Abstract
Nanoparticles are widely used in commodities, and pregnant women are inevitably exposed to these particles. The placenta protects the growing fetus from foreign or toxic materials, and provides energy and oxygen. Here we report that autophagy, a cellular mechanism to maintain homeostasis, engulfs platinum nanoparticles (nPt) to reduce their cytotoxicity in trophoblasts. Autophagy was activated by nPt in extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cell lines, and EVT functions, such as invasion and vascular remodeling, and proliferation were inhibited by nPt. These inhibitory effects by nPt were augmented in autophagy-deficient cells. Regarding the dynamic state of nPt, analysis using ICP-MS demonstrated a higher accumulation of nPt in the autophagosome-rich than the cytoplasmic fraction in autophagy-normal cells. Meanwhile, there were more nPt in the nuclei of autophagy-deficient cells, resulting in greater DNA damage at a lower concentration of nPt. Thus, we found a new protective mechanism against the cytotoxicity of nPt in human trophoblasts.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Pregnant women and developing fetuses are very susceptible to foreign toxins, including air pollutants, microbes, and nanoparticles1,2,3. Smaller nanoparticles made of silica, titanium dioxide, cobalt and chromium, gold, or silver cross the fetal-maternal barrier more readily than larger particles4,5,6,7. Recently, exposure to nanoparticles in the gestational period is becoming a public concern because it may cause developmental disorders in the offspring. However, nanoparticles are currently used in a variety of consumer products such as foods, cosmetics, electronics, and drug delivery systems8,9,10,11,12. Among the metallic nanoparticles, platinum nanoparticles as well as silver nanoparticles have potentially detrimental effects on cells, organs, and bacteria13,14,15,16,17. However, cellular responses evoked by nanoparticles differ according to the properties or modifications of each nanoparticle.
The placenta functions in nutrient and oxygen exchange between the mother and fetus, as well as in protection of the fetus from harmful materials18. Extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cells invade the myometrium or maternal spiral arteries under low oxygen conditions, and replace the endothelial cells to supply oxygen and nutrition to the intervillous space19. Placental insufficiency or poor placentation, which is related to insufficient invasion of EVT cells into the maternal side19, causes severe pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, fetal growth restriction, or placental abruption20,21. Among these small potentially hazardous particles, differently sized and typed nanoparticles that cross the placenta can reach the fetal brain, resulting in neurodevelopmental abnormalities5,7,22. In particular, silica nanoparticles (nSP) accumulate in the liver and placenta in pregnant mice, and nSP with a diameter of 70 nm are specifically trapped in the placenta, but not the liver7. Administration of 70-nm nSP also induced the inflammasome components, resulting in placental inflammation, which is known to cause pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia and preterm labor19,23. In addition, not only intravenously, but also orally administered silver nanoparticles, which are eluted in breast milk during lactation, were distributed in the brain, liver, and lungs in the fetus24. To reduce the risks of nanoparticles for mothers and fetuses, it is important to evaluate the mechanism by which these nanoparticles confer cytotoxicity to the placenta.
Autophagy is a cellular mechanism for maintaining homeostasis by degrading damaged organelles or countervailing a variety of detrimental agents, including intrusion of foreign micro-organisms, i.e., xenophagy25. There is increasing evidence regarding the correlation between autophagy and nanoparticles; there are some reports of nanoparticle-activated autophagy26,27,28, whereas others reported inhibition of autophagy4,29,30. It is unknown, however, how designed nanoparticles interact with the autophagy pathway in detail31. From the viewpoint of autophagic functions for nanoparticles, autophagy protects cells from internalized nanoparticles, which exert toxicity through oxidative stress32, mitochondrial damage33, lysosomal dysfunction34, or direct inhibition of the AKT-TSC-mTOR pathway35. In particular, the biodegradability and surface modification of nanoparticles affected the lysosomal stability in a hepatocellular cell line, resulting in several cellular process being altered via mTOR regulation36. On the other hand, silver nanoparticles have negative effects on autophagy by inhibiting autophagosome-lysosome fusion29.
We report that platinum nanoparticles (nPt), which are one nanometer in size, activated autophagy in two extravillous trophoblast (EVT) cell lines. nPt also impaired the functions, such as invasion and vascular remodeling, and proliferation of EVT cell lines, and this impairment was reduced in autophagy-deficient cells. After separating autophagosome-rich and cytoplasmic fractions, nPt were accumulated in the autophagosome-rich fraction, resulting in the reduction of cytotoxicity by nPt. Meanwhile, nPt, which were not trapped by autophagosomes, was highly accumulated in nuclei of autophagy-deficient cells, showing more susceptible to DNA damage by nPt. Thus, autophagy protected against the cytotoxicity of nPt in the EVT cell lines.
Results
Autophagy activation by nPt in two EVT cell lines
We first evaluated the effects of nPt on autophagy in EVT cells. nPt promoted the conversion of MAP1LC3B-I to MAP1LC3B-II, and decreased SQSTM1/p62 levels, a substrate of the autophagosome, in HchEpC1b cells, an EVT cell line (Fig. 1a). The MAP1LC3B-II/ACTB levels were significantly higher in the cells cultured with nPt than in the control in the presence or absence of E64d and pepstatin A (E64 + P), which block autophagy flux by inhibiting lysosomal proteases37 (Fig. 1a,b), or bafilomycin A1, a lysosomal inhibitor (Supplemental Fig. 1a). Consistent with this result, the SQSTM1 level was significantly decreased by nPt (Fig. 1c). Similar results were obtained in HTR8/SV40neo cells, another EVT cell line (Supplemental Fig. 1b–d). Immunocytochemical analysis of MAP1LC3B also confirmed an increase of dots representing autophagosome formation in the cells subjected to nPt (Fig. 1d). The number of MAP1LC3B dots was significantly higher in the cells with nPt than in the controls regardless of the presence of E64 + P (Fig. 1e). In the presence of nPt, lysosomal inhibition by E64 + P significantly increased the number of MAP1LC3B dots, indicating activation of autophagy flux by nPt. In addition, nPt inhibited cellular proliferation in a dose-dependent manner in HchEpC1b cells (Fig. 1f). Cellular proliferation was also inhibited by nPt in HTR8/SV40neo cells, BeWo cells, a choriocarcinoma cell line, and human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), which were used in the double cell tube formation assay (Supplemental Fig. 2a–c). Taken together, nPt, which exhibit cellular cytotoxicity, activated autophagy in the trophoblast cell lines.
Autophagy protects against functional impairment by nPt in trophoblast cells
To further clarify the involvement of autophagy, a cellular proliferation assay was performed in the presence of bafilomycin A1, which inhibits autophagy by blocking the fusion of lysosomes with autophagosomes. Administration of 25 μg/ml of nPt inhibited the cellular proliferation of HchEpC1b cells in the presence of bafilomycin A1 but not in the presence of DMSO (Fig. 2a). The inhibition of cellular proliferation by nPt was augmented by bafilomycin A1 in a concentration-dependent manner, as compared with that without nPt (Supplemental Fig. 3a). We next evaluated the inhibitory effects of nPt in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells, whose autophagy flux was blocked by the stable expression of mutant ATG4B38 (Supplemental Fig. 3b). The inhibitory effects of nPt on proliferation were higher in autophagy-deficient HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than in autophagy-normal HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 2b). We further evaluated the effects of nPt on EVT functions, such as invasion and vascular remodeling, which are required for normal placentation. As expected, invasion of HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells with nPt was attenuated in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2c, white bars), but the inhibitory effects by nPt were more marked in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 2c, black bars). Of note, invasion was impaired at 3.125 or 6.25 μg/ml of nPt, which had minimal inhibitory effects on cellular proliferation (Fig. 2b). An in vitro tube formation assay using two cell lines, HTR8/SV40neo cells and HUVECs, was performed to evaluate vascular remodeling by EVT cells39. We fixed the concentration of nPt at 6.25 μg/ml, which did not inhibit cellular proliferation in HTR8/SV40neo cells or HUVECs (Supplemental Fig. 2a,c). The tube-like structures, which were constructed together with these two cell lines, were impaired by 6.25 μg/ml of nPt (Fig. 2d). When using HchEpC1b cells instead of HTR8/SV40neo cells, the tube-like structure was disrupted by 3.125 μg/ml of nPt (Supplemental Fig. 3c). Poor tubulation in the assay with nPt was confirmed by evaluating the total tube area, number of segments, total tube length, and the number of total branch points (Supplemental Fig. 3d). These results suggested that basal autophagy is involved in protecting the cells from cytotoxicity as well as in sustaining functions in EVT cells.
Accumulation of nPt in the autophagy-deficient trophoblast cells
To examine the dynamic state of nPt in trophoblast cells, intracellular nPt concentrations were examined in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells and HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells. As shown in Fig. 3a, uptake of nPt was examined initially (exp. 1), and retention of nPt was then measured after washing out the nPt in media (exp. 2). The intracellular nPt concentrations were significantly higher in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells, and the concentrations were dose-dependently increased in both cell lines (Fig. 3b). The accumulation of nPt was also observed in ATG5 knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts (Supplemental Fig. 4a). The time-dependency was also confirmed in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells but not in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 3c), suggesting that autophagy deficiency led to the nPt accumulation in trophoblast cells. Next, to clarify the intake mechanism for nPt into the trophoblast cell lines, endocytosis was blocked by several inhibitors40; chlorpromazine (CPZ) for clathrin, methyl-β-cyclodextrin (MβCD) for caveolae, or amiloride (ALR) for micropinocytosis. These inhibitors, however, did not inhibit the intake of nPt into HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells or -mStrawberry cells (Supplemental Fig. 4b), and the intake of nPt was instead increased in the presence of CPZ or MβCD in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells. Additionally, these inhibitors, which did not inhibit cell proliferation without nPt, did not rescue the reduced cell number by nPt in either cell line (Supplemental Fig. 4c,d). To further examine the retention of nPt, the intracellular nPt concentration was also examined following exclusion of nPt from the media (Fig. 3a, exp. 2). As a result, the intracellular nPt concentration was higher in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells even at 48 h after washing (Fig. 3d). The amount of nPt retained in the cells decreased in a time-dependent manner in both cell lines, but rates were significantly higher in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells until 48 h (37.5 ± 8.4% vs 72.2 ± 11.4% at 12 h, 10.3 ± 0.6% vs 39.0 ± 2.9% at 24 h, 5.5 ± 0.7% vs 29.1 ± 4.9% at 48 h, Supplemental Fig. 4e). Taken together, autophagy deficiency may be one cause of the accumulation of nPt, suggesting failure of nPt evacuation in the autophagy-deficient trophoblast cells.
nPt in the autophagosome
To further investigate the correlation between nPt and autophagy in detail, cell lysates were separated into the MAP1LC3B-I fraction, which mainly contains the cytoplasmic fraction, referred to as fraction A, or the MAP1LC3B-II fraction, which is abundant in autophagosomes and referred to as fraction B. MAP1LC3B-II proteins are only present in autophagosomes. As shown in Fig. 4a, the main MAP1LC3B-II proteins were localized in fraction B, suggesting that fraction B is an autophagosome-rich fraction. The nPt concentration in the autophagosome-rich fraction B was significantly higher than that in fraction A in the HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells, but no significant difference was noted between fraction A and B in the autophagy-deficient HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells (Fig. 4b). These results speculated that nPt were trapped by autophagosomes in the autophagy-normal trophoblast cells.
DNA damage by nPt in autophagy-deficient cells
Platinum-containing medications, such as in chemotherapeutic agents, are known to induce DNA damage by cross-linking DNA. We, therefore, examined the effects of uncaptured nPt on DNA damage in the autophagy-deficient HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells. DNA damage, which was estimated by phosphorylated γH2AX (p-γH2AX) staining, induced by 12.5 μg/ml of nPt was more marked in the HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than that in the HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 5a). When administered 50 μg/ml of nPt, the intensity of p-γH2AX staining was strong in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells; however, shrunken nuclei and p-γH2AX-positive cells were observed more in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells (Fig. 5a). Indeed, the intensity of p-γH2AX staining was the highest with 12.5 μg/ml of nPt in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells and with 50 μg/ml of nPt in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 5b). Similar results were obtained for the amount of p-γH2AX-positive cells (Supplemental Fig. 5a). On the other hand, the amount of propidium iodide-positive cells, which indicates dead cells, was the highest with 50 μg/ml of nPt in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells (Fig. 5c). To further confirm the DNA damage by nPt, immunoblotting of p-γH2AX and the comet assay were performed. p-γH2AX expression was observed in the HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells but not in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells with 12.5 μg/ml of nPt (Fig. 5d). The comet tail length was also significantly longer in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells when treated with 12.5 μg/ml of nPt (Supplemental Fig. 5b). Lastly, the nPt concentration was compared between the nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions in the cells with 12.5 μg/ml of nPt. The amount of nPt in the nuclear fraction was significantly higher in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells than in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells (Fig. 5e). The proportion of nPt in the nuclear fraction to the total was 27.3% in HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A cells and 14.0% in HchEpC1b-mStrawberry cells. These results demonstrated that more nPt accumulated in autophagy-deficient cells, making them more vulnerable to DNA damage induced by nPt without autophagy.
Discussion
We found that nPt activated autophagy flux, which was confirmed by administering lysosomal inhibitors in two EVT cell lines. In addition, nPt inhibited EVT functions and cellular proliferation. Lower concentrations of nPt affected EVT functions more than proliferation, whereas higher concentrations of nPt induced cell death, resulting in the inhibition of proliferation. Moreover, autophagy-deficient cells were more susceptible to the inhibitory effects of nPt than autophagy-normal cells. We observed that nPt accumulated more in the autophagosome-rich fractions in the autophagy-normal EVT cell line. Lastly, more nPt accumulated in the nuclei of autophagy-deficient cells, resulting in greater DNA damage induced by nPt at a lower concentration. Our hypothesis is illustrated in Fig. 6. When autophagy-normal cells are exposed to nPt, excessive nPt, some of which are initially captured by autophagosomes, may accumulate in nuclei, resulting in DNA damage-induced cell death. However, nPt easily accumulate in nuclei in autophagy-deficient cells because of the lack of autophagosomes, which enables nPt to enter the nuclei of autophagy-deficient cells. Thus, segmentation of nPt by autophagosomes reduces the cytotoxicity of nPt (as shown in Figs 2b and 4b) because nPt exhibited greater cytotoxicity in the autophagy-deficient cell line in which the ATG4BC74A mutant blocks the closure of autophagosomes38. On the other hand, CPZ, which inhibits clathrin, increased the intracellular nPt concentrations in both autophagy-normal and –deficient cells (Supplemental Fig. 4b). This suggests that nPt intake depends on other endocytic mechanisms in trophoblasts. Further studies are needed to clarify this.
In pregnant mice administered silica nanoparticles, which were found distributed in the liver and placenta, the proportion of spongiotrophoblast layer area to the total placental area was approximately 50% smaller than that in the control7. In humans, placental growth is partially dependent on EVT functions of invasion and vascular remodeling during early pregnancy41. As EVT functions are supported by autophagy41,42, impairment of autophagy was reported to be involved in the inhibition of placental growth and pregnancy complications such as gestational hypertension or premature delivery41,43,44. Consistent with this, our study demonstrated that autophagy protected against nPt-mediated trophoblast injury. Thus, nPt may exacerbate placenta-mediated pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia or FGR, especially in autophagy-impaired placentas. Indeed, placenta-specific autophagy-deficient mice exhibited poor placentation with impairment of invasion and vascular remodeling, resulting in gestational hypertension44. Furthermore, some nanoparticles are related to placental inflammation via the inflammasome16,45, which worsens preeclampsia. Although there are structural differences between human and mouse placentas, smaller nanoparticles that escape from autophagosomes can elicit cell death in trophoblast cells, resulting in placental inflammation in humans. Thus, measurement of nanoparticle concentrations in the placenta may be a future focus for nano-safety research.
The inhibition of autophagy by nPt was reported in a human lymphoma cell line46, but the precise mechanism by which pretreated nPt inhibited autophagy was not described. Autophagic responses vary with different sizes or physicochemical properties of nanoparticles47, and the degree of autophagic activity or responses induced by even the same stimulus are also different in each organ48. Thus, the autophagic response to nPt may differ in each cell line. This study, however, revealed that autophagy was activated by nPt in two EVT cell lines. For the functional assays of EVT cells, a lower concentration of nPt (e.g. 6.25 μg/ml), which had little effect on proliferation, inhibited invasion and disrupted the tube formation of EVT cells. This means that the functions of EVT cells rather than cellular proliferation are more sensitive to nPt cytotoxicity. The causes are not clear, but accumulation of nPt in nuclei may have led to this result. From a clinical point of view, a lower concentration of nPt may affect placentation in early pregnancy. Therefore, the use of nPt for pregnant women is of concern. Silica nanoparticles were reported to impair endothelial function via autophagy activation in HUVECs26, and similar results were obtained for co-cultured HTR8/SV40neo cells and HUVECs subjected to nPt. Thus, nPt may be also lead to poor placentation through dysfunction in both EVT and endothelial cells.
Regarding the nPt-induced autophagy, xenophagy, which is selective autophagy for eliminating pathogens, may recognize nPt as small pathogens49. The intracellular dynamics of nPt have not been elucidated because we cannot detect these nanoparticles in cells even by electron microscopy. Therefore, we estimated the intracellular distribution of nPt by dividing the autophagosome-rich, fraction B, and non-rich fractions, fraction A. We speculated that more nPt were located in autophagosomes, but it is possible that nPt are located in other types of vesicles such as endocytic vesicles. To clarify the significance of autophagy for nPt, we compared the dynamic state of nPt between the autophagy-normal and –deficient cells. The amount of nPt was time-dependently increased in the autophagy-deficient cells but not in the autophagy-normal cells (Fig. 3c). On the other hand, the proportion of retained nPt was significantly lower in the autophagy-normal cells than in the autophagy-deficient cells (Supplemental Fig. 4e). Additionally, nPt may be trapped by autophagosomes. Based on these results, we hypothesized that the selected autophagy pathway was secretion rather than degradation because nPt were unable to be degraded by autophagic machinery. Autophagic vesicles were reported to release carbon nanotubes into the extracellular space to reduce the cytotoxicity in HUVECs, for unconventional secretion of IL-1β, and to release the Epstein Barr virus50,51,52. To confirm this possibility, we measured the concentrations of nPt released into the media. They were much lower than those of intracellular nPt (data not shown) Furthermore, we were unable to distinguish nPt in the media from those actively released by autophagy in live cells or passively leaked from dead cells. Therefore, autophagy may function in the extracellular release of nPt, but further examinations, such as microscopic observation of the intracellular localization of nPt, are required to confirm our hypothesis.
This study elucidated the physiological importance of nPt in trophoblast cells during early placentation. As some nanoparticles can accumulate in the placenta or liver in pregnant mothers, even low concentrations of nPt must be monitored for pregnant women. Use of nPt may inhibit placental growth or exacerbate placenta-mediated pregnancy complications. In vivo studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis. On the other hand, this study also suggested that nPt are metabolized by autophagy machinery (Fig. 6). Biocompatible surface coating of nanoceria is known to activate autophagy clearance mediated by transcriptional factor EB28. Although surface modifications, which dominate the chemical reaction, of nPt can reduce the negative effects on trophoblast cells, smaller sized nanoparticles should be avoided for pregnant women.
Methods
Reagents
Platinum nanoparticles (nPt) with a nominal mean diameter of less than 1 nm, which was confirmed with a Zetasizer Nano-ZS (Nano platinum water based solution, Malvern Instruments, Malvern, UK), were from Polytech & Net GmbH (Schwalbach, Germany). The particles were not physically modified, and stocked in aqueous solution at 5 mg/ml (Supplemental Fig. 6). The particles were sonicated for 5 min and vortexed for 1 min prior to use. The following mouse monoclonal antibodies (Ab) were used: anti- α-tubulin (T8203, Sigma-Aldrich, MA, USA), anti-p62/SQSTM1 (M162-3, MBL, Nagoya, Japan), anti-phospho Histone 2AX (Ser139) (05–636, Merck Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA), anti-Histone 3 (9715, Cell Signaling Technology (CST), MA, USA), and normal mouse IgG (sc-2025, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA). The rabbit polyclonal Ab anti-MAP1LC3B (PM036, MBL) and normal rabbit IgG (sc-2027, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used. The following secondary Ab were used: anti-mouse IgG-HRP conjugate (7076, CST), anti-rabbit IgG-HRP conjugate (7074, CST), Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (A-21206, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (A-21202, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Chemical inhibitors used were: bafilomycin A1 (11038, Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, USA), a V-ATPase inhibitor, and, E64d (4321-v, Peptide institute Inc., Osaka, Japan) and pepstatin A (4397, Peptide institute Inc.), protease inhibitors, chlorpromazine (CPZ, C2481, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), an inhibitor of clathrin, methyl-beta-cyclodextrin (MβCD, C0777, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd.) an inhibitor of caveolae, or amiloride (ALR, A259, Tokyo Chemical Industry Co. Ltd), an inhibitor of macropinocytosis.
Cell culture and chemical treatments
Two EVT cell lines, HTR8/SV40neo and HchEpC1b, and ATG5 knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts were used in this study. HTR8/SV40neo cells were immortalized by introducing the simian virus 40 large T antigen53, and HchEpC1b cells were immortalized by introducing the type 16 human papillomaviruses E6 and E7 combined with human telomerase reverse transcriptase54. Furthermore, autophagy-deficient cell lines, HTR8-ATG4BC74A and HchEpC1b-ATG4BC74A, and control cell lines, HTR8-mStrawberry and HchEpC1b-mStrawberry, which we previously established, were also used41. These cells were cultured in RPMI1640 medium (11875, GIBCO, MA, USA) supplemented with 10% FBS, 100 U/ml of penicillin, and 100 µg/ml of streptomycin (15140, GIBCO) at 37 °C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. For cell cultures with nanoparticles, cells were grown in media for 24 h prior to treatment. Then, the culture medium was exchanged for fresh medium with each nanoparticle type, and cells were cultured in the media for 12 to 48 h. The particles were sonicated for 5 min just prior to adding them to the media. For cultures with chemical inhibitors, the cells were treated with protease inhibitors, E64d (10 ng/ml) and pepstatin A (10 ng/ml) for 2 h to inhibit autophagy flux on Western blotting. In addition, bafilomycin A1 (range from 0 to 200 nM), an inhibitor of V-ATPase, was also used for 24 h to inhibit autophagy flux.
Western blotting
Western blotting was carried out as described previously55. In brief, cells were washed with cold PBS 3 times to completely remove nanoparticles, and then harvested and lysed in RIPA buffer (9806, CST) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340, Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% phosphatase inhibitor (P5726, Sigma-Aldrich). The lysates were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C. The protein concentration was measured using a Bradford protein assay kit (T9310A, Takara, Shiga, Japan). Protein samples were then mixed with a 2 × Laemmli sample buffer (161–0737, Bio-Rad, CA, USA) and heated at 95 °C for 5 min. Equal amounts of protein were then applied to 5–20% SuperSep® Ace precast gels (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan) and transferred to Immun-Blot PVDF membranes (1620174, Bio-rad). The membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk buffer for 1 h at room temperature, and then incubated overnight at 4 °C with the following ab: anti-ACTB (1:5000), anti-MAP1LC3B (1:1000), and anti-p62/SQSTM1 (1:2000). Lastly, they were incubated for 1 h with HRP-conjugated anti-mouse or anti-rabbit ab and visualized with an enhanced chemiluminescence detection system (32106, PIERCE, Rockford, IL, USA).
Separation of two fractions, MAP1LC3B-I-rich and MAP1LC3B-II-rich fractions, or nuclear and cytoplasmic
Cells were washed with cold PBS 3 times to completely remove nanoparticles, and then harvested and lysed in 10 mM Tris-HCl (312-90061, Nippon Gene, Tokyo, Japan) with protease inhibitor cocktail and 1% phosphatase inhibitor. The supernatant was obtained from the lysates, which were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and stocked as fraction A, the MAP1LC3B-I-rich fraction. The pellet at the bottom was washed with cold PBS 3 times, and PBS was removed. The pellet was further lysed in RIPA buffer containing protease inhibitor cocktail, 1% phosphatase inhibitor, and 0.5% Sodium dodecyl sulfate (L3771, Sigma-Aldrich). The lysates were centrifuged at 14000 rpm for 30 min at 4 °C, and the supernatants were stocked as fraction B, the MAP1LC3B-II-rich fraction. The remaining pellet was discarded. To separate the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, the NE-PER Nuclear and Cytoplasmic fraction kit was used following the manufacturer’s instructions (78833, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The separated fractions were confirmed by Western blotting of ACTB or H3F3B (Supplemental Fig. 6b).
Immunocytochemistry
Immunocytochemistry was carried out as described previously56. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS for 15 min, permeabilized, and blocked with PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin (A2153, Sigma-Aldrich) with 0.1% Triton X-100 (T9284, Sigma-Aldrich). Subsequently, cells were labeled with the primary ab, anti-MAP1LC3B (1/500) or anti-pH2AX (1/250). For negative controls, the primary ab was replaced with normal rabbit IgG or normal mouse IgG. After washing out the primary ab, cells were secondarily stained with Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-rabbit IgG (1/1000) or Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti-mouse IgG (1/1000), followed with Hoechst33342 nuclear staining for 10 min. Cells were observed using a confocal microscope (LSM700, Carl Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany).
Invasion assay
The conventional invasion assay was performed using a BD BioCoat Growth Factor Reduced Matrigel Invasion Chamber (354483, BD Biosciences, NJ, USA) as described previously42. In brief, cells, which were plated on the upper insert at 1 × 105/well with or without nanoparticles, were incubated for 24 h. The invaded cells on the under surface of the membrane were fixed after removing the cells on the upper surface of the membrane in each insert. The number of invaded cells, which were stained with 0.05% Toluidine Blue Solution (206-14555, Wako), was manually counted by microscopy.
Double cell tube formation assays
This assay was reported previously39. In brief, for the double cell tube formation assay, EVT cells (1 × 105/ml), which were labeled with cell tracker red CMTMR (5-(and-6)-(((4-chloromethyl)benzoyl)amino) tetramethylrhodamine, C-2927, Molecular Probes), and HUVECs (1 × 105/ml), which were labeled with cell tracker green CMFDA (5-chloromethylfluorescein diacetate, C-2925, Molecular Probes, MA, USA), were mixed and cultured on plates covered with thick Matrigel (356234, BD) in the presence or absence of nanoparticles at 37 °C for 24 h. The number of tube-like structures per image, and their total area, number of segments, total length, and number of branching points (more than 2) were quantified and averaged for five independent visual fields using Image J (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/).
Cell proliferation assay
Two methods, manual counting or the cell proliferation reagent WST-1 (Roche, 5015944), were used for estimating cell proliferation. In brief, WST-1 reagent was added to the media with nanoparticles in which cells were cultured. Two hours later, the absorbance was measured using a microplate reader (1681135JA, iMark microplate reader, Bio-rad) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The reference wavelength was 650 nm.
Dead cell detection
The number of cells cultured with nanoparticles that were stained or unstained with 0. 4% Trypan Blue Solution (15250061, Thermo Fisher) were counted. Then, the proportion of stained cells among all cells was calculated as dead cells. Fixed cells were also stained with propidium iodide solution (P4864, 1 mg/ml Sigma-Aldrich), which was used at 2 μg/ml diluted in a staining buffer (100 mM Tris, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1% Nonidet P-40). The positive cells were counted as dead cells.
Quantitative analysis of GFP-LC3 puncta
This assay was previously reported41. For the quantitative analysis of MAP1LC3B, the cells were stained with anti-MAP1LC3B. The cells were pretreated with lysosomal protease inhibitors, E64d (10 ng/ml) and pepstatin A (10 ng/ml), for 2 h before fixation. The number of MAP1LC3B puncta in a single cell was estimated by manual counting in at least thirty cells using a confocal microscope.
Measurement of nPt concentrations
Cellular samples, which were washed with cold PBS 3 times followed by treatment with trypsin-EDTA (T4049, Sigma-Aldrich) for 5 min, were counted, and all samples were simultaneously lysed with the same amount of RIPA buffer. Media samples were collected, and the volume of the samples was measured. Subsequently, media samples were collected, and the volume of the samples was measured. The concentration of nPt in the samples was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) with an Agilent 7700 Series instrument (Agilent Technologies, Tokyo, Japan). The instrument was operated with an RF power of 1.5 kW and a carrier gas flow rate of 1.05 L/min Ar. The following isotopes were measured: 195Pt and 205Tl. Prior to ICP-MS analysis, sample aliquots were spiked with internal standards (205Tl) at a concentration of 2 ng/mL. Element concentrations were measured by external 6-to-11-point-calibration with internal standard correction. For the control samples, cells cultured without nPt or media without nPt were used. To calculate the nPt concentrations, the obtained concentrations, which measured all platinum element, were divided by the cell number for cellular samples or by media volume for the samples. The concentrations are presented in μg/ml per 1 × 107 cells for cellular samples or in μg/ml for media samples.
Comet assay
DNA damage was assessed by OxiSelect Comet Assay kit according to the manufacture’s instruction (STA-351, Cell Biolabs, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Electrophoresis was performed in the alkaline solution. The data was obtained from at least 50 cell in each treated groups.
Statistical analysis
Results are presented as the mean ± S.D., and Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used to compare the differences between groups. Values of p lower than 0.05 were considered significant.
References
Hu, H. et al. Ambient Air Pollution and Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Atmos Environ 97(1994), 336–345, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2014.08.027 (2014).
Smarr, M. M., Vadillo-Ortega, F., Castillo-Castrejon, M. & O’Neill, M. S. The use of ultrasound measurements in environmental epidemiological studies of air pollution and fetal growth. Curr Opin Pediatr 25, 240–246, https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e32835e1e74 (2013).
Keelan, J. A. Nanotoxicology: nanoparticles versus the placenta. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 263–264, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.65 (2011).
Hawkins, S. J. et al. Nanoparticle-induced neuronal toxicity across placental barriers is mediated by autophagy and dependent on astrocytes. Nat Nanotechnol 13, 427–433, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0085-3 (2018).
Huang, J. P. et al. Nanoparticles can cross mouse placenta and induce trophoblast apoptosis. Placenta 36, 1433–1441, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2015.10.007 (2015).
Rattanapinyopituk, K. et al. Demonstration of the clathrin- and caveolin-mediated endocytosis at the maternal-fetal barrier in mouse placenta after intravenous administration of gold nanoparticles. J Vet Med Sci 76, 377–387 (2014).
Yamashita, K. et al. Silica and titanium dioxide nanoparticles cause pregnancy complications in mice. Nat Nanotechnol 6, 321–328, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2011.41 (2011).
Augustin, M. A. & Sanguansri, P. Nanostructured materials in the food industry. Adv Food Nutr Res 58, 183–213, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58005-9 (2009).
Bowman, D. M., van Calster, G. & Friedrichs, S. Nanomaterials and regulation of cosmetics. Nat Nanotechnol 5, 92, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.12 (2010).
Konstantatos, G. & Sargent, E. H. Nanostructured materials for photon detection. Nat Nanotechnol 5, 391–400, https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2010.78 (2010).
Petros, R. A. & DeSimone, J. M. Strategies in the design of nanoparticles for therapeutic applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 9, 615–627, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrd2591 (2010).
Wang, J., Tian, S., Petros, R. A., Napier, M. E. & Desimone, J. M. The complex role of multivalency in nanoparticles targeting the transferrin receptor for cancer therapies. J Am Chem Soc 132, 11306–11313, https://doi.org/10.1021/ja1043177 (2010).
Asharani, P. V., Lianwu, Y., Gong, Z. & Valiyaveettil, S. Comparison of the toxicity of silver, gold and platinum nanoparticles in developing zebrafish embryos. Nanotoxicology 5, 43–54, https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2010.489207 (2011).
Gopal, J., Hasan, N., Manikandan, M. & Wu, H. F. Bacterial toxicity/compatibility of platinum nanospheres, nanocuboids and nanoflowers. Sci Rep 3, 1260, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep01260 (2013).
Konieczny, P. et al. Effects triggered by platinum nanoparticles on primary keratinocytes. Int J Nanomedicine 8, 3963–3975, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S49612 (2013).
Shirasuna, K. et al. Nanosilica-induced placental inflammation and pregnancy complications: Different roles of the inflammasome components NLRP3 and ASC. Nanotoxicology 9, 554–567, https://doi.org/10.3109/17435390.2014.956156 (2015).
Yamagishi, Y. et al. Acute and chronic nephrotoxicity of platinum nanoparticles in mice. Nanoscale Res Lett 8, 395, https://doi.org/10.1186/1556-276X-8-395 (2013).
Saito, S. & Nakashima, A. Review: The role of autophagy in extravillous trophoblast function under hypoxia. Placenta 34(Suppl), S79–84, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.placenta.2012.11.026 (2013).
Saito, S. & Nakashima, A. A review of the mechanism for poor placentation in early-onset preeclampsia: the role of autophagy in trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling. J Reprod Immunol 101–102, 80–88, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2013.06.002 (2014).
Martinelli, I. et al. Heparin in pregnant women with previous placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: a prospective, randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical trial. Blood 119, 3269–3275, https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-11-391383 (2012).
Steegers, E. A., von Dadelszen, P., Duvekot, J. J. & Pijnenborg, R. Pre-eclampsia. Lancet 376, 631–644, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60279-6 (2010).
Hougaard, K. S. et al. Effects of prenatal exposure to surface-coated nanosized titanium dioxide (UV-Titan). A study in mice. Part Fibre Toxicol 7, 16, https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-8977-7-16 (2010).
Nakashima, A. et al. Autophagy regulation in preeclampsia: Pros and cons. J Reprod Immunol 123, 17–23, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jri.2017.08.006 (2017).
Morishita, Y. et al. Distribution of Silver Nanoparticles to Breast Milk and Their Biological Effects on Breast-Fed Offspring Mice. ACS Nano 10, 8180–8191, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.6b01782 (2016).
Yuk, J. M., Yoshimori, T. & Jo, E. K. Autophagy and bacterial infectious diseases. Exp Mol Med 44, 99–108, https://doi.org/10.3858/emm.2012.44.2.032 (2012).
Duan, J. et al. Silica nanoparticles induce autophagy and endothelial dysfunction via the PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Int J Nanomedicine 9, 5131–5141, https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S71074 (2014).
Hussain, S. et al. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles induce apoptosis and autophagy in human peripheral blood monocytes. ACS Nano 6, 5820–5829, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn302235u (2012).
Song, W. et al. Ceria nanoparticles stabilized by organic surface coatings activate the lysosome-autophagy system and enhance autophagic clearance. ACS Nano 8, 10328–10342, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn505073u (2014).
Mao, B. H., Tsai, J. C., Chen, C. W., Yan, S. J. & Wang, Y. J. Mechanisms of silver nanoparticle-induced toxicity and important role of autophagy. Nanotoxicology 10, 1021–1040, https://doi.org/10.1080/17435390.2016.1189614 (2016).
Villeret, B. et al. Silver Nanoparticles Impair Retinoic Acid-Inducible Gene I-Mediated Mitochondrial Antiviral Immunity by Blocking the Autophagic Flux in Lung Epithelial Cells. ACS Nano 12, 1188–1202, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.7b06934 (2018).
Albanese, A., Tang, P. S. & Chan, W. C. The effect of nanoparticle size, shape, and surface chemistry on biological systems. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 14, 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071811-150124 (2012).
Li, J. J., Hartono, D., Ong, C. N., Bay, B. H. & Yung, L. Y. Autophagy and oxidative stress associated with gold nanoparticles. Biomaterials 31, 5996–6003, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.014 (2010).
Khan, M. I. et al. Induction of ROS, mitochondrial damage and autophagy in lung epithelial cancer cells by iron oxide nanoparticles. Biomaterials 33, 1477–1488, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2011.10.080 (2012).
Ma, X. et al. Gold nanoparticles induce autophagosome accumulation through size-dependent nanoparticle uptake and lysosome impairment. ACS Nano 5, 8629–8639, https://doi.org/10.1021/nn202155y (2011).
Li, C. et al. PAMAM nanoparticles promote acute lung injury by inducing autophagic cell death through the Akt-TSC2-mTOR signaling pathway. J Mol Cell Biol 1, 37–45, https://doi.org/10.1093/jmcb/mjp002 (2009).
Lunova, M. et al. Nanoparticle core stability and surface functionalization drive the mTOR signaling pathway in hepatocellular cell lines. Sci Rep 7, 16049, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-16447-6 (2017).
Tanida, I., Minematsu-Ikeguchi, N., Ueno, T. & Kominami, E. Lysosomal turnover, but not a cellular level, of endogenous LC3 is a marker for autophagy. Autophagy 1, 84–91 (2005).
Fujita, N. et al. An Atg4B mutant hampers the lipidation of LC3 paralogues and causes defects in autophagosome closure. Mol Biol Cell 19, 4651–4659, https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E08-03-0312 (2008).
Kalkunte, S. et al. Sera from preeclampsia patients elicit symptoms of human disease in mice and provide a basis for an in vitro predictive assay. Am J Pathol 177, 2387–2398, https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2010.100475 (2010).
Ivanov, A. I. Pharmacological inhibition of endocytic pathways: is it specific enough to be useful? Methods Mol Biol 440, 15–33, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-178-9_2 (2008).
Nakashima, A. et al. Impaired autophagy by soluble endoglin, under physiological hypoxia in early pregnant period, is involved in poor placentation in preeclampsia. Autophagy 9, 303–316, https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.22927 (2013).
Yamanaka-Tatematsu, M. et al. Autophagy induced by HIF1alpha overexpression supports trophoblast invasion by supplying cellular energy. PLoS One 8, e76605, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076605 (2013).
Cao, B., Macones, C. & Mysorekar, I. U. ATG16L1 governs placental infection risk and preterm birth in mice and women. JCI Insight 1, e86654, https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.86654 (2016).
Aoki, A. et al. Trophoblast-Specific Conditional Atg7 Knockout Mice Develop Gestational Hypertension. Am J Pathol, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpath.2018.07.021 (2018).
Tian, X. et al. Intrauterine inflammation increases materno-fetal transfer of gold nanoparticles in a size-dependent manner in murine pregnancy. Small 9, 2432–2439, https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201300817 (2013).
Jawaid, P. et al. Effect of platinum nanoparticles on cell death induced by ultrasound in human lymphoma U937 cells. Ultrason Sonochem 31, 206–215, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2015.12.013 (2016).
Popp, L. & Segatori, L. Differential autophagic responses to nano-sized materials. Curr Opin Biotechnol 36, 129–136, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.08.016 (2015).
Mizushima, N., Yamamoto, A., Matsui, M., Yoshimori, T. & Ohsumi, Y. In vivo analysis of autophagy in response to nutrient starvation using transgenic mice expressing a fluorescent autophagosome marker. Mol Biol Cell 15, 1101–1111 (2004).
Bauckman, K. A., Owusu-Boaitey, N. & Mysorekar, I. U. Selective autophagy: xenophagy. Methods 75, 120–127, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2014.12.005 (2015).
Dupont, N. et al. Autophagy-based unconventional secretory pathway for extracellular delivery of IL-1beta. EMBO J 30, 4701–4711, https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.398 (2011).
Nowag, H. et al. Macroautophagy Proteins Assist Epstein Barr Virus Production and Get Incorporated Into the Virus Particles. EBioMedicine 1, 116–125, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ebiom.2014.11.007 (2014).
Orecna, M. et al. Toxicity of carboxylated carbon nanotubes in endothelial cells is attenuated by stimulation of the autophagic flux with the release of nanomaterial in autophagic vesicles. Nanomedicine 10, 939–948, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2014.02.001 (2014).
Graham, C. H. et al. Establishment and characterization of first trimester human trophoblast cells with extended lifespan. Exp Cell Res 206, 204–211 (1993).
Omi, H. et al. Establishment of an immortalized human extravillous trophoblast cell line by retroviral infection of E6/E7/hTERT and its transcriptional profile during hypoxia and reoxygenation. Int J Mol Med 23, 229–236 (2009).
Nakashima, A., Morita, E., Saito, S. & Sugamura, K. Human Parvovirus B19 nonstructural protein transactivates the p21/WAF1 through Sp1. Virology 329, 493–504 (2004).
Nakashima, A. et al. Survival of parvovirus B19-infected cells by cellular autophagy. Virology 349, 254–263, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.virol.2006.03.029 (2006).
Acknowledgements
We thank Professor Tamotsu Yoshimori for providing ATG5 knockout MEF, and Kaori Yamada-Nomoto for the technical assistance. This study was supported by AMED-CREST from the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED 16gk0110018h0001, grants from the Kanazawa Medical Research Foundation, Tamura Science and Technology Foundation, Yamaguchi Endocrine Research Foundation, First Bank of Toyama, Toyama University Hospital Grant, 040200-59200003502, and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Numbers [JP15K15607, JP16K11082, and JP17K11221].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
A.N. performed the majority of experiments and contributed to writing this manuscript. A.U., Y.O. and S.T. performed some assays for cellular proliferation. T.K., A.A., T.S., and O.Y. performed Western blots and analyzed the data. K.H., T.I., K.N. and Y.Y. measured the concentrations of nPt in media and cell lysates. Y.T. and S.S. conceived the study, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript together with data from all co-authors.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Nakashima, A., Higashisaka, K., Kusabiraki, T. et al. Autophagy is a new protective mechanism against the cytotoxicity of platinum nanoparticles in human trophoblasts. Sci Rep 9, 5478 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41927-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41927-2
This article is cited by
-
The regulated cell death at the maternal-fetal interface: beneficial or detrimental?
Cell Death Discovery (2024)
-
The impact of nanomaterials on autophagy across health and disease conditions
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences (2024)
-
Chorionic villus-derived mesenchymal stem cell-mediated autophagy promotes the proliferation and invasiveness of trophoblasts under hypoxia by activating the JAK2/STAT3 signalling pathway
Cell & Bioscience (2021)
-
Recent insights on indirect mechanisms in developmental toxicity of nanomaterials
Particle and Fibre Toxicology (2020)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.