Article | Open | Published:

Potassium usnate, a water-soluble usnic acid salt, shows enhanced bioavailability and inhibits invasion and metastasis in colorectal cancer

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 16234 (2018) | Download Citation


Usnic acid (UA), a lichen secondary substance, has considerable anticancer activity in vitro, whereas its effect in vivo is limited. Here, potassium usnate (KU) was prepared by the salinization of UA to enhance its water solubility. KU showed increased bioavailability compared with UA in the tumor, liver, and plasma of a CT26 syngeneic mouse tumor xenograft model after oral administration, as determined by LC-MS/MS analysis. KU exhibited potent anticancer effects on colorectal cancer cells and inhibited liver metastasis in an orthotopic murine colorectal cancer model. KU treatment downregulated the epithelial-mesenchymal markers Twist, Snail, and Slug and the metastasis-related genes CAPN1, CDC42, CFL1, IGF1, WASF1, and WASL in cells and tumor tissues. The present results suggest the potential application of the water-soluble form of UA, KU, in anticancer therapy.


Drug oral bioavailability is positively related to reduced molecular flexibility and low polar surface area or total hydrogen bond count1. Excellent solubility and a satisfactory dissolution rate are essential conditions for the clinical application of candidate drugs.

Usnic acid (UA) is one of the most widely studied bioactive lichen secondary metabolites2,3. UA was first shown to have inhibitory activity against lung cancer cells4,5, and its effect on inhibiting proliferation was subsequently demonstrated in a wide variety of cancer cell lines6. Despite the promising anticancer activity of UA, it has not been developed for clinical application because of poor water solubility7 and high hepatotoxicity8,9. Therefore, the development of a bioavailable form of UA is an important issue in clinical research. Several strategies were proposed to improve the anticancer activity of UA in vivo by developing modified forms with high water solubility and potent antitumor activity. Studies focused on finding a suitable solvent for the solubilization of UA that showed no direct effects on any of the commonly used cell lines. 2-Hydroxypropyl-beta-cyclodextrin was identified as a solubilizing agent for UA that does not affect its antiproliferative activity against the human leukemia cell line K-56210. Nanoencapsulation was investigated as a method to improve the antitumor activity and reduce the hepatotoxicity of UA, and the encapsulation of UA into PLGA-nanocapsules produced a 26% increase in ascitic tumor formation (Sarcoma-180) in inoculated Swiss mice and a reduction in drug hepatotoxicity11. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Also, Polyacrylamide complex formation with UA by establishment of strong acidic-base interactions made UA water soluble and showed enhanced antimicrobial activity12, and Nanocrystal suspensions of UA prepared by wet milling method showed higher bioavailability in rats13. Another study demonstrated that the cytotoxic activity of UA against L1210 cells can be improved by conjugation to a polyamine chain14. UA was derivatized with various amine moieties to improve drug cellular uptake by targeting the polyamine transport system (PTS). Although the results showed an increase in drug cytotoxicity against human cancer cell lines, drug targeting to the PTS was unsuccessful. In the present study, potassium usnate (KU) was generated using a previously described method, and its anticancer activity was examined in vitro and in vivo experimental model of colorectal cancer as colorectal cancer is one of the most common cancer types and, despite of advances in developing chemotherapy regimen, patients with the cancer suffer from local recurrence with chemoresistance and/or metastasis with 40–80% to liver15. The oral bioavailability of KU was enhanced significantly after oral administration in a CT26 syngeneic mouse xenograft model, as determined by LC-MS/MS detection. KU showed potent anticancer activity against colorectal cancer cell lines, and KU administration suppressed tumor growth in a mouse liver metastasis model. The findings of the present study suggest a promising solution for the low water solubility-related limitation to the use of UA in clinical anticancer therapy.


UA shows anticancer activity in colorectal cancer cells with limited in vivo efficacy

In a previous study, we demonstrated the cytotoxic, anti-motility, and anticancer activity of UA against several cancer cells16,17. Also, it was reported that UA has cytotoxic activity against HCT116, human colorectal cancer cells18. Here, to further examine the anticancer effect of UA on colorectal cancer, human colorectal cancer cell lines including HCT116, DLD1, SW480, HT29, SW620, Caco2, and COLO320 and the CT26 mouse colon carcinoma cell line were exposed to UA at concentrations of 12.5–100 μM, and cell viability was assessed with the MTT assay. As shown in Fig. 1A, UA showed cytotoxic activity in all the tested colorectal cancer cells. To further explore the anti-invasive activity of UA in colorectal cancer cells, Caco2, HCT116, and CT26 cells were subjected to invasion assays after exposure to 5 μM UA. The number of invaded cells was lower in the UA-treated groups than in the control groups (Fig. 1B). Quantitative analysis showed that the inhibitory effect of UA on the invasive ability of these colorectal cancer cells was significant (Fig. 1C). These results indicated that UA exhibits anticancer effects against human colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Usnic acid showed in vitro anticancer activity in colorectal cancer cells. (A) Relative cell viability of HCT116, DLD1, SW480, HT29, SW620, Caco2, CT26, and COLO320 cells treated with usnic acid (UA). (B,C) Invasion assays in Caco2, HCT116, and CT26 cells treated with 5 μM UA (B), and quantification of invaded cell numbers in each group (C). (D) Quantitative analysis of metastasis score in isolated mouse liver tissues from orthotopic liver metastasis models (n = 4 each group). “10x” denote that UA was administered ten times within 2 weeks, while without indication denotes that of six times. Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean.

The most deaths of colorectal cancer are associated with metastasis, and the liver, lung and peritoneum are common metastasis sites for colorectal cancer. Therefore, the in vivo efficacy of UA was then assessed in orthotopic liver metastasis mouse models. Firefly luciferase-expressing CT26 cells were inoculated via splenic injection to form multiple tumor foci in the livers of syngeneic BALB/c mice. On day 3 after tumor establishment, 5 or 10 mg/kg UA in DMSO in a total volume of 200 μL of PBS was administered via intraperitoneal injection (six or ten times within 2 weeks), and each mouse was analyzed by optical imaging on days 2, 9, and 16. Due to the solubility limit, the maximum dosage of UA is 10 mg/kg. Immediately after final imaging analysis, the liver and disseminated peritoneal tumors were excised and counted. Isolated mouse liver tissues from the control and treatment groups showed different numbers of tumor nodules of different sizes (Fig. S1). However, quantitative analysis of metastasis score did not detect a statistically significant difference in the metastasis score between the control and treatment groups (Fig. 1D). All animals in both control and treatment groups showed tumor progression as evidenced by increasing bioluminescence (data not shown). Taken together, these results indicated that UA had no significant inhibitory effect on metastasis in the in vivo orthotopic murine colorectal cancer model despite showing inhibitory activity against invasion in the in vitro experiments.

KU shows enhanced oral bioavailability

As low solubility may account for the poor effect of UA in vivo, KU was synthesized by the salinization of UA; the water solubility of UA alone was measured as 52.2 ± 2.90 μM (17.7 ± 0.20 μg/mL) at 25 °C, pH 7.4 by μSol Method with DMSO stock solution; the structures and the physical properties of KU and UA are shown in Figs 2A and S2, respectively; the hydrolytic stability of UA was consistent at pH range of 4–7 in room temperature while KU was readily converted to its corresponding UA (Fig. S3). To determine whether the salt form of UA improved its bioavailability, the amount and concentration of usnate in the tumors, liver, and plasma of CT26 syngeneic tumor xenograft-bearing mice were measured by LC-MS/MS analysis. UA or KU was administered orally at a dose of 30 mg/kg at 7 days after CT26 cell inoculation, and the tumor tissues, liver tissues, and plasma of mice were collected after 16 h. As shown in Fig. 2B, usnate was undetectable in tumor tissues in mice receiving UA, whereas 1.5117 ± 0.166 nmol/g of tissue was detected in KU-treated mice. Assuming that the density of tumor tissue is 0.1 to 1.0 mL/g, the concentration of usnate in tumor tissue is about 1.51 to 15.1 μM. Similarly, the amounts of usnate detected in liver tissues were 0.2788 ± 0.034 nmol/g of tissue for UA and 2.5789 ± 0.402 nmol/g of tissue for KU administered mice (Fig. 2C); the plasma concentrations of usnate were 0.181 ± 0.016 μM for UA and 1.690 ± 0.122 μM for KU administered mice (Fig. 2D). Taken together, these results indicated that poor water solubility limited the effect of UA in vivo, and KU represents a potential form for in vivo administration as its oral bioavailability was higher than that of UA.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Usnate distribution in the tumor, liver, and plasma after oral administration of potassium usnate in a CT26 syngeneic mouse tumor xenograft model. (A) Chemical structure of UA and potassium usnate (KU). (B–D) Quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis of usnate in tumor tissues (B), liver tissues (C), and plasma (D) in a CT26 syngeneic mouse tumor xenograft model after oral administration of UA or KU. Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. ***P < 0.001.

KU shows potent in vitro anticancer activity in colorectal cancer cells

To determine whether KU retained anticancer activity, MTT and invasion assays were performed in cells exposed to KU as described for UA. Similar to the results observed with UA, KU showed cytotoxic activity (Fig. 3A) and inhibited invasion (Fig. 3B,C) in colorectal cancer cells. To compare the effects of the two forms, IC50 values were calculated for UA and KU in the tested cells. The results showed a significantly lower IC50 value for KU than for UA except in SW480 and CT26 cells (Fig. 3D). At a non-cytotoxic concentration of 5 μM, KU showed more potent inhibitory activity against cell invasion than UA in Caco2 and HCT116 cells (Fig. 3E). These results suggested that KU retained the cytotoxicity and invasive inhibitory activity of UA.

Figure 3
Figure 3

KU shows potent anticancer activity in colorectal cancer cells. (A) Relative viability of HCT116, DLD1, SW480, HT29, SW620, Caco2, CT26, and COLO320 cells treated with KU. (B,C) Invasion assays in Caco2, HCT116, and CT26 cells treated with 5 μM KU (B), and quantification of invaded cell numbers in each group (C). (D) Comparison of IC50 values between UA and KU. (E) Comparison of the relative invasive abilities of Caco2, HCT116, and CT26 cells treated with UA and KU. Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

KU significantly decreases metastatic tumor nodule formation in the liver in the orthotopic murine colorectal cancer model

A mouse liver metastasis model with firefly luciferase-expressing CT26 cells was established to determine the inhibitory activity of KU against metastasis in vivo. As described for UA, different doses of KU dissolved in DW (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg/mouse) in a total volume of 200 μL were administered via intraperitoneal injection (six times within 2 weeks). Immediately after the final imaging analysis, the liver and disseminated peritoneal tumors were excised and counted. The number of tumor nodules was significantly lower in the KU-treated group than in the control group as determined from isolated liver tissue images (Fig. 4A). Quantitative analysis and histologic examination showed that the metastasis score and tumor area were significantly lower in the 20 mg/kg KU-treated group than in the other groups (Figs 4B,C and S4). Also, immunohistochemical analysis revealed that nuclear staining of mitosis marker, phosphorylated histone H3 (pHH3)19, was lower in the 20 mg/kg KU-treated group than in the other groups (Fig. 4C). Optical imaging analysis on days 2, 9, and 16 showed tumor progression in all animals in both control and treatment groups, as evidenced by increasing bioluminescence (Fig. 4D). Quantitative analysis of the region of interest (ROI) showed that the bioluminescent signal was weaker in the 20 mg/kg KU-treated group than in the other groups (Fig. 4E, Table S1). Taken together, these results suggested that KU inhibited tumor growth in an orthotopic liver metastasis mouse model.

Figure 4
Figure 4

KU inhibits liver metastasis in an orthotopic murine colorectal cancer model. (A) Representative images of liver tissues isolated from four mice treated with DW or KU. (B) Quantitative analysis of metastasis score in isolated mouse liver tissues from the orthotopic liver metastasis model (n = 4 each group). (C) Hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemical analysis of phosphor-Histone H3 (pHH3) of isolated liver tissues from the mouse liver metastasis model. Scale bars, 500 μm. (D) Representative images of IVIS luciferase results in mice inoculated with colorectal cancer cells. (E) Quantitative analysis of signals from the IVIS luciferase images. On day 3 after tumor establishment, mice were analyzed by optical bioluminescence imaging at 2, 9, and 16 days after intraperitoneal KU administration (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg/mouse, three times a week). Control groups received DW instead of treatment. The average signal intensity of 20 mg/kg KU-treated mice was weaker than that of control mice (P = 0.105) at 16 days after tumor cell inoculation. (F) Liver function test results of AST and ALT levels in tumor tissue. Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean, n = 4, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

As UA causes hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure in patients receiving UA as an herbal supplement in weight loss agents20, the plasma levels of the liver functional enzymes aspartate aminotransferase (ASL) and alanine transaminase (ALT) were measured in the sham and liver metastasis mouse groups. These enzymes are released from liver cells when the liver is injured or damaged, and increased AST and ALT levels in the plasma indicate hepatic toxicity or disease. AST and ALT levels were higher in orthotopic liver metastasis mice than in the sham control group (Fig. 4F). In mice induced to form liver metastasis, an almost constant ALT level was maintained in both control and treatment groups, whereas AST levels were significantly decreased in mice injected with 20 mg/kg KU. As further severe liver damage was prevented by the therapeutic effects of KU on hepatic tumor growth, AST blood levels seemed to be decreased. These results indicated that KU at the doses administered had no hepatotoxic effects in a mouse liver metastasis model.

KU downregulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers and cell motility-related genes

In our previous study, we showed that UA reduced the levels of epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers in A549 lung cancer cells16. Changes in the expression and the levels of EMT markers were also observed in Caco2 cells treated with UA and KU. As shown in Fig. 5A, the mRNA levels of N-cadherin, Snail, Twist, Slug, and ZEB2 were significantly decreased by UA and KU treatment at 5 μM. However, at the protein level, only Twist, Snail, and Slug were downregulated in UA- and KU-treated cells (Fig. 5B). Consistently, isolated liver tissues from the mouse liver metastasis model administered with 20 mg/kg KU in Fig. 4 showed reduced levels of Twist, Snail, and Slug (Fig. 5C–F). In addition, increased cleavages of apoptosis markers were identified in the isolated liver tissues (Fig. 5F). Collectively, these results indicated that the antimetastatic and anticancer activity of KU may be attributed to the suppression of EMT in colorectal cancer cells.

Figure 5
Figure 5

KU downregulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers and the expression of genes involved in cell motility. (A) Gene expression of EMT markers in Caco2 cells treated with UA and KU. (B) Protein levels of EMT markers in Caco2 cells treated with UA and KU. (C–E) Immunohistochemical analysis of Twist (C), Snail (D), and Slug (E) in isolated liver tissues from the mouse liver metastasis model administered with 20 mg/kg KU. Scale bar, 50 μm. (F) The levels of apoptosis and EMT markers in isolated liver tissues from the mouse liver metastasis model administered with 20 mg/kg KU (n = 2 each group). (G) mRNA expression levels of cell motility-related genes in Caco2 cells treated with UA and KU. Results are reported as the mean ± standard error of the mean. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

The RT2 profilerTM PCR assay was performed to screen for cell motility-related target genes of KU in Caco2 cells. The results showed that CAPN1, CDC42, CFL1, IGF1, WASF1, and WASL were significantly downregulated by KU treatment (Fig. 5G). However, only CFL1 and IGF1 gene expression levels were decreased by UA at the same concentration. These results provided a basis for future studies on the molecular mechanism underlying the KU-mediated anticancer activity.


The present study is the first to describe the cytotoxicity and inhibitory activity of UA in colorectal cancer cells. Water solubility can be considered as the main reason for the unsatisfactory performance of UA in in vivo experiments. Many strategies to increase the in vivo activity of UA have been investigated10,11,12,13,14,15. In this study, water-soluble potassium salts of UA were synthesized as previously described21. Obviously, high oral bioavailability is an important parameter for the selection of bioactive molecules as new drug candidates, and a deep understanding of the molecular properties that limit oral bioavailability can contribute to the design of new therapeutic agents. We found that the oral bioavailability of KU was significantly higher than that of UA in a CT26 inoculated xenograft mouse model, as determined by LC-MS/MS analysis of plasma and isolated tumor and liver tissues. These results suggested that water solubility was a limiting factor regarding the oral bioavailability of these molecules, and KU showed a high potential as a drug candidate.

KU retained the anticancer activity of UA in colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro, and the cytotoxicity and invasive inhibitory activity of KU were more potent than those of UA. Furthermore, KU suppressed tumor growth in our mouse liver metastasis model. KU was expected to show similar in vitro activity with UA when tested at low concentrations where the compound is thought to be completely dissolved. The potent anticancer activity of KU than UA can be explained possibly due to difference in reaching into intracellular action site. However, it is speculated that the intrinsic anticancer activity of usnate is unchanged by salinization of UA. As UA causes hepatotoxicity and acute liver failure when administered as an herbal supplement in weight loss agents20, KU-treated mice were subjected to liver function tests. As shown in Fig. 4F, the levels of the liver functional enzymes AST and ALT did not change significantly in the liver metastasis mouse groups, and the levels of AST were lower in mice treated with 20 mg/kg KU than in the control groups. These results suggested that KU does not cause additional hepatotoxicity when used as an anticancer drug, and the therapeutic effect of KU may prevent liver damage in some cases.

In previous work from our group, we demonstrated the anticancer activity of F. cucullata and UA against several cancer cell lines17. UA exhibits selective cytotoxicity in cancer cells by inducing apoptosis at lethal concentrations, and it inhibits tumorigenesis and the motility of cancer cells at sub-lethal concentrations. The effect of UA on metastasis inhibition was shown to involve the process of EMT. Here, we tested the expression of EMT-related molecules in response to UA and KU treatment. We found that UA or KU decreased the levels of Snail, Slug, and Twist at the mRNA and protein levels. Immunohistochemical analysis of Snail, Slug, and Twist in isolated liver tissues in the metastasis mouse model revealed consistent results, suggesting that the EMT signaling pathway was involved in the inhibitory activity of KU in colorectal cancer cells. In addition, RT2 profilerTM screening identified cell motility target genes, such as CAPN1, CDC42, CFL1, IGF1, WASF1, and WASL, providing valuable information for future molecular mechanistic studies. The results of the present study suggested the potential application of KU in clinical cancer therapy.

In summary, UA showed anticancer activity in human colorectal cancer cell lines in vitro. To improve the in vivo bioactivity of UA for clinical application, KU was synthesized to increase the water solubility of the compound. The improved oral bioavailability demonstrated the potential of KU as a new drug candidate. In addition, the antitumor effect of KU in an orthotopic liver metastasis model suggested its potential as a clinical anticancer drug. However, further studies are necessary to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the metastasis inhibitory activity of KU.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of KU

KU was prepared following a previously published method10. Briefly, 200 mg of UA (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was partially dissolved in 40 mL of water at 40 °C and then mixed with 10% KOH until the compound was completely solubilized. The solution was frozen at −80 °C and lyophilized, and the dried powder was dissolved in autoclaved distilled water (DW) before use. The structure of KU was confirmed by nuclear magnetic resonance.

Cell culture

The human colorectal cancer cell lines HCT116, DLD1, SW480, HT29, SW620, Caco2, and COLO320, and the mouse colorectal cancer cell line CT26, were used in this study22. Cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and 1% Penicillin-Streptomycin solution under a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere at 37 °C in an incubator.

Cell viability assay

Colorectal cancer cell growth and survival were detected with the colorimetric quantification of 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide using the MTT assay23. Briefly, cells were seeded and cultured in 96-well plates (2.5 × 103 cells/well), and treated with UA or KU for 48 h. After DMSO dissolution, the absorbance at 540 nm was determined using a microplate reader with Gen 5 (2.03.1) software (BioTek Eon, VT, USA).

Cell invasion assay

Invasion assays were performed in Boyden chambers (Corning, New York, USA)16. A 120 μL Cells (2 × 106) suspended in medium (DMEM containing 0.2% BSA dissolved in PBS) treated with or without UA or KU were seeded in the upper transwell chamber (Corning, New York, USA) coated with gelatin. Then, fibronectin (10 μg/mL) was added into the lower chamber medium (400 μL) as a chemotactic agent.Then invaded cells adhering to the underneath of upper chamber were fixed and stained with the Diff Quik kit (Sysmex) after 24 h of incubation. The quantitation of the cells were performed under an upright microscope (5 fields/chamber). Each invasion assay was repeated in three independent experiments.

Orthotopic liver metastasis models

Five-week-old male BALB/c mice with pathogen-free condition were obtained from Orient Company (Seongnam, Korea). According to the Guiding Principles in the Care and Use of Animals (DHEW publication, NIH 80–23), the handling of animals and all in vivo experiments were performed. The Chonnam National University Medical School Research Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee approved the experimental protocol.

A syngeneic mouse model of colorectal cancer metastasis to the liver was established by infusion of tumor cells into the portal system via intrasplenic injection24. Briefly, a left subcostal incision was performed under isoflurane anesthesia, and CT26 cells expressing firefly luciferase (CT26-Fluc) (1 × 105 cells) in 50 μL of PBS were inoculated by intrasplenic injection. For optical live imaging in this model, a splenectomy was performed immediately after inoculation of tumor cell, and the firefly luciferase activity was analyzed at several time points with the Xenogen system. After imaging analysis, the liver and disseminated peritoneal tumors were excised and weighed. Weight of tumor was determined by subtracting the average weight of liver of normal mice (n = 4) from the weight of total tumor-bearing liver with addition of the weight of total extrahepatic tumors. UA or KU (5, 10, or 20 mg/kg/mouse) was given via intraperitoneal injection 3 days after inoculation of tumor cell. To evaluate inhibition of tumor growth, mice were analyzed every 7 days with the use of optical imaging. On day 21 after inoculation of tumor, mice were sacrificed and a laparotomy was performed. Metastatic tumor nodules in the liver with a diameter of >1.0 mm were counted using a microscope, and a metastasis score was assigned based on nodule size as follows: 0 (no gross metastasis), 1 (tumor size >1 mm), and 10 (tumor size >5 mm). The metastasis score was multiplied by the number and the score of nodules.

Optical imaging analysis

Examination of bioluminescence in cultured cells or live mice was performed by optical imaging using a cooled CCD system (Xenogen IVIS). Photographic images of the tissues with gray-scale background were overlaid with color images of bioluminescent signals using Living Image and IGOR-PRO image analysis software (Wave Metrics). For in vitro imaging, CT26-Fluc cells subjected to lentiviral vector transduction were confirmed with the Xenogen system at 2 min after addition of D-luciferin. For in vivo imaging, anesthetization of mice were indueded with ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (10 mg/kg), and 2 min after intraperitoneal (ip) administration with D-luciferin (2 mg/mouse), analysis of bioluminescent signals were performed with the Xenogen system with a 1 min acquisition time.

Sample preparation for LC-MS/MS analysis

Stock solutions (10 mM) of UA or KU were prepared by dissolution in DMSO. Stock standard solutions were stored at −20 °C. A working standard solution was prepared by dilution of the stock standard solution with a mixture of acetonitrile-water (1:1, v/v). The working standard solution was serially diluted to prepare a concentration series of 0.975, 3.9, 15.6, 62.5, 250, 1000, and 4000 nM in 50% acetonitrile.

Skin tumor xenografts were established using CT26 cells25. After 7 days of inoculation and gross tumor formation, UA or KU at 30 mg/kg was administered orally, and tumor, liver, and plasma samples were collected after 16 h (n = 9 each). Mouse tumor and liver samples were homogenized in four volumes of ice-cold deionized water. Plasma and homogenized tissue samples were prepared for analysis in a 96-well cluster tube plate by protein precipitation. A volume of 30 µL of each sample was transferred to eight-well tube strips placed in an 8 × 12 rack (VWR, Emeryville, CA, USA). Four volumes of ice-cold extraction solution (acetonitrile) containing 4-methylumbelliferone (4-MUF, internal standard) were added and vortexed for 10 min. After sonication for 30 min, samples were placed on ice for 1 h. The 96-well cluster tube plate was centrifuged at 1000 × g for 10 min, and the supernatant was analyzed by LC-MS/MS. Standard samples were prepared in the same manner using a blank matrix.

LC-MS/MS analysis

Samples were analyzed with the Prominence UPLC system (Shimadzu, Japan) equipped with an API 3200 QTRAP™ LC-MS/MS system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Sample volumes of 10 μL were injected into an Aquity HSS UPLC C18 column (2.5 × 100 mm, 1.8 µm i.d.; Waters, Milford, MA, USA) and maintained at 30 °C. The column was pre-equilibrated in 100% v/v solvent A (deionized water containing 0.1% v/v formic acid)/0% v/v solvent B (acetonitrile containing 0.1% v/v formic acid) at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. The optimized LC elution conditions were 0.0–1.0 min, 0% B; 1.1–2.0 min, 50% B; 2.1–6.0 min, 98% B; 6.0–6.01 min, 0% B; and 6.01–8.0 min, 0% B. The overall chromatographic run time was 8 min. The autosampler compartment was maintained at 10 °C throughout the analysis. The retention times of UA, KU, and IS (4-MUF) were 4.52, 4.52, and 3.76 min, respectively. The ESI source was operated at −4500 V and 500 °C in a negative mode. Quadrupoles Q1 and Q3 were set on unity resolution. The samples were analyzed via multiple reaction monitoring. The monitoring ions were set as m/z 343 → 839 for UA and m/z 175 → 133 for 4-MUF. The acquisition and analysis of data were performed with Analyst™ software (version 1.5.2; Applied Biosystems).

Histological examination and immunohistochemistry

Resected livers were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 3 days. Then, the organs were dissected, embedded in paraffin, and stained with hematoxylin for histopathological evaluation. Tissue sections were immunostained with specific antibodies against phospho-Histone H3 (1:9000, code: 9701, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), Slug (dilution: 1:400, code: 9585, Cell Signaling), Snail (dilution: 1:100, code: sc-28199, Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA), and Twist (dilution: 1:100, code: ab50887, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) using a Bond-max system (Leica Microsystems, Bannockburn, IL, USA). Programmed heat-induced epitope retrieval was performed for 15 min using citrate-based pH 6.0 BOND epitope retrieval solution 1 (Slug) or EDTA-based pH 9.0 epitope retrieval solution 2 (Snail and Twist).

Western blotting

Cells treated with UA or KU for 24 h were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in lysisbuffer26. Antibodies against E-cadherin (61018, BD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA), N-cadherin (610921, BD Biosciences), Snail/Slug (ab180714, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), Twist (ab49254, Abcam), PARP (9542, Cell Signaling), Caspase-3 (9662, Cell Signaling), α-Tubulin (2125, Cell Signaling), and ZEB2 (HPA003456, Sigma) were detected with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with the use of Immobilon Western Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate Kit (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA) and luminescence imaging (Image Quant LAS 4000 mini). Multi-Gauge 3.0 was used to measure bands, and relative density was calculated based on the density of the α-tubulin bands in each sample. Expression of values were as arbitrary densitometric units corresponding to signal intensity.

Gene expression analysis by PCR

The RT² Profiler™ PCR Array (330231, SA Biosciences, Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France) was used to examine the expression patterns of 84 genes involved in human cell motility as previouslydescribed27. The manufacturer’s instructions were strictly followed. Gene expression levels were analyzed using the web-based software ‘RT2 Profiler PCR Array Data Analysis version 3.5′. Six cell motility-related genes, including CAPN1, CDC42, CFL1, IGF1, WASF1, and WASL, were selected as candidates.

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)

Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed as previously described23. Briefly, total RNA (1 mg) isolated from UA- or KU-treated Caco2 cells using RNAiso Plus (TaKaRa, Otsu, Shiga 520–2193, Japan) was used to synthesize cDNA using a M-MLV reverse transcriptase kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and SYBR green (Enzynomics, Seoul, Korea). The primers used for real-time PCR were as follows: E-cadherin (forward) 5′-cagaaagttttccaccaaag-3′ and (reverse) 5′-aaatgtgagcaattctgctt-3′; N-cadherin (forward) 5′-ctcctatgagtggaacaggaacg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-ttggatcaatgtcataatcaagtgctgta-3′; Snail (forward) 5′-tcccgggcaatttaacaatg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-tgggagacacatcggtcga-3′; Twist (forward) 5′-cgggagtccgcagtctta-3′ and (reverse) 5′-tgaatcttgctcagcttgtc-3′; Slug (forward) 5′-cgaactggacacacatacagtg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-ctgaggatctctggttgtggt-3′; ZEB1(forward) 5′-atgacacaggaaaggaagg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-agcagtgtcttgttgtag-3′; ZEB2 (forward) 5′-caagaggcgcaaacaagcc-3′ and (reverse) 5′-ggttggcaataccgtcatcc-3′; CAPN1 (forward) 5′-cctgcttgagaaggcctatg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-ggtccacgttgttccactct-3′; CDC42 (forward) 5′-aggctctctagtttaataaaaatcatgg-3′ and (reverse) 5′-gtttgtttaatacatctgaaaagaatgc-3′; CFL1 (forward) 5′-caaggatgccatcaagaa-3′ and (reverse) 5′-atccttagcctcctcgta-3′; IGF1 (forward) 5′-gatacacatcatgtcgtcttcaca-3′ and (reverse) 5′-cagtacatctccagtctcctcaga-3′; WASF1 (forward) 5′-tcctgatgttttaaaagaagaaacact-3′ and (reverse) 5′-aaaagtttttaactcctataggcaagc-3′; WASL (forward) 5′-agtggaggtctctgattggcc-3′ and (reverse) 5′-tctcctttcagggtctccca-3′; and GAPDH (forward) 5′-atcaccatcttccaggagcga-3′ and (reverse) 5′-agttgtcatggatgaccttggc-3′. qRT-PCR reactions and analyses were performed using CFX (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as the mean ± standard error of the mean obtained from three independent experiments unless otherwise indicated. The Student’s t-test was utilized to determine statistical significance between two groups, and analysis of variance was utilized between three or more groups, respectively. P-values of < 0.05 are considered statistically significant.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.


  1. 1.

    Veber, D. F. et al. Molecular properties that influence the oral bioavailability of drug candidates. Journal of medicinal chemistry 45, 2615–2623 (2002).

  2. 2.

    Kim, H., Kim, K. K. & Hur, J. S. Anticancer activity of lichen metabolites and their mechanisms at the molecular level. In: Modern methods and approaches in lichen systematics and culture techniques (ed^(eds Upreti, D. K., Divakar, P. K., Shukla, V., Bajpai, R.). Springer India (2015).

  3. 3.

    Ingolfsdottir, K. Usnic acid. Phytochemistry 61, 729–736 (2002).

  4. 4.

    Takai, M., Uehara, Y. & Beisler, J. A. Usnic acid derivatives as potential antineoplastic agents. Journal of medicinal chemistry 22, 1380–1384 (1979).

  5. 5.

    Morris Kupchan, S. & Kopperman, H. L. L-Usnic acid: tumor inhibitor isolated from lichens. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences 31, 625–625 (1975).

  6. 6.

    Bačkorová, M., Bačkor, M., Mikeš, J., Jendželovský, R. & Fedoročko, P. Variable responses of different human cancer cells to the lichen compounds parietin, atranorin, usnic acid and gyrophoric acid. Toxicology in Vitro 25, 37–44 (2011).

  7. 7.

    Jin J-q, R. Y., Bian, X.-l, Zeng, A.-g & Yang, G.-D. Solubility of (+)-Usnic Acid in Water, Ethanol, Acetone, Ethyl Acetate and n-Hexane. Journal of Solution Chemistry 42, 1018–1027 (2013).

  8. 8.

    Han, D., Matsumaru, K., Rettori, D. & Kaplowitz, N. Usnic acid-induced necrosis of cultured mouse hepatocytes: inhibition of mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. Biochemical pharmacology 67, 439–451 (2004).

  9. 9.

    Guo, L. et al. Review of usnic acid and Usnea barbata toxicity. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part C 26, 317–338 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Kristmundsdóttir, T., Aradóttir, H. A., Ingólfsdóttir, K. & Ögmundsdóttir, H. M. Solubilization of the lichen metabolite (+)‐usnic acid for testing in tissue culture. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology 54, 1447–1452 (2002).

  11. 11.

    da Silva Santos, N. P. et al. Nanoencapsulation of usnic acid: an attempt to improve antitumour activity and reduce hepatotoxicity. European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics 64, 154–160 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Francolini, I. et al. Water soluble usnic acid-polyacrylamide complexes with enhanced antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus epidermidis. International journal of molecular sciences 14, 7356–7369 (2013).

  13. 13.

    Qu, C. et al. Preparation and evaluation of wet-milled usnic acid nanocrystal suspension for better bioaffinity. Drug development and industrial pharmacy 44, 707–712 (2018).

  14. 14.

    Bazin, M.-A. et al. Synthesis and cytotoxic activities of usnic acid derivatives. Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry 16, 6860–6866 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Siegel, R., Desantis, C. & Jemal, A. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2014. CA Cancer J Clin 64, 104–117 (2014).

  16. 16.

    Yang, Y. et al. Inhibitory Activity of (+)-Usnic Acid against Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Cell Motility. PloS one 11, e0146575 (2016).

  17. 17.

    Nguyen, T. T. et al. Lichen secondary metabolites in Flavocetraria cucullata exhibit anti-cancer effects on human cancer cells through the induction of apoptosis and suppression of tumorigenic potentials. PloS one 9, e111575 (2014).

  18. 18.

    Brisdelli, F. et al. Cytotoxic activity and antioxidant capacity of purified lichen metabolites: an in vitro study. Phytotherapy research: PTR 27, 431–437 (2013).

  19. 19.

    Sun, A. et al. Level of phosphohistone H3 among various types of human cancers. BMJ open 2 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Favreau, J. T. et al. Severe hepatotoxicity associated with the dietary supplement LipoKinetix. Annals of internal medicine 136, 590–595 (2002).

  21. 21.

    Martins, M. C. et al. Usnic acid potassium salt: an alternative for the control of Biomphalaria glabrata (Say, 1818). PloS one 9, e111102 (2014).

  22. 22.

    Sun, E. G. et al. KITENIN functions as a fine regulator of ErbB4 expression level in colorectal cancer via protection of ErbB4 from E3-ligase Nrdp1-mediated degradation. Molecular carcinogenesis 56, 1068–1081 (2017).

  23. 23.

    Yang Y et al. 2-Hydroxymelatonin, a Predominant Hydroxylated Melatonin Metabolite in Plants, Shows Antitumor Activity against Human Colorectal Cancer Cells. Molecules 22 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Kang, S. H. et al. Oral siRNA Delivery to Treat Colorectal Liver Metastases. ACS nano 11, 10417–10429 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Yang, Y. et al. Acetonic extracts of the endolichenic fungus EL002332 isolated from Endocarpon pusillum exhibits anticancer activity in human gastric cancer cells. Phytomedicine: international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology 40, 106–115 (2018).

  26. 26.

    Kim, H., Ki, H. & Park, H. S. Kim K. Presenilin-1 D257A and D385A mutants fail to cleave Notch in their endoproteolyzed forms, but only presenilin-1 D385A mutant can restore its gamma-secretase activity with the compensatory overexpression of normal C-terminal fragment. The Journal of biological chemistry 280, 22462–22472 (2005).

  27. 27.

    Zhou, R. et al. The lichen secondary metabolite atranorin suppresses lung cancer cell motility and tumorigenesis. Scientific reports 7, 8136 (2017).

Download references


This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea grant (NRF-2016R1C1B2007494 and NRF-2015R1A4A1041219 (to HK), NRF-2016R1D1A1B03934637 (to WKB), NRF-2016R1A2B1014597 (to KHL), and NRF-2018M3A9A8023762 (to KKK)) funded by the Korea government (MSIP). Also, this work was supported by a grant from the Forest Science & Technology Projects (Project No. 2017024A00-1720-BA01) funded by the Korea Forest Service.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yi Yang and Woo Kyun Bae contributed equally.


  1. College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Life and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Sunchon National University, Sunchon, Korea

    • Yi Yang
    • , Young Hyun Yu
    • , So-Yeon Park
    • , Rui Zhou
    • , İsa Taş
    • , Chathurika Gamage
    • , Man-Jeong Paik
    • , Hyung-Ho Ha
    •  & Hangun Kim
  2. Korean Lichen Research Institute, Sunchon National University, Sunchon, Korea

    • Yi Yang
    • , İsa Taş
    • , Chathurika Gamage
    •  & Jae-Seoun Hur
  3. Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

    • Woo Kyun Bae
    • , Myong-Suk Park
    •  & Ik Joo Chung
  4. College of Pharmacy, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea

    • Ji-Yoon Lee
    • , Yong Jae Choi
    •  & Sang Kyum Kim
  5. Department of Pathology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

    • Kyung Hwa Lee
    •  & Jae Hyuk Lee
  6. Department of Pharmacology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea

    • Kyung Keun Kim


  1. Search for Yi Yang in:

  2. Search for Woo Kyun Bae in:

  3. Search for Ji-Yoon Lee in:

  4. Search for Yong Jae Choi in:

  5. Search for Kyung Hwa Lee in:

  6. Search for Myong-Suk Park in:

  7. Search for Young Hyun Yu in:

  8. Search for So-Yeon Park in:

  9. Search for Rui Zhou in:

  10. Search for İsa Taş in:

  11. Search for Chathurika Gamage in:

  12. Search for Man-Jeong Paik in:

  13. Search for Jae Hyuk Lee in:

  14. Search for Ik Joo Chung in:

  15. Search for Kyung Keun Kim in:

  16. Search for Jae-Seoun Hur in:

  17. Search for Sang Kyum Kim in:

  18. Search for Hyung-Ho Ha in:

  19. Search for Hangun Kim in:


H.K. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Y., W.K.B., J.Y.L., Y.J.C., K.H.L., M.S.P., Y.H.Y., S.Y.P., R.Z., İ.T. and C.G. performed the experiments. M.J.P., J.H.L., I.J.C., K.K.K., J.S.H., S.K.K., H.H.H. contributed materials and analysis tools. Y.Y. and H.K. analyzed the data and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyung-Ho Ha or Hangun Kim.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history




Issue Date



By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.