Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Fibroblast Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (FGFBP3) impacts carbohydrate and lipid metabolism


Secreted FGF binding proteins (FGFBP) mobilize locally-acting paracrine FGFs from their extracellular storage. Here, we report that FGFBP3 (BP3) modulates fat and glucose metabolism in mouse models of metabolic syndrome. BP3 knockout mice exhibited altered lipid metabolism pathways with reduced hepatic and serum triglycerides. In obese mice the expression of exogenous BP3 reduced hyperglycemia, hepatosteatosis and weight gain, blunted de novo lipogenesis in liver and adipose tissues, increased circulating adiponectin and decreased NEFA. The BP3 protein interacts with endocrine FGFs through its C-terminus and thus enhances their signaling. We propose that BP3 may constitute a new therapeutic to reverse the pathology associated with metabolic syndrome that includes nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus.


Fibroblast growth factor binding proteins (BP1, 2 and 3) are secreted chaperones known to bind and mobilize paracrine FGFs from their heparan sulfate (HS) storage in the extracellular matrix1,2,3,4. BP1, the best characterized member of this family, is known to interact with paracrine FGFs, such as FGF1, 2, 7, 10, and 222,3 and to compensate for the lack of HS to enhance cellular FGF receptor signaling5. BP1 can modulate FGF functions during development, tumorigenesis, tissue homeostasis and tissue repair. BP1 knock-down induced early chick embryo lethality, whereas transient overexpression of BP1 caused aberrant vascular leakage6,7. BP1 expression is elevated in a range of cancers and it is rate-limiting for angiogenesis-dependent cancer growth and metastasis8,9,10,11,12. In addition, BP1 is an early response gene that is upregulated in wounded skin13, in regenerating renal tubular epithelial cells after hemolytic uremia syndrome5, in the aorta during early atherogenesis14, in nervous fibers after spinal cord injury15 as well as in myofibers during reinnervation in a model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)16. Gain-of-function studies in transgenic mice revealed that BP1 enhances neoangiogenesis in subcutaneous matrigel plugs, in ischemic muscle injury, as well as during skin wound healing17 and increases blood pressure18. Complementary to this, in loss-of-function studies, BP1−/− mice displayed reduced angiogenesis, delayed wound healing and a blunted carcinogen-induced skin papillomatosis19.

Mechanisms of action and some of the biological effects of BP2, a gene lost in rodents, and of BP3 overlap with BP1 in that they function as chaperones for heparin-binding, paracrine FGFs and enhance FGF signaling4,6. However, potential interactions of the BPs with members of the non-heparin-binding, endocrine FGF19 family are unknown. These endocrine FGFs, namely FGF19, FGF21 and FGF23, are released into the circulation and control metabolic homeostasis of glucose, lipids and phosphate20,21,22. Here we describe the crosstalk of endocrine FGFs with BP3. BP3 knockout mice exhibited an altered lipid metabolism, with reduced serum and liver triglycerides. On the other hand, exogenous expression of BP3 in obese mice reduced body weight, hyperglycemia and normalized hepatic steatosis due to the suppression of lipogenic gene expression in the liver and white adipose tissue (WAT). Finally, we show that BP3 interacts with endocrine FGFs and modulates FGF19 and FGF21 signaling in vitro. Our data suggest a surprising contribution of BP3 to metabolic control that could provide an innovative treatment of diseases associated with the metabolic syndrome including nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus23,24.


BP3−/− mice show reduced serum and liver triglycerides

To examine the effect of BP3 in vivo, we generated BP3−/− mice from heterozygous founders obtained from the Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP) (Supplemental Fig. 1A–C). Offspring were viable, born at normal Mendelian ratios, with normal life spans and no gross abnormalities. An initial analysis performed by KOMP revealed that BP3−/− mice exhibit a worsened GTT and lower circulating triglycerides (TG) (Supplemental Fig. 1D), suggestive of altered metabolic functions.

To evaluate the metabolic state of the animals, we subjected BP3−/− and wild type (WT) littermates to insulin, glucose and pyruvate tolerance tests but found no significant differences between the WT and BP3−/− groups (Fig. 1A–C). Interestingly, the average serum insulin levels were not different between BP3−/− mice and their WT littermates, but we observed a significantly higher degree of variance (F-test) in the BP3−/− group with 50% of the mice exhibiting high insulin levels. Circulating levels of FGF21, a potent insulin sensitizer and metabolism regulator, are elevated in mouse models of obesity although obese mice still respond to high doses of FGF21 by ameliorating glucose and lipid parameters (reviewed in20). In our study FGF21 levels were low and undistinguishable between WT and BP3−/− mice and the levels of glucagon, adiponectin or beta-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) were unchanged between the two groups (Fig. 1D). The liver and WAT are major regulators not only of energy storage in the body, but also of the control of circulating fatty acids and various lipids, as well as of glucose homeostasis25 and we thus evaluated gene expression of enzymes that control glucose metabolism in livers and white adipose tissues (WAT) of BP3−/− and WT mice. Loss of BP3 resulted in a significant mRNA upregulation of hepatic phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 1 (Pck1), a key regulator of gluconeogenesis, and of interleukin 6 (Il6) that has been linked to insulin resistance26,27 (Fig. 1E). Hepatic peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (Ppargc1a), suppressor of cytokine signaling 3 (Socs3), glucose-6-phospatase (G6pc), Leptin receptor 1 (Lpr1), Fgf21 and β-Klotho (KLB) expression were undistinguishable between WT and BP3−/− mice (Fig. 1E,F).

Figure 1

BP3−/− mice show reduced serum and liver triglycerides. (AC) Insulin tolerance test (ITT) (A); Glucose tolerance test (B) and Pyruvate tolerance test (C) and the respective Area under the curve (AUC) of WT and BP3−/− mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post tests; mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 vs. WT control. (D) Insulin, glucagon, Fgf21, adiponectin and BHB serum concentrations of WT and BP3−/− mice. (E,F) Expression of genes involved in glucose homeostasis in livers (E) and WAT (F) from WT and BP3−/− mice determined by qRT-PCR. (G) Phospholipids, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), cholesterol, and overall triglycerides (TG) serum concentrations of WT and BP3−/− mice. (H) Metabolomics analysis of serum fatty acids. (I) Hepatic lipids and TG levels in WT and BP3−/− mice. (J,K) Metabolomics analysis of linolenic acid (J) and TG isomers (K) in WT and BP3−/− mice. (L,M) Expression of genes involved in lipogenesis in livers and WAT from WT and BP3−/− mice. Data are expressed as fold of WT control (E,F,L,M). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM; n = 6–10, *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001 vs WT control.

We next measured circulating lipids in BP3−/− and WT mice. Circulating phospholipids, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), and cholesterol remained unchanged when comparing the genotypes (Fig. 1G). However, BP3−/− mice displayed significantly lower baseline TG levels in agreement with findings of KOMP (Fig. 1G & Supplemental Fig. 1D). To gain further insights into BP3-induced metabolic alterations, we performed comprehensive, unbiased serum and liver metabolomics analyses in WT and BP3−/− mice. In line with decreased serum triglycerides, we found a striking ~14-fold reduction of 9,10,13-trihydroxystearic acid serum levels in BP3−/− mice (Fig. 1H). We also detected increased circulating levels of arachidonic acid and 5-HETE, ω-3-polyunsaturated fatty acids (ω-3-PUFAs) precursor and metabolite respectively (Fig. 1H), that have been previously connected with worsened insulin resistance28.

