Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Observation of a superconducting glass state in granular superconducting diamond


The magnetic field dependence of the superconductivity in nanocrystalline boron doped diamond thin films is reported. Evidence of a superconducting glass state is presented, as demonstrated by the observation of a quasi de Almeida-Thouless line in the phase diagram and a logarithmic time dependence of the magnetism. The position of the phase boundary in the H-T plane is determined from electrical transport data by detailed fitting to quasi-zero-dimensional fluctuation conductivity theory. This allows determination of the boundary between resistive and non-resistive behaviour to be made with greater precision than the standard ad hoc onset/midpoint/offset criterion. We attribute the glassy superconductivity to the morphological granularity of the diamond films.


The experimental observation of a proposed superconducting glass state was first made by Müller, Takashige and Bednorz in powder samples of La2CuO4−y:Ba1. The authors noted the existence of frustration in granular systems that gives rise to a “superconductive glass” that is equivalent to an XY spin-glass2, demonstrating the existence of degenerate states. In line with the essential features of the analogous spin-glass system, the authors reported a logarithmic decay of the remanent magnetization, and an irreversibility line–the boundary in the H-T plane between reversibility and irreversibility in magnetization–which obeyed \({H}_{irr}\propto {(1-T/{T}_{c})}^{3/2}\). This observed power law of the irreversibility line was likened to the de Almeida-Thouless line which separates the metastable and stable regions of the phase diagram in related models of spin-glasses3.

Similar behaviour regarding the irreversibility line and magnetic relaxation was subsequently observed in single crystal Y-Ba-Cu-O, and an alternative interpretation was proposed by Yeshurun and Malozemoff in the form of a thermally activated flux-creep model4. Tinkham extended this work and proposed a phenomenological model that included the effects of pinning and reproduced the observed power law5. Other theories purporting to explain the form of the irreversibility line in this kind of superconductor include vortex-lattice melting6 and the existence of a disordered vortex glass7,8,9 state arising from random pinning sites. Importantly, these competing theories share in common the idea of a randomly varying superconducting order parameter, leading to a ubiquitous 3/2 power law in the irreversibility line. We will therefore refer to this behaviour as “glassy superconductivity” without concern for the details of any specific theory.

Whilst the majority of reports of irreversible magnetic behaviour have focused on high-Tc compounds, Oppermann10 has pointed out that the signatures of a glassy state should also be expected in the vicinity of a metal-insulator transition, in both low- and high-Tc materials. Additionally, the existence of an irreversibility line has been studied in low-Tc type II materials such as Nb3Sn and Nb-Ti11, Nb12, MgB213, PbMo6S8 and Ba0.25Pb0.75BiO314. The irreversible behaviour in these metallic films has mainly been attributed to flux lattice melting.

In this paper, we describe the measurement of the magnetic field dependence of superconductivity in boron doped nanocrystalline diamond (BNCD) films, where the granularity may be controlled by the film thickness. We have found evidence of glassy superconductivity in the phase diagram, which we have confirmed with electrical resistivity and magnetic relaxation measurements. We observe a quasi de Almeida-Thouless-type line in Hirr(T), and confirm the proposed glassy superconductivity by observing a logarithmic decay of magnetism over time. This glassy dynamics can be attributed to frustration in a system of weakly coupled superconducting clusters, each of which acts as an individual \(U(1)\cong O(2)\) spin2. The BNCD films studied here have a granular morphology15,16,17,18 similar to sintered powders, and are close to a metal-insulator transition19,20,21, so that the observation of glassy superconductivity is perhaps not surprising. Nonetheless, this is a novel observation in BNCD films, made possible by detailed analysis of dimensional crossover in fluctuation conductivity18fluctuation spectroscopy–which allows us to probe material properties that are governed by the morphological granularity of our films.


Electrical resistance

Figure 1 displays the resistance as a function of temperature measured in an applied magnetic field in the range 0–4 T with field increments of 0.2 T. Closely spaced field increments of 0.02T (not shown in Fig. 1 for clarity, but present in Fig. 2) were also used below 0.2 T.

Figure 1

Resistance as a function of temperature for applied magnetic fields in the range 0–4 T in 0.2 T increments. Fit lines (solid) through the data follow the analysis technique discussed in the text.

Figure 2

Magnetic field as a function of transition temperature for a 564 nm thick BNCD film. Inset: rescaled H(T) clearly showing the H2/3 power law behaviour.

We are able to make a very precise determination of Tc in these films by fitting to the resistance data using our understanding of the fluctuation conductivity. In a previous work18, we have shown that the fluctuation contribution to the conductivity - that is the conductivity due to finite-lifetime Cooper pairs above Tc - exhibits a dimensional cross-over into a quasi-zero-dimensional regime. In the approach to the transition, this diverges as σfl ~ (T − Tc)−3, in confirmation of a prediction by Lerner et al.22. In this region, the leading contribution to σfl comes from the lowest eigenvalue of the diffusion operator, −D2, inside the Cooper pair propagator for a single grain. In the presence of a magnetic field, this operator becomes \(-D{(\nabla +2ie{\bf{A}}/\hslash )}^{2}\), and its lowest eigenvalue increases as a function of magnetic field. This correction to the pair propagator has the sole effect of reducing the transition temperature as a function of magnetic field, Tc(H), so that σfl ~ (T − Tc(H))−3.

We first extract the fluctuation conductivity from the resistance data by subtracting the normal state conductivity, which has the form \({\sigma }_{{\rm{n}}}=a+b\sqrt{T}\). Then, to determine Tc, we fit the fluctuation conductivity to the quasi-zero-dimensional power law model, σfl ~ (T − Tc)−3. This form holds for the widest part of the superconducting transition and allows us to obtain Tc as the single fitting parameter. After finding Tc, we then further analyse the temperature dependence of the fluctuation conductivity, and observe two crossovers into three-dimensional intragrain and intergrain regions, both characterised by a σfl ~ (T − Tc)−1/2 behaviour. The experimental R(T) curves can be well fitted using only the quasi-zero-dimensional dependence, σfl ~ (T − Tc)−3, since this is valid for the widest part of the resistive transition.

The fitting of Tc(H) using fluctuation conductivity is significantly more accurate than determining critical behaviour through the more common onset-midpoint-offset (90%–50%–10%) criterion13. Indeed, each R(T) trace in Fig. 1 is displayed along with the associated fit line, which shows an excellent agreement between the theoretical prediction and the experimental data. This agreement between theory and experiment strongly suggests that the broadening of the transition really is due to superconducting fluctuations rather than some other broadening effect coming from a distribution of local critical temperatures.

The resulting field induced transition temperature is shown in Fig. 2. It has been shown that this can be interpeted as the irreversibility line, Hirr(T)11,14,23,24; as the magnetization becomes reversible, a zero voltage state is no longer supported, and a finite resistance is measured. Initially, at the higher temperature end of Fig. 2, there is a clear upturn in the Hirr(T) curve, which closely follows the quasi de Almeida-Thouless H2/3 power law, as shown more clearly in the inset.

An important observation from the theory of Lerner et al.22 on which our theory is based is that for granular systems there are two distinct coherence lengths which must be considered; the coherence length associated with a Cooper pair which straddles a grain boundary through tunneling, ξt, and that for a Cooper pair contained within a single grain, ξg. These are related to the single-crystal diffusion constant, D, and the bulk effective diffusion constant, Deff, through the standard formula (see Varlamov et al.25 for example) \({\xi }_{g}=\sqrt{\pi \hslash D/8{k}_{B}{T}_{c}}\) and \({\xi }_{t}=\sqrt{\pi \hslash {D}_{{\rm{eff}}}/8{k}_{B}{T}_{c}}\). In our previous paper we used the location of cross-overs in the R(T) trace to estimate D ≈ 12 cm2/s and Deff ≈ 0.6 cm2/s, which are comparable to measurements by more standard means. Based on these numbers we determine ξg ≈ 30 nm and ξt ≈ 7 nm. If we use the effective coherence length ξt to estimate the upper critical field using the standard formula \({H}_{c2}={{\rm{\Phi }}}_{0}/2\pi {\xi }^{2}\) we find an order of magnitude estimate 6.7 T which is comparable with estimates for similar samples19.

Magnetic relaxation

We believe that we are in a regime where we observe glassy superconductivity in this system. To further explore this, we have also measured the relaxation of the magnetization, and observed the logarithmic decay that is expected from the analogous frustrated model.

The procedure for measuring the magnetic relaxation described by Yeshurun, Malozemoff and Shaulov26 was followed. The sample was cooled to the measurement temperature in zero applied field. A magnetic field smaller than the irreversibility field, but larger than the minimum sample magnetization, was then applied, followed by a step decrease that ensured a reversal of the flux profile. The values of these fields were determined by measurement of a magnetic hysteresis loop at the appropriate temperature. The magnetic moment was then monitored as a function of time by vibrating sample magnetometry, where the amplitude of sample translation was minimised to avoid possible field inhomogeneity.

The normalised magnetic relaxation at 2.2 K is shown in Fig. 3. For this measurement, after cooling in zero field, an initial applied field of 97 Oe was followed by a step decrease to 33 Oe. The red line is a linear fit to lnM as a function of lnt, which we later use to estimate the logarithmic derivative of the magnetic moment. We observe a logarithmic decay of the magnetic moment as expected for the analogous frustrated model to which we liken the observations.

Figure 3

Magnetic relaxation measured at 2.2 K for a 564 nm thick BNCD film. The red line shows a linear fit of lnM versus lnt, performed after 1 minute to minimise the effect of instrumental transients. Similar logarithmic decay is observed over a range of temperatures up to Tc.

The normalized time-logarithmic slope of the magnetization, \(S=-\,d\,\mathrm{ln}\,M(t)/d\,\mathrm{ln}\,t\), is plotted as a function of temperature in Fig. 4. We observe the appearance of a plateau region for which S is stable at around 0.020–0.035. This is highly noteworthy because a universal plateau, with S in precisely this range of values, is observed in a number of experiments in Y-Ba-Cu-O and was explained by Malozemoff and Fisher27 as an effect of a vortex glass phase. An analogous plateau in S can be seen in other high temperature superconductors such as SmFeAsO0.9F0.128 or ceramic (Bi, Pb)-222329. At first sight it may seem odd that a universal feature associated with high temperature superconductors should be found also in diamond, a low temperature superconductor. However, the explanation put forward by Malozemoff and Fisher does not rely on the system in question being at high temperatures, but only on the existence of a dense environment of random pinning centres. The latter should certainly occur in any granular superconductor, including the BNCD films we consider here.

Figure 4

Normalized time-logarithmic slope of the magnetization, S = −dlnM(t)/dlnt, for a 564 nm thick BNCD film as a function of temperature.


Generally, reports of the field dependence of the resistive transition in BNCD to date have shown that the transition width broadens with applied magnetic field; the onset of the superconductivity has been shown to be less sensitive to the field than the lower temperature tail in the resistance that grows with increasing field30,31,32. Scanning tunnelling microscopy of CVD-grown BNCD films well below Tc has shown that the temperature dependence of the energy gap in polycrystalline33 and epitaxial34 boron doped diamond samples both broadly agree with BCS-like superconductivity. In BNCD films, a strong correlation between the local superconductivity and the granular structure has been shown, with the plane of the grain boundaries approximately in the direction of film growth33. The energy gap showed a smooth variation across a grain, which is believed to be indicative of slowly varying doping concentration. The grain boundaries, however, are reported as having predominantly metallic-like conductance. It is therefore appropriate to consider our BNCD sample as a disordered collection of coupled superconducting grains. We thus interpret the results presented here as likely being due to a superconducting glass arising from frustration in a model of weakly linked superconducting clusters, as described by Ebner and Stroud2.

The samples studied here are not unique in terms of the existence of a quasi de Almeida-Thouless line in the H(T) diagram; there is some evidence in the literature that other BNCD samples show similar behaviour under the influence of a magnetic field19,30,31,35, but this feature has never before been investigated in detail. While discussion of, and experiments pertaining to, glassy states in superconductors are common for high-Tc compounds, they are also expected to be observable in granular materials, or materials near the metal-insulator transition10. The BNCD samples studied here fall into both of these categories, and so it is perhaps unsurprising that this glassy behaviour manifests itself here. Indeed, evidence for a vortex glass ground state has recently been reported in amorphous indium oxide films36, a similarly strongly disordered low Tc superconductor.

As an important side-note, it is common practice throughout the literature to calculate the coherence length in films such as these by comparing the H(T) curve to the Werthamer-Helfand-Hohenberg (WHH) theory37 of the upper critical field31,38. According to WHH theory, the H(T) curve should be linear near to Tc, which is evidently not the case in samples displaying this glassy behaviour due to the curvature of the quasi de Almeida-Thouless line. It follows that fitting to WHH theory may not be a reliable way to determine the coherence length, and studies doing this may need to be reconsidered.

Finally, the signature of glassy superconductivity observed here has potential consequences for the use of BNCD in low temperature device engineering. The high Young’s modulus of diamond–even in the form of nanocrystalline films39–makes it a good candidate for the fabrication of high frequency nanoelectromechanical resonators with which to study the fundamentals of quantum mechanics in a macroscopic object40,41. Recently, an anomalous temperature dependence of the dissipation in a superconducting nanoresonator was observed, and was suggested to arise from the dynamical vortex behaviour below Tc42. It is possible, therefore, that careful measurement of the temperature-dependent dissipation of a glassy superconducting nanoresonator43 would show complementary behaviour to that observed in this study.


We have examined the magnetic field dependence of superconductivity in BNCD films. By determining the dependence of the transition temperature on increasing magnetic field, we have shown that the irreversibility field has the behaviour Hirr(T)  (1 − T/Tc)3/2. This observed power law, coupled with a logarithmic decay of the remanent magnetization, is attributed to a superconducting glass state resulting from the morphological granularity of our BNCD samples.


The BNCD film was grown on a 2″ diameter, 500 nm SiO2-buffered (100) silicon wafer by microwave plasma assisted chemical vapour deposition44. A dense population of nucleation sites on the substrate was obtained by ultrasonification in a monodisperse aqueous colloid of 5 nm diameter nanodiamond particles45, which has been shown to be essential in the production of uniform and fully coalesced nanodiamond films. During growth, the temperature of the substrate was maintained at ~720 °C by a plasma composed of 3% methane in hydrogen, with trimethylboron as the source of boron (B/C ratio of 12800 ppm). The chamber pressure was 40 Torr and the microwave power was 3.5 kW. The carrier concentration is estimated to be >1 × 1021 cm−3, with an upper limit of 2.3 × 1021 cm−3 assuming a 100% incorporation efficiency from the gas phase. The results presented in this paper focus on a BNCD film shown by scanning electron microscopy to have a thickness of 564 nm and a mean grain diameter of 102 ± 24 nm, though other sample thicknesses show a qualitatively similar behaviour. The estimated surface roughness is approximately 45 nm RMS. In previous work, we have shown that the shape and magnitude of the superconducting transition is unaffected by the surface roughness of the film as controlled through chemical mechanical polishing46.

All temperature dependent measurements relating to the magnetic field dependence of the superconductivity were made using a Quantum Design physical property measurement system. Resistance measurements were performed using silver paste contacts made to the sample surface in a four-wire Van der Pauw configuration. Vibrating sample magnetometry was used to measure the magnetization. All measurements were made with the magnetic field applied perpendicularly to the sample plane.


  1. 1.

    Müller, K. A., Takashige, M. & Bednorz, J. G. Flux trapping and superconductive glass state in La2CuO4 − y:Ba. Phys. Rev. Lett. 58, 1143 (1987).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Ebner, C. & Stroud, D. Diamagnetic susceptibility of superconducting clusters: Spin-glass behavior. Phys. Rev. B 31, 165 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Fischer, K. H. & Hertz, J. A. Spin glasses, vol. 1 (Cambridge University Press, 1993).

  4. 4.

    Yeshurun, Y. & Malozemoff, A. P. Giant flux creep and irreversibility in an Y-Ba-Cu-O crystal: an alternative to the superconducting-glass model. Phys. Rev. Lett. 60, 2202 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Tinkham, M. Resistive transition of high-temperature superconductors. Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1658 (1988).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Blatter, G., Geshkenbein, V., Larkin, A. & Nordborg, H. Low-field phase diagram of layered superconductors: The role of electromagnetic coupling. Phys. Rev. B 54, 72 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Fisher, M. P. A. Vortex-glass superconductivity: A possible new phase in bulk high-Tc oxides. Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 1415 (1989).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Huse, D. A., Fisher, M. P. A. & Fisher, D. S. Are superconductors really superconducting? Nat. 358, 553–559 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Lin, C. L., Mihalisin, T., Bykovetz, N., Zhu, Q. & Fischer, J. E. Vortex-glass behavior in superconducting K3C60 and Rb3C60. Phys. Rev. B 49, 4285 (1994).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Oppermann, R. On a quantum theory of superconducting glasses and other impure superconducting phases. Zeitschrift für Physik B Condens. Matter 68, 329–333 (1987).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Suenaga, M., Ghosh, A. K., Xu, Y. & Welch, D. O. Irreversibility temperatures of Nb3Sn and Nb-Ti. Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1777 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schmidt, M. F., Israeloff, N. E. & Goldman, A. M. Applicability of high-Tc paradigms to magnetic relaxation and irreversibility in superconducting Nb. Phys. Rev. B 48, 3404 (1993).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Fuchs, G. et al. Upper critical field and irreversibility line in superconducting MgB2. Solid State Commun. 118, 497–501 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Zheng, D. N., Lang, P. L., Xiang, J. Y. & Zhao, Z. X. Determination of irreversibility fields in low temperature superconductors. Phys. C: Supercond. 386, 14–17 (2003).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Gajewski, W. et al. Electronic and optical properties of boron-doped nanocrystalline diamond films. Phys. Rev. B 79, 045206 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mareš, J. J., Hubík, P., Krištofik, J. & Nesládek, M. Grain boundary effects in nanocrystalline diamond. Phys. Status Solidi (a) 205, 2163–2168 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Janssens, S. D. et al. Separation of intra-and intergranular magnetotransport properties in nanocrystalline diamond films on the metallic side of the metal–insulator transition. New J. Phys. 13, 083008 (2011).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Klemencic, G. M. et al. Fluctuation spectroscopy as a probe of granular superconducting diamond films. Phys. Rev. Mater. 1, 044801 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Takano, Y. et al. Superconductivity in polycrystalline diamond thin films. Diam. Relat. Mater. 14, 1936–1938 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Klein, T. et al. Metal-insulator transition and superconductivity in boron-doped diamond. Phys. Rev. B 75, 165313 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Achatz, P. et al. Low-temperature transport in highly boron-doped nanocrystalline diamond. Phys. Rev. B 79, 201203 (2009).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Lerner, I., Varlamov, A. & Vinokur, V. Fluctuation spectroscopy of granularity in superconducting structures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 117003 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Watanabe, K. On the irreversibility line in superconductors. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 31, L1586 (1992).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Zheng, D. N., Ingle, N. J. C. & Campbell, A. M. Irreversibility fields of superconducting niobium alloys. Phys. Rev. B 61, 15429 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Varlamov, A., Galda, A. & Glatz, A. Fluctuation spectroscopy: From Rayleigh-Jeans waves to Abrikosov vortex clusters. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015009 (2018).

    ADS  MathSciNet  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Yeshurun, Y., Malozemoff, A. P. & Shaulov, A. Magnetic relaxation in high-temperature superconductors. Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 911 (1996).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Malozemoff, A. P. & Fisher, M. P. Universality in the current decay and flux creep of Y-Ba-Cu-O high-temperature superconductors. Phys. Rev. B 42, 6784 (1990).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Yang, H., Ren, C., Shan, L. & Wen, H.-H. Magnetization relaxation and collective vortex pinning in the Fe-based superconductor SmFeAsO0.9F0.1. Phys. Rev. B 78, 092504 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Mittag, M., Job, R. & Rosenberg, M. Magnetic relaxation and flux creep in ceramic (Bi, Pb)-2223 HTSC. Phys. C: Supercond. 174, 101–108 (1991).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Takano, Y. et al. Superconductivity in diamond thin films well above liquid helium temperature. Appl. Phys. Lett. 85, 2851–2853 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Zhang, G. et al. Global and local superconductivity in boron-doped granular diamond. Adv. Mater. 26, 2034–2040 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wang, Z. L. et al. The superconductivity in boron-doped polycrystalline diamond thick films. Diam. Relat. Mater. 15, 659–663 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Dahlem, F. et al. Spatially correlated microstructure and superconductivity in polycrystalline boron-doped diamond. Phys. Rev. B 82, 033306 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Sacépé, B. et al. Tunneling spectroscopy and vortex imaging in boron-doped diamond. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 097006 (2006).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Sidorov, V. A. et al. Superconductivity in boron-doped diamond. Diam. Relat. Mater. 14, 335–339 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sacépé, B. et al. Low-temperature anomaly in disordered superconductors near Bc2 as a vortex-glass property. Nat. Phys. 1 (2018).

  37. 37.

    Helfand, E. & Werthamer, N. R. Temperature and purity dependence of the superconducting critical field, Hc2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 13, 686 (1964).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Ekimov, E. A. et al. Superconductivity in diamond. Nat. 428, 542–545 (2004).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Williams, O. A. et al. High Young’s modulus in ultra thin nanocrystalline diamond. Chem. Phys. Lett. 495, 84–89 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Etaki, S. et al. Motion detection of a micromechanical resonator embedded in a d.c. SQUID. Nat. Phys. 4, 785–788 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    O’Connell, A. D. et al. Quantum ground state and single-phonon control of a mechanical resonator. Nat. 464, 697–703 (2010).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Lulla, K., Defoort, M., Blanc, C., Bourgeois, O. & Collin, E. Evidence for the role of normal-state electrons in nanoelectromechanical damping mechanisms at very low temperatures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 177206 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Bautze, T. et al. Superconducting nano-mechanical diamond resonators. Carbon 72, 100–105 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Williams, O. A. et al. Growth, electronic properties and applications of nanodiamond. Diam. Relat. Mater. 17, 1080–1088 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Williams, O. A. et al. Enhanced diamond nucleation on monodispersed nanocrystalline diamond. Chem. Phys. Lett. 445, 255–258 (2007).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Klemencic, G. M., Mandal, S., Werrell, J. M., Giblin, S. R. & Williams, O. A. Superconductivity in planarised nanocrystalline diamond films. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 18, 239–244 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


The authors gratefully acknowledge support by the European Research Council under the EU Consolidator Grant ‘SUPERNEMS’, and C. M. Muirhead for valuable discussion.

Author information




G.M.K. conceived of the experiment and performed the transport measurements. G.M.K., J.M.W. and S.R.G. performed the magnetic relaxation measurements, S.M. grew the BNCD sample, J.M.F. and R.A.S. developed the theory to analyse the data, J.M.F. performed the data analysis, and S.R.G. and O.A.W. directed the project. G.M.K. and J.M.F. wrote the manuscript and it was reviewed by all authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. M. Klemencic.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Klemencic, G.M., Fellows, J.M., Werrell, J.M. et al. Observation of a superconducting glass state in granular superconducting diamond. Sci Rep 9, 4578 (2019).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing