Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

# Overcoming degradation in spatial multiplexing systems with stochastic nonlinear impairments

## Abstract

Single-mode optical fibres now underpin telecommunication systems and have allowed continuous increases in traffic volume and bandwidth demand whilst simultaneously reducing cost- and energy-per-bit over the last 40 years. However, it is now recognised that such systems are rapidly approaching the limits imposed by the nonlinear Kerr effect. To address this, recent research has been carried out into mitigating Kerr nonlinearities to increase the nonlinear threshold and into spatial multiplexing to offer additional spatial pathways. However, given the complexity associated with nonlinear transmission in spatial multiplexed systems subject to random inter-spatial-path nonlinearities it is widely believed that these technologies are mutually exclusive. By investigating the linear and nonlinear crosstalk in few-mode fibres based optical communications, we numerically demonstrate, for the first time, that even in the presence of significant random mixing of signals, substantial performance benefits are possible. To achieve this, the impact of linear mixing on the Kerr nonlinearities should be taken into account using different compensation strategies for different linear mixing regimes. For the optical communication systems studied, we demonstrate that the performance may be more than doubled with the appropriate selection of compensation method for fibre characteristics which match those presented in the literature.

## Introduction

The Kerr nonlinear limit has imposed an ever-growing capacity gap between the technologies generating/processing data and the technologies transporting it – namely, optical fibre communication systems. The first has consistently grown at 40% compound annual growth rate (CAGR)1, but the latter has slowed to 20% CAGR since late 1990s2. Such large scaling disparity is expected to lead to a full exhaustion of system capacity within the next 5 to 15 years. By 2024, optical networks are projected to require 1 Pb/s transmission capacity which with current technological limits can be expected to be met using 10 parallel line systems each carrying 100 Tb/s per fibre. A trend that would potentially increase the cost- and energy-per-bit by 10 times except for efficiency gains as ancillary functions overhead3 is reduced via sub-system integration. However, with the number of required spatial paths projected to double every 2-years and the current communications infrastructure accounting for 1–2% of global energy4 the current paradigm is exhausted. Thus, research effort must be directed towards the development of transformative means for achieving spatial parallelism that can ensure sublinear scaling of the total system cost and energy consumption. Otherwise, the dooming capacity exhaustion will lead to a dramatic increase of the bandwidth price and ultimately bring the information revolution to a halt.

Mode-division multiplexing (MDM) over few-mode fibres (FMFs) holds one the greatest potential to deliver future cost- and energy-effective high-capacity systems with spatial parallelism5,6. Figure 1 shows the basic system concept of a multi-span MDM-FMF system, composed by integrated arrays of M transmitter and M receiver units, mode multiplexers/de-multiplexers (e.g. photonic lanterns7), and multimode amplifiers8. The information is carried over a set of orthogonal spatial modes overlapping on a single fibre core. Compared to alternative technologies, such as uncoupled multi-core fibres or single-mode fibre (SMF) bundles5, MDM-FMF systems offer a number of advantages, such as lower nonlinear coefficients; higher pump efficiency for their optical amplifiers (similar to core pumped SMF)9; and higher spatial-density level of optical integration for transponders10, amplifiers, and add-drop multiplexers (multiple spatial modes can be routed together11). Nevertheless, coupled-core multi-core fibres (CC-MCFs) offer similar potential to that of FMFs when designed to have similar spatial mode densities12,13,14. Finally, the techniques presented in this paper apply to all SDM fibre types, including CC-MCFs.

Despite the potential of MDM-FMF technology, commercialisation and deployment is not imminent yet because whilst the fibres are now filling up, there are spare fibres in the network, giving a few years grace before an expensive installation of new fibre becomes necessary. By the end of that period, considering the 45% CAGR of CMOS processing capabilities10, it is likely that the DSP ASICs will be able to handle 10 Tb/s worth of traffic by directly coupling to arrays of 10 (or more) parallel integrated high-speed (~Tb/s) optical and opto-electronic components (such as modulators or coherent receivers). Processing multiple tributaries simultaneously would allow to compensate15,16 the combined effects of mode-mixing and walk-off between the different parallel fibre paths shown in Fig. 2. Presently, differential mode delay (DMD) and linear mode-crosstalk (XT) have been successfully mitigated with offline multi-input multi-output (MIMO) based DSP techniques16,17 and DMD compensation maps after transmission over thousands of kilometres18,19. However, whilst SDM systems have seen a significant growth of their bit-rate distance product (e.g. 115 Petabit/s∙km using a 6-mode 19-core fibre20 and 166 Petabit/s∙km using a 3-mode single-core fibre21), they have yet to match the records established using SMFs (e.g. 535 Petabit/s∙km in22). This is due to the increased mode dependent loss of the prototype components19,23 used in a research lab environment, see Fig. 1, and due to the intermodal nonlinear interactions18,24,25 that occur in the transmission medium. However, given the engineering development of prototype components26,27,28,29 (for example, monolithic mode-selective few-mode multicore fibre multiplexers with insertion loss <2 dB and mode dependent loss <0.5 dB have been recently demonstrated over the C + L band with identified margin for improvement29), the impact of the former will become smaller and the latter will therefore become dominant. The intermodal nonlinear distortion is most relevant when the system is loaded with a sufficiently high number of channels such that the total system bandwidth allows exact cancelling of chromatic dispersion and DMD walk-offs for all pairs of modes. Thus, in order to realise the full potential of FMF system by simultaneously increasing the information spatial density (Gbit/s/cm2) and maintaining the system reach it is of paramount importance to address the nonlinear penalties.

Digital-back propagation (DBP) is a nonlinear mitigation method originally proposed for SMFs30 that compensates for the deterministic linear and nonlinear fibre impairments by numerically back-propagating the received optical field with inverted channel parameters, using the split-step Fourier method (SSFM) to solve the nonlinear propagation equation, as shown in Fig. 3. However, effectiveness of this technique is reduced in the presence of random processes such as the group delay spread induced by DMD and XT, like polarisation mode dispersion (PMD) in SMFs31,32,33. A brute force approach, following recent attempts to mitigate PMD31,34, would be to estimate in the digital domain the slowly varying differential delays and the rapidly varying random mixing on relatively short length scales. However, this would increase the complexity, due to the short step size required, and would accumulate an increasing numerical error due to the large number of estimates. In FMFs with large DMD between non-degenerate modes this problem can become much more pronounced depending on the strength of the random linear mode coupling since in its absence the optical signal evolution is fully predictable and DBP could compensate for the nonlinear distortion perfectly (ignoring transceiver noise). In this way, one can expect the amount of DMD tolerable by DBP systems to be much higher for FMFs operating in the weak linear coupling regime than for FMFs operating in the strong linear coupling regime (depending on the DBP implementation).

In this paper, we introduce new simplified DBP methods for the different operational regimes of MDM-FMF systems as determined by the strength of DMD and XT. To illustrate their benefit, we consider the transmission of wavelength-division multiplexed (WDM) multi-level quadrature amplitude modulated (QAM) signals. Some of the proposed methods have been considered in a preliminary study35 under simplified conditions that include the absence of amplified spontaneous noise, and constant amplitude signals.

In this paper, we use an extension of the single-mode split-step Fourier method (SSFM)36 to numerically solve the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GNLSE) that governs multimode propagation over FMFs37 (including all linear and nonlinear fibre effects), provided that the split-step size is compatible with the additional requirements, see Methods. To achieve higher accuracy in the modelling of forward propagation over a real fibre, we consider a symmetric implementation of the SSFM in which the effect of nonlinearity is included in the middle of the segment rather than at the segment boundary38, see Fig. 4. Finally, for backward propagation over the virtual fibre (with inverted parameters), GNLSE can be simplified depending on the strength of the linear mode coupling, see Methods, reducing the computational requirements.

In the presence of extreme linear mode coupling regimes, it has been shown that some or all the linear mode coupling terms in GNLSE can be assumed to vary rapidly and seemingly randomly on a length scale that is expected to be short compared to the effective lengths associated with chromatic dispersion and the various manifestations of nonlinearity. Thus, like in single-mode fibres and the well-known Manakov-PMD equations39,40, one can average the propagation equation itself over all spatial modes. New Manakov-like equations were derived for FMFs41,42 with nonlinear coefficients averaged for the two extreme coupling regimes. In the weak coupling (WC) regime41, only the averaging over birefringence fluctuations must be considered, reducing the intramodal degeneracy factor to 8/9 and the intermodal degeneracy factor to 4/3, see Methods. In the strong coupling (SC) regime the averaging includes all propagation modes42, see Methods.

In the intermediate linear coupling regime, the linear mode coupling introduced by GNLSE needs to be explicitly considered in the SSFM. It has been shown that the semi-analytical solution of this term is possible by discretising the fibre imperfections responsible for linear coupling as fibre sections with a random displacement of the core centre position37. In this way, the authors proposed a multi-section model where the coupling strength is set using a given radial displacement and a uniformly distributed azimuthal displacement for each section. More importantly, the proposed model proved to be accurate against analytical predictions for the statistics of group-delays in FMF links. Finally, the linear coupling step in the SSFM used in this paper is implemented following43.

To compensate for the GD spread imposed by the interplay of XT and DMD, see Fig. 2, multi-input multi-output (MIMO) digital signal processing (DSP) is used with training-symbol-based frequency-domain equalisers offering the lowest complexity44. However, as the effective transmission rate is reduced by the additional training symbols overhead, low DMD links must be used. It has been shown that a DMD lower than 12 ps/km is required for 2000 km MDM transmission at 100 Gb/s in order to restrict the training sequences overhead to 10%44,45. In this way, significant effort has been directed to the optimisation of FMFs, with refractive-index profiles typically composed of a graded-index core (for DMD reduction) and a cladding trench (for macro-bend loss reduction via field confinement). Ferreira et al. in14 have optimised such profile to guide six linearly polarized (LP) modes (LP01, LP02, LP11a, LP11b, LP21a and LP21b) with low DMD (12 ps/km for GD unmanaged long-haul transmission44) and macro-bend losses as low as in SMFs46. Here, we use the same optimum profile. Table 1 shows the optimum profile linear characteristics at 1550 nm, the DMD defined as max(GD)-min(GD) is 5.19 ps/km. Table 2 shows the uncoupled nonlinear coefficients whilst the uncoupled degeneracy factors are found in the GNLSE, see Methods. In this paper, when considering different DMD values, we simply scale the GD vector in Table 1 instead of reoptimizing the fibre profile (as in14) to avoid fluctuations of the other fibre characteristics, such that a direct performance assessment of the proposed DBP methods can be accomplished.

Due to current estimations of the fibre manufacturing limitations14 it is challenging to achieve DMD <12 ps/km for more than 3 LP modes, therefore GD managed spans are often used to minimise the total GD spread by cascading fibres with opposite sign DMD19,47,48. Here we define a GD managed span of length L as one comprising S segments, each itself is composed of two fibres of length L/S/2 with the same characteristics but opposite sign GD (in practice for fibres with more than 2 non-degenerate LP modes, more than two different fibres are needed19,47,48 since exact opposite sign GD is hard to achieve). The GD spread at the end of a managed span is only zero in the absence of linear mode coupling, otherwise there is a residual GD spread. To minimise mode coupling impact, the GD compensation length must be smaller than the correlation length set by the coupling49, which might not be practical when correlation length is on the order of a km. In this paper, when considering DMD >10 ps/km, we will consider one compensation segment per span.

Along this study we consider a WDM-MDM system with 6 linearly polarized (LP) modes each with two orthogonal polarisations. The simulation setup is shown in Fig. 5, where 12.8 Tbit/s are transmitted over 19 WDM channels (in each spatial mode) modulated with 14 Gbaud polarisation-multiplexed 16QAM. Together with the information data, a preamble was transmitted consisting of constant amplitude zero autocorrelation (CAZAC) sequences for time synchronization and channel estimation. Root raised cosine filters with a roll-off factor of 0.001 were used for pulse shaping. For the simulations we considered 216 symbols per polarisation mode, with a 211 symbols CAZAC preamble. The in-phase and quadrature components of each signal drove the optical field of an ideal laser through an optical IQ modulator, and the optical signals were fed into the FMF link (non-GD-managed and GD-managed links are considered). Fibre attenuation was fully compensated using an array of 6 erbium doped fibre amplifiers19, with noise figures of 3 dB and negligible mode dependent loss since the aim of this paper is to assess the isolated impact of the FMF mode coupling and mode delay on DBP performance. The optical signals were coupled in and out of the FMF using a mode multiplexer (MUX) and a mode demultiplexer (DEMUX), respectively, assumed ideal since their transfer function can be fully compensated through DSP given prior characterization (as in conventional transceivers50). After homodyne detection, the baseband electrical signals were sampled at 56 GS/s, yielding 12 digital signals at 2 samples/symbol. DBP was then implemented by launching the coherently received signals into a virtual fibre with characteristics of opposite-sign values of those in the transmission channel, except that no mode coupling was considered. Back-propagation was implemented using the modified SSFM proposed with a fixed step size and considering the nonlinear degeneracy factors derived for WC and SC, Eqs (3) and (4), respectively. As a reference, for linear compensation, the coherently received signals were compensated for chromatic dispersion in the frequency domain using the parameter values of Table 1. In all cases, mode coupling and (residual) DMD were subsequently compensated for using training-symbol-based channel estimation and equalization, as shown in Fig. 5. Coarse time synchronization was performed using the Schmidl & Cox autocorrelation metric. Subsequently, fine-time synchronization and channel impulse response (CIR) estimation were performed by cross-correlating with the training CAZAC sequences. The 12 × 12 CIR estimations were converted into the frequency domain. The MIMO frequency domain equalizer was calculated by inverting the channel matrix, and, finally, the Q-factor for each received signal was estimated using the mean and standard deviation of the received symbols51.

## Results

DBP performance was studied on an optical super-channel consisting of 19 channels (in each of the 6 LP modes), 14 Gbaud polarisation-multiplexed 16QAM (with a frequency spacing of 14.1 GHz), corresponding to a total line-rate of 12.8 Tb/s (a net-data-rate of 9.8 Tb/s given 20% FEC and 3.1% training sequences overheads), over 12 spans of 20 km (the required energy per bit is minimised for span lengths going from 35 km at 6 bits/s/Hz to 20 km at 12 bits/s/Hz52). With a total WDM bandwidth of 268 GHz, the centre WDM channels will experience intermodal nonlinear interactions for all possible combinations of pairs of modes when considering an overall DMD of up to 21.4 ps/km (to allow exact cancelling of chromatic dispersion and DMD walk-offs within the system bandwidth). Conversely, to make all possible intermodal FWM negligible, the overall DMD as to be increased to be higher than 300 ps/km such that the DMD between LP01 and LP11a/b (this is, the mode pair with closest group delay in Table 1) exceeds 21.4 ps/km. The study considered DBP implemented using the WC-Manakov Eq. (3)41 (WC-DBP), the SC-Manakov Eq. (3)42 (SC-DBP), or just the intra-modal nonlinear coefficients in WC-Manakov Eq. (3) (Intra-DBP), and considered as figure of merit the Q-factor of the centre channels averaged over the 12 polarisation modes. The fibre mode coupling strength (XT) was swept within a broad range of values, i.e. −60 dB/100 m to 0 dB/100 m, covering the weak, intermediate and strong coupling regimes, thus covering all observed coupling values presented in the literature53,54,55,56,57,58. For forward propagation, the step size was selected by bounding the local error38, a method found to be more computationally efficient at high accuracy than other common methods such as nonlinear phase rotation. The local error was bound to be lower than 10−5 as smaller values led to negligible performance change. Conversely, the maximum step size is kept much smaller than the dispersion length, the walk-off length, and the correlation length, as explained in Methods. For backward propagation, a constant step size is used, its value is determined in the following. In all cases, backpropagation considered the total number of channels being transmitted since multi-channel DBP was found to be required to achieve effective nonlinearity mitigation for SMF systems59 and this paper aims at exploring the full potential of DBP in SDM systems.

Figure 6 shows the Q-factor gain over linear equalisation for WC-, SC-, and Intra-DBP as a function of the DBP step size after 240 km transmission with a launch power of 0 dBm/ch, for two DMD free fibre links, (a) one with very low XT and (b) one with very high XT, and for (c) one high DMD fibre link GD-managed (one segment). These cases are representative of the broader range of DMD and XT values considered in the following. In all cases, results suggest that the simulation had converged by 100 m (similar results to 10 m). Thus, from this point, the step was kept at 100 m as this paper aims at exploring the full potential of digital nonlinear mitigation.

Figure 7 shows the Q-factor as a function of the power per channel (Pch) after 240 km for two DMD free fibre links, (a) one with very low XT and (b) one with very high XT, and for (c) one high DMD fibre link GD-managed (one segment). From Fig. 7(a,b), it can be seen that WC- and SC-DBP provide substantial Q-factor improvement in particular for low XT and high XT respectively, as Manakov approximations are applicable. And, that Intra-DBP provides performance improvement only for low XT but of smaller order as intermodal nonlinear interactions (strong for low DMD) are not accounted while DBP. Moreover, one can observe that WC-DBP only provides gain for transmission over the weakly coupled fibre, while SC-DBP provides gain for both fibres. WC-DBP is particularly penalizing for high XT values as the nonlinear coefficients in Eq. (2) are larger than the actual channel coefficients leading to large overcompensation. SC-DBP provides gain even for low XT as the nonlinear coefficients in Eq. (3) are smaller than the actual channel coefficients leading to undercompensation. From Fig. 7(c), it can be concluded that when using GD management with high DMD and low XT (GD management with high XT is not effective43), WC-DBP allows to achieve maximum Q-factors of the same order of those for low DMD non-GD-managed spans (Fig. 7(a)). Also in Fig. 7(c), as intermodal FWM efficiency is reduced for high DMD (and a given system bandwidth, as explained previously), Intra-DBP produces similar gains to those of WC-DBP. Finally, in Fig. 7(a,c), the large errors bars for WC-DBP are a consequence of having extremely low strength mode mixing (−60 dB/100 m) providing a few additional pathways to intermodal four-wave mixing phase matching without introducing sufficiently fast random rotations of the field polarisation state along the fibre length which would have led to an averaging of the efficiency of the overall nonlinear process. Note that in practice the lower bound of the Q-factor variation would be considered in the dimensioning of the system. Note that in practice the lower bound of the Q-factor variation would be considered in the dimensioning of the system.

Figure 8 shows the Q-factor improvement over linear equalisation as a function of XT after 240 km with different values of DMD and launch power of 0 dBm/ch for: (a) Intra-, (b) WC- and (c) SC-DBP. First, it can be seen that WC- and SC-DBP can provide significant compensation (above 1 dB) in the regimes where their Manakov equations are valid (for XT < −40 dB/100 m and XT > −15 dB/100 m, respectively). But, also that Intra-DBP provides a performance improvement in many cases higher than that of WC-DBP. Intra-DBP performs particularly well for sufficiently high DMD such that intermodal nonlinear distortion is not so dominant and for a range of low XT in which sufficient coupling events randomise a sufficient share of the intermodal nonlinear distortion. Thus, for sufficiently low XT, Intra-DBP gain rolls-off as can be seen in Fig. 8(a). In this way, for the WC-regime, and for fibres with −55 < XT [dB/100 m] < −35 and DMD > 30 ps/km Intra-DBP provides the highest improvement between 1 and 3 dB, and for fibres with XT < −40 dB/100 m and DMD < 30 ps/km WC-DBP provides an improvement between 1 and 4 dB. These XT and DMD ranges cover many the fibres presented in literature53,54,55,56,57,58. For the SC-regime, SC-DBP provides significant compensation for small DMD values (≤4 ps/km) and XT ≥ −10 dB/100 m, a regime that can be achieved using for example a fibre similar to the one in58. For intermediate XT values (−30 < XT [dB/100 m] < −15) none of the DBP approaches work even for negligible DMD values. This is because for significant transmission distances (240 km, in this case) linear mode coupling leads to evolutions of the nonlinear operator that differ significantly from that of the uncoupled operators in the Manakov approximation. Outside the operational regime identified for WC- and SC-DBP, the evolution of the GD operator is no longer well approximated using the uncoupled GD coefficients as in Table 1, thus the nonlinear distortion is either overcompensated or undercompensated when using the coefficients in Table 2 or their direct average41,42.

## Discussion

Even for the most complex MDM systems significant performance improvement is possible using DBP provided that appropriate approximations for the effect of the stochastic nature of the linear crosstalk are taken into account. For example, fibres optimised primarily for low XT (and with intermediate-to-high DMD), including trench-assisted graded-index fibres19,53 or multiple-step index fibres54,60, allow a significant DBP gain if the crosstalk is neglected. However, this signal processing approach gives no gain for high XT (and low DMD) fibres such as coupled-core fibres18,58. However, for such high XT fibres, if the instantaneous crosstalk is averaged, the so called generalised Manakov approach, high performance gains are again possible. Whilst a small range of possible fibre parameters exist where the approximate models considered here failed to provide significant gain, and compensation would require continuous estimation of the random linear coupling, significant performance gains were possible for all possible XT and DMD regimes in which real fibres operate.

To extend the operational range of Manakov-DBP, active tracking of the GD operator is needed, as observed for SMF systems impacted by polarisation mode dispersion (PMD)31,34. The DBP algorithm proposed in31, takes into account PMD by simply considering GD accumulating in staircase fashion, span-by-span, in such a way that the total PMD accumulated in the forward propagation is reversed (total PMD is available at conventional linear channel equalizers). In34, instead of considering GD accumulating over the same principal states of polarisation in the backward propagation, a blind optimization of each section Jones matrix improved performance by reducing the DBP gain variability at the expense of additional complexity. Future research to develop methods similar to34 applicable to MDM systems are expected to deliver significant additional gains (>1 dB) over a broad range of XT and DMD regimes.

## Methods

### Generalized Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation

The generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation (GNLSE) for FMFs can be written as37:

$$\begin{array}{l}{\partial }_{z}{A}_{ui}+\mathop{\mathop{[{\rm{j}}{\beta }_{ui}^{(0)}+{\beta }_{ui}^{(1)}{\partial }_{t}-\frac{{\rm{j}}{\beta }_{ui}^{(2)}}{2}{\partial }_{t}^{2}+\ldots +\frac{{\alpha }_{ui}}{2}]}\limits^{\frown {}}}\limits^{=\hat{D}}{A}_{ui}\\ \begin{array}{rcl} & = & -\,{\rm{j}}\mathop{\mathop{[{\gamma }_{uuii}{|{A}_{ui}|}^{2}+2{\gamma }_{uvii}\sum _{v\ne u}{|{A}_{vi}|}^{2}+\frac{2}{3}{\gamma }_{uvij}\sum _{\nu }{|{A}_{vj}|}^{2}]}\limits^{\frown {}}}\limits^{=\hat{N}}{A}_{ui}\\ & & -\,{\rm{j}}\mathop{\mathop{\sum _{vk}{C}_{uvik}{A}_{vk}{e}^{{\rm{j}}({\beta }_{ui}^{(0)}-{\beta }_{vk}^{(0)})z}}\limits^{\frown {}}}\limits^{=\hat{C}},\end{array}\end{array}$$
(1)

where i and j are the orthogonal states of polarisation of each mode u and v, with u, v = (1, …, N) for N linearly polarised modes each two orthogonal polarisations. In this way, (1) is a set of 2N coupled equations, one for each polarisation mode ui. Aui(z,t), βui(1), βui(2) and αui are the slowly varying field envelope, group delay, group delay dispersion and attenuation, respectively. γuvij is the nonlinear coefficient between ui and vj, which depends on the nonlinear refractive index n2 of the silica, approximately 2.6 × 10−26 m2/W, and on the intermodal effective area, and is given by:

$${\gamma }_{uvij}={n}_{2}\frac{{\omega }_{0}}{c}\frac{{\iint }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{|{E}_{ui}|}^{2}{|{E}_{vj}|}^{2}{\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y}{({\iint }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{|{E}_{ui}|}^{2}{\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y)({\iint }_{-\infty }^{+\infty }{|{E}_{vj}|}^{2}{\rm{d}}x{\rm{d}}y)}$$
(2)

where Eui(x, y) is the mode field transverse distribution for the i polarisation of mode u.

In Eq. (1), $$\hat{D}$$ is the differential operator that accounts for dispersion and attenuation, and $$\hat{N}$$ is the nonlinear operator that accounts for all the intramodal and intermodal nonlinear effects37. The last term on the right-hand side accounts for the linear mode coupling arising from fibre structure imperfections, where Cuvij are the coupling coefficients as derived in37.

For the extreme coupling regimes, the nonlinear coefficients and degeneracy factors in (1) can be assumed being averaged by the linear coupling41,42, obtaining the so-called few-mode Manakov equations. In the weak coupling (WC) regime41, only the averaging over birefringence fluctuations must be considered, reducing the intramodal degeneracy factor to 8/9 and the intermodal degeneracy factor to 4/3. Thus, the nonlinear operator in (1) becomes:

$$\hat{N}=-\,{\rm{j}}[\frac{8}{9}\sum _{k=\{i,j\}}{\gamma }_{uuik}|{A}_{uk}{|}^{2}+\frac{4}{3}\sum _{\begin{array}{c}\nu \ne u\\ k=\{i,j\}\end{array}}{\gamma }_{u\nu ik}|{A}_{\nu k}{|}^{2}].$$
(3)

In the strong coupling (SC) regime, the averaging includes all propagation modes. For N-modes with two polarisations, the nonlinear operator in (1) becomes42:

$$\hat{N}=-{\rm{j}}\sum _{\begin{array}{c}\nu \\ k=\{i,j\}\end{array}}\kappa {|{A}_{\nu k}|}^{2},\,\kappa =\frac{4}{3}\frac{2N}{2N+1}(\frac{1}{{N}^{2}}\sum _{\begin{array}{c}u,\nu \\ k,l=\{i,j\}\end{array}}{\gamma }_{u\nu kl})$$
(4)

### Few-Mode Symmetric Split-Step Fourier Method

The single-mode split-step Fourier method (SSFM) obtains an approximate solution of the Schrödinger equation by assuming that over a small distance h the dispersive and nonlinear effects act independently. For FMFs, we extend such an approach by assuming that the mode coupling also acts independently. Such approximations require h to be much shorter than the dispersion length T02/|βu(2)| and the walk-off length T0/|βu(1) − βv(1)| where T0 is the pulse width, and shorter than the correlation length Lc defined24 for XT(Lc) = [e2 − 1]/[e2 + 1].

Figure 1 presents a schematic illustration of the few-mode symmetric SSFM proposed. In a symmetric SSFM, the effect of nonlinearity is included in the middle of the segment rather than at the segment boundary38, providing higher accuracy. Finally, the step-size was selected by bounding the local error38, more computationally efficient at high accuracy than the other methods, e.g. nonlinear phase rotation.

## References

1. 1.

Ellis, A. D., Suibhne, N. M., Saad, D. & Payne, D. N. Communication networks beyond the capacity crunch. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2015.0191 (2016).

2. 2.

Tkach, R. W. Scaling optical communications for the next decade and beyond. Bell Labs Technical Journal 14, 3–9, https://doi.org/10.1002/bltj.20400 (2010).

3. 3.

Tucker, R. S. Green Optical Communications&#x2014; Part I: Energy Limitations in Transport. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 17, 245–260, https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2010.2051216 (2011).

4. 4.

Kilper, D. C. & Rastegarfar, H. Energy challenges in optical access and aggregation networks. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0435 (2016).

5. 5.

Richardson, D. J. New optical fibres for high-capacity optical communications. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 374, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2014.0441 (2016).

6. 6.

Li, G., Bai, N., Zhao, N. & Xia, C. Space-division multiplexing: the next frontier in optical communication. Adv. Opt. Photon. 6, 413–487, https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.6.000413 (2014).

7. 7.

Birks, T. A., Gris-Sánchez, I., Yerolatsitis, S., Leon-Saval, S. G. & Thomson, R. R. The photonic lantern. Adv. Opt. Photon. 7, 107–167, https://doi.org/10.1364/AOP.7.000107 (2015).

8. 8.

Chen, H. et al. Integrated cladding-pumped multicore few-mode erbium-doped fibre amplifier for space-division-multiplexed communications. Nature Photonics 10, 529, https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2016.125, https://www.nature.com/articles/nphoton.2016.125#supplementary-information (2016).

9. 9.

Bigot, L., Cocq, G. L. & Quiquempois, Y. Few-Mode Erbium-Doped Fiber Amplifiers: A Review. Journal of Lightwave Technology 33, 588–596, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2014.2376975 (2015).

10. 10.

Winzer, P. J. & Neilson, D. T. From Scaling Disparities to Integrated Parallelism: A Decathlon for a Decade. Journal of Lightwave Technology 35, 1099–1115, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2662082 (2017).

11. 11.

Marom, D. M. et al. Survey of photonic switching architectures and technologies in support of spatially and spectrally flexible optical networking [invited]. IEEE/OSA Journal of Optical Communications and Networking 9, 1–26, https://doi.org/10.1364/JOCN.9.000001 (2017).

12. 12.

Fontaine, N. K. et al. 30 × 30 MIMO Transmission over 15 Spatial Modes, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Post Deadline Papers, OSA Technical Digest (online) (Optical Society of America, 2015), paper Th5C.1, https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2015.Th5C.1.

13. 13.

Arık, S. Ö. & Kahn, J. M. Coupled-Core Multi-Core Fibers for Spatial Multiplexing. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 25, 2054–2057, https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2013.2280897 (2013).

14. 14.

Ferreira, F., Fonseca, D. & Silva, H. J. A. Design of few-mode fibers with M-modes and low differential mode delay. Journal of Lightwave Technology 32, 353–360, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2013.2293066 (2014).

15. 15.

Ho, K.-P. & Kahn, J. M. Statistics of Group Delays in Multimode Fiber With Strong Mode Coupling. Journal of Lightwave Technology 29, 3119–3128, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2011.2165316 (2011).

16. 16.

Costa, C. S., Ferreira, F. M., Suibhne, N. M., Sygletos, S. & Ellis, A. D Receiver Memory Requirement in Mode Delay Compensated Few-Mode Fibre Spans with Intermediate Coupling, In ECOC, p. Tu.1.E.4 2016.

17. 17.

Arik, S. Ö., Askarov, D. & Kahn, J. M. Effect of Mode Coupling on Signal Processing Complexity in Mode-Division Multiplexing. Journal of Lightwave Technology 31, 423–431, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2234083 (2013).

18. 18.

Ryf, R. et al. Long-Distance Transmission over Coupled-Core Multicore Fiber, In ECOC 2016 - Post Deadline Paper; 42nd European Conference on Optical Communication. VDE, p. Th.3.C.3.

19. 19.

Rademacher, G. et al. Long-Haul Transmission over Few-Mode Fibers with Space-Division Multiplexing. Journal of Lightwave Technology PP, 1-1, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2786671 (2017).

20. 20.

Soma, D. et al. 10.16-Peta-B/s Dense SDM/WDM Transmission Over 6-Mode 19-Core Fiber Across the C + L Band. Journal of Lightwave Technology 36, 1362–1368 (2018).

21. 21.

Rademacher, G. et al. 159 Tbit/s C + L Band Transmission over 1045 km 3-Mode Graded-Index Few-Mode Fiber, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers, p. Th4C.4 (2018).

22. 22.

Cai, J.- et al. 70.4 Tb/s Capacity over 7,600 km in C + L Band Using Coded Modulation with Hybrid Constellation Shaping and Nonlinearity Compensation, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers, paper Th5B.2.

23. 23.

Lobato, A. et al. Impact of mode coupling on the mode-dependent loss tolerance in few-mode fiber transmission. Opt. Express 20, 29776, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.029776 (2012).

24. 24.

Ferreira, F., Sanchez, C., Suibhne, N., Sygletos, S. & Ellis, A. Nonlinear Transmission Performance in Delay-Managed Few-Mode Fiber Links with Intermediate Coupling, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference. p. Th2A.53, Optical Society of America, https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2017.Th2A.53

25. 25.

Suibhne, N. M., Ellis, A. D., Gunning, F. C. G. & Sygletos, S. Experimental Verification of Four Wave Mixing Efficiency Characteristics in a Few Mode Fiber, In 39th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication (ECOC 2013). p. P.1.14, IET, London, UK, https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2013.1567.

26. 26.

Eznaveh, Z. S. et al. All-fiber few-mode multicore photonic lantern mode multiplexer. Optics Express 25, 16701–16707, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.25.016701 (2017).

27. 27.

Shikama, K., Abe, Y., Ono, H. & Aratake, A. Low-Loss and Low-Mode-Dependent-Loss Fan-In/Fan-Out Device for 6-Mode 19-Core Fiber. Journal of Lightwave Technology 36, 302–308, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2017.2765404 (2018).

28. 28.

Bade, S. et al. Fabrication and Characterization of a Mode-selective 45-Mode Spatial Multiplexer based on Multi-Plane Light Conversion, In Optical Fiber Communication Conference Postdeadline Papers. p. Th4B.3, Optical Society of America, https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2018.Th4B.3.

29. 29.

Riesen, N., Gross, S., Love, J. D., Sasaki, Y. & Withford, M. J. Monolithic mode-selective few-mode multicore fiber multiplexers. Scientific Reports 7, 6971, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-06561-w (2017).

30. 30.

Ip, E. & Kahn, J. M. Compensation of Dispersion and Nonlinear Impairments Using Digital Backpropagation. Journal of Lightwave Technology 26, 3416–3425, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2008.927791 (2008).

31. 31.

Goroshko, K., Louchet, H. & Richter, A. Overcoming performance limitations of digital back propagation due to polarization mode dispersion, In 2016 18th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks (ICTON). Trento, Italy, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2016.7550257.

32. 32.

Liga, G., Xu, T., Alvarado, A., Killey, R. I. & Bayvel, P. On the performance of multichannel digital backpropagation in high-capacity long-haul optical transmission. Optics Express 22, 30053–30062, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.030053 (2014).

33. 33.

McCarthy, M. E., Al Kahteeb, M. A., Ferreira, F. M. & Ellis, A. D. PMD tolerant nonlinear compensation using in-line phase conjugation. Opt Express 24, 3385–3392, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.24.003385 (2016).

34. 34.

Czegledi, C. B. et al. Polarization-Mode Dispersion Aware Digital Backpropagation, In ECOC 2016; 42nd European Conference on Optical Communication. VDE, p. Th.2.P2.SC3.5, London, UK.

35. 35.

Ferreira, F. M., Costa, C. S., Sygletos, S. & Ellis, A. D. Nonlinear Compensation Using Digital Back-Propagation in Few-Mode Fibre Spans with Intermediate Coupling, In 43 rd European Conference on Optical Communication, p. W.1.D.3, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1109/ECOC.2017.8346175.

36. 36.

Agrawal, G. In Nonlinear Fiber Optics (Fifth Edition) 27–56 (Academic Press, 2013).

37. 37.

Ferreira, F., Jansen, S., Monteiro, P. & Silva, H. Nonlinear Semi-Analytical Model for Simulation of Few-Mode Fiber Transmission. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 24, 240–242, https://doi.org/10.1109/lpt.2011.2177250 (2012).

38. 38.

Sinkin, O. V., Holzlohner, R., Zweck, J. & Menyuk, C. R. Optimization of the split-step fourier method in modeling optical-fiber communications systems. Journal of Lightwave Technology 21, 61–68, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2003.808628 (2003).

39. 39.

Marcuse, D., Manyuk, C. R. & Wai, P. K. A. Application of the Manakov-PMD equation to studies of signal propagation in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence. Journal of Lightwave Technology 15, 1735–1746, https://doi.org/10.1109/50.622902 (1997).

40. 40.

Wai, P. K. A. & Menyak, C. R. Polarization mode dispersion, decorrelation, and diffusion in optical fibers with randomly varying birefringence. Journal of Lightwave Technology 14, 148–157, https://doi.org/10.1109/50.482256 (1996).

41. 41.

Mumtaz, S., Essiambre, R.-J. & Agrawal, G. P. Nonlinear Propagation in Multimode and Multicore Fibers: Generalization of the Manakov Equations. Journal of Lightwave Technology 31, 398–406, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2231401 (2013).

42. 42.

Mecozzi, A., Antonelli, C. & Shtaif, M. Nonlinear propagation in multi-mode fibers in the strong coupling regime. Optics Express 20, 11673–11678, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.011673 (2012).

43. 43.

Ferreira, F. M., Costa, C. S., Sygletos, S. & Ellis, A. D. Semi-Analytical Modelling of Linear Mode Coupling in Few-Mode Fibers. Journal of Lightwave Technology 35, 4011–4022, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2017.2727441 (2017).

44. 44.

Inan, B. et al. DSP complexity of mode-division multiplexed receivers. Opt. Express 20, 10859, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.010859 (2012).

45. 45.

Costa, C. S., Ferreira, F. M., Mac Suibhne, N., Sygletos, S. & Ellis, A. D. In ECOC2016 Düsseldorf: 42nd European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communications. 223–225 (VDE).

46. 46.

Characteristics of a Single-Mode Optical Fibre Cable, Standard ITU-T G.652B, Oct. 2010.

47. 47.

Randel, S. et al. Mode-multiplexed 6 × 20-GBd QPSK transmission over 1200-km DGD-compensated few-mode fiber, In Proc. OFC 2012, p. PDP5C.5, IEEE, Los Angeles, USA.

48. 48.

Sleiffer, V. A. J. M. et al. 73.7 Tb/s (96 × 3 × 256-Gb/s) mode-division-multiplexed DP-16QAM transmission with inline MM-EDFA. Optics Express 20, B428–B438, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.20.00B428 (2012).

49. 49.

Arik, S. O., Ho, K.-P. & Kahn, J. M. Delay Spread Reduction in Mode-Division Multiplexing: Mode Coupling Versus Delay Compensation. Journal of Lightwave Technology 33, 4504–4512, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2015.2475422 (2015).

50. 50.

Napoli, A. et al. Digital Compensation of Bandwidth Limitations for High-Speed DACs and ADCs. Journal of Lightwave Technology 34, 3053–3064, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2016.2535487 (2016).

51. 51.

Schmogrow, R. et al. Error Vector Magnitude as a Performance Measure for Advanced Modulation Formats. IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 24, 61–63, https://doi.org/10.1109/LPT.2011.2172405 (2012).

52. 52.

Doran, N. J. & Ellis, A. D. Minimising total energy requirements in amplified links by optimising amplifier spacing. Optics Express 22, 19810–19817, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.22.019810 (2014).

53. 53.

Gruner-Nielsen, L. et al. Few Mode Transmission Fiber With Low DGD, Low Mode Coupling, and Low Loss. Journal of Lightwave Technology 30, 3693–3698, https://doi.org/10.1109/jlt.2012.2227243 (2012).

54. 54.

Li, A., Amin, A. A., Chen, X. & Shieh, W. Transmission of 107-Gb/s mode and polarization multiplexed CO-OFDM signal over a two-mode fiber. Opt. Express 19, 8808–8814, https://doi.org/10.1364/OE.19.008808 (2011).

55. 55.

Ryf, R. et al. Mode-Division Multiplexing Over 96 km of Few-Mode Fiber Using Coherent 6 × 6 MIMO Processing. Journal of Lightwave Technology 30, 521–531 (2012).

56. 56.

Mori, T. et al. Low DMD Four LP Mode Transmission Fiber for Wide-band WDM-MIMO System, Proc. OFC 2013, p. OTh3K.1, https://doi.org/10.1364/OFC.2013.OTh3K.1.

57. 57.

Ryf, R. et al. Space-division multiplexed transmission over 4200-km 3-core microstructured fiber, In Proc. OFC 2012, p. PDP5C.2, IEEE, Los Angeles, USA.

58. 58.

Hayashi, T., Tamura, Y., Hasegawa, T. & Taru, T. Record-Low Spatial Mode Dispersion and Ultra-Low Loss Coupled Multi-Core Fiber for Ultra-Long-Haul Transmission. Journal of Lightwave Technology 35, 450–457, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2016.2614000 (2017).

59. 59.

Maher, R. et al. Spectrally Shaped DP-16QAM Super-Channel Transmission with Multi-Channel Digital Back-Propagation. Scientific Reports 5, 8214, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08214 (2015).

60. 60.

Sakamoto, T., Mori, T., Yamamoto, T. & Tomita, S. Differential Mode Delay Managed Transmission Line for WDM-MIMO System Using Multi-Step Index Fiber. Journal of Lightwave Technology 30, 2783–2787, https://doi.org/10.1109/JLT.2012.2208095 (2012).

## Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by the EU (654809-HSPACE and 659950-INVENTION), and by EPSRC (EP/L000091/1-PEACE and EP/R024057/1-FPA-ROCS).

## Author information

Authors

### Contributions

F.F. and C.C. conceived, designed, and performed the simulations; All analysed the data and wrote the paper.

### Corresponding author

Correspondence to Filipe M. Ferreira.

## Ethics declarations

### Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

## Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Ferreira, F.M., Costa, C.S., Sygletos, S. et al. Overcoming degradation in spatial multiplexing systems with stochastic nonlinear impairments. Sci Rep 8, 17539 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35893-4

• Accepted:

• Published:

### Keywords

• Few-mode Fiber (FMFs)
• Generalized Nonlinear Schrödinger Equation (GNLSE)
• Linear Mode Coupling
• Constant Amplitude Zero Autocorrelation (CAZAC)
• Split-step Fourier Method (SSFM)