Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Magnetic phase diagram of K2Cr8O16 clarified by high-pressure muon spin spectroscopy

## Abstract

The K2Cr8O16 compound belongs to a series of quasi-1D compounds with intriguing magnetic properties that are stabilized through a high-pressure synthesis technique. In this study, a muon spin rotation, relaxation and resonance (μ+SR) technique is used to investigate the pressure dependent magnetic properties up to 25 kbar. μ+SR allows for measurements in true zero applied field and hereby access the true intrinsic material properties. As a result, a refined temperature/pressure phase diagram is presented revealing a novel low temperature/high pressure (pC1 = 21 kbar) transition from a ferromagnetic insulating to a high-pressure antiferromagnetic insulator. Finally, the current study also indicates the possible presence of a quantum critical point at pC2 ~ 33 kbar where the magnetic order in K2Cr8O16 is expected to be fully suppressed even at T = 0 K.

## Introduction

Low dimensional magnets represent model materials, in which an intertwinning between electronic degrees of freedom leads to strongly correlated ground states1,2,3. Experimental realizations feature an enhanced interplay between quantum and thermal fluctuations, which can be tuned by several parameters, such as applied pressure/field or chemical substitution. In recent years, much attention has been paid to investigate the magnetic ground states of hollandite type materials4,5,6,7,8,9. These materials, with a general chemical formula AxM8O16, have a common quasi-one-dimensional (Q1D) tunnel structure composed from the M2O4 framework formed by the zigzag chains of edge-shared MO6 octahedra and an A cation at the tunnel sites, as shown in Fig. 1. In such systems, the formation of the magnetic ground state originates from a dominant intra-chain interaction together with a competition between the nearest and next nearest neighbor interactions4,6. In addition to their fundamental scientific interests, materials with similar open Q1D tunnel structures could potentially be used in future battery applications, where diffusion of the A cations is the main interest10,11,12.

One of the hollandite materials that has attracted a lot of attention for both theoretical and experimental studies is K2Cr8O1613,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26. This compound has a tetragonal structure, space group I4/m27, and displays a rare mixed valence state, 2Cr3+ + 6Cr4+. While Cr3+ is considered to be very stable, only a few compounds display the Cr4+ state since it is only stabilized under extreme conditions21. This requires the synthesis and growth of the compound to be performed under high pressures (~6.7 GPa) resulting in very limited sample size/amount (100–500 mg), which clearly limits the range of experimental methods available to study its intrinsic physical properties. Furthermore, this compound displays an unexpected metal-insulator transition (MIT) at TMIT = 95 K14, with the phases above and below the MIT temperature being ferromagnetic (FM). While the FM phase appearing below TC = 180 K is well understood through the double exchange mechanism of itinerant d-electrons14, the microscopic mechanism behind the MIT has been a great puzzle for many physicists. Early X-ray diffraction measurements indicated no significant structural changes close to TMIT and purely electronic/magnetic orgin was concluded14, e.g. the double exchange mechanism28. However, double exchange interaction usually implies metallicity and several theoretical studies were initiated13,15,16,20. First-principles electronic structure calculations revealed nesting of the Fermi surface and a charge/spin density wave was proposed13,15. Further calculations predicted charge ordering on two Cr sites, initiated by structural distortions16. This was confirmed by synchrotron X-ray diffraction experiments revealing a structural distortion from a tetragonal to a monoclinic phase at the MIT17,18. However, these studies combined with electronic structure calculations did not detect any charge ordering. Therefore, Peierls instability in the Q1D tunnels formed by four coupled Cr2O4 chains was instead suggested, with the double exchange interaction as the origin for the ferromagnetism, both above and below MIT17,20. Moreover, a previous muon spin rotation, relaxation and resonance (μ+SR) study19 and a recent photoemission study24 also support such Peierls transition scenario.

Previous bulk magnetic susceptibility studies of K2Cr8O16 reported a Curie-Weiss type behavior with a Curie temperature TC = 180 K14, however, such data was obtained in a relatively high magnetic field (B = 0.1 T). It should be emphasized that the μ+SR technique allows for investigations at very low or even zero applied magnetic fields, meaning that the true intrinsic nature of the material can be acquired. In fact, previous μ+SR measurement revealed TC 168 K19, emphasizing the significance of measuring in a magnetic field free environment.

So far, studies of the pressure dependency of the physical properties for this compound have been fairly uncommon due to limited sample volume and, consequently, the magnetic ground state of K2Cr8O16 at low temperatures and high pressures is still unsettled. For this purpose, the μ+SR method is powerful since the muon is a very sensitive magnetic probe and the method allows for measurements in low or even zero applied fields as well as low temperatures and high pressures. Here we present the first study of the true intrinsic magnetic ground state of K2Cr8O16 under high hydrostatic pressures using the μ+SR technique. Both zero-field (ZF) and weak-transverse field (wTF) field configurations were used and provided crucial information for clarifying and revealing a new magnetic phase diagram for this complex compound.

## Results

This section is divided into three subsections: Zero-field (ZF), Weak-transverse field (wTF) and The Phase diagram. The first two explains the experimental data, analysis and the results obtained. The last subsection summarizes the obtained result in form of a phase diagram.

### Zero-field (ZF)

The sample was measured under zero-field (ZF) at T = 5 K for several pressures ranging from p0 = 2.3 kbar to p = 25.0 kbar. The ZF time spectrum at the lowest applied pressure (p0 = 2.3 kbar) at T = 5 K is shown in Fig. 2. Analysis of the t ≥ 0.1 μs time domain reveals a Kubo-Toyabe (KT) function, mainly coming from the pressure cell. The muon spin rotation frequencies, resulting from the Larmor precession of the muon spin around the internal fields of the magnetically ordered sample, can be obtained by analyzing the shorter time domain, t < 0.1 μs as illustrated by the inset of Fig. 2. For reference, the result of the previous ambient pressure μ+SR19 experiment is shown in the same figure. Note that the spectra have not been shifted in the figure, indicating that the current study has a higher background asymmetry due to the pressure cell.

Figure 3(a,b) display the ZF time spectra and their respective power Fourier transforms, recorded at T = 5 K for different applied pressures. The Fourier transform of the time spectrum at the lowest pressure (p0 = 2.3 kbar) indicates the presence of four major peaks, f1, f2, f3 and f4. Consequently, the time spectrum was accurately fitted using four oscillating signals, one non-oscillatory relaxing signal and one static gaussian Kubo-Toyabe signal:

$${A}_{0}\,{P}_{{\rm{ZF}}}(t)=\sum _{n=1}^{4}\,{A}_{n}^{{\rm{ZF}}}\,\cos ({\omega }_{n}t+{\varphi }_{n})\exp (\,-\,{\lambda }_{n}^{{\rm{ZF}}}t)+{A}_{{\rm{Tail}}}\exp (\,-\,{\lambda }_{{\rm{Tail}}}t)+{A}_{{\rm{KT}}}{G}^{{\rm{SGKT}}}({\rm{\Delta }},t),$$
(1)

where A0 is the initial asymmetry, PZF(t) is the muon spin polarization function, An, ωn, ϕn, λn are the associated asymmetries, muon spin rotation frequencies, initial phases, and exponential depolarization rates, respectively, and GSGKT represents a static gaussian Kubo-Toyabe function. Here, AKT is the background asymmetry from the pressure cell while $${\sum }_{n=1}^{4}\,{A}_{{\rm{n}}}^{{\rm{Z}}F}$$ and ATail represent the sample’s asymmetry. In a powder/multidomain sample, 2/3 of the muons precess around magnetic fields perpendicular to their initial polarization (the oscillation terms) while 1/3 of the muons sense a local magnetic field parallel to their initial polarization and do not precess (the non-oscillating tail). This illustrates one of the powers of μ+SR with the possibility to extract the magnetic volume fractions through the absolute values of the individual asymmetry components.

The following frequencies were obtained at the lowest pressure using the global fit procedure described in the next paragraph: f1 = 51.6(2), f2 = 76.04(3), f3 = 85.29(2) and f4 = 114.6(4) MHz where fn = ωn/2π. Note that the obtained frequencies for lowest pressure are very similar to those from the previous μ+SR study19 at ambient pressure. There is a slight difference in the lowest frequency that could be related to the fact that this frequency has a very broad field distribution and will be more difficult to fit accurately, especially with the increased background from the pressure cell.

In Fig. 3(b), a clear pressure dependence is observed for the number of frequencies in the Fourier transform by comparing low pressure and the high pressure results. Both f2 and f3 are virtually constant throughout the entire pressure range, while f1 and f4 are strongly suppressed and finally vanish completely for the higher pressures p > 19.1 kbar. A closer look at the time spectra [Fig. 3(a)] highlights that the μ+SR spectra recorded at p = 23.0 and 25.0 kbar clearly contain less frequency components than those recorded at lower pressure. In addition, it was determined from individual fits, using Eq. (1), that ATail and λTail were pressure independent up to p = 19.1 kbar and p = 25.0 kbar, respectively. As expected, the fitted value of ATail is about 1/3 of the sample’s full asymmetry. The maximum sample asymmetry for each pressure was determined from the wTF asymmetry well above the magnetic transition temperature, as detailed in the next subsection and Fig. 6(a). Combining the results of the individual fits with the Fourier transforms shown in Fig. 3(b) it is concluded that: (i) the frequencies (f2 and f3) are practically pressure independent and (ii) $${\lambda }_{{\rm{T}}ail} \sim 0$$ μs−1, which indicates that the magnetic ordering is static for the whole pressure range. Therefore, the spectra at 5 K were fitted in a global fit by keeping f2 and f3 as common parameters for all pressures, while having f4 as a common parameter up to p = 19.1 kbar and fixing the λTail = 0 μs−1. Finally, using a common but free phase (ϕ1 = ϕ2 = ϕ3 = ϕ4) for all pressures gave virtually the same fitting results (in terms of frequencies, depolarization rates, etc.) as when fixing the phase to zero. However, leaving the phase a free fitting parameter yielded a slightly better χ2, which reflects the expected complex field distribution in a sample with multiple muon sites and/or local field contributions29. Note that a ϕn = 0 implies the formation of a commensurate magnetic order in K2Cr8O16 up to the highest pressure measured.

The four muon spin rotation frequencies (f1 − f4) obtained through the global fit as a function of pressure are illustrated in Fig. 4. Between p = 19.1 kbar and p = 23.0 kbar, two of the four frequencies disappear and only f2 and f3 are remaining. This behavior clearly reveals the occurrence of a magnetic phase transition at pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar, which is also apparent from Fig. 3.

### Weak-transverse field (wTF)

The magnetic properties of the sample were also studied by applying a weak-transverse field, wTF = 5 mT. Note that this field is significantly smaller than the internal ordered magnetic field at each muon site below the magnetic transition temperature. It is also much lower than the field applied in the previously published bulk measurements14,25 where B = 0.1 or 1 T were used. The time spectra of the wTF measurements at the lowest pressure for selected temperatures are illustrated in Fig. 5(a). The obtained spectra were fitted by using one relaxing oscillatory signal and one exponentially relaxing non-oscillatory signal:

$${A}_{0}\,{P}_{{\rm{TF}}}(t)={A}_{{\rm{TF}}}\,\cos ({\omega }_{{\rm{TF}}}t+{\varphi }_{{\rm{TF}}})\exp (\,-\,{\lambda }_{{\rm{TF}}}t)+{A}_{{\rm{S}}}\exp (\,-\,{\lambda }_{{\rm{S}}}t),$$
(2)

where A0 is the initial asymmetry, PTF(t) is the muon spin polarization function in wTF, ωTF is the frequency from the applied wTF, ϕTF is the initial phase of the oscillatory signal, λTF and λS are the corresponding depolarization rates, while ATF and AS are the asymmetries (signal amplitudes) of the two components. Here, ATF accounts for the signal from the p-cell and the paramagnetic fraction of the sample in the externally applied wTF and AS is identical with ATail from Eq. (1).

The temperature dependence of the normalized sample component with the pressure cell contribution subtracted, $${A}_{{\rm{TF}}}^{{\rm{Sample}}}(T)=({A}_{{\rm{TF}}}-{A}_{{\rm{\min }}})/{A}_{{\rm{\max }}}$$, at lowest pressure (p0 = 2.3 kbar) is shown in Fig. 5(b). Since $${A}_{{\rm{TF}}}^{{\rm{Sample}}}$$ approximately corresponds to the paramagnetic volume fraction of the sample, the step-like $${A}_{{\rm{TF}}}^{{\rm{Sample}}}(T)$$ curve indicates that the system changes from a low-temperature magnetically ordered state to a high-temperature paramagnetic state at around 160 K. More accurately, the transition temperature is extracted as the middle point of a sigmoid fit is TC = 160.7(0.3) K. For reference, our previous μ+SR ambient pressure measurement19 is shown in the same figure with TC = 168 K. The difference in transition temperatures is explained by difference in pressure. When the pressure cell with a sample and a pressure medium is sealed by hand, it is normal that a pressure of p0 ≈ 1–2 kbar is applied. A lower TC (=160.7 K) is also consistent with the fact that the pressure is slightly higher, because the transition temperature decreases with pressure, as described below. Thus, the lowest applied pressure in the current study is estimated to p0 = 2.3 kbar by a linear extrapolation using the transition temperatures at p = 11.7 kbar and the ambient pressure data19. This is in line with what can be expected from closing and sealing the pressure cell using manual hand tools (as mentioned above).

The temperature dependencies of ATF and λTF for each applied pressure are obtained from fits of the corresponding μ+SR spectra using Eq. (2) and are displayed in Fig. 6. A magnetic phase transition is clearly visible from the drastic change in both ATF and λTF. The transition temperature is shifted towards lower temperatures [Fig. 6(a)] with increasing pressure. Interestingly, λTF(T) [Fig. 6(b)] drastically changes its behavior above pC1 [Fig. 6(d)]. At lower pressures, λTF(T) display an abrupt increase at TC and then keeps a constant value at lower temperatures. Above pC1 ≈ 21 kbar, however, λTF(T) shows a sharp cusp at the magnetic transition temperature and then rapidly decreases with decreasing temperature. Such drastic change in behavior suggests the presence of a pressure induced magnetic phase transition between p = 19.1 kbar and p = 23.0 kbar. This finding is discussed in greater detail in Sec. 3.

Looking closely at the TF asymmetries, a subtle difference can be discerned between the low and high pressure magnetic phases. As emphasized in Fig. 6(c), the low pressure asymmetries display a bigger change in comparison to the high pressured one when crossing the magnetic transition temperature. As discussed in Sec. 3, this is most likely related to a change in magnetic order of the sample, inducing weak stray fields in the neighboring pressure cell.

### The Phase diagram

Based on the results obtained from both ZF and wTF measurements, we have have constructed a novel and detailed magnetic phase-diagram for K2Cr8O16 (see Fig. 7). The pressure dependence of the MIT temperature25 is displayed in Fig. 7 as blue symbols/line. The transition temperature and the observed MIT from the previous ambient pressure μ+SR study19 are also included as indicated by the yellow circles. Note that this MIT temperature is in good agreement with the resistivity measurements.

The pressure dependence of the transition temperature, obtained from wTF μ+SR experiments, is shown as red circles in Fig. 7. The transition temperature is decreasing with higher pressure, in agreement with published bulk transport measurements25, however, the current μ+SR data yields slightly lower (~10 K) overall phase boundary. Since our μ+SR measurements are performed at zero or very low applied fields, the current results represent the true intrinsic magnetic properties of K2Cr8O16. Even though the maximum applied pressure is approximately 25 kbar30,31, the extrapolation of the red curve (dashed green line in Fig. 7) suggests the complete suppression of magnetic order in K2Cr8O16 at about $${p}_{{\rm{C}}2} \sim 33$$ kbar, i.e. the existence of a quantum critical point. Here it should also be emphized that the current μ+SR data show the presence of a non-magnetic state just below the MIT for p = 23.0 kbar and p = 25.0 kbar. The high-pressure, p ≥ 33 kbar, and low-temperature phase is assigned as a paramagnetic insulator (PI). Such results also conclusively resolve the findings of ref.25 that reported this phase as either an antiferromagnetic insulator (AFI) or a PI.

The transition pressure (pC1 = 21(2) kbar) between the two magnetically ordered states at low temperatures is indicated in Fig. 7 with a vertical black line. This line is faded to indicate that it is extrapolated vertically from the ZF data acquired at T = 5 K up to where the TC line (red circles/line) is crossing the blue MIT line. Consequently, ZF and wTF data are very consistent and additional evidences to further support why such phase is assigned as an AFI ordered phase is described in Sec. 3.

## Discussion

This section includes discussions regarding how the low-temperature phase between pC1 = 21(2) kbar and pC2 = 33 kbar is assigned to be AFI. Note that this phase was already firmly determined to be an insulating phase from previous resistivity study25. First of all, it is clear from both ZF and wTF measurements that this phase has to be magnetically ordered, i.e. not a PM phase. At ambient pressure and low temperatures, K2Cr8O16 enters into a FM phase. The internal field at each muon site in ZF can be expressed as32:

$${\overline{H}}_{\mu }={\overline{H}}_{\mathrm{Di}{\rm{p}}^{\prime} }({r}_{{\rm{\mu }}})+{\overline{H}}_{{\rm{Hyp}}}({r}_{{\rm{\mu }}})+{\overline{H}}_{{\rm{L}}},$$
(3)

where HDip′ is the summation of dipolar fields within a Lorentz sphere, HHyp is the hyperfine contact field, rμ is the distance from the magnetic ion to the muon site and HL is the Lorentz field. For paramagnetic and antiferromagnetic materials, both HHyp and HL are usually very small, essentially zero, hence, the dipole field will solely dominate the contribution to the muon spin rotation frequency in such a state. Looking at the pressure dependence of the current ZF μ+SR data [see Figs 3 and 4], it is clear that the number of frequencies, fn, in the μ+SR spectra decreases from four to two, when crossing pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar. This behavior can be explained by either a magnetic transition, structural transition or a combination of both. A structural transition seems unlikely since f2 and f3 are independent of pressure and a change of muon sites would have dramatically changed the internal dipole field contributions. Instead, the changes in the number of frequencies can be explained by a magnetic transition. From the wTF results, we will show that this fact can be ascribed to a change from FI to AFI order.

In general, at a second order phase transition, the λTF(T) curve exhibits a sharp maximum at the phase transition temperature33,34,35,36 with a typical critical behavior related to the formation of magnetic order. This is also the case for K2Cr8O16 in our previous ambient pressure μ+SR study19 where λTF(T) displays a sharp cusp at TC but have values close to zero below the transition. This behavior originates from the fact that the internal magnetic field, caused by the magnetic order, is considerably greater than the applied wTF. For the current high-pressure study, the situation is a bit more complex. Looking carefully at λTF(T) in Fig. 6(d), for p ≤ 19 kbar, it is clear that λTF is temperature independent even below the transition temperature. Such situation drastically changes at p ≥ 23 kbar (pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar) where the λTF(T) curve exhibits a typical critical behavior with a maximum at the phase transition and then quickly decreases again as temperature is lowered. In order to explain this, we should note that for a high-pressure experiment some muons (~26%) stop in the sample and the remaining muon fraction (~74%) stop in the non-magnetic pressure cell. At low pressures, K2Cr8O16 is known to be in a ferromagnetic state, which induces a magnetization by the externally applied field. This would naturally cause a weak stray-field from the sample into the surrounding non-magnetic pressure cell [as schematically illustrated below in Fig. 8(d)]. Such stray-field will provide a very broad field-distribution width in the sample and cell below TC, leading to large λTF. However, when passing pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar, λTF decreases with decreasing temperature below the transition temperature and recovers to a value expected for a MP35N pressure cell. This indicates absence of stray-fields inside the pressure cell meaning the high-pressure magnetic phase is no longer FI but, as explained below, AFI [TN = 71.2 K at p = 25.0 kbar], i.e. a phase without induced magnetization under applied magnetic field.

Having the wTF depolarization rate in mind, also the wTF asymmetry (ATF) strengthen the case for an AFI phase above pC1 ~ 21 kbar. As shown in Fig. 6(c), the sample’s asymmetry, i.e. the difference of ATF above and below the magnetic transition temperature (ΔATF), varies with pressure. That is, at low pressures with p ≤ 19 kbar, ΔATF ~ 0.07, while ΔATF ~ 0.06 at p ≥ 23 kbar. This could be explained in a similar manner as in the case of λTF. When K2Cr8O16 is in the FI state, stray-fields, larger than the wTF = 5 mT, are induced in the adjacent pressure cell. As a consequence, wTF μ+SR experiments provide a “false” increase of the sample’s asymmetry, i.e. a decrease of the ATF, below TC. On the contrary, in the AFI phase above pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar, the whole pressure cell returns into an entirely non-magnetic state due to the absence of the stray-fields. Therefore, muons stopping in the pressure cell do no longer contribute to a loss of ATF below the transition temperature.

It has also been proposed that the K2Cr8O16 compound at high pressures and low temperatures enters into a more complex magnetic structure25, e.g. an island structure or perhaps a spiral spin order. An island scenario is, however, clearly excluded, because the μ+SR data does not show the expected separation of different magnetic volume fractions. An incommensurate spiral order is also not supported since the ZF-μ+SR spectrum is accurately fitted with ϕn ≈ 0°, indicating the presence of commensurate magnetic order. A typical incommensurate magnetic ordering is characterized by a broad field distribution limited by two well separated fields, Bmax and Bmin. The transition from a ferromagnetic to an incommensurate magnetic structure would imply an abrupt increase of the depolarization rates, which is not the case in our data (see Fig. 3(b)). Such rapidly depolarizing oscillation should also be fitted by the product of zeroth-order Bessel function of the first kind [J0(t)] and a cosine function, rather than an single exponentially relaxing cosine function37. For K2Cr8O16, however, both below and above pC1 ≈ 21(2) kbar, fits using any combination of J0(t) yields very poor results. Based on the fact that two frequencies remain the same below and above pC1, with similar depolarization rates and the stray field disappear at low temperatures, above pC1, the most likely simple scenario is that the sample undergoes a FI to AFI transition. Nevertheless, commensurate spiral order could still be a candidate for the magnetic structure at high pressures and low temperatures. In order to gain further insights into the subtle details of the spin order, neutron diffraction measurements under high pressure and low temperature are needed. Unfortunately, such experiments are challenging due to the limited available sample volume from the high-pressure synthesis. Another route to more accurately determine the magnetic ground state would be a combination of the current muon data with detailed structural analysis from high-resolution x-ray diffraction (XRD). Information on subtle structural changes with pressure could allow us to deduce possible changes in muon stopping site(s) with changes in the individual Larmor frequencies. Such information could give a possibility to determine a more detailed spin structure from μ+SR29,38, particularly in combination with first principles calculations for predicting the muon site(s).

In summary, the present ZF and wTF μ+SR results reveal that the low-temperature magnetic phase at p ≥ pC1 ≈ 21 kbar is an AFI phase, although the previous bulk magnetization measurements25 suggested either a ferro- or ferrimagnetic phase. However, it should be noted that looking carefully at the data in Fig. 3(a) of ref.25 the magnetization curve display an evident decrease below the magnetic transition temperature for pressures above pC1. Such a decrease in magnetization with lowering of the temperature is a clear sign of an antiferromagnetic spin order. However, since the magnetization below the transition temperature did indeed not approach zero value, the phase was instead identified as ferrimagnetic rather than antiferromagnetic. Now having the present μ+SR data available, we are able to revisit and potentially re-evaluate the previous magnetization data25. There can be several reasons why the magnetization does not decrease to zero below the AFI transition temperature (TN). First of all, the sample is known to contain a small fraction (2%) of a highly ferromagnetic CrO228,39,40,41 impurity phase, which has shown to retain ferromagnetic order also at higher pressures42. Such impurity phase will clearly cause the entire sample to have a ferromagnetic background on top of the AFI signal, which in a bulk magnetic measurement cannot be separated from a ferrimagnetic state. In a muon measurement this is not a problem since one of the powers of μ+SR is the capability to separate individual magnetic volume fractions and hereby easily distinguish between a ferrimagnetic phase vs. an AFI + FM impurities. The current μ+SR data strongly supports the latter. Note that a strong ferrimagnetic state would cause similar stray fields in the pressure cell as the ferromagnetic state and can therefore be excluded. However, a nearly compensated ferrimagnetic phase (i.e. almost AFI) would yield a similar λTF(T) temperature dependence [Fig. 6(d)]. Therefore, such phase should not be completely excluded. Nevertheless, the ZF data shown in Fig. 4 suggest that AFI phase is more likely compared to a nearly compensated ferrimagnetic phase. In addition to the impurity scenario, it should once again be emphasized that the magnetization data25 was acquired under a rather high externally applied magnetic field (B = 0.1 and 1.0 T), while our current μ+SR data was recorded under very low (B = 5 mT) or even zero applied field. Finally, it should also be noted that μ+SR and bulk magnetization covers very different times and length scales.

In conclusion, the current μ+SR investigations under high pressure have yielded a novel insight on the magnetic order and transitions in K2Cr8O16. A new and more detailed P − T phase diagram is presented where two phase transitions at pC1 ≈ 21 kbar and pC2 ≈ 33 kbar are found for T = 5 K. Combining the ZF and wTF muon data, the first transition is uniquely assigned as a low-pressure ferromagnetic insulator phase to a medium-pressure antiferromagnetic insulator phase (FMI-to-AFI) and the second one as a medium-pressure antiferromagnetic insulator phase to a high-pressure paramagnetic insulator phase (AFI-to-PI). The latter would then indicate the presence of a quantum critical point in K2Cr8O16. This demonstrates a unique power of the μ+SR technique to provide fundamental information on the magnetic ground state in complex compounds, even in zero applied field.

## Methods

The sample was prepared under high pressure and high-temperature conditions with a Walker-type multianvil press at Max Planck Institute for Solid State Research, by a solid-state reaction of a mixture of K2Cr2O7:Cr2O3 = 1:3 in a sealed platinum-foil capsule under 7 GPa at 1100 °C for 1 h. The amount of the obtained sample was a few hundred milligrams in each synthesis batch. The characterization of the sample is reported in refs14,18. The sample used for the current high-pressure μ+SR measurements was characterized using x-ray diffraction (XRD), magnetic susceptibility and ambient pressure μ+SR in order to confirm the high sample quality.

Three pressed pellets of the powder samples were stacked (6 mm diameter and 14 mm total height) for each series of measurements. The sample pellet was inserted into a piston-cylinder clamp cell made of MP35 alloy30 [see also Fig. 8(a,b)]. Daphne oil was used as a pressure medium to apply hydrostatic pressure up to 25 kbar and a 3He cryostat was used to achieve temperatures down to TBase = 0.3 K. The pressure inside the cell was determined by in situ AC susceptibility measurements for the superconducting transition temperature of an indium wire located at the bottom of the cell. Zero-field (ZF) and weak-transverse field (wTF = 50 G) μ+SR measurements were performed at the GPD instrument30,31 on the μE1 beamline of the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in Switzerland. Vertical sample position scans [adjustable by few mm, see Fig. 8(b)] and muon momentum scan (adjustable by few percent, Fig. 8(c)]) were performed before each initial sample setup in order to maximize the cross section between the muon beam and the sample (i.e. minimize the background asymmetry from the pressure cell). More detailed information of the high-pressure μ+SR experimental setup can be found in refs30,31. Finally, the software package musrfit43 was used to analyze the μ+SR data.

## References

1. 1.

Steglich, F. et al. Superconductivity in the presence of strong pauli paramagnetism: CeCu2Si2. Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 1892–1896, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.43.1892 (1979).

2. 2.

Dagotto, E. Complexity in strongly correlated electronic systems. Sci. 309, 257–262, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1107559 (2005).

3. 3.

Pfleiderer, C. Superconducting phases of f-electron compounds. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1551–1624, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1551 (2009).

4. 4.

Ishiwata, S., Bos, J. W. G., Huang, Q. & Cava, R. J. Structure and magnetic properties of hollandite Ba1.2Mn8O16. J. Physics: Condens. Matter 18, 3745 (2006).

5. 5.

Isobe, M. et al. Observation of metal–insulator transition in hollandite vanadate, K2V8O16. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 75, 073801, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.75.073801 (2006).

6. 6.

Horiuchi, S., Shirakawa, T. & Ohta, Y. Theoretical study of the electronic states of hollandite vanadate K2V8O16. Phys. Rev. B 77, 155120, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.77.155120 (2008).

7. 7.

Komarek, A. C. et al. Dimerization and charge order in hollandite K2V8O16. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 027201, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.027201 (2011).

8. 8.

Ohta, Y., Toriyama, T., Sakamaki, M. & Konishi, T. Anomalous electronic states of hollandite-type transition-metal oxides. J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 400, 032070 (2012).

9. 9.

Liu, S. et al. Hollandites as a new class of multiferroics. Sci. Reports 4, 6203 EP, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06203 (2014).

10. 10.

Sharma, N., Plévert, J., Subba Rao, G. V., Chowdari, B. V. R. & White, T. J. Tin oxides with hollandite structure as anodes for lithium ion batteries. Chem. Mater. 17, 4700–4710, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm0505042 (2005).

11. 11.

Tompsett, D. A. & Islam, M. S. Electrochemistry of hollandite a-MnO2: Li-ion and na-ion insertion and Li2O incorporation. Chem. Mater. 25, 2515–2526, https://doi.org/10.1021/cm400864n (2013).

12. 12.

Månsson, M. et al. Na-ion dynamics in quasi-1D compound NaV2O4. J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 551, 012035 (2014).

13. 13.

Sakamaki, M., Konishi, T. & Ohta, Y. K2Cr8O16 predicted as a half-metallic ferromagnet: Scenario for a metal-insulator transition. Phys. Rev. B 80, 024416, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.80.024416 (2009).

14. 14.

Hasegawa, K. et al. Discovery of ferromagnetic-half-metal–to–insulator transition in K2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 146403, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.146403 (2009).

15. 15.

Sakamaki, M., Konishi, T., Shirakawa, T. & Ohta, Y. A new half-metallic ferromagnet K2Cr8O16 predicted by an ab-initio electronic structure calculation. J. Physics: Conf. Ser. 200, 012172 (2010).

16. 16.

Mahadevan, P., Kumar, A., Choudhury, D. & Sarma, D. D. Charge ordering induced ferromagnetic insulator: K2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. Lett. 104, 256401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.256401 (2010).

17. 17.

Toriyama, T. et al. Peierls mechanism of the metal-insulator transition in ferromagnetic hollandite K2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 266402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.266402 (2011).

18. 18.

Nakao, A. et al. Observation of structural change in the novel ferromagnetic metal–insulator transition of K2Cr8O16. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 054710, https://doi.org/10.1143/JPSJ.81.054710 (2012).

19. 19.

Sugiyama, J. et al. μ +sr study on ferromagnetic hollandite K2Cr8O16 and Rb2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. B 85, 214407, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.214407 (2012).

20. 20.

Nishimoto, S. & Ohta, Y. Double exchange ferromagnetism in the peierls insulator state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 076401, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.076401 (2012).

21. 21.

Pirrotta, I. et al. Driving curie temperature towards room temperature in the half-metallic ferromagnet K2Cr8O16 by soft redox chemistry. Dalton Transactions 41, 1840–1847 (2012).

22. 22.

Takeda, H., Shimizu, Y., Itoh, M., Isobe, M. & Ueda, Y. Local electronic state in the high-valence hollandite-type chromium oxide K2Cr8O16 investigated by 53Cr NMR. Phys. Rev. B 88, 165107, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.165107 (2013).

23. 23.

Kim, S., Kim, K. & Min, B. I. Structural instability and the mott-peierls transition in a half-metallic hollandite: K2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. B 90, 045124, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.90.045124 (2014).

24. 24.

Bhobe, P. A. et al. Electronic structure evolution across the peierls metal-insulator transition in a correlated ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. X 5, 041004, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.5.041004 (2015).

25. 25.

Yamauchi, T., Hasegawa, K., Ueda, H., Isobe, M. & Ueda, Y. Competing electronic states under pressure in the doubleexchange ferromagnetic peierls system K2Cr8O16. Phys. Rev. B 92, 165115, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.165115 (2015).

26. 26.

Forslund, O. K. et al. μ +SR study of K2Cr8O16 under hydrostatic pressure. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. on Muon Spin Rotation, Relax. Reson. (2017) 21, 011006, https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSCP.21.011006 (2018).

27. 27.

Tamada, O., Yamamoto, N., Mori, T. & Endo, T. The crystal structure of K2Cr8O16: The hollandite-type full cationic occupation in a tunnel. J. Solid State Chem. 126, 1–6, https://doi.org/10.1006/jssc.1996.0301 (1996).

28. 28.

Korotin, M. A., Anisimov, V. I., Khomskii, D. I. & Sawatzky, G. A. CrO2: A self-doped double exchange ferromagnet. Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 4305–4308, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.4305 (1998).

29. 29.

Sugiyama, J. et al. μ +SR investigation of local magnetic order in LiCrO2. Phys. Rev. B 79, 184411, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.184411 (2009).

30. 30.

Khasanov, R. et al. High pressure research using muons at the paul scherrer institute. High Press. Res. 36, 140–166, https://doi.org/10.1080/08957959.2016.1173690 (2016).

31. 31.

Andreica, D. Magnetic phase diagram in some kondo-lattice compounds: Microscopic and macroscopic studies (2001). Ph.D. thesis, IPP/ETH-Zurich, 2001.

32. 32.

Barth, S. et al. Local magnetic fields in ferromagnetic intermetallic compounds of cubic laves-phase type. Phys. Rev. B 33, 430–436, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.33.430 (1986).

33. 33.

Sugiyama, J. et al. Hidden magnetic order in Sr2VO4 clarified with μ +SR. Phys. Rev. B 89, 020402, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.020402 (2014).

34. 34.

Sugiyama, J. et al. Unveiled magnetic transition in Na battery material: μ +SR study of P2-Na0:5VO2. RSC Adv. 5, 18531–18537, https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA00400D (2015).

35. 35.

Sugiyama, J. et al. Low-temperature magnetic properties and high-temperature diffusive behavior of LiNiO2 investigated by muon-spin spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 82, 224412, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.224412 (2010).

36. 36.

Sugiyama, J. et al. Magnetic and diffusive nature of LiFePO4 investigated by muon spin rotation and relaxation. Phys. Rev. B 84, 054430, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.054430 (2011).

37. 37.

Amato, A. et al. Understanding the msr spectra of mnsi without magnetic polarons. Phys. Rev. B 89, 184425, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.89.184425 (2014).

38. 38.

Ofer, O. et al. Magnetic structure of the zigzag chain family NaxCa1−xV2O4 determined by muon-spin rotation. Phys. Rev. B 82, 094410, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.094410 (2010).

39. 39.

Solovyev, I. V., Kashin, I. V. & Mazurenko, V. V. Mechanisms and origins of half-metallic ferromagnetism in CrO2. Phys. Rev. B 92, 144407, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.144407 (2015).

40. 40.

Schwarz, K. Cro 2 predicted as a half-metallic ferromagnet. J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 16, L211 (1986).

41. 41.

Katsnelson, M., Irkhin, V., Chioncel, L., Lichtenstein, A. & de Groot, R. Half-metallic ferromagnets: From band structure to many-body effects. Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 315–378, https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.80.315 (2008).

42. 42.

Sidorov, V., Rakhmanina, A. & Morya, O. Influence of high pressure on the ferromagnetic transition temperature of cro2. Solid State Commun. 139, 360–362, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssc.2006.06.025 (2006).

43. 43.

Suter, A. & Wojek, B. M. Musrfit: A free platform-independent framework for mSR data analysis. Phys. Proc. 30, 69, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phpro.2012.04.042 (2012).

## Acknowledgements

We thank F. Falkenberg and K. Schunke for support in the high-pressure synthesis and Matthias Elender together with the staff of PSI for help with the μ+SR experiments. This research was supported by the European Commission through a Marie Skłodowska-Curie Action and the Swedish Research Council - VR (Dnr. 2014-6426 and 2016-06955) as well as the Carl Tryggers Foundation for Scientific Research (CTS-16:324). J.S., H.N. and I.U. acknowledge support from Japan Society for the Promotion Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant No. JP26286084 and JP18H01863. Y.S. is funded by the Swedish Research Council (VR) through a Starting Grant (Dnr. 2017-05078) and E.N. the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) within the Swedish national graduate school in neutron scattering (SwedNess). D.A. acknowledges partial financial support from the Romanian UEFISCDI project PN-III-P4-ID-PCE-2016-0534. All images involving crystal structure were made with the DIAMOND software and the μ+SR data was fitted using musrfit. Finally, we would like to thank T. Yamauchi et al. for providing the data points of the MIT line shown in Fig. 7.

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

J.S. and M.M. conceived the experiments. O.K.F., D.A., Y.S., H.N., I.U., V.J., Z.G., Z.S., R.K., J.S. and M.M. conducted the experiments, O.K.F., D.A., E.N. and Y.S. analyzed the results. M.I., H.T. and Y.U. synthesized the samples and conducted the initial sample characterizations. O.K.F. and M.M. created the first draft, J.S. fully revised it, and all authors reviewed the manuscript in several steps.

### Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ola Kenji Forslund or Martin Månsson.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Forslund, O.K., Andreica, D., Sassa, Y. et al. Magnetic phase diagram of K2Cr8O16 clarified by high-pressure muon spin spectroscopy. Sci Rep 9, 1141 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37844-5

• Accepted:

• Published:

• DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-37844-5