Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

Plasmodium APC3 mediates chromosome condensation and cytokinesis during atypical mitosis in male gametogenesis

An Author Correction to this article was published on 21 August 2018

This article has been updated

Abstract

The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C) is a highly conserved multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase that controls mitotic division in eukaryotic cells by tagging cell cycle regulators for proteolysis. APC3 is a key component that contributes to APC/C function. Plasmodium, the causative agent of malaria, undergoes atypical mitotic division during its life cycle. Only a small subset of APC/C components has been identified in Plasmodium and their involvement in atypical cell division is not well understood. Here, using reverse genetics we examined the localisation and function of APC3 in Plasmodium berghei. APC3 was observed as a single focus that co-localised with the centriolar plaque during asexual cell division in schizonts, whereas it appeared as multiple foci in male gametocytes. Functional studies using gene disruption and conditional knockdown revealed essential roles of APC3 during these mitotic stages with loss resulting in a lack of chromosome condensation, abnormal cytokinesis and absence of microgamete formation. Overall, our data suggest that Plasmodium utilises unique cell cycle machinery to coordinate various processes during endomitosis, and this warrants further investigation in future studies.

Introduction

Cell division in the malarial parasite, Plasmodium spp., involves distinct events not seen in most other eukaryotes. Despite a detailed morphological description of the cell division process and the subcellular structures involved1, the molecular mechanisms and key components required for the different stages are not well understood. It has also been found that a number of highly conserved cell cycle regulators, such as cell division cycle 25 (CDC25), CDC14 and classical cyclins are absent from Plasmodium2,3,4.

Mammalian cell division involves an open mitosis, where mitotic spindle formation is accompanied by nuclear envelope disintegration and subsequent partition of the cytoplasm during cytokinesis5. In contrast, Plasmodium undergoes a closed mitosis, which proceeds with karyokinesis (nuclear division) without concomitant cytokinesis6,7. In many organisms the cell cycle is spatially and temporally coordinated with the centrosome duplication cycle. During mitosis, the centrosome serves as a microtubule organising center (MTOC), with the separated pair of duplicated centrosomes forming the two poles of the mitotic spindle8. However, Plasmodium has structurally distinct centrosomes that lack classical centrioles. Instead, spindle microtubules originate from an MTOC referred to as a centriolar plaque (CP) that resembles the spindle pole body (SPB) found in yeasts and Dictyostelium9. In Plasmodium, the CP functions as a major site for microtubule formation, determining microtubule movement during mitosis6.

During the Plasmodium life cycle, there are two atypical mitotic processes: one that resembles endomitosis occurs during asexual multiplication, for example, during blood stage schizogony6,7, and another that occurs during the sexual stage - the formation of microgametes (male progenitor sex cells) in the mosquito midgut10. During schizogony, genome duplication and segregation proceed via the formation of an intra-nuclear spindle without disintegration of the nuclear membrane1,7 resulting in a multinucleated syncytium called a schizont. In microgametogenesis, exposure of the male gametocyte to mosquito midgut factors results in ‘activation’ of the microgametocyte, which undergoes three rounds of rapid genome duplication from haploid to octaploid, followed by simultaneous chromatin condensation and nuclear budding. Each condensed haploid nucleus and associated MTOC, together with a basal body, axoneme and flagellum, is incorporated into the microgamete, which egresses from the main cellular body in a process termed exflagellation10. Eight motile microgametes are released 8 to 12 minutes post activation (mpa)10. Exflagellation in Plasmodium is tightly regulated by protein phosphorylation, with key roles for protein kinases, including calcium dependent protein kinase 4 (CDPK4), mitogen-activated protein kinase 2 (MAP2) and SR protein kinase (SRPK), as well as metallo-dependent protein phosphatase 1 (PPM1)2,11.

One essential component that drives the cell cycle, and particularly mitosis, in many eukaryotic systems is the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C). The APC/C is a multi-subunit E3 ubiquitin ligase that promotes cell-cycle progression by covalently tagging regulators such as securin and cyclin B1 with ubiquitin leading to their proteolysis by the proteasome12,13. The mammalian APC/C has 14 core components, and several key adaptor subunits, including cell division cycle protein 20 (CDC20) and the related CDH113,14. Intriguingly, only four APC/C components have been identified as coded by the Plasmodium genome: APC10, APC11 and APC3 (a tetratricopeptide repeat [TPR] containing subunit), along with CDC2015.

In Plasmodium, there is a single orthologue of CDC20, which is the only member of the APC/C components functionally characterised to date16. Plasmodium CDC20 is dispensable during asexual multiplication in blood stage schizogony but has an essential role in microgametogenesis16. In other eukaryotes, APC10 (also known as Destruction of cyclin B protein 1 or Doc1) promotes substrate binding and increases the processivity of substrate ubiquitylation17,18; APC11 is a RING-H2 zinc finger protein that forms a tight complex with APC2 and constitutes the catalytic core of the APC/C; and APC3 (also known as CDC27) forms a homo-dimer with one molecule binding, via its TPR repeats, to a C-terminal Ile-Arg (IR) motif of CDC20/CDH1 and the other binding to the C-terminal IR motif of APC10, which together with CDC20/CDH1 forms a co-receptor for the D-box of APC/C substrates14. APC3 also interacts with mitotic checkpoint complex (MCC), through CDC20, suggesting that it may play a role in controlling checkpoint function19,20. As APC3, APC10, APC11 and CDC20 are key subunits involved in APC/C-dependent substrate recognition and ubiquitylation in eukaryotes, we hypothesised that these Plasmodium homologues might form a ‘minimal’ complex for ubiquitylation and/or control the Plasmodium life cycle.

Here, we investigate the localisation and function of APC3 in schizogony and male gametogenesis using gene disruption and conditional knockdown in the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. We demonstrate that APC3 is associated with the MTOC-like centriolar plaque during schizogony and male gametogenesis, but surprisingly is not associated with the other APC/C components. However, it is required for chromosome condensation and cytokinesis, but not DNA replication, during microgamete formation.

Results

Plasmodium APC3, APC10, APC11 and CDC20 do not form detectable complexes

Only a small number of APC/C components have been identified in the apicomplexan parasite Plasmodium, namely: APC3, APC10, APC11 and CDC2015. We began by examining their putative structures and testing whether they form a complex in Plasmodium. Homology modelling suggested significant similarity with known APC/C component structures21,22,23 (Supplementary Fig. S1a). However, primary sequence analysis indicated that Plasmodium APC3 is highly divergent from known orthologues15, despite retaining the seven predicted conserved TPRs that bind to the IR motif (Fig. 1A). Since the IR motif is absent from Plasmodium APC10 this raises the question of whether and how APC10 might interact with APC3 (Fig. 1A). To investigate whether the proteins form a complex in Plasmodium, immunoprecipitation was performed from transgenic parasite lines expressing C-terminal GFP-tagged versions of the endogenous APC3 and CDC20 sequences (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S1b)16. Successful integration of the targeting vector downstream of apc3 was shown by integration PCR and Pulse Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE), while the presence of the APC3-GFP fusion protein (111 kDa) was confirmed by Western blot of gametocyte cell lysate (Supplementary Fig. S1c–e). Immunoprecipitation was performed using activated gametocytes since both Plasmodium APC3 and CDC20 are expressed highly in male gametocytes at this stage16. During gametogenesis, anaphase-related processes are predicted to start around 7 to 8 minutes post-activation (mpa) when nuclear replication has occurred and chromosomes start to condense, making this the optimum point to investigate APC/C complex formation. Mass spectrometry analyses of immunoprecipitates revealed no co-precipitation of other APC/C components with either APC3-GFP or CDC20-GFP (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S1f,g; Supplementary Tables S1 and S2). Quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis, as well as previous RNA-seq data24, suggest that these components have subtly different expression patterns during the parasite life cycle (Fig. 1C). We also attempted to examine protein-protein interactions among Plasmodium APC/C components identified to date using a yeast two-hybrid assay (Supplementary Fig. S2a–c). Surprisingly, APC10 self-interaction, presumably dimerization, was observed, but no other interactions between the four Plasmodium APC/C components were detected (Supplementary Fig. S2a–c), although expression of APC3 was very poor. All together, these results strongly suggest that, unlike in other eukaryotic cells, Plasmodium APC/C components may act independently during the cell cycle.

Figure 1
figure1

Protein domain analysis, complex formation and transcription. (A) Protein domains of the four putative APC/C components. TPR: Tetratricopeptide repeat, WD: WD40 repeat, RING: RING finger. Grey circle: KEN box, Red flag: IR motif. (B) Analysis of APC3-GFP by mass spectrometry following immunoprecipitation from a parasite lysate using gametocytes activated for 7 min. Venn diagrams display mean totals of shared and unique proteins compared with WT-GFP (constitutively expressing GFP) and WT-ANKA (without GFP) lines. Table lists unique proteins found only in APC3-GFP samples. Full results can be found in Supplementary Table S1. For APC3-GFP parasite generation see Supplementary Fig. S1. (C) Normalised transcript levels of apc3, apc10, apc11 and cdc20 throughout the wild type parasite life cycle analysed by qRT-PCR. Data were normalised against two endogenous control genes, arginine-tRNA synthetase and hsp70. Each bar is the mean of three biological replicates ± SEM. All asexual blood stages: AS; schizonts: Sch; non-activated gametocytes: NAG; activated gametocytes: AG; ookinete: Ook. Unpaired t-tests were performed between apc3 and the other APC/C components in NAG. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001. See also Supplementary Figs. S1 and S2; Supplementary Tables S13.

Plasmodium APC3 associates with centriolar plaques resembling SPBs in schizonts

APC3 is a conserved component of the centrosome that controls the metaphase-anaphase transition during mitosis25. However, since Plasmodium has CPs instead of a centriole-containing centrosome, we explored the localisation of the APC3 protein in dividing cells using the APC3-GFP transgenic parasite line (Supplementary Fig. S1b–e). Live cell imaging revealed cytoplasmic localisation of APC3-GFP in schizonts and microgametocytes (Fig. 2A) but no expression was observed at any other stage of the life cycle examined. Using immunofluorescence microscopy and deconvolution analysis in both asexual and sexual dividing stages (schizonts and male gametocytes), APC3-GFP was found to localise to specific foci in the cytoplasm. Co-staining with antibodies against the known centrosomal markers, centrin and ɣ-tubulin, revealed that in schizonts a single focus of APC3-GFP was present associated with each nucleus, which partially co-localised with a single focus of centrin and γ-tubulin; this is highly persuasive of an association of APC3 with the CPs in this stage of the life cycle (Fig. 2B).

Figure 2
figure2

Localisation and expression of APC3-GFP in mitotic cells. (A) Live imaging or (B to E) fixed IFA of APC3-GFP with centrin, α-tubulin (α-Tub) or γ-tubulin (γ-Tub) antibodies in schizonts, microgametocytes (gametocytes) and gametes. DIC: Differential interference contrast, Merge: GFP and Hoechst. Scale bar = 5 µm. For APC3-GFP parasite generation see Supplementary Fig. S1.

During male gametogenesis, multiple MTOC-like structures were observed with centrin and γ-tubulin antibodies. A few of these exhibited partial colocalisation with APC3-GFP foci but the majority did not (Fig. 2C and D). These features suggest that Plasmodium differs from models such as yeast and mammal cells where only a single MTOC is observed in interphase. Since the process of cell division is very dynamic and fast during male gametogenesis it is possible that APC3 may not associate strongly with these multiple MTOCs. Staining of parasites with antibodies to α-tubulin revealed the microtubule-based flagellar axoneme coiled around the nucleus in microgametocytes at 8 mpa26, with very little colocalisation with APC3-GFP. However, when axonemes were extended in the flagellated, mature microgametes, more than 50% of APC3-GFP could be observed as a single focus midway along the axoneme (Fig. 2E; Supplementary Table S3).

All Plasmodium APC/C proteins (APC3, APC10 and APC11) are likely essential for schizogony, whilst APC3 has an additional essential function during male gamete formation

To elucidate the function of the three Plasmodium APC/C components, we attempted to delete each gene (apc3, apc10 and apc11) on 4 separate occasions each by replacement with a Toxoplasma gondii dhfr/ts selectable marker using a double homologous recombination strategy in asexual blood stage parasites (Supplementary Fig. S3a,b). In contrast to our previous study showing that CDC20 was not essential for blood stage schizogony16, we were not able to delete any of these other genes suggesting that all three proteins are likely essential during blood stage schizogony.

Since APC3 TPR motifs recruit the substrate-binding coactivators CDC20 and CDH127, and APC3 is a key centre for cell cycle regulation, we used a promoter swap strategy to knock-down apc3 expression and study its function in male gametocytes and during microgametogenesis (Supplementary Fig. S4a).

For this purpose, the endogenous apc3 was placed under the control of the ama1 promoter since ama1 is expressed in schizonts but has low expression during gametogenesis28. Two independently derived clones, known collectively as Pama1apc3, with the ama1 promoter integrated upstream of the apc3 coding sequence were generated, as confirmed using integration PCR, Southern blot and PFGE (Supplementary Fig. S4b–d). In these parasites apc3 gene expression was maintained in the asexual blood stages but reduced in gametocytes, as confirmed by qRT-PCR (Fig. 3A). Asexual parasite development was normal and the localisation of centrosomal markers, centrin and γ-tubulin, was not affected in Pama1apc3 schizonts (Fig. 3B,C and Supplementary Fig. S4e). In contrast, in the Pama1apc3 parasite line, in vitro activation of microgametocytes for up to 30 min did not result in microgametogenesis as microgamete formation and exflagellation were not observed (Fig. 3D). Further development including in vitro fertilisation and zygote/ookinete formation did not occur and no oocysts were formed when infected blood was fed to Anopheles mosquitoes in vivo (Fig. 3E and Supplementary Fig. S4f). These data indicate that APC3 has an essential role during mitosis in both blood stage schizogony and microgametogenesis, in contrast to CDC20 that has an essential function only in male gametogenesis16. Further analysis of genome replication in activated Pama1apc3 gametocytes showed that the DNA content progressed to octoploidy (8 N) after 8 mpa, similar to the control, indicating successful DNA replication had occurred (Fig. 3F and Supplementary Fig. S4g,h). We next investigated whether the observed phenotype in gamete formation was a male-specific defect by performing a genetic cross of Pama1apc3 with a parasite that produces fertile micro- and infertile macro-gametes (∆nek4). The partial rescue to form zygotes/ookinetes is consistent with the Pama1apc3 defect being in microgametes alone (Fig. 3G). Crosses of parasites with a fertile macro- and infertile micro-gamete did not rescue the phenotype, confirming that Pama1apc3 parasites are defective along the male line.

Figure 3
figure3

Conditional knockdown of apc3 during gametogenesis. (A) Relative apc3 transcript levels normalised against two endogenous control genes, arginine-tRNA synthetase and hsp70, in Pama1apc3. n = 3 biological replicates ± SEM. Schizonts: Sch; non-activated gametocytes: NAG; activated gametocytes: AG. Unpaired t-test was performed: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001. (B) Number of nuclei per schizont. n = 3 independent experiments (30 schizonts per experiment) + /− SEM. (C) IFA of α-tubulin in schizonts. Scale bar = 5 µm. (D) Number of exflagellation centres per field at 15 mpa. n = 3 independent experiments (10 fields per experiment) + /− SEM. Unpaired t-test was performed: *** p < 0.001. (E) Ookinete conversion from zygotes. n = 6 independent experiments (>50 cells per experiment). Unpaired t-test was performed: *** p < 0.001. (F) FACS analysis of cells in G1 phase of the cell cycle for 0, 8 and 15 mpa. n = two independent experiments + /− SEM. Unpaired t-test was performed. (G) Genetic complementation of Pama1apc3. Combinations of WT-GFP, Pama1apc3 or Pama1apc3 with either male (∆map2) or female (∆nek4) mutants were activated in ookinete medium. n = > 100 cells from 3 independent experiments. (H) Normalised relative transcript levels of selected genes related to APC/C and cell cycle regulation during microgametogenesis by qRT-PCR. n = mean from 3 replicates + /− SEM. (I) IFA of α-tubulin in Pama1apc3 or WT-GFP microgametocytes activated for 2, 8 or 15 min. Differential intereference contrast (DIC) and merged image with 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI) DNA staining are also shown. Scale bar = 5 µm. For Pama1apc3 parasite generation see Fig. S4.

To determine if apc3 knockdown affected other APC components and known mitotic kinases like cdpk4 and map2 involved in gametogenesis, we examined their transcriptional profile in Pama1apc3 parasites. This analysis showed that transcript levels of the other APC/C components and mitotic kinases were unaffected in activated Pama1apc3 gametocytes (Fig. 3H). Staining of centrosomal markers, as well as α-tubulin, was also unaffected in Pama1apc3 microgametocytes (Supplementary Fig. S4i–k). This suggests that while APC3 is partially localised to the CPs during mitosis, formation of MTOCs in schizonts and gametocytes is not APC3-dependent. Staining of the flagellum with an α-tubulin antibody at multiple time points showed that, while control wildtype GFP-expressing (WT-GFP) male gametes had a fully formed flagellum and had egressed after 15 mpa, the microgametes had not egressed from the gametocyte body of Pama1apc3 parasites despite axoneme formation (Fig. 3I). This phenotype is similar to that of ∆cdc20 and ∆map2 parasites which exhibit complete ablation of exflagellation, and confirms an essential role for APC3 in microgamete formation16.

Plasmodium APC3 is required for chromosome condensation and cytokinesis

To gain deeper insight into the morphological changes in the Pama1apc3 mutant, we examined the activated Pama1apc3 microgametocytes using transmission electron microscopy at 8 mpa, 15 mpa and 30 mpa time points. The ultrastructure of wild type and mutant parasites revealed that at 8 mpa microgametocytes in the Pama1apc3 mutant appeared similar to WT-GFP parasites with a single, large nucleus containing multiple nuclear poles and radiating microtubules, while the cytoplasm contained basal bodies and axonemes with the 9 + 2 microtubular structure (Fig. 4A, Table 1). However, at 15 mpa, while a substantial number of control WT-GFP microgametocytes showed evidence of chromatin condensation within the nucleus and formation of free microgametes, there was no evidence of chromatin condensation or microgamete formation in Pama1apc3 microgametocytes (Fig. 4B, see insert, Table 1). These morphological defects were similar to those observed in ∆cdc20 parasites where we showed a blockage of nuclear division at the nuclear spindle/kinetochore stage16. Since Plasmodium retains its nuclear envelope during closed mitosis and chromosomes do not condense until late in the cell cycle, these observations indicate that disruption of either apc3 or cdc20 blocks late stages of cell cycle progression; whereas DNA replication is not affected. These ultrastructural changes are also similar to those of mutant parasites lacking MAP2, but distinct from those in parasites lacking CDPK4, which show defects in both DNA replication and exflagellation16,29.

Figure 4
figure4

Electron microscopy of microgametocytes. (A) WT-GFP (i, ii) and Pama1apc3 (iii, iv) microgametocytes at 8 mpa. (B) WT-GFP (i, ii) and Pama1apc3 (iii, iv) microgametocytes at 15 mpa (i, iii) and 30 mins (ii, iv). A: axoneme, BB: basal body, Ch: condensed chromatin/chromosome, F: flagellum, N: nucleus, NP: nuclear pole. Bar on inserts = 100 nm. See also Supplementary Fig. S4.

Table 1 Quantitation of the ultrastructural features of wild type and mutant parasites based on stage of microgametocyte development.

Discussion

Plasmodium, which belongs to the group Apicomplexa, undergoes an unusual set of mitotic division processes, has an atypical repertoire of cell cycle regulators, and possesses morphologically different MTOC-like structures compared to most other eukaryotes2,4,6,9,11,16. These observations call into question how conserved are their mechanisms of cell cycle control. Here, we have addressed this question through analysis of the Plasmodium APC/C components, and APC3 in particular. Our data reveal different gene expression profiles for the four Plasmodium APC/C components, a lack of typical APC/C binding domains, and an inability to detect interaction of APC3 with other APC/C components by co-immunoprecipitation pull down or yeast two-hybrid assays. Together, these data suggest that APC3 operates in Plasmodium in a manner distinct from that in the well-described pathways in other eukaryotes. These atypical functions may also be present in certain other parasites and plant species. Indeed, in some cases these functions are not required at all. Consistent with this idea, other closely related apicomplexan parasites appear to no longer require a conventional APC/C, with T. gondii lacking APC315, and Babesia, Theileria and Giardia lacking all known APC/C subunits15,30.

During microgametogenesis, we observed multiple MTOC-like structures by staining with antibodies against centrin and γ-tubulin. The requirement for multiple MTOCs may reflect the rapid DNA replication and segregation during this stage when the genome is replicated three times within 8 to10 min. The different forms of MTOC, including centrosomes, apical complexes and centriolar plaques, are a distinct feature of Apicomplexan parasites such as Plasmodium9. Novel bipartite centrosomal components31 and an essential factor for chromosome replication (ECR1)32 have been reported in Toxoplasma. None of the APC components have been studied in any other Apicomplexan parasite. Whilst in eukaryotic cells, both APC3 and CDC20 are localised to the centrosome25,33,34,35, here we found that APC3 localised to multiple foci in microgametes, but showed little obvious co-localization with the MTOCs. The function and composition of these APC3 foci remain to be determined.

Here, we show that all three Plasmodium APC/C components (APC3, APC10, and APC11) are likely to be essential for asexual multiplication during blood stage schizogony. This is in contrast to CDC20, which is not essential at this stage. Functional studies using conditional gene knockdown also revealed an essential role for APC3 in gametogenesis during chromosome condensation and cytokinesis. This observation closely resembles the requirement for CDC20, as well as one of the atypical MAP kinases (MAP2)16. Interestingly, APC/C activity has an important role in MTOC assembly in Schizosaccharomyces pombe, with MTOC formation blocked in cells with mutated APC/C components33. In Arabidopsis thaliana, which undergoes open mitosis36, APC3 deletion led to severe perturbation of gametogenesis and mitotic progression37. The A. thaliana APC/C regulates expression of CYCB1;1 and DUO POLLEN1 (DUO1), two proteins required for cell division in male gametophytes38. Although Plasmodium undergoes closed mitosis, deletion of APC3 shows similar defects during gametogenesis and cytokinesis. Furthermore, the lack of chromosome condensation supports the conclusion that cells reach G2 phase but do not progress to anaphase. This shows similarity to another protozoan parasite, Trypanosoma brucei, in which loss of APC3 leads to parasites with two kinetoplasts and an enlarged single nucleus consistent with cells reaching G2 but not anaphase39. Knockdown of the other T. brucei APC/C components revealed no such phenotype, suggesting they are not required for APC3 function or cell cycle progression39.

The detailed mechanisms of cell cycle control in Plasmodium may well be different from those in model organisms, for example the presence of only a small subset of APC/C components15 is already indicative of an atypical APC/C. In addition, a number of other key cell cycle regulators are also missing in Plasmodium, such as the protein phosphatases CDC25 and CDC14, and classical cyclins3,4,16. However, it remains possible that not all APC/C components have been identified in Plasmodium due to a lack of sequence or structural similarity with known components in other organisms. Indeed, although phylogenetic analysis showed that CDC25 is missing from Plasmodium, several cyclin dependent kinases (CDKs) are present that have residues in the catalytic site which are normally subjected to phosphorylation and dephosphorylation, and so may be targeted by a structurally-distinct set of enzymes in this organism3.

The Plasmodium genome encodes an expanded family of plant-like calcium dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), of which CDPK4 has been shown to be essential for male gametogenesis, affecting DNA replication and exflagellation. A recent study showed that CDPK4 coordinates various cell cycle events during male gametogenesis in Plasmodium40. Here, nuclear content analysis revealed that activated Pama1apc3 male gametocytes reached octoploid (8 N) DNA content but cytokinesis leading to haploid (1 N) gametes did not occur. In contrast, a ∆cdpk4 mutant did not undergo nuclear replication. This difference suggests that APC3 acts in a similar pathway to CDC20 and MAP2, but one that is separate from that of CDPK416. Moreover, it highlights the possibility that Plasmodium uses different cell cycle machinery to coordinate various processes during endomitosis, and this will need to be explored in future studies.

Methods

Ethics statement

All animal work has passed an ethical review process and was approved by the United Kingdom Home Office. Work was carried out under UK Home Office Project Licenses (40/3344 and 30/3248).

Generation of transgenic parasites

Gene deletion targeting vectors were constructed using the pBS-DHFR plasmid11 and the conditional gene knockdown construct (Pama1apc3) was derived from Pama1 (pSS368)28. P. berghei ANKA line 2.34 (for GFP-tagging) or ANKA line 507cl1 (for gene deletion and promoter swap) parasites were transfected by electroporation. Genotypic analysis involved a diagnostic PCR reaction and Southern or Western blot. All of the oligonucleotides used to confirm the mutant parasite lines genetically can be found in Supplementary Table S4.

Immunoprecipitation and Mass Spectrometry Analysis

Lysates from purified gametocytes of WT-GFP, WT ANKA and APC3-GFP parasite lines activated in ookinete medium for 7 min were incubated with GFP-Trap agarose beads (Chromotek). Bound proteins were digested with trypsin and analysed by LC-MS/MS.

Two hybrid assay

Budding yeast strain Y2HGold was transformed with the two-hybrid vectors pGADT7 (AD) and pGBKT7 (BD) containing codon-optimised Plasmodium apc3, apc10, apc11, cdc20 or T-antigen and p53.

Phenotypic Analysis

Phenotypic analysis was performed at different stages of the parasite life cycle as previously described2. Briefly, asexual blood stages and gametocytes were analysed using infected blood smears. Gametocyte activation, zygote formation and ookinete conversion rates were analysed using in vitro cultures. For mosquito transmission, triplicate sets of 20 to 60 Anopheles stephensi were used. Briefly, exflagellation was examined on day 4 to 5 post-infection. Gametocyte-infected blood was obtained from the tail with a heparinised pipette tip and mixed immediately with 40 µl of ookinete culture medium (RPMI1640 containing 25 mM HEPES, 20% fetal bovine serum, 10 mM sodium bicarbonate, 50 µM xanthurenic acid at pH 7.6). Microgametogenesis was monitored at two different points during mitotic division (8 and 15 mpa). Gametocytes were purified and activated in ookinete medium then fixed and processed for immunofluorescence assay (IFA) with antibodies to a range of different markers. Parasites were visualised on a Zeiss AxioImager M2 microscope fitted with an AxioCam ICc1 digital camera (Carl Zeiss, Inc).

Deconvolution microscopy

High resolution live cell imaging was performed using an Olympus-based Delta Vision Elite work station fitted with a 100× objective (numerical NA 1.4, oil). Post-acquisition analysis was carried out using Applied Precision software. Images presented are 2D projections of deconvoluted Z-stacks of 0.3 μm optical sections.

Nuclear DNA content analysis

The nuclear DNA content of gametocytes was analysed by FACS as described previously16, using Hoechst dye-fluorescence intensity measured in a LSR-II flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson).

Quantitative RT-PCR

qRT-PCR reactions used SYBR green fast master mix (Applied Biosystems) and were analysed using an Applied Biosystems 7500 fast machine. Experiments used hsp70 and arginine-tRNA synthetase as reference genes (Supplementary Table S4).

Electron microscopy

Activated gametocytes at 8, 15 and 30 mpa were fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer16. Briefly, samples were post fixed in osmium tetroxide, treated en bloc with uranyl acetate, dehydrated and embedded in Spurr’s epoxy resin. Thin sections were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate prior to examination in a JEOL1200EX electron microscope (Jeol UK Ltd).

Change history

  • 21 August 2018

    A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper.

References

  1. 1.

    Francia, M. E. & Striepen, B. Cell division in apicomplexan parasites. Nat Rev Microbiol 12, 125–136, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro3184 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Guttery, D. S. et al. Genome-wide Functional Analysis of Plasmodium Protein Phosphatases Reveals Key Regulators of Parasite Development and Differentiation. Cell Host & Microbe 16, 128–140, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.020 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Wilkes, J. M. & Doerig, C. The protein-phosphatome of the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. BMC Genomics 9, 412, https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-9-412 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Roques, M. et al. Plasmodium P-Type Cyclin CYC3 Modulates Endomitotic Growth during Oocyst Development in Mosquitoes. PLOS Pathogens 11, e1005273, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1005273 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Guttinger, S., Laurell, E. & Kutay, U. Orchestrating nuclear envelope disassembly and reassembly during mitosis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 10, 178–191, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2641 (2009).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Arnot, D. E., Ronander, E. & Bengtsson, D. C. The progression of the intra-erythrocytic cell cycle of Plasmodium falciparum and the role of the centriolar plaques in asynchronous mitotic division during schizogony. Int J Parasitol 41, 71–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpara.2010.07.012 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Gerald, N., Mahajan, B. & Kumar, S. Mitosis in the Human Malaria Parasite Plasmodium falciparum. Eukaryotic Cell 10, 474–482 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Conduit, P. T., Wainman, A. & Raff, J. W. Centrosome function and assembly in animal cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16, 611–624, https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm4062 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Francia, M. E., Dubremetz, J.-F. & Morrissette, N. S. Basal body structure and composition in the apicomplexans Toxoplasma and Plasmodium. Cilia 5, 3, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13630-016-0025-5 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Sinden, R. E. Mitosis and meiosis in malarial parasites. Acta Leiden 60, 19–27 (1991).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Tewari, R. et al. The Systematic Functional Analysis of Plasmodium Protein Kinases Identifies Essential Regulators of Mosquito Transmission. Cell Host & Microbe 8, 377–387, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2010.09.006 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Peters, J.-M. The anaphase promoting complex/cyclosome: a machine designed to destroy. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7, 644–656, http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/v7/n9/suppinfo/nrm1988_S1.html (2006).

  13. 13.

    Pines, J. Cubism and the cell cycle: the many faces of the APC/C. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 12, 427–438, http://www.nature.com/nrm/journal/v12/n7/suppinfo/nrm3132_S1.html (2011).

  14. 14.

    Chang, L., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., McLaughlin, S. H. & Barford, D. Molecular architecture and mechanism of the anaphase-promoting complex. Nature 513, 388–393, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13543 http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v513/n7518/abs/nature13543.html#supplementary-information (2014).

  15. 15.

    Eme, L., Trilles, A., Moreira, D. & Brochier-Armanet, C. The phylogenomic analysis of the anaphase promoting complex and its targets points to complex and modern-like control of the cell cycle in the last common ancestor of eukaryotes. BMC Evolutionary Biology 11, 265 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Guttery, D. S. et al. A Putative Homologue of CDC20/CDH1 in the Malaria Parasite Is Essential for Male Gamete Development. PLoS Pathog 8, e1002554, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1002554 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Passmore, L. A. et al. Doc1 mediates the activity of the anaphase-promoting complex by contributing to substrate recognition. The EMBO Journal 22, 786–796, https://doi.org/10.1093/emboj/cdg084 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Carroll, C. W. & Morgan, D. O. The Doc1 subunit is a processivity factor for the anaphase-promoting complex. 4, 880, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb871 (2002).

  19. 19.

    Alfieri, C. et al. Molecular basis of APC/C regulation by the spindle assembly checkpoint. Nature 536, 431–436, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19083 (2016).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Yamaguchi, M. et al. Cryo-EM of Mitotic Checkpoint Complex-Bound APC/C Reveals Reciprocal and Conformational Regulation of Ubiquitin Ligation. Mol Cell 63, 593–607, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.07.003 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Au, S. W., Leng, X., Harper, J. W. & Barford, D. Implications for the ubiquitination reaction of the anaphase-promoting complex from the crystal structure of the Doc1/Apc10 subunit. J Mol Biol 316, 955–968, https://doi.org/10.1006/jmbi.2002.5399 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Chang, L., Zhang, Z., Yang, J., McLaughlin, S. H. & Barford, D. Atomic structure of the APC/C and its mechanism of protein ubiquitination. Nature 522, 450–454, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14471 (2015).

    ADS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Yamaguchi, M. et al. Structure of an APC3–APC16 Complex: Insights into Assembly of the Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome. Journal of Molecular Biology https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.020 (2014).

  24. 24.

    Otto, T. D. et al. A comprehensive evaluation of rodent malaria parasite genomes and gene expression. BMC Biol 12, 86, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-014-0086-0 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Tugendreich, S., Tomkiel, J., Earnshaw, W. & Hieter, P. CDC27Hs colocalizes with CDC16Hs to the centrosome and mitotic spindle and is essential for the metaphase to anaphase transition. Cell 81, 261–268 (1995).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Billker, O. et al. Azadirachtin Disrupts Formation of Organised Microtubule Arrays during Microgametogenesis of Plasmodium berghei. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 49, 489–497, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2002.tb00234.x (2002).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Yamaguchi, M. et al. Structure of an APC3-APC16 complex: Insights into assembly of the Anaphase Promoting Complex/Cyclosome. Journal of molecular biology 427, 1748–1764, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmb.2014.11.020 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Sebastian, S. et al. A Plasmodium Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase Controls Zygote Development and Transmission by Translationally Activating Repressed mRNAs. Cell Host & Microbe 12, 9–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2012.05.014 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Billker, O. et al. Calcium and a Calcium-Dependent Protein Kinase Regulate Gamete Formation and Mosquito Transmission in a Malaria Parasite. Cell 117, 503–514, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(04)00449-0 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Gourguechon, S., Holt, L. J. & Cande, W. Z. The Giardia cell cycle progresses independently of the anaphase-promoting complex. Journal of Cell Science 126, 2246–2255, https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.121632 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Suvorova, E. S., Francia, M., Striepen, B. & White, M. W. A Novel Bipartite Centrosome Coordinates the Apicomplexan Cell Cycle. PLOS Biology 13, e1002093, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002093 (2015).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Naumov, A. et al. The Toxoplasma centrocone houses cell cycle regulatory factors. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/122465 (2017).

  33. 33.

    Heitz, M. J., Petersen, J., Valovin, S. & Hagan, I. M. MTOC formation during mitotic exit in fission yeast. Journal of Cell Science 114, 4521–4532 (2001).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Kallio, M. J., Beardmore, V. A., Weinstein, J. & Gorbsky, G. J. Rapid microtubule-independent dynamics of Cdc20 at kinetochores and centrosomes in mammalian cells. The Journal of Cell Biology 158, 841–847, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200201135 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Raff, J. W., Jeffers, K. & Huang, J.-Y. The roles of Fzy/Cdc20 and Fzr/Cdh1 in regulating the destruction of cyclin B in space and time. The Journal of Cell Biology 157, 1139–1149, https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200203035 (2002).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Sazer, S., Lynch, M. & Needleman, D. Deciphering the evolutionary history of open and closed mitosis. Current biology: CB 24, R1099–R1103, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.011 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Pérez-Pérez, J. M. et al. Specialization of CDC27 function in the Arabidopsis thaliana anaphase-promoting complex (APC/C). The Plant Journal 53, 78–89, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03312.x (2008).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Zheng, B., Chen, X. & McCormick, S. The anaphase-promoting complex is a dual integrator that regulates both MicroRNA-mediated transcriptional regulation of cyclin B1 and degradation of Cyclin B1 during Arabidopsis male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 23, 1033–1046, https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.111.083980 (2011).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Kumar, P. & Wang, C. C. Depletion of Anaphase-promoting Complex or Cyclosome (APC/C) Subunit Homolog APC1 or CDC27 of Trypanosoma brucei Arrests the Procyclic Form in Metaphase but the Bloodstream Form in Anaphase. Journal of Biological Chemistry 280, 31783–31791, https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M504326200 (2005).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Fang, H. et al. Multiple short windows of calcium-dependent protein kinase 4 activity coordinate distinct cell cycle events during Plasmodium gametogenesis. eLife 6, e26524, https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.26524 (2017).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by MRC Investigator Award and MRC project grants to RT [G0900109, G0900278, MR/K011782/1]. Work in the HY laboratory was funded by the MRC (MR/M010899/1) and Wellcome Trust (205150/Z/16/Z). AAH was supported by the Francis Crick Institute which receives its core funding from Cancer Research UK (FC001097), the UK Medical Research Council (FC001097), and the Wellcome Trust (FC001097). AMF acknowledges support for his lab from Worldwide Cancer Research (16-0119). We would like to thank Dr Oliver Billker (Sanger Institute) for the Pama1/pSS368 construct. We would also like to thank all the members of the RT lab for their technical assistance.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A.H., D.S.G. and R.T.; Methodology and Investigation: Performed the parasite functional analysis, R.J.W., A.F., D.B., M.P., D.S.G., and R.T; DNA content analysis; R.J.W., B.F.F., C.J.J., D.S.G., and R.T.; Performed IFA and Cell Biology, R.J.W., A.F., S.W., and R.T.; Immunoprecipitation experiments, R.J.W., M.Z., A.R.B., and R.T.; qRT-PCR analysis, R.J.W. and A.F.; Yeast two-hybrid experiments, H.Y.; Electron microscopy experiments, D.J.P.F.; Resources, D.J.P.F., C.J.J., H.Y., and R.T.; Writing - Original Draft, R.J.W., D.S.G., and R.T.; Writing - Review & Editing, R.J.W., A.M.F., C.J.J., A.A.H., D.S.G., R.T., and all others contributed; Project Administration, D.B. and R.T.; Supervision, A.A.H. and R.T.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rita Tewari.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wall, R.J., Ferguson, D.J.P., Freville, A. et al. Plasmodium APC3 mediates chromosome condensation and cytokinesis during atypical mitosis in male gametogenesis. Sci Rep 8, 5610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-23871-9

Download citation

Further reading

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing