Table 3 Reproducibility of the measurement of vessel length density between each pair of the four OCTA devices on four different peripapillary locations.

From: Repeatability and Reproducibility of Quantification of Superficial Peri-papillary Capillaries by four Different Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Devices

Location Superior Nasal Inferior Temporal
Pairs of instruments
Spectralis
vs
Optovue
CV (%)
mean ± SD
10 ± 7 15 ± 8 10 ± 7 12 ± 9
ICC
(95% CI)
0.47
(0.00–0.72)
0.46
(−0.02–0.72)
0.36
(−0.23–0.66)
0.07
(−0.78–0.51)
Spectralis
vs
Triton
CV (%)
mean ± SD
11 ± 9 11 ± 9 12 ± 10 9 ± 9
ICC
(95% CI)
0.40
(−0.15–0.69)
0.42
(−0.09–0.70)
0.10
(−0.72–0.53)
0.45
(−0.04–0.71)
Spectralis
vs
Cirrus
CV (%)
mean ± SD
14 ± 8 16 ± 7 11 ± 7 15 ± 12
ICC
95% CI
0.61
(0.26–0.80)
0.52
(0.08–0.75)
0.73
(0.48–0.86)
0.79
(0.61–0.89)
Optovue
vs
Triton
CV (%)
mean ± SD
11 ± 5 7 ± 4 11 ± 7 6 ± 4
ICC
95% CI
0.85
(0.71–0.92)
0.89
(0.79–0.94)
0.73
(0.48–0.86)
0.83
(0.67–0.91)
Optovue
vs
Cirrus
CV (%)
mean ± SD
8 ± 6 5 ± 4 10 ± 6 15 ± 15
ICC
95% CI
0.75
(0.52–0.87)
0.81
(0.64–0.90)
0.64
(0.31–0.81)
0.17
(−0.58–0.57)
Triton
vs
Cirrus
CV (%)
mean ± SD
18 ± 9 9 ± 6 19 ± 9 17 ± 15
ICC
95% CI
0.58
(0.20–0.78)
0.75
(0.52–0.87)
0.55
(0.14–0.76)
0.47
(−0.02–0.72)