Article | Open | Published:

Coordinated Regulation of Axonal Microtubule Organization and Transport by Drosophila Neurexin and BMP Pathway

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 17337 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Neurexins are well known trans-synaptic cell adhesion molecules that are required for proper synaptic development and function across species. Beyond synapse organization and function, little is known about other roles Neurexins might have in the nervous system. Here we report novel phenotypic consequences of mutations in Drosophila neurexin (dnrx), which alters axonal microtubule organization and transport. We show that dnrx mutants display phenotypic similarities with the BMP receptor wishful thinking (wit) and one of the downstream effectors, futsch, which is a known regulator of microtubule organization and stability. dnrx has genetic interactions with wit and futsch. Loss of Dnrx also results in reduced levels of other downstream effectors of BMP signaling, phosphorylated-Mad and Trio. Interestingly, postsynaptic overexpression of the BMP ligand, Glass bottom boat, in dnrx mutants partially rescues the axonal transport defects but not the synapse undergrowth at the neuromuscular junctions. These data suggest that Dnrx and BMP signaling are involved in many diverse functions and that regulation of axonal MT organization and transport might be distinct from regulation of synaptic growth in dnrx mutants. Together, our work uncovers a novel function of Drosophila Neurexin and may provide insights into functions of Neurexins in vertebrates.

Introduction

The synaptic cell adhesion molecule Neurexin (Nrx) is involved in the development and function of synapses across species1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8. Elucidating the function of Nrx is important because it is linked to many human neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders4,7. In Drosophila, Neurexin (Dnrx) has a critical role in the assembly and maintenance of glutamatergic neuromuscular junction (NMJ) synapses. Lack of Dnrx shows a significant reduction in synaptic bouton growth at the NMJ3,8,9. Our recent studies show that dnrx and its binding partner neuroligin (dnlg)10,11,12 interact with the Bone Morphogenetic Protein (BMP) receptor, wishful thinking (wit), to coordinate synaptic growth and cytoarchitecture at the NMJs8.

The BMP pathway is a well established signaling pathway needed for the regulation of synapse assembly, maintenance, and function13,14,15,16. In Drosophila, the BMP pathway has the postsynaptic muscle-derived ligand, Glass bottom boat (Gbb) that binds to the receptors Wishful thinking (Wit), Thickveins (Tkv), and Saxophone (Sax) at the NMJ and activates a cascade of downstream effectors. One of these effectors is the phosphorylated-mothers against decapentaplegic (pMad) in neurons. pMad and the co-Smad, Medea, translocate to the nucleus and initiates transcription of downstream targets17. Besides NMJ growth, recent studies have shown that the BMP pathway is required for axonal microtubule (MT) stability, synaptic strength and normal axonal transport17,18,19,20. Axonal transport involves long-range bidirectional transport of specialized cargo, such as the components of synaptic vesicles, active zones, and organelles from soma to the nerve terminals21,22, and this process is powered by axonal MTs. Disruption of the delicate axonal MT organization and transport machinery has been associated with several human neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer’s, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Huntington’s and Parkinson’s diseases23,24. While trafficking of Neurexins at synaptic terminals has been studied25, not much is known about the role of Neurexins in trafficking of synaptic cargoes or assembly of MTs along the axons.

Here we report that loss of Dnrx causes axonal MT disorganization and disruption in transport that resembles phenotypes observed in wit mutants. dnrx displays genetic interactions with wit. dnrx also shows phenotypic similarities and genetic interactions with futsch. futsch is the Drosophila homolog of mammalian microtubule associated protein (MAP1B)26,27 and one of the downstream effectors of BMP pathway that regulates MT organization and stability18,20. Absence of Dnrx affects levels of the downstream effectors of the BMP pathway, pMad and Trio in motor neurons. Interestingly, postsynaptic overexpression of Gbb in dnrx mutants partially ameliorates axonal transport defects but not the NMJ undergrowth phenotype of dnrx mutants. Together, these data suggest that Dnrx functions with components of the BMP signaling pathway to ensure proper MT organization and axonal transport which is crucial for proper neuronal function.

Results

Loss and Gain of Dnrx Affects Axonal Microtubule Organization and Transport

In the current studies, we set out to determine what other functions, apart from synapse assembly, Dnrx plays in the Drosophila nervous system. dnrx mutants displayed accumulation of synaptic cargoes in motor axons that innervated the larval muscle field3. This phenotype is reflective of axonal transport defects. We wanted to analyze this phenotype further by looking at the segmental nerve axons that exited the ventral nerve cord (VNC) and traversed long distances before they innervated the more distal larval musculature in wild type and dnrx mutants (Fig. 1). We also wanted to investigate whether a defect in axonal transport might be accompanied by a disorganized axonal MT cytoskeleton28,29,30. We hypothesized that the more distal portions of axons are more sensitive to impairments of MT function and accumulation of various cargoes. We stained age-matched 3rd instar wild type (Fig. 1A,A’), homozygous dnrx (dnrx−/−, Fig. 1B,B’) and dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 (a deletion that removes dnrx locus; Fig. 1C,C’) larvae with anti-Synaptotagmin (Syt) (Fig. 1A–C, green) which labels synaptic vesicles31 and anti-Futsch (Fig. 1A’–C’, red) which labels the presynaptic MTs26,27. Wild type nerve fibers did not show any axonal transport defects as evidenced by anti-Syt staining (Fig. 1A), while dnrx mutants showed a significant accumulation of Syt puncta along the axons (Fig. 1B,C, see quantification in K, L). Moreover, axonal MTs in wild type show tightly fasciculated bundles that are arranged in parallel arrays (Fig. 1A’), while in dnrx mutants, axonal MT displayed a distorted and ruffling morphology and defasciculation (Fig. 1B’,C’). Next we wanted to study the effects of knocking down Dnrx in all neurons using pan-neuronal elav-Gal4/UAS-dnrx-RNAi (Fig. 1D,D’) or selectively in motor neurons using OK6-Gal4/UAS-dnrx-RNAi (Fig. 1E,E’). Both genotypes presented axonal transport defects in the mutant larvae that were significantly enhanced than the wild type (Fig. 1K,L). While the axonal transport defects resulting from Dnrx knockdown using both elav-Gal4 (Fig. 1D) and OK6-Gal4 (Fig. 1E) were not significantly different (Fig. 1K,L) when compared to one another, they were found to be milder than the dnrx mutants (for comparison, see Fig. 1K,L). We then wanted to examine whether wild type overexpression of Dnrx either pre- or postsynaptically show any of these MT organization and/or transport defects. While postsynaptic overexpression of Dnrx in mef2-Gal4/UAS-dnrx larvae did not display any axonal MT disorganization or transport defects (data not shown), presynaptic Dnrx overexpression using elav-Gal4 (Fig. 1F,F’) and OK6-Gal4 driver (Fig. 1G,G’) led to disrupted axonal MT (Fig. 1F’,G’) and blockage of Syt (Fig. 1F,F’ and G,G’) as seen in elav-Gal4;UAS-dnrx and OK6-Gal4, UAS-dnrx larvae.

Figure 1
Figure 1

dnrx mutants show defects in axonal microtubule cytoskeleton and transport. (AJ’) Confocal images of 3rd instar larval nerve fibers labeled with antibodies against Syt (green) and Futsch (red) in indicated genotypes. (K,L) Quantification of Syt puncta per 80 μm nerve length (K) and per μm2 nerve area of 3rd instar larval segmental nerve 5–8 passing through abdominal segments A4–7 of specified genotypes. n = 15 animals. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant). Scale bar: (AJ’) = 10 μm.

Previous studies have reported that wishful thinking (wit, a Type II receptor of the BMP signaling pathway) mutants also display a punctate Syt staining in motor axons13 (Fig. 1H,H’). Based on our recent studies that showed Dnrx and Wit function together in regulation of synaptic growth at the Drosophila larval NMJs8. Given this finding, we hypothesized that Dnrx and Wit may play a similar role in coordinating axonal MT organization and transport which may or may not be dependent on synaptic growth. We first wanted to examine the presence and/or extent of axonal MT organization and transport deficits in both loss and gain of Wit functions. We found that wit mutants (witA12/witB11)14 showed structural alteration and organization defects in MTs (Fig. 1H’) in addition to accumulation of Syt, which is consistent with previous reports13 (Fig. 1H,H’,K,L) and similar to those observed in dnrx mutants (Fig. 1K,L). However, unlike Dnrx, there were no phenotypic consequences of presynaptic Wit overexpression as seen in elav-Gal4; UAS-wit-GFP larvae on MT organization or transport of axonal cargoes (Fig. 1I,I’, K,L). The elav-Gal4 driver (Fig. 1J,J’) or the OK6-Gal4 driver (data not shown) used in this study did not display any obvious axonal transport or MT organization defects along the segmental axons. In order to rule out that Syt was not the only synaptic vesicle cargo that failed to transport along segmental axons in dnrx and wit mutants, we also immunostained these mutants with other synaptic vesicle proteins, like Drosophila Cysteine String Protein 2 (DCSP2)32 and active zone protein, Bruchpilot (Brp)33 together with the wild type control (Fig. S1). We found blockage of both DCSP2 and Brp in dnrx and wit mutants indicating possibly a more general defect in the transport machinery. Together, these data suggest that proper axonal MT organization and transport are dependent on both Dnrx and the BMP receptor, Wit.

Neurexin Displays Genetic Interaction with the BMP Receptor wishful thinking

We have shown that there are similarities in accumulation of cargoes in the axons and structural disorganization of MTs in dnrx and wit mutants. Given these observations, we wanted to further explore whether dnrx and wit display genetic interactions and likely play a role together in regulating MT organization and transport. For these genetic interaction studies, we generated various combinations of wit and dnrx mutants, including double mutants. We first tested dnrx/+ (Fig. 2A,A’,G) and wit/+ (Fig. 2B,B’,G) heterozygotes and found them to be similar to wild type (Fig. 2G). Interestingly, transheterozygous combination of witx/+, dnrxx/+ (Fig. 2C,C’,G) showed a significant accumulation of Syt puncta which is not observed in wild type controls (Fig. 2G) or individual heterozygotes (Fig. 2A,B,G). Loss of one copy of wit in dnrx (Fig. 2D,D’,G) mutants did not show an increase in Syt puncta along the motor axons compared to dnrx or wit mutants (Fig. 2G). Double mutants of wit,dnrx (Fig. 2E,E’,G) displayed no significant difference in terms of accumulation of Syt puncta along axons compared to wit mutants (Fig. 2G). Interestingly, other measurement of Syt puncta, like area and intensity was found to be similar in wit and dnrx single and double mutants (Fig. S2). These genetic interaction data confirm that Dnrx functions together with Wit for regulating axonal transport. We also studied the effect of wit loss with Dnrx overexpression using motor neuronal driver, OK6-Gal4 (Fig. 2F,F’). We found it to be comparable to the double loss of wit,dnrx double mutants (Fig. 2G). Finally, various genetic combinations of wit,dnrx (Fig. 2D’,E’) mutants also show MT structural alteration and organization defects as observed in dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 1). These data suggest that wit and dnrx display genetic interactions and coordinate proper axonal MT organization and transport during nervous system development.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Genetic interactions between dnrx and wit and their influence on axonal transport. (AF’) Confocal images of portions of nerve fibers showing axonal MT stained with anti-Futsch (red) and anti-Syt (green) from 3rd instar larvae of indicated genotypes. (G) Quantification Syt puncta per 80 μm of segmental nerve 5–8 passing through A4-7 in all indicated genotypes. n = 15 animals. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant). Scale bar: (AF’) = 10 μm.

Ultrastructural Defects in Axonal Microtubules in dnrx and wit Mutants

dnrx and wit mutants have distorted axonal MT organization and ruffling morphology that is visualized by anti-Futsch immunostaining. The fluorescence intensity ratio of Futsch/Hrp in wit and dnrx mutants did not show any significant difference in segmental axons when compared to wild type (Fig. S2). We were limited by not having a clear quantifiable parameter to analyze MT disorganization by light microscopy. Given this limitation, we wanted to study the structural organization of MTs at a high resolution in these mutants compared to the wild type control. To achieve this, we analyzed longitudinal sections of the peripheral nerve fibers of wild type (Fig. 3AA’”), dnrx (Fig. 3B-B”’) and wit (Fig. 3C-C”’) mutant larvae using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to study the arrangement and organization of MTs. Longitudinal sections of nerve fibers at lower magnification (Fig. 3A–C) of all three genotypes showed similar overall organization with axons separated by glial processes (represented by the darker cytoplasmic areas). dnrx and wit mutants occasionally displayed thinner outermost membrane layer (Fig. 1B,C), the neural lamella34,35, that provides mechanical support to the axon and was not significantly different than wild type (data not shown). However, at higher magnification, there was a noticeable difference in axonal MT organization in dnrx (Fig. 3B’) and wit (Fig. 3C’) compared to wild type controls (Fig. 3A’). Wild type axons have long parallel arrays of MT filaments (arrows, Fig. 3A’) with consistent spacing between them. This is similar to what is observed by anti-Futsch immunostaining (Fig. 1A’). dnrx (Fig. 3B’) and wit (Fig. 3C’) mutants displayed shorter, broken MT filaments (black arrows, Fig. 3B’,C’) that are disarrayed and sometimes even appear to crisscross as filaments intersect each other (blue arrows, Fig. 3C’). These mutant phenotypes are consistent with those seen by light microscopy (Figs 1 and 2). However, given the fragility of MTs under the TEM processing conditions, we wanted to rule out that the MT fragmentation observed in dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 3B’,C’, respectively) is not due to preservation/fixation artifact. We therefore looked at the ultrastructural morphology of other organelles, e.g., mitochondria (Fig. 3A”–C”) and SJs34,35,36 (Fig. 3A’”–C’”) across all three genotypes. The morphology of these structures (A”–C” and A’”–C’”) was preserved and consistent across the genotypes. Quantification of MT breaks from longitudinal sections of dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 1D) revealed significantly higher percentage of breaks compared to the wild type axons. These data demonstrate that loss of Dnrx and Wit are required for proper organization of MTs along the segmental axons.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Ultrastructural changes in axonal microtubule organization in dnrx and wit mutants. (AC’) Longitudinal sections at low (AC) and high magnifications (A’C’) of segmental nerves of +/+ (A,A’), dnrx (B,B’) and wit (C,C’) mutants. Black arrows (A’C’) represent axonal MT filaments in indicated genotypes and blue arrows (wit mutants, C) point to intersecting MT filaments. (A”C’”) Higher magnification images showing mitochondria (A”C”) and septate junctions (A’”C’”) in wild type (A”,A’”), dnrx (B”,B’”) and wit (C”,C’”) mutant nerves. (D) Quantification of percent MT breaks in axons of wild type, dnrx and wit mutants. Scale bars: (AC) = 1 μM, (A’C’) = 200 nm, (A”C”) = 600 nm and (A’”C’”) = 200 nm. n = 5 animals/genotype. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant).

dnrx and wit mutant larvae Show Larval Locomotor Deficits

Mutations in genes with defects in MT organization and/or axon transport often display a range of behavioral deficits in the locomotor activities of larvae28. Given the impaired axonal transport and disorganized MT cytoskeleton in the segmental nerves of dnrx and wit mutants (Figs 13), we wanted to examine the locomotor behavior in these mutant larvae compared to their wild type counterparts. We performed behavior assays to examine various locomotion activity, patterns and rhythms. We used a grid crossing assay (Fig. 4A) where larvae are placed on a horizontal agar surface and the number of 0.5 cm2 grids crossed are counted within a timeframe of 30 seconds3. We found that both dnrx and wit mutants showed significantly fewer number of grids entered compared to wild type larvae (Fig. 4A). In the next assay, larvae were placed at the center of a circle termed as the “release zone”37 (Fig. 4B). Typically, wild type larvae display a dispersal behavior where they quickly move away from their point of origin while dnrx and wit mutants took significantly longer time to exit the circle (Fig. 4B). In both instances (Fig. 4A,B), dnrx mutant larvae were found to be significantly slower than wit mutants.

Figure 4
Figure 4

dnrx and wit mutants show defects in larval locomotion. (AD) Wild type, dnrx and wit mutant larval locomotor behavior assayed by measuring the number of 0.5 cm2 grids crossed in 30 seconds (A), time taken in seconds for larvae to exit a circle of 1.5 cm in diameter (B), number of full body peristaltic contractions in 1 minute (C) and time taken in seconds for larvae to right themselves when turned on their dorsal surface (D). n = 50 animals/genotype. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant).

Another major larval behavior is forward locomotion, which is achieved by sequential contraction of segments driven by waves of peristalsis that travel from tail (posterior) to head (anterior). We next examined the rhythmic peristaltic contraction behavior in dnrx and wit mutants compared to wild type larvae (Fig. 4C). We found that mutants of dnrx and wit had significantly fewer peristaltic contractions compared to wild type larvae (Fig. 4C). The last locomotion analysis performed was the “righting assay”38. In this assay, wild type, dnrx and wit mutant larvae were placed on their dorsal side and the time taken to return to their ventral (crawling position) side was measured (Fig. 4D). Both dnrx and wit mutants took significantly longer time to return to their crawling position compared to wild type larvae (Fig. 4D). Taken together, these datasets indicate that both wit and dnrx mutant larvae display severely impaired locomotor behavior consistent with axonal MT disorganization and axonal transport, as has been observed in other MT-related mutants.

Axonal Transport Defects in futsch Mutants and Genetic Interactions with dnrx

Previous studies have implicated Drosophila microtubule associated protein, Futsch, in the BMP pathway in regulating MT organization and stability18,20. Similar to Wit, both Dnrx and Futsch are found in both the presynaptic area and along axons. Since the presynaptic MT organization as visualized by anti-Futsch immunostainings (Fig. 1) and by high resolution TEM (Fig. 3) was affected in dnrx mutants, we wanted to further study the relationship between Dnrx and Futsch. More specifically, we wanted to determine: 1) whether there are axonal transport defects in futsch mutants similar to dnrx mutants, and 2) whether futsch and dnrx display genetic interactions. futschK68/Y (Fig. 5A,A’) and futschK68/futschK68 (Fig. 5B,B’) motor neurons show loss of Futsch expression in axonal MT (Fig. 5A’,B’, respectively) and pronounced vesicular Syt aggregates along the axons (Fig. 5A,B, respectively). This is similar to dnrx mutants (Figs 1B,C, 5E). In order to test for genetic interactions between dnrx and futsch, we generated transheterozygous combinations of futschK68/+; dnrx/+ and double mutants of futschK68/Y;dnrx. Transheterozygous futschK68/+; dnrx/+ larvae showed a significant increase in axonal Syt puncta (Fig. 5C,E) compared to control wild type (Fig. 5E) or individual heterozygotes (data not shown) suggesting that loss of futsch and dnrx may affect a common pathway. Double mutants of futschK68/Y; dnrx (Fig. 5D,E) did not show any additive increase in the vesicular Syt accumulation than individual single mutants. futsch mutants also display significantly increased Brp-positive puncta along distal segmental axons (Fig. S3) compared to their wild type counterparts. These data show that dnrx and futsch display genetic interactions, and also regulate MT organization and axonal transport during nervous system development.

Figure 5
Figure 5

Axon Transport Defects in futsch Mutants and Genetic Interactions between dnrx and futsch. (AD’) Portions of segmental nerves labeled with anti-Syt (green) and anti-Futsch (red) in indicated genotypes. (E) Quantification of Syt puncta along 80 μM of segmental nerves of indicated genotypes. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant). Scale bar: (AD’) = 10 μm.

Consequences of Postsynaptic Upregulation of BMP ligand, Glass Bottom Boat, in dnrx Mutant

Having established that Dnrx shows phenotypic similarities and genetic interactions with the type II BMP receptor, Wit, we next wanted to investigate if the loss of Dnrx had any impact on the immediate downstream effectors of the Wit pathway. For these studies, we examined whether the classical readout of the BMP pathway, namely pMad levels are affected in dnrx mutant VNC. We carried out pMad immunoblot analysis of brain lobe/VNC lysates (Fig. 6A) from wild type, dnrx and wit mutants. As expected, wit mutants showed a severe reduction in pMad levels (Fig. 6A,C). We observed a significant reduction of pMad in dnrx (Fig. 6A,C) mutants compared to wild type (Fig. 6A,C). We next tested for another downstream component of the BMP cascade, the Rho type guanyl nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) Trio39, by immunoblotting of brain lobes/VNC extracts from wild type, dnrx and wit mutants. The levels of Trio were significantly reduced in both dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 6B,D). Immunoblot analysis with anti-Actin served as loading controls (Fig. 6A,B). These data reveal that loss of Dnrx leads to reduced levels of the pMad and Trio.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Postsynaptic Overexpression of Gbb in dnrx mutants partially rescues the axonal transport defects. (AD) Immunoblots of brain lobes/VNC lysates from wild type, dnrx and wit mutants showing levels of phosphorylated Mad (pMad, 55 kDa, A) and the cytoskeletal RhoGEF, Trio (250 kDa, B), together with their corresponding Actin levels as loading controls. (Note the breaks in panels separated by white space are due to removal of irrelevant lanes, see Fig. S4). Ratio of band intensity was quantified by measuring levels of pMad to Actin (C) and Trio to Actin (D) in indicated genotypes. (EH’) Confocal images of portions of segmental nerves from 3rd instar larvae stained against Futsch (red) and Syt (green) in various genotypes. (IN) Confocal images of larval NMJ synaptic boutons stained with antibodies against Dlg (red) and Hrp (green) in indicated genotypes. (O,P) Quantification of Syt puncta (O) and total bouton numbers in NMJ 6/7 of A3 (P) in indicated genotypes. n = 15 animals/genotype in (EN). Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant). Scale bars: (AH’ and IN) = 10 μm.

To further gain mechanistic insights into the axonal transport deficits of dnrx mutants and establish the involvement of the BMP signaling pathway, we next designed experiments to bypass the requirement of Dnrx in dnrx mutants. We did this by postsynaptic overexpression of the Wit ligand, Gbb. We also used these methods to determine to what extent, if any, the axonal transport phenotypes in these mutants could be rescued. For these studies, we utilized the UAS-gbb overexpression using mef2-Gal4 first. We wanted to confirm if mef2-Gal4;UAS-gbb overexpression and gbb1/gbb4 mutants show any axonal transport defects as revealed by accumulation of Syt puncta along segmental axons. While overexpression of Gbb in mef2-Gal4;UAS-gbb did not cause any Syt accumulation along axons (Fig. 6E,E’,O), gbb1/gbb4 mutants displayed significant accumulation of Syt puncta along axons18 (Fig. 6F,F’,O). Next, we tested if overexpression of UAS-gbb postsynaptically could rescue dnrx mutant phenotypes. As dnrx homozygous mutants in mef2-Gal4;UAS-gbb background caused lethality, we used dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 for generating dnrx null background3. dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 showed similar axonal transport phenotypes as dnrx mutants (Fig. 1C,K,L). mef2-Gal4/UAS-gbb in the mutant background of dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 (Fig. 6G,G’) showed a significant improvement in axonal transport defects compared to dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 alone (Fig. 6O) [*** for difference between dnrx/Df and mef2-Gal4/UAS-gbb;dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 rescue bar heights]. However, the rescue was not complete [** for difference between the rescue genotype and the wild type bar heights]. We also examined the pre-synaptic overexpression of Gbb using elav-Gal4 in the mutant background of dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 to see if that affects the phenotype. The axonal transport phenotype was not rescued in elav-Gal4;UAS-gbb;dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 mutant larvae (Fig. 6H,H’,O). This data reveals that Dnrx and the Gbb-dependent BMP signaling pathway display phenotypic similarities with respect to axonal MT organization and transport and that overdriving the BMP pathway partially rescues the axonal transport defects in dnrx mutants.

Since Dnrx and the BMP signaling pathway are implicated in regulating synaptic growth, we wanted to examine if transport and synaptic growth are inter-related. Specifically, we asked whether the pre- or postsynaptic overexpression of Gbb will rescue the bouton growth phenotype of dnrx mutants? In order to analyze synaptic growth, larval NMJs were immunostained with antibodies against postsynaptic density protein, Discs large (Dlg)40, and the neuronal marker Hrp. As presented here (Fig. 6I–N, P) and reported earlier, dnrx (Fig. 6L,P) and gbb (Fig. 6K,P) mutants show synaptic undergrowth at the larval NMJ3,8,11,15 compared to their respective wild type control. Postsynaptic overexpression of Gbb in mef2-Gal4/UAS-gbb (Fig. 6J,P) did not show any significant differences in bouton numbers compared to wild type. Postsynaptic overexpression of Gbb in mef2-Gal4/UAS-gbb;dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 (Fig. 6M,P) as well as presynaptic overexpression of Gbb in elav-Gal4;UAS-gbb;dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 (Fig. 6N,O) mutants failed to rescue the synaptic undergrowth phenotype seen in dnrx/Df(3R)5C1 mutants (Fig. 6L,P). These datasets suggest that regulation of axon transport deficits in dnrx mutants might be distinct from regulation of synaptic growth during larval NMJ development, and that Dnrx plays a much broader role in axonal transport and synaptic development.

Discussion

Neurexins are some of the most extensively studied synaptic cell adhesion molecules for their role in synapse formation and function3,4,8,10,11,12. In Drosophila, dnrx mutants have reduced synaptic growth. This reduced synaptic growth is similar to what we observe in the BMP signaling mutants: wit, gbb, mad and trio3,8,10,13,14,15,39,41. Our recent studies have shown that dnrx regulates components of the BMP signaling pathway and directs synaptic growth and cytoarchitecture in conjunction with dnlg1 and wit8. The data presented here show that Dnrx engages in a complex molecular machinery with the BMP receptor Wit, the ligand Gbb and other downstream effectors to allow smooth axonal transport and proper MT organization.

Both dnrx and wit mutants display phenotypic similarities with axonal MT organization and transport of various cargo along the segmental nerves (Figs 1; S1; Table S1). It is interesting to note that axonal MT and transport phenotypes resulting from gain of Dnrx function are similar to loss of function mutants. This suggests that a fine balance in levels of Dnrx is important, and either too little or too much of it is detrimental for MT organization and the transport machinery. Defects in axonal transport resulting from cell type specific reduction in motor neurons using dnrx-RNAi confirmed that the axon transport defect is autonomous to motor neurons (Fig. 1). The defects resulting from the Dnrx knockdown, however, were milder than dnrx loss-of-function possibly due to penetrance or expressivity factors. The Gal4-only controls (elav-Gal4 and OK6-Gal4) did not display any axonal transport or MT organization defects further confirming the specificity of the dnrx phenotypes. It is also worth noting that gain of Wit did not disrupt MT organization or axonal transport.

The genetic interaction between dnrx and wit suggest that these proteins regulate axonal MT organization and transport (Fig. 2). Our recent studies have also showed that Dnrx and Wit coordinate synaptic organization and growth8, which suggests that these proteins are needed for multiple processes during nervous system development. The ultrastructural phenotypes in dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 3) reveal a structural disorganization in the arrangement of MT filaments along the axons. These datasets showed that there is indeed disorganization in MT morphology in our mutants and these findings are not artifacts from the altered localization of Futsch (Figs 1 and 2).

Both dnrx and wit are presynaptic proteins and their loss shows a multitude of defects at the axonal, cytoskeletal and synaptic levels. It was therefore important to examine the range of behavioral deficits in these mutant larvae. dnrx and wit mutants displayed defects both in peristalsis and locomotor behaviors. These behaviors are attributable, most likely at least in part, to the defects in axon transport, MT organization and possible dysfunction of the NMJ synapses. Behavior in animals could be a composite of defects at many levels of integration at the CNS, PNS, NMJ and circuits responsible for producing rhythmic patterns of movement and general locomotion42. Defects in both peristalsis and wandering behavior in cysteine string protein (csp) mutant larvae, for example, are thought to be due to motor defects at the NMJ and at the levels of CNS output generation43. The locomotor behaviors (Fig. 4A,B) observed in dnrx and wit mutants also indicate that these proteins might play a boarder role in organization of motor circuits.

Recent studies have implicated BMP signaling in the regulation of synaptic strength, axonal MT organization and transport17,18,20. While our studies point to the reliance of MT organization and axonal transport on BMP signaling, there are other studies that show disruption of axonal transport perturbing BMP signaling contributes to synaptic abnormalities in neurodegenerative diseases44. It is important to note that mutations that fall under the categories of both positive regulators of BMP, like dnrx8 and negative regulators of BMP such as, Spicthyin and Spartin18,20 both lead to MT disorganization. It is, therefore, interesting that while Spichthyin and Spartin function as negative regulators of the BMP signaling by regulating BMP receptor traffic and modulate regulation of MT cytoskeleton, loss of these proteins does not show impaired axonal transport18,20. Dnrx loss results in disorganized MTs, but unlike Spichthyin and Spartin, loss of Dnrx shows transport defects. These findings suggest that MT cytoskeletal organization could be compromised by both positive and negative regulation of BMP signaling.

The regulation of microtubule stability is essential for axonal transport. The microtubule-associated protein, Futsch, recently implicated in the BMP pathway18,20, has a role in the stabilization of MTs26,27. futsch mutants display axonal transport defects consistent with altered MT organization similar to dnrx and wit mutants (Fig. 5). A previous report, however, showed that futsch mutants do not show defects in axonal transport of Brp45. We examined futsch mutants for accumulation of Brp puncta along axons using our experimental parameters. We found mild, yet significant, increase in accumulation of Brp along the axons in futsch mutants. Our studies are not completely in agreement with the previous report45. The discrepancies between the studies could be possibly due to: (1) differences in quantification parameters (Brp area/Hrp area45 as opposed to number of Brp puncta along nerve length); (2) difference in segmental nerves analyzed (our analysis was restricted to segmental nerves 5–8); and (3) the region of nerve fiber analyzed (proximal or distal). It is also worth noting that our light microscopy studies showed Syt and DCSP2 aggregation along mutant axons did not always co-localize with Brp puncta (Fig. S1). These observations are consistent with recently published report that showed Syt co-traffic less efficiently with active zone scaffold proteins Brp and Basoon46. Collectively, these findings suggest the possibility of the presence of distinct transport mechanisms for different synaptic cargoes. Future studies will be aimed at addressing the dynamics of axonal membrane traffic in mutants of dnrx and BMP pathway, and whether some synaptic proteins are co-transported and others are not, or whether transport mechanisms are able to discriminate synaptic cargo as it is transported along the axons.

futsch and dnrx interact genetically as double heterozygotes display axonal transport defects consistent with dose-dependent genetic interactions (Fig. 5). This data further corroborates the idea that Dnrx is not only necessary for trans-synaptic adhesion and apposition of the pre- and post-synaptic compartments, but also for maintaining the stability of the BMP receptor Wit for optimal BMP signaling8. Future studies will be aimed at addressing the link between Dnrx and Futsch. Dnrx is a transmembrane protein with a PDZ domain binding motif3 and Futsch is a MT-binding protein26. Both of these proteins are highly expressed along the axons and could potentially exist as a complex. It is also possible that Dnrx might interact with MT motor proteins such as Kinesin or Dynein. The Kinesin superfamily protein, KIF 17, was previously shown to interact with PDZ domain of mLin-10 (Mint1/X11) to transport NMDA receptor 2B. mLin-10 is part of a larger protein complex that includes mLin-2 (Cask) and mLin-7 (Veli)30. It is likely that the intracellular PDZ domain of Dnrx is capable of recruiting protein complexes such as these to form a link between axonal membranes to the axonal MT cytoskeleton.

While it was not a surprise that levels of the downstream effectors of the BMP cascade, pMad and Trio, would be reduced in dnrx mutant BL/VNC (Fig. 6) given that our previous studies showed reduced levels of Wit, Tkv and pMad at the dnrx mutant NMJ synapses8. It is interesting that postsynaptic overexpression of the BMP ligand, Gbb, partially rescues the axonal transport phenotypes in dnrx mutant background but not the NMJ bouton undergrowth phenotype (Fig. 6). This indicates that distinct regulatory mechanisms might be involved in proper axonal MT organization and transport and growth during NMJ development, which are still not well understood. While this finding may suggest that Wit/Gbb signaling does not require Dnrx to regulate axon transport, it is important to note that the rescue of the axonal transport phenotype was partial and did not reach wild type levels, suggesting that Dnrx is required to allow optimal levels of axonal transport to occur. This finding also indicates: (1) that possibly it is the retrograde transport that gets somewhat corrected while there might still be defects in anterograde transport of cargoes in dnrx mutants; (2) that BMP signaling solely is not responsible for trafficking of cargoes and overall MT health in dnrx mutants; and (3) that there might be additional proteins involved in forming a cascade to link Dnrx from axonal membrane to MT cytoskeleton. Given our findings as reported here on Drosophila Nrx, it would be of immense interest to investigate whether mammalian Neurexins will have similar functions separate from their role in synapse formation and their functional modulation, and also axonal microtubular organization. Future studies will further address other aspects of Neurexin functions in the nervous system.

Methods

Fly Stocks

The fly strains used in this study were isogenized w1118 Canton-S line (a gift from V. Budnik) used as the WT control, dnrx273, UAS-dnrx3, UAS-gbb, gbb1 and gbb4,47 and UAS-wit-GFP (a gift from M. O’Connor). All other fly stocks were obtained from Bloomington Stock Center, Indiana. UAS-dnrx-RNAi was obtained from Vienna Drosophila Resource Center. All flies were maintained at 22 °C, 50% humidity and with a 12-hour light/dark cycle. To avoid over-crowding, all fly lines for various phenotypic analyses were set up using 10 females and 5 males and transferred every 24 hours into fresh media.

Immunohistochemistry and Confocal Imaging

Wandering third-instar larvae for various genotypes were dissected and fixed in Bouin’s fix for 15 minutes and processed simultaneously as previously described11. Confocal images of all genotypes of larvae belonging to the same experimental group were acquired using same settings with a Zeiss LSM710 confocal microscope.

The following primary antibodies were used: FITC-conjugated anti-HRP (1:250, Jackson ImmunoResearch laboratories), Rabbit anti-Syt31 (1:1000, H. Bellen, Baylor College of Medicine), mouse monoclonal anti-Dlg (1:1500, 4F3), anti-Brp (1:250, NC82), anti-DCSP2 (1:250, 6D6) and anti-Futsch (1:1000, 22C10) obtained from Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank (DSHB), University of Iowa. Anti-Hrp conjugated to Alexa 488 or 568 were used at 1:250. Secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa 488, 568, and 647 (Invitrogen-Molecular Probes) were used at 1:200.

Electron Microscopy

Ultrastructural analyses of third-instar larval peripheral nerves were processed for TEM as previously described8. 5 larvae were processed for EM analysis from each of the genotypes shown in Fig. 3 and at least 50 longitudinal sections of segmental nerves from each of the specified genotypes were analyzed to show a representative phenotype and for quantification of MT breaks.

Immunoblotting Analysis

3rd instar larval VNC and brain lobes without any attached imaginal discs were homogenized in ice-cold RIPA buffer8. The supernatants with equal amounts of proteins from each genotype were separated on SDS-PAGE for immunoblotting with respective antibodies. Each experiment was done independently three times and the most representative blots are shown.

Primary antibodies used for immunoblotting were: anti-Trio (1:250; 9.4A, DSHB), anti-Smad3 (1:150, Abcam), and anti-βActin (1:10,000, 4967S, Cell Signaling).

Composition of RIPA buffer: 150 mM sodium chloride, 1% Igepal CA630, 0.5% Deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS and 50 mM TrisHCl, pH 8.0.

Larval Locomotion Assays

The larval locomotion assay was performed as described previously3,37,38,48 with minor modifications. Number of larvae (n) analyzed from the specified genotypes were >50. Larvae were first washed briefly in distilled water to remove any traces of food before performing various assays. Each larva was acclimatized to the test plate for 1 minute prior to testing. 5 trials per larvae were conducted. Statistics was performed using Graphpad PRISM software as described in the following section.

Grid crossing assay

Individual larvae were placed in the center of a 145-mm diameter Petri Dish, with 3% non-nutritious agar previously poured and allowed to harden covering a graph paper at the bottom with 0.5 cm2 grids marked. The number of grid line crossings within a 30 second time window was recorded five times per larva.

Central zone release assay

A circular white card 1.5 cm in diameter was taped to the bottom of the dish to mark the central release zone. 5–10 animals were placed at the center of the release zone. The time taken for each animal to exit the release zone was recorded.

Peristalsis contraction assay

Full body peristalsis contractions (full posterior to anterior movement = 1 contraction) were counted for each larva in one minute while observing under a dissection microscope.

Righting assay

Larvae were placed on the agar plate for one minute to allow them to equilibrate to the new environment. They were then turned on their dorsal surfaces with a fine brush and the time taken to return to their ventral crawling position was noted.

Quantification and Statistical Analysis

Bouton number quantifications were performed at muscles 6/7 of abdominal segment 3 (A3) by staining of the body wall muscle preparations with anti-HRP and anti-Dlg. Axonal Syt accumulations were quantified in regions of segmental nerve axons as they passed through A4-A7. The number of Syt and Brp puncta along these axons were counted per 80 μm of nerve length or nerve area (μm2).

ImageJ was used for quantification of band intensities of western blots from three independent experiments. The intensity of the bands of interest were divided by their respective Actin protein to control for any possible unequal loading. ImageJ was also used for quantification of fluorescence intensity measurements as previously reported8.

All statistical analyses were performed using the Graphpad PRISM software and data are presented as mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA followed by post hoc Tukey’s multiple comparison test and Student’s t-test. Error bars represent mean ± SEM (***p < 0.001, **p ≤ 0.01, *p ≤ 0.5, ns – not significant).

Data Availability

The authors declare that all data generated or analyzed in this study are available within the article. The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Scheiffele, P., Fan, J., Choih, J., Fetter, R. & Serafini, T. Neuroligin expressed in nonneuronal cells triggers presynaptic development in contacting axons. Cell 101, 657–669 (2000).

  2. 2.

    Graf, E. R., Zhang, X., Jin, S. X., Linhoff, M. W. & Craig, A. M. Neurexins induce differentiation of GABA and glutamate postsynaptic specializations via neuroligins. Cell 119, 1013–1026 (2004).

  3. 3.

    Li, J., Ashley, J., Budnik, V. & Bhat, M. A. Crucial role of Drosophila neurexin in proper active zone apposition to postsynaptic densities, synaptic growth, and synaptic transmission. Neuron 55, 741–755 (2007).

  4. 4.

    Sudhof, T. C. Neuroligins and neurexins link synaptic function to cognitive disease. Nature 455, 903–911 (2008).

  5. 5.

    Choi, Y. B. et al. Neurexin-neuroligin transsynaptic interaction mediates learning-related synaptic remodeling and long-term facilitation in aplysia. Neuron 70, 468–481 (2011).

  6. 6.

    Hu, Z. et al. Neurexin and neuroligin mediate retrograde synaptic inhibition in C. elegans. Science 337, 980–984 (2012).

  7. 7.

    Banerjee, S., Riordan, M. & Bhat, M. A. Genetic aspects of autism spectrum disorders: insights from animal models. Frontiers in cellular neuroscience 8, 58 (2014).

  8. 8.

    Banerjee, S., Venkatesan, A. & Bhat, M. A. Neurexin, Neuroligin and Wishful Thinking coordinate synaptic cytoarchitecture and growth at neuromuscular junctions. Mol Cell Neurosci. 78, 9–24 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Zeng, X. et al. Neurexin-1 is required for synapse formation and larvae associative learning in Drosophila. FEBS Lett 581, 2509–2516 (2007).

  10. 10.

    Banovic, D. et al. Drosophila neuroligin 1 promotes growth and postsynaptic differentiation at glutamatergic neuromuscular junctions. Neuron 66, 724–738 (2010).

  11. 11.

    Chen, Y. C. et al. Drosophila neuroligin 2 is required presynaptically and postsynaptically for proper synaptic differentiation and synaptic transmission. Journal of neuroscience 32, 16018–16030 (2012).

  12. 12.

    Mozer, B. A. & Sandstrom, D. J. Drosophila neuroligin 1 regulates synaptic growth and function in response to activity and phosphoinositide-3-kinase. Molecular and cellular neurosciences 51, 89–100 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Aberle, H. et al. wishful thinking encodes a BMP type II receptor that regulates synaptic growth in Drosophila. Neuron 33, 545–558 (2002).

  14. 14.

    Marques, G. et al. The Drosophila BMP type II receptor Wishful Thinking regulates neuromuscular synapse morphology and function. Neuron 33, 529–543 (2002).

  15. 15.

    McCabe, B. D. et al. The BMP homolog Gbb provides a retrograde signal that regulates synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Neuron 39, 241–254 (2003).

  16. 16.

    Berke, B., Wittnam, J., McNeill, E., Van Vactor, D. L. & Keshishian, H. Retrograde BMP signaling at the synapse: a permissive signal for synapse maturation and activity-dependent plasticity. Journal of neuroscience 33, 17937–17950 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Ball, R. W., Peled, E. S., Guerrero, G. & Isacoff, E. Y. BMP signaling and microtubule organization regulate synaptic strength. Neuroscience 291, 155–166 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Wang, X., Shaw, W. R., Tsang, H. T., Reid, E. & O’Kane, C. J. Drosophila spichthyin inhibits BMP signaling and regulates synaptic growth and axonal microtubules. Nature Neuroscience 10, 177–185 (2007).

  19. 19.

    Smith, R. B., Machamer, J. B., Kim, N. C., Hays, T. S. & Marques, G. Relay of retrograde synaptogenic signals through axonal transport of BMP receptors. Journal of cell science 125, 3752–3764 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Nahm, M. et al. Spartin regulates synaptic growth and neuronal survival by inhibiting BMP-mediated microtubule stabilization. Neuron 77, 680–695 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Wang, X. et al. PINK1 and Parkin target Miro for phosphorylation and degradation to arrest mitochondrial motility. Cell 147, 893–906 (2011).

  22. 22.

    Wong, M. Y. et al. Neuropeptide delivery to synapses by long-range vesicle circulation and sporadic capture. Cell 148, 1029–1038 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Goldstein, L. S. Do disorders of movement cause movement disorders and dementia? Neuron 40, 415–425 (2003).

  24. 24.

    Millecamps, S. & Julien, J. P. Axonal transport deficits and neurodegenerative diseases. Nature reviews Neuroscience 14, 161–176 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Neupert, C. et al. Regulated Dynamic Trafficking of Neurexins Inside and Outside of Synaptic Terminals. J Neurosci. 35, 13629–13647 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Roos, J., Hummel, T., Ng, N., Klambt, C. & Davis, G. W. Drosophila Futsch regulates synaptic microtubule organization and is necessary for synaptic growth. Neuron 26, 371–382 (2000).

  27. 27.

    Hummel, T., Krukkert, K., Roos, J., Davis, G. & Klämbt, C. Drosophila Futsch/22C10 is a MAP1B-like protein required for dendritic and axonal development. Neuron 26, 357–370 (2000).

  28. 28.

    Martin, M. et al. Cytoplasmic dynein, the dynactin complex, and kinesin are interdependent and essential for fast axonal transport. Molecular biology of the cell 10, 3717–3728 (1999).

  29. 29.

    Bowman, A. B. et al. Kinesin-dependent axonal transport is mediated by the sunday driver (SYD). protein. Cell 103, 583–594 (2000).

  30. 30.

    Setou, M., Nakagawa, T., Seog, D. H. & Hirokawa, N. Kinesin superfamily motor protein KIF17 and mLin-10 in NMDA receptor-containing vesicle transport. Science 288, 1796–1802 (2000).

  31. 31.

    Littleton, J. T., Stern, M., Schulze, K., Perin, M. & Bellen, H. J. Mutational analysis of Drosophila synaptotagmin demonstrates its essential role in Ca(2+)-activated neurotransmitter release. Cell 74, 1125–1134 (1993).

  32. 32.

    Umbach, J. A. et al. Presynaptic dysfunction in Drosophila csp mutants. Neuron 13, 899–907 (1994).

  33. 33.

    Kittel, R. J. et al. Bruchpilot promotes active zone assembly, Ca2+ channel clustering, and vesicle release. Science 312, 1051–1954 (2006).

  34. 34.

    Banerjee, S., Pillai, A. M., Paik, R., Li, J. & Bhat, M. A. Axonal ensheathment and septate junction formation in the peripheral nervous system of Drosophila. Journal of neuroscience 26, 3319–3329 (2006a).

  35. 35.

    Banerjee, S., Sousa, A. D. & Bhat, M. A. Organization and function of septate junctions: an evolutionary perspective. Cell Biochem Biophys. 46, 65–77 (2006b).

  36. 36.

    Banerjee, S. & Bhat, M. A. Neuron-glial interactions in blood-brain barrier formation. Annu Rev Neurosci. 30, 235–258 (2007).

  37. 37.

    Ellis, J. E., Parker, L., Cho, J. & Arora, K. Activin signaling functions upstream of Gbb to regulate synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Dev Biol. 342, 121–133 (2010).

  38. 38.

    Praveen, K., Wen, Y. & Matera, A. G. A Drosophila model of spinal muscular atrophy uncouples snRNP biogenesis functions of survival motor neuron from locomotion and viability defects. Cell Rep. 1, 624–631 (2012).

  39. 39.

    Ball, R. W. et al. Retrograde BMP signaling controls synaptic growth at the NMJ by regulating trio expression in motor neurons. Neuron 66, 536–549 (2010).

  40. 40.

    Budnik, V. et al. Regulation of synapse structure and function by the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg. Neuron. 17, 627–640 (1996).

  41. 41.

    Merino, C. et al. Nemo kinase interacts with Mad to coordinate synaptic growth at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction. Journal of cell biology 185, 713–725 (2009).

  42. 42.

    Suster, M. L., Martin, J. R., Sung, C. & Robinow, S. Targeted expression of tetanus toxin reveals sets of neurons involved in larval locomotion in Drosophila. J Neurobiol. 55, 233–246 (2003).

  43. 43.

    Barclay, J. W., Atwood, H. L. & Robertson, R. M. Impairement of central pattern generation in Drosophila cysteine string protein mutants. J. Comp. Physiol. A 188, 71–78 (2002).

  44. 44.

    Kang, M. J. et al. Disruption of axonal transport perturbs bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)–signaling and contributes to synaptic abnormalities in two neurodegenerative diseases. PloS one 9, e104617 (2014).

  45. 45.

    Lepicard, S., Franco, B., de Bock, F. & Parmentier, M. L. A presynaptic role of microtubule-associated protein 1/Futsch in Drosophila: regulation of active zone number and neurotransmitter release. J Neurosci. 34, 6759–6771 (2014).

  46. 46.

    Vukoja, A. et al. Presynaptic biogenesis requires axonal transport of lysosome-related vesicles. Neuron 99, 1216–1232 (2018).

  47. 47.

    Wharton, K. A. et al. Genetic analysis of the bone morphogenetic protein-related gene, gbb, identifies multiple requirements during Drosophila development. Genetics 152, 629–640 (1999).

  48. 48.

    Nichols, C. D., Becnel, J. & Pandey, U. B. Methods to assay Drosophila behavior. J Vis Exp. 7, 61 (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank C. Burch for technical assistance, H. Bellen, V. Budnik, P. Haghighi, B. McCabe, M. O’Connor, B. Eaton and K. Wharton for generously sharing their reagents. We thank M. A. Bhat and all lab members for helpful discussion. This work was supported by funds to S.B. from UT Health, San Antonio and funding from the National Institute of Health R01 grant # NS50356 to M.A. Bhat in which S.B. was a Co-Investigator.

Author information

Author notes

    • Maeveen Riordan

    Present address: University of Colorado School of Medicine, 12631 E. 17th Avenue B177, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

Affiliations

  1. Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Long School of Medicine, University of Texas Health, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA

    • Swati Banerjee
    •  & Maeveen Riordan

Authors

  1. Search for Swati Banerjee in:

  2. Search for Maeveen Riordan in:

Contributions

M.R. and S.B. performed experiments; S.B. conceptualized and designed research, analyzed data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Swati Banerjee.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35618-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.