Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Vibrio cholerae accessory colonisation factor AcfC: a chemotactic protein with a role in hyperinfectivity

Abstract

Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor is an aquatic Gram-negative bacterium responsible for the current seventh pandemic of the diarrheal disease, cholera. A previous whole-genome analysis on V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains from the 2010 epidemic in Pakistan showed that all strains contained the V. cholerae pathogenicity island-1 and the accessory colonisation gene acfC (VC_0841). Here we show that acfC possess an open reading frame of 770 bp encoding a protein with a predicted size of 28 kDa, which shares high amino acid similarity with two adhesion proteins found in other enteropathogens, including Paa in serotype O45 porcine enteropathogenic Escherichia coli and PEB3 in Campylobacter jejuni. Using a defined acfC deletion mutant, we studied the specific role of AcfC in V. cholerae O1 El Tor environmental survival, colonisation and virulence in two infection model systems (Galleria mellonella and infant rabbits). Our results indicate that AcfC might be a periplasmic sulfate-binding protein that affects chemotaxis towards mucin and bacterial infectivity in the infant rabbit model of cholera. Overall, our findings suggest that AcfC contributes to the chemotactic response of WT V. cholerae and plays an important role in defining the overall distribution of the organism within the intestine.

Introduction

Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor is an aquatic, Gram-negative, single flagellated bacterium responsible for the current seventh cholera pandemic1. After entering the human body by ingestion of contaminated food or water, bacteria migrate towards the surface of the small intestine. Colonisation of the intestine leads to the release of cholera toxin (CT) and the development of profuse, watery diarrhoea that is characteristic of the disease. Cholera is treatable with oral rehydration therapy, but if left untreated, can quickly lead to severe dehydration, toxic shock, and death in less than 24 hours post infection2. Cholera remains an important global health problem, mainly affecting areas with poor water sanitation. Each year cholera affects an estimated 3 million people, resulting in over 100,000 deaths, particularly young children3, causing considerable adverse economic consequences to countries in Asia, Africa, Oceania and South America4.

CT and the toxin co-regulated pilus (TCP) are well established as the main virulence factors of V. cholerae5,6,7. CT is responsible for the profuse watery diarrhoea that characterises the disease6 whereas TCP, a type IV pilus, is essential for V. cholerae colonisation of the small intestine, as demonstrated in both human volunteers8 and animal models9. A myriad of other factors has also been associated with V. cholerae pathogenicity10. Of these, motility and chemotaxis have been the subject of considerable study given their proposed role in controlling the intestinal localisation of the organism. Historically Freter and colleagues proposed that chemotactic-based motility was responsible for the preferential localisation of V. cholerae to the crypts of the distal small intestine10,11. However, recent studies12,13 suggest that the distribution of Vibrio cholerae in the intestine is as a result of a complex interplay between motility, chemotaxis and host mucin. Chemotaxis is controlled by numerous inner membrane-localised methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins (MCPs) and soluble chemotaxis proteins11,12. However, at the molecular level, the chemotaxis network is incompletely understood. Chemotaxis also has a role in the aquatic environment, where it allows bacteria to find suitable environmental and host surfaces, made, for example, of chitin. Chitin - a polymer of N-acetylglucosamine, the second most abundant polymer in nature - is present in the exoskeleton of crustaceans and serves as both a carbon source and as a chemoattractant of marine Vibrio species14,15.

An important genomic island involved in cholera disease is the V. cholerae pathogenicity island 1 (VPI-1), which contains the TCP gene cluster. VPI-1 also possesses a cluster of four accessory colonisation factor (acf) genes, designated as acfA, acfB, acfC and acfD16. Both TCP and acf genes are regulated by ToxR, the cholera toxin transcriptional activator17. The acf genes in V. cholerae O395 (O1 Classical biotype) appear to be required for efficient intestinal mice colonisation and biogenesis of the toxin-associated pilus of V. cholerae. In addition, AcfB was shown to be an inner membrane protein that affects motility in V. cholerae O39517. However, in the case of V. cholerae O1 El Tor, acf genes do not seem to have a role in virulence.

In August 2010, Pakistan experienced the worst flooding in its recorded history, affecting more than 20 million people18, followed by a cholera epidemic19. A genetic analysis of V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains from the floods identified two distinct groups, isolated from different geographic regions: Pakistan subclades 1 (PSC-1) (isolates from the coastal city of Karachi) and 2 (PSC-2) (in countrywide areas). Amongst other differences, genome analyses showed that PSC-2 strains had a frame-shift mutation in acfC introducing several stop codons, whereas acfC encoded a full open reading frame in PSC-1 strains19. PSC-1 strains appear to be replacing PSC-2 strains in Pakistan (Nick Thomson, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, personal communication). In addition, comprehensive data base searching revealed that AcfC-like proteins are only found in two other bacterial species, which are both enteropathogens (Campylobacter jejuni and Escherichia coli), suggesting a new family of proteins that maybe important for survival in the mammalian gut. We therefore hypothesized that the presence of a functional acfC in V. cholerae may confer an advantage to strains in PSC-1 to survive in the environment and/or to colonise the human small intestine.

In this work, we investigated the biological role of AcfC in V. cholerae O1 El Tor and found that it might be a periplasmic sulfate-binding protein, which affects chemotaxis towards mucin and has a direct impact on bacterial hyperinfectivity in the infant rabbit model of disease.

Results

Sequence analysis of AcfC suggests a periplasmic localisation and reveals high identity to PEB3 and Paa proteins

The V. cholerae acfC is an open reading frame of 770 bp encoding a polypeptide of 256 amino acids that is predicted to be localised to the periplasm, according to the Protein Subcellular Localization Prediction for Gram-negative Bacteria (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/Cell-PLoc-2/). A protein blast search (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov) indicated that AcfC protein has high similarity to E. coli Paa and C. jejuni PEB3. The amino acid sequences of AcfC, PEB3 and Paa were aligned by ClustalW (Fig. 1a). AcfC has 48,4% identity to PEB3 and 47% identity to Paa. After cleavage of the first 24 amino acids, which likely encodes a signal sequence, the mature AcfC protein is predicted to have a size of 28 kDa (http://www.uniprot.org/uniprot). We confirmed the periplasmic localisation of AcfC by cellular fractionation and western blot with anti-AcfC antibodies (Fig. 1b).

Figure 1
figure1

(a) Blast alignments of V. cholerae AcfC with similar proteins from enteropathogenic bacteria (Paa from E. coli and PEB3 from C. jejuni) using Clustal W software; (b) Detection of V. cholerae AcfC expression in the different bacterial cell compartments using anti-AcfC antibodies. M: Page ruler plus pre-stained protein ladder (Thermo Fisher Scientific); S: Supernatant fraction; OM: Outer membrane fraction; P: Periplasmic fraction; IM: Inner membrane fraction; C: Cytoplasmic fraction; Ctrl: Ni-NTA purified His6-tagged AcfC, used as a positive control; (c) ELISA analysis of binding AcfC to different sulfated glycosaminoglycans (heparin sulfate and chondroitin sulfate), non-sufated glycosaminoglycan (hyaluronic acid) and type II porcine mucin. The values are the means ± standard deviation (n = 3). *p < 0.05, as determined by Tukey’s test.

V. cholerae AcfC is a sulfate-binding protein

The presence of lysine- and arginine-rich regions in the amino acid sequence suggests AcfC may have sulfate-binding properties. We thus tested the ability of His6-tagged AcfC to bind to plastic surfaces coated with sulfated proteins - such as heparin sulfate, chondroitin sulfate and porcine mucin type II or the non-sulfated protein hyaluronic acid as a negative control. Using an ELISA assay, we found that His6-tagged AcfC bound to both heparin, chondroitin sulfate and mucin, but significantly less to hyaluronic acid (Fig. 1c). These results suggest that that AcfC might prefer binding to sulfate-containing proteins (Fig. 1c).

AcfC is not involved in Caco-2 or HT-29MTX-E12 cell adhesion

Given that orthologous AcfC proteins are involved in epithelial cell adhesion, we tested if that was also the case for AcfC in V. cholerae. The role of AcfC in adhesion of V. cholerae was assayed using Caco-2 cells, a cell line well known to produce comparatively low amounts of mucin. The adherence of wild type (S2CHK17 strain) and V. cholerae ΔacfC to Caco-2 cells was similar (Fig. 2a). We next repeated the experiment with a previously described mucin hyper-producer cell line, HT-29MTX-E12 cells. However, we found no differences in adherence between V. cholerae wild type (S2CHK17 strain) and V. cholerae ΔacfC (Fig. 2a). These findings indicate that AcfC, unlike its protein homologues (PEB3 or/and Paa)20,21, is not involved in cell adhesion in the conditions of our experiment.

Figure 2
figure2

(a) Adhesion of V. cholerae S2CHK17 and ΔacfC to Caco-2 and HT-29MTX-E12 cell lines. Adhesion of LMG194 and LMG194 with pEXT20-AcfC construct to Caco-2 (b) and HT-29MTX-E12 (c) cell lines. E. coli ATCC25922 was used as an adhesion positive control. Each value is the average of three replicates. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). Statistical analyses using the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test showed no significant differences in adhesion to cell lines.

To confirm this result, we investigated whether recombinant expression of AcfC in a non-adherent E. coli strain (LMG194) would be able to alter its’ adhesion properties. In line with our results obtained with V. cholerae, expression of His6-tagged AcfC in E. coli LMG194 did not alter adhesion to Caco-2 or HT-29MTX-E12 cells compared to the empty vector control (Fig. 2b and c). The positive control strain, E. coli ATCC25922, however adhered effectively to Caco-2 cells (10% ± SD) and HT-29MTX-E12 cells (3%±) indicating the validity of the assay. Based on these results, we concluded that AcfC is not an adhesion to intestinal cell lines.

Biofilm formation

To survive and colonise both the aquatic environment and the human intestine, V. cholerae forms biofilms on different abiotic and biotic surfaces. We thus studied the ability of V. cholerae S2CHK17 and ΔacfC to form biofilms on 24-well plates with or without mucin and/or chitin. Our results demonstrate that the presence of mucin or chitin enhances biofilm formation in both V. cholerae S2CHK17 and ΔacfC. However, the absence of AcfC does not affect biofilm formation neither on mucin nor on a chitin surface (Fig. 3a).

Figure 3
figure3

V. cholerae S2CHK17 and ΔacfC biofilm formation (a), chemotaxis towards mucin including AcfC complement strain and chemotaxis towards chitin (b). The values are the means ± standard deviation (n = 3). *p < 0.05, as determined by Tukey’s test.

AcfC mediates chemotaxis to mucin but not chitin

The initial stages of colonisation of the human intestinal epithelium often involve the efficient movement and taxis towards mucin covering epithelial cells. We studied bacterial chemotaxis by filling a syringe with the chemoattractant, chitin or mucin, and inserting it into a pipette tip containing a bacterial suspension. We found that V. cholerae ΔacfC is significantly less chemotactic towards mucin compared to the wild type strain; complementation of the acfC gene restored normal chemotaxis (Fig. 3b). However, we found no significant differences in chemotaxis towards chitin between V. cholerae wild type and ΔacfC mutant (Fig. 3b). Our results suggest that AcfC is required for chemotaxis towards mucin, but does not affect chemotaxis towards chitin.

AcfC deletion does not affect flagellar assembly or motility

To rule out that the attenuated chemotactic phenotype in the ΔacfC mutant was not due to a defect on motility or flagella assembly, we measured V. cholerae motility and flagellar length. Both wild type V. cholerae and the ΔacfC mutant were similarly motile (Fig. 4a) and bacteria of both strains possessed a single polar flagellum (Fig. 4b) of similar length (Fig. 4c), suggesting that AcfC has no direct role in motility or flagellar assembly.

Figure 4
figure4

(a) V. cholerae S2CHK17 and ΔacfC motility; (b) TEM pictures; (c) Flagella measurements: The flagella length of one hundred bacteria were measured in each strain and TEM images were analysed using the line measuring tool of Image J 1.50i software (National Institutes of Health, USA); (d) G. mellonella infection results Representative data of survival rate of 3 biological replicates of 10 individual G. mellonella injected with 2.6 ± 1.0 × 105 CFU of each strain in 10 µl of sterilised PBS and incubated at 37 °C. Survival was assayed by response to touch or discoloration. Killing by WT and ΔacfC was observed after 24 h. No killing was observed in the PBS injection control for the length of the experiment. Error bars represent the standard deviation (n = 3). Statistical analyses using the Tukey’s multiple comparisons test showed no significant differences in V. cholerae survival.

AcfC does not contribute to virulence in Galleria mellonella

G. mellonella larvae have been used previously as a simple, invertebrate model to study the virulence of different bacterial pathogens, including V. cholerae22. Pathogenic potential, as reflected by larvae mortality, has been found to correlate with virulence established using mammalian models for several pathogens23,24. Injection of G. mellonella with 2.6 ± 1.0 × 105 CFU of WT or ΔAcfC lead to similar mortality of the wax moth larvae after 24 hours infection (22% versus 24% survival in WT and ΔAcfC, respectively; Fig. 4d). Consistent with this finding, the corresponding LD50 of the WT and the ΔacfC mutant was 1.1 ± 0.3 × 105 CFU per larvae, respectively. As expected, control larvae injected with PBS maintained 100% survival throughout the length of the virulence assay. These results demonstrate that AcfC deletion in V. cholerae El Tor has no effect on pathogenesis in the G. mellonella model.

AcfC mutant exhibits increased infectivity and colonisation of the proximal small intestine of infant rabbits

To further explore the virulence of the ΔacfC mutant and correlate the response seen in G. mellonella larvae to that of a mammalian host, we used the infant rabbit model of cholera25. Oral infection of rabbits with ~1 × 109 CFU of WT bacteria caused diarrhoea or intestinal fluid accumulation in ~67% of animals (Table 1), similar to that found previously for other V. cholerae O1 El Tor strains25, although this was evident by 12 h rather than 18 h post infection. By contrast, the ΔacfC mutant caused watery diarrhoea in all (100%) infected rabbits. Furthermore, the rabbits appeared sicker with a trend towards a more rapid and severe infection compared to those given WT organisms. While fluid accumulation was evident in the mid to distal regions of the small intestine of WT-infected animals, this extended proximally into the upper third of the small intestine of animals infected with ΔacfC mutant. Moreover, the cecal fluid accumulation ratio (FAR), a surrogate measure for diarrhoea, tended to be greater in rabbits infected with ΔacfC mutant compared to WT (Table 1). Thus, overall the ΔacfC mutant appeared to exhibit increased (or hyper) infectivity compared to the WT strain.

Table 1 Diarrhoeal status of rabbits infected with wild type V. cholerae or the ΔacfC mutant.

Hyperinfectivity of V. cholerae has previously been associated with non-chemotactic smooth swimming strains that are better able to colonise the entire length of the small intestine2,11. In order to investigate whether enhanced colonisation occurred in rabbits infected with the ΔAcfC mutant, we determined the number of WT and ΔacfC mutant bacteria present in tissue homogenates taken from the proximal, mid and distal regions of the small intestine, and from the mid colon of infected rabbits. Higher numbers of the ΔacfC mutant were recovered in each of the intestinal sections taken from these single strain infected animals, reaching statistically significant differences in the proximal (P < 0.01) and mid (P < 0.05) small intestine, and the colon (P < 0.05) (Fig. 5). In the tissue samples, ~1 log more bacteria were recovered in acfC-infected rabbits than in those given WT V. cholerae. Furthermore, significantly higher numbers of the mutant were recovered in the cecal fluid (WT – 3.6 × 107 CFU/mL versus ΔacfC mutant 3.6 × 108 CFU/mL; P < 0.05), consistent with the higher burden of V. cholerae present in tissue homogenates.

Figure 5
figure5

Recovery of WT V. cholerae or the ΔacfC mutant from different regions of the rabbit intestine at 12 hours post infection. Numbers of CFU recovered from tissue homogenates of different regions of the small intestine (SI) or colon. Open symbols represent samples where the number of recovered bacteria is below the detection limit (value has been set at detection limit). Bars represent the geometric mean and each data point represents an individual animal (WT – 15 rabbits; acfC mutant – 19 rabbits; 3 independent litters used for each strain). Data were log transformed and compared using an unpaired 2-tailed Students T test.

Discussion

In this study, we provide a detailed characterisation of the V. cholerae O1 El Tor accessory colonisation factor, AcfC, which might be a sulfate-binding protein that enhances chemotaxis towards intestinal mucin and contributes to promoting the ‘correct’ localisation of WT V. cholerae in the small intestine. As mucus is rich in sulfated molecules26 we hypothesize that AcfC might act as a ‘sulfate sensor’ of V. cholerae O1 El Tor that senses intestinal mucus and facilitates penetration of the mucus layer by directing chemotaxis towards sulfated molecules at the intestinal surface. The V. cholerae acfC gene is part of a polycistronic operon downstream of acfB in Vibrio pathogenicity island I. Moreover, acfB gene is under the control of ToxR-ToxT regulatory cascade and is structurally and functionally related to methyl-accepting chemotaxis enteric protein27,28. It has been suggested that V.cholerae AcfB and AcfC interaction activates a chemotaxis signal transduction cascade mediated by Che proteins29. It has also been reported that AcfB is another accessory colonisation factor, which affects chemotaxis but does not affect V. cholerae virulence in mice. This may be due to overlapping or redundant chemotaxis roles with other proteins, such as toxin co-regulated pilus (TcpI)28. Two orthologues of AcfC, PEB3 from C. jejuni and Paa from porcine-pathogenic E.coli are considered to be adhesins involved in attachment to human epithelial cells26,30. However, our work suggests that the primary role of AcfC in V. cholerae is that of a chemotaxis-related protein, rather than being directly involved in adhesion to cell lines. AcfC has been also hypothesized to be a secreted protein in V. cholerae O395 (O1 El Classical biotype)30. By contrast, we confirmed the periplasmic localisation of AcfC in V. cholerae O1 El Tor using cellular fractionation and immunoblotting. In C. jejuni, PEB3 is also known to be a periplasmic glycoprotein30.

AcfC mediates chemotaxis towards mucin but does not have a role in mucin or chitin induced biofilm formation. However, other proteins in V. cholerae with a role on chitin induced biofilm formation such as the toxin co-regulated pilus, which mediates bacterial interactions during biofilm formation on chitinaceous surfaces have been described31.

Motility is necessary for chemotaxis in V. cholerae, but mutants in motility and chemotaxis behave differently in vivo12. V. cholerae chemotaxic mutants exhibited enhanced colonisation in infant mice particularly in the proximal intestine13. Our AcfC mutant has an altered chemotaxis phenotype and increased infectivity with enhanced fluid accumulation in AcfC-infected rabbits comparing to wild-type infected animals. All these data are in accord with other non-chemotactic “smooth swimming” mutants which have also increased infectivity11,12. In contrast, Kamp and colleagues reported that acf genes in V. cholerae O1 El Tor are not important in pathogenesis, dissemination and transmission32. However, in the study of Kamp et al., they sampled the distal small intestine of infant rabbits and did not investigate the other parts of the small intestine, which might explain their contrasting results.

We studied the role of AcfC in virulence by using two in vivo model systems. In our G. mellonella infection model, AcfC mutant has no effect on pathogenesis. This insect model may only be suitable for crude virulence screening of strains. However, for colonisation studies, an animal model with a more developed intestine would be more appropriate, such as the case of the infant rabbit model.

Taken together, this is the first study showing the accessory colonisation factor AcfC of V. cholerae O1 El Tor might act as a periplasmic sulfate-binding protein, affecting bacterial chemotaxis towards mucin. Furthermore, our results show that AcfC has a significant role in governing V. cholerae distribution in the small intestine of infant rabbits. It is intriguing to speculate why PSC-2 strains, which lack a functional acfC gene, are less prominent in the Pakistan cholera outbreak than PSC-1 strains, given that the former may exhibit increased infectivity. Perhaps despite their increased infectivity, other genetic or phenotypic differences between the lineages aid survival outside of the host, an important aspect of the V. cholerae lifecycle.

Methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study are listed in Table 2. Vibrio cholerae S2CHK17 and acfC mutant were routinely grown on Luria agar (LA), broth (LB) or thiosulfate citrate bile salts sucrose agar (TCBS) at 37 °C. All cultures were grown from glycerol stocks in aerobiosis. Escherichia coli DH5α were used for cloning experiments. E. coli MFD λ-pir was used as a conjugation donor. E. coli LMG194 was used as host strain for protein expression. Where appropriate media was supplemented with ampicillin (100 μg/ml) or chloramphenicol (30 μg/ml).

Table 2 Strains, plasmids and oligonucleotides used in this study.

Vibrio cholerae cell fractionation and AcfC antibody production

V. cholerae cells were fractionated following the protocol as described33. Each protein fraction was run on a Nu-Page 4–12% Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gel and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-AcfC antibodies. Experiments were performed in three separate biological replicates and measured as two technical replicates each. AcfC rabbit polyclonal antiserum was obtained from CovalAB UK (Cambridge, UK) against the following peptides: CAESFEKSQSKRVNIT and CFDYLTKSKDAEAIFQHY.

Expression of C-terminally His6-tagged AcfC in Escherichia coli and Vibrio cholerae

The acfC ORF with an optimized ribosomal binding site (RBS) and a C-terminally His6-tag were amplified using primer VC0841RBS_EcoRIF and VC0841RBS_XbaI (Table 2) and Phusion polymerase (NEB). The amplicon was cloned into pEXT20 using EcoRI and XbaI cloning sites producing pEXT20-acfC. This construct was transformed into the expression strain E. coli LMG194 (Invitrogen) and V. cholerae S2CHK17. E. coli or V. cholerae cells were grown until the OD600 was 0.5–0.7. Protein expression was induced by adding isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) at 1 mM for 3 h and 24 h in E. coli and V. cholerae, respectively. Cultures were centrifuged and pellets were stored at −20 °C. Cells were subsequently thawed on ice, lysed and recombinant protein was purified with Ni-NTA agarose (QIAGEN). Protein samples were run on a Nu-Page 4–12% Bis-Tris SDS-PAGE gel and analysed by immunoblotting using anti-His6 antibodies (Abcam, UK).

Western blot

Proteins were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane using iBLOT system (Life Technologies). A rabbit anti-Histag (ab9108, Abcam,UK) or anti-acfC antibody were used as primary antibodies and a fluorescently labelled goat anti-rabbit IR Dye 680RD secondary antibody (Li-cor) was used as secondary antibody. The membrane was visualized using an Odyssey fluorescent imager (LI-COR). The un-cropped image of Fig. 1b is in Supplementary Figure 1.

Sulfate binding assay

Flat-bottomed 96-well plates were coated with 200 µl of 100 µgml−1 glycosaminoglycans (chondroitin sulfate and heparin sulfate), type II porcine mucin (Sigma) and non-glycoaminoglycan (hyaluronic acid), at 4 °C for 18 h. The wells were washed with PBS and blocked with 0.5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 1 h at 37 °C. The wells were washed and then incubated with 0–200 pmol purified AcfC (in PBS) for 1 h at room temperature and then incubated with 200 µl of rabbit anti-AcfC antibodies (1:1000) in 0.1% BSA in PBS for 1 h at RT. After several washes, bound AcfC was then incubated with alkaline phosphatase conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Sigma, UK) in 0.1% BSA in PBS. Reactions were developed with 50 mM p-nitrophenylphosphate (Sigma, UK). The reactions were stopped by adding 3 M NaOH to each well and absorbance at 405 nm was measured. Coating efficiency of the glycoaminoglycans and non-glycoaminoglycans and porcine mucin used in this study, was analyzed by measuring the protein concentration in each well after PBS washes using a Bradford assay. Wells without coating were used as negative controls. Experiments were performed in three separate biological replicates, measured as three technical replicates each.

Allelic exchange mutagenesis and complementation

In-frame deletion mutants were constructed using the splicing by overlap extension (SOE) PCR and allelic exchange34. We used the V. cholerae S2CHK17 genome sequence as a template. Primers are listed in Table 2. The SOE PCR fragment was cloned into the suicide vector pDS13235 and electroporated into the E. coli MFD λ-pir strain (a diaminopemilic acid (DAP) auxotroph) and then conjugated into V. cholerae λ-pir via cross streaking on LB plates containing 0.3 mM diaminopimelic acid (DAP). Growth from these plates was then transferred to LB plates containing 30 μg/ml chloramphenicol to select for V. cholerae with the suicide vector only. Double-crossover deletion mutants were then screened by PCR using flanking primers (Table 2) and confirmed by colony PCR and sequencing. The complemented strain was made by electroporation (1.8 kV) of the pEXT20-acfC construct to acfC mutant strain. The complemented strain was grown in LB with the corresponding antibiotic and 1 mM IPTG induction for 24 h.

Cell adhesion to Caco-2 and HT-29MTX-E12 mucus secreting cell lines

The low mucin producer, human Caco-2 colon adenocarcinoma cell line36 was obtained from the National Type Culture Collection. The human HT-29MTX-E12 mucus secreting cell line37 was obtained from Sigma, UK. The cells were maintained in Gibco RPMI 1640 (Life technologies, USA) or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s high glucose medium (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) respectively, both supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal calf serum, 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids and 1% (v/v) penicillin-streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) in a 5% CO2 humidified atmosphere at 37 °C. Escherichia coli LMG194 and V. cholerae were grown in LA from a glycerol stock for 20 h at 37 °C and then LB was inoculated with a single colony and grown 20 h at 37 °C. A secondary culture was inoculated, and protein expression was induced by adding IPTG 1 mM for 24 h at 37 °C.

For adhesion assay, medium was replaced with 1 ml of 1 × 108 CFU/ml of E. coli LMG194 or V. cholerae suspended in the previously described antibiotic free tissue culture media (human Caco-2 colon adenocarcinoma and HT-29MTX-E12 mucus secreting cell line with Gibco RPMI 1640 (Life technologies, USA) or Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s high glucose medium (Sigma-Aldrich, UK) respectively, both with 1% (v/v) fetal calf serum and 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids). The adhesion assay was performed for 2 h. In parallel, we grew E.coli and V. cholerae in the antibiotic free tissue culture media we used for the adhesion assay (described above) and checked AcfC expression after 2 h and we were able to detect AcfC expression in V. cholerae wild type and E.coli with pEXT20-AcfC construct. This could be due to the pTac promoter on the medium copy pEXT20 vector which does lead to leakiness38. However, we did not detect AcfC expression in the acfC mutant or pEXT20 empty vector.

For adhesion assays, the medium was replaced with antibiotic free medium supplemented with 1% (v/v) fetal calf serum and 1% (v/v) non-essential amino acids 24 hours prior to experiments. Both cell lines were seeded at 2.5 × 105 cells/ml into 24-well plates (Corning Glass Works, Netherlands) using 1 ml of cell suspension per well.

Adhesion assays were performed on Caco2 or HT-29MTX-E12 monolayers that had reached 80–90% confluence in 24-well plates. Infections were carried out for 2 h. For infections, medium was replaced with 1 ml of 1 × 108 CFU/ml of E. coli LMG194 or V. cholerae suspended in the previously described antibiotic free tissue culture media. After co-incubation, the monolayers were washed 3 times with 1 ml of PBS 1X and incubated with 200 µl of 0.25% trypsin EDTA to break up the monolayer which was subsequently diluted and plated onto LB agar with or without corresponding antibiotic to calculate CFU/ml. E. coli ATCC25922 was used as adhesion positive control. Experiments were performed in three separate biological replicates, measured as three technical replicates each.

Motility and electron microscopy (EM)

Bacteria were grown on LA plates for 24 h, at 37 °C. One colony was inoculated in LB with 0.3% agar (BD Bacto-agar) and incubated at 37 °C for 18 h. Photographs were captured after the incubation time with a Canon 600D SLR. The diameter of the halo was also determined. Experiments were performed in three separate biological replicates, measured as three technical replicates each.

For V. cholerae visualization by EM, strains were grown in LB tubes at 37 °C, overnight under aerobic conditions. Each strain was grown in a total volume of 1 ml and was incubated for 18 h. 500 µl of 2.5% paraformaldehide/2.5% glutaraldehyde/0.1 M Na cacodylate pH 7.4 was added to 500 µl of the bacterial culture. Five ml were placed onto a platform coated 300 mesh copper grid for 1 min. The sample was then stained with 10 µl of 0.3% phosphotungstic acid (PTA) pH 7 for 1 min. The PTA was drained and the grid was air-dried before examining on the Jeol 1200EX Transmission Electron Microscope. Digital images were recorded using a side-mounted AMT 2K CCD Digital camera supplied by Deben UK Ltd, IP30 9QS.

Chemotaxis towards mucin and chitin

Chitin (Sigma, UK) and Type II mucin from porcine stomach (Sigma, UK) was prepared freshly for each assay by suspending at 2% (wt/vol) in chemotaxis buffer (sterile PBS 1X with 0.01 mM filter sterilised EDTA). V. cholerae cells were grown to an OD600 of between 0.4 and 0.6 in LB broth. Chemotaxis was measured following the protocol as described39. Results were compared to control needles containing only chemotaxis buffer to determine the chemotaxis response. The chemotaxis response was calculated as the ratio of test CFU/ml to control CFU/ml. Comparisons were made between strains using at least three biological assays containing two technical replicates each.

Biofilm formation

V. cholerae strains were grown in Marine Sea Water Yeast Extract (MSWYE) agar and broth40 overnight at 37 °C. Two ml of culture was inoculated into low evaporation 24-well plates at 1:200 dilution. The cultures were grown statically for one day after which the supernatant was carefully removed and the wells washed with 1 ml of PBS 1X. Each well was incubated with 1% crystal violet (wt/v) at room temperature for 20 min. The crystal violet was dissolved with methanol for 15 min at room temperature. The OD595 was measured in a Spectrophotometer (Biotek, UK). Experiments were performed in three separate biological replicates, measured as three technical replicates each.

Galleria mellonella virulence assay

This assay was performed as previously described41,42 using a micro-injection technique whereby 10 µl V. cholerae was injected into the haemocoel via the right foreleg, using a Hamilton syringe. G. mellonella larvae were bred in sterile conditions at 37 °C. After injection of bacteria, caterpillars were incubated at 37 °C and survival and macroscopic appearance were recorded at 24 h post-infection. Caterpillars were considered dead when they were nonresponsive to touch. Three biological replicates of ten individual G. mellonella were performed.

Infant rabbit infections

All experimental protocols were approved by the local Animal Welfare and Ethical Review Body, the Home Office and carried out in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

Adult New Zealand White females were obtained from a commercial breeder (Harlan Laboratories, UK) and time-mated when required to produce litters of infant rabbits. Individual litters, typically containing 6–8 pups, were housed as a group in a nest box with the lactating doe for the duration of the experiments. Experiments were performed generally as described previously25. Briefly, two- to three day old infant rabbits were treated with ranitidine hydrochloride (GlaxoSmithKline) by intraperitoneal injection (2 mg/kg bodyweight) 2 hours prior to infection. Bacteria were given orally by gavage using a Size 5 French catheter (Arrow International). Infant rabbits were infected with ~1 × 109 CFU WT V. cholerae or the ΔacfC mutant. The inoculum was prepared from stationary phase (18 h) cultures of the bacteria grown in LB broth supplemented with 100 µg/mL streptomycin at 37 °C with shaking (250 rpm). To prepare the inoculum, bacterial cultures were centrifuged (5 min, 8 rpm) to pellet the cells and the supernatant was removed. Cell pellets were resuspended in sodium bicarbonate solution (2.5 g in 100 mL; pH 9) adjusted to yield a final cell density of ~2 × 109 CFU/mL. Diarrhoea was scored using the following scale: none (rabbits were dry with no signs of faecal contamination or wetness on their ventral surfaces; upon dissection, the colon contained digesta that appeared normal (dark green, hard and formed)); mild (soft yellow stools and/or limited areas of wetness were evident on the rabbits’ fur; upon dissection, digesta was missing from the colon or appeared yellow, soft and unformed), and severe (rabbits exhibited extensive areas of wetness on their tails’ and ventral surfaces; upon dissection no digesta was found in the colon and the cecum and small intestine contained large quantities of clear fluid). Infant rabbits were anesthetized with inhalational isoflurane prior to euthanasia by cervical dislocation.

At euthanasia, intestinal samples and cecal fluid were collected as described previously25. The number of V. cholerae CFU in tissue samples was determined after homogenisation in PBS by plating on LB supplemented with 100 µg/mL streptomycin. The detection limit of the assays was ~100 CFU/g. Rabbits, which contained no WT V. cholerae colonies in any of the intestinal samples were considered ‘uncolonised’ and excluded from subsequent analysis; the reasons why we fail to recover any colonies in a small number (<1 in 10) of rabbits orally-infected with wild type bacteria are unknown. However, rabbits, in which viable V. cholerae were detected in at least one intestinal sample, were included in order to capture the natural variation of colonisation and disease that occurs in this host. In these animals, samples that yielded no bacteria at the lowest dilution tested were included in the calculation of the mean values presented in Fig. 5 by using the lower limit of detection as a value.

Statistical analysis

Data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The statistical test used was Tukey’s multiple comparisons test using Prism software 9 version 4.0 (GraphPad Software, Inc, San Diego, CA). p > 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The diarrhoeal state of the rabbits were compared using Fisher’s exact test. Cecal fluid accumulation ratios (FARs) and colonisation data (after log transformation) were statistically analysed using unpaired 2-sided Student T test (GraphPad Prism, San Diego, CA).

Data availability statement

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Chin, C. S. et al. The origin of the Haitin cholera outbreak strain. N. Engl. J. Med. 364, 33–42 (2011).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Barua, D. History of cholera (ed. Barua, D. & Greenbough, W. B.) 136 (Cholera Plenum Publishing Corp., New York, NY, 1992).

  3. 3.

    Ali, M. et al. The global burden of cholera. Bull World Health Organ. 90, 209–218 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Ali, M., Nelson, A. R., Lopez, A. L. & Sack, D. Updated global burden of cholera in endemic countries. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 9, e0003832 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Pierce, N. F., Greenough, W. B. & Carpenter, C. C. Vibrio cholerae enterotoxin and its mode of action. Bacteriol. Rev. 35, 1–13 (1971).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Thelin, K. H. & Taylor, R. K. Toxin-coregulated pilus, but not mannose-sensitive hemagglutinin, is required for colonization by Vibrio cholerae O1 El Tor biotype and O139 strains. Infect. Immun. 64, 2853–2856 (1996).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Taylor, R. K., Miller, V. L., Furlong, D. B. & Mekalanos, J. J. Use of phoA gene fusions to identify a pilus colonization factor coordinately regulated with cholera toxin. Proc. Nath. Acad. Sci. 84, 2833–2837 (1987).

    ADS  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Herrington, D. A. et al. Toxin, toxin-coregulated pili, and the toxR regulon are essential for Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in humans. J. Exp Med. 168, 1487–1492 (1988).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Ritchie, J. M. & Waldor, M. K. Vibrio cholera interactions with the gastrointestinal tract: lessons from animal studies. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol. 337, 37–59 (2009).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Freter, R. & O’Brien, P. C. Role of chemotaxis in the association of motile bacteria with intestinal mucosa: fitness and virulence of nonchemotactic Vibrio cholerae mutants in infant mice. Infect. Immun. 34, 222–233 (1981).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Butler, S. M. & Camilli, A. Both chemotaxis and net motility greatly influence the infectivity of Vibrio cholerae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 101, 5018–5023 (2004).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Millet, Y. A. et al. Insights into Vibrio cholerae intestinal colonization from monitoring fluorescently labelled bacteria. PLoS Pathog. 10, e1004405 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Boin, M. A., Austin, M. J. & Häse, C. C. Chemotaxis in Vibrio cholerae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 239, 1–8 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Hunt, D. E., Gevers, D., Vahora, N. M. & Polz, M. F. Conservation of the chitin utilization pathway in the Vibrionaceae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 44–51 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Riemann, L. & Azam, F. Widespread N-acetyl-d-glucosamine uptake among pelagic marine bacteria and its ecological implications. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68, 554–5562 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Withey, J. H. & DiRita, V. J. Activation of both acfA and acfD transcription by Vibrio cholerae ToxT requires binding to two centrally located DNA sites in an inverted repeat conformation. Mol. Microbiol. 56, 1062–1077 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Peterson, K. M. & Mekalanos, J. J. Characterization of the Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon: identification of novel genes involved in intestinal colonization. Infect. Immun. 56, 2822–2829 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Singapore Red Cross. Pakistan floods: the deluge of disaster Facts & Figures as of 15 September 2010. http://reliefweb.int/report/pakistan/pakistan-floodsthe-deluge-disaster-facts-figures-15-september-2010 (2010).

  19. 19.

    Shah, M. A. et al. Genomic epidemiology of Vibrio cholerae O1 associated with flood, Pakistan, 2010. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20, 13–19 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Rangarajan, E. S. et al. Structural context for protein N-glycosylation in bacteria: The structure of PEB3, an adhesion from Campylobacter jejuni. Protein Sci. 16, 990–995 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Batisson, I. et al. Characterization of the novel factor Paa involved in the early steps of the adhesion mechanism of attaching and effacing Escherichia coli. Infect. Immun. 71, 4616–4625 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Champion, O. L. et al. Insect infection model for Campylobacter jejuni reveals that O-methyl phosphoramidate has insecticidal activity. J. Infect. Dis. 201, 776–782 (2010).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Jander, G., Rahme, L. G. & Ausubel, F. M. Positive correlation between virulence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa mutants in mice and insects. J. Bacteriol. 182, 3843–3845 (2000).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Mylonakis, E. et al. Galleria mellonella as a model system to study Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 73, 3842–3850 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Ritchie, J. M., Rui, H., Bronson, R. T. & Waldor, M. K. Back to the future: studying cholera pathogenesis using infant rabbits. MBio. 18, e00047–10 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Jeffery, P. K. Structure and function of mucus-secreting cells of cat and goose airway epithelium. Ciba Found Symp. 54, 5–23 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Everiss, K. D., Hughes, K. J., Kovach, M. E. & Peterson, K. M. The Vibrio cholerae acfB colonization determinant encodes an inner membrane protein that is related to a family of signal-transducing proteins. Infect. Immun. 62, 3289–3298 (1994).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Chaparro, A. P., Ali, S. K. & Klose, K. E. The ToxT-dependent methyl-accepting chemoreceptors AcfB and TcpI contribute to Vibrio cholera intestinal colonization. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 302, 99–105 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Selvaraj,P., Gupta, R. & Peterson, K.M. The Vibrio cholerae ToxR regulon encodes host-specific chemotaxis proteins that function in intestinal colonization. SOJ Microbiol.Infect. Dis. 3, https://doi.org/10.15226/sojmid/3/3/00141 (2015).

  30. 30.

    Linton, D., Allan, E., Karlyshev, A. V., Cronshaw, A. D. & Wren, B. W. Identification of N-aceytlgalactosamine-containing glycoproteins PEB3 and CgpA in Campylobacter jejuni. Mol. Microbiol. 43, 497–508 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Reguera, G. & Kolter, R. Virulence and the environment: a novel role for Vibrio cholerae toxin-coregulated pili in biofilm formation on chitin. J. Bacteriol. 187, 3551–3555 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Kamp, H. D., Patimalla-Dipali, B., Lazinski, D. W., Wallace-Gadsden, F. & Camilli, A. Gene fitness landscapes of Vibrio cholerae at important stages of its life cycle. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003800 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Megli, C. J. & Taylor, R. K. Secretion of TcpF by the Vibrio cholerae toxin-coregulated pilus biogenesis apparatus requires an N-terminal determinant. J. Bacteriol. 195, 2718–2727 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ho, S. N., Hunt, H. D., Horton, R. M., Pullen, J. K. & Pease, L. R. Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. Gene. 77, 51–59 (1989).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Philippe, N., Alcaraz, J. P., Coursange, E., Geiselmann, J. & Schneider, D. Improvement of pCVD442, a suicide plasmid for gene allele exchange in bacteria. Plasmid. 51, 246–255 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Linden, S. K., Driessen, K. M. & McGuckin, M. A. Improved in vitro model systems for gastrointestinal infection by choice of cell line, pH, microaerobic conditions, and optimization of culture conditions. Helicobacter. 12, 341–355 (2007).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Behrens, I., Stenberg, P., Artursson, P. & Kissel, T. Transport of lipophilic drug molecules in a new mucus-secreting cell culture model based on HT29-MTX cells. Pharm. Res. 18, 1138–1145 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Dykxhoom, D. M., St.Pierre, R. & Linn, T. A set of compatible tac promoter expression vectors. Gene. 177, 133–136 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Mazumder, R., Phelps, T. J., Krieg, N. R. & Benoit, R. E. Determining chemotactic responses by two subsurface microaerophiles using a simplified capillary assay method. J. Microbiol. Meth. 37, 255–263 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Oliver, J. D. & Colwell, R. R. Extractable lipids of gram-negative marine bacteria: phospholipid composition. J. Bacteriol. 114, 897–908 (1973).

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Nuidate, T. et al. Role of indole production on virulence of Vibrio cholerae using Galleria mellonella larvae model. Indian J. Microbiol. 56, 368–374 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Bokhari, H., Ali, A., Noreen, Z., Thomson, N. & Wren, B. W. Galleria mellonella is low cost and suitable surrogate host for studying virulence of human pathogenic Vibrio cholerae. Gene. 628, 1–7 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ferrieres, L. et al. Silent mischief: bacteriophage Mu insertions contaminate products of Escherichia coli random mutagenesis performed using suicidal transposon delivery plasmids mobilized by broad-host-range RP4 conjugative machinery. J. Bacteriol. 192, 6418–6427 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge funding from Wellcome Trust grant ref 102979/Z/13/Z. In addition, Esmeralda Valiente and Cadi Davies were also supported by LSHTM pre-entry Athena Swan award 2016. Jennifer Ritchie was supported by an expert services contract (QC8127) held at the University of Surrey. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We thank Maria Mc Crossan for assistance with the TEM images.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

E.V. and B.W.W. conceived the experiments; E.V. conducted mutant complementation, phenotypic assays and G. mellonella experiments, analysed the results and wrote the paper; C.D. conducted the Caco-2 and HTX-29 cell adhesion and assisted in the chemotaxis experiments; D.M. initiated the project and carried out mutagenesis and cloning experiments. J.R. performed infant rabbit experiments. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brendan W. Wren.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valiente, E., Davies, C., Mills, D.C. et al. Vibrio cholerae accessory colonisation factor AcfC: a chemotactic protein with a role in hyperinfectivity. Sci Rep 8, 8390 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26570-7

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing