Article | Open | Published:

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated ablation of elovl2 in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) inhibits elongation of polyunsaturated fatty acids and induces Srebp-1 and target genes

Abstract

Atlantic salmon can synthesize polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs), such as eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3), arachidonic acid (20:4n-6) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) via activities of very long chain fatty acyl elongases (Elovls) and fatty acyl desaturases (Fads), albeit to a limited degree. Understanding molecular mechanisms of PUFA biosynthesis and regulation is a pre-requisite for sustainable use of vegetable oils in aquafeeds as current sources of fish oils are unable to meet increasing demands for omega-3 PUFAs. By generating CRISPR-mediated elovl2 partial knockout (KO), we have shown that elovl2 is crucial for multi-tissue synthesis of 22:6n-3 in vivo and that endogenously synthesized PUFAs are important for transcriptional regulation of lipogenic genes in Atlantic salmon. The elovl2-KOs showed reduced levels of 22:6n-3 and accumulation of 20:5n-3 and docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) in the liver, brain and white muscle, suggesting inhibition of elongation. Additionally, elovl2-KO salmon showed accumulation of 20:4n-6 in brain and white muscle. The impaired synthesis of 22:6n-3 induced hepatic expression of sterol regulatory element binding protein-1 (srebp-1), fatty acid synthase-b, Δ6fad-a, Δ5fad and elovl5. Our study demonstrates key roles of elovl2 at two penultimate steps of PUFA synthesis in vivo and suggests Srebp-1 as a main regulator of endogenous PUFA synthesis in Atlantic salmon.

Introduction

The health benefits of fish oil particularly eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3) and docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) are well documented in many studies and has been linked to the prevention of inflammatory and cardiovascular diseases in humans1. Humans however have limited capacity for endogenous synthesis of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-32 and therefore dietary supplementation of preformed 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 remains the best way to meet the requirements in humans. Fishes are primary sources of omega-3 long chain polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LC-PUFAs) in the human food chain3 and with stagnant wild capture fisheries, farmed fish including Atlantic salmon now provide increasing proportion of the required n-3 LC-PUFAs for human consumption4. Traditionally, formulation of diet for carnivorous farmed fish like Atlantic salmon, (Salmo salar L.), relies on high levels of fish oil (FO) and fish meal (FM)5. However, the steady increase in Atlantic salmon aquaculture has led to increased substitution with vegetable oils (VOs)6,7,8 which are often characterized by high levels of the C18 PUFAs, linoleic acid, 18:2n-6 or linolenic acid, 18:3n-3. Furthermore, these oils are deficient in 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-39. Although VOs have been shown to be promising alternatives to FO for Atlantic salmon 10,11,12,13, results clearly show limited capacity to produce n-3 LC-PUFAs from 18:3n-38. Accordingly, fish fed VOs have increased levels of 18:3n-3 and 18:2n-6 and decreased content of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3, reducing the health-promoting effects of salmon to the human consumer14.

Biosynthesis of LC-PUFAs in vertebrates involves alternating steps of desaturation and elongation of the C18 PUFAs, 18:3n-3 and 18:2n-6. Synthesis of 20:5n-3 is achieved by Δ6 desaturation of 18:3n-3 to produce 18:4n-3 which is elongated to 20:4n-3 by very long chain fatty acyl elongase 5 (elovl5) followed by Δ5 desaturation. Biosynthesis of 22:6n-3 involves two further elongation steps to 24:5n-3, a second Δ6 desaturation to 24:6n-3 followed by a chain-shortening step via peroxisomal β-oxidation through the so called “Sprecher pathway”15. A more direct pathway for 22:6n-3 biosynthesis involves elongation of 20:5n-3 to docosapentaenoic acid (22:5n-3) followed by Δ4 desaturation to 22:6n-3, but this pathway may not exist in Atlantic salmon16,17. Synthesis of arachidonic acid, 20:4n-6 requires the same set of enzymes, and involves Δ6 desaturation of 18:2n-6 to 18:3n-6 which is elongated to 20:3n-6 followed by Δ5 desaturation18. The capacity for LC-PUFA biosynthesis in a species depends on the complementary roles of fatty acyl desaturases (Fads) and very long chain fatty acyl elongases (Elovls). Genes encoding Atlantic salmon fads (Δ6fad-a, Δ6fad-b, Δ6fad-c and Δ5fad) and elovls (elovl5a, elovl5b, elovl2 and elovl4) have been cloned and functionally characterized through heterologous expression in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae19,20,21,22. Salmon elovl5a and elovl5b elongate C18 and C20 PUFAs with low activity towards C2220,22, whereas elovl2 and elovl4 efficiently convert C20 and C22 PUFAs19,22. Additionally, heterologous expression in S. cerevisiae showed that salmon Δ6fad-a, Δ6fad-b, and Δ6fad-c have Δ6 desaturation activity towards 18:3n-3 and 18:2n-6 20,21, while Δ5fad predominantly has Δ5 desaturation activity mainly towards C20 PUFAs with low level Δ6 activity towards C18 PUFAs20.

The expression of Atlantic salmon fad and elovl genes has been shown to be under nutritional regulation, responding to changes in dietary fatty acid composition21,22. Results from feeding trials showed upregulation of elovl2 and elovl5b transcripts in the liver of VO-fed salmon compared to FO-fed fish22. Similarly, increased expression of Δ6fad-a and Δ6fad-b was observed respectively in the liver and intestine (pyloric caeca) of Atlantic salmon fed VO21. PUFAs exert their effects on transcriptional regulators, particularly Srebp-1 (Sterol regulatory element-binding protein 1)23,24 via transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms23. The promoter of a member of Srebp family, Srebp-1c, has been shown to contain liver X receptor-alpha (Lxr-alpha) response element and was identified as the primary site mediating n-3 PUFA-dependent regulation of Srebp-1c23. Accordingly, 20:5n-3 and in particular 22:6n-3 has been shown to suppress transcription of Srebp-1c by preventing trans-activation of Lxr-alpha in rat hepatocytes23. Additionally, treatment of Atlantic salmon established head kidney cell line, SHK-1 with 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 downregulated srebp-1 and reduced expression of target genes, such as fatty acid synthase (fasn), Δ6fad-a and Δ5fad25. A detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms of endogenous LC-PUFA synthesis as well as nutritional and transcriptional regulation in Atlantic salmon will require in vivo functional studies. In this study we have generated CRISPR/Cas9 mediated partial knockouts of elovl2 and analysed the effects on biosynthesis of LC-PUFAs when the salmon are fed two different feed formulations, including one with reduced content of LC-PUFAs. To further support the findings and detect other changes induced by the partial knockout of elovl2, a transcriptional analysis by RNAseq was performed. Our results show that 20:5n-3, 20:4n-6 and 22:5n-3 are the main in vivo substrates of Elovl2 and show that it is an important elongase needed for 22:6n-3 synthesis in the liver, white muscle and brain. Furthermore, our data suggest that aside dietary LC-PUFAs, endogenously synthesized LC-PUFAs play key roles in transcriptional regulation of hepatic lipogenic genes in Atlantic salmon, most likely through Srebp-1.

Results

Generation of elovl2 KOs and growth performance

Atlantic salmon with indels in the coding region of elovl2 alleles, (referred to as elovl2 KOs in this manuscript), were generated by CRISPR/Cas9 as previously described in Atlantic salmon26. Three CRISPR constructs targeting exon 4 (CRISPR-target 1, T1), exon 6 (T2) and exon 7 (T3) were used in generating elovl2 KOs. T1, T2 and T3 account for approximately 51%, 36% and 13% of the elovl2 KOs used in our study. Only one elovl2 target site was selected for each individual salmon. In addition to elovl2, the slc45a2 gene involved in melanin synthesis27 was simultaneously targeted. CRISPR-mediated KO of slc45a2 served as a visual marker as the phenotype of non-functional slc45a2 is complete loss of pigmentation26. To study the general response of Atlantic salmon PUFA biosynthetic pathway to elovl2 KO, the fish were fed either a “low PUFA” diet or a standard commercial diet. The low PUFA diet contained reduced levels of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 but higher levels of the C18 precursors, 18:3n-3 and 18:2n-6, while the standard commercial diet contained relatively higher levels of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 but lower composition of 18:3n-3, 18:2n-6 and 20:4n-6 (Supplemental Table 1). There were no observable differences in length and weight of fish after the feeding trial (Supplemental Table 2). Additionally, no mortality was recorded during the feeding trial.

Confirmation and identification of elovl2 KO Atlantic salmon

CRISPR-induced mutations in the albino gene, slc45a2 are highly correlated with indels within elovl2 (Supplemental Table 3), thus facilitating identification of elovl2 KOs. This high correlation was in agreement with previously reported results by Wargelius et al.28. The three different CRISPR target sites within elovl2 gene (T1-T3) were characterised by Sanger sequencing, sequencing on average 8 clones per individual. Notably was the identification of mosaicism in albino fish containing mutant and wildtype (WT) elovl2 alleles at T2 as well as a variety of insertions/deletions (indels) for T1-T3 (Fig. 1). Each indel was subsequently annotated using SnpEff29, whereby we summarised the indel effect predictions in three categories: Loss-of-function (LOF); splice-site (SS) and in-frame (IF). Both T1 and T2 were located in proximity to the intron-exon boundary of exon four and six respectively. Consequently, many of the indels, particularly those found at T1 and to a lesser degree T2 in the elovl2 gene were predicted to affect the splicing site (Fig. 1a–c), leading to an aberrant transcript lacking exon 4. To validate these SnpEff predictions for aberrant splicing, we utilised the RNAseq data to calculate the percentage exon retention for exons 4, 6 and 7. We found abundant missplicing of elovl2 for T1 group (Fig. 2). On average more than 50% of the elovl2 transcripts were truncated, lacking exon 4. Additionally, we found low levels of missplicing for the T2 group whereby on average less than 10% of the transcript were truncated, lacking exon 6 (Fig. 2).

Figure 1
figure1

Insertions/deletions at the CRISPR target sites in the elovl2 gene identified by Sanger sequencing for elovl2 KOs at both 60 and 108 days of feeding. (a) Highlights the three CRISPR target sites (T1-3) within the coding-sequence of the elovl2 gene. (bd) Magnifications show the orientation of the CRISPR target site on top and the different unique indels below. (e) Histogram depicting the (SnpEff) predicted effects of the indels on the elovl2 gene. Insertions/deletions are indicated in the legend by the ins/del prefix. IF: In-frame; LOF: Loss of function (indels predicted to disrupt a transcript’s reading frame or removing more than 50% of the protein-coding sequence); SS: Splice-site; WT: Wildtype.

Figure 2
figure2

Missplicing: Exon retention for exons: 4, 6 and 7 of the elovl2 gene. Displayed is the percentage exon retention for each individual belonging to either wildtype (WT) or one of the groups carrying a KO at target site 1–3 in the elovl2 gene (T1-3). Only one CRISPR construct targeting either T1 or T2 or T3 was injected per individual. However, each KO individual from both time points (60 and 108 days) was analysed for exon 4, exon 6 and exon 7 retention.

Elovl2 KO inhibits elongation of 20:5n-3, 22:5n-3 and 20:4n-6

To investigate in vivo functions of elovl2 in Atlantic salmon LC-PUFA biosynthesis, hepatic, whole brain and white muscle fatty acid composition in phospholipids was determined after 108 days of feeding trial. We observed accumulation of 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 in liver, brain and white muscle phospholipids in elovl2 KO salmon compared with the WT. This was accompanied by a reduction in the levels of 22:6n-3 (Fig. 3). Similar patterns were observed in hepatic phospholipids in elovl2 KOs compared with WT after 60 days of feeding (Supplemental Fig. 1). In addition, there was a significant (p < 0.05) accumulation of 20:4n-6 in brain and white muscle phospholipids in fish fed low PUFA diet after 108 days of feeding trial (Fig. 3). These effects were not found in liver phospholipids. Moreover, it was clear that fish fed both low PUFA and the standard commercial diets had active fatty acyl desaturation and elongation as demonstrated by accumulation of 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 in the liver of elovl2 KO salmon, and relatively higher levels of 22:6n-3 in the wildtypes under the two dietary treatments (Fig. 3). The impact of elovl2 ablation and dietary treatments on fatty acid storage was also studied by determining fatty acid composition in white muscle triacylglycerol (TAG). Similar to phospholipids, we observed accumulation of 20:4n-6, 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 and a reduction of 22:6n-3 in white muscle TAG in elovl2 KO salmon compared with the WT (Supplemental Fig. 2).

Figure 3
figure3

Polyunsaturated fatty acid composition of phospholipid pool in the whole Brain, liver, and white muscle of wildtype (Ctr or WT) and elovl2 knockout (KO) fish fed either low PUFA or standard commercial diet for 108 days. Results are shown as individual data points (n = 3), the bar represents the mean value per group. ANOVA p-values for diets, elovl2 KO (Ko/WT) as well as interaction (Diet*Ko) are indicated in the figure. Groups with different letters are significantly different from each other (p-value < 0.05; Tukey HSD test).

Impaired endogenous synthesis of 22:6n-3 induces hepatic mRNA expression of srebp-1 and target genes

From the RNAseq analysis an average of 28 million reads were collected from each library, of which ~97% were mapped to the salmon genome and ~83% were uniquely mapped. Out of 55304 annotated genes in salmon genome, we found 24558 genes which passed the minimum level of expression with at least 1 count per million (CPM) in 25% of the samples. Differential expression analysis identified 19 genes (DEGs, q < 0.05) between KO and WT salmon fed low PUFA diet, while 6 DEGs were found in salmon fed standard commercial diet (Supplemental Table 4). Several genes involved in fatty acid metabolism were found among the DEGs, including those involved in LC-PUFA synthesis and Srebp regulation. This includes acsl3a, acsl3b and acsl4 genes involved in fatty acid-CoA synthesis, agpat3a involved in phosphatidic acid synthesis and chrac1 gene which encode a protein component of the chromatin-accessibility complex CHRAC. All of these genes were significantly (q < 0.05) upregulated in KO salmon (Supplemental Table 4).

The expression of Δ6fad-a, Δ6fad-b and Δ5fad genes in LC-PUFA synthetic pathway were generally higher in KO compared to WT salmon regardless of dietary treatment while expression of elovl2 gene was downregulated (Fig. 4b). However, the expressional differences between these genes were only significant (q < 0.05) when salmon was fed low PUFA diet. The expression of elovl5a and elovl5b genes was similar between KO and WT salmon according to our RNAseq data. However, RT-qPCR analysis showed slight upregulation of elovl5a (Supplemental Fig. 3). The expression of LC-PUFA biosynthetic genes was correlated to percentage radioactivity recovery in LC-PUFAs from isolated hepatocytes after incubating with 14C-18:3n-3. Our data showed significant (p < 0.05) accumulation of 14C-20:4n-3, 14C-20:5n-3 and 14C-22:5n-3 in hepatocytes from KO salmon compared to WT. A significant (p < 0.05) reduction in the levels of 14C-22:6n-3 in KO salmon was also observed (Fig. 5).