Livers from BP3−/− mice were similar in size and macroscopic and microscopic appearance relative to those of WT littermates. In line with the levels of lower circulating TG, the amount of hepatic TG were also two-fold lower in BP3−/− mice relative to WT controls, whereas the total hepatic lipid content was indistinguishable between the different genotypes (Fig. 1I). A liver metabolomics analysis showed a >2-fold increase of hepatic alpha-linolenic acid, an ω-3-PUFA precursor (Fig. 1J) and, most prominently, a 4.5- to 40-fold reduction of different TG isomers in BP3−/− mice (Fig. 1K). Thus, the loss of BP3 impacts hepatic accumulation of TGs, but not total lipids.

To evaluate the underlying pathways, we measured changes in baseline expression of key fatty acid and TG synthesis enzymes and their upstream regulators in both livers and WAT of BP3−/− and WT mice (Fig. 1L,M). Interestingly, Ppargc1b, a key upstream regulator of lipogenesis and steatosis29, was significantly reduced in BP3−/− mice. As a consequence, essential de novo lipogenesis enzyme genes such as acetoacetyl-coenzyme A synthetase (Aacs), acetyl-CoA carboxylase Alpha (Acac), ATP citrate lyase (Acly), acetyl-coenzyme A synthetase 2 (Acas2), and fatty acid synthase (Fasn) were significantly downregulated in BP3−/− animals. Moreover, the lack of BP3 reduced expression of Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (Scd1) and Diacylglycerol O-acyltransferase 1 and 2 (Dgat1 and Dgat2), that are rate limiting enzymes for TG synthesis30 (Fig. 1L). Silencing of the lipogenic enzymatic machinery in mice lacking BP3 provides an explanation for the reduced serum stearic acid and TG levels. The effect appears to be liver specific and was not seen in the comparison of WAT gene expression (Fig. 1M). These data altogether suggest that endogenous BP3 controls glucose and lipid metabolic pathways.

Chronic expression of BP3 in ob/ob mice reduces hyperglycemia, weight gain, steatosis, WAT and BAT mass and liver lipids

We next sought to identify BP3 mechanisms of action in the modulation of lipid and glucose metabolism. For this, we chronically administered a BP3 expression vector to leptin deficient ob/ob mice, an animal model with metabolic disease and dysregulated lipogenic and gluconeogenic genes31,32,33. We delivered a plasmid that expressed full length murine BP3 (=mBP3) repeatedly over a period of 18 days using a cationic polymer carrier (Fig. 2A) and detected exogenous mBP3 mRNA in livers and lungs by qPCR (Fig. 2B) as well as protein in lungs by immunoblot analysis (Fig. 2C). We transduced the plasmid repeatedly as mice showed a progressive loss of exogenous mBP3 in the liver as early as 6 days after treatment (Supplemental Fig. 2). The mBP3 expressing ob/ob mice exhibited significantly lower body weight and weight gain relative to control littermates (Fig. 2D), paralleled by a reduction of visceral white adipose tissues (WAT) (Fig. 2E,F) and interscapular brown adipose tissues (iBAT) (Fig. 2G,H). A crude measurement of food intake performed in two independent experiments indicated a slight increase of food consumption in mBP3 treated cohort [3.03 ± 0.38 vs. 3.09 ± 0.17 g/day (n = 3–6), and 3.86 ± 0.49 vs. 4.60 ± 0.50 g/day; ctrl vs. mBP3, (n = 5)] that was not statistically significant, indicating that BP3 does not suppress appetite. Administration of mBP3 significantly reduced hyperglycemia (−124.5 ± 58.2 mg/dl glucose at day 18 vs day 0) (Fig. 2I) whereas blood glucose levels in control ob/ob animals remained unaltered (−21 ± 68 mg/dl glucose at day 18 vs day 0) (Fig. 2I). Moreover, during the course of the study, mean daily blood glucose was significantly lowered in the mBP3 group (−84.58 ± 47.03 vs 9.67 ± 39.87 mg/dl glucose; mBP3 vs control) (Fig. 2J). The amelioration of hyperglycemic conditions in mBP3 overexpressing ob/ob mice was parallel by a significant reduction of BHB (Fig. 2K). Furthermore, when compared to control ob/ob littermates, exogenous mBP3 expressing mice exhibited a significant decrease of serum non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA) and increase of FGF21 and adiponectin, whereas TG, cholesterol, phospholipids and glucagon levels remained unchanged (Fig. 2K). It has been shown that increased circulating NEFA levels in ob/ob mice contribute to the onset of hepatic macro- and microsteatosis34,35, whereas adiponectin, an FGF21-induced adipokine, is negatively correlated to the hepatic fat content36. Strikingly, commensurate with the reduced NEFA and increased FGF21 and adiponectin levels in the serum, livers of mBP3 expressing ob/ob mice displayed a significant reduction of steatosis and were almost indistinguishable microscopically from healthy livers (Fig. 2L,M). Chronic mBP3 treatment induced a slight reduction of liver gross weight (2.43 ± 0.12 vs 2.06 ± 0.09, ctrl vs mBP3) and failed to cause hepatocyte proliferation as measured by ex vivo BrdU incorporation (Supplemental Fig. 3). As a consequence of liver remodeling, we observed an increased number of proliferating liver sinusoidal cells. Commensurate with the amelioration of steatosis, mBP3 expressing ob/ob mice exhibited a significant decrease of total liver lipids (Fig. 2N) and triglycerides (Fig. 2O) when compared to ob/ob control animals. Hepatic metabolomics profiling of mBP3 transduced mice showed a 55-fold reduction of glycerol and between 2.5 to 9-fold decrease of the oleic, palmitic, capric, lauroleic and tridecanoid NEFAs (Fig. 2P), that resulted in a significant decrease of hepatic diglycerides (DG) (Fig. 2Q) and TG (Fig. 2R), particularly those containing palmitic (16:0), stearic (18:0) and arachidic (20:0) acids. Interestingly, the amount of hepatic TG in mBP3 treated animals was blunted to levels undistinguishable from those of WT lean mice (Fig. 2S).

Figure 2

Chronic BP3 expression in ob/ob mice by in vivo transfection reduces body weight, WAT, BAT and hepatic steatosis. (A) Schematic diagram showing the protocol for the in vivo transfection with a murine BP3 (mBP3) expression vector in ob/ob mice. Mice received eight treatments and were euthanized 18 days after the first treatment. (B) mBP3 mRNA expression in livers and lungs from transfected ob/ob mice determined by qRT-PCR. Values are shown as fold of control. (C) Western blot analysis for mBP3 protein in lungs. (D) Total body weight and weight gain of control and mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice. Data were analyzed with two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post tests. (E) Representative photographic images of viscera. The white dotted lines indicate visceral WAT. (F) Quantitation of the area occupied by visceral fat. (G) Representative macroscopic photographs of iBAT. (H) iBAT weight. (I) Random blood glucose in fed control and mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice before treatment and at the end of the experiment (day 18). (J) Average Δ glucose in fed control and mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice throughout the course of the experiment. (K) Concentrations of serum metabolites in control and mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice. (L) Representative 4x H&E-stained sections of livers. (M) Semiquantitative scoring of hepatosteatosis from H&E-stained sections of livers. ***P < 0.0001, χ2 test. (N) Hepatic lipids and (O) TG levels in control and mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice. (P–R) Liver metabolomics analysis of (P) Glycerol and fatty acids; (Q) Diacylglycerides (DG) and (R) TG isomers in mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice (fold of control). (S) Liver triglyceride levels in control and mBP3 expressing ob/ob and lean C57BL/6 J (WT) mice. All values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3 (control); 6 (mBP3 transfected). ns, non significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001.

In summary, these data indicate that sustained BP3 treatment in ob/ob mice reduces body weight, hyperglycemia, fat mass and steatosis likely due to an increase of serum adiponectin and reduction of circulating NEFA and intrahepatic lipids and without inducing a hepatocellular mitogenic response.

Chronic expression of BP3 in ob/ob mice suppresses gluconeogenic and lipogenic gene expression

We next examined hepatic and WAT gene expression changes in ob/ob mice after chronic treatment with the BP3 expression vector (Fig. 3A). Consistent with a reduction of blood glucose (Fig. 2I,J), mBP3 overexpression resulted in a two-fold suppression of glucose-6-phosphatase (G6pc), the hepatic rate-limiting enzyme for gluconeogenesis. This is likely mediated by the increase of interleukin 6 (Il6) and a decrease of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ coactivator-1α (Ppargc1a) expression (Fig. 3B). Il6 and Ppargc1a were similarly regulated in WAT (Fig. 3C). Notably, no changes of hepatic Lpr1, Socs3, Fgf21 or KLB mRNA expression were observed after chronic BP3 administration (Fig. 3B,C). Next, we evaluated the regulation of the de novo lipogenesis genes in both liver and WAT of mBP3 transduced ob/ob mice. Expression of the lipogenesis regulator Fgf21 was downregulated in WAT whereas Ppargc1b and Srebf129,37 were significantly reduced in both tissues, likely resulting in the observed downstream suppression of Aacs, Acac, Acas2, Acly, and Fasn. Additionally, Scd1 and Dgat2 were significantly reduced in both livers and WAT (Fig. 3B,C). Finally, uncoupling protein 1 (Ucp1) mRNA levels in the BAT were indistinguishable between the BP3 treated and the control group indicating no obvious effect on thermogenesis regulation (Supplemental Fig. 4).

Figure 3

Chronic BP3 expression induces hepatic Stat3 and Akt activation and modulates glucose and fat enzymatic cascades in ob/ob mouse livers and WAT. (A) Schematic diagram showing the protocol for the in vivo transfection of an mBP3 expression vector in ob/ob mice. (B,C) Changes in liver (B) and WAT (C) gene expression analyzed by qRT-PCR in mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice (n = 6). Values are calculated as fold of control (n = 3). (D) Stat3 and Akt phosphorylation in livers from mBP3 transfected ob/ob mice or control (n = 3) analyzed by immunoprecipitation (IP) and western blot (WB). Fold activation over controls is shown. (E) Schematic diagram showing the in vivo delivery of a single dose of an mBP3 expression vector in ob/ob mice. Mice were euthanized 72 hours post treatment. (F) Random blood glucose levels at 0, 24, 48 and 72 hours post treatment in control and mBP3 transfected fed ob/ob mice. (G,H) Change in gene expression in ob/ob mouse livers (G) and WAT (H) measured by qRT-PCR at the times indicated after a single delivery of mBP3 or control DNA (n = 4). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001.

To investigate the effect of a chronic mBP3 administration on signaling pathways that govern carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism, we analyzed the phosphorylation state of Akt and Stat3, key effector molecules of gluconeogenic and lipogenic genes in ob/ob mice38,39. Sustained mBP3 expression increased hepatic endogenous Stat3 and Akt phosphorylation by 2.8 and 3.9 fold, respectively, while total Stat3 and Akt proteins remained unchanged (Fig. 3D).

A single administration of the mBP3 expression vector to ad libitum fed ob/ob mice (Fig. 3E) transiently reduced the pathologically elevated blood glucose levels of >300 mg/dl significantly to normoglycemia (Fig. 3F), whereas control mice remained hyperglycemic. This effect was corroborated by a transient four-fold downregulation of hepatic G6pc mRNA expression (Fig. 3G) and was paralleled by a significant mBP3 overexpression in both liver and WAT up to 72 hours post transduction (Fig. 3G,H). Moreover, a sustained suppression of Fasn and Scd1 mRNAs in livers and WAT was observed whereas upregulation of Il6 was seen exclusively in the WAT for 24, 48 and 72 hours post transduction (Fig. 3G,H).

Overall, our data suggest that chronic BP3 treatment in ob/ob mice results in the suppression of rate-limiting genes regulating metabolic pathways in the liver and WAT that control the synthesis of lipids and glucose.

Chronic expression of BP3 in diet-induced obesity (DIO) mice suppresses hyperglycemia, weight gain and hepatic and WAT lipogenic gene expression

Next, we sought to investigate the response to exogenous mBP3 in C57BL/6J DIO (=diet-induced obesity) mice, an animal model that mimics the most common cause of human obesity40. mBP3 plasmid or an empty vector control were administered eight times over a period of 42 days to 14 week-old DIO mice (Fig. 4A). Consistent with our findings in the ob/ob mouse model (Fig. 2), BP3 exhibited a significant anti-obesity and antidiabetogenic effect. mBP3 treated DIO mice, in contrast to their control littermates, failed to gain body weight, despite a high calorie intake (Fig. 4B,C). Circulating insulin, FGF21, adiponectin, and NEFA remained unchanged between the two groups (Fig. 4D). Still, mBP3 treated DIO mice exhibited significantly lower blood glucose (Fig. 4E,F) that coincided with a significant 3.5 fold reduction of hepatic G6pc mRNA (Fig. 4G). Moreover, BP3 treatment induced a significant downregulation of hepatic Srebf1 mRNA and its target genes, such as Acly, Acas2, Fasn and Scd1. However, Lepr, Il6, Ppargc1b, Acac, Dgat2, Fgf21 and KLB transcript level remained unchanged from the control (Fig. 4G). Similarly, WAT Fgf21, KLB and Srebf1 mRNA levels were reduced as well as Acac, Acas2, Fasn, Scd1, Dgat1 and Dgat2, but not Ppargc1b, Aacs, or Acly (Fig. 4H).

Figure 4

Chronic BP3 expression in DIO mice reduces body weight, hyperglycemia and modulates lipogenic gene expression in liver and WAT. (A) Schematic diagram showing the protocol for the in vivo transfection of mBP3 or control expression vector in C57BL/6 J DIO mice. Mice received eight treatments and were euthanized 45 days after the first treatment. (B,C) Total body weight (B) and body weight gain (C) of control and mBP3 transfected DIO mice, analyzed by linear regression. (D) Concentrations of serum metabolites in control and mBP3 transfected DIO mice. (E) Random blood glucose in fed control and mBP3 transfected DIO mice measured every 7 days. (F) Average change in blood glucose in fed control and mBP3 transfected DIO mice throughout the course of the experiment. (G,H) Change in gene expression in DIO mouse livers (G) and WAT (H) measured by qRT-PCR. Data are expressed as fold of control (Mean ± SEM; n = 5; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001).

Taken together these data suggest that BP3 impacts the de novo lipogenesis and TG synthesis enzymatic cascade also in the DIO mouse model.

BP3 binds to endocrine FGFs and enhances their signaling in vitro

The interactions of FGF-binding proteins (BPs) with heparin-binding, paracrine FGFs have been well-defined. BP1 was found to supplement for a lack of HS in FGF2 signaling1,2,4,5. From this we expected a different interaction of BPs and endocrine FGFs that exhibit a low heparin affinity [reviewed in41]. The predicted structures of the BP1 and BP3 C-terminal FGF binding domains2,4,5,42 show distinct features (Fig. 5A) and we thus compared the interaction of both proteins with FGF19, the prototypic member of the endocrine FGF family. We generated an MBP-tagged human recombinant BP3 devoid of its signal peptide (=BP3), purified it by affinity chromatography (Supplemental Fig. 5A) and verified its purity and identity by Coomassie blue staining and western blot analysis with anti-hBP3 and MBP antibodies (Supplemental Fig. 5B,C) as well as mass spectrometry (Supplemental Fig. 5D). Surprisingly, FGF19 showed a significantly stronger binding to BP3 than to BP1 (Fig. 5B). Binding of BP3 to FGF19 was also confirmed by surface plasmon resonance (SPR; Biacore) (Fig. 5C). BP3 bound with analogous affinity to FGF15, the FGF19 murine ortholog, and to FGF23 (Fig. 5D). Moreover, as shown in a solid-phase equilibrium binding assay, BP3 could bind to FGF2 and FGF19 in a similar fashion, with a Kd = 0.269 ± 0.273 nM and Kd = 0.172 ± 0.341 nM, respectively (Fig. 5E,F).

