Abstract
Although liver regeneration has been intensively studied in various ways, the mechanisms underlying liver regeneration remain elusive. Apoptosis-stimulating protein two of p53 (ASPP2) was discovered as a binding partner of p53 and plays an important role in regulating cell apoptosis and growth. However, the role of ASPP2 in hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration has not been reported. The expression profile of ASPP2 was measured in a mouse model with 70% partial hepatectomy (PHX). Liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation were detected in wild-type (ASPP2+/+) and ASPP2 haploinsufficient (ASPP2+/−) mice with PHX. The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and autophagy pathways were analyzed in the ASPP2+/+ and ASPP2+/− mice with PHX. After rapamycin or 3-methyladenine (3-MA) treatment, hepatocyte proliferation and liver regeneration were analyzed in the ASPP2+/+ and ASPP2+/− mice with PHX. ASPP2 expression was shown to be upregulated at the early stage and downregulated at the late stage. Compared to the ASPP2+/+ mice, liver regeneration was enhanced in ASPP2+/− mice with 70% PHX. In addition, compared to the ASPP2+/+ mice, the mTORC1 pathway was significantly upregulated and the autophagic pathway was downregulated in ASPP2+/−mice with 70% PHX. Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway significantly suppressed liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice with 70% PHX. In contrast, disruption of the autophagic pathway further enhanced liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice with 70% PHX. ASPP2 deficiency can promote liver regeneration through activating the mTORC1 pathway, which further regulates downstream molecules, such as those related to autophagy and p70S6K expression in mouse model post-PHX.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
After a partial hepatectomy (PH) or liver injury, hepatocytes and the other nonparenchymal hepatocytes in G0 phage enter into the cell cycle rapidly, and the remaining liver restore the original mass, structure and function, which is a process called liver regeneration1. Liver regeneration is regulated by many cytokines and growth factors, such as tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), interleukin six (IL-6), hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), transforming growth factor α (TGF-α), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) and others. TNF-α and IL-6 act as the initial factors in liver regeneration, HGF, TGF-α and cyclin proteins play important roles in cell cycle entry and proliferation, and TGF-β is involved in the cessation of cell division2,3,4. Although liver regeneration has been intensively studied in various ways, the underlying mechanisms remain elusive.
Apoptosis-stimulating protein 2 of p53 (ASPP2) is a member of the ASPP family, which regulatesp53-dependent apoptosis, specifically5. ASPP2, which was discovered as a binding partner of p53 more than 10 years ago, plays an important role in regulating cell apoptosis and growth. In the case of stress or DNA damage, ASPP2 is activated and induces cell apoptosis. On the other hand, methylation of the ASPP2 promoter results in ASPP2 inactivation and cell growth6,7. Studies on ASPP2 have primarily focused on cancer, as ASPP2 expression is downregulated in many human tumors8,9,10. In liver cancer, the overexpression of ASPP2 promotes tumor cell apoptosis, and a deficiency of ASPP2 causes tumor cell growth and proliferation9,10. Apart from liver cancer, there are a few reports on ASPP2 in liver injury. Xie et al. found that ASPP2 overexpression suppressed methionine and choline-deficient (MCD) diet-induced autophagy, steatosis and apoptosis and reduced liver injury in a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) mouse model, which indicated that ASPP2 may participate in hepatocyte apoptosis and liver injury11. However, the role of ASPP2 in liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation has not been reported.
Given the role of ASPP2 in cell apoptosis and growth, we speculated that the deletion of ASPP2 would promote liver regeneration and hepatocyte proliferation. The results of this study were consistent with our hypothesis. In addition, we found that enhanced liver regeneration in ASPP2 haploinsufficient (ASPP2+/−) mice after PHX was dependent on the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway.
