Table 2 MANCOVA results for switching trials.

From: Distinct online and offline effects of alpha and beta transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) on continuous bimanual performance and task-set switching

Multivariate Effects Pillai’s trace Approx F (df, Error df) Pr(>F)
COORDINATION PATTERN 0.0289 17.53 (2, 1180) 0.00000003***
STIMULATION FREQUENCY 0.0096 5.72 (2, 1180) 0.003**
STIMULATION CONDITION 0.0049 2.92 (2, 1180) 0.05*
TIME centred 0.0045 2.65 (2, 1180) 0.07
TARGET FREQUENCY centred 0.0226 13.66 (2, 1180) 0.000001***
COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY 0.0004 0.21 (2, 1180) 0.8
COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION CONDITION 0.0031 1.81 (2, 1180) 0.2
STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION 0.0009 0.55 (2, 1180) 0.6
COORDINATION PATTERN*TIME centred 0.0039 2.31 (2, 1180) 0.1
STIMULATION FREQUENCY*TIME centred 0.0024 1.46 (2, 1180) 0.2
STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred 0.0003 0.21 (2, 1180) 0.8
COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION 0.0003 0.16 (2, 1180) 0.9
COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*TIME centred 0.0001 0.03 (2, 1180) 0.9
COORDINATION PATTERN* STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred 0.0001 0.07 (2, 1180) 0.9
STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred 0.0010 0.61 (2, 1180) 0.5
COORDINATION PATTERN*STIMULATION FREQUENCY*STIMULATION CONDITION*TIME centred 0.0046 2.73 (2, 1180) 0.07
Residuals 1181  
Residual standard errors 128.209
4.33
Error: subject level Pillai’s trace approx F (df, Error df)  
TARGET FREQUENCY centred 0.1447 1.35 (2, 16)  
Residuals 17  
  1. Type I sums of squares given. Asterisks indicate level of significance at ***p < 0.0001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05.