Figure 5

BP3 binds to endocrine FGFs, enhances FGF19 and FGF21 signal transduction and promotes FGFR4/FGF19 complex formation. (A) Domains and computational structure prediction for BP1 and BP3. The FGF-binding domains in BP1 and BP3 in the C-terminal portion, the heparin-binding domain and the conserved cysteins of BP1 are shown. The white arrows in the 3D model indicate distinct folding of the FGF-binding domains. The PHYRE2 program ( was used68. (B) Binding of MBP-tagged BP1 or BP3 or MBP control to immobilized FGF19 measured by direct ELISA with an anti-MBP antibody. Mean ± SEM of one of three independent experiments done in duplicate (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001). (C) SPR sensorgrams illustrating the binding of BP3 to immobilized FGF19. The concentrations of the BP3 analyte are indicated. RU, response units. (D) Binding of BP3 or MBP control to immobilized FGF15, or FGF23 measured by direct ELISA with an anti-MBP antibody. Mean ± SEM of one of three independent experiments done in duplicate. *P < 0.05 BP3 (black bars) vs. control (white bars). (E,F) Equilibrium binding of BP3 to immobilized FGF2 (E) or FGF19 (F) measured by direct ELISA with an anti-MBP antibody. Mean ± SEM of one of three independent experiments done in duplicate (**P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001; Two-way ANOVA). (G) Competition of KLB and KLa proteins for binding of BP3 to immobilized FGF19 (left panel) or FGF21 (right panel). Mean ± SEM of one of three independent experiments run in duplicate (*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01 BP3 + KLB (red or blue dot) vs. BP3 + KLa (black diamond); Two-way ANOVA). (H) Schematic representation of human BP3. The numbers correspond to the human BP3 amino acid sequence. (I) Coomassie blue staining of MBP-tagged C66 fusion protein purified by amylose affinity chromatography. The arrow indicates a band of an apparent molecular mass of 52 kDa. (J) SPR sensorgrams illustrating the binding of C66 to immobilized FGF19 and FGF2. RU, response units. (K,L,M) Equilibrium binding of C66 to immobilized FGF19 (K), FGF15 (L) or FGF21 (M) measured by direct ELISA with an anti-MBP antibody. Mean ± SEM of one of two independent experiments done in duplicate (*P < 0.05**; P < 0.01; ***P < 0.0001; t-test). (N) Detection of FGFR4-FGF19-BP3 protein complex. In vitro binding of FGF19 ± BP3 to immobilized FGFR4 was detected by western blot analysis. The numbers below the blots indicate the fold-change of FGF19 corrected for FGFR4. Samples derive from the same experiment and gels/blots were processed in the same gel. The blots are representative of three independent experiments. (O,P) Phospho and total ERK1/2 in HepG2 cells treated for 15 minutes with different concentrations of FGF19 ± BP3 (O) or FGF21 ± BP3 (P). FGF2 was used as a positive control for ERK1/2 activation. Controls were treated with MBP. The numbers below the blots indicate the fold-change, corrected for total ERK1/2. (Q) Phospho and total ERK1/2 in KLB-negative HEK293 cells treated for 15 minutes with FGF19 ± BP3 (100 ng/ml). FGF2 was used as a positive control for ERK1/2 activation.

In support of the notion that FGF19 and FGF21 utilize KLB as co-receptor41, we sought to investigate the effect of BP3 on the FGF/KLB interaction. Excess concentrations of KLB, but not α-Klotho (KLa), inhibited the interaction of BP3 with either FGF19 or FGF21 (Fig. 5G) indicating mutually exclusive binding of either BP3 or KLB to these endocrine FGFs.

Because endocrine FGFs do not utilize HS, we tested the effects of a C-terminal fragment of the BP3 protein (C66) that lacks the BP3 heparin-binding domain (HBD) (Fig. 5H). MBP-tagged C66 was purified by affinity chromatography and its purity established by Coomassie blue staining (Fig. 5I). By SPR, the C66 fragment displayed a higher binding affinity for FGF19 than for FGF2, which distinguished it from the full-length protein (Fig. 5J). In addition, in a solid-phase equilibrium binding assay, C66 showed binding to increasing concentrations of FGF19, FGF15 and FGF21 (Fig. 5K–M). These data suggest that the C-terminal FGF-binding domain of BP3 is sufficient for the interaction with endocrine FGFs.

Since the preferential receptor of FGF19 is FGFR443, we examined the interaction of BP3 and FGF19 with immobilized recombinant FGFR4 in a cell-free assay. The inclusion of BP3 enhanced FGF19 - FGFR4 binding by 2.8-fold (Fig. 5N) and we conclude that BP3 favors the formation of a stable complex between FGF19 and FGFR4.

FGF19 and FGF21 have been shown to activate ERK1/2 in HepG2 cells44,45. We found that addition of BP3 to FGF19 increased the activation of ERK1/2 by 1.3 to 2.8 fold, while BP3 alone did not show an effect (Fig. 5O). Similarly, FGF21-induced ERK1/2 activation was enhanced by added BP3 by ~1.8 fold (Fig. 5P). Klotho deficient-HEK293 cells will signal in response to endocrine FGFs only after KLa or KLB overexpression, whereas FGF2 can induce a robust downstream ERK1/2 activation46,47 (and Fig. 5Q). Interestingly, exogenous co-administration of recombinant BP3 and FGF19 proteins to HEK293 cells was sufficient to elicit ERK1/2 phosphorylation, while either protein alone had no detectable effect (Fig. 5Q). This shows that BP3 is sufficient to promote receptor activation by an endocrine FGF in the absence of KLB. We conclude that BP3 binds to the endocrine FGFs, competes with KLB, and can enhance FGF19 and FGF21 signaling in vitro.

In composite, our data suggest that BP3 is a metabolic modulator that interacts with endocrine FGFs and can ameliorate metabolic syndrome pathology by modulation of glucose and lipid metabolism in liver and adipose tissues. The schematic in Fig. 6 connects the signaling pathways to the respective metabolic enzyme cascade and biological function impacted by chronic BP3 treatment in obesity models.

Figure 6

Summary of the pathways impacted by chronic BP3 treatment in liver and WAT in obese mouse models. BP3 enhances FGF/FGFR signaling and downstream activation of Akt and IL6/Stat3 that lead to the inhibition of gluconeogenesis, through Ppargc1a/G6pc downregulation. The parallel activation of Akt and Stat3 results in an inhibition of Ppargc1b and/or Srebf1, key regulators of downstream lipogenic enzymes, thus leading to the inhibition of de novo lipogenesis and TG synthesis.


In this report we show a new role for BP3 in regulating carbohydrate and lipid metabolism that overlaps with the effects of endocrine FGF19 and FGF2148. BP1 and BP3 proteins share 8 conserved cysteine residues responsible for the formation of disulfide bonds4 but possess a distinct C-terminal FGF binding domain, as evidenced by the secondary structure prediction (see Fig. 5A). We had hypothesized that these structural differences could translate into differential affinity and selectivity of BP1 and BP3 for different FGFs. BP1 and BP3 have been shown to bind to paracrine FGF1 and 2 and modulate their signaling and biological functions2,4. ECM-bound paracrine FGFs are released by BPs that compete with the binding of FGF to the heparin-rich ECM2. In contrast to the paracrine FGFs, endocrine FGFs are characterized by a weak heparin binding, as they lack the critical GXXXXGXX(T/S) binding motif. This explains their ability to freely circulate and thus act in a systemic, hormone-like, rather than local fashion41. A surprising result from our present study is that BP3 binds with high affinity to FGF19, the prototype member of the endocrine FGF family, and to FGF21 and FGF23, the other two members of the family, whilst BP1 exhibits a lower affinity. Notably, the C-terminal FGF-binding domain (C66) exhibits a higher affinity for FGF19 than FGF2. Furthermore, the interaction between FGF19 and BP3 stabilizes the ligand/receptor complex and enhances downstream signaling. Based on the competitive binding of BP3 and KLB proteins to FGF19 and FGF21 and the ability of BP3 to evoke FGF19 signaling in vitro despite the lack of KLB, we propose that BP3 may function as a co-receptor for these endocrine FGFs.

The ablation of endogenous BP3 did not impact embryo viability or overall survival but was associated with abnormal GTT and reduced levels of circulating triglycerides, suggesting an increased risk for metabolic disease (Supplemental Fig. 1D). Both FGF19 and FGF21 are insulin-independent modulators of carbohydrate and lipid metabolism in rodents, primates and humans48. Knockout mouse models for FGF15, the mouse ortholog of FGF19, and for FGF21 develop glucose intolerance and insulin resistance49,50. Similarly, BP3−/− mice showed trends of hyperinsulinemia and upregulation of key hepatic gluconeogenic genes that can result in an increase of fasting blood glucose and abnormal insulin resistance.

BP3 did not seem to be differentially regulated between lean C57BL/6 J and ob/ob or DIO mouse ilea, livers and WAT (Supplemental Fig. 6). However, a survey of published gene expression data in tissues from diabetic human subjects or from diabetes-related mouse models showed a significant downregulation of BP3. BP1 expression was typically not correlated with the disease (Supplemental Fig. 7A–F). This supports a contribution of endogenous BP3 to the mechanisms underlying metabolic disease revealed by the phenotypic characteristics of the BP3−/− mice (see Fig. 1).

Exogenous BP3 induced a robust activation of hepatic STAT3 and inhibition of Ppargc1b and Srebf1, the transcriptional regulators of lipogenic genes, resulting in reduced de novo lipogenesis, FA elongation and TG synthesis (see scheme in Fig. 6). Chronic expression of BP3 indeed resulted in a dramatic reduction of white and brown fat mass and an amelioration of hepatic steatosis. Mechanisms that induce fatty liver disease are mostly due to increased NEFA delivery from peripheral WAT and a greater de novo lipogenesis alongside with insulin resistance, whereas β-oxidation of FA seems to be of marginal importance34,37. That is, chronically treated ob/ob mice exhibit reduced circulating and liver fatty acids and increased circulating FGF21 and adiponectin as well as a significant suppression of the de novo hepatic lipogenic enzymatic cascade, providing an explanation for the reversal of steatosis. It is noteworthy that circulating NEFA levels are reduced in mice after recombinant FGF19 and FGF21 treatment and are elevated in FGF21−/− mice43,51. Consistent with our findings, the amelioration of a fatty liver phenotype in FGF21-treated DIO mice results from the suppression of the Srebf1-induced fatty acid biosynthetic pathway52. Moreover, the beneficial effects of FGF21 on obesity-associated metabolic disorders are dependent on the increase of adiponectin mRNA and protein and are obliterated in adiponectin-deficient mice53. Notably, the effect of BP3 treatment on weight gain mimics the effect of FGF21 in ob/ob and in the DIO mouse models54.

The improved glycemic control in obese mice after acute or chronic BP3 treatment was also paralleled by a downregulation of G6pc, the rate limiting gluconeogenic enzyme, likely resulting from sustained hepatic Akt and Stat3 activation and Il6 upregulation. We found that BP3 activates the IL6/STAT3 signaling axis, which represents a previously unknown FGF-response pathway. To date, the role of IL6 in obesity-associated insulin resistance is controversial55: Impaired insulin action can be induced by increased IL6 levels in vivo or vice versa, thus denoting an unfavorable metabolic effect of IL656,57. Conversely, in gain-of-function studies, others have suggested that IL6 can have an anti-inflammatory beneficial role in preventing obesity and T2D in a STAT3-dependent manner58. Moreover, IL6 can have an insulin sensitizing effect by increasing glucose uptake in cultured and intact human skeletal muscle59 and by modulating insulin release after glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from intestinal L and pancreatic alpha cells in response to exercise60. In our studies, IL6 upregulation, seen after BP3 treatment, matches with improved insulin sensitivity, obesity and steatosis in IL6 transgenic mice58,61,62, likely by suppressing gluconeogenic and lipogenic enzymatic cascade via hepatic STAT3 phosphorylation (see scheme in Fig. 6). Complementary to this, hepatocyte-specific IL6R, IL6, or STAT3 deficient mice develop increased gluconeogenesis and insulin resistance, as a result of G6pc upregulation, likely via a PI3K/FoxO1-independent pathway, as well as age-related obesity and steatosis38,63.

Obesity, which affects more than 650 million people worldwide, is the major driver for metabolic syndrome, which also encompasses disorders such as insulin resistance, glucose intolerance, hypertension and dyslipidemia23. Our studies show that the interaction between BP3 and endocrine FGFs could be leveraged for a novel approach to the treatment of metabolic disease and the associated symptoms. Both FGF19 and FGF21 are potential therapeutic agents for the treatment of metabolic syndrome48,64. However, the mitogenic effects of FGF19 and the induction of hepatocellular carcinoma in FGF19 transgenic mice and in mice treated with the recombinant protein are of concern65. In contrast, FGF21 lacks a proliferative activity both in vitro and in vivo66. Moreover, in line with these observations, a recent report has proposed that the endocrinization of FGF1 exhibits anti-diabetogenic and non-mitogenic effects in mice67. It is noteworthy that when chronically delivered to ob/ob mice, BP3 fails to induce a hepatocellular mitogenic response, thus matching with the lack of mitogenic effects reported for FGF1 and FGF21.

In conclusion, the striking reduction of fat mass and fatty liver disease as well as hyperglycemia and the lack of a mitogenic response make BP3 an attractive candidate for the treatment of metabolic disease.


Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)

High binding ELISA plates (Nest Scientific, Rahway, NJ) were coated with 100 μl/well of recombinant proteins (human recombinant FGF2, FGF15, FGF19, or FGF23, 7.5 μg/ml] and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed thrice between each incubation step with washing buffer [1X Phosphate buffered saline with 0.2% Tween 20, pH 7.4 (PBST)]. Blocking was carried out with 100 μl/well of 5% dry milk diluted in PBST for 1 hour at room temperature. Subsequently, plates were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with 100 μl/well of an MBP-tagged recombinant protein (MBP control, BP3 or C66) at a fixed concentration (0.7 nM) or in serial dilutions. Detection was carried out with 100 μl/well of an anti-MBP mouse monoclonal antibody (New England BioLabs, Ipswich, MA) and with an affinity-purified goat anti-mouse horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated antibody (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Pittsburgh, PA) (1:1,000 dilution in PBS). The reactions were visualized with the aid of 1-Step Turbo TMB (Thermo Scientific, Grand Island, NY), according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and read with an Ultramark Microplate Imaging System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA) at 450 nm absorbance. For the competitive protein binding assays, increasing excess amounts of β-Klotho (KLB) or α-Klotho (KLa) (competitors) were bound to immobilized FGF19 or FGF21 (2.5 μg/ml) for 1 hour prior to the addition of BP3 or MBP control (0.15 μg/ml) in MaxiSorp microtiter plates (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Human recombinant FGF2 was purchased from Life Technologies (Grand Island, NY). Recombinant human FGF21, human FGF23, human KLa and mouse KLB were purchased from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant FGF15 was purchased from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA). Human recombinant FGF19 was generated in the lab of Dr. Moosa Mohammadi at NYU.

