Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Methane release from the southern Brazilian margin during the last glacial


Seafloor methane release can significantly affect the global carbon cycle and climate. Appreciable quantities of methane are stored in continental margin sediments as shallow gas and hydrate deposits, and changes in pressure, temperature and/or bottom-currents can liberate significant amounts of this greenhouse gas. Understanding the spatial and temporal dynamics of marine methane deposits and their relationships to environmental change are critical for assessing past and future carbon cycle and climate change. Here we present foraminiferal stable carbon isotope and sediment mineralogy records suggesting for the first time that seafloor methane release occurred along the southern Brazilian margin during the last glacial period (40–20 cal ka BP). Our results show that shallow gas deposits on the southern Brazilian margin responded to glacial−interglacial paleoceanographic changes releasing methane due to the synergy of sea level lowstand, warmer bottom waters and vigorous bottom currents during the last glacial period. High sea level during the Holocene resulted in an upslope shift of the Brazil Current, cooling the bottom waters and reducing bottom current strength, reducing methane emissions from the southern Brazilian margin.


Methane is an important greenhouse gas and alterations in its atmospheric concentration have been associated with changes in global temperature over orbital and millennial time-scales1. Appreciable quantities of methane are sequestered in marine sediments in the form of ice-like gas hydrate deposits (ca. 1,600–2,000 Pg of C)2 and shallow subsurface gas deposits, which are sensitive to changes in environmental conditions on the seafloor3,4,5. Changes in pressure (i.e. sea level changes), bottom water temperature and bottom current strength have been the main triggers for seafloor gas methane seepage6,7,8,9. A decrease in pressure and an increase in bottom water temperature and flow speed have great potential to destabilize gas deposits and release considerable amounts of methane to the ocean3,10. An appreciable amount of methane released from seafloor gas deposits is consumed by microorganisms in the water column, potentially altering seawater carbonate chemistry and promoting ocean acidification11. A portion of the released methane may reach the atmosphere, and significantly contribute to global warming2,11, although the amount of methane that reaches the atmosphere is still debated12. An in-depth understanding of the temporal evolution and mechanisms related to seafloor gas methane release are critical for assessing ancient changes in the climate and chemistry of the oceans and the atmosphere, with potential consequences for future global carbon cycle and climate projections2,11.

The calcareous shells of benthic foraminifera living in cold seep habitats have more negative stable carbon isotopic (δ13C) values compared to the same species living in non-seep environments (see supplementary information)13,14,15 because of the incorporation of negative δ13C from ambient methane16. Recent laboratory culture experiments using pressure chambers to expose deep-water foraminifera species to labeled methane showed that these species can live in a methane-laden environment and that the δ13C of calcareous benthic foraminiferal tests are influenced by the δ13C signature of methane17. Thus, anomalously negative δ13C excursions in fossil foraminiferal carbonate from sedimentary records are used to assess the geologic history of methane seepage6,7,18,19,20. Additionally, tests of planktonic foraminifera deposited in sites influenced by methane seepage may also show negative δ13C excursions due to carbonate overgrowth21.

The southern Brazilian margin (SBM) is a passive hydrocarbon basin where several circular and elliptical depressions of collapsed sediments (i.e. large pockmark fields) have been associated with methane release from hydrate reservoirs and shallow free gas layers5,22,23. Multi-channel seismic data revealed complex subsurface faults, fractures and channels connecting deep and shallow gas hydrates as well as shallow subsurface free-gas deposits to the pockmarks5,23. The presence of chemosynthetic communities24,25 and high biogenic methane concentrations23 are suggestive of modern active cold methane seeps on the SBM, while the presence of authigenic carbonate nodules with δ13C values between −16‰ and −30‰ likely resulted from past methane release26,27. However, only a few studies have examined methane seepage history in the Brazilian margin26,27.

To determine the temporal evolution of past seafloor methane seepage at the SBM, we examined the δ13C signatures of benthic (Cibicides spp. and Uvigerina spp., ≥250 μm) and planktonic (Globigerinoides ruber and Globigerinoides sacculifer, ≥250 μm) foraminifera from marine sediment core GeoB6201-5 (26°40′S, 46°26′W, 475 m water depth, 235 cm long) collected at a funnel-shaped depression (i.e. pockmark) located on the SBM (Fig. 1 and supplementary Figure S1)28. The pockmark is placed at the boundary between two southern sourced water masses, the denser Antarctic Intermediated Water (AAIW) and the less dense South Atlantic Central Water (SACW) that are separated by the 27.1 isopycnal at ca. 500 m water depth29 (Fig. 1B; see supplementary information for further details). We compare δ13C records from core GeoB6201-5 to δ13C records from nearby cores collected outside of the pockmark, namely GeoB2107-3 (27°17′S, 46°45′W, 1048 m water depth, 780 cm long) and 14GGC (26°68′S, 46°50′W, 441 m water depth, 200 cm long)30 (Fig. 1A and supplementary information). The δ13C records from these two sediment cores provide the regional background conditions not affected by methane seepage. The presence of authigenic carbonate precipitation derived by the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) in core GeoB6201-5 was determined by the elemental composition of individual benthic foraminiferal tests (Cibicides wuellerstorfi) as well as the mineralogical composition of sediments (see Material and methods).

Figure 1

Location of core GeoB6201-5 (this study) and adjacent control cores GeoB2107-364 and 14GGC30. (A) Sea surface temperature in the western South Atlantic Ocean65 showing the southward transport of warm tropical waters by the Brazil Current (red arrow). (B) Depth profile (dashed rectangle in A) showing water mass geometry in the western South Atlantic Ocean; Tropical Water (TW), South Atlantic Central Water (SACW) and Antarctic Intermediated Water (AAIW). White dotted line indicated the isopycnal σ = 27.1 marking the boundary between the lighter SACW and the denser AAIW29,66. Both TW and SACW are transported southward by the Brazil Current south of 20°S67 (C) 25m-resolution bathymetric map of the pockmark field at the southern Brazilian Margin showing funnel-shaped depressions. Core GeoB6201-5 was collected from one of these depressions28. (A) and (B) were prepared using Ocean Data View software68 (ODV - version, 4.7.9.,, 2017). The bathymetric data in C were collected with a Hydrosweep DS2 system during the RV Meteor cruise M46/2(CIT). Processing and visualization was done with software Fledermaus Pro 7.7.6 (QPS; The map represents a grid with 25 m resolution.

The age model of GeoB6201-5 is based on six AMS 14C ages performed on planktonic foraminifera G. ruber (supplementary Table S1), regional planktonic foraminiferal biostratigraphy and stable oxygen isotope (δ18O) stratigraphy (supplementary Figs. S2, S3 and S4). The age model and associated uncertainties were calculated with the R script BACON version 2.231 with the IntCal13 calibration curve32 and a reservoir correction age of 400 ± 100 yr (supplementary Fig. S2). We verified our 14C-based age model for the last 40 cal ka BP by confronting the Cibicides spp. δ18O record from GeoB6201-5 to a Cibicides spp. δ18O record from nearby core GeoB2107-3 as well as to a recently published intermediate water South Atlantic benthic δ18O stack33 (supplementary Fig. S2). The chronology of core GeoB6201-5 is additionally supported by planktonic foraminifera biostratigraphy34,35, where the presence of Globorotalia menardii and the low abundance of Globorotalia inflata indicate Biozone Z (Holocene), while the absence of G. menardii and the high abundance of G,inflata characterize the glacial Biozone Y (last glacial) (supplementary Fig. S2b). The chronology of core GeoB2107-3 was previously published in Heil36 and Gu37.

The Holocene δ13C values of planktonic foraminifera species G. ruber (1.6‰–1.8‰) and G,sacculifer (2.2–3.0‰) as well as benthic foraminifera Cibicides spp. (1.2–1.7‰) and Uvigerina spp,(−0.1–0.8‰) from core GeoB6201-5 are consistent with those from non-seep surface sediments from the western South Atlantic Ocean38,39 and with downcore values from adjacent cores GeoB2107-3 and 14GGC30 (Fig. 2). On the other hand, anomalous negative δ13C values in both planktonic (down to −6‰) and benthic (down to −4.6‰) species are present in the last glacial (40–20 cal ka BP) section of core GeoB6201-5 (Fig. 2). These values are significantly more negative than the values of the adjacent non-seep cores GeoB2107-3 and 14GGC30.

Figure 2

Methane release from southern Brazilian margin during the last glacial period. (A) Downcore benthic and planktonic foraminifera δ13C records from the seep core GeoB6201-5 showing the strong δ13C depletion between 40 and 20 cal ka BP. (B) Comparison of benthic foraminifera Uvigerina spp. and Cibicides spp. δ13C records from seep core GeoB6201-5 and adjacent non-seep cores GeoB2107-3 and 14GGC30. (C) Comparison of planktonic foraminifera Globigerinoides ruber and Globigerinoides sacculifer δ13C records from seep core GeoB6201-5 and adjacent non-seep cores GeoB2107-3. Stars in the bottom indicates depth with presence of High-Mg calcite derived from XRD (Red stars) and presence of Mg derived from SEM-EDX (Yellow stars).

The absence of anomalously negative δ13C values in contemporaneous foraminifera from the adjacent cores (GeoB2107-3 and 14GGC30; Fig. 2B–C) rules out the possibility of an enhanced primary productivity event and associated increased carbon flux to the seafloor (the so called Mackensen effect)40 as well as the influence of a bottom water mass with significantly lighter δ13C30,39 as the main sources for the observed negative δ13C excursions recorded in core GeoB6201-5. The anomalously negative benthic foraminiferal δ13C values in our records are consistent with those previously reported from modern and past cold-methane seeps (supplementary Table S2)13,14,19,41,42,43. For example, living epifaunal specimens of Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi from a cold seep in Monterey Bay off California show mean δ13C values as low as −3.3‰14 while the same species from our core GeoB6201-5 had δ13C values down to −3.2‰ (Fig. 3B). The infaunal species U. peregrina, from a Blake Ridge seep diapir in the NE-Atlantic had a mean δ13C of −4.2‰ for the late Holocene43 while U. peregrina specimens from our core GeoB6201-5 had values down to −4.6‰ (Fig. 3B). This suggests that the carbonate tests of foraminifera were precipitated under the influence of low δ13C values of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) due to sulfate-dependent AOM44,45,46.

Figure 3

Response of methane release from the southern Brazilian margin to paleoceanographic changes over the last 50 cal ka BP. (A) Relative sea level changes over the last 50 cal ka BP55. (B) Sea Surface temperatures derived from Globigerinoides ruber Mg/Ca from core GL-109057. (C) Temperature at 100m-water depth estimated using the modern analogue technic based on planktonic foraminifera from cores GL-75 and GL-7458. (D) Stable carbon isotope (δ13C) records of Cibicides spp. and Globigerinoides ruber showing the strong depletion that indicate methane release from the SBM between 40 and 20 cal ka BP (this study). (E) Vertical thermal gradient in the southern Brazilian margin derived from the stable oxygen isotopic differences (δ18O) of Cibicides spp. between core GeoB6201-5 (at 475 m water depth) and GeoB2107-3 (1048 m water depth).

Depleted-δ13C signals in foraminifera shells can be also related, in part, to authigenic carbonate overgrowth induced by AOM20,21,41,47. Our specimens of planktonic foraminifera also show anomalous negative δ13C values down to −6‰ (Fig. 2C), which are unlikely to have been caused by AOM in the water column, as suggested in previous studies6,19. Instead, gas methane is rapidly consumed by the methanogenic bacterial consortium in the water column and/or is deflected laterally by bottom currents48. Therefore, we suggest that the anomalously negative δ13C values in the foraminiferal shells of core GeoB6201-5 were partially affected by post-depositional authigenic carbonate overgrowth. Elemental analyses of C. wuellerstorfi from core GeoB6201-5 reveals an elevated content of magnesium (Mg) and sulfur (S) between 140 and 235 cm core depth (supplementary Table S3), which is supported by bulk sediment mineralogy that shows the presence of high-Mg calcite (HMC) at the same interval (Fig. 2). Elevated Mg and S as well as the presence of HMC closely matches the interval of depleted-δ13C in foraminifera (Fig. 2 and Table S3), confirming that authigenic precipitation affected the original δ13C of foraminiferal shells. However, not all samples containing elevated Mg, S and HMC were associated with depleted δ13C. For example, shells analyzed at 195 cm core depth show δ13C values of −1.39‰ and an absence of Mg and S (supplementary Table S3), suggesting that the anomalously negative δ13C value represents the original test composition. On the other hand, mineralogical analyses indicated HMC in sediments at 180 cm core depth (Fig. 2 and supplementary Fig. S5), while foraminiferal shells show positive δ13C values together with high Mg (1.36%) and S (6.14%) (Supplementary Table S3). Our results suggest that AOM-derived authigenic carbonate precipitation may have added negative δ13C to some of the original foraminiferal shells, but this process was not responsible for all depleted δ13C values. Thus, the depleted-δ13C signals in core GeoB6201-5 evidence methane outgassing from the SBM, that occurred during the last glacial.

The AOM-depth in sediments at seep sites is mostly a function of fluid flow intensity; high flux displaces the AOM towards the seafloor while the AOM occurs deeper within sediments affected by low flux49. Authigenic carbonates containing aragonite (i.e. nodules, concretions and crusts) precipitate preferentially when the AOM occurs near the sediment-water interface due to a high methane flux9,49,50. No evidence of aragonite was observed in core GeoB6201-5, but the absence of aragonite in sediments can also be associated with post-depositional dissolution. Modeling experiments reveal that dissolution of aragonite in sediments starts just after the decrease in the methane flux and the halt in AOM, and ca. 2000 years would cause complete aragonite dissolution51. In addition, AOM-derived authigenic carbonates in methane seepage sites are generally enriched in δ18O9,49,52,53, which is not observed in our results (Fig. S6). Adjusting the δ18O values of Uvigerina spp. to the Cibicides spp. scale by subtracting 0.47‰54, glacial δ18O suggest that both taxa recorded the bottom water conditions (supplementary Fig. S6). This interpretation is supported by the similarity of the post-glacial Cibicides spp. δ18O curve of seep core GeoB6201-5 and non-seep core 14GGC30, collected at a similar water depth (Fig. S6a). Interestingly, an anomalous offset (of 0.2–2.72‰) is observed after the 17.5 cal ka BP (Fig. S6b). The origin of this offset is unclear. Yet, no depleted δ13C values is observed at this interval. It is unlikely that appreciable thermal gradient differences existed within the top few cm, and it is also unlikely that diagenetic processes can account for the isotopic offset of taxa that experienced the same postdepositional environment. It seems more likely that the decoupling of δ18O signals between the epifaunal Cibicides species and the infaunal Uvigerina species results from different ambient water conditions where they lived (bottom water compared with pore water). We therefore argue that such changes in the isotopic composition of benthic foraminifera reflect bottom water conditions at the time the shells were calcified. Further analyses of benthic foraminifera assemblages from core GeoB6201-5 are needed to confirm our interpretation of changes in seafloor conditions at the pockmark during the last glacial cycle. The observed depleted δ13C values in core GeoB6201-5 indicate that the AOM occurred close and/or at the seafloor, suggesting methane seepage from the SBM during the glacial.

Core GeoB6201-5 was collected from a pockmark depression on the SBM (26°S), where multi-channel seismic reflection profiles reveal shallow subsurface overpressured gas deposits accumulated in stratigraphic traps and gaps between pockmark arrays sensitive to hydrodynamic processes on the seafloor5. These deposits are connected to paleo-pockmarks through deep-seated complex subsurface faults, fractures and channels, highlighting a genetic relationship between salt diapirism and pockmarks5. During the last glacial (40–20 cal ka BP), global relative sea level was ca. 60–120 m lower than modern sea level55 (Fig. 3A). Hydrostatic depressurization over the sediment column probably contributed to expansion of the gas and the subsequent release of methane to the ocean. In addition to decreased hydrostatic pressure, the lower sea level displaced the upper water column structure downslope, bringing the core of the Brazil Current (BC) close to the core site location56. The BC increased local bottom temperatures, since surface and thermocline waters from the BC warmed up to 4 °C between 45 and 20 cal ka BP (Fig. 3B–C)57,58. Increased temperatures amplified the effect of decreased pressure on the shallow gas in subsurface sediments. The shift of the upper water column structure in relation to our core site is evident when the benthic δ18O record from core GeoB6201-5 (475 m water depth) is compared to the benthic δ18O record from adjacent core GeoB2107-3 located deeper in the water column (1084 m water depth) (Fig. S3e). The large glacial isotopic differences between benthic foraminifera from both cores (δ18O) suggests that core GeoB6201-5 was bathed by a warmer water mass while the core located deeper in the water column (GeoB2107-3) was exposed to a cooler water mass (Fig. 3E). In contrast, lower δ18O values occurring from the mid-deglaciation onwards suggest that both cores were bathed by a water mass with a similar δ18O signature. The downslope shift of the BC may also have intensified the bottom current velocity at site GeoB6201-5, which may have acted as a hydraulic pump8,59, facilitating the exhumation of gas methane from subsurface sediments to the ocean. The same mechanism was evoked to explain the pockmark formation in the Strait of Gibraltar (Mediterranean Sea) during the low sea level stand of the Last Glacial Maximum LGM)8.

After the LGM, the absence/reduced seepage of methane is evidenced by the more positive and less variable δ13C signals from core GeoB6201-5, with δ13C values becoming similar to those of modern foraminiferal calcite from non-seep environments (Figs 2 and 3B) (e.g. Curry and Oppo39 and Chiessi et al.38). The rising sea level increased the hydrostatic pressure on the seafloor and shifted the BC upslope decreasing bottom temperatures and current strength, thus reducing methane outgassing from the SBM (Fig. 3). The high sea level during the Holocene together with a decreased bottom current strength at our core site may have favored the deposition of pelagic fine-grained sediments, consequently forming a sealing layer that blocked the upward migration and allowed gas accumulation underneath the sediment, forming shallow subsurface deposits5. It is noteworthy that gas could also have migrated laterally within the sediments, not being recorded in our δ13C after the LGM, feeding nearby pockmarks as evidenced by current presence of chemosynthetic communities in this region24. This suggests that sea level changes and associated oceanographic processes played a key role on the stability of gas deposits in the SBM since ca. 40 cal ka BP.

Previously published evidence of past methane release from the Brazilian margin is limited to depleted δ13C values (−16 to −30‰) from authigenic carbonate nodules26,27. Some of these nodules from the southeastern Brazilian margin were U/Th-dated to 130–140 cal ka BP27, which are contemporaneous with an accumulation of warm water in the upper western South Atlantic Ocean that preceded Termination II57,60, as well as with a decrease in sea level55. Thus, available data are consistent with the notion that methane release from shallow subsurface gas deposits in the SBM occurred repeatedly over time, responding to glacial−interglacial changes in sea level and associated changes in the structure of the upper water column. The combination of lower sea level, warmer bottom waters and vigorous bottom current induced the destabilization of shallow subsurface gas deposits during the two recent glacial periods, while the higher sea level, relative cooling of bottom waters and reduced bottom current stabilized these gas deposits during the modern and last interglacials in the western South Atlantic Ocean.

In summary, we present the first foraminiferal δ13C records demonstrating methane outgassing in the SBM during the last glacial period. Our results show that shallow subsurface gas deposits in shallow water depths (ca. 500 m water depth) on the SBM are sensitive to changes in hydrostatic pressure, bottom water temperature and bottom current velocity over glacial-interglacial cycles. Additional research is needed to better understand the spatial-temporal paleoceanographic processes controlling methane gas dynamics and stability in the Brazilian margin. This is particularly important in the SBM where a huge hydrate deposit covering an area around 45.000 km2 with water depths ranging from 500 to 3500 m, the so-called Rio Grande Cone23, may have also been sensitive to the changes postulated in this study.

Material and Methods

Marine sediment cores

We examined core GeoB6201-5 (26°40′S, 46°26′W, 475 m water depth, 235 cm long)28, taken from the center of a funnel-shaped depression (600 m diameter and 70 m high) and core GeoB2107-3 (27°17′S, 46°45′W, 1048 m water depth, 780 cm long)61 collected outside of the pockmark, both from the SBM (Fig. 1). Core GeoB6201-5 is mainly composed of gray to very dark gray clay bearing nannofossil ooze, weakly to moderately bioturbated sediments with shell fragments and macrofossils28. Core GeoB 2107 (27°10,6′ S, 46°27,1′ W, 1048 m water depth), raised outside of the pockmark, consists of homogeneous dark grey nannofossil-bearing silt with two small sandy silt layers61.

Stable isotopic analyses

Between 10 and 20 shells of planktonic foraminifera species G. ruber (white; sensu stricto) and G. sacculifer (with sac-like chamber) and 3–8 shells of benthic foraminifera Cibicides spp. (involving species C. wuellerstorfi, C. lobatus and C. pachyderma) and Uvigerina spp. (U. peregrina plexus) from core GeoB6201–5 as well as 10 and 20 shells of G. ruber and 3–8 shells of Cibicides spp. from core GeoB2107-3 (from the size fraction ≥ 250 μm) were selected for δ13C and δ18O analyses. Foraminiferal samples were analyzed on a Finnigan MAT 252 mass spectrometer equipped with an automatic carbonate preparation device at the MARUM/University of Bremen. Isotopic results were calibrated relative to the Vienna Peedee belemnite (VPDB) using the NBS19 standard. The standard deviation of the laboratory standard was lower than 0.07‰ and 0.05‰ for δ18O and δ13C, respectively, for the measuring period.

Chronology of the sediment cores

The chronology of sediment core GeoB6201-5 is based on six AMS 14C measurements (supplementary Table S1), regional planktonic foraminifera biostratigraphy and oxygen isotope stratigraphy (supplementary Figs. S2, S3 and S4). The age model of GeoB2107-3 was published in Heil36 and Gu37.

AMS 14C ages

The AMS 14C measurements of the planktonic foraminifera G. ruber from GeoB6201-5 were performed at the Poznan Radiocarbon Laboratory (supplementary Table. S1). To avoid possible contamination from an old carbon source, the samples selected for 14C analyses were chosen among the depths not affected by anomalous negative δ13C values, except for the basal age (235 cm). The age model and associated uncertainties were calculated using the R script BACON version 2.231 and the IntCal13 calibration curve32 with a reservoir correction of 400 ± 100 years (supplementary Fig. S2). Beside the default parameters of the software, we used the following settings: mem.mean = 0.7, acc.shape = 0.8. and t.a = 8/t.b = 9. Sedimentation rates for core GeoB6201-5 are shown in supplementary Fig. S3.

Verifying the 14C-based chronostratigraphy of core GeoB6201-5 with foraminiferal oxygen stable isotopes

We verified the 14C-based age model of GeoB6201-5 by comparing our benthic Cibicides spp. δ18O record with the Cibicides spp. δ18O record from adjacent well-dated core GeoB2107-336,37 and the intermediate South Atlantic benthic δ18O stack LS1633 (supplementary Fig. S3a). This approach supports the 14C-based age model indicating that core GeoB6201-5 recorded the last 40 cal ka BP, corresponding to Marine Isotope Stages 1–3 (supplementary Fig. S4a).

Verifying the 14C-based chronostratigraphy of GeoB6201–5 with planktonic foraminifera biostratigraphy

The presence/absence of planktonic foraminifera species and subspecies of Globorotalia menardii, the so-called “menardiform plexus”, in marine cores has been widely applied as an indicator of paleoclimatic fluctuations of the late Quaternary, and the menardiform plexus is the main group of planktonic foraminiferal species used in the biostratigraphic zonation of this interval34,35. Ericson and Wollin34 divided the Late Quaternary into 10 biozones (Q to Z) in accordance with the presence/absence of the menardiform plexus. The menardiform plexus was found to occur in the interglacial intervals (biozones R, T, V, and X), whereas its absence characterized the glacial intervals (biozones Q, S, U, W, and Y) of the late Pleistocene. As the Holocene is the latest interglacial, it was named zone Z (Fig. 1). In core GeoB6201-5, the absence of the menardiform plexus between 235 and 55 cm core depth (ca. 40–10 cal ka BP) is indicative of the glacial biozone Y of Ericson and Wollin34, while its presence after 55 cm core depth (ca. 10 cal ka BP) indicates the post-glacial biozone Z (Holocene) (supplementary Fig. S4b). In addition, the elevated abundance of Ginflata, a cold-transitional water species in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean62 being regionally abundant during glacial biozone Y and virtually absent during the Holocene biozone Z35, further supports the 14C-based age model of core GeoB6201-5 (supplementary Fig. S4b).

Non-seep adjacent cores

We used a published record from adjacent core 14GGC (26°68’S, 46°50’W, 441 m water depth, 200 cm long) as a control core, in addition to GeoB2107-3. The Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi δ13C records and age model from core 14GGC were presented in Lund et al.30.

Mineralogical analyses

The bulk mineralogy of 13 samples of core GeoB6201-5 was determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD) (Bruker D8 Advance using Cu Kα radiation) at the Physics Institute/Fluminense Federal University. The samples were powdered before analyses and the diffractograms were produced with 2θ from 3° to 70°, with an increment of 0.02° and 0.1 s of reading time. Minerals were identified by comparison of the experimental pattern with tables from Brindley and Brown63.

Elemental composition of benthic foraminifera

Scanning electron microscope energy dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX) analyses of 19 individual specimens of Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi (>150 μm) from 13 sediment samples of core GeoB6201-5 were carried out in the Institute of Chemistry/Fluminense Federal University. The analyzed specimens were cleaned by sonication for 20 s in methanol and subsequently in distilled water to remove the methanol. The samples were dried for 24 hours at 40 °C, put on carbon adhesive tape in a circular 25 mm diameter stub, and analyzed on a SEM Hitachi Analytical Table Top Microscope/benchtop SEM TM3000 equipped with a EDX detector by Bruker Nano GmbH. The EDX point analyses were obtained from the penultimate chamber of each specimen. For optimal results, a minimum of one minute for each target was selected after rarefaction optimization of results from 6, 4, 2 and 1 minute minimum.


  1. 1.

    Loulergue, L. et al. Orbital and millennial-scale features of atmospheric CH4 over the past 800,000 years. Nature 453, 383–386 (2008).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Archer, D., Buffett, B. & Brovkin, V. Ocean methane hydrates as a slow tipping point in the global carbon cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106, 20596–20601 (2009).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Buffett, B. A. Clathrate Hydrates. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 28, 477–507 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Skarke, a., Ruppel, C., Kodis, M., Brothers, D. & Lobecker, E. Widespread methane leakage from the sea floor on the northern US Atlantic margin. Nat,Geosci. 7, 657–661 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Mahiques, M. M., Schattner, U., Lazar, M., Sumida, P. Y. G. & Souza, L. A. P. De. An extensive pockmark field on the upper Atlantic margin of Southeast Brazil: spatial analysis and its relationship with salt diapirism. Heliyon 3 (2017).

  6. 6.

    Kennett, J. P. Carbon Isotopic Evidence for Methane Hydrate Instability During Quaternary Interstadials. Science (80−). 288, 128–133 (2000).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Consolaro, C. et al. Carbon isotope (d13C) excursions suggest times of major methane release during the last 14 kyr in Fram Strait, the deep-water gateway to the Arctic. Clim. Past 11, 669–685 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    León, R. et al. Pockmarks on either side of the Strait of Gibraltar: formation from overpressured shallow contourite gas reservoirs and internal wave action during the last glacial sea-level lowstand? Geo-Marine Lett. 34, 131–151 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Prouty, N. G. et al. Corrigendum to ‘Insights into methane dynamics from analysis of authigenic carbonates and chemosynthetic mussels at newly-discovered Atlantic Margin seeps’ [Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 449 (2016) 332–344]. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 475, 268 (2017).

  10. 10.

    Riboulot, V., Thomas, Y., Berné, S., Jouet, G. & Cattaneo, A. Control of Quaternary sea-level changes on gas seeps. Geophys Res. Lett. 41, 4970–4977 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Biastoch, A. et al. Rising Arctic Ocean temperatures cause gas hydrate destabilization and ocean acidification. Geophys Res. Lett. 38, 1–6 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Ruppel, C. D. & Kessler, J. D. The interaction of climate change and methane hydrates. Rev. Geophys. 1–43, (2017).

  13. 13.

    Rathburn, A. E. et al. Relationships between the distribution and stable isotopic composition of living benthic foraminifera and cold methane seep biogeochemistry in Monterey Bay, California. Geochemistry, Geophys Geosystems 4 (2003).

  14. 14.

    Bernhard, J. M., Martin, J. B. & Rathburn, A. E. Combined carbonate carbon isotopic and cellular ultrastructural studies of individual benthic foraminifera: 2. Toward an understanding of apparent disequilibrium in hydrocarbon seeps. Paleoceanography 25, 1–12 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Burkett, A. M., Rathburn, A. E., Elena Pérez, M., Levin, L. A. & Martin, J. B. Colonization of over a thousand Cibicidoides wuellerstorfi (foraminifera: Schwager, 1866) on artificial substrates in seep and adjacent off-seep locations in dysoxic, deep-sea environments. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr Res. Pap. 117, 39–50 (2016).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Torres, M. E. Is methane venting at the seafloor recorded by δ13C of benthic foraminifera shells? Paleoceanography 18, 1062 (2003).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Wollenburg, J. E., Raitzsch, M. & Tiedemann, R. Novel high-pressure culture experiments on deep-sea benthic foraminifera - Evidence for methane seepage-related δ13C of Cibicides wuellerstorfi. Mar. Micropaleontol. 117, 47–64 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Panieri, G. et al. Record of methane emissions from the West Svalbard continental margin during the last 23.500yrs revealed by d13C of benthic foraminifera. Glob. Planet Change 122, 151–160 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Millo, C., Sarnthein, M., Erlenkeuser, H. & Frederichs, T. Methane-driven late Pleistocene d13C minima and overflow reversals in the southwestern Greenland Sea. Geology 33, 873–876 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Cook, M. S., Keigwin, L. D., Birgel, D. & Hinrichs, K.-U. Repeated pulses of vertical methane flux recorded in glacial sediments from the southeast Bering Sea. Paleoceanography 26, n/a–n/a (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Panieri, G. et al. Diagenetic Mg-calcite overgrowths on foraminiferal tests in the vicinity of methane seeps. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 458, 203–212 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Schattner, U., Lazar, M., Souza, L. A. P., ten Brink, U. & Mahiques, M. M. Pockmark asymmetry and seafloor currents in the Santos Basin offshore Brazil. Geo-Marine Lett. 36, 457–464 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Miller, D. J. et al. Natural gas hydrates in the Rio Grande Cone (Brazil): A new province in the western SouthAtlantic. Mar. Pet. Geol. 67, 187–196 (2015).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Sumida, P. Y. G., Yoshinaga, M. Y., Madureira, L. A. S.-P. & Hovland, M. Seabed pockmarks associated with deepwater corals off SE Brazilian continental slope, Santos Basin. Mar. Geol. 207, 159–167 (2004).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Giongo, A. et al. Discovery of a Chemosynthesis-based Community in the Western South Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part I Oceanogr. Res. Pap. (2015).

  26. 26.

    Kowsmann, R. O. & De Carvalho, M. D. Erosional event causing gas-venting on the upper continental slope, Campos Basin, Brazil. Cont. Shelf Res. 22, 2345–2354 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Wirsig, C., Kowsmann, R. O., Miller, D. J., de Oliveira Godoy, J. M. & Mangini, A. U/Th-dating and post-depositional alteration of a cold seep carbonate chimney from the Campos Basin offshore Brazil. Mar. Geol. 329–331, 24–33 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schulz, H. D. et al. Report and preliminary results of Meteor Cruise M46/2, Recife (Brazil) - Montevodel (Utuguay), December 2 - December 29, 1999. Berichte, fachbereich Geowessenschaften, Universitat Bremen, No. 174, 107 pages, Bremen (2001).

  29. 29.

    Stramma, L. & Schott, F. The mean flow field of the tropical Atlantic Ocean. Deep Sea Res. Part II Top Stud. Oceanogr. 46, 279–303 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Lund, D. C., Tessin, A. C., Hoffman, J. L. & Schmittner, A. Southwest Atlantic watermass evolution during the last deglaciation. Paleoceanography n/a-n/a (2015).

  31. 31.

    Blaauw, M. & Christeny, J. A. Flexible paleoclimate age-depth models using an autoregressive gamma process. Bayesian Anal. 6, 457–474 (2011).

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Reimer, P. IntCal13 and Marine13 Radiocarbon Age Calibration Curves 0–50,000 Years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55, 1869–1887 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Lisiecki, L. E. & Stern, J. V. Regional and global benthic δ18O stacks for the last glacial cycle. Paleoceanography 31, 1368–1394 (2016).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Ericson, D. B. & Wollin, G. Pleistocene Climates and Chronology in Deep-Sea Sediments. Science (80-.). 162, 1227–1234 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Portilho-Ramos, R. C. et al. Globorotalia crassaformis optimum event: a new late Quaternary biostratigraphic marker for the southeastern Brazilian margin. Palaios 29, 578–593 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Heil, G. Abrupt climate shifts in the western tropical to subtropical atlantic region during the last glacial. (2006).

  37. 37.

    Gu, F. et al. Long-term vegetation, climate and ocean dynamics inferred from a 73,500 years old marine sediment core (GeoB2107-3) off southern Brazil. Quat. Sci. Rev. 172, 55–71 (2017).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Chiessi, C. M., Ulrich, S., Mulitza, S., Pätzold, J. & Wefer, G. Signature of the Brazil-Malvinas Confluence (Argentine Basin) in the isotopic composition of planktonic foraminifera from surface sediments. Mar. Micropaleontol. 64, 52–66 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Curry, W. B. & Oppo, D. W. Glacial water mass geometry and the distribution of d13C of ΣCO2 in the western Atlantic Ocean. Paleoceanography 20, n/a–n/a (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Mackensen, A., Hubberten, H., Bickert, T. & Ftitterer, D. K. The δ13C in benthic foraminifera tests of Fontbotia wuellerstorfi (Schwager) relative to the δ13C of dissolved inorganic carbon in Southern Ocean deep water: implications for glacial ocean circulation models. Paleoceanography 8, 587–610 (1993).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Rathburn, A. E., Levin, L. A., Held, Z. & Lohmann, K. C. Benthic foraminifera associated with cold methane seeps on the northern California margin: Ecology and stable isotopic composition. Mar. Micropaleontol. 38, 247–266 (2000).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Panieri, G. & Sen Gupta, B. K. Benthic Foraminifera of the Blake Ridge hydrate mound, Western North Atlantic Ocean. Mar. Micropaleontol. 66, 91–102 (2008).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Panieri, G. et al. Late Holocene foraminifera of blake ridge diapir: Assemblage variation and stable-isotope record in gas-hydrate bearing sediments. Mar. Geol. 353, 99–107 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Iversen, N. & Jorgensen, B. B. Anaerobic methane oxidation rates at the sulfate-methane transition in marine sediments from Kattegat and Skagerrak (Denmark)1. Limnol. Oceanogr. 30, 944–955 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Borowski, W. S., Paull, C. K. & Ussler, W. Global and local variations of interstitial sulfate gradients in deep-water, continental margin sediments: Sensitivity to underlying methane and gas hydrates. Mar. Geol. 159, 131–154 (1999).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Yoshinaga, M. Y. et al. Carbon isotope equilibration during sulphate-limited anaerobic oxidation of methane. Nat. Geosci. 7, 190–194 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Torres, M. E., Martin, R. A., Klinkhammer, G. P. & Nesbitt, E. A. Post depositional alteration of foraminiferal shells in cold seep settings: New insights from flow-through time-resolved analyses of biogenic and inorganic seep carbonates. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 299, 10–22 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Graves, C. A. et al. Fluxes and fate of dissolved methane released at the seafloor at the landward limit of the gas hydrate stability zone offshore western Svalbard. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 120, 6185–6201 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Haas, A., Peckmann, J., Elvert, M., Sahling, H. & Bohrmann, G. Patterns of carbonate authigenesis at the Kouilou pockmarks on the Congo deep-sea fan. Mar. Geol. 268, 129–136 (2010).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Bayon, G. et al. Sr/Ca and Mg/Ca ratios in Niger Delta sediments: Implications for authigenic carbonate genesis in cold seep environments. Mar. Geol. 241, 93–109 (2007).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Luff, R., Greinert, J., Wallmann, K., Klaucke, I. & Suess, E. Simulation of long-term feedbacks from authigenic carbonate crust formation at cold vent sites. Chem. Geol. 216, 157–174 (2005).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Feng, D., Chen, D., Peckmann, J. & Bohrmann, G. Authigenic carbonates from methane seeps of the northern Congo fan: Microbial formation mechanism. Mar. Pet. Geol. 27, 748–756 (2010).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Herguera, J. C., Paull, C. K., Perez, E., Ussler, W. & Peltzer, E. Limits to the sensitivity of living benthic foraminifera to pore water carbon isotope anomalies in methane vent environments. Paleoceanography 29, 273–289 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Marchitto, T. M. et al. Improved oxygen isotope temperature calibrations for cosmopolitan benthic foraminifera. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 130, 1–11 (2014).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Waelbroeck, C. et al. Sea-level and deep water temperature changes derived from benthic foraminifera isotopic records. Quat. Sci. Rev. 21, 295–305 (2002).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Viana, A. R. & Faugères, J.-C. Upper slope sand deposits: the example of Campos Basin, a latest Pleistocene-Holocene record of the interaction between alongslope and downslope currents. Geol. Soc. London, Spec. Publ. 129, 287–316 (1998).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Santos, T. P. et al. Prolonged warming of the Brazil Current precedes deglaciations. Earth Planet Sci. Lett. 463, 1–12 (2017).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Portilho-Ramos, R. et al. Variability of the upwelling system in the southeastern Brazilian margin for the last 110,000years. Glob. Planet Change 135, 179–189 (2015).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Baltzer, A. et al. Geophysical exploration of an active pockmark field in the Bay of Concarneau, southern Brittany, and implications for resident suspension feeders. Geo-Marine Lett. 34, 215–230 (2014).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Santos, T. P. et al. The Impact of the AMOC Resumption in the Western South Atlantic Thermocline at the Onset of the Last Interglacial. Geophys Res. Lett. 1–8, (2017).

  61. 61.

    Bleil, U. et al. Report and preliminary results of Meteor Cruise 23/2, Rio de Janeiro-Recife, February 27 - March 19, 1993. Berichte, Fachbereich Geowissenschaften, Universität Bremen, No. 43, 133 pages, Bremen (1993).

  62. 62.

    Boltovskoy, E., Boltovskoy, D., Correa, N. & Brandini, F. Planktic foraminifera from the southwestern Atlantic (30°–60°S): species-specific patterns in the upper 50 m. Mar. Micropaleontol. 28, 53–72 (1996).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Brown, G., Brindley, G. W. Crystal structures of clay minerals and their Xray identification. J, Mineral, Soc. (1980).

  64. 64.

    Hendry, K. R. et al. Abrupt changes in high-latitude nutrient supply to the Atlantic during the last glacial cycle. Geology 40, 123–126 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Locarnini, R. A. et al. World Ocean Atlas 2009. In: Levitus, S. (Ed.), temperature, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 68 vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D. C., 184 pp (2010).

  66. 66.

    Stramma, L. & England, M. On the water masses and mean circulation of the South Atlantic Ocean. J. Geophys Res. 104, 20863–20883 (1999).

    ADS  Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Silveira, I. C. A. da, Schmidt, A. C. K., Campos, E. J. D., Godoi, S. S. de & Ikeda, Y. A corrente do Brasil ao largo da costa leste brasileira. Brazilian J. Oceanogr. 48 (2000).

  68. 68.

    Schlitzer, R. Ocean Data View. Bremerhaven, Germany. (2016).

Download references


Logistical and technical assistance was provided by the Captain and Crew of the R/V Meteor. We thank the Brazilian Navy for authorization of METEOR cruise 46, leg2 of 1999. RCPR thanks PNPD scholarship from CAPES. CNPq financially supported IMV and RCPR with CsF scholarships (grants 248819/2013-5 and 201071/2012-6, respectively). APSC is grateful for a PDJ scholarship from CNPq. CMC acknowledges the financial support from FAPESP (grant 2012/17517-3), CAPES (grants 1976/2014 and 564/2015) and CNPq (grants 302607/2016-1 and 422255/2016-5). Sample material has been provided by the GeoB Core Repository at the MARUM – Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Germany. The data reported in this paper will be archived in the World Data Center PANGAEA (

Author information




R.C.P.R. and C.F.B. designed the study. R.C.P.R., A.E.R. and C.F.B. wrote the manuscript. R.C.P.R. analyzed planktonic foraminifera assemblage. R.C.P.R. and A.P.S.C. selected the foraminifera tests for isotopic and A.M.S. analyses. S.M. provided the isotopic analyses for GeoB6201-5. L.V. and C.R. provided the isotopic analyses for GeoB2107-3. I.M.V. performed age modeling. A.P.S.C. and C.S.S. provided the SEM-EDX and XRD analyses. T.S. acquired and processed the bathymetric data. All authors contributed to the interpretation of the data.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. C. Portilho-Ramos.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Portilho-Ramos, R.C., Cruz, A.P.S., Barbosa, C.F. et al. Methane release from the southern Brazilian margin during the last glacial. Sci Rep 8, 5948 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading

  • Deep pockmarks as natural sediment traps: a case study from southern Santos Basin (SW Atlantic upper slope)

    • Raíssa Basti Ramos
    • , Rosangela Felicio dos Santos
    • , Uri Schattner
    • , Rubens Cesar Lopes Figueira
    • , Marcia Caruso Bícego
    • , Francisco José Lobo
    •  & Michel Michaelovitch de Mahiques

    Geo-Marine Letters (2020)

  • The Alpha Crucis Carbonate Ridge (ACCR): Discovery of a giant ring-shaped carbonate complex on the SW Atlantic margin

    • Mascimiliano Maly
    • , Uri Schattner
    • , Francisco José Lobo
    • , Rodolfo Jasão Soares Dias
    • , Raissa Basti Ramos
    • , Daniel de Matos Couto
    • , Paulo Yukio Gomes Sumida
    •  & Michel Michaelovitch de Mahiques

    Scientific Reports (2019)

  • Consistently dated Atlantic sediment cores over the last 40 thousand years

    • Claire Waelbroeck
    • , Bryan C. Lougheed
    • , Natalia Vazquez Riveiros
    • , Lise Missiaen
    • , Joel Pedro
    • , Trond Dokken
    • , Irka Hajdas
    • , Lukas Wacker
    • , Peter Abbott
    • , Jean-Pascal Dumoulin
    • , François Thil
    • , Frédérique Eynaud
    • , Linda Rossignol
    • , Wiem Fersi
    • , Ana Luiza Albuquerque
    • , Helge Arz
    • , William E. N. Austin
    • , Rosemarie Came
    • , Anders E. Carlson
    • , James A. Collins
    • , Bernard Dennielou
    • , Stéphanie Desprat
    • , Alex Dickson
    • , Mary Elliot
    • , Christa Farmer
    • , Jacques Giraudeau
    • , Julia Gottschalk
    • , Jorijntje Henderiks
    • , Konrad Hughen
    • , Simon Jung
    • , Paul Knutz
    • , Susana Lebreiro
    • , David C. Lund
    • , Jean Lynch-Stieglitz
    • , Bruno Malaizé
    • , Thomas Marchitto
    • , Gema Martínez-Méndez
    • , Gesine Mollenhauer
    • , Filipa Naughton
    • , Silvia Nave
    • , Dirk Nürnberg
    • , Delia Oppo
    • , Victoria Peck
    • , Frank J. C. Peeters
    • , Aurélie Penaud
    • , Rodrigo da Costa Portilho-Ramos
    • , Janne Repschläger
    • , Jenny Roberts
    • , Carsten Rühlemann
    • , Emilia Salgueiro
    • , Maria Fernanda Sanchez Goni
    • , Joachim Schönfeld
    • , Paolo Scussolini
    • , Luke C. Skinner
    • , Charlotte Skonieczny
    • , David Thornalley
    • , Samuel Toucanne
    • , David Van Rooij
    • , Laurence Vidal
    • , Antje H. L. Voelker
    • , Mélanie Wary
    • , Syee Weldeab
    •  & Martin Ziegler

    Scientific Data (2019)


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.


Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing