Table 2 Model comparisons, separately for each ERP component.

From: Electrophysiological correlates of the interplay between low-level visual features and emotional content during word reading

component Model r = 0.5 r = 0.707 r = 1
BF10 % pe BF10 % pe BF10 % pe
P1 size × cont × emo 517.25 ±26.10 514.57 ±21.76 512.82 ±38.59
size + cont + emo 491.61 ±12.25 490.49 ±11.28 489.70 ±12.94
size + emo 488.04 ±10.98 487.25 ±13.15 486.48 ±15.14
size × emo 485.31 ±13.64 484.26 ±14.00 483.27 ±14.79
cont + emo 455.18 ±10.52 454.54 ±10.86 453.44 ±11.01
cont × emo 451.90 ±11.86 451.12 ±15.34 450.06 ±17.30
N1 size × contr × emo 1,136.06 ±17.41 1,133.45 ±7.68 1,130.97 ±7.70
size + cont + emo 1,095.33 ±3.84 1,094.31 ±3.89 1,093.33 ±3.86
cont + emo 1,054.64 ±3.28 1,053.99 ±3.47 1,053.30 ±3.32
cont × emo 1,050.90 ±4.21 1,049.97 ±4.21 1,048.95 ±4.57
size + emo 968.70 ±3.56 968.00 ±3.43 967.29 ±3.46
size × emo 964.94 ±4.22 963.88 ±4.34 962.80 ±4.43
EPN size + emo 1,326.56 ±2.33 1,325.85 ±2.36 1,325.17 ±2.40
size × emo 1,323.40 ±3.04 1,322.38 ±3.07 1,321.31 ±3.03
size + cont + emo 1,322.78 ±2.97 1,321.78 ±3.01 1,320.75 ±2.96
size × cont × emo 1,312.82 ±5.84 1,310.22 ±6.12 1,307.83 ±7.52
contr + emo 1,232.28 ±2.47 1,231.57 ±2.40 1,230.90 ±2.62
cont × emo 1,229.30 ±3.27 1,228.28 ±2.96 1,227.24 ±3.13
LPP size + cont + emo 520.75 ±11.58 519.6 ±14.21 518.57 ±12.27
size × cont × emo 515.67 ±15.47 513.49 ±15.62 511.30 ±26.89
size + emo 496.26 ±10.65 495.59 ±11.47 493.47 ±0.00
cont + emo 494.06 ±9.85 493.60 ±11.74 492.97 ±10.90
size × emo 493.14 ±12.55 492.07 ±10.01 491.39 ±12.85
cont × emo 490.48 ±12.07 489.49 ±11.99 488.63 ±15.22
  1. Note. Bayes factors (BF10, on log scale) and percentage of proportional errors (% pe) for each model relative to the null, obtained by using JZS priors with different scaling factors (see Section 4.6 for details). The model best explaining the data for each component is highlighted in bold. Factors are: emotion (emo), negative or neutral; size, large or small; contrast (cont), high or low.