Surface Plasmon Resonance Binding Assay

Biacore T200 instrument (GE Healthcare, Piscataway, NJ) was used for surface plasmon resonance measurements. Human recombinant FGF19 or FGF2 in HBS-P buffer (0.01 M HEPES pH 7.4, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% P-20) were immobilized on a flow cell of a CM-5 sensor chip (GE Healthcare) via amine coupling. A blank flow cell was used as a negative control for non-specific binding to the sensor surface. BP3 (1, 0.5, or 0.25 μM) or C66 (245 nM) in HBS-P buffer were injected over the immobilized proteins with a flow rate of 10 µL/min for 60 seconds and the resulting maximum responses were obtained. The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Binding of BP3 to FGFR4/FGF19 complex

MaxiSorp microtiter plates were coated with 0.75 mg of human recombinant FGFR4 Fc Chimera (R&D Systems) and incubated overnight at 4 °C. Plates were washed thrice between each incubation step with PBS. Blocking was carried out with 100 μl/well of 5% dry milk diluted in PBS for 1 hour at room temperature. Subsequently, plates were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature with 100 μl/well of FGF19 (2 μg/ml) ± BP3 or MBP control (1 μg/ml). Bound proteins were detected by western blot analysis with 1 μg/ml of an anti FGFR4 (LD1; a kind gift of Genentech, South San Francisco, CA), anti MBP (New England BioLabs) or anti FGF19 (Abnova, Walnut, CA) mouse monoclonal antibodies.

Cell cultures

Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) and HEK293 cells were maintained in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum.

Animals, genotyping and animal treatments

Animal experiments were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Georgetown University. All experiments were performed in accordance with relevant guidelines and regulations. BP3−/− mice were generated by the trans-NIH Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP) and obtained from the KOMP Repository (University of California, Davis, CA) ( BP3−/− mice were genotyped by q-PCR (see below) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 40 cycles (95 °C for 20 seconds, 65 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 40 seconds). The PCR primers are in Table S1.

Twelve week-old C57BL/6J DIO male mice and six week-old ob/ob female mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). C57BL/6 J DIO mice were maintained on a HFD containing 60% kCal from fat (D12492; Research Diets, Inc., New Brunswick, NJ) from weaning for at least 14 weeks before randomization by weight and treatment and until the completion of the study. Body weight ranged from 30 to 47 grams. Animals were maintained in a normal light-cycle room and were provided with regular diet or HFD and water ad libitum. Body weight gain was calculated as the daily body weight minus body weight before treatment for each animal and presented as an average for the group.

pCMV6-Kan/Neo mouse FGFBP3 (mBP3) or the empty vector (Origene, Rockville, MD) were delivered in vivo by an intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection with the TurboFect in vivo Transfection Reagent (ThermoScientific), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. This reagent, developed by Dharmacon, was designed to avoid an inflammatory response in mice as determined by TNFalpha induction by ELISA and also for intraperitoneal injections ( The endotoxin measure in our plasmid prep was 0.2 EU/ug and thus considered endotoxin free.

Glucose, insulin and pyruvate tolerance test

Glucose, insulin and pyruvate tolerance tests (GTT, ITT and PTT) were performed by an i.p. injection of glucose (1 g kg−1), insulin (0.75 IU kg−1) (Novo Nordisk Novolin-R, ADW Diabetes, Pompano Beach, FL) or pyruvate (1 g kg−1) (Sigma Aldrich) in mice fasted overnight (for GTT and PTT) or for 6 hours (for ITT). Tail blood glucose concentrations were measured with a portable glucose meter (Contour, Bayer, Whippany, NJ) as indicated in the respective figures. Average Δ glucose was calculated as the group average of daily or weekly blood glucose concentration minus blood glucose concentration before treatment for each animal.

Histological Analysis

Histologic hepatosteatosis score was performed semiquantitatively on five to 10 H&E-stained paraffin-embedded liver sections by two blinded investigators and expressed as percentage of fatty hepatocytes occupying the hepatic parenchyma.

Western Blots and Immunoprecipitation

Immunoprecipitation and western blot analyses were performed as described earlier17. Briefly, livers or lungs from ob/ob mice were homogenized in 1 mL of lysis buffer with a MagNa lyser homogenizer (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). 5 mg of total liver lysates were immunoprecipitated with 10 μl of sepharose-conjugated anti-Akt or phospho Stat3 antibodies and immunoblotted with an anti-phospho Akt or anti-Stat3 rabbit polyclonal antibodies, respectively. Total Akt and Stat3 in the liver lysates (50 μg) were detected using an anti-Akt and Stat3 rabbit polyclonal antibodies, respectively. ERK1/2 phosphorylation studies in HepG2 cells were performed by immunoblotting for phospho ERK1/2 and anti-ERK1/2 with rabbit polyclonal antibodies, as described2. All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling (Danvers, MA). mBP3 expression in transfected ob/ob mouse lungs was detected by immunoblot analysis using an anti mouse FGFBP3 rabbit polyclonal antibody (Abgent).

RNA isolation, microarray analysis and quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was isolated from mouse livers, lungs, WAT or ilea using RNeasy Mini kit or RNeasy Lipid Tissue kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit, according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was performed in a Realplex2 (Eppendorf, Hauppauge, NY) using the iQ SYBR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad Laboratories) under the following conditions: 95 °C for 3 minutes, followed by 40 cycles (95 °C for 20 seconds, 60 °C for 30 seconds, and 72 °C for 40 seconds). mRNA levels, determined by qRT-PCR, were normalized to endogenous β-actin mRNA and shown as fold of control. The forward (FW) and reverse (Rev) PCR primers for murine genes used are provided in Table S1.

Data Analysis and Statistics

GraphPad Prism (La Jolla, CA) was used to compare the means of two or more groups by Student’s t-test or ANOVA respectively. Semiquantitative scoring of hepatosteatosis was analyzed by χ2 test for trend. Statistical significance was defined as P < 0.05.


  1. 1.

    Mongiat, M. et al. Fibroblast growth factor-binding protein is a novel partner for perlecan protein core. J Biol Chem 276, 10263–10271 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Tassi, E. et al. Enhancement of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) activity by an FGF-binding protein. J Biol Chem 276, 40247–40253 (2001).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Beer, H.-D. et al. The fibroblast growth factor binding protein is a novel interaction partner of FGF-7, FGF-10 and FGF-22 and regulates FGF activity: implications for epithelial repair. Oncogene 24, 5269–5277 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Zhang, W. et al. Effect of FGF-binding protein 3 on vascular permeability. J Biol Chem 283, 28329–28337 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Ray, P. E., Tassi, E., Liu, X.-H. & Wellstein, A. Role of fibroblast growth factor-binding protein in the pathogenesis of HIV-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 290, R105–13 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Gibby, K. A., McDonnell, K., Schmidt, M. O. & Wellstein, A. A distinct role for secreted fibroblast growth factor-binding proteins in development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106, 8585–8590 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    McDonnell, K. et al. Vascular leakage in chick embryos after expression of a secreted binding protein for fibroblast growth factors. Lab Invest 85, 747–755 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Czubayko, F. et al. A secreted FGF-binding protein can serve as the angiogenic switch in human cancer. Nat Med 3, 1137–1140 (1997).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ray, R. et al. Up-regulation of fibroblast growth factor-binding protein, by beta-catenin during colon carcinogenesis. Cancer Research 63, 8085–8089 (2003).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Tassi, E. et al. Expression of a fibroblast growth factor-binding protein during the development of adenocarcinoma of the pancreas and colon. Cancer Research 66, 1191–1198 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Czubayko, F., Smith, R. V., Chung, H. C. & Wellstein, A. Tumor growth and angiogenesis induced by a secreted binding protein for fibroblast growth factors. J Biol Chem 269, 28243–28248 (1994).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schulze, D., Plohmann, P., Hobel, S. & Aigner, A. Anti-tumor effects of fibroblast growth factor-binding protein (FGF-BP) knockdown in colon carcinoma. Mol Cancer 10, 144 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Kurtz, A. et al. Differential regulation of a fibroblast growth factor-binding protein during skin carcinogenesis and wound healing. Neoplasia 6, 595–602 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Napoli, C. et al. Maternal hypercholesterolemia during pregnancy promotes early atherogenesis in LDL receptor-deficient mice and alters aortic gene expression determined by microarray. Circulation 105, 1360–1367 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Tassi, E. et al. Effects on neurite outgrowth and cell survival of a secreted fibroblast growth factor binding protein upregulated during spinal cord injury. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 293, R775–83 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Williams, A. H. et al. MicroRNA-206 delays ALS progression and promotes regeneration of neuromuscular synapses in mice. Science (New York, NY) 326, 1549–1554 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Tassi, E. et al. Impact of fibroblast growth factor-binding protein-1 expression on angiogenesis and wound healing. Am J Pathol 179, 2220–2232 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Tassi, E. et al. Blood Pressure Control by a Secreted FGFBP1 (Fibroblast Growth Factor-Binding Protein). Hypertension 71, 160–167 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Schmidt, M. O. et al. The Role of Fibroblast GrowthFactor-Binding Protein 1 in SkinCarcinogenesis and Inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 138, 179–188 (2018).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Potthoff, M. J., Kliewer, S. A. & Mangelsdorf, D. J. Endocrine fibroblast growth factors 15/19 and 21: from feast to famine. Genes Dev 26, 312–324 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Cicione, C., Degirolamo, C. & Moschetta, A. Emerging role of fibroblast growth factors 15/19 and 21 as metabolic integrators in the liver. Hepatology 56, 2404–2411 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Angelin, B., Larsson, T. E. & Rudling, M. Circulating fibroblast growth factors as metabolic regulators–a critical appraisal. Cell Metab 16, 693–705 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Kaur, J. A comprehensive review on metabolic syndrome. Cardiol Res Pract 2014, 943162 (2014).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Diehl, A. M. & Day, C. Cause, Pathogenesis, and Treatment of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis. N Engl J Med 377, 2063–2072 (2017).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Masoodi, M., Kuda, O., Rossmeisl, M., Flachs, P. & Kopecky, J. Lipid signaling in adipose tissue: Connecting inflammation & metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta 1851, 503–518 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Gómez-Valadés, A. G. et al. Pck1 gene silencing in the liver improves glycemia control, insulin sensitivity, and dyslipidemia in db/db mice. Diabetes 57, 2199–2210 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Senn, J. J., Klover, P. J., Nowak, I. A. & Mooney, R. A. Interleukin-6 induces cellular insulin resistance in hepatocytes. Diabetes 51, 3391–3399 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    González-Périz, A. et al. Obesity-induced insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis are alleviated by omega-3 fatty acids: a role for resolvins and protectins. FASEB J 23, 1946–1957 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Finck, B. N. & Kelly, D. P. PGC-1 coactivators: inducible regulators of energy metabolism in health and disease. J Clin Invest 116, 615–622 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Yen, C.-L. E., Stone, S. J., Koliwad, S., Harris, C. & Farese, R. V. Jr. Thematic Review Series: Glycerolipids.DGAT enzymes and triacylglycerol biosynthesis. J Lipid Res 49, 2283–2301 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Perfield, J. W. et al. Altered hepatic lipid metabolism contributes to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in leptin-deficient Ob/Ob mice. J Obes 2013, 296537 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Wolf, G. Insulin resistance associated with leptin deficiency in mice: a possible model for noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Nutr Rev 59, 177–179 (2001).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Kennedy, A. J., Ellacott, K. L. J., King, V. L. & Hasty, A. H. Mouse models of the metabolic syndrome. Dis Model Mech 3, 156–166 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Postic, C. & Girard, J. Contribution of de novo fatty acid synthesis to hepatic steatosis and insulin resistance: lessons from genetically engineered mice. J Clin Invest 118, 829–838 (2008).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Shimomura, I., Bashmakov, Y. & Horton, J. D. Increased levels of nuclear SREBP-1c associated with fatty livers in two mouse models of diabetes mellitus. 274, 30028–30032 (1999).

  36. 36.

    Luo, Y. & McKeehan, W. L. Stressed Liver and Muscle Call on Adipocytes with FGF21. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 4, 194 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L. & Brown, M. S. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J Clin Invest 109, 1125–1131 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Inoue, H. et al. Role of STAT-3 in regulation of hepatic gluconeogenic genes and carbohydrate metabolism in vivo. Nat Med 10, 168–174 (2004).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Taniguchi, C. M., Emanuelli, B. & Kahn, C. R. Critical nodes in signalling pathways: insights into insulin action. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 85–96 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Nilsson, C., Raun, K., Yan, F.-F., Larsen, M. O. & Tang-Christensen, M. Laboratory animals as surrogate models of human obesity. Acta Pharmacol Sin 33, 173–181 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Goetz, R. & Mohammadi, M. Exploring mechanisms of FGF signalling through the lens of structural biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 14, 166–180 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Xie, B. et al. Identification of the fibroblast growth factor (FGF)-interacting domain in a secreted FGF-binding protein by phage display. J Biol Chem 281, 1137–1144 (2006).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Wu, A. L., Coulter, S., Liddle, C. & Wong, A. FGF19 regulates cell proliferation, glucose and bile acid metabolism via FGFR4-dependent and independent pathways. 6, 1–11 (2011).

  44. 44.

    Miao, J. et al. Bile acid signaling pathways increase stability of Small Heterodimer Partner (SHP) by inhibiting ubiquitin-proteasomal degradation. Genes Dev 23, 986–996 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Lin, X. et al. FGF21 inhibits apolipoprotein(a) expression in HepG2 cells via the FGFR1-ERK1/2-Elk-1 pathway. Mol Cell Biochem 393, 33–42 (2014).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Fon Tacer, K. et al. Research resource: Comprehensive expression atlas of the fibroblast growth factor system in adult mouse. Mol Endocrinol 24, 2050–2064 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Kurosu, H. et al. Tissue-specific expression of betaKlotho and fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor isoforms determines metabolic activity of FGF19 and FGF21. J Biol Chem 282, 26687–26695 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Degirolamo, C., Sabbà, C. & Moschetta, A. Therapeutic potential of the endocrine fibroblast growth factors FGF19, FGF21 and FGF23. Nat Rev Drug Discov 15, 51–69 (2016).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kir, S. et al. FGF19 as a postprandial, insulin-independent activator of hepatic protein and glycogen synthesis. Science (New York, NY) 331, 1621–1624 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Badman, M. K., Koester, A., Flier, J. S., Kharitonenkov, A. & Maratos-Flier, E. Fibroblast growth factor 21-deficient mice demonstrate impaired adaptation to ketosis. Endocrinology 150, 4931–4940 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Fisher, F. M. et al. Obesity is a fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21)-resistant state. Diabetes 59, 2781–2789 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Xu, J. et al. Fibroblast growth factor 21 reverses hepatic steatosis, increases energy expenditure, and improves insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese mice. Diabetes 58, 250–259 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Lin, Z. et al. Adiponectin Mediates the Metabolic Effects of FGF21 on Glucose Homeostasis and Insulin Sensitivity in Mice. Cell Metab 17, 779–789 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Kharitonenkov, A. & Dimarchi, R. FGF21 Revolutions: Recent Advances Illuminating FGF21 Biology and MedicinalProperties. Trends Endocrinol Metab 1–10, (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Mauer, J., Denson, J. L. & Brüning, J. C. Versatile functions for IL-6 in metabolism and cancer. Trends Immunol 36, 92–101 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Wallenius, V. et al. Interleukin-6-deficient mice develop mature-onset obesity. Nat Med 8, 75–79 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Wallenius, K., Wallenius, V., Sunter, D., Dickson, S. L. & Jansson, J.-O. Intracerebroventricular interleukin-6 treatment decreases body fat in rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 293, 560–565 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Sadagurski, M. et al. Human IL6 enhances leptin action in mice. Diabetologia 53, 525–535 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Glund, S. et al. Interleukin-6 directly increases glucose metabolism in resting human skeletal muscle. Diabetes 56, 1630–1637 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Ellingsgaard, H. et al. Interleukin-6 enhances insulin secretion by increasing glucagon-like peptide-1 secretion from L cells and alpha cells. Nat Med 17, 1481–1489 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Ma, Y., Gao, M., Sun, H. & Liu, D. Interleukin-6 gene transfer reverses body weight gain and fatty liver in obese mice. Biochim Biophys Acta 1852, 1001–1011 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Hidalgo, J. et al. Transgenic mice with astrocyte-targeted production of interleukin-6 are resistant to high-fat diet-induced increases in body weight and body fat. Brain Behav. Immun. 24, 119–126 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Wunderlich, F. T. et al. Interleukin-6 signaling in liver-parenchymal cells suppresses hepatic inflammation and improves systemic insulin action. Cell Metab 12, 237–249 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Reitman, M. L. FGF21 mimetic shows therapeutic promise. Cell Metab 18, 307–309 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Nicholes, K. et al. A mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma: ectopic expression of fibroblast growth factor 19 in skeletal muscle of transgenic mice. Am J Pathol 160, 2295–2307 (2002).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Kharitonenkov, A. et al. FGF-21 as a novel metabolic regulator. J Clin Invest 115, 1627–1635 (2005).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Suh, J. M. et al. Endocrinization of FGF1 produces a neomorphic and potent insulin sensitizer. Nature 513, 436–439 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Stylianou, D. C. et al. Effect of single-chain antibody targeting of the ligand-binding domain in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor. Oncogene 28, 3296–3306 (2009).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references


We wish to thank Wentao Zhang, PhD who generated the MBP-BP3 constructs and some of the initial data, Tabari Baker, PhD and Siyuan Zhao for experimental assistance and Amrita Cheema, PhD for some of the metabolomics analysis. Supported by Georgetown University institutional funds, NIH grants P01 HL068686 (CSW, AW), R01 CA71508 (AW), P30 CA51008 (AW) and by the Swedish Research Council (2016-01381 MC). BP3−/− mice were generated by the trans-NIH Knock-Out Mouse Project (KOMP) and obtained from the KOMP Repository ( NIH grants to Velocigene (U01HG004085) and the CSD Consortium (U01HG004080) funded the generation of gene-targeted ES cells archived and distributed by the KOMP Repository at UC Davis and CHORI (U42RR024244). SPR experiments and metabolomics analyses were done by the shared resources of the Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center (supported by P30 CA51008). Analysis of metabolic panels and liver lipids was done at the Mouse Metabolic Phenotypic Center (MMPC), University of Cincinnati, (Cincinnati, OH; U24 DK059630).

Author information




E.T., K.A.G. and A.W. designed the experiments in discussion with A.T.R., M.C. and C.S.W. E.T. and K.A.G. conducted the experiments, with assistance from M.O.S., X.M., M.C., K.W.K. and Y.T. E.T., K.A.G. and M.O.S. analyzed data. R.G., M.M. and A.U. provided reagents and analytic tools. E.T. and A.W. wrote and revised the manuscript with input from all co-authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anton Wellstein.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

A.W. declares competing interests since he is named as inventor on a Georgetown University patent related to treatments for lowering glucose levels using FGFBP3, described in this manuscript. All other authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tassi, E., Garman, K.A., Schmidt, M.O. et al. Fibroblast Growth Factor Binding Protein 3 (FGFBP3) impacts carbohydrate and lipid metabolism. Sci Rep 8, 15973 (2018).

Download citation


  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Binding Protein (FGFBP3)
  • Endocrine FGFs
  • Non-esterified Fatty Acids (NEFA)
  • Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD)
  • MBP Expression

Further reading

  • Loss of UGP2 in brain leads to a severe epileptic encephalopathy, emphasizing that bi-allelic isoform-specific start-loss mutations of essential genes can cause genetic diseases

    • Elena Perenthaler
    • , Anita Nikoncuk
    • , Soheil Yousefi
    • , Woutje M. Berdowski
    • , Maysoon Alsagob
    • , Ivan Capo
    • , Herma C. van der Linde
    • , Paul van den Berg
    • , Edwin H. Jacobs
    • , Darija Putar
    • , Mehrnaz Ghazvini
    • , Eleonora Aronica
    • , Wilfred F. J. van IJcken
    • , Walter G. de Valk
    • , Evita Medici-van den Herik
    • , Marjon van Slegtenhorst
    • , Lauren Brick
    • , Mariya Kozenko
    • , Jennefer N. Kohler
    • , Jonathan A. Bernstein
    • , Kristin G. Monaghan
    • , Amber Begtrup
    • , Rebecca Torene
    • , Amna Al Futaisi
    • , Fathiya Al Murshedi
    • , Renjith Mani
    • , Faisal Al Azri
    • , Erik-Jan Kamsteeg
    • , Majid Mojarrad
    • , Atieh Eslahi
    • , Zaynab Khazaei
    • , Fateme Massinaei Darmiyan
    • , Mohammad Doosti
    • , Ehsan Ghayoor Karimiani
    • , Jana Vandrovcova
    • , Faisal Zafar
    • , Nuzhat Rana
    • , Krishna K. Kandaswamy
    • , Jozef Hertecant
    • , Peter Bauer
    • , Mohammed A. AlMuhaizea
    • , Mustafa A. Salih
    • , Mazhor Aldosary
    • , Rawan Almass
    • , Laila Al-Quait
    • , Wafa Qubbaj
    • , Serdar Coskun
    • , Khaled O. Alahmadi
    • , Muddathir H. A. Hamad
    • , Salem Alwadaee
    • , Khalid Awartani
    • , Anas M. Dababo
    • , Futwan Almohanna
    • , Dilek Colak
    • , Mohammadreza Dehghani
    • , Mohammad Yahya Vahidi Mehrjardi
    • , Murat Gunel
    • , A. Gulhan Ercan-Sencicek
    • , Gouri Rao Passi
    • , Huma Arshad Cheema
    • , Stephanie Efthymiou
    • , Henry Houlden
    • , Aida M. Bertoli-Avella
    • , Alice S. Brooks
    • , Kyle Retterer
    • , Reza Maroofian
    • , Namik Kaya
    • , Tjakko J. van Ham
    •  & Tahsin Stefan Barakat

    Acta Neuropathologica (2020)

  • Deciphering role of FGFR signalling pathway in pancreatic cancer

    • Xiaodiao Kang
    • , Zeng Lin
    • , Minhui Xu
    • , Jun Pan
    •  & Zhi‐wei Wang

    Cell Proliferation (2019)


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing