Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Implications of the strain irreversibility cliff on the fabrication of particle-accelerator magnets made of restacked-rod-process Nb3Sn wires

A Publisher Correction to this article was published on 03 May 2019

Abstract

The strain irreversibility cliff (SIC), marking the abrupt change of the intrinsic irreversible strain limit εirr,0 as a function of heat-treatment (HT) temperature θ in Nb3Sn superconducting wires made by the restacked-rod process (RRP®), is confirmed in various wire designs. It adds to the complexity of reconciling conflicting requirements on conductors for fabricating magnets. Those intended for the high-luminosity upgrade of the Large Hardon Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) facility require maintaining the residual resistivity ratio RRR of conductors above 150 to ensure stability of magnets against quenching. This benchmark may compromise the conductors’ mechanical integrity if their εirr,0 is within or at the bottom of SIC. In this coupled investigation of strain and RRR properties to fully assess the implications of SIC, we introduce an electro-mechanical stability criterion that takes into account both aspects. For standard-Sn billets, this requires a strikingly narrow HT temperature window that is impractical. On the other hand, reduced-Sn billets offer a significantly wider choice of θ, not only for ensuring that εirr,0 is located at the SIC plateau while RRR ≥ 150, but also for containing the strain-induced irreversible degradation of the conductor’s critical-current beyond εirr,0. This study suggests that HT of LHC magnets, made of reduced-Sn wires having a Nb/Sn ratio of 3.6 and 108/127 restacking architecture, be operated at θ in the range of 680 to 695 °C (when the dwell time is 48 hours).

Introduction

The expected application of Nb3Sn superconducting wires in the high-luminosity (HL) upgrade of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) facility is dictated by the need for magnetic-field intensities in the range of 11 to 13 T, required to increase the rate of particle collisions at the ATLAS (A Toroidal LHC ApparatuS) and CMS (Compact Muon Solenoid) detectors of the LHC1,2. Such intensities are beyond the practical limits of Nb-Ti, which has been the main conductor for particle-accelerator technologies to date3,4,5. Tens of Nb3Sn dipoles and quadrupoles with large apertures will be constructed to replace the Nb-Ti magnets in the collimation system and beams’ interaction regions. The upgrade project (HL-LHC) will consume about 30 tonnes of state-of-the art, very high critical-current density Jc, Nb3Sn wires2, and will be a crucial step for testing the maturity of Nb3Sn technology for its potential usage to extend the field range to 16 T in future high-energy particle colliders1. (In this paper, wire is interchangeably referred to as conductor, billet, or strand).

The internal-tin restacked-rod process RRP® for fabricating Nb3Sn wires increases the cross-sectional area of the conductor’s superconducting component and promotes a homogeneous diffusion of Sn to Nb rods during the heat-treatment (HT) reaction for forming the A15 phase6,7,8. These improvements are achieved through increasing the fractions of Sn and Nb and decreasing that of Cu in the wire design6,7,8. It results in Nb3Sn occupying about a third of the wire’s cross-section9, with a near stoichiometric composition6,7,8,9. Both of these features are needed to obtain very high Jc. On the other hand, during HT, individual filaments coalesce into one solid Nb3Sn tube inside each of the wire sub-elements, of a diameter in the range of 35 to 100 μm depending on the wire architecture7,8.

Whereas Jc values in excess of 3,000 A/mm2 at 12 T and 4.2 K obtained in RRP Nb3Sn wires are sufficient for HL-LHC, magneto-electrical instabilities that stem from magnetic-flux and electric-current fast redistributions in the conductor during current ramping could be challenging10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. These instabilities, referred to as magnetization and self-field instabilities, respectively, generate local heat and temperature rise that can cause magnets to quench at currents significantly below the conductor’s critical surface of Jc versus magnetic field B at low and moderate field ranges10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18. Reducing the size of Nb3Sn sub-elements can mitigate these instabilities significantly, and a sub-element size around 20 μm or less is desirable1. However, size reductions below 50 μm in RRP wires have resulted in a dramatic drop of Jc8,19. In addition, such wires still need further development to become technological conductors that can be readily fabricated in piece-lengths sufficient for applications. Furthermore, such sub-element reduction may impose additional limitations on HT temperature and duration to avoid breaching distributed Nb barriers that would otherwise result in a significant decrease of the wire’s residual resistivity ratio RRR1, a parameter that is also important to remedy conductor instabilities11,12,13,14,16,17.

Magnetization and self-field instabilities may be contained if RRR of the conductor’s Cu component is sufficiently high14,16,17. Basically, magnet quenching can be prevented if disturbance-generated heat is evacuated to the surrounding helium bath fast enough through Cu. The thermal conductivity of Cu improves by a factor of about 3.4, in the temperature range 1–10 K, when its RRR is increased from 30 to 10020. Such an improvement may be useful for a more effective evacuation of heat away from the magnet21. Extensive empirical and simulation studies of wire instabilities suggested that RRR be at least 100 in the final conductor form (once cabled and reacted as part of the magnet) to mitigate instability effects14,16,17. This translates to an RRR in undeformed conductor (i.e. before cabling it) of at least 150.

This requirement RRR ≥ 150 was achieved, first, by applying less aggressive HTs that promote RRR but at the expense of Jc14,16,17,22. Thereafter, a 6% reduction of the amount of Sn in the wire turned out to be very effective for meeting the RRR requirement8. Indeed, a change of the ratio Nb/Sn from 3.4 in early RRP billets (referred to as standard-Sn billets) to 3.6 in new ones (reduced-Sn billets) was a beneficial adjustment in the wire design8. Even though Jc of reduced-Sn billets decreases due to the reduction of the amount of Sn in the wire, it can be recovered partially by increasing the HT temperature typically from 640–650 °C for the standard-Sn billets to 665–680 °C for the reduced-Sn billets without compromising the RRR benchmark.

The sub-element size for the wires to be fabricated for HL-LHC has been set to a compromise value of about 55 μm to maintain a sufficiently high and homogeneous Jc2,23, further underscoring the need to maintain high RRR to mitigate wire instabilities.

Another aspect of great importance is the inherent high sensitivity of Nb3Sn superconducting properties to strain, unlike the ductile Nb-Ti material (see for example24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37 and references therein). These properties also degrade irreversibly when mechanical cracks start to form in Nb3Sn under the effects of stress and strain (see for example38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46 and references therein). By incorporating the brittle Nb3Sn superconductor in a particle-accelerator machine, where mechanical forces on the conductor are going to be intense, especially at high magnet fields, strain and stress limits for conductor handling and operation naturally come into play in the design, fabrication, transportation, and cool-down and powering of accelerator magnets47,48,49,50,51,52,53. Both axial and transverse strain components should be taken into account54,55,56. In this paper, we will discuss the axial strain limits and irreversible effects.

In a recent report, the U.S. high-luminosity LHC accelerator upgrade project (US HL-LHC AUP) added a requirement “εirr,0 > 0.25%” to the strand design criteria for the fabrication of quadrupole magnets23, εirr,0 being the intrinsic irreversible axial-strain limit where irreversible effects first appear in the behavior of the conductor’s transport critical current Ic as a function of axial strain ε to which it is subjected. The benchmark value of 0.25% is actually empirical, based on earlier strain characterizations of Ti-doped RRP Nb3Sn wires41. In effect, even higher εirr,0 values are better to help reduce the complexity of the mechanical structures and tooling needed for stress and strain management in magnets.

We recently showed that εirr,0 depends strongly on HT conditions in RRP Nb3Sn standard-Sn billets either doped with Ti or Ta. We found that εirr,0 undergoes a precipitous and large change as a function of HT temperature θ, called the strain irreversibility cliff (SIC)46. As we discussed in46 and will show in great detail herein, SIC too imposes certain conditions on HT with competing requirements vis-à-vis those favorable to RRR. As such, SIC adds to the complexity of the trade-offs among Jc, RRR, and sub-element size benchmarks. Therefore, studies of the conductors’ electromechanical properties should be combined with investigations of Jc and RRR as a function of conductor design and HT to find optimal parameters for magnet conditioning. In order to evaluate the practical implications of SIC comprehensively, such approach is essential.

In this paper, we build on our previous strain characterization of standard-Sn billets RRP 13711-2 (Ta-doped) and 11976-1 (Ti-doped) by adding two more billets, RRP 14943-2a and 14984, both Ti-doped (Table 1). Billet 14984 has a reduced-Sn content. We will put more emphasis on it as it is a pre-production billet for HL-LHC. We investigate if such a conductor exhibits the SIC behavior and how it is affected by the Sn content. Billet 14943-2a is a standard-Sn, used for comparisons and for gaging reproducibility of the results with respect to billet 11976-1 that has the same design but a slightly smaller diameter (Table 1). Furthermore, we expand the study to encompass RRR measurements on all four billets. We investigate how the HT temperature θ affects εirr,0 (and SIC), Ic, and RRR of a given conductor, and define the range of θ that is suitable to fulfil the competing requirements on the multiple parameters for each of the conductors and the role played by the content of Sn and the doping element.

Each of the four billets has 108 Nb3Sn sub-elements distributed around 19 Cu sub-elements at the billet center (design 108/127). Additional details are provided in Table 1. The HT (made in vacuum) consists of two pre-stages at 210 °C for 72 hours and 400 °C for 48 hours to mix Cu and Sn, followed by a final stage at temperature θ for 48 hours to form the Nb3Sn phase. We varied θ from 599 to 752 °C. The dwell duration at θ was kept constant in this study so as to investigate the effects of one HT parameter at a time.

Results

We used a Cu-Be Walters spring to strain samples in-situ57,58,59. Information on the apparatus is provided in the Methods section. For each sample (of helical form), we determined Ic values for three sample locations, each being one full sample turn (or segment) about 8 cm long. Measurements were made while the sample was immersed in liquid helium at a temperature of 4.04 to 4.07 K and subjected to an external magnetic field of 15 T provided by a superconducting solenoid. For each billet, we measured one to three samples (i.e., three to nine segments) per HT. For this study, Ic(ε) measurements were made on 94 samples in total. Values of Ic were determined at the electric field criterion Ec of 0.1 μV/cm.

Details of the RRR apparatus are also given in the Methods section. Measurements of sample resistance R as a function of sample temperature T were made to determine RRR, defined as the ratio of R at 293 K to that at 18 K. For each billet, we measured three samples per HT. For this study, RRR measurements were made on 81 samples in total. Values of RRR in the literature are generally quite scattered, so the results we present here may not be representative of those of a large number of billets of a given design.

Expanded uncertainties (k = 2) due to random effects in estimating θ, Ic, εirr,0, and RRR were 3 °C, 2%, 0.03% strain, and 30%, respectively. The uncertainties for Ic, εirr,0, and RRR are based on type A evaluations of uncertainty, whereas the uncertainty for θ is based on type B evaluation of uncertainty60.

Effects of heat-treatment temperature on εirr,0 and RRR

Examples of Ic(ε) data are provided in Fig. 1. These particular results are for the reduced-Sn wire 14984; Fig. 1(a,c) are for the θ spectrum extremes used for this billet, 599 and 746 °C, respectively, and Fig. 1(b) is for the intermediate value 666 °C. Other Ic(ε) examples are published in46 for billets 11976-1 and 13711-2. Strain applied to the sample is increased incrementally until Ic reaches its peak value Ic-max at strain εmax that compensates for the Nb3Sn compressive pre-strain. The latter develops during cool-down of the sample from θ to 4 K, and originates from the mismatch of thermal expansion coefficient of Nb3Sn with respect to those of the other wire components and that of Cu-Be spring material to which the sample is soldered. Around εmax, we unload strain partially and remeasure Ic to check its reversibility with strain. This operation is repeated multiple times while increasing strain gradually until Ic is driven close to zero. From the “loaded” and “unloaded” (solid- and empty-symbol) curves thus obtained, we determine the irreversible strain limit εirr that produces the first splitting of the two curves (see details in the Methods section)42. The partial-unloading step is kept constant at 0.09% throughout the experiments; it is small enough to minimize Ic increases upon unloading (for ε < εirr) due to the three-dimensional strain effects43,61, and large enough to reveal Ic(ε) irreversibility. Locations of εmax and εirr are marked by arrows in Fig. 1(a–c).

Our values of εmax and εirr are artificially high because the thick Cu-Be spring dominates the thermal contraction of the assembly (spring + sample) and puts an additional compressive pre-strain on Nb3Sn upon cooling to 4 K. These values can also change slightly from sample to sample depending on how tight the sample is made on the spring before soldering. Nevertheless, Ic versus intrinsic strain ε0 (=ε − εmax) is not affected by the spring material’s differential thermal contraction or by the sample mounting35,62. Therefore, the same should hold for the values of the intrinsic irreversible strain limit εirr,0 (=εirr − εmax). Absolute values of εmax (and εirr) provided herein should not be taken as a direct measure of strain margins for the wires. In fact, the actual values of εmax for RRP wires are rather small due to the high Nb3Sn fraction as compared to moderate-Jc Nb3Sn conductors63. Thus, εirr,0 values are appropriate to gage the strain resilience of the wires as investigated here.

Values of εirr,0 are displayed in Fig. 1(a–c) in red for their corresponding billet and HTs. The complete dependence of εirr,0 on θ is depicted in Fig. 2(a) for the standard-Sn, Ti- or Ta-doped wires, and in Fig. 2(b) for the standard- or reduced-Sn, Ti-doped wires. Each point represents an average value of εirr,0 over one to three samples (i.e., three to nine segments) per HT. For all four wires, εirr,0 exhibits a precipitous and large change with θ, indicating a transition of Nb3Sn from a highly brittle state, where irreversible effects start as soon as Nb3Sn is subjected to a tensile strain of any measurable amount, to a more strain-resilient state where changes of Ic(ε) remain reversible up to a tensile strain close to 0.4%. This behavior is the strain irreversibility cliff (SIC)46; it is confirmed here for the four RRP Nb3Sn billets. These results clearly show that θ (or HT schedule in general) has a major influence on εirr,0.

For the four billets, values of εirr,0 on the SIC plateau are above the required value of 0.25%. The cliff extends over a narrow temperature range of ≈23 to 29 °C, and its bulk part (excluding the tail) is much steeper as it occurs over only 10 to 15 °C depending on the billet (see Fig. 2). The shift of SIC between the two standard-Sn, Ti-doped billets 11976-1 (Fig. 2(a)) and 14943–2a (Fig. 2(b)) is about 5 °C, indicating that the temperature location of SIC is fairly reproducible for fairly similar wires. In comparison to standard-Sn, Ti-doped wires, SIC is shifted to higher temperatures by 10 to 12 °C for the Ta-doped wire (Fig. 2(a)) and is shifted to lower temperatures by 11 to 14 °C for the reduced-Sn wire (Fig. 2(b)) [see horizontal black arrows in Fig. 2(a,b)]. Also, the height of the cliff is lower for the standard-Sn, Ta-doped, or reduced-Sn, Ti-doped wires [see vertical black arrows in Fig. 2(a,b)]. Nevertheless, for the reduced-Sn wire, εirr,0 improved further and precipitously when θ is increased beyond 705 °C [see orange arrow in Fig. 2(b)], revealing a double-cliff structure for this particular billet, though the second step is much smaller than the main cliff height. We do not know yet if this double-cliff structure is typical of reduced-Sn billets. These differences from billet to billet may provide clues regarding the origins of SIC. This paper is principally focused on treating the implications of SIC on applications.

The results of RRR(θ) are depicted in Fig. 3, where each data point represents an average value of RRR over three samples. Figure 3 illustrates the strong decline of RRR as θ is increased, especially for the standard-Sn billets. The red line delimits RRR = 150, and is crossed at θ ≈ 639, 656, 664, and (approximately projected) 745 °C for billets 14943-2a, 11976-1, 13711-2, and 14984, respectively. (This temperature is noted below as θRRR). The reduced-Sn billet shows a significantly higher RRR that stays above 150 for an extended range of θ as compared to the standard-Sn billets.

Electro-mechanical stability (EMS) criterion

As discussed in46, the narrowness of the θ range where SIC occurs may have challenging implications for the heat-treatment of large magnets. Reducing θ to promote the strand’s magneto-electrical stability will be at the expense of the strand’s strain properties if εirr,0 is not positioned away from the SIC tip somewhere on the SIC main plateau. The magneto-electrical (or electrical for simplicity) and mechanical requirements are in conflict, and we need to find HT conditions that achieve them both. In our analysis, we build on the requirements RRR ≥ 150 and εirr,0 ≥ 0.25%, but, for the latter, we put more emphasis on staying away from the cliff to ensure that the inevitable temperature gradient across the magnet during heat-treatment and furnace-temperature imprecisions do not produce weak εirr,0 anywhere in the magnet. This analysis is flexible enough to accommodate other applications if RRR requirements are different.

To link RRR(θ) and εirr,0(θ) results for analysis, we define θRRR as the temperature where RRR crosses the required minimum value (150 in the case of LHC magnets) and θCliff as the temperature where the precipitous drop of εirr,0 starts to occur (tip or onset of SIC). The choice of θ must be such that the wire fulfills both requirements for electrical stability (RRR ≥ 150 for LHC magnets; it could be a different value for another application) and mechanical stability (εirr,0 at the top of SIC). First, billet properties must be such that θCliff is lower than θRRR with enough margin; then, the operator must choose θ between these two values. We capture these recommendations in what we call the electro-mechanical stability (EMS) criterion as:

$${\theta }_{{\rm{Cliff}}}+\delta \theta < {\theta }_{RRR}-\delta \theta ,$$
(1)

where δθ is introduced to account for uncertainties in θ arising from possible inhomogeneity and inaccuracy of furnace temperature. If a wire (considered for fabricating a magnet) meets this requirement, then θ must be chosen such that

$${\theta }_{{\rm{Cliff}}}+\delta \theta < \theta < {\theta }_{RRR}-\delta \theta ,$$
(2)

thus setting the allowable window for best HT. We define the EMS criterion by both equations (1) and (2), even though fulfilling Eq. (2) implies the same for Eq. (1). We wanted to indicate that some billets may be intrinsically limited to fulfil Eq. (1), in which case fabricating a magnet from such billet should not be even considered (let alone heat-treating it). We believe the EMS criterion is a valuable tool to inspect billets before considering their use in magnets. We illustrate this concept in Figs 46 for the four wires, for the LHC magnets.

In Fig. 4(a), εirr,0(θ) and RRR(θ) are plotted together for the standard-Sn, Ti-doped billet 11976-1 (the arrows near the bottom point to the Y-axis corresponding to each curve). The areas shaded in gray delimit the domains where θ < θCliff (unsatisfactory mechanical properties) and θ > θRRR (unsatisfactory electrical properties). The hatched areas in the remaining window (in Fig. 4a) represent temperature safety margins of a width δθ ≈ 5 °C on each side to ensure that conductor performance is sufficiently away from the SIC tip and away from getting below RRR of 150. Thus, the residual domain between the hatched areas (pointed to by an arrow in Fig. 4(a)) defines the allowable temperature window for an optimal HT, as defined in Eq. (2). In this case of billet 11976-1, the allowable θ is 648 ± 3 °C; a very narrow range that might be difficult to apply for heat treating large magnets (4 to 8 meters long in the case of HL-LHC). The value of 5 °C for δθ is arbitrary and used here for illustration purposes. Actual value of δθ can be adjusted depending on the quality of the furnace used and on the size of the magnet. It can be also adjusted to reflect θCliff and θRRR variations among a large number of billets of a given design (when such statistical data are available).

In Fig. 4(b), the dependence of Ic-max on θ is shown for same billet 11976-1 (see ref.46 for more details on this dependence and on the choice of Ic at this particular strain reference εmax). The gray and hatched areas of Fig. 4(a) are pasted in Fig. 4(b) to evaluate the consequences on Ic of the EMS criterion’s HT restrictions. It appears that staying within the allowable HT window means that this wire will be used at approximately 10% below its full Ic potential. Figure 4(b) reveals the trade-off between the electro-mechanical and transport properties for this particular billet, for a HT conducted at the optimal θ (=648 °C) for a duration of 48 hours. We will comment on the effect of HT duration later.

Analysis for the standard-Sn, Ta-doped billet 13711-2 is depicted in the same way in Fig. 5. For this billet, the allowable HT window is 658 ± 1 °C (Fig. 5(a)). It is located at a temperature 10 °C higher than for billet 11976-1 but is narrower, making it even more difficult to apply such HT. As shown in Fig. 5(b), this wire will be at approximately 9% below its full Ic potential. The case of the standard-Sn, Ti-doped billet 14943-2a illustrated in Fig. 6(a) is the worst. The HT window is too small, even smaller than the safety margin δθ. Hence, the EMS criterion is not met and, as such, there is no temperature window to secure an optimal HT (at 48-hour dwell time) that will satisfy both the electrical and mechanical requirements. Therefore, we suggest that such a billet be discarded to avoid fabricating magnets with poor properties and save valuable funds. This particular billet may not be representative of the standard-Sn billets produced, considering its low values of RRR (see Fig. 3), but is illustrative of the implications of SIC that could possibly happen. Furthermore, existence of outlier billets in a large production volume cannot be excluded.

The narrowness of the allowable HT window for the three standard-Sn billets, dictated by the EMS criterion, is not desirable. It might be a general trend for standard-Sn billets, but we cannot be certain as there is some RRR variability from billet to billet. Nevertheless, alternative HTs with lower temperatures for longer dwell time might render such billets more suitable. By lowering θ below θCliff, εirr,0 will decrease but perhaps will be restored if the dwell time is increased sufficiently. However, we should also consider the dependence of RRR on dwell time. Lowering θ will increase RRR, but increasing the dwell time will tend to decrease RRR. So, it is a matter of finding the right balance between θ and dwell time to achieve high εirr,0 and high RRR. This deserves a study of its own to supplement the results presented here. Effects on the allowable HT window of a simplified HT scheme that has two stages (instead of three) to control the Sn-Nb-Cu Nausite phase are also worthy of a systematic study19.

For the reduced-Sn billet, in contrast, the situation is far better. As depicted in Fig. 6(b), the allowable θ is 684 ± 56 °C—a very wide range. Moreover, it is centered very close to the optimum value of θ (≈ 680 °C) where Ic is maximal (see Fig. 6(c)). Therefore, no trade-off is needed between Ic and RRR for such billet except for the lowering of Ic due to the reduced content of Sn (see the discussion below). Such a billet seems very suitable. It is fortunate that HL-LHC will use the reduced-Sn RRP billets design.

Comparison of Ic-max between the standard- and reduced-Sn billets 14943-2a and 14984 is displayed as a function of θ in Fig. 7. These two billets are well suited for a direct comparison of Ic because they have the same non-Cu area (Table 1). Values of Ic-max are the same for both billets for θ ≤ 630 °C. Differences appear above 630 °C and culminate at about 7% around 680 °C in favor of the standard-Sn billet. However, considering that the reduced-Sn billet can be used with no Ic trade-off and that the standard-Sn billet may be used but at less than its full Ic potential due to the EMS-criterion restrictions, the reduced-Sn billet is in fact the better option even in terms of Ic. If higher Ic is needed, we could envision a billet design having an amount of Sn reduced by less than 6% compared to the standard-Sn design (for example 4% or so). Such design may increase Ic but may also shrink the allowable HT window in comparison to that of billet 14984 (Fig. 6(b)), though we speculate that it may still be wide enough. Also, it might be possible that such a modified billet will have a higher εirr,0 than billet 14984, somewhere between the values for billets 14984 and 14943-2a (Fig. 2(b)).

The US HL-LHC AUP in collaboration with CERN decided that HT of magnets be made at 665 °C (for a dwell time <50 hours) to stay away from SIC23. Whereas this choice is consistent with what we presented here so far, below we show that an increase of this temperature by about 15 to 30 °C may have some additional benefits.

Searching for useful information beyond the irreversible strain limit

The reversible effects of strain have been studied extensively since the 1970s, once the high sensitivity of Nb3Sn properties to axial strain became evident64. Comparatively, the strain boundary of these reversible effects, εirr,0 (or εirr), has received very little attention. As for the irreversible effects themselves, they have probably been considered not worth studying beyond using the data to determine εirr,0 (or εirr). This limit is generally considered as the intrinsic strain where cracks start to form in Nb3Sn. Hence, disregarding data beyond it is understandable, considering that applications should not be designed to exceed this limit41.

In a recent report, we showed some evidence that Ic degradation rate in the irreversible regime also depends on HT conditions46. This is the reason why we conducted measurements of Ic(ε) far beyond εirr for the samples presented here, until Ic was driven close to zero as in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1(b), for example, the shape of Ic(ε) (loaded curve) for 666 °C has an “elbow” marking a severe degradation of Ic that does not start immediately at εirr. This feature in Ic(ε) dependence is also present for several HTs below 666 °C, and more pronounced, but disappears for HTs above 666 °C as in Fig. 1(c) for 746 °C.

In Fig. 8, we show a comparison of Ic(ε0) for HTs done at 656, 666, 681, and 695 °C, for the specific measurements protocol (described above) that we applied in all these experiments. Note that the curves represent raw Ic data (not normalized), plotted as a function of the intrinsic strain (ε0 = ε − εmax) to eliminate slight differences of εmax from sample to sample. The values and behavior of Ic(ε0) are very similar for the three samples reacted at 666–695 °C, even past εirr,0, until the elbow feature appears for the sample reacted at 666 °C that distinguishes it from the other two samples. This feature is even more pronounced for the sample reacted at 656 °C, indicating its progressive evolution with lowering temperature θ. The four samples have about the same value of εirr,0 (Fig. 2(b)).

Disappearance of the severe drop of Ic(ε0) for samples reacted at 681 °C and above may possibly indicate an increase of the fracture toughness of Nb3Sn that perhaps becomes more resistant to additional cracking and crack propagation (at a given strain) in these samples. Fracture toughness measurements on individual filaments are needed to verify this assumption. These observations suggest that it may be judicious to increase θ for the LHC magnets from 665 °C to somewhere between 680 and 695 °C (when the dwell time at θ is 48 hours) to contain Ic irreversible degradation, especially that this increase in θ keeps it still within the allowable HT window (Fig. 6(b)). Even though the design of these magnets should be such that εirr,0 is not exceeded, this adjustment of θ would provide an extra precaution.

Conclusion

We coupled studies of Ic(ε) and those of RRR for various RRP Nb3Sn billets heat-treated at different temperatures from 599 to 752 °C for 48 hours. The billets were either standard- or reduced-Sn, doped with either Ti or Ta, of the type intended for use in particle-accelerator magnets for HL-LHC. They all exhibited an abrupt change of εirr,0 as a function of θ, known as the strain irreversibility cliff. The approach of combining the two studies allowed us to comprehensively assess the implications of SIC on restricting the HT conditions. We introduced the electro-mechanical stability criterion that takes into account both requirements for electrical (RRR ≥ 150) and mechanical (εirr,0 away from SIC) stability for best outcome. For the standard-Sn billets, fulfilling these conflicting requirements yields a significant narrowing of the allowable HT temperature window that is impractical. On the other hand, the reduced-Sn billets offer a significantly wider choices for HT, not only for ensuring that RRR ≥ 150 and εirr,0 is located at the top of SIC, but also for containing the strain-induced irreversible degradation of Ic beyond εirr,0. This study suggests that HT of magnets for HL-LHC, made of reduced-Sn RRP billets having a Nb/Sn ratio of 3.6 and 108/127 restacking architecture, be conducted at a temperature of 680 to 695 °C, about 15 to 30 °C higher than the 665 °C (for a dwell time <50 hours) that is targeted by HL-LHC project.

Finally, we highly recommend investigating whether the effects of transverse compression are also dependent on HT conditions. This will allow the magnet designer to account for effects of HT on conductor resilience against the various stress components in a magnet. Of course, the reversible effects should be taken into account as well, and be measured or projected accurately through Ic parametrization within the reversible strain regime (ε0 ≤ εirr,0) as a function of magnet operating conditions of strain, temperature, and magnetic field37. A spreadsheet was created to facilitate these calculations65.

Methods

Apparatus for Ic(ε) measurements

Transport measurements of Ic as a function of applied axial strain ε were conducted by use of a Walters spring made of Cu-Be (see Fig. 9(a))57,58,59. This spring device had four turns with a T-section profile, designed such that the spring behaves elastically over a wide strain range from −1% to +1%58,59. By twisting one spring end with respect to the other end, the spring’s outer surface where the sample was attached can be subjected to either a tensile or a compressive axial strain57,58,59. The sample was first mounted on a stainless-steel mandrel for heat treatment, then transferred onto the spring carefully and soldered to it along its full length at ≈200 °C. The sample length prepared (~2.5 m) allowed for multiple spare turns that we cut and used as current splices (visible in Fig. 9(a)). They were soldered to the sample ends to facilitate current transfer into the sample with minimal contact resistance. Multiple pairs of instrumentation leads were attached to the sample to monitor voltage V during ramping of electric current I through the sample. Each of the three main pairs covered one of the sample turns (≈8 cm long each) that were on the spring turns. Values of Ic were determined from V-I characteristics at various electric-field criteria Ec. Data shown here are for 0.1 μV/cm that is a more commonly used criterion.

Apparatus for RRR measurements

Samples for resistivity measurements were mounted on the apparatus shown in Fig. 9(b). This RRR apparatus was designed to accommodate six straight samples mounted in series. Pressure contacts were used to connect the current and voltage contacts to each sample. Voltage-tap pairs on each sample were separated by 10 cm. The probe was inserted into a cold cryostat and lowered very slowly to gradually cool the probe with the ambient helium gas. The samples and thermometers were positioned horizontally to minimize temperature gradients. In addition, and for the same purpose, samples were enclosed between two nesting copper plates (only one Cu plate is shown in Fig. 9(b)). An excitation current of about 0.1 A was run through the samples and voltage across each of them was measured to determine their respective resistance. Sample resistance R was measured as a function of sample temperature T, from room temperature T0 down to temperatures low enough for the sample to become superconducting. RRR was defined as the ratio of R at 293 K to that at 18 K (just before the superconducting transition). The value of R(293 K) was extrapolated from R(T0) by use of the empirical equation66,67:

$$R(293\,K)=\frac{R({T}_{0})}{[1+0.00393\times ({T}_{0}-293)]}$$
(3)

For HT (prior to measurements), samples were inserted individually into small-diameter alumina tubes to keep them straight.

Change history

• 03 May 2019

A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has been fixed in the paper.

References

1. Ballarino, A. & Bottura, L. Targets for R&D on Nb3Sn conductor for high energy physics. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 25, 6000906 (2015).

2. Cooley, L. D., Ghosh, A. K., Dietderich, D. R. & Pong, I. Conductor specification and validation of high-luminosity LHC quadrupole magnets. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 6000505 (2017).

3. Rossi, L. Superconductivity: its role, its success and its setbacks in the Large Hadron Collider of CERN. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 034001 (2010).

4. Bottura, L. & Godeke, A. Superconducting materials and conductors: fabrication and limiting parameters. Rev. Accl. Sci. Technol. 5, 25–50 (2012).

5. Gourlay, S. A. Superconducting accelerator magnet technology in the 21st century: A new paradigm on the horizon? Nucl. Instrum. Meth. Phys. Res. A 893, 124–137 (2018).

6. Parrell, J. A., Zhang, Y., Field, M. B., Cisek, P. & Hong, S. High field Nb3Sn conductor development at Oxford Superconducting Technology. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 13, 3470–3473 (2003).

7. Parrell, J. A. et al. Internal tin Nb3Sn conductors engineered for fusion and particle accelerator applications. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 19, 2573–2579 (2009).

8. Field, M. B., Zhang, Y., Miao, H., Gerace, M. & Parrell, A. Optimizing Nb3Sn conductors for high field applications. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 6001105 (2014).

9. Tarantini, C., Lee, P. J., Craig, N., Ghosh, A. & Larbalestier, D. C. Examination of the trade-off between intrinsic and extrinsic properties in the optimization of a modern internal tin Nb3Sn conductor. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 065013 (2014).

10. Zlobin, A. V. et al. R&D of Nb3Sn accelerator magnets at Fermilab. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 1113–1118 (2005).

11. Dietderich, D. R. Correlation between strand stability and magnet performance. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 1524–1528 (2005).

12. Ghosh, A. K., Cooley, L. D. & Moodenbaugh, A. R. Investigation of instability in high J c Nb3Sn strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 3360–3363 (2005).

13. Barzi, E. et al. Instabilities in transport current measurements of Nb3Sn strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 3364–3367 (2005).

14. Bordini, B. & Rossi, L. Self field instability in high-J c Nb3Sn strands with high copper residual resistivity ratio. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 19, 2470–2476 (2009).

15. Takala, E. et al. An experimental setup to measure the minimum trigger energy for magnetothermal instability in Nb3Sn strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 6000704 (2012).

16. Bordini, B., Bottura, L., Oberli, L., Rossi, L. & Takala, E. Impact of the residual resistivity ratio on the stability of Nb3Sn magnets. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4705804 (2012).

17. Ghosh, A. K. Effect of copper resistivity and filament size on the self-field instability of high-J c Nb3Sn strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 7100407 (2013).

18. Bordini, B. et al. Magnetization measurements of high-J c Nb3Sn strands. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 7100806 (2013).

19. Sanabria, C. et al. Controlling Cu–Sn mixing so as to enable higher critical current densities in RRP® Nb3Sn wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 31, 064001 (2018).

20. Simon, N. J., Drexler, E. S. & Reed, R. P. Properties of copper and copper alloys at cryogenic temperatures. NIST Monograph 177 (1992).

21. Ambrosio, G. et al. Test results and analysis of LQS03 third long Nb3Sn quadrupole by LARP. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 4002204 (2013).

22. Godeke, A. et al. A review of conductor performance for the LARP high-gradient quadrupole magnets. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 095015 (2013).

23. Ambrosio, G. et al. Design criteria for MQXFA superconducting elements. US HL-LHC Accelerator Upgrade Project. Document 885-v5. http://us-hilumi-docdb.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/ShowDocument?docid=885.

24. Ekin, J. W. Effect of stress on the critical current of Nb3Sn multifilamentary composite wire. Appl. Phys. Lett. 29, 216–219 (1976).

25. Ekin, J. W. Strain scaling law for flux pinning in practical superconductors. Part 1: Basic relationship and application to Nb3Sn conductors. Cryogenics 20, 611–624 (1980).

26. ten Haken, B., Godeke, A. & ten Kate, H. H. J. The strain dependence of the critical properties of Nb3Sn conductors. J. Appl. Phys. 85, 3247–3253 (1999).

27. Cheggour, N. & Hampshire, D. P. Unifying the strain and temperature scaling laws for the pinning force density in superconducting niobium-tin multifilamentary wires. J. Appl. Phys. 86, 552–555 (1999).

28. Cheggour, N. & Hampshire, D. P. The unified strain and temperature scaling law for the pinning force density of bronze-route Nb3Sn wires in high magnetic fields. Cryogenics 42, 299–309 (2002).

29. Taylor, D. M. J. & Hampshire, D. P. The scaling law for the strain dependence of the critical current density in Nb3Sn superconducting wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, S241–S252 (2005).

30. Flükiger, R., Uglietti, D., Abächerli, V. & Seeber, B. Asymmetric behavior of J c(ε) in Nb3Sn wires and correlation with the stress induced elastic tetragonal distortion. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, S416–S423 (2005).

31. Oh, S. & Kim, K. A scaling law for the critical current of Nb3Sn strands based on strong-coupling theory of superconductivity. J. Appl. Phys. 99, 033909 (2006).

32. Godeke, A., ten Haken, B., ten Kate, H. H. J. & Larbalestier, D. C. A general scaling relation for the critical current density in Nb3Sn. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 19, R100–R116 (2006).

33. Ilyin, Y., Nijhuis, A. & Krooshoop, E. Scaling law for the strain dependence of the critical current in an advanced ITER Nb3Sn strand. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20, 186–191 (2007).

34. Markiewicz, W. D. Comparison of strain scaling functions for the strain dependence of composite Nb3Sn superconductors. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 21, 054004 (2008).

35. Cheggour, N. et al. Strain and magnetic-field characterization of a bronze-route Nb3Sn ITER wire: benchmarking of strain measurement facilities at NIST and University of Twente. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 22, 4805104 (2012).

36. Bordini, B., Alknes, P., Bottura, L., Rossi, L. & Valentinis, D. An exponential scaling law for the strain dependence of the Nb3Sn critical current density. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 26, 075014 (2013).

37. Ekin, J. W., Cheggour, N., Goodrich, L. & Splett, J. Unified scaling law for flux pinning in practical superconductors: III. Minimum datasets, core parameters, and application of the extrapolative scaling expression. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 30, 033005 (2017).

38. Ekin, J. W. Strain effects in superconducting compounds. Adv. Cryog. Eng. 30, 823–836 (1984).

39. Jewell, M. C., Lee, P. J. & Larbalestier, D. C. The influence of Nb3Sn strand geometry on filament breakage under bend strain as revealed by metallography. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 16, 1005–1011 (2003).

40. Miyoshi, Y., van Lanen, E. P. A., Dhallé, M. M. J. & Nijhuis, A. Distinct voltage-current characteristics of Nb3Sn strands with dispersed and collective crack distributions. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 22, 085009 (2009).

41. Cheggour, N. et al. Influence of Ti and Ta doping on the irreversible strain limit of ternary Nb3Sn superconducting wires made by the restacked-rod process. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 23, 052002 (2010).

42. Goodrich, L. F. et al. Method for determining the irreversible strain limit of Nb3Sn wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 24, 075022 (2011).

43. Cheggour, N. et al. Influence of the heat-treatment conditions, microchemistry, and microstructure on the irreversible strain limit of a selection of Ti-doped internal-tin Nb3Sn ITER wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 27, 105004 (2014).

44. Dylla, M. T., Schultz, S. E. & Jewell, M. C. Fracture strength distribution of individual Nb3Sn filaments. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 6001907 (2016).

45. Barth, C. et al. Quantitative correlation between the void morphology of niobium-tin wires and their irreversible critical current degradation upon mechanical loading. Scientific Reports 8, 6589 (2018).

46. Cheggour, N. et al. Precipitous change of the irreversible strain limit with heat-treatment temperature in Nb3Sn wires made by the restacked-rod process. Scientific Reports 8, 13048 (2018).

47. Bajas, H. et al. Cold test results of the LARP HQ Nb3Sn quadrupole magnet at 1.9 K. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 23, 4002606 (2013).

48. Ferracin, P. et al. Magnet design of the 150 mm aperture low-β quadrupoles for the high luminosity LHC. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 24, 4002306 (2014).

49. Ferracin, P. et al. Development of MQXF: the Nb3Sn low-β quadrupole for the HiLumi LHC. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4000207 (2016).

50. Izquierdo, S. et al. Second-generation coil design of the Nb3Sn low-β quadrupole for the high luminosity LHC. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 26, 4001105 (2016).

51. Stoynev, S. et al. Quench performance and field quality of FNAL twin-aperture 11 T Nb3Sn dipole model for LHC upgrades. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 27, 4000705 (2017).

52. Stoynev, S. et al. Summary of test results of MQXFS1—the first short model 150 mm aperture Nb3Sn quadrupole for the high-luminosity LHC upgrade. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 4001705 (2018).

53. Santini, C. Ambrosio, G. & Appollinari, G. MQXFA coils handling & shipping requirements. US HL-LHC Accelerator Upgrade Project. http://us-hilumi-docdb.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/ShowDocument?docid=820.

54. Ekin, J. W. Effect of transverse compressive stress on the critical current and upper critical field of Nb3Sn. J. Appl. Phys. 62, 4829–4834 (1987).

55. Seeber, B., Ferreira, A., Abächerli, V. & Flükiger, R. Critical current of a Nb3Sn bronze route conductor under uniaxial tensile and transverse compressive stress. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 20, S184–S188 (2007).

56. Mondonico, G. et al. Effect of quasi-hydrostatical radial pressure on I c of Nb3Sn wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 115002 (2012).

57. Walters, C. R., Davidson, I. M. & Tuck, G. E. Long sample high sensitivity critical current measurements under strain. Cryogenics 26, 406–412 (1986).

58. Cheggour, N. & Hampshire, D. P. A probe for investigating the effects of temperature, strain, and magnetic field on transport critical currents in superconducting wires and tapes. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 71, 4521–4530 (2000).

59. Goodrich, L. F., Cheggour, N., Stauffer, T. C., Filla, B. J. & Lu, X. F. Kiloampere, variable-temperature, critical-current measurements of high-field superconductors. J. Res. NIST 118, 301–352 (2013).

60. Joint Committee for Guides in Metrology. Evaluation of measurement data — guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. BIPM, IEC, IFCC, ILAC, ISO, IUPAC, IUPAP, and OIML, JCGM 100:2008, GUM 1995 with minor corrections, https://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_100_2008_E.pdf (2008a)

61. Seeber, B., Mondonico, G. & Senatore, C. Toward a standard for critical current versus axial strain measurements of Nb3Sn. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 25, 054002 (2012).

62. Taylor, D. M. J. & Hampshire, D. P. Properties of helical springs used to measure the axial strain dependence of the critical current density in superconducting wires. Supercond. Sci. Technol. 18, 356–368 (2005).

63. Ekin, J. et al. Compressive pre-strain in high-niobium-fraction Nb3Sn superconductors. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 15, 3560–3563 (2005).

64. Buehler, E. & Levinstein, H. J. Effect of tensile stress on the transition temperature and current-carrying capacity of Nb3Sn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 3856–3860 (1965).

66. International Standard IEC 61788-4. Superconductivity – Residual resistance ratio measurement – Residual resistance ratio of Nb-Ti and Nb3Sn composite superconductors. Edition 4.0, 2016-01.

67. Matsushita, T. et al. Round robin test of residual resistance ratio of Nb3Sn composite superconductors. IEEE Trans. Appl. Supercond. 28, 6000205 (2018).

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of High Energy Physics, Grants DE-SC0010690, DE-SC0017657, and partially through the U.S. LHC Accelerator Research Program (LARP). A portion of this work was also supported by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (LBNL), subcontract No. 7216283. A portion of this work was performed at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL), supported by the National Science Foundation Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida. We thank A.K. Ghosh from Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL) for conducting six heat-treatment cycles. We thank L. Marks from NHMFL for preparing the sample that is presented in Fig. 1(c), as part of a training to mount samples on the Walters’ strain device and apparatus. We are also very grateful to R.B. Goldfarb from NIST for enabling the experimental work performed at NIST. Nb3Sn RRP wires were provided by the U.S. Conductor Development Program (CDP), managed by D. Dietderich and I. Pong at LBNL and supported by DOE contract number DE-AC02-05CH11231 and LBNL. RRP is a registered trademark of Oxford Instruments, Superconducting Technology. Certain commercial materials are specified in order to adequately describe the experiment; endorsement by NIST is not implied. Contribution of NIST, an agency of the U.S. government, not subjected to copyright. N. Cheggour is a NIST Associate.

Author information

Authors

Contributions

N.C. designed the study, performed the electromechanical and RRR measurements, analyzed the data, and prepared the manuscript. T.C.S. mounted the samples on the Walters strain device and apparatus. W.S. commissioned furnaces, prepared the strain and RRR samples, and conducted 44 heat-treatment cycles. L.F.G. developed the software for acquiring transport data and for analyzing the irreversible strain limit. J.D.S developed the software for analyzing the irreversible strain limit and analyzed the underlying critical-current vs. strain data to extract the irreversible-strain-limit values. N.C., L.F.G. and T.C.S. designed and commissioned the Walters strain apparatus. L.F.G., and T.C.S. designed and commissioned the RRR apparatus. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Najib Cheggour.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Cheggour, N., Stauffer, T.C., Starch, W. et al. Implications of the strain irreversibility cliff on the fabrication of particle-accelerator magnets made of restacked-rod-process Nb3Sn wires. Sci Rep 9, 5466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41817-7

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41817-7

• Machine learning applied to X-ray tomography as a new tool to analyze the voids in RRP Nb3Sn wires

• T. Bagni
• G. Bovone
• C. Senatore

Scientific Reports (2021)