Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Glucocorticoids do not influence a secondary sexual trait or its behavioral expression in eastern fence lizards


Secondary sexual traits and associated behaviors can be influenced by environmental factors such as exposure to stressors. Such effects may be mediated by the physiological stress response, which is typified by the release of glucocorticoid hormones. The effects of glucocorticoids on sexual traits such as plumage and display coloration have most commonly been studied in isolation rather than in conjunction with other pertinent aspects of signalling, such as behavior and habitat use, though these have substantial potential to alter signal perception. Here we test the effects of corticosterone (CORT), a common glucocorticoid, on a secondary sexual trait (badge coloration) in male eastern fence lizards (Sceloporus undulatus), and behaviors associated with its expression. We show that neither baseline nor experimentally manipulated CORT levels were associated with badge coloration. Further, elevation of CORT levels in the field did not alter signalling or associated territorial behaviors. There was a trend for CORT-treatment to influence perch height selection, which may influence signal perception. We suggest that future studies investigating the effects of environmental stressors and associated physiological changes on secondary sexual traits should consider behaviors and ecology relevant to signal perception in order to best understand the influence of stressors in nature.


Secondary sexual traits - such as bright plumage or elaborate ornamentation, and associated signalling behaviors - are important for territoriality and mate choice1,2,3. Traditional models of sexual selection have focused on the genetic basis of secondary sexual traits4, but such traits can also can be influenced by environmental factors, generating considerable within-individual variation in trait expression over time based on factors such as condition5,6,7,8. For example, exposure to environmental stressors can influence secondary sexual traits in vertebrates9. High population density, a common ecological stressor, is associated with reduced ventral coloration in the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara10; nutritional stress affects ornamental plumage in birds11; and parasite load correlates with aspects of male structural coloration in Gallotia lizards12. Given the influence of individual condition, sexual traits can function as signals of, for example, competitive and foraging ability and resistance to parasites13,14,15,16.

Effects of stressor exposure on sexual traits are likely to be mediated by the physiological stress response, a suite of neuroendocrine processes characterized by activation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis (HPA) and subsequent release of glucocorticoid hormones which facilitate appropriate reactions to and recovery from stressors17,18,19. Links between glucocorticoids and the expression of carotenoid-based coloration are well-established20,21,22,23, potentially due to glucocorticoid-driven redirection of carotenoids (which are primarily antioxidants) to immune functions24. Glucocorticoids can also influence melanic coloration25 through inhibiting effects on melanogenesis26. Although stress effects on primarily visual traits such as plumage and display coloration have most commonly been studied in isolation27,28, color frequently functions as part of a multi-modal display which also includes behavioral components28,29,30. Given the common effects of stress on behavior (for example, increased vigilance and shelter-seeking behaviors9), it seems likely that exposure to environmental stressors should also influence behavioral components of sexual traits. The effects of stress on behavioral components of multi-modal traits may be especially important if the visual component requires a behavioral (e.g. postural31,32) adjustment in order to be seen, or if habitat choice relates directly to signalling efficiency29,33,34.

Here, we test the effects of physiological stress on male secondary sexual traits and behaviors relevant to their expression, in the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Adult male eastern fence lizards have bright blue and contrasting black gular (throat) and ventral (abdominal) badges (Fig. 1) which function in sex recognition and intrasexual signalling35. Male badge coloration is influenced by hormones in a number of Sceloporus species35,36,37; for example, male secondary coloration is influenced by plasma corticosterone (corticosterone, hereafter CORT, the primary glucocorticoid in reptiles38) in the spiny lizard (Sceloporus pyrocephalus), with dull gular stripes being associated with higher CORT37. We therefore expect that baseline CORT will correspond with badge color, and that experimental elevations of CORT will change badge color in male fence lizards – in both cases we predict that elevated levels of CORT would be associated with paler, less vivid badges.

Figure 1

Diagram showing typical selections from the blue and black segments of S. undulatus male ventral badges (A,B – approx. 15 scales each) and the blue and black segments of gular badges (C,D – approx. 5 scales each) respectively. RGB values (intensity of the red, green and blue color components) were extracted from these selections using the Average Filter function, and the Color Dropper Tool in Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA).

The ventral badges of Sceloporus lizards are cryptic unless displayed35,36,39, including through conspicuous “headbob” and “pushup” displays that expose the gular and abdominal regions40,41,42. Previous work in this genus has linked plasma CORT levels with habitat use, with hatchlings moving to higher elevations when CORT levels were experimentally elevated43. If adult males do the same, this could alter the visibility of their badges during display, an important factor in determining perch height selection in territorial lizards. The polygamous mating system of Sceloporus means that the outcome of social encounters are important for fitness42,44. Any changes in secondary coloration and its behavioral expression due to exposure to a stressor are therefore likely to have fitness-relevant outcomes.

We conducted three studies to examine the relationship between CORT and color and/or its use in adult male fence lizards (Sceloporus undulatus). First, in a Field Baseline study, we investigated the effects of glucocorticoids on male badge coloration by testing the association between baseline levels of a glucocorticoid hormone, CORT, and the color of male badge components (the blue ventral and gular segments, and the corresponding black segments). Second, we conducted a Lab Manipulation experiment, which tested causal effects of glucocorticoid elevation on male badge color using a manipulative experiment that elevated CORT to levels likely to be frequently experienced by this species. Lastly, using a Field Manipulation experiment, we investigated glucocorticoid effects on display behavior by experimentally elevating CORT levels of male lizards in the field and quantifying their display behavior and pertinent aspects of their habitat use, including time spent in refugia and perch height selection. By investigating effects on multiple aspects of this multicomponent signal, we aim to illuminate the effects of glucocorticoids elevated to ecologically relevant stress-induced levels on male secondary sexual traits in lizards.


Field baseline

To test for correlations between CORT and badge coloration, we captured male S. undulatus from three populations in southern Alabama (Geneva State Forest, Blakeley State Park, and Conecuh National Forest) in April and May of 2016 and 2017. Immediately upon capture we collected a blood sample from the postorbital sinus (time to bleed = 199.2 ± 13.8 seconds). Samples were kept on ice until centrifugation. Plasma was separated and frozen within 4 hrs of collection for later CORT analysis at The Pennsylvania State University. We obtained plasma samples from 46 males (N = 23 in 2015 and N = 23 in 2017). Lizards were transported in cloth bags from field sites to Solon Dixon Forestry Education Center, where they were weighed (to the nearest 0.01 g) and measured (snout-vent length, to the nearest 0.1 cm). Lizards were immediately photographed under standardized light conditions following the protocol of Langkilde & Boronow (2012). In short, the lizards’ ventral surfaces were photographed against a piece of white paper under standardized lighting: in a room illuminated only by overhead fluorescent tubes and with no windows. No auxiliary light (e.g. flash) was provided. Photographs were taken with a tripod-mounted Sony Cyber shot DSC-H5 digital camera (Sony Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). We manually set the exposure settings (shutter speed 4, ISO 100, F 2.8) and white balance to avoid inappropriate weighting of color values resulting from automatic color balance. Digital photographs do not capture light in the ultraviolet spectrum, however, like humans, lizard color photoreceptors respond best to red (long wavelength), green (medium wavelength), and blue (short wavelength) light45. Lizards have an additional ultraviolet wavelength-responsive color photoreceptor45, but Sceloporus undulatus badges exhibit low reflectance within UV wavelengths46. Lizard internal cloacal temperature was measured immediately prior to photographing using a thermocouple thermometer (Fluke Corporation, Everett, WA).

Badge color properties were extracted from photographs using Adobe Photoshop (Adobe Systems Incorporated, San Jose, CA). The white balance of each photograph was standardized, and the average color of four areas was then determined: the blue and black segments of the ventral badge, and the blue and black segments of the gular badge, using the right-side badges in all cases. An area at the centre of each segment was selected using the Elliptical Marquee Tool. The same number of scales was selected to represent each segment from each photograph: 15 scales for the ventral badge segments, and 5 scales for the gular badge segments (Fig. 1). Selecting from the same location of each badge (the centre of the badge) helped to account for variation between individuals in uniformity of color across the segment. The average color of these selections was obtained using the Average Filter function; the Color Picker Tool was then used to obtain RGB color channel values. We use RGB values instead of another commonly used metric, HSB (hue, saturation, and brightness), as HSB is based on human vision and requires image conversion47. We took digital photographs of a set of reflectance standards (Q13 Color Separation Guide and Gray Scale, Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY, USA), fit a calibration curve, and derived a linearization equation to linearize the responses of our camera to changes in light intensity. Previous work in this species has shown that these color measurements are highly repeatable48.

Plasma CORT was measured via a commercially-available enzyme immunoassay (Corticosterone High Sensitivity EIA, Immunodiagnostic Systems LTD., Fountain Hills, AZ, USA) which has been previously validated for use in this species43. Plasma (5 uL) was brought to a final volume of 50 uL with assay buffer, and final CORT concentrations corrected for the dilution factor; all samples fell in the detectable range of the standard curve. The mean intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation for baseline CORT were 7.8% and 13.4%. This procedure was followed for quantification of all CORT concentrations in this study.

Effects of baseline CORT on RGB values of male lizard badge segments were analysed in repeated measures MANOVAs using the statistical software JMP (Pro 13, SAS Institute Inc). The three color channels were analysed in separate models, with R/G/B values for the four badge segments (ventral blue, ventral black, gular blue, gular black) from each individual set as dependent variables to control for likely covariance in color within individuals. This model structure allows us to assess variation between individuals based on CORT levels, as well as to assess whether the badge segments change relative to each other (for example, if RGB values change in blue segments but not black, and vice versa). Initial global models for each color channel included the following independent variables: lizard internal temperature prior to photographing, SVL, body condition (residuals of log-transformed mass~SVL correlation), and baseline CORT (ng/mL, log-transformed to improve normality, hereafter logCORT). We also included year (N = 2) and site of capture (N = 6) as covariates, and an interaction term, logCORT*year, to test for different effects of baseline CORT on color between years. Non-significant terms were removed from the model (α > 0.05); logCORT was retained in all models as our term of interest. Mean values are presented as mean ± 1 standard error throughout, unless stated otherwise.

Laboratory Manipulation

To experimentally test the effect of CORT on badge coloration, we captured 39 adult male S. undulatus from six populations across Alabama (Geneva State Forest, Conecuh National Forest), Florida (Blackwater River State Forest), Tennessee (Standing Stone State Park, Edgar Evins State Park), and Arkansas (St. Francis National Forest) in April and May of 2012. Lizards were measured and weighed upon capture (as described under Field Baseline) and transported in cloth bags to Pennsylvania State University, where they were individually housed in plastic enclosures as described in McCormick and Langkilde49.

Lizards were allowed to acclimate in the lab for 1.5 months (47–77 days depending on date of capture), after which they were photographed (see methods below), and randomly assigned to a treatment or control group. Lizards in the treatment group (N = 20) received daily application of a solution of CORT (P92%, Sigma C2505) dissolved in sesame oil (1 μg CORT/1 μL sesame oil), which resulted in the lizards receiving an average of 0.87 ug CORT per g body mass (0.50–1.25 ug/g body mass). Lizards in the control group (N = 19) received the sesame oil vehicle only. We applied 6 uL of either CORT solution or sesame oil only to the backs of lizards every day for 23 days. The oil and hormone were quickly absorbed due to the lipophilic nature of lizard skin50. A CORT-dosage in this range (0.8 μg/g body mass) results in an elevation of circulating plasma CORT concentrations approximately 30 minutes after application, which peaks at ecologically relevant stress-induced concentrations, and return to baseline levels by 90 minutes post-dosing51. This procedure and dosage level mimics the increase in plasma CORT after exposure to ecologically relevant stressors, such as non-lethal exposure to predatory fire ants52,53, heat stress (R. Telemeco, pers. comm.), chasing43 and restraint54, suggesting that elevations of CORT in this range allows us to relatively non-invasively mimic the short-term increases in CORT experienced by free-living lizards who encounter natural stressors daily. This protocol explicitly does not test the effects of pharmacologically high levels of glucocorticoids which are less likely to be frequent in natural situations55, and which may be better replicated using the sustained release CORT through hormone implants56,57. Eighteen to 21 hours after the final treatment was applied, we collected blood samples from lizards and then photographed lizards again (see Field Baseline). Plasma CORT was measured, and mean intra- and inter-assay coefficients of variation of these tests were 7.73% and 2.79%. Photography and color information extraction methods were as described under Field Baseline, with the exception that lizard temperature was measured using infrared thermometer temperature gun (Raytek MT4, Raytek Corporation, Santa Cruz, CA, U.S.A). External body temperatures obtained using this method are significantly correlated with cloacal temperatures of the same lizards obtained with a thermocouple (P < 0.01, D. Owen, unpublished data).

Effects of CORT treatment on RGB values of male lizard badge segments were analysed in MANOVAs using JMP. Initial global models for each color channel included the following independent variables: lizard body temperature, SVL, body condition (residuals of log-transformed mass~SVL correlation), site of capture (N = 7), and which treatment the lizard received (CORT or control). As before, non-significant terms were removed from the models (α > 0.05). There were no differences between the treatment groups in initial coloration (Red F1,31 = 1.09, P = 0.30; Green F1,30 = 1.41, P = 0.24; Blue F1,30 = 1.03, P = 0.32).

Field manipulation

We conducted an experiment to test the effects of short-term increases in glucocorticoid hormones on male behavior in three populations in southern Alabama (Geneva State Forest, Blakeley State Park, and Conecuh National Forest) in April and May of 2016 and 2017. Male lizards were located in the field and given an in situ transdermal application of a CORT solution (4 ug CORT/1 mL of sesame oil vehicle) or a vehicle control using a fine paintbrush attached to a 6 ft fishing pole. We predict that this method transferred a mean dose volume in the order of 6.5 ± 0.67 ul, approximated by using this method to apply oil onto strips of paper which were subsequently weighed to determine volume of oil transferred (N = 20). The body mass of males captured over 2016 and 2017 for the baseline CORT/color study ranged from 4.2–12.7 g, with a mean of 8.8 g. Assuming a similar distribution (behavioral trials were conducted at the same sites, and therefore drew from the same populations), our dosing protocol resulted in doses ranging from 2.05–6.13 ug/g lizard body mass, with a mean dose concentration of 3.0 ug/g body mass. All doses were prepared and allocated a random number in advance so that when the numbered dose was selected haphazardly in the field, the observer was blind to treatment.

From initial sighting of the lizard, the mean time to apply the dose (“dose time”) was 83.7 seconds. After dose application, the observer moved to a distance of approximately 5 metres so as to minimize the effects of observer presence on lizard behavior. The lizard’s start position (actual location on the tree) and elevation (meters, to the nearest 0.5 m) were noted in order to calculate change in elevation, and distance moved during a trial. For a period of thirty minutes from the time of dosing, the following behaviors were recorded: number of push-ups, whether or not the lizard performed head-bobs, and how much time (min) the lizard spent in a refuge (not visible from directly above). The total distance the lizard moved and the lizard’s distance from the start position at the end of the thirty-minute period were estimated visually to the nearest 0.5 m. Elevation of the lizard (meters) was estimated to the nearest 0.5 m every five minutes, including the final elevation. Change in elevation, maximum elevation, and average elevation throughout the thirty-minute period were then calculated. Whether or not the lizard sought refuge during the trial was also recorded. The lizard was deemed to have sought refuge if it was no longer visible from directly above. Ambient temperature was measured, and cloud cover estimated visually (to the nearest 10%). Given the potential for subjectivity in estimating distance and height, only one researcher conducted trials to maximize consistency in distance and elevation estimation. Trials were discontinued if the focal lizard interacted with another lizard, as social interactions have a strong effect on behavior and CORT levels44. Lizards that did not have an available perch of at least 15 m within 2 m of their starting position were not used to avoid variation in maximum, average, and change in elevation due to differences in perch availability (i.e. if a lizard was on a downed log with no alternative perches nearby it would not be able to increase its perch height).

To minimize any other source of stress, lizards were not handled during these trials. Once a trial was completed, the same area (a radius of 20 m) was not resampled unless we were confident we were not resampling the same lizard, so it is likely that no male was tested twice in the same year as part of this experiment and, given low rates of recapture in these populations it is unlikely that any males were tested in both years. We conducted behavioral trials on a total of 40 males (30 from 2016, 10 from 2017): 19 were dosed with vehicle control and 21 were dosed with exogenous CORT.

The effect of treatment (CORT or control dose) on male behavior was tested in a set of linear mixed models, with the following as dependent variables: frequency of push-ups; the presence/absence of head-bobbing; total distance moved; average elevation; maximum elevation achieved; and whether or not the lizard sought refuge during the trial (0 – no, 1 – refuge sought). In all cases models include the site at which the study was conducted as a random term (N = 6). We first tested associations with year, month, dose time, cloud cover, and temperature, using single-term linear models controlling for site as a random term; where there was no significant correlation these terms were not included in final models to preserve degrees of freedom. As the presence/absence of head-bobbing was a binary variable, this model used a binomial error structure.

All protocols described adhere to the Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research and the Institutional Guidelines of Penn State University (IACUC #35780 and # 44595), and animal collection was permitted by the respective States.

Ethical approval

The research presented in this article adheres to the Guidelines for the Use of Animals in Research and the Institutional Guidelines of Penn State University. Approval for all procedures was granted by Penn State’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (protocol numbers 35780 and 44595). Animal collection was permitted by the respective States.

Informed consent

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.


Field Baseline: baseline CORT and correlations with male badge color

Baseline CORT did not predict variation in badge coloration between individuals (RGB repeated measures MANOVA: Red F1,43 = 0.19, P = 0.66; Green F1,43 = 1.19, P = 0.28; Blue F1,43 = 2.69, P = 0.11 Fig. 2). There were significant differences between years in all color channels across badge segments (Year: Red F1,43 = 11.84, P = 0.001; Green F1,43 = 6.56, P = 0.013; Blue F1,43 = 5.08, P = 0.029); badge segments were significantly lighter in 2017 (higher RGB values) than in 2016. CORT level had a significant effect on within-individual variation (i.e. between-segment) in Red color values; higher CORT levels were associated with higher Red values in chest badge segments, but reduced Red values in chin segments (F3,41 = 3.57, P = 0.02). Baseline CORT levels did not predict within-individual variation in Green (F1,41 = 2.73, P = 0.06) or Blue (F1,41 = 2.64, P = 0.06) values.

Figure 2

Baseline CORT in male lizards was not significantly associated (MANOVA p > 0.05) with color channel (RGB) values in ventral (a – blue, b – black) or gular badge segments (c – blue, d – black).

Laboratory Manipulation: effects of elevated CORT on male badge color

CORT treatment did not result in changes in badge coloration: there were no significant differences in any color channel measured for badges of individuals that had received the CORT or control treatments (Treatment: Red F1,27 = 1.44, P = 0.24; Green F1,27 = 0.16, P = 0.69; Blue F1,34 = 0.68, P = 0.41; Fig. 3). In this experiment, SVL predicted color channel values, with larger individuals having lower Red and Green values, and therefore being darker overall (SVL: Red F1,27 = 8.21, P = 0.008; Green F1,27 = 9.76, P = 0.004). Blue values were not affected by SVL (F1,27 = 3.28, P = 0.08). There was also significant variation between sites of initial capture in Red and Green values (Site: Red F6,27 = 3.58, P = 0.01; Green F6,27 = 2.90, P = 0.03), but not in Blue values (F1,27 = 1.41, P = 0.25).

Figure 3

CORT and control-treated males did not significantly differ from each other in color channel (RGB) values after 23 days of treatment (MANOVA p > 0.05) in ventral badge segments (a – blue, b – black) or gular badge segments (c – blue, d – black).

Field Manipulation: effects of elevated CORT on male signalling behavior

CORT treatment did not affect the number of push-ups performed by male lizards (T1,39 = −0.58, P = 0.58), the likelihood of males displaying head-bobbing behavior (Z1,39 = 0.29, P = 0.77), or the total distance (m) male lizards moved during the trial period (T1,38 = 0.037, P = 0.97). The higher the percentage of cloud cover during a trial, the less the male lizards moved overall (T1,38 = −3.61, P < 0.001). Thirteen males sought refuge during trials; there was no significant effect of treatment on this behavior (5 CORT-treated and 8 control lizards sought refuge; Z1,39 = −0.73, P = 0.46).

Although all trials were started in situ and there was thus variation between male start elevation, start elevation did not differ between treatment groups (Kruskal Wallis X21 = 0.31, P = 0.58); differences in average and maximum height therefore represent movement to higher elevations during the trial itself. Treatment had some influence on the height at which male lizards chose to perch (Fig. 4): there was a trend for CORT-treated lizards to maintain a higher average height during trials; however, this result did not achieve statistical significance (T1,39 = 1.84, P = 0.06, control mean 1.78 m ± 0.55, CORT-treatment mean 3.0 m ± 0.6). The maximum height attained during trials was greater for the CORT-treated than control males (T1,39 = 2.00, P = 0.04, control mean 2.6 m ± 0.7, CORT-treatment mean 4.9 m ± 0.9), though this effect is driven largely by one male that achieved a maximum height of 15 m in the CORT-treated group (there was no significant effect of treatment with this male excluded: T1,38 = 1.59, P = 0.10).

Figure 4

Male lizards treated with CORT in the field perched higher on average during trials than controls (P = 0.06) and trended to have a greater maximum height during the trial period. Individual data points are shown in grey. Average elevation values in both treatment groups are shown as open circles, and maximum elevation values in both treatment groups are shown as solid circles. Mean ± 1 SE for the control and CORT-treated groups are overlaid in black.


Exposure to environmental stressors has long been thought likely to influence aspects of sexual signals and traits through direct or indirect effects of glucocorticoid hormones such as corticosterone (CORT)9. Studies have focused largely on long-term stress or glucocorticoid exposure which may not represent environmental stimuli at ecologically relevant levels in wild-living animals. Here, we explicitly test the effects of glucocorticoid elevation on sexual signalling traits at ecologically relevant levels and timescales. Short-term stimuli have the potential to alter iridophore- and melanin-based coloration58, such as that in Sceloporus39. However, we show using a combination of baseline CORT measurements and CORT manipulations in the field and laboratory that CORT did not influence gular or ventral badge coloration, or signalling behavior, in wild-caught eastern fence lizards. These traits may be maintained in the face of stressors due to their importance in determining male fence lizard fitness through acquiring and maintaining territories42,44; alternatively, these traits may not be strongly condition-dependent, or simply not affected by short-term changes in CORT. However, there was some indication that male lizards altered their perch height selection, which may have consequences for signal perception. It is difficult to assess whether our results represent a common lack of a link between ecologically-relevant levels of physiological stress and coloration/signalling behavior, or are more anomalous given a likely publication bias toward significant results in ecology and evolution59.

There is cross-taxa evidence for effects on secondary sexual traits of environmental stressor-exposure, and/or specific components of the physiological stress response10,11,12,20,21,22,23,25. In lizards, (carotenoid-based) coloration can be influenced by glucocorticoid concentrations20,21. However, the evidence for glucocorticoid effects on color traits in sceloporine lizards is mixed. Blue gular stripe brightness correlated negatively with plasma CORT in male spiny lizards (Sceloporus pyrocephalus)37, but no correlation existed between CORT and gular/ventral melanin in the western fence lizard (Sceloporus occidentalis)60. It is possible that the characteristic badges in these lizards are robust to environmental and physiological change; for example, male Sceloporus badge characteristics display a lack of change according to seasonal change61 and fluctuations in testosterone37, potentially suggesting a lack of condition-dependence in this trait. Although sexual signalling traits are often assumed to be condition-dependent, in line with the Handicap Principle62, there is surprisingly little empirical support for this63. Badge coloration in S. undulatus alters according to temperature64, suggesting the ability of this trait to display some lability in the face of short-term environmental variation. The blue coloration in these badges is formed by structural plates which reflect the light. These may be largely permanent once formed, though the distance between these structural plates is temperature-sensitive, altering the reflected color (see64). We showed no link between baseline CORT levels and badge coloration (in terms of RGB values) despite considerable variation in CORT levels. This was supported up by our experimental manipulation, which also found no effects of elevated CORT levels.

In addition to a lack of influence of CORT on secondary sexual trait coloration (baseline and manipulated levels), we found no effect of short-term CORT elevation on signalling and related territorial behaviors in wild male fence lizards. Specifically, in situ CORT treatment did not alter the rate of pushup and head-bob displays, how far lizards moved, and whether they sought refuge. We predicted that signalling behavior may change, given that numerous studies have found behavioral effects of glucocorticoids: for example, common wall lizards (Lacerta vivipara) show increased locomotor activity when CORT is increased50,65. Elevated plasma CORT has also been shown to increase antipredator behaviors in lizards (including Sceloporus), such as hiding or fleeing43,66,67. Nevertheless, these results are in line with a meta-analysis that found no correlation between physiological correlates of stress and the expression of sexual signals across 26 vertebrate species68. Despite no signficant trends for “stress” effects on vocalisation, morphological, or color traits, there was a significant opposite-sex preference for low-stress individuals68. Therefore, although male fence lizards in our study did not show differences in expression of sexual traits, there may still be a cost of higher glucocorticoid levels in terms of female preference that we were not able to quantify. Further, the maintenance of signalling and signalling behaviors in the face of higher glucocorticoids may represent a trade-off between display and survival with downstream costs that were beyond the scope of this study69,70. For example, the trade-off between signalling investment and survival in field crickets71.

Although we found no effects of CORT on secondary sexual coloration or signalling or signalling-relevant behavior, there was a trend for CORT-treated male lizards to move to higher perching elevations, with a mean maximum perch height almost double that of the males that received a control dose. This ~2.5 m difference in perch height has the potential to affect the perception of the secondary sexual signals by conspecifics be removing the male from their line of sight. Although we did not test aspects of signal perception by either conspecific females or rival males, we suggest that perception, and how habitat use might influence perception, is often neglected in the study of sexual signalling, particularly how it is affected by physiological change. Our results emphasize the importance of considering the effects of physiological traits such as glucocorticoids on secondary sexual traits in a holistic way that takes into account species ecology as well as morphology and behavior.

Data Availability

All data are available at


  1. 1.

    Andersson, M. B. Sexual selection. (Princeton University Press, 1994).

  2. 2.

    Andersson, M. & Simmons, L. W. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21, 296–302 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Kirkpatrick, M. Sexual Selection and the Evolution of Female Choice. Evolution (N. Y). 36, 1–12 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Cornwallis, C. K. & Uller, T. Towards an evolutionary ecology of sexual traits. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25, 145–152 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Kotiaho, J. S. Testing the assumptions of conditional handicap theory: Costs and condition dependence of a sexually selected trait. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 48, 188–194 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Cotton, S., Fowler, K., Pomiankowski, A. & Bjorklund, M. Condition Dependence of Sexual Ornament Size and Variation in The Stalk-Eyed Fly Cyrtodiopsis Dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Evolution (N. Y). 58, 1038–1046 (2004).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Vanpé, C. et al. Antler Size Provides an Honest Signal of Male Phenotypic Quality in Roe Deer. Am. Nat. 169, 481–493 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Scheuber, H., Jacot, A. & Brinkhof, M. W. G. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual signal in the field cricket Gryllus campestris. Anim. Behav. 65, 721–727 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Buchanan, K. L. Stress and the evolution of condition-dependent signals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 156–160 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Meylan, S., Clobert, J. & Sinervo, B. Adaptive significance of maternal induction of density‐dependent phenotypes. Oikos 116, 650–661 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    McGraw, K. J., Mackillop, E. A., Dale, J. & Hauber, M. E. Different colors reveal different information: how nutritional stress affects the expression of melanin- and structurally based ornamental plumage. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 3747–3755 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Megía-Palma, R., Martínez, J. & Merino, S. A structural colour ornament correlates positively with parasite load and body condition in an insular lizard species. Sci. Nat. 103 (2016).

  13. 13.

    Berglund, A., Bisazza, A. & Pilastro, A. Armaments and ornaments: an evolutionary explanation of traits of dual utility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58, 385–399 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Folstad, I. & Karter, A. J. Parasites, Bright Males, and the Immunocompetence Handicap Author (s): Ivar Folstad and Andrew John Karter Source: The American Naturalist, Vol. 139, No. 3 (Mar., 1992), pp. 603–622 Published by: The University of Chicago Press for The Ameri. 139, 603–622 (2018).

  15. 15.

    Kodric-Brown, A. & Brown, J. H. Truth in Advertising: The Kinds of Traits Favored by Sexual Selection. Am. Nat. 124, 309–323 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Schantz, T. V., Bensch, S., Grahn, M., Hasselquist, D. & Wittzell, H. Good genes, oxidative stress and condition-dependent sexual signals. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 266, 1–12 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wingfield, J. C. et al. Ecological bases of hormone-behaviour interactions: the ‘emergency life history stage’. Am. Zool. 38, 191–206 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Sapolsky, R. M. In Behavioral Endocrinology (eds Becker, S. M., Breedlove, D. C. & Mccarthy, M. M.) 409–450 (MIT Press, 2002).

  19. 19.

    McEwen, B. S. & Wingfield, J. C. The concept of allostasis in biology and biomedicine. Horm. Behav. 43, 2–15 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cote, J., Meylan, S., Clobert, J. & Voituron, Y. Carotenoid-based coloration, oxidative stress and corticosterone in common lizards. J. Exp. Biol. 213, 2116 LP–2124 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Fitze, P. S. et al. Carotenoid-based colours reflect the stress response in the common lizard. Plos One 4, e5111 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    San-Jose, L. M. & Fitze, P. S. Corticosterone regulates multiple colour traits in Lacerta [Zootoca] vivipara males. J. Evol. Biol. 26, 2681–2690 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Lendvai, Á. Z., Giraudeau, M., Németh, J., Bakó, V. & McGraw, K. J. Carotenoid-based plumage coloration reflects feather corticosterone levels in male house finches (Haemorhous mexicanus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 67, 1817–1824 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Loiseau, C., Fellous, S., Haussy, C., Chastel, O. & Sorci, G. Condition-dependent effects of corticosterone on a carotenoid-based begging signal in house sparrows. Horm. Behav. 53, 266–273 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Roulin, A. et al. Corticosterone mediates the condition-dependent component of melanin-based coloration. Anim. Behav. 75, 1351–1358 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Slominski, A., Tobin, D. J., Shibahara, S. & Wortsman, J. Melanin Pigmentation in Mammalian Skin and Its Hormonal Regulation. Physiol. Rev. 84, 1155–1228 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Badyaev, A. V. & Qvarnström, A. Putting sexual traits into the context of an organism: a life-history persepctive in studies of sexual selection. Auk 119, 301–310 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Hebets, E. A. & Papaj, D. R. Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 57, 197–214 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Endler, J. A. Signals, Signal Conditions, and the Direction of Evolution. Am. Nat. 139, S125–153 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Partan, S. R. & Marler, P. Issues in the Classification of Multimodal Communication Signals. Am. Nat. 166, 231–245 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Steffen, J. E. & Guyer, C. C. Display behaviour and dewlap colour as predictors of contest success in brown anoles. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 111, 646–655 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Johnson, M. A. & Wade, J. Behavioural display systems across nine Anolis lizard species: sexual dimorphisms in structure and function. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 277, 1711–1719 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Endler, J. A. & Basolo, A. L. Sensory ecology, receiver biases and sexual selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 13, 415–420 (1998).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kotiaho, J. S., Alatalo, R. V., Mappes, J. & Parri, S. Microhabitat selection and audible sexual signalling in the wolf spider Hygrolycosa rubrofasciata (Araneae, Lycosidae). Acta Ethol. 2, 123–128 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Cox, R. M., Skelly, S. L., Leo, A. & John-Alder, H. B. Testosterone regulates sexually dimorphic coloration in the eastern fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Copeia 2005, 597–608 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Rand, M. S. Hormonal control of polymorphic and sexually dimorphic coloration in the lizard Sceloporus undulatus erythrocheilus. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 88, 461–468 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Calisi, R. M. & Hews, D. K. Steroid correlates of multiple color traits in the spiny lizard, Sceloporus pyrocephalus. J. Comp. Physiol. B, Biochem. Syst. Environ. Physiol. 177, 641–654 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Meylan, S. & Clobert, J. Is corticosterone-mediated phenotype development adaptive? Maternal corticosterone treatment enhances survival in male lizards. Horm. Behav. 48, 44–52 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Morrison, R. L., Rand, M. S. & Frost-Mason, S. K. Cellular Basis of Color Differences in Three Morphs of the Lizard Sceloporus undulatus erythrocheilus. Copeia 1995, 397–408 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Rothblum, L. & Jenssen, T. A. Display repertoire analysis of Sceloporus undulatus hyacinthinus (Sauria: Iguanidae) from south-western Virginia. Anim. Behav. 26, 130–137 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Cooper, W. E. & Burns, N. Social significance of ventrolateral coloration in the fence lizard, Sceloporus undulatus. Anim. Behav. 35, 526–532 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Haenel, G. J., Smith, L. C. & John-Alder, H. B. Home-Range Analysis in Sceloporus undulatus (Eastern Fence Lizard). I. Spacing Patterns and the Context of Territorial Behavior. Copeia 2003, 99–112 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Trompeter, W. P. & Langkilde, T. Invader danger: lizards faced with novel predators exhibit an altered behavioral response to stress. Horm. Behav. 60, 152–8 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Smith, L. C. & John-Alder, H. B. Seasonal Specificity of Hormonal, Behavioral, and Coloration Responses to Within- and Between-Sex Encounters in Male Lizards (Sceloporus undulatus). Horm. Behav. 36, 39–52 (1999).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Loew, E. R., Fleishman, L. J., Foster, R. G. & Provencio, I. Visual pigments and oil droplets in Caribbean anoles. J. Exp. Biol. 205, 927–938 (2002).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Stoehr, A. M. & Mcgraw, K. J. Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Ultraviolet Reflectance of Color Patches in Male Sceloporus undulatus and Anolis carolinensis Published by: Society for the Study of Amphibians and Reptiles Stable. Society 35, 168–171, (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Stevens, M., Parraga, C. A., Cuthill, I. C., Partridge, J. C. & Troscianko, T. S. Using digital photography to study animal coloration. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 90, 211–237 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Langkilde, T. & Boronow, K. E. Color as a Signal: The Relationship between Coloration and Morphology in Male Eastern Fence Lizards, Sceloporus undulatus. J. Herpetol. 44, 261–271 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    McCormick, G. L. & Langkilde, T. Immune responses of eastern fence lizards (Sceloporus undulatus) to repeated acute elevation of corticosterone. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 204, 135–140 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Belliure, J. & Clobert, J. Behavioral sensitivity to corticosterone in juveniles of the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Physiol. Behav. 81, 121–127 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    MacLeod, K. J., Sheriff, M. J., Ensminger, D. C., Owen, D. A. S. & Langkilde, T. L. Survival and reproductive costs of repeated acute glucocorticoid elevations in a captive, wild animal. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol, (2018).

  52. 52.

    Owen, D. A. S., Robbins, T. R. & Langkilde, T. L. Trans-generational but not early-life exposure to stressors influences offspring morphology and survival. Oecologia 186, 347–355 (2018).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    McCormick, G. L., Robbins, T. R., Cavigelli, S. A. & Langkilde, T. Ancestry trumps experience: Transgenerational but not early life stress affects the adult physiological stress response. Horm. Behav. 87, 115–121 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Graham, S. P., Freidenfelds, N. A., McCormick, G. L. & Langkilde, T. The impacts of invaders: Basal and acute stress glucocorticoid profiles and immune function in native lizards threatened by invasive ants. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 176, 400–408 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Boonstra, R. Reality as the leading cause of stress: Rethinking the impact of chronic stress in nature. Funct. Ecol. 27, 11–23 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Breuner, C. W., Patterson, S. H. & Hahn, T. P. In search of relationships between the acute adrenocortical response and fitness. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 157, 288–295 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Crossin, G. T., Love, O. P., Cooke, S. J. & Williams, T. D. Glucocorticoid manipulations in free-living animals: Considerations of dose delivery, life-history context and reproductive state. Funct. Ecol. 30, 116–125 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Nery, L. E. M., Castrucci, A. M. & de, L. Pigment cell signalling for physiological color change. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. Part A Physiol. 118, 1135–1144 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Jennions, M. D. & Møller, A. P. Publication bias in ecology and evolution: an empirical assessment using the ‘trim and fill’method. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 77, 211–222 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Seddon, R. J. & Hews, D. K. Phenotypic correlates of melanization in two Sceloporus occidentalis (Phrynosomatidae) populations: Behavior, androgens, stress reactivity, and ectoparasites. Physiol. Behav. 163, 70–80 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Hews, D. K. & Quinn, V. S. Endocrinology of Species Differences in Sexually Dichromatic Signals. Fox, S. F., McCoy, J. Kelly, Baird, T. A., eds Lizard Soc. Behav. Balt. MD John Hopkins Univ. Press. Chapter 8 253–277 (2003).

  62. 62.

    Zahavi, A. Mate selection-A selection for a handicap. J. Theor. Biol. 53, 205–214 (1975).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Cotton, S., Fowler, K. & Pomiankowski, A. Do sexual ornaments demonstrate heightened condition-dependent expression as predicted by the handicap hypothesis? Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 271, 771–783 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Langkilde, T. & Boronow, K. E. Hot Boys Are Blue: Temperature-Dependent Color Change in Male Eastern Fence Lizards. J. Herpetol. 46, 461–465 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Belliure, J., Meylan, S. & Clobert, J. Prenatal and postnatal effects of corticosterone on behavior in juveniles of the common lizard, Lacerta vivipara. J. Exp. Zool. 301A, 401–410 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Thaker, M., Lima, S. L. & Hews, D. K. Acute corticosterone elevation enhances antipredator behaviors in male tree lizard morphs. Horm. Behav. 56, 51–57 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Langkilde, T. Invasive fire ants alter behavior and morphology of native lizards. Ecology 90, 208–217 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Moore, F. R., Shuker, D. M. & Dougherty, L. Stress and sexual signaling: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav. Ecol. 27, 363–371 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Reznick, D., Nunney, L. & Tessier, A. Big houses, big cars, superfleas and the costs of reproduction. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15, 421–425 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Badyaev, A. V. Stress-induced variation in evolution: from behavioural plasticity to genetic assimilation. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 272, 877–886 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Hunt, J. et al. High-quality male field crickets invest heavily in sexual display but die young. Nature 432, 1024 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We thank the Landsdale family for access to their land and personnel at St Francis National Forest, Edgar Evins State Park, Standing Stone State Park, Blackwater River State Forest, Blakeley State Park, Geneva State Forest, Conecuh National Forest, and especially Joel Martin and the Solon Dixon Forestry Education Center, for logistical support. We also thank Travis Robbins, Sean Graham, Jill Newman, Shannon McGinley, Cameron Venable, David Ensminger, Jennifer Heppner, Nicole Freidenfelds, Mark Herr, Asia Murphy, and Michaleia Nudd for assistance in the lab and field. We also thank two anonymous reviewers, and Dr Mark Daly, for helpful comments on previous drafts. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (IOS1456655 to MJS and TL; DGE1255832 to GLM; IOS1051367 to TL) and the Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists (Gaige Award to GLM).

Author information




All authors contributed to experimental design and data collection. K.M. and T.L. conducted the statistical analysis. All authors contributed to the writing and editing of the study.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. J. MacLeod.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

MacLeod, K.J., McCormick, G.L. & Langkilde, T. Glucocorticoids do not influence a secondary sexual trait or its behavioral expression in eastern fence lizards. Sci Rep 9, 5229 (2019).

Download citation


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing