Article | Open | Published:

First observation of direct methane emission to the atmosphere from the subglacial domain of the Greenland Ice Sheet

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 16623 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

During a 2016 field expedition to the West Greenland Ice Sheet, a striking observation of significantly elevated CH4 concentrations of up to 15 times the background atmospheric concentration were measured directly in the air expelled with meltwater at a subglacial discharge point from the Greenland Ice Sheet. The range of hourly subglacial CH4 flux rate through the discharge point was estimated to be 3.1 to 134 g CH4 hr−1. These measurements are the first observations of direct emissions of CH4 from the subglacial environment under the Greenlandic Ice Sheet to the atmosphere and indicate a novel emission pathway of CH4 that is currently a non-quantified component of the Arctic CH4 budget.

Introduction

Permafrost and glaciers have been hypothesized to function as important caps of methane (CH4) – a greenhouse gas 25–30 times more powerful than carbon dioxide (CO2)1 due to its higher energy absorption properties. Disintegration of these cryospheric caps could lead to large increases in CH4 emissions in the Arctic with a significant feedback to the global climate system2,3. Direct evidence of the occurrence, magnitude and temporal extent of cryospheric CH4 emissions are currently derived from Arctic wetlands4, lakes5,6 and sub-marine CH4 sources7. Subglacial sediments and glacial meltwater have been shown to hold the potential for CH4 production and emission8,9,10,11, due to anaerobic decomposition of organic carbon2,10,12 by methanogenic archaea. This subglacial CH4 may subsequently be oxidized by methanotrophs facilitated by atmospheric oxygen (O2) or O2 release from basal ice melting11. Reservoirs of CH4 hydrates have been found beneath ice sheets1,13,14,15 of which the future stability may change due to accelerated melting and marginal thinning of the ice sheet leading to potential emissions of CH4 to the atmosphere. These studies suggest that subglacial environments could be active components of the Earth’s CH4 cycle. However, observations of direct emissions of subglacial CH4 have so far not been documented and the importance of subglacial CH4 for cryospheric CH4 release in the Arctic thus remains unknown.

Results

In the period between the 23rd and 27th of August 2016, CH4 and CO2 concentrations (Fig. 1A–D) were periodically measured in the air streaming out of one subglacial cavity connected to a lateral subglacial discharge point on the southern flank of the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier on the western Greenland Ice Sheet (Fig. 2). The measured subglacial CH4 concentrations were consistently higher than the atmospheric background concentration (at 1.9 ppm) and varied between 5.4 and 31.7 ppm (Fig. 1A–D). Subglacial CO2 concentrations varied around the atmospheric CO2 level (391 ppm) from 380 to 450 ppm. CO2 concentrations above the ambient level occurred with the highest CH4 concentrations on August 25th and 26th (Fig. 1C,D). High-frequency fluctuations in the subglacial air stream CH4 (range 0.12–0.75 ppm) and CO2 (range 0.21–1.49 ppm) concentrations were observed (Fig. 1A–D) during the measurements in the subglacial cave and the magnitude of the fluctuations increased with the subglacial CH4 and CO2 concentrations (Fig. 1A–D). The fluctuations were higher (except for CO2 on August 23rd and 24th) than the natural fluctuations of the atmospheric background level CH4 and CO2 measured on site with a portable CH4 and CO2 analyzer (see Materials and Methods). The fluctuations indicate that the subglacial CH4 and CO2 is mixed by air with lower concentrations, which likely is atmospheric air entering the subglacial system via surface moulins or other pathways which connects the subglacial system to the atmosphere. A net emission of CH4 from the subglacial meltwater to atmosphere was also measured directly (Fig. 1B) showing that the meltwater itself can be a direct source of CH4 and sink of CO2. In the free air immediately above the subglacial meltwater outside the subglacial cavity, CH4 concentrations fluctuated rapidly from the ambient atmospheric concentration to approximately 5 ppm CH4 (Fig. 1B). There was no exchange of either CH4 and CO2 (not shown) from the sediment at the edge of the glacier (Fig. 1D).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Measurements of CH4 (black) and CO2 (green) concentrations in subglacial air expelled from one lateral subglacial meltwater discharge point at the Isunnguata Sermia glacier, West Greenland on (A) August 23rd, (B) August 24th, (C) August 25th and (D) August 26th 2016. Blue and red triangles mark the start and end of CH4 and CO2 measurements in the subglacial cave, respectively. For (B) is also shown timeseries of CH4 concentrations measured in the air flowing through cracks in the ice next to the main lateral outlet. (see Fig. 3C for details). The red asterisk in (B) represent a closed chamber measurement (Fig. 3B) of the CH4 exchange between meltwater and the atmosphere (insert graph). The CO2 concentrations in the air is not shown due to contamination with human breadth resulting in highly fluctuating measurements of CO2 in the air outside the cave. This was not the case for CH4.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Location and detailed view of study site in Western Greenland. Source of satellite images: Google Earth (accessed 05–05–2017), Google Inc. 2017. Attribution to map providers: (A) IBCAO, U.S. Geological Survey, Landsat/Copernicus, (B) IBCAO, U.S. Geological Survey, (C) DigitalGlobe 2017, U.S. Geological Survey, (D) DigitalGlobe 2017. (E) Panoramic view of the margin of the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier. Letters A to D refer to the location of the four different modes of CH4 and CO2 exchange performed at the site (see Fig. 3 for details).

Based on field observations (Supplementary Video Material) and wind tunnel experiments (Supplementary Fig. S1), the velocity of the subglacial air stream was estimated to fall in the range of 0.2 m s−1 to 2 m s−1 (Supplementary Fig. S2). From field observations, the cross-sectional area of the subglacial cavity where air was streaming out was estimated to be in the range of 1–2 m2. Using a cross sectional area of 1 m2, the estimated range in air velocity of 0.2–2 m s−1 and the span of measured CH4 and CO2 concentrations, the total hourly cumulative flux rate per square-meter cross-section area were estimated to range from 3.1 to 134 g CH4 m−2 h−1 and 537 to 6360 g CO2 m−2 h−1 (Table 1). However, it should be emphasized that these flux estimates represent the total emission of CH4 and CO2 from a so far unknown subglacial catchment area and the average emission per square meter catchment remains unknown.

Table 1 Flux rates of subglacial CH4 and CO2 to the atmosphere.

Acknowledging the fact that any conclusions on the overall climatic implication from this type of CH4 release would be premature due to the limited spatiotemporal observation of the phenomena, the presented measurements are to our knowledge the first showing direct emissions of CH4 and CO2 in the air being ventilated from the subglacial environment below the Greenland Ice Sheet to the atmosphere. The only previous reported study which similarly measured CH4 concentrations in the air mass directly at the glacial edge of the Greenland Ice Sheet was done in a dry subglacial cave in the Kangerlussuaq area at the Greenland Ice Sheet16. In this dry setting, CH4 concentrations were similar to the ambient atmospheric background level of CH4 at nearby field sites and the natural atmospheric background measured at the summit station on the Greenland Ice Sheet17.

Discussion

The highly elevated CH4 concentrations and calculated flux rates of this study show an apparent correlation with a moving air mass induced by flowing subglacial meltwater. The observation of direct emissions of subglacial CH4 to the atmosphere supports earlier findings in the area, namely that this region of the Greenland Ice sheet may be a source of CH4 to the atmosphere8. The direct emission of gaseous CH4 also shows that biologic aerobic oxidation of CH4 in the subglacial domain may not be able to fully mitigate subglacial CH4 production11. Nonetheless, the process of CH4 production and location of the source of the measured subglacial CH4 is still unknown. Possible explanations for the presence of subglacial CH4 are either release of old (i.e. radiocarbon dead CH4) microbial and/or thermogenic gas from the subglacial domain1 which could be formed and stored under the Ice Sheet in the presence of a gas-hydrate stability zone13,15. Following entrainment in the subglacial water this old CH4 could be released following degassing of saturated subglacial meltwater in a similar process as described in Dieser et al.8. Alternatively, the emitted CH4 could be a product of more recently in situ produced biological CH4 from subglacial sediments10,18 or intermediately aged CH4 formed in carbon containing sediments capped during neoglacial readvances3. Finally, the possibility exist that the emitted CH4 could be a combined product of mentioned sources, which could be transported to the emission point via either running meltwater at the bedrock-glacier bed interface or as part of a deeper groundwater aquifer below the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier19. A plausible mechanism for the observed CO2 sink is the dissolution of CO2 in undersaturated meltwater resulting in a net uptake of atmospheric CO220.

Future research efforts could be guided by two hypotheses focusing on the interrelations between meltwater volumes and glaciological dynamics. Thus, the release of subglacial CH4 and CO2 could be (1) caused by venting of the subglacial drainage system if atmospheric air entered the subglacial system due to alternating surface meltwater volumes. This could push out any gas that had accumulated in non-deformed englacial cavities through to the subglacial drainage system resulting in a short-lived but intense period of emissions. In this context, the glacial deformation of the meltwater drainage system will likely determine releases of gases to the atmosphere. Alternatively, (2) continuous emissions extending over the entire melt season could be due to a constant degassing of subglacial meltwater at the margin. This implies also that the subglacial emission would be tightly linked to the meltwater volume and the coupling between climate and supraglacial melting. Finally, obtaining data on the composition of C-isotopes in the emitted CH4 and CO2 will shed light on the origin of the emitted C-gases.

Despite these uncertainties in the origin of subglacial CH4 and CO2, the mechanism of release and the limited extend of the measurement period, our measurements present the first evidence of a new pathway for direct interaction between the subglacial carbon cycle below the Greenland Ice Sheet and the atmosphere through the direct emission of CH4 and CO2. However, caution should be taken before drawing unjustified conclusions about the importance of subglacial CH4 emission in the Arctic CH4 budget and potential climate impact. Improving our understanding of the overall importance of subglacial CH4 emissions for the Arctic CH4 budget is therefore to expand the documentation of the spatial and temporal occurrences of subglacial emissions along the Greenland Ice Sheet. Also, further investigation into the release mechanism from the source area(s) can help resolve whether expected future increases in meltwater runoff due to increased surface melting and thinning of the ice sheet in a warming climate will affect the magnitude of subglacial CH4 emissions.

Materials and Methods

Study site

The study site is located at a lateral subglacial meltwater discharge point on the southern flank at the terminus of the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier at the western margin of the Greenland Ice sheet (67°09′16.40′′N 50°04′08.48′′W) (Fig. 2A–D). The site was at an elevation of 450 meter above sea level. The lateral outlet has been the focus of previous investigations of the geochemical composition of subglacial meltwater21,22 as well as drilling projects to assess groundwater chemistry below the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier23.

The area in front of the meltwater outlet consisted of the abraded granodioritic gneiss bedrock with large boulders and patches of gravel, sand and silt deposited by flowing meltwater (Fig. 2E). In close proximity to the subglacial meltwater outlet were air-filled cavities in the ice through which air constantly streamed from underneath the Ice Sheet to the atmosphere. Direct measurements of the subglacial CH4 and CO2 concentrations in the subglacial air streams from the air-filled ice cavities took place in the period August 23rd to 26th 2016. The 3-dimensional shape of the subglacial cavity was highly irregular, but the cross-section area (shown in Fig. 2E – marked by an A and Fig. 3A) at the terminus was estimated to be approximately 1–2 m2.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Modes of CH4 and CO2 measurements at the subglacial discharge point. (A) Open chamber inside the subglacial cave, (B) Closed chamber placed in a pool of subglacial meltwater, (C) open chamber placed in front of an ice crack connected to the subglacial discharge point and (D) Closed chamber placed on sediment beneath the ice edge. For (B,D) the chamber was connected to the analyzer forming a closed recirculation system for the measurement of the meltwater/sediment atmosphere exchange of gases, respectively. The mobile CH4 and CO2 analyzer (G4301, Picarro Inc.) can be seen in (BD).

The landscape in the Kangerlussuaq area is typical of west Greenland, intersected by numerous long, narrow and up to 600 meter deep valleys in East to West direction. This type of topography extends below the ice sheet, in places reaching hundreds of meters below sea level. Groundwater recharge and discharge of the area is restricted to taliks, e.i. unfrozen zones in the permafrost, beneath large lakes, rivers and fiords19.

Deglaciation in the southern West Greenland area started around 12,300 years BP and the ice sheet margin reached its present position between 6,500 and 7,000 years BP. At approximately 6,000 years BP, the ice margin was east of its present position. Neoglacial re-advance may have started as early as 4,800 years BP and culminated about 2,000 years BP. During the the Little Ice Age (LIA) the ice sheet advanced again reaching a maximum position around 1850 AD with the maximum extent of the edge of the Isunnguata Sermia approximately 50–200 meters beyond its current position19.

Continuous permafrost extending to 350 meters below the surface has been reported at the study area23. The Isunnguata Sermia Glacier and the surrounding glaciers are underlain by granodioritic gneiss with no or only little sediment or organic material21. The glacier is warm based with an annual ice flow of 150–200 meters and surface meltwater reaches the base of the glacier21. The meltwater at the discharge point has been characterized as acidic (pH between 5.82–6.53)22 and poorly mineralized and may represent an outlier in terms of the pH of the subglacial meltwater24. However, the reported range in pH values of the subglacial meltwater with a seasonal average of 6.8 ± 0.5 at a nearby subglacial meltwater discharge point8 are within the range of typical pH values for silica-bedded glaciers and ice sheets (5.1 to 7.8)24. Borehole geochemistry at the site suggests that glacial meltwater extends deep in bedrock fractures below the Isunnguata Sermia Glacier and that groundwater below the permafrost is flowing away from the glacier margin23.


In situ measurements of CH4 and CO2

In situ concentrations of CH4 and CO2 of the subglacial air were measured using a portable greenhouse gas analyzer based on state-of-the-art cavity ring-down spectroscopy with a measurement precision of 3 ppb and 0.4 ppm for CH4 and CO2, respectively and a sampling frequency of 1 hz (GasScouter G4301, Picarro Inc., CA, USA). The analyzer was connected to a flux chamber via a PVC tube (4 meter) which was deployed under the following ways: (1) the open chamber was lowered into the opening of one subglacial ice cavity (Fig. 3A), (2) the chamber was placed in a pool of subglacial meltwater forming a closed loop where the CH4 exchange between the meltwater and atmosphere was measured (Fig. 3B), (3) the open chamber was placed directly in front of cracks near the primary discharge point of the subglacial meltwater channel (Fig. 3C) and (4) the closed chamber was placed on top of loose sediments at the edge of the ice (Fig. 3D). Air temperature and relative humidity of the subglacial air stream was continuously measured inside the open chamber using a datalogger unit (TinyTag Ultra 2 – TGU-4500, Gemini Data Loggers Ltd, UK). The temperature and relative humidity of the subglacial air stream was constant at a level of 0.2 °C and 100%, respectively.


Air flow velocity of the subglacial wind

The velocity of the air flow in the subglacial cavity was estimated by combining in situ observation of a smoke fan placed directly in the air filled cavity in the ice with a verification experiment in the laboratory using a small-scale wind tunnel with smoke injection. The general assumption was that movement of smoke when entrained in moving air in the ice cavity would be identical to movement of smoke entrained in moving air in a wind tunnel. The wind tunnel was constructed using a circular array of parallel straws to create laminar flow placed in the inlet end of a cardboard tube (inner diameter 10 cm). At the outlet end of the tube, a 12 V fan generated a laminar air flow that could be varied by controlling the power of the fan with an adjustable power supply. The flow velocity inside the tube was measured with a hot wire anemometer (model Testo 425, Testo SE & Co KGaA, Germany). Generated wind speeds in the tunnel ranged from 0.2 to 1.2 m s−1. Details on the wind tunnel setup and test is presented in Supplementary Material.

Video footage of in situ smoke movement in the air filled cavity in the ice was compared with observations of the smoke fans in the laboratory under wind speeds of 0.2, 0.5 and 1.2 m s−1 (Supplementary Video Material). This approach provided a best estimate of the in situ velocity of air flow in the subglacial cavity, and indicated that air speeds in the subglacial cavity reached at least 1.2 m s−1 and probably exceeded this value. We thus estimated that the likely range of air flow velocities in the subglacial cavity had a flow range between 0.2–2 m s−1 which was used for the estimation of the subglacial CH4 and CO2 flux rates.


Flux rate calculation

Cumulative hourly flux rates of subglacial and CO2 (g m−2 h−1) were calculated combining a constant air flow rate through a 1 m2 cross-section area of the subglacial cavity and the measured CH4 and CO2 concentrations over a one hour measurement period (Equation 1). Flux rates are reported on an hourly basis as this was the maximum measurement time on August 23rd–25th. Concentrations were converted to mass using the ideal gas law.

$${F}_{C{O}_{2}/C{H}_{4}}=C\ast \bar{{\rm{\upsilon }}}\ast A\ast \frac{273.15}{({M}_{v}\ast (273.15+{T}_{a}))}\ast M\ast 3600\ast {10}^{-6}$$
(1)

where \({F}_{C{O}_{2}/C{H}_{4}}\) is the flux rate in g CH4/CO2 m−2 h−1, C is the measured 1 hz dry mole fraction concentration (µmol mol−1) of CO2 or CH4, is the wind speed (m s−1), A is the cross sectional area (m2), Mv is the molar volume (m3 mol−1), Ta is the air temperature (°C) measured in the cavity, M is the molar mass of CO2 or CH4 (g mol−1), the multiplier 3600 converts the flux to hourly values and the constant 10−6 converts the flux from µg to g CO2/CH4.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset of CH4 and CO2 concentrations presented in Fig. 1 are available from the PANGAEA data repository (https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.892391).

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Portnov, A., Vadakkepuliyambatta, S., Mienert, J. & Hubbard, A. Ice-sheet-driven methane storage and release in the Arctic. Nat. Commun. 7, 10314 (2016).

  2. 2.

    Wadham, J. L., Tranter, M., Tulaczyk, S. & Sharp, M. Subglacial methanogenesis: A potential climatic amplifier? Global Biogeochem. Cycles 22, n/a–n/a (2008).

  3. 3.

    Walter Anthony, K. M., Anthony, P., Grosse, G. & Chanton, J. Geologic methane seeps along boundaries of Arctic permafrost thaw and melting glaciers. Nat. Geosci. 5, 419–426 (2012).

  4. 4.

    Petrescu, A. M. R. et al. The uncertain climate footprint of wetlands under human pressure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112, 4594–4599 (2015).

  5. 5.

    Sturtevant, C. S. & Oechel, W. C. Spatial variation in landscape-level CO2 and CH4 fluxes from arctic coastal tundra: influence from vegetation, wetness, and the thaw lake cycle. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19, 2853–66 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Walter, K. M., Zimov, S. A., Chanton, J. P., Verbyla, D. & Chapin, F. S. Methane bubbling from Siberian thaw lakes as a positive feedback to climate warming. Nature 443, 71–5 (2006).

  7. 7.

    Thornton, B. F., Geibel, M. C., Crill, P. M., Humborg, C. & Mörth, C.-M. Methane fluxes from the sea to the atmosphere across the Siberian shelf seas. Geophys. Res. Lett. 43, 5869–5877 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Dieser, M. et al. Molecular and biogeochemical evidence for methane cycling beneath the western margin of the Greenland Ice Sheet. ISME J. 8, 2305–16 (2014).

  9. 9.

    Skidmore, M. L., Foght, J. M. & Sharp, M. J. Microbial life beneath a high arctic glacier. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3214–20 (2000).

  10. 10.

    Stibal, M. et al. Methanogenic potential of Arctic and Antarctic subglacial environments with contrasting organic carbon sources. Glob. Chang. Biol. 18, 3332–3345 (2012).

  11. 11.

    Michaud, A. B. et al. Microbial oxidation as a methane sink beneath the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Nat. Geosci. 10, 582–586 (2017).

  12. 12.

    Boyd, E. S., Skidmore, M., Mitchell, A. C., Bakermans, C. & Peters, J. W. Methanogenesis in subglacial sediments. Environ. Microbiol. Rep. 2, 685–692 (2010).

  13. 13.

    Winsborrow, M. et al. Regulation of ice stream flow through subglacial formation of gas hydrates. Nat. Geosci. 9, 370–374 (2016).

  14. 14.

    Christner, B. C., Montross, G. G. & Priscu, J. C. Dissolved gases in frozen basal water from the NGRIP borehole: Implications for biogeochemical processes beneath the Greenland Ice Sheet. Polar Biol. 35, 1735–1741 (2012).

  15. 15.

    Wadham, J. L. et al. Potential methane reservoirs beneath Antarctica. Nature 488, 633–637 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Webster, K. D., White, J. R. & Pratt, L. M. Ground-Level Concentrations of Atmospheric Methane in Southwest Greenland Evaluated Using Open-Path Laser Spectroscopy and Cavity-Enhanced Absorption Spectroscopy. Arctic, Antarct. Alp. Res. 47, 599–609 (2015).

  17. 17.

    NOAA. ESRL Global Monitoring Division. Open access online data files for Summit, Greenland (SUM) (2017). Available at, ftp://aftp.cmdl.noaa.gov/data/trace_gases/ch4/flask/surface/ch4_sum_surface-flask_1_ccgg_event.txt. (Accessed: 9th March 2017).

  18. 18.

    Barcena, T. G., Yde, J. C. & Finster, K. W. Methane flux and high-affinity methanotrophic diversity along the chronosequence of a receding glacier in Greenland. Ann. Glaciol. 51, 23–31 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Liljedahl, C. et al. The Greenland Analogue Project: Final report. Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management, Stockholm, Sweden (2016).

  20. 20.

    Meire, L. et al. Glacial meltwater and primary production are drivers of strong CO2 uptake in fjord and coastal waters adjacent to the Greenland Ice Sheet. Biogeosciences 12, 2347–2363 (2015).

  21. 21.

    Graly, J. A., Humphrey, N. F., Landowski, C. M. & Harper, J. T. Chemical weathering under the Greenland Ice Sheet. Geology 42, 551–554 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Ryu, J.-S. & Jacobson, A. D. CO2 evasion from the Greenland Ice Sheet: A new carbon-climate feedback. Chem. Geol. 320–321, 80–95 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Drake, H., Suksi, J., Tullborg, E. L. & Lahaye, Y. Quaternary redox transitions in deep crystalline rock fractures at the western margin of the Greenland ice sheet. Appl. Geochemistry 76, 196–209 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Graly, J. A., Drever, J. I. & Humphrey, N. F. Calculating the balance between atmospheric CO2 drawdown and organic carbon oxidation in subglacial hydrochemical systems. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 31, 709–727 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the Innovation Fund Denmark under the Joint Partnership Initiative (JPI) project Constraining Uncertainties in the Permafrost-climate feedback (COUP). The authors also thank Kristian Juul Pedersen for photographic assistance in the field.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Department of Geoscience and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, DK-1958, Frederiksberg C, Denmark

    • Jesper Riis Christiansen
    •  & Christian Juncher Jørgensen
  2. Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, DK-4000, Roskilde, Denmark

    • Christian Juncher Jørgensen

Authors

  1. Search for Jesper Riis Christiansen in:

  2. Search for Christian Juncher Jørgensen in:

Contributions

J.R.C. and C.J.J. contributed equally to collection of data in the field, data analyses and writing of the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper Riis Christiansen.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-35054-7

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.