Article | Open | Published:

BlsA integrates light and temperature signals into iron metabolism through Fur in the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 7728 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Light modulates global features of the important human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii lifestyle including metabolism, tolerance to antibiotics and virulence, most of which depend on the short BLUF-type photoreceptor BlsA. In this work, we show that the ability to circumvent iron deficiency is also modulated by light at moderate temperatures, and disclose the mechanism of signal transduction by showing that BlsA antagonizes the functioning of the ferric uptake regulator (Fur) in a temperature-dependent manner. In fact, we show that BlsA interacts with Fur in the dark at 23 °C, while the interaction is significantly weakened under blue light. Moreover, under iron deprived conditions, expression of Fur-regulated Acinetobactin siderophore genes is only induced in the dark in a BlsA-dependent manner. Finally, growth under iron deficiency is supported in the dark rather than under blue light at moderate temperatures through BlsA. The data is consistent with a model in which BlsA might sequester the repressor from the corresponding operator-promoters, allowing Acinetobactin gene expression. The photoregulation of iron metabolism is lost at higher temperatures such as 30 °C, consistent with fading of the BlsA-Fur interaction at this condition. Overall, we provide new understanding on the functioning of the widespread Fur regulator as well as short-BLUFs.

Introduction

BLUF (Blue Light Using Flavin) domains are light-triggered switches that control enzyme activity or gene expression in response to blue light1. These photosensors bind riboflavin (RB) derivatives as chromophores, namely FMN (Flavin Mononucleotide) or FAD (Flavin Adenine Dinucleotide)2. Many BLUF proteins, including AppA and PAC, carry an extra domain adjacent to the BLUF domain, with enzymatic activity or other properties1. However, the majority of bacterial BLUF proteins, do not possess an effector domain covalently linked2, and consist solely of the BLUF core and a C-terminal extension1. The BLUF domain transmits the light-induced signal to downstream protein modules via intermolecular or intramolecular interactions3. Despite being widely distributed in bacterial genomes, signal transduction involving BLUF photoreceptors has been envisaged only in a few cases.

We have previously recognized that Acinetobacter baumannii perceives and responds to light modulating global features of its physiology through the only “traditional” photoreceptor encoded in its genome, a short BLUF protein designated BlsA4,5,6. A. baumannii is in fact a threatening human pathogen considered to be the paradigm of multidrug resistance (MDR), and recognized recently as one of the pathogens requiring urgent attention by the world health organization (WHO). A key component in its success as a pathogen is its outstanding capability to acquire resistance as well as its peculiar ability to reside and persist in the hospital environment, factors that contribute to colonization, infection, and dissemination of the MDR clones7,8.

Cellular processes modulated by light in A. baumannii are wide and diverse. In fact, we have previously shown that in A. baumannii light modulates motility, biofilm formation, and virulence against Candida albicans4. We further showed that light regulates metabolic pathways such as the phenylacetic acid degradation pathway and trehalose biosynthesis, susceptibility and tolerance to some antibiotics, antioxidant enzyme levels such as catalase, likely contributing to bacterial persistence in adverse environments6,9. Moreover, the expression of whole pathways and gene clusters, such as genes involved in lipid metabolism, the complete type VI secretion system, as well as efflux pumps related to antibiotic resistance, were differentially induced by light6. In A. baumannii, light modulation occurs at moderate temperatures such as 23 °C but not at higher such as 37 °C, in contrast to other Acinetobacter species4,5,10. It is therefore clear that light could have a direct effect on persistence of the bacteria in the environment. On the contrary, light may not play a role in systemic infections in humans but rather might be relevant in the pathogenesis of surface-exposed wound infections, considering the exposure of the bacteria to light and the relatively lower temperatures of skin wounds4. Besides BlsA, no other clues on the mechanism or other components of the light signal transduction are known for this pathogen.

In this work, we provide for the first time evidence on the mechanism of light signal transduction mediated by BlsA in A. baumannii by showing that this photoreceptor directly interacts with the ferric uptake regulator, Fur, antagonizing its functioning and enabling expression of the Acinetobactin siderophore gene cluster, as well as growth under iron deprived conditions.

Iron is involved in diverse functions in bacterial cells11. However, an excess of Fe(II) is toxic for the cell because of the formation of highly reactive radicals via the Fenton reaction, and therefore, the intracellular iron concentration has to be tightly regulated11. In mammals, iron is virtually unavailable to invading bacteria, being mainly incorporated into iron transport and storage proteins. One of the strategies developed by bacterial pathogens to respond to iron deprivation imposed by the human host is the production of high-affinity uptake systems known as siderophores12. Siderophores, such as A. baumannii Acinetobactin, are low molecular weight compounds which solubilize external Fe+3, and whose production is strongly repressed by the presence of iron. In Gram-negative bacteria, iron-regulated gene expression is generally under the control of Fur11,13,14. The binding of Fe(II) induces a conformational change that allows Fur to behave as a transcriptional repressor by blocking access of RNA polymerase to the DNA.

Most of the genes involved in Acinetobactin biosynthesis and utilization are organized in a genomic cluster15 identified by Fur titration assay (FURTRA) in A. baumannii ATCC 19606, i.e. by the ability of the Fur repressor to bind to the corresponding Fur boxes in the promoter-operator regions, followed by cloning and sequencing of the sequestered DNA fragment15. Subsequent studies determined that the cluster includes 18 genes expressed in seven transcriptional units from five Fur-related promoters15. Some of these genes are involved in Acinetobactin biosynthesis and were designated bas (A. baumannii Acinetobactin biosynthesis); others bau, which stand for A. baumannii Acinetobactin utilization; and finally the barAB genes, which are involved in Acinetobactin release out of the cell (A. baumannii Acinetobactin release)15. Functional analysis of the bauA and basD mutants proved that the Acinetobactin-mediated system is the only siderophore-mediated high-affinity iron acquisition system produced by the type strain 19606 under iron deprived conditions12,16,17.

Overall, in this work we provide new understanding of iron homeostasis, showing that light modulates iron acquisition and revealing a new role for Fur in transduction of the light signal mediated by BlsA.

Results

BlsA interacts with Fur in the dark at moderate temperatures in A. baumannii

To find BlsA´s partners that mediate signal transduction between light perception and transcriptional regulation by protein-protein interactions, we performed a candidate approach. To do this, we first surveyed the literature and databases for confirmed or proposed transcriptional regulators of the pathways that we have shown before to be modulated by light through BlsA6. One of these candidates was the Fur regulator, as in other microorganisms it was shown to regulate catalase18; and also as enzymes involved in the phenylacetic acid degradation as well as benzoate degradation pathways were shown to be modulated by iron levels in A. baumannii14.

To investigate whether BlsA interacts with Fur, we performed yeast two hybrid experiments (Y2H) using a system adapted from the ProQuest™ Two-Hybrid System (http://www.invitrogen.com/content/sfs/manuals/10835031.pdf). The yeast strain employed, Mav 203, contains three different reporter genes, namely lacZ and two auxotrophic markers such as HIS3 or URA3, with independent promoters to rapidly weed out false positives. Whether an interaction occurs, the system would result in the development of blue color or gain in the ability of the yeast to grow in the absence of histidine or uracil. Based in our previous experience19, we used Gateway-system adapted Y2H vectors pGAD-T7Gw and pGBK-T7Gw to express each gene under study, namely blsA and the single fur homolog produced by A. baumannii13,20,21, as fusions to the GAL4 DNA binding domain (DB) and activation domain (AD), respectively. Self-activation controls (pGAD-T7Gw and pGBK-T7Gw empty vectors) and different force interaction controls (A–E) were also included in each plate, allowing for a better comparison between the reporter genes’ expression levels. Figure 1 summarizes the Y2H assay results for the different reporter genes at different conditions, which in all cases provided congruent results. At 23 °C in the dark (Fig. 1), the three reporters showed positive indications for the interaction between BlsA and Fur, evidenced by the development of blue color, as well as the ability to grow in plates lacking histidine or uracil. As expected, the reporter gene expression was observed for both the pGADblsA/pGBKfur and pGADfur/pGBKblsA clones. It is noteworthy that growth was observed even on SC-Ura plates, since only strong protein:protein interactions can induce the least sensitive URA3 reporter gene sufficiently to allow growth, therefore indicating that the interaction between BlsA and Fur is strong under these conditions. The possible self-activation of each protein fused to DB was tested in strains expressing the GAL4 AD alone and the corresponding fusion to DB (pGAD-T7/pGBKblsA or pGBKfur). In addition, AD fusions (pGBK-T7/pGADblsA or pGADfur) were also tested and, as expected, none of those were capable of activating reporters’ expression by themselves. These results allow us to confirm that BlsA interacts with Fur specifically at 23 °C and in the dark. On the contrary, at 23 °C under blue light, Y2H assays showed null or negligible Fur-BlsA interaction for the three reporters (Fig. 1). Overall, our results show that BlsA interacts with Fur in a light dependent manner at moderate temperatures.

Figure 1
Figure 1

BlsA interacts with Fur at moderate temperatures in the dark, but not under blue light or at higher temperatures. Y2H assays of BlsA/Fur interaction at the different conditions, namely 23 °C in the dark (D), 23 °C under blue light (L) or 30 °C in the dark. Each plate contains six clones of MaV203/pGAD-blsA or MaV203/pGAD-fur transformed with plasmids pGBK-fur or pGBK-blsA, respectively, as well as plasmid pGBK as negative control. In addition, we included at least six clones of MaV203/pGBKT-blsA or MaV203/pGBKT-fur transformed with plasmid pGAD as negative control. Finally, two clones of each interaction-control strain A–E were also included. Pictures show development of blue color (panel A) or yeast growth in Synthetic Complete medium (SC) without leucine, tryptophan and histidine (SC-LWH) supplemented with 25 mM 3-amino-1, 2, 4-triazole (3AT) (panel B), and SC without leucine, tryptophan and uracil (SC-LWU) (panel C). For β-galactosidase expression analysis (X-Gal), yeasts were transferred to a nitrocellulose filter, permeabilized and subjected to the X-Gal assay. The scheme on the right side represent the order of yeast streaks on each plate. The assays were performed following procedures described in19. Experiments were performed in triplicates and representative results are shown.

Furthermore, we also assayed self interactions of BlsA or Fur. In the case of BlsA, interaction BlsA-BlsA was observed for the three reporters at all conditions assayed, i.e. 23 °C under blue light or in the dark and 30 °C in the dark (see Fig. S1), indicating an important tendency of BlsA to form oligomers. On the contrary, Fur-Fur interactions were found to depend on the presence of iron. Indeed, Fur-Fur interaction allowed the reporter genes’ expression in the presence of 0.75 mM FeCl3 in the growth medium under all conditions tested, however, the interaction appears to be impaired in the absence of added iron (see Fig. S2).

Expression of the Acinetobactin gene cluster is modulated by light and depends on BlsA at moderate temperatures in A. baumannii

Since our data indicate that BlsA interacts with Fur at 23 °C in the dark, we next analyzed the expression of Fur-regulated Acinetobactin cluster genes to follow Fur activity under different conditions. For this purpose, we analyzed the expression of basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD by qRT-PCR at different light and iron-availability conditions in strain ATCC 19606. Our results show that their expression levels were basal both under blue light or in the dark at 23 °C in LB, a condition in which iron is not limiting (DIP = 0 µM). However, under iron deprived conditions (DIP 150 or DIP 175 µM), the expression of the studied genes was induced only in the dark (Fig. 2), while under blue light the expression levels were similar to those observed for the non iron-limiting condition (Fig. 2). Therefore, the Acinetobactin gene expression was unresponsive to iron limitation under blue light at 23 °C, maintaining basal levels similar to those observed in the iron proficient condition, i.e. as if the repressor was bound to the promoter region. On the contrary, in the dark, the system responded to iron deprivation inducing the corresponding expression of siderophore genes at moderate temperatures.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Acinetobactin genes are induced in the dark at moderate temperatures under iron deprived conditions. Estimation by RT-qPCR of the expression levels of representative genes components of the Acinetobactin siderophore cluster, namely basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD, in ATCC 19606 wild-type and blsA genetic backgrounds at 23 °C under blue light (L) or in the dark (D). The data shown are mean ± SD of normalized relative quantities (NRQ) obtained from transcript levels of representative Acinetobactin cluster genes such as basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD, in samples grown in LB at the indicated DIP concentrations under blue light or in the dark at 23 °C, measured in at least three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences as determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

In the blsA mutant, the expression of these genes was similar under blue light or in the dark at 23 °C under iron limiting conditions, and comparable to those observed for the non iron-deprived condition (LB DIP = 0 µM), i.e., without induction in the dark. These results show that modulation by light of the expression of genes of the Acinetobactin cluster is dependent on the presence of the BlsA photoreceptor. In other words, the Acinetobactin genes are expressed at a basal level at 23 °C (repressed) even under iron deprived conditions (Fig. 2), had it not been for the presence of BlsA that rescues this inhibition in the dark. The overall data so far is consistent with a model in which BlsA interacts with Fur in the dark at 23 °C, antagonizing the repressor functioning and resulting in induction of the expression of the Fur-regulated, Acinetobactin gene cluster.

Growth under iron limitation is modulated by light and depends on BlsA at moderate temperatures in A. baumannii

The evidence obtained above indicating that Fur interacts with BlsA at 23 °C in the dark with the concomitant induction of expression of Acinetobactin genes only in this condition, suggested that light could be modulating iron metabolism. Therefore, we next studied whether the ability to acquire iron was modulated by light by performing growth curves in LB under iron deprived conditions in the dark or under blue light at 23 °C. Our results show that, under iron deprived conditions, strain ATCC 19606 displays a much poorer capability to grow under blue light rather than in the dark at 23 °C (Fig. 3A,B). The blsA mutant, both under blue light and in the dark, showed a similar pattern as the wild type under blue light, as did the mutant harboring the empty pWH1266 (Fig. 3A,B). On the contrary, the mutant harboring plasmid pWHBlsA19, which expresses a wild type copy of blsA from its own promoter, complemented the blsA mutation as the ability to grow under iron deprived conditions better in the dark than under blue light was restored (Fig. 3A,B). Reducing the levels of a particular protein in the cell by generating isogenic mutants or increasing its levels by overexpression are strategies frequently used to study the function a particular gene plays in the bacterial cell. Given that fur could not be knocked out neither by us nor by others despite many attempts22,23, therefore suggesting that fur is an essential gene in A. baumannii, we constructed a plasmid expressing its coding sequence from its own promoter and assayed the effect on growth under iron deprived conditions. As shown in Fig. 3A,B, the presence of higher levels of Fur resulted in complete abolition of the bacterial capacity to grow under low iron, regardless of the presence of light or in the dark, or BlsA content. It should be noted that there is no effect of light on the growth of cells under iron replete conditions, as the growth curves were similar under blue light or in the dark for the different strains in LB (Fig. 3C). Overall, the data is consistent with light modulation of iron acquisition in ATCC 19606, and the response depends on the BlsA photoreceptor. To reinforce this notion, similar experiments performed using tryptone media instead of LB and also strain ATCC 17978 in addition to ATCC 19606, showed modulation by light as well as dependence of the light response on BlsA (see Fig. S3).

Figure 3
Figure 3

Light modulates growth at moderate temperatures under iron deprived conditions in A. baumannii ATCC 19606. (A) Growth curves of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 wild-type and derivative strains used in this study in LB medium supplemented with DIP 150 or 175 µM incubated stagnantly at 23 °C under blue light (L) or in the dark (D). The experiment was repeated at least three times, including in each repetition three replicates for each strain at each condition. Representative results are shown.

BlsA-Fur interaction is significantly reduced at higher temperatures

In A. baumannii, light modulation occurs at moderate temperatures such as 23 °C but does not take place at higher temperatures such as 30 or 37 °C (4,5,6 and unpublished results). BlsA-Fur interaction was verified at 23 °C in the dark, and the question therefore arises regarding whether the interaction is maintained at higher temperatures. Therefore, we next assayed BlsA-Fur interactions by Y2H but incubating the plates at 30 °C in the dark. A control at 23 °C in the dark was also included for each repetition. Representative results are shown in Fig. 1. Y2H assays show a negligible Fur-BlsA interaction at higher temperature conditions (Fig. 1).

Our results therefore show that BlsA-Fur interactions occur at certain physiological conditions, which are coincident with conditions of photoregulation observed so far, i.e. 23 °C but not higher temperatures such as 30 °C.

Modulation of iron metabolism by light does not occur at higher temperatures

Our results indicating that BlsA and Fur show null or negligible interaction at 30 °C prompted us to study Acinetobactin gene expression and growth under iron deprived conditions at this temperature. As expected, the siderophore-related genes, namely basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD, were more expressed under iron deprived conditions (DIP 225 and 250 µM) relative to the iron sufficient condition (DIP 0 µM). However, in accordance with the observed lack of interaction between BlsA and Fur at 30 °C, expression of the Acinetobactin genes showed no differential modulation by light (Fig. 4A). In addition, growth curves performed in LB with increasing concentrations of DIP showed no significant difference between light and dark (Fig. 4B). Overall, these results indicate that iron acquisition is not subjected to light modulation at 30 °C, and are congruent with the previous notion that photoregulation occurs only at moderate temperatures in A. baumannii4,5,10. It should be noted that at this higher temperature, higher DIP concentrations had to be used to obtain an effect of iron deprivation on growth relative to 23 °C. A similar situation occurred with the expression of the Acinetobactin cluster genes, whose induction occurred at higher DIP concentrations at this temperature, DIP = 225 and 250 µM, rather than at DIP 150 and 175 µM as occurred at 23 °C (not shown). This is not surprising since it is well known that susceptibility to antibacterial agents depends on the culture conditions such as media composition, temperature, etc.

Figure 4
Figure 4

Modulation of iron metabolism by light does not occur at higher temperatures. (A) Estimation by RT-qPCR of the expression levels of representative genes components of the Acinetobactin siderophore cluster, namely basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD, in ATCC 19606 at 30 °C under blue light (L) or in the dark (D). The data shown are mean ± SD of normalized relative quantities (NRQ) obtained from transcript levels of representative Acinetobactin cluster genes such as basA, bauD, basE, bauA and basD, in samples grown in LB at the indicated DIP concentrations under blue light or in the dark at 30 °C, measured in at least three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences as determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05). (B) Growth curves of A. baumannii ATCC 19606 wild-type LB medium supplemented with DIP 0, 150, 225 or 250 µM incubated stagnantly under blue light or in the dark at 30 °C. Growth was measured by determining the optical density at 660 nm. The curves are inserted into the same graphic sharing Y axis, while the x axes we added for each curve at the bottom.

Temperature modulates expression of Acinetobactin genes under iron deprivation

We further compared the levels of expression of representative Acinetobactin genes, such as basA and basE, in A. baumannii ATCC 19606 blsA background at 23 and 30 °C under iron deprived conditions. We evaluated light vs. dark but, as expected, no differences were observed between the two conditions, as photoregulation is lost given to the absence of BlsA (Fig. 5). As also shown in the figure, at 30 °C basE and basA expression levels were 1.5 to 2 fold higher than at 23 °C under iron deprived conditions. Overall, the data suggests that temperature modulates Fur binding to Acinetobactin promoters. In fact, the results are compatible with more Fur molecules binding to promoters (or with higher affinity) at 23 °C than at 30 °C under iron deficient conditions. Other possibilities are also plausible such as the differential presence of a yet unknown factor at 23 °C contributing to Fur binding to promoters. It should be noted that, as was explained in the above item, the minimal inhibitory concentrations for DIP vary with culturing temperature, and different DIP conditions were required to produce iron deprivation at 23 °C (DIP 150 and 157 µM) and at 30 °C (DIP 225 and 250 µM).

Figure 5
Figure 5

Temperature modulates expression of Acinetobactin genes under iron deprivation. Estimation by RT-qPCR of the expression levels of representative genes components of the Acinetobactin siderophore cluster, namely basA and basE, in ATCC 19606 blsA genetic background at 23 °C and 30 °C under blue light (L) or in the dark (D) under iron deprived conditions. The data shown are mean ± SD of normalized relative quantities (NRQ) obtained from transcript levels of basA and basE in samples grown in LB at the indicated DIP concentrations under blue light or in the dark at 23 °C and 30 °C, measured in at least three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences as determined by ANOVA followed by Tukey’s multiple comparison test (p < 0.05).

Discussion

The signal transduction mechanism of BlsA has remained elusive even though it is directly involved in regulation by light of many cellular processes in A. baumannii4,6. In this work, we disclose a new physiological trait modulated by light in this pathogen as is the ability to circumvent iron deprivation, and provide for the first time insights into the signal transduction mechanism of BlsA by showing that this photoreceptor integrates a light signal into iron metabolism through association with Fur. First, we showed that BlsA interacts with Fur at 23 °C in the dark by Y2H experiments. Then, expression of the genes coding for the siderophore Acinetobactin are modulated by light showing induction only in the dark and dependence on BlsA. Finally, we also showed that the ability to grow under iron deprivation is modulated by light and depends on BlsA, and again, bacterial growth is supported in the dark while under blue light it is severely affected. The overall data is consistent with a model in which BlsA binding to Fur at 23 °C in the dark antagonizes the repressor functioning, likely reducing its binding to Acinetobactin promoters and allowing expression of the corresponding genes at this condition (Fig. 6A). Another important factor to be taken into account is BlsA levels at the different physiological conditions. In fact, BlsA levels are much higher in the dark than under blue light at 23 °C (Fig. S4 and4,10), and this could result in a higher ability of BlsA to sequester Fur in the dark rather than under blue light (Fig. 6A). Fur levels available in the cell to bind promoters therefore appear important for the regulation, as is also observed in growth curves (Fig. 3A,B). Therefore, BlsA seems to perform a fine tuning of Fur levels available to bind promoters in vivo at 23 °C. Another important aspect is that under blue light BlsA is subjected to an excited state that could confer differential properties regarding its ability to bind Fur, as well as its own oligomerization state. Our data suggest that BlsA forms oligomers both under blue light or in the dark at 23 °C (Fig. S1). However, these complexes could vary in the composition and order level at each condition. At 30 °C, the expression of Acinetobactin genes is unresponsive to light, while induced under iron deprived conditions (Fig. 6B–D). Since the levels of the photoreceptor are much reduced at higher temperatures such as 37 °C4,10 or 30 °C (Fig. S4), this could also contribute to the absence of photoregulation observed. Indeed, our results show that blsA expression levels are very low in the cells at 30 °C (Fig. S4), and at 37 °C BlsA levels are negligible10. Furthermore, our Y2H results show that had BlsA been present at 30 °C, as one could expect in a physiological situation of sudden temperature change, it would not interact with Fur (Fig. 1). For many bacteria, it has been reported that binding of iron (ferrous iron) to the regulatory site of the Fur dimer enables the protein to bind to Fur box, thus repressing gene transcription11,24. This could also be the case in A. baumannii, as our Y2H results indicate that Fur self interaction is favored in the presence of iron (Fig. S2). This interaction could indeed be much more stronger than the Fur-BlsA interaction in iron proficient conditions, supporting binding of Fur to promoters with high affinity, and resulting therefore in a basal expression of the Acinetobactin genes at this condition (Fig. 6C,D), regardless of the temperature. Whether Fur is able to bind Acinetobactin promoters at 23 °C under blue light even under iron deprived conditions, should be further explored, but seems a plausible possibility given our results showing basal Acinetobactin expression levels and severely affected growth. Indeed, repression of gene expression by apo-Fur has already been reported in Helicobacter pylori25 despite this apo-repression appears to depend on the presence of an additional α-helix at the N-terminus of the Fur protein, conserved in the proteobacteria clade26. Also, regulation of Fur binding by oxidative signals has also been described25. In the same context, the possibility that Fur binding to Acinetobactin promoters is modulated by termperature under blue light and low iron conditions (Fig. 5), should also be further studied, and could imply changes of Fur affinity to promoters with temperature

Figure 6
Figure 6

Working model depicting Fur and BlsA behavior in iron homeostasis at different physiological conditions. Under iron deficiency at 23 °C (Fig. 5A), Fur would not form oligomers and might be able to bind operator regions with low affinity. In the dark, BlsA is produced in higher quantities than under blue light, and interacts strongly with Fur antagonizing its activity as repressor. As a result, Acinetobactin gene expression is induced and growth is supported under iron deprived conditions. Under blue light, BlsA is in an excited state and its levels are much more reduced than in the dark, and does not support the interaction with Fur. Therefore, at this condition more Fur molecules are able to bind to Acinetobactin gene promoters and growth is severely affected. Overall, BlsA performs fine tuning of Fur levels available to bind Acinetobactin promoters at 23 °C under iron deprived conditions. Under iron deprivation conditions at 30 °C (Fig. 5B), Fur would not form oligomers and is basically released from Acinetobactin promoters, being the corresponding genes induced and growth is supported. Under iron proficient conditions (Fig. 5C,D), Fur forms oligomers with high affinity (much more than with BlsA), independently of the illumination and temperature condition, favoring its binding to Acinetobactin promoters and expressing the cluster genes at basal levels.

The mechanism of light signal transduction has been characterized for a few BLUF-domain containing proteins1,27,28,29. Some of them have also been reported to interact and antagonize the functioning of transcriptional regulators, as described here for BlsA of A. baumannii. For example, AppA from Rhodobacter spharoides, which harbors a SCHIC (Sensor Containing Heme Instead of Cobalamin) domain covalently attached to the BLUF domain, interacts with the DNA binding protein PpsR to control photosynthesis30. AppA–PpsR complex formation in the dark or under low light antagonized PpsR binding to its target DNA promoters29,30,31. Once AppA is activated by blue light illumination, it undergoes a conformational change and dissociates from PpsR, thereby inhibiting photosynthetic gene transcription. In E. coli, the BLUF domain of YcgF is associated with a C-terminal pseudo-EAL domain. YcgF directly binds to the MerR-like repressor YcgE and releases it from its operator DNA in a light-dependent manner, which can ultimately modulate biofilm functions32. Therefore, these two BLUF-containing proteins also bind transcriptional repressors and antagonize their functioning. Regarding short BluFs, the most extensively characterized is PixD from Synechosystis sp. PCC 6803, which is involved in controlling phototaxis by interacting with the response regulator-like protein PixE in an apparent light intensity-dependent manner27,33,34. Under dark conditions PixD forms a large molecular weight complex with PixE27, inhibiting PixE’s ability to prevent positive phototaxis. Upon photoexcitation of two PixD molecules in a complex, PixE is released from the complex and positive phototaxis is then inhibited27,34. The evidence so far suggests that the PixD–PixE complex could regulate phototaxis through type-IV pili and the motor protein PilB, although it is not clear how this is accomplished27,35. These examples illustrate the diversity of mechanisms and components of light signal transduction in bacterial cells, also disclosing the novelty of signal tranduction by BlsA.

Many questions arise from our findings such as why is the ability to grow under iron deficiency photoregulated at moderate temperatures? Why has this pathogen evolved such a sophisticated mechanism that enables it to grow under iron deprivation in the dark at moderate temperatures? Or rather, why is growth under iron deprivation restricted in the presence of light? The answer may reside in the lifestyle the microorganism leads at this condition. One would expect it to live outside the human host at 23 °C, and be exposed to environmental fluctuations such as presence/absence of light, temperature and nutrient composition shifts, etc. In the presence of light, the production of reactive oxidative species can be stimulated by a superoxide-driven Fenton reaction (or iron-catalyzed Haber-Weiss reaction)36. Moreover, it has been shown that irradiation with UV-visible light accelerates Fenton reaction by photoreduction of Fe(III) back to Fe(II) (photo-Fenton) in vitro37. Therefore, restraining iron bioavailability under light conditions could constitute a strategy to avoid oxidative stress and increase antioxidant tolerance which is, indeed, a universal strategy. Perhaps at higher temperatures compensatory mechanisms like antioxidant defenses are more efficient and could explain absence of photoregulation of iron acquisition at this condition. This hypothesis needs further exploration.

Whether BlsA interacts with Fur to modulate other physiological traits such as those previously shown in A. baumannii to be regulated by light, or rather, BlsA interacts with different partners to accomplish these functions is currently under study in our laboratory. Indeed, a global role has been described for Fur in various literature reports, indicating that in addition to regulation of iron metabolism, Fur could also modulate many other cellular processes. Escherichia coli Fur, in particular, is a global transcriptional regulator that controls the expression of more than 90 genes mainly implicated in iron uptake but also in other fundamental processes, such as the regulation of oxidative stress, acid tolerance, and bacterial virulence determinants24. Indeed, as mentioned before, it has been shown that Fur regulates catalase, and the levels of enzymes involved in the phenylacetic acid degradation pathway and benzoate pathway are modulated by iron14. The question arises on whether Fur and BlsA also act in concert to regulate these phenotypes.

Overall, the mechanism of Fur functioning appears to be complex and variable across the different bacterial species, and A. baumannii appears not to be an exception. In this work, we contribute to iron homeostasis knowledge also at environmental temperatures, which has not been much studied so far.

Methods

Bacterial strains, plasmids, and media

The bacterial strains and plasmids used in this work are listed in Table S1. Luria-Bertani (LB) broth (Difco) and agar (Difco), as well as tryptone media (tryptone 1%, NaCl 0.5%, agarose 0.3%) were used to grow bacterial strains. When indicated, the iron quelator 2,2′-dipyridyl (DIP) was added to the media. Broth cultures were incubated either statically or with shaking at 200 rpm at the indicated temperatures.


Blue light treatments

Blue light treatments were performed as described in our previous studies4,5,6,10. Briefly, cells were incubated at 23 or 30 °C in the dark or under blue light emitted by 9-light-emitting diode (LED) arrays, with an intensity of 6 to 10 µol photons/m2/s. Each array was built using 3-LED module strips emitting blue light, with emission peaks centered at 462 nm, determined using a LI-COR LI-1800 spectroradiometer4.


Plasmid construction

Y2H Plasmid Construction

blsA and fur coding sequences were amplified from A. baumannii genomic DNA using primers blsAdh and furdh (Table S2), respectively, and subsequently cloned into the BamHI and XhoI sites of Gateway entry vector pENTR3C (Invitrogen) (see Table S1). These CDSs were then transferred using LR Clonase reaction to pGBKT7-Gw and pGADT7-Gw Y2H vectors (Clontech), which were previously adapted to Gateway Technology by the introduction of the Gateway cassette to allow cloning by recombination. Once transformed into yeast cells, these plasmids express fusion proteins to the GAL4 DNA-binding (DB) or activation (AD) domain, under control of the constitutive ADH1 promoter. Proper construction of each plasmid was confirmed by automated DNA sequencing.

pWHFUR plasmid construction

A 807-bp fragment harboring fur and its predicted promoter was PCR amplified using A. baumannii ATCC 19606 genomic DNA and primers PFurF and PFurR (see Table S2), both of which were tailed with BamHI restriction sites. The amplicon was cloned into GEM-T Easy and then subcloned as a BamHI fragment into the cognate site of pWH1266. Proper construction of the complementing pWHFur plasmid was confirmed by automated DNA sequencing.

Two-hybrid assays (Y2H)

Y2H analysis were performed essentially as described previously19. All the assays were performed on Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mav 203 strain (MATa, leu2-3,112, trp1-901, his3-D200, ade2-101, gal4D, gal80D, SPAL10::URA3, GAL1::lacZ, HIS3UAS GAL1::HIS3, LYS2, can1R and cyh2R) transformed with the corresponding expression vectors for Y2H interaction assays. We first tested BlsA and Fur for self-activation in the Y2H system. To do this, the DNA binding domain (DB)-fusion protein expressing vectors (pGBK-X) (X = BlsA or Fur) were transformed into the MaV203 yeast strain. Each MaV203/pGBK-X strain was first transformed with the pGAD-T7 empty vector and these pGBK-X/pGAD containing yeast cells were tested for their ability to activate reporters’ expression without a real X-Y protein–protein interaction (self-activation) and to determine the optimal 3-amino-1,2,4-triazole (3AT) concentration required to titrate the basal HIS3 reporter expression to be used later in the interaction assays. MaV203/pGBK-X strains were then transformed with each pGAD-Y construction for Y_AD fusion protein expression (again, Y represents BlsA or Fur). Transformations were performed by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method38 using either one or both Y2H plasmids and plated in the corresponding minimal selective medium (Synthetic Complete medium (SC) without leucine (-leu) for pGAD-Y transformants, SC without tryptophan (-trp) for pGBK-X transformants and SC-leu-trp for both plasmids transformants) and then incubated in the dark at 23 °C for 72 h. Because our previous results suggested that temperature and light may induce conformational changes in the proteins’ structures, we performed all the steps in the dark and at 23 °C, (except when comparing the interaction assays in other conditions). Four to six clones of each pGBK-X/pGAD-Y containing yeasts, four to six self-activation control clones pGBK-X/pGAD and pGBK/pGAD-Y (Y DNA-binding negative control) and two isolated colonies of each of the five yeast control strains (A to E) were patched in the same SC-leu-trp plate and incubated for 48-72 h at 23 °C in the dark to be used as “Master Plate”. To test for the three reporter genes’ expression phenotypes, this Master Plate was then replica plated to SC-leu-trp-his +3AT (3AT was added in the optimal concentration previously determined) and to SC-leu-trp-ura to test for growth in absence of histidine (his) and uracil (ura), respectively (his3 and ura3 reporter activation). Each plate was incubated in the corresponding conditions to be tested (dark/light; 23 °C/30 °C) for at least 72 h. For qualitative measurement of β-galactosidase (β-Gal) expression, transformed yeasts were replica plated onto a nitrocellulose filter placed on a YPAD medium plate and incubated in the dark at 23 °C. Once the yeast cells were grown, the nitrocellulose filter was lifted from the agar plate and transferred to a new empty Petri dish. Cells were permeabilized with liquid Nitrogen and then tested for the presence of β-Gal activity by incubation on a filter paper soaked in X-Gal solution (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-b-D-galactopyranoside in Z buffer (60 mM Na2HPO4, 40 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4, pH 7.0) under the corresponding conditions to be tested for the interactions (dark/light; 24 °C/30 °C).

Analyses of gene expression by qRT-PCR

Retrotranscription and qRT-PCR analysis were done as described in reference39, using primers listed in Table S2 in the supplemental information. Data are presented as NRQ (Normalized relative quantities) calculated by the qBASE method40, using recA and rpoB genes as normalizers6.

Growth of A. baumannii under iron deprivation conditions

To test the ability of the A. baumannii wild-type and derivative strains used in this work to grow under iron deprivation conditions, 1/100 dilutions of overnight cultures grown in LB Difco or tryptone media were inoculated in the corresponding liquid medium supplemented or not with the indicated iron chelator 2,2′-dipyridyl (DIP) concentrations. Cultures were subsequently grown stagnantly at 23 °C under blue light or in the dark. At the times indicated in the figures, an aliquot was taken to record the A660 of the culture.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Park, S. Y. & Tame, J. R. H. Seeing the light with BLUF proteins. Biophysical reviews 9, 169–176 (2017).

  2. 2.

    Losi, A. & Gartner, W. Bacterial bilin- and flavin-binding photoreceptors. Photochemical & photobiological sciences 7, 1168–1178 (2008).

  3. 3.

    Gomelsky, M. & Klug, G. BLUF: a novel FAD-binding domain involved in sensory transduction in microorganisms. Trends in biochemical sciences 27, 497–500 (2002).

  4. 4.

    Mussi, M. A. et al. The opportunistic human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii senses and responds to light. Journal of bacteriology 192, 6336–6345 (2010).

  5. 5.

    Golic, A. et al. Staring at the cold sun: blue light regulation is distributed within the genus Acinetobacter. PloS one 8, e55059 (2013).

  6. 6.

    Muller, G. L. et al. Light Modulates Metabolic Pathways and Other Novel Physiological Traits in the Human Pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of bacteriology 199 (2017).

  7. 7.

    Spellberg, B. & Bonomo, R. A. The deadly impact of extreme drug resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Critical care medicine 42, 1289–1291 (2014).

  8. 8.

    McConnell, M. J., Actis, L. & Pachon, J. Acinetobacter baumannii: human infections, factors contributing to pathogenesis and animal models. FEMS microbiology reviews 37, 130–155 (2013).

  9. 9.

    Ramirez, M. S. et al. White and blue light induce reduction in susceptibility to minocycline and tigecycline in Acinetobacter spp. and other bacteria of clinical importance. Journal of medical microbiology 64, 525–537 (2015).

  10. 10.

    Abatedaga, I. et al. Integration of Temperature and Blue-Light Sensing in Acinetobacter baumannii Through the BlsA Sensor. Photochemistry and photobiology 93, 805–814 (2017).

  11. 11.

    Pecqueur, L. et al. Structural changes of Escherichia coli ferric uptake regulator during metal-dependent dimerization and activation explored by NMR and X-ray crystallography. The Journal of biological chemistry 281, 21286–21295 (2006).

  12. 12.

    Penwell, W. F., Arivett, B. A. & Actis, L. A. The Acinetobacter baumannii entA gene located outside the acinetobactin cluster is critical for siderophore production, iron acquisition and virulence. PloS one 7, e36493 (2012).

  13. 13.

    Dorsey, C. W., Tolmasky, M. E., Crosa, J. H. & Actis, L. A. Genetic organization of an Acinetobacter baumannii chromosomal region harbouring genes related to siderophore biosynthesis and transport. Microbiology 149, 1227–1238 (2003).

  14. 14.

    Nwugo, C. C., Gaddy, J. A., Zimbler, D. L. & Actis, L. A. Deciphering the iron response in Acinetobacter baumannii: A proteomics approach. Journal of proteomics 74, 44–58 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Mihara, K. et al. Identification and transcriptional organization of a gene cluster involved in biosynthesis and transport of acinetobactin, a siderophore produced by Acinetobacter baumannii ATCC 19606T. Microbiology 150, 2587–2597 (2004).

  16. 16.

    Eijkelkamp, B. A., Hassan, K. A., Paulsen, I. T. & Brown, M. H. Investigation of the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii under iron limiting conditions. BMC genomics 12, 126 (2011).

  17. 17.

    Zimbler, D. L. et al. Iron acquisition functions expressed by the human pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Biometals 22, 23–32 (2009).

  18. 18.

    Horsburgh, M. J., Ingham, E. & Foster, S. J. In Staphylococcus aureus, fur is an interactive regulator with PerR, contributes to virulence, and Is necessary for oxidative stress resistance through positive regulation of catalase and iron homeostasis. Journal of bacteriology 183, 468–475 (2001).

  19. 19.

    Cribb, P. & Serra, E. One- and two-hybrid analysis of the interactions between components of the Trypanosoma cruzi spliced leader RNA gene promoter binding complex. International journal for parasitology 39, 525–532 (2009).

  20. 20.

    Daniel, C., Haentjens, S., Bissinger, M. C. & Courcol, R. J. Characterization of the Acinetobacter baumannii Fur regulator: cloning and sequencing of the fur homolog gene. FEMS microbiology letters 170, 199–209 (1999).

  21. 21.

    Vallenet, D. et al. Comparative analysis of Acinetobacters: three genomes for three lifestyles. PloS one 3, e1805 (2008).

  22. 22.

    Fiester, S. E. et al. Iron-Regulated Phospholipase C Activity Contributes to the Cytolytic Activity and Virulence of Acinetobacter baumannii. PloS one 11, e0167068 (2016).

  23. 23.

    Gallagher, L. A. et al. Resources for Genetic and Genomic Analysis of Emerging Pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii. Journal of bacteriology 197, 2027–2035 (2015).

  24. 24.

    Patzer, S. I. & Hantke, K. Dual repression by Fe(2+)-Fur and Mn(2+)-MntR of the mntH gene, encoding an NRAMP-like Mn(2+) transporter in Escherichia coli. Journal of bacteriology 183, 4806–4813 (2001).

  25. 25.

    Pelliciari, S., Vannini, A., Roncarati, D. & Danielli, A. The allosteric behavior of Fur mediates oxidative stress signal transduction in Helicobacter pylori. Frontiers in microbiology 6, 840 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Agriesti, F. et al. FeON-FeOFF: the Helicobacter pylori Fur regulator commutates iron-responsive transcription by discriminative readout of opposed DNA grooves. Nucleic acids research 42, 3138–3151 (2014).

  27. 27.

    Fujisawa, T. & Masuda, S. Light-induced chromophore and protein responses and mechanical signal transduction of BLUF proteins. Biophysical reviews 10, 327–337 (2017).

  28. 28.

    Masuda, S. Light detection and signal transduction in the BLUF photoreceptors. Plant & cell physiology 54, 171–179 (2013).

  29. 29.

    Purcell, E. B. & Crosson, S. Photoregulation in prokaryotes. Current opinion in microbiology 11, 168–178 (2008).

  30. 30.

    Masuda, S. & Bauer, C. E. AppA is a blue light photoreceptor that antirepresses photosynthesis gene expression in Rhodobacter sphaeroides. Cell 110, 613–623 (2002).

  31. 31.

    Braatsch, S. et al. PsrR, a member of the AraC family of transcriptional regulators, is required for the synthesis of Wolinella succinogenes polysulfide reductase. Archives of microbiology 178, 202–207 (2002).

  32. 32.

    Tschowri, N., Lindenberg, S. & Hengge, R. Molecular function and potential evolution of the biofilm-modulating blue light-signalling pathway of Escherichia coli. Molecular microbiology 85, 893–906 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Tanaka, K. et al. Time-resolved tracking of interprotein signal transduction: Synechocystis PixD-PixE complex as a sensor of light intensity. Journal of the American Chemical Society 134, 8336–8339 (2012).

  34. 34.

    Yuan, H. & Bauer, C. E. PixE promotes dark oligomerization of the BLUF photoreceptor PixD. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105, 11715–11719 (2008).

  35. 35.

    Nakane, D. & Nishizaka, T. Asymmetric distribution of type IV pili triggered by directional light in unicellular cyanobacteria. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 114, 6593–6598 (2017).

  36. 36.

    Liochev, S. I. & Fridovich, I. The Haber-Weiss cycle–70 years later: an alternative view. Redox report: communications in free radical research 7, 55–57; author reply 59–60 (2002).

  37. 37.

    Amilcar Machulek, F. H. Q. Jr., et al. In Organic Pollutants Ten Years After the Stockholm Convention - Environmental and Analytical Update (ed. Tomasz Puzyn and Aleksandra Mostrag-Szlichtyng) Ch. 11 (2002).

  38. 38.

    Gietz, R. D. & Woods, R. A. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods in enzymology 350, 87–96 (2002).

  39. 39.

    Ramirez, M. S., Muller, G. L., Perez, J. F., Golic, A. E. & Mussi, M. A. More Than Just Light: Clinical Relevance of Light Perception in the Nosocomial Pathogen Acinetobacter baumannii and Other Members of the Genus Acinetobacter. Photochemistry and photobiology 91, 1291–1301 (2015).

  40. 40.

    Hellemans, J., Mortier, G., De Paepe, A., Speleman, F. & Vandesompele, J. qBase relative quantification framework and software for management and automated analysis of real-time quantitative PCR data. Genome biology 8, R19 (2007).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (PICT 2013-0018 and PICT 2014-1161), and ASaCTeI (Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación Productiva de la Provincia de Santa Fe) 2010-147-16 to M.A.M. P.C. and M.A.M. are career investigators of CONICET. M.R.T. is fellow from the same institution. We acknowledge Dr. Ramiro Rodríguez and Larisa Cybulski for critical reading of the manuscript.

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Centro de Estudios Fotosintéticos y Bioquímicos (CEFOBI- CONICET), 2000, Rosario, Argentina

    • Marisel R. Tuttobene
    •  & María Alejandra Mussi
  2. Instituto de Biología Molecular y Celular de Rosario (IBR-CONICET), 2000, Rosario, Argentina

    • Pamela Cribb

Authors

  1. Search for Marisel R. Tuttobene in:

  2. Search for Pamela Cribb in:

  3. Search for María Alejandra Mussi in:

Contributions

M.R.T. performed experiments. P.C. performed experiments and collaborated in writing the manuscript. M.A.M. designed experiments, wrote the manuscript and provide funding.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María Alejandra Mussi.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26127-8

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.