Article | Open | Published:

Downregulation of Endothelin Receptor B Contributes to Defective B Cell Lymphopoiesis in Trisomy 21 Pluripotent Stem Cells

Scientific Reportsvolume 8, Article number: 8001 (2018) | Download Citation

Abstract

Individuals with Trisomy 21 (T21) exhibit numerous hematological abnormalities, including reductions in numbers of circulating B and T lymphocytes. To elucidate molecular mechanisms underlying these phenotypes, we differentiated human isogenic disomic and trisomic pluripotent cells, and observed that trisomic cells showed defects in B cell, but not T cell differentiation. Global gene expression of differentiated, trisomic B cells revealed reduced expression of genes encoding endothelin signaling components, namely the Endothelin Receptor B (EDNRB), and its ligand Endothelin1 (EDN1). Depletion of EDNRB mRNA in cord blood-derived CD34+ cells led to defective B cell differentiation, supporting a hypothesis that low EDNRB expression in T21 contributes to intrinsic lymphoid defects. Further evidence for the role of the EDNRB pathway in B cell differentiation was obtained through CRISPR/Cas9 gene targeting in disomic and trisomic iPS cells. Knockout of EDNRB in both cell backgrounds reduced the capacity for B cell differentiation. Collectively, this work identifies downregulation of EDNRB as a causative factor for impaired B lymphocyte generation in trisomic cells, which may contribute to defects in immune function associated with T21. Furthermore, a novel role for endothelin signaling in regulation of B cell development has been identified.

Introduction

Trisomy 21 (T21), the most common viable chromosomal abnormality, has an incidence of ~1 in 700 in the United States1. Often caused by maternal chromosomal non-disjunction, T21 is characterized by phenotypes affecting numerous tissues, including craniofacial abnormalities, shortened extremities, cognitive impairment, heart defects and increased incidence of Hirschsprung Disease2,3. T21 is also associated with hematologic phenotypes, including an increase in fetal liver hematopoietic progenitor cells, and increased incidence of acute megakaryoblastic leukemia (AMKL) and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (B-ALL)4,5,6,7. T21 individuals also exhibit reduced numbers of circulating B and T lymphocytes8,9,10,11, which likely contributes to increased frequency of respiratory infections, altered vaccine responses and autoimmune disorders, which in aggregate affect morbidity and quality of life12,13,14.

The hematologic phenotypes of T21 are of particular interest as T21 may impact hematopoiesis at multiple steps in development. Though investigators have employed several mouse models for T21, such models fail to accurately recapitulate the diverse hematologic phenotypes observed in humans, and thus may be of limited utility in uncovering molecular mechanisms underlying T21 phenotypes15. These limitations provide a strong rationale for the use of differentiated human pluripotent cells to model aspects of T21, including perturbed hematopoiesis. Differentiated human ES and iPS cells have been used to model hematologic malignancies with varied success16,17. A significant caveat with in vitro disease modeling studies using differentiated pluripotent cells is inherent cell line variability in differentiation capacity. The use of isogenic iPS cells mitigates this problem, and is critical for exploring genetic effects in the absence of confounding genetic backgrounds.

We have isolated and characterized isogenic iPS cells that are either disomic or trisomic for chromosome 21. Isogenic subclones were originally isolated from a parental trisomic iPS line that spontaneously lost a copy of chromosome 21 in some cells18. These cells provide a unique tool for in vitro differentiation experiments that allow for determination of the effect of T21 in isolation18. We, and others, have demonstrated that differentiated trisomic pluripotent cells exhibit an increase in hematopoietic progenitor cells capable of multilineage colony forming potential18,19,20. Prior studies focused on megakaryocyte, erythroid and myeloid lineages, and recapitulated T21 phenotypes reported in vivo6,5. As the numbers of circulating B and T lymphocytes are reduced in T21 individuals, we have now extended analysis to in vitro lymphoid differentiation in an effort to uncover potential intrinsic deficits.

Trisomic clones exhibited a striking reduction in their capacity for B cell differentiation, yet T cell generation appeared unaffected. Transcriptomic analysis of differentiated B cells identified both a ligand (Endothelin 1) and receptor (Endothelin Receptor B) involved in Endothelin signaling as reduced in expression in trisomic cells. shRNA knockdown and CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing experiments further support the hypothesis that reduced EDNRB expression contributes to impaired B cell differentiation. Collectively, our findings identify EDNRB as a factor underlying the defect in B cell development seen in T21, and demonstrate that endothelin signaling is critical for proper B cell lymphopoiesis.

Results

Trisomy 21 subclones exhibit reduced capacity for B-cell differentiation

We employed previously characterized isogenic disomic and trisomic iPS cells18, to assess B lymphoid cell development. Undifferentiated cells were induced to hematopoietic differentiation via embryoid bodies21, and after 9–10 days of culture, hematopoietic progenitor cells expressing CD34+ were isolated and plated on MS5 feeder cells with cytokines permissive for B cell differentiation (Fig. 1A). After 3 weeks of co-culture with MS5 cells, cells were isolated and analyzed by FACS for expression of markers of B cell development. Disomic and trisomic iPS cells yielded similar numbers of CD45+CD34 progenitors. In contrast, generation of developing B cells, encompassed by CD19+CD10+ and CD19+CD10 populations, was reduced from trisomic iPS cells. Within this population, trisomic clones generated 22.0 ± 3.0% CD19+CD10 and 7.1 ± 1.1% CD19+CD10+ cells, whereas disomic counterparts yielded 33.6 ± 3.9% CD19+CD10 and 9.2 ± 1.3% CD19+CD10+ (Fig. 1B,C). The total percentage of CD19+ cells generated was 29.2 ± 3.5% in trisomic clones, and 42.9 ± 3.7% in disomic clones (Fig. 1C). These results are reminiscent of reduced numbers of B lymphoid cells described in T21 individuals, as well as in T21 fetal liver8,22.

Figure 1
Figure 1

Trisomy 21 Pluripotent Cells Exhibit a Reduced Capacity for B Cell Differentiation. (A) Schematic of culture conditions for B Cell differentiation of human pluripotent cells. (B) Representative FACS plots of differentiated disomic and trisomic isogenic iPS cells. Plots show the distribution of CD19+CD10+ cells within gated CD45+CD34 cells. (C) Quantification of FACS analysis, shown as percentage of CD19+ and CD10+ cells within CD45+CD34 populations. Trisomic clones (N = 22) generated fewer CD19+ and CD19+CD10+ cells than disomic (N = 22) counterparts. (*p-value ≤ 0.05).

T lymphoid cell generation is unaffected from trisomy 21 iPS cells

T-cell potential of isogenic disomic and trisomic iPS cells was evaluated by placing in vitro generated CD34+ cells into T cell differentiation assays (Fig. 2A)21. Following 4 or 6 weeks of co-culture, cells were analyzed by FACS to determine the extent of T-cell differentiation (Fig. 2B,C). Generation of early T-cell progenitor populations, defined by expression of CD5 and CD7, was similar between disomic and trisomic iPS cells at either 4 or 6 weeks of differentiation (Fig. 2B,C). Similarly, CD4 and CD8 single and double positive cells were detected at comparable levels (Fig. 2B,C). A small population of CD45+CD3+ cells was detected with no appreciable differences between disomic and trisomic subclones (Fig. 2B,C), thus indicating that T21 does not appear to affect T-cell development in this culture system. Taken together, despite reports of T cell defects in T21 individuals, in vitro T cell development appeared ostensibly unaffected9,10.

Figure 2
Figure 2

Disomic and Trisomic Isogenic iPS cells Show Comparable Efficiency in T Cell Differentiation. (A) Differentiation conditions for generation of T cells from isogenic iPS cells. (B) FACS analysis showing distribution of CD5/CD7, CD4/CD8 and CD3/TcRα/β cells within CD45+ populations. (C) Quantification of FACS analysis for T cell progenitor populations, no significant differences were observed between disomic and trisomic clones for any population analyzed after either 4 or 6 weeks of differentiation.

Differentiated trisomic CD19+ B cells exhibit reduced expression of endothelin signaling genes

In an effort to uncover mechanisms responsible for reduced B cell development from T21 iPS cells, global gene expression analysis was performed (Fig. 3A) on in vitro differentiated CD19+ cells. Comparison of transcriptomic profiles of differentiated disomic and trisomic subclones revealed 556 up-regulated genes and 286 genes downregulated genes in trisomic cells (fold change ≥2, p < 0.05) (Fig. 3B). In trisomic cells, a general enrichment in expression of chromosome 21 genes was observed, comparable to reports from other T21 gene expression studies19,23. Among chromosome 21 genes expressed in trisomic clones, we did not identify any candidates previously suspected as regulators of B cell lymphopoiesis. However, upon assessment of all transcripts, we observed that expression of both an endothelin receptor (EDNRB) and its ligand (EDN1) were reduced in trisomic clones (Fig. 3B, Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). Quantitative RT-qPCR confirmed microarray results (Fig. 3C). EDNRB encodes a G-protein coupled receptor that binds EDN124. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) revealed that both G-protein_coupled_receptor_activity and Endothelin_Pathway gene sets were enriched in disomic cells (Figs 3D and S1). Overall, 43% of genes in the Endothelin Pathway gene set were downregulated in trisomic clones (Fisher exact test, P-value < 0.0001). A comparable overlap between the Endothelin Pathway gene set and genes enriched in trisomic clones was not observed (Supplementary Fig. S1b). A similar trend was observed with the G protein coupled receptor activity gene set (Supplementary Fig. S1a,b). Of potential relevance to our findings, mice deficient for EDNRB exhibit defects in B cell development25,26. Therefore, we hypothesized that reduced endothelin signaling may account in part for the observed abnormalities in B cell differentiation due to T21.

Figure 3
Figure 3

Global Gene Expression Analysis of Differentiated B Cells. (A) Gating profile of CD45+CD34CD19+ cells isolated for expression analysis. (B) Volcano plot showing distribution of expressed genes in differentiated trisomic cells relative to disomic cells. Log2 (fold-change) is displayed on the X-axis, and Log (Adjusted P-Value) is along the Y-axis. Red squares represent genes on chromosome 21, and blue squares represent all other genes. (C) qPCR validation of EDNRB and EDN1 expression in differentiated disomic and trisomic cells (N = 3 for each). Both genes are downregulated in trisomic cells, validating microarray results. (D) Gene Set Enrichment Analysis with a Endothelin Pathway gene set showing enrichment in differentiated disomic cells. A Venn diagram was constructed using the same Endothelin Pathway gene set, and genes depleted in trisomic clones by Log(fold change) <0.2, to indicate that 43% of the genes in the set are also depleted in differentiated trisomic clones (P-value < 0.0001).

Knockdown of EDNRB impairs B cell differentiation

We focused attention on the role of EDNRB expression on B cell differentiation, as we reasoned that reduced expression of a receptor (EDNRB) rather than the ligand (EDN1) would be more limiting in establishing a phenotype. We tested 5 shRNAs directed to EDNRB for knockdown efficiency in HEK 293 T cells. Two shRNAs, NM_000115.2-1527s21c1 (shRNA1) and NM_000115.2-1323s21c1 (shRNA2), reduced EDNRB expression by 58% and 82%, respectively (Supplementary Fig. S2), and were employed in subsequent differentiation experiments. Normal disomic umbilical cord blood (CB) CD34+ cells were co-cultured with MS5 cells for 21–28 days (Fig. 4A). Under these conditions, the majority of cells differentiate to a CD45+CD34 immunophenotype. As cells undergo B cell differentiation, they express CD10 followed by CD1927. To assess the impact of EDNRB knockdown on B cell differentiation, CB CD34+ cells were transduced with lentivirus encoding either a specific EDNRB shRNA or a scrambled shRNA control. At 21 days of co-culture, cells transduced with the two EDNRB-specific shRNAs generated 16.74 ± 5.70% and 15.11 ± 4.62% of CD10+ CD19 cells, and 2.79 ± 0.95% and 1.01 ± 0.38% of CD10+CD19+ cells, respectively. In contrast, cells treated with scrambled shRNA control exhibit comparable levels of CD19+CD10 cells (20.42 ± 4.87%), but a greater number of CD19+CD10+ cells (6.15 ± 1.90%) (Fig. 4D). After 28 days of co-culture, cells treated with EDNRB shRNA also showed significant reductions in production of CD10+CD19+ positive cells in comparison to control cells transduced with scrambled shRNA (3.51 ± 0.82% and 1.86 ± 0.65% compared to 8.80 ± 2.84%) (Fig. 4E). The total number of cells generated by in vitro differentiation was also quantitated. At 21 days of co-culture, samples treated with specific EDNRB shRNA generated fewer CD19+ cells than controls exposed to scrambled shRNA (76.99 ± 16.16 and 82.86 ± 13.05 cells/μL compared to 248.42 ± 56.2 cells/μL) (Fig. 4D). Similarly, after 28 days of co-culture, shRNA transduced cells generated fewer CD45+ cells (818.05 ± 105.44 and 523.53 ± 140.06 cells/μL) and CD19+ cells (50.71 ± 16.77 and 22.51 ± 9.19 cells/μL) than control samples (1947.02 ± 327.25 CD45+ cells/μL and 383.67 ± 53.45 CD19+ cells/μL) (Fig. 4E). These results demonstrate that depletion of EDNRB impairs B cell generation, and are consistent with the hypothesis that reduced expression contributes to impaired B cell production in T21.

Figure 4
Figure 4

shRNA Knockdown of EDNRB in CB CD34+ cells Reduces Efficiency and Absolute Output of B Cell Differentiation. (A) Differentiation conditions for transduced CB CD34+ cells. (B,C) Representative FACS analysis of CB CD34+ cells after 21 or 28 days of differentiation. The first column of panels depicts CD45+ and CD34+ staining, and the second column shows CD19+ and CD10+ staining within the CD45+CD34 population. Each row shows cells transduced with specific EDNRB shRNA, a scrambled control, or untransduced cells. (D,E) Quantification of FACS analysis showing percentage of CD10+ and CD19+CD10+ within the CD45+CD34 population for various experimental groups after 21 and 28 days of differentiation. Also represented are the cell counts for generated CD45+ and CD19+ cells as determined using CountBright beads. (*p-value ≤ 0.05).

CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of EDNRB in isogenic iPS cells validates a role for EDNRB in B cell development

In order to validate observations from shRNA knockdown of EDNRB in CB CD34+ cell differentiation, we ablated EDNRB expression by CRISPR/Cas9 in isogenic iPS cells. The EDNRB gene encodes 4 transcripts, with 2 alternative start codons. Hence, a dual sgRNA strategy to engender a genomic deletion was utilized to eliminate all isoforms (Fig. 5A). Undifferentiated disomic and trisomic isogenic iPS cells were electroporated with plasmids encoding Cas9, sgRNAs 1 and 2, and a GFP fluorescent marker. PCR primers were designed to discriminate between wild-type and knockout alleles, and individual colonies derived from single cells were genotyped (Fig. 5B). Sanger sequencing of PCR products of clones containing a wild-type allele was performed to exclude the presence of any indels or inversions. Multiple, independent disomic and trisomic clones of appropriate genotypes were isolated and subjected to in vitro B-cell differentiation. No significant difference in production of CD34+ cells was noted on comparison of disomic or trisomic clones, irrespective of EDNRB genotype (Fig. 5C). CD34+ cells were isolated from embryoid bodies and grown on MS5 cells for B-cell differentiation. After 21 days of MS5 cell co-culture, the number of CD19+ cells generated per input CD34+ cell was enumerated (Fig. 5D). Knock-out of EDNRB in trisomic cells had minimal effect on B cell production, as compared to trisomic wild-type or EDNRB+/− clones. Disomic EDNRB−/− cells generated roughly the same ratio of B cells as trisomic EDNRB+/+ or EDNRB+/− cells, and more than trisomic EDNRB−/− cells, although the difference was not statistically significant. EDNRB knockout in disomic cells reduced B cell production (p-value ≤ 0.15), with EDNRB−/− cells generating fewer B cells than disomic EDNRB+/− or EDNRB+/+ cells. Although, not statistically significant, coupled with shRNA results, this trend is consistent with the hypothesis that EDNRB serves a critical role in B cell differentiation.

Figure 5
Figure 5

CRISPR/Cas9 Targeting of EDNRB in isogenic iPS cells. (A) Structure of the EDNRB locus showing localization of two guides that were used to ablate all 4 isoforms. (B) Genotyping of isogenic clones after CRISPR/Cas9 editing showing EDNRB+/+, EDNRB+/− and EDNRB−/− clones. (C) FACS analysis for CD34+ generated from Cas9 edited disomic and trisomic isogenic cells. (D) Quantification of B cell production in differentiated cells, presented as number of B cells generated per input CD34+ cell (p-value ≤ 0.15, between disomic KO and disomic WT/Het). G1 and G2 refer to two guides that were used for EDNRB editing.

Discussion

T21 individuals exhibit reduced numbers of circulating B and T cells, which likely contributes to increased susceptibility to infections, although the mechanisms underlying these phenotypes are unknown8,9,10,11. Here, we differentiated human isogenic iPS cells into lymphoid lineages to gain insight into pathogenesis. We did not observe differences between disomic and trisomic cells in production of T cell progenitor cells. Given the reduction in T cells observed in T21 individuals9, we suggest that abnormalities in T cell generation in vivo may be extrinsic to hematopoietic progenitor cells. As thymi are smaller in size in T21 fetuses compared to age-matched controls28, we speculate that reduced T cell numbers in vivo may reflect a developmental patterning abnormality. If that were the case, in vitro T cell generation by trisomic iPS cells would be unaffected.

Our observations pertaining to reduced B cell production by trisomic iPS in vitro are reminiscent of decreased B cell development described in T21 individuals8,10. Transcriptome analysis of differentiated cells revealed that the Endothelin Receptor B (EDNRB), and its ligand (EDN1) were among the top 20 downregulated genes in trisomic clones (Supplementary Table 1). These observations were validated by qPCR, and subsequent bioinformatic analysis revealed overlap between endothelin signaling and G-protein receptor signaling gene sets and transcripts enriched in disomic clones. Endothelin signaling was initially recognized in relation to regulation of vasodilation, but has since been associated with numerous cell processes, including regulation of differentiation and proliferation depending on cellular context24. Limited data link endothelin signaling to regulation of hematopoiesis, or lymphopoiesis. However, it has been reported that EDNRB knockout mice have small spleens and exhibit impaired B cell development25,26. This phenotype correlates with our observations of reduced B cell development in trisomic clones exhibiting a reduction in EDNRB expression. Abnormalities in EDNRB expression has not previously been linked to T21. However, reduced EDN1 expression has described in peripheral blood cells of T21 adolescents29. EDNRB is encoded on chromosome 13, while EDN1 is localized to chromosome 6, and thus unanticipated candidates to mediate a trisomy 21 phenotype. Therefore, reduced expression is presumably the consequence of altered transcriptional networks in trisomic cells. Besides potential roles for transcriptional regulators expressed from chromosome 21, it is also possible that microRNAs encoded on chromosome 21 may ultimately influence EDNRB expression.

To establish a causal relationship between a reduction in EDNRB expression and defects in B cell development, we utilized two different approaches. Normal, disomic CB CD34+ cells were transduced with either specific shRNA targeting EDNRB or a scrambled shRNA control, and differentiated to generate B cells in vitro. In samples transduced with EDNRB shRNA, generation of CD45+CD34CD19+CD10+ cells was markedly reduced, thus indicating that reduction of EDNRB expression is sufficient to impair B cell differentiation in a disomic cell context.

Further evidence of a critical role for EDNRB in B cell development was obtained through CRISPR/Cas9 targeting of EDNRB in disomic and trisomic isogenic iPS cells. No difference in percentage production of CD34+ cells was observed, irrespective of EDNRB genotype in either disomic or trisomic cells. The production of B cells quantitated as a ratio of number of B cells produced per input CD34+ cell indicated that disomic EDNRB−/− cells generate fewer B cells/CD34+ cell than disomic EDNRB+/− or EDNRB+/+ clones. Furthermore, disomic EDNRB−/− clones were comparable in B cell production as trisomic EDNRB+/+ or EDNRB−/− clones, indicating that EDNRB ablation confers a trisomic-like phenotype to disomic cells in terms of B-cell production. These findings strongly implicate reduced EDNRB expression in trisomic cells as a major contributor to reduced B cell potential, and provide a potential pathological basis for observations in T21 individuals. More broadly, our work illustrates how in vitro differentiation of human iPS can be employed to discriminate between intrinsic and extrinsic effects of altered genotypes on individual hematopoietic lineages.

Experimental Procedures

Maintenance and Differentiation of iPS Cells

Human isogenic iPS cells that are genetically indistinguishable with the exception of disomy or trisomy for chromosome 21 have been previously characterized18. iPS cells were maintained on irradiated CF-1 feeder cells (Global Stem) in DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 20% knockout serum replacement (KOSR), 1% L-glutamine, 1% non-essential amino acids, 0.1 mM β-mercaptoethanol and 10 ng/mL Fgf-basic (StemGent). In vitro hematopoietic differentiation via embryoid bodies (EBs) was performed following existing protocols18,21. In short, prior to differentiation, iPS cells were feeder-depleted by plating out for 24–48 hours on growth factor-reduced matrigel (Corning). Colonies were then treated with 10 mg/mL collagenase B (Roche) for 20 minutes at 37 C, followed by 0.05% trypsin for 1.5 minutes at 25 C. 500 μL of fetal calf serum (FCS) was added to stop trypsin digestion, and colonies were collected and washed with DMEM/F12 media supplemented with 5% KOSR. Resultant colony fragments were plated on ultra-low attachment plates (Corning) in base media of StemPro-34 media (ThermoFisher) supplemented with 1% L-glutamine, 5 mg/mL ascorbic acid, 150 μg/mL transferrin (Roche) and 4 × 10−4 M monothioglycerol. Cytokines were added on appropriate days (as shown in Fig. 1) at the following concentrations: BMP4 (10 ng/mL) (R and D Systems), FGF (5 ng/mL) (Stemgent), SB-431542 (6 μM) (Stemgent), VEGF (15 ng/mL), IL-6 (10 ng/mL), IL-11 (5 ng/mL), IGF-1 (25 ng/mL), SCF (50 ng/mL) (R and D Systems), EPO (2 U/mL), TPO (30 ng/mL), Flt-3L (10 ng/mL), IL-3 (30 ng/mL). Embryoid bodies were maintained in a hypoxic 5% CO2/5% O2/90% N2 environment for 8 days before transfer to an incubator with ambient oxygen for the balance of differentiation. After 9–10 days of differentiation, EBs were dissociated by incubation in 10 mg/mL collagenase IV in 20% FSC/PBS for 1 hour at 37 C, followed by 5 min incubation in 0.25% trypsin and passage through a 20 gauge needle. Single cells were stained with anti-CD34-APC (Biolegend) and CD34+ viable cells were isolated by fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) sorting. All cytokines were purchased from Peprotech unless otherwise noted.

B-Cell Differentiation and Analysis of iPS Derived CD34+ Cells

MS5 cells were maintained in base media consisting of Mem-α (powder, Thermofisher) supplemented with 10% FCS (Hyclone) and 1% L-glutamine. 48 hours prior to co-culture, 40 000 MS5 cells were plated per well in 12-well dishes. After FACS isolation from EBs, CD34+ cells were added to MS5 cells in base media supplemented with monothioglycerol (4 × 10−4 M), SCF (50 ng/mL), G-CSF (25 ng/mL), Flt3-L (50 ng/mL) and IL-7 (20 ng/mL). Every 7 days, cells were given a half media change with fresh cytokines, and samples were collected after 21 or 28 days of co-culture. For analysis, co-culture supernatant was collected, and the MS5 layer was incubated with collagenase IV (1 mg/mL) for 20 minutes at 37 C followed by treatment with 0.25% trypsin for 5 minutes, after which this fraction was combined with the previous supernatant. For experiments, 4 disomic and 4 trisomic sublcones from the same parental line were differentiated in parallel. Multiple independent differentiation experiments were performed, and results were compiled for analysis (Fig. 1). P-values were calculated by Student’s T test.

T-Cell Differentiation and Analysis

OP9-DL1 cells were maintained in base media consisting of Mem-α supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% L-glutamine. 48 hours prior to differentiation, 40 000 OP9-DL1 cells were plated per well in 12-well dishes. CD34+ cells were then added to OP9-DL1 cells in differentiation media consisting of Mem-α supplemented with 20% FCS, 1% L-Glutamine, Flt3-L (5 ng/mL), IL-7 (5 ng/mL) and SCF (50 ng/mL). Every 4–5 days, cells were collected, filtered through a 50 μm filter and plated on fresh OP9-DL1 cells21. For experiments, 4 disomic and 4 trisomic sublcones from the same parental line were differentiated in parallel.

Lentivirus Production

For lentivirus production, HEK 293 T cells were grown to 80% confluence in DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and 1% L-glutamine in 15 cm tissue culture plates. Cells were then transfected using 63 μL of 7.5 mM polyethylenimine, along with 3.5 μg of Δ8.9 packaging plasmid, 1.75 μg of Vsv-g envelope plasmid and 5.25 μg of appropriate vector. 60 hours after transfection, supernatant was collected, passed through a 0.45 μm filter, and concentrated by ultracentrifugation at 75 000 g for 2 hours at 4 C. After resuspension in DMEM media, virus was aliquoted and stored at −80. Virus was titered using a qPCR lentiviral titer kit as per manufacturer’s directions (ABM). shRNA constructs directed to EDNRB were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, clone IDs NM_000115.2-1527s21c1 (shRNA1), NM_000115.2-1323s21c1 (shRNA2), NM_000115.1-1488s1c1, NM_000115.2-1659s21c1 and NM_000115.1-515s1c1.

Differentiation and Transduction of Cord Blood CD34+ Cells

Cord blood (CB) CD34+ cells were differentiated to generate B cells as described above. For lentiviral transduction, cells were plated in a low adhesion 96 well plate with virus at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 25. 8 μg/mL of protamine sulfate was added, along with B cell differentiation media, to bring the volume of each sample to 100 μL. After 24 hour incubation at 37 C, samples were transferred to 12 well plates containing MS5 cells and 2 mL of differentiation media. Appropriate samples were supplemented with puromycin (1 mg/mL) for selection of transduced cells for the duration of differentiation. These experiments were performed 3 independent times in triplicate, and statistical significance was calculated by Student’s T test.

Cell Staining and FACS

Cells were prepared and stained for FACS using standard protocols. Combinations of the following antibodies were used for all analysis. CD4-BV605, CD5-APC/Cy7, CD8-AF700, CD10-PE, CD10-PE-Cy7, CD45-PE-Cy7, CD34-APC, CD34-AF700, CD19-FITC, CD19-APC, CD3-FITC and dapi for viability. Antibodies were obtained from Biolegend. To obtain absolute counts of differentiated cells, CountBright beads (ThermoFisher) were added to stained cells. Cells were analyzed on a LSRFortessa (BD Biosciences), and sorted using a FACSAria II (BD Biosciences).

CRISPR/Cas9 Editing

Single guide RNAs (sgRNAs) targeting EDNRB were selected using online tools (http://crispr.mit.edu). Several sgRNAs were tested for editing efficiency, and two guides (GTGCCAACGACCGCGCCAGAC, GTCTGGCGCGGTCGTTGGCAC) were selected for use in isogenic iPS cells. sgRNAs were cloned into px458 (Addgene) via golden gate cloning30. To perform editing in isogenic cells, 25 μg of vector containing each sgRNA was electroporated into 10 × 106 undifferentiated iPS cells using a BioRad Gene Pulsar II at 250 mV with a resistance of 500 μF. After electroporation, cells were cultured on matrigel coated plates in mTESR media (Stem Cell Technologies) supplemented with 10 μM Y27632 (Stemgent) for 48 hours. Cells were then collected, and GFP+ cells were isolated by FACS. After sorting, cells were plated at limiting dilution to promote formation of colonies from single cells. Colonies were expanded for analysis before transfer to CF1 feeder cells for differentiation experiments. Editing was performed in disomic or trisomic isogenic cells, and 3 Ednrb−/− clones, 1 Ednrb+/− clone, and 2 Ednrb+/+ clones for each background were used for in vitro differentiation experiments. Multiple independent differentiation experiments were performed, and results were compiled for analysis (Fig. 5). P-values were calculated by Student’s T test.

Microarray analysis

Disomic and trisomic isogenic iPS cells were differentiated in parallel, and after co-culture with MS5 cells, CD45+CD34 CD19+ cells were isolated by FACS. RNA was extracted using Trizol. Global gene expression analysis by microarray was performed on the Human HG U133 Plus 2.0 platform. Affymetrix CEL files were normalized using RMA, followed by the SVA package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation31,32. Differentially expressed genes were detected by lmFit function in limma package with a threshold of fold change ≥2 and adjusted p-value ≤ 0.0533. Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was performed using GSEA software (http://broadinstitute.org/gsea) with default parameters, and existing gene sets (PID_Endothelin_Pathway, G_Protein_Coupled_Receptor_Activity)34.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the GEO database, accession number GSE110064.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  1. 1.

    Parker, S. E. et al. Updated National Birth Prevalence estimates for selected birth defects in the United States, 2004–2006. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 88, 1008–1016 (2010).

  2. 2.

    Arumugam, A. et al. Down syndrome-A narrative review with a focus on anatomical features. Clin Anat 29, 568–577 (2016).

  3. 3.

    Antonarakis, S. E. Parental origin of the extra chromosome in trisomy 21 as indicated by analysis of DNA polymorphisms. Down Syndrome Collaborative Group. N Engl J Med 324, 872–876 (1991).

  4. 4.

    Roberts, I. & Izraeli, S. Haematopoietic development and leukaemia in Down syndrome. Br J Haematol 167, 587–599 (2014).

  5. 5.

    Tunstall-Pedoe, O. et al. Abnormalities in the myeloid progenitor compartment in Down syndrome fetal liver precede acquisition of GATA1 mutations. Blood 112, 4507–4511 (2008).

  6. 6.

    Chou, S. T. et al. Trisomy 21 enhances human fetal erythro-megakaryocytic development. Blood 112, 4503–4506 (2008).

  7. 7.

    Martínez, E. et al. Altered immune parameters correlate with infection-related hospitalizations in children with Down syndrome. Hum Immunol 77, 594–599 (2016).

  8. 8.

    Schoch, J. et al. Quantitative, Phenotypical, and Functional Characterization of Cellular Immunity in Children and Adolescents With Down Syndrome. J Infect Dis 215, 1619–1628 (2017).

  9. 9.

    Burgio, G. R. et al. Immunodeficiency in Down’s syndrome: T-lymphocyte subset imbalance in trisomic children. Clin Exp Immunol 33, 298–301 (1978).

  10. 10.

    Bloemers, B. L. et al. Decreased thymic output accounts for decreased naive T cell numbers in children with Down syndrome. J Immunol 186, 4500–4507 (2011).

  11. 11.

    Verstegen, R. H., Kusters, M. A., Gemen, E. F. & DE Vries, E. Down syndrome B-lymphocyte subpopulations, intrinsic defect or decreased T-lymphocyte help. Pediatr Res 67, 563–569 (2010).

  12. 12.

    Goldacre, M. J., Wotton, C. J., Seagroatt, V. & Yeates, D. Cancers and immune related diseases associated with Down’s syndrome: a record linkage study. Arch Dis Child 89, 1014–1017 (2004).

  13. 13.

    Garrison, M. M., Jeffries, H. & Christakis, D. A. Risk of death for children with down syndrome and sepsis. J Pediatr 147, 748–752 (2005).

  14. 14.

    Hilton, J. M., Fitzgerald, D. A. & Cooper, D. M. Respiratory morbidity of hospitalized children with Trisomy 21. J Paediatr Child Health 35, 383–386 (1999).

  15. 15.

    Alford, K. A. et al. Perturbed hematopoiesis in the Tc1 mouse model of Down syndrome. Blood 115, 2928–2937 (2010).

  16. 16.

    Sontag, S. et al. Modelling IRF8 Deficient human hematopoiesis and dendritic cell development with engineered iPS cells. Stem Cells 35, 898–908 (2017).

  17. 17.

    Iizuka, H. et al. Targeted gene correction of RUNX1 in induced pluripotent stem cells derived from familial platelet disorder with propensity to myeloid malignancy restores normal megakaryopoiesis. Exp Hematol 43, 849–857 (2015).

  18. 18.

    Maclean, G. A. et al. Altered hematopoiesis in trisomy 21 as revealed through in vitro differentiation of isogenic human pluripotent cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 17567–17572 (2012).

  19. 19.

    Chou, S. T. et al. Trisomy 21-associated defects in human primitive hematopoiesis revealed through induced pluripotent stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 17573–17578 (2012).

  20. 20.

    Banno, K. et al. Systematic Cellular Disease Models Reveal Synergistic Interaction of Trisomy 21 and GATA1 Mutations in Hematopoietic Abnormalities. Cell Rep 15, 1228–1241 (2016).

  21. 21.

    Kennedy, M. et al. T lymphocyte potential marks the emergence of definitive hematopoietic progenitors in human pluripotent stem cell differentiation cultures. Cell Rep 2, 1722–1735 (2012).

  22. 22.

    Roy, A. et al. Perturbation of fetal liver hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell development by trisomy 21. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 17579–17584 (2012).

  23. 23.

    Lim, J. H. et al. Genome-wide gene expression analysis in the placenta from fetus with trisomy 21. BMC Genomics 18, 720 (2017).

  24. 24.

    Rosanò, L., Spinella, F. & Bagnato, A. Endothelin 1 in cancer: biological implications and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer 13, 637–651 (2013).

  25. 25.

    Frykman, P. K., Cheng, Z., Wang, X. & Dhall, D. Enterocolitis causes profound lymphoid depletion in endothelin receptor B- and endothelin 3-null mouse models of Hirschsprung-associated enterocolitis. Eur J Immunol 45, 807–817 (2015).

  26. 26.

    Gosain, A. et al. Impaired cellular immunity in the murine neural crest conditional deletion of endothelin receptor-B model of Hirschsprung’s Disease. PLoS One 10, e0128822 (2015).

  27. 27.

    Hirose, Y. et al. B-cell precursors differentiated from cord blood CD34+ cells are more immature than those derived from granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-mobilized peripheral blood CD34+ cells. Immunology 104, 410–417 (2001).

  28. 28.

    De Leon-Luis, J. et al. Sonographic thymic measurements in Down syndrome fetuses. Prenat Diagn 31, 841–845 (2011).

  29. 29.

    Zampieri, B. L. et al. Altered expression of immune-related genes in children with Down syndrome. PLoS One 9, e107218 (2014).

  30. 30.

    Bauer, D. E., Canver, M. C. & Orkin, S. H. Generation of genomic deletions in mammalian cell lines via CRISPR/Cas9. J Vis Exp e52118 (2015).

  31. 31.

    Irizarry, R. A. et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4, 249–264 (2003).

  32. 32.

    Leek, J. T., Johnson, W. E., Parker, H. S., Jaffe, A. E. & Storey, J. D. The sva package for removing batch effects and other unwanted variation in high-throughput experiments. Bioinformatics 28, 882–883 (2012).

  33. 33.

    Smyth, G. K. Linear models and empirical bayes methods for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol 3, Article3 (2004).

  34. 34.

    Subramanian, A. et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102, 15545–15550 (2005).

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a grant from the NHLBI Progenitor Cell Biology Consortium (U01-HL100001).

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Division of Hematology/Oncology, Boston Children’s Hospital and Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, 02115, Boston, USA

    • Glenn A. MacLean
    • , Jennifer McEldoon
    • , Jialiang Huang
    • , Jeremy Allred
    • , Matthew C. Canver
    •  & Stuart. H. Orkin
  2. Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, 02115, Boston, USA

    • Stuart. H. Orkin
  3. Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, 02115, Boston, USA

    • Stuart. H. Orkin

Authors

  1. Search for Glenn A. MacLean in:

  2. Search for Jennifer McEldoon in:

  3. Search for Jialiang Huang in:

  4. Search for Jeremy Allred in:

  5. Search for Matthew C. Canver in:

  6. Search for Stuart. H. Orkin in:

Contributions

G.A.M. designed and performed experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. J.M. performed experiments and analyzed data. J.H. performed bioinformatics analysis of microarray data. J.A. designed and performed experiments and analyzed data. M.C. performed experiments and analyzed data. S.H.O. analyzed and interpreted data and wrote the manuscript.

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart. H. Orkin.

Electronic supplementary material

About this article

Publication history

Received

Accepted

Published

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26123-y

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.