Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Geometric-Phase Microscopy for Quantitative Phase Imaging of Isotropic, Birefringent and Space-Variant Polarization Samples

## Abstract

We present geometric-phase microscopy allowing a multipurpose quantitative phase imaging in which the ground-truth phase is restored by quantifying the phase retardance. The method uses broadband spatially incoherent light that is polarization sensitively controlled through the geometric (Pancharatnam-Berry) phase. The assessed retardance possibly originates either in dynamic or geometric phase and measurements are customized for quantitative mapping of isotropic and birefringent samples or multi-functional geometric-phase elements. The phase restoration is based on the self-interference of polarization distinguished waves carrying sample information and providing pure reference phase, while passing through an inherently stable common-path setup. The experimental configuration allows an instantaneous (single-shot) phase restoration with guaranteed subnanometer precision and excellent ground-truth accuracy (well below 5 nm). The optical performance is demonstrated in advanced yet routinely feasible noninvasive biophotonic imaging executed in the automated manner and predestined for supervised machine learning. The experiments demonstrate measurement of cell dry mass density, cell classification based on the morphological parameters and visualization of dynamic dry mass changes. The multipurpose use of the method was demonstrated by restoring variations in the dynamic phase originating from the electrically induced birefringence of liquid crystals and by mapping the geometric phase of a space-variant polarization directed lens.

## Introduction

The dynamic phase of light directly related to the optical path has always played a key role in optics. The controlled change of the dynamic phase has become the basis for light shaping methods implemented by traditional optical components. The spatial changes of the dynamic phase imposed on light have been successfully utilized in quantitative phase imaging (QPI) and phase-sensitive measurement to observe weakly absorbing biological samples and to measure surface topography1,2,3. In current optics, controlling light through the geometric phase also becomes important thanks to emerging technology known as fourth-generation (4G) optics4,5,6. Exceptional features of 4G optics open entirely new pathways for developing various branches of optics, represented here by the multipurpose polarization sensitive QPI.

The QPI is a rapidly developing area of optics that excels by an ability to map variations of the optical path difference (OPD) caused by the light interaction with phase objects being examined7,8. In optical microscopy, a variety of advanced QPI techniques has recently appeared, opening entirely new possibilities for quantitative label-free live cell studies in life sciences9. Depending on the complexity of the phase encoding in the intensity records, the QPI can be loosely divided into interference and computational methods. In interference methods, the phase information is obtained from interference patterns created by sample and well-defined reference waves using procedures known from digital holography and interferometry10 that can be combined with tomography algorithms11,12. The typical computational approaches to QPI include propagation-based methods using the transport of intensity equation13 or techniques of conventional and Fourier ptychographic microscopy utilizing the phase-retrieval algorithms14.

In the conventional QPI methods, the dynamic phase influenced by spatial changes of the sample refractive index is quantitatively restored using light shaping optical components also modulating the dynamic phase of light. Here, we present 4G optics platform for the polarization sensitive QPI employing the geometric phase associated with the evolution of light in an anisotropic parameter space. Although the geometric phase was discovered in quite distant history by Pancharatnam15 and later widely elaborated by Berry16, the pioneering 4G optics technology enabling realization of unique geometric-phase elements has emerged just recently4. The highly efficient elements of 4G optics are capable of a wavelength independent modulation of the geometric phase carried out by the polarization transformation. The most important property of the geometric-phase elements is their polarization sensitivity allowing to impose phase changes of the opposite sign on the light with left-/right-handed circular polarization (LHCP/RHCP)5,6. This capability was used to design optically thick and physically thin light shaping components such as sub-wavelength gratings17, polarization directed lenses and prisms4 or complex geometric-phase holograms5. Recently, the geometric-phase lens was utilized in the incoherent correlation holographic imaging18,19 while the geometric-phase mask allowed improved design of the vector Zernike sensor20.

We have used the innovative light control technology to develop a geometric-phase QPI modality capable of quantifying spatial variations of the phase retardance between orthogonally polarized waves. The geometric-phase QPI platform, here referred to as quantitative 4G optics microscopy (Q4GOM), was developed as an incoherent achromatic imaging technique allowing the instantaneous (single-shot) restoration of the phase retardance introduced in either dynamic or geometric phase. This capability makes Q4GOM powerful and versatile. The phase restoration uses self-interference of light and is implemented in an inherently stable common-path setup. The experiments are based on the use of an add-on 4G optics imaging module that is simply connected to either standard or polarization modified optical microscope. The multipurpose use of Q4GOM is demonstrated by quantitative noninvasive imaging of live cells, restoration of the dynamic phase retardance originating from birefringence of liquid crystals and complete quantitative mapping of geometric-phase holograms5.

## Methods

### Optical setup and strategy of experiments

Q4GOM was implemented in the experimental configuration shown in Fig. 1. The key part of the setup is an add-on 4G optics imaging module capable of quantifying the phase retardance between orthogonally polarized waves. The polarized waves entering the module carry information on the sample phase and provide the pure (sample independent) reference phase guaranteeing high ground-truth accuracy of the measurement. Depending on the specific application, the add-on 4G optics module is used in two different ways. In experiments with isotropic samples, the imaging module is connected to optical microscope using a polarization adapted imaging path, in which the signal and reference waves with orthogonal polarizations are prepared21. When restoring the retardance of polarization sensitive samples, the imaging module is connected to a conventional optical microscope, working either in reflection or transmission mode.

In the live cell imaging, the add-on 4G optics module was connected to a polarization adapted interference microscope (Fig. 1a, Supplementary material, Part A). The orthogonally polarized sample and reference waves were created by the Mirau microscope objective MMO (Nikon 10x, NA = 0.3) using the beam splitter BS1 (Fig. 1b, Supplementary material, Part B). To operate the MMO in a polarization mode, BS1 was supplemented by the quarter-wave plates QWP1 and QWP2 with the directions of the anisotropy axis turned by 45° (details about design and adjustment of the polarization adapter are available in Supplementary material, Part B). The illumination path was created using a tungsten-halogen lamp with bandpass filter (central wavelength 600 nm, full width at half maximum 50 nm) and lenses IL1 and IL2 providing Köhler illumination conditions. The light entering the MMO through the input polarizer P1 and the beam splitter cube BS2 is linearly polarized in the direction coinciding with the azimuth of the compensating quarter-wave plate QWP1.

Hence, the waves reflected from the sample and the reference mirror M of the MMO get the orthogonal linear polarizations after double passing through QWP1 and QWP2 (Fig. 1b). Using the quarter-wave plate QWP3, the orthogonal linear polarizations are transformed into LHCP and RHCP. The light collimated by the MMO is focused by the tube lens TL (Nikon CFI60). The back focal plane of the TL coincides with the input plane of the add-on 4G optics module, where LHCP and RHCP images created in the sample and reference path overlap, and a polarization directed geometric-phase grating (GPG) is placed. The GPG was custom-made by Boulder Nonlinear Systems as a polymer liquid crystal grating with the spatially modulated orientation of the anisotropy axis. The spatial period corresponding to 2π rotation of the anisotropy axis was chosen as Λ = 9 µm (functionality of the GPG is discussed in detail in Supplementary material, Part C). When the sample and reference waves pass through the GPG, their polarization state is transformed from LHCP to RHCP and vice versa, while the geometric phase varies as ±2φ, where φ defines the periodic spatial change of the angular orientation of the anisotropy axis (Fig. 1c). Because of the geometric-phase modulation, the sample and reference waves with the orthogonal circular polarizations are inclined to directions of +1 st and −1 st diffraction order with the mutual angle of 8° for the central wavelength. Although the modulation of the geometric phase is achromatic, the light propagation causes a diffractive dispersion whose manifestation is observable at the back focal plane of the Fourier lens L1. After the polarization projection and the Fourier transform carried out using the polarizer P2 and the lens L2, respectively, the off-axis hologram is recorded on the CCD (XimeaMR4021MC-BH). Thanks to different deflection angles of the individual spectral components, the captured achromatic hologram is modulated by the interference fringes with the period independent of the wavelength22,23. Utilizing the spatial separation of the sample and reference waves, the length of their optical paths can be aligned by inserting an optical path difference compensator to the back focal plane of the lens L1. With this compensation, the MMO, so far exclusively used in metrology, was successfully deployed in biological experiments using broadband light. The change of the optical path caused by the sample (for instance by coverslip and cellular medium) was reduced below the coherence length by means of the inserted compensating glass slides or the variable compensator composed of optical prisms24.

Besides demonstrated QPI of live cells, Q4GOM holds a great promise for quantitative measurement of both dynamic and geometric phase retardance created by birefringent samples, geometric-phase elements, plasmonic metasurfaces25 and chiral samples. Light interacting with these objects becomes naturally encoded in polarization, hence the add-on 4G optics module is connected to optical microscope using a standard microscope objective (MO). Here, these experiments are represented by restoration of the phase retardance originating from the birefringence of liquid crystals and from the rotation of anisotropy axis in polarization directed 4G optics elements.

Measurement of the birefringent liquid crystal retardance was carried out in the setup shown in Fig. 1, in which the liquid crystal display of a reflective spatial light modulator (SLM) was used as a testing sample and placed in the front focal plane of a standard MO (Fig. 1d). The SLM was illuminated by polarized light (diagonal linear polarization, circular polarization) formed by orthogonal linear polarizations. Using the birefringence of liquid crystals, the dynamic phase of one polarization component was modulated by controlling the refractive index of individual pixels, while the orthogonal polarization component was reflected without phase modulation. By QWP3, the sample and reference waves with the orthogonal circular polarizations were created in the input plane of the 4G optics module.

The quantification of the geometric-phase retardance was demonstrated using a thin polarization directed lens positioned in the front focal plane of the MO and illuminated by linearly polarized light composed of orthogonal circular polarizations (Fig. 1e). The functionality of the measured lens is the same as that explained for the GPG (Supplementary material, Part C). The handedness of the circular polarizations is reversed by the lens transformation, and the waves receive a change of the geometric phase, which differs in the sign (i.e. the waves are complex conjugate). Hence, the geometric-phase lens is polarization directed and acts as converging and diverging lens on the waves with the orthogonal circular polarizations. Since the circularly polarized waves are created in the imaging path and are directed toward the GPG without any polarization change, QWP3 is not needed in this measurement. In Q4GOM, the spatially varying retardance of the geometric phase introduced by the polarization directed lens was measured using the add-on 4G optics module connected to a standard optical microscope.

### Theoretical framework

Restoration of the phase retardance in Q4GOM is realized using broadband spatially incoherent illumination. This is highly desirable because the coherence noise is suppressed and the lateral resolution is increased twice compared to the systems operating with laser light10. The phase restoration is clarified in simulation model working with monochromatic components of the temporal Fourier spectrum of light illuminating the sample under Köhler conditions. The model also includes the polarization transformation and the geometric-phase modulation of light. The description of the polarization modification of the imaging path in measurement of isotropic samples is made using Jones formalism while the imaging of the sample into the input plane of the 4G optics module is examined by the convolution approach. The GPG performing the polarization transformation resulting in a spatially variable change of the geometric phase is described by Jones matrix acting in the basis of circularly polarized waves. The entire intensity record is described as a continuous superposition of the correlation patterns that originate from the interference of diffraction spots representing optically conjugated point images created in the sample and reference imaging paths. Because the individual correlation patterns are recorded with the achromatically created carrier frequency, the phase retardance is quantitatively reconstructed from a single shot by processing the space-time coherence function. Exact restoration of the phase retardance is demonstrated for fully incoherent illumination of the sample and an ideal point imaging. The detailed computational model of Q4GOM is elaborated in Supplementary material, Part C.

## Results

### Q4GOM in noninvasive biological experiments

To demonstrate the optical performance and application potential of the developed technique, Q4GOM was used for quantitative imaging of different types of cells including human cheek cells, blood smear and spontaneously transformed rat embryonic fibroblast (LW3K12) cells. Experimental data were obtained in the setup composed of the add-on 4G optics module connected to the interference microscope (Fig. 1a) using the polarization adapted MMO (Fig. 1b). The phase delay of the sample wave was introduced by double transmission of light through the specimen sandwiched between the mirror slide and the coverslip26. Details regarding the preparation of specimens and cultivation of cells are described in Supplementary material, Part F. The measured holograms were numerically reconstructed and the resulting data subsequently quantified and visualized using commercial software distributed by TESCAN Orsay Holding, a. s. Before starting biological experiments, the calibration measurements were performed to assess the optical performance of the used setup.

#### Spatio-temporal precision and ground-truth accuracy of phase restoration

To assess the temporal stability and the spatial background noise of Q4GOM in biological experiments, the measurements verifying the spatio-temporal precision and the ground-truth accuracy of the phase restoration were carried out. During the evaluation experiments, Q4GOM was operated without any adaptive hardware control or covering box providing constant atmosphere and thermal stability. Quantitative phase images were reconstructed using numerical procedure27 which is further discussed in Supplementary material, Part D.

The temporal stability was evaluated from 300 holograms captured during 25-minute long time period. The reconstructed phase was transferred to heights and the height deviations were evaluated at 9 different parts of the field of view. The size of the evaluated areas corresponded to the diffraction spot of the used MMO. A representative height histogram corresponding to the temporal deviations is shown in Fig. 2a. Results obtained in the remaining 8 areas are presented in Supplementary material, Part E. Using the measured height variations, the temporal stability with the standard deviation $${\sigma }_{T}=0.83\pm 0.23$$ nm was obtained. Evaluation of the temporal stability is further documented by Supplementary Movie 1.

The spatial background noise was examined using the height variations in 9 blank areas of 20 × 20 µm2 equally distributed over the field of view. The height histogram representing spatial variations of the restored phase in one selected area is shown in Fig. 2b. Results obtained in the remaining 8 areas are presented in Supplementary material, Part E. Using the spatial height variations, the spatial accuracy given by the standard deviation $${\sigma }_{Z}=2.95\pm 0.51$$ nm was obtained.

In the last calibration measurement, the ground-truth accuracy of the phase restoration was evaluated. In the experiment, the heights retrieved from the phase measurement were compared with the ground-truth heights. The ground truth heights were provided by the displacement of the plane mirror loaded on a piezoelectric transducer. In the measurement, the plane mirror was gradually displaced from the initial reference position to the final position 1 μm away with the step of 100 nm. This axial range assures a reliable operation of the piezoelectric transducer and in experiments with biological samples is not exceeded. The same experiment was repeated 5 times to obtain the standard deviation of the independent measurements. The solid line in Fig. 2c shows a theoretical dependence of the restored phase on the mirror displacement, while the circles demonstrate experimental results representing one from 5 measurements. In Fig. 2d, the accuracy is demonstrated by the mean error (ME-bars) and the root mean square error (RMSE-error bars) of 5 independent measurements. The obtained results verify that Q4GOM is able to measure ground-truth heights with the accuracy well below 5 nm.

#### Demonstrating versatility of Q4GOM in artifact-free QPI

The versatility and strengths of Q4GOM are convincingly demonstrated when imaging different types of cells (Fig. 3). To demonstrate the advantages of the quantitative phase restoration, the images obtained by Zernike phase contrast and differential interference contrast were added to Supplementary Information, Part G. These methods are widely used although they provide only qualitative information and are impaired by apparent halo artifacts and relief shading28 (Fig. S7 of Supplementary Information). Figure 3a shows the QPI of human cheek cells and the enlarged parts of the field of view in Fig. 3b,c demonstrate the enhanced contrast of the quantitative phase image compared to bright field image. In the QPI, both nucleus and cytoplasmic organelles can be observed and quantitatively characterized. Figure 3d demonstrates imaging of smaller and more concentrated objects that are represented by human red blood cells. Comparison between the QPI and the bright field image is shown in Fig. 3e,f. The experimental result in Fig. 3g shows the QPI of 100% confluent LW3K12 cells. Comparison between the QPI and the bright field image is presented in Fig. 3h,i. The demonstrations in Fig. 3 illustrate the fact that Q4GOM provides quantitative information in artifact-free high-contrast images without the need of staining, which might possibly affect the behavior of images cells. Restoration of the quantitative artifact-free images also simplifies numerical processing and automate evaluation of measured data29. These options are crucial for high throughput microscopy working with large dataset and implementation of machine learning methods.

#### Time-lapse imaging and cell growth study

To demonstrate the instantaneous operation and the inherent temporal stability of Q4GOM, we performed time-lapse imaging of healthy LW3K12 cells. The cells were imaged for 140-minute-long time period, with the time step 20 seconds. Representative image from the measured time series is presented in Fig. 4a. For subsequent processing, the cells were segmented from the background by watershed segmentation approach and identified as separate regions as shown in Fig. 4b. After the segmentation, area and average dry mass density were extracted from the cells labeled 3 and 5. Both cell parameters were monitored over the whole time period of imaging as represented in Fig. 4c. The area of both cells is increasing over time, while the average density of cell dry mass has a decreasing trend, which is in correspondence with the visual observation. The density of cell dry mass in units of pg/µm2 is calculated from the measured phase in radians according to Davies30. Representative images of studied cells 3 and 5 along with cell 23 in five time instants with 30 minutes time increment are demonstrated in Fig. 4d. Detail behavior of cells 3 and 5 during the evaluated time extent is shown in Supplementary Movie 2. The experiment demonstrates the potential of Q4GOM for cell tracking and monitoring of cell parameters describing cell behavior in time-lapse images. Only area and dry mass density of the cell were extracted here, however, more extensive list of cell parameters can be obtained29.

### Advanced experiments with morphologically changed cells

The instantaneous ground-truth phase restoration that is in Q4GOM maintained with an exceptional temporal stability and accuracy was successfully deployed also in advanced biological experiments with morphologically changed LW3K12 cells. The gradual morphological change was induced by phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) causing nutritional deprivation, while the more rapid change of morphology was a result of trypsin application. In these experiments, we carried out time-lapse imaging and performed advanced evaluation of measured data including monitoring of cell dry mass density, cell classification based on the morphological parameters and visualization of dynamic dry mass changes. Details regarding the induction of morphological changes of cells are described in Supplementary material, Part F. The results of advanced experiments executed in the automated manner and showing a predestination of Q4GOM for supervised machine learning are available in Supplementary material, Part H, and further documented by Supplementary Movies 3 and 4.

### Q4GOM in quantitative retardance imaging of birefringent liquid crystal cells

The multipurpose use of Q4GOM was demonstrated by the experiments for quantification of the birefringent phase retardation that were implemented using the 4G optics module connected to optical microscope with a standard MO (Fig. 1d). In the measurement, liquid crystal display of a reflective SLM (Hamamatsu, X10468-01) was used as a birefringent object. Thanks to the high optical performance of Q4GOM, the phase alterations caused by individual liquid crystal cells were quantified and reliably resolved.

The SLM display was placed in the front focal plane of the MO (10x, NA = 0.3) and illuminated by circularly polarized light composed of two orthogonal linear polarization components. As a result of the electrically induced birefringence, one of the polarization components was altered in phase by individual liquid crystal cells to form a signal wave. The orthogonal polarization component was reflected without phase modulation, creating a reference wave31. The dynamic phase at the individual liquid crystal cells was determined from the retardance and quantitatively restored using records taken by the 4G optics module. The results obtained are illustrated in Fig. 5. When the SLM was not addressed (i.e., the voltage was not applied to individual pixels), the phase of the sample wave was not spatially modulated, and the background phase shown in Fig. 5a was reconstructed. In the subsequent measurement, a constant phase shift with the stroke π was introduced in the square area of 5 × 5 pixels. Due to thickness inhomogeneities of the liquid crystal layer and its local heating or non-uniform electric drive scheme, the SLM operation suffers from a spatially varying phase response. To eliminate this error, several calibration methods were developed that allow converting the desired phase values at individual pixels to the correct pixel addressing values32. Q4GOM supports these techniques by direct wide-field measurement of real phase variations in individual liquid crystal cells. This capability is clearly demonstrated by experimental results shown in Fig. 5b-d. In Fig. 5b, the restored background phase related to the zero-phase level setting is shown along with the phase restored in the rectangular area containing 5 × 5 pixels. Although all the pixels were addressed for the phase shift π, the reconstructed phase is different at individual pixels. The phase level in the upper row and in the left column is obviously reduced compared to the desired phase stroke π. This is apparent from the gray-level phase map in Fig. 5b and also from the phase profiles taken along the dashed lines in Fig. 5b and shown in Fig. 5c. Figure 5d illustrates the histograms for the neighboring pixels marked I and II in Fig. 5b. The mean value of the pixel II is very close to the desired phase stroke (μ = 3.09) while the mean value of the pixel I slightly deviates (μ = 2.85). Since the histogram distributions are not significantly overlapped, the phase of the neighboring pixels is safely resolved for the determined mean values and variances. As such Q4GOM was proven as a powerful tool for wide-field incoherent QPI of individual SLM pixels allowing assessing their inhomogeneous phase response and crosstalks. This is a progress over the available techniques that gain phase from the intensity of diffracted light or from interference fringes created by beams originating from reference and phase shifted areas of the SLM32,33. Direct access to the phase of the individual SLM pixels provided by Q4GOM is not possible using these methods.

In the same configuration, Q4GOM can be applied to quantitative imaging of birefringence in biological samples34,35,36, flow of polymer solutions37,38, or stress measurements in either biological specimens39 or optical materials40.

### Q4GOM in quantitative retardance imaging of multi-functional geometric-phase elements

The add-on 4G optics module connected to optical microscope with a standard MO can also be deployed for quantifying the geometric phase of multi-functional optical elements. These elements control light through modulation of the geometric phase and are most often implemented as plasmonic metasurfaces41 or polarization directed flat elements based on polymer liquid crystals4,5. In prove of principle experiment, we deployed Q4GOM for the quantitative restoration of spatial variations of the geometric phase introduced by a polarization directed flat lens. The experiment was carried out using a low magnification MO (4x, NA = 0.1) providing the field of view of 0.5 × 0.5 mm2. The measured geometric-phase lens (f = 100 mm) was illuminated by the linearly polarized light composed of RHCP and LHCP components as shown in Fig. 1e. The illumination was implemented in Köhler system (Fig. 1a) using a tungsten-halogen lamp with bandpass filter (central wavelength 600 nm, full width at half maximum 50 nm). In the transformation of light by the geometric-phase lens, the handedness of the circular polarization turns from RHCP to LHCP, and vice versa. Simultaneously with the polarization transformation, the modulation of the geometric phase is carried out. The change of the geometric phase is polarization selective and its spatial variations are determined by the local angular rotation of the anisotropy axis of the polymer liquid crystals. In this way, a quadratic phase profile of converging and diverging lens is created for incident waves with RHCP and LHCP, respectively. At individual points of the polarization directed flat lens with the coordinates x, y, the phase φ(x, y) and -φ(x, y) was imposed on the sample and reference waves with the orthogonal circular polarizations (Fig. 1e). Hence, the phase 2φ(x, y) was restored from the off-axis hologram recorded in the Q4GOM setup.

The raw and unwrapped phase images of the measured polarization directed flat lens are shown in Fig. 6a,b. The reconstructed phase ΔΦ(x, y) reveals a spherical wavefront φ(x, y) shaped by the polarization directed flat lens. To assess the measurement, the phase profiles were taken along dashed line cross sections I and II and compared with the theoretical phase profile created for the focal length of the lens f = 100 mm (Fig. 6c). The difference between the theoretical and measured phase profiles was below 0.14 rad in the whole field of view. To demonstrate potential of the measurement for characterization of the geometric-phase elements, we used the measured geometric phase ΔΦ(x, y) for numerical calculation of the light propagation behind the lens, which allowed to examine the focused field. The 3D amplitude distribution of the light behind the polarization directed flat lens is visualized in Fig. 6d. This amplitude distribution was obtained as a numerical solution of the Kirchhoff diffraction integral42. From the amplitude of the focused field, we calculated the axial intensity response shown in Fig. 6e. The axial intensity is significantly asymmetrical with rapid oscillations in the near distance from the lens and a gradual decrease in the distant region. Furthermore, the intensity maximum is not located at the paraxial focal plane at the distance of 100 mm from the lens but is significantly shifted toward the lens. This specific profile of the axial intensity is a result of the focusing performed with a low Fresnel number43, which is given by NF = 1 in the demonstrated case. Using the Fresnel approximation, the relation describing the axial intensity of the diffraction limited lens can be obtained44. In Fig. 6e, the theoretical axial intensity of an ideal lens (red dashed line) is compared with the intensity profile obtained from measured data (blue line). Both axial intensity profiles are matched well and have a perfect coincidence of intensity maxima and zero points. The transverse intensity profile of the focused field taken at the position of the maximum axial intensity is shown in Fig. 6f (blue line) together with the theoretical profile for the diffraction limited lens (red dashed line). The experimental transverse intensity corresponding to the paraxial focal plane is illustrated by green line in Fig. 6f.

The Q4GOM configuration used in this experiment can also be applied to the measurement of geometric-phase metasurfaces25 and optically active compounds or biological specimens.

## Discussion

The developed Q4GOM combines the benefits of widely used QPI techniques and has the multipurpose use. Well established QPI methods are adapted to broadband spatially incoherent illumination and utilize a common-path arrangement7, which can be simply implemented by spatial light modulation45,46,47,48,49 or polarization transformation50,51. The inherently stable common-path systems allow the high precision measurement but require the temporal coding; hence the phase is not restored instantaneously. Unscattered light passing through the sample path is used as the reference wave that enables restoration of the phase associated with the image field52. The highest demands on the accuracy, which are not guaranteed by the high precision53, are met when the double-path systems are used. The ground-truth OPD introduced by the sample is restored in real time from a single off-axis hologram using a pure reference wave coming from the sample independent path10,26,54,55,56,57. Double-path laser interferometers58,59,60 can be converted to correlation systems for hologram recording in broadband spatially incoherent light10. Unfortunately, high vibration sensitivity and a very complex design make it difficult to use these systems in common operating conditions. In Q4GOM deployed in biological experiments, the restoration of the ground-truth OPD requiring a pure (sample independent) reference phase is carried out by combining the benefits of the instantaneous QPI executed in broadband spatially incoherent light with the high stability of the common-path setup. This imaging technique is simple to implement but requires polarization modification of a standard interference MMO and works in reflection mode. The strength of Q4GOM is phase measurement based on the quantification of the phase retardance introduced between orthogonal polarization components. This principle allows measurement of samples changing both the dynamic and geometric phase in either transmission or reflection mode. With this flexibility, the method holds exceptionally wide application potential.

## Conclusion

Taking full advantage of the geometric-phase control of light provided by the emerging 4G optics technology, we have developed a novel QPI modality, referenced here as Q4GOM, in which information on the spatially varying OPD is acquired through the quantification of the phase retardance. The strength of the method lies in providing spatially resolved restoration of the phase retardance introduced either in dynamic or geometric phase by isotropic, birefringent and chiral samples or multi-functional optical elements. This capability of Q4GOM was demonstrated by its deploying in advanced noninvasive live cell imaging, quantitative imaging of electrically induced birefringent retardance of liquid crystals and mapping of the geometric phase of polarization directed lenses based on a spatially variable rotation of the anisotropy axis in polymer liquid crystals.

As such, Q4GOM brings a new concept for the QPI in traditional areas, such as biophotonics and optical topography, where it may execute imaging of cells with rapid change of morphology or topographic or stress measurement of dynamic events. Progress also lies in subnanometer precision and excellent ground-truth accuracy (well below 5 nm) guaranteed in simple to implement experiments that can be operated under common conditions. The use of Q4GOM goes far beyond the demonstrated experiments and opens new pathways to develop the quantitative retardance imaging of anisotropic biological samples34,35,36 and flow of polymer solutions37,38, to implement stress measurements39,40 and to provide new tools for the calibration of liquid crystal devices32,33. Another significant area in which Q4GOM excels is the quantitative phase imaging of multi-functional optical elements that control light through the geometric phase and are collectively referred to as geometric-phase holograms5,6. In addition to the demonstrated measurement of polarization directed 4G optics elements, Q4GOM has also been successfully deployed for the QPI of plasmonic metasurfaces. Thanks to the unique optical performance of Q4GOM, the QPI of the plasmonic metasurfaces with the sensitivity down to a single nanoantenna has been for the first time demonstrated in wide-field (non-scanning) experiments25. These experiments open new research directions in the design, optimization and diagnostics of optical composite nanostructures and support their application to biomolecular sensing.

## Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its Supplementary Information files.

## References

1. 1.

Cuche, E., Bevilacqua, F. & Depeursinge, C. Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging. Opt. Lett. 24, 291 (1999).

2. 2.

Marquet, P. et al. Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy. Opt. Lett. 30, 468 (2005).

3. 3.

de Groot, P. Principles of interference microscopy for the measurement of surface topography. Adv. Opt. Photonics 7, 1 (2015).

4. 4.

Kim, J. et al. Fabrication of ideal geometric-phase holograms with arbitrary wavefronts. Optica 2, 958 (2015).

5. 5.

Escuti, M. J., Kim, J. & Kudenov, M. W. Geometric-Phase Holograms. Opt. Photonics News 27, 22–29 (2016).

6. 6.

Lee, Y.-H. et al. Recent progress in Pancharatnam–Berry phase optical elements and the applications for virtual/augmented realities. Opt. Data Process. Storage 3, 79–88 (2017).

7. 7.

Park, Y., Depeursinge, C. & Popescu, G. Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine. Nat. Photonics 12, 578–589 (2018).

8. 8.

Marquet, P., Depeursinge, C. & Magistretti, P. J. Review of quantitative phase-digital holographic microscopy: promising novel imaging technique to resolve neuronal network activity and identify cellular biomarkers of psychiatric disorders. Neurophotonics 1, 020901 (2014).

9. 9.

Majeed, H. et al. Quantitative phase imaging for medical diagnosis. J. Biophotonics 10, 177–205 (2017).

10. 10.

Slabý, T. et al. Off-axis setup taking full advantage of incoherent illumination in coherence-controlled holographic microscope. Opt. Express 21, 14747 (2013).

11. 11.

Cotte, Y. et al. Marker-free phase nanoscopy. Nat. Photonics 7, 113–117 (2013).

12. 12.

Kim, T. et al. White-light diffraction tomography of unlabelled live cells. Nat. Photonics 8, 256–263 (2014).

13. 13.

Paganin, D. & Nugent, K. A. Noninterferometric Phase Imaging with Partially Coherent Light. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2586–2589 (1998).

14. 14.

Zheng, G., Horstmeyer, R. & Yang, C. Wide-field, high-resolution Fourier ptychographic microscopy. Nat. Photonics 7, 739–745 (2013).

15. 15.

Pancharatnam, S. Generalized theory of interference, and its applications. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. - Sect. A 44, 247–262 (1956).

16. 16.

Berry, M. V. Quantal Phase Factors Accompanying Adiabatic Changes. Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 392, 45–57 (1984).

17. 17.

Bomzon, Z., Biener, G., Kleiner, V. & Hasman, E. Space-variant Pancharatnam–Berry phase optical elements with computer-generated subwavelength gratings. Opt. Lett. 27, 1141 (2002).

18. 18.

Choi, K., Yim, J., Yoo, S. & Min, S.-W. Self-interference digital holography with a geometric-phase hologram lens. Opt. Lett. 42, 3940 (2017).

19. 19.

Choi, K., Yim, J. & Min, S.-W. Achromatic phase shifting self-interference incoherent digital holography using linear polarizer and geometric phase lens. Opt. Express 26, 16212 (2018).

20. 20.

Doelman, D. S., Fagginger Auer, F., Escuti, M. J. & Snik, F. Simultaneous phase and amplitude aberration sensing with a liquid-crystal vector-Zernike phase mask. Opt. Lett. 44, 17 (2019).

21. 21.

Bouchal, P., Čelechovský, R. & Bouchal, Z. Polarization sensitive phase-shifting Mirau interferometry using a liquid crystal variable retarder. Opt. Lett. 40, 4567–4570 (2015).

22. 22.

Leith, E. N. & Upatnieks, J. Holography with Achromatic-Fringe Systems. J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 975 (1967).

23. 23.

Leith, E. N. & Swanson, G. J. Achromatic interferometers for white light optical processing and holography. Appl. Opt. 19, 638 (1980).

24. 24.

Lee, H.-H., You, J.-H. & Park, S.-H. Phase-shifting lateral shearing interferometer with two pairs of wedge plates. Opt. Lett. 28, 2243 (2003).

25. 25.

Bouchal, P. et al. High-Resolution Quantitative Phase Imaging of Plasmonic Metasurfaces with Sensitivity down to a Single Nanoantenna. Nano Lett. 19(2), 1242–1250, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b04776 (2019).

26. 26.

Choi, Y. et al. Dynamic speckle illumination wide-field reflection phase microscopy. Opt. Lett. 39, 6062 (2014).

27. 27.

Zikmund, T. et al. Sequential processing of quantitative phase images for the study of cell behaviour in real-time digital holographic microscopy. J. Microsc. 256, 117–125 (2014).

28. 28.

Pastorek, L., Venit, T. & Hozák, P. Holography microscopy as an artifact-free alternative to phase-contrast. Histochem. Cell Biol. 149, 179–186 (2018).

29. 29.

Strbkova, L., Zicha, D., Vesely, P. & Chmelik, R. Automated classification of cell morphology by coherence-controlled holographic microscopy. J. Biomed. Opt. 22, 1 (2017).

30. 30.

Davies, H. G. & Wilkins, M. H. F. Interference Microscopy and Mass Determination. Nature 169, 541–541 (1952).

31. 31.

Bouchal, P., Chmelík, R. & Bouchal, Z. Dual-polarization interference microscopy for advanced quantification of phase associated with the image field. Opt. Lett. 43, 427–430 (2018).

32. 32.

Engström, D., Persson, M., Bengtsson, J. & Goksör, M. Calibration of spatial light modulators suffering from spatially varying phase response. Opt. Express 21, 16086 (2013).

33. 33.

Reichelt, S. Spatially resolved phase-response calibration of liquid-crystal-based spatial light modulators. Appl. Opt. 52, 2610 (2013).

34. 34.

Aknoun, S., Bon, P., Savatier, J., Wattellier, B. & Monneret, S. Quantitative retardance imaging of biological samples using quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry. Opt. Express 23, 16383 (2015).

35. 35.

de Boer, J. F., Milner, T. E., van Gemert, M. J. C. & Nelson, J. S. Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt. Lett. 22, 934 (1997).

36. 36.

Shin, I. H., Shin, S.-M. & Kim, D. Y. New, simple theory-based, accurate polarization microscope for birefringence imaging of biological cells. J. Biomed. Opt. 15, 016028 (2010).

37. 37.

Haward, S. J., McKinley, G. H. & Shen, A. Q. Elastic instabilities in planar elongational flow of monodisperse polymer solutions. Sci. Rep. 6, 33029 (2016).

38. 38.

Haward, S. J., Oliveira, M. S. N., Alves, M. A. & McKinley, G. H. Optimized Cross-Slot Flow Geometry for Microfluidic Extensional Rheometry. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 128301 (2012).

39. 39.

Sugimura, K., Lenne, P.-F. & Graner, F. Measuring forces and stresses in situ in living tissues. Development 143, 186–196 (2016).

40. 40.

McCann, S., Sato, Y., Ogawa, T., Tummala, R. R. & Sitaraman, S. K. Use of Birefringence to Determine Redistribution Layer Stresses to Create Design Guidelines to Prevent Glass Cracking. IEEE Trans. Device Mater. Reliab. 17, 585–592 (2017).

41. 41.

Hsiao, H.-H., Chu, C. H. & Tsai, D. P. Fundamentals and Applications of Metasurfaces. Small Methods 1, 1600064 (2017).

42. 42.

Born, M., Wolf, E. & Bhatia, A. B. Principles of Optics: Electromagnetic Theory of Propagation, Interference and Diffraction of Light. (Cambridge University Press, 2000).

43. 43.

Mahajan, V. N. Axial irradiance and optimum focusing of laser beams. Appl. Opt. 22, 3042 (1983).

44. 44.

Běhal, J. & Bouchal, Z. Optimizing three-dimensional point spread function in lensless holographic microscopy. Opt. Express 25, 29026 (2017).

45. 45.

Popescu, G., Ikeda, T., Dasari, R. R. & Feld, M. S. Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics. Opt. Lett. 31, 775 (2006).

46. 46.

Ding, H. & Popescu, G. Diffraction phase contrast microscopy. Opt. Express 18, 1569 (2010).

47. 47.

Bhaduri, B., Pham, H., Mir, M. & Popescu, G. Diffraction phase microscopy with white light. Opt. Lett. 37, 1094 (2012).

48. 48.

Wang, Z. et al. Spatial light interference microscopy (SLIM). Opt. Express 19, 1016 (2011).

49. 49.

Li, Y., Fanous, M. J., Kilian, K. A. & Popescu, G. Quantitative phase imaging reveals matrix stiffness-dependent growth and migration of cancer cells. Sci. Rep. 9, 248 (2019).

50. 50.

Lee, K. & Park, Y. Quantitative phase imaging unit. Opt. Lett. 39, 3630 (2014).

51. 51.

Baek, Y., Lee, K., Yoon, J., Kim, K. & Park, Y. White-light quantitative phase imaging unit. Opt. Express 24, 9308 (2016).

52. 52.

Popescu, G. et al. Fourier phase microscopy for investigation of biological structures and dynamics. Opt. Lett. 29, 2503 (2004).

53. 53.

Copeland, C. R. et al. Subnanometer localization accuracy in widefield optical microscopy. Light Sci. Appl. 7, 31 (2018).

54. 54.

Kolman, P. & Chmelík, R. Coherence-controlled holographic microscope. Opt. Express 18, 21990 (2010).

55. 55.

Lošt’ák, M., Chmelík, R., Slabá, M. & Slabý, T. Coherence-controlled holographic microscopy in diffuse media. Opt. Express 22, 4180 (2014).

56. 56.

Tolde, O. et al. Quantitative phase imaging unravels new insight into dynamics of mesenchymal and amoeboid cancer cell invasion. Sci. Rep. 8, 12020 (2018).

57. 57.

Choi, Y. et al. Reflection phase microscopy using spatio-temporal coherence of light. Optica 5, 1468 (2018).

58. 58.

Lee, K. et al. Quantitative Phase Imaging Techniques for the Study of Cell Pathophysiology: From Principles to Applications. Sensors 13, 4170–4191 (2013).

59. 59.

Kühn, J. et al. Real-time dual-wavelength digital holographic microscopy with a single hologram acquisition. Opt. Express 15, 7231 (2007).

60. 60.

Shaked, N. T., Rinehart, M. T. & Wax, A. Dual-interference-channel quantitative-phase microscopy of live cell dynamics. Opt. Lett. 34, 767 (2009).

## Acknowledgements

Grant agency of the Czech Republic (18-01396S); Ministry of Education Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic (LQ1601, CEITEC 2020 and LM2015062 Czech BioImaging); European Union’s H2020 programme Twinning (project SINNCE, GA 810626). PB has been supported by scholarship awarded by the Czechoslovak Microscopy Society.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

P.B., Z.B. and R.Ch. proposed principle of quantitative measurement, P.B. performed experiments and L.Š. processed the experimental data. Z.D. realized polarization modification of Mirau interference objective and assisted with experiments. Z.B. contributed with theoretical model and numerical simulations of the measurement. P.B. and Z.B. wrote the manuscript. R. Ch. and Z.B. directed and supervised the project. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petr Bouchal.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

P. B., R. Ch., and Z. B. report a Czech patent, number 307520, and pending PCT application for the Quantitative 4G optics microscope, filed by Brno University of Technology and Palacký University Olomouc.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Bouchal, P., Štrbková, L., Dostál, Z. et al. Geometric-Phase Microscopy for Quantitative Phase Imaging of Isotropic, Birefringent and Space-Variant Polarization Samples. Sci Rep 9, 3608 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-40441-9

• Accepted:

• Published:

• ### Single-shot quantitative phase gradient microscopy using a system of multifunctional metasurfaces

• Hyounghan Kwon
• Ehsan Arbabi
• Andrei Faraon

Nature Photonics (2020)