Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Anti-HIV-1 integrase potency of methylgallate from Alchornea cordifolia using in vitro and in silico approaches


According to the 2018 report of the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), a disease caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), remains a significant public health problem. The non-existence of a cure or effective vaccine for the disease and the associated emergence of resistant viral strains imply an urgent need for the discovery of novel anti-HIV drug candidates. The current study aimed to identify potential anti-retroviral compounds from Alchornea cordifolia. Bioactive compounds were identified using several chromatographic and spectroscopic techniques and subsequently evaluated for cytotoxicity and anti-HIV properties. Molecular modelling studies against HIV-1 integrase (HIV-1 IN) were performed to decipher the mode of action of methylgallate, the most potent compound (IC50 = 3.7 nM) and its analogues from ZINC database. Cytotoxicity assays showed that neither the isolated compounds nor the crude methanolic extract displayed cytotoxicity effects on the HeLa cell line. A strong correlation between the in vitro and in silico results was observed and important HIV-1 IN residues interacting with the different compounds were identified. These current results indicate that methylgallate is the main anti-HIV-1 compound in A. cordifolia stem bark, and could be a potential platform for the development of new HIV-1 IN inhibitors.


Acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS), a disease caused by the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), remains a significant public health problem with more than 76.1 million people infected since its discovery in 19811,2. According to the 2018 report of the United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS (UNAIDS), about 37 million people are currently living with HIV/AIDS globally with an estimated 5,000 new infections occurring each day, the majority being in sub-Saharan Africa3. Upon infection, the virus targets host dendritic and CD4+ T cells, subsequently weakening their cell-mediated immunity4. Ultimately, this primes the host body systems for attack by a myriad of opportunistic infections and cancers5.

Presently, there is no cure or effective vaccine for the disease, mainly due to latency and quiescence inherent in the nature of the virus6. However, a customized cocktail of diverse classes of drugs commonly referred to as the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) is available for the management of the disease7,8. The different HAART components suppress the replication of the virus in host cells by targeting different stages of its replication cycle: (i) viral entry (co-receptor antagonists and fusion inhibitors); (ii) viral cDNA synthesis [reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors]; (iii) viral cDNA-host DNA integration [integrase (IN) inhibitors]; (iv) virion release and maturation [protease (PR) inhibitors]9. Despite the considerable success realized hitherto through HAART, the continued emergence of cross-resistant viral strains and associated adverse effects of most of the drugs on patients remain significant challenges to a sustained combat against the disease10,11,12,13,14. Thus, there is an urgent need for the discovery of novel anti-HIV drug candidates with improved potency, pharmacokinetic profiles and minimal side effects. Out of the close to 40 HAART drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), only three target HIV-1 IN viz. Raltegravir, Elvitegravir and Dolutegravir8. This deficit was initially linked to the inadequate knowledge on the enzyme’s catalytic mechanism and lack of structural information due to its poor solubility and dynamic nature15. Mammalian cells lack functional or structural IN homologues, making it a desirable drug target for antiretroviral drug development16,17.

The HIV-1 IN enzyme is a 288-amino acid protein with three domains: N-terminal domain18 (NTD; residues 1–49); the catalytic core domain (CCD; residues 50–212)19 and the C-terminal domain (CTD; residues 213–288)20. It plays an essential role in the viral replication cycle by covalently integrating pro-viral cDNA into the host cell’s chromosomal DNA via a two-step SN2 nucleophilic reaction: a 3′-end viral cDNA processing and the strand transfer reaction. In the cytoplasm, the enzyme removes two or three nucleotides from the 3′ end of linear pro-viral cDNA at the U3 and U5 ends, exposing the active 3′-OH groups forming a pre-integration complex (PIC)21. The PIC is then imported into the nucleus, and IN catalyzes the attack of the exposed 3′-OH groups by phosphate groups of host DNA18,19,20,22. The two independent viral cDNA integration reactions occur in the CCD and are mediated by a DDE motif highly conserved in all retroviruses. Mutagenesis experiments involving the Asp64-Asp116-Glu152 catalytic triad residues inactivated the enzyme as well as virus replication23. The Asp residues co-ordinate a divalent cation (Mg2+ or Mn2+) which is an essential cofactor that facilitates a nucleophilic attack on the 3′-OH groups and stabilization of transition states19,24.

As part of our effort to identify potential anti-retroviral hits, current work evaluates the HIV-1 IN inhibitory properties and cytotoxicity properties of compounds from Alchornea cordifolia stem bark using the recombinant form of the enzyme and human HeLa cells respectively. A. cordifolia is a tropical medicinal plant distributed throughout central, western, eastern and southern Africa. Its crude extract has been reported to exhibit strong anti-HIV25, anti-bacterial26 and anti-inflammatory27 activities. Out of the seven compounds (Fig. 1) isolated from a crude methanolic extract (MeOH) of A. cordifolia stem bark, methylgallate was found to significantly inhibit HIV-1 IN in vitro with an IC50 value lower than that of L-chicoric acid (a known HIV-1 IN inhibitor). Cytotoxicity assays showed that neither the isolated compounds nor the crude methanolic extract displayed cytotoxicity effects on the HeLa cell line. To decipher the mode of action of methylgallate and its analogues from the Zinc Is Not Commercial (ZINC)28 database, molecular modelling studies were performed. A strong correlation between the in vitro and in silico results was observed, and critical HIV-1 IN residues interacting with the different compounds were identified. Molecular dynamic studies to determine the system stability and flexibility revealed that the different IN-ligand complexes investigated in this study were energetically stable. The results presented here indicate that methylgallate is the main anti-HIV-1 compound in A. cordifolia crude extract and could be a potential platform for the development of newer HIV-1 IN inhibitors.

Figure 1
figure 1

Chemical structures of isolated compounds (1–7) from A. cordifolia and L-chicoric acid.


Plant identification and collection

Fresh stem bark of A. cordifolia was collected from uncultivated farmland on the Elounden Mountain in the central region of Cameroon in January 2010. Plant specimens were identified by Victor Nana, a botanist at the National Herbarium of Cameroon in Yaoundé. A voucher specimen (Nos. 40512/HNC) deposited in the same herbarium.

Extraction and identification of compounds

Plant material was dried at ambient temperature and finely ground using a blender. Extraction with methanol was performed by maceration for 72 h at room temperature. Four liters of methanol was used to extract one kilogram of the dry stem bark resulting to 140 g of crude extract. The crude extract was subjected to vacuum column chromatography followed by several open column chromatography steps to yield the pure compounds according to an already established protocol26.

Cell viability assay

The cytotoxicity of the crude extract and isolated pure compounds was evaluated by incubating 20 μM of pure compounds and 25 μg/mL of extracts in 96-well plates containing HeLa (human cervical adenocarcinoma) cells. The cells were maintained in a culture medium made of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM) with 5 mM L-glutamine (Lonza), supplemented with 10% foetal bovine serum (FBS) and antibiotics (penicillin/streptomycin/fungizone - PSF) for 24 h. Cell viability was determined by adding resazurin to a final concentration of 0.09 mM to the cells, incubating for 4 hours and quantifying resorufin fluorescence (Excitation560/Emission590) in a multiwell plate reader.

Anti-HIV IN assay

The HIV-1 IN strand transfer inhibition assay was adapted from previously described methods29. Briefly, 20 nM double-stranded biotinylated donor DNA (5′-5BiotinTEG/ACCCTTTTAGTCAGTGTGGAAAATCTCTAGCA-3′ annealed to 5′-ACTGCTAGAGATTTTCCACACTGACTAAAAG-3′) was immobilized in wells of streptavidin-coated 96-well microtiter plates (R&D Systems, USA) by incubation at room temperature for 40 minutes in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 0.05% (v/v) Tween 20 and 0.01% (w/v) bovine serum albumin (BSA). After a stringent wash step, 5 µg/ml purified recombinant HIV-1 subtype C IN in integrase buffer 1 (50 mm NaCl, 25 mM Hepes, 25 mM MnCl2, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 50 µg/ml BSA, pH 7.5) was added to individual wells. Recombinant HIV-1 subtype C IN was assembled onto the pre-processed donor DNA through incubation for 45 minutes at room temperature, followed by washing. Test compounds and L-chicoric acid were added to individual wells as 10-fold serial dilutions starting at 100 µM. Strand transfer was initiated through the addition of 10 nM (final concentration) double-stranded FITC-labelled target DNA (5′-TGACCAAGGGCTAATTCACT/36-FAM/-3′ annealed to 5′-AGTGAATTAGCCCTTGGTCA-/36-FAM/-3′) in integrase buffer 2 (same as buffer 1, except 25 mm MnCl2 was replaced with 2.5 mm MgCl2). After an incubation period of 60 minutes at 37 °C, the plates were washed using PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 and 0.01% BSA, followed by the addition of peroxidase-conjugated sheep anti-FITC antibody (Thermo Scientific, USA) diluted 1:1000 in the same PBS buffer. Finally, the plates were washed and peroxidase substrate (SureBlue Reserve™, SeraCare, USA) was added to allow for detection at 620 nm using a Synergy MX (BioTek®) plate reader. Absorbance values were converted to % enzyme activity relative to the readings obtained from control wells (enzyme without inhibitor). For IC50 determination, dose-response plots of log[compound] vs. % enzyme activity were prepared and IC50 values calculated by non-linear regression analysis. Data was fitted to the curve using the least squares method and with a maximum number (1000) of iterations. These calculations were performed, and figures prepared, in GraphPad Prism (version 5.02).

Homology modelling, molecular docking and dynamic studies

Even with the central function of HIV-1 IN, a complete structure of the functional intasome is unavailable. However, structures of the separate domains have been resolved. From the protein database (PDB), the structure of the catalytic core domain (CCD) of HIV-IN (PDB ID: 1QS4)30 co-crystallised with an inhibitor, 1-(5-chloroindol-3-yl)-3-hydroxy-3-(2H-tetrazol-5-yl)-propenone (5-CITEP) and Mg2+ ions as a cofactor was retrieved. The structure has four (141–144) missing residues within the 140 s loop which are crucial for its catalytic function. Therefore, 100 model structures were modelled using MODELLER version 9.1831 with 1QS4 as the template. Models had the same amino acid sequence as the recombinant protein used for in vitro HIV-IN assays. Models were then ranked according to their normalized discrete optimized protein energy (z-DOPE)32. The top three models were further validated using ProSA33, Verify3D34, QMEAN35 and PROCHECK36 and the best quality model selected for docking studies. AutoDock4.237 was used to determine the interaction and binding affinity of the different compounds. The receptor and compound structure files were prepared in AutoDock4.2 for docking using a previously established protocol38. The Gasteiger-Hückel method was used to assign charges on the different ligand and receptor atoms. The Mg2+ charge was set at 1.7 as previously determined by the RESP method38 and was included in the resulting AutoDock protein file. A cubic grid box with centre at −18.6, 30.1, 66.6 and size of 60 points along the x, y and z directions with point spacing of 0.375 Å was set on the protein. A 100 poses docking simulation run for each ligand was performed using the Lamarckian Genetic Algorithm (LGA). The best docked ligand pose was selected based on clustering and with the lowest docking energy score for molecular dynamics (MD) simulation studies. A 60% similarity search was then used to retrieve analogues of the best compound from the ZINC database. Docking studies on these compounds were performed according to the same protocol.

Seven all-atom Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations were prepared for the apo IN protein and for ligand-protein complexes showing in silico potency with a greater significance than L-chicoric acid. All simulations were performed using the Chemistry at HARvard Macromolecular Mechanics (CHARMM 42) software package39. For each system, 50 ns MD simulations were created in a 90 Å3 cubic box with periodic boundary conditions. Energy minimization was then performed in two stages. The first stage involved the use of a 100 steps of steepest descent minimization in vacuo. The second step was 1,000 steps of Adopted Basis Newton-Raphson (ABNR) with a tolerance of 0.001. Each MD system was solvated with TIP3P40 water molecules and counter ions were used for neutralization. The solvated system was then minimized using 200 steps of steepest descent followed by 1000 steps of ABNR. Equilibration of the protein was performed by heating the system from 110 K to 310 K. Heating was performed for 100,000 steps using a 1 fs (0.001) time-step. The actual MD simulations were performed at constant pressure and temperature (CPT) conditions. Each 50 ns simulation was achieved by performing 257 steps using a 0.002 time-step. Parameters for describing the protein were obtained from the CHARMM 36 force field41. Due to the presence of a Mg2+ ion in the active HIV IN, previously determined force field parameters were required to ensure the correct coordination geometry of the active site38. These force field parameters were used to account for the bonds and dihedral angles crucial for the residues coordinating the Mg2+ active site. The ligands used in the MD simulations were parameterised using the ParamChem webserver42 using the CHARMM General Force Field (CGENFF)43.

Results and Discussion

The crude methanolic extract of A. cordifolia stem bark and some of its constituents lack cytotoxicity against HeLa cells

In vitro viability testing has become an integral step in modern drug discovery as it characterises the toxic potential of a compound and provides predictive evidence of its safety index thus reducing attrition rates in pharmaceutical development44,45. Hence, the crude methanolic extract and all the compounds isolated from it (Fig. 1) were tested for cytotoxicity against the HeLa cell line using a resazurin-based cell viability assay. The inherent reducing potential of viable cells converts resazurin to resorufin (detectable by fluorimetry), and is considered as one of the most cost-effective method of determining cytotoxicity46. The activity of untreated HeLa cells was normalized to 100% activity and all samples were compared to the normalized control. The crude methanolic extract showed no effect on the cell viability (116.1%, Fig. 2a). Friedelin, O-acetyl-aleuritolic acid, 3-O-acetyl-erythrodiol, Stigmasterol, Friedelane-3-one-28-al and Stigmasta-4,22-diene-3-one also show no significant change in their viability, with mean cell viability values ranging from 102.3% to 118.3% (Fig. 2a). For methylgallate it showed a cell viability of 83.77%, which represents a significant reduction in the cell viability compared to all the other compounds as well as the methanol extract (Fig. 2a). This indicates that methylgallate does show some toxicity towards the HeLa cells.

Figure 2
figure 2

(a) The effects of isolated compounds and crude extract of A. cordifolia on HeLa cell viability. A vertical box and whisker plot shows the range of cell viability data values (n = 3) and the mean cell viability is marked by the horizontal bar. Statistical analyses showed that the data was normally distributed so a one-way ANOVA and a Tukey’s multiple comparison test were performed. Differences of p > 0.05 are not significant and not shown on the graph. p values between 0.01–0.05 are marked as significant (*), 0.001–0.1 marked as very significant (**) and p < 0.001 marked as extremely significant (***). (b) The dose–response plots obtained for the compounds and extracts in an HIV integrase enzyme assay. The % enzyme activity levels were derived from the absorbance values of the experimental sample compared to the untreated (control) samples. The log[compound] is plotted against the % IN enzyme activity. A non-linear regression analysis was used to calculate the IC50 values for the compounds of interest. Data manipulation was performed as described in the methodology.

Methygallate is the primary compound responsible for the in vitro anti-HIV properties of A. cardifolia

With the increased knowledge about the catalytic mechanism of HIV IN in the recent past, considerable progress to discover potential inhibitors from natural compounds has been made. The crude methanolic extract and all the isolated compounds from the A. cordifolia methanolic crude extract were tested for anti-HIV IN activity. From these samples, 3-O-acetyl-aleuritolic acid, methylgallate, stigmasterol and the crude methanolic extract exhibited activity against HIV-1 IN (Fig. 2b). The IC50 of the crude extract was found to be 8.5 ng/ml. Methylgallate, stigmasterol and 3‐O-acetyl aleuritolic acid exhibited IC50 values of 3.7, 20.5 and 83.7 nM, respectively.

Interestingly, the IC50 of L-chicoric acid was found to be higher (IC50 = 5.9 nM) than that obtained with methylgallate. Thus, methylgallate might be the principle chemical constituent that is responsible for the anti-HIV IN activity of the methanolic A. cordifolia stem bark extract. In addition, the isolated compounds were also screened for potency against HIV-1 PR and found to be inactive. From the literature, crude aqueous extract from A. cordifolia seeds has also been shown to possess moderate in vitro inhibitory potency against HIV-1 RT with EC50 values of <0.01–0.03 mg/ml25.

Methylgallate inhibits HIV-1 IN by chelating the active site Mg2+ cofactor

The availability of good quality and complete structural information is vital for structure-based drug design and molecular dynamics studies. Due to the missing residues in the available HIV IN structures in the PDB database, homology modelling was performed with the same target sequence as that of the recombinant protein used in the in vitro HIV-IN experiments. A near-native complete structure was obtained with a z-DOPE score of −1.48 as compared to that of the template (1QS4) of −1.68. Z-Dope score is an atomic distance-displacement statistical potential that evaluates how close a model is compared to the native structure32,47 with a preferred value of < −0.5. Table 1 shows a summary of the validation results from different quality evaluation webservers. All the results gave consistently good quality scores for the top model as to those of the template. Figure 3 shows the structural fold of both the template (1QS4) and the top model with a bound inhibitor on the active site as well as the catalytic Mg2+.

Table 1 HIV-1 IN CCD best homology model validation results from different structure quality assessment tools.
Figure 3
figure 3

HIV-1 IN CCD homology modeling. (a) Template used for modeling studies with missing residues in the 140 s loop (dotted red line) bound to a co-crystallized 5-CITEP inhibitor. (b) Top model selected for docking studies with a complete 140 s loop. Shown in blue sphere is Mg2+ cofactor essential for catalytic mechanism during proviral cDNA-host genome integration. The red spheres are the metal-coordinating water molecules.

Docking results indicated that out of the six compounds from A. cordifolia, only methylgallate had stronger binding affinity to HIV-1 IN compared to L-chicoric acid (Table 2). A protein-ligand interaction analysis was performed to understand its mechanism of action. Despite methylgallate being smaller compared to L-chicoric acid, it exhibited a similar binding pattern involving key residues responsible for the enzyme’s catalytic mechanism. Interestingly, methylgallate was found to mimic the central core of L-chicoric acid involved in HIV-IN inhibition.

Table 2 Docking results from 100 independent runs per compound with HIV-1 IN CCD.

As there was a strong correlation between the in vitro and in silico anti-HIV-1 IN activity results, 127 methylgallate analogues from ZINC were obtained. Four of the analogues had binding affinities higher than that of methylgallate (Fig. S1). All the identified hits had good drug-likeness properties and passed the PAINS filter (Table 3). The PAINS filter flags chemical compounds containing substructures that cause them to promiscuously bind to numerous proteins rather than the desired drug target48.

Table 3 Drug like properties and PAINS filtering of methylgallate and its ZINC analogues.

Existing IN drugs including L-chicoric acid, possess a characteristic β-diketo moiety which chelates the metal co-factor thus selectively inhibiting the strand transfer reaction29. From the docking results, methylgallate, its four ZINC analogues and L-chicoric acid formed hydrogen bonds with the Mg2+ cofactor either directly or indirectly (via coordinating water molecules), making it unavailable for catalysis (Fig. 4). The presence of hydroxyl groups in methylgallate and its ZINC analogues that are close enough to interact with the metal cofactor was essential for the hydrogen bond formation. This might explain the observed inactivity with the rest of the compounds from A. cordifolia which had mainly hydrophobic cores (Fig. S2). A similar observation regarding the importance of hydroxyl groups on IN inhibitory activity of chalcones and homoisoflavonoids from Caesalpinia sappan has been reported49. Besides the hydrogen bonds by Asp64 and Asp116, methylgallate and the ZINC hits formed additional hydrogen bonds with active site residues (Fig. 4). In methylgallate and ZINC1576053, one of the vicinal hydroxyl groups in the compounds formed a hydrogen bond with Cys65 and His67 respectively. ZINC407934 formed two hydrogen bonds; one with a hydroxyl group and the other with its alkoxy oxygen of the ester group with Asn155. These additional hydrogen bonds might explain its strong interaction of −6.2 kcal/mol compared to methylgallate.

Figure 4
figure 4

Protein-ligand binding pose and interaction. HIV-IN complete CCD bound to (a) methylgallate from A. cordifolia and (b) L-chicoric acid and (c) ZINC407934. Corresponding images show the important residues for coordinating the catalytic Mg2+ as well as interacting with the different ligands. Shown in blue dotted green lines are hydrogen bonds while the radiating residues show the residues forming hydrophobic interactions. The red loop shows the 140 s loop.

Additional hydrophobic contacts with similar residues common across the different ligands were observed. These residues include Cys65, Glu152, Asn155, Lys156, and Lys159. Of particular interest is the ability of these ligands to interact with the thiol group of Cys65 which is known to be an efficient nucleophile as it can be oxidized with ease50. Unique to L-chicoric acid was the ability to interact with Gln148 found in the 140 s loop facing the active site. This interaction was not observed with the other compounds mainly because of their small size. Molecular modeling studies with 5-CITEP (1QS4 co-crystalized ligand) show similar binding modes as the current ligands and interacted with the identified residues51. A structure-activity relationship study of HIV-1 IN inhibitors indicated that for optimum interaction of L-chicoric acid, it has to adopt a pose in which the two aromatic rings form a 90° angle50.

Additional studies involving MD simulations were performed to assess the behaviour of the protein ligand complexes relative to the apoprotein. For each protein system, 50 ns simulations were prepared. The dynamic stability of each protein-ligand complexe was assessed using backbone Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD), Root Mean Square Fluctuation (RMSF) and radius of gyration (Rg). Both the apo and ligand-bound forms of the enzyme displayed similar conformational stability during the molecular dynamic simulations (Fig. 5). Cα RMSD analysis showed that the systems converged around 3–5 Å (Angstrom) immediately after equilibration (Fig. 5a). Additionally, the ligands maintained same poses throughout the MD simulations (Fig. 5b). A similar observation regarding global stability was made with Rg where protein-ligand complexes were found to maintain a radius between 15 and 16 Å during simulations (Fig. 5c). RMSF calculations were performed to determine the fluctuations within the residues. All the catalytic triad residues and their neighbouring residues were stable (Fig. 5d). However, prominent fluctuations were observed in the 140 s loop residues in the apo form and when the protein was bound to methylgallate (Fig. 5d). A significant reduction in the fluctuation of this loop was observed when the protein was bound to L-chicoric acid, mainly because of the observed interactions between the ligand and Gln148 (Fig. 4b). As expected, high fluctuations similar to those in the apo form were observed in the methylgallate, ZINC77441, ZINC407934 bound proteins as no interaction between these ligands and the 140 s loop were observed.

Figure 5
figure 5

Dynamic properties of both the apo form and ligand bound HIV-IN CCD over a simulation period of 100 ns. (a,b) The global stability of the different systems as determined by complex and ligand Root Mean Square Deviation (RMSD). (c) The compactness of the systems by Radius of Gyration. (d) Local fluctuations of the individual residues by Root Mean Square Fluctuations (RMSF).


According to the current antiretroviral guidelines, integrase strand transfer inhibitors (InSTIs) are considered the cornerstone of the HAART regimens against HIV/AIDS because they are highly effective and well tolerated compared to RT and PR inhibitors52,53. Considering the limited number of FDA approved InSTIs and the rise of viral mutants exhibiting resistance to existing drugs, the discovery of novel InSTIs becomes imperative. So far, CCD viral mutants with G148H, N155H and G148H/G140S polymorphisms have been reported and have shown resistance against Elvitegravir and Dolutegravir underscoring the need for the development of novel drugs54,55.

Methylgallate was found to be an important inhibitor of HIV-IN with its IC50 value 3.7 nM, which is lower than that of the positive control i.e. L-chicoric acid (IC50 = 5.9 nM). This not only confirms that methylgallate could be used as lead for new HIV drugs, but also that A. cordifolia is a potential source for HIV drugs discovery. Both the in vitro and in silico results presented here show that methylgallate is a possible platform for the development of novel HIV-1 IN drugs. Additional downstream optimization studies involving structure-activity relationships are needed to improve the potency of the identified compounds. One of the possibilities to enhance their potency is the utilization of synthetic chemical approaches to increase their size in order to interact with the catalytic 140 s loop. Considering the vital role played by hydroxyl or ester groups that interact with the metal cofactor, the incorporation of such chemical moities would also be valuable.

Data Availability

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article and its Supplementary Information.


  1. Kharsany, A. B. M. & Karim, Q. A. HIV Infection and AIDS in Sub-Saharan Africa: Current Status, Challenges and Opportunities. Open. AIDS J. 10, 34–48 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, N. et al. Managing Advanced HIV Disease in a Public Health Approach. Clin. Infect. Dis. 66, S106–SS110 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. UNAIDS data 2018.

  4. Okoye, A. A. & Picker, L. J. CD4(+) T-cell depletion in HIV infection: mechanisms of immunological failure. Immunol. Rev. 254, 54–64 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Furrer, H. Opportunistic Diseases During HIV Infection—Things Aren′t What They Used to Be, or Are They? J. Infect. Dis. 214, 830–831 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lederman, M. M. et al. A Cure for HIV Infection: “Not in My Lifetime” or “Just Around the Corner”? Pathog. Immun. 1, 154–164 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Granich, R. et al. Highly active antiretroviral treatment as prevention of HIV transmission: review of scientific evidence and update. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 5, 298–304 (2010).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. FDA-Approved HIV Medicines | Understanding HIV/AIDS | AIDSinfo. Available at: (Accessed: 24th September 2018).

  9. Menéndez-Arias, L. Molecular basis of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance: Overview and recent developments. Antiviral Res. 98, 93–120 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ghosh, R. K., Ghosh, S. M. & Chawla, S. Recent advances in antiretroviral drugs. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 12, 31–46 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhang, J. & Crumpacker, C. Eradication of HIV and Cure of AIDS, Now and How? Front. Immunol. 4, 337 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Clercq, E. D. Antiretroviral drugs. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 10, 507–515 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumarasamy, N. et al. Spectrum of Adverse Events After Generic HAART in Southern Indian HIV-Infected Patients. AIDS Patient Care STDS 22, 337–344 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Steegen, K. et al. Prevalence of antiretroviral drug resistance in patients who are not responding to protease inhibitor-based treatment: Results from the first national survey in South Africa. J. Infect. Dis. 214, 1826–1830 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hickmans, A. B., Palmer, I., Engelmans, A., Craigies, R. & Wingfieldon, P. Biophysical and Enzymatic Properties of the Catalytic Domain of HIV-1 Integyase*. The Journal Of Biological Chemistry 269 (1994).

  16. Anthony, N. J. HIV-1 integrase: a target for new AIDS chemotherapeutics. Curr. Top. Med. Chem. 4, 979–90 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Thomas, M. & Brady, L. HIV integrase: a target for AIDS therapeutics. Trends Biotechnol. 15, 167–72 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cai, M. et al. Solution structure of the N-terminal zinc binding domain of HIV-1 integrase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4, 567–77 (1997).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dyda, F. et al. Crystal structure of the catalytic domain of HIV-1 integrase: similarity to other polynucleotidyl transferases. Science 266, 1981–6 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Lodi, P. J. et al. Solution structure of the DNA binding domain of HIV-1 integrase. Biochemistry 34, 9826–33 (1995).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bushman, F. D., Fujiwara, T. & Craigie, R. Retroviral DNA integration directed by HIV integration protein in vitro. Science 249, 1555–8 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Bushman, F. D. & Craigie, R. Activities of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) integration protein in vitro: specific cleavage and integration of HIV DNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 1339–43 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Engelman, A. & Craigie, R. Identification of conserved amino acid residues critical for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 integrase function in vitro. J. Virol. 66, 6361–9 (1992).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Kulkosky, J., Jones, K. S., Katz, R. A., Mack, J. P. & Skalka, A. M. Residues critical for retroviral integrative recombination in a region that is highly conserved among retroviral/retrotransposon integrases and bacterial insertion sequence transposases. Mol. Cell. Biol. 12, 2331–8 (1992).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ayisi, N. K. & Nyadedzor, C. Comparative in vitro effects of AZT and extracts of Ocimum gratissimum, Ficus polita, Clausena anisata, Alchornea cordifolia, and Elaeophorbia drupifera against HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections. Antiviral Res. 58, 25–33 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Siwe Noundou, X., Krause, R. W. M., Van Vuuren, S. F., Ndinteh, D. T. & Olivier, D. K. Antibacterial effects of Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. and Thonn.) Müll. Arg extracts and compounds on gastrointestinal, skin, respiratory and urinary tract pathogens. J. Ethnopharmacol. 179, 76–82 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mavar-Manga, H. et al. Anti-inflammatory compounds from leaves and root bark of Alchornea cordifolia (Schumach. & Thonn.) Müll. Arg. J. Ethnopharmacol. 115, 25–29 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sterling, T. & Irwin, J. J. ZINC 15 – Ligand Discovery for Everyone. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55, 2324–2337 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Grobler, J. A. et al. Diketo acid inhibitor mechanism and HIV-1 integrase: implications for metal binding in the active site of phosphotransferase enzymes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 6661–6 (2002).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldgur, Y. et al. Structure of the HIV-1 integrase catalytic domain complexed with an inhibitor: a platform for antiviral drug design. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 13040–3 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Webb, B. & Sali, A. In Current Protocols in Bioinformatics 54, 5.6.1–5.6.37 (John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2016).

  32. Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. Statistical potential for assessment and prediction of protein structures. Protein Sci. 15, 2507–24 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wiederstein, M. & Sippl, M. J. ProSA-web: interactive web service for the recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W407–W410 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eisenberg, D., Lüthy, R. & Bowie, J. U. VERIFY3D: assessment of protein models with three-dimensional profiles. Methods Enzymol. 277, 396–404 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Benkert, P., Tosatto, S. C. E. & Schomburg, D. QMEAN: A comprehensive scoring function for model quality assessment. Proteins Struct. Funct. Bioinforma. 71, 261–277 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Laskowski, R. A., MacArthur, M. W., Moss, D. S. & Thornton, J. M. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 26, 283–291 (1993).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Morris, G. M. et al. AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: Automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 2785–2791 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Musyoka, T., Tastan, Ö., Lobb, K. & Moses, V. The determination of CHARMM force fi eld parameters for the Mg 2+ containing HIV-1 integrase. Chem. Phys. Lett. 711, 1–7 (2018).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Brooks, B. R. et al. CHARMM: The biomolecular simulation program. J. Comput. Chem. 30, 1545–1614 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. And, P. M. & Nilsson, L. Structure and Dynamics of the TIP3P, SPC, and SPC/E Water Models at 298 K. J. Phys. Chem. A 105, 9954–9960 (2001).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Huang, J. & MacKerell, A. D. CHARMM36 all-atom additive protein force field: Validation based on comparison to NMR data. J. Comput. Chem. 34, 2135–2145 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Vanommeslaeghe, K. & MacKerell, A. D. Automation of the CHARMM General Force Field (CGenFF) I: Bond Perception and Atom Typing. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52, 3144–3154 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Vanommeslaeghe, K. et al. CHARMM general force field: A force field for drug-like molecules compatible with the CHARMM all-atom additive biological force fields. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 671–90 (2010).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Niles, A. L., Moravec, R. A. & Riss, T. L. In Vitro Viability and Cytotoxicity Testing and Same-Well Multi-Parametric Combinations for High Throughput Screening. Curr. Chem. Genomics 3, 33–41 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Katsuno, K. et al. Hit and lead criteria in drug discovery for infectious diseases of the developing world. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 14, 751–758 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Miret, S., De Groene, E. M. & Klaffke, W. Comparison of In Vitro Assays of Cellular Toxicity in the Human Hepatic Cell Line HepG2. J. Biomol. Screen. 11, 184–193 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Eramian, D., Eswar, N., Shen, M.-Y. & Sali, A. How well can the accuracy of comparative protein structure models be predicted? Protein Sci. 17, 1881–1893 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Baell, J. & Walters, M. A. Chemistry: Chemical con artists foil drug discovery. Nature 513, 481–483 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Tewtrakul, S. et al. Anti-HIV-1 Integrase Activity and Molecular Docking Study of Compounds from Caesalpinia  sappan L. Phyther. Res. 29, 724–729 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Maurin, C., Bailly, F. & Cotelle, P. Structure-activity relationships of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors–enzyme-ligand interactions. Curr. Med. Chem. 10, 1795–810 (2003).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sotriffer, C. A., Ni, H. & McCammon, J. A. Active site binding modes of HIV-1 integrase inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 43, 4109–17 (2000).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Clotet, B. et al. Once-daily dolutegravir versus darunavir plus ritonavir in antiretroviral-naive adults with HIV-1 infection (FLAMINGO): 48 week results from the randomised open-label phase 3b study. Lancet 383, 2222–2231 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Walmsley, S. L. et al. Dolutegravir plus Abacavir–Lamivudine for the Treatment of HIV-1 Infection. N. Engl. J. Med. 369, 1807–1818 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Marinello, J. et al. Comparison of Raltegravir and Elvitegravir on HIV-1 Integrase Catalytic Reactions and on a Series of Drug-Resistant Integrase Mutants. Biochemistry 47, 9345–9354 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Goethals, O. et al. Resistance Mutations in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase Selected with Elvitegravir Confer Reduced Susceptibility to a Wide Range of Integrase Inhibitors. J. Virol. 82, 10366–10374 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


X.S.N. and T.M.M. acknowledge Rhodes University Research Office for Postdoctoral Fellowship. This research project was supported by the South African Medical Research Council (MRC) with funds from National Treasury under its Economic Competitiveness and Support Package, and Rhodes University Sandisa Imbewu. The content of this publication is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent official views of funders. Authors acknowledge use of Centre for High Performance Computing (CHPC), South Africa. We acknowledge the help of Dr. Meesbah Jiwaji and Dr. Leonie Goosen for interpreting the statistical analysis and proofreading the manuscript, respectively.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



X.S.N., T.M.M., Ö.T.B. and R.W.M.K. conceived and designed the study. X.S.N., D.T.N. and R.W.M.K. performed the isolation and identification of compounds. D.M. and H.H. performed the in vitro assays. V.M. and T.M.M. performed homology modelling, docking experiments and MD simulations. All authors contributed to the interpretation of results and discussion. X.S.N. and T.M.M. wrote the initial draft. X.S.N., T.M.M., V.M., Ö.T.B. and R.W.M.K. wrote the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Xavier Siwe-Noundou, Özlem Tastan Bishop or Rui W. M. Krause.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siwe-Noundou, X., Musyoka, T.M., Moses, V. et al. Anti-HIV-1 integrase potency of methylgallate from Alchornea cordifolia using in vitro and in silico approaches. Sci Rep 9, 4718 (2019).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing