Article | Open | Published:

Experimental evidence that thermal selection shapes mitochondrial genome evolution

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 9500 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Mitochondria are essential organelles, found within eukaryotic cells, which contain their own DNA. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) has traditionally been used in population genetic and biogeographic studies as a maternally-inherited and evolutionary-neutral genetic marker. However, it is now clear that polymorphisms within the mtDNA sequence are routinely non-neutral, and furthermore several studies have suggested that such mtDNA polymorphisms are also sensitive to thermal selection. These observations led to the formulation of the “mitochondrial climatic adaptation” hypothesis, for which all published evidence to date is correlational. Here, we use laboratory-based experimental evolution in the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, to test whether thermal selection can shift population frequencies of two mtDNA haplogroups whose natural frequencies exhibit clinal associations with latitude along the Australian east-coast. We present experimental evidence that the thermal regime in which the laboratory populations were maintained drove changes in haplogroup frequencies across generations. Our results strengthen the emerging view that intra-specific mtDNA variants are sensitive to selection, and suggest spatial distributions of mtDNA variants in natural populations of metazoans might reflect adaptation to climatic environments rather than within-population coalescence and diffusion of selectively-neutral haplotypes across populations.

Introduction

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is usually maternally inherited1, and was long considered a neutral evolutionary marker2. Accordingly, the mtDNA has been routinely harnessed as a quintessential tool in phylogenetics, population genetic studies, and especially in phylogeographic reconstructions seeking to understand demographic responses to postglacial climate change3. Nevertheless, non-neutral evolution of DNA can compromise historical inferences in population and evolutionary biology4. Selection on standing genetic variation plays an important role in facilitating rapid adaptation to novel environments5,6, and evidence published over the past two decades has suggested that a sizeable amount of genetic variation within the mitochondrial genome is sensitive to natural selection, and exerts strong effects on the phenotype7,8,9,10,11.

Previously, it has been suggested that the thermal environment is likely to impose particularly strong selection on the mtDNA sequence9,12. The underpinning logic is that mitochondrial genes encode multiple subunits in four of the five enzyme complexes that drive mitochondrial respiration, and these enzymatic processes are highly temperature sensitive. The mitochondria of poikilotherms will, for example, presumably be constantly exposed to the prevailing environmental temperature. On the other hand, the mitochondria of homeotherms are not just involved in the production of ATP, but also the production of heat via the uncoupling of mitochondrial respiration13,14. Thus, particular mitochondrial polymorphisms might accumulate that confer highly efficient ATP production, but at the expense of heat production, or vice versa. Thus, adaptation to novel environments might routinely involve selection of mitochondrial polymorphisms that optimize thermal performance in those environments, and this process might be relevant to all metazoans, both poikilothermic or homeothermic, and indeed to all eukaryote life. In support of this contention, emerging data indicate that not all mitochondrial haplotypes perform equally well under the same thermal conditions – some perform best when it is warmer, others when it is colder15,16,17,18,19. Correlative molecular data in humans are also consistent with the idea that certain mitochondrial mutations might represent adaptations to cold climates20,21,22,23, and thus support is growing for a hypothesis, which suggests that polymorphisms that accumulate across mtDNA haplotypes found in different spatial locations have been shaped by selection to the prevailing climate. This hypothesis was termed the “mitochondrial climatic adaptation” hypothesis in 201724.

Currently, this hypothesis remains contentious, primarily because the conclusions of previous studies have, by and large, been based on correlations between mutational patterns in the mtDNA sequence and climatic regions, many of which have proven difficult to replicate in other or larger datasets25,26. We therefore decided to apply experimental evolution to test the mitochondrial climatic adaptation hypothesis, by determining whether multigenerational exposure of replicated populations of fruit flies to different thermal conditions leads to consistent changes in the population frequencies of naturally-occurring mtDNA haplotypes.

In the wild, different locally-adapted populations routinely come into secondary contact and hybridize, which enables selection of novel mito-nuclear genotypes that might be better suited to a new or changing environment27. Such an evolutionary scenario is likely to have become increasingly common in the Anthropocene, wherein humans have rapidly altered both climatic conditions and levels of habitat connectivity28. We reproduced such a hybridization event under controlled laboratory conditions by interbreeding two subpopulations of D. melanogaster, each adapted to thermal environments at a different end of an established and well-studied latitudinal cline29,30. It is thought that the species was introduced into Australia during the past one to two hundred years, probably via recurrent introductions of flies from both African and European origins30,31. The species has been studied extensively in the context of thermal adaptation along latitudinal clines, both within Australia, and other replicated clines in other continents29,30,32. This research has shown that numerous phenotypes related to thermal tolerance exhibit linear associations with latitude, and that these patterns are underscored by linear associations of key candidate nuclear genes29. Yet, no research had focused on the quantitative spatial distribution of mtDNA variants32, until Camus et al.24 reported that similar clinal patterns are found for two phylogenetic groups of mtDNA haplotypes (haplogroups) along the eastern coast of Australia. Furthermore, Camus et al.24 were able to map these clinal patterns of mtDNA variation to the phenotype, showing that the mtDNA haplotype that predominates at subtropical latitudes confers superior resistance to extreme heat exposure, but inferior resistance to cold exposure than its temperate-predominant counterparts.

To characterize our model system in detail, we designed a study based on experimental evolution, in which we submitted replicated laboratory populations of D. melanogaster to one of four different regimes of thermal selection. We note that similarly to patterns observed in mtDNA haplotype frequencies, Wolbachia infection frequencies also concord to latitudinal clinal patterns along the Australian east coast distribution of D. melanogaster, with higher frequencies in low latitude populations33. Furthermore, both the mtDNA and Wolbachia are maternally-inherited. Therefore, it is possible that previously reported clinal patterns in mtDNA haplotypes in Australia24 might have been in part shaped by direct selection on Wolbachia genomes, with changes in mtDNA haplotype frequencies brought about by genetic hitchhiking on particular strains of Wolbachia. In order to test the interacting effect of Wolbachia infection on the dynamics of mtDNA adaptation under thermal selection, we replicated our experiment, under two different conditions – one in which the ancestors of our experimental flies had been treated with antibiotics to remove Wolbachia infections, and the other in which the ancestors had not received antibiotic treatment.

Material and Methods

Experimental procedures

Wild subpopulations of D. melanogaster were sampled during March 2012 in Australia. We sampled a “hot” adapted subpopulation (“H”; Townsville: −19.26, 146.79) in the northeast, and a “cool” adapted subpopulation (“C”; Melbourne: −37.99, 145.27) in the south of the continent. We collected fertilised females and established 20 isofemale lineages from each wild population. Each lineage then underwent three generations of acclimatisation to laboratory conditions.

Wild fruit flies are often hosts of intracellular parasites, such as Wolbachia and associated maternally-transmitted microbiomes that are known to manipulate host phenotypes and affect their thermal sensitivity34,35,36. To assess the effects of thermal selection on the standing mitochondrial variation in our experiment, both in the presence and especially the absence of these maternally-inherited microbiota that co-transmit with the mtDNA, we treated a full copy of our isofemale lineages with the antibiotic tetracycline hydrochloride (0.164 mg mL−1 tetracycline in food for 3 generations), such that we maintained a one full copy with putative Wolbachia and unperturbed microbiomes, and one full copy without Wolbachia but with perturbed microbiomes37.

We then propagated these lineages for a further 10 generations to mitigate any effects of the antibiotic treatment under laboratory conditions. Flies were reared at 25 °C on a 12:12 hour light:dark cycle in 10 dram plastic vials on a potato-dextrose-agar medium, with live yeast added to each vial ad libitum. All isofemale lineages were then transferred from our laboratories in Australia to those in Japan, and their food medium changed to a corn flour-glucose-agar medium (see Supplementary Table S1), with live yeast added to each vial ad libitum. This transition to corn flour based food was made for logistic reasons and the macronutrient content of the two diets is qualitatively similar (Supplementary Table S1). We furthermore note that there was no scope for the isofemale lineages to have adapted to these potato-based food source provided in the laboratory in Australia, given these lineages were founded by single females, and thus lacked the requisite genetic variation required to facilitate an adaptive evolutionary response. Prior to setting up a series of replicated experimental populations, these lineages acclimatized to their new food source for a further 3 generations at 25 °C before entering the admixture process described below.

We pooled 5 virgin females (♀) from each of 18 of the H isofemale lineages, mentioned above, with 5 virgin males (♂) from each of 18 of the C lineages in one bottle (HC = 18 × 5 ♀H + 18 × 5 ♂C), and 5 virgin females from each of the 18 C isofemale lineages with 5 virgin males from each of the 18 H isofemale lineages in another bottle (CH = 18 × 5 ♀C + 18 × 5 ♂H), such that each bottle contained 90 males and 90 females. This step was performed separately for flies sourced from the tetracycline-treated isofemale lineages and flies sourced from untreated isofemale lineages (Fig. 1; Supplementary Table S2). We then allowed the flies to lay eggs over 8 consecutive days and transferred them to fresh bottles as indicated in Supplementary Table S3. From this step, we reared all flies in 250 ml bottles on a corn flour-glucose-agar medium until the experiment was concluded. In the next step, we created each experimental population by mixing F1 offspring (25 virgin males and 25 virgin females) from the HC bottles with corresponding F1 offspring (25 virgin males and 25 virgin females) from the CH bottles (25 ♂CH + 25 ♀HC + 25 ♀CH + 25 ♂HC). These flies (randomly selected from the first hybrid generation) we call the starting generation. In this way, we established 7 experimental populations from the tetracycline-treated isofemale lineages and 8 experimental populations from the untreated lineages. We allowed flies of these populations to mate and lay eggs at 25 °C before transferring bottles with approximately 500 eggs each into four thermal regimes, represented by cold versus warm temperatures on either a constant or fluctuating temperature cycle. This design nests the temperature treatment inside the experimental population; each experimental population consists of four experimental subpopulations, and each experimental subpopulation adapts to one of the four thermal conditions. Bottles maintained in the constant cold temperature were kept at 19 °C (denoted “19 °C”), and those in the constant warm temperature at 25 °C (denoted “25 °C”). In addition, we used Environmental Chambers (MIR-154, Sanyo) to generate fluctuating thermal conditions that are common in areas of origin of our experimental populations38. The first such conditions (denoted “cold”) are typical of Melbourne (mean of 17.4 °C): 8:00(22 °C); 11:30(28 °C); 16:00(20 °C); 20:00(17 °C); 22:00(14 °C); 8:00(15 °C); 11:30(20 °C); 16:00(16 °C); 20:00(15 °C); 22:00(14 °C). The second (denoted “warm”) are typical of Townsville (mean of 26.4 °C): 8:00(27 °C); 10:30(28 °C); 20:00(27 °C); 22:30(26 °C); 0:00(24 °C); 8:00(26 °C); 10:30(28 °C); 20:00(27 °C); 22:30(26 °C); 0:00(25 °C). The temperatures in all conditions were continually monitored, and in fluctuating conditions recorded by Thermo-hydro SD Data Loggers (AD-5696; A&D Ltd). We propagated all replicate populations for three months (3 or 7 successive discrete generations depending on the thermal condition; Supplementary Table S4). We controlled the size of each subpopulation by trimming egg numbers in each generation to approximately 500. At the end of the experimental evolution period of three months, adult flies were collected and fixed in 95% ethanol.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Scheme of experimental evolution by hybridization of differentially thermally-adapted subpopulations of fruit fly. Prior to the application of thermal selection, we created a series of replicated experimental populations, by combining flies of isofemale lineages collected from the Melbourne (putatively cool-adapted, or “C”) subpopulation, denoted in blue, and the Townsville (putatively hot-adapted, “H”) subpopulation (red). This was achieved over two generations, via a process of admixture of the individual isofemale lineages. In the Admixture 1 step, we pooled 5 virgin females (♀) from each of 18 of the H isofemale lineages, with 5 virgin males (♂) from each of 18 C isofemale lineages into one bottle, denoted by HC = 18 × 5(♀H) + 18 × 5(♂C). In parallel in Admixture 1, we performed the reciprocal cross wherein \(H < \,=\, > {\rm{C}}\) above, denoted by CH = 18 × 5(♀C) + 18 × 5((♂H). Each bottle contained 90 males and 90 females (180 flies). In the following generation, at Admixture step 2, we combined 25 virgin females and 25 virgin males from HC bottles together with 25 virgin females and 25 virgin males from CH bottles, 25(♂CH) + 25(♀HC) + 25(♀CH) + 25(♂HC), across 15 biological replicates (7 of which were descendants of flies treated by antibiotics, 8 of which were descendants of untreated flies). At this stage, all flies had been maintained in standard laboratory conditions (25 °C) for 16 generations (14 generations as isofemale lineages, 2 during the admixture process). We then divided each of these 15 biological replicates into 4 subpopulations, subjecting each subpopulation to one of four thermal treatments (19 °C, 25 °C, fluctuating cold, and fluctuating warm), with each experimental subpopulation containing around 500 individuals. On the left side of the figure, yellow text denotes sample sizes associated with each stage of the admixture process for flies whose ancestors had been exposed to antibiotic treatment (ATB), while grey text on the right corresponds with untreated flies (UTR).


Data collection

Total genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen). To identify regions of variation between the populations, we sequenced total DNA of the H and C population samples quantitatively, using an Illumina platform at Micromon (Monash University, Australia). Length of reads was set to 200 bp, and we reached a minimum coverage of 26x at relevant sites of the mitochondrial genomes in each population24.

We mapped all reads to the published mito-genomic sequence NC 001709 in Geneious R639. We observed overall mitogenomic variability and picked 14 mtDNA polymorphic sites (SNPs) that are not unique to the H or C populations. These SNPs segregate all flies into one of two corresponding mtDNA haplogroups denoted A and B in Camus et al.24 (Fig. 2, Supplementary Table S5). Using multiplexPCR and MALDI/Tof mass spectrometry40 (Geneworks, Australia), we genotyped individually a) all isofemale lineages; b) virtually all flies in the starting generation (50 males and 50 females in each of the 15 experimental populations) and c) at least 24 males and 25 females per experimental subpopulation in the final generation upon completion of experimental evolution. This method provides 100% accuracy in the assessment of individuals into one of the two haplogroups. A lower bound for the number of individuals per each sex and experimental subpopulation to sequence (n = 24) was estimated assuming α = 0.05 and a relative thermal effect of 10% at a power of 1 – β = 70%. In total, we genotyped 4410 individuals (data available in Supplementary Table S2).

Figure 2
Figure 2

Relationship of (A) and (B) mtDNA haplogroups. The circle area for each haplogroup is proportional to its frequency in the wild sample (A = 18 females, B = 22 females). Colours indicate the sampling region: Townsville (red, 20 females) and Melbourne (blue, 20 females). Small grey circles represent genotyped-SNP divergence (Supplementary Table S5).


Data analysis

MtDNA is transmitted maternally; males do not transmit their mtDNA to their offspring; and therefore evolutionary changes in mitochondrial genomes must proceed via selection on females. Therefore, our analyses focus on estimating changes in mtDNA haplogroup frequencies in females of each experimental population across the three months of the experiment. We applied a linear mixed-effect model (lmer) in the lme4 v. 1.1–10 package41 of R version 3.2.242. in RStudio server v. 099.46543 with restricted maximum likelihood estimation of variance components, and type III Wald F-tests with Kenward-Roger degrees of freedom appropriate for finite sample size44. We modelled the antibiotic and thermal treatment as fixed effects, and the experimental population (n = 15 levels) as a random effect. This model revealed a significant interaction between the fixed effects of antibiotic treatment and thermal regime on the frequency change of the B haplogroup (Table 1). To interpret the underlying basis of this interaction, we then decomposed the analysis into two linear mixed-effect models examining haplogroup frequency change according to thermal regime for descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB) and untreated (UTR) separately (Table 2). We modelled the thermal treatment as a fixed effect, and the experimental population as a random effect. Statistical significance between fluctuating-cold and fluctuating-warm thermal treatments has been evaluated by multiple Welch’s t-tests (Table 3). It is key to note that the four levels of the thermal treatment are not only characterised by differences in the environments (warm versus cold, in either constant or fluctuating states), but also by the opportunity for adaptation, given that the warmer treatments ran for seven generations, but the colder treatments ran for only three. While the effect of the number of generations of selection cannot be statistically partitioned from the effect of the thermal environments per se, one might plausibly predict that there will have been greater opportunity for changes in haplotype frequency under the warmer conditions, than under the cooler conditions. Importantly, however, we estimated selection coefficients for the thermal treatments, according to the haploid selection model45, that explicitly take into account generation time (Appendix S1). We also verified that our measurements are not affected by genetic drift by simulations of the Wright-Fisher model46 (Appendix S1).

Table 1 Two-level mixed model comparison of B mtDNA haplogroup frequency change according to antibiotic treatment and thermal regime.
Table 2 Linear mixed models examining B mtDNA haplogroup frequency change according to thermal regime for descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB) and untreated (UTR) separately.
Table 3 Welch’s t-tests of B mtDNA haplogroup frequency change between thermal regimes for descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB).

In order to evaluate whether haplogroup frequencies in males are following the frequencies in females in our starting generation, we applied a linear mixed-effect model comparison of haplogroup frequencies between males and females in starting generation according to antibiotic treatment. Antibiotic treatment and sex were modelled as fixed effects; experimental population was modelled as a random effect.

Even within a single generation, thermal selection might yield sex differences in differential survival, from egg to adulthood, of individuals bearing different mtDNA haplotypes; however, under strict maternal inheritance these differences will be reset at each generation. To evaluate the capacity for thermal selection to evoke such within-generation sex-differences in mtDNA frequencies, we applied a multilevel model examining the effect of sex, antibiotic treatment, and thermal regime on B mtDNA haplogroup frequency in the final generation. We modelled the thermal treatment as a fixed effect, the experimental population (n = 15 levels) and subpopulations (n = 60 levels) as random effects. Statistical significance of within generation frequency differences between sexes in particular treatments has been evaluated by homoscedastic two-tail t-tests in Microsoft Excel.

Results

The A haplogroup is found to predominate in the low-latitude, hot, tropical subpopulation from Townsville (H), whilst the B haplogroup predominates in the temperate, cooler Melbourne subpopulation (C; Fig. 2). Starting haplogroup frequencies in our experimental populations reflect the composition of the wild populations. On average, 45% of flies at the outset of the experiment possessed the A haplogroup and 55% the B haplogroup. These frequencies were confirmed by individual genotyping of nearly all flies in all 15 experimental populations, at this starting generation of experimental evolution (Supplementary Table S2).

We observed a statistically significant two-way interaction between thermal regime and antibiotic treatment on changes in haplogroup frequency in our experiment (Table 1). The interaction was driven by an effect of thermal regime on haplotype frequencies in the antibiotic treated, but not the untreated, populations (Group ATB, P = 0.0110, Fig. 3, Table 2). This effect is important because in the absence of Wolbachia infection, changes in haplogroup frequencies can presumably be attributed directly to selection on standing variation in the mitochondrial genome. In the antibiotic treated group, we found that the frequency of the B haplogroup decreased in both of the warmer treatments but increased in the colder treatments. This response is consistent with the spatial distribution of the haplogroups along the Australian cline, where the B haplogroup predominates at temperate higher latitudes, while the A haplogroup predominates in subtropical low latitudes24. The largest statistically significant haplotype frequency differences are observed between fluctuating cold and fluctuating warm conditions (P = 0.0034 in Table 3). We estimated the selection coefficient of the B haplogroup for fluctuating warm conditions sw = −0.082 ± 0.026. We estimated the selection coefficient of the B haplogroup for fluctuating cold conditions sc = 0.085 ± 0.050 (Fig. 4, Appendix S1). Simulations confirm that our observations are unlikely to be accounted for solely by drift (P = 0.0013 in Appendix S1).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Mean change of B mtDNA haplogroup frequency per thermal environment. Plots depict change in frequencies (final generation -initial generation) in constant 25 °C, fluctuating warm, constant 19 °C, and fluctuating cold environments for female descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB; 7 replicates) and untreated (UTR; 8 replicates; in which Wolbachia and associated maternally transmitted microbiomes present). The error-bars are estimated as \(\hat{\sigma }/\sqrt{N}\) where \(\hat{\sigma }\) is the sample standard deviation and N the number of samples.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Estimated change in B mtDNA haplogroup frequency extrapolated to 100 generations of flies whose ancestors had had their coevolved microbiomes, including Wolbachia infection, disrupted by antibiotic treatment (ATB). Colours indicate the experimental fluctuating thermal conditions representing sampling regions: Townsville (red) and Melbourne (blue). Circles mark the actual values we obtained from experiment.

We also observed an effect of the thermal regime on within-generation sex differences in the frequency of the mtDNA haplogroups (Tables 4 and 5, Figs 5 and 6). These differences were already apparent in the starting generation (P = 0.0387 in Table 4). The patterns observed in the antibiotic-untreated populations at 25 °C at the commencement of the experiment (panel I in Figs 5 and 6) tracked closely those observed at the conclusion of the experiment seven generations later for populations maintained under the same conditions (UTR 25 °C, panel II in Figs 5 and 6). This replication of the sex-specificity of mtDNA frequencies is striking, supporting the finding that sex-differences in frequencies are not occurring randomly (P = 0.0321 in Table 5). Under these particular conditions, the frequency of the B haplogroup was higher in adult males than in adult females, suggesting differences in egg-to-adult survivorship of the two haplogroups (UTR 25 °C, panels I and II in Figs 5 and 6, P = 0.0310). Nonetheless, visual inspection of Figs 5 and 6 reveals other instances of sex specificity in haplogroup frequencies across the experimental treatments, including changes in the direction of sex bias across different combinations of thermal regime and antibiotic treatment. For example, in antibiotic-treated populations, frequencies of the B haplogroup exhibited signatures of female-bias under cooler conditions, particularly in the fluctuating cold regime (ATB panel V in Figs 5 and 6, P = 0.0058).

Table 4 Mixed model comparison of B mtDNA haplogroup frequencies according to antibiotic treatment between males and females in the starting generation.
Table 5 Multilevel model examining the effect of sex, antibiotic treatment, and thermal regime on B mtDNA haplogroup frequency in final generation, as a response variable.
Figure 5
Figure 5

B mtDNA haplogroup frequency per thermal environment. Plots depict frequencies in starting generation (I) and final generation constant 25 °C (II), fluctuating warm (III), constant 19 °C (IV), and fluctuating cold (V) environments for female (filled shape) and male (empty shape) descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB; yellow squares, 7 replicates) and untreated (UTR; black circles, 8 replicates; in which Wolbachia and associated maternally transmitted microbiomes present). Dashed line marks mean starting B mtDNA haplogroup frequency in females. The error-bars are estimated as \(\hat{\sigma }/\sqrt{N}\) where \(\hat{\sigma }\) is the sample standard deviation and N the number of samples.

Figure 6
Figure 6

Mean differences of B mtDNA haplogroup frequency between sexes per thermal environment. Plots depict frequencies differences (within generation males - within generation females) in starting generation (I) and final generation constant 25 °C (II), fluctuating warm (III), constant 19 °C (IV), and fluctuating cold (V) environments for descendants of flies treated by antibiotics (ATB; yellow squares, 7 replicates) and untreated (UTR; black circles, 8 replicates; in which Wolbachia and associated maternally transmitted microbiomes present). The error-bars are estimated as \(\hat{\sigma }/\sqrt{N}\) where \(\hat{\sigma }\) is the sample standard deviation and N the number of samples.

Discussion

Our experimental evidence demonstrated context-dependent shifts in population frequencies of two naturally-occurring mtDNA haplogroups under thermal selection. This result is broadly consistent with the hypothesis that spatial distributions of mtDNA haplotypes in natural populations might be in part shaped by thermal selection. In experimental populations whose ancestors’ coevolved microbiomes, including Wolbachia infection, were disrupted by antibiotic treatment (ATB), we observed significant effects of thermal selection on mtDNA haplogroup frequencies, in patterns consistent with their corresponding frequencies in the wild. The advantage of these conditions (ATB) is that we could attribute frequency changes of mtDNA haplogroups directly to the variation in the thermal selection regime. Furthermore, our estimated selection coefficients would predict that in the absence of demographic or genetic processes other than thermal selection in shaping the haplogroup distributions (Fig. 4), the mtDNA haplogroups would reach reciprocal mitochondrial fixation in less than 10 years on both sides of the eastern Australian thermal cline.

Nevertheless, haplogroup frequencies have not reached fixation in wild populations along the Australian latitudinal cline24. Indeed, twenty years prior to the study of Camus et al.24, Boussy et al.47 reported that both the A and B haplogroups coexisted within most sampled populations along the Australian eastern seaboard. Haplogroup A possesses the HinfI restriction site used in their study (see Supplementary Table S5). Clearly the dynamics of selection in the wild will differ from those in a highly controlled laboratory experiment, and spatial and temporal environmental variation is likely to lead to genotype-by-environment interactions that might maintain these mitochondrial haplotypes in the wild notwithstanding their sensitivity to thermal selection. In agreement with this argument, our experiments found that the predicted patterns of the A haplogroup outcompeting the B haplogroup under warmer conditions were sustained only in experimental populations that had been antibiotic-treated, and had therefore experienced a microbiome perturbation, and were free from Wolbachia. We did not observe the predicted patterns in populations in which flies harboured their coevolved microsymbionts, including possible infections with Wolbachia, which might have for instance lead to Wolbachia-induced cytonuclear incompatibilities48,49 and diverse fitness related effects34,50. Wolbachia infection transmission dynamics are known to depend on thermal conditions51, and thus thermal selection in these untreated populations would presumably be mediated through complex interactions between host nuclear genome, mtDNA haplotype, Wolbachia genome, microbiont genomes, which might have obscured any direct effects on the mtDNA frequencies. Furthermore, in the wild, there is a latitudinal cline in Wolbachia presence50, indicating that Wolbachia prevalence is likely to be itself shaped by climatic selection. The low-latitude Australian subtropical populations exhibit higher levels of Wolbachia infection than higher latitude temperate populations33,50. It is possible that genetic polymorphisms within the mitochondrial genome will interact with polymorphisms spanning distinct Wolbachia strains to affect fitness outcomes of their hosts. The nature of these complex interactions between Wolbachia, mitochondrial, and host nuclear genome currently remains completely unexplored. In the absence of further research that elucidates the relative contributions of selection on Wolbachia versus mtDNA haplotypes in shaping the patterns of mitochondrial haplotypic variation observed in nature, it remains difficult to derive predictions as to how host-Wolbachia dynamics will affect changes in mito-genomic compositions of natural fruit fly populations33,52. Wolbachia clades are also known to exhibit habitat-specific fitness dynamics53, and it is possible that different Wolbachia, or other microsymbiont, strains are linked to the two different mtDNA haplogroups studied here, given that each co-transmit with the mtDNA in perfect association along the maternal lineage, and that the mtDNA frequencies in the antibiotic-free treatments hitchhiked on frequency changes involving these microsymbiotic assemblages, as is expected by theory, and has been observed previously54,55.

We observed that haplotype frequencies in males did not necessarily track frequencies in females across the experimental treatments. These sex differences across the experimental treatments were complex, and involved changes in sign under the different combinations of experimental conditions. A key point to note is that selection on mtDNA in males will not directly contribute to shaping patterns of mtDNA variation between generations, under the assumption that males virtually never transmit their mtDNA haplotypes to their offspring. As such, mitochondrial genomes are predicted to evolve under a sex-specific selective sieve56, in which mutations in the mtDNA sequence that confer harm to males can nonetheless accumulate in wild populations, so long as these same mutations are neutral or beneficial for females57,58,59,60. In the absence of inter-sexual positive pleiotropy, such male-expression specific mtDNA mutations could in theory shape patterns of haplotype frequencies within a generation, if they affect male-specific patterns of juvenile or adult survival, but would not be passed on to the next generation, and would thus not shape haplotype frequencies across generations. Male-biased mitochondrial genetic effects on key life history phenotypes have been observed previously56,60,61,62,63,64, and the patterns observed here strengthen the emerging view of ubiquity of sex-specific effects of mtDNA polymorphisms and suggest that such polymorphisms are sensitive to selection imposed by the thermal and microbial environment.

It is possible that paternal leakage (transmission of mtDNA haplotypes from fathers to offspring) could have affected the evolutionary dynamics of selection across the experimental treatments. While paternal leakage has been previously observed in Drosophila, most reports have been limited to cases involving interspecific crosses between individuals of divergent species65,66, or intraspecific crosses between individuals with high levels of genetic divergence67. One recent study, which sampled flies from natural European and Mediterranean populations of D. melanogaster, noted that as many as 14% of individuals were heteroplasmic for divergent haplotypes, thus indicating paternal leakage68. Notwithstanding, the average frequency of the minor haplotype was very low within individuals (less than 1%), and such a low level of heteroplasmy seems unlikely to be of evolutionary significance. Indeed, the Dowling lab had not observed even a single case of paternal leakage among the numerous mitochondrial strains created or maintained in the laboratory over the past decade, despite continual backcrossing to males of isogenic strains possessing a different mtDNA haplotype24,60,69. However, in 2017, Wolff et al.70 observed heteroplasmic individuals in two of 168 replicate populations (1%) following a large experimental evolution study in which flies of two divergent mtDNA haplotypes coexisted across 10 generations. In summary, while paternal leakage appears to occur in this species at low frequencies, we assume at this stage that selection on males would have played at most only a minor role in shaping the intergenerational changes in the frequencies of each haplotype.

Mitochondrial genetic markers remain an important tool for population genetics, despite growing experimental evidence that mitochondrial genetic variation is affected by thermal24, and other kinds of selection71. The evolutionary trajectories of distinct mitochondrial haplotypes might furthermore be selected together with functionally-linked nuclear gene complexes72,73. This reinforces the point that phylogenetic, population-genetic, and biogeographic studies involving mtDNA should incorporate statistical tests to investigate the forces shaping sequence variation and evolution74, and examine variation at multiple genetic loci75. To date, researchers have focused mainly on the effects of nonsynonymous mutations in the evolutionary dynamics of mitochondrial genomes76, but growing evidence suggests that mitochondrial molecular function is also affected by single nucleotides in synonymous and non-protein coding positions on mtDNA24; a contention supported by the current study since there are no non-synonymous SNPs separating the A and B haplogroups24.

Our study advances understanding of the dynamics of evolutionary adaptation by providing experimental evidence that thermal selection acts upon standing variation in the mtDNA sequence. However, further research is needed to resolve the dynamics of this thermal evolution; for instance, by determining whether thermal selection acts on the mtDNA sequence directly, or on epistatic combinations of mitochondrial-nuclear genotype or mitochondrial-microbial genomes77. Furthermore, it remains unclear how much of the pool of non-neutral genetic variation that delineates distinct mitochondrial haplotypes has actually been shaped by adaptive relative to non-adaptive processes. Finally, because of the difficulty of implementing experimental evolution in vertebrates, almost all experimental work investigating the adaptive capacity of the mitochondrial genome has been conducted on a small number of model invertebrate species19,59,71,78,79,80,81, with few exceptions82,83,84. Future studies should involve a combination of ecological and experimental evolutionary approaches, with high resolution transcriptomics and proteomics applied more generally across eukaryotes, and the development of tests enabling us to reliably discern the footprint of thermal selection in wild populations85.

Impact Summary

We applied experimental laboratory evolution to provide the first direct test of the “mitochondrial climatic hypothesis,” which predicts that the variation of mitochondrial genomes across natural distributions of metazoans can be shaped by thermal selection. Our design is the first of its kind when it comes to inferring the role of thermal selection in shaping mtDNA frequencies in nature. We harness two naturally occurring mtDNA haplotypes of Drosophila melanogaster that segregate along the east coast of Australia. One of these haplotypes predominates at subtropical northern latitudes and the other in the temperate and cooler south of the country. We then compete these haplotypes against each other in replicated experimental fly populations submitted to one of four different thermal regimes, in either the presence or absence of infection by Wolbachia, a coevolved endosymbiont that also exhibits maternal transmission.

We confirm that when evolving in the laboratory under warmer conditions, a haplotype naturally predominating in subtropical conditions outcompetes a haplotype that predominates at cooler Australian latitudes in the wild. We see this effect on haplotype frequencies in females in populations where latent Wolbachia infections had been purged.

Our results also suggest that sex-specificity of mtDNA effects, and co-occurrence of other maternally-inherited microbiotic entities - of which Wolbachia is just one example - are likely to shape the trajectories of mitochondrial genome evolution in the wild.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Greiner, S., Sobanski, J. & Bock, R. Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally? BioEssays 37, 80–94 (2015).

  2. 2.

    Moritz, C., Dowling, T. E. & Brown, W. M. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 18, 269–292 (1987).

  3. 3.

    Avise, J. C. et al. Intraspecific phylogeography: the mitochondrial DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 18, 489–522 (1987).

  4. 4.

    Rand, D. M., Dorfsman, M. & Kann, L. M. Neutral and non-neutral evolution of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA. Genetics 138, 741–756 (1994).

  5. 5.

    Barrett, R. D. & Schluter, D. Adaptation from standing genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 38–44 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Hedrick, P. W. Adaptive introgression in animals: examples and comparison to new mutation and standing variation as sources of adaptive variation. Mol. Ecol. 22, 4606–4618 (2013).

  7. 7.

    Rand, D. M. The units of selection on mitochondrial DNA. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 32, 415–448 (2001).

  8. 8.

    Ballard, J. W. O. & Rand, D. M. The population biology of mitochondrial DNA and its phylogenetic implications. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36, 621–642 (2005).

  9. 9.

    Dowling, D. K., Friberg, U. & Lindell, J. Evolutionary implications of nonneutral mitochondrial genetic variation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 546–554 (2008).

  10. 10.

    Dowling, D. K. Evolutionary perspectives on the links between mitochondrial genotype and disease phenotype. BBA-Gen. Subjects 1840, 1393–1403 (2014).

  11. 11.

    Wallace, D. C. Genetics: Mitochondrial DNA in evolution and disease. Nature 535, 498–500 (2016).

  12. 12.

    Ballard, J. W. O. & Whitlock, M. C. The incomplete natural history of mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 13, 729–744 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Brand, M. D., Chien, L. F., Ainscow, E. K., Rolfe, D. F. & Porter, R. K. The causes and functions of mitochondrial proton leak. BBA-Bioenergetics 1187, 132–139 (1994).

  14. 14.

    Ricquier, D. & Bouillaud, F. Mitochondrial uncoupling proteins: from mitochondria to the regulation of energy balance. J. Physiol. 529, 3–10 (2000).

  15. 15.

    Matsuura, E. T., Niki, Y. & Chigusa, S. I. Temperature-dependent selection in the transmission of mitochondrial-DNA in Drosophila. Jpn. J. Genet. 68, 127–135 (1993).

  16. 16.

    Doi, A., Suzuki, H. & Matsuura, E. T. Genetic analysis of temperature-dependent transmission of mitochondrial DNA in Drosophila. Heredity 82, 555–560 (1999).

  17. 17.

    Dowling, D. K., Abiega, K. C. & Arnqvist, G. Temperature-specific outcomes of cytoplasmic-nuclear interactions on egg-to-adult development time in seed beetles. Evolution 61, 194–201 (2007).

  18. 18.

    Arnqvist, G. et al. Genetic architecture of metabolic rate: environment specific epistasis between mitochondrial and nuclear genes in an insect. Evolution 64, 3354–3363 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Wolff, J. N., Tompkins, D. M., Gemmell, N. J. & Dowling, D. K. Mitonuclear interactions, mtDNA-mediated thermal plasticity, and implications for the Trojan Female Technique for pest control. Sci. Rep. 6, 30016 (2016).

  20. 20.

    Mishmar, D. et al. Natural selection shaped regional mtDNA variation in humans. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 100, 171–176 (2003).

  21. 21.

    Ruiz-Pesini, E., Mishmar, D., Brandon, M., Procaccio, V. & Wallace, D. C. Effects of purifying and adaptive selection on regional variation in human mtDNA. Science 303, 223–226 (2004).

  22. 22.

    Balloux, F., Handley, L. J. L., Jombart, T., Liu, H. & Manica, A. Climate shaped the worldwide distribution of human mitochondrial DNA sequence variation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol] 276, 3447–3455 (2009).

  23. 23.

    Luo, Y., Gao, W., Liu, F. & Gao, Y. Mitochondrial nt3010G-nt3970C haplotype is implicated in high-altitude adaptation of Tibetans. Mitochondrial DNA 22, 181–190 (2011).

  24. 24.

    Camus, M. F., Wolff, J. N., Sgrò, C. M. & Dowling, D. K. Experimental evidence that thermal selection has shaped the latitudinal distribution of mitochondrial haplotypes in Australian fruit flies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 2600–2612 (2017).

  25. 25.

    Kivisild, T. et al. The role of selection in the evolution of human mitochondrial genomes. Genetics 172, 373–387 (2006).

  26. 26.

    Sun, C., Kong, Q. P. & Zhang, Y. P. The role of climate in human mitochondrial DNA evolution: A reappraisal. Genomics 89, 338–342 (2007).

  27. 27.

    Canestrelli, D. et al. The tangled evolutionary legacies of range expansion and hybridization. Trends Ecol. Evol. 31, 677–688 (2016).

  28. 28.

    Lewis, S. L. & Maslin, M. A. Defining the Anthropocene. Nature 519, 171–180 (2015).

  29. 29.

    Hoffmann, A. A. & Weeks, A. R. Climatic selection on genes and traits after a 100 year-old invasion: a critical look at the temperate-tropical clines in Drosophila melanogaster from eastern Australia. Genetica 129, 133–147 (2007).

  30. 30.

    Bergland, A. O., Tobler, R., González, J., Schmidt, P. & Petrov, D. Secondary contact and local adaptation contribute to genome-wide patterns of clinal variation in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1157–1174 (2016).

  31. 31.

    David, J. R. & Capy, P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 4, 106–111 (1988).

  32. 32.

    Adrion, J. R., Hahn, M. W. & Cooper, B. S. Revisiting classic clines in Drosophila melanogaster in the age of genomics. Trends Genet. 31, 434–444 (2015).

  33. 33.

    Kriesner, P., Conner, W. R., Weeks, A. R., Turelli, M. & Hoffmann, A. A. Persistence of a Wolbachia infection frequency cline in Drosophila melanogaster and the possible role of reproductive dormancy. Evolution 70, 979–997 (2016).

  34. 34.

    Fry, A. J., Palmer, M. R. & Rand, D. M. Variable fitness effects of Wolbachia infection in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 93, 379–389 (2004).

  35. 35.

    Hurst, G. D. & Jiggins, F. M. Problems with mitochondrial DNA as a marker in population, phylogeographic and phylogenetic studies: the effects of inherited symbionts. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol] 272, 1525–1534 (2005).

  36. 36.

    Koukou, K. et al. Influence of antibiotic treatment and Wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations. Evolution 60, 87–96 (2006).

  37. 37.

    Clancy, D. J. & Hoffmann, A. A. Environmental effects on cytoplasmic incompatibility and bacterial load in Wolbachia-infected Drosophila simulans. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 86, 13–24 (1998).

  38. 38.

    The Australia Government, Bureau of Meteorology at http://www.bom.gov.au/climate/data (2017).

  39. 39.

    Kearse, M. et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics 28, 1647–1649 (2012).

  40. 40.

    Ross, P., Hall, L., Smirnov, I. & Ha, L. High level multiplex genotyping by MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry. Nat. Biotechnol. 16, 1347–1351 (1998).

  41. 41.

    Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B. & Walker, S. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Softw. 67, i01 (2015).

  42. 42.

    R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/ (2015).

  43. 43.

    RStudio Team. RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, Inc., Boston, MA http://www.rstudio.com/ (2015).

  44. 44.

    Kenward, M. & Roger, J. Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics 53, 983–997 (1997).

  45. 45.

    Neal, D. I ntroduction to population biology. 393 (Cambridge University Press, 2004).

  46. 46.

    Neuhauser, C. Matematical models in population genetics in Handbook of statistical genetics (eds Balding, D. J., Bishop, M. & Cannings, C.) 753–780 (John Wiley & Sons, 2008).

  47. 47.

    Boussy, I. A., Itoh, M., Rand, D. & Woodruff, R. C. Origin and decay of the P element-associated latitudinal cline in Australian Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica 104, 45–57 (1998).

  48. 48.

    Hoffmann, A. A. Partial cytoplasmic incompatibility between two Australian populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48, 61–67 (1988).

  49. 49.

    Reynolds, K. T. & Hoffmann, A. A. Male age, host effects and the weak expression or non-expression of cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila strains infected by maternally transmitted Wolbachia. Genet. Res. 80, 79–87 (2002).

  50. 50.

    Hoffmann, A. A., Hercus, M. & Dagher, H. Population dynamics of the Wolbachia infection causing cytoplasmic incompatibility in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 148, 221–231 (1998).

  51. 51.

    Perrot-Minnot, M. J., Guo, L. R. & Werren, J. H. Single and double infections with Wolbachia in the parasitic wasp Nasonia vitripennis: effects on compatibility. Genetics 143, 961–972 (1996).

  52. 52.

    Corbin, C., Heyworth, E. R., Ferrari, J. & Hurst, G. D. Heritable symbionts in a world of varying temperature. Heredity 118, 10–20 (2017).

  53. 53.

    Versace, E., Nolte, V., Pandey, R. V., Tobler, R. & Schlötterer, C. Experimental evolution reveals habitat-specific fitness dynamics among Wolbachia clades in Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 23, 802–814 (2014).

  54. 54.

    Rasgon, J. L., Cornel, A. J. & Scott, T. W. Evolutionary history of a mosquito endosymbiont revealed through mitochondrial hitchhiking. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. [Biol] 273, 1603–1611 (2006).

  55. 55.

    Schuler, H. et al. The hitchhiker’s guide to Europe: the infection dynamics of an ongoing Wolbachia invasion and mitochondrial selective sweep in Rhagoletis cerasi. Mol. Ecol. 25, 1595–1609 (2016).

  56. 56.

    Innocenti, P., Morrow, E. H. & Dowling, D. K. Experimental evidence supports a sex-specific selective sieve in mitochondrial genome evolution. Science 332, 845–848 (2011).

  57. 57.

    Frank, S. A. & Hurst, L. D. Mitochondria and male disease. Nature 383, 224 (1996).

  58. 58.

    Gemmell, N. J., Metcalfe, V. J. & Allendorf, F. W. Mother’s curse: the effect of mtDNA on individual fitness and population viability. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19, 238–244 (2004).

  59. 59.

    Beekman, M., Dowling, D. K. & Aanen, D. K. The costs of being male: are there sex-specific effects of uniparental mitochondrial inheritance? Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130440 (2014).

  60. 60.

    Camus, M. F., Wolf, J. B., Morrow, E. H. & Dowling, D. K. Single nucleotides in the mtDNA sequence modify mitochondrial molecular function and are associated with sex-specific effects on fertility and aging. Curr. Biol. 25, 2717–2722 (2015).

  61. 61.

    Xu, H., DeLuca, S. Z. & O’Farrell, P. H. Manipulating the metazoan mitochondrial genome with targeted restriction enzymes. Science 321, 575–577 (2008).

  62. 62.

    Patel, M. R. et al. A mitochondrial DNA hypomorph of cytochrome oxidase specifically impairs male fertility in Drosophila melanogaster. eLife 5, e16923 (2016).

  63. 63.

    Camus, M. F. & Dowling, D. K. Mitochondrial genetic effects on reproductive success: signatures of positive intra-sexual, but negative inter-sexual pleiotropy. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/15/138180 (2017).

  64. 64.

    Vaught, R. C. & Dowling, D. K. Maternal inheritance of mitochondria: implications for male fertility? Reproduction 155, R159–R168 (2018).

  65. 65.

    Kondo, R., Matsuura, E. T. & Chigusa, S. I. Further observation of paternal transmission of Drosophila mitochondrial DNA by PCR selective amplification method. Genet Res. 59, 81–84 (1992).

  66. 66.

    Dokianakis, E. & Ladoukakis, E. D. Different degree of paternal mtDNA leakage between male and female progeny in interspecific Drosophila crosses. Ecol. Evol. 4, 2633–2641 (2014).

  67. 67.

    Wolff, J. N., Nafisinia, M., Sutovsky, P. & Ballard, J. W. Paternal transmission of mitochondrial DNA as an integral part of mitochondrial inheritance in metapopulations of Drosophila simulans. Heredity 110, 57–62 (2013).

  68. 68.

    Nunes, M. S., Dolezal, M. & Schlötterer, C. Extensive paternal mtDNA leakage in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Mol. Ecol. 22, 2106–2117 (2013).

  69. 69.

    Clancy, D. J. Variation in mitochondrial genotype has substantial lifespan effects which may be modulated by nuclear background. Aging Cell 7, 795–804 (2008).

  70. 70.

    Wolff, J. N., Gemmell, N. J., Tompkins, D. M. & Dowling, D. K. Introduction of a male-harming mitochondrial haplotype via ‘Trojan Females’ achieves population suppression in fruit flies. eLife 6, e23551 (2017).

  71. 71.

    Kazancıoğlu, E. & Arnqvist, G. The maintenance of mitochondrial genetic variation by negative frequency-dependent selection. Ecol. Lett. 17, 22–27 (2014).

  72. 72.

    Wolff, J. N., Ladoukakis, E. D., Enríquez, J. A. & Dowling, D. K. Mitonuclear interactions: evolutionary consequences over multiple biological scales. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 369, 20130443 (2014).

  73. 73.

    Hill, G. E. Mitonuclear ecology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 1917–1927 (2015).

  74. 74.

    Ballard, J. W. O. & Kreitman, M. Is mitochondrial DNA a strictly neutral marker? Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 485–488 (1995).

  75. 75.

    Galtier, N., Nabholz, B., Glemin, S. & Hurst, G. D. D. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol. Ecol. 18, 4541–4550 (2009).

  76. 76.

    James, J. E., Piganeau, G. & Eyre-Walker, A. The rate of adaptive evolution in animal mitochondria. Mol. Ecol. 25, 67–78 (2016).

  77. 77.

    Hirose, M. et al. Mitochondrial gene polymorphism is associated with gut microbial communities in mice. Sci. Rep. 7, 15293 (2017).

  78. 78.

    Dowling, D. K., Meerupati, T. & Arnqvist, G. Cytonuclear interactions and the economics of mating in seed beetles. Am. Nat. 176, 131–140 (2010).

  79. 79.

    Barreto, F. S. & Burton, R. S. Evidence for compensatory evolution of ribosomal proteins in response to rapid divergence of mitochondrial rRNA. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 310–314 (2013).

  80. 80.

    Christy, S. F. et al. Adaptive evolution under extreme genetic drift in oxidatively stressed Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. Evol. 9, 3008–3022 (2017).

  81. 81.

    Stojković, B. et al. 2017. Divergent evolution of life span associated with mitochondrial DNA evolution. Evolution 71, 160–166 (2017).

  82. 82.

    Fontanillas, P., Depraz, A., Giorgi, M. S. & Perrin, N. Nonshivering thermogenesis capacity associated to mitochondrial DNA haplotypes and gender in the greater white-toothed shrew, Crocidura russula. Mol. Ecol. 14, 661–670 (2005).

  83. 83.

    Boratyński, Z., Ketola, T., Koskela, E. & Mappes, T. The sex specific genetic variation of energetics in bank voles, consequences of introgression? Evol. Biol. 43, 37–47 (2016).

  84. 84.

    Baris, T. Z. et al. Evolved genetic and phenotypic differences due to mitochondrial-nuclear interactions. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006517 (2017).

  85. 85.

    Sunnucks, P., Morales, H. E., Lamb, A. M., Pavlova, A. & Greening, C. Integrative approaches for studying mitochondrial and nuclear genome co-evolution in oxidative phosphorylation. Front. Genet. 8, 25 (2017).

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Vanessa Kellerman and Winston Yee for assistance with wild sample collection, and Mary Ann Price, Carla Sgrò, Ritsuko Suyama, Garth Illsley, Richard Lee, Nicholas Luscombe, Pavel Munclinger, Takeshi Noda, and Oleg Simakov for helpful advice. We thank Yuan Liu for her assistance with artwork design. This work was supported by the Physics and Biology Unit of the Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (J.M.) and JSPS P12751 + 24 2751 to Z.L. and J.M., the Hermon-Slade Foundation (HSF 15/2) and the Australian Research Council (FT160100022 and DP170100165) to D.K.D. Initial stages of the study were funded by Go8EURFA11 2011003556 to Z.L. and D.K.D.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Physics and Biology Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (OIST), 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa, 904-0945, Japan

    • Zdeněk Lajbner
    • , Reuven Pnini
    •  & Jonathan Miller
  2. School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, 3800, Australia

    • M. Florencia Camus
    •  & Damian K. Dowling
  3. Department of Genetics, Evolution & Environment, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK

    • M. Florencia Camus

Authors

  1. Search for Zdeněk Lajbner in:

  2. Search for Reuven Pnini in:

  3. Search for M. Florencia Camus in:

  4. Search for Jonathan Miller in:

  5. Search for Damian K. Dowling in:

Contributions

Z.L. and D.K.D. designed the experiment. Z.L. performed the experiment. Z.L. and M.F.C. provided mitogenomic sequences. Z.L., R.P., D.K.D., M.F.C. and J.M. contributed to the data analyses. Z.L., D.K.D., R.P., J.M. and M.F.C. wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zdeněk Lajbner.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27805-3

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.