Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Respiration and the watershed of spinal CSF flow in humans

Abstract

The dynamics of human CSF in brain and upper spinal canal are regulated by inspiration and connected to the venous system through associated pressure changes. Upward CSF flow into the head during inspiration counterbalances venous flow out of the brain. Here, we investigated CSF motion along the spinal canal by real-time phase-contrast flow MRI at high spatial and temporal resolution. Results reveal a watershed of spinal CSF dynamics which divides flow behavior at about the level of the heart. While forced inspiration prompts upward surge of CSF flow volumes in the entire spinal canal, ensuing expiration leads to pronounced downward CSF flow, but only in the lower canal. The resulting pattern of net flow volumes during forced respiration yields upward CSF motion in the upper and downward flow in the lower spinal canal. These observations most likely reflect closely coupled CSF and venous systems as both large caval veins and their anastomosing vertebral plexus react to respiration-induced pressure changes.

Introduction

The compartments of the human CSF system are closely interconnected comprising the internal ventricular system, the subarachnoid spaces embedding the brain and the spinal cord. In particular, the subarachnoid spaces of brain and spine communicate freely via the foramen magnum at the cranio-cervical junction. In contrast to intracranial and upper cervical spinal CSF flow, few studies have addressed CSF dynamics along the entire spine. Moreover, diverse results have raised controversy and clinically relevant mechanisms of CSF flow in the spinal canal are still poorly understood. Thus, the pathogenesis of spinal cord developmental disorders like syringomyelia is vastly unknown.

Using radionuclide scintiphotographic techniques1,2,3 Di Chiro et al. described both a spinal ascent and in a later study a descent of CSF, which led to the postulation of a two-directional spinal CSF flow3. These results could not always be reproduced and other authors explained their pattern of tracer accumulation and uptake by pulsatile flow and mixing of CSF4. Early ECG-synchronized cine flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies also suggested a pulsatile nature of spinal CSF flow without net movement5 or reported systolic-diastolic flow until the thoracolumbar junction but none below in lumbar regions6. Cardiac-related CSF oscillations were also measured in cervical segments of the spine with respiration-induced bulk flow superimposed and moving in separate channels, i.e. downward during inspiration and upward during expiration7. Henry-Feugeas et al.8 also referred to separate dynamic channels in the spinal CSF space with different flow directions.

Spinal and intracranial vascular pulsations were considered as the main factors initiating motion with cardiac pulsation most prevalent at cervical levels and increasing influence of respiration in thoracic and lumbar regions9. Homogeneous cardiac-driven CSF flow in the cervical spine was noticed by 4D cardiac-gated phase-contrast flow MRI10.

In recent real-time MRI studies we identified forced inspiration as the main driving force of CSF flow in humans11,12. A consistent upward surge of CSF towards the brain was observed in response to deep inspiration in the aqueduct and at cervical level C3 and for the majority of measurements at upper and middle thoracic levels. Concomitant analyses of cerebral venous blood flow in epidural veins demonstrated enhanced downward flow of venous blood out of the head during deep inspiration which was counterbalanced by the simultaneous upward movement of CSF12. Here, we address for the first time CSF dynamics along the entire spinal canal using real-time phase-contrast flow MRI at high spatial and temporal resolution.

Results

Real-time flow MRI

Figure 1 shows a typical result of a real-time phase-contrast flow MRI study of the spinal cord at lumbar level L4 in supine position. The serial MRI data consist of simultaneous pairs of an anatomic image (Fig. 1a) and a corresponding velocity map (Fig. 1b). Here, the selected example refers to inspiration. A region-of-interest (ROI) for analysis was defined in anatomic images which exhibit a high sensitivity to through-plane flow (bright signal in Fig. 1a, arrow). The quantitative analysis of directional flow velocities (bright upward signal in Fig. 1b, arrow) yields time courses of flow velocities (not shown) and flow rates (Fig. 1d) in response to the 40 s breathing protocol (Fig. 1e). The actual performance of the subject is visualized by MRI signal intensity variations of the abdominal wall, which are synchronous with respiration (Fig. 1c) and taken from the same real-time image series. The results reveal a distinct positive CSF flow, which accompanies every onset of forced inspiration and refers to an upward surge of the fluid. This finding is in concordance with our previous results at the aqueduct and upper spinal canal12. Forced expiration, on the other hand, results in a reversal of flow direction and hence in a downward movement. The observation of a superimposed low-amplitude component must be ascribed to cardiac-related pulsations.

Figure 1
figure1

Real-time phase-contrast flow MRI of the spinal canal. (a) Selected anatomic image at lumbar level L4 depicting CSF through-plane flow (arrow) and (b) corresponding velocity map with bright signals (arrow) indicating CSF flow in upward direction. (c) Signal intensity in the abdominal wall from anatomic images indicating the subjects breathing performance and (d) corresponding CSF flow (ml s−1) in response to (e) a visually presented breathing protocol comprising 4 cycles of 2.5 s forced inspiration (IN) and 2.5 s expiration (EX).

CSF flow along the spinal canal

The central findings for CSF dynamics along the entire spinal canal are summarized in Figs. 2 and 3 for 19/20 subjects. One subject failed to comply with the breathing protocol and in 10/19 subjects a total of 18/190 measurements could not be analyzed due to technical reasons leading to impaired image quality.

Figure 2
figure2

CSF dynamics along the spinal canal. (a) Mean color-coded flow velocities and (b) flow rates averaged across subjects as a function of spinal level. CSF flow increases in upward direction (red) with every forced inspiration at all spinal levels. During subsequent expiration CSF dynamics follow a bidirectional pattern with very low flow in the upper spinal canal and a pronounced downward movement (blue) in the lower spinal canal. White color represents zero flow.

Figure 3
figure3

Watershed of spinal CSF flow during forced breathing. (a) Mean CSF volumes averaged across subjects from all 4 cycles of forced inspiration (IN = red) and expiration (EX = blue) as a function of spinal level. While inspiratory CSF volumes represent upward flow in the entire spinal canal, expiration leads to a downward directionality in the lower spinal canal. (b) Corresponding net CSF flow volumes point upwards at cervical and high thoracic levels and downwards between mid and lower thoracic regions. Error bars represent standard deviations.

Figure 2 shows color-coded results for the mean flow velocity (Fig. 2a) and flow rate (Fig. 2b) averaged across subjects. Both datasets indicate cranially directed (red) CSF movements with every forced inspiration at all spinal levels. During exhalation CSF follows a caudal movement (blue), which is most prominent in lower thoracic regions, while upper thoracic and cervical levels do not exhibit a clear trend. The 10 s periods of normal breathing before and after the 4 cycles of forced breathing reveal similar patterns though at reduced strength.

Figure 3 depicts the CSF flow volumes (Fig. 3a) for 4 cycles (20 s) of 2.5 s forced inspiration and 2.5 s expiration. Inspiration caused consistent positive values (upward flow) along the entire spinal canal with the highest flow volumes at Th10. In contrast, expiratory CSF flow volumes were rather small at cervical and upper thoracic levels, but revealed a distinct downward flow in the lower spinal canal, in particular at levels Th6 to L2. Consequently, the resulting net CSF flow volumes for 20 s of forced respiration shift directionality over the length of the spinal canal (Fig. 3b), yielding a watershed at about the level of the heart. In other words, the net CSF flow volumes were positive from C3 to Th1, implying an upward movement towards the skull, whereas net flow volumes at levels Th8 to Th12 moved downward towards the thecal sac below the conus of the spinal cord. For all 19 subjects the quantitative CSF flow volumes during inspiration and expiration as well as the net volumes are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1 Net CSF volumes (ml) at all spinal levels in response to forced breathing.

ROI sizes during forced breathing

Because the flow volumes not only reflect flow velocities but also the underlying lumen (or chosen ROI), we further evaluated the size of the individual ROI as a function of time for all 19 subjects (see Supplementary Fig. 1). Although the values were highly variable both between subjects and along the spinal canal, the temporal evolution of ROI sizes revealed no distinct changes over time, not even during forced respiration. These results confirm that the observed alterations in CSF volumes are entirely evoked by changes of CSF flow velocities (see Fig. 2a) and not due to variations in ROI sizes.

Discussion

Real-time phase-contrast flow MRI at high spatiotemporal resolution for the first time allowed for the evaluation of CSF dynamics along the entire spinal canal. We consistently found that forced inspiration is associated with an upward movement in the entire spinal canal in close agreement with our previous observations in the brain and upper spinal canal only. In contrast, forced expiration led to downward CSF flow below level Th6, but very low flow cranial to levels Th1 to Th4. This uniform pattern of CSF flow across subjects suggests a compartmentalization of the spinal subarachnoid space in such a way that CSF dynamics exhibit a watershed with a dividing point at about the level of the heart.

The occurrence of upward CSF flow into the head and brain in response to forced inspiration has been elucidated as a necessity to counterbalance the inspiratory-regulated venous outflow out of the head/neck region12. CSF and venous blood flow appear tightly interconnected and balanced to ensure the Monro-Kellie doctrine of a constant intracranial volume9,13,14. Based on the present results, this compensation of venous outflow from the brain during forced inspiration seems to constitute a remarkably strong regulator, which translates the upward surge of CSF from the cervical region along the entire spinal canal down to the lumbar thecal sac.

CSF flow during ensuing deep expiration in turn resulted in a pattern indicating pronounced caudal movements. The observed watershed-like pattern therefore draws attention on putative dependencies of CSF and venous flow in inferior regions of the spine. In fact, the large caval veins of thorax and abdomen as well as the vertebral plexus of the spine readily conform to external pressures. Respiration-induced changes of intrathoracic and intraabdominal pressures are transmitted via the abundant external venous plexus located in the paravertebral zones through the intervertebral foramina to the epidural spaces and their venous plexus therein. The intimate contact with the parietal pleura and the direct exposure to alternating pressures are shown by anatomic dissections15,16,17 and the pressure in the epidural space has been reported to oscillate with respiration18,19. Interestingly, a study of epidural pressures at different spinal segments revealed two opposing types of pressure changes in response to respiration20. In the upper body above the heart the pressure decreased during inspiration and rose during expiration, while in the lower abdominal lumbar areas pressures increased during inspiration and decreased throughout exhalation. Together, the spinal epidural space mirrored the pressure conditions in the superior caval venous system of the upper body and the inferior vena cava system of the lower body region20. Linking our present CSF findings more closely to these concepts would require parallel studies of lumbar epidural venous blood flow. However, such real-time flow MRI measurements are hampered by the variable and irregular local anatomy of the lumbar venous plexus and remain outside the scope of this study.

In conclusion, real-time flow MRI enables rapid and robust assessment of CSF velocities and volumes in the entire human spinal canal. This study revealed a watershed-like pattern of CSF movement during forced breathing where the divide could be identified at about the level of the heart. Forced inspiration distinctly perturbed that pattern and induced an upsurge of apparently the entire spinal CSF volume, whereas during the accompanying deep expiration the resting flow pattern was resumed. It can be postulated that the CSF flow counterbalances the effects of respiratory pressure changes in the tightly interconnected venous systems not only in the head and neck but also in the lower part of the body. These findings significantly expand our understanding of spinal CSF dynamics in humans. Translating real-time phase-contrast MRI to clinical applications will be of eminent importance to unravel the pathological mechanisms underlying spinal cord disorders such as syringomyelia and to open new options for therapies and respective evaluations.

Methods

Subjects

Twenty healthy volunteers were enrolled (age range 23–34 years, 6 females, 14 males) without contraindication for MRI and no known illness. The institutional review board of the Georg-August-University Goettingen approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from each subject before MRI. The study was in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Study Design

CSF flow was quantitatively evaluated by real-time phase-contrast flow MRI along the entire length of the spinal canal. During MRI all subjects were placed in the supine position and required to follow a protocol (Fig. 1e) with 10 s of normal breathing followed by 4 cycles of 2.5 s forced inspiration and 2.5 s forced expiration, respectively, and again 10 s of normal breathing. The performance was monitored with use of a respiration belt. Moreover, adherence to the breathing protocol was verified by comparing the movement of the abdominal wall with the timing of the protocol and the observed CSF flow. Corresponding signal intensity changes (Fig. 1c) and CSF flow rates (Fig. 1d) in response to breathing demonstrate elevation and lowering of the abdominal wall as well as positive (i.e., upward) and negative (i.e., downward) CSF flow in association with inspiration and expiration.

Real-Time MRI

All measurements were performed at 3 Tesla (Magnetom Prisma Fit; Siemens Healthcare). The real-time phase-contrast flow MRI technique21,22,23 is an extension of an advanced real-time MRI method24 which combines highly undersampled radial FLASH acquisitions with image reconstruction by regularized nonlinear inversion. Similar to conventional MRI studies of through-plane flow, the real-time technique involves the acquisition of two images with different velocity encodings perpendicular to the imaging section. The experimental parameters were: repetition time (TR) 5.7 ms, echo time (TE) 4.5 ms, slice thickness 5 mm, flip angle 10°, 1 × 1 mm2 in-plane resolution, field of view (FOV) 192 mm2 or 256 mm2. The two acquisitions with different velocity encodings employed 11 radial spokes each and provided a temporal resolution of 125 ms for the resulting pair of anatomic magnitude image and phase-contrast velocity map. Velocity sensitivity (VENC) varied between 10–40 cm s−1 and was adjusted according to CSF and epidural venous flow at the different levels of the spinal cord. While data at C3 were acquired with a 64-channel head coil, all other regions used suitable combinations of elements from the 18-channel thorax coil and 32-channel spine coil. Online reconstruction of real-time images was accomplished with use of a highly parallelized version of the reconstruction algorithm which was implemented on a computer with 8 graphical processing units (sysGen/TYAN Octuple-GPU, GeForce GTX TITAN, Nvidia; Sysgen, Bremen, Germany) bypassing the host of the MRI system in a fully integrated manner.

Data Analysis

Analyses of real-time flow MRI measurements, i.e. serial anatomic images and velocity maps, was performed using CAFUR software (Fraunhofer Mevis, Bremen, Germany) specifically developed to perform automatic segmentation of structures in real-time MRI datasets25. Suitable ROIs were placed at cervical levels C3 and C5, thoracic levels Th1, Th4, Th6, Th8, Th10, and Th12, as well as lumbar levels L2 and L4. The definition of a ROI focused on all readily discernable flow signals observed in both the magnitude images and phase-contrast maps. Additional analyses were carried out using Matlab (Mathworks, USA).

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Dichiro, G. Movement of the Cerebrospinal Fluid in Human Beings. Nature 204, 290–291 (1964).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Di Chiro, G. Observations on the circulation of the cerebrospinal fluid. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh) 5, 988–1002 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Chiro, G. D., Hammock, M. K. & Bleyer, W. A. Spinal descent of cerebrospinal fluid in man. Neurology 26, 1–8 (1976).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Greitz, D. & Hannerz, J. A proposed model of cerebrospinal fluid circulation: observations with radionuclide cisternography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 17, 431–438 (1996).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Greitz, D., Franck, A. & Nordell, B. On the pulsatile nature of intracranial and spinal CSF-circulation demonstrated by MR imaging. Acta Radiol 34, 321–328 (1993).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Enzmann, D. R. & Pelc, N. J. Normal flow patterns of intracranial and spinal cerebrospinal fluid defined with phase-contrast cine MR imaging. Radiology 178, 467–474, https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.178.2.1987610 (1991).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Schroth, G. & Klose, U. Cerebrospinal fluid flow II. Physiology of respiration-related pulsations. Neuroradiology 35, 10–15 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Henry-Feugeas, M. C. et al. Origin of subarachnoid cerebrospinal fluid pulsations: a phase-contrast MR analysis. Magn Reson Imaging 18, 387–395 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Friese, S., Hamhaber, U., Erb, M., Kueker, W. & Klose, U. The influence of pulse and respiration on spinal cerebrospinal fluid pulsation. Invest Radiol 39, 120–130, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.rli.0000112089.66448.bd (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Bunck, A. C. et al. Magnetic resonance 4D flow characteristics of cerebrospinal fluid at the craniocervical junction and the cervical spinal canal. Eur Radiol 21, 1788–1796, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-011-2105-7 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Dreha-Kulaczewski, S. et al. Inspiration is the major regulator of human CSF flow. J Neurosci 35, 2485–2491, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3246-14.2015 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Dreha-Kulaczewski, S. et al. Identification of the Upward Movement of Human CSF In Vivo and its Relation to the Brain Venous System. J Neurosci 37, 2395–2402, https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2754-16.2017 (2017).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Greitz, D. et al. Pulsatile brain movement and associated hydrodynamics studied by magnetic resonance phase imaging. The Monro-Kellie doctrine revisited. Neuroradiology 34, 370–380 (1992).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Klose, U., Strik, C., Kiefer, C. & Grodd, W. Detection of a relation between respiration and CSF pulsation with an echoplanar technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 11, 438–444 (2000).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Macintosh, R. R. & Mushin, W. W. Observations on the epidural space. Anaesthesia 2, 100–104 (1947).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Henriques, C. Q. The veins of the vertebral column and their role in the spread of cancer. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 31, 1–22 (1962).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Stringer, M. D., Restieaux, M., Fisher, A. L. & Crosado, B. The vertebral venous plexuses: the internal veins are muscular and external veins have valves. Clin Anat 25, 609–618, https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.21281 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Shah, J. L. Influence of cerebrospinal fluid on epidural pressure. Anaesthesia 36, 627–631 (1981).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Williams, B. Simultaneous cerebral and spinal fluid pressure recordings. I Technique, physiology, and normal results. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 58, 167–185 (1981).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Usubiaga, J. E., Moya, F. & Usubiaga, L. E. Effect of thoracic and abdominal pressure changes on the epidural space pressure. Br J Anaesth 39, 612–618 (1967).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Joseph, A. A. et al. Real-time phase-contrast MRI of cardiovascular blood flow using undersampled radial fast low-angle shot and nonlinear inverse reconstruction. NMR Biomed 25, 917–924, https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1812 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Joseph, A. et al. Real-time flow MRI of the aorta at a resolution of 40 msec. J Magn Reson Imaging 40, 206–213, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24328 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Untenberger, M. et al. Advances in real-time phase-contrast flow MRI using asymmetric radial gradient echoes. Magn Reson Med 75, 1901–1908 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Uecker, M. et al. Real-time MRI at a resolution of 20 ms. NMR Biomed 23, 986–994, https://doi.org/10.1002/nbm.1585 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Chitiboi, T, et al. Context-based segmentation and analysis of multi-cycle real-time cardiac MRI. IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging, 943-946 (2014).

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.D.K. designed the study, performed the research, wrote the manuscript. M.K. performed the research, analysed the data. AJ performed the research, reviewed the manuscript. J.K. analysed the data, prepared Figs 1–3 and Supplementary Figure 1. K.-D.M. performed the research. H.-L.L. and J.G. designed the study, reviewed the manuscript. J.F. performed the research, wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffi Dreha-Kulaczewski.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dreha-Kulaczewski, S., Konopka, M., Joseph, A.A. et al. Respiration and the watershed of spinal CSF flow in humans. Sci Rep 8, 5594 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23908-z

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing