Abstract
The cellular redox state of organisms continues to fluctuate during the metabolism. All organisms have various sensors that help detect and adapt to changes in the redox state. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides (NAD+/NADH), which are involved in various cellular metabolic activities as cofactors, have been revealed as the key molecules sensing the intra-cellular redox state. The Rex family members are well conserved transcriptional repressors that regulate the expression of respiratory genes by sensing the redox state according to the intra-cellular NAD+/NADH balance. Herein, we reported crystal structures of apo and NAD+- and NADH-bound forms of Rex from Thermotoga maritima to analyse the structural basis of transcriptional regulation depending on either NAD+ or NADH binding. The different orientation of the reduced nicotinamide group to helix α9 caused the rearrangement of N-terminal DNA binding domain, thus resulting in closed form of Rex to dissociate from cognate DNA. The structural data of Rex from T. maritima also support the previous redox-sensing mechanism models of Rex homologues.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Bacteria have adapted and responded to changing environmental oxygen levels for their survival by altering the transcriptional regulation of genes involved in respiratory pathways1. A reduction-oxidation (redox) reaction is a chemical reaction wherein the oxidation states of atoms are changed, involving a transfer of electrons between two molecules. Redox reactions are involved in many important biological processes, such as cellular respiration, photosynthesis, various biosyntheses, and enzymatic degradation. Intracellular redox state can be represented by the ratio of oxidized and reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotides (NAD+ and NADH, respectively). The NADs play an important role in cellular metabolism by acting as electron carriers2.
NADH is a major source of ATP through re-oxidizing to NAD+ by reduction of oxygen acting as an electron acceptor in electron transport chain3. The intracellular NAD+/NADH ratio changes when the NADH level is elevated because of low environmental oxygen levels or the inhibition of the electron transport chain4. Therefore, the NAD+/NADH ratio can be a critical indicator for the intracellular redox state. In other words, monitoring the continuous intracellular redox level using the NAD+/NADH ratio enables the sophisticated regulation of gene expressions involved in energy metabolism5.
The Rex family members are well-conserved transcription factors to control the respiratory pathway, which senses changes in the redox state according to the intracellular NAD+/NADH balance6,7,8. The Rex proteins negatively regulate the expression of the genes involved in catabolic metabolism, such as cytochrome bd oxidase (cydABCD), proton-translocating NADH dehydrogenase (nuoA-N), and NADH-linked fermentative lactate dehydrogenase (lctP-ldh), in the high level of NAD+6,7. The Rex homologues show an affinity for both oxidized NAD+ and reduced NADH but have a preference for the latter6,9. When the reduced NADH level is elevated, NADH is bound to a Rex protein, causing it to dissociate from the Rex DNA operator8,9.
A Rex protein comprises two domains; an N-terminal DNA binding domain containing a winged helix-turn-helix motif, and a C-terminal dimerization domain containing a NAD(H) binding site. A Rex protein exists as a homodimer and dimerization is significantly affected by the last helix of the C-terminal domain. The crystal structures of the Rex family have been determined from bacterial species, including Thermus aquaticus8,10, Thermus thermophilus5, Bacillus subtilis9, Streptococcus agalactiae, and Thermoanaerobacter ethanolicus11. Previous structural studies of the Rex family have described not only how conformation changes depending on whether they bind to NAD+ or NADH, but also how such conformational change induces the dissociation of cognate DNA from the Rex protein. Rex DNA operator sites of Thermotoga maritima have been identified and experimentally proved whether Rex from T. maritima (TmRex) could bind to cognate Rex binding sites depending on dinucleotide ligands using in vitro binding assays (Kd values of 5–27 nM)12. However, more investigation is needed on the detailed biochemical properties at the molecular level depending on NAD+ or NADH. To further understand the conformational changes of the Rex protein depending on the intracellular redox level, we determined crystal structures of apo and NAD+- and NADH-bound forms of the Rex proteins from T. maritima (TM0169). A structural comparison revealed that the transcriptional regulation of TmRex was controlled by NAD+/NADH cofactor inducing a conformational change of the dimeric structure.
Results and Discussion
Model building and quality
The initial structure of the apo TmRex was determined at 2.8 Å resolution using selenomethionine-based single-wavelength anomalous dispersion (SAD) data set collected at the selenium peak (0.9791 Å, Table S1). The refined model of SeMet-substituted TmRex gave Rwork and Rfree values of 23.86% and 26.75%, respectively. Subsequently, the native structure of apo TmRex was refined to 2.0 Å resolution with crystallographic Rwork and Rfree values of 20.40% and 25.83%, respectively. The refined model contained four TmRex subunits which formed two homodimers in an asymmetric unit. One dimer formed by subunits A and B was well ordered because of crystal contact stabilization, and the residues 4–208 in the subunit A and the residues 9–208 in the subunit B were interpretable. However, the N-terminal domains of the other dimer, formed by subunits C and D, were poorly ordered (average B-factors 79.6 Å2 and 73.1 Å2, respectively) (Fig. S1 and Table S2). Particularly, the glycine-rich loop comprising residues 55–63 was not visible due to the lack of electron-density maps. The NAD+-bound TmRex crystals were obtained by soaking NAD+ in apo crystals. The crystal structure of the NAD+-bound form was also determined at 2.2 Å resolution, and the NAD+ ligand was clearly observed in the 2Fo-Fc maps (Fig. S2). The structure of NAD+-bound TmRex was refined with crystallographic Rwork and Rfree values of 20.60% and 25.44%, respectively. One of the two dimers in the asymmetric unit is well defined, whereas the N-terminal domains of the other dimer was also disordered as shown in apo TmRex structure (Fig. S1 and Table S2). NADH-bound TmRex crystals were grown by co-crystallization. The structure of the NADH-bound form was determined at 2.45 Å resolution and refined to Rwork and Rfree of 21.53% and 24.73%, respectively. The refined model of NADH-bound TmRex includes 409 residues of the two independent Rex monomers and two NADH molecules in the asymmetric unit; the NADH molecules were clearly observed in the 2Fo-Fc maps (Fig. S2). All refined models for TmRex showed favoured or allowed regions of the Ramachandran plot. The detailed refinement statistics are summarized in Table 1.
Overall structures of the T. maritima Rex
TmRex forms a homodimer, and each monomer was composed of two distinct domains: the N-terminal domain involved in DNA binding and the C-terminal domain involved in NAD binding, which were linked by a flexible loop (residues 78–83). The N-terminal domain (residues 1–77), which had a winged helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif, was folded into four α-helices and a hairpin loop. The C-terminal domain (residues 84–208), which contained the NAD(H) binding site, comprised six β-strands and five α-helices, showing a typical Rossman fold (Fig. 1B). The last helix α9 of the C-terminal domain was mainly responsible for dimerization through the formation of a hydrophobic interface by extending to between the N- and C-terminal domains of the other subunit (Fig. 1C). The residues of α9 (Ile192, Ala194, Leu196, Val198, Leu199, Phe201, Ile203, and Val204) contributed to the hydrophobic interface with the residues in the N-, and C-terminal domains, and the loop region (Val14′, Tyr17′, Leu77′, Val102′, Phe108′, Trp83′, Leu85′, Try100′, Val150′, Leu174′, Phe176′, Ile190′, Pro191′) of the other subunit (Fig. S3A). The short helix α5 in the C-terminal domain also contributed to dimerization by hydrogen bonding between the Asn92 residue and the main chain atoms of α5 helix in the other subunit (Ala96′ and Asn99′) (Fig. S3B). The refined models of TmRex contained either two independent dimers (apo and NAD+-bound forms) or one dimer (NADH-bound form) in each asymmetric unit. Although the overall conformations of each domain in the asymmetric unit were similar (r.m.s.d. 0.5–1.6 Å), their position and orientation were varied due to the flexible linker loop (Fig. S4 and Table S3). There were little structural differences between apo and NAD+-bound dimeric forms (r.m.s.d. 0.7 Å), whereas NADH-bound form showed a large structural differences comparing with apo and NAD+-bound forms (r.m.s.d. 3.5–4.3 Å) (Fig. S5 and Table S4).
NAD/NADH binding mode
The C-terminal domain of TmRex has the signature sequence of a P loop, which is common to dinucleotide binding protein, including Gly-X-Gly-X-X-Gly (Residues 89–94; Gly-Ala-Gly-Asn-Ile-Gly in TmRex). The dinucleotide ligands (NAD+ or NADH) are bound with 1:1 stoichiometry with each C-terminal domain near the dimer interface. The NAD(H) binding site of TmRex could be divided into two distinct parts: (1) the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) binding part, and (2) nicotinamide and N-ribose (connected with nicotinamide) binding part.
The adenosine moiety was buried in a hydrophobic pocket (Val88, Val134, Leu137, Val153, Pro154, and Ile161) and stabilized by hydrogen bonds with the residues Asp115, Ser116, and His157, as well as by van der Waals attractions involving a series of nonpolar residues (Val88, Gly89, and Ala90) of the P-loop (Fig. 2A,B). The pyrophosphate moiety of NAD(H) binds to the N-terminus of the helix α5 through hydrogen bonds with Asn92 N and Ile93 N atoms.
In both structures of TmRex bound to NAD+ and NADH, the ADP parts were well fixed at the ligand binding pocket and shared the same binding pattern, whereas nicotinamide and N-ribose moieties showed a different binding pattern. The nicotinamide ring of oxidized NAD+ is an aromatic organic compound composed of a conjugated planar ring system with a positively charged nitrogen. However, the charge of NADH is vanished by accepting two electrons, and the planarity of the nicotinamide ring is broken by forming only two double bonds. When the TmRex bound to NAD+, (1) the carboxamide group formed a hydrogen bond with the main chain atom O of Ala96′; (2) the nicotinamide ring stacked with the phenyl ring of a Tyr100′ residue of a neighboring subunit and (3) the hydroxyl group of the Tyr100′ residue formed a hydrogen bond with the 2′ OH of the N-ribose moiety. In contrast to the NAD+-bound TmRex, the reduced nicotinamide of NADH was flipped by allowing the carboxamide group to form hydrogen bonds with the main chain atoms of Ile190 O and Ile192 N at the N-terminus of the helix α9. In addition, the hydroxyl group of the Tyr100′ residue formed a hydrogen bond with the Asp191 residue in the helix α9. The differential binding of the nicotinamide ring between NAD+ and NADH caused the reorientation of the other subunit through the swapped C-terminal helix α9. Particularly, the N-terminal domains of each subunit tilted approximately 30° toward each other, resulting in higher proximity between the DNA recognition helices (α3) of the N-terminal domains from 35.7 Å to 29.5 Å (Fig. 2C). Because the rearranged N-terminal domains were too close to interact with the cognate DNA, the dramatic conformational change of the N-terminal domains by NADH binding allowed TmRex to dissociate from the DNA.
Comparisons with other Rex family
We compared the structural and sequence similarities among the Rex proteins from various organisms using DALI server13 and Clustal Omega14. The five Rex homolouegs from T. aquaticus, T. thermophilus, B. subtilis, S. agalactiae, and T. ethanolicus were well matched with TmRex. Although each domain among the Rex homologues were structurally well aligned (r.m.s.d. 0.9–2.7 Å), their overall structures varied because of domain movement caused by the flexible loop (r.m.s.d. 1.9–4.0 Å) (Table S5).
Previous researches of the T. aquaticus Rex have suggested that Arg16′, Tyr98′, and Asp188 were involved in the switching mechanism for open and closed forms of the Rex dimers depending on either NAD+ or NADH binding. Particularly, it was investigated that Asp188 played a key role in the sensing intracellular redox state. The Asp188 residue was salt-bridged to Arg16′ in the open conformation when bound to NAD+, and the Asp188 residue interacted with the hydroxyl group of Tyr98′ via a hydrogen bond in the closed conformation when bound to NADH. The residues were well conserved in the Rex homologues of T. aquaticus, T. thermophilus, B. subtilis, and S. agalactiae, whereas the arginine was replaced by Met18′ in TmRex. Although the side chain of Asp192 of TmRex, which is equivalent to that of Asp188 in the T. aquaticus Rex, interacted with the hydroxyl group of Tyr100′ in the closed conformation, the Asp192 was not involved in any interaction in the open conformation (Fig. 3A).
In the Rex structures of NAD+- or NADH-bound form, their adenosine moieties were buried at conserved hydrophobic pockets. In all the homologous structures, the oxidized nicotinamide interacted with equivalent residues of Try100′ and the main chain atom of Ala96′ in TmRex. The reduced nicotinamide formed hydrogen bonds with the main chain atoms of Ile190 and Ile192 in TmRex, which is consistently found in the Rex homologous structures. This common binding mode of nicotinamide in Rex repressors plays a key role in redox sensing regulation.
Conclusion
This paper reported three crystal structures of TmRex: apo, NAD+-bound, and NADH-bound forms. TmRex composed of two distinct domains existed in the homodimeric form, and its overall structure was similar to those of other Rex homologues. In NAD(H)-bound TmRex, the dinucleotide ligands caused the differential orientation of the last helix α9 according to their redox state, which is commonly observed in other Rex homologues. When TmRex bound to NADH, the N-terminal domains were rearranged by the movement of the helix α9, resulting in a shorter distance between DNA recognition helices (α3) of the N-terminal domains. Several models of the redox-sensing mechanism have been proposed8,11. The structural data of TmRex also supported the previous models with a little modifications as shown in Fig. 3B. When Rex proteins bound to NAD+, the carboxamide group and N-ribose 2′ OH formed hydrogen bonds with the main chain atom O of alanine and the hydroxyl group of tyrosine, respectively. However, the carboxamide group of NADH formed hydrogen bonds with the main chain atoms at the N-terminus of the helix α9, and the hydrogen bond between N-ribose and tyrosine was broken. This structural model is widely applicable to other Rex homologous structures.
Materials and Methods
Expression and Purification of TmRex
The rex gene encoding TmRex was amplified from the genomic DNA of Thermotoga maritima by the polymerase chain reaction using oligonucleotide primers containing the artificial restriction endonuclease sites, NdeI and XhoI (forward primer: 5′-GGAATTCCATATGGCGGAAAAGATACCGAAG-3′ and reverse primer: 5′-CCGCTCGAGTCAAGAATTCCTCCTCACAATC-3′). The amplified DNA was cloned into expression vector, pET28b (+) (Novagen), and then, the recombinant plasmid was introduced into E. coli BL21 (DE3) star pLysS (Invitrogen) for protein overexpression. The integrity of the cloned gene was verified by DNA sequencing.
The transformed cells were grown up to OD600 ~0.5 at 310 K in Luria-Bertani medium containing 30 μg/ml chloramphenicol and kanamycin, respectively. The expression of the native TmRex was induced by the addition of 1 mM isopropyl-β-D-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and the growth of the culture was continued at 303 K for 4 h. To get single-wavelength anomalous diffraction (SAD) data, selenomethionine (SeMet)-substituted TmRex was also expressed in the E. coli BL21 Star (DE3) pLysS cells in M9 salt medium supplemented with 2 μM MgSO4, 0.1 μM CaCl2, 0.4% (w/v) glucose and a mixture of all amino acids at 40 mg/L except Asn, Ala, Gly, Cys, Pro and Met. When the OD600 of the cell culture reached ~ 0.5, 50 mg/L of Ile, Pro, Leu, and Val and 100 mg/L of Phe, Lys, and Thr were simultaneously added to inhibit Met synthesis15. After 15 min, 50 mg/L of Se-Met was added and the expression of SeMet-substituted TmRex was induced with 1 mM IPTG. The cells were continuously cultured at 303 K for 16 h. Each cell overexpressed native TmRex and Se-Met TmRex was collected by centrifugation at 2,300 g at 277 K for 15 min (Hanil Supra 22 K A500S-6 rotor) and immediately frozen at 193 K.
Because native and Se-Met TmRex were expressed with N-terminal hexa-histidine tag, a nickel affinity chromatography was applied. The cell pellets were re-suspended in the lysis buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride) and homogenized using an ultrasonic processor (Sonics ™ Vibra Cell VCX750) at 277 K. The cell lysate was centrifuged at 36,000 g for 1 h at 277 K and the insoluble fraction including cell debris was removed. The supernatant was loaded onto an immobilized-metal-affinity-chromatography (IMAC) column charged nickel ion (GE Healthcare). The native TmRex was eluted with the elution buffer (500 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 10%(v/v) glycerol, and 300 mM imidazole). The TmRex was further purified by size exclusion chromatography using Superdex 200 gel-filtration column (GE Healthcare) pre-equilibrated with gel-filtration buffer (200 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Tris-HCl at pH 8.0, 5%(v/v) glycerol and 1 mM dithiothreitol (DTT)). The purity of TmRex was assessed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of 0.1%(w/v) sodium dodecyl sulfate. The histidine tag of the SeMet-substituted TmRex was removed by PreScission protease after identical process of Ni+-affinity chromatography performed in purification step of the native TmRex, and then finally purified by size-exclusion chromatography.
Crystallization and X-ray data collection
The purified native and SeMet-substituted proteins of TmRex were concentrated up to 36 mg/mL for crystallization using a Centrifugal Filter (Millipore). The crystallization was carried out using a sitting-drop vapour diffusion method at 296 K using 96-well CrystalQuick plates (Greiner Bio-one) and commercial screens from Hampton Research, Qiagen and Emerald BioSystems. Each sitting-drop was prepared by mixing equal volume of the concentrated protein and reservoir solution (0.75 μl, respectively). The crystals of the apo TmRex were initially obtained in several reservoir solution containing polyethylene glycol (PEG) 3,350, which were further optimized to 200 mM potassium chloride and 20%(w/v) PEG 3,350. The NADH complex crystals were obtained by co-crystallization with 1 mM NADH and were grown at 200 mM ammonium chloride and 20%(w/v) PEG 3,350. The redox state of NAD+/NADH was monitored at a wavelength of 340 nm using a spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, ThermoFisher Scientific). The crystals of SeMet-substituted TmRex were obtained in the condition containing PEG 8,000, and were further optimized to 100 mM HEPES pH 7.0 and 8%(w/v) PEG 8,000.
Prior to data collection, each crystal of apo, NAD(H) complex and SeMet-substituted TmRex was transferred into a cryo-protectant solution containing the reservoir solution with 25%(v/v) glycerol, and was then flash-frozen in a liquid nitrogen stream. X-ray diffraction data of apo and NADH complex crystals of TmRex were collected at 100 K with an RAYONIX MX300HE CCD detector using synchrotron radiation on BL44XU beamline of the SPring-8 in Japan. The crystals were exposed to X-ray for 1.0 s per image, and 280 frames (apo) and 230 frames (NADH complex) were obtained with each 1.0° oscillation. X-ray diffraction data of the NAD+ complex and SeMet-substituted crystals of TmRex were collected at 100 K with a Pilatus 6 M detector and ADSC Q315r CCD detector, respectively, using synchrotron radiation on beamline 5 C at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory (PAL) in Republic of Korea. In order to collect diffraction data of the NAD+-bound crystal, the apo crystals were soaked with 1 mM NAD+ for 10 h. The NAD+ complex and SeMet-substituted crystals were exposed to X-ray for 1.0 s and 1.5 s per image, and 200 frames (NAD+ complex) and 100 frames (SeMet-substituted) were respectively recorded. All data were processed and scaled using DENZO and SCALEPACK from the HKL-2000 software16,17.
Structure determination and refinement
In order to determine the initial structure of the apo TmRex, the SAD data from SeMet-substituted TmRex crystal were collected. Eight of twelve possible selenium sites were found and the SAD-phased electron-density map was interpreted using AutoSol and AutoBuild from PHENIX program suite18. Subsequently, the native structure of apo TmRex was solved by molecular replacement (PHASER MR, CCP4 program suite)19, and was refined to 2.0 Å resolution. The structures of NAD+ and NADH complexes were solved by molecular replacement using the apo structure and were refined to 2.2 Å and 2.45 Å resolution, respectively. All TmRex structures were manually built and refined by Coot20 and PHENIX21 program suite. The refined models were finally evaluated by MolProbity22.
Accession numbers
Coordinate and structure factors have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB): apo TmRex, PDB ID, 5ZZ5; NAD+-bound TmRex, PDB ID, 5ZZ6; NADH-bound TmRex, PDB ID, 5ZZ7.
Data Availability
All data are fully available without restriction.
References
Giaccia, A. J., Simon, M. C. & Johnson, R. The biology of hypoxia: the role of oxygen sensing in development, normal function, and disease. Genes Dev 18, 2183–94 (2004).
Belenky, P., Bogan, K. L. & Brenner, C. NAD+ metabolism in health and disease. Trends Biochem Sci 32, 12–9 (2007).
Rich, P. R. The molecular machinery of Keilin’s respiratory chain. Biochem Soc Trans 31, 1095–105 (2003).
Williamson, D. H., Lund, P. & Krebs, H. A. The redox state of free nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of rat liver. Biochem J 103, 514–27 (1967).
Nakamura, A., Sosa, A., Komori, H., Kita, A. & Miki, K. Crystal structure of TTHA1657 (AT-rich DNA-binding protein; p25) from Thermus thermophilus HB8 at 2.16 A resolution. Proteins 66, 755–9 (2007).
Brekasis, D. & Paget, M. S. A novel sensor of NADH/NAD+ redox poise in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). EMBO J 22, 4856–65 (2003).
Gyan, S., Shiohira, Y., Sato, I., Takeuchi, M. & Sato, T. Regulatory loop between redox sensing of the NADH/NAD(+) ratio by Rex (YdiH) and oxidation of NADH by NADH dehydrogenase Ndh in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 188, 7062–71 (2006).
McLaughlin, K. J. et al. Structural basis for NADH/NAD+ redox sensing by a Rex family repressor. Mol Cell 38, 563–75 (2010).
Wang, E. et al. Structure and functional properties of the Bacillus subtilis transcriptional repressor Rex. Mol Microbiol 69, 466–78 (2008).
Sickmier, E. A. et al. X-ray structure of a Rex-family repressor/NADH complex insights into the mechanism of redox sensing. Structure 13, 43–54 (2005).
Zheng, Y. et al. Distinct structural features of Rex-family repressors to sense redox levels in anaerobes and aerobes. J Struct Biol 188, 195–204 (2014).
Ravcheev, D. A. et al. Transcriptional regulation of central carbon and energy metabolism in bacteria by redox-responsive repressor Rex. J Bacteriol 194, 1145–57 (2012).
Holm, L. & Laakso, L. M. Dali server update. Nucleic Acids Res 44, W351–5 (2016).
Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7, 539 (2011).
Van Duyne, G. D., Standaert, R. F., Karplus, P. A., Schreiber, S. L. & Clardy, J. Atomic structures of the human immunophilin FKBP-12 complexes with FK506 and rapamycin. J Mol Biol 229, 105–24 (1993).
Otwinowski, Z. & Minor, W. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol 276, 307–26 (1997).
Minor, W., Cymborowski, M., Otwinowski, Z. & Chruszcz, M. HKL-3000: the integration of data reduction and structure solution–from diffraction images to an initial model in minutes. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 62, 859–66 (2006).
Adams, P. D. et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 213–21 (2010).
McCoy, A. J. et al. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr 40, 658–674 (2007).
Emsley, P., Lohkamp, B., Scott, W. G. & Cowtan, K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 486–501 (2010).
Afonine, P. V. et al. Towards automated crystallographic structure refinement with phenix.refine. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 68, 352–67 (2012).
Chen, V. B. et al. MolProbity: all-atom structure validation for macromolecular crystallography. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 66, 12–21 (2010).
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff members at the Pohang Accelerator Laboratory beamlines 5 C, and SPring-8 beamline BL44XU for their help with data collection. This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (2017R1D1A1B03032109); and the Agriculture Research Center (ARC) program of the Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Korea (710013-03-1-SB120).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Y.W.P., Y.Y.J. and J.Y.L. contributed to experimental design, data analyzing, discussions, and writing the manuscript. H.K.J. contributed to data collection and analysis of the results.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Park, Y.W., Jang, Y.Y., Joo, H.K. et al. Structural Analysis of Redox-sensing Transcriptional Repressor Rex from Thermotoga maritima. Sci Rep 8, 13244 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31676-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-31676-z
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.