Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Type–II superlattices base visible/extended short–wavelength infrared photodetectors with a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor

## Abstract

Visible/extended short–wavelength infrared photodetectors with a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor based on type–II InAs/AlSb/GaSb superlattices have been demonstrated. The photodetectors are designed to have a 100% cut-off wavelength of ~2.4 μm at 300K, with sensitivity down to visible wavelengths. The photodetectors exhibit room–temperature (300K) peak responsivity of 0.6 A/W at ~1.7 μm, corresponding to a quantum efficiency of 43% at zero bias under front–side illumination, without any anti–reflection coating where the visible cut−on wavelength of the devices is <0.5 µm. With a dark current density of 5.3 × 10−4 A/cm2 under −20 mV applied bias at 300K, the photodetectors exhibit a specific detectivity of 4.72 × 1010 cm·Hz1/2/W. At 150K, the photodetectors exhibit a dark current density of 1.8 × 10−10 A/cm2 and a quantum efficiency of 40%, resulting in a detectivity of 5.56 × 1013 cm·Hz1/2/W.

## Introduction

Visible/extended short–wavelength infrared (Vis/e–SWIR) imaging is a non-destructive optical analysis technique that can be used to obtain information that would otherwise be unavailable with conventional visible light imaging alone1,2; for instance, it can be used to see hidden layers in cultural heritage objects. This technique can be used to distinguish and recognize materials, to enhance the visibility of faint or obscured features, to detect signs of degradation, and to study the effects of environmental conditions on objects. This same capability for extended spectral imaging can also be used by NASA for planetary sciences to study the atmospheres and surfaces earth and other nearby planetary bodies. Images in the e-SWIR spectrum are used in many satellites for remote sensing applications. The spectrum is well known for its sensitivity to moisture, which offers vital measures in remote sensing applications, such as leaf water content, plant water stress, the remote sensing of vegetation liquid water and forest fire burn severity3,4,5.

Precise quantification of spectral and spatial features with extended spectral imaging can also be implemented in medical applications such as to analyze spectral and colorimetric properties of the skin reliably and non-invasively for medical applications6. Images taken by Vis/e–SWIR light can offer the interchange between the reflection of visible light, which may be invisible for human eyes which can be an opening for a new domain of special effects or surrealistic colors in variety of materials2,7.

Vis/e–SWIR spectrum imagers are also advantageous for military applications such as, long range visibility, haze/fire penetration, maritime and ground target contrast8. The e-SWIR passes through small particles (haze or smoke) which is a key point for enhanced long range visibility in surveillance applications5,9, where longer wavelength of e-SWIR spectrum also can create better visibility since it is less affected by the Rayleigh scattering5.

For imaging application, multispectral imagers have been presented in which by combinations of Vis/e–SWIR focal plan array (FPA) camera system with thermal infrared (TIR) cameras creates systems with advance interpretable images rather than just a thermal ones10.

So far, a variety of material systems have been used for visible/infrared imaging; with their own advantages and disadvantages. For example, silicon is the main semiconductor material that is used for visible light and near infrared (NIR) image sensors; but it has a fixed cut-off wavelength of ~1.1 µm and it is an indirect bandgap semiconductor which makes it non–ideal for light detection. InxGa1−xAs based photodetectors, which are almost lattice matched to InP substrates, exhibited high performance devices11, however, the performance diminishes at longer wavelengths due to excess of mismatch–induced defects12. Photodetectors based on the more mature mercury–cadmium–telluride (HgCdTe) material system are able to cover the visible/e–SWIR spectral range with remarkable performance; nonetheless, complex fabrication procedure and material growth can make these sensors prohibitively expensive13.

As a developing material system, Type–II superlattices (T2SLs) have plenty of advantages for infrared detection and imaging including unique band gap engineering capability, lower costs for growth and manufacturing, suppression of auger recombination with reliable material uniformity over large grown area14,15,16. T2SLs have recently demonstrated coverage of the e−SWIR spectral region17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24, however, there have been no reports of visible/infrared photodetectors based on the T2SLs material system.

The main challenge for making a visible/e–SWIR photodetector is to suppress the photo–generated carrier recombination near the surface and inside the highly–doped contact. Because most of the visible photons (E > 1 eV) have much higher energy than the absorption region bandgap, they are strongly absorbed near the surface and would recombine either via surface dangling bonds or inside the highly–doped top contact of a conventional e–SWIR photodetector with a ~500 meV bandgap. Therefore, one needs to address these two issues in order to make a Vis/e–SWIR photodetector.

In order to address the surface recombination, a heterostructure with a larger bandgap top window/contact layer should be employed to help move the absorption away from the surface. Replacing the free surface of the Vis/e–SWIR absorption region with a lattice–matched large–bandgap window layer also reduces the interface recombination velocity of the narrower–bandgap absorption region. The second problem of absorption in the highly−doped contact can be solved by avoiding the need to highly dope the contact by extracting the photo−generated carriers from the device with a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor (BECX) instead of a conventional pn junction.

In present work using T2SL InAs/AlSb/GaSb based material, we combined these two schemes together and used a BECX as the window layer and engineered the band−alignment of this hetero−face to efficiently extract photo−generated carriers. The new BECX design allows the T2SL–based Vis/e–SWIR photodetector to operate with lower dark current densities with an optical response covering the visible light spectrum. In this letter, we report the demonstration of visible/extended short–wavelength infrared photodetectors based on type–II InAs/AlSb/GaSb superlattices with a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor.

## Results

Figure 1 demonstrates schematic diagram of conduction (EC) and valence (EV) bands of the visible/e–SWIR photodetector with a BECX, where section 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of the device have ~760, 580, 715, 1040, and 800 meV bandgap, respectively. The 1.1 μm–thick Vis/e–SWIR absorption region of the photodetector (section 2 in Fig. 1) is placed between two parts of the photo–generated carrier extractor. The extractor design extracts holes and electrons from the top and bottom of absorption region, respectively. The absorption region was chosen to have 6/1/5/1 mono–layers (MLs) of InAs/GaSb/AlSb/GaSb (unintentionally doped, n–type-1014 cm−3), respectively. The superlattice was designed using the empirical tight–binding model (ETBM)25. The photo−generated carrier transport inside the absorption region relies entirely on diffusion; thus, the new photo–generated carrier extractor does not require the applied bias which is required by other unipolar photodetector structures, such as nBn and pMp17,26,27; as such, it functions under zero bias like a conventional pn junction photodetector.

Each respective part of the photo–generated carrier extractor only allows extraction of either electrons or holes. The electron extractor (section 1 in Fig. 1) consists of 6/5 MLs of InAs/AlSb (n–type 1018 cm−3), respectively; which performs extraction of the electrons from the absorption region while it blocks the transport of holes and serves as the n−contact.

The combination of sections 3, 4, and 5 in Fig. 1 form the electron barrier and hole extractor. They create a digitally−graded energy profile in the valence band which generates a quasi–electric field and acts like a semi–pn junction. The first section of the electron barrier (Section 3) consists of 4/1/5/1 MLs of InAs/GaSb/AlSb/GaSb, (unintentionally doped, n–type-1014 cm−3), respectively. The middle section of the electron barrier (Section 4) was chosen to have 5/2 MLs of AlAs0.10Sb0.90/GaSb (p–type 1017 cm−3)17, respectively; and finally the last section (Section 5) consists of 10 MLs of GaSb (p–type 1018 cm−3). The thickness of section 4 should be high enough in order to block electron tunneling as much as possible, at the same time this section as a barrier, must be high enough to stop thermally excited electrons passing over the barrier (section 4) and so that there is negligible visible absorption inside this electron–barrier. The wide–bandgap of sections 3 and 4 together are able to reduce the generation/recombination (G-R) based dark current as well as some portion of the dark current which comes from the band–to–band tunneling and trap–assisted.

After choosing the design of superlattice for separate parts of the photodetector the device was grown by solid source molecular beam epitaxy (SSMBE) with group III SUMO® cells and group V valved crackers. The substrate used for the grown material was Te–doped GaSb wafer (n–type-1017 cm−3). The epitaxial growth begun by growing a 100 nm GaSb buffer layer followed by 500 nm n–doped InAs0.91Sb0.09 etch stop layer (1018 cm−3). The whole BECX structure with the thickness of ~1.5 µm was grown next as it is illustrated in Fig. 1. Figure 2 demonstrates the schematic diagram of the whole structure of the photodetector after the epitaxial growth.

The material quality right after MBE growth was evaluated using high–resolution X–ray diffraction (HR–XRD) and atomic force microscopy (Fig. 3a,b). Analysis of the HR−XRD satellite peaks showed the overall periods of sections 1, 2, 3, and 4 were about 33, 45, 39, and 22 Å, respectively. The various superlattices that make up the structure are all lattice matched to the GaSb substrate to within 1000 ppm, which is in agreement with the superlattice designs. AFM results reveals high quality for surface morphology (clear atomic steps can be seen in Fig. 3b) with a small surface–roughness of 0.86 Å over a 10 × 10 μm2 area. This indicates that no structural degradation was introduced to the material due to presence of multilayer superlattices in BECX structure.

A calibrated 1000 °C blackbody source and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometer (Bruker IFS 66 v/S) were implemented to carry out optical characterization and front–side–illuminated. During optical test no anti–reflection (AR) coating was applied on the BECX photodetectors. The optical performance of the photodetectors is shown in Fig. 4a. They exhibit a 100% cut-off wavelength of ~2.1 μm at 150 K (Fig. 4b) as predicted from the band structure calculations; the visible cut−on wavelength of the device is <0.5 µm. The %100 cut-off wavelength was defined as the wavelength that the optical response (QE spectrum) reaches to the measurement system’s noise floor. The device responsivity then peaks at 0.51 A/W, corresponding to quantum efficiency (QE) of 40% for this photodetector with a 1.10 μm–thick absorption region.

At 300K, the device responsivity peaks at 0.6 A/W at ~1.7 μm with a 100% cut–off wavelength at ~2.4 μm; and the QE of 43%. The abruptness of the band-edge absorption is proportional to the variation in superlattice period during epitaxial growth. As expected, the QE and responsivity spectra do not show any bias−dependency, Fig. 4c demonstrates QE values at different applied bias voltage at 1.7 μm in 300K. The decreased quantum efficiency at shorter wavelengths is caused by partial absorption of the visible/near infrared light in the hole extractor part of the device (sections 3, 4, and 5) where it does not contribute to the photo–current. This issue could be addressed in the future by adopting thinner top contacts or larger bandgap energies.

Figure 5(a) shows the dark current density versus applied bias voltage of the BECX device at various temperatures spanning from 150 to 300K. At 150K, the device shows a dark current density of 1.8 × 10−10 A/cm2 under −20 mV applied bias, while at room temperature (T = 300K), the dark current density at −20 mV is 5.3 × 10−4 A/cm2. Figure 5(b) shows an Arrhenius plot28 of the differential resistance × area of the photodetector at zero bias (R0 × A) versus inverse temperature (1/T) from 150 to 300K. The dark current of the BECX photodetectors is nearly diffusion-limited at operating temperatures above 150K.

As it can be seen around 150K the deviation from pure diffusion suggests that the device is G-R limited at lower temperature. At low temperature, by changing the band gap, the G-R current starts to dominate the dark current due to the Shockley-Read-Hall (SRH) generation through trap states existed in the bandgap29. For instance, at low temperature, GaSb native defects inside the InAs/GaSb superlattice can produce SRH recombination centers which affect the carrier life time and increase the G-R current30,31.

Because of measurement system limitations, we could not measure device electrical performance below 150K to find the actual cross-over temperature (T0) of this device at which both the G-R and diffusion current become equal. However, the measurement result suggests that it should be below 150K; that is lower than T0 value for T2SL–based homo−junction photodiodes and nBn photodetectors operating in the e−SWIR region17,18, The BECX device architecture provide us to push down T0 to considerably lower operating temperatures with lower dark current compare to other T2SL-based e−SWIR photodetectors operating at the same temperatures. Consecutively, the BECX device can operate at a higher temperature with similar range of dark current. Beside the significant improvement electrical performance, the BECX design also has capability of being used in shallow-etched device geometry fabrication process, in which the mesa etch can terminate at the bottom of the hole extractor/window section and the smaller bandgap e−SWIR absorption region does not need to be etched, thus avoiding surface leakage. This could reduce the dark current further and may lead to more uniform focal plane arrays.

After performing optical and electrical testing, the specific detectivity (D*) of the BECX photodetector was calculated. The D* is defined as eq. (1):

$${D}^{\ast }={R}_{i}{[2q{J}_{c}+4{k}_{B}T/{R}_{A}]}^{-1/2}$$
(1)

where Ri is representing responsivity, q is the fundamental charge, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is temperature, JC is dark current density, and RA is differential resistance area product.

For 2π field-of-view (FOV) background condition, the device reveals a saturated dark current shot noise limited specific detectivity value of 5.56 × 1013 cm·Hz1/2/W at 150K and 4.72 × 1010 cm·Hz1/2/W (Fig. 6a) at 300 K with the applied bias of −20 mV, respectively. Figure 6b demonstrates the variation of the specific detectivity values of the device for different temperature. Table 1 shows the performance comparison of our photodetector (this work) with the other SWIR photodetector technologies.

## Discussion and Conclusion

Based on InAs/AlSb/GaSb type–II superlattices, we have presented growth, design,, and characterization of high–performance visible/e−SWIR photodetectors, using a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor. The 100% cut–off wavelengths of theses BECX photodetectors were ~2.1 μm at 150K and ~2.4 μm at 300K. The visible cut−on wavelength of the BECX devices was measured to be <0.5 µm. The devices exhibited saturated quantum efficiency values of 40% and 43% at 150 and 300K, respectively. A dark current density of 1.8 × 10−10 A/cm2 was measured at 150K, under −20 mV applied bias. The optical and electrical characterization device has led us to achieve the specific detectivity of 5.56 × 1013 cm·Hz1/2/W at 150K. The dark current density value at 300K was 5.3 × 10−4 A/cm2 under −20 mV bias, which led to a specific detectivity of 4.72 × 1010 cm·Hz1/2/W.

The bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor design has made it possible for T2SL–based e−SWIR to reach lower dark current densities and cover the visible light spectrum in its optical response. Furthermore, considering the benefits of unlimited charge integration capability for recent digital readout integrated circuit devices, the BECXs photodetector can be an excellent alternative to be used for high–performance room–temperature imaging systems. This progress can open the prospect of implementing T2SL–based visible/e−SWIR photodetectors in high–performance focal plan array infrared imaging systems and makes T2SL a feasible candidate for current state–of–the–art infrared detection and imaging technologies.

## Methods and Fabrication

For the fabrication of the device, the material after the growth was processed using standard photolithography into a set of mesa–isolated BECX photodetectors. The processed photodetectors have the areas spanning from 7.85 × 10−5 to 1.26 × 10−3 cm2. The detail about processing was already reported in somewhere else32. The photodetectors were left unpassivated but in order to minimize the surface leakage special attention was paid to ensure the surfaces were kept clean and minimal surface oxidization occurred. A 68–pin leadless ceramic chip carrier was wire–bonded to photodetectors for further electrical and optical characterization. For testing the devices at different temperature range (140 to 300K) a cryostat chamber was used.

## References

1. Klein, M. E., Aalderink, B. J., Padoan, R., de Bruin, G. & Steemers, T. A. G. Quantitative Hyperspectral Reflectance Imaging. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 8, 5576–5618 (2008).

2. Roy, R. et al. Geological mapping strategy using visible near-infrared–shortwave infrared hyperspectral remote sensing: Application to the Oman ophiolite (Sumail Massif). Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 10 (2009).

3. Kimes, D. S., Markham, B. L., Tucker, C. J. & McMurtrey, J. E. Temporal relationships between spectral response and agronomic variables of a corn canopy. Remote Sensing of Environment 11, 401–411 (1981).

4. Gao, B.-c. NDWI—A normalized difference water index for remote sensing of vegetation liquid water from space. Remote Sensing of Environment 58, 257–266 (1996).

5. Green, J. & Robinson, T. Test equipment and methods to characterize fully assembled SWIR digital imaging systems, in SPIE Defense + Security. 14 (SPIE) (2014).

6. Rey-Barroso, L. et al. Visible and Extended Near-Infrared Multispectral Imaging for Skin Cancer Diagnosis. Sensors 18, 1441 (2018).

7. Diago, M. P., Fernández-Novales, J., Fernandes, A. M., Melo-Pinto, P. & Tardaguila, J. Use of Visible and Short-Wave Near-Infrared Hyperspectral Imaging To Fingerprint Anthocyanins in Intact Grape Berries. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 64, 7658–7666 (2016).

8. Driggers, R. G., Hodgkin, V. & Vollmerhausen, R. What good is SWIR? Passive day comparison of VIS, NIR, and SWIR. SPIE Defense, Security, and Sensing: SPIE;. p. 15 (2013).

9. Hansen, M. P. & Malchow, D. S. Overview of SWIR detectors, cameras, and applications. SPIE Defense and Security Symposium;: SPIE; p. 11. (2008).

10. Baker, I., et al. Advanced infrared detectors for multimode active and passive imaging applications. SPIE Defense and Security Symposium; SPIE;. p. 11. (2008).

11. Fathipour, V., Bonakdar, A. & Mohseni, H. Advances on Sensitive Electron-Injection Based Cameras for Low-Flux, Short-Wave Infrared Applications. Frontiers in Materials 3 (2016).

12. Dehzangi, A., Haddadi, A., Adhikary, S. & Razeghi, M. Impact of scaling base thickness on the performance of heterojunction phototransistors. Nanotechnology 28(10), 10LT01 (2017).

13. Chevallier, R., Dehzangi, A., Haddadii, A. & Razeghi, M. Type-II superlattice-based extended short-wavelength infrared focal plane array with an AlAsSb/GaSb superlattice etch-stop layer to allow near-visible light detection. Opt. Lett. 42, 4299–4302 (2017).

14. Zegrya, G. G. & Andreev, A. D. Mechanism of suppression of Auger recombination processes in type‐II heterostructures. Applied Physics Letters 67, 2681–2683 (1995).

15. Binh-Minh, N., Guanxi, C., Minh-Anh, H. & Razeghi, M. Growth and Characterization of Long-Wavelength Infrared Type-II Superlattice Photodiodes on a 3-in GaSb Wafer. Quantum Electronics, IEEE Journal of 47, 686–690 (2011).

16. Razeghi, M. Focal Plane Arrays in Type-II Superlattices. US Patent 6864552 (2005).

17. Haddadi, A., Chevallier, R., Dehzangi, A. & Razeghi, M. Extended short-wavelength infrared nBn photodetectors based on type-II InAs/AlSb/GaSb superlattices with an AlAsSb/GaSb superlattice barrier. Applied Physics Letters 110, 101104 (2017).

18. Hoang, A. M., Chen, G., Haddadi, A., Pour, S. A. & Razeghi, M. Demonstration of shortwavelength infrared photodiodes based on type-II InAs/GaSb/AlSb superlattices. Applied Physics Letters 100, 211101 (2012).

19. Cohen-Elias, D. et al. Minority carrier diffusion length for electrons in an extended SWIR InAs/AlSb type-II superlattice photodiode. Applied Physics Letters 111, 201106 (2017).

20. Cohen-Elias, D. et al. Short wavelength infrared InAs/InSb/AlSb type-II superlattice photodetector. Infrared Physics &. Technology 84, 82–86 (2017).

21. Zhang, Y. et al. Pushing Detection Wavelength Toward by Type II InAs/GaAsSb Superlattices With AlSb Insertion Layers. IEEE Electron Device Letters 37, 1166–1169 (2016).

22. Lotfi, H. et al. Short-wavelength interband cascade infrared photodetectors operating above room temperature. Journal of Applied Physics 119, 023105 (2016).

23. Huang, W. et al. Electrical gain in interband cascade infrared photodetectors. Journal of Applied Physics 123, 113104 (2018).

24. Dehzangi, A., Haddadii, A., Chevallier, R., Zhang, Y. & Razeghi, M. Fabrication of 12 µm pixel-pitch 1280 × 1024 extended short wavelength infrared focal plane array using heterojunction type-II superlattice-based photodetectors. Semiconductor Science and Technology 34, 03LT01 (2019).

25. Wei, Y. & Razeghi, M. Modeling of type-II InAs/GaSb superlattices using an empirical tight-binding method and interface engineering. Physical Review B 69, 085316 (2004).

26. Dehzangi, A., Haddadi, A., Chevallier, R., Zhang, Y. & Razeghi, M. nBn extended short-wavelength infrared focal plane array. Opt. Lett. 43, 591–594 (2018).

27. Haddadi, A., Dehzangi, A., Adhikary, S., Chevallier, R. & Razeghi, M. Background–limited long wavelength infrared InAs/InAs1− xSbx type-II superlattice-based photodetectors operating at 110 K. APL Materials 5, 035502 (2017).

28. Rogalski, A., Kopytko, M. & Piotr, M. Antimonide-based Infrared Detectors: A New Perspective. (2018).

29. Marozas, B. T. et al. Surface dark current mechanisms in III–V infrared photodetectors. Opt. Mater. Express 8, 1419–1424 (2018).

30. Hakala, M., Puska, M. J. & Nieminen, R. M. Native defects and self-diffusion in GaSb. Journal of Applied Physics 91, 4988–4994 (2002).

31. Svensson, S. P. et al. Growth of type II strained layer superlattice, bulk InAs and GaSb materials for minority lifetime characterization. Journal of Crystal Growth 334, 103–107 (2011).

32. Haddadi, A., Dehzangi, A., Chevallier, R., Adhikary, S. & Razeghi, M. Bias–selectable nBn dual–band long–/very long–wavelength infrared photodetectors based on InAs/InAs1−xSbx/AlAs1−xSbx type–II superlattices. Scientific Reports 7, 3379 (2017).

33. Rogalski, A. HgCdTe infrared detector material: history, status and outlook. Reports on Progress in Physics 68, 2267 (2005).

34. Bubulac, L. O. et al. High performance SWIR HgCdTe detector arrays. Journal of Elec Materi 26, 649–655 (1997).

## Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by NASA contract 80NSSC18C0170 and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) under agreement number FA8650-18-1-7810. Authors would like to acknowledge the support and encouragement of Dr. Murzy Jhabvala, Chief Engineer at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Dr. Jay Lewis and Dr. Whitney Mason from DARPA, and Dr. Meimei Tidrow from U.S. Army Night Vision Laboratory.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

A.H. and A.D. conceived and designed this project, performed the photodetector design, and wrote the paper. A.H. performed epitaxial growth of the material, A.H. and D.W. performed structural characterization. A.D., R.C. and R. M. performed photodetectors fabrication and electro-optical characterization. M.R. provided the idea and supervised the project. All authors analyzed the data, revised and modified the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manijeh Razeghi.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Dehzangi, A., McClintock, R., Haddadi, A. et al. Type–II superlattices base visible/extended short–wavelength infrared photodetectors with a bandstructure–engineered photo–generated carrier extractor. Sci Rep 9, 5003 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41494-6

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-41494-6

• ### Dual strategy of modulating growth temperature and inserting ultrathin barrier to enhance the wave function overlap in type-II superlattices

• Yuyang Wu
• Yahui Zhang
• Renchao Che

Nano Research (2022)

• ### Band-structure-engineered high-gain LWIR photodetector based on a type-II superlattice

• Arash Dehzangi
• Jiakai Li
• Manijeh Razeghi

Light: Science & Applications (2021)