hydrogen peroxide. Plant and Cell Physiology. 25, 385–395 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Hossain, M. A. & Asada, K. Purification of dehydroascorbate reductase from spinach and its characterization as a thiol enzyme. Plant and Cell Physiology. 25(1), 85–92 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Roselló, M., Poschenrieder, C., Gunsé, B., Barceló, J. & Llugany, M. Differential activation of genes related to aluminium tolerance in two contrasting rice cultivars. Journal of inorganic biochemistry. 152, 160–166 (2015).

    PubMed  Article  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Yokosho, K., Yamaji, N., Fujii-Kashino, M. & Ma, J. F. Retrotransposon-mediated aluminum tolerance through enhanced expression of the citrate transporter OsFRDL4. Plant Physiology 172(4), 2327–2336 (2016).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


Our sincere thanks to Regional Agricultural Research Station, Akbarpur (Karimganj), India, and Regional Rainfed Lowland Rice Research Station (RRLRRS) Gerua, Guwahati, Assam, India for providing us with rice seeds.

Author information




J.P.A., J.P., H.K., S.K.P. conceived and designed the experiments. J.P.A., B.S., E.Y. performed the experiments. J.P.A., B.S., E.Y., S.K.P. analysed the data. S.K.P., H.K. contributed reagents/materials/computational resources. J.P.A., B.S. wrote the paper. All authors have reviewed the manuscript and have given approval to the final version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjib Kumar Panda.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Awasthi, J.P., Saha, B., Panigrahi, J. et al. Redox balance, metabolic fingerprint and physiological characterization in contrasting North East Indian rice for Aluminum stress tolerance. Sci Rep 9, 8681 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing