Proteolysis inhibition by hibernating bear serum leads to increased protein content in human muscle cells


Muscle atrophy is one of the main characteristics of human ageing and physical inactivity, with resulting adverse health outcomes. To date, there are still no efficient therapeutic strategies for its prevention and/or treatment. However, during hibernation, bears exhibit a unique ability for preserving muscle in conditions where muscle atrophy would be expected in humans. Therefore, our objective was to determine whether there are components of bear serum which can control protein balance in human muscles. In this study, we exposed cultured human differentiated muscle cells to bear serum collected during winter and summer periods, and measured the impact on cell protein content and turnover. In addition, we explored the signalling pathways that control rates of protein synthesis and degradation. We show that the protein turnover of human myotubes is reduced when incubated with winter bear serum, with a dramatic inhibition of proteolysis involving both proteasomal and lysosomal systems, and resulting in an increase in muscle cell protein content. By modulating intracellular signalling pathways and inducing a protein sparing phenotype in human muscle cells, winter bear serum therefore holds potential for developing new tools to fight human muscle atrophy and related metabolic disorders.


Muscle disuse atrophy is common in humans during immobilization, bedrest, spaceflight, denervation, cancer, and ageing, and therefore represents a major health issue1,2,3, and is also observed in a number of non-human models used for atrophy studies4. Basic knowledge regarding the underlying mechanisms is continuously growing, and an intricate network of signalling pathways appears to be involved in the regulation of muscle fibre size, including IGF1-AKT-FOXO, inflammatory cytokines, NFκB signaling, myostatin, and glucocorticoids5. However, there is still no fully effective therapy or prevention for disuse atrophy.

In humans, bed-rest and inactivity result in the loss of up to 30–40% of muscle volume after 2–4 months of disuse6,7,8, and this loss of muscle strength reaches 54% after 3 months of disuse6. Physical inactivity and associated loss of muscle mass and strength have severe deleterious consequences for metabolism and health, inducing metabolic inflexibility that could develop into a reduction in the capacity to oxidize lipid fuels, insulin resistance, and ectopic storage of fat9. In contrast, minimal or no loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength has been observed in several species during hibernation, despite prolonged disuse and fasting. Among them, bears (family Ursidae) are quite spectacular in this regard. They remain inactive up to seven months during the denning period, without eating, drinking, urinating, or defecating, and without arousal episodes10,11,12. Yet, a very low loss in protein content (from 4% to 17%) is reported in early winter, and this value remains uniquely stable during the following 3–4 months, whereas muscle and fibre cross-sectional area is preserved13,14,15, and muscle strength only decreases by 23%15.

The underlying protein sparing mechanisms in bears have yet to be discovered. So far, the current hypotheses, including recycling of nitrogen11,16,17,18 and existence of a specific antioxidant strategy, still require deeper examination. Strikingly, bear skeletal muscles are resistant to the atrophic effects of denervation in winter, but not in summer19, suggesting that the nervous system is not directly involved. The direct corollary is the possible role of still unknown humoral factors in controlling bear muscle adaptive responses to hibernation. In support of this view, winter bear plasma has been reported to induce a 40% decrease in the net proteolytic rate in isolated rat muscles20, indicating the presence of circulating factors possibly able to trigger protein sparing during hibernation.

In this study, we exposed cultured human differentiated muscle cells to bear serum collected in winter and summer periods (WBS and SBS, respectively), and measured the impact on cell protein content and turnover. In addition, we explored the signalling pathways that control rates of protein synthesis and degradation. Our results highlight how serum from hibernating bears is able to trigger trans-species effects, hence being a potential source for new therapeutic molecules to fight human muscle atrophy and associated metabolic disorders.

Materials and Methods

Bear sample collection

Free-ranging sub-adult (2- to 3-year-old) brown bears (Ursus arctos; 16 females and 6 males) were captured during both their active (summer) and inactive (winter) periods in Dalarna and Gävleborg counties, Sweden (see Table 1 for bear characteristics). The same bears were immobilized during winter (February) and recaptured during summer (June), as described previously21,22. Blood samples were collected from the jugular vein in tubes containing a clot activator (VenosafeTM VF-109SP, Terumo) within 20 min after darting, then centrifuged (2000g, 10 min) within 1 hour after sampling, and serum was immediately frozen on dry ice until storage at −80 °C. The study was approved by the Swedish Ethical Committee on Animal Experiment (applications #C212/9, #C47/9, #C7/12, #C268/12, and #C18/15), the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (NV-0758-14), and the Swedish Board of Agriculture (31- 11102/12). All procedures complied with Swedish laws and regulations.

Table 1 Characteristics of the brown bears used in this study.

We prepared different mixes of winter bear serum (WBS) and of summer bear serum (SBS) using the individual bear samples (Table 1). It is important to note that serum samples were collected from the same animals during both seasons, and that both summer and winter mixes were obtained by pooling the exact same volume of serum for all bears. Detailed characteristics of the sera in terms of metabolite and hormone levels and more global proteomic compositions have been published previously from the same bear population23,24.

Culture of human skeletal muscle cells and treatments with bear serum mixes

Human muscle cells were derived from vastus lateralis muscle biopsies obtained from healthy control donors (Diomede experimental protocol). All procedures were approved by the French Ethical Committee SUD EST IV (Agreement #12/111 A 13-02) and performed according to the French legislation (Huriet’s law). All patients gave their written consent after being informed of the nature, purpose, and possible risks of the study. The myoblasts were purified and differentiated into myotubes according to the procedure previously described in detail25. After five days of differentiation in the standard differentiation medium (DMEM medium), containing glucose (1 g/l) and fetal bovine serum (FBS, 2%), myotubes were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and then incubated at 37 °C with 5% of either SBS or WBS. The 5% concentration of bear serum was chosen on the basis of the previous work from Fuster et al.20, who tested the effects of plasma on ex vivo rat muscles. A control group was set as myotubes kept in differentiation medium containing 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS condition). For all experiments, repetitions were performed on cell preparations coming from different donors.

Myosin heavy chain imaging and cell surface determination

After exposure to FBS, SBS or WBS (48 h), human muscle cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% formaldehyde for 10 min, then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100/PBS for 15 min and blocked by 1% bovine serum albumin for 30 min at room temperature. Myosin heavy chain protein of human myotubes was detected with primary antibody MF-20, followed by a secondary antibody Alexa Fluor® 555 Anti-Mouse IgG (H + L) incubation. Then, the area occupied by myotubes was measured, as described in detail previously26. For each well, corresponding to one mix applied to one cell preparation, at least ten pictures were taken to determine the percentage of surface occupied by myotubes.

Measurement of protein degradation and synthesis rates

Protein degradation rates were assayed, as previously described26. Human muscle cells were first incubated for 24 hours with [3H]-L-Tyrosine (2 μCi/ml), then washed three times with PBS, and shifted in chase medium (containing nonradiolabeled tyrosine) for two hours. The release of TCA-soluble radioactivity in the culture medium was assayed for the 6 hours following 24 hours of incubation in SBS and WBS conditions to determine the rate per hour of free tyrosine release. The total amount of incorporated radioactivity was then determined in the whole cell culture to calculate the degradation rate relative to the amount of labeled protein, expressed in percentage per hour. Protein degradation rates were also measured in the presence of proteasome (Bortezomib/PS-341, 1 μM) and lysosome (Concanamycin A, 0.1 μM) inhibitors, as previously described27. Briefly, after cell protein labeling (24 hours, see above), inhibitors or DMSO were added to FBS, SBS and WBS conditions one hour before monitoring the release of TCA-soluble radioactivity for 6 hours. All procedures were repeated with three different primary myotube preparations.

Protein synthesis rates were assessed using two different procedures. Incorporation of radiolabeled tyrosine was monitored, as already described26. Briefly, myotubes were exposed to SBS and WBS for 24 or 48 hours, and [3H]-L-Tyrosine (2 μCi/ml) was then added to the medium. After 2 hours incubation, cells were scraped in 10% TCA to precipitate proteins. The pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (Tris-HCl 20 mM, NaCl 138 mM, KCl 2.7 mM, MgCl2 1 mM, Glycerol 5%, NP 40 1%, EDTA 5 mM, Na3VO4 1 mM, NaF 20 mM and DTT 1 mM), and protein concentration and radioactivity were quantified. Protein synthesis rates are presented as means ± SEM of at least three determinations with different myotube preparations. We also used puromycin incorporation assays to determine protein synthesis rates using the SunSET method28. Cells were exposed to SBS and WBS for 24 or 48 hours and puromycin (5 μM) was added for the last 30 minutes. Measurements for the FBS condition were only performed after 48 hours. Cells were then scraped in lysis buffer to extract proteins. After quantification, 20 μg of proteins were immunoblotted using an anti-puromycin antibody (see western blot procedures).

Western blotting

After bear serum incubation, cells were scraped into 200 μl of ice-cold lysis buffer (TRIS-HCl 20 mM, NaCl 138 mM, KCl 2.7 mM, MgCl2 1 mM, Glycerol 5%, NP 40 1%, EDTA 5 mM, Na3VO4 1 mM, NaF 20 mM and DTT 1 mM) supplemented with a protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma-Aldrich, France). Protein concentration was determined by Bradford quantification. Western blotting was performed, as described previously29, loading 20 μg of total protein on precast gels (Mini-protean TGX Stain-freeTM gel, Biorad, France). After migration, gels were UV exposed for 3 minutes and pictures were taken for further quantification of protein loading. After semi-dry transfer, all membranes were blocked with 4% BSA (Bovine Serum Albumin, Euromedex, Souffelweyersheim, France) before incubation with primary antibodies (see Table S1). Corresponding secondary HRP antibodies were used for chemiluminescence revelation (Chemidoc Bio-Rad).

Quantification of mRNAs by real-time RT-PCR

Total RNA was isolated using the TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Courtaboeuf, France) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RT-qPCR was performed as previously described29. TBP (Tata-box Binding Protein) mRNA levels were determined in each sample and was used as internal standard for normalization. No change in TBP expression was found comparing FBS, SBS and WBS conditions. The primers and real-time PCR assay conditions are listed in Table S2.

Statistical analysis

All data are presented as means ± SEM, and fold change always related to the SBS condition. To compare the SBS and WBS conditions, statistical significance was determined using paired student t-tests, with * indicating a p value < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and NS not significant.


Human muscle cells exposed to WBS exhibit higher protein content

To evaluate the ability of bear serum to impact human muscle cell protein content, we first incubated quiescent differentiated polynucleated myotubes with bear serum collected in winter during hibernation and in summer during their active period. After 48 hours, we determined the cell content of heavy chain myosin by immunofluorescence and quantified myotube surface area (Fig. 1). While no difference could be observed between FBS and SBS conditions, the WBS treatment induced a significant increase in muscle cell surface area (+21.7 ± 7.2% p = 0.015) compared to SBS, indicating higher protein content.

Figure 1

Winter bear serum promotes an increase in human muscle cell size. Illustrative immunodetection and corresponding quantification of myosin heavy chain in cultured myotubes upon standard culture condition with fetal bovine serum (FBS), winter bear serum (WBS) or summer bear serum (SBS) treatment. Results are the mean ± SEM of 6 independent experiments (different cell preparations and bear serum mixes). Scale bar: 100 µm. Significant differences result from paired T-tests (*p < 0.05).

Reduced protein turnover in human myotubes exposed to WBS compared to SBS

To investigate the mechanisms driving the change in protein content of treated human myotubes, we next determined the rates of protein synthesis and degradation. Whereas incubation with SBS did not change the degradation rate compared to standard culture conditions (FBS condition), a 33% lower protein degradation rate (0.56 ± 0.04 vs 0.37 ± 0.06, p = 003) was recorded after 24 hours of incubation with WBS compared to the SBS condition (Fig. 2A). To determine whether this could be related to proteasomal and/or lysosomal pathways, we next measured degradation rates in the presence of proteasome (PS-341, Bortezomid) or lysosomal proton pump (concanamycin A) specific inhibitors. Calculation of the inhibitor-sensitive fraction by subtracting the rates of proteolysis in cells treated with inhibitors from those in untreated cells then represented the actual contribution of each pathway in the total degradation process. As shown in Fig. 2B, the contribution of both proteasomes and lysosomes to the degradation rates were dramatically decreased (−47% and −71%, respectively) in human myotubes exposed to WBS compared to the SBS condition, thus showing the involvement of both systems in the response to WBS.

Figure 2

Winter bear serum inhibits protein degradation and synthesis rates in human muscle cells. Overall protein degradation rates in human myotubes exposed for 24 hours to FBS, SBS or WBS (A), and rates of proteolysis after proteasomal or lysosomal inhibition (B) were measured. For the latter, twenty-four hours after serum exposure, inhibitors (1 µM Bortezomid [PS-341], 0.1 µM concanamycin [Conc. A], or DMSO only [Veh.]) were added, and rates of proteolysis were determined for six hours. Proteasomal and lysosomal degradation rates were expressed as the difference between total and specifically inhibited rates. Overall protein synthesis rates were assessed in human myotubes with quantification of puromycin incorporation after 48 hours of exposure to FBS, SBS or WBS (C,D). Protein synthesis rates were also assessed by measuring [3H]-tyrosine incorporation in human myotubes exposed for 48 hours to SBS or WBS (E). (F) Shows incorporation rates of [3H]-tyrosine and puromycin after 24 hours. Results are the mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments measured in duplicate. Significant differences result from paired T-tests (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

We next quantified protein synthesis rates in myotubes exposed to bear serum by measuring the incorporation of puromycin (Fig. 2C,D). SBS did not change protein synthesis rates compared to standard culture conditions (FBS condition) whereas the puromycin incorporation was significantly decreased under the WBS condition. The same result was observed when measurements were performed using incorporation of [3H]-tyrosine into neosynthesized proteins. A mild but significant decrease was found only after 48 hours of treatment in WBS- compared to SBS- treated cells (Fig. 2E), while after 24 hours of treatment, rates were slightly, but not significantly, lower (Fig. 2F). The human myotubes exposed to WBS thus displayed a mildly reduced rate of protein synthesis, whereas protein degradation was dramatically inhibited.

Effects of WBS on proteasomal and lysosomal degradation pathways

To explore the ubiquitin-proteasome system in myotubes exposed to bear serum, we first quantified the level of ubiquitinated proteins in human myotubes under FBS, SBS and WBS conditions (Fig. 3A). Comparing SBS and WBS conditions, no differences could be found in the control (veh) and lysosomal inhibition (Conc.A) conditions, whereas proteasome inhibition (PS-341) promoted an increase in the amount of ubiquitinated protein (Fig. 3B). In this latter condition, the increase was significantly reduced in the WBS compared to SBS condition, suggesting that WBS alone lowers proteasome activity. The overall process from ubiquitin ligation to protein degradation was explored with the quantification of the mRNA levels of ubiquitin (UBB), E2 Ubiquitin-Conjugating Enzyme B (UBE2B), the proteasome subunit alpha1 (PSMA1), and muscle specific E3 ligases TRIM63 and FBXO32 (Fig. 3C,D). Expression levels of all of these messengers were similar in SBS and WBS conditions, indicating that lower proteasomal degradation due to WBS treatment was unlikely to originate from transcriptional regulations and would most likely be due to lower activities of related components.

Figure 3

Winter bear serum inhibits proteasomal degradation in human muscle cells. Illustrative immunodetection (A) and corresponding quantification (B) of ubiquitinated proteins in human myotubes exposed for 24 hours to FBS, SBS or WBS. Quantifications were performed after one hour of proteasomal (1 µM Bortezomid [PS-341]) or lysosomal (0.1 µM concanamycin [Conc. A]) inhibition, and in control conditions (DMSO only [Veh.]). Myotube expression levels of muscle specific E3-specific ligase FBXO32 (MuRF1) and TRIM63 (Atrogin-1) (C), and of ubiquitin (UBB) and two components of the proteasome system (UBE2B and PSAM1) were measured by RT-qPCR, normalized against TBP mRNA levels, and expressed as a fold change relative to the SBS condition. Results are the mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments. Significant differences result from paired T-tests (*p < 0.05).

Autophagy was investigated by quantification of SQSTM1 (p62) protein and LC3II/I ratios (Fig. 4A–C). During induction of the autophagosomal process, SQSTM1 binds the ubiquitinated proteins and LC3I is lipidated to LC3II, resulting in an increase in the LC3II/I ratio. We observed a highly significant lower abundance in SQSTM1 under WBS versus SBS conditions, whereas LC3b II/I ratios were not significantly decreased. At the mRNA level, expression of the E2-conjugating enzyme ATG3, and the lysosomal hydrolase cathepsin L (CTSL) were quantified in WBS- and SBS-treated cells (Fig. 4D). Whereas ATG3 expression was not modified, expression of CTSL was lower in the WBS condition, which would be in line with reduced lysosomal protein degradation.

Figure 4

Winter bear serum impacts main factors of autophagy/lysosomal degradation in human muscle cells. Illustrative immunodetection (A) and corresponding quantification (B) of SQSTM1 (p62) and the LC3b II/I ratio in human myotubes exposed for 24 hours to SBS or WBS (C). Myotube expression of CTSL and ATG3 was measured by RT-qPCR, normalized against TBP mRNA levels, and expressed as a fold change relative to the SBS condition (D). Data are the mean ± SEM of at least 3 independent experiments. Significant differences result from paired T-tests (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01).

Effects of WBS on protein metabolism signaling pathways

Intracellular signaling pathways were investigated by the quantification of the phosphorylated fraction of several key actors involved in the regulation of protein turnover (Fig. 5). The fraction of phosphorylated PKB (protein kinase B), but not mTOR (mechanistic Target of Rapamycin), was found at higher levels in WBS- than SBS-treated cells. Accordingly, the downstream target FOXO3 (Forkhead box O3) was also found to be hyper-phosphorylated and thus presumably inactivated in the WBS condition. Meanwhile, similar phosphorylation levels of serum/glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 (SGK1) were recorded in SBS and WBS conditions, indicating that it might not participate in the higher phosphorylation level of FOXO3 that we observed upon WBS exposure. Finally, the levels of phosphorylation of S6K (ribosomal protein S6 kinase) and GSK3beta (glycogen synthase kinase 3ß) were found to be not statistically different between SBS and WBS conditions.

Figure 5

Winter bear serum activates mTOR/PKB pathways in human muscle cells. Illustrative blots and corresponding quantification of mTOR, PKB, FOXO3a, S6K, GSK3beta, SGK and their phosphorylated forms. Results are the mean ± SEM of at least of 3 independent experiments. Significant differences result from paired T-tests (*p < 0.05).


Despite prolonged periods of fasting and inactivity, conditions which induce dramatic muscle wasting in humans30,31, the muscle mass and strength of hibernating bears are remarkably well preserved14,32,33,34. This preservation is part of an overall adaptation scheme in which energy and metabolic changes are triggered in the cardiovascular system, kidney, liver, and intestine (microbiota). In this regard, the coordination of tissue and organ functions may involve circulating factors, and winter bear plasma has been reported to decrease the net proteolytic rate in isolated rat muscles20. As a new approach to overcome the lack of efficient treatment or prevention of human muscle disuse-induced atrophy, we explored here how WBS can affect protein turnover in human muscle cells, studying protein synthesis and degradation, as well as key actors involved in regulating pathways. To examine if circulating factors could impact human muscle cell physiology, we choose to incubate cells with bear serum rather than plasma that may contain coagulation inhibitors susceptible to induce effects per se like alteration of enzyme activities. Application of WBS to human myotubes resulted in a unique situation, where a marked inhibition of proteolysis and a slight decrease in protein synthesis were observed. The resulting positive balance in protein turnover led to a higher protein content in muscle cells.

Muscle protein turnover is a tightly regulated process, the equilibrium between catabolic and anabolic pathways being under the control of several endocrine, paracrine, and autocrine factors (for review see5,35,36,37,38). In any situation of muscle atrophy, whether it results from immobilization, denervation, fasting, ageing (sarcopenia), inflammation, or cancer (cachexia), muscle protein degradation is activated through two intricate systems: the ubiquitin proteasome and autophagy systems39,40. We show here that, in human myotubes, both proteasomal and lysosomal system activities were reduced in the WBS condition compared to SBS. Considering signaling pathways, the canonical PKB actor was found activated and accordingly, the downstream FOXO3 transcription factor was inactivated by higher phosphorylation. Coordinated activation of this signaling pathway may thus explain most of the observed effects on the proteasomal and lysosomal systems, considering their role in the control of protein degradation and regulation of muscle mass5,27,36,41.

Inactivation of FOXO3 is consistent with the recent demonstration of FOXO4 inactivation in hibernating squirrels42. Although serum/glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 (SGK1) has been shown to be involved in the prevention of atrophy in hibernating 13-lined ground squirrels34,43, we recorded similar phosphorylation levels of SGK1 in myotubes exposed to either SBS and WBS conditions. Thus, in our human muscle cell model, SGK1 may not participate in the regulating the higher phosphorylation level of FOXO3 that we observed upon WBS exposure. The observed increase in PKB phosphorylation of treated myotubes could also reflect the modified insulin sensitivity of the bear skeletal muscle tissue during hibernation44 and highlights a promising future in the field of human diabetes.

Among the few factors inhibiting muscle proteolysis described to date, insulin and amino-acids are the best characterized45,46,47,48. Their circulating levels are increased in the post-prandial situation, at the same time substrates and energy are available for muscle protein metabolism47,49. These anabolic conditions trigger activation of the PKB/mTOR pathway, with subsequent inhibition of proteolysis and concomitant activation of proteosynthesis. Strikingly, we found an activation of PKB with positive consequences on protein content in human myotubes exposed to WBS, despite the fact that the serum originated from animals that had been food deprived and physically inactive for at least three months. How WBS can mimic an anabolic situation for human cultured muscle cells remains to be elucidated. Moreover, considering the ability of WBS to reproduce in treated human cells the regulation of protein turnover already described in hibernating bear muscle (i.e. lower synthesis and lower degradation rates13), it is highly probable that the maintenance of muscle mass during bear hibernation involves one or several circulating factors.

To explain how WBS can activate PKB, leading to FOXO inactivation and protein degradation inhibition in human muscle cells, active circulating factors may be sought among those whose concentrations are known to change between seasons, either due to the central regulation of hibernation via the hypothalamic-pituitary axis50,51, and/or in relation to the nutritional status of the animals through their gut-liver axis52,53. Although several differences have already been highlighted in the blood composition of active and hibernating bears11,23,24,51,52,53,54,55,56,57, no particular factors have yet been identified that specifically control muscle adaptive responses. Serum conveys hormones and growth factors that are major actors in muscle mass regulation58,59. However, considering the reduced metabolic rate in hibernating bears60, it is difficult to imagine an increase in such factors during winter. Of note, higher levels of blood proteins and hematocrit have been reported during hibernation23, which can likely be attributed to dehydration in hibernating bears. Such seasonal changes may lead to higher concentrations of circulating factors during winter, without any change in their production or clearance.

Among the circulating components that are known to show seasonal regulation in bears, fatty acids, whose composition are changed due to prolonged fasting, could play a role. Lipids are known regulators of muscle mass61, notably through saturated fatty acids and their ability to generate ceramides. Whereas both lipid classes negatively affect muscle mass, the positive impact of other lipid moieties cannot be excluded. Notably ketone bodies could be involved, since their circulating levels are increased by fasting62,63 and hibernation64, and they are known to be involved in the regulation of muscle mass65. In hibernating bears, fasting is also associated with modifications in urea and nitrogen metabolism66. The role of specific amino acids can not be ruled out, such as BCAA67 or citrulline68, even if supplementation experiments have not yet produced conclusive results. Finally, from the recent proteomic characterization of WBS and SBS69, it has been proposed that α2-macroglobulin, a non-specific protease inhibitor that exhibits higher circulating levels in winter bears, could be involved in the reduction in protein degradation in isolated rat muscle when incubated with winter bear plasma20. Therefore, α2-macroglobulin could be involved in the reduced proteolysis of human muscle cells that we observed here upon WBS treatment.

In conclusion, the circulating components that induce the potent trans-species effects on human muscle cells and that make their phenotype closely mimic that of winter bear muscles are probably those that are responsible for the maintenance of muscle mass and strength in hibernating bears. Their identification will no doubt pave the way for a new field of studies that will investigate novel solutions to prevent and/or reverse muscle atrophy in humans.


  1. 1.

    Bodine, S. C. Hibernation: The search for treatments to prevent disuse-induced skeletal muscle atrophy. Exp. Neurol. 248, 129–135 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Dodson, S. et al. Muscle wasting in cancer cachexia: clinical implications, diagnosis, and emerging treatment strategies. Annu Rev Med 62, 265–79 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Narici, M. V. & de Boer, M. D. Disuse of the musculo-skeletal system in space and on earth. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 403–20 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Romanick, M., Thompson, L. V. & Brown-Borg, H. M. Murine models of atrophy, cachexia, and sarcopenia in skeletal muscle. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832, 1410–1420 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Bonaldo, P. & Sandri, M. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of muscle atrophy. Model Mech 6, 25–39 (2013).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Alkner, B. A. & Tesch, P. A. Knee extensor and plantar flexor muscle size and function following 90 days of bed rest with or without resistance exercise. Eur J Appl Physiol 93, 294–305 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Bloomfield, S. A. Changes in musculoskeletal structure and function with prolonged bed rest. Med Sci Sports Exerc 29, 197–206 (1997).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Trappe, T. A., Burd, N. A., Louis, E. S., Lee, G. A. & Trappe, S. W. Influence of concurrent exercise or nutrition countermeasures on thigh and calf muscle size and function during 60 days of bed rest in women. Acta Physiol. 191, 147–59 (2007).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Bergouignan, A., Rudwill, F., Simon, C. & Blanc, S. Physical inactivity as the culprit of metabolic inflexibility: evidence from bed-rest studies. J. Appl. Physiol. Bethesda Md 1985 111, 1201–1210 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Manchi, S. & Swenson, J. E. Denning behaviour of Scandinavian brown bears Ursus arctos. Wildl Biol 11, 123–132 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Nelson, R. A., Wahner, H. W., Jones, J. D., Ellefson, R. D. & Zollman, P. E. Metabolism of bears before, during, and after winter sleep. Am J Physiol 224, 491–6 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Schwartz, C. C., Miller, S. D. & Haroldson, M. A. Grizzly bear. In Wild Mammals of North America: Biology, Management, and Conservation. (eds Feldhamer, G. A., Thompson, B. & Chapman, J. A.) 556–586 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 2003).

  13. 13.

    Lohuis, T. D., Harlow, H. J. & Beck, T. D. Hibernating black bears (Ursus americanus) experience skeletal muscle protein balance during winter anorexia. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 147, 20–8 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Tinker, D. B., Harlow, H. J. & Beck, T. D. Protein use and muscle-fiber changes in free-ranging, hibernating black bears. Physiol Zool 71, 414–424 (1998).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Harlow, H. J., Lohuis, T., Beck, T. D. & Iaizzo, P. A. Muscle strength in overwintering bears. Nature 409, 997 (2001).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Barboza, P. S., Farley, S. D. & Robbins, C. T. Whole-body urea cycling and protein turnover during hyperphagia and dormancy in growing bears (Ursus americanus and U-arctos). Can. J. Zool.-Rev. Can. Zool. 75, 2129–2136 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Hissa, R. Physiology of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos). 34, (1997).

  18. 18.

    Nelson, R. A. et al. Behavior, Biochemistry, and Hibernation in Black, Grizzly, and Polar Bears. Bears Their Biol. Manag. 5, 284 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Lin, D. C., Hershey, J. D., Mattoon, J. S. & Robbins, C. T. Skeletal muscles of hibernating brown bears are unusually resistant to effects of denervation. J Exp Biol 215, 2081–7 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Fuster, G., Busquets, S., Almendro, V., Lopez-Soriano, F. J. & Argiles, J. M. Antiproteolytic effects of plasma from hibernating bears: a new approach for muscle wasting therapy? Clin Nutr 26, 658–661 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Arnemo, J. M. et al. Biomedical Protocols for Free-ranging Brown Bears, Wolves, Wolverines and Lynx. Report. (2012).

  22. 22.

    Evans, A. L. et al. Capture, anesthesia, and disturbance of free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos) during hibernation. PLoS One 7, e40520 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Græsli, A. R. et al. Haematological and biochemical reference intervals for free-ranging brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Sweden. BMC Vet. Res. 10, 183 (2014).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Græsli, A. R. et al. Seasonal variation in haematological and biochemical variables in free-ranging subadult brown bears (Ursus arctos) in Sweden. BMC Vet. Res. 11, 301 (2015).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Perrin, L. et al. Human skeletal myotubes display a cell-autonomous circadian clock implicated in basal myokine secretion. Mol. Metab. 4, 834–845 (2015).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    De Larichaudy, J. et al. TNF-α- and tumor-induced skeletal muscle atrophy involves sphingolipid metabolism. Skelet. Muscle 2, 2 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Zhao, J. et al. FoxO3 coordinately activates protein degradation by the autophagic/lysosomal and proteasomal pathways in atrophying muscle cells. Cell Metab. 6, 472–483 (2007).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Schmidt, E. K., Clavarino, G., Ceppi, M. & Pierre, P. SUnSET, a nonradioactive method to monitor protein synthesis. Nat Methods 6, 275–7 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Dessalle, K. et al. SREBP-1 transcription factors regulate skeletal muscle cell size by controlling protein synthesis through myogenic regulatory factors. PloS One 7, e50878 (2012).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Jagoe, R. T., Lecker, S. H., Gomes, M. & Goldberg, A. L. Patterns of gene expression in atrophying skeletal muscles: response to food deprivation. FASEB J 16, 1697–1712 (2002).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Wijngaarden, M. A. et al. Regulation of skeletal muscle energy/nutrient-sensing pathways during metabolic adaptation to fasting in healthy humans. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 307, E885–95 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Lee, K. et al. Overcoming muscle atrophy in a hibernating mammal despite prolonged disuse in dormancy: proteomic and molecular assessment. J Cell Biochem 104, 642–56 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Gao, Y. F. et al. Skeletal muscle is protected from disuse in hibernating dauria ground squirrels. Comp Biochem Physiol Mol Integr Physiol 161, 296–300 (2012).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Andres-Mateos, E. et al. Activation of serum/glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 (SGK1) is important to maintain skeletal muscle homeostasis and prevent atrophy. EMBO Mol Med 5, 80–91 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Glass, D. J. Molecular mechanisms modulating muscle mass. Trends Mol. Med. 9, 344–350 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sandri, M. Signaling in Muscle Atrophy and Hypertrophy. Physiology 23, 160–170 (2008).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Lee, S. W. et al. Regulation of muscle protein degradation: coordinated control of apoptotic and ubiquitin-proteasome systems by phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. JASN 15, 1537–1545 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Gordon, B. S., Kelleher, A. R. & Kimball, S. R. Regulation of muscle protein synthesis and the effects of catabolic states. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 45, 2147–2157 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Bilodeau, P. A., Coyne, E. S. & Wing, S. S. The ubiquitin proteasome system in atrophying skeletal muscle: roles and regulation. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 311, C392–403 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Sandri, M. Autophagy in skeletal muscle. FEBS Lett. 584, 1411–1416 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Stitt, T. N. et al. The IGF-1/PI3K/Akt pathway prevents short article expression of muscle atrophy-induced ubiquitin ligases by inhibiting FOXO transcription factors. Mol. Cell 14, 395–403 (2004).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Zhang, Y., Tessier, S. N. & Storey, K. B. Inhibition of skeletal muscle atrophy during torpor in ground squirrels occurs through downregulation of MyoG and inactivation of Foxo4. Cryobiology 73, 112–119 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Ivakine, E. A. & Cohn, R. D. Maintaining skeletal muscle mass: lessons learned from hibernation. Exp Physiol 99, 632–7 (2014).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Kamine, A., Shimozuru, M., Shibata, H. & Tsubota, T. Changes in blood glucose and insulin responses to intravenous glucose tolerance tests and blood biochemical values in adult female Japanese black bears (Ursus thibetanus japonicus). Jpn. J. Vet. Res. 60, 5–13 (2012).

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Chen, Q. et al. Insulin alleviates degradation of skeletal muscle protein by inhibiting the ubiquitin-proteasome system in septic rats. J. Inflamm. Lond. Engl. 8, 13 (2011).

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Chotechuang, N. et al. Down-regulation of the ubiquitin-proteasome proteolysis system by amino acids and insulin involves the adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase and mammalian target of rapamycin pathways in rat hepatocytes. Amino Acids 41, 457–468 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Sadiq, F., Hazlerigg, D. G. & Lomax, M. A. Amino acids and insulin act additively to regulate components of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway in C2C12 myotubes. BMC Mol. Biol. 8, 23 (2007).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Everman, S. et al. Insulin does not stimulate muscle protein synthesis during increased plasma branched-chain amino acids alone but still decreases whole body proteolysis in humans. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 311, E671–E677 (2016).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Kee, A. J. et al. Ubiquitin-proteasome-dependent muscle proteolysis responds slowly to insulin release and refeeding in starved rats. J. Physiol. 546, 765–776 (2003).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Azizi, F., Mannix, J. E., Howard, D. & Nelson, R. A. Effect of winter sleep on pituitary-thyroid axis in American black bear. Am J Physiol 237, E227–30 (1979).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Tsubota, T., Garshelis, D. L., Nelson, R. A. & Bahr, J. M. Sex steroid and prolactin profiles in male American black bears (Ursus americanus) during denning. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 61, 81–83 (1999).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Hissa, R., Hohtola, E., Tuomala-Saramaki, T., Laine, T. & Kallio, H. Seasonal changes in fatty acids and leptin contents in the plasma of the European brown bear (Ursus arctos arctos). Ann. Zool. Fenn. 35, 215–224 (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Sommer, F. et al. The Gut Microbiota Modulates Energy Metabolism in the Hibernating Brown Bear Ursus arctos. Cell Rep 14, 1655–61 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Arinell, K. et al. Brown bears (Ursus arctos) seem resistant to atherosclerosis despite highly elevated plasma lipids during hibernation and active state. Clin Transl Sci 5, 269–72 (2012).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Chow, B. A., Donahue, S. W., Vaughan, M. R., McConkey, B. & Vijayan, M. M. Serum immune-related proteins are differentially expressed during hibernation in the American black bear. PLoS One 8, e66119 (2013).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Harlow, H. J., Lohuis, T., Grogan, R. G. & Beck, T. D. I. Body mass and lipid changes by hibernating reproductive and nonreproductive black bears (Ursus americanus). J. Mammal. 83, 1020–1025 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    LeBlanc, P. J. et al. Correlations of plasma lipid metabolites with hibernation and lactation in wild black bears Ursus americanus. J Comp Physiol B 171, 327–34 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Perrini, S. et al. The GH/IGF1 axis and signaling pathways in the muscle and bone: mechanisms underlying age-related skeletal muscle wasting and osteoporosis. J Endocrinol 205, 201–10 (2010).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Rommel, C. et al. Mediation of IGF-1-induced skeletal myotube hypertrophy by PI(3)K/Akt/mTOR and PI(3)K/Akt/GSK3 pathways. Nat Cell Biol 3, 1009–13 (2001).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Toien, O. et al. Hibernation in black bears: independence of metabolic suppression from body temperature. Science 331, 906–9 (2011).

    ADS  CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Lipina, C. & Hundal, H. S. Lipid modulation of skeletal muscle mass and function. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 8, 190–201 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Cotter, D. G., Schugar, R. C., Wentz, A. E., d’Avignon, D. A. & Crawford, P. A. Successful adaptation to ketosis by mice with tissue-specific deficiency of ketone body oxidation. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 304, E363–74 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Robinson, A. M. & Williamson, D. H. Physiological roles of ketone bodies as substrates and signals in mammalian tissues. Physiol Rev 60, 143–87 (1980).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Andrews, M. T., Russeth, K. P., Drewes, L. R. & Henry, P. G. Adaptive mechanisms regulate preferred utilization of ketones in the heart and brain of a hibernating mammal during arousal from torpor. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 296, R383–93 (2009).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Zou, X. et al. Acetoacetate Accelerates Muscle Regeneration and Ameliorates Muscular Dystrophy in Mice. J Biol Chem 291, 2181–95 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Stenvinkel, P., Jani, A. H. & Johnson, R. J. Hibernating bears (Ursidae): metabolic magicians of definite interest for the nephrologist. Kidney Int 83, 207–12 (2013).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Bajotto, G., Sato, Y., Kitaura, Y. & Shimomura, Y. Effect of branched-chain amino acid supplementation during unloading on regulatory components of protein synthesis in atrophied soleus muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 111, 1815–28 (2011).

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Ham, D. J. et al. L-Citrulline Protects Skeletal Muscle Cells from Cachectic Stimuli through an iNOS-Dependent Mechanism. PLoS One 10, e0141572 (2015).

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Welinder, K. G. et al. Biochemical Foundations of Health and Energy Conservation in Hibernating Free-ranging Subadult Brown Bear Ursus arctos. J Biol Chem 291, 22509–22523 (2016).

    CAS  Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


This work was supported by the French Space Agency (CNES), CNRS and Strasbourg University (H2E project; MyoBears project of the PEPS ExoMod program), and French Proteomic Infrastructure (ProFI; ANR-10-INSB-08-03). SC is supported by a grant from the National Swiss Fund. BC is supported by a grant from the CNES and the CNRS. KS is funded by grants from NSERC Canada. The long-term funding of Scandinavian Brown Bear Research Project (SBBRP) has come primarily from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, the Norwegian Environment Agency, the Austrian Science Fund, and the Swedish Association for Hunting and Wildlife Management. The capture team of the SBBRP was essential to the project. This is scientific paper no. 253 from the SBBRP.

Author information




F.B., C.S., S.Bl., and E.L. designed the study. F.B., E.L., I.C., A.L.E., S.Br., J.A., and S.Bl. conducted and managed fieldwork. S.C., B.C., B.T., C.D., A.V.-M., M.R., F.B. and E.L. performed experiments and analysed data. F.B. and E.L. interpreted the data. F.B., S.C., C.S., S.Bl., and E.L. wrote the paper. J.S., A.Z., A.L.E., J.A., K.S., and G.G.-K. gave intellectual support and conceptual advice.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Etienne Lefai.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chanon, S., Chazarin, B., Toubhans, B. et al. Proteolysis inhibition by hibernating bear serum leads to increased protein content in human muscle cells. Sci Rep 8, 5525 (2018).

Download citation

Further reading


By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.