Materials and Methods
Animals
ASPP2+/+ Balb/c mice (aged 6 to 8 weeks) were provided by the Animal Center at the Academy of Military Medical Sciences (Beijing, China). ASPP2+/− Balb/c mice (aged 6 to 8 weeks) were provided by the Animal Center of Beijing Institute of Hepatology (Beijing, China). All experimental protocols were approved by the Ethics Committee of Beijing Youan Hospital. All methods were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations.
PHX Experiments
The mice were anesthetized with chloral hydrate (4 g/100 mL) and subjected to approximately 70% PHx by removing the left, median and posterior right lobes after a midventral laparotomy. The control group was anesthetized and subjected to an abdominal incision, but no liver lobes were removed. The mice were scarified at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h after the PHx. The inhibition of mTORC1 was induced by an intraperitoneal injection of rapamycin (2.5 mg/kg, Sigma) 2 h before the PHx. The inhibition of autophagy was induced by a tail vein injection of 3-methyladenine (3-MA, 1 mg/kg, Sigma) 2 h before the PHx.
Immunohistochemical analysis
The liver samples were fixed in buffered formalin, embedded in paraffin and cut into 5-um sections. The sections were deparaffinized, washed in PBS and blocked with normal goat serum. Then, the sections were incubated with a rabbit monoclonal antibody against proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) (Cell Signaling, CA, USA) overnight. After that, the sections were incubated with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cell Signaling, CA, USA) for 30 minutes at 37 °C. After being washed with PBS, the sections were stained with diaminobenzidine substrate solution. All images were collected using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse E800, Tokyo, Japan).
Western blotting analysis
Liver tissues were lysed with a homogenizer in RIPA buffer with protease inhibitors. Total proteins were extracted using centrifugation and denatured via boiling. Then, 50 μg of protein were loaded onto a 12% separation gel and a 5% concentration gel. The total proteins were separated into many bands by electrophoresis and subsequently transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) by electroblotting. The membranes were incubated with the rabbit primary antibodies against ASPP2, LC3B (Sigma, MO, USA), p62, Atg7, Beclin-1, CyclinA2, CyclinB1, CyclinE1, phospho-4EBP1 T37/46, phospho-S6 S235/236, and phospho-P70S6K T389 (Cell Signaling, CA, USA). Then, the membranes were incubated with a goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Cell Signaling, CA, USA). Finally, immunoreactive bands were developed using a chemiluminescent substrate (Thermo Fisher Scientific, IL, USA). The grayscale was analyzed by ImageJ software, and the relative grayscale value was normalized to that of β-actin.
Statistical analysis
Variables among different groups were compared by One-Way ANOVA for the post hoc multiple comparisons (LSD method) using the SPSS software package. Differences were considered significant when the p value was less than 0.05.
Results
ASPP2 expression profile during liver regeneration in mice after 70% PHX
To investigate the role of ASPP2 in liver regeneration, we examined expression profile of ASPP2 in wild-type mice after 70% PHX. The number of proliferative cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive hepatocytes was significantly increased in mice after 70% PHX (Fig. 1B). In addition, the index of liver to body weight was significantly increased in mice after 70% PHX (Fig. 1C). Accompanied with liver regeneration, the ASPP2 protein displayed a significant upregulation at the early stage (12 hours after PHX) and a significant downregulation at the late stage (24, 48 and 72 hours after PHX) (Fig. 1A). These results indicate that ASPP2 may play an important role in liver regeneration.
Enhanced liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX
To further investigate the role of ASPP2 in liver regeneration, we disrupted the gene expression of ASPP2 and examined liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX. It is known that cyclins are evolutionarily conserved proteins that are essential for cell-cycle control in eukaryotes12. The expression levels of cyclinA2, cyclinB1 and cyclinE1 were significantly higher in ASPP2+/− mice than in ASPP2+/+ mice at 12 hours after PHX (Fig. 2C). In addition, the index of liver to body weight in ASPP2+/− mice was significantly increased in comparison to the ASPP2+/+ mice at 12 and 24 hours after PHX (Fig. 2B). Consistently, the number of PCNA-positive hepatocytes in ASPP2+/− mice were significantly increased compared to the ASPP2+/+ mice at 12 and 24 hours after PHX (Fig. 2A). Taken together, these data indicate that liver regeneration was enhanced in the ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX.
Deficiency of ASPP2 activates the mTORC1 pathway in mice after 70% PHX
Considering that the mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) pathway is the primary pathway that regulates liver regeneration, we examined mTORC1 activity in ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX. Compared to the ASPP2+/+ mice, the ASPP2+/− mice exhibited significantly increased levels of phospho-4EBP1 (Thr37/46), phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) and phospho-P70S6K (Thr389) at 12, 24 and 48 hours after PHX (Fig. 3). These findings demonstrated that a deficiency of ASPP2 activated the mTORC1 pathway, indicating that the mTORC1 pathway was likely responsible for enhanced liver regeneration in the ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX.
Deficiency of ASPP2 suppresses the autophagic pathway in mice after 70% PHX
Previous studies indicated that ASPP2 regulates the autophagic pathway, which plays an important role in liver regeneration; therefore, we analyzed the role of the autophagic pathway in ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX. The conversion of LC3II and degradation of p62 were significantly lower in the ASPP2+/− mice than in ASPP2+/+ mice after PHX. Consistently, Beclin-1 and Atg-7 expression were decreased in the ASPP2+/− mice compared with the ASPP2+/+ mice after PHX (Fig. 4). These data showed that the knockdown of ASPP2 suppressed the autophagic pathway, which may participate in the regulation of liver regeneration through ASPP2.
Inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway significantly suppresses liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice
To investigate the role of the mTORC1 pathway in the ASPP2-mediated regulation of liver regeneration, we used rapamycin to block the mTORC1 pathway in ASPP2+/+ and ASPP2+/− mice after 70% PHX. As expected, rapamycin treatment inhibited the expression of phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) in ASPP2+/+ and ASPP2+/− mice (Fig. 5C). Remarkably, the expression of PCNA and cyclins in the ASPP2+/− mice was significantly higher compared with the ASPP2+/+ mice at 12 hours post-PHX, but rapamycin treatment attenuated or abolished the proliferative effect of ASPP2 deficiency (Fig. 5C,D). Furthermore, the number of PCNA-positive hepatocytes and the index of liver weight to body weight exhibited the same trend as PCNA expression in ASPP2+/− and ASPP2+/+ mice post-PHX (Fig. 5A,B). Taken together, these findings demonstrate that the inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway significantly suppressed liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice, indicating that the enhanced liver regeneration observed in the ASPP2+/− mice was dependent upon the mTORC1 pathway.
Disruption of autophagic pathway further enhances liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice
Considering that ASPP2 deficiency results in the inhibition of the autophagic pathway, we analyzed the role of the autophagic pathway in liver regeneration. 3-Methyladenine (3-MA) was used to block the autophagic pathway. As expected, there was no detectable LC3II conversion after 3-MA treatment in either the ASPP2+/+ or ASPP2+/− mice (Fig. 6C). ASPP2 deficiency promoted the expression of PCNA and cyclinE1, which was significant higher after the 3-MA treatment compared with the vehicle treatment in the ASPP2+/− mice at 12 hours post-PHX (Fig. 6C,D). Furthermore, the number of PCNA-positive hepatocytes and the index of liver weight to body weight exhibited the same trend as PCNA expression in the ASPP2+/− and ASPP2+/+ mice post-PHX (Fig. 6A,B). Therefore, 3-MA treatment further enhanced liver regeneration in ASPP2+/+ or ASPP2+/− mice post-PHX, indicating that the inhibition of the autophagic pathway promoted liver regeneration in mice post-PHX.
Discussion
Although it is known that ASPP2 regulates cell apoptosis and growth, the role of ASPP2 in liver regeneration is still unknown. Here, we found that ASPP2 deficiency promoted liver regeneration through activating the mTORC1 pathway, which further regulated the expression of downstream molecules, such as p70S6K and those related to autophagy in the mouse model post-PHX (Fig. 7).
The role of ASPP2 in liver regeneration has not been reported, but studies have shown that ASPP2 is involved in cell proliferation. Zhu et al. found that dioscin promoted osteoblast proliferation and differentiation by inhibiting cell autophagy via the ASPP2/NFκβ pathway, which indicated that ASPP2 was closely related to cell proliferation13. Liu et al. found that all-trans retinoic acid (ATPR) inhibited the proliferation of HepG2 cells by inducing G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis through the upregulation of p53 and ASPP1 and the downregulation of iASPP, which indicated that the ASPP family may participate in cell cycle regulation14. In our study, the ASPP2 protein displayed a significant upregulation in wild-type (ASPP2+/+) mice at 12 hours post-PHX, and liver regeneration was enhanced in ASPP2 haploinsufficient (ASPP2+/−) mice at 12 hours after 70% PHX, which indicated that ASPP2 may play an inhibitory role in liver regeneration.
mTOR, which is a serine/threonine kinase that acts as a central regulator of important cellular functions, has two multiprotein complexes, namely, mTOR complex 1 (mTORC1) and mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2). mTORC1 regulates cellular growth, autophagy and apoptosis, and mTOR2 is involved in insulin sensitivity and cytoskeletal reorganization15,16. Therefore, the activation of mTORC1 is an important for stimulating cell growth and proliferation17,18. We found that the mTORC1 pathway was activated in ASPP2 haploinsufficient (ASPP2+/−) mice after 70% PHX. ASPP2 deficiency promoted liver regeneration, but the inhibition of the mTORC1 pathway reversed the proliferative effect of ASPP2 deficiency, which indicated that ASPP2 deficiency promoted liver regeneration through the activation of the mTORC1 pathway.
Our study found that ASPP2 can regulate the mTORC1 pathway in a mouse model with 70% PHx, but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. Our previous study determined that ASPP2 could bind to AKT in the nucleus and suppress the function of AKT9. mTORC1 is a major target of AKT, and mTORC1 is activated by AKT via phosphorylation; thus, we speculated that ASPP2 may regulate themTORC1 pathway through AKT. Another study demonstrated an interaction between p53 and mTORC1, and p53 is upstream of the repression of the mTOR pathway during ESC differentiation19. ASPP2 is a binding protein of p53, thus we speculated that ASPP2 may regulate the mTORC1 pathway through p53. Overall, we hypothesize that ASPP2 plays an important role in the mTORC1 pathway.
Some studies have indicated that there is a close relationship between autophagy and liver regeneration, but the results were controversial20,21,22. Toshima et al. found that liver regeneration and DNA synthesis are impaired in Atg5 knockout mice after PHX, indicating that the suppression of autophagy impaired liver regeneration20. Ni et al. found that hepatocyte proliferation was significantly increased in Atg5 liver-specific knockout mice with acetaminophen-induced liver injury, suggesting that the inhibition of autophagy promoted liver regeneration22. Our study showed that the inhibition of autophagy further enhanced liver regeneration, and the activation of autophagy suppressed liver regeneration in ASPP2+/− mice post-PHX, indicating that autophagy may be a negative regulator of liver regeneration.
Previous studies showed that ASPP2 regulates autophagy23,24,25,26, but the mechanism was still unknown. Liu et al. showed that ASPP2 overexpression releases Beclin-1 from cytoplasmic Bcl-2–Beclin-1 complexes, and then, the released Beclin-1 induces autophagy in hepatoma cells, indicating that ASPP2 may induce autophagy26. Consistently, we found that autophagy was inhibited in ASPP2 haploinsufficient (ASPP2+/−) mice after 70% PHX, indicating that ASPP2 may promote autophagy. Considering that mTORC1 is one of the upstream regulators of autophagy27,28,29 and that ASPP2 regulates mTORC1, we speculated that ASPP2 may regulate autophagy through the mTORC1 pathway, which may be a novel finding that warrants further exploration.
Liver regeneration has critical clinical applications, including liver failure, cirrhosis and liver transplantation30,31,32. Our findings indicate that ASPP2 may be a negative regulator of liver regeneration, which may provide therapeutic targets for liver injury and hepatectomy in the future.
Data Availability Statements
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Tao, Y., Wang, M., Chen, E. & Tang, H. Liver regeneration: analysis of the main relevant signaling molecules. Mediators Inflamm. 2017, 4256352 (2017).
Karin, M. & Clevers, H. Reparative inflammation takes charge of tissue regeneration. Nature. 529, 307–315 (2016).
Kang, L. I., Mars, W. M. & Michalopoulos, G. K. Signals and cells involved in regulating liver regeneration. Cells. 1, 1261–1292 (2012).
Mao, S. A., Glorioso, J. M. & Nyberg, S. L. Liver regeneration. Transl Res. 163, 352–362 (2014).
Li, Y., Ahmad, A. & Sarkar, F. H. ASPP and iASPP: Implication in cancer development and progression. Cell Mol Biol. 61, 2–8 (2015).
Vives, V., Slee, E. A. & Lu, X. ASPP2: a gene that controls life and death in vivo. Cell Cycle. 5, 2187–2190 (2006).
Kampa, K. M., Bonin, M. & Lopez, C. D. New insights into the expanding complexity of the tumor suppressor ASPP2. Cell Cycle. 8, 2871–2876 (2009).
Tordella, L. et al. ASPP2 suppresses squamous cell carcinoma via RelA/p65-mediated repression of p63. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 17969–17974 (2013).
Liu, K. et al. Nuclear EGFR impairs ASPP2-p53 complex-induced apoptosis by inducing SOS1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 6, 16507–16516 (2015).
Zhao, J. et al. Epigenetic silence of ankyrin-repeat-containing, SH3-domain-containing, and proline-rich-region-containing protein 1 (ASPP1) and ASPP2 genes promotes tumor growth in hepatitis B virus-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology. 51, 142–153 (2010).
Xie, F. et al. ASPP2 attenuates triglycerides to protect against hepatocyte injury by reducing autophagy in a cell and mouse model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Cell Mol Med. 19, 155–164 (2015).
Hydbring, P., Malumbres, M. & Sicinski, P. Non-canonical functions of cell cycle cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 17, 280–292 (2016).
Zhu, C., Bao, N., Chen, S. & Zhao, J. Dioscin enhances osteoblastic cell differentiation and proliferation by inhibiting cell autophagy via the ASPP2/NF-κβ pathway. Mol Med Rep. 16, 4922–4926 (2017).
Liu, H. et al. A novel all-trans retinoic acid derivative 4-amino2trifluoromethyl-phenyl retinate inhibits the proliferation of human hepatocellular carcinoma HepG2 cells by inducing G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis via upregulation of p53 and ASPP1 and downregulation of iASPP. Oncol Rep. 36, 333–341 (2016).
Ding, L. et al. mTOR: An attractive therapeutic target for osteosarcoma? Oncotarget. 7, 50805–50813 (2016).
Fouraschen, S. M. et al. mTOR signaling in liver regeneration: rapamycin combined with growth factor treatment. World J Transplant. 3, 36–47 (2013).
Zhang, L. et al. Inhibition of wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 promotes liver regeneration in mice by direct activation of mammalian target of rapamycin. Hepatology. 61, 2030–2041 (2015).
Panasyuk, G., Patitucci, C., Espeillac, C. & Pende, M. The role of the mTOR pathway during liver regeneration and tumorigenesis. Ann Endocrinol. 74, 121–122 (2013).
Bowling, S. et al. Author Correction: P53 and mTOR signalling determine fitness selection through cell competition during early mouse embryonic development. Nat Commun. 9, 3123 (2018).
Toshima, T. et al. Suppression of autophagy during liver regeneration impairs energy charge and hepatocyte senescence in Mice. Hepatology. 60, 290–300 (2014).
Ni, H. M., Williams, J. A., Jaeschke, H. & Ding, W. X. Zonated induction of autophagy and mitochondrial spheroids limits acetaminophen-induced necrosis in the liver. Redox Biol. 1, 427–432 (2013).
Ni, H. M. et al. Liver-specific loss of Atg5 causes persistent activation of Nrf2 and protects against acetaminophen-induced liver injury. Toxicol Sci. 127, 438–450 (2012).
Turnquist, C. et al. STAT1-induced ASPP2 transcription identifies a link between neuroinflammation, cell polarity, and tumor suppression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111, 9834–9839 (2014).
Wang, Y. et al. Autophagic activity dictates the cellular response to oncogenic RAS. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 13325–13330 (2012).
Shi, Y. et al. ASPP2 enhances oxaliplatin (L-OHP)-induced colorectal cancer cell apoptosis in a p53-independent manner by inhibiting cell autophagy. J Cell Mol Med. 19, 535–543 (2015).
Liu, K. et al. CHOP mediates ASPP2-induced autophagic apoptosis in hepatoma cells by releasing Beclin-1 from Bcl-2 and inducing nuclear translocation of Bcl-2. Cell Death Dis. 5, e1323 (2014).
Zhang, X. et al. TTF1NP induces protective autophagy during apoptosis by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR pathway and activating JNK in human liver cancer cells. Oncol Rep. 39, 1423–1431 (2018).
Paquette, M., El-Houjeiri, L., Pause, A. mTOR pathways in cancer and autophagy. Cancers (Basel). 10 (2018).
Chen, J. F. et al. STAT3-induced lncRNA HAGLROS overexpression contributes to the malignant progression of gastric cancer cells via mTOR signal-mediated inhibition of autophagy. Mol Cancer. 17, 6 (2018).
Kwon, Y. J., Lee, K. G. & Choi, D. Clinical implications of advances in liver regeneration. Clin Mol Hepatol. 21, 7–13 (2015).
Forbes, S. J. & Newsome, P. N. Liver regeneration-mechanisms and models to clinical application. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13, 473–485 (2016).
Sarin, S. K. & Choudhury, A. Acute-on-chronic liver failure: terminology, mechanisms and management. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 13, 131–149 (2016).
Acknowledgements
This study was financially supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (7172102 and 7162085); the National Science and Technology Key Project on Major Infectious Diseases such as HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis Prevention and Treatment (2017ZX10203201-005); the Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Project (Z171100002217070); and the Beijing Municipal Institute of Public Medical Research Development and Reform Pilot Project (JING YI YAN 2016-2).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Hongbo Shi analyzed the experimental data and drafted the manuscript. Yizhi Zhang, Jing Ji and Ping Xu performed most of the experiments. Honglin Shi and Xiujuan Yue generated the mouse models of partial hepatectomy. Feng Ren, Yu Chen and Zhongping Duan were involved in editing the manuscript. Hongbo Shi and Dexi Chen conceived and supervised the study. Dexi Chen provided the ASPP2+/− mice. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Shi, H., Zhang, Y., Ji, J. et al. Deficiency of apoptosis-stimulating protein two of p53 promotes liver regeneration in mice by activating mammalian target of rapamycin. Sci Rep 8, 17927 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36208-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36208-3
This article is cited by
-
Regorafenib inhibits EphA2 phosphorylation and leads to liver damage via the ERK/MDM2/p53 axis
Nature Communications (2023)
-
RDIVpSGP motif of ASPP2 binds to 14-3-3 and enhances ASPP2/k18/14-3-3 ternary complex formulation to promote BRAF/MEK/ERK signal inhibited cell proliferation in hepatocellular carcinoma
Cancer Gene Therapy (2022)
-
Metabolic regulation of cholestatic liver injury by D-2-hydroxyglutarate with the modulation of hepatic microenvironment and the mammalian target of rapamycin signaling
Cell Death & Disease (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.