Figure 4
figure4

Expressional change of hepatic srebp-1 genes (a) and their targeted-genes (b) between elovl2 knockout (KO) and wildtype (WT) salmon fed either low PUFA or standard commercial diet. (a) Boxplots displaying all four srebp-1 genes with their respective expression (log2 CPM) in KO and WT salmon fed either low PUFA or standard diet. Asterisks indicates differential expression (q < 0.05). (b) Violin plot showing 183 lipid genes with least 1 Srebp-1-targeted motif in the promoter region. The density of the plot is proportional to the number of genes in each log2 fold change unit. Both fish fed low PUFA or standard diet showed significant enrichment of the Srebp-1-targeted genes. Gene expression analysis was performed using n = 18 elovl2 KO + n = 18 WT fed low PUFA diet, and n = 11 each of elovl2 KO and WT fed standard diet.

Figure 5
figure5

Gene expression and 14C fatty acids production in LC-PUFA synthesis pathway of liver between knockout (KO) and wildtype (WT) salmon. The LC-PUFA biosynthesis pathway is shown in the middle. Figures on the left indicate expression of elongase and desaturase genes in log2 count per million (Log2 CPM) between KO and WT salmon fed either low-PUFA diet (low) or standard (std) diet. Asterisks indicates differentially expressed gene (q < 0.05) between KO and WT salmon. The expression of Δ6fad-c and elovl4 genes was not shown in the figure because their expression in liver is very low (Log2 CPM < 1). Gene expression analysis was performed using n = 18 elovl2 KO + n = 18 WT fed low PUFA diet, and n = 11 each of elovl2 KO and WT fed standard diet. The right figures show the percentage recovery of radioactivity in n-3 LC-PUFA from cellular total lipids after incubation 1–14C-18:3n-3 on hepatocytes from salmon fed low and std diets for 108 days. Two-way ANOVA was applied, and asterisks indicates significant (p < 0.05) differences in recovery of radioactivity in the fatty acid between KO and WT salmon with n = 3. No significance (p > 0.05) was observed between low and std diets, nor between the interactions (Diet*Ko). Statistical differences between WT and elovl2 KO under two diets is denoted by different letters.

Additionally, we paid special attention to the expression of srebp-1 genes, since they are well known as major transcription factors regulating fatty acid metabolism. The salmon genome contains four srebp-1 genes at different locations (Supplemental Table 9), hereafter referred to as srebp-1 (a–d). Expression of all srebp-1 genes was higher in liver of KO salmon compared to WT when fed low PUFA diet, though only srebp-1b was significantly different (Fig. 4a). Expression of the srebp-1 genes in salmon fed standard diet was less affected by the KO compared to the WT. To further test if srebp-1 had a significant role in regulating gene expression, we performed gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), testing for enrichment of 183 lipid metabolism genes with at least 1 Srebp-1 motif in their promoter region. Indeed we found that lipid genes with Srebp-1 motif tended to be significantly upregulated in KO salmon fed either low PUFA or standard diet (Fig. 4b). The effect was more distinct in the low PUFA group (p = 0.005 vs 0.04), which was associated to higher fold change of fasn-a, fasn-b, elovl2, Δ6fad-a and Δ5fad genes in low-PUFA fed salmon. Upregulation of fasn-a and fasn-b showed no observable effects on the composition of liver phospholipid 16:0 and 18:0 (Supplemental Table 10).

RNAseq Validation

To verify the RNAseq results, five genes were chosen and analyzed by RT-qPCR. The results showed a high, significant correlation between the log2 fold changes obtained by RT-qPCR and those obtained by RNAseq (Pearson correlation r = 0.99, p < 0.7e−10) (Fig. 6).

Figure 6
figure6

Validation of RNAseq results by RT-qPCR. Log2FCs from the RNAseq experiment are plotted on the y-axis, while log2FCs from the RT-qPCR are plotted on the x-axis. RT-qPCR data was normalized to the housekeeping gene ef1α-b. Expression levels of six different genes were compared. For each gene the log2FCs for the two contrasts: low PUFA (Ctr vs KO) and standard (Ctr vs KO) were calculated and plotted. Overall we found a highly significant correlation (p-value < 7.988e-10) between log2FCs from RNAseq and those calculated by qPCR. The dashed line represents the linear regression line (formula displayed in the plot).

Discussion

The ability of any species to synthesize LC-PUFAs depends on the complementary roles of fatty acyl desaturases (Fads) and very long chain fatty acyl elongases (Elovls). The elovl5a, elovl5b, elovl2 and elovl4 genes have been described in Atlantic salmon and their gene products functionally characterized via heterologous expression in yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae19,20,22. Salmon elovl5a and elovl5b encode proteins that efficiently elongate C18 and C20 PUFAs, with low activity towards C2220,22, while elovl2 and elovl4 effectively elongate C20 and C22 PUFAs19,22. Here, by generating elovl2 KO Atlantic salmon using CRISPR/Cas9, we have shown that elovl2 is crucial for elongation of 20:4n-6 for synthesis of longer chain n-6 PUFAs, as well as 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 for the formation of 22:6n-3 in multiple tissues in vivo. Our results are consistent with results from the heterologous studies in S. cerevisiae22, however results from the hepatocyte assay revealed a low but detectable synthesis of 22:6n-3 in elovl2 ablated cells, suggesting a partial compensation by other elongases such as elovl4 or elovl5a/elovl5b as these Elovl5 elongases have been shown to have some capability to elongate 22:5n-322. RT-qPCR analysis showed slight upregulation of elovl5a in the liver and white muscle of elovl2 KO salmon fed standard commercial diet and in liver of fish fed low PUFA diet (Supplemental Fig. 3), but this was not revealed by our RNAseq data. Furthermore, no upregulation was observed for elovl4 (data not shown). The fact that transcriptional activity of elovl4, elovl5a and elovl5b are hardly affected by the elovl2 KO does not rule out that their encoded proteins can compensate for lack of Elovl2 activity. Additionally, we cannot exclude the contribution of mosaicism to the observed background 22:6n-3 synthesis in the elovl2 KO hepatocytes. Although sequences from 8 clones may be limiting in providing full overview of the extent of mosaicism in individual salmon, our RNAseq data showed to a reasonable degree that the mutant elovl2 alleles are dominating. Results from the current in vivo study also suggest that in addition to dietary LC-PUFAs, endogenously synthesized PUFAs play important roles in transcriptional regulation of lipogenic genes in Atlantic salmon.

Truncated proteins produced by the CRISPR-induced out of frame mutations will all miss the C-terminal dilysine-motifs which are important for ER-retention. Similar frameshift mutations in human ELOVL4 are observed in patients with autosomal dominant Stargardt-like juvenile macular dystrophy and produce truncated ELOVL4 proteins that fail to localize to the ER and lack innate condensation activity30,31. elovl2 KOs generated from CRISPR-target site 3 will produce truncated proteins missing a catalytic histidine dideoxy binding motif (HVYHH) essential for fatty acid condensation. Additionally, the CRISPR-induced skipping of exon 4 will generate truncated Elovl2 proteins missing 30 amino acid residues resulting in lack of portions of a putative membrane-spanning domain22 and a number of conserved amino acids that will most likely render the Elovl2 protein non-functional.

Mammalian ELOVL2 is highly effective in elongation of 20- and 22-carbon PUFAs with low or no activity in the case of humans towards C1832, similar to what we observed in salmon. Elovl2 – deficient mice displayed decreased levels of 22:6n-3 and 22:5n-6 with an accumulation of 20:4n-6, 20:5n-3, 22:5n-3 and 22:4n-624. In addition to 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3, the elovl2 KO salmon also accumulated 20:4n-6 in brain and white muscle phospholipids as well as in white muscle TAG. Increased 20:4n-6 levels were particularly observed under low PUFA diet indicating higher conversion rate from 18:2n-6 in the feed. The levels of other n-6 PUFAs, such as docosatetraenoic acid, 22:4n-6 and 22:5n-6 was either very low or undetectable. The differences in n-6 LC-PUFA elongation between the elovl2 KO salmon and the Elovl2 KO mice suggest a probable preference of Atlantic salmon LC-PUFA biosynthetic pathway for omega-3 PUFAs. The rate limiting enzyme for 22.6n-3 synthesis in fish is Δ6fad-a, which is reported to have higher activity towards n-3 fatty acids compared to n-6 PUFAs20,33,34,35,36. In addition, it appears that Atlantic salmon Elovl2 has relatively lower activity towards 20:4n-6 and 22:4n-6 compared to their n-3 homologs22. Similarly, salmon elovl5a seems to have preferences towards C18 and C20 n-3 PUFAs. This does not appear to be the case for elovl5b22. Thus, it is probable that reduced activity of Δ6 Fad-a, Elovl5a and Elovl2 towards n-6 PUFA precursors decreased subsequent synthesis of longer chain n-6 PUFAs in the current study. This may have masked the impact of elovl2 ablation on omega-6 PUFA synthesis. These observed preferences of Atlantic salmon PUFA biosynthetic pathway for omega-3 PUFAs warrants further investigation.

Atlantic salmon LC-PUFA biosynthetic pathway has been shown to be under nutritional regulation, responding to levels of dietary PUFAs21,22,37. Atlantic salmon fed diet containing relatively high levels of 20:5n-3 (7.3% of total fatty acids, FAs) and 22:6n-3 (10.5% of total FAs) showed reduced hepatocyte fatty acyl desaturation and elongation37. In fact, results from the current study suggest that fish fed low PUFA and standard commercial diet had active fatty acyl desaturation and elongation. While it is expected that the relatively high levels of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 in the standard diet feed-back inhibit desaturation and elongation, the presence of appreciable levels of 18:2n-6 (10.8% of total FAs) and 18:3n-3 (4.8% of total FAs) may have had stimulatory effects on PUFA synthesis. Consistent with our observation, salmon fed diet rich in 18:2n-6 demonstrated strong fatty acyl desaturation and elongation37.

The brain is known to have a unique fatty acid composition with relatively high levels of 22.6n-3, 20:4n-6 and 16:0, but low levels of 20:5n-338,39. Endogenous synthesis of 20.5n-3, 22:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 have been shown to be low within the brain40,41, suggesting that it maintains its unique fatty acid levels through uptake from dietary sources. In the present study, analysis of whole brain LC-PUFA composition in phospholipids from elovl2 KO salmon revealed accumulation of 20:5n-3, 20:4n-6 and 22:5n-3 under low PUFA diet, suggesting a likely inhibition of elongation of these Elovl2 substrates. In contrast, whole brain phospholipid 20:5n-3, 20:4n-6 and 22:5n-3 levels remained unchanged under standard dietary condition, suggesting that acquisition of these fatty acids from the standard commercial diet was probably sufficient to meet requirements in the brain. A slight reduction in the levels of 22:6n-3 in the brain of elovl2 KO was however noted under both dietary conditions, suggesting a reduced Elovl2 activity (Fig. 3). The elovl2 expression in Atlantic salmon is relatively high in the brain compared to other tissues, except the intestine and liver22. Thus, it is compelling to suggest that the brain is capable of synthesizing LC-PUFAs under reduced dietary LC-PUFA conditions. In support of this, trout brain astrocytes incubated with 14C-18:3n-3 and 14C-18:2n-6 showed clear capacities for desaturation and elongation42.

Interestingly, results from the present study suggest that impaired formation of endogenous 22:6n-3 activates sterol regulatory element binding protein -1 (Srebp-1), which has been shown to be responsible for transcriptional regulation of many lipogenic genes in mice, including sterol-CoA desaturase 1, fatty acid synthase (fasn), Δ6fad-a, elovl5, elovl2 and Δ5fad24,43. Accordingly, upregulation of hepatic srebp-1, most likely in response to the reduced levels of liver 22:6n-3 appears to induce mRNA expression of fasn-b, Δ6fad-a, Δ5fad and to a less extent elovl5a in our elovl2 KO salmon. Additionally, GSEA of Atlantic salmon lipid metabolic genes identified the above upregulated genes as potential targets of Srebp-1 as they have at least 1 Srebp-1 binding motif within their promoter regions. Results from many studies have shown that dietary LC-PUFAs influence transcriptional regulation of Atlantic salmon fad and elovl genes22,44,45,46. In addition, gene promoter studies have reported Srebps as key transcriptional regulators of Atlantic salmon Δ6fad-a46. Thus, it appears dietary LC-PUFAs as well as endogenously synthesized 22:6n-3 regulate the expression of lipogenic genes in a Srebp-1-dependent fashion in Atlantic salmon. Consistent with our observation, Atlantic salmon SHK-1 cells supplemented with 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 showed decreased expression of srebp-1 and its targets, Δ6fad-a and fasn25. Though it is compelling to suggest that upregulation of srebp-1 and target genes is a response to reduced 22:6n-3 levels, we cannot exclude the possibility that it is as well a response to general impairment of the PUFA biosynthetic pathway. Taken together our lipidomics and transcriptomics data, we propose that there is a form of end-product feedback regulation of Atlantic salmon LC-PUFA biosynthetic pathway, most likely via Srebp-1 activation when end-products such as 22:6n-3 is low or inhibition when end-products are high through dietary supplementation and endogenous synthesis.

In conclusion, results from the present study highlight in vivo functions of elovl2 in multiple tissues in Atlantic salmon LC-PUFA biosynthesis. Thus, our findings show the key roles of elovl2 in elongation of 20:4n-6 for synthesis of 22:5n-6 as well as 20:5n-3 and 22:5n-3 in 22:6n-3 synthesis in vivo. The current study also suggests an important role of elovl2 in 22:6n-3 synthesis in the brain of Atlantic salmon. Furthermore, our data to some extent highlights the crucial roles of endogenously synthesized PUFAs in the regulation of hepatic lipogenic genes, most likely in a Srebp-1-dependent manner. The obvious changes in the levels of LC-PUFAs in our elovl2 KO salmon coupled with the significant hepatic transcript response, and with the fact that Elovl2 catalyses two important penultimate steps of PUFA synthesis suggests elovl2 as a potential selective Atlantic salmon breeding marker for ensuring an increased conversion of C18 fatty acids present in vegetable oils to 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3.

Methods

Ethics statement

All experiments in this study have been approved by the Norwegian Animal Research Authority (NARA 5741). Use of experimental animals was strictly in accordance with the Norwegian Animal Welfare Act of 19th of June 2009.

Cloning target sequences in gRNAs

For easy recognition of knockouts (KOs) and avoiding studying mosaic animals, slc45a2 involved in melanin synthesis was simultaneously ablated with elovl2. The gRNA for slc45a2 and its effect was described by Edvardsen et al.26. Using genomic and cDNA sequences for elovl2 (NC_027318.1, NM_001136553.1), three target sites (Fig. 1a) were selected using a custom made Perl script, which identifies unique CRISPR-target sites. Candidate target sequences were screened against the latest salmon genome assembly (GCA 000233375.4) to eliminate off-target indels. Target sequences and oligonucleotides for salmon slc45a2 and elovl2 are listed in Supplemental Table 5. One μg of each forward and reverse oligonucleotide was annealed in T4 ligase buffer (NEB, Massachusetts, USA) by incubating at 85 °C for 10 min, followed by cooling to room temperature. One μl of diluted (1:10) annealed oligonucleotides was ligated into 50 ng of BsmBI-digested pT7-gRNA (Addgene ID# 46759)47 using T4 DNA ligase (NEB), and subsequently transformed into competent DH5α cells. Plasmids were prepared using QIAprep Spin Miniprep Kit (Qiagen, Germantown, USA).

In vitro transcription of Cas9 mRNA and gRNA

For producing Cas9 nuclease mRNA, pTST3-nCas9n vector, codon optimized for zebrafish (Addgene ID# 46757)47 was linearized using XbaI (NEB) and gel-purified using Wizard® SV Gel and PCR clean-up system (Promega, Madison, USA). Cas9 mRNA was produced using the mMessage mMachine T3 kit (Ambion, Vilnius, Lithuania) and cleaned up using RNeasy Minikit spin column (Qiagen). For making gRNAs, pT7-gRNA plasmid was linearized using BamHI-HF™ (NEB) and purified using DNA Clean and Concentrator™-5 (ZYMO RESEARCH, California, USA). The gRNAs were in vitro transcribed using the MEGAscript T7 kit (Ambion). The mirVana miRNA Isolation Kit (Invitrogen, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands) was used to purify gRNAs. The integrity of synthesized Cas9 mRNA and gRNAs was checked using the Agilent RNA 600 Nano kit and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany).

Microinjection

Atlantic salmon eggs and sperm were obtained from Aquagen (Trondheim, Norway). Eggs were fertilized with sperm in fresh water containing 0.5 mM reduced glutathione and incubated at 6–8 °C for 2–3 hours until the first cell was visible48. Eggs were held on concavities of plastic petri dish and injected with a mixture of 50 ng/μl gRNA each for slc45a2 and elovl2, and 150 ng/μl Cas9 mRNA in Hepes buffer using the picospritzer III (Parker Automation, UK)26,49. Microinjected embryos were incubated at 6–8 °C until hatching. A few weeks after startfeeding, fully albino fish were sorted out, fin clipped or fully sampled to check for mutations in elovl2. Fin clips and tissues were stored in 100% ethanol.

Screening for CRISPR-induced mutations

Genomic DNA was extracted from fin clips and tissues of salmon using DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen). Genomic targets were amplified by PCR using DyNAzyme II DNA Polymerase (Thermo Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). PCR primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table 6. PCR products were subcloned into the pCR™4-TOPO® vector (Invitrogen) and subsequently sequenced using Bigdye™ Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems™, BLEISWIJK, NETHERLANDS).

Feeding trials

Two diets were used in the feeding trial, a standard commercial diet (Nutra Olympic, Skretting Nutreco Company, Stavanger, Norway) containing relatively high levels of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 and a low PUFA diet (SPAROS, LDA, Olhão, Portugal) with reduced levels of 20:5n-3 and 22:6n-3 but high composition of 18:2n-6 and 18:3n-3 (Supplemental Table 1). The feeding trial was carried out at the Institute of Marine Research Matre, Norway, from late January to mid-May 2017, in fresh water at 8–10 °C with oxygen saturation of 95.3% to 97.7% at outlet during the trial. All experimental fish were initially reared on the standard commercial diet to Atlantic salmon parrs of approximate weight of 20 g before feeding trial. Groups of 15 elovl2 KOs and 15 WTs were randomly allocated to 3 tanks and fed low PUFA diet. The 4th tank containing 30 elovl2 KOs and 30 WTs was fed standard commercial diet. The lack of pigmentation in elovl2 KOs allowed for an easy identification and distinction from WTs in the tanks. The feeding was done by automatic feeders (Arvotec single feeder). Tissues were sampled after 60 (time point 1) and 108 (time point 2) days of feeding. Fish were anesthetized with Finquel MS-222 (ScanVacc) and then killed with a blow to the head. Twelve fish per tank comprising of 6 elovl2 KOs and 6 WTs were collected from both diets for tissue lipid analysis, gene expression studies and screening for CRISPR-induced mutations. Collected tissues were quickly frozen on dry ice and stored at −80 °C.

Lipid analysis

Total lipids were extracted from tissues of white muscle, liver and whole brain from three fish per dietary treatment according to Folch et al.50. Total lipid content per milligram of tissue after 108 days of feeding are presented in Supplemental Table 11. Triacylglycerols and polar lipids were separated by HPTLC silica gel 60 plates (10 × 10 cm, Merck KGaA Damstadt, Germany) using hexane: diethyl ether: acetic acid (70:30:1, v/v) as developing solvent51. Lipid classes were visualized by exposure to iodine and then transesterified overnight at 50 °C52. Fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) were separated, identified and quantified by gas chromatography (Agilent 7890) equipped with MS (Agilent 5977B).

Preparation of hepatocytes for assay of fatty acyl desaturation/elongation

Hepatocytes were prepared as described previously53, with minor modifications. Liver from three each of WT and elovl2 KO salmon per dietary treatment was dissected, quickly perfused via hepatic vein, finely chopped and incubated with 20 ml of Solution A; Hank’s balanced salt solution supplemented with 10 mM Hepes, 1 mM EDTA and 1 mg ml−1 collagenase (Sigma, Missouri, USA) for 45 min at 20 °C. Digested tissues were filtered through 100 μm cell strainer (Sigma) and the cells collected by centrifugation at 400 × g for 3 min. The cell pellet was washed with 20 ml of solution A containing 10 mg ml−1 fatty acid free bovine serum albumin, FAF-BSA (Sigma). Thereafter, the cell pellet was washed with 20 ml freshly prepared solution B (calcium free minimum essential medium supplemented with 100 U/ml Penicillin, 100 μg/ml Streptomycin, 0.25 µg/ml Amphotericin B and pH adjusted to 7.1–7.4 by sodium bicarbonate). The cells were further purified by centrifuging at 400 × g for 30 min on top of 54% percoll solution. The hepatocytes layer were collected and washed twice with solution B.

Incubation of hepatocytes with 14C-18:3n-3 and assay of fatty acyl desaturation/elongation

For each sample, 1.904 ml of hepatocytes and 96 μl of approximately 4.55 µM, 0.5 μCi 14C-18:3n-3 (American Radiolabelled Chemicals Inc., Saint Louis, USA) was incubated in cell culture flask at 20 °C for 2 h. The cells were isolated by centrifugation at 400 × g for 2 min and cell pellet washed with 2 ml solution B containing FAF-BSA 10 mg ml−1 and then homogenized in 2.5 ml of ice-cold chloroform/methanol (2:1, v/v) with 0.01% butylated hydroxyl toluene (BHT). Total cellular lipid was extracted according to Folch et al.50. Transmethylation of lipids was performed as described above. FAMEs were extracted by adding 2 ml of 2% KHCO3 followed by 5 ml of hexane/diethyl ether (1:1, v/v) containing 0.01% BHT. The mixture was centrifuged at 500 × g and FAMEs from the upper phase were dried under a stream of nitrogen and re-suspended in 100 μl of hexane containing 0.01% BHT. FAMEs were applied as a streak of 2–2.5 cm on 20 × 20 TLC plate pre-coated with 0.1 g/ml of silver nitrate. The plate was developed in toluene/acetonitrile (95:5, v/v) and desiccated in the dark for 30 min. Autoradiography was performed by placing the plate in an autorad cassette for 4–6 days with Kodak BioMax MR2 film and developed using Carestream Kodak GBX Developer and Carestream Kodak GBX Fixer. Bands were scraped into scintillation vials containing 2.5 ml scintillation cocktail and counted in a scintillation counter.

RNA isolation and quality check

Total RNA from approximately 20–50 mg of liver, whole brain and white muscle was isolated using the RNeasy Plus Universal Mini Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity of isolated RNA was checked using the Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit and Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). RNA integrity values varied from 8.3 to 10. At each time point, RNA was extracted from a total of 30 liver (15 WT + 15 KOs), 30 white muscle (15 WT + 15 KOs) and 18 whole brain (9 WT and 9 KOs) samples from salmon fed low PUFA diet. For fish fed standard diet, 12 liver (6 WT + 6 KOs), 12 white muscle (6 WT + 6 KOs) and 6 whole brain (3 WT + 3 KOs) samples were used for RNA extraction after each time point. Liver samples selected for gene expression analysis included those analysed for fatty acid composition.

Gene expression analysis

Library preparation

Stranded RNAseq libraries were prepared from 1 µg total RNA from liver tissue using TruSeq Stranded mRNA library preparation kit (Illumina, San Diego, USA) using double unique indices (#20022371), according to the manufacturer’s instruction (Part 15031057 Rev.E). A total of 58 liver samples were used for library preparations: For each time point, 10–12 individuals fed standard diet (5 WT + 5 KOs at time point 1; 6 WT + 6 KOs at time point 2) and 18 individuals fed low PUFA diet (9 WT + 9 KOs). Libraries were sequenced at the Norwegian Sequencing Centre (NSC). All libraries were pooled, and the same pool was sequenced on 4 flow cell lanes on a HiSeq 3000 machine (Illumina), generating 100 bp single-end reads. RT-qPCR: To validate the RNAseq gene expression data, 1 µg of total RNA per liver, white muscle or brain sample was reverse transcribed into cDNA using the QuantiTect® Reverse Transcription kit (Qiagen) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Negative controls (containing no reverse transcriptase) were included to check for genomic DNA contamination. The expression of srebp-1 as well as fatty acid or the LC-PUFA biosynthetic enzymes, Δ6fad-a, Δ5 fad, elovl5a, elovl5b and fatty acid synthase-b (fasn-b) was studied by RT-qPCR using LightCycler® 96 (Roche, Munich, Germany). For fish fed low PUFA diet, liver samples from a total of 13–15 WT and 10–15 elovl2 KOs were used for RT-qPCR analysis, whereas samples from 5–6 WT and 5–6 KOs fed standard diet were used. All primers used are reported in Supplemental Table 7. Elongation factor 1 alpha-b (ef1α-b), previously validated in Atlantic salmon54 was used as the housekeeping gene.

Bioinformatics

Screening for CRISPR-induced mutations

The Sanger reads were transformed to .fastq format, residuals of the vector were trimmed off and trimmed reads were mapped to the Atlantic salmon genome (GCA 0002333375.4) using bwa55. Insertions/deletions overlapping with the three elovl2 target sites were identified from the CIGAR string of the read alignments (.bam) and subsequently annotated using SnpEff29. Results are summarized in Supplemental Table 8.

RT-qPCR

Expression levels were normalised to the housekeeping gene elongation factor α-b (ef1α-b) using the ΔCt method. Fold changes were subsequently calculated using the ΔΔCt method56.

Analysis of RNAseq data

RNA sequencing files (.fastq) were processed in the following manner: (i) All reads from the same individual were merged into one fastq file. (ii) Reads were mapped to the Atlantic salmon genome (GenBank Accession number: GCA_0002333375.4) using STAR (v 2.6.0c)57. (iii) Read alignments, recorded in BAM format were subsequently used to count uniquely mapped reads per gene using featurecounts (v1.4.4)58, with the RefSeq gene_ids. Raw illumina reads as well as gene counts are publicly available through ArrayExpress59 accession E-MTAB-7220. Gene expression levels were calculated as counts per million total library counts using the R package edgeR60. Total library sizes were normalized to account for bias in sample composition, using the trimmed mean of m-values approach. For each dietary group (low PUFA or standard commercial diet), a differential expression analysis (DEA) was performed comparing KO to WT samples. Libraries of samples from 60 and 108 days of each dietary group were merged prior to contrasting KO vs WT in order to minimize the effect of fish development between the 60 and 108 days of feeding, as no effect on gene expression in terms of interaction between KO and sampling time point was observed. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was calculated for genes containing at least 1 Srebp motif in their promoter region (within 1.5 kb upstream of the transcription start site) using the ‘fry’61 function implemented within the edgeR package. Motif information for all salmon genes was available through SalmonMotifDB (SalMotifDB), a publicly accessible DB (Mulugeta T. et al., unpublished). In brief, SalMotifDB is a genome wide map of putative transcription factor binding sites (TFBSs) for salmonids and related fish genomes. The database contains predicted binding sites identified in the upstream promoter regions (−1000/+200 base pairs) from transcription start site (TSS) in seven fish genomes. The database was developed by scanning the promoter sequences using over 12,000 position specific scoring matrices (PSSMs) collected from different public and commercial motif databases. All candidate TFBSs were predicted by FIMO tool from MEME suite62. The database is accessible through a web-based platform (https://salmobase.org/shiny/3.5.0/teshmu/SalMotifDB/) for motif enrichment and analysis.

Exon retention analysis

Exon retention was calculated analogous to Braunschweig et al.63. In brief the percentage exon retention (PIR) was calculated as PIR = inclusion/(inclusion + exclusion). Whereby inclusion reads are defined as reads including the Exon of interest (Eoi); reads spanning from the adjacent 3′exon (E3) to the Eoi or from the Eoi to the adjacent 5′exon (E5). Inclusion = (E3-Eoi + e5Eoi)/2. Exclusion reads connect E3 with E5, skipping the Eoi. Exon spanning reads were extracted from the alignment files using a custom python script64 counting only exon spanning reads that were anchored by at least 8 bp on either side.

Statistical analysis

The significance of the effects of diet and CRISPR-induced mutations on fatty acid composition and biosynthesis of LC-PUFAs from 14C-18:3n-3 (percentage radioactivity recovery in elovl2 KO hepatocytes) was determined by two-way ANOVA, using dietary treatment and KO/WT as experimental factors, followed by a Tukey HSD post-tests (R version 3.5.2). Differences were reported significant when p value < 0.05. For RNAseq, levels of gene expression were determined as counts per million total library counts (CPM) and only genes with at least 1 CPM in more than 25% of samples were used in DEA. Genes with a false discovery rate (FDR), an adjusted p value (q) < 0.05 and absolute log2 fold change ((|Log2FC|) > 1 were considered to be differentially expressed between KO and WT. RNAseq analysis was performed in R (v3.4.2). DEA was performed using R package edgeR60.

Data Availability

Raw Illumina reads as well as gene counts are publicly available through ArrayExpress accession E-MTAB-7220. Additional data: Lipid, qPCR, Sanger-sequencing as well as exon retention data are available through FairDom (https://fairdomhub.org/studies/449).

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Calder, P. C. & Yaqoob, P. Omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids and human health outcomes. BioFactors (Oxford, England) 35, 266–272, https://doi.org/10.1002/biof.42 (2009).

  2. 2.

    Brenna, J. T. Efficiency of conversion of alpha-linolenic acid to long chain n-3 fatty acids in man. Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care 5, 127–132 (2002).

  3. 3.

    Raatz, S. K., Johnson, L. K., Rosenberger, T. A. & Picklo, M. J. Twice weekly intake of farmed Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) positively influences lipoprotein concentration and particle size in overweight men and women. Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.) 36, 899–906, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2016.06.011 (2016).

  4. 4.

    FAO. State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. (2016).

  5. 5.

    Tacon, A. G. M. M. Global overview on the use of fish meal and fish oil in industrially compounded aquafeeds: Trends and future prospects. Aquaculture 285, 146–158 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Marine-Harvest. Salmon Farming Industry Handbook 2017. 25 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Turchini, G. M., Torstensen, B. E. & Ng, W. K. Fish oil replacementin finfish nutrition. Rev Aquac 1, 10–57 (2009).

  8. 8.

    Miller, M. R., Nichols, P. D. & Carter, C. G. n-3 Oil sources for use in aquaculture–alternatives to the unsustainable harvest of wild fish. Nutrition research reviews 21, 85–96, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0954422408102414 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Sargent, J. R., Tocher, D. R. & Bell, J. G. The lipids. In: Halver, J. E., Hardy, R. W. (eds) Fish nutrition. 3rd edn. pp 181–257 (2002).

  10. 10.

    Rosenlund, G., Obach, A., Sandberg, M. G., Standal, H. & Tveit, K. Effect of alternative lipid sources on long-term growth performance and quality of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Aquaculture Research 32, 323–328 (2001).

  11. 11.

    Bell, J. G. et al. Substituting fish oil with crude palm oil in the diet of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) affects muscle fatty acid composition and hepatic fatty acid metabolism. J Nutr 132, 222–230 (2002).

  12. 12.

    Betancor, M. B. et al. Oil from transgenic Camelina sativa containing over 25% n-3 long-chain PUFA as the major lipid source in feed for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). The British journal of nutrition 119, 1378–1392, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114518001125 (2018).

  13. 13.

    Betancor, M. B. et al. An oil containing EPA and DHA from transgenic Camelina sativa to replace marine fish oil in feeds for Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): Effects on intestinal transcriptome, histology, tissue fatty acid profiles and plasma biochemistry. PloS one 12, e0175415, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0175415 (2017).

  14. 14.

    Rosenlund, G., Corraze, G., Izquierdo, M. & Torstensen, B. E. The effects of fish oil replacement on nutritional and organoleptic qualities of farmed fish. In Fish Oil Replacement and Alternative Lipid Sources in Aquaculture Feeds. 487–522 (CRC Press, 2010).

  15. 15.

    Sprecher, H. Metabolism of highly unsaturated n-3 and n-6 fatty acids. Biochim Biophys Acta 1486, 219–231 (2000).

  16. 16.

    Li, Y. et al. Vertebrate fatty acyl desaturase with Delta4 activity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107, 16840–16845, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1008429107 (2010).

  17. 17.

    Oboh, A. et al. Two alternative pathways for docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6n-3) biosynthesis are widespread among teleost fish. Scientific reports 7, 3889, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04288-2 (2017).

  18. 18.

    Cook, H. W. & McMaster, C. R. Fatty acid desaturation and chain elongation in eukaryotes, in: D. E. Vance, J. E. Vance (Eds), Biochemistry of Lipids, Lipoproteins and Membranes. pp. 181–204 (2004).

  19. 19.

    Carmona-Antonanzas, G., Monroig, O., Dick, J. R., Davie, A. & Tocher, D. R. Biosynthesis of very long-chain fatty acids (C > 24) in Atlantic salmon: cloning, functional characterisation, and tissue distribution of an Elovl4 elongase. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology 159, 122–129, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2011.02.007 (2011).

  20. 20.

    Hastings, N. et al. Molecular cloning and functional characterization of fatty acyl desaturase and elongase cDNAs involved in the production of eicosapentaenoic and docosahexaenoic acids from alpha-linolenic acid in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) 6, 463–474, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-004-3002-8 (2004).

  21. 21.

    Monroig, O. et al. Multiple genes for functional 6 fatty acyl desaturases (Fad) in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.): gene and cDNA characterization, functional expression, tissue distribution and nutritional regulation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1801, 1072–1081, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2010.04.007 (2010).

  22. 22.

    Morais, S., Monroig, O., Zheng, X., Leaver, M. J. & Tocher, D. R. Highly unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in Atlantic salmon: characterization of ELOVL5- and ELOVL2-like elongases. Marine biotechnology (New York, N.Y.) 11, 627–639, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10126-009-9179-0 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Howell, G. III et al. N-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids suppress insulin-induced SREBP-1c transcription via reduced trans-activating capacity of LXRalpha. Biochim Biophys Acta 1791, 1190–1196, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.08.008 (2009).

  24. 24.

    Pauter, A. M. et al. Elovl2 ablation demonstrates that systemic DHA is endogenously produced and is essential for lipid homeostasis in mice. Journal of lipid research 55, 718–728, https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M046151 (2014).

  25. 25.

    Minghetti, M., Leaver, M. J. & Tocher, D. R. Transcriptional control mechanisms of genes of lipid and fatty acid metabolism in the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) established cell line, SHK-1. Biochim Biophys Acta 1811, 194–202 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Edvardsen, R. B., Leininger, S., Kleppe, L., Skaftnesmo, K. O. & Wargelius, A. Targeted mutagenesis in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) using the CRISPR/Cas9 system induces complete knockout individuals in the F0 generation. PloS one 9, e108622, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0108622 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Lamason, R. L. et al. SLC24A5, a putative cation exchanger, affects pigmentation in zebrafish and humans. Science (New York, N.Y.) 310, 1782–1786, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116238 (2005).

  28. 28.

    Wargelius, A. et al. Dnd knockout ablates germ cells and demonstrates germ cell independent sex differentiation in Atlantic salmon. Scientific reports 6, 21284, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21284 (2016).

  29. 29.

    Cingolani, P. et al. A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff: SNPs in the genome of Drosophila melanogaster strain w1118; iso-2; iso-3. Fly 6, 80–92, https://doi.org/10.4161/fly.19695 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Logan, S. et al. Deciphering mutant ELOVL4 activity in autosomal-dominant Stargardt macular dystrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110, 5446–5451, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1217251110 (2013).

  31. 31.

    Zhang, K. et al. A 5-bp deletion in ELOVL4 is associated with two related forms of autosomal dominant macular dystrophy. Nature genetics 27, 89–93, https://doi.org/10.1038/83817 (2001).

  32. 32.

    Leonard, A. E. et al. Identification and expression of mammalian long-chain PUFA elongation enzymes. Lipids 37, 733–740 (2002).

  33. 33.

    Hastings, N. et al. A vertebrate fatty acid desaturase with Delta 5 and Delta 6 activities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 14304–14309, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.251516598 (2001).

  34. 34.

    Tocher, D. R. et al. Highly unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in marine fish: cloning, functional characterization, and nutritional regulation of fatty acyl delta 6 desaturase of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.). Lipids 41, 1003–1016 (2006).

  35. 35.

    Zheng, X. Z. et al. Highly unsaturated fatty acid synthesis in vertebrates: new insights with the cloning and characterization of a Delta 6 desaturase of Atlantic salmon. Lipids 40, 13–24 (2005).

  36. 36.

    Zheng, X. et al. Physiological roles of fatty acyl desaturase and elongase in marine fish: Characterisation of cDNAs of fatty acyl Δ6 desaturase and Elovl5 elongase of cobia (Rachycentron canadum). Aquaculture 290, 122–131 (2009).

  37. 37.

    Tocher, D. R., Bell, J. G., Dick, J. R. & Crampton, V. O. Effects of dietary vegetable oil on Atlantic salmon hepatocyte fatty acid desaturation and liver fatty acid compositions. Lipids 38, 723–732 (2003).

  38. 38.

    Brenna, J. T. & Diau, G. Y. The influence of dietary docosahexaenoic acid and arachidonic acid on central nervous system polyunsaturated fatty acid composition. Prostaglandins, leukotrienes, and essential fatty acids 77, 247–250, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plefa.2007.10.016 (2007).

  39. 39.

    Crawford, M. A., Casperd, N. M. & Sinclair, A. J. The long chain metabolites of linoleic avid linolenic acids in liver and brain in herbivores and carnivores. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. B, Comparative biochemistry 54, 395–401 (1976).

  40. 40.

    DeMar, J. C. Jr. et al. Brain elongation of linoleic acid is a negligible source of the arachidonate in brain phospholipids of adult rats. Biochim Biophys Acta 1761, 1050–1059, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbalip.2006.06.006 (2006).

  41. 41.

    Demar, J. C. Jr., Ma, K., Chang, L., Bell, J. M. & Rapoport, S. I. Alpha-Linolenic acid does not contribute appreciably to docosahexaenoic acid within brain phospholipids of adult rats fed a diet enriched in docosahexaenoic acid. Journal of neurochemistry 94, 1063–1076, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.2005.03258.x (2005).

  42. 42.

    Tocher, D. R. & Sargent, J. R. Incorporation into phospholipid classes and metabolism via desaturation and elongation of various 14C-labelled (n-3) and (n-6) polyunsaturated fatty acids in trout astrocytes in primary culture. J Neurochem 54, 2118–2124 (1990).

  43. 43.

    Horton, J. D. et al. Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 12027–12032, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1534923100 (2003).

  44. 44.

    Leaver, M. J. et al. Functional genomics reveals increases in cholesterol biosynthetic genes and highly unsaturated fatty acid biosynthesis after dietary substitution of fish oil with vegetable oils in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). BMC Genomics 9, 299 (2008).

  45. 45.

    Taggart, J. B. et al. A description of the origins, design and performance of the TRAITS-SGP Atlantic salmon Salmo salar L. cDNA microarray. J Fish Biol 72, 2071–2094, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2008.01876.x (2008).

  46. 46.

    Zheng, X., Leaver, M. J. & Tocher, D. R. Long-chain polyunsaturated fatty acid synthesis in fish: Comparative analysis of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.) and Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua L.) Delta6 fatty acyl desaturase gene promoters. Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part B, Biochemistry & molecular biology 154, 255–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpb.2009.06.010 (2009).

  47. 47.

    Jao, L. E., Wente, S. R. & Chen, W. Efficient multiplex biallelic zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR nuclease system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 13904–13909 (2013).

  48. 48.

    Yoshizaki, G., Takeuchi, Y., Sakatani, S. & Takeuchi, T. Germ cell-specific expression of green fluorescent protein in transgenic rainbow trout under control of the rainbow trout vasa-like gene promoter. The International journal of developmental biology 44, 323–326 (2000).

  49. 49.

    Yoshizaki, G., Oshiro, T. & Takashima, F. Introduction of Carp & alpha;-Globin Gene into Rainbow Trout. Nippon Suisan Gakkaishi 57, 819–824, https://doi.org/10.2331/suisan.57.819 (1991).

  50. 50.

    Folch, J. & Stanley, L. M. GHS A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 226, 497–509 (1957).

  51. 51.

    Olsen, R. E., Henderson, R. J. The rapid analysis of neutral and polar marine lipids using double-development HPTLC and scanning densitometry. Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 2, 189–197 (189).

  52. 52.

    Christie, W. W. Lipid Analysis. 3rd edn, (2003).

  53. 53.

    Tocher, D. R. et al. Effects of diets containing linseed oil on fatty acid desaturation and oxidation in hepatocytes and intestinal enterocytes in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar). Fish Physiol Biochem 26, 157–170 (2002).

  54. 54.

    Olsvik, P. A., Lie, K. K., Jordal, A.-E. O., Hordvik, L. & Nilsen, T. O. A. I. Evaluation of potential reference genes in real-time RT-PCR studies of Atlantic salmon. BioMed Central 6 (2005).

  55. 55.

    Almendros, C., Mojica, F. J., Diez-Villasenor, C., Guzman, N. M. & Garcia-Martinez, J. CRISPR-Cas functional module exchange in Escherichia coli. MBio 5, e00767–00713, https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00767-13e00767-13 (2013).

  56. 56.

    Hellemans, J., Mortier, G., De Paepe, A., Speleman, F. & Vandesompele, J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol 8(2) (2007).

  57. 57.

    Dobin, A. et al. STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 29, 15–21, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635 (2013).

  58. 58.

    Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 30, 923–930, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt656 (2014).

  59. 59.

    Kim, J. M., Kim, D., Kim, S. & Kim, J. S. Genotyping with CRISPR-Cas-derived RNA-guided endonucleases. Nat Commun 5, 3157, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4157ncomms4157 (2014).

  60. 60.

    Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. EdgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 139–140, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 (2010).

  61. 61.

    Wu, D. et al. ROAST: rotation gene set tests for complex microarray experiments. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 2176–2182, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq401 (2010).

  62. 62.

    Grant, C. E., Bailey, T. L. & Noble, W. S. FIMO: scanning for occurrences of a given motif. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 27, 1017–1018, https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr064 (2011).

  63. 63.

    Braunschweig, U. et al. Widespread intron retention in mammals functionally tunes transcriptomes. Genome research 24, 1774–1786, https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.177790.114 (2014).

  64. 64.

    Erdmann, S., Le Moine Bauer, S. & Garrett, R. A. Inter-viral conflicts that exploit host CRISPR immune systems of Sulfolobus. Mol Microbiol 91, 900–917, https://doi.org/10.1111/mmi.12503 (2014).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the NTNU enabling technologies initiative and NRC project: “Towards the Digital Salmon: From a reactive to a pre-emptive research strategy in aquaculture (DigiSal)” 248792/O30. We would like to thank Ivar Helge Matre and Lise Dyrhovden for their immense support on rearing embryos and juvenile fish, and Karen Anita Kvestad for providing reagents and help with tissue sampling. Gratitude is also due to Kai Ove Skaftnesmo and Fernando Ayllon for providing technical support during microinjection. Furthermore, we would like to thank Teshome Mulugeta for his help in accessing the motif information through motifDB.

Author information

A.K.D., R.E.O., A.W., R.B.E. and P.W. conceived and planned the experiments. P.W. designed CRISPR/Cas9 constructs. A.K.D. cloned and synthesized Cas9 mRNA and gRNAs and injected fertilized embryos with CRISPR/Cas9. R.E.O. designed low PUFA experimental diet. A.K.D. sampled tissues, extracted genomic DNA and screened mutant fish and was checked by P.W. A.K.D. isolated total RNA and performed RT-qPCR analysis. K.L., N.Z. and R.E.O. performed lipid analytical works. K.L. and R.E.O. carried out hepatocyte desaturation/elongation assays. Y.J., F.G. made libraries and A.K.D assisted. Y.J. and F.G. analysed RNAseq data. F.G. analysed CRISPR-indels and performed exon retention test. J.O.V. provided all facilities or resources for library preparations and RNAseq analysis. A.K.D. drafted the manuscript which  was proof-read by P.W., A.W., R.E.O., R.B.E., Y.J., J.O.V., F.G. and K.L. Additionally, Y.J. and F.G. worked together with A.K.D. to finishing the final draft of the manuscript. All authors have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Correspondence to Anna Wargelius or Per Winge.

Supplementary information

  1. Supplemental Figures and Tables

  2. Supplementary table 4

  3. Supplementary table 8

Rights and permissions

Creative Commons BY

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.