Correction to: Scientific Reports https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13340-0, published online 13 October 2017
This Article contains errors.
In Figure 1 the two fitted curves should be shown as dashed lines. The correct Figure 1 appears below.
Number of flowering individuals, fruit set (proportion of flowers forming a fruit), and pre-dispersal seed herbivory (proportion of damaged flowers and fruits) with date in one P. alpicola population at Lulang, China in 2016. -■- Number of individuals, ▲ Pre-dispersal seed herbivory ○ Fruit set, ---- Fitted curve.
In addition, in the Results section, under the subheading ‘Evidence for pollinator mediated natural selection’,
“Pollinators selected for more flowers and shorter scape plants (Δβ poll = −0.177, P < 0.05), accounting for all of the observed net selection (β ij = −0.088) (Table 3).”
should read:
“Pollinators selected for more flowers and shorter scape plants (Δγpoll = −0.177, P < 0.05), accounting for all of the observed net selection (γij = −0.088) (Table 3).”
Furthermore, the title of Table 3,
“Correlational selection gradients (μ ± SE) among open-pollinated and hand-pollinated plants and pollinator-mediated selection gradients, with proportion of damaged flowers and fruits as covariate, in one P. alpicola population at Lulang, China in 2016.”
should read:
“Correlational selection gradients (γij ± SE) among open-pollinated and hand-pollinated plants and pollinator-mediated selection gradients, with proportion of damaged flowers and fruits as covariate, in one P. alpicola population at Lulang, China in 2016.”
The legend of Table 3,
“Pollinator-mediated selection Δμ poll = γ OP − γ HP and P-values associated with differences in selection gradients between pollination treatments (the trait × pollination treatment interaction) in ANCOVA. Significant selection gradient estimates and their P-values are indicated in bold (P < 0.05).”
should read:
“Pollinator-mediated selection Δγpoll = γ OP − γ HP and P-values associated with differences in selection gradients between pollination treatments (the trait × pollination treatment interaction) in ANCOVA. Significant selection gradient estimates and their P-values are indicated in bold (P < 0.05).”
Finally, in Table 3, in the ‘Pollinator-mediated’ column,
“Δμ poll”
should read:
“Δγpoll”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Chen, L., Zhang, B. & Li, Q. Author Correction: Pollinator-mediated selection on flowering phenology and floral display in a distylous herb Primula alpicola. Sci Rep 9, 7054 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43381-6
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43381-6
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.
