Article | Open | Published:

Sensitivity to near-future CO2 conditions in marine crabs depends on their compensatory capacities for salinity change

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 15639 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Marine crabs inhabit shallow coastal/estuarine habitats particularly sensitive to climate change, and yet we know very little about the diversity of their responses to environmental change. We report the effects of a rarely studied, but increasingly prevalent, combination of environmental factors, that of near-future pCO2 (~1000 µatm) and a physiologically relevant 20% reduction in salinity. We focused on two crab species with differing abilities to cope with natural salinity change, and revealed via physiological and molecular studies that salinity had an overriding effect on ion exchange in the osmoregulating shore crab, Carcinus maenas. This species was unaffected by elevated CO2, and was able to hyper-osmoregulate and maintain haemolymph pH homeostasis for at least one year. By contrast, the commercially important edible crab, Cancer pagurus, an osmoconformer, had limited ion-transporting capacities, which were unresponsive to dilute seawater. Elevated CO2 disrupted haemolymph pH homeostasis, but there was some respite in dilute seawater due to a salinity-induced metabolic alkalosis (increase in HCO3 at constant pCO2). Ultimately, Cancer pagurus was poorly equipped to compensate for change, and exposures were limited to 9 months. Failure to understand the full spectrum of species-related vulnerabilities could lead to erroneous predictions of the impacts of a changing marine climate.

Introduction

Estuarine and shallow coastal habitats are complex ecosystems of high productivity facing conflicting socio-economic and environmental demands1. Estuaries, for instance, are important areas for fisheries and aquaculture production and yet are challenging environments in which to live because of the co-occurrence of fluctuations in salinity, temperature, pH and oxygen on different spatial and temporal scales2. Climate change is inflicting further environmental change with global increases in atmospheric CO2 leading to elevated sea surface temperatures and CO2-driven reductions in ocean pH, broadly termed ‘ocean acidification’ (OA)3. Increased surface temperature is also leading to an intensification of the global water cycle resulting in changing patterns of ocean surface salinity4. Shallow coastal and estuarine regions may experience greater changes in pH and salinity than the open ocean through an increased frequency of exceptional storm events and freshwater runoff from terrestrial flooding5,6.

The impacts of reductions in salinity and pH on marine communities and populations are difficult to assess because of the complexity of species and community interactions, and the time scales involved in observing changes in biodiversity, abundance and geographical range7. Individual physiologies, however, are ecologically relevant as they may provide mechanistic explanations for differences in sensitivity, performance, adaptive potential, and ultimately survival to environmental change among species and taxa8,9. For example, physiological responses to salinity change influence salinity tolerances of aquatic organisms and can be related to community structure and boundaries of species distribution2. Indeed, marine invertebrates demonstrate a range of osmoregulatory strategies from independent regulation of body fluid osmolality to conformity10. Conventionally, species that demonstrate active life styles with high metabolic rates are considered less vulnerable7,11,12,13. Physiologically, it is argued that such species have greater capacities for ion exchange and for buffering and transporting CO2 in the blood8,11,12,14. However, much of our understanding of these responses comes from short-term experiments (e.g. days to weeks) and acute exposures to single stressors12,14,15. Of more concern, comparatively little is known about physiological responses to environmentally relevant changes under more realistic climate change scenarios of multiple interacting environmental drivers over the longer term (months to years)16,17,18,19.

Multifactorial experiments are beginning to show interactive effects on an organism’s physiology, which might have significant longer-term repercussions on performance than each factor in isolation19,20,21,22,23. The research focus to date, however, has been on elevated pCO2 and warming20,24. Experiments investigating combined effects of elevated pCO2 and salinity have received much less attention, especially the ability of species to compensate for CO2-induced changes in extracellular pH (acid-base status). Compensation of extracellular pH is fundamental to survival during elevated pCO212,13,15,25, but is itself influenced by salinity, with seawater dilution disrupting extracellular acid-base status26 and energy status27. The combined effects of both environmental factors are difficult to predict as acid-base adjustments occur via ion exchange mechanisms, which may also have the opposing function of ion uptake during low salinity exposure for the purposes of osmoregulation. Ion regulation, however, is an energetically demanding process suggesting that osmoregulation in marine invertebrates under low salinity may be a distinct disadvantage in the longer-term due to trade-offs with ecologically important processes such as growth and reproduction15,27,28.

Marine crabs are important predators of molluscs, polychaetes and other crustaceans and have significant effects on community structure in shallow coastal and estuarine ecosystems. Many crab species are also commercially important and increasingly contribute to global food security through capture fisheries and aquaculture. Marine crustaceans are generally considered to be more tolerant of increasing CO2 levels than other taxa, but physiological studies are mainly limited to those species more capable of coping with environmental change12,13. Here we test these broad assumptions about the performance of key taxa, and explore the prediction that compensatory capacities are complex, highly variable but intrinsically linked with the ability to ion and osmo-regulate12 by examining two species of marine crabs with differing abilities to compensate for salinity change. We studied a moderate osmoregulator, the intertidal/estuarine shore crab, Carcinus maenas and an osmoconformer, the subtidal edible crab, Cancer pagurus. Carcinus maenas is euryhaline and capable of hyper-osmoregulation down to an external salinity of 829, but Cancer pagurus is stenohaline, and prefers marine habitats usually buffered from salinity change. Carcinus maenas demonstrates remarkable environmental tolerance, has a wide geographical distribution and is highly invasive outside of Europe30. Cancer pagurus inhabits shallow shelf waters of the NE Atlantic from tidal levels (juveniles) down to 50–100 m (adults)31, and supports one of the most important fisheries in Europe32. Little is known about Cancer pagurus physiology, apart from the fact that it is an osmoconformer unable to maintain body fluid osmolality separate from that of the external environment33, and is more sensitive to rising temperatures when exposed to high CO234. We exposed both species to combinations of pCO2 (ambient at 400 µatm vs ‘business as usual’ predictions for 2100 at ~1000 µatm), and salinity (SW, full strength salinity = 33 vs DW, reduced salinity = 25) according to a fully factorial design, and studied key physiological processes of pH homeostasis and ion regulation for up to 12 months. The purpose here was to provide a physiological framework to explain species-specific differences in CO2 tolerances, to further understand vulnerabilities of marine invertebrates to future coastal/estuarine environments.

Results

Seawater Chemistry

Seawater locally sourced from the Menai Strait was unpolluted and had an ionic composition in agreement with that of reference seawater (Table 1 in35). Variations in seawater carbonate chemistry were greater among treatments than within treatments over time. The seawater manipulations produced reasonably stable and accurate experimental parameters as detailed in Supplementary Table S1. Overall, salinity had no effect on seawater pCO2 but AT and DIC were significantly higher and pH significantly lower in SW compared with DW. Under elevated pCO2, seawater pCO2 and DIC increased but AT was unaffected (Supplementary Table S1). Temperature varied over time in all four treatments, but all treatments showed the same temporal pattern.

Haemolymph Acid-base Status

To determine the ability of crabs to maintain extracellular acid-base homeostasis, we measured haemolymph pH, partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2), and bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3]). In Carcinus maenas, all three acid-base parameters varied with time (Fig. 1a,c,e; Table 1), but were unaffected by either salinity or pCO2 (Supplementary Tables S3 and S4). Haemolymph pH remained unchanged from one to 6 months, but fell significantly between 6 and 12 months (Fig. 1a). Haemolymph pCO2 and [HCO3] were significantly higher at 3 and 6 months than at one month, but declined again at 12 months (Fig. 1c,e).

Figure 1
Figure 1

Haemolymph acid-base changes against time in Carcinus maenas: (a) haemolymph pH; (c) partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2); (e) bicarbonate concentration ([HCO3]). Acid-base changes in Cancer pagurus: (b) haemolymph pH according to salinity and time (SW = full strength seawater, closed circles; DW = dilute seawater, open circles); (d) haemolymph pCO2 and (f) haemolymph [HCO3] according to external pCO2 and time (CCO2 = control, closed triangles; HCO2 = elevated pCO2, open triangles). Values given as means ± SEM. For all acid-base variables in Carcinus maenas n = 27, 25, 30 and 24 at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months, respectively. For haemolymph pH in Cancer pagurus: n = 15 at 1 month and n = 16 at 3, 6 and 12 months in SW and DW, apart from 9 months in DW when n = 12. For haemolymph pCO2 and [HCO3] in Cancer pagurus: n = 15 at 1, 3 and 9 months at CCO2 and HCO2, apart from 9 months in HCO2 when n = 13, and n = 16 at 6 months in both conditions. Values with different letters show significant differences (SNK post hoc, P < 0.05). In 1a, c and e, both SW and DW shown for reference even though salinity had no effect (significant differences related to changes over time). All values in control crabs at one month (CCO2, SW) were similar to those measured in baseline crabs (closed squares; t-tests, df = 13, P = 0.457 to 0.996).

Table 1 Summary of the models that best explain variation in the physiological parameters for both crab species.

All four explanatory variables (CO2, salinity, time, body size) influenced haemolymph acid-base status in Cancer pagurus but in different combinations depending on acid-base parameter. Haemolymph pH varied according to salinity and time, but the salinity effect was consistent over the course of the experiment (Fig. 1b; Tables 1, S5 and S6). Haemolymph pH was significantly lower in SW vs DW crabs at 7.79 ± 0.02 (n = 63) and 7.83 ± 0.02 (n = 59), respectively (Supplementary Table S6). Haemolymph pCO2 and [HCO3] were higher under elevated seawater pCO2, irrespective of the significant effect of time (Tables 1 and S6; Fig. 1d,f), and the small but significant increase in both acid-base variables with increase in body size (Supplementary Figs S1 and S2; Table S6). For example, mean haemolymph pCO2 in Carcinus maenas at 6 months was 0.36 ± 0.03 µatm in ambient and 0.50 ± 0.06 µatm in elevated pCO2 (Fig. 1d). In the same month, [HCO3] was 8.25 ± 0.43 mmol L−1 in ambient but 10.29 ± 0.82 mmol L−1 in elevated pCO2 (Fig. 1f). In all cases n = 16.

Haemolymph osmolality was determined to assess the ability of the crabs to osmoregulate.

In Carcinus maenas, haemolymph osmolality varied due to salinity and time (Tables 1 and S3), but pCO2 had no effect. Haemolymph osmolality was significantly lower in DW vs SW crabs at 839 ± 14 (n = 50) and 944 ± 10 (n = 51) mosmol kg−1, respectively (Supplementary Table S4). Over time, osmolality fell significantly at 3 months (SNK post hoc P < 0.05), but values recovered after 6 and 12 months exposure. Haemolymph osmolality in DW crabs remained 103 to 175 mosmol kg−1 above that of external DW, apart from 3 months when haemolymph osmolality was only 44 mosmol kg−1 above that of DW.

The main effect on haemolymph osmolality in Cancer pagurus, was salinity, but there were also interactive effects of body size with CO2, and with time (Tables 1 and S5). As the effects of CO2 and body size were relatively small (Supplementary Fig. S3), the most important factors were salinity and time. Haemolymph osmolality was significantly lower in DW vs SW crabs at 757 ± 9 (n = 59) and 947 ± 8 (n = 62) mosmol kg−1, respectively (Supplementary Table S5), but remained 22 mosmol kg−1 above that of the dilute seawater in DW crabs.

Branchial NKA activities were examined in posterior gill 8 to determine whether crabs were engaging active, energy consuming mechanisms to maintain acid-base status and osmoregulation. Salinity had a highly significant effect on NKA activities in Carcinus maenas (Tables 1 and S4) with activities 1.5 fold higher in DW vs SW crabs at 3.86 ± 0.13 (n = 54) and 2.5 ± 0.08 (n = 51) µmol ADP mg−1 protein h−1, respectively. By contrast, elevated pCO2 had no effect on NKA activity in Carcinus maenas. NKA activities in the posterior gill 8 of Cancer pagurus were unaffected by any of the explanatory variables (Tables 2 and S5), apart from a small increase in NKA activities with increase in body size, which was marginally significant (Table S6). Mean NKA activities in Cancer pagurus gills were 1.07 ± 0.03 (n = 110) µmol ADP mg−1 protein h−1.

Table 2 Summary of models that best explain variation in expression of six genes in the posterior gills of both crab species.

Branchial gene expression

Gene transcription of several ion transporting genes were quantified to examine the underlying mechanisms responsible for ion and acid-base regulation in the posterior gills of marine crabs. We measured the ion transporting enzymes: Na+/K+-ATPase α-subunit, NKAα; cytoplasmic carbonic anhydrase, CAc; and gpi-linked carbonic anhydrase, gpi-CA. We also examined the ion exchangers: anion exchanger protein (Cl/HCO3), AE; sodium/proton exchanger, NHE; and V-type H+ ATPase B-subunit, VATB. Justification for the choice of genes is given in Methods.

In Carcinus maenas, NKAα expression in gill 8 varied due to a relatively weak 3-way interaction between salinity, pCO2 and body size (Supplementary Table S7 and Fig. S4). Further analysis of the simpler models demonstrated that salinity had an important effect with significantly higher values in DW crabs (Table 2; Fig. 2). Variation in CAc was influenced by 3-way interactions between time and body size, and either salinity or pCO2 (Supplementary Fig. S5; Tables 2 and S7). Further analysis revealed that there was a clear effect of salinity, regardless of time and body size, with higher CAc expression in DW crabs (Fig. 2). In contrast, elevated pCO2 had no effect (Fig. 3). Salinity was the only factor to influence gpi-CA and VATB gene expression in Carcinus maenas (Tables 2 and S7). Both genes were upregulated in DW but to a lesser extent than CAc (Fig. 2). NHE expression for Carcinus maenas varied due to a 3-way interaction between pCO2, time and body size (Supplementary Table S7). However, exploration of simpler models revealed an interaction between salinity and body size, as well as time and body size (Tables 2 and S7; Fig. S6). At one and 3 months, NHE expression tended to be lower in the smallest SW Carcinus maenas (CW < 30 mm at one month and <35 mm at 3 months) (Supplementary Fig. S6). At the same sampling intervals, smaller crabs showed an increase in NHE expression in DW. When considered as a main effect, salinity significantly affected NHE expression (Fig. 2). AE was unaffected by salinity or pCO2, but instead depended on body size and sampling time (Tables 2 and S7). AE expression increased with body size at one and 3 months, but declined with body size at 6 and 9 months (Supplementary Fig. S7).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Expression of selected genes as a function of salinity. Gene expression under control (SW, closed circles) and dilute seawater (DW, open triangles) salinity across all time points and pCO2 treatments. Gene expression values scaled relative to values in the control salinity treatment. Numbers at the top of the plots represent the proportional change in expression between control and low salinity. Asterisks represent the significance of these difference from t-tests, where P = 0.05–0.01 (*), 0.01–0.001 (**) and <0.001 (***). Shaded areas represent the spread (SE) of expression values at the end of acclimation period and prior to the start of the experiment. For Carcinus maenas, n = 62 for SW and for DW crabs. For Cancer pagurus, n = 64 for SW, and n = 61 for DW.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Expression of selected genes as a function of pCO2 level. Gene expression under control (closed circles) and elevated (open triangles) pCO2 across all time points and salinity treatments. Gene expression values scaled relative to values in the control pCO2 treatment. Numbers at the top of the plots represent the proportional change in expression between control and elevated pCO2. Explanation for asterisks and shaded areas given in Fig. 2. For Carcinus maenas, n = 62 for both CCO2 and HCO2. For Cancer pagurus, n = 64 for CCO2, and n = 61 for HCO2.

In contrast to Carcinus maenas, NKAα, gpi-CA and AE in gill 8 of Cancer pagurus were unaffected by any of the main factors (Tables 2 and S8). CAc expression varied with time due to a small down regulation between one and 12 months. VATB was the only gene in the gills of Cancer pagurus to vary with salinity, and even though VATB expression also varied with time and body size, it was consistently lower in DW crabs (Fig. 2).

Discussion

Here we develop a novel mechanistic understanding of the combined effects of long-term exposure to elevated pCO2 and reduced salinity in two marine crab species with contrasting ecophysiological characteristics. We provide evidence that physiological responses of crab species with differing experiences of salinity change in their natural environment, affects their ability to cope with elevations in seawater pCO2. Overall, pH homeostasis in Carcinus maenas, the osmoregulator, which has invaded estuarine and intertidal environments, was unaffected by elevated pCO2 or salinity, either alone or in combination. In marked contrast, the edible crab, the osmoconformer, was unable to maintain pH homeostasis under similar CO2 and salinity treatments, although there was some respite to acid-base disruptions in dilute seawater. All DW crabs at a salinity of 25 experienced higher external pH values and lower AT values than their SW counterparts (Supplementary Table S1). Such changes in seawater carbonate chemistry result from salinity-induced changes in dissociation constants for carbonic acid and solubility coefficients for CO236. Physico-chemical changes in seawater can influence haemolymph pCO2 levels in Carcinus maenas but are not known to affect the metabolic alkalosis caused by reduced salinity (reviewed in12). With this in mind, we discuss below the potential mechanisms underlying the contrasting abilities of these two species to compensate for external changes in CO2 and salinity, and consider how this information can generally inform on the vulnerability of osmoregulators vs osmoconformers in a changing ocean.

Effects of reduced salinity and elevated CO2 on the osmoregulator

Haemolymph acid-base status in Carcinus maenas was unaffected by either a salinity reduction to 25, or an elevation in pCO2 to 1000 µatm, or both factors in combination. Minor adjustments in haemolymph [HCO3] occurred over time to compensate for small elevations in haemolymph pCO2, and despite a slight fall in haemolymph pH at 12 months, all 3 acid-base parameters remained well within the normal range of values reported for aquatic crabs37. Carcinus maenas was clearly capable of fully compensating for the treatment combinations over 12 months exposure. First, because haemolymph pCO2 was unaffected by the near-future increases in seawater pCO2 (~1000 µatm, 0.10 kPa), which suggested the maintenance of an outward diffusion gradient for CO2 excretion across the gills11,37. Second, because external reductions in salinity had no effect on haemolymph pH, which usually increases in marine crabs during short-term salinity transfer through the increased elimination of H+ during enhanced Na+ uptake26. Compensation over time is likely to have involved branchial HCO3 uptake from external seawater, which is the principal mechanism for extracellular acid-base regulation in aquatic crabs37.

In Carcinus maenas, salinity was the only factor to affect NKA activity in posterior gill 8. NKA activities were significantly higher in DW than SW crabs as previously observed in euryhaline crabs, including Carcinus maenas, after transfer to low salinity29,38. This large, trans-membrane transport enzyme is a critical component of low salinity acclimation in osmoregulating crabs, as it establishes electrochemical gradients across the gill and provides the major driving force for the transepithelial movement of ions29,39. During low salinity exposure, increased NKA activities in the posterior gills are associated with the active branchial absorption of Na+ and Cl to compensate for the passive, diffusive loss of these ions. The NKA activities obtained in the posterior gills of SW crabs in this investigation match those obtained by40. The moderate 2-fold increase in NKA activities observed in DW crabs, however, was smaller than that previously reported for Carcinus maenas during shorter term exposures to lower salinities (3 weeks at a salinity of 10)41. The difference here was the maintenance of elevated NKA activities in the posterior gills of DW crabs for 12 months, despite the possible energetic repercussions associated with NKA activity as a major energy-demanding process42.

The current gene transcription experiment supports an increasing role for ion regulation in Carcinus maenas during dilute seawater exposure. Five out of the 6 genes responsible for both ion and acid-base regulation were upregulated in response to salinity. For NKAα; gpi-CA and VATB, salinity was the main driver resulting in upregulation of all 3 genes. Collectively these responses indicate an increasing dependence on ion regulation during exposure to dilute seawater to compensate for the high rate of ion loss and increased passive uptake of water43,44. More specifically, upregulation of NKAα in combination with increased NKA activities suggests proliferation of specialised cells for osmo- and ion exchange in the posterior gills, and an increased ability to drive ion exchange across the gill epithelium against a concentration gradient29,45. The salinity-induced increase in VATB expression may support the movement of Na+, K+ and Cl across the apical membrane, and it may also increase the rate at which H+ provided by CAc is pumped out of the cytoplasm, assuming the proton pump is located on the apical membrane38,46,47. The salinity-induced upregulation of gpi-CA is harder to explain as this enzyme is present on the basolateral membrane of gill epithelia and mainly has a respiratory role in enhancing CO2 excretion48. However, upregulation of gpi-CA in the posterior gills of Carcinus maenas also occurs in response to short-term, low salinity transfer and may be associated with the combined effects of increased metabolic rate (increased rate of CO2 excretion) and the proliferation of ion transporting cells in low salinity48.

Reduced salinity also caused the upregulation of 2 further genes: CAc and NHE. Although pCO2 interacted with salinity and with body size in the present study, further inspection of the relationships revealed that salinity was the main factor responsible for the upregulation of CAc. Increased CAc expression represents a permanent transcriptional response to low salinity, and indicates an increase in CAc activity44. CAc plays a central role in both ion and acid-base regulation as it catalyses the hydration of CO2 in the cytoplasm of gill epithelia to provide counter ions (H+ and HCO3) for both anion and NHE exchange29,48,49. Previous studies demonstrate that CAc is directly involved in osmo- and ion regulation in several euryhaline crabs including Carcinus maenas44,50. Our studies further support this view as the CAc gene was the most sensitive to reduced salinity suggesting an important involvement in ion regulation as outlined by48. Upregulation of NHE in DW crabs suggests enhanced Na+ uptake, as NHE is responsible for exchanging two cations (Na+ and possibly NH4+) for one proton across the apical surface of crab gill epithelia51. Previous studies have failed to show an upregulation in NHE in Carcinus maenas gills after 15 days in low salinity49, but the present study demonstrates the importance of NHE in making long-term adjustments.

In sharp contrast to salinity, near-future pCO2 had no effect on posterior gill NKA activities, or on the transcription levels of the genes measured here in Carcinus maenas. Similarly, a pCO2 of 4,000 µatm (0.4 kPa) had no effect on the genes associated with acid-base regulation in Carcinus maenas gills after acute exposures of 7 days and 11 weeks25, although the experimental crabs used by these authors originated in the Baltic living at salinities of 14–15, and may already have increased capacities for ion exchange. Collectively, these studies illustrate that the capacity to regulate acid-base disturbances under elevated pCO2 in osmoregulators is not reliant on biochemical or transcriptional control of ion exchange mechanisms in the posterior gill, although the role of anterior gills warrants further study52. Indeed other acute studies have revealed an increase in NKAα expression and membrane bound CA in isolated, perfused gills from Carcinus maenas acclimated to low salinity (S = 10) for 7 days and exposed to a pCO2 of 3,243 µatm (0.32 kPa)53, although upregulation of both genes were only observed in the anterior but not the posterior gills.

As body size co-varied with time in Carcinus maenas, it was difficult to assess the independent effects of either factor. Our study suggests that body size had some effect on the gene expression ratios of CAc, NHE and AE in posterior gills (Table 2). It is possible that these size-dependent relationships were due to a decline in weight-specific gill surface area with increase in body mass, as observed in the strong osmoregulating crab, Callinectes sapidus, and in several freshwater decapod species33,54. The positive relationships between body size and gene expression could also be associated with reductions in gill permeability observed with increase in body size54. Clearly, the independent effect of body size on gene expression ratios for branchial ion-transporters requires further investigation.

Effects of reduced salinity and elevated CO2 on the osmoconformer

Our study demonstrates that the edible crab, Cancer pagurus, was unable to increase ion regulatory capacities during exposure to reduced salinity even after prolonged exposure for 9 months, as branchial NKA activities and gene expression ratios for all genes, apart from VATB, were unaffected by salinity. Moreover, NKA activities in Cancer pagurus gills were the same as those determined by40 and lower than those observed in SW Carcinus maenas, further supporting the general observation that NKA activities are lower in stenohaline vs euryhaline species29. Nonetheless, the ability of Cancer pagurus to maintain haemolymph osmolality just above the values in dilute seawater demonstrates some control over extracellular osmolality. Such control is likely to be related to the production and efflux of free amino acids from the tissues during low salinity exposure in order to decrease intracellular osmolality and protect against cell swelling10,28,52. Previous studies report that Cancer pagurus gills have greater capacities than Carcinus maenas gills for dealing with deamination resulting from amino acid mobilisation; for instance, they have greater capacities for the active excretion of NH3, and have an increased dependency on the metabolism of amino acids55,56. Moreover, osmoconforming species tend to have higher gill permeabilities to water and to ions56,57. For example, transepithelial conductances are 5 times higher in the posterior gills of Cancer pagurus compared with Carcinus maenas56. Whilst there is some indication that gill permeabilities do not change in osmoconformers after 2 week’s exposure to low salinity29, preliminary results show a thickening of the branchial cuticle in Cancer pagurus after 6 months exposure to DW, which may indicate a decrease in gill permeability (R. Poulter, B. Ciotti, C. Hauton, unpublished observations).

The general accumulation of haemolymph pCO2 and [HCO3] in Cancer pagurus over time suggests impairment of CO2 excretion, especially after 9 months. This response is difficult to explain but may result from a combination of factors, such as increase in body size reducing CO2 excretion rates caused by a fall in weight-specific gill surface area, and/or the limited involvement of ion exchange mechanisms and ion transporting cells in CO2 excretion in Cancer pagurus gills. Regardless of time, we provide evidence that pCO2 and [HCO3] were consistently higher in crabs exposed to elevated pCO2 than in controls. Moreover, a key observation in the present study was the diminished disturbance to haemolymph pH in Cancer pagurus held in dilute seawater. It is possible that this response was caused by a metabolic alkalosis resulting from an increase in haemolymph [HCO3] independently of external changes to offset the increased difference in haemolymph Na+ and Cl concentrations (known as strong ion difference) resulting from exposure to low salinity58. An increased deamination of amino acids associated with cell volume control, may also buffer the production of H+ via subsequent binding to NH3 to give NH4+ as observed in isolated gill preparations in osmoconforming Carcinus maenas on exposure to elevated pCO252. In addition, increased ammonia excretion via NHE exchangers would increase the loss of H+ during low salinity exposure. Although the actual mechanisms causing the metabolic alkalosis remain unclear, the pH-bicarbonate diagram in Fig. 4 illustrates that SW Cancer pagurus had lower haemolymph pH than DW crabs and experienced greater disruptions to acid-base status during elevations in seawater pCO2. Although there was some ability to increase haemolymph [HCO3], values were considerably lower (<15 mmol l−l) than those reported in osmoregulators during hypercapnia12. Moreover, VATB was downregulated in low salinity, which may have increased H+ availability in the haemolymph supporting the formation of NH4+, potentially contributing to the metabolic alkalosis. In our study Cancer pagurus survived the treatment combinations for 9 months before mortality rates started to increase. Cancer pagurus exposed to 50% seawater (S = 15) survived for 15 days by tolerating the salinity-induced changes31. This is unlikely to be the case in the present study, because of the time scale involved. Instead, longer-term exposures may allow alterations in the concentration of osmotically active solutes and also changes in gill permeability28. The effectiveness of such a strategy, however, was limited ultimately demonstrating the sensitivity of Cancer pagurus to combined changes in CO2 and salinity.

Figure 4
Figure 4

A pH–bicarbonate diagram comparing the main acid-base variables in the haemolymph of Cancer pagurus exposed to the 4 treatments: SW = seawater S = 33 (grey symbols); DW = dilute seawater S = 25 (black symbols); CCO2 = control pCO2 (closed circles); HCO2 = elevated pCO2 (open circles). Continuous curved lines represent pCO2 isopleths for Cancer pagurus haemolymph in SW. The associated dotted lines represent the shift in pCO2 isopleths in DW, resulting from salinity-related changes in dissociation constants for carbonic acid. The broken line represents the non-bicarbonate buffer line (β = 12 mmol l−1 pH−1) taken from78 adjusted for the protein levels measured in Cancer pagurus haemolymph. Values given as means ± SEM (n = 32 in SW + CCO2; n = 31 in SW + HCO2; n = 29 in DW + CCO2; n = 27 in DW + HCO2).

Conclusion

Our work emphasises the dominant impact of a relatively understudied climate change variable, salinity, in comparison to elevated pCO2, and demonstrates the necessity to study specific salinity/pCO2 combinations. We also demonstrate that ion transporting capacities are of key importance in terms of predicting responses of marine species to climate change. Mechanisms of active transbranchial ion uptake, which enable euryhaline osmoregulating crabs to invade and exploit estuarine environments have also improved their tolerances to elevated CO2. The sustained, salinity-driven increase in gill NKA activities observed in dilute seawater Carcinus maenas, as well as the salinity–induced upregulation of 5 out of the 6 genes of interest suggests permanent adjustments in branchial ion exchange to low salinity. Such mechanisms are also sufficient to maintain CO2 excretion across the gills at elevated CO2, regardless of salinity. The failure to increase branchial ion transporting capacities in the osmoconforming species, Cancer pagurus, even in juveniles occupying the low intertidal, shows greater species sensitivity to elevated CO2, although there is some respite in dilute seawater. We conclude that osmoconformers with their preferences for stable habitats are poorly equipped for changes in seawater CO2 and salinity via the inability to increase ion exchange capacities. Further high resolution studies are urgently required to assess the role of ecological (e.g. behaviour, habitat use etc.) and evolutionary (e.g. genetic diversity) responses in determining whether osmoconformers, such as Cancer pagurus, are able to survive a multivariate natural environment. In conclusion, our observations argue for the careful identification of species sensitivity to environmental perturbations and cautions against forecasting potential ecosystem futures based on assessments of community structure at relatively course taxonomic resolution.

Methods

Animal collection and maintenance

Juvenile Carcinus maenas were collected by hand from low intertidal sites on Anglesey, UK (53°13′48″N, 4°9′W and 53°13′12″N, 4°10′48″W) between March and May 2013 and returned to the Nuffield Laboratory, School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University within 2 h of collection. Carcinus maenas were exposed to treatments starting in June 2013 (body mass = 7.12 ± 0.17 g; carapace width = 30.7 ± 0.2 mm; n = 480). Juvenile Cancer pagurus from a single panmictic population were collected by hand from Feb to March 2014 at various low intertidal, non-SAC (Special Areas of Conservation) sites from Anglesey (53°24′36″N,4°17′24″W) to South Wales (51°34′12″N,3°58′48″W). Crabs were transported back to the Nuffield Laboratory and returned to seawater within 5 h. Cancer pagurus were exposed to treatments from June 2014 (body mass = 21.74 ± 0.74 g; carapace width = 48.3 ± 0.6 mm; n = 472). Both species were collected from low intertidal sites characterised by rocky outcrops on generally sheltered shores. Before treatments commenced, crabs were held in fully aerated and recirculated (sand filtered and UV sterilised) seawater at ambient conditions of salinity, pCO2 (400 µatm), day length and temperature (Carcinus maenas: 9.0 ± 0.3 °C, salinity 33.9 ± 0.1, pHNIST 8.03 ± 0.10; Cancer pagurus: 12.0 ± 1.6 °C, salinity 34.4 ± 0.1, pHNIST 8.01 ± 0.10) for between one and 4 months. Crabs were fed a food ration of approximately 4% of body mass three times a week; twice on a diet of squid (Squid rings, Bradleys, UK) and once a week with a diet of mussels (Mytilus edulis).

Experimental regime

Juvenile Carcinus maenas and Cancer pagurus were exposed on separate occasions to elevated pCO2 to match the ‘business as usual’ scenario for 2100 of ~1000 µatm59, and a reduction in salinity to 25 corresponding to the values just below those responsible for initiating osmoregulation in Carcinus maenas29,48. Crabs were exposed to one of 4 treatments in an aquarium system modified from60: ambient pCO2 (~400 µatm)/seawater (salinity 33); elevated pCO2 (~1000 µatm)/seawater (salinity 33); ambient pCO2 (~400 µatm)/dilute seawater (salinity 25); and elevated pCO2 (~1000 µatm)/dilute seawater (salinity 25). Each treatment consisted of a mixing tank (350 L), a header tank (100 L) and five holding tanks (48 L). Each mixing tank was supplied with natural, filtered (200 µm) and UV sterilized seawater. Seawater dilution was achieved in two of the mixing tanks by adding dechlorinated freshwater vigorously aerated for several hours in an adjoining holding tank (510 L). Salinity was controlled at 25 via conductivity sensors (Eutech Instruments COND 560) calibrated with certified standards (Cole Palmer) every week. Elevated CO2 levels were delivered to two of the mixing tanks by controlling the flow of a gas mixture of air and pure CO2 via gas line restrictors and flow meters according to61. The composition of the air/CO2 gas mixture was determined using a Licor LI-840A CO2 analyser. The two remaining mixing tanks were fully aerated to represent ambient pCO2 levels (~400 µatm). Seawater supplied to each header tank from its corresponding mixing tank was gravity fed to five independent holding tanks at a rate of 68 ± 6 L h−1 (mean ± SD) and run to waste. The system was housed within a temperature controlled room set at 11 °C and held in a light: dark cycle of 12 L:12D. Further control of seawater temperature in each header tank was achieved by an inline thermostatic heater (Elecro 900 Evo Titanium Digital aquarium Heater, Electro Engineering Ltd., Hertfordshire, UK), offset against a chiller (Aqua Medic TITAN 2000, Aqua Medic Ltd, Coalville, UK). Temperatures were maintained at 11–12 °C across all treatments but allowed to rise in the summer months to 15–16 °C to mimic natural conditions, which is an important consideration during longer-term exposures62.

At the start of the experimental exposures, crabs were allocated at random to each of the 25 holding tanks, and progressively exposed to the final treatment combinations over three days. Crabs were held individually in perforated cylindrical plastic containers ranging in size from 0.6 to 3 L with no more than 24 crabs per holding tank. The high flow rate of seawater through the system ensured that the seawater within each holding tank was replaced approximately every 44 min. This minimised any non-treatment effects, such as temperature variation, and maintained the seawater carbonate chemistry at the desired levels in both the holding tanks, and in the individual perforated containers. The latter were unaffected by the biological captivity of the crabs. As the crabs moulted and grew in size, each container was replaced to ensure a constant ratio between crab size and container volume. Crabs were fed 3 times a week as described previously, but left for 48 h without food before sampling.

Crabs were sampled before exposure (baseline) and after 1, 3, 6 months, and 12 months in Carcinus maenas, and 1, 3, 6 and 9 months in Cancer pagurus (n = 6–8 treatment−1 month−1). Experiments on Cancer pagurus were limited to 9 months as mortality rates started to increase and the aim here was to ensure determination of physiological responses to sub-lethal effects. Carcinus maenas increased in body mass from 8.63 ± 0.65 (n = 26) to 44.16 ± 2.34 (n = 24) g, and in CW from 33.1 ± 1.0 (n = 26) and 57.3 ± 1.1 (n = 24) mm between 1 and 12 months. Cancer pagurus increased in body mass from 22.00 ± 2.57 (n = 31) to 55.52 ± 5.68 (n = 28) g, and in CW from 36.1 ± 2.1 (n = 31) to 68.3 ± 1.0 (n = 28) mm between 1 and 9 months. In the majority of cases all crabs were in intermoult, but several crabs in the summer sampling months were in early premoult (D0 and D1). The latter were determined as crabs in which the lower margin of the carapace and the merus of the cheliped remained firm, but the new underlying epidermis was either confluent with the carapace or just beginning to separate at the dorsal anterior edge. No crabs were sampled beyond D1 avoiding the physiological changes that are known to occur at D3 and D4 stages of premoult and the large changes in gene expression reported to occur in postmoult63. At each sampling interval, haemolymph samples (300–400 µL) were withdrawn from the infrabranchial sinus with the minimum of disturbance to the crabs and used immediately to determine haemolymph acid-base status and osmolality. Crabs were sacrificed by ablating the thoracic and cerebral ganglia, and gill pair 8 dissected out from the branchial chamber, and flash frozen and stored at −80 °C for the determination of NKA activity (right) and gene expression (left).

Seawater Chemistry

Daily temperature (°C) and pHNIST were recorded for each treatment using a combined pH electrode and meter (Mettler Toledo SG2 SevenGO, MT Ltd., Leicester, UK), along with daily salinity using a conductivity electrode and meter (Mettler Toledo SG3 SevenGO MT Ltd., Leicester, UK). The pH and conductivity electrodes were calibrated twice weekly with NIST certified pH buffer solutions and standard solutions, respectively. Seawater samples were removed monthly from holding tanks at random for the measurement of Total Alkalinity (AT) and Dissolved Inorganic Carbon (DIC), as well as nutrient concentrations (total nitrate, phosphate and silicate). Samples (100 ml) for AT and DIC analysis were taken in triplicate from each of the cylindrical mixing tanks, siphoned into glass containers and preserved with 0.02% mercuric chloride. Carbon chemistry was analysed by the UKOARP Carbonate System Facility at National Oceanographic Centre Southampton. Seawater samples of 60 ml were taken at the same time, filtered (Whatman GFF 0.7 µm), and stored at −20 °C in light proof containers for nutrient analysis at the Scottish Association for Marine Sciences using a Lachat Quikchem 800 Flow Injection Analyser. Carbonate system variables (pCO2, Ω calcite and Ω aragonite) were calculated with CO2SYS64 with refitted constants65,66 and are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

Haemolymph Acid-Base Status and Osmolality

Haemolymph pH was determined by injecting a small subsample (~200 µL) past the face of an E310 glass pH electrode connected to an E351 reference electrode housed in a BC202 blood gas cell (Cameron Instrument Company) and supplied with circulating water at the appropriate temperature. The electrodes were connected to a pH/blood gas meter (Radiometer PHM73) and calibrated using NIST analytical buffers at regular intervals (7.45 and 8.06 at 15 °C, Fluka Analytical). Total CO2 (TCO2) was determined according to the Cameron technique67. Small subsamples (40 µL) were injected into a 2 mL chamber filled with 0.01 N HCl and maintained at 38 °C. A CO2 electrode (Radiometer E5037) in contact with the chamber was connected to a pH/blood gas meter (Radiometer PHM73) and calibrated with standard solutions of NaHCO3 (10, 20 and 40 mmol L−1). A further haemolymph subsample of 15 µL was used to determine osmolality using a freezing point osmometer calibrated with deionised water and a standard solution (Osmomat 030, Gonotec GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Partial pressure of CO2 (pCO2) and HCO3 concentrations were calculated from measured values of haemolymph pH and TCO2 using the Henderson-Hasselbach equation. The apparent first dissociation constant for carbonic acid (pK’1) and the solubility coefficients for CO2 (αCO2) were adjusted for salinity and temperature provided by68.

Branchial Na+/K+-ATPase (NKA) activities

NKA activities were determined in gill 8 homogenates by microassay69, in which the hydrolysis of ATP is enzymatically linked to the oxidation of NADH. Protein concentrations in the gill homogenates were determined using the micro-modification of the Pierce BCA Protein Assay (Thermo Scientific). NKA activity was expressed as µmol ADP produced mg−1 protein h−1.

Gene Expression

The genes of interest were chosen for their role in the exchange of ions and acid-base equivalents across the gill epithelia of aquatic crabs. Na+/K+-ATPase on the basolateral membrane drives Na+ uptake from the surrounding seawater via an apical Na+/K+/2Cl symporter and possibly through the apical 2Na+/H+ antiporter (NHE). Cytoplasmic carbonic anhydrase converts CO2 into the acid-base equivalents HCO3 and H+ for use as counterions for Cl or Na+ uptake, via anion and NHE exchangers, respectively. A basolateral location for NHE suggests a role in the uptake of HCO3 across the gill epithelia as speculated by52. The gpi-linked carbonic anhydrase located on the basolateral membrane dehydrates HCO3 and H+ into CO2 for diffusion across the gill epithelium into seawater. These mechanisms are based on models summarised by10,29,52,70.

Expression of selected gene targets was measured in gill 8 using a relative quantification strategy by real-time PCR with SYBR Green I detection chemistry following MIQE guidelines71. Gill tissue (<0.1 g) was homogenized in 1 ml TRI reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Dorset, UK) for 4 min on a TissueLyserII (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK) and extracted according to the manufacturer’s protocol to yield high purity, high integrity total RNA, as confirmed by NanodropTM (mean A260/280 = 1.9; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Leics, UK), and an ExperionTM RNA StdSens Analysis kit (mean RQI > 9.0; Bio-Rad, Herts, UK). Total RNA samples were treated with RQ1 RNase-free DNase (Promega, Hants, UK) and reverse-transcribed from poly dT20 primers using SuperscriptIIITM (LifeTechnologies, Strathclyde, UK). We used PrecisionPLUS Mastermix (Primer Design, Hampshire, UK) for Carcinus maenas and iQ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad, Herts, UK) for Cancer pagurus. Primers were designed using PrimerExpressTM (Applied Biosystems®, California, USA) or Beacon DesignerTM (Premier Biosoft, CA, USA) against target DNA sequences obtained from GenBank or through degenerate PCR on conserved regions identified through Clustal Omega protein alignments72. Details of gene targets, primers and assay performance are provided in Supplementary Table S2. Technical duplicates were run on a Corbett Rotorgene 3000 (QIAGEN, Manchester, UK) with the following reaction conditions: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 10 min (Carcinus maenas) or 3 min (Cancer pagurus); 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s (Carcinus maenas) or 15 s (Cancer pagurus) and 60 °C for 60 s, 1 cycle of 72 °C for 45 s and a final ramp to 95 °C of 1 °C per 5 s. Reaction specificity was confirmed in all reactions by inspecting melt curves.

Threshold cycles for all target genes were calibrated across runs using three inter-run calibrators and normalized to the best combination of five candidate reference genes (act, AK, eefl1A, gapdh, tub) using GeNorm™73 and qBase+™ (Biogazelle, Zwijnaarde, Belgium) to establish Calibrated Normalized Relative Quantities (‘CNRQs’)74. The logarithm (base 10) of CNRQs were used in statistical analyses because variation in gene expression follows a log normal distribution75,76. Differences in log(CNRQ) are equivalent to log fold changes.

Statistical analysis

Means for all seawater parameters were compared among all 4 treatments, after testing for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and homogeneity of variance using the Levene Statistic. For parametric data, we used a one-way ANOVA and a Student-Newman-Keuls (SNK) post hoc test to make pairwise comparisons between treatments. For those comparisons that did not meet the assumptions for normality, we used a Kruskal-Wallis test, and then Dunn’s post hoc test with Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons (SPSS version 22, Chicago).

The influence of CO2, salinity, sampling month (all fixed factors) and body size (covariate) on the response variables (haemolymph acid-base variables, osmolality, branchial NKA activities and gene expression) were tested using a generalised least squares (GLS) approach. In our full model, we fully crossed all explanatory variables and allowed heterogeneity in variance among each CO2, salinity and sampling time combination (Tables 1 and 2). We then identified the best variance structure by comparing candidate models having reduced variance structures using the gls function in R (version 3.3.2). The best candidate model was selected as that with the lowest Akaike’s Information Criterion with small sample correction (AICc). Once the best variance structure had been established, we attempted to remove fixed effects from the global model after refitting with maximum likelihood (ML) and the appropriate variance structure. Terms were removed if this did not increase the AICc. In cases where dropping a term increased the AICc by less than two, the decision to drop terms was made on the basis of log-likelihood ratio tests (α = 0.05) (Supplementary Tables S3S8). All analyses were performed using the nlme package in R (version 3.3.2)77. When response variables were influenced by independent factors, the SNK post hoc test was used to determine significant differences among multiple means (SPSS, version 22). To aid interpretation, we report the simpler models for both species in Results, and outline model selection in Supplementary Tables S3S8.

Exposing crabs for many months introduces confounding factors, such as increases in body size, and in this study, seasonal changes in temperature. To account for changes in body size, we included carapace width (CW) as a covariate in our statistical models. CW was chosen as a proxy for body size to avoid inaccuracies caused by water retention in the branchial chambers of the crabs during weighing. Throughout there was some potential level of co-variation in time and body size, but not all time intervals were confounded by size differences. Throughout exposure, small/damped seasonal changes in temperature occurred, but changes were similar across all treatments and there was no tank effect as variation among tanks was smaller than the variation within tanks.

Data Availability Statement

Data pertaining to the manuscript will be made available via the Research Information Management System PURE.

Additional information

Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Little, S., Spencer, K. L., Schuttelaars, H. M., Millward, G. E. & Elliott, M. Unbounded boundaries and shifting baselines: Estuaries and coastal seas in a rapidly changing world. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 198, 311–318 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Elliott, M. & Whitfield, A. Challenging paradigms in estuarine ecology and management. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 94, 306–314 (2011).

  3. 3.

    Gattuso, J.-P. et al. Contrasting futures for ocean and society from different anthropogenic CO2 emission scenarios. Science 349(6243), aac4722 (2015).

  4. 4.

    Durack, P. J., Wijffels, S. E. & Matear, R. J. Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000. Science 336, 455–458 (2012).

  5. 5.

    Blackford, J. C. & Gilbert, F. J. pH variability and CO2 induced acification in the North Sea. J. Mar. Syst. 64, 229–241 (2007).

  6. 6.

    Przeslawski, R., Anyong, S., Byrne, M., Wörheides, G. & Hutchings, P. Beyond corals and fish: the effects of climate change on noncoral benthic invertebrates of tropical reefs. Global Change Biol. 14(12), 2773–2795 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Widdicombe, S. & Spicer, J. I. Predicting the impact of ocean acidification on benthic biodiversity: What can animal physiology tell us? J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 366(1–2), 187–197 (2008).

  8. 8.

    Pörtner, H.-O. Ecosystem effects of ocean acidification in times of ocean warming: a physiologist’s view. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 373, 203–217 (2008).

  9. 9.

    Kelly, M. W. & Hofmann, G. E. Adaptation and the physiology of ocean acidification. Funct. Ecol. 27(4), 380–390 (2013).

  10. 10.

    Larsen, E. H. et al. Osmoregulation and excretion. Compr. Physiol. 4(2), 405–573 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Melzner, F. et al. Physiological basis for high CO2 tolerance in marine ectothermic animals: pre-adaptation through lifestyle and ontogeny? Biogeosciences 6(10), 2313–2331, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-6-2313-2009 (2009).

  12. 12.

    Whiteley, N. M. Physiological and ecological responses of crustaceans to ocean acidification. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 430, 257–271 (2011).

  13. 13.

    Wittmann, A. C. & Pörtner, H.-O. Sensitivities of extant animal taxa to ocean acidification. Nat. Clim. Change 3(11), 995–1001 (2013).

  14. 14.

    Fabry, V. J., Seibel, B. A., Feely, R. A. & Orr, J. C. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine fauna and ecosystem processes. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 65(3), 414–432 (2008).

  15. 15.

    Pörtner, H.-O. Integrating climate-related stressors effects on marine organisms: unifying principles linking molecules to ecosystem-levels changes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 470, 273–290 (2012).

  16. 16.

    Todgham, A. E. & Stillman, J. H. Physiological responses to shifts in multiple environmental stressors: relevance in a changing world. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 53(4), 539–544 (2013).

  17. 17.

    Riebesell, U. & Gattuso, J.-P. Lessons learned from ocean acidification research. Nat. Clim. Change 5, 12–14 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Gunderson, A. R., Armstrong, E. J. & Stillman, J. H. Multiple stressors in a changing world: the need for an improved perspective on physiological responses to the dynamic marine environment. Ann. Rev. Mar. Sci. 8, 357–378 (2016).

  19. 19.

    Boyd, P. W. et al. Experimental strategies to assess the biological ramifications of multiple drivers of global ocean change - A review. Global Change Biol. 24, 2239–2261 (2018).

  20. 20.

    Harvey, B., Gwynn-Jones, D. & Moore, P. Meta-analysis reveals complex marine biological responses to the interactive effects of ocean acidification and warming. Ecol. Evol. 3(4), 1016–1030 (2013).

  21. 21.

    Bozinovic, F. & Pörtner, H.-O. Physiological ecology meetsclimate change. Ecol. Evol. 5(5), 1025–1030 (2015).

  22. 22.

    Przeslawski, R., Byrne, M. & Mellin, C. A review and meta-analysis of the effects of multiple stressors on marine embryos and larvae. Global Change Biol. 21(6), 2122–2140 (2015).

  23. 23.

    Sokolova, I. M., Matoo, O. B., Dickinson, G. H., & Beniash, E. Physiological effects of ocean acidification on animal calcifiers in Stressors in the Marine Environment Physiological and Ecological Responses; Societal Implications (eds Solan, M. & Whiteley, N. M.) 36–55 (Oxford University Press, 2016).

  24. 24.

    Kroeker, K. J. et al. Impacts of ocean acidification on marine organisms: Quantifying sensitivities and interaction with warming. Global Change Biol. 19(6), 1884–1896 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Fehsenfeld, S. et al. Effects of elevated pCO2 on gene expression patterns in the gills of the green crab, Carcinus maenas. BMC Genomics 12, 488 (2011).

  26. 26.

    Whiteley, N. M., Scott, J. L., Breeze, S. J. & McCann, L. Effects of water salinity on acid-base balance in decapod crustaceans. J. Exp. Biol. 204(5), 1003–1011 (2001).

  27. 27.

    Dickinson, G. H. Interactive effects of salinity and elevated CO2 levels on juvenile eastern oysters Crassostrea virginica. J. Exp. Biol. 215, 29–43 (2012).

  28. 28.

    Rivera-Ingraham, G. A. & Lignot, J.-H. Osmoregulation, bioenergetics and oxidative stress in coastal marine invertebrates: raising the questions for future research. J. Exp. Biol. 220, 1749–1760 (2017).

  29. 29.

    Henry, R. P., Lucu, C., Onken, H. & Weihrauch, D. Multiple functions of the crustacean gill: osmotic/ionic regulation, acid-base balance, ammonia excretion, and bioaccumulation of toxic metals. Front. Physiol. 3, 431, https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2012.00431 (2012).

  30. 30.

    Roman, J. & Palumbi, S. R. A global invader at home: population structure of the green crab, Carcinus maenas, in Europe. Mol. Ecol. 13, 2891–2898 (2004).

  31. 31.

    Wanson, S., Pequeux, A. & Gilles, R. Osmoregulation in the stone crab Cancer pagurus. Mar. Biol. Lett. 4(6), 321–330 (1983).

  32. 32.

    McKeown, N. J., Hauser, L. & Shaw, P. W. Microsatellite genotyping of brown crab Cancer pagurus reveals fine-scale selection and ‘non-chaotic’ genetic patchiness within a high gene flow system. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 566, 91–103 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Lignot, J. -H. & Charmantier, G. Osmoregulation and excretion in Natural History of the Crustacea, Physiology (eds Chang, E. S. & Thiel, M.) 249–284 (Oxford University Press, 2015).

  34. 34.

    Metzger, R., Sartoris, F. J., Langenbuch, M. & Pörtner, H.-O. Influence of elevated CO2 concentrations on thermal tolerance of the edible crab Cancer pagurus. J. Therm. Biol. 32, 144–151 (2007).

  35. 35.

    Papadimitriou, S. et al. The stoichiometric dissociation constant of carbonic acid in seawater brines from 298 to 267 K. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 220, 55–70 (2018).

  36. 36.

    Zeebe, R. E. & Wolf-Gladrow, D. CO 2 in seawater: Equilibrium, kinetics, isotopes. (Elsevier Oceanography Series, 2001).

  37. 37.

    Wheatly, M. G. & Henry, R. P. Extracellular and intracellular acid-base regulation in crustaceans. J. Exp. Zool. 263(2), 127–142 (1992).

  38. 38.

    Tsai, J. R. & Lin, H.-C. V-type H+ ATPase and Na+, K+ ATPase in the gills of 13 euryhaline crabs during salinity acclimation. J. Exp. Biol. 210(4), 620–627 (2007).

  39. 39.

    Lucu, C. & Towle, D. W. Na+ + K+ ATPase in the gills of aquatic crustacea. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 135(2), 195–214 (2003).

  40. 40.

    Harris, R. R. & Bayliss, D. Gill (Na+ + K+) ATPases in decapod crustaceans: distribution and characteristics in relation to Na+ regulation. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 90, 303–308 (1988).

  41. 41.

    Lucu, C. & Flik, C. Na+-K+-ATPase and Na+/Ca2+ exchange activities in the gills of hyperregulating Carcinus maenas. Am. J. Physiol. 276, R490–R499 (1999).

  42. 42.

    Pan, F. T.-C., Applehaum, S. L., Lentz, B. A. & Manahan, D. T. Predicting phenotypic variation in growth and metabolism of marine invertebrate larvae. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 483, 64–73 (2016).

  43. 43.

    Havird, J. C., Henry, R. P. & Wilson, A. E. Altered expression of Na+/K+-ATPase and other osmoregulating genes in the gills of euryhaline animals in response to salinity transfer: A meta-analysis of 59 quantitative PCR studies over 10 years. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D 8(2), 131–140 (2013).

  44. 44.

    Henry, R. P. Environmentally mediated carbonic anhydrase induction in the gills of euryhaline crustaceans. J. Exp. Biol. 204(5), 991–1002 (2001).

  45. 45.

    Torres, G., Charmantier-Daures, M., Chifflet, S. & Anger, K. Effects of long-term exposure to different salinities on the location and activity of Na+-K+-ATPase in the gills of juvenile mitten crab Eriochier sinensis. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 147(2), 460–465 (2007).

  46. 46.

    Towle, D. W., Henry, R. P. & Terwilliger, N. B. Micro-array detected changes in gene expression in gills of green crabs (Carcinus maenas) upon dilution of environmental salinity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D 6(2), 115–125 (2011).

  47. 47.

    Weihrauch, D. & O’Donnell, M. J. Links between osmoregulation and nitrogen-excretion in insects and crustaceans. Integr. Comp. Biol. 55(5), 816–829 (2015).

  48. 48.

    Serrano, L. & Henry, R. P. Differential expression and induction of two carbonic anhydrase isoforms in the gills of the euryhaline green crab Carcinus maenas in response to slow salinity. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. D 3(2), 186–193 (2008).

  49. 49.

    Henry, R. P., Garrelts, E. E., McCarty, M. M. & Towle, D. W. Differential induction of branchial carbonic anhydrase and Na+/K+ ATPase activity in the euryhaline crab, Carcinus maenas, in response to low salinity exposure. J. Exp. Zool. 292(7), 595–603 (2002).

  50. 50.

    Mitchell, R. T. & Henry, R. P. Functional characterization of neuroendocrine regulation of branchial carbonic anhydrase induction of the euryhaline crab Callinectes sapidus. Biol. Bull. 227(3), 285–299 (2014).

  51. 51.

    Towle, D. W. et al. Sodium/proton antiporter in the euryhaline crab Carcinus maenas molecular cloning, expression, and tissue distribution. J. Exp. Biol. 200(6), 1003–1014 (1997).

  52. 52.

    Fehsenfeld, S. & Weihrauch, D. Mechanisms of acid-base regulation in seawater-acclimated green crabs (Carcinus maenas). Can. J. Zool. 94, 95–107 (2016).

  53. 53.

    Fehsenfeld, S. & Weihrauch, D. Differential acid-base regulation in various gills of the green crab Carcinus maenas: Effects of environmental pCO2 levels. Comp. Biochem. Physio. A 164(1), 54–65 (2013).

  54. 54.

    Li, T., Roer, R., Vana, M., Pate, S. & Check, J. Gill area, permeability and Na+, K+-ATPase activity as a function of size and salinity in the blue crab, Callinectes sapidus. J. Exp. Zool. 305A(3), 233–245 (2006).

  55. 55.

    King, F. D., Cucci, T. L. & Bidigare, R. R. A pathway of nitrogen-metabolism in marine decapod crabs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. B 80(3), 401–403 (1985).

  56. 56.

    Weihrauch, D., Becker, W., Postel, U., Luck-Kopp, S. & Siebers, D. Potential of active excretion of ammonia in three different haline species of crabs. J. Comp. Physiol. B 169(1), 25–37 (1999).

  57. 57.

    Rainbow, P. S. & Black, W. H. Effects of changes in salinity on the apparent water permeability of three carb species: Carcinus maenas, Eriocheir sinensis and Necora puber. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 264, 1–13 (2001).

  58. 58.

    Henry, R. P. & Cameron, J. N. Acid-base balance in Callinectes sapidus during acclimation from high to low salinity. J. Exp. Biol. 101, 255–264 (1982).

  59. 59.

    Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213–241 (2011).

  60. 60.

    Suckling, C. C. et al. Experimental evidence of pH on the early life-stages of sea urchins II: increasing parental exposure times gives rise to different responses. Invertebr. Repr. Dev. 58(3), 161–175 (2014).

  61. 61.

    Findlay, H. S., Kendall, M. A., Spicer, J. I., Turley, C. & Widdicombe, S. Novel microcosm system for investigating the effects of elevated carbon dioxide and temperature on intertidal organisms. Aquat. Biol. 3, 51–62 (2008).

  62. 62.

    Godbold, J. A. & Solan, M. Long-term effects of warming and ocean acidification are modified by seasonal variation in species responses and environmental conditions. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. B 368, 20130186 (2013).

  63. 63.

    Xu, B.-P., Tu, D.-D., Yan, M.-C., Shu, M.-A. & Shao, Q.-J. Molecular characterisation of a cDNA encoding Na+/K+/2Cl transporter in the gill of the mud crab (Scylla paramamosain) during the molt cycle: Implication of its function in osmoregulation. Comp Biochem Physiol A 203, 115–125 (2017).

  64. 64.

    Lewis, E., & Wallace, D. W. R. Program Developed for CO 2 System Calculations, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, TN (1998).

  65. 65.

    Dickson, A. G. & Millero, F. J. A comparison of the equilibrium constants for the dissociation of carbonic acid in seawater media. Deep-Sea Res. 34(10), 1733–1743 (1987).

  66. 66.

    Mehrbach, C., Culberson, C. H., Hawley, J. E. & Pytkowicz, R. M. Measurement of the apparent dissociation constants of carbonic acid in seawater at atmospheric pressure. Limnol. Oceanog. 18, 897–907 (1973).

  67. 67.

    Cameron, J. N. Rapid method for the determination of total carbon dioxide in small blood samples. J. Appl. Physiol. 31(4), 632–634 (1971).

  68. 68.

    Truchot, J.-P. Carbon dioxide combining properties of the blood of the shore crab Carcinus maenas (L.): Carbon dioxide solubility coefficient and carbonic acid dissociation constants. J. Exp. Biol. 64, 45–57 (1976a).

  69. 69.

    McCormick, S. D. & Bern, H. A. In vitro stimulation of Na+, K+-ATPase activity and oubain binding by cortisol in coho salmon gill. Am. J. Physiol. 256(3), R707–R715 (1989).

  70. 70.

    Freire, C. A., Onken, H. & McNamara, J. C. A structure-function analysis of ion transport in crustacean gills and excretory organs. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A 151(3), 272–304 (2008).

  71. 71.

    Bustin, S. A. et al. The MIQE guidelines: Minimum Information for publication of Quantitative real-time PCR Experiments. Clin. Chem. 55, 611–622 (2009).

  72. 72.

    Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011).

  73. 73.

    Vandesompele, J. et al. Accurate normalization of real-time quantitative RT-PCR data by geometric averaging of multiple internal control genes. Genome Biol. 3(7); genomebiology.com/2002/3/7/research/0034.1 (2002).

  74. 74.

    Hellemans, J., Mortier, G., De Paepe, A., Speleman, F. & Vandesompele, J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome Biol. 8(2); genomebiology.com/2007/8/2/R19 (2007).

  75. 75.

    Bengtsson, M., Ståhlberg, A., Rorsman, P. & Kubista, M. Gene expression profiling in single cells from the pancreatic islets of Langerhans reveals lognormal distribution of mRNA levels. Genome Res. 15, 1388–1392 (2005).

  76. 76.

    Derveaux, S., Vandesompele, J. & Hellemans, J. How to do successful gene expression analysis using real-time PCR. Methods 50, 227–230 (2010).

  77. 77.

    Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D. & R Core Team. nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3, 1–128, http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme (2016).

  78. 78.

    Truchot, J.-P. Carbon dioxide combining properties of the blood of the shore crab, Carcinus maenas (l.): CO2-Dissociation curves and Haldane effect. J. Comp. Physiol. 112(3), 283–293 (1976b).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Gwyn Hughes and Berwyn Roberts for maintaining the aquarium, and we thank the many students who helped with the animal husbandry. Special thanks go to Stephanie Andrews, Victoria Collier, Dale Gutsell, Erica Gomes, Charlotte Heney, Libby Hopkinson, Maria Hayden-Hughes, Matilda Painter Jones, Emma Keen, Richard Patton, Jonathan Sayer and Rebecca Turner. We are also grateful to Prof Andrew Rowley and Charlotte Davies for their help in the collection and accommodation of Cancer pagurus from South Wales. The collection of Cancer pagurus from the non-SAC sites in Wales was authorised by the Marine and Fisheries Division, Welsh Government. This work was funded by the Natural Environment Research Council, UK (NE/J007544/1 and NE/J007951/1).

Author information

Author notes

    • Coleen C. Suckling

    Present address: University of Rhode Island, Fisheries, Animal and Veterinary Sciences, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, USA

    • Benjamin J. Ciotti

    Present address: School of Biological and Marine Sciences, University of Plymouth, Drake Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK

Affiliations

  1. School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Deiniol Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, LL57 2UW, UK

    • Nia M. Whiteley
    • , Coleen C. Suckling
    •  & James Brown
  2. School of Ocean Sciences, Bangor University, Askew Street, Menai Bridge, Anglesey, LL59 5AB, UK

    • Coleen C. Suckling
    • , Ian D. McCarthy
    •  & Luis Gimenez
  3. Ocean and Earth Science, University of Southampton, Waterfront Campus, National Oceanography Centre Southampton, European Way, Southampton, SO14 3ZH, UK

    • Benjamin J. Ciotti
    •  & Chris Hauton

Authors

  1. Search for Nia M. Whiteley in:

  2. Search for Coleen C. Suckling in:

  3. Search for Benjamin J. Ciotti in:

  4. Search for James Brown in:

  5. Search for Ian D. McCarthy in:

  6. Search for Luis Gimenez in:

  7. Search for Chris Hauton in:

Contributions

N.W., C.H. and I.M. wrote the grant proposal that funded the work. All authors were involved in the experiments, but C.S. was responsible for the determination of acid-base status and osmolality, J.B. for enzyme analysis, and B.C. and C.H. for the molecular work. N.W. wrote the main manuscript text with help from C.H., C.S. and B.C. L.G. and B.C. performed the statistical analyses, and prepared Tables 1 and 2, respectively. C.S. prepared table S1. B.C. prepared Table S2, and L.G. Tables S3 to S6. B.C. prepared Tables S7 and S8. N.W. prepared Figures 1 and 4, and B.C. prepared Figures 2 and 3. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nia M. Whiteley.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-34089-0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.